Liberty Property Trust (LPT): New Analyst Report from Zacks Equity Research – Zacks Equity Research Report

Posted on by

Summary: Liberty Property's fourth-quarter 2013 FFO per share came in line with the Zacks Consensus Estimate and the prior-year quarter figure. Results were driven by revenue growth, strong leasing and portfolio restructuring activity. Going forward, we believe that the repositioning efforts by the company through strategic acquisitions, JV investments and dispositions would help it ride on the growth trajectory. In particular, the Cabot buyout accomplishment and Comcast deal are expected to enhance the company's growth prospects. Furthermore, the improving U.S. industrial market positions Liberty Property well for future growth. Yet, the company's large development pipeline increases operational risks. Also, modest office space demand due to adequate space availability exerts pressure on rent and occupancies while an expected rise in interest rates in the long term adds to its woes.

Overview:

Based in Pennsylvania, Liberty Property Trust is one of the major real estate investment trusts (REIT) that provides leasing, property management, development, construction management, design management, and related services for a portfolio of industrial and office properties. Liberty Property, which provides office, distribution and light manufacturing facilities to 1,800 tenants, focuses primarily on premier properties in the Mid-Atlantic and Midwestern regions of the U.S. and U.K.

As of Dec 31, 2013, Liberty Property had 489 industrial and 223 office properties (totaling 89.5 million square feet) in operation, 16 properties under development and 1,315 acres of developable land. Also, the company had 45 industrial and 34 office properties (totaling 13.5 million square feet) in operation and 1 asset under development that are owned through joint ventures (JVs). In addition, as of that date, Liberty Property had an ownership interest through unconsolidated JVs in 518 acres of developable land for commercial use.

LIBERTY PPTY TR (LPT): Free Stock Analysis Report

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.

Continued here:

Liberty Property Trust (LPT): New Analyst Report from Zacks Equity Research - Zacks Equity Research Report

KOL119 | Libertarian and Anarchist Concepts and Basics with Harrison Fischberg: Part 1 – Video

Posted on by


KOL119 | Libertarian and Anarchist Concepts and Basics with Harrison Fischberg: Part 1
Kinsella on Liberty Podcast, Episode 119. This is Part 1 of a fairly in-depth discussion I had with Harrison Fischberg (who was on a previous podcast in epis...

By: Stephan Kinsella

Original post:

KOL119 | Libertarian and Anarchist Concepts and Basics with Harrison Fischberg: Part 1 - Video

Stradbroke Islands …how to swim both and the blue lake…tony alexander presents – Video

Posted on by


Stradbroke Islands ...how to swim both and the blue lake...tony alexander presents
Can u swim both Ocean beaches of the Stradbroke Islands within 24 hrs ? Here #39;s how...we find regeneration and revegetation after the bushfires..There is a na...

By: guyfawkes

See original here:

Stradbroke Islands ...how to swim both and the blue lake...tony alexander presents - Video

Music Video – Adam O feat. Mystro – Oh Yea (Directed By Shad & Sean) "Virgin Islands" – Video

Posted on by


Music Video - Adam O feat. Mystro - Oh Yea (Directed By Shad Sean) "Virgin Islands"
Subscribe to Channel Here: http://tiny.cc/julianspromos | AVAILABLE ON ITUNES- iTunes: http://tiny.cc/7b2udx | Produced by: AGstudios Coolbreeze Production...

By: JulianspromosTV | Soca Music

Follow this link:

Music Video - Adam O feat. Mystro - Oh Yea (Directed By Shad & Sean) "Virgin Islands" - Video

Artificial Reproductive Technology: Constructing a Dystopia

Posted on by

Beings Less and Less Dependent on Parents to Exist Washington, D.C., April 10, 2014 (Zenit.org) Denise Hunnell, MD | 0 hits

Both the 1932 novel Brave New World by Aldous Huxley and the 1997 science fiction movie Gattaca are classified as dystopias because they depict societies riddled with misery, tragedy, and a dehumanizing culture. Both attribute this decline in civilization to manipulations of human genetics and perversions of human reproduction. In Brave New World the traditional family structure has completely disintegrated and children are manufactured in hatcheries through in vitro fertilization (IVF) and gestation. In Gattaca, human beings are enhanced through genetic alterations, and those who do not have their DNA modified are seen as second-class citizens.

It is curious that genetically modified humans can be clearly seen as dangerous and undesirable in fiction but are celebrated as great achievements in current biomedical sciences. In the name of progress we are steadily marching forward to separate human procreation from human relationships and make it a laboratory procedure.

The floodgates of artificial reproductive technology were opened in Great Britain on July 25, 1978, with the birth of Louise Brown, the first test tube baby. In the ensuing years the use of IVF has fueled the growth of the multi-billion dollar fertility industry. The growing demand for ova to produce children for infertile couples has led to the widespread exploitation of young women as egg donors. Similar exploitation of poor women in countries like India has occurred as couples seek both egg donors to help conceive a child and a surrogate mother to gestate the child. Both women and children are dehumanized as human reproduction is commercialized.

The development of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) pushed artificial reproductive technology to a new level of genetic manipulation. It is no longer sufficient to conceive a child, but that child must now be defect free. Embryos are conceived through IVF, but before they are implanted in the uterus, their DNA is screened for chromosomal abnormalities. Embryos found to have undesirable genetics are discarded as medical waste with no regard for their humanity. These nascent human beings may be destroyed because they have chromosomal patterns linked to diseases like Down syndrome or Trisomy 18, or they may have the gene linked to familial cancers, or they may just be the wrong sex. Sex-selection abortions and sex-selection of embryos for implantation have led to serious gender imbalances in countries like China and India where sons are highly preferred over daughters.

If one can select against undesirable traits, the next logical leap is to choose embryos that have desirable features. With the help of a billion dollar investment from the Chinese government, the Chinese firm B.G.I. is working to make selecting the most intelligent embryo a viable option. It is not unreasonable to think that the selection for other traits such as physical attractiveness or athletic ability cannot be far behind.

The idea of building the perfect child is part of the philosophical principle of procreative beneficence. The term was coined by Oxford professor Julian Savulescu, and refers to a form of utilitarianism that asserts parents have a moral obligation to produce the best child possible. The utilitarian foundation of his reasoning only values those who produce a material benefit to others. The sick, the weak, and the disabled drain resources and are therefore disposable. Professor Savulescu freely admits this amounts to eugenics. He justifies it as providing the greatest good to most people. However, the good that he seeks only benefits the strong and powerful, and is obtained at the expense of the weak and vulnerable.

Current reproductive technology requires fully formed gametes, ova and sperm, to produce human embryos. What if that requirement was removed? The next big leap in artificial reproductive technology is in vitro gametogenesis. Adult or embryonic stem cells are manipulated in the laboratory to function as gametes. This removes the need for both male and female donors. Ova and sperm can be produced from stem cells from either a man or a woman. This would allow same-sex couples to have children that are genetically related to both partners. Theoretically, in vitro gametogenesis could allow a single person to use his own cells to produce two gametes and have a child with only one biological parent.

In a 2013 article in the Journal of Medical Ethics,Dr. Robert Sparrow of Monach University in Australia invokes Savulescus procreative beneficence and outlines the potential uses of in vitro gametogenesis. He suggests that this technology would allow the breeding of better humans. Embryos could be produced and screened for desirable traits. Instead of implanting these embryos for gestation, their stem cells could be harvested and used to make more gametes. These would be used to make another generation of embryos that are again screened and selected. This process could be repeated again and again until the desired refinement of the genome is achieved. The embryo who is ultimately selected for full gestation may actually be several generations removed from his last relative who was actually born. Dr. Sparrow points out that the use of in vitro gametogenesis could shorten the time span between successive generations to a matter of months instead of a matter of decades.

In vitro gametogenesis does not require naturally formed gametes, but it does require naturally formed DNA. Dr. Jef Boeke and his research team, working at both Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore and New York University, are working to remove even that constraint. They have successfully constructed the first synthetic yeast chromosome. The yeast has a cell structure very similar to humans, so this work is seen as the first steps towards producing a completely synthetic human genome. While the research is in its infancy, the ultimate goal is mind-boggling. Children that have no biological parents could be produced from gametes made with synthetic DNA. Their DNA would be designed in the laboratory to meet the specifications of whoever is commissioning their creation.

Read the original:

Artificial Reproductive Technology: Constructing a Dystopia

Avera Medical Minute AMcK: Researching the human genome

Posted on by

You probably wouldn't guess it, but some of the world's foremost genetics research is happening right here in South Dakota. Last Fall we introduced you to the rare partnership that Avera has with genetics research in the Netherlands. Now we'll give you a closer look at the research being done.

At the Avera Institute for Human Genetics, scientists continue to dive into the deep end of the gene pool.

"Things just continue to amaze me on how we progress and the findings we find!" Said Dr. Gareth Davies, a molecular geneticist and the scientific director for the institute.

Thanks to the collaboration with the Netherlands Twin Registry, researchers here in Sioux Falls have access to more than 40,000 DNA samples to help further their study.

"They (the samples) are stored with their co-twin and also with their parents; so each row we have two twins and then mom and dad." Said Dr. Davies.

Studying twins gives scientists a better understanding on the role genetics play in behaviors and disease because identical twins share the same DNA; that is until you look very closely.

"What we find is that if you look at copy number variations not all identical twins need to be completely identical." Said Dr. Dorret Boomsma of Vrije University in Amsterdam and pioneer of the Netherlands Twin Registry.

A copy number variation or CNV is when a chromosome that makes up a gene is either added or deleted. Take for example if I had a twin. Our DNA is identical but for one of my genes, the chromosome makeup is A-B-C-D and for my twin that same gene makeup is A-B-C-C-D. That extra "C" is the only difference, but it could be what causes different behavior traits or disease susceptibility between us two. However, just having a gene linked to disease doesn't put you at risk.

"We have known that they can be switched on and switched off but we didn't realize how important the environment was, the environment outside the cell, and how it could affect the structure of the DNA and alter how those genes are switched off and on." Said Dr. Davies.

Research continues to support the thought that genetics may load the gun, but it's the environment that pulls the trigger.

More here:

Avera Medical Minute AMcK: Researching the human genome

Are Human Pheromones Real?

Posted on by

See Inside

Scientists are still unraveling natures secret olfactory signals

Since pheromones were first defined in 1959, scientists have found many examples of pheromonal communication. Credit: Thinkstock

Strange as it may sound, some scientists suspect that the humble armpit could be sending all kinds of signals from casual flirtation to sounding the alarm. Thats because the bodys secretions, some stinky and others below the threshold your nose can detect, may be rife with chemical messages called pheromones. Yet despite half a century of research into these subtle cues, we have yet to find direct evidence of their existence in humans. What Are Pheromones? Humans and other animals have an olfactory system designed to detect and discriminate between thousands of chemical compounds. For more than 50 years, scientists have been aware of the fact that certain insects and animals can release chemical compoundsoften as oils or sweatand that other creatures can detect and respond to these compounds, which allows for a form of silent, purely chemical communication.

Although the exact definition has been debated and redefined several times, pheromones are generally recognized as single or small sets of compounds that transmit signals between organisms of the same species. They are typically just one part of the larger potpourri of odorants emitted from an insect or animal, and some pheromones do not have a discernable scent.

Since pheromones were first defined in 1959, scientists have found many examples of pheromonal communication. The most striking of these signals elicits an immediate behavioral response. For example, the female silk moth releases a trail of the molecule bombykol, which unerringly draws males from the moment they encounter it. Slower-acting pheromones can affect the recipients reproductive physiology, as when the alpha-farnesene molecule in male mouse urine accelerates puberty in young female mice.

Some researchers have proposed a third group of pheromones called signalers that simply transmit information such as an individuals social status or health. Mice can select appropriate mates based on odor cues, deriving information in part from unique proteins associated with a mouses genetics. The Trouble with Humans

So far, scientists have had some success in demonstrating that exposure to body odor can elicit responses in other humans. As in rodent research, human sweat and secretions can affect the reproductive readiness of other humans. Since the 1970s researchers have observed changes in a womans menstrual cycle when she is exposed to the sweat of other women. In 2011 a Florida State University group demonstrated that the scent of ovulating women could cause testosterone levels to increase in men.

But there is no evidence of a consistent and strong behavioral response to any human-produced chemical cue. Maybe once upon a time we could react more viscerally, says chemist George Preti of the Monell Chemical Senses Center. Today, however, our reactions seem to be much subtlerand harder to detectthan those of a silk moth. This subtlety has led researchers to propose another kind of chemical messenger, known as a modulator pheromone, that affects the mood or mental state of the recipient. In an example of this type, researchers at Stony Brook University found in 2009 that sniffing the sweat of first-time parachute jumpers could increase a persons ability to discriminate between ambiguous emotional expressions. The implication is that chemicals in the jumpers sweat might constitute an alarm signal, which puts the recipient on high alert and makes them more attentive to details.

Yet to demonstrate definitively that pheromones are at work, researchers need to point to the molecules responsible, which they have not yet done. To date, scientists have collected evidence for possible pheromone effects but have not definitively identified a single human pheromone. A Signature Scent

Read the original:

Are Human Pheromones Real?

Port – Pre-operative Evaluation: When to Order a Stress Test and When to Consult Cardiology – Video

Posted on by


Port - Pre-operative Evaluation: When to Order a Stress Test and When to Consult Cardiology
Pre-operative evaluation: when to order a stress test and when to consult cardiology, presented by Steven C. Port, MD, Medical Director of Noninvasive Cardio...

By: Aurora Health Care

Continued here:

Port - Pre-operative Evaluation: When to Order a Stress Test and When to Consult Cardiology - Video