Little Mix – DNA The Deluxe Edition (Album) – Video

Posted on by


Little Mix - DNA The Deluxe Edition (Album)
For More Information Of Little Mix VISIT US ON : Facebook : http://www.facebook.com Twitter : twitter.com mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; #39;-Jade Channel : http://www.youtube.com #39;-Perrie Channel : http://www.youtube.com #39;-Jesy Channel : http://www.youtube.com #39;-Leigh-Anne Channel : http://www.youtube.com mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash; mdash;From:Jade ThirlwallViews:18 6ratingsTime:01:27More inComedy

Read more here:
Little Mix - DNA The Deluxe Edition (Album) - Video

Posted in DNA

Tennis umpire's DNA not on the murder weapon, attorney says

Posted on by

Tennis umpire Lois Goodman's DNA is not on the coffee cup that authorities say she used to bludgeonher 80-year-old husband to death last April, one of her attorneys said Thursday. He cited preliminary DNA test results.

Defense attorney Robert Sheahen said an initial DNA test showed that although her DNA was not on the shattered coffee cup, Alan Goodman's DNA was. The information was among thousands of pages of discovery turned over by L.A. County prosecutors to Goodman's defense team. Sheahen said prosecutors after Goodman's arrest sought her DNA and tested her pants butfound her DNA only on the clothing and none from her husband.

Sheahen said the "DNA findings bolster our contention from the very beginning that this is a horrible accident."

Goodman has pleaded not guilty to the attack on her husband. She told police she came home and found her husband dead in bed. She said she believed he crawled there after falling down the stairs and falling on the coffee cup he was carrying.

Prosecutors have insisted that Goodman was a calculating killer who bludgeoned her husband with the coffee cup and then stabbed him when it shattered. They allege she left him to die and went off to a tennis match and to get a manicure as he bled to death.

Sources familar with the investigation said they believe that the large amount of blood from Alan Goodman may have washed away his wife's DNA on the cup.

Authoritiesbegan to investigate the death as a homicide a few days after Alan Goodman's death when a coroner's investigator at the funeral home noticed a deep wound in his head. An autopsy revealed shards of pottery in the wound. They allege that Goodman wielded the broken coffee cup like a knife.

A search warrant executed April 21 turned up blood throughout the home "inconsistent with accidental death," Det. Jeffrey Briscoe wrote. Stains on carpets, the refrigerator door, inside a linen closet and on the wall leading to the garage suggested "a mobile victim" who, police theorized, would have called for help.

Goodman's attorneys insist the investigation was "botched from start to finish."

Go here to read the rest:
Tennis umpire's DNA not on the murder weapon, attorney says

Posted in DNA

Supreme Court will review Md. DNA law

Posted on by

Maryland's DNA law, which allows police to take samples of suspects' genetic material for possible matches to other crimes, will be reviewed by the U.S. Supreme Court next year, the justices announced Friday.

The law, a signature crime-fighting initiative of Gov. Martin O'Malley, was ruled unconstitutional by Maryland's highest court in April. But in July, U.S. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. issued an order allowing police to continue collecting DNA samples, signaling that the high court would ultimately weigh in on the issue that has pitted law enforcement interests against privacy concerns.

"We applaud the decision by the Supreme Court to review Maryland's case regarding DNA collection," O'Malley said in a prepared statement. "Allowing law enforcement to collect DNA samples from offenders charged with serious crimes is absolutely critical to our efforts to continue driving down crime in Maryland and bolsters our efforts to resolve open investigations and bring them to a resolution providing victims long-deserved closure."

The Maryland Public Defender's office, which represented King, has argued that taking suspects' DNA before they are even convicted of crimes and using the samples to link them to previous or future crimes violates their right to privacy and constitutes an unlawful search and seizure.

"People who are presumed to be innocent should not be subject to the warrantless seizure of intensely personal genetic information," Stephen B. Mercer, chief of the Public Defender's Forensics Division, said Friday.

Advocates of the DNA law argue that the measure has helped police solve even cold-case crimes and put away violent criminals.

"We are pleased by [Friday's] decision and look forward to the opportunity to defend this important crime-fighting tool before the nation's highest court," Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler said in a prepared statement. "With Chief Justice Roberts' stay still in place, Maryland's DNA database remains in operation, helping law enforcement identify and bring to justice violent perpetrators in some of our state's most gruesome unsolved cases."

The law, which went into effect in 2009, expanded the collection of DNA samples from those convicted of crimes to those who have been arrested for violent crime or burglary, even if they were not found guilty. More than half of the states currently collect DNA samples from suspects of violent crime.

Taking DNA is akin to fingerprinting suspects in an attempt to link them to crimes, its supporters have argued.

"There is no reasonable, principled distinction to be made between taking and using fingerprints for identification purposes and taking and using DNA identifiers for identification purposes," Gansler wrote in his petition to the Supreme Court to allow its continued collection.

View post:
Supreme Court will review Md. DNA law

Posted in DNA

Monster DNA On-Ear Headphones

Posted on by

By Tim Gideon

The partnership between Monster and Beats that began with the Monster Beats by Dr. Dre is no longer, and now both brands make their own exclusive headphone models. The most recent from Monster is the DNA On-Ear headphones ($229.95 direct), with a highly stylized look that can be customized with various skins. The sound signature would still fit well in the Beats lineup, with boosted bass and highs that make pop music sound exciting, but will likely turn off audiophiles seeking flat response. The fact that the DNA distorts on tracks with deep bass at maximum volume is not as much of an issue as the price. Recently, we've seen a few better-sounding options at lower prices.

Design The DNA has a futuristic look, with rounded, triangular earpieces and circular, supra-aural (on-ear) earpads. Available in a variety of color combinations, our review model was white, glossy plastic, with gray padding and gray, rubberized material on the underside of the headband. This material is soft, but doesn't exactly feel like an overstuffed pillow floating on your head. The earpads can also feel a bit uncomfortable over time. The fit is secure, but the slight discomfort is one of the first things I noticed after a few minutes of testing.

Monster includes two cables, one with inline controls and a microphone for mobile phone calls. That the cables are removable and replaceable adds significant value to the DNA's pricesince cables are often the culprit when headphones malfunction, you can simply replace the cable rather than look into repairs or replacing the whole thing.

Other than the two cables, the only other accessory is a black felt drawstring bag that has internal pockets and a carabiner attached. As mentioned earlier, the DNA is designed to be customized by the userthe skins cost an extra $29.95 each, and come in flashy varieties such as leopard print, peacock feathers, and a carbon fiber look. With or without the skins, the color schemes for the headphones are the aforementioned white/gray, black/chrome, blue/gray, blue/chrome, and white/teal.

Performance On songs that feature deep bass, the DNA often distorts at high volume levels. A song like The Knife's "Silent Shout" starts to get fuzzy when you approach maximum volume. Granted, this is a volume you shouldn't be listening at, but at this price, distortion shouldn't enter the equation. At moderate-to-high volumes, before distortion kicks in, the bass response is powerfuleven palpable, as the headphone frame vibrates noticeably with the beat. This gets less intense at even more moderate volumes, where the deep bass and highly sculpted high frequency responsetwo typical Monster traitswork far better together to create an exciting mix.

On classical tracks, like John Adams' "The Chairman Dances," the boosted bass response lends some heft to the lower register percussion and strings. It's not what most audiophiles are looking for, as the bass and highs are quite exaggerated, but it does add some crispness and resonance to the mix without going overboard.

Generally, however, the DNA is best suited for modern mixes in popular music. At moderate volumes, the kick drum loop in Jay-Z and Kanye West's "No Church in the Wild" has a crisp attack backed up by an impressive thump, while the deep bass synth hits pack plenty of low-end resonance without distortion coming into the equation. The vocals are never obscured by the low-end intensity.

On Radiohead's "Staircase," the bouncing, doubled guitar-and-bass line carries a nice low-frequency presence, never booming, but definitely the star of the mixexcept for Thom Yorke's vocals, which are crisp and sit above everything else, thanks to the DNA's mid-to-high boost.

If you're a fan of deep bass, the DNA is not a bad choiceyou just have to accept the distortion at high volumes. A better-sounding example of what Monster can do with boosted low-end is the more expensive, bulkier, and sturdier Monster Inspiration . It's not perfect, but it performs with more power than the DNA, and without distortion.

Excerpt from:
Monster DNA On-Ear Headphones

Posted in DNA

Supreme Court to decide if police can collect DNA from suspects

Posted on by

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court agreed Friday to resolve a national debate over the collection of DNA and decide whether police across the country may take a saliva sample from all people who are arrested for serious or violent crimes.

Prosecutors and judges say DNA has a unique ability to convict the guilty and free the innocent. And the FBI now has a growing national database of DNA samples from convicted criminals. All 50 states now collect DNA from those who are convicted of felonies.

But judges in several states, including Maryland, have ruled that this forced collection of DNA from suspects who are presumed innocent violates the Constitutions ban on unreasonable searches. The Maryland Court of Appeals said those arrested have a presumption of innocence and a right to be free from biological searches. The ruling overturned the rape conviction of Alonzo King, who was convicted after his arrest on an unrelated assault charge.

The Supreme Court said Friday it would hear the case of Maryland vs. King to decide whether the states interest in crime fighting outweighs the privacy right of a suspect under arrest. In defending their law, Maryland prosecutors compared collecting DNA to taking a fingerprint, neither of which poses a significant intrusion on personal privacy, they said.

Victims rights groups said DNA matches from those who are arrested could stop repeat criminals wanted for unsolved rapes and murders.

Some civil liberties advocates say DNA differs fundamentally from a fingerprint because it reveals the genetic makeup of an individual. They also note that investigators in several states, including California, have used DNA from arrested people to find and apprehend relatives who are wanted for crimes.

Californias voters approved the mandatory collection of DNA samples from people, including juveniles, who are arrested for felony crimes. The law took effect in 2009.

Critics say Californias law is more stringent than many because the DNA samples are not automatically thrown out if the arrested person is set free or acquitted of the charges. In September, the U.S. 9thCircuit Court of Appeals heard a constitutional challenge to the law, but no decision has been handed down.

ALSO:

Price of Thanksgiving dinner gobbles up a few cents more

View post:
Supreme Court to decide if police can collect DNA from suspects

Posted in DNA

Court Will Decide on Collection of DNA Samples

Posted on by

The Supreme Court announced Friday that it will decide whether it's legal for police to collect DNA samples from people under arrest, a case that could have nationwide implications on the question of privacy versus public safety.

The justices announced that they will review a Maryland court decision that effectively barred the warrantless collection of genetic material from suspects who have not yet been convicted of a crime, a procedure used around the country in hopes of cracking old cases.

Courts have consistently upheld DNA collection from those convicted of a crime. But the federal government and 27 states also have laws that allow the collection of DNA from people arrested but not yet convicted.

Maryland began collecting samples from people arrested for violent crimes in 2009 and authorities took a cheek swab from Alonzo King Jr., who was arrested on assault charges. Police found out the sample matched the DNA of a rapist from a 2003 rape in Salisbury, Md. King was later found guilty in the 2003 attack and sentenced to life in prison.

But King challenged his conviction, saying the pre-conviction collection of his DNA violated his Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizures. Maryland's highest court agreed, with judges saying "King's expectation of privacy is greater than the state's purported interest in using his DNA to identify him for purposes of his 10 April 2009 arrest on the assault charges."

Chief Justice John Roberts previously blocked the ruling and allowed police to keep collecting DNA samples pending the high court's review.

The federal appeals courts have so far sided with the police on this issue, who say the samples contribute to a database that helps law enforcement.

In February, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco ruled California law enforcement officials can keep collecting DNA samples from people arrested for felonies because law enforcement's interest in solving cold cases, identifying suspects and even exonerating the wrongly accused outweighed privacy concerns. In July, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia overturned a lower court judge who called it an unconstitutional invasion of privacy to routinely collect DNA samples from defendants who had yet to be convicted.

The case will be argued in early 2013.

Visit link:
Court Will Decide on Collection of DNA Samples

Posted in DNA

Supreme Court takes up DNA and sentencing cases

Posted on by

(Reuters) - The Supreme Court agreed on Friday to consider whether a state may collect DNA samples from people who are arrested but not yet convicted of violent crimes, in a case that may have national implications for law enforcement.

Maryland is appealing an April 24 decision by the state Court of Appeals overturning the 2010 conviction and life sentence of Alonzo Jay King for a rape committed seven years earlier, and prior to his 2009 arrest for assault.

A DNA sample taken following that arrest without a warrant had linked him to the earlier crime.

In overturning King's conviction, the Maryland appeals court said the state's DNA Collection Act violated the ban on unreasonable searches and seizures under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

That Maryland law lets police take DNA samples from people arrested for violent crimes, attempted violent crimes, burglary and attempted burglary.

In July, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts put that lower court ruling on hold, allowing the law to remain in effect, while Maryland appealed the King case.

Roberts said at the time that there was a "fair prospect" that the Supreme Court would reverse the ruling, and that the ruling subjected Maryland to "irreparable harm."

The chief justice said the court of appeals ruling conflicted with three other courts that had upheld laws similar to Maryland's DNA collection law.

He also said the appeals court ruling had national implications because it would, if upheld, prevent the FBI from getting the samples for a national database.

Collecting DNA samples "implicates an important feature of day-to-day law enforcement practice" in half of all U.S. states and the federal government, Roberts said.

Original post:
Supreme Court takes up DNA and sentencing cases

Posted in DNA

DNA tests for rare birch trees

Posted on by

11 November 2012 Last updated at 04:17 ET By Chris Ellis BBC News Online, South West

The DNA of endangered trees found only in the Caucasus Mountains will be analysed by a botanist in Devon and a London university in a bid to find out more information about their evolution.

The birch tree seeds have been brought back to Devon by Paul Bartlett, from Stone Lane Gardens, in Chagford.

Scientists from Queen Mary, University of London, plan to test three species of birch found only in the mountain range, which extends across several countries including Georgia, southern Russia and Azerbaijan.

Mr Bartlett said he believed the research had never been done before and was new to science.

He said: "The trees have been grown in the UK in the past, using seed sent by Caucasian botanists, but the seed I have collected is possibly the first seed brought back by anyone from the UK."

Mr Bartlett will germinate the seeds and raise the seedlings in Devon.

Tissue samples will then be sent to the university for analysis, which includes counting the number of chromosomes, which house the genetic code DNA.

Mr Bartlett said: "I can then use that information to decide which birch they are likely to be related to.

"Eventually they can produce a kind of fingerprint of that species, which enables them [scientists] to check against other plant DNA to determine whether they are the same species or not."

See original here:
DNA tests for rare birch trees

Posted in DNA

Can police collect DNA before conviction? Supreme Court to hear case

Posted on by

The US Supreme Court on Friday agreed to take up a case examining whether the Fourth Amendment permits police to collect and analyze a persons DNA at the time of arrest or whether they have to wait until after the suspect has been convicted to take a DNA sample.

The case raises the thorny issue of when the government is allowed to collect a DNA sample from an individual and store it in a national database.

DNA information has become a major crime-fighting tool, providing a significantly more accurate method of identifying individuals than the subjective art of fingerprint comparisons. DNA data have helped police solve crimes and have also helped defense lawyers identify and correct wrongful convictions.

How much do you know about the US Constitution? A quiz.

But unlike fingerprints, DNA material can reveal far more about an individual, including details that most people consider highly personal and private.

Nonetheless, law enforcement officials insist that they are interested in using DNA technology only for identification, as a kind of enhanced form of fingerprinting.

The issue arises in the case of Alonzo King, who was arrested in southern Maryland in 2009 on an assault charge.

As part of his processing by police, officers used a swab to collect a sample of his saliva from his cheek. The sample yielded an identifying DNA profile which was fed into a national database.

Mr. Kings DNA profile was found to match the DNA profile of the person who robbed and raped a woman in the same area of southern Maryland in 2003.

Armed with that information, authorities applied for a search warrant and obtained a second swab of Kings cheek. The second sample also matched the DNA evidence from the 2003 rape. King was charged with the rape and robbery.

See more here:
Can police collect DNA before conviction? Supreme Court to hear case

Posted in DNA

Twilight Biology Class Scene Edward's Golden Eyes [Twilight: About Edward] – Video

Posted on by


Twilight Biology Class Scene Edward #39;s Golden Eyes [Twilight: About Edward]
Watch Full Movies Here @free-hot-movies.com Edward Twilight Bella twilight jacob and bella Edward Cullen edward and jacob fight twilight saga eclipse Cullen Twilight (2008 Film) Eclipse in Totally Gorgeous Jonathan mcintosh underwater diving Robert Pattinson Bring me to life a thousand years edward and bella Jacob Twilight (series) twilight eclipse romantic fantasy classical music science fiction christina perry Kristen Stewart kristen stewart KRISTEN STEWART christina perri thousand years Taylor Lautner twilight saga edward cullen Soundtrack deleted scene breaking dawn teen interest fantasy movie TWILIGHT clips entertainment Entertainment Lullaby Bella #39;s joslyn davis edward bella Katy Perry Morgengrauen pro-feminist soundtrack pattinson team edward pop-culture Advertising Commercials personality alternative sentimental Evanescence Pattinson marriage vampire video game Bella Swan Short Film video clip by patriarchy nomination flightless Performing Catherine Stephenie stephanie hollywood Breaking Biology propose Beyonce cullen dana ward new moon Hardwicke interview teambuffy boyfriend teardrops classical Stephanie KristenFrom:BeliaFalhabnyViews:0 0ratingsTime:08:36More inFilm Animation

Go here to see the original:
Twilight Biology Class Scene Edward's Golden Eyes [Twilight: About Edward] - Video

Belive In Me E.5 – Video

Posted on by


Belive In Me E.5
i hate working at the children #39;s place; stupid little kids whining all day I was making the popcorn when Nick walks in and hugs me from behind. I smiled and pulled the popcorn out of the microwave. Nick:*kisses his head;goes to the fridge*So, pick a movie? Joe:Yeah. *smiles; walks into the living room; sits on the couch* Nick:*walks over to him; sits down*So ready? Joe:*nods*Put the movie on please? Nick:You lazy butt. *gets up* Joe:*smirks*I know. *throws popcorn at him* Nick:Hey, no food fights. *smirks* Joe:*pouts*Meanie. Nick sat next to me and I leaned against him and we both ate from the bowl of popcorn. Our hands brushed every now and then, but neither of us said anything. I jumped a few times throughout the movie and Nick would just chuckle, but held onto me tighter. After the movie was over, I was laying on the couch with my feet resting on Nick #39;s lap as he told me some stupid story. Joe:*laughs*You #39;re so stupid it #39;s funny! Nick:Hey now kid, may I remind you who got a B plus on their biology test? Joe:*shrugs*May I remind you that I took the test after being absent for over a week and got an A on it? Nick:Touche. *rubs Joe #39;s legs* Feeling better? Joe:A lot. Thanks for everything. Nick:No problem kid, let #39;s go to bed alright? Joe:*nods; yawns* Nick:*helps Joe up*We should do this more often you know. Just us two and no one else. Catch up on everything. Joe:*nods; puts his arms up* Nick:*picks him up bridal style*You weigh like a feather dude. Joe:*yawns; cuddles ...From:SparkleMusicLoveLifeViews:0 0ratingsTime:00:26More inPeople Blogs

Read more from the original source:
Belive In Me E.5 - Video

Main Show Only – The Human Genome Coast To Coast AM – Video

Posted on by


Main Show Only - The Human Genome Coast To Coast AM
WATCH THE LATEST VIDEO THAT CAME OUT TODAY HERE http://www.youtube.com http://www.jetstreamnews.com http://www.jetnews.us http If You Use Twitter heres the Twitter address or just click the twitter link on the right of the channel page twitter.com Date: 07-05-10 Host: George Noory Guests: Victor McElheny, Mitch Battros During the middle two hours, science journalist Victor McElheny (book link) discussed the history of the Human Genome Project, and the implications of what has, is, and will happen as we understand what the human genome is telling us. McElheny recalled being in attendance at a 1986 biology conference when the Human Genome Project was first seriously discussed. He noted that some of the scientists in attendance were aghast at the prospects of the venture. "They saw their money getting swallowed up in a big biology project," he mused. Ironically, he said, the concept was supported by the older scientists and vehemently opposed by their younger colleagues, who were skeptical of the potential of the project. Compounding the institutional intrigue, the Department of Energy pushed to develop the Human Genome Project, since it had the technological resources to undertake the venture. However, the National Institute of Health was troubled by the prospect of losing control over the "future of biology" and fought to be a part of the project, despite the reservations of "several key people" in the institution. In detailing some of the benefits of genomics, McElheny explained that ...From:USAMOONBASEViews:2 0ratingsTime:01:16:26More inEducation

Follow this link:
Main Show Only - The Human Genome Coast To Coast AM - Video

Cellanyx Diagnostics Pitch – Video

Posted on by


Cellanyx Diagnostics Pitch
Cellanyx Diagnostics is a development stage company innovating in vitro tissue and cell culturing techniques for use in research and in-vitro diagnostics. Leveraging a novel suite of biomarkers, microfluidic technology and computational techniques, Cellanyx Diagnostics will offer a quantitative and objective diagnostic for prostate cancer. Ultimately, Cellanyx Diagnostics will provide a lab service that offers critical prognostic information before the radical prostatectomy decision point. Cellanyx leverages advances in matrix biology and nanofabrication to return discrete prognostic metrics based on biopsy analysis. Cellanyx #39;s product will allow physicians and patients to make more personalized and cost-effective treatment decisions.From:cellanyxinfoViews:3 0ratingsTime:01:09More inScience Technology

Link:
Cellanyx Diagnostics Pitch - Video

How to Pronounce Analogous – Video

Posted on by


How to Pronounce Analogous
Learn how to say Analogous correctly with EmmaSaying #39;s "how do you pronounce" free tutorials. Definition of analogous (oxford dictionary): adjective comparable in certain respects, typically in a way which makes clearer the nature of the things compared: they saw the relationship between a ruler and his subjects as analogous to that of father and children Biology (of organs) performing a similar function but having a different evolutionary origin, such as the wings of insects and birds. Often contrasted with homologous. Derivatives analogously adverb Origin: mid 17th century: via Latin from Greek analogos #39;proportionate #39; + -ous http://www.emmasaying.comFrom:Emma SayingViews:0 0ratingsTime:00:11More inHowto Style

Visit link:
How to Pronounce Analogous - Video

Stand As A Loaf Not A Slice (SAALNAS) – Video

Posted on by


Stand As A Loaf Not A Slice (SAALNAS)
I #39;m an undergraduate student studying Human Biology and I want diseases such as Cancer(s) to not exists. View and share and money will go into the curing of diseases Half towards Cancer Research Uk and the rest to university #39;s with ambitious efforts to cureFrom:Peter NashViews:0 0ratingsTime:00:59More inScience Technology

View original post here:
Stand As A Loaf Not A Slice (SAALNAS) - Video

How to Pronounce Areola – Video

Posted on by


How to Pronounce Areola
Learn how to say Areola correctly with EmmaSaying #39;s "how do you pronounce" free tutorials. Definition of areola (oxford dictionary): noun (plural areolae /-li #720;/) Anatomy a small circular area, in particular the ring of pigmented skin surrounding a nipple. Biology any of the small spaces between lines or cracks on a leaf or an insect #39;s wing. Medicine a reddened patch around a spot or papule. Derivatives areolar adjective areolate adjective Origin: mid 17th century (in the sense #39;small space or interstice #39;): from Latin, literally #39;small open space #39;, diminutive of area (see area) http://www.emmasaying.comFrom:Emma SayingViews:0 0ratingsTime:00:11More inHowto Style

Read the original post:
How to Pronounce Areola - Video

Bill Nye – Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children – Video

Posted on by


Bill Nye - Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children
http://www.collectivelyconscious.net - Where artists, seekers, activists, and healers UNITE! http - A global community focused on sharing politically, socially, environmentally, and spiritually conscious artwork, music, film, and various other forms of media. "Like" us for a daily supply in your FB news feed! Evolution is the fundamental idea in all of life science, in all of biology. According to Bill Nye, aka "the science guy," if grownups want to "deny evolution and live in your world that #39;s completely inconsistent with everything we observe in the universe, that #39;s fine, but don #39;t make your kids do it because we need them." -- Transcript: Denial of evolution is unique to the United States. I mean, we #39;re the world #39;s most advanced technological mdash;I mean, you could say Japan mdash;but generally, the United States is where most of the innovations still happens. People still move to the United States. And that #39;s largely because of the intellectual capital we have, the general understanding of science. When you have a portion of the population that doesn #39;t believe in that, it holds everybody back, really. Evolution is the fundamental idea in all of life science, in all of biology. It #39;s like, it #39;s very much analogous to trying to do geology without believing in tectonic plates. You #39;re just not going to get the right answer. Your whole world is just going to be a mystery instead of an exciting place. As my old professor, Carl Sagan, said, "When you #39;re in love you want to tell the world." So ...From:CConsciousTVViews:0 0ratingsTime:02:32More inEducation

Read more here:
Bill Nye - Creationism Is Not Appropriate For Children - Video

Solar System (elearning) – Video

Posted on by


Solar System (elearning)
Goyal Brothers Prakashan is a name to reckon with among the leading, well known and prestigious publishing houses in India today. You can avail these animation with our books and our elearning website http://www.testlabz.com. We are also providing online support for our books which provide you animations, interactive exercise, important photographs and useful information related to the subjects. We provide animation for all subjects like physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics, hindi story, english, moral story, history, geography, civics etc. Goyal Brothers Prakashan has largest team of multimedia (2d animator, graphics designer, artist, website developer, SEO, Ebook Developer) in India. Key: Cartoon, Animation, Elearning, Funny, Joke, Moral Story, Science, Story, Education, Educational, FlashFrom:Kadir KhanViews:0 0ratingsTime:03:58More inEducation

Go here to read the rest:
Solar System (elearning) - Video

Too Late To Apologize ~ Chapter Three – Video

Posted on by


Too Late To Apologize ~ Chapter Three
Too Late To Apologize ~ Chapter Three. "Justin Bieber fan" I huffed a sigh when I unpacked my last item. "Finally." I blew the hair out of my face and sat in my dorm. My friend, Kacie, yes I already made a friend on my first day here because she #39;s my roommate --- showed me around campus. "So what classes are you taking?" She asked, sitting across from me on her own bed. "I #39;m taking the usual Mathematics, Biology, US History..." I trailed off, not willing to explain. "Anything of your interests?" Kacie asked. "Photography." "Really? So you like taking pictures and stuff?" "I guess you could say that... whenever something catches my eye I have the urge to capture it, so I thought #39;photography would be the perfect calss for me. #39;" "So where did you come from? Like down south?" Kacie wondered. "A lot farther than that," I laughed. "Stratford, Canada actually." "Like... where Justin Bieber grew up?" She sat up, suddenly interested. I inwardly rolled my eyes and shrugged. "Yeah. Where... he lived." I exaggerated the #39;he #39;, not wanting to say his name. "That #39;s so cool! Don #39;t think I #39;m weird but... I love him so much. He #39;s so cute and oh - my - god don #39;t get me started with his songs he..." Kacie continued to blab about Justin while I blocked her out after the first few seconds and went to get a drink. She #39;s a sweet girl, but if she #39;s going to be talking about him all the time I don #39;t know if this is the place for me. Once she quieted down, I nodded, acting like I heard everything ...From:XxSweeterKissXxViews:2 0ratingsTime:00:16More inEntertainment

Follow this link:
Too Late To Apologize ~ Chapter Three - Video