Lib Tech launches eco-friendly surfboard line

Updated: June 27, 2012, 5:20 PM ET

After more than three decades spent refining an eco-alternative to the traditional high performance surfboard, Mike Olson and Lib Tech have officially announced the release of their long-anticipated line of surfboards, the Lib Tech Waterboards.

Lib Tech is highly regarded in the snowboard and skateboard industries for its environmental board building practices and original, artistic board designs, but the company's roots are actually in surfing. It is a little-known fact that Mike Olson, co-founder of Lib Tech, generated a large portion of the original funds he used to finance his early snowboard projects by shaping and selling surfboards in the Pacific Northwest in the late 70s and early 80s. Unhappy with the toxicity of the materials used to create surfboards, Olson set out to find alternatives.

Though almost every component in the Waterboards, from the fins, fin boxes, (non-rusting) leash plugs, foam, fibers, resin and graphics, is an original design -- with many components having only been dreamed into existence by Olson himself in the last two years -- the crowning achievement is that the boards are virtually "unsinkable."

If you were to get a ding that penetrated all the layers you wouldn't have to ever take [your board] out of the water...

"If you were to get a ding that penetrated all the layers," says Olson, "you wouldn't have to ever take [your board] out of the water -- which I hate." This, Olson explains, is due in part to the unique layering technology utilized in making the boards.

Instead of fiberglass, Lib Tech uses something called Volcanic Organic Basalt Honeycomb Technology. Basalt is an organic fiber that is damp, impact resistant, and unlike traditional fiberglass, contains no boron and other harmful additives.

Unsatisfied by the limitations of epoxy and the toxicity of polyester, Olson came up with what he refers to as LVR43 High Rebound Matrix, a chemistry of his own design that has higher elongation, extreme ding resistance, and what he refers to as "responsive rebound." Rails are wrapped in rubberized metallic fibers called Elastomatrix Perimeter 2D2D Dampening Web, which give the boards a smooth, chatter-free ride. According to Olson, the Waterboards feel like a polyester board underfoot but have more durability than a Surftech.

Board cores made with materials that won't lose their pop and won't absorb water means less broken boards in landfills. Additionally, the foam core contains up to 50-percent recycled content, using ozone-friendly blowing agents, and 100-percent of the off-cut foam produced while shaping is recycled into new blanks.

Tim LawlerLib Tech's Mike Olson (right) delivers the very first shipment of Waterboards to the shop he was working at when he first developed his passion for surfboard design.

See the rest here:

Lib Tech launches eco-friendly surfboard line

Eco-Tec Opening Western Office

Western Canadian Office in Calgary, AlbertaOpens July 1st

Design and manufacturing company Eco-Tec Inc. is pleased to announce a new sales office in Calgary, Alberta. As of July 1, 2012, Eco-Tec's 'Western Canadian Office' will begin providing greater services to the growing region, which is currently the hub of Canada's natural resources and oil sands sector.

"Our new Calgary office will allow us to fully meet the needs of operators based in Western Canada and allow us to better communicate the benefits of Eco-Tec's ion exchange and filtration technologies," says Mehdi Surury, Eco-Tec's Western Regional Manager, who will be directing efforts at the new location."

"In recent years, the heavy oil community in California has been the source of considerable success as they have accepted Eco-Tec's advanced filtration and softening systems. We are now delivering our seventh produced water treatment system in that market. From our discussions over the past year in the Western Canadian market, we are confident that the benefits of this technology wil come to be realized here as well. In addition to the operational benefits of the technology, we will be able to serve the market in terms of equipment delivery since our Ontario manufacturing facility already designs and constructs the equipment in compact, pre-assembled, pre-tested modules. For the Alberta market, these modules will be shipped to Alberta and consolidated in even larger modules and building structures, and then moved to site to minimize site construction," Surury added.

The Western Canadian Office is conveniently located in the heart of Calgary's downtown core, where most Alberta oil and gas operations are based. Oil sands projects, in particular, currently face various produced-water treatment challenges that can be addressed through Eco-Tec's advanced RecoPur Ion Exchange and Spectrum Micro Media Filtration technology.

The new Western Canadian Office will serve the market for Eco-Tec's water demnineralization systems used in power generation and steam production, amine purification systems (AmiPur), Metal Recovery and Chemical Purification Systems, and Gas Processing equipment - sold worldwide and proven reliable for over 40 years. Eco-Tec equipment is developed, designed and manufactured in Pickering, Ontario,Canada.

About Eco-Tec Inc. Eco-Tec products incorporate advanced, proprietary designs that provide clients with improved performance, economy, and reliability in their operations, while facilitating environmental responsibility.We aredesigners, developers, and manufacturers of equipment for industrial water treatment and purification of chemicals and gases. In business since 1970, Eco-Tec has supplied over 2,000 systems in close to 60 countries.

SOURCE: Eco-Tec Inc.

Read the original here:

Eco-Tec Opening Western Office

A Guide To The Cleanest And Filthiest U.S. Beaches

Enlarge Reed Saxon/AP

San Juan Creek meets the Pacific Ocean at Doheny State Beach in Dana Point, Calif. The poor water quality off Doheny State Beach put in a list of worst beaches in the U.S.

San Juan Creek meets the Pacific Ocean at Doheny State Beach in Dana Point, Calif. The poor water quality off Doheny State Beach put in a list of worst beaches in the U.S.

If you thought sharks were the scariest threat at the beach, you might consider the lowly bacteria lurking in shore waters instead.

For the 22nd year in a row, the Natural Resources Defense Council has issued a report on the nation's filthiest and cleanest beaches. And the group found that the number of days beaches were closed or under health advisories last year hit 23,481. That total is the third-highest in the report's history, only one notch better than last year's results.

Bacteria in the water are the main safety issue. The group's beach ratings factor in various potential health hazards, including pollution levels and the quality of beach monitoring.

In findings that echo rankings released in the last few years, Avalon and Doheny beaches in California and several beaches in Louisiana were among the worst again.

Newport and Bolsa Chica beaches in California, Hampton Beach in New Hampshire and Gulf Shores Public Beach in Alabama were lauded for keeping dangerous bacteria levels low and aggressively monitoring water quality. In all, 12 beaches got 5-star ratings from NRDC.

Despite the group's reports, there's been little improvement in water quality. "The rate at which beach samples are worse than the recreational national standards is static," NRDC's Jon Devine said in a briefing about the findings. "Unfortunately, what we think that indicates is a real need for policy shifts to move those numbers."

Harmful water bacteria often come from animal or human waste. The germs can cause diarrhea, skin rashes, stomach flu and respiratory problems. The risks are higher for young children, according to the report, who generally spend more time swimming and dunk their heads underwater more often.

Read more from the original source:

A Guide To The Cleanest And Filthiest U.S. Beaches

Florida beaches rank high in water quality, escape nation’s dirtiest list

Florida beaches ranked fifth out of 30 states surveyed for beach water quality, according a new report by the National Resources Defense Council.

The study, which compiles beach water monitoring data from public health officials from across the country, ranked 30 states based on the frequency of water monitoring and the level of bacterial and environmental pollutants in beach water.

Based on national beach water standards set by the Environmental Protection Agency, the report ranked Delaware with the some of the nation's cleanest beaches and Louisiana with some of the dirtiest. The report also individually ranks 12 of the cleanest beaches and 16 of the dirtiest.

While no Florida beaches rank among the cleanest beaches, none ranked amongst the dirtiest. Overall, the state's beaches received high marks for frequency of monitoring and reporting and for clean water quality.

However, the report highlighted concerns over the elimination of Florida state's beach monitoring program, a trend occurring across the country as state budgets shrink.

"It is a concern that some states are cutting back on testing," said Jon Devine, the environmental advocacy groups senior water attorney. "Congress has chronically underfunded the beach act in previous years and that cuts support for beach monitoring and notification."

The Natural Resources Defense Council issues the report every year just before the July 4 holiday to inform beachgoers about the water quality at beaches.

With nearly 10 trillion gallons of untreated waste water spilling into the nations beaches, the health risks associated with swimming in contaminated water are real and include minor sickness like stomach flu, diarrhea, skin rash, and ear infections to more serious problems which involve neurological disorders.

Steven Fleischli, the acting director of the water program at the council, urged beachgoers to use the study as guide for which beaches are safe to swim in this summer. He also asked that the public do its part in keeping beaches clean.

"In their own lives the public can be stewards of the beach," Fleischli said.

Go here to read the rest:

Florida beaches rank high in water quality, escape nation’s dirtiest list

How clean are South Florida beaches? National environmental group issues ratings

Beaches in South Florida scored high for cleanliness compared to their counterparts around the United States, according to the latest annual scorecard by the Natural Resources Defense Council.

The report released Wednesday, which may surprise those who have picked their way past cigarette butts, fast-food wrappers and other debris on South Florida beaches, focused on bacteria counts from water sampled by state and local governments around the United States.

Of 46 testing sites in Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties, 18 had perfect scores. Of the rest, the vast majority failed to meet health standards 2 to 4 percent of the time, a much better record than the national average.

You can look up your beach by address, zip code or state here.

Nationwide, water samples exceeded national bacteria standards 8 percent of the time. But the vast majority of South Florida beaches scored well below that number, with many racking up no high bacteria counts at all. Of the 19 worst offenders among the nations beaches, in which more than 25 percent of water samples exceeded national bacteria standards, none were located in Florida. California and Louisiana dominated that list.

The main source of high bacteria counts, which indicate the present of human or animal waste, is stormwater runoff, although sewage breaks have also caused bacteria to spike. Swimming in contaminated water can put you at risk of gastrointestinal illnesses.

The worst beaches in Palm Beach County were Phil Foster Park, which exceeded safe bacteria levels in 19 percent of water samples, and Dubois Park, which exceeded them in 7 percent of samples. But several beaches had no high bacteria counts, despite regular tests.

Broward didnt have any major offenders, but one reason for this may be that the county's water isn't tested as frequently. Broward's water was tested twice a month, while inMiami-Dade Countythe water is tested once a week and in Palm Beach County it is tested twice a week.

The worst beaches in Broward, with high bacteria counts in 4 percent of tests, were at Commercial Boulevard, Custer Street in Hollywood, Minnesota Street in Hollywood and Northeast 16 Street in Pompano Beach. Several beaches never had high bacteria counts, including Bahia Mar, Deerfield Beach, John U. Lloyd Beach State Park and Oakland Park Boulevard.

Miami-Dade had a few beaches with high counts, including, not surprisingly Hobie Beach (aka Dog Beach), with high bacteria counts in 10 percent of water samples, Samson Park in Sunny Isles Beach, 7 percent and Crandon Park-South, 7 percent. Among the cleanest beaches were Cape Florida Park, Golden Beach, Matheson Hammock and 93rd Street in Surfside.

View post:

How clean are South Florida beaches? National environmental group issues ratings

Volusia, Flagler beaches get high marks for water quality

Jump in, the water's fine

Daytona Beach got four out of five stars in a national water quality report on 200 popular vacation beaches. It scored high marks for:

- Less than 5 percent of water samples had bacteria levels higher than national standards in 2009, 2010 and 2011.

- Local officials post advisories without re-sampling.

- Closings/advisories are posted online and at the beach.

The city's beach only got four stars because water quality is monitored less frequently than once a week, a result of budget cuts in the Health Department.

The report also showed that sites in Flagler County, Ormond Beach and New Smyrna Beach never had bacteria levels higher than state standards in 2011.

SOURCE: National Resources Defense Council

DAYTONA BEACH -- Beaches in Volusia and Flagler counties received high marks again this week from a national environmental group that rates water quality at vacation beaches around the country.

Daytona Beach -- one of 200 popular U.S. beaches highlighted in the survey -- was given four out of five stars in the report released Wednesday by the Natural Resources Defense Council.

See the rest here:

Volusia, Flagler beaches get high marks for water quality

Dirtiest Beaches In US

Before you take that plane, train, or car ride this summer to the seaside, you may want to make sure the beach you are planning to visit is clean.

According to the Natural Resources Defense Council's annual beach quality report, some of the country's most popular beaches are contaminated by storm water runoff and sewage that could cause stomach flu, skin rashes, pink eye, ear nose and throat problems,

The NRDC, in Testing the Waters: A Guide to Water Quality at Vacation Beaches, looks at 2011 data collected by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency from test results taken at more than 3,000 beaches nationwide and examines pollution factors, water testing practices and public notification systems.

The biggest reason for pollution is sewer runoff that can be laden with bacteria from animal and human waste, noted NRDC Water Program Director Steve Fleischili, who along with Jon Devine, the groups senior attorney, gave the report. As a result Americas beaches had the third-highest number of closings or advisories in the reports 22-year-history.

Our beaches are plagued by a sobering legacy of water pollution, said Devine. Luckily, today more than ever, we know that much of this filth is preventable and we can turn the tide against water pollution. By establishing better beachwater quality standards and putting untapped 21st century solutions in place we can make a day at the beach as carefree as it should be, and safeguard Americas vital tourism economies.

The reports findings shouldn't keep all beach lovers away. The NRDC includes a guide that ranks 200 popular vacation beaches on a scale of one to five. Those that exceed the standards get 5 stars.

The NRDC also created a list of the top 12 cleanest beaches and the top 15 repeat offenders, along with an interactive map of 3,000 other beaches in the nation, that can be searched by zip code.

Some of the dirtiest

Some of the top offenders in NRDCs 2012 report are popular beaches in tourist areas such as California, Illinois, New York, and New Jersey, and they violate public standards for health, upwards of 25 percent of the time, Devine explained. The list is as follows:

--Avalon Beach in Los Angeles County, Calif.

View post:

Dirtiest Beaches In US

The galaxy that shouldn’t be there | Bad Astronomy

Its generally said that discoveries in science tend to be at the thin hairy edge of what you can do always at the faintest limits you can see, the furthest reaches, the lowest signals. That can be trivially true because stuff thats easy to find has already been discovered. But many times, when youre looking farther and fainter than you ever have, you find things that really are new and can (maybe!) be a problem for existing models of how the Universe behaves.

Astronomers ran across just such thing recently. Hubble observations of a distant galaxy cluster revealed an arc of light above it. Thats actually the distorted image of a more distant galaxy, and its a common enough sight near foreground clusters. But the thing is, that galaxy shouldnt be there.

This picture is a combination of two images taken in the near-infrared using Hubble. The cluster is the clump of fuzzy blobs in the center left. The small square outlines the arc, and the big square zooms in on it.

The cluster is unusual. Its at a distance of nearly 10 billion light years away. Clusters have been seen that far away, so by itself thats not so odd. The thing is, its a whopper: the total mass in all those galaxies combined may be as much as a staggering 500 trillion times the mass of the Sun, making this by far the most massive cluster seen at that distance.

But that arc First, things like this are seen pretty often near clusters. Theyre gravitational lenses: the gravity from the cluster bends the light from a more distant galaxy in the background, bending its shape into an arc. See Related Posts below for lots of info and cool pictures on these arcs. In this case, Ill note the shape of the arc implies the biggest galaxy in the cluster, the one right below the small square, is doing most of the lensing.

But heres the problem: the galaxy whose light is getting bent has to be on the other side of the cluster, and that cluster is really far away. Note only that, the galaxy has to be bright enough that we can see it at all. Combined, this should make an arc like this rare. Really rare.

So rare, in fact, that it shouldnt be there at all! The astronomers who did this research worked through the physics and statistics, and what they found is that the odds of seeing this arc in this way are zero. As in, what the heck is it doing there at all?

Now we have to be careful here. What we have is one observation of one arc, and it happens to be behind an extraordinarily massive cluster. Its hard to extrapolate exactly what this means. Maybe galaxies formed more vigorously than we thought in the early Universe, so there are more than we might suppose. Maybe its a huge coincidence, with a bright galaxy behind a massive cluster. Maybe the galaxy in the cluster doing most of the heavy lifting is surrounded by more than the usual amount of matter, making it an even stronger lens. Interestingly, using the arc itself, astronomers calculated the mass of that one big galaxy is something like 70 trillion times the mass of the Sun, making it bigger than most entire clusters at that distance!

If you get one weird thing happening, you might be able to shrug it off as coincidence. But two? In this case the existence of the arc at all coupled with the huge mass of this galaxy and cluster make me think theres more going on here than we see. Still, its not clear what it might be.

Visit link:

The galaxy that shouldn’t be there | Bad Astronomy

Teachers: help your kids detect cosmic rays | Bad Astronomy

One thing I like to see is kids getting their hands on doing science. Theres something about being involved with something, actually doing it for yourself, that gives you a sense of ownership over the knowledge, makes you part of something bigger.

Heres another chance to do that for students across the world: the ERGO telescope project. ERGO stands for "Energetic Ray Global Observatory" and the idea is to build simple cosmic-ray detectors that can be sent to classrooms all over the world. Heres a short video describing the project:

Cosmic rays are energetic subatomic particles that come blasting in from space. Theyre created by the Sun, by exploding stars, but distant galaxies basically, by cool, interesting objects. By distributing these detectors across the world, students can share their data and come up with their own ways of examining them.

If youre a teacher and you want your students to not just learn science, but to experience it, then this sounds like a good way to do it! They even have a simple form you can fill out to apply for a grant to get started.

Related Posts:

- Something powerful lurks nearby - Attack of the galactic subatomic particles - No, a new study does not show cosmic-rays are connected to global warming - Bobbing for extinctions

See the rest here:

Teachers: help your kids detect cosmic rays | Bad Astronomy

IPsoft CEO Chetan Dube Asks: Can Machines Really Think?

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

As the world celebrates Turings 100th birthday, IPsoft, the leading independent provider of autonomic IT services, looks back on the developments made in artificial intelligence to date, and what the world will look like once humans and machines are equal in intelligence:

Since the birth of computer science, man has been asking that question: Can machines really think? Some noteworthy philosophers have argued that artificial intelligence is impossible (Dreyfus), that it is immoral (Weizenbaum) and that the very concept of it is incoherent (Searle). Yet six decades ago, the father of computer science, Alan Mathison Turing, posed the Turing challenge. It stated that the age of machine intelligence would come when we could not discern between human and machine intelligence.

Since then, the world has wrestled with various cognitive models mimicking human intelligence. In 1966, Weizenbaum created Eliza to replicate the behavior of a Rogerian psychotherapist, which sometimes fooled people into thinking they were talking to a real person, by using rules that transformedusers questions. From the early Eliza and chatterbot modules to the more recent chess-playing Deep Blue, the world has started to wake up to the idea of machine intelligence. Today, we know computers can beat Jeopardy human champions (IBMs Watson), cars can drive themselves (Google) and machines can follow rudimentary commands (Apples Siri). But rather than just domain specific game-playing or office management kinds of tools, the question remains: Can machines graduate to really emulate and rival human intelligence?

Francis Crick, the Nobel Prize-winning father of modern genetics and discoverer of DNA helix structures, used to opine that there is a fundamental framework of ideas that are missing to be able to interpret approaches to achieving machine intelligence. One thing is clear: If we are to clone human intelligence in all its generic thinking and problem-solving grandeur, we cannot fake it. We need to sincerely emulate the human brain. We need to study hierarchical temporal memory systems to gain insight into the theoretical neuroscience behind how human brains work.

Too often, we are tempted to take the course of studying a specific body of knowledge and combating combinatorial explosion by throwing computing power to distill copious amounts of knowledge into supercomputers, said Chetan Dube, IPsoft CEO. We ignore a pivotal suggestion from Turing, that the scalable way to make machines think is not to simulate the adult mind, but to simulate a childs brain and then let it rapidly learn about the environment in which it finds itself. Adaptive learning is the key to unlocking the secrets of machine intelligence and fostering its ability to rival human intelligence.

Leveraging theoretical computer science principles including those taught by Turing, we are precipitously close to being the first to sincerely answer the six decade old Turing challenge. The idea would not be to just fake human behavior to win the Loebner prize, but to make a sincere emulation of human brain that is capable of adaptively learning just the way a child learns, and rapidly becoming smarter and smarter by its interactions with humans.

What impact will thinking machines have on modern times?

It is hard to tell all the ramifications of machines starting to learn and think. When a prodigious child is born, it is hard to tell of the impact he will have when he grows up. What we do know is that we are on the precipice of a transformation unlike any before. When microprocessors were invented, they were predominantly developed for calculators and traffic light controllers. Today, the world is a more efficient shrinking village through the use of Internet and mobile communications.

As opposed to any schools of thoughts that preach beware of machines, we believe machine intelligence will lead the optimal form of creative destruction. Take a look at the world today. We are enslaved. The Pareto principle holds. 80% of the time we are caught in the trap of doing the same 20% of canonical, yet mundane, chores. Whether it is vacuuming the floor or driving a car, we are currently slaves to ordinary chores. Machine intelligence will serve as the ultimate liberator. It will liberate mankind to engage in higher forms of creative expression.

See the original post:

IPsoft CEO Chetan Dube Asks: Can Machines Really Think?

Aerospace & Defense Advisor Jay Wynn Launches Fairmont Consulting Group

Fairmont Consulting Group Will Provide Due Diligence And Strategic Advisory Services To Clients In Aerospace, Defense, Government Services, and IT/TelecomBoston, MA (PRWEB) June 28, 2012 Aerospace and defense business advisor Jay Wynn today announced the launch of Fairmont Consulting Group, a management consulting firm specializing in strategy and due diligence for clients active in aerospace ...

See the rest here:

Aerospace & Defense Advisor Jay Wynn Launches Fairmont Consulting Group

Aerospace and Defense ETFs Face U.S. Fiscal Cliff

Election season is just around the corner in the U.S. and the countrys deep fiscal hole remains a political hot potato. If the U.S. Congress drags its feet again and does not meet a definitive agreement on the fiscal budget, aerospace and defense exchange traded funds will likely see turbulence.

Congress has until Jan. 1, 2013 to make things right or else a mix of tax hikes and $1.2 trillion in budget cuts are set to go off, reports Stacy Curtin for the Daily Ticker.

The aerospace and defense sector witnessed a similar scare last year when Congress dawdled ahead of raising the debt ceiling, which led to S&Ps downgrade on U.S. sovereign debt. [Budget, Spending Concerns Ground Aerospace and Defense ETFs]

Most economists estimate that without an answer to the countrys budget, there will be a $600 billion hole in the economy in 2013.

The defense sector would likely take the brunt of the hit, accounting for half of the budget cuts. About $500 billion in defense spending would be phased out over the next 10 years, with $55 billion immediately cut next year.

In a recent study conducted by National Association of Manufacturers, over 1 million private sector jobs could disappear by 2014 due to the poor fiscal budget. The job loss would translate to a 0.7% rise in unemployment and up to a 1% drop in GDP.

Lockheed Martin (LMT - News) has already warned that the majority of its 100,000 workforce is at risk due to federal budget cuts to defense. Additionally, other defense companies will also likely diminish their workforce in light of the constrained budget.

For more information on the defense sector, visit our aerospace & defense category.

Max Chen contributed to this article.

Originally posted here:

Aerospace and Defense ETFs Face U.S. Fiscal Cliff