Liberty Township, Warren County, NJ

Of Note

Holiday Lighting Safety Reminder from FirstEnergy

The holiday season is the most popular time for home decoration. FirstEnergy's (NYSE: FE) utilities hope you will enjoy this festive season with family and friends while also remembering a few tips to ensure your holiday lighting displays remain safe throughout the season.

Outdoor Lighting Safety

Indoor Lighting Safety

Additional holiday safety information is available at https://www.firstenergycorp.com/help/safety/safe-holiday-decorating.html.

Dog License and Ordinances

Download License Application (.pdf)

Dog licenses must be obtained for all dogs over six months of age. Licenses must be renewed each year, before January 31st. Proof of rabies vaccination must be produced before the license will be issued.

Rabies vaccination must be current through November of the license year in order to comply with New Jersey State Department of Health requirement that the expiration date of the rabies vaccination expire no more than two months prior to the end of the licensing period. (January 31st).

View post:

Liberty Township, Warren County, NJ

Liberty Bowl: Can Rice’s rushing attack succeed against an SEC defense?

Home Mail News Sports Finance Weather Games Groups Answers Screen Flickr Mobile More omg! Shine Movies Music TV Health Shopping Travel Autos Homes Yahoo Sports Search Sports Search Web Sign In Mail Help Account Info Help Suggestions Yahoo Score Strip League: NCAAF Arizona St. vs. Texas Tech Live 8:35 4th 23 (14) AZ ST 37 TX TCH Boise St. vs. Oregon St. Final 23 BOIS 38 OR ST Pittsburgh vs. Bowling Green Final 30 PITT 27 BGSU Utah St. vs. Northern Illinois Final 21 UT ST 14 (23) N ILL Marshall vs. Maryland Final 31 MRSH 20 MD Syracuse vs. Minnesota Final 21 SYRA 17 MINN BYU vs. Washington Final 16 BYU 31 WASH Rutgers vs. Notre Dame Final 16 RUTG 29 ND Cincinnati vs. North Carolina Final 17 CINC 39 NC Miami (FL) vs. Louisville Final 9 MIA F 36 (18) LOU Michigan vs. Kansas St. Final 14 MICH 31 KS ST Middle Tenn. St. vs. Navy Final 6 MTSU 24 NAVY Mississippi vs. Georgia Tech Final 25 MISS 17 GT Oregon vs. Texas Final 30 (10) ORE 7 TEX View All

Excerpt from:

Liberty Bowl: Can Rice’s rushing attack succeed against an SEC defense?

For Liberty High Grenadiers, everything’s coming up roses — again

It's not your typical honeymoon.

Allen Frank got married on Dec. 14. Two weeks later, the assistant director of the Liberty High School Grenadier Band and his new wife flew to Pasadena, Calif., where they planned to do some sightseeing, hear live music and enjoy California cuisine.

That's where it gets complicated. Riding herd on more than 200 kids might put a damper on post-wedding bliss. The music isn't so dreamy, unless "Rule, Britannia!" melts your butter. And try being intimate in front of roaring crowds, with millions more from around the globe watching on TV.

But the couple couldn't ask for a better experience than the pageantry of the marching band equivalent of the Super Bowl. Frank and the rest of the Liberty High School Grenadier Band will march Wednesday morning in the 125h annual Rose Parade, one of 20 high school bands to perform in the legendary event.

The march begins at 11 a.m. EST on Wednesday. It takes a 51/2-mile route on Colorado Boulevard in Pasadena. Liberty will begin its march in the first third of the parade, the fourth band to depart.

"This is really a big event for the history of the band," said Director Kevin Long, himself a former member who graduated from Liberty in 1981. "It is a pinnacle point in the band's history that we're in the Rose Parade again."

It's both Long's and Frank's second trip to Pasadena. The president of the Tournament of Roses selected the Liberty band to perform in 2009. Bands apply for the honor, and the organization selected Liberty's application from 200 bands vying for the coveted spot. Long found out about the honor in November 2012.

"We're a very unique band," Frank said. "When you see them with the bearskin hats, the pipers it's not something you see very often."

For senior Drew Donaher, the Rose Parade is the event, the watershed moment, one he never thought he'd see.

"This is the best moment of my senior year," Donaher said.

Original post:

For Liberty High Grenadiers, everything's coming up roses — again

Liberty Bowl brings big bucks to Bluff City

DOWNTOWN MEMPHIS, Tenn. (FOX13) -

Beale Street blue turned maroon and white as the Liberty Bowl celebrations kicked off at Monday's parade.

The festivities also mean a lot of green for the city of Memphis.

"It's our second biggest moneymaker of the year," said Alfred's manager Scott Lawrence, "With the Liberty Bowl falling so close to New Year's Eve, between the Liberty Bowl, New Year's Eve, the parade, the pep rally, all the events downtown, it really brings a lot of tourism to downtown; a lot of money to the whole area."

In 2007, the last time Mississippi State played in the Liberty Bowl, Memphis generated an estimated $23 million.

While bulldog bells filled Beale Street during the parade, Mississippi State families marched to other Bluff City establishments throughout the week, pouring money into the local economy.

"We're going to Graceland, we're going to do the BBQ at Tom's next to Graceland," said Mississippi State Alum Barry Boatner, "The tickets, the room, the lodging, the food: It's going to be a couple thousand dollars on my American Express card when it's all over."

Lawrence said Alfred's is the official hangout for the Mississippi State Alumni Association this year; they expected nearly 900 people on parade day just from that.

The 55th AutoZone Liberty Bowl between Mississippi State and Rice kicks off at 3 p.m. on Tuesday.

Go here to see the original:

Liberty Bowl brings big bucks to Bluff City

Libertarianism – Frequently Asked Questions – The Advocates …

What is Libertarianism?

Libertarians see the individual as the basic, most essential element of society. The word roughly means believer in liberty. Libertarians believe that each individual owns his or her own life and property and has the right to make his own choices about how to live his life as long as he respects the rights of others to do the same.

Liberty is one of the central lessons of world history. Virtually all the progress the human race has enjoyed during the past few centuries is due to the increasing acceptance of free markets, civil liberties and self-ownership.

Libertarianism is thus the combination of liberty (the freedom to live your life in any peaceful way you choose), responsibility (the prohibition against the use of force against others, except in defense) and tolerance (honoring and respecting the peaceful choices of others).

Click here to view some definitions of libertarianism.

Libertarians are not left or right or a combination of the two. Libertarians believe that on every issue you have the right to decide for yourself whats best for you and to act on that belief, so long as you simply respect the right of other people to do the same.

How does this compare with the left and right? Todays liberals tend to value personal liberty, but want significant government control of the economy. Todays conservatives tend to favor economic freedom, but want to use the government to uphold traditional values. Libertarians, in contrast, support both personal and economic liberty.

Libertarianism is the only political movement that consistently advocates a high degree of both personal and economic liberty.

Modern libertarianism has multiple roots, but perhaps the most important one is the minimal-government republicanism of Americas founding revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson and the Anti-Federalists. The core ideals of libertarianism that all men are created equal and are endowed with the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness can be seen in the Declaration of Independence and in the limited government established in the Constitution.

Adam Smith and John Stuart Mill are among the most famous of the 18th and 19th centuries classical liberals that developed theories on the invisible hand of free markets. More recently, libertarian philosophy has been explored and defined through Ayn Rands ethical egoism and the Austrian School of free-market economics.

Read more here:

Libertarianism - Frequently Asked Questions - The Advocates ...

Libertarianism – New World Encyclopedia

From New World Encyclopedia

In English-speaking countries, libertarianism usually refers to a political philosophy maintaining that every person is the absolute owner of their own life and should be free to do whatever they wish with their person or property, as long as they respect the liberty of others.

Libertarianism can also be an ethical theory or stance that holds that the besti.e., best ethically speaking, or what "ought to" or "should" exist or be upheldpolitical, social, economic, and/or governmental system is the one that governs least, that provides for the greatest individual liberty, initiative, entrepreneurship, etc. Libertarian theory advocates minimizing social and governmental power, action, control, and regulation, and maximizing individual liberty and freedom. Libertarians are suspicious of the ability of government and bureaucrats to make good, wise, and informed ethical, social, or economic choices for people. Libertarians believe, instead, that people are the best judges and masters of their own self-interest, and that they make the best choices when they choose freely for themselves.

Libertarianism can be contrasted with socialismthe two are more or less opposite in their political, social, and ethical stances.

Some libertarians (as explained below) are anarchists. But it is important not to assume that libertarianism implies or is synonymous with anarchism because most libertarians do believe in and accept some minimal government and governmental powera view sometimes called the "night-watchman theory of the state."

There are broadly two types of libertarians: consequentialists and rights theorists.[1] Rights theorists hold that it is morally imperative that all human interaction, including government interaction with private individuals, should be voluntary and consensual. They maintain that the initiation of force by any person or government, against another person or their propertywith "force" meaning the use of physical force, the threat of it, or the commission of fraud against someonewho has not initiated physical force, threat, or fraud, is a violation of that principle. This form of libertarianism is associated with Objectivists, as well as with individualist anarchists who see this prohibition as requiring opposition to the state to be consistent.

Consequentialist libertarians do not have a moral prohibition against "initiation of force," but support those actions that they believe will result in the maximum well-being or efficiency for a society. Though they will allow some initiation of force by the state if they believe it necessary to bring about good consequences for society, they believe that allowing a very large scope of individual liberty is the most productive way toward this end. This type of libertarianism is associated with Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises, and Friedrich Hayek.

Libertarians generally do not oppose force used in response to initiatory aggressions such as violence, fraud, or trespassing. Libertarians favor an ethic of self-responsibility and strongly oppose the welfare state, because they believe "forcing" someone to provide aid to others is ethically wrong, ultimately counter-productive, or both. Libertarians also strongly oppose conscription, because they oppose slavery and involuntary servitude.

Critics of libertarianism may point to its unrealistic view of human nature. Since human beings are fallen and prone to selfish behaviors, lacking in self-control and greedy to promote themselves at the expense of others, a condition of unfettered liberty will necessarily result in inequality and oppression of the many by a privileged few who are stronger and more ruthless. The state, in this view, has a positive role to regulate selfish and immoral behavior and to provide redress to those oppressed by economic or social circumstances. This is the essence of Jean-Jacque Rousseau's social contract, which founds the sovereign role of government on an implicit contract in which citizens surrender a measure of individual liberty for a measure of protection and greater social equality. On the other hand, elements of libertarian policy can succeed if non-governmental organizations in a society were to deliver widespread moral instruction to encourage citizens to practice self-control and embody divinity within themselves, support healthy families in which such virtues are most readily cultivated, and encourage voluntary charity to care for the less fortunate.

Note on terminology: Some writers who have been called libertarians have also been referred to as "classical liberals," by others or themselves. Also, some use the phrase "the freedom philosophy" to refer to libertarianism, classical liberalism, or both.

See more here:

Libertarianism - New World Encyclopedia

libertarianism (politics) — Encyclopedia Britannica

libertarianism,political philosophy that takes individual liberty to be the primary political value. It may be understood as a form of liberalism, the political philosophy associated with the English philosophers John Locke and John Stuart Mill, the Scottish economist Adam Smith, and the American statesman Thomas Jefferson. Liberalism seeks to define and justify the legitimate powers of government in terms of certain natural or God-given individual rights. These rights include the rights to life, liberty, private property, freedom of speech and association, freedom of worship, government by consent, equality under the law, and moral autonomy (the pursuit of ones own conception of happiness, or the good life). The purpose of government, according to liberals, is to protect these and other individual rights, and in general liberals have contended that government power should be limited to that which is necessary to accomplish this task. Libertarians are classical liberals who strongly emphasize the individual right to liberty. They contend that the scope and powers of government should be constrained so as to allow each individual as much freedom of action as is consistent with a like freedom for everyone else. Thus, they believe that individuals should be free to behave ... (200 of 4,037 words)

Read the original:

libertarianism (politics) -- Encyclopedia Britannica

Walter Block Is Still Defending the Undefendable

Walter Block is at his finest when he subjects the most loathsome jobs and nastiest behaviors to a logical and libertarian scrutiny. Blocks Defending the Undefendable has needled and irritated an entire generation of readers and compelled many to re-examine long-held beliefs in favor of the logic of libertarianism. Now comes volume 2, Defending the Undefendable: Freedom in All Realms (with a foreword by Ron Paul) that promises more such irritation for future generations.

The introduction is a short course in libertarianism. Block explains that libertarianism is a political philosophy that shows when the use of coercion is justified or not justified. The book examines 30 cases that are often seen as illegal, immoral, or unethical. Block analyzes each case by subjecting it to a libertarian standard, and ultimately exonerates each from punishment by government.

Please note: the author is only defending these cases by the political standard of libertarianism and whether they should face coercive threat from the state. It does not mean by any stretch of the imagination that this implies approval and commendation. It simply means they should not go to jail for their behavior.

The examination of these hard cases is what helps us sharpen our understanding of libertarianism and our ability to debate and defend the free society. I agree with the author that studying hard cases strengthens libertarianism and improves the likelihood of achieving a free society. Much of my own research has been on such hard cases, such as drug dealers and smugglers. People, particularly college students, find such cases interesting and often convincing.

Speaking of hard cases, one of my colleagues recently visited South Africa. He saw that private security was everywhere. He was told that he and his belongings were safe with private security, but not safe where government police was in charge. My colleague noted that a nation that understands that the market provides a better service for security, the hardest of all cases, is going to be more easily convinced that the market can provide a better garbage collection service.

The book is divided into seven sections. The first, on trade, contains five short chapters: The Multinational Enterpriser, The Smuggler, British Petroleum, Nuclear Energy, and The Corporate Raider.

British Petroleum is a good hard case because everyone knows about the accident in the Gulf of Mexico, the 200 million gallons of oil that was spilled, and that BP has been vilified by the media pundits and politicians because of it. Block begins by calling the people at BP heroes in part because they do the dangerous work so we can comfortably drive across town at 10 cents a mile.

Block asks if BP knew the dangers of deep water drilling. Of course they did, but government regulations prevent shallow water drilling near the shoreline and provide incentives to drill in deep water far out at sea. Meanwhile government regulators were not doing their job, goofing off, taking bribes, and they failed to upgrade safety standards to account for the new deep water drilling.

As BP was vilified for negligence and as the oil continued to seep into the the gulf, the U.S. government turned down offers of assistance from foreign companies that specialized in such spills and who had more experience than U.S. firms. Ships from foreign countries also offered their assistance, but like after Hurricane Katrina, the volunteers were turned away. Block argues persuasively why such disasters are very unlikely to happen in a libertarian society and that this tragedy was the result of government intervention.

The second section on labor looks at the cases of The Hatchet Man, The Home Worker, The Picket-Line Crosser, The Daycare Provider, and The Automator. In the case of automation, it does destroy some jobs, and creates new jobs, and this should be celebrated by society, not denigrated or sabotaged. Technological advance is the main source of rising prosperity and job creation. Machines can increase our productivity and free up labor to produce other goods that are in short supply. The chapter does a wonderful job of showing how this process takes place and how we all benefit from automation and robots.

Visit link:

Walter Block Is Still Defending the Undefendable

What is Libertarian? | The Institute for Humane Studies

The libertarian or "classical liberal" perspective is that individual well-being, prosperity, and social harmony are fostered by "as much liberty as possible" and "as little government as necessary."

These ideas lead to new questions: What's possible? What's necessary? What are the practical implications and the unsolved problems?

Below are a number of different takes on the libertarian political perspective from which you can deepen your understanding;also be sure to check out the videos in the sidebar.

According to The Machinery of Freedom by David Friedman, Open Court Publishing Company,1973.

The central idea of libertarianism is that people should be permitted to run their own lives as they wish.

According toLibertarianism: A Primerby David Boaz,Free Press, 1997.

Libertarianism is the view that each person has the right to live his life in any way he chooses so long as he respects the equal rights of others. Libertarians defend each person's right to life, liberty, and property-rights that people have naturally, before governments are created. In the libertarian view, all human relationships should be voluntary; the only actions that should be forbidden by law are those that involve the initiation of force against those who have not themselves used force-actions like murder, rape, robbery, kidnapping, and fraud.

According to Funk and Wagnall's Dictionary

lib-er-tar-i-an, n. 1. a person who advocates liberty, esp. with regard to thought or conduct.... advocating liberty or conforming to principles of liberty.

According to American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition, 2000.

See the article here:

What is Libertarian? | The Institute for Humane Studies

Bitcoin As An Alternative Currency? – Libertarian Vs Pragmatist

One question that keeps popping up, and was addressed to some extent by NAB's recent report, is whether all the elements of the current Bitcoin are necessary for a viable alternative currency. And, as Citi's Steve Englander asks (from a libertarian and pragmatic perspective), if they are not, or can be improved on, where does that leave Bitcoins first mover advantage?

Via Citi's Steven Englander,

The libertarian streak in me likes the anonymity of Bitcoin transactions, but there is a rational part of me that asks whether that aspect is essential if I am paying for a latte in Soho. Similarly if the Bitcoin wallet can be made more secure by dropping anonymity, how many transactors will give up transactional security for libertarian principle? Giving up anonymity may make Bitcoin transactions more secure, and I suspect almost all transactors will value security much more than anonymity.

Going further, Bitcoins decentralized nodes are not needed, if there was less concern about keeping Bitcoin outside the current payments/fiat currency system. The nodes allow transactions to be validated by the Bitcoin community, but you can have efficient transactions without the particular validation system used by Bitcoin. The secure ledger of transactions can be centralized rather than decentralized. Bitcoins particular approach may be attractive for those who really want to operate outside the current financial system. There may be both legitimate and illegitimate reasons for this, but the vast majority of transactions do not have this need.

Going even further, if Bitcoin or an alternative currency embraced the financial regulatory system to make it more secure, how much payments efficiency is lost? You can still have secure, instantaneous transactions but inside the financial system there may be more security against fraud and more recourse if your Bitcoins are contained in your PC which gets hit by a meteor.

So there is this story about a special recipe for potato fritters (a very good recipe that I have tried). When a chef is handed the recipe, she decides to improve it by replacing each ingredient one-by-one with something more familiar. Having done so, she and her husband decide that the final result isnt nearly as good as advertised and is pretty close to what they prepare all the time. In eliminating anonymity, decentralization and non-regulation, much of the original intent of the Bitcoin developer(s) is being thwarted. The question is whether the core innovation of Bitcoin has been compromised or whether unneeded baggage is being dropped.

For the record, mining Bitcoin is waste of resources from a social perspective. The amount of CPU and electricity needed to mine Bitcoin is high, and from a social viewpoint about as valuable as building defenses against attacks from Mars. What the mining does is decide the allocation of the limited amount of Bitcoin produced each period and encourage the ledger to be kept. There is a real social cost to the decentralization designed into Bitcoin.

If Bitcoin is a payments technology, much of what makes it efficient and attractive can be retained, while dropping some features that most users find unnecessary. Bitcoin may become less attractive to illicit users as a result, but that is a sacrifice many will be willing to make. Culturally, the developers of Bitcoin may find this evolution extremely unattractive, because the distrust of the financial system and of financial authorities was one of the motivations for its development. However attractive philosophically, many users will vote for pragmatism over principle and a Bitcoin clone that satisfied this pragmatic streak could be able to overcome the first mover advantage.

So far I have ignored Bitcoin as a store of value, but the proponents of Bitcoin as a store of value/speculation crucially need Bitcoin to be unique and have strong barriers to entry, despite the replicability of the technology. If it turns out that investors/miners will arbitrage between Bitcoin and other mined alternative currencies, the outcome will be that there are many perfect or near perfect substitutes for Bitcoin, and the effective supply will be much larger than would be suggested by the gradually increasing and ultimately capped supply of the original Bitcoin. This will mean that valuations will be very fragile because in the long-term there will be no ability to limit the supply of Bitcoin lookalikes ... unless some subset of Bitcoin-like currencies gain government/central bank endorsement which gives them an advantage over non-endorsed Bitcoin-like currencies.

Continue reading here:

Bitcoin As An Alternative Currency? - Libertarian Vs Pragmatist

SWARM | Strong! 5.6 EARTHQUAKE just strike MARIANA ISLANDS S of JAPAN 12 28 13 See ‘DESCRIPTION’ – Video


SWARM | Strong! 5.6 EARTHQUAKE just strike MARIANA ISLANDS S of JAPAN 12 28 13 See #39;DESCRIPTION #39;
http://www.harvestarmy.org - - SUBSCRIBE FOR PREDICTIONS THAT MAY AFFECT YOU - - [quick generic news report until official video] NEWS ARTICLES: http://www.e...

By: HarvestArmy

Read more here:

SWARM | Strong! 5.6 EARTHQUAKE just strike MARIANA ISLANDS S of JAPAN 12 28 13 See 'DESCRIPTION' - Video