Two other projects completed during the Clinton administration focused on the mechanics of making germ weapons.
In a program code-named Clear Vision, the Central Intelligence Agency built and tested a model of a Soviet-designed germ bomb that agency officials feared was being sold on the international market. The C.I.A. device lacked a fuse and other parts that would make it a working bomb, intelligence officials said.
At about the same time, Pentagon experts assembled a germ factory in the Nevada desert from commercially available materials. Pentagon officials said the project demonstrated the ease with which a terrorist or rogue nation could build a plant that could produce pounds of the deadly germs.
Both the mock bomb and the factory were tested with simulants -- benign substances with characteristics similar to the germs used in weapons, officials said.
A senior Bush administration official said all the projects were ''fully consistent'' with the treaty banning biological weapons and were needed to protect Americans against a growing danger. ''This administration will pursue defenses against the full spectrum of biological threats,'' the official said.
The treaty, another administration official said, allows the United States to conduct research on both microbes and germ munitions for ''protective or defensive purposes.''
Some Clinton administration officials worried, however, that the project violated the pact. And others expressed concern that the experiments, if disclosed, might be misunderstood as a clandestine effort to resume work on a class of weapons that President Nixon had relinquished in 1969.
Simultaneous experiments involving a model of a germ bomb, a factory to make biological agents and the developoment of more potent anthrax, these officials said, would draw vociferous protests from Washington if conducted by a country the United States viewed as suspect.
Administration officials said the need to keep such projects secret was a significant reason behind President Bush's recent rejection of a draft agreement to strengthen the germ-weapons treaty, which has been signed by 143 nations.
The draft would require those countries to disclose where they are conducting defensive research involving gene-splicing or germs likely to be used in weapons. The sites would then be subject to international inspections.
Many national security officials in both the Clinton and Bush administrations opposed the draft, arguing that it would give potential adversaries a road map to what the United States considers its most serious vulnerabilities.
Among the facilities likely to be open to inspection under the draft agreement would be the West Jefferson, Ohio, laboratory of the Battelle Memorial Institute, a military contractor that has been selected to create the genetically altered anthrax.
Several officials who served in senior posts in the Clinton administration acknowledged that the secretive efforts were so poorly coordinated that even the White House was unaware of their full scope.
The Pentagon's project to build a germ factory was not reported to the White House, they said. President Clinton, who developed an intense interest in germ weapons, was never briefed on the programs under way or contemplated, the officials said.
A former senior official in the Clinton White House conceded that in retrospect, someone should have been responsible for reviewing the projects to ensure that they were not only effective in defending the United States, but consistent with the nation's arms-control pledges.
The C.I.A.'s tests on the bomb model touched off a dispute among government experts after the tests were concluded in 2000, with some officials arguing that they violated the germ treaty's prohibition against developing weapons.
Intelligence officials said lawyers at the agency and the White House concluded that the work was defensive, and therefore allowed. But even officials who supported the effort acknowledged that it brought the United States closer to what was forbidden.
''It was pressing how far you go before you do something illegal or immoral,'' recalled one senior official who was briefed on the program.
Public disclosure of the research is likely to complicate the position of the United States, which has long been in the forefront of efforts to enforce the ban on germ weapons.
The Bush administration's willingness to abandon the 1972 Antiballistic Missile treaty has already drawn criticism around the world. And the administration's stance on the draft agreement for the germ treaty has put Washington at odds with many of its allies, including Japan and Britain.
The Original Treaty
During the cold war, both the United States and the Soviet Union produced vast quantities of germ weapons, enough to kill everyone on earth.
Eager to halt the spread of what many called the poor man's atom bomb, the United States unilaterally gave up germ arms and helped lead the global campaign to abolish them. By 1975, most of the world's nations had signed the convention.
In doing so, they agreed not to develop, produce, acquire or stockpile quantities or types of germs that had no ''prophylactic, protective or other peaceful purposes.'' They also pledged not to develop or obtain weapons or other equipment ''designed to use such agents or toxins for hostile purposes or in armed conflict.''
There were at least two significant loopholes: The pact did not define ''defensive'' research or say what studies might be prohibited, if any. And it provided no means of catching cheaters.
In the following decades, several countries did cheat, some on a huge scale. The Soviet Union built entire cities devoted to developing germ weapons, employing tens of thousands of people and turning anthrax, smallpox and bubonic plague into weapons of war. In the late 1980's, Iraq began a crash program to produce its own germ arsenal.
Both countries insisted that their programs were for defensive purposes.
American intelligence officials had suspected that Baghdad and Moscow were clandestinely producing germ weapons. But the full picture of their efforts did not become clear until the 1990's, after several Iraqi and Soviet officials defected.
Fears about the spread of biological weapons were deepened by the rise of terrorism against Americans, the great strides in genetic engineering and the collapse of the Soviet Union, which left thousands of scientists skilled in biological warfare unemployed, penniless and vulnerable to recruitment.
The threat disclosed a quandary: While the United States spent billions of dollars a year to assess enemy military forces and to defend against bullets, tanks, bombs and jet fighters, it knew relatively little about the working of exotic arms it had relinquished long ago.
Designing a Delivery System
In the mid-1990's, the C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies stepped up their search for information about other nations' biological research programs, focusing on the former Soviet Union, Iran, Iraq and Libya, among others. Much of the initial emphasis was on the germs that enemies might use in an attack, officials said.
But in 1997, the agency embarked on Clear Vision, which focused on weapons systems that would deliver the germs.
Intelligence officials said the project was led by Gene Johnson, a senior C.I.A. scientist who had long worked with some of the world's deadliest viruses. Dr. Johnson was eager to understand the damage that Soviet miniature bombs -- bomblets, in military parlance -- might inflict.
The agency asked its spies to find or buy a Soviet bomblet, which releases germs in a fine mist. That search proved unsuccessful, and the agency approved a proposal to build a replica and study how well it could disperse its lethal cargo.
The agency's lawyers concluded that such a project was permitted by the treaty because the intent was defensive. Intelligence officials said the C.I.A. had reports that at least one nation was trying to buy the Soviet-made bomblets.
A model was constructed and the agency conducted two sets of tests at Battelle, the military contractor. The experiments measured dissemination characteristics and how the model performed under different atmospheric conditions, intelligence officials said. They emphasized that the device was a ''portion'' of a bomb that could not have been used as a weapon.
The experiments caused concern at the White House, which learned about the project after it was under way. Some aides to President Clinton worried that the benefits did not justify the risks. But a White House lawyer led a joint assessment by several departments that concluded that the program did not violate the treaty, and it went ahead.
The questions were debated anew after the project was completed, this time without consensus. A State Department official argued for a strict reading of the treaty: the ban on acquiring or developing ''weapons'' barred states from building even a partial model of a germ bomb, no matter what the rationale.
''A bomb is a bomb is a bomb,'' another official said at the time.
The C.I.A. continued to insist that it had the legal authority to conduct such tests and, intelligence officials said, the agency was prepared to reopen the fight over how to interpret the treaty. But even so, the agency ended the Clear Vision project in the last year of the Clinton administration, intelligence officials said.
Bill Harlow, the C.I.A. spokesman, acknowledged that the agency had conducted ''laboratory or experimental'' work to assess the intelligence it had gathered about biological warfare.
''Everything we have done in this respect was entirely appropriate, necessary, consistent with U.S. treaty obligations and was briefed to the National Security Council staff and appropriate Congressional oversight committees,'' Mr. Harlow said.
Breeding More Potent Anthrax
In the 1990's, government officials also grew increasingly worried about the possibility that scientists could use the widely available techniques of gene-splicing to create even more deadly weapons.
Those concerns deepened in 1995, when Russian scientists disclosed at a scientific conference in Britain that they had implanted genes from Bacillus cereus, an organism that causes food poisoning, into the anthrax microbe.
The scientists said later that the experiments were peaceful; the two microbes can be found side-by-side in nature and, the Russians said, they wanted to see what happened if they cross-bred.
A published account of the experiment, which appeared in a scientific journal in late 1997, alarmed the Pentagon, which had just decided to require that American soldiers be vaccinated against anthrax. According to the article, the new strain was resistant to Russia's anthrax vaccine, at least in hamsters.
American officials tried to obtain a sample from Russia through a scientific exchange program to see whether the Russians had really created such a hybrid. The Americans also wanted to test whether the microbe could defeat the American vaccine, which is different from that used by Russia.
Despite repeated promises, the bacteria were never provided.
Eventually the C.I.A. drew up plans to replicate the strain, but intelligence officials said the agency hesitated because there was no specific report that an adversary was attempting to turn the superbug into a weapon.
This year, officials said, the project was taken over by the Pentagon's intelligence arm, the Defense Intelligence Agency. Pentagon lawyers reviewed the proposal and said it complied with the treaty. Officials said the research would be part of Project Jefferson, yet another government effort to track the dangers posed by germ weapons.
A spokesman for Defense Intelligence, Lt. Cmdr. James Brooks, declined comment. Asked about the precautions at Battelle, which is to create the enhanced anthrax, Commander Brooks said security was ''entirely suitable for all work already conducted and planned for Project Jefferson.''
The Question of Secrecy
While several officials in both the Clinton and Bush administrations called this and other research long overdue, they expressed concern about the lack of a central system for vetting such proposals.
And a former American diplomat questioned the wisdom of keeping them secret.
James F. Leonard, head of the delegation that negotiated the germ treaty, said research on microbes or munitions could be justified, depending on the specifics.
But he said such experiments should be done openly, exposed to the scrutiny of scientists and the public. Public disclosure, he said, is important evidence that the United States is proceeding with a ''clean heart.''
''It's very important to be open,'' he said. ''If we're not open, who's going to be open?''
Mr. Leonard said the fine distinctions drawn by government lawyers were frequently ignored when a secret program was exposed. Then, he said, others offer the harshest possible interpretations -- a ''vulgarization of what has been done.''
But he concluded that the secret germ research, as described to him, was ''foolish, but not illegal.''
The authors have reported on biological weapons for The New York Times and based this article on material gathered for their book, ''Germs: Biological Weapons and America's Secret War,'' which is being published this month by Simon & Schuster Inc.
View post:
U.S. Germ Warfare Research Pushes Treaty Limits - The New ...
- Germ Warfare: Learning About Germs - January 21st, 2017 [January 21st, 2017]
- Germ warfare - mutant bugs could wipe out human life - January 24th, 2017 [January 24th, 2017]
- Germ warfare: the battle for the key to modern vaccines - The Guardian - February 7th, 2017 [February 7th, 2017]
- Deadly global pandemic to kill tens of millions: Bill Gates - Press TV - February 18th, 2017 [February 18th, 2017]
- Biopreparat - Wikipedia - February 18th, 2017 [February 18th, 2017]
- 'Ideation' is complex, convoluted, not-so-funny satire - Marinscope Community Newspapers - February 24th, 2017 [February 24th, 2017]
- The Vaccine Race: How Scientists Used Human Cells to Combat Killer Viruses by Meredith Wadman review - The Guardian - February 27th, 2017 [February 27th, 2017]
- We're 'in touch' every day with things that can make us sick - Williamsport Sun-Gazette - February 28th, 2017 [February 28th, 2017]
- Getting ready for a global pandemic - Amandala - March 1st, 2017 [March 1st, 2017]
- Killen Church Youth Taking Out Germs - courierjournal - March 1st, 2017 [March 1st, 2017]
- Ed Vasicek: The ever-surfacing future has arrived - Kokomo Tribune - March 2nd, 2017 [March 2nd, 2017]
- A human pinball in a germ warfare experiment - Varsity Online - March 7th, 2017 [March 7th, 2017]
- US Navy Film Reveals Crazy Cold War Chemical Weapons Plans - The National Interest Online (blog) - March 12th, 2017 [March 12th, 2017]
- Amherst College announces the Mammoths as first official mascot ... - Boston.com - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- Letter: Protect the public health officials who protect us - Republican Eagle - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- Geoffrey Norman: What Next? After The Syrian Strike - Caledonian Record - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- Could The Global Community Coexist With A Nuclear Pyongyang ... - Daily Caller - April 8th, 2017 [April 8th, 2017]
- Nuclear war: the US took a highly bureaucratic response to preparing for it - The Australian Financial Review - June 9th, 2017 [June 9th, 2017]
- Shoemaker: Seeing a tragedy or a mere statistic? - Opinion ... - MetroWest Daily News - June 11th, 2017 [June 11th, 2017]
- LETTER: Process of forgetting simply facilitated - The Guardian - June 14th, 2017 [June 14th, 2017]
- 'New' way to look at smallpox - Fiji Times - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- I meant every word - Fort Madison Daily Democrat - June 16th, 2017 [June 16th, 2017]
- What Do We Celebrate? - The Runner - June 17th, 2017 [June 17th, 2017]
- We'll pass on the Liberal Lollapalooza - Net Newsledger - June 18th, 2017 [June 18th, 2017]
- Whom Are You Fooling? - The Jewish Press - JewishPress.com - June 23rd, 2017 [June 23rd, 2017]
- The case for keeping 'Langevin Block' - Macleans.ca - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- Military Tested Germ Warfare on San Francisco and Other ... - June 30th, 2017 [June 30th, 2017]
- Area man wants Amherst to change town's name - The Recorder - August 25th, 2017 [August 25th, 2017]
- EARLE LOCKERBY: A simplistic approach - The Guardian - August 25th, 2017 [August 25th, 2017]
- Belchertown man wants Amherst's town name banished - Amherst Bulletin - August 25th, 2017 [August 25th, 2017]
- Shir Ishii - Wikipedia - February 27th, 2018 [February 27th, 2018]
- U.S. Germ Warfare Experiments used against the American ... - March 10th, 2018 [March 10th, 2018]
- The Long Read: The Germ Warfare Island Abandoned by the ... - May 12th, 2018 [May 12th, 2018]
- Conspiracy Theory? US Army Has Admitted to Conducting 100s ... - May 30th, 2018 [May 30th, 2018]
- US Army Has Admitted To Conducting 100s Of Germ Warfare ... - May 30th, 2018 [May 30th, 2018]
- GERM WARFARE - Carpet Cleaning and Upholstery Cleaning - July 10th, 2018 [July 10th, 2018]
- Coconut Oil: Germ Warfare! | Underground Wellness - July 15th, 2018 [July 15th, 2018]
- Germ Warfare | Recess Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia - July 16th, 2018 [July 16th, 2018]
- History of cancer chemotherapy - Wikipedia - October 16th, 2018 [October 16th, 2018]
- International Military Tribunal for the Far East - Wikipedia - October 16th, 2018 [October 16th, 2018]
- Recess Season 4 Episode 38 | Germ Warfare | Recess Full Episodes TV Series - November 30th, 2018 [November 30th, 2018]
- Germ Warfare | Dexter's Laboratory Wiki | FANDOM powered ... - December 4th, 2018 [December 4th, 2018]
- Colonial Germ Warfare : The Colonial Williamsburg Official ... - December 30th, 2018 [December 30th, 2018]
- America's Secret War: Germs & Biological Weapons - Spies, Scientists (2001) - December 30th, 2018 [December 30th, 2018]
- UNIT 731 Japan's Biological Warfare Project - March 29th, 2019 [March 29th, 2019]
- Korean War - Air warfare | Britannica.com - March 29th, 2019 [March 29th, 2019]
- "M*A*S*H" Germ Warfare (TV Episode 1972) - IMDb - April 14th, 2019 [April 14th, 2019]
- Unit 731 - Wikipedia - April 29th, 2019 [April 29th, 2019]
- The Concern for the Secretive Bio-Geopolitics - FXStreet - October 16th, 2019 [October 16th, 2019]
- Depression Quest: Bad Brains, Good Friends and Night in the Woods - HeadStuff.org - November 25th, 2019 [November 25th, 2019]
- On Her Majesty's Secret Service: This Never Happened to the Other Fellow - Ricochet.com - November 25th, 2019 [November 25th, 2019]
- The Fall or Dive of Sydney Gottlieb and Company - CounterPunch - January 9th, 2020 [January 9th, 2020]
- As China death toll rises, do we need a vaccine for the virus of State secrecy - The Conservative Woman - January 30th, 2020 [January 30th, 2020]
- DC Hero's Most Disgusting Power Was Popular With The President - Screen Rant - January 30th, 2020 [January 30th, 2020]
- Lord Jeffery Amherst, the town namesake who attempted a Native American genocide - Buffalo News - January 30th, 2020 [January 30th, 2020]
- Clean Buildings Expo To Offer Expanded Education Sessions - CleanLink - February 12th, 2020 [February 12th, 2020]
- What If Donald Got the Bug? - LA Progressive - March 4th, 2020 [March 4th, 2020]
- Letter to the editor: Don't get your coronavirus information from Rush - The Winchester Star - March 4th, 2020 [March 4th, 2020]
- Herbs That Fight Viruses - Newsmax - March 4th, 2020 [March 4th, 2020]
- Don't Touch Anything: The Unintended Consequences of Environmental Ecosystems - The Good Men Project - March 4th, 2020 [March 4th, 2020]
- COVID-19 and Us OrissaPOST - Wink Report - March 16th, 2020 [March 16th, 2020]
- STERAMIST IS MOBILIZED TO AID IN THE CONTROL SARS-CoV-2 IN DAEGU-KYUNGBUK PROVINCE, SOUTH KOREA - Yahoo Finance - March 16th, 2020 [March 16th, 2020]
- We clean freaks will stand and scrub together | Sam Venable - Knoxville News Sentinel - March 16th, 2020 [March 16th, 2020]
- Corbella: Don't spread the virus or fake news - Calgary Sun - March 16th, 2020 [March 16th, 2020]
- Coronavirus and what we can learn from the 1918 flu's hidden history - Mashable - March 16th, 2020 [March 16th, 2020]
- Exasperating Farrago of Distortions! Coronavirus and the Pandemic of Conspiracy Theories - News18 - March 16th, 2020 [March 16th, 2020]
- Rab McNeil: Stocks wiped out as germ warfare sees panic buyers rolling in the aisles - HeraldScotland - March 16th, 2020 [March 16th, 2020]
- Is biological warfare raising its ugly head? - citytoday - March 16th, 2020 [March 16th, 2020]
- REVEALED: Millions of Brits were in SECRET germ war tests between 1940 and 1979 - Politicalite - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- Coronavirus: How Orania has been affected by the disease - The South African - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- The Plague and the Long War - Inkstick - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- Historically Speaking: The flu epidemic we've been here before - Roswell Daily Record - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- For China and Russia, coronavirus hoaxes are another strain of disinformation warfare - The Globe and Mail - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- State Department marks bioweapons accord with reference to pandemic - Washington Times - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- Past Pandemics Exposed Chinas Weaknesses - Foreign Affairs Magazine - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- 'All Of This Panic Could Have Been Prevented': Author Max Brooks On COVID-19 - NPR - March 31st, 2020 [March 31st, 2020]
- U.S. Created Coronavirus to Target Islamic Nations! (And Other Conspiracy Theories) | News and Politics - PJ Media - April 9th, 2020 [April 9th, 2020]
- The decade of transformation: Remaking international relations - NationofChange - April 9th, 2020 [April 9th, 2020]
- Mad Man Modly: The Secretary of the Navy Gets the Boot - Antiwar.com - April 9th, 2020 [April 9th, 2020]
- Plagues and wars alter economic policies: but not for ever - The Guardian - April 9th, 2020 [April 9th, 2020]