How The War On Drugs Affects Climate Change – Texas Standard

Half a century after President Richard Nixon declared drug use Americas public enemy number one, U.S.-led efforts to combat drug trafficking abroad have had mixed political consequences. Now, new studies show the war on drugs could be having another unintended consequence: contributing to climate change.

Jennifer Devine, assistant professor of geography at Texas State University, describes this phenomenon as narco deforestation. She says drug traffickers will move into remote, protected rainforest areas near international borders, claim territory, clear the trees and erect cattle ranches. From there, they hide their air strips, launder money and to evade military crackdowns.

When people think of drug trafficking activities they normally dont think of environmental impacts, Devine says. They deforest primary rainforests remaining in Central America and plant pasture for cattle ranching, so it is a direct contribution to deforestation.

Devine says illegal deforestation in protected areas is blamed on poor farmers, when the true drivers of this deforestation are drug traffickers. The studies estimate narco deforestation contributes to more than 80% of deforestation in protected areas. She says deforestation is not the only environmental issue affected by drug trafficking.

Environmental impacts differ from country to country and it reflects the different role each country and each protected area plays in the supply route, so were not just talking about deforestation, there are many other environmental impacts, Devine says.

Since the war on drugs inception, $3 trillion has been spent combating the sale and use of drugs, while usage, and the purity of drugs available have only increased, Devine says. She says her team offers alternative solutions to combating this issue, like investing in indigenous and community control over protected lands, which she says have been found to be more resilient against narco land grabs.

Rather than investing money in Black Hawk helicopters for Central American militaries, the U.S. should be investing in indigenous land-titling and community resource management programs which both alleviate poverty. They mitigate migration to the United States and they undermine the territorial grasp of drug cartels in Central America, Devine says.

Written by Savana Dunning.

View post:

How The War On Drugs Affects Climate Change - Texas Standard

Border to Border: The war on drugs – KFYR-TV

Hundreds of thousands of drugs are seized every year nationwide across our borders.

Despite Border Agents and officers efforts and technology, criminal organizations are getting smarter and drugs are still making it into the United States. In the final part of our Border to Border: A tale of two crossings series,we take a look at how drugs from the Mexican border are coming into North Dakota.

In the last year, the Office of Field Operations has found nearly half a million pounds of drugs at ports of entry in the country.

Border Patrol agents have confiscated nearly 300,000 pounds of drugs.

Those drugs include cocaine, heroin, marijuana, methamphetamine and fentanyl.

Our state continues to fight a war on drugs. Local law enforcement is finding more meth, heroin and pills than ever before.

Stopping drug trafficking is like finding a needle in a haystack.

Narcotics seizures are made every day. Anywhere from personal use, we mean just a few ounces to pounds," said Ruben Jauregui, Office of Field Operations spokesperson.

Drugs smuggled across the border are distributed throughout the United States.

We are part of the pipeline, were just the end of it. So it starts like in Mexico and it eventually finds its way here," said a ND BCI agent.

Criminal organizations like the gang La Linea are making a footprint across the El Paso sector.

Whether it be the smuggling of people, trafficking of people, narcotics, hard drugs, its all tied to the same criminal organizations. Nothing happens along the border without the criminal organization being involved," said Mario Escalante, El Paso Border Patrol.

Their m.o. constantly shifts.

Narcotics arent only found in vehicles. But also within merchandise. We also see it taped to the people, you know on their bodies [as] pedestrians coming across," said Jauregui.

All the area on the Mexican side is controlled by criminal organizations. A lot of them are generations of smugglers, said Fidel Baca, El Paso Border Patrol.

Smugglers go to lengths to hide their cargo, so it goes under the noses of law enforcement.

The El Paso sector sees hides often, like marijuana in rims or within the floor board of cars, drugs within car bumpers and meth packaged in homemade wheels.

Some areas are easier targets for the cartelswhere theres only desert for miles.

Were always being observed. So if they see that an agent left an area, maybe to go to the restroom, to go to get a drink at the convenience store, an agent is supposed to come in and fill in that spot. But if in those two minutes there is an opening, theyre going to exploit them," said Baca.

Those tokens of opportunity are examples on how the drugs are coming from Mexico and making it all the way to communities like Bismarck, North Dakota.

"Starts like in Mexico and then eventually finds its way here. And using cities like Milwaukee, St. Paul, Chicagothose type of cities are just hubs. That then they branch out like spider webs to the local areas," said a BCI agent.

He says drug money made off of addiction in our state is funding terrorism in other parts of the world.

Good people who never used to lock their doors to have to deal with narcoterrorism. Who ever thought in North Dakota youd have to worry about a word like that as far as we are from the border," said a BCI agent.

In a room at the Metro Area Narcotics Task Force headquarters is evidence law enforcement is tackling the drug issue head on.

Take away the dealers as they come here. Piece by piece. If we take away 500 pills off the streets, thats 500 pills that arent going to trickle their way down to an addict," said a BCI agent.

Agents say the anecdote for the drug problems is to cut the demand. Law enforcement says this will curve suppliers.

Agents say drugs are killing our community and increasing the violence across the state.

Law enforcement say its difficult to see drug dealers from other areas taking advantage of North Dakotans.

Border Patrol agents and officers, along with North Dakota law enforcement, say theyre using all the technology and strategy in their power to stop drug trafficking.

As our five part series comes to an end we'd like to hear from you.

How do you think issues can be resolved on our borders and within our state?

Join the conversation on Facebook with #BorderToBorder.

We'd like to thank the U.S. Customs and Border Protection for talking to us and our local state agents for the exclusive access they provided us to tell these stories.

Read more:

Border to Border: The war on drugs - KFYR-TV

The Man Who Led Duterte’s Brutal War on Drugs Quit Amid Claims He Took a Bribe From a Drug Trafficker – VICE

The man who oversaw Philippines President Rodrigo Dutertes war on drugs, which has left tens of thousands of people dead, resigned Monday amid allegations he protected police officers who were selling large quantities of seized drugs.

General Oscar Albayalde, chief of the Philippine National Police, tendered his resignation over the weekend, though in a speech Monday he continued to deny the allegations that have been building against him in recent weeks.

After careful deliberation, I have come to the decision to relinquish my post as chief, effective today and go on non-duty status, Albayalde said. He had been scheduled to retire on November 8.

Albayalde rose to power as Dutertes enforcer in the brutal war on drugs the Philippines president has waged since he took office in 2016.

But in recent weeks, Senate hearings have revealed accusations of a grand cover-up by Albayalde when he was Pampanga police chief in 2013.

Albayalde was accused by a former police chief of intervening to prevent the dismissal of officers under his command after they seized 200kg of methamphetamine from a drug suspect, who they then allowed to escape after receiving a $1 million bribe.

The officers were also accused of only declaring 38kg of the total haul of drugs and retaining the rest for use in other operations, or selling it on.

READ: Duterte promises cash prize for capturing felons. But he's also fine if you kill them.

Benjamin Magalong, the retired head of the criminal investigation and detection group, made the allegation accidentally during a Senate hearing on a different topic. A second police general came forward to back up the allegation and said Albayalde told him he got a little of the bribe.

Despite the mounting evidence against Albayalde, Duterte has refused to fire him, saying no criminal charges have been laid against the police chief, and insisting he needed clear proof before firing him.

I can only speculate that maybe [Albayalde] had enough of the according to him false, unfair accusations and innuendos, especially because his family is suffering. Maybe the guy gave in," Dutertes spokesman, Salvador Panelo, told reporters Monday.

READ: Duterte said you must be stupid if you think hell stand trial at the Hague for his drug war

Dutertes brutal crackdown on drug users and dealers has resulted in thousands of deaths. While the Philippines police put the figure at 6,600 in a June report, human rights groups claim over 25,000 people may have been killed.

Cover: In this Oct. 3, 2019, file photo, Philippine National Police chief Gen. Oscar Albayalde gestures as he testifies at the resumption of the Senate probe on the release of hundreds of convicts under the shortened serving of their sentence for good behavior, in suburban Pasay city, south of Manila, Philippines. Albayalde has resigned after he faced allegations in a Senate hearing that he intervened as a provincial police chief in 2013 to prevent his officers from being prosecuted for allegedly selling a huge quantity of seized drugs. (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez, File)

See original here:

The Man Who Led Duterte's Brutal War on Drugs Quit Amid Claims He Took a Bribe From a Drug Trafficker - VICE

This Day In History, October 14th, 2019 – "War On Drugs" – Signals AZ

By Staff | on October 14, 2019

"Talking Glass" Audible Stories on Signals AZ made possible by The Fain Signature Group - Celebrating 60 Years of Community Building

(40th President of the United States of America Ronald Reagan; Image courtesy of Wikicommons, Public Domain)

It was just 37 years ago today, October 14, 1982, that President Ronald Reagan declared the War on Drugs, a serious issue that had long plagued America and the rest of the world. This was not the first War on Drugs that the United States had declared, several Presidents have made attempts to control different types of illegal substances. Real wars have been fought over the control and trade of narcotics and other various stimulants since the dawn of civilization. However, it was Reagans declaration that not only sought to control the trafficking in the United States, but where it was produced as well.

There are various notions on whether or not the War on Drugs has been a success. As long as there is a demand, its hard for the government to control anything. However, though strict enforcement might not have had the greatest affects so far, the question remains, what should we do then? Currently we are still facing the age-old problems, but will there be a solution?

Follow Signals on Facebook to get the latest local events and updates:Facebook.com/SignalsAZ

Subscribe to the Signals Newsletter, events, entertainment, info & news right to your inbox!SUBSCRIBE

Follow this link:

This Day In History, October 14th, 2019 - "War On Drugs" - Signals AZ

Why Scotland can ill afford to ignore Portugals ground-breaking war on drugs – The Scotsman

By a make-shift shack on a wasteland in Bairro da Picheleira, in Lisbon, a man holds out his bloody arms and gestures to me to douse them with water. He has spotted the outreach team from Crescer one of Portugals many drugs agencies making their way down the hill, and staggered over, fresh from injecting, to drop his dirty needle in one of their trademark red and yellow buckets.

On either side of the path, the ground is a mosaic of drugs-related paraphernalia: brightly coloured spoons, tiny plastic bottles, empty packets of citric acid and condoms, which are used as tourniquets more than prophylactics.

The detritus comes from the many kits the outreach workers hand out every day and looks, from a distance, like 100,000 Christmas crackers have been pulled, their contents disgorged. I take the water from the man and pour it over his arms; as he rubs off the still-flowing blood, the track marks become visible.

Behind me, the owner of the shack has emerged from behind some hanging blankets. He is carrying a plastic bottle full of hypodermics; he cuts round the top and spills the needles on to the ground. Argentina, a peer worker, picks them up them one by one and places them in the bin, while psychologist Patricia Cabral hands him clean needle kits and foils (for smokers) and tries to encourage him to sort out a new identity card. Every day, he says he will come; every day he does not, she says.

Further down the hill, we approach another 3D jigsaw of crates and a wizened face appears in the doorway. It is the face of Pablo*, an artist who lives in a house nearby, but uses this precarious structure as a studio. A totem pole featuring a bearded man, a monkey and a snake stands sentinel outside. Pablo has been here for years, Cabral says. He makes art in the studio, but he lets others in to take their drugs. The shack is divided in two: half for smokers, half for injecters. We know he will sell some of the needle kits and the foil we give him, but we accept that because it means they will reach the users we dont see.

As a visitor accustomed to a more punitive approach towards Class A drugs, it is curious to witness this open-air injection site, known for trafficking as well as consumption, accepted as part of the Lisbon landscape in much the same way as the Castelo de So Jorge. But it is the lack of moral judgment, more even than the headline-grabbing decriminalisation, that defines the countrys much-lauded drugs policy.

Every year, agencies like Crescer are inundated with requests from journalists and politicians desperate to know how Portugal did it; how it rescued itself from the drugs epidemic of the 80s and 90s, reduced its death toll, and turned itself into a world leader in recovery and harm reduction.

As the country with the highest number of drugs deaths in the EU, Scotland is desperate for answers. In the same period, its mortality rate has risen from 369 to 1,187 more than 30 times that of a country with almost double its population.

The proportion of people affected by drugs in Scotland now stands at 1.1 per cent higher than in Portugal at the height of its crisis.

One oft-quoted statistic is that twice as many people died drugs-related deaths in Dundee last year (66 out of a population of 148,000) than in the whole of Portugal. Dundee and Lisbon: two cities with stunning waterfronts, one on the Tay, the other on the Tagus. Two cities keen to market themselves as tourist destinations, both with visible drugs problems. Why should the death tolls be so very different? And what can Dundee, and the rest of Scotland, learn from Portugals success?

The first thing that strikes me when I arrive in Lisbon is the mind-boggling panoply of drugs-related organisations and approaches. The Porto-based NGO APDES has set up dozens of interviews across the two cities. Over four days, I will visit policy-makers, treatment centres, harm reduction centres and employability programmes. I will go out with three outreach teams and spend time in both low-threshold methadone dispensing vans and the countrys first mobile safer consumption unit; and even then I will only have scratched the surface.

The second thing that strikes me is how seamlessly all these organisations appear to fit together. Despite their many differences in approach and funding structures, each one appears to understand its place in the whole. They are bound together by a shared ethos . At the centre of Portugals drugs policy is a belief in users as individuals, with a range of interconnecting problems childhood trauma, unemployment, mental health, homelessness which must be tackled holistically rather than in isolation.

Of course other countries make the same claims; but in Portugal the philosophy does appear to be at the heart of the system. All the drop-in services and outreach teams are made up of a range of professionals: doctors, nurses, psychologists, social workers and peer workers people with lived experience of drugs use, who are crucial in building trust with those wary of do-gooders.

We understand that poverty, mental health and drug use are all linked and that many drug users find it difficult to attend appointments in different places so we offer as much as we can under one roof, says Adriana Curado, project manager at GAT an activist organisation for those living with HIV.

Curado is taking me on a tour of IN-Mouraria, GATs low-threshold harm reduction centre in Lisbon. Its outside walls are decorated with a futuristic black and white mural, its internal walls with posters reading: No More War on Drugs.

IN-Mouraria has an area for socialising, a small office for private interviews, facilities to test for HIV, Hep C and TB, a computer where clients can fill out benefits forms, a counter full of clean needles, foils and crack pipes, a stock of shower gel and toothpaste, which clients can take to nearby public showers, and a room full of second-hand clothes. It sees 70 people a day and serves sandwiches from 5-8pm. It is, in short, a soup kitchen, benefits office and health clinic rolled into one.

GAT is also spearheading a pilot safe consumption project in an adjacent building. The pilot project, involving 40 users, is being run in advance of two fixed sites opening in the city next year. Safer consumption rooms are a source of great controversy in Scotland. Glasgow City Council would like to open one in the city centre to tackle spiralling HIV rates, but cant because drugs policy is reserved to Westminster and Westminster has said No. Though it has been legally possible in Portugal since 2001, the local authorities have dragged their heels. Lisbon City Council is acting now because the crash in 2008 led to a relapse among some ageing heroin users and a slight spike in deaths. It is also funding the mobile safer consumption unit which began operating in April.

The drug user comes in and sits here, says Curado, gesturing towards a steel counter where needles and other equipment are set out like toiletries. Sometimes people prefer to inject in private, but mostly we will stay with them. We can give them advice; help them find a vein in a safe part of the body. The only thing we cannot do is help them inject.

Curado is no PR officer. She complains about budget cuts and the governments failure (so far) to give outreach workers Naloxone the antidote to a heroin overdose. They are allowed to take it on the safer consumption van the first time this has ever happened but it is not yet provided in other settings.

We have anyway. We order it in from Spain and other countries as disobedience, Curado says. What would happen if the authorities found out? Oh, they already know, she shrugs.

In the drop-in centre, peer worker Jo Santa Maria tells me he wishes GAT had been around when he started taking drugs in the 80s. A wilful boy, who smoked and drank, he left school at 15 to work in construction. I was earning so much money, he says. More than my mum and dad put together. He followed a well-worn route from cannabis to smoking heroin to injecting it.

Then a friend encouraged him to try a speedball: a mix of heroin and cocaine taken intravenously. Thus began my tragic career, Santa Maria says. Over 13 years, I lost everything: my home, my job, my family.

Those were the years when everyone seemed to be on drugs. The years of Casal Ventoso: a vast open-air market where people like Santa Maria came to buy and consume, and never left.

Casal Ventoso was pulled down in 1999, its inhabitants decanted to projects like Bairro Quinto do Carbrinho a series of Duplo blocks in clashing colours; like Balamory on acid. But it has left a painful scar. Everyone I meet mentions it. They conjure up a scene of Bosch-like horror; the Garden of Earthly Delights cum The Fall of the Damned into Hell. A place where you might stumble over corpses; a place where souls were lost.

Its not clear exactly when Santa Maria began to get his life together; but the catalysts were becoming an activist and encountering GAT. And having a baby too, although not immediately. His son with a fellow addict (now his wife) was given medication to prevent the transmission of HIV. He was born Hep C, which was cured after treatment .

Santa Maria, too, was also cleared of Hep C and started working for GAT. Now his wife and son work there too. He still uses cannabis, but not heroin. I feel I have a normal life, he says. I dont have all the cravings and anxiety I had when I used other drugs. I took MDMA for the first time recently, but I informed myself about the risks first. I just wish Id had access to such information in the 80s,

Elsa Maia is also haunted by the Casal Ventoso years. The daughter of a doctor and a teacher, she was never tempted to try anything other than cannabis, but others were. Three of her friends died of overdoses while she was a teenager. Back then, heroin use cut across all classes. One fatality was the daughter of the justice minister.

My mother had a colleague from a very wealthy family who started selling silver cups, says Maia who now works in the international relations division of policy body SICAD. It turned out her son was an addict whod started stealing and she was trying to help him.

Portugals drugs epidemic was rooted in its history. Under dictator Antnio de Oliveira Salazar, the country was very closed. Our news was controlled by the state, Maia says. We missed out on flower power and the student riots.

At the same time, it was a country with a high level of emigration and a number of colonies. Many of its men were sent out as soldiers to South America, Asia and Africa. As a doctor, Maias father spent some time in Mozambique.

When Salazar died in 1970, things moved very quickly. Portugal agreed to give up its colonies, so settlers and soldiers, who had used cannabis abroad, moved home. Gangsters moved in. Portugal was suddenly awash with drugs, but unlike other countries, where the increase in drugs use had been gradual, it had no policy or structures to deal with the consequences. Very quickly there was no difference between recreational and problematic drugs use. And we had all the comorbidities that went with addiction too: HIV, and the onset of Aids, TB and all the different types of hepatitis, Maia says.

By the 90s, around 1 per cent of the population or 100,000 people was using heroin. It was almost impossible to find a family which hadnt been touched by it.

Portugals drug problem became a domestic obsession and an international embarrassment. Something had to be done. In 1999, a socialist government led by Antonio Guterres now general secretary of the UN came into power. Guterres invited a panel of medical, legal and academic experts to come up with new ways of thinking.

The result was a radical two-pronged strategy. The first involved decriminalisation. Under the new law, possession of small amounts of illegal substances enough for ten days consumption would become a civil rather than a criminal offence, to be dealt with by newly created Commissions for Dissuasion. These commissions have the power to refer users to treatment centres and to impose sanctions such as fines and community service on those unwilling to attend.

The decision to decriminalise caused international controversy, but in Portugal it was readily accepted. What you have to understand is how desperate everyone was for change, Maia says.

I lived near Casal Ventoso and I remember participating in some of the public consultations. On the one hand you had the mother of a huge family complaining that all her kids were already using, on the other shop-owners saying: We are being threatened.

The other less sensational, but arguably more important change was the adoption of an integrated approach encompassing prevention, treatment and harm reduction. We realised we needed to look at each person as an individual in need of care and treatment; as an individual who is part of society and not an outsider, Maia says.

In the intervening years, a political consensus has formed around this approach. In the UK, where drugs policy is a political football, the country has bounced from recovery to harm reduction and back again. But Portugals drugs strategy has survived both left-wing and right governments. Sure, there have been arguments over funding and the structure of organisations. But the basic principle that drug use is a health rather than a criminal justice issue appears to be inviolable.

So what impact has it had? Well, it hasnt eradicated drug use. You can still see dealers and users in open air sites like the one in Pescheleira and on the city centre streets. Out in Porto with a team from Medicos de Mundo, I climbed some steps off the busy Rua Mouzinho da Silveira, with its thronged restaurants and artisan delicatessens. They led up to a hidden courtyard where a dozen addicts were smoking and injecting. In one corner, there was so much smoke it caught in my throat. Bent over their gear, the huddled users barely looked up as the team handed over new foils .

In fact, some claim there has been a slight rise in drug consumption. But drugs-related deaths and rates of HIV infection have plummeted, and there has been an increased uptake in treatment. Such details speak for themselves . So too do stories like Argentinas.

Argentina is a long-term cocaine user who spent ten years living on the streets in one of the areas the Crescer outreach team visits. Last Christmas, the organisation found her a flat through its Housing First initiative.

As we drive from stop to stop, she enthuses about her new home. Muito lindo, muito lindo, she cries excitedly. Very beautiful. Argentina talks about her fridge and her microwave, and how she hasnt taken cocaine for two months now. She still needs support, but her new job gives her structure. I like being out with the team, she says, because then I worry about work and not about drugs.

It is with the outreach teams that the humanity at the core of Portugals drugs policy is most palpable. Parked under a flyover near the Praa de Espanha, the citys mobile methadone unit could pass for an ice cream van, albeit with the drugs handed out openly through the hatch, as opposed to under the counter a la Glasgow in the 1980s.

The early evening clientele is a mixed bunch: those prematurely aged by long-term use knock back their methadone from plastic shot glasses alongside professionals stopping off on their way home from work.

One woman arrives on the back of her partners scooter. She is wearing a long floral skirt and stilettos. Removing her helmet, she shakes out her hair, as if filming a shampoo ad; then she swigs her methadone, gets back on the bike and va va vooms into the distance.

The methadone van is a low-threshold service aimed at those who might fall foul of mainstream services. Users do not have to prove they are clean to register, nor will they be sanctioned if they fail to turn up several days in a row. Most importantly, with a doctor on board, it is possible for a user to start taking the methadone on their first visit.

There is an important social aspect to all the outreach services too. Gaggles of homeless, isolated men cluster round APDES GiruGaia (Around Gaia) van, hungry for conversation, at every stop on its route through the city.

Social worker Joana Vilares, who works alongside nurse Nuno Lourinho, is tiny, but manages the men like the landlady of a rowdy boozer, allowing them to lift her up as a demonstration of their strength, encouraging their chat, and diffusing any hint of tension with semi-flirtatious humour.

At the first stop, Vilares pets a toddler perched on her mothers hip; at another she laughs when a man castigates her for not giving him a kiss before closing the van door in preparation for moving on. Shame. On. Me, she says in English for my benefit.

Vilares knows the mans story. He was a former Porto football player who lost his career to his addiction and a leg to a car accident. On being introduced to me, another regular Manuel reveals he was once married to one of the countrys most famous news presenters. In the car she and Lourinho google the glamorous presenters picture to show me what she looks like. Do you believe him? I ask. He is not the sort of person who generally makes things up, she says.

Manuel, 56, has been coming to the van for methadone for two years; after decades of addiction, he now consumes just a tiny amount of heroin and cocaine. He has a job at a beachfront bar, is clear of Hep C and has reconnected with his estranged son who works nearby. I like coming here, he says. It has changed everything.

What Fiona*, the mother of a Scottish user, would give for a touch of that humanity. Sitting 1,800 miles away in Dundee, she tells me of her desperate struggle to get her son David back on the methadone programme after he failed to pick up his prescription. He had blood clots and fatigue and was suffering the symptoms of withdrawal so he missed several days in a row, says Fiona, who gave up her work to look after Davids son, Ryan. But the danger of taking drug users off the methadone is that they will go looking for street drugs and that those street drugs will kill them.

David was already known to services so there was no reason he shouldnt have been able to start again immediately on a lower dose; but it took her months of wrangling to sort out. I worry about David dying every day. The worst is when I wake up at 3am and wonder what he is doing, she says.

Fiona was part of the Dundee Drugs Commission, a body of experts tasked with looking at what could be done to tackle the citys drugs deaths toll. The commission discovered almost all of Dundees drug users were being funnelled through one NHS service: the Integrated Substance Misuse Services (ISMS), which is stretched and focused almost entirely on the prescribing of methadone. The commission also found there was little collaboration between ISMS and the citys myriad third sector and community organisations, to the point that it seemed to believe there was no alternative service to which patients could be referred or discharged.

As a result, there were only 22 planned discharges from ISMS last year and 452 unplanned discharges (where users have simply fallen out of the programme). A greater proportion of those who died drugs-related deaths were in treatment than in other parts of Scotland.

Dealing with drug users has become a specialism, says Andy Perkins, director of the Figure 8 consultancy contracted to run the commission. Because there are medical issues with prescribing, ISMS sees itself as the only organisation that can deal with this population. Its partly territorial, partly that they dont trust anyone else. But the idea that its a speciality leads mental health services to turn people away. They say: Oh no we cant help you. You need to be seen by the drugs service.

Its not just mental health services that are the problem. Fiona recalls the stress of trying to sort out Davids benefits. He was in crisis and wanted to stop his joint claim with his partner, so I put him in a B&B, got him his own bank account and took him to the benefits office, she says.

As we walked in, he saw the words universal credit and went white. He said: I cant do this because he was frightened of having to cope with daily life. I managed to convince him. I said: Look, just take a deep breath and ask the question and he did and it was sorted out but that was with me by his side. What happens to those who have nobody?

Chair of the commission Robert Peat says the ISMS focus on prescribing means there is little time for outreach initiatives. Thats why we should be using the third sector more. You dont need a nurse or a social worker for that type of work. You need support workers who will treat the user with kindness and compassion.

Nationally, the Scottish Government has set up a task force, headed by Professor Catriona Matheson, which is looking at the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and gathering evidence on good practice elsewhere. Last year, much of the debate focused on the safer consumption rooms, with SNP MPs calling for decriminalisation or a one-off exemption to allow it to happen. But many of those who work in the sector believe there is plenty that could done without Westminsters help.

The commission hopes the Scottish government and the Dundee Partnership will act on its recommendations. If the city wants to attract people, it needs to be a good place for those who live here, Peat says. Everyone must be valued.

Portugals drugs policy is not perfect. As Curado points out the government has been slow to fund both Naxolene and the safer drugs consumption rooms. Many working on the front line would also like to see the introduction of drug-testing facilities.

At a semi-derelict property in Porto, I meet Rui Coimbra Morais, president of CASO, the local drug users union. With his grey beard, thick-set glasses and rakish scarf, there is a touch of Jeff Goldblum to Morais, who must be a thorn in the side of those trying to sell the Portuguese model to the world.

Morais is a former heroin addict. He still smokes it occasionally. He would continue to inject on special occasions if he could, but he no longer has any veins he can inject into. Injecting heroin gives me a sense of unity I cannot achieve with any other substance, he tells me. It brings the broken pieces back together. In its place, he takes MDMA or snorts cocaine about once a month.

Moraiss biggest gripe with Portugals drugs strategy is the Commission of Dissuasion which he has appeared before several times. It is better than going to court, he says , but it is still patronising. It is saying to people: You dont know how to take care of yourself. It also encourages game-playing. If I go to the psychologist because I want my life to change thats one thing, but if the police or the Commission of Dissuasion sends me, I am going because I dont want to pay a fine.

The irony is that Morais and the secretary of his local Commission for Dissuasion see each other regularly when they drop their children off at the same nursery. She treats me like everyone else, he says. But making people appear before a committee, it is stigmatising I would not like to see Scotland replicating this.

Morais insists that, despite the spin, stigma is woven throughout the system. If there is no stigma, then why are psychologists who work with outreach teams paid so much less than those who work in hospitals? he demands. And he is impatient with the various governments for not progressing from decriminalisation to regulation.

So, is the Portuguese system not all its cracked up to be? Oh Im playing devils advocate, Morais says. When I go to conferences and see what other countries are doing, Im glad I live here.

When I look at whats happening with drugs deaths here, I wish I lived there. Or at least I wish we could tap into some of Portugals vision.

Imagine a Scotland where drugs policy wasnt prey to the whims of each new government; where no-one spoke dismissively of being parked on methadone and where the most vulnerable had easy access to the support they required.

Fiona often imagines what life might have been like for her son if he had been given more support. David, now in his late 30s, started struggling emotionally when his father died. He became addicted to over-the-counter painkillers and began using cannabis. His transition from soft to hard drugs came when he was placed in a hostel after serving a short prison sentence.

Fiona believes there were lots of moments where wrap-around support or even just someone who listened might have pushed him further towards recovery. She would like to see more outreach work, and the forging of one-to-one relationships with long-term users. If you have someone to talk to and are treated with kindness, everything else will follow, she says.

While she lobbies for change, she has to bear the pain of losing the essence of the son she once knew and the worry of trying to keep what is left of him alive. There was so much joy in having David and seeing him develop and knowing that he was IS such a good person, although I dont see so much of that side of him any more, she says.

He is stuck in a hole now. I just want someone to reach in and pull him out.

*Some names have been changed

Read more:

Why Scotland can ill afford to ignore Portugals ground-breaking war on drugs - The Scotsman

The US War on Drugs Is a War on the Climate – Gizmodo UK

The US War on Drugs has a troubled history riddled with racism, propaganda, and failure as the country remains one of the top markets for illegal drugs. The US crackdown on drugs is, unfortunately, also driving deforestation throughout Central America according to new research.

As cocaine traffickers try to avoid detection, they venture further into remote rainforests to hide, often cutting down key protected areas along the way. In fact, they often launder their drug money by posing as loggers and ranchers who are still illegally cutting down precious rainforest. The natural and cultural resources lost a year in the region amounts to some $214.6 million (172.8 million), according to the new research.

A team of researchers from the US, Costa Rica, and El Salvador presented their findings Tuesday in three separate papers at the pre-COP, an event the Costa Rican government hosted as part of the build-up for the Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP25) in Chile in December. They monitored criminal activity in protected areas in Petn, Guatemala; northeastern Honduras; and Costa Ricas Osa Peninsula by taking trips to the region in 2015 and 2016, followed by fieldwork in the three areas in 2018. The scientists conducted a total of 45 interviews with Costa Rican protected area administrators and other stakeholders from the public and private sectors from Guatemala and Honduras.

These drug-trafficking practices have been ongoing since the early 2000s, but with the climate crisis reaching a fever pitch, researchers are focusing more attention on the growing invasion of narcos in Central American rainforests. Per the new research, this environmental devastation doesnt just look like fallen trees; it includes destroyed mangroves, drained wetlands, and poached flora and fauna.

The research presented on Tuesday also points to the value of letting local communities manage their forests. It turns out they do a damn good job. Costa Rica, which has higher rates of community forest management, narcotics-related activity is not as pronounced as it is in Guatemala and Honduras. The findings also show that letting communities manage their forests could help address climate change. The findings show that carbon stored in community forests in southern Mexico and Central America is enough to help the region meet its Paris Agreement goals.

Thats only if governments give them the power and resources, however, to properly manage these lands. Thats the main takeaway from all this research, author Jennifer Devine, an assistant professor of geography at Texas State University,told us in an email.

Communal and indigenous land rights are the most effective strategy to combat the negative impacts of drug trafficking and climate change simultaneously, she wrote. The War on Drugs approach to fighting drug traffickers has to end. Rather than engaging in military-based approaches, governments and donors should invest in community and indigenous land rights and governance systems to curtail the power and proliferation of [drug trafficking organisations], mitigate climate change by slowing narco deforestation, and to recognise the rights of Indigenous and peasant communities.

Otherwise, dangerous and violent drug-dealing organisations often enter the remote rainforests where there is little to no human activity or settlements and essentially claim them. Once that happens, it makes protecting those lands close to impossible with park rangers facing death if they retaliate against the narcos. Clashes like this have been unfolding in the Brazilian Amazon as criminal gangs look to convert the forest to cattle pastures and farms.

Those are just some of the unintended consequences of this issue. The world is losing valuable, sometimes centuries-old forests, but people are also dying as a result of this infiltration. And those who survive do so by escaping to foreign lands where theyre treated as the other.

Drug trafficking and its environmental and social impacts are contributing to the refugee crisis at the US-Southern border that is mistakenly referred to as a migration crisis, Devine said.

World leaders need to step up to both protect these rainforests and the communities under siege by narcos. Thats one way to stop climate change and help the communities that live there.

Featured image: AP

Here is the original post:

The US War on Drugs Is a War on the Climate - Gizmodo UK

Where Canada’s Political Parties Stand On Marijuana And Drugs Ahead Of The Election – Marijuana Moment

Canadian voters will decide on Monday whether Prime Minister Justin Trudeaus Liberal Party will retain control of the federal government, or if one of several competing parties will get a chance to take over.

The result of the election could have a variety of implications for marijuana policy about one year after the country legalized cannabisa reform move that Trudeau campaigned on in 2015.

But its not just marijuana positions that separate the parties, as broader drug policy issues have also exposed differences in the direction Canada may take depending on which party controls the House of Commons.

Heres a breakdown of where each party and their respective leaders stand on drug policy.

During his first campaign for prime minister, Trudeau pledged to legalize cannabis nationwide if electedand while it didnt materialize as quickly as hed anticipated, marijuana prohibition was officially ended for adults in October 2018.

But while the prime minister scored points with advocates for making good on his promise, hes disappointed others with the specifics of its implementation and for repeatedly declining to give his support to broader drug decriminalization efforts.

Trudeau was asked in February 2018 whether his administration would consider lifting criminal penalties for opioid possession as a means to combat the drug crisis. He responded that the policy is not a step that Canada is looking at taking at this point.

Its not part of the plan, Trudeau, who admitted to using cannabis while serving in the House of Commons, said. There are many steps we can and have taken.

He made similar comments when he was asked about the same issue the previous year, stating that the country is not looking at decriminalization or legalization of any other drugs other than what were doing with marijuana.

The reasoning, Trudeau said, is because theres a lot of other tools that we are using right now instead.

We are going to focus on getting the control and regulation of [the] marijuana regime right, and thats quite a handful right now, he said. Were not looking at any other steps.

Trudeaus views on the issue dont necessarily align with those of his party, however. Liberal delegates voted in favor of a resolution that sought to remove criminal penalties for drug offenses at a convention last year, hoping to put the policy on the partys campaign platform for this upcoming election.

The Government of Canada should treat drug abuse as a health issue, expand treatment and harm reduction services and re-classify low-level drug possession and consumption as administrative violations, the measure stated.

Following the vote, however, Trudeau said at a press conference that its not part of our plans.

The party did ultimately adopt a formal platform backing certain harm reduction policies such as safe consumption sites and stipulating that first-time non-violent drug offenders should be diverted to drug treatment court in order to help drug users get quick access to treatment, and to prevent more serious crimes.

During a debate with Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer last month, decriminalization came up again. While Trudeau initially said it wasnt on the partys agenda at the moment, he later clarified in a press scrum that we will not be further decriminalizing any drugs other than cannabis.

Bill Blair, the parliamentary secretary to the minister of justice, said in April 2018 that the government had no plans to legalize or decriminalize any other drugs besides marijuana.

But despite opposition from the administration, some Liberal lawmakers have been undeterred. MP Nathaniel Erskine-Smith introduced a bill in July that would repeal sections of federal drug law that concern possession, effectively decriminalizing the controlled substances.

And the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health, which is controlled by the majority Liberals, issued a report in June recommending the government work with provinces, territories, municipalities and Indigenous communities and law enforcement agencies to decriminalize the simple possession of small quantities of illicit substances.

All but one member of the Conservative Party, including Scheer, voted against legalizing marijuana last year. However, if elected to the majority, Scheer said lawmakers wouldnt seek to overturn the law.

We will maintainthe fact that cannabis is legal, we are not going to change that and we do support the idea of people having those records pardoned for prior cannabis offenses, he said in June.

While hes pledged to uphold the legal marijuana program, the Conservative leader said during a debate with Trudeau that hed use funds for cannabis tax revenue to increase enforcement against the illicit market. Scheer also accused the prime minister of promoting a secret agenda to decriminalize and legalize hard drugs.

The party also pushed advertisements on Facebook that falsely accused the Liberals of seeking to legalize hard drugs.

This is yet another example of Conservatives copying the American right-wing playbook, spreading false information to scare and mislead voters, Liberal Party spokesperson Joe Pickerill said in response to the ads.

Conservative Senators visited Washington, D.C. to meet with then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions in April 2018. The purpose of the trip, according to a press release, was to investigate the predictable consequences of legalization for Canadians traveling to the United States by discussing the matter with the anti-marijuana official.

Though Scheer and other Conservative lawmakers have derided drug policy proposals from the Liberals, their official party platform does stress the need to craft drug laws that treat addiction as a public health issue.

To help more Canadians recover from addiction, we will revise the federal governments substance abuse policy framework to make recovery its overarching goal, the platform states. We will reorient the Canadian Drugs and Substances Strategy towards ensuring that every addict has the opportunity to recover from their addiction and to lead a drug-free life and that all policies that fall under the Strategy have recovery as their objective.

Conservatives also voiced support for expanding drug treatment facilities, funding education campaigns that encourage young people to avoid illicit substances and partnering with school districts and other institutions to clean up used needles.

All NDP lawmakers present for the vote on the cannabis legalization bill supported it. The party has not shied away from broader drug decriminalization, and members have emphasized the need to promote restorative justice in Canadas marijuana program.

New Democrats believe that there is much more we can do to save lives and support those struggling with opioids, the partys platform reads. In government, we will declare a public health emergency and commit to working with all levels of government, experts and Canadians to end the criminalization and stigma of drug addiction, so that people struggling with addiction can get the help they need without fear of arrest, while getting tough on the real criminalsthose who traffic in and profit from illegal drugs.

The platform voiced support for expanding overdose prevention facilities and investigating the role of pharmaceutical companies in the opioid crisis and ensuring that the public is compensated if the industry is found culpable.

We will also proactively expunge criminal records for Canadians convicted of minor cannabis possession, NDP said. With cannabis now legal in Canada, too many people are still burdened with criminal records for simple possessionrecords that mean real hardships that affect their employment opportunities and their ability to travel. These records for minor cannabis possession will be completely erased, allowing people to get on with building their lives.

Singh has repeatedly proposed decriminalization as a solution to the countrys drug problems.

I can tell you from personal experience, but I can also show youand Im sure you all know that theres a preponderance of evidence when we look at those folks that are being charged with personal possession of a controlled substance people that are being arrested and incarcerated, these are folks that are struggling with issues of mental health of addiction and poverty, Singh said in November 2017. To me poverty, mental health and addictions dont sound like criminal justice problems. They sound to me like a social justice problem that should be dealt with like a social justice problem.

Thats why Im calling for the decriminalization of all personal possession offenses when it comes to drugs, to make a difference in the lives of people and actually bring real change, he said.

During a debate as Singh was competing to become leader of NDP, he emphasized his decriminalization proposal.

I would call for the immediate decriminalization of all personal possession offenses when it comes to drugs. Period, he said.

NDP has also been critical of the rollout of Canadas legal marijuana law, with the party writing in September that Justin Trudeaus Liberals had plenty of time to get this right and its not enough, referring to the limited number of pardons for cannabis convictions that the government had issued.

The NDP is going to keep fighting for criminal records for Canadians convicted of minor cannabis possession to be expunged, they said.

NDP MP Don Davies unsuccessfully tried to get unanimous consent for a measure to immediately provide pardons for those burdened by criminal records for cannabis offenses that will soon be legal shortly after the legalization bill passed.

For some people in Canada, and in some places, pot has been effectively legal for years, Singh said in October 2018. But depending on who you are, the color of your skin, and where you live, theres a different set of rules.

A private member bill introduced by NDP MP Murray Rankin to expunge criminal records for cannabis possession was rejected by Liberal lawmakers in May despite agreement that minority communities have been disproportionately impacted by federal drug laws.

In May, NDP urged their Liberal colleagues to answer questions about the impact of medical cannabis taxes on patients.

The Liberal tax on medical cannabis is unfair and damaging to the health of patients. It shows that the Liberal government is out of touch with the reality of people, NDP Deputy Leader Alexandre Boulerice said. So far, my questions to the Minister have gone unanswered. But this time, I hope that he will finally justify the stance taken by the Liberals.

Medical cannabis must be treated just like other prescription drugs. Its price must be reviewed and untaxed in order to allow patients to treat themselves properly, Boulerice said. Some patients are forced to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars each month to get their medication. This is wrong!

May voted for the cannabis legalization bill, and the Green Party platform backs decriminalizing all drugs, pledging to address the opioid crisis as a health-care issue, not a criminal issue, by declaring a national health emergency.

Drug possession should be decriminalized, ensuring people have access to a screened supply and the medical support they need to combat their addictions, it says.

The platform includes several provisions aimed at reforming the current legal marijuana regime.

A year into the legalization of cannabis, the flaws in the regulatory framework for cannabis production and sale are evident and a reform agenda is emerging, the party said, adding that the governments regulatory approach treats the production of cannabis as uniquely dangerous and thats contributed to the ongoing presence of an illicit market.

To combat the issue, Green Party said it would lower the federally set price of marijuana to be more competitive with illicit sellers, eliminate excess plastic packaging requirements, remove excise duties and sales tax on medical cannabis products, allow outdoor cultivation, impose organic production standards and allow CBD to be marketed as a natural health supplement.

Security requirements mean growers must use more energy and water and deal with diseases and pests that thrive in greenhouses, increasing costs and hobbling their ability to meet production expectations, the platform says.

Other policies the party supports include expanding funding of community-based organizations that test drugs for safety and increase the availability of the overdose reversal medication naloxone.

We must stop treating drug addiction as a criminal issue and start treating is as a health-care issue, May said in a press release last month announcing her partys support for decriminalization. This is a national health emergency.

The opioid crisis is a national tragedy that is devastating communities and families across Canada, she said. We have to abandon old notions of the war on drugs and join the battle that really mattersthe fight to save Canadian lives.

Its hard to stand up as a national party leader and say its time to decriminalize all illicit drugs, May said during a press conference. Its what we have to do.

We have to take emergency steps in an emergency situation, and its far too dangerous to allow people, whether theyre living on the streets or living at home with their parentsto have illicit drugs that are not thoroughly screened for fentanyl contamination, she said.

Members of the Bloc Qubcois, which is primarily focused on advocating for Quebec sovereignty, voted against the marijuana legalization bill.

The partys leader, Blanchet, doesnt appear to have extensively discussed cannabis or drug policy issues.

Former Bloc Qubcois Party Leader Martine Ouellet was more outspoken about the need for reform and said in 2017 that the country should nationalize a legal cannabis market.

With the legalizationit creates a brand new market and [it] is a market that is currently occupied by criminal organizations, she said. The choice we have, do we want it to go from criminal organizations to private firms, big corporations, or if we want these profits to go from criminal organizations to all citizens?

Ensuring that individuals provinces have the jurisdiction to allow or ban home cultivation for personal use was reportedly a key policy the party supported.

Bernier, voted against the cannabis legalization bill as a Conservative lawmaker but said that he would not reverse it if elected. However, he pledged to remain watchful of the industry.

In the longer term, my main worry is to make sure that we see the illegal market significantly reduced and ideally disappear, he said through a spokesperson. That was one of the key justifications for cannabis legalization.

If [the illicit market] stays large, we would look at regulatory and tax changes to ensure the legal market is better served, he said. We do not have any specific proposal for now. Same thing for edibles.

According to Burnaby Now, Bernier has said that hes in favor of marijuana legalization in principle and that the country should review the impact of safe consumption sites.

When running as for the leadership of the Conservative Party in 2016, Bernier welcomed an endorsement from Marc Emery, the so-called Prince of Pot who has since faced allegations of sexual misconduct. Emery said at the time, I dont even know what his position on marijuana is and I dont care because for me Maxime Bernier represents a long-term future on all the issues during a radio interview.

Days before Bernier formally launched the PPC last year, Emery told The Toronto Star that he totally endorses the candidates policies.

Ive never seen anything I disagree with, Emery said.

Laura-Lynn Tyler Thompson, a PPC candidate, said earlier this year that the party does not have an official stance on cannabis policy but expressed personal opposition to legalization.

Analysts expect voter turnout to be down for the Liberals, as enthusiasm for Trudeau continues to suffer amid controversy over revelations that he wore blackface and brownface. Thats presented an opportunity that some of the lesser parties such as the Greens intend to take advantage of, with May urging voters to elect enough of her party members to the House of Commons to prevent the Liberals from winning an outright majority.

That situation would mean that the Greens and other smaller parties would hold the balance of power, possibly even including the Bloc Qubcois, The New York Times reported.

But regardless of the outcome, what appears certain is that Canadas legal marijuana law will survive no matter which party holds power, though the specifics of how the program will continue to roll out could depend on the electoral results.

A bigger question is whether the country will build on the momentum of cannabis legalization and pursue broader drug policy reforms such as decriminalization or if that movement will stall under unsupportive leadership.

Presidential Candidate Wants To Let Americans Legalize Marijuana Through National Referendum

Photo courtesy of Christopher Policarpio.

The rest is here:

Where Canada's Political Parties Stand On Marijuana And Drugs Ahead Of The Election - Marijuana Moment

History Rhymes: From The War on Drugs to The War on Guns – The Libertarian Republic

Somebody f*cking do somethingscreamed Kacey Musgraves at Lollapalooza music festival.

Gun control is fashionable at the moment. But in reality, it is just another government program that will grow bureaucracy and diminish individual liberty. The same knee-jerk mob reaction that pleads for the government to f*cking do something about gun control is the same mentality that started the Drug War.

Musgraves passionate plea was in response to two mass shootings in the same week in America. She was pleading for something like governmental regulation to solve the heinous tragedy of mass shootings. Its not the first time that America has faced scary situations and reacted by asking the government to solve it.

Through the 1970s to the 1990s, America struggled with drug abuse never seen before. The public clamored, somebody f*cking do something. What was the policy response? Massive law enforcement campaigns that spent tons of money and incarcerated countless people for answering consumer demands.

The hysteria of the time wasnt completely unfounded. Americans were dying of overdoses all over the country. However, as most panic-induced government solutions do, the fix was too expansive and had some nasty side-effects. It created a system that harassed, arrested and sentenced people to long prison terms for marijuana charges. Even though, the plant has never caused an overdose death by itself.

Republicans played a role in perpetuating the war on drugs boondoggle, but it was far from ONLY a Republican mistake. Many Democrats played their part in it too (looking at you, Joe Biden). Some of them have owned up to their past and helped in bipartisan criminal justice reform.

Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill) recognized that he played a role in creating the disparity between sentencing for crack cocaine versus powder during the 1990s. The disparity was created in a hysterical rush and inadvertently caused a disproportionate number of non-white offenders receiving harsh sentences for drug offenses.

For example, in 1994 at the age of 25, Alton Mills was sentenced to life without parole for a low-level nonviolent drug offense. Senator Durbin started arguing on Mills behalf and in December of 2015, he was released from prison after serving 22 years.

There are numerous similar cases where unduly harsh sentences were given to offenders, and that is why there is bipartisan dislike of the Drug War. That should remind us how panicked government action can be dangerous, and result in toxic solutions that have long-lasting repercussions.

Drug overdoses are terrible just like gun violence. Blindly begging the government to f*cking do something isnt the answer, whether its drugs or guns.

See the original post here:

History Rhymes: From The War on Drugs to The War on Guns - The Libertarian Republic

Is it time to legalise heroin and cocaine to win the war on drugs? – 702

A new think-tank is calling for the legalisation of all recreational drugs within a specific regulatory framework.

The South African Drug Policy Initiative (SADPI) is made up of some of the country's leading professors of medicine and believes the criminalisation of drugs and drug users causes greater harm than drugs themselves.

Dr Keith Scott is one of the co-founders of SADPI.

It should be a fundamental right for people to use any drugs they want.

Scott says politicians have consistently got it wrong when it comes to trying to win the war against drugs.

Every new official who comes in wants to be tough on crime and they start with drugs and then they make the same mistakes and the consumption of drugs goes up and the supply goes up and the crime goes up.

The group believes legal regulation is the only solution to an escalating problem.

We want to use similar regulatory platforms as we use for alcohol to regulate these other drugs from heroin to magic mushrooms.

Find out more about SAPDI's objectives by listening to the full interview below:

This article first appeared on CapeTalk : Is it time to legalise heroin and cocaine to win the war on drugs?

Read the original post:

Is it time to legalise heroin and cocaine to win the war on drugs? - 702

Drugs and the death penalty – Inside Indonesia

Puri Kencana Putri & Aghniadi

In 2018 there were 39 new death sentences for drug-related offences in Indonesia, accounting for a staggering 81 per cent of all new death sentences. By comparison, only 17 per cent were for murder, and the remaining 2 per cent were for terrorism.

The popular-but-hard-line war on drugs has been vociferously condemned by the international community. But the Indonesian government remains committed to it, motivated in a large part by a moral panic around a national narcotics emergency which has resulted from data now known to be dodgy.

Indonesias National Narcotics Agency has claimed, for example, that there are around 4.5 million people in the country in need of rehabilitation for their drug use at any one time, but this figure is in fact a projection of the total number of people in Indonesia who have used drugs even if only a few times ever not just those unable to manage their drug use.

More than 30 people die from drug-related causes every day in Indonesia, and as part of the war on drugs the government has also restored the death penalty and executed 18 drug traffickers since 2015, including 15 foreigners eight from Nigeria, two each from Australia and Brazil, and one from each of Malawi, the Netherlands and Vietnam.

Meanwhile, it is common knowledge that some law enforcers in Indonesia rely on questionable legal grounds and do not always follow procedure. The legal process is at risk of being marred by arbitrary or discriminative practices, and law enforcers can, of course, make mistakes, but the death penalty cannot be reversed, unlike other severe punishments.

A sleuth of executions in 2015 drew attention to how Indonesias legal system is not well-equipped to make sure criminal proceedings against drug users and traffickers are fair. On 29 April of that year 43-year-old Rodrigo Gularte from Brazil was executed after being convicted of smuggling cocaine into Indonesia back in 2004. But his lawyers say that his case should never have gone to trial in the first place because, as Amnesty International reported, he had been diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. Rodrigo had lived with this mental illness from the age of 16, and throughout the 10 years he waited on death row in Indonesias prison system, his illness was not recognised. Indonesias penal code ought to prevent people with mental illnesses like Rodrigo from ever standing trial. But the revelation was not enough to save him from the firing squad.

In a more fortunate case, 30-year-old Mary Jane Veloso from the Philippines avoided execution at the eleventh hour. She had been working in Malaysia as a domestic servant but was convicted of carrying drugs on her first visit to Indonesia back in 2010. Since then Mary Jane has languished in an Indonesian prison on death row without much support even from the Philippine Embassy in Jakarta. Her family in the Philippines was never informed about her case, and it has since come to light that the Indonesian police did not even provide her with a translator so she could properly defend herself. Her planned execution in 2015 was only stayed after the president of the Philippines, Rodrigo Duterte, provided evidence that Mary Jane had been manipulated into carrying the contraband.

The Draft Criminal Code proposes to change things for the worse. One severe proposal is that the death penalty be made final, meaning that the president would not have authority to grant clemency. But the Indonesian government seems to have backtracked, asking instead that any death sentence be able to be commuted to life imprisonment for good behaviour on death row, and that the death penalty be re-categorised as an alternative punishment. Lawmakers from both the governing coalition and the opposition admit that the death penalty has been an ineffective deterrent, particularly for drug-related crime, as the number of cases has risen rather than fallen.

The current war on drugs can only be won if the Indonesian government shifts its focus from punishment and the disproven deterrent of the death penalty to the important battle against the underlying causes of drug use. At the heart of the new approach, there needs to be a greater commitment to protecting the human rights of everyone, including drug traffickers and drug users who have borne the brunt of Indonesias punitive war on drugs.

Puri Kencana Putri (puri.kencanaputri@amnesty.id) is campaign manager at Amnesty International Indonesia.

Aghniadi (aghniadi.adi@amnesty.id) is a campaigner at Amnesty International Indonesia.

See more here:

Drugs and the death penalty - Inside Indonesia

Best of the 2010s: Pitchfork Readers’ Poll Results – Pitchfork

A few weeks ago, we launched the Pitchfork 2010s Readers Poll, in which we asked you to tell us your favorite songs and albums of the past 10 years. Tens of thousands of you did. (Thank you!) Below, find the results, and compare them to Pitchforks own list of the best songs and best albums of the 2010s. And check out all of our 2010s wrap-up coverage here.

1. Kanye West: My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy2. Kendrick Lamar: To Pimp a Butterfly3. Frank Ocean: Blonde4. Kendrick Lamar: good kid, m.A.A.d city5. Frank Ocean: Channel Orange6. Kanye West: Yeezus7. Vampire Weekend: Modern Vampires of the City8. Sufjan Stevens: Carrie & Lowell9. Arcade Fire: The Suburbs10. Lorde: Melodrama11. Tame Impala: Currents12. Bon Iver: Bon Iver13. Radiohead: A Moon Shaped Pool14. Beyonc: Lemonade15. LCD Soundsystem: This Is Happening16. Joanna Newsom: Have One on Me17. Tame Impala: Lonerism18. Beach House: Teen Dream19. David Bowie: Blackstar20. Death Grips: The Money Store21. Carly Rae Jepsen: EMOTION22. Kendrick Lamar: DAMN.23. Deerhunter: Halcyon Digest24. Bon Iver: 22, A Million25. Fiona Apple: The Idler Wheel...26. Kanye West: The Life of Pablo27. Beach House: Bloom28. The National: High Violet29. DAngelo & the Vanguard: Black Messiah30. Tyler, the Creator: Flower Boy31. Daft Punk: Random Access Memories32. The War on Drugs: Lost in the Dream33. Solange: A Seat at the Table34. Grimes: Art Angels35. Father John Misty: I Love You, Honeybear36. Fleet Foxes: Helplessness Blues37. Danny Brown: Atrocity Exhibition38. Beyonc: Beyonc39. Car Seat Headrest: Twin Fantasy40. Charli XCX: Pop 241. Kacey Musgraves: Golden Hour42. Destroyer: Kaputt43. Lana Del Rey: Ultraviolence44. Taylor Swift: 198945. Grimes: Visions46. Sun Kil Moon: Benji47. Robyn: Body Talk48. Jamie xx: In Colour49. Swans: To Be Kind50. Sufjan Stevens: The Age of Adz

1. Kanye West: Runaway [ft. Pusha-T]2. Frank Ocean: Pyramids3. Kendrick Lamar: Alright4. LCD Soundsystem: Dance Yrself Clean5. Robyn: Dancing on My Own6. Grimes: Oblivion7. Tame Impala: Let It Happen8. Kanye West: Ultralight Beam [ft. Chance the Rapper, The-Dream, Kelly Price, and Kirk Franklin]9. Carly Rae Jepsen: Run Away With Me10. Bon Iver: Holocene11. Beyonc: Formation12. Kanye West: POWER [ft. Dwele]13. Vampire Weekend: Hannah Hunt14. Arcade Fire: Sprawl II (Mountains Beyond Mountains)15. M83: Midnight City16. Lana Del Rey: Video Games17. Frank Ocean: Thinkin Bout You18. Mitski: Your Best American Girl19. Kendrick Lamar: King Kunta20. Kanye West: Monster [ft. Justin Vernon, Rick Ross, Jay-Z, and Nicki Minaj]21. Lana Del Rey: Venice Bitch22. Sufjan Stevens: Should Have Known Better23. JAY-Z / Kanye West: Niggas in Paris24. Daft Punk: Get Lucky [ft. Pharrell]25. Kendrick Lamar: The Blacker the Berry26. Solange: Cranes in the Sky27. Kanye West: Blood on the Leaves28. Frank Ocean: Nikes29. Beach House: Myth30. Kanye West: New Slaves31. Radiohead: Daydreaming32. Frank Ocean: Ivy33. The National: Bloodbuzz Ohio34. Lorde: Royals35. Lorde: Green Light36. Sufjan Stevens: Fourth of July37. Kendrick Lamar: Bitch Dont Kill My Vibe38. David Bowie: Blackstar39. Tame Impala: Feels Like We Only Go Backwards40. Mitski: Nobody41. Radiohead: True Love Waits42. Charli XCX: Track 1043. Vampire Weekend: Step44. Future Islands: Seasons (Waiting on You)45. FKA twigs: Two Weeks46. Ariel Pinks Haunted Graffiti: Round and Round47. Taylor Swift: Style48. Lorde: The Louvre49. Fleet Foxes: Helplessness Blues50. Death Grips: Ive Seen Footage

Go here to read the rest:

Best of the 2010s: Pitchfork Readers' Poll Results - Pitchfork

When it comes to NZ drugs, better safe than sorry – Stuff.co.nz

OPINION: Last year the Global Commission on Drug Policy reported that the international "war"on drugs has been a complete failure.

The evidence from around the world is clear hard-line drug policies don't reduce the demand or supply of illegal drugs.

Instead these policies put people taking drugs completely in the dark. Their MDMA(ecstasy) might have five doses in one pill.

ROSA WOODS/STUFF

Moralising doesn't change people's behaviour or keep them safe.

Or it might have been padded out with cheaper, more dangerous drugs.

READ MORE:*How Kiwis' drugs are being tested before they do harm* Summer of love tinged with danger as MDMA reaches new peaks at NZ festivals * Call for urgency on 'life saving' drug tests before summer music festival season starts* Drugs tested covertly at a NZ festival: 57 per cent not what partygoers expected

It's all well and good shrugging our shoulders and saying people shouldn't do drugs if they don't want to risk overdosing or being poisoned.But moralising doesn't change people's behaviour or keep them safe.

ROSA WOODS/STUFF

Testing illegal drugs at festivals is worthwhile, say Wendy Allison, Managing Director of KnowYourStuffNZ, and Samuel Andrews, Harm Reduction Project Advisor for the NZ Drug Foundation.

I agree with the commission that we need to move away from prohibition and punishment and reduce the risk of drug users coming to harm.

KnowYourStuffNZ is a not-for-profit social enterprise that works in partnership with the NZ Drug Foundation to set up drug-checking tents at festivals and events.

Funded entirely by donations, the KnowYourStuffNZ volunteers use spectrometers to let people check what's in their drugs before deciding whether to take them.

Importantly, after testing, the volunteers talk to people about the risks of taking whatever it is they've identified.

They also let event medical staff know what drugs they've come across so that the staff have a better chance of dealing with any medical issues that may arise.

This is vital, as KnowYourStuffNZ have found more than 70 different types of substances being sold as the main three or four illegal drugstypes.

The good news is that according to their latest data, almost two thirds of people choose not to take their drugs if it turns out they weren't what they thought they were.

Right now, it's unclear whether festival organisers could be prosecuted for "knowingly" providing drug-checking at their events.

Or they could lose their event insurance for keeping people safer.

That's why the Green Party are calling on Parliament to amend the Misuse of Drugs Act 1975 so that drug-checking can be made more widely available.

With the weather warming up and our summer festival season approaching, I hope Parliament gets behind this initiative and drug-checking becomes the norm.

Dr Siouxsie Wiles MNZM is an Associate Professor at the University of Auckland and a Deputy Director of Te Pnaha Matatini, a New Zealand Centre of Research Excellence.

Follow this link:

When it comes to NZ drugs, better safe than sorry - Stuff.co.nz

Drugs and drug policy – Inside Indonesia

Claudia Stoicescu & Wayne Palmer

For much of its modern history drugs have been legally produced and consumed in Indonesia, largely in response to demand at home. As far back as the 10thcentury, the use of cannabis (ganja), mostly cultivated in North Sumatra and used for medicinal, recreational and culinary purposes, has been documented across the archipelago. Opium (candu), thought to be initially introduced by Arab traders, was already a significant import when the Dutch arrived six centuries later. Capitalising on a thriving local market, Dutch colonial powers gradually monopolised the import and distribution of candu in Java from the late 17thcentury, with imports reaching an average of 56,000kg annually well into the late 18thcentury, according to official estimates. In the early 1900s, international demand for cocaine for medical, therapeutic and casual uses grew, spurring the legal cultivation of coca in Java. By 1912 Java had become the largest coca exporter in the world, outdoing its rivals in South America with annual shipments of 1000 tonnes of coca. Interestingly though, local consumption of coca derivatives never took off in the Dutch East Indies.

The Dutch East Indies resisted the growing United States-led international movement against the narcotics trade, which saw many other states restrict the production, use and distribution of certain substances from the 1920s. But following Indonesias independence, an international drug control system emerged in the second half of the 20thcentury. It was propped up by three United Nations (UN) conventions that specify how different types of illicit drugs should be regulated. Indonesia ratified the UN conventions on drug control passed in 1961, 1971 and 1988. Subsequently, the Indonesian government (like many others) has adopted some of the harshest penalties against drug use, possession and trafficking in Asia.

For the last two decades, Indonesia has waged an unforgiving war on drugs. The majority of its contemporary drug laws were enacted in 1997 and further amended in 2009. Severe sanctions against the use and supply of controlled drugs are justified by real and imagined harms associated with illicit drugs: health problems, crime, unemployment and poverty. Nowadays, cannabis and heroin, along with newer substances like crystal methamphetamine (sabu-sabu) stir desire, temptation, fear and hatred in equal measure. Broad public support for harsh punishments meted out for drugs offences in Indonesia including capital punishment are stoked by national fears of societal collapse and corruption of the new generation. But despite control efforts, Indonesias drug markets continue to grow, involving millions of people from all walks of life. Indonesia needs a much more sophisticated approach to ensure that the most vulnerable amongst them get the support they need to navigate the terrain safely.

In this special edition, we showcase a range of perspectives on the social, structural, and environmental factors that shape drug-related policy and drug use in Indonesia. The first two articles offer insights into the daily lives of people who use drugs. Laura Nevendorff and Ignatius Praptoraharjo reflect on the dominant lens of the Indonesian government that tends to view any and all drug use as a dependency or criminal issue, while in fact many users of crystal methamphetamine in Indonesia manage their use while leading productive lives. We also learn that using sabu-sabu enables them to negotiate the challenges of life and work. Through her photo essay, Alexandra Radu offers a rare glimpse into the daily life of women undergoing voluntary rehabilitation for drug use at Rumah Singga Peka. Not only does the centre cater to the needs of women, but it is also unique because their approach to drug treatment focuses on harm reduction when most other programs in Indonesia promote abstinence.

Emily Rowe draws our attention to the fact that the Indonesian government prefers to spend its limited budget on expensive and largely ineffective drug control activities instead of financially supporting public-health oriented programs that are proven to save lives. Lex Kuiper hones in on an uncomfortable contradiction in government rhetoric on drug policy. On the one hand, Indonesian officials see themselves as tasked with the responsibility to protect the people against the perils of drug use. On the other, they want to save people who use drugs from drug use. Here, so-called protection also criminalises and punishes the very people the government wants to save.

Puri Kencana Putri and Aghniadi draw our attention to Indonesias use of the death penalty to punish drug trafficking. They show how Indonesias stance hardened in 2015, as the government sought to project an image that it was tough on drugs. Ricky Gunawan and Raynov T. Pamintori provide a heart-wrenching frontline account of how Indonesias criminal justice system is too flawed to mete out irreversible punishments like the death penalty, and offer helpful reflections on how to improve the situation.

The edition concludes with an article by Dania Putri on the growing support for decriminalisation of cannabis in Indonesia. Given the current governments commitment to its war on drugs, decriminalisation in the near future is a pipedream. But the new Criminal Code has not been passed yet, and Indonesias legislators might just surprise us again.

Claudia Stoicescu (claudia.stoicescu@icloud.com) is an Associate Member in the Department of Social Policy and Intervention at the University of Oxford, and a Visiting Fellow at the Atmajaya University HIV and AIDS Research Centre in Jakarta.

Wayne Palmer (wpalmer@binus.edu) is an Associate Professor in the Department of International Relations at Universitas Bina Nusantara in Jakarta.

Go here to read the rest:

Drugs and drug policy - Inside Indonesia

"Eradicating Peace: The Other Side of the Colombian War on Drugs" – madison365.com

Eradicating Peace: The Other Side of the Colombian War on Drugs, a talk with Leider Valencia and short documentary film, The Coca Trap/Non-Narcos: Colombias coca growers fight for alternative to their trade will take place Wednesday, Oct. 9, 7-8:30 p.m. at the Anderson Auditorium of Edgewood College.Leider Valencia is Colombian National Coordinator of the Growers of Coca, Poppy, and Marijuana (COCCAM), which is trying to find alternative crops to grow that will give them a living wage to support their families. Through his perspective as a campesino organizer, Leider will discuss forces threatening the Colombian peace process in rural areas and how movements in the U.S may contribute to solidarity in action. COCCAM emerged with the objective of promoting the implementation of point 4 (Solution to the problem of illicit drugs) of the peace accords in Havana. Paramilitaries have assassinated more 38 leaders participating in this movement.

This Witness for Peace speaker tour touches on the grassroots efforts by afro-Colombians, campesinos and indigenous peoples working towards alternative sustainable development in areas hard-hit by the internal armed conflict as well as fumigations and forced eradication/militarization. The speaker will discuss the various forces threatening the Colombian peace process and how movements in the U.S may contribute in defending it.

More here:

"Eradicating Peace: The Other Side of the Colombian War on Drugs" - madison365.com

The failed war on drugs: What Africa needs to do – Daily Maverick

The new AU Plan of Action on Drugs Control (2019-2023) includes a commitment to review and collate drug policies across the region and provide continuous support of the epidemiology network and its research across the region. (Photo: Gallo Images / City Press / Leon Sadiki)

It is deeply worrying that the fundamental rights of people who use drugs are constantly compromised by hostile supply reduction activities and the criminalisation of minor non-violent drug offences.

All too often, governments are quick to blame drugs and drug users for so many lives lost, while forgetting the impact of drug control mechanisms that are causing more harm than the drugs themselves. The negative impacts of the criminalisation of people who use drugs continue to raise serious concerns in most African countries. Every individual has a right to access life-saving health services without fear of punishment or discrimination.

However, fear of criminal sanctions generally drives people who use drugs away from proven, effective harm reduction services, leading to infections and premature death from HIV, hepatitis C and overdose. This notion has most recently been recognised by all UN agencies in their new Common Position on Drugs.

The war on drugs has failed woefully

Drug use and possession is still within the moral debate. This makes the promotion of the needs of people who use drugs globally, an uphill task. Some sections of society believe that people who use drugs are morally weak or deserve to be punished. The stigma is even greater in Africa when that person is a woman. This is why the purported war on drugs is considered acceptable and easily implemented in many parts of Africa.

The punishment of a crime must be proportionate to the crime committed. Yet millions of people continue to be imprisoned or are handed more severe sentences for possession or use of controlled drugs. Sentences for low-level, non-violent drug crimes tend to be disproportionately high. In many contexts, those suspected of drug offences are beaten, tortured, or imprisoned for life while some countries still resort to the death penalty or extrajudicial killings.

Small-scale subsistence farmers involved in the cultivation of drug-linked crops are also criminalised despite the lack of other sustainable livelihood options. Since the declaration of the war on drugs more than 50 years ago, it was felt this tough approach would reduce demand and supply. This has clearly not happened, and the negative consequences are increasingly clear. In reality, we should lay the blame on the architects of the disastrous drug war, the lack of political will to find real solutions, and societal apathy generated by decades of stigma and discrimination against persons who use drugs.

A new approach to the drug situation

Governments must begin to question the effectiveness of existing drug control mechanisms. They need to acknowledge that punitive enforcement has proven expensive and counterproductive and to reorient towards pragmatic health and harm reduction approaches that have been shown to minimise the effects of drugs on people who use them.

It is imperative to put an immediate end to the criminalisation of people who use drugs, the possession of drugs for personal use, and of subsistence farmers. Governments also need to address disproportionate sentences for other drug offences.

In addition, governments must focus on ending the continuous violations of human rights experienced by people who use drugs justified by law enforcement agencies due to their goal of achieving a drug-free society. In reality, this is an illusion that is not attainable. Prohibition has never worked in the history of humankind. We need to rethink our drug policies.

Global drug policy needs to be built on firm human rights, health and development principles. Currently, there is no consensus among governments on drugs and human rights and huge disparities in positions and practices. However, the existence of regional bodies like the African Union and Economic Community of West African States provides an institutional bedrock which can steer the process of reviewing drug policies to promote harm reduction practices in the region as a whole.

Governments can move the debate forward by calling for more human-centred objectives and measurable indicators for the future. They need to shift the objectives of drug policy away from process measures such as crop eradication statistics, arrest rates, drug seizures and imprisonment statistics.

Success needs to be measured with a focus on the impacts on health, security and development. Indicators such as reduced drug-related deaths, increased coverage and quality of harm reduction and drug treatment services, reduced incidence of HIV, and increased availability of controlled medicines for pain and palliative care in Africa all need to be taken into account.

Furthermore, there is an urgent need to improve social and economic indicators in areas of drug production, and for increased provision of equitable and environmentally sustainable development programmes, and advances in achieving these goals. And finally, ending human rights violations and abuses against affected populations, the establishment of rigorous and effective human rights monitoring mechanisms to ensure compliance by governments and law enforcement agencies, putting in place comprehensive access to health, social and legal protections with adequate access to justice and legal aid for victims of human rights abuses.

For a more forward-looking response to the world drug situation, there is a need to promote a balanced and integrated approach. Evidence-based responses should be the standard for countries to enable them to curb the health and social consequences of drugs.

Governments need to begin to make efforts to address the drug situation through the adoption of various methods and strategies. The African Union continues to demonstrate strong commitment to addressing the drug situation in the region by facilitating the availability of a wide range of evidence-based treatment options, including opioid substitution therapy (OST).

The new AU Plan of Action on Drugs Control (2019-2023) was recently adopted by member states during the third Specialised Technical Committee meeting in Cairo from 29 July to 2 August 2019, and member states called for harm reduction services to be made available. This is a great step taken by AU member states. It includes a commitment to review and collate drug policies across the region and provide continuous support of the epidemiology network and its research across the region. The action plan further calls for alternatives to punishment for people who use drugs instead of the present status quo being implemented by many countries.

What is the future?

The future looks promising for the region. The adoption of the AU Plan of Action on Drugs Control (2019-2023) can pave the way for member states to adopt a different evidence-based stance away from punitive approaches, which have consistently proved not to work and exacerbated problems related to drug use by creating a system that marginalises already vulnerable communities.

The action plan requests countries to make available comprehensive accessible evidence-based, and human rights-based drug use prevention, dependence treatment and after-care services.

Most importantly, people need not die in pain, fear or helplessness because of mechanisms that do not allow access to essential medicines for those who truly need them.

We must rethink drug policy in Africa. Support, dont punish. DM

Maria-Goretti Ane is the African consultant for the International Drug Policy Consortium. She represents IDPC at regional events and also serves as a focal point for IDPC networking and advocacy work in Africa. She is a private legal practitioner based in Ghana and an expert on drug policy, having been involved in high-level engagements and advocacy on drug use and the law, locally and internationally. She has written a number of articles on drug use and drug policy reform in Africa.

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

See the article here:

The failed war on drugs: What Africa needs to do - Daily Maverick

Lawmakers want to give students with drug convictions access to financial aid – CNBC

If you're convicted of burglary, you can still get federal financial aid for college. But current rules make it nearly impossible for tens of thousands of students who are charged for even minor drug offenses to get that same aid.

That's because the Free Application for Federal Student Aid, which was released on Tuesday for the 2020-2021 school year, includes a question: Have you been convicted for the possession or sale of illegal drugs for an offense that occurred while you were receiving federal student aid (such as grants, work-study or loans)?

If students answer "yes," their eligibility for aid will be restricted until they complete a drug rehabilitation program or pass two random drug tests. During the 2003-2004 school year, roughly 41,000 students, or about .03% of those who filled out the FAFSA application, were deemed ineligible for aid on the basis of drug-related offenses, according to perhaps the most comprehensive report on the topic issued by the Government Accountability Office in 2005.

"As we rethink the war on drugs and the convictions and prison sentences that came with it, we must address all aspects that impacted our communities," Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.) said in a statement Tuesday. "Investing in a person's education is perhaps the best investment we can make to ensure our young people succeed."

That's why the congresswoman, along with over 30 co-sponsors, is introducing the Financial Aid Fairness for Students Act on Tuesday, which would prohibit the Department of Education from asking about drug convictions in future federal aid applications, including the FAFSA.

The legislation would repeal sections of the Higher Education Act that suspends college aid for any person convicted of a drug offense, a barrier that Bass says has "denied tens of thousands of people of needed aid for college and has discouraged tens of thousands of others from even applying."

"This bill addresses yet another unnecessary hindrance for folks trying to access higher education," Bass tells CNBC Make It. "Higher education is not accessible right now. How do you expect people to turn their lives around if you don't give them tools not only not give them tools, but don't give them access to tools to do so?"

Under the current rules, if a student is convicted of drug possession, they face one year of ineligibility from the time of their first conviction. A second conviction earns them two years of ineligibility, while a third offense will suspend their eligibility for financial aid indefinitely.

During the 2016-2017 school year, over 1,000 students were deemed fully ineligible because they had a drug-related conviction or failed to properly answer the question, according to Insider Higher Ed's analysis of data from the Department of Education. The Education Department deemed another 250 students partially suspended from receiving aid.

"This policy unfairly targets poor and minority students and costs society more in terms of crime and lost economic productivity," Rep. Danny Davis (D-Ill.), co-sponsor of the FAFSA Act, said regarding the current FAFSA question around drug convictions.

Graham Boyd, director of the ACLU's Drug Law Reform Project also called the policy "discriminatory." While the FAFSA does not collect data on students' race, and researchers are therefore unable to conclusively say how minority groups are affected, African Americans and Latinos are arrested and convicted of drug offenses at higher rates than white Americans.

"If a student is convicted of a drug offense and her family can afford to pay for college, she will be unaffected by the legislation, while those who are already in danger of being forced to society's margins will be further disempowered," Boyd said.

And advocates say that in addition to presenting an incomplete picture on how the policy affects minorities, the Education Department's data does not capture the number of students who failed to even apply for aid because they feared they would be ineligible. In fact, last year, 38 advocacy groups joined together and sent joint letters urging leaders of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions and U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos to eliminate the FAFSA's drug conviction question.

The letters noted that the Center for Community Alternatives found in a 2015 report that nearly two out of every three undergraduate applicants to the State University of New York who disclosed a felony conviction never completed their application.

This is not the first time lawmakers have pushed to provide students with drug convictions increased access to federal financial aid. Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.) re-introduced the Second Chance for Students Act in July, which would give students convicted of marijuana possession a break before they lost their financial aid.

"Education promotes economic well-being and labor force participation," Davis says. "Excluding individuals who have struggled with addiction from financial assistance is an ineffective policy that has harmed tens of thousands of students."

Don't miss: These 3 states will require you to file a FAFSA to graduate from high school

Like this story? Subscribe to CNBC Make It on YouTube!

Follow this link:

Lawmakers want to give students with drug convictions access to financial aid - CNBC

Rappler investigation into war on drugs wins 2019 Global Shining Light Award – Rappler

Rappler journalist, Patricia Evangelista (4th from right), received the 2019 Global Shining Light Award of the Global Investigative Journalism Network (GIJN) on behalf of the Rappler team that worked on "Murder in Manila", an investigative series on President Rodrigo Duterte's anti-illegal drugs campaign.Photo by Jodesz Gavilan/Rappler

HAMBURG, Germany A Rappler investigative series on President Rodrigo Duterte's anti-illegal drugs campaign won the 2019 Global Shining Light Award of the Global Investigative Journalism Network (GIJN).

The award was given on Saturday, September 28, at the Global Investigative Journalism Conference in Hamburg, Germany.

The 7-part Murder in Manila series, published daily beginning October 4, 2018, focused on the local chapter of a vigilante gang in Tondo, Manila, whose members had been arrested for killing drug suspects and small-time criminals, including a 16-year-old boy.

The story was written and investigated by Patricia Evangelista, photographed by Magnum fellow Carlo Gabuco, with reports by justice reporter Lian Buan and police reporter Rambo Talabong. The investigative team, Newsbreak, is headed by editor and Rappler co-founder Chay Hofilea.

The 6-month investigation found strong indications that the police were outsourcing extrajudicial killings to the Confederate Sentinels Group a group of force multipliers they had also accused of murder.

The series won alongside the #GuptaLeaks investigation by Daily Maverick from South Africa under the Large Outlets category, besting 10 other finalists.

The Global Shining Light Awards honors investigative journalism conducted in developing or transitioning countries, done under threat, duress, or in the direst of conditions.

More than 290 entries were received by the GIJN for 2019.

Peru-based IDL-Reporteros Car Wash/White Collars that explored transnational corruption, meanwhile, won in the small outlets category.

This is the second award for Rappler's Murder in Manila series. It won the Excellence in Human Rights Reporting Award and Excellence in Investigative Reporting Award of the Society of Publishers in Asia (SOPA) in May 2019.

Duterte's violent drug war has been highly criticized for its high number of deaths.

More than 6,000 people were killed in police operations alone. Human rights groups, however, estimate the numbers could reach almost 27,000 to include victims of vigilante-style killings. (READ: The Impunity Series) Rappler.com

Read the rest here:

Rappler investigation into war on drugs wins 2019 Global Shining Light Award - Rappler

Hard-Hit By Drug War, Parts Of B-N Will Get Advantage With Cannabis Legalization – WGLT News

State officials said Monday that Bloomingtons west side and neighborhoods around Illinois State University were among the hardest-hit by the war on drugs and those living there should get a leg up when cannabis becomes legal next year.

The Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity released a map Monday showing 683 Census tracts with high rates of arrest, conviction, and incarceration related to cannabis, plus higher rates of poverty and unemployment.

In McLean County, those disproportionately impacted areas include most of west and south Bloomington, plus ISU and surrounding areas in Normal. Bloomington-Normals east side is almost entirely excluded, as is a donut hole where Illinois Wesleyan University is located.

As Illinois continues its path toward putting equity at the forefront of the states new adult-use cannabis expansion, its important to create opportunities in communities that have been hardest hit by the war on marijuana, Gov. JB Pritzker said in a statement.

Starting in December, those looking to open a new cannabis dispensary can apply for a license. The state will issue up to 75 licenses by May 2020.

The state will score applicants on a scale of 1 to 200, with 25 points specifically designated for so-called social equity applicants. They can get bonus points if their store will be owned mostly by someone living in a disproportionately impacted area, or if most of their employees live in such an area. (Bonus points will also be available for majority owners who were previously arrested for or convicted of any offense that is now eligible for expungement under the new cannabis law.)

Not only will social equity applicants receive points on their applications, but many applicants will also get grants, technical assistance, low-interest loans and fee reductions and waivers, Pritzker said Monday. Taken together, these efforts will do more than any other state in the nation has done to focus on equity.

There are currently 55 medical marijuana dispensaries in Illinois, including one in north Normal (The Green Solution). That business can apply to sell recreational marijuana too, as well as open a second location. Those are separate from the 75 new licenses that will be awarded by May 2020, with up to 110 more by 2021.

The683 Census tracts announced Monday are home to over 2 million Illinoisans.

Too many communities in Illinois have been torn apart due to failed drug policies. By providing resources to justice-impacted individuals and members of their communities, we can ensure that the legalization of cannabis benefits all Illinoisans, regardless of income or background, Erin Guthrie, acting director of the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, said in a statement.

People like you value experienced, knowledgeable and award-winning journalism that covers meaningful stories in Bloomington-Normal. To support more stories and interviews like this one, please consider making a contribution.

Follow this link:

Hard-Hit By Drug War, Parts Of B-N Will Get Advantage With Cannabis Legalization - WGLT News

Ban on pre-employment weed testing to have national impact – amNewYork

A new law that bans most private companies in New York City from testing job applicants for marijuana as part of the hiring process may have an impact that reaches far past city limits.

Local Law 91, which was passed by the City Council in April, designates pre-employment testing for the presence of tetrahydrocannabinols the psychoactive ingredient in marijuana commonly known as THC as a discriminatory practice.

While the law provides exemptions to a handful of industries, including law enforcement, commercial drivers and anyone who cares for medical patients or children, it will likely force many multistate companies with offices in the city to remove or rework their drug testing policies nationwide.

Youre going to see changes in employment policies across the country because for a national company it becomes too hard to have different HR policies, and then you run into discrimination issues if youre drug testing in New Jersey but not in New York, said Rob Wilson, president of the human resources firm Employco. The last thing you want is a national drug policy and youre not on top of this law, you could find yourself with some big headaches.

The law doesnt go into effect until May 2020, which gives affected companies time to rework their policies, but Wilson said hes already seen a shift away from pre-employment drug testing as more states legalize medical and recreational use of the drug.

A lot of our clients, theyre adjusting their policies for after ajob has been accepted, he said. So our clients that have zero tolerance are pretty much in the group [of exemptions], working at the airports or clients that have people driving vehicles for work.

In addition to the ongoing culture shift surrounding marijuana, opponents of pre-employment drug testing argue it does more harm than good by depleting the talent pool either through positive test results or encouraging prospective employees to avoid applying all together.

Editors' picks of our best stories, right to your inbox.

By clicking Sign up, you agree to our privacy policy.

Given that the presence of THC stays in an individuals system for up to 30 days after use, testing during the hiring process is also ineffective in determining whether someone is usingmarijuana during work hours.

Im not sure that drug testing actually does what you want it to do, said Dr. Danielle Ompad, deputy director of New York Universitys Center for Drug Use and HIV/HCV Research. I would not want somebody who can be productive in the workplace and has tested positive for drugs, I wouldnt want to prevent them from having a job if they can be a great employee because I dont think drug use is the only measure of whether someone is going to be successful in a job.

Ompad suggested employers approach marijuana use inthe workforce in the same way they view alcohol. Public Advocate Jumaane Williams, who championed the legislation along with a handful of City Councilmembers, drew similar parallels after it was approved in April.

"Testing isn't a deterrent to using marijuana, it's an impediment to opportunity that dates back to the Reagan-era war on drugs measure that's now a war on workers, Williams said in a statement. Prospective employers don't test for alcohol so marijuana should be no different, but in no way does this bill justify individuals going to work under the influence.

Crafting a fair drug testing policy foremployees, in lieu of a pre-employment requirement, would likely be a more effective deterrent, Ompad said, adding that how a company handles a positive test result is just as critical.

If somebody immediately gets fired and they only tested positive once, Im not sure thats the right thing to do, she said. And so maybe a warning or a referral to drug treatment if theres a problem, but again not all drug use is problematic drug use.

And while New York Citys law appears to be the first of its kind, Wilson said he doesnt expect it to remain that way for long.

I think youre going to see this more and more, especially as you see first medical marijuana and now recreational marijuana [legalization], he said. And its not just drug testing. Youre going to see more and more pro-employee laws such as this in more liberal cities.

Lauren joined amNY.com as a news editor in 2016. Previously, she worked as a web producer at CBS New York and News 12.

Go here to read the rest:

Ban on pre-employment weed testing to have national impact - amNewYork

Prevention education: Saying more than just "no" – Education Dive

As the opioid epidemic roils communities and the popularity of vaping is leading to hospitalizations and even deaths, our nations schools are feeling the impact. While the half-century-old War on Drugs has not always been consistently or fairly fought, there are signs that something is working, at least with adolescents.

The University of Michigans annual Monitoring the Future study found that todays teens are consuming far fewer substances than their 90s counterparts and regular use of illicit drugs among students has fallen. EVERFIs own research of high school students and incoming first-year college students supports these findings. Still, the unrelenting flood of headlines about vaping incidents and the opioid epidemic remind us that the drug crisis is not overits just taken new dimensions.

These conflicting trendswith drug use down on the one hand, but overdoses and related risk factors up on the othermake this question paramount: what works in prevention education? Whats the something that will prevent our students from tumbling down the slippery slope? Its not enough to implement just say no policies. The problem is more nuanced, and the solutions need to be as well.

Over the past 15 years, EVERFI has seen, studied, and implemented prevention education across more than 20,000 K-12 schools and college campuses. Here are five components we have found to be critical elements of effective prevention education:

Many prevention programs focus on a subset of students who demonstrate high-risk behaviors. While these are important students to reach, it is just as critical to strengthen healthy behaviors amongst the vast majority of students who are not currently misusing drugs.

When we provide entire student populations with an evidence-based curriculum that challenges misconceptions and encourages health-promoting behaviors, all students benefit. Those who already have healthy beliefs and behaviors will see their choices reinforced, and those who may be at-risk will have the opportunity to reframe and reflect on their decisions. By ensuring that every single student experiences high-quality prevention education, you can help establish consistent expectations and baseline knowledge within your school community.

Strong social and emotional programming, especially when coupled with mental wellness training, can target many of the underlying causes of drug abuse. Integrating SEL strategies into programming also reinforces positive prosocial behaviors and social skills such as self-management, goal-setting, problem-solving and decision-making, as well as the cognitive skills and confidence needed to be able to resist unhealthy influences.

Effective prevention programs take a strength-based approach - aligning learners values and motivations, while also challenging misconceptions that may exist. By correcting commonly held myths about behaviors (for example, that trying substances is a normal part of the adolescent experience), prevention programs can paint realistic portrayals that reinforce the healthy behaviors in which most students want to engage.

One effective way of doing this is surveying the total student population on their perceptions or usage of drugs and alcohol and presenting that information back to them in aggregate. When students believe that most of their peers are behaving a certain way, they are more likely to accept their own behavior as normal or to behave similarly, even when they identify that behavior as wrong. This tactic, called a social norms approach, is particularly compelling when large gaps exist between what a student perceives their peers would do, and what their peers would actually do. By sharing data that challenges misperceptions, you can influence behavior change.

Provide opportunities to learn and practice a range of personal and social skills, including coping, decision-making, refusal, and bystander intervention. These skills should be practiced and demonstrated in a variety of settings, in response to relatable and relevant situations.

These practices are recommended by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). Both organizations are full of great resources for any teacher or administrator looking to improve their prevention education practices.

Ninety percent of substance use disorders begin between the ages of 12 and 23. We know that to have an impact, you must start early. This is why EVERFI has created free, comprehensive student health programs like Prescription Drug Safety for high school, which features a mini-lesson on vaping. EVERFI also offers a full suite of social-emotional learning resources from grade school onward. For us, this isnt about winning a war on drugs. Its about building a movement for mental, physical, and emotional wellness wholly.

Go here to read the rest:

Prevention education: Saying more than just "no" - Education Dive