V-22 Osprey Escort on route to NATO Summit 2014 - Flyover River Wye, Tintern
We get a lot of military aircraft flyovers here, being close to hereford etc. But today we had an actual V-22 Osprey along with a load of helicopters fly over in a group. Almost as if the helicopte...
By: Tom - olopodis
See the rest here:
V-22 Osprey & Escort on route to NATO Summit 2014 - Flyover River Wye, Tintern - Video
Castro Compares NATO to Nazi SS! Slams US, Israel for Creating ISIS!
http://www.undergroundworldnews.com He accused McCain of supporting Israel #39;s Mossad intelligence agency as well as participating together with that service in the creation of the Islamic...
By: DAHBOO77
See the article here:
Castro Compares NATO to Nazi SS! Slams US, Israel for Creating ISIS! - Video
NATO Creates Rapid Response Force for #39;Great War #39; with Russia!
http://www.undergroundworldnews.com As Ukrainian leaders warned on Monday of a great war with Russia, NATO leaders meeting in Wales this week were expected to endorse their most concrete...
By: DAHBOO77
Read more:
NATO Creates Rapid Response Force for 'Great War' with Russia! - Video
Russian military Air defense SHOOTS DOWN Nato in marketing video
Russia military air defense shoots down nato aircraft in marketing video. The S-300VM "Antey-2500" (NATO reporting name SA-23 GladiatorGiant) is a Russian anti-ballistic missile system. The...
By: ArmedForcesUpdate
Read more from the original source:
Russian military Air defense SHOOTS DOWN Nato in marketing video - Video
Military helicopter flies over Llanelli for Newport NATO summit
Video by Emma Howells-Protheroe.
By: Llanelli Star
Read more here:
Military helicopter flies over Llanelli for Newport NATO summit - Video
Moscow to adapt military doctrine over NATO plans in Eastern Europe
Amid the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, a senior Kremlin official says Russia will adjust its military doctrine in response to NATO plans to boost its presence in Eastern Europe. The deputy...
By: PressTV News Videos
View post:
Moscow to adapt military doctrine over NATO plans in Eastern Europe - Video
NATO unable to prove Russia #39;s military presence in Ukraine
NATO has recently provided the photographs that allegedly proved the presence of Russian troops in Ukraine. However, the accuracy of the report was quickly compared to widely ridiculed studies...
By: PravdaTV
View original post here:
NATO unable to prove Russia's military presence in Ukraine - Video
Ukraine a New Cold War - No New Wars! No to NATO! - Cardiff 31.08.14
notonato.
By: Fourman Films
View original post here:
Ukraine & a New Cold War - No New Wars! No to NATO! - Cardiff 31.08.14 - Video
HMS Duncan arriving in Cardiff for the 2014 NATO Summit
By: Hello There
The rest is here:
HMS Duncan arriving in Cardiff for the 2014 NATO Summit - Video
Boris Kagarlitsky - No New Wars! No to NATO! - Newport Demonstration - 30.08.14
notonato.
By: Fourman Films
Read the original here:
Boris Kagarlitsky - No New Wars! No to NATO! - Newport Demonstration - 30.08.14 - Video
Medea Benjamin Code Pink - No New Wars No to NATO - Newport Demonstration 30.08.4
notonato.
By: Fourman Films
Here is the original post:
Medea Benjamin Code Pink - No New Wars No to NATO - Newport Demonstration 30.08.4 - Video
2 September 2014 Breaking News Obama in Estonia as Russia NATO square off over Ukraine
2 September 2014 Breaking News USA President Barack Obama in Estonia as Russia NATO square off over the Ukraine crisishttp://news.yahoo.com/kiev-warns-great-war-russia-forces-retreat-170207035.ht...
By: Utoo B Heavenbound
See the rest here:
2 September 2014 Breaking News Obama in Estonia as Russia & NATO square off over Ukraine - Video
Ukraine #39;s full NATO membership idea #39;akin to lunacy #39;
Kiev expects NATO countries to give Ukraine a status of #39;special partner #39;, Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseny Yatsenyuk said Wednesday. However, the best decision for NATO would be Ukraine #39;s...
By: RT
Read the original:
Ukraine's full NATO membership idea 'akin to lunacy' - Video
NATO forces are well positioned to refight the battle of Waterloo of 1815, the first Balkan War of 1912, the botched invasion of the Dardanelles in 1915 and German panzers sweep through the Ardennes in 1940 -- just not to repel an attack by Russia in 2014.
Leaders of the trans-Atlantic alliance will vow to change that at a summit starting today, with eastern European countries close to Russia clamoring for a beefed-up military profile to deter the Kremlin from broadening its territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine.
Europes progressive demilitarization, the legacy of years of declining military budgets and varying perceptions of the Russian threat, will limit how far the alliance goes, leaving eastern Europe dependent on mobile contingents of NATO-flagged troops, backed up by the full spectrum of U.S. military might and, tacitly, its nuclear arsenal.
The message is that in the event of a confrontation, NATO could deploy a holding force very quickly and then would wait for the cavalry to arrive, which was pretty much the model during the Cold War, said Neil Melvin, a senior researcher at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
The summit of 28 North Atlantic Treaty Organization leaders starts at 11:45 a.m. today in Newport, Wales, and runs through tomorrow afternoon.
NATO countries demobilized after the Cold War and sought to co-opt Russia as a partner. Alliance out of area missions in the Balkans and Afghanistan, along with cuts in defense spending, especially in Europe, led to a growing mismatch between U.S. and European firepower. NATO entered this years Ukraine crisis with an exposed eastern flank and a rapid-response force that takes six months to deploy.
The alliances absorption of eastern European countries once under the Soviet yoke set the stage for the current tensions. To reassure Russia that it wasnt going on the offensive, NATO pledged in 1997 to refrain from new permanent stationing of substantial combat forces near Russias borders.
Even in the heat of the Ukraine crisis, that non-binding pledge has held. So as not to multiply the Kremlins suspicions of NATO intentions, allied leaders have vowed to abide by the original commitment, at least publicly.
As a result, NATO has multinational bases and command centers dotted across western Europe, in places like Brunssum, Netherlands, and Naples, Italy. The basing map evokes past wars: supreme headquarters in Mons, Belgium is close to the site of Napoleons final defeat at Waterloo and the scene of the first German-British clashes at the start of World War I in August 1914.
Wide swathes of eastern Europe are blank spots in NATOs order of battle. Szczecin, Poland hosts a headquarters for a multinational corps, and warplanes from a rotating cast of militaries patrol the alliances northeastern flank from bases in Estonia and Lithuania.
Go here to read the rest:
NATO Switches Aim From Waterloo to East as Russia Bares Fangs
Did NSA Employee Hack Celebrity Photos?
Did NSA Employee Hack Celebrity Photos Using the Tools Edward Snowden Revealed are at their Disposal? *SUBSCRIBE* for more great videos! Mark Dice is a media analyst, author, and political...
By: Mark Dice
Read the original:
There is no doubt that the Visa Waiver Program merits a national discussion free from partisan politics. Terrorists have already used the VWP to gain access to soft targets. Whether additional security measures would have prevented their entry is the $64 million question.
Recent U.S. history paints a clear picture of abuses by law enforcement and intelligence agencies, often with the approval of politicians. Despite paternalistic assurances that Americans have no reason to fear their own government, caution is warranted.
T.A. Ridout
Global Politics, Economics, and Society from an American Perspective
In his latest article for The Intercept, Glenn Greenwald takes a highly critical look at a story by NPR's counterterrorism correspondent, Dina Temple-Raston, which aired on Morning Edition earlier this month.
Democracy Now!
Independent, weekday news hour, anchored by award-winning journalists Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzlez
co-authored by Tom Malatesta, CEO, Ziklag Systems For those focused on the subject matter, yesterday's Tweet fest from TeamAndIRC and Blackphone was ...
See the original post:
Sept. 2 (Bloomberg) -- Gen. Keith Alexander (Ret.), former director of the NSA, comments on the escalating situation in Ukraine. He speaks with Trish Regan on "Street Smart." (Source: Bloomberg)
Hackers who stole gigabytes of data from JPMorgan Chase & Co. may have been trying to send a message that U.S. financial institutions can be disrupted, the former director of the National Security Agency said.
The FBI is investigating the cyberattack on JPMorgan and whether other banks were penetrated in retaliation for U.S.- backed sanctions on Russia, according to people familiar with the investigation who asked not to be identified because the probe is still underway.
Graphic: Data Breaches in the U.S.
Keith Alexander, the NSA director from 2005 until last March, said he had no direct knowledge of the attack though it could have been backed by the Russian government in response to sanctions imposed by the U.S. and EU over the crisis in Ukraine.
Securing the Net
How would you shake the United States back? Attack a bank in cyberspace, said Alexander, a retired U.S. Army general who has started his own cybersecurity company to sell services to U.S. banks. If it was them, they just sent a real message: Youre vulnerable.
As NSA chief and head of the U.S. Cyber Command, Alexander tracked and tried to thwart international hackers, giving him knowledge of their tactics. He was head of the NSA in 2008 when the country of Georgia was invaded by Russia and experienced a series of disruptive cyberattacks believed to be the work of Russian hackers.
Keith Alexander, former director of the National Security Agency and former commander of U.S. Cyber Command, speaks during a Bloomberg Television interview in Washington, on June 3, 2014. Close
Keith Alexander, former director of the National Security Agency and former commander... Read More
Read the original post:
A panel of federal judges voiced significant concerns Tuesday about the privacy implications of NSA surveillance tactics during a wide-ranging hearing on a legal challenge brought by the ACLU.
In an oral argument that was set for less than 30 minutes and lasted nearly two hours, three judges on a panel hearing the case at the Second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan probed claims by the ACLU that the federal government's collection of data relating to "every phone call made or received by residents of the United States" is illegal and unconstitutional.
The ACLU appeal challenged a lower courts decision to uphold the NSA's mass bulk data collection of phone records.
Judges Gerard Lynch and Vernon Broderick were appointed by President Obama. Judge Robert Sack was appointed by President Clinton. At some point, each expressed significant concern about the privacy implications of allowing the federal government broad access to a wide range of information without any specific suspicion of wrongdoing.
Assistant Attorney General Stuart Delery first argued that federal courts do not have jurisdiction to review disputes regarding the NSA program. In addition, Delery argued the program is constitutional and has been repeatedly renewed by Congress.
Lynch asked how well briefed members of Congress were before voting, and questioned how much they understood about the program. At one point, Sack chimed in, "We don't know what we don't know"about NSA operations.
Lynch and Broderick both questioned why the government's justification for the bulk phone data collection program would not also extend to bank records, credit card transactions and other personal data. Lynch asked if the government's argument would not also entitle it to access "every American's everything."
Both sides acknowledged that President Obama has publicly stated that there are other ways to get the relevant intelligence, short of the sweeping NSA bulk data collection program that now exists.
That prompted Lynch to ask, if that was the case, why government attorneys were there to argue otherwise.
The panel also discussed the need for federal agencies such as the FBI and NSA to be able to move quickly when connecting dots on the intelligence landscape, acknowledging that having bulk data already at its disposal would speed the process.
Go here to see the original:
The U.S. Supreme Court could soon be asked to decide the constitutionality of the federal government'smassive data collection of phone records after two lawsuits challenging the National Security Agency's controversial surveillance program have begun to inch forward in federal circuit court for the first time. The American Civil Liberties Union and other privacy rights groups have denounced the NSA'sdata collection program, first revealed by former contractor Edward Snowden last summer.
"The phone-records program under which the NSA collects a record of the calls made by millions of Americans every single day is perhaps the most sweeping surveillance operation ever directed against the American public by our government," Alex Abdo, an ACLU staff attorney, said in astatementTuesday. "It raises profound questions about the role of government in a democracy and about the future of privacy in the digital era. And it threatens our constitutional rights in ways unimaginable by the founders of our country."
The NSA stores information about calls received and made on major U.S. telephone networks, including the time and length of the calls. The government claims it uses the information to track terrorist suspects.
ACLU lawyers called the surveillance program unconstitutional Tuesday in an oral argument before theSecond U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York. The DC Circuit Court is set to hear arguments in a similar case on Nov. 4. The surveillance program has previously been debated in district courts. An appeal in either circuit court case could come before the Supreme Court.
The U.S. government argued in court papers that the ACLU and other groups suing over the data collection program lack legal standing because they cant show their telephone data was reviewed by the NSA. The ACLU lawsuit was filed in June 2013, days after Snowden disclosed the program.
Members in both houses of Congress have proposed laws to overhaul the data collection program,but they are unlikely to be acted on this year, said the Wall Street Journal.
Continued here:
NSA Surveillance: Supreme Court Could Debate Data Collection Program After ACLU Lawsuit
In the upcoming general election, voters will have many important decisions to make, one of which might make it easier to prosecute sex offenders.
The action, Missouri Evidence in Sexual Crimes Against Minors or Amendment 2, would allow prosecutors who are trying a case against an alleged child sex offender to use relevant past criminal activity as evidence against the defendants.
This means that if an alleged sex offender had been accused, but not found guilty, of a past crime, a prosecutor could still introduce the record of that accusation to the court as evidence against the defendant under Amendment 2.
The amendment has been seen as controversial, as it might make it easier to reach a guilty verdict in those types of cases.
Due to some Supreme Court decisions, prosecuting attorneys were unable to try many cases of child sexual abuse in our state, Rep. John McCaherty, R-Mo., said. As a member of the Crime Prevention and Public Safety Committee, I see the amendment as a positive step to give prosecutors the tools they need to protect our children, and to see those that prey on them prosecuted. There has been no opposition to this legislation, and I was proud to sponsor it.
McCaherty is the primary sponsor of the amendment, which recently received approval from the Missouri House of Representatives to be placed on the ballot in November.
McCaherty said he felt the bill would address an important gap in Missouris justice system, giving prosecutors a powerful tool to imprison sex offenders.
He said there should be no violation of the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, which forbids double jeopardy, secures the right to a grand jury and protects against self-incrimination, or the Sixth Amendment, which includes the right to a public trial without unnecessary delay, the rights to a lawyer and an impartial jury and the right to know who your accusers are.
Of course there have to be safeguards in place as well, so a defendant can receive a fair trial, McCaherty said. Not all evidence is relevant to every trial. This is the responsibility of the judge to determine the relevance in each case.
The amendment has gained local attention and a Protect Missouri Children Committee formed to support the measure. The group believes that the amendment will protect children and aid in putting dangerous criminals behind bars.
More: