Today’s letters: Readers comment on news coverage of The Villages and the Second Amendment – Daily Commercial

Covering The Villages

Throughout Donald Trumps presidency and during most of the 2020 election, it seemed like The Villages made headlines every week. A picture was painted of lines being drawn in the sand, neighbor turning against neighbor, and even some threats of violence. But these events are very rare, especially when you consider the size of the community as a whole with more than 130,000 residents today and growing.

The claims by the media of The Villages being only a Trump-loving community are often blatantly false, some are outdated and others only have a grain of truth to them. The reputation may be related to the developer being a large contributor to Republican politicians; however, The Villages does not support a single political party but is home to residents with varying opinions. According to the Florida Division of Elections, as of Nov. 31, 2021, the number of registered voters in Sumter County (where most Villages residents reside) was 111,753, of which 56.4% were registered as Republicans, 22.4% were registered as Democrats, 1% were registered as as members of a minor party, and 20.2% had no party affiliation.

The media must cover this diversity and call out real sources of fraud. Three voters in Florida all living in The Villages were recently arrested for voting more than once in the 2020 election. They all voted for Trump two registered Republicans and one with no party affiliation. What these arrests actually show is that when would-be criminals try to cheat, the existing system can be strong enough to catch them and hold them legally accountable. And the public deserves accurate coverage, regardless of party affiliation. Where is that coverage?

Susan Koffman, The Villages

In early November 2021, the Supreme Court heard another case on your right to keep and bear arms. Not long ago the court ruled you had that right, but it never discourages liberals from wanting to limit your Second Amendment rights.

Liberals know they can continue to deny individuals their constitutional rights because no law enforcement officer is going to show up at their door with an arrest warrant because the Supreme Court has no power to compel politicians to follow laws they dont like.

The latest case involves two New Yorkers who claim, since the court has ruled, they have a right to own firearms and should not have to show cause as to why any more than any citizen has to show cause as to why they can exercise their right to free speech or practice their religion.

Judges discuss the historical context of our laws as to how they came about. Liberal politicians are going back to early English times and arguing that even though English citizens originally had a right to firearms, those rights were limited and, since our laws are based on early English laws, our rights should be limited also. Its called originalism.

If religious theologians can change some of the Ten Commandments, why cant progressives change the meaning of the Second Amendment? Today, the sixth commandment states, "Thou shall not kill. Originally it was, Thou shall not commit murder. Big difference.

Today, the 10th states, Thou shall not covet thy neighbors wife. Originally it was, Thou shall not covet thy neighbors goods. In biblical times, a mans wife was part of his goods.

Normally progressives want to move away from originalism, encouraging liberal judges to draft new meanings to laws they dont like. Today, progressives are arguing the reverse. Will they succeed?

Sonny Heninger, Leesburg

Follow this link:

Today's letters: Readers comment on news coverage of The Villages and the Second Amendment - Daily Commercial

Letters: Right to bear arms has limits. Teachers should be allowed to teach. – The Columbus Dispatch

Letters to the editor| The Columbus Dispatch

In response toRandy J.Lindowers Jan. 4 letter, "DeWine urged to uphold Second Amendment, sign concealed carry bill,"he infersthat in our world of rules, licenses are simply sources of revenue and should not be applied to the Second Amendment.

More: Letters: Freedom isn't free when it comes to vaccination. DeWine should sign concealed carry bill.

This is where, in my opinion, he misses the point of safety. For example, we issue licenses to drivers after they complete instruction not to simply accrue funds, but to provide proof of the knowledge needed to drive safely. This does not violate their right to drive. Imagine giving a set of car keys to a 16-year-old without instruction.

More: Our view: Hellbent lawmakers are doing 'something' about gun violence making it worse

I agree bad actors will access guns illegally, but how many more law-abiding citizens know how to properly use a weapon and when?

I support the Second Amendment and am of the opinion that a requirement for proper training (i.e., not from Uncle Bob on the farm) is simply common sense and can help prevent needless accidental deaths.

I also do not see the need to inform police officers of the possession of a weapon as being unduly burdensome to anyone who is law-abiding. Consequently, I think it only prudent to reconsider this bill.

More: Jack D'Aurora: Gun fetish making America more dangerous than war zones

Regarding constitutionality of this issue the U.S. Supreme Court, in a landmark 2008 opinion from Justice Antonin Scalia expanding the personal right to bear arms, noted the Second Amendment is not unlimited and doesnt grant the right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for any purpose.

David Guza, Powell

More: How to submit a letter to the editor for The Columbus Dispatch

Congressman Brett Hillyer's proposal to require teachers to report their curriculum online makes no sense.The time needed to report curriculum could be better spent teaching their students.

More: 'Teacher transparency bill': Republican lawmakers want Ohio school syllabi shared online

As a former special education teacher/tutor, I was more than happy to share with parents any and all information they requested regarding their child's education.I also had two children in the school system and teachers were also willing to answer my questions and share information.

So let's let the teachers do what they are trained to do teach and not make them catalog their curriculum.

Jean W. Hoitsma, Columbus

It is astounding to me that supposedly well-educated people are so opposed to being vaccinated. Their selfish attitude is largely responsible for spreading and prolonging the COVIDpandemic.

More: Ray Marcano: I wear a mask to protect those trying to do right thing to ward off COVID

Does it take a member of their family becoming infected or even dying before they accept the advice and expertise of the medical community?Is it too late to bring this pandemic under control?

Bernice J.Cooper, Worthington

The campaign ads currentlyrunning on TV for Mike Gibbons and Bernie Moreno illustrate just how far the Republican party has fallen.

More: Thomas Suddes: Will Dolan, Gibbons, Mandel, Moreno, Timken or Vance be Ohio Republicans' pick?

Both men's ads consist of racist dog whistles, slanderous claims about immigrants, calls for voter suppression, and, of course, Trump's Big Lie. Obviously, these are the falsehoods that fascinate the Republican core these days, and no Republican running for election dares to correct them.

More: Letters: Out with the Grand Old Party and in with a real Conservative Party

But wouldn't it be great if some senior Republican who is not seeking re-election had the guts to call BS on this nonsense? Oh, I don't know, maybe Rob Portman?

Thomas J. Kelly, Worthington

Follow this link:

Letters: Right to bear arms has limits. Teachers should be allowed to teach. - The Columbus Dispatch

Letters to the editor Jan. 9 – Daily Inter Lake

Second Amendment

Dont let the anti-Second Amendment crowd distract you from the actual problem we face with violence here in the USA.

We dont just have a gun violence problem here in the United States of America we have a people violence problem. Whenever people are using guns, knives, baseball bats, hammers, sticks, stones, vehicles, explosives, or poison to kill each other, it is never the fault of the method, or inanimate object used. It is always due to the common denominator; criminal minded humans.

Humans are very ingenious when it comes to harming their fellow humans. Humans are also very ingenious at skirting the law when they are so inclined. It is extremely foolish to try and control human behavior by controlling the inanimate objects used to commit crimes. Humans have been harming each other since we first appeared on Earth and will continue to do so long after guns, etc. have been replaced with more potent weapons. At this point all object control laws will be obsolete, but behavior control laws will not.

A criminal mind set is a character flaw and that is what needs to be controlled. The motive for any criminal act is a perceived reward. Remove that reward and replace it with an unwanted consequence and the criminal will be discourage from doing it.

The severity of the unwanted consequence is not what stops criminal acts. It is the surety of that consequence that does it.

Lets put our thinking caps on and make sure each criminal act results in an appropriate unwanted consequence for the criminal and only the criminal.

Catch-and-release is not working and repeatedly writing ineffective laws against inanimate objects while expecting a different result is insane.

Gerald W Hurst, Marion

The Dec. 8 edition of the Inter Lake included a story entitled No Permit, No Problem, about Montana joining the growing number of states allowing constitutional carry of guns. Some proponents of the permitless carry bill argue that people needing protection quickly do not have time to take an eight-hour class or wait through the permitting process. I believe that by eliminating the requirement for gun owners to take classes and undergo background checks to carry a firearm, the likelihood increases that unhinged people with easy access to concealed firearms will put law enforcement and citizens at greater risk of harm.

For example, a Helena court recently sentenced a Montana man charged with felony assault with a weapon and two concealed weapons charges. Police alleged that he got into an altercation with employees at a Helena restaurant when he was asked to wear a mask. He reportedly threatened the restaurant manager and employees, at one point patting his handgun and saying, Im going to get you.

Montanas attorney general Austin Knudsen told the Lewis and Clark County prosecutor to dismiss the concealed carry charges. Although the district judge strongly disagreed with Knudsens decision, he reduced the sentence to disorderly conduct, a $100 misdemeanor charge.

As another example, a year-old Inter Lake article entitled Flathead Man with Long Criminal Record Gets Prison Time, a local man stole an unlocked truck containing a handgun. During three reported confrontations, he used the handgun to intimidate and threaten individuals. He was eventually spotted by Montana Highway Patrol and a high-speed chase ensued, some of it the wrong way down U.S. 93. HIs criminal record dates back 20 years. He is precisely the wrong person you want having easy access to firearms.

I believe that those who threaten violence when asked by restaurant staff to follow public safety rules or flee at high speeds armed with stolen guns pose a danger to all of us. Making guns accessible to all without background checks invites lawlessness and chaos. There is an old adage: when guns are outlawed only outlaws will have guns. We have arrived at a place, the Wild West, where all of us have guns including the outlaws.

Joseph Biby, Kalispell

Just like the frog in slow boiling water who didnt notice the danger, we seem to be in a similar situation where things are consistently changing at every moment. But because the change is small, most of us fail to notice it.

The Epoch Times newspaper put out a series of articles on How the Specter of Communism Is Ruling Our World.

The series explains: The specter of communism has been working for centuries to corrupt and destroy humanity. It began by crippling man spiritually, divorcing him from his divine origins. From here, the specter has led the peoples of the world to cast out their millennia-old cultural traditions that the divine had meticulously arranged as the proper standards for human existence.

The series explains how the Chinese Communist Party has infiltrated our family values, schools, universities, government, media, real estate every aspect of American life, bringing the U.S. into a chaotic state, and how it is causing the destruction of our beliefs. This series helps us to understand how we are being slowly manipulated into accepting communism. Also, this global pandemic could have been avoided if the CCP hadnt been deceitful and lied.

Katherine Combes, Kalispell

View original post here:

Letters to the editor Jan. 9 - Daily Inter Lake

Marathon Gold Announces Filing of Amendment to the EIS for the Valentine Gold Project in Newfoundland and Labrador – Yahoo Finance

TORONTO, Jan. 07, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Marathon Gold Corporation (Marathon or the Company; TSX: MOZ) is pleased to report that it has filed an amendment to the Environmental Impact Statement (the EIS and, as amended, the amended-EIS) for the Valentine Gold Project (the Project) located in the central region of Newfoundland and Labrador (NL).

The amended-EIS has been filed with the Environmental Assessment Division of the NL Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECC) pursuant to the Projects ongoing Environmental Assessment (EA), and is the second such amendment filed. The amended-EIS addresses all requests for additional information on the Project received by Marathon from the NL Minister of Environment and Climate Change (the Minister) on October 29, 2021, including in the areas of Caribou Protection and Effects Monitoring, Victoria Lake Reservoir and Victoria Dam Effects and Mitigations, and Effects on Human Health, amongst others.

Matt Manson, President and CEO, commented: Since the commencement of the EA process for the Valentine Gold Project in April 2019, Marathon has worked diligently to measure and describe the full range of potential social and environmental impacts from the development and operation of the Project, and their mitigations. This large body of work, that includes several years of detailed environmental and social baseline data, is contained within the Projects EIS. The filing of this second amendment to the EIS is in response to the provincial review comments that we received at the time of the October 29, 2021 letter issued to us by the NL Minister of Environment and Climate Change. Since that time our team has worked diligently to address the issues raised in the Ministers letter. This includes the completion of a Caribou Protection and Environmental Effects Monitoring Plan (the Caribou Plan) that fully operationalizes our proposed monitoring programs for potential impacts on caribou behaviour arising from the Project, and their mitigations. The Caribou Plan has been developed in close consultation with the Wildlife Division of the NL Department of Fisheries, Forestry and Agriculture, and has benefitted from engagement with impacted NL stakeholders and Indigenous groups. Todays filing triggers a new 70-day round of technical and public review of the amended-EIS, as prescribed within the provincial EA process. At the end of this period, the Minister will have a further opportunity to make a determination on the acceptability of the Project. Successful completion of the provincial EA process this spring, and the completion of the parallel federal EA process, will allow us to commence the Projects activity-specific permitting process ahead of anticipated ground-breaking in the third quarter of this year.

Story continues

The Valentine Gold Project is subject to regulation under the environmental protection regimes of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 and the NL Environmental Protection Act. Marathon filed a Project Description with both the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada (IAAC) and the NL DECC on April 5, 2019, which was accepted into the formal EA process on April 16, 2019. An Environmental Assessment Committee for the Project was established on July 3, 2019, and the Projects EIS was filed on September 29, 2020. The EIS was accepted as conforming with guidelines on November 3, 2020 and has been undergoing formal review since this time.

Both the federal and provincial EA processes provide for the technical review of the EIS by multiple government agencies and the opportunity for public comment. Following initial regulatory and public review, federal Information Requirements (IRs) and provincial review comments were issued to Marathon in February 2021. The IRs and review comments are a routine part of the EA process, reflecting requested clarifications or information on various aspects of the EIS received from regulators, Indigenous groups, the public, and other stakeholders.

Marathon completed the submission of responses to 76 first-round federal IRs on May 3, 2021. Responses to 362 first-round provincial review comments were submitted on August 3, 2021. In the provincial process, responses to review comments take the form of an amendment to the EIS. IAAC subsequently issued a second round of 23 federal IRs, to which Marathon submitted responses on October 18, 2021. On October 29, 2021, Marathon was informed by the NL Minister of Environment and Climate Change that it would be required to respond to a second round of 33 provincial review comments, with responses to take the form of a second amendment to the EIS. Since this time, an additional 3 IRs have been received from the federal regulator and responded to.

Marathons filing of the amended-EIS with the provincial regulator starts an additional 70-day period of technical review and opportunity for public comment. At the end of this period, the Minister has up to 10 days to issue a decision as to whether the amended-EIS is acceptable or if further work is required. If the amended-EIS is deemed to be acceptable, the Minister has up to a further 30 days to make a recommendation to the provincial cabinet as to whether the Project should be released from its EA. Should the Minister decide that additional information is needed, a further round of review comments will result, triggering another round of response preparation, EIS amendment, and technical and public review. The federal EA process under the authority of IAAC remains ongoing in parallel with the provincial EA process. Release from both EA processes in a timely fashion, and the completion of sufficient activity-specific permitting, is a pre-requisite for the commencement of Project construction.

Qualified Persons

Disclosure of a scientific or technical nature in this news release has been approved by Mr. Tim Williams, FAusIMM, Chief Operating Officer of Marathon and Mr. James Powell, P.Eng. (NL), Vice President, Regulatory and Government Affairs for Marathon. Mr. Williams and Mr. Powell are qualified persons under National Instrument (NI) 43-101.

About Marathon

Marathon (TSX:MOZ) is a Toronto based gold company advancing its 100%-owned Valentine Gold Project located in the central region of Newfoundland and Labrador, one of the top mining jurisdictions in the world. The Project comprises a series of five mineralized deposits along a 20-kilometre system. An April 2021 Feasibility Study outlined an open pit mining and conventional milling operation over a thirteen-year mine life with a 31.5% after-tax rate of return. The Project has estimated Proven Mineral Reserves of 1.40 Moz (29.68 Mt at 1.46 g/t) and Probable Mineral Reserves of 0.65 Moz (17.38 Mt at 1.17 g/t). Total Measured Mineral Resources (inclusive of the Mineral Reserves) comprise 1.92 Moz (32.59 Mt at 1.83 g/t) with Indicated Mineral Resources (inclusive of the Mineral Reserves) of 1.22 Moz (24.07 Mt at 1.57 g/t). Additional Inferred Mineral Resources are 1.64 Moz (29.59 Mt at 1.72 g/t Au). Please see Marathons Amended and Restated Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2020 and other filings made with Canadian securities regulatory authorities and available at http://www.sedar.com for further details and assumptions relating to the Valentine Gold Project.

For more information, please contact:

Matt Manson

President & CEO

Tel: 416 987-0711

mmanson@marathon-gold.com

Hannes Portmann

CFO & Business Development

Tel: 416 855-8200

hportmann@marathon-gold.com

Amanda Mallough

Senior Associate, Investor Relations

Tel: 416 855-8202

amallough@marathon-gold.com

To find out more information on Marathon Gold Corporation and the Valentine Gold Project, please visit http://www.marathon-gold.com.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

Certain information contained in this news release, constitutes forward-looking information within the meaning of Canadian securities laws (forward-looking statements). All statements in this news release, other than statements of historical fact, which address events, results, outcomes or developments that Marathon expects to occur are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or include words such as expects, anticipates, plans, believes, estimates, considers, intends, targets, or negative versions thereof and other similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as may, will, should, would and could. We provide forward-looking statements for the purpose of conveying information about our current expectations and plans relating to the future, and readers are cautioned that such statements may not be appropriate for other purposes. More particularly and without restriction, this news release contains forward-looking information, including statements as to management's expectations with respect to, among other things, the matters and activities contemplated in this news release.

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions and accordingly, actual results and future events could differ materially from those expressed or implied in such statements. You are hence cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. In respect of the forward-looking statements concerning the interpretation of exploration results and the impact on the Projects mineral resource estimate, the Company has provided such statements in reliance on certain assumptions it believes are reasonable at this time, including assumptions as to the continuity of mineralization between drill holes. A mineral resource that is classified as inferred or indicated has a great amount of uncertainty as to its existence and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that any or part of an indicated mineral resource or inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category of mineral resource. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of mineral deposits in these categories will ever be converted into proven and probable mineral reserves.

By its nature, this information is subject to inherent risks and uncertainties that may be general or specific and which give rise to the possibility that expectations, forecasts, predictions, projections or conclusions will not prove to be accurate, that assumptions may not be correct and that objectives, strategic goals and priorities will not be achieved. Factors that could cause future results or events to differ materially from current expectations expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements include risks and uncertainties relating to the interpretation of drill results, the geology, grade and continuity of mineral deposits and conclusions of economic evaluations; uncertainty as to estimation of mineral resources; inaccurate geological and metallurgical assumptions (including with respect to the size, grade and recoverability of mineral resources); the potential for delays or changes in plans in exploration or development projects or capital expenditures, or the completion of feasibility studies due to changes in logistical, technical or other factors; the possibility that future exploration, development, construction or mining results will not be consistent with the Companys expectations; risks related to the ability of the current exploration program to identify and expand mineral resources; risks relating to possible variations in grade, planned mining dilution and ore loss, or recovery rates and changes in project parameters as plans continue to be refined; operational mining and development risks, including risks related to accidents, equipment breakdowns, labour disputes (including work stoppages and strikes) or other unanticipated difficulties with or interruptions in exploration and development; risks related to the inherent uncertainty of production and cost estimates and the potential for unexpected costs and expenses; risks related to commodity and power prices, foreign exchange rate fluctuations and changes in interest rates; the uncertainty of profitability based upon the cyclical nature of the mining industry; risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms or delays in obtaining governmental or other stakeholder approvals or in the completion of development or construction activities; risks related to environmental regulation and liability, government regulation and permitting; risks relating to the Companys ability to attract and retain skilled staff; risks relating to the timing of the receipt of regulatory and governmental approvals for continued operations and future development projects; political and regulatory risks associated with mining and exploration; risks relating to the potential impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company and the mining industry; changes in general economic conditions or conditions in the financial markets; and other risks described in Marathons documents filed with Canadian securities regulatory authorities, including the Amended and Restated Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2020.

You can find further information with respect to these and other risks in Marathons Amended and Restated Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2020 and other filings made with Canadian securities regulatory authorities available at http://www.sedar.com. Other than as specifically required by law, Marathon undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statement is made, or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, whether as a result of new information, future events or results otherwise.

Read more:

Marathon Gold Announces Filing of Amendment to the EIS for the Valentine Gold Project in Newfoundland and Labrador - Yahoo Finance

Six things to watch for this legislative session – Yellowhammer News

Alabamas 2022 legislative session begins Tuesday at the Alabama State House in Montgomery.

While it is not as contentious as Congress in Washington, D.C., it will have its moments, especially as the 2022 election cycle is now underway.

Here are some of the things we at Yellowhammer News are watching:

1) The COVID Question: Damned if you do, damned if you dont

For the third year in a row, COVID-19 protocols will play a factor in the regular legislative session. But the protocols are not uniform throughout the Alabama State House.

The upper chamber, occupied by the Alabama State Senate, will institute a mask-preferred policy. However, the lower chamber, occupied by the Alabama State House, is requiring masks in common areas.

Though the public in Alabama seems desensitized to the threat of the Omicron variant of COVID-19, those in Montgomery are taking precautions. But there are political sensitivities at play.

Some Republican incumbents behind the scenes are concerned about the possibility of another closed session similar to 2020, and how it might be perceived.

There is fear that a closed session might be used by Republican primary challengers as an attack, alleging the good ol boy network that resides in the Montgomery swamp is wheeling and dealing out of the specter of the public in smoke-filled backrooms.

The Alabama Department of Public Health and State Health Officer Dr. Scott Harris have thus far been reluctant to weigh in on the Omicron variant of COVID threat as it pertains to the legislative session.

If they did, it could give cover to the legislature to limit access to the Alabama State House once again. However, such drastic action may be opposed by Gov. Kay Ivey.

2) ARPA funds and a special session within a session: Gov. Iveys trick play

In 2019, Gov. Kay Ivey and Republicans in leadership in the Alabama Legislature insisted the one thing that we could not live without was the Rebuild Alabama Act.

Its time to make our crumbling infrastructure system a problem of the past, Ivey declared in her 2019 State of the State speech. This is a challenge that is felt by every Alabamian, clearly making it a bipartisan issue. As governor, I say enough is enough. Now is the time to Rebuild Alabama.

The problem for lawmakers was they were being asked to increase Alabamas fuel tax, making that the first vote of this quadrennium, and the first vote for some newly elected lawmakers.

Rather than go through the usual process, which at the time would have required the adoption of a budget isolation resolution through a three-fifths vote of the legislature, Ivey called a special session within moments of completing her State of the State speech.

The goal was to avoid the parliamentary protocol and not allow it to be tied up by lawmakers using their powers to slow down or thwart the process.

Although Ivey and leadership fell short of the goal of unanimity on passage of the Rebuild Alabama Act, it worked, and the law was signed by the Governor seven days after her State of the State address.

Now with a traunch of $580 million in so-called ARPA (American Rescue Plan Act) federal relief funds on the table, Ivey is believed to be eyeing a special session within the session, and it has the support of some in the legislature.

Some lawmakers tell Yellowhammer News that they are skeptical of the special session approach.

Watch for late January, perhaps beyond the Alabama Republican Party primary qualifying deadline for Ivey to make the call.

The early word is such money will be applied to the ongoing rural broadband internet initiative. State Rep. Steve Clouse (R-Ozark), the House General Fund committee chairman, also said to expect a portion of the money to be applied to rural sewer and water infrastructure.

Oh yeah, there is more federal money where that came from, as well.

The government spending money may sound like a seamless task, but dont underestimate the potential for controversy when politicians and money are involved.

3) Constitutional/permitless carry: When will the sheriffs make a stand?

This is supposed to be the year Alabama finally gets a so-called constitutional (or permitless, depending on your side of the issue) carry bill through the legislature.

In the past, State Sen. Gerald Allen (R-Tuscaloosa) has made it a perennial effort, where it would either die in a Senate committee or pass but die in the House.

However, this is believed to be the breakthrough year in the House because one-time opponents of permitless carry have evolved on the issue given the state is implementing a so-called prohibited firearm-holders database, which in theory would alleviate some safety concerns of abolishing the permit requirement.

One of the constitutional carry bills, HB44, filed by the outgoing State Rep. Andrew Sorrell (R-Muscle Shoals), has 38 co-sponsors, including House Speaker Mac McCutcheon (R-Monrovia), who was formerly a hostage negotiator for the Huntsville Police Department.

That is reason to believe there is a reasonable likelihood of consideration by the House in 2022.

The long-standing opponent of permitless carry has been the powerful Alabama Sheriffs Association, which has been successful in fending off any push within the legislature.

Very few sheriffs have spoken out against the bill publicly. One exception has been Mobile County Sheriff Sam Cochran, who fired State Rep. Shane Stringer (R-Citronelle) from his department last year for supporting constitutional carry.

With potentially millions of dollars in permit revenue at stake, expect the sheriffs to make one more stand. But dont expect it until after the January 28 Republican Party qualifying deadline.

Once incumbent Republican sheriffs, some with considerable political influence in their county, have a better sense of who or if they could face in a GOP primary, they could be more available to speak out against a permitless carry bill without fear of it being used against them in a primary contest.

Despite the support in the House, passage isnt a given.

This isnt going to be a pushover like people think it is, one lawmaker told Yellowhammer News.

4) Alabama Legislature vs. The Biden administration: Jabs and guns

Some Republican lawmakers tell Yellowhammer News that one of the main efforts the party will undertake this session will be to continue to combat what they see as federal overreach.

Republicans will take another crack at strengthening state law to combat the Biden administrations COVID-19 vaccine mandates as a means of bolstering Attorney General Steve Marshalls ability to take on legal challenges against the Biden administrations edicts.

Expect the Second Amendment also to play into the discussion of ways to counter actions from the Biden administration.

Last week, the House GOP Caucus released its policy agenda, which called for passing legislation to shield Alabama law enforcement from having to enforce what the state would deem to be an unconstitutional gun control executive order issued by President Joe Biden.

It is an election year, after all.

5) Gambling isnt going away: Expect an obligatory gesture

Did you hear? The lottery is popular with voters. Why cant they just do a simple lottery this year?

That is such a simplistic question for a complicated issue.

We, the voting public, may want it, but apparently, there are not enough of us.

Every year, we have this tired discussion, and every year the clock runs out before the legislature can take it up.

For the gambling prohibition to be removed from the Alabama Constitution of 1901, you need a constitutional amendment on the ballot, which would be put up for a vote of the people.

A three-fifths supermajority is required to get through the legislature and onto the ballot. However, while Republicans have the numbers, they do not all agree on gambling, as it is not a traditional issue that conservatives support.

Thus, it will require buy-in from Democrats in the legislature.

Democrats have been receptive to gambling bills, but for fear of ceding a competitive advantage to the Poarch Band of Creek Indians, who operate three casinos in Alabama, allowed under federal law, they have sought protections for two casinos in Democrat-controlled areas of the state Victoryland and Greenetrack.

All this for a lottery, right?

State Sen. Greg Albritton (R-Atmore) says a gambling bill will be introduced, and others in the Senate have said it could resemble the 2021 effort passed by the Senate but was deemed unworkable by the House.

6) Education bills: Yes, Alabama is still last in K-12 rankings

A reoccurring refrain about Alabama education is how poorly the state ranks head-to-head against the other 49 states, the District of Columbia and military schools.

One of the unfulfilled promises of the Republican majorities in Montgomery was to improve the states standing nationally.

Key GOP lawmakers have signaled their support for a pause on a Literacy Act provision that requires third-graders to read at a third-grade level before being promoted to the fourth grade.

It seems simple enough until educators and administrators have expressed concerns about how woefully unprepared they would be if there were an unusually high amount of third-graders being retained this year.

Some for fear of this unpreparedness and some for fear the law will expose potential gross deficiencies in Alabamas public education system are seeking a pause in that requirement.

The stated reason is difficulties with the COVID-19 pandemic and the challenges of at-home learning.

A similar pause was passed by both chambers of the legislature but vetoed by Ivey in 2021. Ivey has since expressed a willingness to consider signing into law a delay in the future.

That may very well happen, but dont expect it to happen without some resistance.

@Jeff_Pooris a graduate of Auburn University and the University of South Alabama, the editor ofBreitbart TV, a columnist for MobilesLagniappe Weekly, and host of Mobiles The Jeff Poor Show from 9 a.m.-12 p.m.on FM Talk 106.5.

Dylan Smith is a staff writer for Yellowhammer News. You can follow him on Twitter@DylanSmithAL

Follow this link:

Six things to watch for this legislative session - Yellowhammer News

Bob Dole: Veteran, Senator, and Friend to the Second Amendment – NRA ILA

Former Senate majority leader and 1996 Republican presidential nominee Bob Dole passed away December 5 at the age of 98. A World War II veteran who was the recipient of two Purple Hearts and two Bronze stars, a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, and a five-term Senator from Kansas, Dole served his country with distinction throughout his life.

A quarter century has passed since Dole was in the U.S. Senate, but the freedom he helped secure for law-abiding gun owners lives on. A staunch supporter of the Second Amendment, Dole was instrumental in enacting several pieces of legislation that had a profound effect on gun rights.

Dole was first elected to the Senate in 1968, the same year President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Gun Control Act. In the years that followed, Dole would become one of the GCAs staunchest critics.

Describing his position on the GCA in those years at a 1988 candidates forum, Dole explained,

Simply stated, the legislation placed undue burdens on law-abiding gun owners, thereby diverting law enforcement resources away from real criminals. That, coupled with overzealous enforcement by government bureaucrats, eventually made the need for remedial legislation painfully obvious.

Putting this understanding into action, in 1979 Dole co-sponsored the first version of the McClure-Volkmer bill (the Firearms Owners' Protection Act, or FOPA).

In 1982 Dole secured the first legislative rollback of the GCA. At the time, the GCA required federal licensing for all ammunition dealers and required that a record be kept on all handgun ammunition sales by retailers. The senator sponsored a successful amendment to a trade bill that removed .22 caliber rimfire ammunition from the GCAs dealer ammunition sale recordkeeping requirement. Two years later, Dole offered a successful amendment removing the GCAs restrictions on military surplus imports.

Upon becoming Senate majority leader for the first time in 1985, Dole put FOPA at the top of the legislative agenda, securing passage on July 9 of that year. Writing Dole to thank him for his hard work several days after FOPA passed the Senate, NRA-ILA Executive Director J. Warren Cassidy noted,

all of us here in the Institute will never forget that it was your strong, determined leadership that brought about the passage.

If you had not made it known that you intended to bring that bill to a vote, certain parties both pro and anti gun would have once again blocked any positive action.

The House passed FOPA on April 10, 1986. On April 26 of that year Dole served as the keynote speaker at the 115th NRA Members Banquet at the NRA Annual Meetings. During his speech, Dole made clear his intent to shepherd the vital gun rights bill through final Senate approval. FOPA was signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on May 19. Pursuant to NRA tradition, NRA presented Dole with a well-deserved flintlock long rifle crafted by master gunmaker Cecil Brooks.

[For more information on the important changes to federal law in FOPA, readers are encouraged to study David T. Hardys excellent work on the subject, here and here.]

Doles obvious work on behalf of gun owners did not stop some of the more outspoken within the gun rights community from, at times, finding perceived fault with the senator. Speaking in 1988 Dole explained,

Ive done more than talk about my commitment. Ive done more than give lip service to gun owners rights. Ive made a difference.

All gun owners should be grateful for the tremendous difference Dole made.

Read more:

Bob Dole: Veteran, Senator, and Friend to the Second Amendment - NRA ILA

Opinion: The real meaning of the Second Amendment remains open for discussion – The San Diego Union-Tribune

Firearms are protected by Second Amendment

Re 9th Circuit upholds large-capacity gun magazine ban (Nov. 30): This decision essentially turns hundreds of thousands of people in California into felons for owning normal gun parts. A magazine is an essential part of a firearm and firearms are protected by the Second Amendment. The ability to defend yourself should not be limited by an arbitrary restriction put in place for political reasons.

Michael SchwartzExecutive Director,San Diego County Gun Owners PAC

The Second Amendment includes the phrases well regulated militia and right to bear arms. According to historians, the phrase to bear arms applies only to the military. Arming oneself can refer to individuals.

If courts believe the Second Amendment applies to individuals, then taken literally it means individuals have the right to any weapon considered arms by militaries, e.g., hand grenades, 50-caliber armor-piercing machine-guns, flame throwers, etc.

If courts rule one can only own guns for self-defense, then an assault-style rifle by its very name is not for self-defense.

Americans own more guns than any other advanced democracy and have a high murder rate, and almost every day there is another random attack in schools. Historically, several Supreme Court justices have stated, The Constitution is not a suicide pact. But the individual interpretation of the Second Amendment seems to contradict them.

Joel A. HarrisonNorth Park

Opinion resources

The U-T welcomes and encourages community dialogue on important public matters.

Read more:

Opinion: The real meaning of the Second Amendment remains open for discussion - The San Diego Union-Tribune

Progressives have gun rights in their sights in 2022 session – Albuquerque Journal

The coordinated attack on law-abiding New Mexicans Second Amendment rights by the media, gun control advocates and Democrats in the Roundhouse is already in full swing in advance of the 2022 session.

Gun control is here. The progressive leadership recently fast-tracked and bypassed public input including the full legislative body to pass a firearm ban in the Roundhouse. The debate was convoluted and secretive, as the progressive lawmakers opted to discuss much of the matter behind closed doors. Before the progressives stripped away the Second Amendment rights of the people, it was revealed that legislative staff had already been working behind the scenes to implement the firearm ban before any other lawmaker was made aware of the restrictive plan.

The progressive anti-Second Amendment cohort decided they would strip away the rights of even those that have a New Mexico concealed carry license. The ramifications of these feel-good policies put the safety of the public who attend hearings, our staff, and my fellow lawmakers in jeopardy. Much was discussed about safety; however, despite staff working on implementing this secretive plan, very few answers were provided even behind closed doors.

Santa Fe Sen. and Majority Leader Peter Wirth bumbled his way through defending his actions in attacking the Second Amendment by accusing unnamed individuals of brandishing firearms at him in the Capitol building at different points throughout his esteemed near two decades in the Roundhouse. Wirth eventually walked his statements back when he was made aware that brandishing a firearm is an arrestable offense and there is no record of that crime within the Roundhouse. Unfortunately, this type of rhetoric is par for the course from progressives salivating at the opportunity to take away our Second Amendment freedom.

Activists hired by New York billionaire Michael Bloomberg testified before another interim committee that they demand passage of their gold standard for firearms storage legislation mandating all gun owners keep their firearms unloaded and locked up at all times. Such a proposal is not only unenforceable, but also defies logic as it renders firearms unusable for self-defense in the middle of a crime epidemic. Our nations capitol had a similar firearm storage law that was struck down in the D.C. v. Heller Supreme Court case. The Heller decision found restricting immediate access to legally owned firearms was unconstitutional.

Now, paid activists are calling for data-driven solutions to stem gun violence and have proposed to add bureaucracy with an Office of Gun Violence at the cost of $20 million. We dont need to waste $20 million of public money to conclude their gun control measures are nothing more than charades that havent made the public any safer. Out-of-touch activists and radical progressives have pushed for restrictions on the Second Amendment and the result has been skyrocketing crime in New Mexico. Such bills as the universal background check law have yielded zero arrests or prosecutions in over two years, and the red flag statute has reportedly been used only four times during the first year it was in effect. Why is this data dismissed? These same activists are calling for expansions of gun laws that produce no results or data, yet so many are dying in our communities due to the failed policies of the progressive bloc of lawmakers.

New Mexicos 30-day legislative session starts Jan. 18. Ostensibly its scheduled to be a budget session, but Bloombergs gun control posse will push to erase your Second Amendment rights, even if it requires a suspension of logic, liberty and results-oriented legislation.

Do you have a question you want someone to try to answer for you? Do you have a bright spot you want to share?We want to hear from you. Please email yourstory@abqjournal.com

Read this article:

Progressives have gun rights in their sights in 2022 session - Albuquerque Journal

Second Amendment victory | News, Sports, Jobs – Williamsport Sun-Gazette – Williamsport Sun-Gazette

The verdict came in and Kyle Rittenhouse was found not guilty on all charges as he should I might add.

This is truly a victory not only for Kyle Rittenhouse but also for our Second Amendment.

That young man shouldve never been arrested, charged and tried to begin with after viewing all the video that was available.

The D.A. was withholding evidence and I believe produced a pair of brothers to go on the stand and lie to help prosecute an innocent man. The mainstream media was really pushing all of the false narratives in order to discredit the Second Amendment and all of those who value it.

Now, after all that I find it really sick that there are a lot of protesters claiming they want justice. They wanted a innocent white man to be punished for refusing to be a victim. (Unbelievable)

There were threats made on the jury members and the judge. They were even following the jurys transport van at one point. I saw on MSNBC a news commentator state that there would be rioting in the streets and should be since it is the protesters right to do so.

The last time I checked it is our Constitutional right to peacefully protest but it is still unlawful to riot and create unrest and harm to anyone or their property. When was the law on the changed?

The mainstream media has been portraying this whole incident as racist and even calling Kyle Rittenhouse a White Supremacist. I really doubt they know what a white supremacist is but a good hard look at the Democrats elected officials should clear things up for them.

All of these anti-Americans that are protesting everything at the drop of the hat should get themselves a productive life and stop trying to destroy the very country that gave them the right to protest to begin with.

GEORGE LOCKETT

Morris

Submitted by Virtual Newsroom

Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

Go here to read the rest:

Second Amendment victory | News, Sports, Jobs - Williamsport Sun-Gazette - Williamsport Sun-Gazette

Guns aren’t the problem. People like Rep. Lauren Boebert and the NRA are. – USA TODAY

Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., and I have a few things in common.

We are both white women. We are both mothers. We have both lived in Florida and Colorado (she is from the former; I am from the latter). But that is where the similarities end.

When I saw one of my state's representatives in Congress post a Christmas card from hell with a picture of her and the kids around the tree and clutching theirmilitary-style weaponsafter adeadly school shooting in MichiganI had to say something.

To be clear: Boebert's brand of outrage is nothing new;she's a wannabee Donald Trump in a dress. Her heartlessness isn't even really worth writing an opinion column aboutexcept to point out thatpeople likeBoebert and Rep. ThomasMassie, R-Ky., who don't give a damn about the gun violence andtrauma we are constantly cycling through as a nation,are the problem.

Mass shootingsare a ubiquitous part of American life. But we don't have toaccept that as the status quo. Similarly, we must not accept that ourrepresentatives in government threaten other members of Congressand taunt traumatized families with their armed tyranny.

These displays of wanton disregard for peace andsecuritymust have consequences.

Now, I'm not about to tell you that the Second Amendment doesn't say you can't have guns, because it clearlydoes, and the U.S. Supreme Court agrees. That question has been asked and answered.

But in our failure to adequately teach American history and civics, we forget thatthe Second Amendment has an important context that should accompany its interpretation.Specifically, the Founding Fathers were absolutelyterrified of standing armies and gun ownershipwas common for a variety of practical reasons that didn't always have to do with self-defense.

Where did America go wrong? The problem isn't the guns. The problem is us. Our taste forgun violence is a uniquely American crisis. And I say that as someone who has lived in Switzerland, a country armed to the teethbut with zero school shootings, annually.

It is the sense of exceptionalism our nation is known for, and the recklessinterpretationof those27 words in the Second Amendment by gun lobbyists, the NRA and their supporters that have, since the late 1990s, hada devastating effect on American life. I mention the '90s because it was in1999, at Columbine High School in Colorado, when two students went on a gun rampage, killing 13 other people.

Every timea Republican posts a picture of themselves and their families snuggled up to the muzzle of a semiautomatic rifle immediately after a mass shooting,I wonder what the Founding Fathers would think if they knew that this was what was to become oftheSecond Amendment.

Surely they would find it infinitely sad, infinitely pathetic that we have not made necessary changes.

We are thesource of our own tyranny. We are also the solution.We must look to our God-given common senseto solve this uniquely American crisis.

And common sense begs us to do better in electing our representatives and getting rid of them when they cross the line.

Carli Pierson is an attorney and an opinion writer at USA TODAY. Follow her on Twitter:@CarliPiersonEsq

Read the rest here:

Guns aren't the problem. People like Rep. Lauren Boebert and the NRA are. - USA TODAY

Gun and Ammo Taxes on Shaky Constitutional Footing (Podcast) – Bloomberg Tax

Cities and counties have been using so-called sin taxes to disincentivize socially harmful behavior for many years. But can this principle be applied to gun violence?

A few localities think it can and have passed their own excise taxes on guns and ammunition, even though the legal basis for these taxes may be unclear. One of them, Cook County, Ill., recently had its gun tax struck down by the Illinois Supreme Court as a violation of the constitutions uniformity clause. The high court never reached a decision on whether Cook Countys tax constituted a direct violation of the right to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment an issue the plaintiff Guns Save Life still wants the court to answer.

On todays episode of our weekly podcast, Talking Tax, we hear two perspectives on this: one from the gun rights attorney who sued Cook County, and another from an economist and gun control advocate. Bloomberg Taxs Michael Bologna spoke to Pete Patterson with the firm Cooper & Kirk about the status of the litigation, and also to Rosanna Smart, a RAND Corporation economist, who supports local gun control measures but questions the value of excise taxes as a strategy for addressing gun violence.

Listen here.

Have feedback on this episode of Talking Tax? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Everytown for Gun Safety advocates for universal background checks and other gun control measures. Bloomberg Law is operated by entities controlled by Michael Bloomberg, who serves as a member of Everytown for Gun Safetys advisory board.

Read more:

Gun and Ammo Taxes on Shaky Constitutional Footing (Podcast) - Bloomberg Tax

Hartmann: The Tyranny of Mike Parson – Riverfront Times

When the governor of Missouri uttered strange words two months ago about using the Missouri State Highway Patrol to criminalize journalism, most of us thought he was just blowing off some steam.

He wasnt.

Last week Governor Mike Parson doubled down publicly on his intention to pursue an investigation of a St. Louis Post-Dispatch reporter for an October 14 investigative story that embarrassed his administration. The piece by reporter Josh Renaud had revealed that the Social Security numbers of more than 100,000 teachers were compromised by a flaw on the website of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

I attempted to contact Renaud but was referred to Joe Martineau, an attorney at Lewis Rice who represents the Post-Dispatch. Martineau declined to discuss details of the case but did confirm that the highway patrol had indeed opened the investigation and had interviewed Renaud.

Wow. Parson wasnt bluffing when he threatened to take the extraordinary step of deploying a law-enforcement agency under his command to get back at that dang reporter. Vladimir Putin is green with envy.

Catch up on Ray Hartmann's latest columns

No public official in America gets to abuse power vested in them to investigate, punish or intimidate a journalist. Not a president, not a governor, not a mayor, not anyone possessing authority over law-enforcement resources.

Freedom of the press is firmly ensconced in the Bill of Rights, right there in the First Amendment, the one Parson skips over every night as he rereads the Second Amendment before turning in. Governors dont get to sic police on reporters who write stories they dont like. Full stop.

Theres a word for this: tyranny. Not the watered-down, diminished tyranny that random idiots misapply to public-health orders designed to save lives. No, this is the oppressive ruler or cruel master version from which the term evolved.

The government doesnt lock up journalists over their journalism in America. But didnt we already know that?

One of the terrible repercussions of the 24/7 news cycle is that it robs people of perspective. Both sides of the Great Divide traffic in constant outrage and hyperbole to the point everyone becomes the boy who cried wolf when a real catastrophe arrives.

If routine affronts are routinely labeled existential, what are people supposed to call the existential ones? What happens when a fire drill cannot be distinguished from a real blaze?

Parsons instinct to prosecute a journalist is the governmental equivalent of a forest fire. This wrongdoing on his part must stand apart from the noise.

It would have been bad enough had Parson sought judicial relief by suing the Post-Dispatch based on his cockamamie assumptions. For that, however, the governor might have needed to enlist the services of Attorney General Eric Schmitt, and hes preoccupied suing school districts and drowning liberals puppies.

But Parson did not do that. He violated all principle and precedent and called in the highway patrols Digital Forensic Unit to do his political dirty work (along with the Cole County prosecutor).

It is almost incidental to the story that Parson is thoroughly wrong about the facts of the case. His slanderous description of Renaud as a hacker was just stunning for its English as a second language feel, even by the governors standards.

Hackers dont customarily advise the hackees that they might want to fix whats wrong as a professional courtesy. Thats precisely what Renaud and the newspaper did by alerting the state to the problem and then holding up publication of the story so that it didnt cause harm.

That uncommon journalistic good deed was apparently going to garner a letter of thanks based on a draft email from Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Commissioner Margie Vandeven, according to a subsequent Post-Dispatch report. Somehow, that never saw the light of day.

In case youre puzzled as to why, look no further than the quasi-literate statement Parson made about Renaud at his initial press conference on the matter: This individual is not a victim. They were acting against the state agency to compromise teachers personal information in an attempt to embarrass the state and sell headlines for their news outlet.

Not sure where to start here. Setting aside that annoying syntax thing, did Parson say the quiet part out loud by accusing the suddenly plural Renaud of having tried to embarrass the state and sell headlines for their news outlet?

So, thats the theory of the case. Whats the crime here? Simple. Why, he embarrassed the state. As for the governor dismissing a solid piece of investigative journalism as selling headlines for a news outlet, well now thats embarrassing the state.

But that pales next to the scary-stupid assertion by Parson that Renaud was acting against the state agency to compromise teachers personal information. Really? By publishing a story for the obvious purpose of un-compromising the information?

What is wrong with this guy?

Now, being of a certain age like me Parson might be forgiven for not having known the difference between words like encoded and encrypted. But he ought to know there are people out there who could have explained it to him, like Shaji Khan, a cybersecurity professor at the University of Missouri-St. Louis, a state institution as luck would have it.

Heres what the Post-Dispatch attributed to Khan when the story broke in October:

The data on DESEs website was encoded but not encrypted. No one can view encrypted data without the specific decryption key used to hide the data. But encoded just means the data is in a different format and can be relatively easily decoded and viewed.

Anybody who knows anything about development and the bad guys are way ahead can easily decode that data, Khan said. He added that the bigger problem was that DESE had the sensitive data on the website at all.

So, the technical explanation is that Renaud did not employ any sort of aggressive or intrusive or improper action to ascertain the data flaw that jeopardized the privacy of all those teachers. Just as important, thats the common-sense explanation as well.

What Parson has done by initiating his criminal investigation of a journalist for embarrassing him is far more impeachable than the epic sleaziness of his predecessor, the disgraced Eric Greitens. He is a lucky man that the General Assembly is overwhelmingly controlled by his political party.

Parson is the same governor who has spent nearly two years insisting that it would represent government overreach to enact public-health regulations to combat the spread of COVID-19, as the vast majority of states not named Missouri have done. More than 15,700 Missourians have died during the pandemic.

But Parson has moved on from that. Theres a journalist who needs locking up, after all.

Someone, please hack into a U.S. Constitution for this man.

Ray Hartmann founded the Riverfront Times in 1977. Contact him at rhartmann1952@gmail.com or catch him on Donnybrook at 7 p.m. on Thursdays on the Nine Network and St. Louis In the Know With Ray Hartmann from 9 to 11 p.m. Monday thru Friday on KTRS (550 AM).

Read the original here:

Hartmann: The Tyranny of Mike Parson - Riverfront Times

Complaints with no substance or facts | Letters To Editor | thesunchronicle.com – The Sun Chronicle

To the editor:

Re; Stranger than fiction, by Bob Foley (column, Opinion Page, Dec. 10):

Another week, another column about nothing from Bob Foley where all he does is double down on the things and people he dislikes.

First he writes about a track coach who tried to get women to send him provocative photos of themselves to him. What he was really saying was how dumb are women? Did they actually send their photos to him?

Then he goes on to take a shot at a known liberal in actor Alec Baldwin over a tragedy that took a womans life. It was not Baldwins fault he was handed a loaded gun and now the assistant director on that movie has been indicted. Nice try Bobby.

His next Democratic victim is former Boston Mayor Marty Walsh, who is now Labor Secretary. He slams his job performance in that job but of course did not give us one example of his claim.

He then goes on to ramble about the Second Amendment and how all citizens have a right to own guns to protect themselves, but my question is protect themselves from whom? Does he fear some military take over of the country? Talk about paranoia, which puts him in lockstep with the crazies that attacked the U.S. Capitol building on Jan. 6.

I guess he is also clueless on the XL Pipeline and who exactly was going to benefit from that project. It was a project to take the dirtiest oil and pump it down to the Gulf Coast for export to other countries, not to be used in our country.

When it comes to Russian leader Vladimir Putin, I would much rather have Joe Biden in charge than Donald Trump who kissed Putins behind at every turn. Trump believed him over our own national intelligence. Russia is already dealing with a crippled economy and if he invades Ukraine, Biden will hit him where it hurts the most.

Biggest thing missing from Foleys column was he didnt even have the decency to mention the passing of Bob Dole, a true patriot, who gave so much and asked for so little in return.

Comparing Doles life of service to this country shows the contrast on just how far the GOP has fallen.

Aldo Ferrario

Mansfield

Here is the original post:

Complaints with no substance or facts | Letters To Editor | thesunchronicle.com - The Sun Chronicle

Murphy will lead Democratic Governors Association in 2023 – New Jersey Globe | New Jersey Politics

Governor Phi Murphy is looking at two years of potentially heavy out-of-state travel after securing a second stint as the chairman of the Democratic Governors Association.

Murphy will serve as DGA vice chairman in 2022 and chairman in 2023, the DGA announced on Sunday. He will become the governor to serve a second term as head of the Democratic Governors Association since the precursor of the group was formed in 1965.

At the same time, the recently re-elected New Jersey governor is serving as the vice chairman o f the National Governors Association. In July 2022, Murphy is set to assume the NGA chairmanship.

Gubernatorial contests in three southern states Louisiana, Mississippi and Kentucky could put Murphy in the thick of races where major issues like abortion and guns might put his own beliefs at odds with many Democrats in those states.

But Murphys progressive stances on state and national issues wont necessarily hurt Democrats running in those states.

The DGA position is primarily a fundraising position, said Jessica Taylor, the Senate and Governors Editor of the non-partisan Cook Political Report. The average voter will nt know who the DGA chair is.

Taylor said that voters will be more likely to hear names like Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez and Nancy Pelosi than Murphy in states where Republicans will make guns and abortion an issue.

Were seeing governors races becoming increasingly nationalized, she said.

If Murphys main responsibility is to raise money, his resumption of the DGA leadership post will likely add to the portfolio of the governors fundraiser-in-chief, First Lady Tammy Murphy.

Murphy was the DGA vice chair in 2019 and chair in 2020. The coronavirus pandemic prevented Murphy from traveling the country last year in support of Democratic gubernatorial candidates and left him spending his time on the telephone and in Zoom meetings.

On his watch, Democrats re-elected governors in North Carolina their most important battleground state along with Delaware and Washington. Republican governors won in Indiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Vermont and West Virginia. The GOP also held an open governorship in Utah.

In Montana, New Jersey transplant Greg Gianforte, a Republican congressman, was elected governor. That was a pickup for the GOP after term-limited Democratic Gov. Steve Bullock ran unsuccessful bids for the presidency, and then the United States Senate.

Democrats face tough map in 2023

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a pro-choice Democrat who ousted Republican Gov. Matt Bevin by just 4,136 votes (49.2%-48.8%) in 2019, is seeking re-election. So far, the only announced candidate against Beshear is State Auditor Mike Harmon.

But Murphy could potentially find it difficult to even get behind the Democratic nominee in Louisiana and Mississippi, the other two states with gubernatorial elections in two years.

Both states nominated pro-life, pro-gun candidates in 2019 and Murphy, as the DGA vice chair that year, sidestepped endorsing either of the Democratic candidates.

In Louisiana, Gov. John Bel Edwards, a conservative Democrat who was re-elected with 51.3% in 2019, is term-limited. Edwards signed a law that banned abortion after fifteen weeks of pregnancy, and he signed a package of gun rights bills backed by the National Rifle Organization.

Taylor said Democrats face an uphill battle in Louisiana, unless they find another John Bell Edwards.

The Democratic nominee for governor of Mississippi two years ago, state Attorney General Don Hood, referred to himself as a poster child for the Second Amendment, and as a Pro-Life Democrat.

The Republican governor of Mississippi, Tate Reeves, has not yet announced if he will seek a second term. Mississippi is ground zero in the national fight to overturn Roe v. Wade and the U.S. Supreme Court recently heard oral arguments in a case to uphold the states 15-week abortion ban Reeves signed that might lead to an overturning of the landmark 1973 decision that legalizes abortion.

Reeves beat Hood with 52% of the vote in 2019 in a state that hasnt elected a Democratic governor since 1999. Edwards was re-elected with 51% after a runoff two years ago.

According to Taylor, Murphy can make the case that Democratic donors might hold their noses and support more conservative candidates in the southern gubernatorial races in 2023 because of their impact on regaining the White House in 2024.

Just having a Democratic governor in place helps if Donald Trump runs against, said Taylor, who cited issues like challenges to the way votes are counted.in American elections.

Murphys greatest impact could be as DGA vice chairman next year, when 39 governorships will be on the ballot during President Joe Bidens mid-term elections.

Democrats are looking at flipping two seats currently held by moderate Republicans: Massachusetts, Gov. Charlie Baker, Murphys high school classmate, is not seeking a third term, and Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan is term-limited.

The Cook Political Report lists four Democratic governors Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan, Laura Kelly in Kansas, Steve Sisolak in Nevada, and Tony Evers in Wisconsin as toss-ups. An open seat in Pennsylvania, where Gov Tom Wolf is term-limited, is also a toss-up.

Republicans are defending 20 governorships, including an open seat in Arizona Gov. Rob Ducey is term-limited and in Georgia, where Gov. Brian Kemp faces a GOP primary challenge from David Perdue, a former U.S. Senator who has Trumps backing. The winner of that primary will face former state House Minority Leader Stacey Abrams, who has emerged as a national Democratic leader on voting rights issues since her narrow 54,723-vote loss, 50.2%-48.8%, to Kemp in 2018.

Murphy is the third New Jersey governor to lead his partys political arm: Brendan Byrne ran the DGA in 1980 and Chris Christie was the RGA chairman in 2014.

Go here to see the original:

Murphy will lead Democratic Governors Association in 2023 - New Jersey Globe | New Jersey Politics

NBC News Rats Out More of the Gun Community – NRA ILA

A sad fact about gun control politics is that if you are cynical enough you can darn near see the future.

Consider this NRA-ILA item from November 8, titled, NBC News Tattletale Alerts Secret Service to Lets go Brandon AR-15 Receiver. The piece concerned an NBC News reporter who contacted the U.S. Secret Service over the sale of an AR-15 lower receiver emblazoned with the popular Lets go Brandon political slogan. NRA-ILA explained in the article,

As legacy press outlets have lost much of their ability to manipulate public opinion, these institutions have resorted to increasingly desperate tactics to shape public discourse. Enter tattletale journalism.

This genre of article consists of identifying something that offends the delicate sensibilities of the prestige press and the elites they cater to and then reporting the offensive conduct to various authorities under the guise of asking them for comment. The transparent goal of such pieces is to pressure those in authority to stamp out the behavior. This sometimes takes the form of a journalist alerting one of the tech oligopolies to material hosted on their platform that the reporter deems politically incorrect.

Less than a month after publishing the ridiculous Lets go Brandon piece, NBC engaged in exactly the conduct described above.

According to an account from Ammoland.com, in recent weeks NBC News contributor Joshua Eaton contacted several firearms-related YouTube content producers to ask them about the material on their channels. The query focused on channels containing information on how people can exercise their Second Amendment right to build their own firearms.

NBC News then contacted YouTube with a list of channels containing this information, alerting the tech giant that these channels were supposedly not in compliance with the companys community guidelines. This resulted in videos being deleted and demonetization of the channels. Ammoland.com obtained a letter from YouTube that explained,

All channels on YouTube must comply with our Community Guidelines, which prohibit content instructing viewers how to make firearms, Jack Malon, YouTube spokesperson, told AmmoLand News. After careful review, we have removed the videos in question for violation of our firearms policy, and we have also suspended the channels sent by NBC from the YouTube Partner Program for failure to follow our Advertiser-Friendly Guidelines.

For more information on this vital story see the Ammoland.com article by clicking here.

With its recent behavior, NBC News has abandoned any pretense of objectivity and is now engaged in partisan activism.

On his personal website, Eaton notes that prior to going freelance he wrote for ThinkProgress. That outlet was a project of the left-wing Center for American Progress Action Fund. The Center for American Progress is a radical anti-gun organization. The group supports a ban on commonly-owned semi-automatic firearms and their magazines and background checks for ammunition sales. At present, the outfit opposes the NRA-supported New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen U.S. Supreme Court case that would ensure the Second Amendment right of New Yorkers to carry a firearm for self-defense outside the home.

NBCUniversal would do well to keep this sort of rank advocacy to MSNBC, lest the public get wise to their broader propaganda campaign.

Link:

NBC News Rats Out More of the Gun Community - NRA ILA

Across the Divide: Using guns for self-gratification undermines the 2nd Amendment | Opinion – pennlive.com

By Becky Bennett

The Kyle Rittenhouse acquittal and the arrival of hunting season are making guns a topic around rural holiday tables.

Ive written about how guns are a normal, even necessary part of everyday rural life. But gun owners need to think hard about our reaction to the debacle in Kenoshain which Rittenhouse, a teenager with an AR-15, went looking for trouble and found it. Rural people who revere the Second Amendment, but feel joy, or improbably, vindication in the verdict, are in danger of undermining any legitimate place for guns in our society.

We all know theres a line between murder with a gun and self-defense. But the Rittenhouse verdict explodes that line into a vast gray area of twisted law, exploitative pundits, and rural conservatives hungry for any kind of victory over left-wing media.

So lets talk about the line and the need to etch it in granite before its too late (or later than it is already).

A refrain you hear when rural people talk about why they have guns, other than for hunting, is you never know. . .

There was a stretch in late October-early November when I was having construction work done on my house. It involved removing my garage doors and covering the opening with only a tarp for about five days.

I was concerned about security, and the contractor, whom Id known since high school, asked if I had a gun. I told him, no, but I had a cordless drill. He replied in all seriousness that I needed a gun because . . . you never know.

He recounted a local incident where a man in his seventies shot an intruder in his home. And he told me about getting a handgun for a female family member. Its not uncommon for men in rural areas to buy handguns for women in their families and teach them to shoot. Its part of taking responsibility for yourself and your loved ones. (Imagine if wed tapped into this sense of responsibility around vaccination.)

Because you never know, acquaintances often urge me to carry a gun while hiking. Its why, during an office security check after the mass shooting at a newspaper in Maryland, one of my colleagues gestured meaningfully toward her purse and assured me she was prepared.

The problem with Rittenhouse was that he knew exactly what might happen because his behavior provoked the attacks he then defended himself from.

Theres a difference between reasonable defense and a parade. Parades are intended to impress spectators and to make the parader feel big. In the past, no one bragged about owning guns or flaunted them outside a shooting range. They bragged only about hunting prowess.

Rittenhouse loved a parade. If he wasnt just feeding his egoif he sincerely believed that waving an assault-style firearm in a chaotic situation improved securitythen whoever taught him to behave this way with a gun damaged him immeasurably. No credible rural gun owner would teach children that guns are playthings or props (they teach constant awareness of a guns capacity for harm).

Unfortunately, in our presently unhinged society, allowing guns for responsible defense also opens the way for self-gratifying and provocative displays. Not to mention for exploiters like Gun Owners of America, which intends to award Rittenhouse an AR-15 like the one he killed with, as a thank-you for being a warrior for gun owners and self-defense rights across the country!

When pro-gun organizations and gun owners conflate self-defense and self-aggrandizement, they affirm the weak-minded and guarantee tragedy.

Rural residents, who claim to have their heads on straight about guns (unlike hand-wringing liberals), should know, and do, better. Anyone who cheers the Rittenhouse debacle betrays their rural values of respect for guns, responsible use, and responsibility for yourself and others.

They also risk undermining support for the Second Amendment. The National Rifle Association, untroubled by contradiction or nuance, quoted the amendment after the Rittenhouse verdict. Of course, well-regulated militia and security were the antithesis of the Kenosha debacle.

Similarly, gun-toting congresswoman Lauren Boebert hailed a great day for the Second Amendment and the right to self-defense. . . Glory to God! (although nobody ended up covered in anything like glory).

Rural gun owners used to take the Second Amendment seriously as the underpinning of responsible self-protection and the freedom that security brings. If we no longer believe these things, why should our urban counterparts support the right to bear arms?

Becky Bennett lives in south-central Pennsylvania and is a freelance writer and editor. She was editor of the Public Opinion newspaper in Chambersburg for 18 years and a journalist for 40. Across the Divide examines rural perspectives on issues facing Pennsylvania and the nation. Email her at rbenn135@yahoo.com.

View post:

Across the Divide: Using guns for self-gratification undermines the 2nd Amendment | Opinion - pennlive.com

Is the US 2nd Amendment a major contributor to US Mass Shootings? – The Speak Easy – BleepingComputer

> Because the right to bear arms pertains to anything from a sword to a rifle. Anything and everything can be used as a weapon to kill and to inflict massive harm. A good example is a car that was recently driven into a parade killing 6 and injuring more than 50.

Agreed. Just about anything can be used to kill - even a bag of cotton balls if shoved into someone's throat to the point where their airway is blocked and they suffocate. But that's not the point.

You can not seriously argue that it's not far easier to kill using a gun, particularly a semi-automatic and from a distance to boot. A lunatic wielding a sword may be able to kill several people before being overpowered but put an AR-15 with 30 rounds of ammunition into the same lunatic hands, and the potential death rate goes up tenfold.

I take your point about the recent tragedy where an idiot drove a car through a parade and killed people in America, but that's not comparable to gun-related crime year after year.

If nothing changes and the second amendment isn't revised to suit modern times and living conditions, then when or how can gun-related violence end?

Making guns even more readily available than they already are so that people can defend themselves only exacerbates the problem, so simple logic dictates that the removal of guns from the streets and regulating to force people to have to show justification for obtaining (and continue keeping) firearms makes perfect sense. Wouldn't you say that would be a massive step in the right direction?

In other words, revisit the second amendment and bring it back into line with 21st Century living.

> My son or daughter could easily take a knife to school to inflict pain or use a pair of readily available scissors to kill students that have bullied them.

No doubt, but their opportunity to kill multiple kids instead of just injuring a few would be severely restricted, and that's the whole point. A knife or a pair of scissors can kill, yes. So can a fork, but none of those things are designed for that purpose.

A gun, on the other hand, is specifically designed for that purpose. To kill and maim as quickly and efficiently as possible. It makes sense to have strict laws about how available they are, not just to kids but also to the American population in general. Guns have no logical place in society.

> People are the cause not the second amendment.

But that's only half the story, Dan.

Of course it's people that pull the trigger, but it's the second amendment that gives them the means to obtain deadly weapons in the first place. It's a vicious circle and given that you can't police people who will harm 24/7, it logically follows that the ease of gun availability has to be addressed. How to start doing that? By revisiting the need and value of the second amendment.

That amendment is well overdue to be revised or cut out of the American constitution entirely in my opinion. Remove and severely restrict the ability for people to obtain guns and the people problem (relating to guns) takes care of itself. At a minimum, the people who slaughter others through yearly mass shootings no longer have easy access to the weapons they need to cause the carnage you guys must live with every year.

> The anarchist cook book protected by the first amendment details how to make a simple pipe bomb. Also don't forget that in chemistry classes one can learn how to make a simple bomb.

Sure, the info can be found on the Internet as well. But how often have you heard of kids being slaughtered at school because someone made use of a pipe bomb? Now, how many times have you heard of mass shootings resulting in slaughtered kids?

> So your argument is very moot with regards to guns killing people.

On the contrary, I've just shown you why it's your argument that fails the logic test and is moot.

> So what is worse guns or obesity?

Guns. Because an obese person primarily harms himself through his own choice. A gun, on the other hand, harms others. But you're just trying to deflect from the real issue again.

This discussion isn't about how many Americans die and from what. It's about the value and worth of an outdated second amendment that has a direct cause and effect on the number of yearly gun-related deaths in America. Remove that second amendment protection and gun availability is immediately curtailed. Combine that with a buy-back scheme to get guns back off the streets, and America could finally start making some headway in putting a stop to mass shootings.

It's logic that can't be argued, and countries (just like Australia) have already shown that such steps are both effective and doable.

Edited by achzone, 27 November 2021 - 12:53 AM.

Link:

Is the US 2nd Amendment a major contributor to US Mass Shootings? - The Speak Easy - BleepingComputer

Giving Thanks this Thanksgiving: Family, Freedom, the Second Amendment and Hunting – America’s 1st Freedom

Traditionally, the Wisconsin gun deer season launches the weekend before Thanksgiving and runs through the Sunday following the national holiday. This years opening weekend found me on family property in north-central Wisconsin with my back to a huge oak tree and a lever-action rifle sitting across my lap. My blaze-orange coat was zipped up tight in the below-freezing temperature, but I know I had a satisfied smile on face.

Thanksgiving and Wisconsin deer hunting are state traditionsa time to celebrate family and friends, and to give thanks for all that we have in this country. This tradition is founded on the ideals of self-determination and freedom. Perhaps most crucial among the freedoms we enjoy is the Second Amendment, which, in a sense, is well celebrated during this week by Wisconsinites and by millions more around this great nation.

For many Wisconsin families, Thanksgiving itself starts with deer hunters getting out the door in the chilly pre-dawn and making their way to their hunting areas. They then, somehow, get back home early enough to enjoy the bird and all the trimmings with the family. After the meal, these hunters may take a quick nap on the couch while the football game plays on the television, and then itss up and back out for the later afternoon hunt.

Wisconsin is home to nearly 700,000 deer hunters, and those participating in the gun deer season are often called the orange army. While it is legal to use a bow during this season, most volunteers in the orange army head afield with the firearm of their choice. It may be grandpas lever-action or a new semi-automatic; whatever the choice, the experience is the same.

Those who are opposed to our Second Amendment rights have a different idea about the decisions we make as gun owners in a free nation. All too often these same anti-gun types have tried to divide gun owners at this time of the year by saying someone doesnt need this or that type of firearm to hunt deer with.

As A1F.com Editor in Chief Frank Miniter recently wrote: Anti-Second Amendment groups and politicianssuch as President Joe Biden (D) and former senator and presidential candidate John Kerry (D)have tried to divide and conquer gun owners by going hunting or mentioning hunters and then claiming true sportsmen and women dont need this or that type of gun.

Were not going to take away your hunting guns, these anti-gunners claim, just the bad ones that no real hunter would use. You know, those scary black rifles, or some other guns they wish to villify.

This tactic implies that the Second Amendment is essentially a hunting right. And since these anti-gun individuals and organizations arent targeting our hunting guns, well, they think we should be okay with their desired restrictions and bans.

The Second Amendment was written to stop government from infringing on our inherent right to keep and bear arms, as self-defense and self-determination are critical elements of actual freedom.

That said, would we have the hunting culture we do today in the United States and Wisconsin without the Second Amendment? I dont see how.

This deer season, I am using a Henry Arms Big Boy All-Weather Sidegate chambered in .357 Magnum. I like lever-actions, and wanted to try this particular rifle with new .357 mag. hunting ammunition.

Actually, though, my favorite hunting rifle is one of those scary black rifles the anti-gunners despise. Its an AR-10, specifically a DPMS GII Hunter chambered in .260 Rem., and Ive used it to great success on many deer and hog hunts.

Anti-Second Amendment types will tell you no one uses an AR-style rifle for huntingthese people are either misinformed or are intentionally spreading a falsehood. All sorts of American hunters like myself use AR-style rifles for hunting game, large and small, and its their choice to do so.

A vibrant Second Amendment provides somewhere between 14 and 20 million Americans with the right to go afield toting the firearms of their choice (state and local hunting regulations dependent, of course). The hunting we do is an important cultural force in this nation; this is so even though most of us dont need to hunt to feed ourselves and our families.

Hunting connects us to the self-sufficiency of the past. Hunting further connects us to the land and to nature, and every Thanksgiving week, tens-of-thousands of Wisconsin hunters and their families share the hunt as an annual tradition.

And for all that, Wisconsin deer hunters like myself very much give thanks.

Read more here:

Giving Thanks this Thanksgiving: Family, Freedom, the Second Amendment and Hunting - America's 1st Freedom

NRA celebrates 150th anniversary: Americans’ ‘guardians’ of the Second Amendment – Fox News

The National Rifle Association has notched a big milestone: its 150th anniversary.

"For 150 years, millions of Americans from all walks of life, races, colors, and creeds have been proud members of the National Rifle Association of America. From Presidents of the United States, military heroes, those with household names to rank and file Americans like us, all have entrusted the NRA to be the guardians of their Second Amendment, their self-defense and hunting rights, and indeed their freedom as Americans," NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre exclusively told Fox News.

"That is a solemn duty that all of us at the NRA take seriously. That is why the NRA never has and never will shrink from a fight."

Wayne LaPierre, NRA vice president and CEO, speaks to guests at the NRA-ILA Leadership Forum at the 148th NRA Annual Meetings Exhibits on April 26, 2019, in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by Scott Olson/Getty Images) ()

The NRA was officially founded on Nov. 17, 1871, by Union veterans Col. William C. Church and Gen. George Wingate. The pair launched the group after they became disheartened by the lack of marksmanship among their troops during the war. Church explained in an op-ed at the time that the NRAs primary goal was to "promote and encourage rifle shooting on a scientific basis."

NRA founders Col. William C. Church and Gen. George Wingate (Provided by the NRA)

Its history also includes arming Americans so they could fight back against the Ku Klux Klan, and the organization touts that some of its first members were Black Americans looking to defend themselves against Klan members. Nine of its 10 first presidents were also Union veterans who fought to defeat slavery.

NRA INSTRUCTOR TRAINS THOUSANDS OF INNER CITY WOMEN 'TO ENSURE THEYRE NEVER VICTIMS'

The association has repeatedly come under fire from liberals who say it is rooted in racism, which LaPierre also shot down earlier this year at CPAC.

"The fact is, before the color barrier was broken in professional sports, before it was broken in schools, lunch lines, water fountains, in the media, or in Hollywood, before all of that, and since our founding 150 years ago, the National Rifle Association of America has not only welcomed all Americans. We've fought for civil rights and constitutional freedom for all Americans!" LaPierre said at the time.

Through the years, the NRA has remained on target with its founders goal: training Americans.

During World War II, the NRA opened its ranges to the government and developed training guidelines. After the war, it focused on training hunters and established the first hunter education program, which has since spread from New York to across the country and Canada. In 1957, local North Carolina NAACP leader Rob Williams chartered an NRA-affiliated club to help residents of Monroe fight the KKK. And by 1960, the NRA became the only national trainer of law enforcement officers with its Police Firearms Instructor certification program.

The various training courses continue to today. One NRA instructor recently touted that he has trained thousands of women from Detroit on how to safely protect themselves with guns "to ensure theyre never victims."

The group also has also celebrated the many U.S. presidents throughout history who were NRA members, including John F. Kennedy, Theodore Roosevelt and Dwight Eisenhower.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Conservative political leaders also celebrated the NRAs birthday on social media, heralding the group as one protecting freedom.

More:

NRA celebrates 150th anniversary: Americans' 'guardians' of the Second Amendment - Fox News

Winter session of Parliament to begin today; Farm Laws Repeal, other key bills on agenda – Business Today

Winter session of the Parliament is all set to begin today. The winter session is expected to conclude on December 23. Business Advisory Committee (BAC) of the Rajya Sabha is slated to be held at 10 am today. Lok Sabha's Business Advisory Committee (BAC) is scheduled to meet at 10:30 am today.

This will be a busy session as 26 bills are on the legislators' agenda. Farm Laws Repeal Bill, 2021 will be taken up on priority. The bill aims to repeal the three farm laws -- Farmers' Produce Trade and Commerce (Promotion and Facilitation) Act, 2020; the Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Act, 2020; and the Essential Commodities (Amendment) Act, 2020. Farmers have been agitating against these laws on Delhis borders since November 2020.

Governments agenda includes the Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021. This bill seeks to prohibit all private cryptocurrencies in India, however, it allows for certain exceptions to promote the underlying technology and its uses. It will also allow a facilitative framework for creation of the official digital currency to be issued by the Reserve Bank of India.

Meanwhile, the Congress has issued a whip to its MPs to be present in both the Houses on November 29 while the BJP has asked all its Rajya Sabha MPs to be present in the House on November 29. Leader of Opposition Mallikarjun Kharge has also called on a meeting of all Opposition parties to create consensus over the issues to be raised in the Parliament. The Trinamool Congress (TMC) will not attend this meeting, news agency ANI reported.

KEY BILLS FOR WINTER SESSION OF PARLIAMENT

1. Farm Laws Repeal Bill, 20212. Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 20213. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Second Amendment) Bill4. Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill5. Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority (Amendment) Bill6. Metro Rail (Construction, Operation and Maintenance) Bill7. The Chartered Accountants, Cost and Works Accountants and the Company Secretaries (Amendment) Bill8. Electricity (Amendment) Bill9. The Energy Conservation (Amendment) Bill, 202110. The National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (Amendment) Bill, 202111. The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (Amendment) Bill, 201912. The High Court and Supreme Court (Salaries and Conditions of Service) Amendment Bill13. Trafficking of Persons (Prevention, Protection and Rehabilitation) Bill14. The Assisted Reproductive Technology Regulation Bill, 202015. Constitution (Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) Order (Amendment) Bill16. Central Vigilance Commission (Amendment) Bill17. Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Bill18. Narcotics Drug and Psychotic Substances Bill19. The Cantonment Bill, 202120. Personal Data Protection Bill21.National Anti-Doping and Mediation Bill22. National Transport University Bill23. Indian Antarctica Bill24. Indian Maritime Fisheries Bill25. National Dental Commission Bill26. National Midwifery Commission Bill

(With agency inputs)

Also read: Facebook executives likely to depose before parliamentary panel on Monday

Also read: Winter Session of Parliament to begin on Monday

Visit link:

Winter session of Parliament to begin today; Farm Laws Repeal, other key bills on agenda - Business Today