question - the constitution not for all?
"Freedom of private life" Silvio Berlusconi and mine also! This "slogan" should be as an oath on the bible. It not only is moral but criminally pursued.Human rights here are broken as don #39;t twist.This that that now is very necessary for al l countries of the world.Silvio Berlusconi should create precedent then who becomes simpler to achieve the rights for all needs. I don #39;t think that to become the politician it is necessary to refuse a part of the rights, especially private life. It frightens, if there is no private life about what public work there can be a speech. Paparazzi should lose a source of the income and somewhat equate them to terrorists. as it is blackmail and a way to fears and the risk to become a puppet and the corrupt official. evil comes from evil. Restriction of the income of Paparazzi I think to make so - everything who it is realized or not, used information on private life should pay 50 % from total amount, thus to the first affected party - to the state - 85 % and 15 % for the citizen. The state pays 15 % for the citizen and in the necessary sum allows a loan or takes as proof of 85 % of the remained property of all participants.From:yurynicViews:0 0ratingsTime:00:41More inPeople Blogs
Visit link: