GPT-5 might arrive this summer as a materially better update to ChatGPT – Ars Technica

Posted on by

When OpenAI launched its GPT-4 AI model a year ago, it created a wave of immense hype and existential panic from its ability to imitate human communication and composition. Since then, the biggest question in AI has remained the same: When is GPT-5 coming out? During interviews and media appearances around the world, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman frequently gets asked this question, and he usually gives a coy or evasive answer, sometimes coupled with promises of amazing things to come.

According to a new report from Business Insider, OpenAI is expected to release GPT-5, an improved version of the AI language model that powers ChatGPT, sometime in mid-2024and likely during the summer. Two anonymous sources familiar with the company have revealed that some enterprise customers have recently received demos of GPT-5 and related enhancements to ChatGPT.

One CEO who recently saw a version of GPT-5 described it as "really good" and "materially better," with OpenAI demonstrating the new model using use cases and data unique to his company. The CEO also hinted at other unreleased capabilities of the model, such as the ability to launch AI agents being developed by OpenAI to perform tasks automatically.

We asked OpenAI representatives about GPT-5's release date and the Business Insider report. They responded that they had no particular comment, but they included a snippet of a transcript from Altman's recent appearance on the Lex Fridman podcast.

Lex Fridman(01:06:13) So when is GPT-5 coming out again? Sam Altman(01:06:15) I dont know. Thats the honest answer. Lex Fridman(01:06:18) Oh, thats the honest answer. Blink twice if its this year. Sam Altman(01:06:30) We will release an amazing new model this year. I dont know what well call it. Lex Fridman(01:06:36) So that goes to the question of, whats the way we release this thing? Sam Altman(01:06:41) Well release in the coming months many different things. I think thatd be very cool. I think before we talk about a GPT-5-like model called that, or not called that, or a little bit worse or a little bit better than what youd expect from a GPT-5, I think we have a lot of other important things to release first.

In this conversation, Altman seems to imply that the company is prepared to launch a major AI model this year, but whether it will be called "GPT-5" or be considered a major upgrade to GPT-4 Turbo (or perhaps an incremental update like GPT-4.5) is up in the air.

Like its predecessor, GPT-5 (or whatever it will be called) is expected to be a multimodal large language model (LLM) that can accept text or encoded visual input (called a "prompt"). And like GPT-4, GPT-5 will be a next-token prediction model, which means that it will output its best estimate of the most likely next token (a fragment of a word) in a sequence, which allows for tasks such as completing a sentence or writing code. When configured in a specific way, GPT models can power conversational chatbot applications like ChatGPT.

OpenAI launched GPT-4 in March 2023 as an upgrade to its most major predecessor, GPT-3, which emerged in 2020 (with GPT-3.5 arriving in late 2022). Last November, OpenAI released GPT-4 Turbo, which lowered inference (running) costs of OpenAI's best AI model dramatically but has been plagued with accusations of "laziness" where the model sometimes refuses to answer prompts or complete coding projects as requested. OpenAI has attempted to fix the laziness issue several times.

LLMs like those developed by OpenAI are trained on massive datasets scraped from the Internet and licensed from media companies, enabling them to respond to user prompts in a human-like manner. However, the quality of the information provided by the model can vary depending on the training data used, and also based on the model's tendency to confabulate information. If GPT-5 can improve generalization (its ability to perform novel tasks) while also reducing what are commonly called "hallucinations" in the industry, it will likely represent a notable advancement for the firm.

According to the report, OpenAI is still training GPT-5, and after that is complete, the model will undergo internal safety testing and further "red teaming" to identify and address any issues before its public release. The release date could be delayed depending on the duration of the safety testing process.

Of course, the sources in the report could be mistaken, and GPT-5 could launch later for reasons aside from testing. So, consider this a strong rumor, but this is the first time we've seen a potential release date for GPT-5 from a reputable source. Also, we now know that GPT-5 is reportedly complete enough to undergo testing, which means its major training run is likely complete. Further refinements will likely follow.

Visit link:

GPT-5 might arrive this summer as a materially better update to ChatGPT - Ars Technica

‘Materially better’ GPT-5 could come to ChatGPT as early as this summer – ZDNet

Posted on by

Leon Neal/Getty Images

OpenAI has released several iterations of the large language model (LLM) powering ChatGPT, including GPT-4 and GPT-4 Turbo. Still, sources say the highly anticipated GPT-5 could be released as early as mid-year.

According to reports from Business Insider, GPT-5 is expected to be a major leap from GPT-4 and was described as "materially better" by early testers. The new LLM will offer improvements that have reportedly impressed testers and enterprise customers, including CEOs who've been demoed GPT bots tailored to their companies and powered by GPT-5.

Also: What does GPT stand for? Understanding GPT 3.5, GPT 4, and more

`A customer who got a GPT-5 demo from OpenAI told BI that the company hinted at new, yet-to-be-released GPT-5 features, including its ability to interact with other AI programs that OpenAI is developing. These AI programs, called AI agents by OpenAI, could perform tasks autonomously.

This feature hints at an interconnected ecosystem of AI tools developed by OpenAI, which would allow its different AI systems to collaborate to complete complex tasks or provide more comprehensive services.

The specific launch date for GPT-5 has yet to be released. OpenAI is reportedly training the model and will conduct red-team testing to identify and correct potential issues before its public release.

Also: 3 ways we tried to outwit AI last week: Legislation, preparation, intervention

It's unclear whether GPT-5 will be released exclusively to Plus subscribers, who pay a $20-a-month fee to access GPT-4. GPT-3.5 powers the free tier of ChatGPT, but anyone can access GPT-4 Turbo in Copilot for free by choosing the Creative or Precise conversation styles.

OpenAI has been the target of scrutiny and dissatisfaction from users amid reports of quality degradation with GPT-4, making this a good time to release a newer and smarter model.

Excerpt from:

'Materially better' GPT-5 could come to ChatGPT as early as this summer - ZDNet

Claude 3 vs ChatGPT: Here is How to Find the Best in Data Science – DataDrivenInvestor

Posted on by

5 min read

The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.

Edsger W. Dijkstra

Echoing Edsgers insight, we go into capabilities of two LLMs, contrasting their prowess in the arena of Data Science.

Here are the prompts well use to compare ;

Claude 3, developed by ex-OpenAI employees and supported by a $2 billion investment from Google in October, has quickly gained fame for its exceptional reasoning abilities.

See the original post here:

Claude 3 vs ChatGPT: Here is How to Find the Best in Data Science - DataDrivenInvestor

ChatGPT is here. There is no going back. – The Presbyterian Outlook

Posted on by

Working on a college campus, you must be careful about mentioning the use of AI or the purpose of such a tool. If youre not, you may catch a professor reciting their monolog outlining the evils of AI in the academic world. And while there is some validity to their reaction and concerns about this emerging technological tool, I find it to be just that, a tool.

I think part of what makes AI a challenge for the academic world is that there are no true rules or guides to help navigate this new instrument. Students can use it, and do use it, in ways others might deem harmful to academic integrity. I understand that side. I get the hesitation. We received this tool before we could develop the ethics about its use.

But in my experience, it is never a good practice to shut something out or make it restrictive in a way that will cause pushback and challenge. I try to embrace this tool instead of running away or ignoring it.

I try to embrace this tool instead of running away or ignoring it.

I am currently reworking my future lesson plans with the help of AI and finding ways to integrate its use alongside traditional coursework. To me, this process is fascinating. There is still a lot to learn about AI and plenty of need for ethical reflection on its use. But this much is clear to me: it can be helpful.

Several months ago, my coworkers and I decided to try ChatGPT. We wanted to see what all the fuss from our faculty colleagues was about. We sat together and thought of questions related to our work. We created the parameters for our topics and entered them all into ChatGPT. What resulted was a wild experience: outlines for emails, basic lesson plans, liturgy for worship, prayers and letters to community partners. The list went on and on. And it was captivating to engage in the process.

The items ChatGPT produced were not perfect. There were grammatical errors. There were some oddly worded phrases. All these things indicated that the product was not something created by a human. And that absence is the key to AI ethics for me.

We are just starting to build an ethical framework of AI in the academic world, and I hope the church is also thinking about such a thing. But the key to me is the human element. When working with ChatGPT to craft prayers, it does a decent job. But if you compare an AI prayer to a Chaplain Maggie prayer, the thing missing would be the heart the human element.

ChatGPT has been introduced to our lives. There is no going back. We should find ways to integrate it into our work rather than push back or turn from it. It can offer words when you are having a brain freeze or are too tired to think. It can offer a frame for your writing. It isnt perfect, but it is a tool that we can and should learn how to use just dont forget to add your human uniqueness as you go along.

The Presbyterian Outlook is committed to fostering faithful conversations by publishinga diversity ofvoices.The opinions expressed are the authors and may or may not reflect the opinions and beliefs of the Outlooks editorial staff or the Presbyterian Outlook Foundation.Want to join the conversation?You can write to us or submit your own articlehere.

Read more from the original source:

ChatGPT is here. There is no going back. - The Presbyterian Outlook

Meet Kimi AI, The Chinese ChatGPT – Dataconomy

Posted on by

Moonshot AI has introduced a Chinese ChatGPT: Kimi AI, backed by Alibaba, an advanced chatbot designed to revolutionize how we interact with technology, even if you put 2 million characters or tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of words in the chatbox. But what exactly is Kimi, and what sets it apart in the world of AI? Lets dive in and explore the marvels of this innovative creation.

Kimi is a large language model (LLM) chatbot developed by Moonshot AI, a Beijing-based startup. Essentially, a large language model is an artificial intelligence (AI) system trained on vast amounts of text data to understand and generate human-like text responses. These models have become increasingly sophisticated, enabling them to process and generate natural language with remarkable accuracy. In Kimi AIs case, its like a smart robot that can talk to people using written words on a computer or phone screen. You can connect to the web or upload PDFs on the AI chatbot.

What makes Kimi AI special is that its really good at understanding what people say and responding in a way that makes sense. Recently, the team behind Kimi made it even smarter by teaching it to understand really long messagesup to 2 million Chinese characters in one go!

Kimi Smart Assistant is a versatile tool designed to cater to the diverse needs of various groups of people. Heres how Kimi can lend a helping hand:

Kimi makes life easier for all these people by helping them complete tasks quickly and get things done better, especially in Chinese. However, if you want to use Kimi AI, you should have a WeChat account.

Claude 3 vs ChatGPT: Are Claude 3 models better than ChatGPT?

Moonshot AI is a Beijing-based startup specializing in advanced artificial intelligence (AI) technology. Founded in April 2023, the company has quickly become a leader in AI innovation, particularly in the development of large language models (LLMs) and conversational AI solutions.

Their flagship product, Kimi AI chatbot, has gained widespread acclaim for its ability to understand and generate human-like text responses. Moonshot AIs mission is to harness AIs power to solve real-world problems and enhance human-machine interactions.

Through strategic partnerships like Alibaba and products like Kimi, we probably hear their name more soon.

Featured image credit: Eray Eliak/Bing

Go here to see the original:

Meet Kimi AI, The Chinese ChatGPT - Dataconomy

ChatGPT Predicts Ethereum Price Post-ETH ETF Approval – Watcher Guru

Posted on by

With the Bitcoin ETF witnessing a huge surge in inflows, driving the assets price to a new all-time high, the anticipation surrounding an Ethereum ETF has reached fever pitch.

The price of Ethereum (ETH) has significantly increased due to the growing buzz around a potential Ethereum ETF, increasing institutional investments, and community support. Bulls have managed to push the ETH price towards the $4,000 mark, setting a new 52-week high and signaling a strong bullish sentiment in the market.

Also read: Shiba Inu: Machine Learning AI Predicts SHIBs Price for March 31

We shared the weekly ETH price chart with ChatGPT to gain further insight into the potential impact of an Ethereum ETF on the assets price. Based on its analysis of the recent price action and utilizing Fibonacci retracement levels, ChatGPT predicts that Ethereum could surge to new heights, reaching a target of $6,835 amidst the growing enthusiasm surrounding the ETF launch.

The AI model further suggests that beyond this initial target, Ethereum may face psychological barriers at the $7,000 and $8,000 levels. However, with the increasing institutional interest and the potential influx of capital from the ETF, Ethereum could be well-positioned to overcome these obstacles and establish new all-time highs.

Also read: Shiba Inu vs. Dogecoin: ChatGPT Predicts If SHIB Can Outperform DOGE

As the cryptocurrency market eagerly awaits the launch of an Ethereum ETF, the road ahead for the second-largest cryptocurrency appears promising. The growing institutional adoption, combined with the assets strong fundamentals and the robustness of the Ethereum ecosystem, has created fertile ground for significant price appreciation.

As Ethereum stands on the cusp of a potential ETF launch, the cryptocurrency market is abuzz with excitement and anticipation. With bulls driving the ETH price towards $4,000 and ChatGPT predicting even higher targets, the future looks bright for Ethereum and its investors.

Also read: Cryptocurrency: Top 3 Coins Under $1 To Buy Before Bitcoin Halving

Follow this link:

ChatGPT Predicts Ethereum Price Post-ETH ETF Approval - Watcher Guru

4 Reasons to Start Using Claude 3 Instead of ChatGPT – MUO – MakeUseOf

Posted on by

Key Takeaways

In the AI chatbot space, ChatGPT has been the undisputed leader since its launch in November 2022. However, with the release of Claude 3, it is increasingly looking like ChatGPT might be losing that title. Here are four reasons you should consider switching from ChatGPT to Claude.

Besides occasional science homework, programming tasks, and fun games, one of the most popular use cases of AI chatbots is creative writing. Most users use AI chatbots to help draft an email, cover letter, resume, article, or song lyricsbasically one creative write-up or another. While ChatGPT has clearly been the favored option owing mostly to its brand name and publicity, Claude has consistently delivered top-notch results even in earlier iterations of the AI chatbots. But it's not just about providing top-notch results. Claude, especially backed by the latest Claude 3 model, outperforms ChatGPT in a wide range of creative writing tasks.

As someone who has consistently used both chatbots since their launch, Claude, although not necessarily the overall better model, is significantly better at creating write-ups that better mimic human "creativity and imperfections." Putting both chatbots to the test, ChatGPT's write-ups, although grammatically correct, were full of tell-tale signs of an AI-written piece. Claude's write-ups read more naturally and sound human. Although not perfect, they are likely to be more engaging and creative.

Too frequently, ChatGPT falls victim to the use of so many clichs and predictable word choices. Ask ChatGPT to write about some business topics, and there's a good chance you will see words like "In today's business environment," "In recent history," and "In the fast-paced digital landscape" in the starting paragraphs.

Putting our theory to the test, it was just as predicted. ChatGPT (GPT-3.5 and GPT-4) used clich intros in five out of five trials. Here are the first three samples:

Claude, on the other hand, produced varying results four times out of five trials, avoiding the cliche on the first trial:

Besides clich, ChatGPT, more than Claude, tends to fall victim to the sporadic use of joining words like "in conclusion," "as a result," and a tendency for unnecessary emphasis where emphatic words like "undisputed, critical, unquestionable, must" etc., are used.

But besides these flaws, how do write-ups from each chatbot sound from a holistic point of view?

To top off the comparison, I asked both chatbots to produce rhyming rap lyrics on the theme "coconut to wealth." Claude seems the better option, but I'll let you be the judge.

Here's ChatGPT's take:

And here's Claude's take:

Early adopters of ChatGPT probably have a deep-rooted preference for the AI chatbot, but when it comes to creative writing, ChatGPT has some serious catching up to do in many areas.

Besides Google's Gemini AI chatbot, there are hardly any major AI chatbots in the market that offer Claude's multimodal features for free. With the free version of ChatGPT, all you get is text generation abilities, and that's it. No file uploads for analysis, no image processing, nothing else! On the other hand, Claude offers these premium features on its free tier. So, you can use image prompting or upload files for analysis on the chatbot for free if you use the free beta version of the bot.

Context window is the limit of text data an AI chatbot can process at a go. Think of it as how many things you can keep in your memory (and be able to recall) at a time.

Depending on the version of ChatGPT you use, you should get anywhere between 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k, and 128k context windows. For clarity, a 4k context window can accommodate around 3,000 words, while a 32k window can accommodate around 24,000 words. With the ChatGPT free tier, you get the lowest limits of the context window options (4k or 8k), meaning a few pages of text. You can access the 16k and possibly 32k options on ChatGPT Plus or Team plans, while the 128k context window seems to be an exclusive reserve of the ChatGPT Enterprise plans.

Whereas Claude has a 200k context window on its free and premium plansa significant improvement from ChatGPT's 4k or 8k window.

Why does this even matter? Well, the larger the context window, the more text data you can process at a time without the AI chatbot making things up. Claude's 200k context window is equivalent to around 150,000 words. Yep, it means you'll theoretically be able to process 150,000 words simultaneously with Claude, while ChatGPT could cap you out at 24,000 words even on its premium tier. You see? The difference is like night and dayat least in theory.

Rate limits can be a pain. You're in the middle of an interesting prompting session, you get an alert that you've reached your limit and have to wait (sometimes hours!) to get a reset. It's a huge joy killer and can set your work back hours. However, this happens both on ChatGPT and Claude, so it's an even ground on that point.

ChatGPT offers 40 messages every three hours on the Plus plan, while Claude offers 100 messages per eight hours. If you're not lost in the optics and do the math, ChatGPT's message limits are slightly better than Claude's. But there's more to it.

OpenAI dynamically throttles your usage limits. This means the limit you see isn't what you'll always get. It depends on the demand, as per OpenAI. On the other hand, despite having slightly lower usage limits, Claude can actually be more liberal with the limits depending on how much text you use per message.

So, if, for instance, you send around 2,000 words (around 200 English sentences of 1525 words each), you should be able to get "at least" the 100 messages per 8-hour limit. Two thousand words per prompt is a generous number; only a few people get that wordy when doing basic prompting. If you use a lower number of words per prompt, you should be able to get a larger number of messages per hour theoretically.

So, while ChatGPT might seem more generous on the outside if you use both chatbots daily, Claude seems to be the more generous option, although not necessarily at all times.

While early adopters may have a sentimental attachment to ChatGPT, it's becoming increasingly clear that Claude is a force to be reckoned with. As the AI landscape continues to evolve, it will be fascinating to see how these titans of conversational AI push each other to new heights, ultimately benefiting users with ever-improving and more capable chatbots. The future of AI-powered interactions has never been more exciting.

Original post:

4 Reasons to Start Using Claude 3 Instead of ChatGPT - MUO - MakeUseOf

6 Unexpected Uses For ChatGPT You’ll Want To Try For Yourself – SlashGear

Posted on by

Many folks have recently been obsessed with knowing their personal colors, and for good reason. Your personal color tells you exactly what shades of clothing, makeup, and even accessories go well with your skin tone, hair, and eye color. When you wear the right shades, you look less dull and more youthful. However, getting a professional color analysis done can cost a pretty penny, sometimes even going over $500. If you're not too keen on shelling out that much just to know your color palette, you can just use ChatGPT.

Right in the GPT Store on your ChatGPT Plus account, you'll find the Personal Color Analysis GPT, and it does exactly that: determine what your personal colors may be. Here's how to use it:

It will then provide you with an analysis based on your photo. You can send additional prompts, like "Give me visual examples" or "I like wearing a cottagecore style, can you suggest specific clothes to buy?" should you need more information.

See the rest here:

6 Unexpected Uses For ChatGPT You'll Want To Try For Yourself - SlashGear

How do ChatGPT, Gemini, and other LLMs Work? – MarkTechPost

Posted on by

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.

Read the original here:

How do ChatGPT, Gemini, and other LLMs Work? - MarkTechPost

9 mind-blowing things you can do with ChatGPT-4 Vision – Android Authority

Posted on by

Not long ago, OpenAI unveiled a new iteration of ChatGPT, known as ChatGPT-4V or 4 Vision. This version allows users to upload images, photos, text, or mathematical problems, and it can analyze these and respond to questions based on the uploaded image. This remarkably powerful feature is currently only available to ChatGPT Plus account holders. If you happen to be a subscriber, here are nine things you can do with ChatGPT-4 Vision.

For a full demonstration of how to use ChatGPT-4 Vision to accomplish these tasks, be sure to watch the video embedded above.

Andy Walker / Android Authority

I started with something simple: a picture of a house plant that looked like a cabbage growing in a pot. I asked ChatGPT with Vision to identify it. It turns out its an ornamental kale or cabbage, known for its vibrant and colorful leaves and often used for decorative purposes.

Andy Walker / Android Authority

One of the impressive features of ChatGPT-4 Vision is its ability to read handwritten notes and diagrams. I tested it with a flow chart that describes a simple loop. Despite the poor handwriting and drawing, ChatGPT managed to interpret it accurately and even converted it into Python code.

Andy Walker / Android Authority

I also used a chart from a recent video about the Tensor G3 chipset, which shows Geekbench 6 multi-core scores. I asked ChatGPT to convert this into a table, and it did so easily. This feature can be handy for converting graphical data into a more manageable format.

Andy Walker / Android Authority

Next, I presented it with a visual math puzzle involving fireworks and stars. Despite some color confusion, ChatGPT correctly identified the fireworks that hadnt been launched.

Andy Walker / Android Authority

I then uploaded a US dollar to Euro currency conversion chart covering a period of one year. ChatGPT accurately described the chart and even provided some analysis of the value of the US dollar compared to the Euro. However, its important to note that ChatGPT should not be used for financial or medical advice.

Andy Walker / Android Authority

For those interested in family history research, ChatGPT can be a useful tool. I uploaded an image of a UK census document from 1851 and asked ChatGPT to transcribe it. Despite a minor error in transcribing a surname, it did a commendable job.

Andy Walker / Android Authority

I also tested it with an AI-generated image of a seascape with two moons. ChatGPT provided a detailed image description, including the smallest elements, demonstrating its ability to interpret and describe complex visuals.

Andy Walker / Android Authority

Finally, I gave it an image of an unbalanced binary tree and an AVL tree and asked it to create a lesson plan for a high school computer science class based on the image. It developed a comprehensive lesson plan, demonstrating its potential as an educational tool.

Andy Walker / Android Authority

I uploaded a seemingly blank yellow image with a hidden message in a fun final test. ChatGPT successfully read the hidden message written in a color thats barely noticeable to the naked eye. This demonstrates ChatGPT-4 Visions ability to detect subtle color differences.

In conclusion, ChatGPT-4 Vision is a powerful tool with many applications, from image analysis to educational planning. Its an exciting development in the field of AI, and I look forward to seeing how it advances.

Go here to read the rest:

9 mind-blowing things you can do with ChatGPT-4 Vision - Android Authority

VTouch’s WIZPR RING Redefines Wearable Tech with ChatGPT AI Voice Command – stupidDOPE.com

Posted on by

In the realm of wearable technology, VTouch emerges as a pioneer with its latest innovation: the WIZPR RING. Unveiled at CES 2024, this fashion-forward accessory is about style, and being a gateway to seamless interactions with artificial intelligence, featuring none other than ChatGPT.

Imagine whispering commands to your ring, and AI responding with precision and speed. Thats the promise of WIZPR RING. Equipped with cutting-edge technology, it filters out background noise, responding only to the whisper of its wearer. But its capabilities extend beyond mere commands; it fosters ASMR-style conversations, making interactions with AI an intimate experience.

Privacy concerns? VTouch has you covered. The WIZPR RINGs design incorporates a proximity sensor and microphone, ensuring that conversations remain confidential. With no wake words required, users can effortlessly activate the device by bringing it close to their lips, with automatic deactivation upon withdrawal.

Functionality meets elegance with this wearable marvel. Users can seamlessly switch between AI tools like ChatGPT, Siri, Alexa, and more, all with a simple whisper. Contextual conversations? Just mutter Whats up? or press a button, and the ring delves into your smartphones calendar, messages, and even the weather.

But the WIZPR RING isnt just about convenience; its a lifeline in emergencies. With a simple five-time button press, it activates an SOS mode, alerting pre-set contacts and providing location data for swift assistance.

And lets talk design. Available in eight sizes and crafted from titanium and epoxy resin, this accessory blends seamlessly into your style. Plus, with up to 66 hours of connectivity on a single charge, its ready for the long haul.

Excited to get your hands on one? VTouch has already kicked off an online campaign, with release and shipping slated for July 2024. Dont miss out on the future of wearable tech. Whisper your commands with WIZPR RING and step into a new era of AI integration.

Explore opportunities for maximum brand exposure. For advertising, contact us.

More:

VTouch's WIZPR RING Redefines Wearable Tech with ChatGPT AI Voice Command - stupidDOPE.com

GPT-5 is ChatGPT’s next big upgrade, and it could be here very soon – Android Authority

Posted on by

Calvin Wankhede / Android Authority

TL;DR

OpenAIs ChatGPT has taken the world by storm, highlighting how AI can help with mundane tasks and, in turn, causing a mad rush among companies to incorporate AI into their products. GPT is the large language model that powers ChatGPT, with GPT-3 powering the ChatGPT that most of us know about. OpenAI has then upgraded ChatGPT with GPT-4, and it seems the company is on track to release GPT-5 too very soon.

According to a report from Business Insider, OpenAI is on track to release GPT-5 sometime in the middle of this year, likely during summer. Some enterprise customers are said to have received demos of the latest model and its related enhancements to ChatGPT, and they mention it to be really good, like materially better. These enterprise customers were showcased in a demo by OpenAI, which included use cases and data unique to the company.

Further, OpenAI is also said to have alluded to other as-yet-unreleased capabilities of the model, including the ability to call AI agents being developed by OpenAI to perform tasks autonomously.

The report clarifies that the company does not have a set release date for the new model and is still training GPT-5. Once training is complete, the model will be safety-tested internally. This includes red teaming the model, where it would be challenged in various ways to find issues before the tool is made available to the public. The safety testing has no specific timeframe for completion, so the process could potentially delay the release date.

The last major update to ChatGPT was a year ago with GPT-4. GPT-4 is faster and more accurate in its responses than GPT-3. The company also launched GPT-4 Turbo, which was made available to ChatGPT Plus subscribers. Before this report, GPT-5 was expected to take a while to train, develop, and test, potentially not releasing before 2025. The report gives us hope for an expedited release timeframe.

The report mentions that OpenAI hopes GPT-5 will be more reliable than previous models. Users have complained of GPT-4 degradation and worse outputs from ChatGPT, possibly due to degradation of training data that OpenAI may have used for updates and maintenance work.

In a recent interview with Lex Fridman, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman commented that GPT-4 kind of sucks when he was asked about the most impressive capabilities of GPT-4 and GPT-4 Turbo. He clarified that both are amazing, but people thought GPT-3 was also amazing, but now it is unimaginably horrible. Altman expects the delta between GPT-5 and 4 will be the same as between GPT-4 and 3. Altman commented, Maybe [GPT] 5 will be the pivotal moment, I dont know. Hard to say that looking forward. Were definitely looking forward to what OpenAI has in store for the future.

What are your expectations from GPT-5 and ChatGPT-5? What would you like to see improved? Let us know your thoughts in the comments below!

See more here:

GPT-5 is ChatGPT's next big upgrade, and it could be here very soon - Android Authority

65% of Korean firms penalize ChatGPT-crafted resumes – The Korea Herald

Posted on by

A majority of large companies in South Korea disadvantage applicants who craft their resumes using artificial intelligence services, such as ChatGPT, according to a survey released Sunday.

The Labor Ministry and the Korea Employment Information Service unveiled a report on employment trends in the second half of 2023, which was based on a survey of human resource managers at the nations top 500 companies by sales. The survey was conducted from Nov. 20 to Dec. 22 last year, with 315 out of the 500 firms responding.

The survey revealed that 65.4 percent of respondents indicated that if an applicant uses artificial intelligence technologies to write their resume, they would either downgrade their evaluation (42.4 percent) or outright reject the application (23.2 percent). Also, 64.1 percent of those surveyed viewed the use of artificial intelligence for resume writing negatively, citing a lack of originality and creativity as the main reason for their assessment.

Despite companies viewing AI-assisted resumes negatively, 73 percent of them did not attempt to determine whether a resume had employed AI. Only 18.7 percent of companies outsourced the task of identifying AI-written resumes to third-party agencies, and a mere 8.3 percent had their own systems in place to filter out resumes assisted by AI.

Read the original here:

65% of Korean firms penalize ChatGPT-crafted resumes - The Korea Herald

iOS 18 won’t have a big focus on ‘ChatGPT-like generative AI features’ New leak says we should expect ‘ a slew of AI … – iMore

Posted on by

A new report into Apples rumored iOS 18 AI shift has revealed that Apple will focus on tools to improve the daily life of iPhone users, rather than its answer to ChatGPT, when the software is unveiled in June.

Ever since the explosion of AI in the public domain last year, rumors have indicated that Apple is frantically trying to play catch up to rivals like Microsoft, Google, and OpenAI, allegedly spending millions of dollars a day on its own answer to ChatGPT. Bloombergs Mark Gurman has been at the forefront of these rumors, most recently reporting that Apple is in discussions with Google to bring Gemini AI to iPhone in a landmark deal. Now, Gurman has tempered expectations.

In his latest Power On Newsletter, Gurman states that while iOS 18 is still considered internally to be the biggest update to iOS since the original iPhone, and while the main event will be artificial intelligence, iOS 18 wont have a big focus on ChatGPT-esque generative AI.

According to Gurman we shouldnt expect a big focus on ChatGPT-like generative AI features. To be clear, this doesnt necessarily mean that Apple wont have any generative AI features. Indeed, earlier on in his report Gurman indicates that Apple could open up iOS so any developer could build a generative AI system deep into the iPhone, building on swirling rumors of the Google partnership, and reported discussions with Chinese multinational and AI company Baidu.

Instead, Gurmans report seems to indicate that Apples focus for consumers at WWDC 2024 (when we should see iOS 18 unveiled) will be on a slew of AI tools that help manage your daily life. Previously, weve heard that there are six iPhone applications Apple plans to improve with AI, including its Xcode development software, Messages, Pages, and Keynote.

Alongside these AI incursions, Gurman also reports that Apples iPhone Home Screen will offer more customizability in iOS 18, including the option to have blank spaces and columns, just like Android. iOS 18 will likely debut in September alongside Apple's next best iPhone, the iPhone 16 and iPhone 16 Pro.

iMore offers spot-on advice and guidance from our team of experts, with decades of Apple device experience to lean on. Learn more with iMore!

View post:

iOS 18 won't have a big focus on 'ChatGPT-like generative AI features' New leak says we should expect ' a slew of AI ... - iMore

Le Monde and Open AI sign partnership agreement on artificial intelligence – Le Monde

Posted on by

As part of its discussions with major players in the field of artificial intelligence, Le Monde has just signed a multi-year agreement with OpenAI, the company known for its ChatGPT tool. This agreement is historic as it is the first signed between a French media organization and a major player in this nascent industry. It covers both the training of artificial intelligence models developed by the American company and answer engine services such as ChatGPT. It will benefit users of this tool by improving its relevance thanks to recent, authoritative content on a wide range of current topics, while explicitly highlighting our news organization's contribution to OpenAI's services.

This is a long-term agreement, designed as a true partnership. Under the terms of the agreement, our teams will be able to draw on OpenAI technologies to develop projects and functionalities using AI. Within the framework of this partnership, and for the duration of the agreement, the two parties will collaborate on a privileged and recurring basis. A dialogue between the teams of both parties will ensure the monitoring of products and technologies developed by OpenAI.

For the general public, the effects of this agreement will be visible on ChatGPT, which can be described, in simple terms, as an answer engine using established facts or comments expressed by a limited number of references. The engine generates the most plausible and predictive synthetic answer to a given question.

The agreement between Le Monde and OpenAI allows the latter to use Le Monde's corpus, for the duration of the agreement, as one of the major references to establish its answers and make them reliable. It provides for references to Le Monde articles to be highlighted and systematically accompanied by a logo, a hyperlink, and the titles of the articles used as references. Content supplied to us by news agencies and photographs published by Le Monde are expressly excluded.

For Le Monde, this agreement is further recognition of the reliability of the work of our editorial teams, often considered a reference. It is also a first step toward protecting our work and our rights, at a time when we are still at the very beginning of the AI revolution, a wave predicted by many observers to be even more imposing than the digital one. We were among the very first signatories in France of the "neighboring rights" agreements, with Facebook and then Google. Here too, we had to ensure that the rights of press publishers applied to the use of Le Monde content referenced in answers generated by the services developed by OpenAI.

This point is crucial to us. We hope this agreement will set a precedent for our industry. With this first signature, it will be more difficult for other AI platforms to evade or refuse to negotiate. From this point of view, we are convinced that the agreement is beneficial for the entire profession.

Lastly, this partnership enables the Socit Editrice du Monde, Le Monde's holding company, to work with OpenAI to explore advances in this technology, anticipating as far as possible any consequences, negative or favorable. It also has the advantage of consolidating our business model by providing a significant source of additional, multi-year revenue, including a share of neighboring rights. An "appropriate and equitable" portion of these rights, as defined by law, will be paid back to the newsroom.

These discussions with AI players, punctuated by this first signature, are born of our belief that, faced with the scale of the transformations that lie ahead, we need, more than ever, to remain mobile in order to avoid the perils that are taking shape and seize the opportunities for development. The dangers have already been widely identified: the plundering or counterfeiting of our content, the industrial and immediate fabrication of false information that flouts all journalistic rules, the re-routing of our audiences towards platforms likely to provide undocumented answers to every question. Simply put, the end of our uniqueness and the disappearance of an economic model based on revenues from paid distribution.

These risks, which are probably fatal for our industry, do not prevent the existence of historic opportunities: putting the computing power of artificial intelligence at the service of journalism, making it easier to work with data in a shorter timeframe as part of large-scale investigations, translating our written content into foreign languages or producing audio versions to expand our readership and disseminate our information and editorial formats to new audiences.

To take the measure of these challenges, we decided to act in steps. The first was devoted to protecting our content and strengthening our procedures. Last year, we first activated an opt-out clause on our sites, following the example of several other media organizations, prohibiting AI platforms from accessing our data to train their generative intelligence models without our agreement. We also collectively discussed and drew up an appendix to our ethics and deontology charter, devoted specifically to the use of AI within our group. In particular, this text states that generative artificial intelligence cannot be used in our publications to produce editorial content ex-nihilo. Nor can it replace the editorial teams that form the core of our business and our value. Our charter does, however, authorize the use of generative AI as a tool to assist editorial production, under strictly defined conditions.

With this in mind, another phase was opened, dedicated to experimenting with artificial intelligence tools in very specific sectors of our business. Using DeepL, we were able to launch our Le Monde in English website and app, whose articles are initially translated by this AI tool, before being re-read by professional translators and then edited and published by a team of English-speaking journalists. At the same time, we signed an agreement with Microsoft to test the audio version of our articles. This feature, now available on almost all our French-language articles published in our app, opens us up to new audiences, often younger, as well as to new uses, particularly for people on the move. The third step is the one that led us to sign the agreement with OpenAI, which we hope will create a dynamic favorable to independent journalism in the new technological landscape that is taking shape.

At each of these stages, Le Monde has remained true to the spirit that has driven it since the advent of the Internet, and during the major changes in our industry: We have sought to reconcile the desire to discover new territories, while taking care to protect our editorial identity and the high standards of our content. In recent years, this approach has paid off. As the first French media organization to rely on digital subscriptions without ever having recourse to online kiosks, we have for several years been able to claim a significant lead in the hierarchy of national general-interest dailies, thanks to an unprecedented number of over 600,000 subscribers. In the same way, our determination to be a pioneer on numerous social media platforms has given us a highly visible place on all of them, helping to rejuvenate our audience.

The agreement with OpenAI is a continuation of this strategy of reasoned innovation. And we continue to guarantee the total independence of our newsroom: It goes without saying that this new agreement, like the previous ones we have signed, will in no way hinder our journalists' freedom to investigate the artificial intelligence sector in general, and OpenAI in particular. In fact, over the coming months, we will be stepping up our reporting and investigative capabilities in this key area of technological innovation.

This is the very first condition of our editorial independence, and therefore of your trust. As we move forward into the new world of artificial intelligence, we have close to our hearts an ambition that goes back to the very first day of our history, whose 80th anniversary we are celebrating this year: deserving your loyalty.

Le Monde

Louis Dreyfus(Chief Executive Officer of Le Monde) and Jrme Fenoglio(Director of Le Monde)

Translation of an original article published in French on lemonde.fr; the publisher may only be liable for the French version.

Read the original here:

Le Monde and Open AI sign partnership agreement on artificial intelligence - Le Monde

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, Open AI’s Anna Makanju, Senators Mark Warner and Todd Young, and other power players … – The Washington Post

Posted on by

Washington Post Live, The Posts award-winning live journalism platform, is unveiling its speakers for The Futurist Summit: The New Age of Tech, its second recent major convening focused on technology.

An all-star lineup of Post journalists will moderate interviews with influential business leaders and policy-makers about the promise and risks posed by emerging technologies. The event will be held on Thursday, March 21 at The Post Live Center in The Washington Posts D.C. headquarters.

Notable interviews include:

The summit will also feature an interactive session about the challenge of deepfakes led by Post technology columnist Geoffrey Fowler and a drone demonstration during an interview with Skydio CEO Adam Bry by associate editor Jonathan Capehart.

Todays ever-changing technology presents unlimited opportunities to better co-pilot our lives, said Vineet Khosla, Chief Technology Officer for The Washington Post. The conversations at The Posts tech summit will highlight some of these solutions and explore the pressing questions facing the world. Khosla, a founding engineer of Siri, joined The Post in 2023 from Uber where he was responsible for its routing engine. He will kick off the summit with opening remarks.

View the program agenda and the full list of speakers here.

The Washington Posts Futurist Summit is hosted with presenting sponsor Mozilla.

Originally posted here:

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger, Open AI's Anna Makanju, Senators Mark Warner and Todd Young, and other power players ... - The Washington Post

Why is Elon Musk suing Open AI and Sam Altman? In a word: Microsoft. – Morningstar

Posted on by

By Jurica Dujmovic

Potential ramifications extend far beyond the courtroom

In a striking turn of events, Elon Musk, Tesla's (TSLA) CEO, has initiated legal action against OpenAI and its leadership, alleging that the organization he helped found has moved from its original altruistic mission toward a profit-driven approach, particularly after partnering with Microsoft (MSFT).

The lawsuit accentuates Musk's deep-seated concerns that OpenAI has deviated from its foundational manifesto of developing artificial general intelligence (AGI) for the betterment of humanity, choosing instead to prioritize financial gains. But is that really so, or is there something else at hand?

Musk was deeply involved with OpenAI since its inception in 2015, as his concerns about AI's potential risks and the vision to advance AI in a way that benefits humanity aligned with OpenAI's original ethos as a non-profit organization.

In 2018, however, Musk became disillusioned with OpenAI because, in his view, it no longer operated as a nonprofit and was building technology that took sides in political and social debates. The recent OpenAI drama that culminated with a series of significant changes in OpenAI's structure and ethos, as well as a what can only be seen as Microsoft's power grab, seems to have sparked Musk's discontent.

To understand his reasoning, it helps to remember that Microsoft is a company with a long history of litigation. Over the years, Microsoft has faced numerous high-profile legal battles related to its market practices.

Here are some prominent cases to illustrate the issue:

-- In the United States v. Microsoft Corp. case, which began in 1998, the U.S. Department of Justice accused Microsoft of holding a monopolistic position in the PC operating-systems market and taking actions to crush threats to that monopoly. In April 2000, the case resulted in a verdict that Microsoft had engaged in monopolization and attempted monopolization in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act.

-- In Europe, Microsoft has faced significant fines for abusing its dominant market position. In 2004, the European Commission fined Microsoft 497.2 million euros, the largest sum it had ever imposed on a single company at the time??. In 2008, Microsoft was fined an additional 899 million euros for failing to comply with the 2004 antitrust order.

-- In 2013, the European Commission levied a 561 million euro fine against Microsoft for failing to comply with a 2009 settlement agreement to offer Windows users a choice of internet browsers instead of defaulting to Internet Explorer.

In light of these past litigations, it's much easier to understand why OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman's brief departure from the company and subsequent return late last year - which culminated in a significant shift in the organization's governance and its relationship with Microsoft - was the straw that likely broke Musk's back.

After Altman was reinstated, Microsoft solidified its influence over OpenAI by securing a permanent position on its board. Furthermore, the restructuring of OpenAI's board to include business-oriented members, rather than AI experts or ethicists, signaled a permanent shift in the organization's priorities and marked a pivotal turn toward a profit-driven model underpinned by corporate governance.

The consequences of this power grab are plain to see: Microsoft is already implementing various AI models designed by the company in its various products while none of the code is being released to the public. These models also include a specific political and ideological bias that makes them problematic from an ethical point of view. This too, is an issue that cannot be addressed due to the closed-source nature of AI models generated and shaped under the watchful eye of Microsoft.

Musk's own ventures, like xAI and Neuralink, suggest he's still deeply invested in the AI space, albeit in a way he has more control over, presumably to ensure that the technology develops according to his vision for the future of humanity.

On the other hand, proponents of Microsoft's partnership with OpenAI emphasize strategic and mutually-beneficial aspects. Microsoft's $1 billion investment in OpenAI is viewed as a significant step in advancing artificial-intelligence technology as it allows OpenAI to utilize Microsoft's Azure cloud services to train and run its AI software. Additionally, the collaboration is positioned as a way for Microsoft to stay competitive against other tech giants by integrating AI into its cloud services and developing more sophisticated AI models????.

Proponents say Microsoft's involvement with OpenAI is a strategic business decision aimed at promoting Azure's AI capabilities and securing a leading position in the industry. The partnership is framed as a move to democratize AI technology while ensuring AI safety, which aligns with broader industry goals of responsible and ethical AI development. It is also seen as a way for OpenAI to access necessary resources and expertise to further its research, emphasizing the collaborative nature of the partnership rather than a mere financial transaction??.

Hard truths and consequences

While many point out that Musk winning the case is extremely unlikely, it's still worth looking into potential consequences. Such a verdict could mandate that OpenAI returns to a non-profit status or open-source its technology, significantly impacting its business model, revenue generation and future collaborations. It could also affect Microsoft's investment in OpenAI, particularly if the court determines that the latter has strayed from its founding mission, influencing the tech giant's ability to protect its investment and realize expected returns.

The lawsuit's outcome might influence public and market perceptions of OpenAI and Microsoft, possibly affecting customer trust and market share, with Musk potentially seen as an advocate for ethical AI development. Additionally, the case could drive the direction of AI development, balancing between open-source and proprietary models, and possibly accelerating innovation while raising concerns about controlling and misusing advanced AI technologies.

The scrutiny from this lawsuit might lead to more cautious approaches in contractual relationships within the tech sector, focusing on partnerships and intellectual property. Furthermore, the case could draw regulatory attention, possibly leading to increased oversight or regulation of AI companies, particularly concerning transparency, data privacy and ethical considerations in AI development. While Musk's quest might seem like a longshot to some legal experts, the potential ramifications of this lawsuit extend far beyond the courtroom.

More: Here's what an AI chatbot thinks of Elon Musk's lawsuit against OpenAI and Sam Altman

Also read: Microsoft hasn't been worth this much more than Apple since 2003

-Jurica Dujmovic

This content was created by MarketWatch, which is operated by Dow Jones & Co. MarketWatch is published independently from Dow Jones Newswires and The Wall Street Journal.

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

03-09-24 1003ET

Original post:

Why is Elon Musk suing Open AI and Sam Altman? In a word: Microsoft. - Morningstar

Quertaro to host the Aerospace Innovation and Entrepreneurship Congress – MEXICONOW

Posted on by

QUERETARO - The Aeronautical University of Queretaro (UNAQ) is organizing the First Aerospace Innovation and Entrepreneurship Congress (INNAE).

This event will bring together scientists, researchers, entrepreneurs and industry leaders with the objective of exploring the frontiers of knowledge and creating strategic alliances that will drive the advancement of aeronautics and space exploration.

Likewise, the first edition of the INNAE Congress is an opportunity for interaction and exchange of knowledge between different profiles in the aerospace field.

It is worth mentioning that participants will be able to contribute with academic articles, research posters or innovative projects in different thematic areas.

See more here:

Quertaro to host the Aerospace Innovation and Entrepreneurship Congress - MEXICONOW

3DEO partners with IHI Aerospace for AM in Japan’s aerospace sector – Metal Additive Manufacturing magazine

Posted on by

The partnership aims to integrate the advanced capabilities of Additive Manufacturing with the precision and tradition of Japans aerospace manufacturing sector (Courtesy 3DEO)

3DEO, headquartered in Los Angeles, California, USA, has announced a strategic partnership and investment with IHI Aerospace Co., Ltd. (IA), based in Koutou-ku, Japan. This multi-faceted, multi-phase deal is designed to enhance the adoption and application of Additive Manufacturing technologies within IA. It integrates advanced AM capabilities with the precision and tradition of Japans aerospace manufacturing sector.

We are deeply honoured to partner with IA, a company that shares our vision for the future of aerospace manufacturing, Matt Petros, CEO and Co-founder of 3DEO, commented. This partnership underscores the incredible progress and potential of Additive Manufacturing, especially when coupled with a highly collaborative design for additive approach.

By leveraging 3DEOs patented technology, its Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) knowledge and IAs engineering expertise, the partners expect to make a lasting impact on the aerospace industry, enhancing capabilities and setting heightened standards for manufacturing.

Payman Torabi, CTO and Co-founder of 3DEO, added, Working alongside IA presents an exceptional opportunity to apply our Additive Manufacturing technologies to the aerospace sector. Its a collaboration that stands to reduce time-to-market and drive innovation.

The announcement follows 3DEOs recent strategic investment from the Development Bank of Japan and Seiko Epson Corporation.

http://www.3deo.co

http://www.ihi.co.jp

Continue reading here:

3DEO partners with IHI Aerospace for AM in Japan's aerospace sector - Metal Additive Manufacturing magazine

Perquimans wins going away against Northeast Academy For Aerospace and Advanced Tech – MaxPreps

Posted on by

The Perquimans Pirates entered their tilt with the Northeast Academy For Aerospace and Advanced Tech Griffins with two consecutive wins but they'll enter their next game with three. Perquimans blew past Northeast Academy For Aerospace and Advanced Tech 5-1. Tyler Sweitzer was a massive factor in the win, as she booted in three goals all by herself.

Perquimans' victory bumped their record up to 3-1. As for Northeast Academy For Aerospace and Advanced Tech, they now have a losing record at 1-2.

Perquimans didn't take long to hit the pitch again: they've already played their next contest, a 3-1 win vs. Lawrence Academy on the 14th. Northeast Academy For Aerospace and Advanced Tech will be staying on the road on Thursday to face off against Camden County at 5:00 p.m. on March 21st.

Article generated by infoSentience based on data entered on MaxPreps

See more here:

Perquimans wins going away against Northeast Academy For Aerospace and Advanced Tech - MaxPreps