Were Current NASA Employees Aware Of The Women Portrayed In ‘Hidden Figures’? – Forbes


Forbes
Were Current NASA Employees Aware Of The Women Portrayed In 'Hidden Figures'?
Forbes
We have initiatives like Women@NASA and Modern Figures that make it really easy to learn about the roles people of various backgrounds have played in NASA's accomplishments so that people of similar backgrounds will be encouraged to pursue their ...
Authors discuss 'Hidden Figures' subjects black women at NASATwinCities.com-Pioneer Press
Honoring NASA scientists this Black History MonthCleveland 19 News

all 107 news articles »

See the article here:

Were Current NASA Employees Aware Of The Women Portrayed In 'Hidden Figures'? - Forbes

Jezero crater most popular scientific target on Mars for NASA’s 2020 rover – Science Magazine

A deltalike fan in Jezero crater shows where water would have flowed into the lake-filled crater, transporting clay minerals and, possibly, organic molecules.

NASA/JPL/JHUAPL/MSSS/Brown University

By Paul VoosenFeb. 10, 2017 , 4:45 PM

Mars scientists have spoken, nominating Jezero crater and three other sites as their favorite targets for a NASA rover to be launched in 2020. Once home to an ancient river delta, Jezero crater may have collected and preserved ancient organic molecules that flowed in from beyond the craters rim.

The tally, taken today at the end of a 3-day meeting of 172 scientists in Monrovia, California, exposed a debate about the merits of sampling ancient deltas similar to the promising terrain in Gale crater currently being explored by the Curiosity rover, versus those who would prefer to visit rocks that formed in hot springs and may have harbored underground life.

The clear top candidate was Jezero crater. It was followed by Northeast Syrtis, a nearby carbonate-rich site home to ancient, water-associated clays that could be tied to potential hydrothermal springs. Both spots sit close to old volcanic rocks, another important goal for a mission that will collect samples that may ultimately be returned to Earth. Eberswalde crater, home to another clay-rich delta, came in third, followed by Mawrth Vallis, another potential hot spring site.

A voyage to Jezero crater, with clear evidence of an ancient delta visible from orbit, would ultimately show whether or not an early, wet surface could support life, Munir Humayun, a planetary scientist at Florida State University in Tallahassee who serves on the missions return sample science board, said at the meeting. They would be building off experience with Curiosity, armed with some sense of what clays to target. If we dont find a biomarker at Jezero, he said, then well really be showing that a surface biosphere did not exist at Mars.

Credits: (Graphic) Val Altounian/Science; (Data) NASA/JPL/University of Arizona

But other scientists favor a destination containing rocks that were formed in underground, hot spring environments. Subsurface life is a model that needs to be considered for Mars, says Bethany Ehlmann, a planetary scientist at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, who supports the Northeast Syrtis site. Life is found throughout Earths deep and extreme underground environments, and the Mars research community is now seriously considering how such biosignatures could be detected by the 2020 rover, she says.

The vote is purely advisory. NASA project scientists and engineers will decide on a final recommendation of three or four targets, also considering safety factors such as the difficulty of landing in a rocky site. Prior to the vote, the NASA team gave a quick insight into their thinking, naming three sites as clear candidates for further study: Jezero, Mawrth, and Northeast Syrtis, with Jezero the only unanimous decision. Mars scientists will hold more workshops focused on the three or four finalists, with a final site selection not expected for a year or more.

The $2 billion Mars 2020 rover has the ultimate goal of drilling some 30 pencilwide rock cores that would then be cached on the planets surface and, ultimately, returned to Earth for analysis. The means of return are not yet determined, but would require subsequent missions.

Please note that, in an effort to combat spam, comments with hyperlinks will not be published.

Read more from the original source:

Jezero crater most popular scientific target on Mars for NASA's 2020 rover - Science Magazine

Should we leave Earth to colonize Mars? A NASA astronaut says nope – Quartz

Todays businesspeople are very excited about launching into the stratosphere. Whether its Elon Musks SpaceX, Richard Bransons Virgin Galactic, the Mars One mission, or a slew of other aerospace enterprises, a host of companies are trying to help humans leave the rocky planet weve called home for the past six million years. But some critics argue that instead of finding a nook elsewhere in the solar system, we really ought to be focusing on solving the issues with our own planet.

Ron Garan, a former NASA astronaut, believes we should not be abandoning hope for continued life on planet Earth in favor of rubbing shoulders with Martians. He has spent time on the International Space Station (ISS), done four spacewalks, and has been awarded both the NASA Exceptional Service medal and the NASA Space Flight medial. Back on land, Garan spends his time focusing on bettering the home we already have. Being so far away from Earth makes you see how similar and interconnected everything is, he says, rather than us compartmentalizing home.

To be clear, Garan isnt opposed to exploring the notion of colonizing Mars: Its just that we should be using the innovative technologies were developing to live up there to make life better down here. Human curiosity is one of the biggest drivers for space exploration, and it keeps us hungry to continuing wanting to innovate and solve these problems, he says.

It may be a moonshoot, but perhaps if we aim for the moon, well land on the stars.

This conversation has been lightly condensed and edited for clarity.

Considering you are one of the few people who have left Earth, how have you come to form the opinion that we shouldnt colonize Mars?

I think we should explore other planets, but I dont think we should abandon this planet to go live on Mars. It just doesnt make any logical sense that we would leave this planet for an inhospitable one like Mars. First of all, if we cant even terraformwhich is to control our climate and environmentour own planet, what makes us think that we can go to another planet and control the environment there? If we developed the capability to terraform and create atmospheres and climates on other planets, then we should apply that capability to benefit our home planet.

From Elon Musk to Richard Branson, private entrepreneurs are sending a lot of money up into space. Would it be best to redirect that capital toward solving the problems that already exist on Earth?

I think funding should go to both. Space is our future; we need to devote resources and time and effort toward further exploration of our solar system, including human exploration. The primary reason for doing this is not so that we can have a plan B, via having another planet we can go live on, but instead so that we can use the technology thats developed through those efforts to help us here on Earth.

Carl Sagan basically said that for the foreseeable future, Earth is where we make our stand. So if there is nowhere else we can go right now, we need to take this really seriously.

Have you always felt this way, or was there a moment when you realized the importance of focusing on the Earth instead of the stars?

Ive always had the idea that everyone has a responsibility to leave this place a little bit better than how they found it. But going to space broadened, reinforced, and amplified that opinion.

The Earth is just incredibly beautiful when viewed from space, and all those buzzwords youve heard astronaut after astronaut say about how beautiful and tranquil and peaceful and fragile this planet looks from spacethose are all true. It really does look like this jewel in the blackness of space; a fragile oasis. I try to use this perspective of our planet to inspire people to make a difference, mind the ship, and take care of our fellow crewmates on Spaceship Earth.

Why are so many people obsessed with getting off planet Earth?

I wanted to be an astronaut ever since July 20, 1969. That was the day when I, along with millions and millions of people all around the world, watched those first footsteps on the moon on TV. I wouldnt have been able to put it in these words at the time, but even as a young boy, on some level I realized that we had just become a different species. We had become a species that was no longer confined to this planet, and that was really exciting to me.

I wanted to become a part of that group of explorers that got to step off the planet and look back upon ourselves. I think continuing that exploration out into the solar system and beyond is part of human nature. We are explorers by nature. We want to expand our knowledge and expand our understanding of our universe.

Is it common among astronauts that once you finally leave Earth and can look back upon it from space, you have an urge to go straight back to protect it?

I dont want to speak for other astronauts, cosmonauts, or taikonauts, but most of the people I know whove had this experience have come back with a deeper appreciation for the planet that we live on. And its not just an appreciation for the planetits appreciation for the living things on the planet, too.

One of the things I experienced in space is what I can only describe as a sobering contradiction: a contradiction between the beauty of our planet and the unfortunate realities of life for a significant number of its inhabitants. Its obvious from space that life on our planet is not always as beautiful as it looks from space.

The other thing Ive experienced was a profound sense of gratitude: gratitude for the opportunity to see the planet from that perspective, and gratitude for the planet that weve been given. Being physically detached from the Earth made me feel deeply interconnected with everyone on it in some way that I really cant fully explain. Its very obvious from that vantage point that we are all not only deeply connected, but also deeply interdependent as well.

What new discoveries have we uncovered in our exploration of the universe that have been particularly revolutionary back on Earth?

Theres the technology side, and theres then theres perspective. Perspective is very powerful. That first time that we looked back and saw this planet from spaceEarthrisewas incredibly revolutionary. That photograph of Earthrise is certainly the most influential environmental photograph ever taken. It was credited for inspiring the first Earth Day in 1970, and its helped launch the modern environmental movement. It really shows the truth, the reality of the world we live in; that were on this oasis, and its all we have.

So theres that aspect of it, but theres also all the technology that comes from the space program, whether its computing technology, energy production through things like solar energy, or all of the implications for medicine and medical diagnostics. We do a tremendous amount of Earth observation from space that gives us a profound increase in understanding of our planet and its life-support systems that we would not have insight into if we didnt have a space program.

Why do you think there are so many conversations about Martian colonization? Have we lost hope for Earth?

This idea that we are going to abandon Earth and go live on Mars is utter nonsense. Its illogical. It makes perfect sense to expand human presence to Mars, but were not going to abandon Earth. If we had the capability to colonize and terraform Mars to make it habitable for humans, then we certainly could control whats happening on our own planet, which has a head start of millions of years.

What conversation should we be having instead?

The first place we should establish a permanent human presence in our solar system is the moon, our closest neighbor. And then from there, establish transportation infrastructure to allow regular flights between the Earth and the moon. Then from there, we could use it as a jump-off point and have that be a transportation hub to the rest of the solar system. That makes perfect sense to me.

We need to basically take parallel paths: We need to be exploring the solar system because of all the benefits to humanity that that will incur, while also devoting as much effort to being able to control the life-support systems of Spaceship Earth.

If we expand milestones such as the accomplishment of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030 and having complete decarbonization by 2050 out to 2068which is the 100-year anniversary of EarthriseI believe we should have complete control of the life-support systems on our planet by then. If we had complete control of the chemical constituents of our atmosphere, soil, land, and oceans, wed be able to monitor it and adjust itand optimize it for life.

Why are we having more conversations about living on Mars than the potential of being able to control our own atmosphere on Earth? Learning how to counteract climate change and other environmental factors here instead of establishing colonies elsewhere seems far more beneficial.

Well, its a moon shot, right? Its something thats going to take a lot of effort and a lot of time to accomplish, but we started this conversation off with terraforming Mars. Its a lot easier to control our own atmosphere and our own oceans than it is to create an entirely new atmosphere.

What are you currently trying to achieve back on Earth?

Ive got a non-profit that I founded and am still involved in, and I have a lot of social enterprises that Im involved in. Most of the stuff I work with in that sector is around being able to provide clean water to folks, because I think its really important to do that in an environmentally, financially sustainable way.

Im also involved with an effort called Constellation, which is bringing together a coalition of international astronauts, visionaries, and futurists to put out a call to the world to crowdsource and co-imagine a vision of our future. Were not going to be able to get to the vision of our future we want if we dont learn how to work together on a planetary level, not just a local level.

My primary day job is working as the chief pilot for a company called World View, which is trying to launch all kinds of thingsincluding peopleto the edge of space in high-altitude balloons. This project has tremendous environmental capabilities as far as being able to hover these platforms over a specific area of interest to do things like monitor the oceans, coral reefs, or how much CO2 is in the atmosphere. From it, we might be able to develop better ways to do climate modeling, weather predictions, and agricultural optimization.

For those who would still want to go live on Mars, what kinds of over-romantic notions do people have about living in space?

You cant be claustrophobic, because if youre going to Mars, youre gonna be in a can for six to eight months. And once you get there, youre still gonna be living in a tin can. There are a lot of things that define the beauty of life on our planet, like the breeze in your face, mist on a lake, and the sound of the birds. If youre going to live on Mars, youre not gonna have that for the rest of your life. Thats not so romantic to me.

What is romantic is expanding the body of human knowledge and expanding human presence. Its not going to be all fun. Those pioneers who will eventually be exploring Mars are going have to deal with hardships. Im sure there will be a lot of people who get homesick, which is an interesting thought: When you get that far away from the planet, your definition of home changes radically. Home simply becomes Earth.

You can follow Ron on Twitter at @Astro_Ron and read more on his website. He is also the author of The Orbital Perspective. Learn how to write for Quartz Ideas. We welcome your comments at ideas@qz.com.

More:

Should we leave Earth to colonize Mars? A NASA astronaut says nope - Quartz

NASA releases new alien-looking image of Jupiter’s south pole … – Chron.com

NASA's new telescope

NASA's Juno spacecraft recently snapped an amazingly detailed view of Jupiter's southern pole.

Click through to see the James Webb Telescope, NASA's most powerful and advanced telescope yet.

NASA's Juno spacecraft recently snapped an amazingly detailed view of Jupiter's southern pole.

Click through to see the James Webb Telescope, NASA's most powerful and advanced telescope yet.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

The largest and most powerful telescope to ever be launched into space, NASA's James Webb Telescope, is nearly ready to blast off.

NASA releases new alien-looking image of Jupiter's south pole

Over the years, NASA's Juno spacecraft has delivered hundreds of amazing images of Jupiter. With each new high-definition image, the idea of what we think Jupiter looks like is changed.

Most recently, NASA's photo of the gas giant's southern pole is one such example. To a casual observer, the enhanced-color image might not even look like Jupiter, but instead a strange alien planet straight out of Hollywood.

MORE IMAGES:NASA unveils 'unprecedented' detailed photos after ring-grazing Saturn orbit

Snapped63,400 miles above the gas giant in early February, the image is one of the first photographs taken in Juno's last year.

By February of next year, Juno is expected to "deorbit into Jupiter," or crash land into the storm-filled planet in order to end its 7-year mission.

Until then, we can except more amazing images.

SHOUT OUT:Pharrell Williams wears a NASA sweatshirt to the Oscars Nominees Luncheon

Click through above to see images NASA's newest telescope that will bring beam back the deepest images of the universe yet.

Here is the original post:

NASA releases new alien-looking image of Jupiter's south pole ... - Chron.com

NASA Space Launch System Opens Pathway To Mars — And Thousands Of Jobs On Earth – Forbes


Forbes
NASA Space Launch System Opens Pathway To Mars -- And Thousands Of Jobs On Earth
Forbes
There's a conference next week near Capitol Hill to discuss a project that may lead to the greatest technological achievement in history -- and yet chances are, you haven't heard about it. The project is NASA's effort to develop a huge rocket and ...
Is NASA heading back to the moon under Trump?AL.com
European space agency to help NASA take humans beyond moonU.S. News & World Report
Legislation Would Require Strategic Plan for NASA Human SpaceflightSpace.com
Express.co.uk -RT -Daily Caller
all 56 news articles »

More here:

NASA Space Launch System Opens Pathway To Mars -- And Thousands Of Jobs On Earth - Forbes

Bloomsburg University Professor Teams Up With NASA – wnep.com


wnep.com
Bloomsburg University Professor Teams Up With NASA
wnep.com
BLOOMSBURG Hundreds of millions of miles away from Bloomsburg University, there's an asteroid sitting somewhere between Mars and Jupiter. Dr. Michael Shepard spent months building a 3D model of the asteroid Psyche using a radar telescope.

and more »

Continued here:

Bloomsburg University Professor Teams Up With NASA - wnep.com

SpaceX Targets Feb. 18 for 1st Launch from Historic NASA Pad – Space.com

SpaceX will launch a mission from the historic Launch Complex 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center for the first time in mid-Februrary. The private spaceflight company modified the pad for its Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets.

SpaceXis preparing to launch its 10th cargo resupply mission to the International Space Station for NASA, which is now set for Feb. 18.

The mission will bring crucial supplies for the space station crew and materials to support more than a dozen experiments on the orbiting lab, including a new muscle cell experiment designed by high school students. It will also be the first to launch from the newly renovated, historic Launch Complex 39A at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.

SpaceX announced the Feb. 18 launch date via Twitter today (Feb. 8).

Targeting Feb. 18 for Dragon's next resupply mission to the @Space_Station our 1st launch from LC-39A at @NASA's Kennedy Space Center.

The launch pad was built in the 1960s, and hosted a number of famous mission launches, including Apollo 11, which put the first humans on the moon, and the first and last space shuttle flights. SpaceX leased the pad from NASA starting in 2014.

SpaceX has modified the pad to suit its Falcon 9 and future Falcon Heavy rockets. For the Feb. 18 launch, a Falcon 9 will loft into orbit a robotic Dragon spacecraft filled with more than 5,500 lbs. (2,500 kg) of cargo, NASA officials said during a news briefing today. After its stay on the space station, the Dragon will return nearly 5,000 lbs. (2,300 kg) of cargo to Earth.

Raven, a technology demonstration from the Satellite Servicing Projects Division at NASA's Goddard Spaceflight Center, will monitor comings and goings from the International Space Station with an eye toward developing autonomous rendezvous missions with satellites and spacecraft.

Riding to the station on this launch is an experiment by high school students at Craft Academy at Morehead State University, which will test the impact of microgravity on smooth muscle cell contraction. The experiment will use cells from rats to better understand how the muscle cells lining veins and arteries function.

Dragon will also carry an experiment monitoring the "superbug" MRSA(in a sealed experiment environment) to investigate how the bacterium grows and mutates without the pull of gravity; an experiment to grow and study antibody crystals; a "three-eyed" Raven tech demonstration system that will gather data for future autonomous rendezvous missions with satellites and spacecraft; and two Earth-monitoring systems that will sense lightning and gases in the planet's stratosphere.

The launch will also mark SpaceX's first liftoff from Florida's Space Coast since a Falcon 9 rocket burst into flames during a prelaunch test Sept. 1at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, which is next door to KSC.

Email Sarah Lewin at slewin@space.com or follow her@SarahExplains.Follow us@Spacedotcom,FacebookandGoogle+. Original article onSpace.com.

Follow this link:

SpaceX Targets Feb. 18 for 1st Launch from Historic NASA Pad - Space.com

Want NASA to pick your space mission proposal? Two winning scientists share some tips – The Planetary Society (blog)

Posted by Jason Davis

09-02-2017 6:00 CST

Topics: Psyche mission, OSIRIS-REx

It was 8:00 a.m. on January 4, 2017 when Lindy Elkins-Tanton got a phone call from NASA saying her proposed mission to send a spacecraft to a metallic asteroid had been selected.

Elkins-Tanton, the director of Arizona State University's School of Earth and Space Exploration, had just wrapped up a busy 2016. She was taking a well-earned, two-and-a-half week vacation in western Massachusetts, where she was reading academic papers and novels, and trying to get in a little snowshoeing.

Her mission, Psyche, was one of five finalists in the current iteration of NASA's Discovery program, which selects low-cost planetary science missions from a whittled-down pool of applicants.

First, NASA told the finalists to expect a decision the week after New Year's Day. Then, Elkins-Tanton was told to expect a phone call between 10:00 and 11:00 a.m. on January 4.

The call came early. She was still asleepand slightly embarrassed about that. When she picked up the phone, it was Thomas Zurbuchen, the head of NASA's science division.

"He knew right away I'd been asleep," Elkins-Tanton told me recently. "He said, 'Oh, I think I've wakened you. But I think you're going to be happy that I've wakened you.' So I knew right at that moment that we won. I was out there in the hills, in the snow, getting this phone call from NASA. It was really surreal."

Arizona State University

The phone call Elkins-Tanton received was the culmination of a process that officially started in November 2014, when NASA announced it was accepting proposals for its next Discovery mission.

Discovery missions are cost-capped at about $500 million, not including launch and operations costs. There is also a second competitively selected mission type called New Frontiers, which gives winning missions a budget of around $800 million, including the price tag of a rocket.

Right now, NASA is accepting proposals for its next New Frontiers mission. They're due in April, and in November, three winners will get funded for further studies. NASA plans to make a final decision on which mission will fly in mid-2019.

The process is not for the faint of heart. Scientists and engineers can spend years toiling over a proposal, only to have their hopes dashed by the selection process.

I wanted to learn more about why some missions succeed and some don't, so I asked two recent winners how they pulled it off. It turns out that while both missions had slightly different recipes for success, there were a lot of similarities: intangible assets like good team chemistry and a knack for navigating the science community landscape can be just as important as the nuts and bolts that make up a spacecraft.

The last New Frontiers mission to launch was OSIRIS-REx, which blasted off in September to collect a sample from asteroid Bennu.

It would actually be more accurate to say the journey of OSIRIS-REx began 13 years ago. In 2004, Michael Drake, the former head of the University of Arizona Lunar and Planetary Laboratory in Tucson, wanted to propose an asteroid sample return mission. Drake asked LPL colleague Dante Lauretta, who was an untenured, assistant professor at the time, to become his deputy principal investigator.

Drake and Lauretta pitched the mission to NASA's Discovery program. They weren't selected, and NASA gave the proposal the lowest possible grade: category four.

"Category four means you're rejected and they shouldn't even need to tell you why," Lauretta said during a recent phone interview. "We were pretty naive back then, I'll admit."

The mission science, he said, was compelling. "But the technical management and cost needed a lot of work."

Ultimately, NASA didn't select any Discovery missions that time around. When the agency asked for new proposals a year later, Drake and Lauretta decided to try again.

This time, Lauretta worked closely with engineers at Lockheed Martin, in an attempt to better synchronize the mission's science and engineering aspects. He wanted to understand every aspect of the spacecraft, and ensure the Lockheed team understood every part of the mission science.

"I really learned how spacecraft are put together," Lauretta said. "But, most importantly, I learned how you translate science into engineering-speak, because they really are different languages."

Drake and Lauretta made it to the final round, but ultimately lost to GRAIL, a pair of lunar gravity mapping probes that launched in 2011. On the bright side, NASA said the asteroid mission's science and engineering was solidthe problem was that it was getting too expensive.

In 2008, the National Academy of Sciences prepared to release an interim update to their 10-year Decadal Survey, which lays out acceptable mission themes for the mid-cost New Frontiers program. An asteroid sample return mission had not been prioritized in the last Decadal Survey, so Drake and Lauretta's team started pitching the benefits of such a mission to the science community. They also demonstrated how they could overcome any potential engineering challenges.

The Academy was convinced. When the interim report was released, "Asteroid Rover/Sample Return" was listed as a mission theme. The next New Frontiers proposal was due in 2009, so Drake and Lauretta tweaked their proposal and applied. This time, they won, beating out a lunar sample return and a Venus mission.

Jason Davis / The Planetary Society

When compared with OSIRIS-REx, the origin story of Psyche is a bit simpler.

In 2011, Lindy Elkins-Tanton was the lead author of a paper on the diversity found among different types of asteroids.

"We all have this image of asteroids that kind of comes from Star Wars, and doesn't actually reflect the truth," she said. "I got an e-mail from some colleagues at JPL (NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory) asking whether I'd be interested in helping design a mission to test our hypothesis."

Might NASA decide to send a spacecraft to an asteroid unlike anything scientists had ever seen? Elkins-Tanton was intrigued, and as the mission concept came together, her team started looking at targets. Very quickly, Psychea metallic asteroid that may have iron-nickel spires jutting into spaceended up as a prime target for the spacecraft. The asteroid was so compelling, the team ultimately named their mission Psyche as well.

Whereas it took Drake and Lauretta three tries to get OSIRIS-REx on the launch pad, Elkins-Tanton was fortunatePsyche was selected the first time.

"I kind of feel guilty because we won the first time through the proposal process," she said. "That's rare."

Psyche was selected alongside another asteroid mission called Lucy. Once again, asteroids triumphed over Venus.

"As totally, unbelievably thrilled as I am that we won, I feel heartbroken that we're not going to Venus right now," said Elkins-Tanton. "My big hope is that an even better Venus mission, with a higher dollar value will go."

The currently allowed New Frontiers mission themes are Venus, a lunar south pole sample return, a comet surface sample return, an ocean worlds (Titan and/or Enceladus) mission, a Saturn probe, and a Trojan asteroids tour.

NASA is already working on a high-dollar mission to another ocean world: Europa. The aforementioned Lucy spacecraft is headed for Jupiter's Trojan asteroids. Cassini is currently operating around Saturnwhich includes Titan and Enceladusthough the aging probe's mission ends later this year. This leads many to believe Venus already has an advantage over the competition. NASA hasn't sent a spacecraft there since the Magellan probe, in 1990.

"Venus has had a rough time," Lauretta said. "I don't think anybody at NASA or anywhere else disagrees that the science is really exciting. It's just that the technical risks are so high. It's not a friendly environment to operate in, especially for a surface package."

2005 Mattias Malmer, from NASA/JPL data

A team proposing a mission to Venus will have to convince NASA their spacecraft can survive in one of the harshest places in the solar system. The planet's surface is hotter than Mercury, air pressures are equivalent to operating almost a kilometer under Earth's ocean, and winds in the upper atmosphere are stronger than an Earth-based tornado or hurricane.

Engineering competency aside, what gives one team's proposal the edge over another? Both Lauretta and Elkins-Tanton were in agreement that fostering a positive team chemistry was absolutely vital. NASA wants to see groups that are cohesive and relaxed, where everyone has a voice.

And no negative nellies.

"One loud, negative voice can turn the tide of everything," Elkins-Tanton said. "It can cause people who feel more timid to shut up and not share things that are important and critical."

Projecting confidence is also important. Prior to NASA's onsite visit, Elkins-Tanton hired a speaking coach to visit her team for one afternoon. "It turned out to be really helpful to turn our minds away from the super-minutia that we'd been obsessed with for years, and out to the larger story for people who were going to care about it," she said.

Lauretta said one strategy he used for unifying his team was making sure everyone knew everyone else's role, and who the expert was on any particular topic.

"When you see missions that get into trouble, a lot of it is because of dysfunctional teaming," he said. This particularly shows in documents like the mission's concept study report, which, in the case of OSIRIS-REx, was about 2,000 pages.

"If you don't have a coherent team that's communicating well, that document is going to be a mess," said Lauretta. "NASA's going to be like, 'Wait a minute. If they can't communicate enough to make this document consistent, how on Earth are they going to pull off something as complicated as building and launching a spacecraft?'"

Because Discovery and New Frontiers missions are competitively selected, teams pay close attention to what other contenders are doing. Elkins-Tanton said this is particularly the case among missions heading to the same destination, such as Venus.

To prevent other teams from "ghosting" aspects of their own proposals, many groups work in secrecy.

"A lot of the proposals are top secret, and nobody even knows they're happening," she said. "There were proposals that we didn't even hear a rumor about until after they were all submitted, and more news started leaking out."

The Psyche team, however, took a different approach.

"We thought that probably a lot of people, even in planetary science, didn't understand what an amazing, unique, improbable object Psyche was," Elkins-Tanton said. "So we decided that we needed to be public about what we were doing." This included conference talks and workshops on asteroid differentiation.

Her team also developed artist's concepts to show off how the asteroid might look. This had the dual benefit of exciting the Psyche team itself, and helping its members visualize where they were going.

Lauretta said the OSIRIS-REx team wasn't as focused on publicity, except when it came to demonstrating why the National Academy interim report should include an asteroid sample return mission. But during the proposal process, Lauretta said his team often highlighted how OSIRIS-REx was different, especially when it came to other missions' weaknesses. If there was concern over the operating environment on Venus, for instance, the OSIRIS-REx team might highlight how comparatively benign Bennu was.

NASA / Joel Kowsky

By the time OSIRIS-REx was selected in May 2011, Michael Drake's health was suffering. Lauretta started to assume a de facto principal investigator role, and Drake passed away that September.

"It was emotionally and incredibly personally draining," Lauretta said. "He was a mentor and a friend. I still miss him dearly and I really wish he was here to see everything we have accomplished at this point."

Lauretta knew he would need his family's help if he were to fill Drake's shoes permanently.

"That was a big conversation I had with my wife," he said. "I said, 'I'm going to try to go do this. I need to know if you're on board with it, because if you think it's going to disrupt the family, then I'll back off.'"

In the end, support came not just from his immediate family, but his extended familyon everything from child care to help around the house.

Elkins-Tantonmanaged to lead her Psyche team through the proposal process while holding down a full-time directorship job at ASU.

"I calculated that in the last two years I've had less than one day off per month," she said. NASA advisors have already told her to expect 80 to 100 percent of her work time will be consumed by the mission as it proceeds from development toward launch. She is currently exploring how to shuffle her responsibilities to make way for what will become an entirely new career path.

Now that OSIRIS-REx is safely on its way to Bennu, Lauretta's schedule has opened enough for him to teach a class again. This semester, he's leading a course on spacecraft mission design and implementation, trying to pass on lessons he has learned to the next generation of would-be principal investigators.

His students are currently designing a New Frontiers-class mission to Titan. Everyone in the class was assigned a mission role, from principal investigator to business lead.

But before the students started designed their spacecraft, Lauretta led them through a crash course on space policy. They learned about the federal budget, the roles Congress and the White House play, and what different assessment groups do.

This philosophythat successful missions depend on sound social strategies as much as they do engineering and scienceisalso reflected in Lauretta's Xtronaut board game, which teaches players the logistics behind space missions. Xtronauthas been such a hit, Lauretta has expanded it into an upcoming successor game, as well as a series of STEM education programs.

He also had his students read through a recent NASA authorization bill that passed the Senate in 2016.

"I said, look at what's in here," he told me. "Mars 2020. Europa. How do you think that got in there? Somebody in the science community decided these are important missions."

As part of his spacecraft mission design and implementation class, Lauretta shared ten leadership principles he has learned after spending five years at the helm of the OSIRIS-REx program:

Reward initiative

Value capabilities over credentials

Share the credit / take the blame

Assume good intentions

Cultivate diversity and seek out different perspectives

Work the problem

Make the hard decisions

Admit mistakes

Show appreciation

Keep temper under control (easier said then done when the stakes are high)

Or read more blog entries about: Psyche mission, OSIRIS-REx

See original here:

Want NASA to pick your space mission proposal? Two winning scientists share some tips - The Planetary Society (blog)

How NASA’s Astrobee Robot Is Bringing Useful Autonomy to the ISS – IEEE Spectrum

Photo: Evan Ackerman/IEEE Spectrum NASA's Astrobee is a new generation of free-flying robots designed to help astronauts on board the International Space Station.

Since 2006, NASA has had a trio of small, free-flying robots on board the International Space Station. Called SPHERES (Synchronized Position Hold Engage and Reorient Experimental Satellites), these robots have spent about 600 hours participating in an enormous variety of experiments, including autonomous formation flying, navigation and mapping, and running programs written by middle school students in team competitions. But beyond serving as a scientific platform, SPHERES werent designed to do anything especially practical in terms of assisting the astronauts or flight controllers, and its time for a new generation of robotic free fliers thats fancier, more versatile, and will be a big help for the humans on the ISS.

This is Astrobee.

Last fall, IEEE Spectrum visited NASA Ames Research Center in Mountain View, Calif., to have a look at the latest Astrobee prototype and meet the team behind the robot.

Astrobee is a cube about 32centimeters on a side. Each corner and most of two sides are covered in a soft bumper material, with a propulsion system embedded in it. The central part of the robot contains sensors, control systems, a touchscreen, and several payload bays for adding hardware, including an arm designed to grab onto ISS handrails.

While the robot is designed to fly freely on board the ISS, for testing on the ground, Astrobee is mounted on top of a sled that uses a jet of CO2 to create a low-friction air bearing above a perfectly flat (and very enormous) block of granite. This allows the researchers to simulate microgravity in two dimensions to test the robots propulsion and navigation systems, but once its up in space, the entire robot will consist of just the cube thats defined by the blue bumpers, without all of the stuff underneath it.

From the beginning, Astrobee was intended to be much more than a successor to SPHERES: Its a completely new platform, designed from scratch to operate autonomously and safely on board the ISS. One of the biggest improvements is the propulsion system. While SPHERES require constant astronaut supervision (because theyre slightly flammable, among other reasons) and rely on disposable alkaline battery packs and tanks of CO2 propellant to function, Astrobee has an electrically-powered propulsion system, and it can recharge itself on a dock. NASA says Astrobee will be able to make its way around the ISS either under direct remote control from the ground or completely by itself. With modular bays designed to accept customized hardware, the robot can perform a variety of tasks, in some cases taking over boring housekeeping jobs from human astronauts.

Astrobee is fundamentally different than SPHERES in that its designed from the ground up to operate exclusively inside the ISS. Were an IVA [intra vehicular activity] free flier, so were flying around on the inside of the International Space Station with the crew, Trey Smith, lead systems engineer for the Astrobee Project at NASAs Intelligent Robotics Group tells us. In contrast, SPHERES was designed around a CO2 propulsion system that could theoretically operate not only inside but also outside of the station in the vacuum of spacethough that would have required some upgrades tothe SPHERES platform.

Since Astrobee can rely on having an atmosphere around it, it can move itself by pushing air in specific directions, the way most things that fly here on Earth do. There are all kinds of ways of making this work, but operating safely in microgravity comes with an intimidating number of unique challenges, which led to Astrobees fairly complicatedand absolutely fascinatingpropulsion design.

On two faces of Astrobee, behind a protective screen, theres an impeller: A big fan that sucks in air. The impellers, which counter-rotate with each other to minimize gyroscopic forces, are constantly generating a pressurized pocket of air inside of the robot, which is directed out of steerable nozzles on each face. If all of the nozzles are closed, Astrobee doesnt move, and opening them individually or in combination generates thrust, which moves the robot in the opposite direction.

There are twelve nozzles, and theyre carefully arranged so that all of them are off-center, Smith explains. If you ever have one thruster that goes crazy, youre going to wind up flying around in circles, not accelerating across the space station. But if you use a pair of thrusters, then you get a balance. There are different pairs that give you pure translation or pure rotation in each of the cartesian axes in both plus and minus directions, and that shows you that you can get any kind of directional thrust you want.

NASA is understandably somewhat nervous about the idea of a robot that can generate its own thrust and move autonomously around the ISS. Off-center thrusters are just one way that Astrobee is designed to be safe: All of its moving parts are internal, meaning that an astronaut can safely grab it anywhere, and each corner is rounded and cushioned in soft foam, minimizing potential damage if it runs into anything.

Were flying anywhere on station, says Smith. If we run into something, we could run into practically anything. The ISS windows turn out to be a very big issue: Astrobee is kind of like a big fluffy bowling ball, in terms of the mass, and were having to be very conservative about the amount of force we could potentially apply if we have a collision. The typical window on the ISS has four layers of glass: two of them are the pressure panes, and then on the inside and on the outside are what arecalled the scratch and debris panes respectively. What were trying to prove is that theres no way we could break the scratch pane.

Astrobee has to be hardware safe on a fundamental level. In other words, if all of the software goes haywire in the worst way possible, the robot must not be able to cause critical damage to the station. To fully address the safety concerns of an out-of-control robot, the Astrobee team has had to imagine an absolute worst case scenario, and its this: A software glitch causes the robot to accelerate as fast as it can, along the entirety of the longest straight line distance on the ISS (about 20 meters), directly into one of the stations windows. At that point, the robot would be moving at about 2 meters per second, much faster than its software-limited top speed of 0.75 m/s. Its possible that we could break the scratch pane, but we wouldnt be able to do worse than that. No critical damage, Smith says.

Between the propulsion modules on each side of Astrobee theres plenty of room for all the sensors and computing hardware the robot needs to operate autonomously, with enough left over to host a diverse array of payloads. The top and bottom thirds of the robot are payload bays (two in front and two in back), each with mechanical, data, and power connections. The top payload bay in the front is currently taken over with Astrobees own navigation sensors, but having open payload bays was a priority for Astrobee, according to Smith. The way we do the payloads really came out of our experience with SPHERES: At first, SPHERES were mostly for testing formation-flying software, but then people realized you could attach payloads, and they went crazy with it, he says.So we invested a lot more effort in thinking out how to do that with Astrobee.

Astrobees computing system has three layers of processors inside: one low level, one mid level, and one high level. The mid and high level processors are identical, except that the mid level is running Linux and taking care of most of the robots core functionality, while the high-level processor is running Android and is dedicated to the payload. This keeps the science payload nice and isolated, while also making Astrobee relatively easy to program, since you can just write Android apps that interface with Astrobee through a broad API.

Astrobees sensor suite consists of a primary navigation camera with a 116 field of view, along with an HD autofocusing camera that can stream video from the ISS down to the ground in real time. Theres also a CamBoard Pico Flexx time-of-flight flash IR 3D sensor that can detect obstacles out to about 4 meters (although its not mounted in the prototype we saw), and an optical-flow detector mounted on Astrobees top face that detects velocity and will cut off the motors if the robot starts moving too fast.

Two more cameras looks behind the robot to assist with obstacle avoidance, docking, and perching (more on that in a bit). Powering everything (including the propulsion system) are lithium-ion batteries, which can be quite dangerous, but fortunately for the Astrobee team, they werent the first group to use lithium-ion on station, so there are already accepted safety procedures in place that they can follow. The robot should be good for a few hours of flight time before it has to recharge.

One of the things that makes Astrobee unique and valuable is that itll be able to navigate autonomously around the U.S. module of the ISS, as well as in the ESAand JAXA modules (not the Russian segment). Astrobee has one major thing going for it in this regard: The ISS is a highly structured environment. Its a compact, well defined, and predictable area, and unless something goes horribly wrong, things like darkness or rain arent a factor. With this in mind, the robot will be using a relatively simple (in principle, at least) system to localize itself, matching features that a single monocular camera sees with a map of the interior of the ISS, as Smith explains: We have a prior map, so with a single frame of video, we should be able to see the landmarks from our prior map, recognize them, and say, okay, were here on the station.

A problem thats unique to a space robot is navigating around humans where there is no established up or down. With our current maps we pretend that theres gravity, so the top of the robot always points overhead, and you can kind of imagine were driving around like a car, says Smith. As it turns out, the ISS does have a ceiling (called the overhead) as well as a deck that the astronauts tend to use, defined at least in part by which way the lighting is oriented. Astrobee will likely try to maintain a fixed distance from the ceiling as it navigates, to keep from being accidentally stepped on or kicked. Initially, Astrobee will be able to detect obstacles (like astronauts) and stop, but not replan around them, andNASA plans to gradually improve Astrobees autonomous navigation capabilities over time.

Of course, all of Astrobees autonomy is optional, and being able to teleoperate it from the ground is an important feature, both in terms of allowing controllers to direct the robot when necessary and making sure that a humancan take over if Astrobees autonomy somehow fails. This kind of adjustable autonomy makes the robot much more efficient and versatile, since controllers can issue commands at any level, although its expected that a human (somewhere) will always have supervisory control. And if all else goes wrong, the crew can always step in and manhandle the robot back to its dock.

When its not flying around the ISS being very busy and important, Astrobee will have a cozy home on a customized dock. The dock is connected to the station for power and basic telemetry, and includes some fiducials to make it easy for Astrobee to see.There are two berths on each dock, and Astrobee can dock by itself, using its rear-facing camera to back up onto the dock. Once its close enough, magnets will engage to hold it there, and the dock has to be instructed to retract the magnets before the robot can fly off again.

Whenever Astrobee isnt actively traveling somewhere, itll need to keep itself from floating away, and to do that, it has an adorable little 3D-printed perching arm that was designed by NASA Ames systems engineer In Won Park. The arm spends most of its time retracted into Astrobees upper rear payload bay, but itll unfold itself on demand. Using the rear camera, the arm can locate and grab onto the same standardized handrails that astronauts use to get around and hold themselves in place. By using the perching arm to keep Astrobee stationary rather than running the impellers, the robots battery life can be extended by up to 80 percent. Once perched, the arms motors can be used to pan and tilt the body of the robot, which is exactly what youd need for a remote video camera.

The gripper on the arm is a collaboration between NASA Ames and Columbia Universitys ROAM Lab, under the direction of Matei Ciocarlie, who developed theVelo gripper at Willow Garage. The gripper is mechanically compliant, and calibrated to be able to hold Astrobee securely, but not so securely that an astronaut cant pull the robot free if they need to, since the arm is programmed to power down once it detects a force above a certain threshold. This is also a safety feature: If the robot is secured to a rail and someone runs into it by accident, itll just let go and float away.

While the primary purpose of the arm is perching, there are some other use cases that NASA is considering. An interesting one is to add a little bit of handrail to a spare payload bay in one Astrobee, and then grab onto it with the arm of another Astrobee. The gripper is also interchangeable, so other researchers could develop custom grippers to do a variety of different tasks (including manipulation), and then test them out on an Astrobee in space.

The key to making a robot valuable is to design and program it such that it provides a positive return on the amount of time invested into it. Astrobee needs to be able to operate independently of the astronauts to be usefulthis can be fully autonomous operation, or teleoperation from the ground, but the goal is to avoid it being more of a hassle to use the robots than it is to just use a human instead. If Astrobee can reliably do its own thing without getting in the way of the astronauts, ideally with zero crew involvement, there are all kinds of tasks it could take over from them.

The Astrobee team has identified several things that the astronauts spend time doing that Astrobee could do just as well. One is taking video of crew activities, says Smith: The state of the art right now is that the crew themselves set up a camcorder, and wed like it if the flight controllers [on Earth] can position a camcorder so the crew dont have to. With its built-in camera and perching arm, Astrobee would provide a stable view that flight controllers could move around however they wanted, while the astronauts just keep on doing whatever theyre doing.

The crew also spends time doing a lot of really boring stuff like taking sound readings all over the space station, or doing inventory with RFID, or checking CO2 levels. These dull, repetitive housekeeping projects are, to be blunt, a waste of astronauts time, even as theyre mandatory for the long term safety of the ISS. If Astrobee can take over, that gives the humans more time to do the things that humans are good at, like science, or observing the behavior of a can of mixed nuts.

While the prototype Astrobee that we saw at NASA Ames was pretty cool-looking just in terms of hardware, the version of the robot that starts work on the ISS will be much more visually interesting. Astrobees final look is the project of Yun-kyung Kim, an HRI researcher at NASA Ames. Itll be covered in colorful, graphical skins made of nomex fabric, which researchers can design themselves, or the designs could be outsourced, providing a fun way for kids to get involved with space robots. Besides looking cool, part of the reason for these skins will be to help give the robot an easily identifiable front and back, which is not necessarily obvious when youre looking at a cube in an environment with arbitrary directionality. Knowing where the front of Astrobee is will be important for the astronauts, since thats the way the robot will be travelling.

The plan is also to outfit Astrobee with an array of LEDs around the impeller intakes, which can be used to visually communicate simple information. Things like turn signals, or an indication of what task the robot is performing, or whether its being teleoperated or in autonomous mode. The robot does have a touch screen, but the LEDs are intended to be much simpler and more immediate. Astrobee has speakers as well, and Kim is working on ways of using sound to help Astrobee communicate to the astronauts (or alert them) without being too noisy or annoying.

NASA expects to have Astrobee on orbit at some point in the 2018 fiscal year, which covers October 2017 through September 2018. Theyll be sending three of them to the ISS, although only two robots can fit onto the dock at once: The third will be packed away in a space closet somewhere, but the crew will be able to pull it out to participate in some triple Astrobee experiments. Itll probably take a little while to get these robots up and runningbesides installing the dock, the astronauts will have to help out with making a map of the station so that the robots will be able to navigate autonomously. Crew time is always at a premium, but the hope is that once Astrobee is good to go, itll be able to free up some of that time in return by helping out around the station.

Astrobee will also be taking the place of SPHERES, and as a part of that transition, the idea is that NASAs Guest Scientist Program will eventually provide a way for scientists around the world to run experiments on the robots, in both hardware and software. In the past, SPHERES participation has been limited since it demands constant astronaut supervision along with extra time for setting up the robots and then stowing everything again, but the increased autonomy of Astrobee should result in more opportunities for collaboration and research.

NASAs plans for its space robots have been ambitious to an extent that they havent always been able to live up to their potential. Usually, this is because too much participation is required from the human crew. Astrobee is promising because it was designed specifically for autonomous operation, and to be assistive for the human crew. Robonaut was supposed to do the same thing, but it still hasnt, because its been too difficult and time intensive for the crew to get it to work. If Astrobee can make it over that first hurdle, to the point where it achieves a useful level of autonomy, it has the potential to show the entire Earth exactly how valuable a little space robot can be.

[ NASA Astrobee ]

IEEE Spectrum's award-winning robotics blog, featuring news, articles, and videos on robots, humanoids, drones, automation, artificial intelligence, and more. Contact us:e.guizzo@ieee.org

Sign up for the Automaton newsletter and get biweekly updates about robotics, automation, and AI, all delivered directly to your inbox.

NASA shares this video update on SPHERES and Robonaut 2 aboard the ISS3Feb2012

Inside the International Space Station, robots are slowly but surely taking over from humans 15Oct2014

Practicing on a taskboard may not be exciting, but Robonaut will have to master it before he can get a real job on the International Space Station16Feb2012

It took special orders from President Obama, but Robonaut is now unpacked, armed, and almost operational17Mar2011

A new video from NASA shows Robonaut's legs in action 10Dec2013

Top teams will compete in a simulated Mars mission 8Feb

The competition starts with teams operating a robot in a simulated Martian dust storm 17Aug2016

Teleoperation and in-situ materials are how robots will prepare the moon and Mars for our arrival 25Jan2016

Among the challenges: competing with Facebook and Google, and figuring out how to integrate commercial technology into space programs 7Dec2015

The U.S. space agency plans to use tiny satellites and GPS signals to more accurately predict hurricane strength 27Oct2015

An MIT engineer and historian argues that self-driving cars and other robotic systems should still keep humans in the loop 23Oct2015

Robotic teleoperation means we can explore places where it's too difficult to send fragile, needy humans 17Sep2015

This is what happens when we skip a week of Video Friday 11Sep2015

JPL's tumbling robotic hedgehog can jump, spin, and roll in microgravity to explore asteroids and comets 10Sep2015

A robot powered by turbulence might be the best way to explore gas giants 23Jul2015

Refueling and repairing satellites in orbit could drastically lower costs, and NASA is working to make it happen 22Jul2015

The first spacecraft of the asteroid-mining venture Planetary Resources will test technologies for future space missions 20Jul2015

Robots using mirrors to reflect sunlight at other robots could enable exploration of craters and caves 13Jul2015

A satellite with a net will locate and capture a cubesat in an operational test of an orbital space junk removal system 9Jul2015

NASA wants pick up where the DARPA Robotics Challenge left offand then go to Mars 24Jun2015

See original here:

How NASA's Astrobee Robot Is Bringing Useful Autonomy to the ISS - IEEE Spectrum

NASA spacecraft prepares to fly to new heights – Phys.Org

February 9, 2017 by Mara Johnson-Groh Over three months in 2017, the MMS spacecraft transitions from the dayside magnetopause, to a new, larger orbit on the nightside, as shown in this visualization. This image shows the four satellites' orientation on March 15, 2017. Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/Tom Bridgman, visualizer

On Feb. 9, 2017, NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale mission, known as MMS, began a three-month long journey into a new orbit. MMS flies in a highly elliptical orbit around Earth and the new orbit will take MMS twice as far out as it has previously flown. In the new orbit, which begins the second phase of its mission, MMS will continue to map out the fundamental characteristics of space around Earth, helping us understand this key region through which our satellites and astronauts travel. MMS will fly directly through regionswhere giant explosions called magnetic reconnection occurnever before observed in high resolution.

Launched in March 2015, MMS uses four identical spacecraft to map magnetic reconnectiona process that occurs when magnetic fields collide and re-align explosively into new positions. NASA scientists and engineers fly MMS in an unprecedentedly close formation that allows the mission to travel through regions where the sun's magnetic fields interact with Earth's magnetic fieldsbut keeping four spacecraft in formation is far from easy.

"This is one of the most complicated missions Goddard has ever done in terms of flight dynamics and maneuvers," said Mark Woodard, MMS mission director at NASA's Goddard Flight Space Center in Greenbelt, Maryland. "No one anywhere has done formation flying like this before."

To form a three-dimensional picture of reconnection, the mission flies four individual satellites in a pyramid formation called a tetrahedron. While a previous joint ESA (European Space Agency)/NASA mission flew in a similar formation, MMS is the first to fly in such an extremely tight formation - only four miles apart on average. Maintaining this close separation allows for high-resolution mapping but adds an extra dimension of challenge to flying MMS, which is already a complex undertaking.

Flying a spacecraft, as one would suspect, is nothing like driving a car. Instead of focusing on just two dimensionsleft and right, forward and backwards - you also must consider up and down. Add on to that, keeping the four MMS spacecraft in the specific tetrahedral formation necessary for three-dimensional mapping, and you've got quite a challenge. And don't forget to avoid any space debris and other spacecraft that might cross your path. Oh, and each spacecraft is spinning like a top, adding another layer to the dizzying complexity.

"Typically, it takes about two weeks to go through the whole procedure of designing maneuvers," said Trevor Williams, MMS flight dynamics lead at NASA Goddard.

Williams leads a team of about a dozen engineers to make sure MMS's orbit stays on track. During a normal week of operations, the maneuvers, which have been carefully crafted and calculated beforehand, are finalized in a meeting at the start of the week.

To calculate its location, MMS uses GPS, just like a smart phone. The only difference is this GPS receiver is far above Earth, higher than the GPS satellites sending out the signals.

"We're using GPS to do something it wasn't designed for, but it works," Woodard said.

Since GPS was designed with Earth-bound users in mind, signals are broadcast downwards, making it difficult to use from above. Fortunately, signals from GPS satellites are sent widely to blanket the entire planet and consequentially some from the far side of the planet sneak around Earth and continue up into space, where MMS can observe them. Using a special receiver that can pick up weak signals, MMS is able to stay in constant GPS contact. The spacecraft uses the GPS signals to automatically compute their location, which they send down to the flight control headquarters at Goddard. The engineers then use that positioning to design the maneuvers for the spacecraft's orbits.

The video will load shortly

While the orbit for each MMS spacecraft is almost identical, small adjustments need to be made to keep the spacecraft in a tight formation. The engineers also rely on reports from NASA's Conjunction Assessment Risk Analysis, which identifies the locations of space debris and provides notification when objects, like an old communications satellite, might cross MMS's path. While nothing yet has been at risk for colliding with MMS, the crew has a prepared backup plan - a dodge maneuver - should the need arise.

On scheduled Wednesdays, one or two per month, the commands are sent up to the spacecraft to adjust the tetrahedral formation and make any necessary orbit adjustments. These commands tell MMS to fire its thrusters in short bursts, propelling the spacecraft to its intended location.

Moving MMS is a slow process. Each spacecraft is equipped with thrusters that provide four pounds of thrust, but they also weigh nearly a ton each. The spacecraft all spin like tops, so the timing of each burst needs to be precisely synchronized to push the spacecraft in the right direction.

The next day, once the spacecraft are in their proper locations, a second round of commands are given to fire the thrusters in the opposite direction, to fix the spacecraft in formation. Without this command, the spacecraft would overshoot their intended positions and drift apart with no resisting forces to stop them.

Unlike airplanes, which constantly fire their engines to keep in motion, the spacecraft rely on their momentum to carry them around their orbit. Only short bursts from their thrusters, lasting just a few minutes, are required to maintain their formation and make minor adjustments to the orbit.

"We spend 99.9 percent of the time coasting because we need to be sparing with the fuel," Williams said.

Launched with 904 pounds of fuel, the spacecraft have only used about 140 pounds in their first two years of operation. However, sending MMS into a wider orbit for its second phase will consume about half the remaining fuel - and there are no gas stations in space for refueling. The operations crew carefully plan each maneuver to minimize fuel consumption. Typical maneuvers take less than half a pound of fuel and the crew hopes their fuel conservation efforts will save MMS enough fuel to allow extended studies past the end of the primary mission.

The new elliptical orbit will take MMS to within 600 miles above the surface of Earth at its closest approach, and out to about 40 percent of the distance to the moon. Previously, the spacecraft went out only one-fifth (20 percent) of the distance to the moon.

In the first phase of the mission, MMS investigated the sun-side of Earth's magnetosphere, where the sun's magnetic field lines connect to Earth's magnetic field lines, allowing material and energy from the sun to funnel into near-Earth space. In the second phase, MMS will pass through the night side, where reconnection is thought to trigger auroras.

In addition to helping us understand our own space environment, learning about the causes of magnetic reconnection sheds light on how this phenomenon occurs throughout the universe, from auroras on Earth, to flares on the surface of the sun, and even to areas surrounding black holes.

While MMS will not maintain its tetrahedral formation as it moves to its new orbit, it will continue taking data on the environments it flies through. The operations crew expects MMS to reach its new orbit on May 4, 2017, at which point it will be back in formation and ready to collect new 3-D science data, as its elliptical orbit carries it through specific areas thought to be sites for magnetic reconnection.

Explore further: NASA's MMS breaks Guinness World Record

NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale mission, or MMS, is breaking records. MMS now holds the Guinness World Record for highest altitude fix of a GPS signal. Operating in a highly elliptical orbit around Earth, the MMS satellites ...

On Sept. 15, 2016, NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale, or MMS, mission achieved a new record: Its four spacecraft are flying only four-and-a-half miles apart, the closest separation ever of any multi-spacecraft formation. The ...

On Oct. 15, 2015, a NASA mission broke its own record: the four satellites of its Magnetospheric Multiscale mission are now flying at their smallest separation, the tightest multi-spacecraft formation ever flown in orbit. ...

(PhysOrg.com) -- The first of two ARTEMIS ("Acceleration, Reconnection, Turbulence and Electrodynamics of the Moons Interaction with the Sun") spacecraft is now in its lunar orbit.

On July 9, 2015 the four spacecraft of NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale, or MMS, mission began flying in a pyramid shape for the first time. The four-sided pyramid shapecalled a tetrahedronmeans that scientists' observations ...

NASA's OSIRIS-REx spacecraft fired its Trajectory Correction Maneuver (TCM) thrusters for the first time Friday in order to slightly adjust its trajectory on the outbound journey from Earth to the asteroid Bennu. The spacecraft's ...

Many scientists believe the Earth was dry when it first formed, and that the building blocks for life on our planetcarbon, nitrogen and waterappeared only later as a result of collisions with other objects in our solar ...

For astronomers trying to understand which distant planets might have habitable conditions, the role of atmospheric haze has been hazy. To help sort it out, a team of researchers has been looking to Earth specifically ...

About 4.6 billion years ago, an enormous cloud of hydrogen gas and dust collapsed under its own weight, eventually flattening into a disk called the solar nebula. Most of this interstellar material contracted at the disk's ...

For years, their existence has been debated: elusive electrical discharges in the upper atmosphere that sport names such as red sprites, blue jets, pixies and elves. Reported by pilots, they are difficult to study as they ...

Astronomers at The University of Texas at Austin have developed a new technique to discover the faintest galaxies yet seen in the early universe 10 times fainter than any previously seen. These galaxies will help astronomers ...

On Feb. 9, 2017, NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale mission, known as MMS, began a three-month long journey into a new orbit. MMS flies in a highly elliptical orbit around Earth and the new orbit will take MMS twice as far ...

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

See the rest here:

NASA spacecraft prepares to fly to new heights - Phys.Org

NASA Glenn Scientists are Leading the Way to Future Surface Missions on Venus – Cleveland Scene Weekly

Using a simulated Venus atmosphere right here in Cleveland, NASA Glenn scientists have been testing ways to keep electronic devices functional in such harsh conditions. With recent experiments lasting521 hours, the hope is that NASA can sustain longer, more involved surface lander missions on our planet's mysterious next-door neighbor.

The surface temperature on Venus is often a balmy 860 degrees Fahrenheit, and the atmospheric pressure to similar to what you'd deal with about a half-mile under the ocean. That's not good for circuits and wires. Previous surface missions on Venus have lasted no more than two hours.

The NASA Glenn team developed some really incrediblesilicon carbide semiconductor integrated circuits durable pieces of equipment that need no cooling or protective packaging to withstand Venusian heat.

With further technology development, such electronics could drastically improve Venus lander designs and mission concepts, enabling the first long-duration missions to the surface of Venus, Phil Neudeck, lead electronics engineer on this one, said in a public statement.

See more here:

NASA Glenn Scientists are Leading the Way to Future Surface Missions on Venus - Cleveland Scene Weekly

Vision & Capital: From NASA Engineer To Female Tech Startup CEO – Forbes


Forbes
Vision & Capital: From NASA Engineer To Female Tech Startup CEO
Forbes
When Harleen Kaur was a little girl dreaming about big possibilities, she didn't know what she would be when she grew up. She believed that big dreaming happens at NASA, and she was right. Kaur became an engineer and got a job at NASA working on ...

See the rest here:

Vision & Capital: From NASA Engineer To Female Tech Startup CEO - Forbes

Radar study targeting wind events at NASA, Air Force launch facilities – UAH News (press release)

Corey Amiot has focused on improving lead times for warnings of high wind events.

Phillip Gentry | UAH

Rockets rolling to their launch towers at both the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida (and the people who work on them) may soon be a little bit safer, thanks to research in the Atmospheric Science Department at The University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH).

Funded by NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center and the U.S. Air Force's 45th Weather Squadron (45WS), research by UAH graduate student Corey Amiot has focused on improving lead times for warnings of high wind events that threaten the Florida launch complexes.

Now, Amiot's task is to verify the extended warning times (up to 40 minutes in advance of a high speed wind event) and then to figure out how to reduce the number of false alarms.

"I'm looking at thunderstorm downbursts, when a convective storm begins to collapse and spread out at the surface," Amiot said.

His primary tool is storm data collected by the dual-polarization C-band weather radar operated by the 45WS from its station 26.5 miles southwest of the launch facilities. He also uses data from 29 weather stations scattered across the NASA and Air Force facilities.

"I have those towers as ground truth," Amiot said, "and a way to identify which storms produced wind gusts on the ground."

Early results from this research were presented recently at an American Meteorological Society meeting in Seattle.

NASA and the Air Force want Amiot to improve predictions of ground wind in excess of 35 knots (just over 40 mph), the point at which strong wind warnings are issued and personnel are required to take safety measures. Wind that speed or faster could be hazardous to people working outdoors and might put some hardware at risk.

Amiot used the dual-polarization radar data from 14 high-wind producing warm-season thunderstorms to look for patterns and possible signatures of upcoming changes in each storm. Dual-polarization radar sends out both vertical and horizontal radar waves. By comparing the signals returned by both, researchers can look inside a storm and see water droplets, small ice particles and larger ice that might indicate the presence of graupel or hail.

"A storm updraft lifts liquid water above the freezing level, where it forms ice," Amiot said. "This is very important to downburst formation. When the ice melts it cools the surrounding air, which will accelerate the downburst."

Focusing on multi-cell storms, Amiot identified four distinct radar signatures found in 85 to 92 percent of the 14 storms that generated high wind events.

"This is a good step forward," he said. "Now I need to expand the sample size so I can identify other radar signatures in addition to the four I've identified so far."

View original post here:

Radar study targeting wind events at NASA, Air Force launch facilities - UAH News (press release)

NASA: Pictures, Videos, Breaking News

The Green News Report is also available via... ...

Today, the Earth got a little hotter, and a little more crowded. And the chances of Donald Trump's family and fortune surviving climate change are s...

I teach at Dartmouth College, famous among other things for having provided a home to the author Theodore Geisel (aka "Dr. Seuss") during his formativ...

Dan Rockmore

William H. Neukom '64 Professor of Computational Science, Director of the Neukom Institute for Computational Science, Professor of Mathematics and Computer Science, at Dartmouth College, Santa Fe Institute External Faculty

Today, the Earth got a little hotter, and a little more crowded. And the chances of Donald Trump's family and fortune surviving climate change are s...

This article was originally posted on Inverse. ...

The Green News Report is also available via... ...

If we want our planet to be able to house 10 billion people and also want to preserve biodiversity in the future, then we need to leverage the new technologies associated with "big data" and artificial intelligence.

Today, the Earth got a little hotter, and a little more crowded. And the chances of Donald Trump's family and fortune surviving climate change are s...

The last twelve months have been monumental for astronomers, physicists, and fellow enthusiasts of the cosmos. From the most powerful supernova record...

Nikhil Reddy

YouTuber, Developer, UC Berkeley EECS Student (@bignikhilreddy)

So, as some assert their desire to make America "great" again by reverting to a time long past and gone, Hidden Figures pulls back the curtain and reminds us of how oppressive those days were for everyone.

Gary Bailey M.S.W., A.C.S.W.

Professor of Practice, Simmons College School of Social Work, SocialWork@Simmons, and Simmons College School of Nursing and Health Sciences

Today, the Earth got a little hotter, and a little more crowded. And the chances of Donald Trump's family and fortune surviving climate change are s...

When I saw Hidden Figures, two thoughts entered my mind. I experienced gratitude, and I felt shock. To further explain, Hidden Figures is receiving ma...

Today, the Earth got a little hotter, and a little more crowded. And the chances of Donald Trump's family and fortune surviving climate change are s...

Here are the things you need to know going into the new year.

Outspeak

Empowering a new generation of digital voices

Today, the Earth got a little hotter, and a little more crowded. And the chances of Donald Trump's family and fortune surviving climate change are s...

Today, the Earth got a little hotter, and a little more crowded. And the chances of Donald Trump's family and fortune surviving climate change are s...

Read more:

NASA: Pictures, Videos, Breaking News

NASA’s future deep space rocket gets critical endorsement from commercial space group – The Verge

Yesterday, NASAs Space Launch System the giant, expensive rocket the space agency is building to take astronauts into deep space and onto Mars someday got a crucial endorsement from an unlikely ally: the commercial space industry.

Alan Stern, the chairman of the board of directors for the Commercial Spaceflight Federation (CSF), publicly announced the organizations support for the rocket at a conference in DC. The CSF is an association representing more than 70 businesses and organizations in the realm of commercial space, including major players like SpaceX and Blue Origin. Getting the seal of approval from CSF marks a significant attitude shift for the private sector, which has been home to some of the strongest opponents of the Space Launch System, or SLS.

We see many potential benefits in the development of NASA's Space Launch System.

CSF and its members believe strongly in the exploration of space of all kinds, including commercial purposes, Stern said Tuesday in a speech at the FAA Commercial Space Transportation Conference, according to a CSF spokesperson. To that end, CSF announced today that we see many potential benefits in the development of NASA's Space Launch System. There are bright futures across the spectrum of commercial space. The SLS can be a resource that benefits commercial spaceflight and makes our future even brighter.

NASA is currently developing the SLS to get the vehicle ready for its debut flight, slated for fall of 2018. When complete, the rocket will be capable of carrying 70 metric tons, or more than 150,000 pounds, to lower Earth orbit. And thats just the expected capability of the first iteration of the rocket, known as Block 1. NASA is planning on building multiple variants of SLS, which will increase the rockets lift capacity and make it one of the most powerful vehicles thats ever been built. The next evolution of SLS is called Block 1B, which will include a more powerful upper stage that can loft 105 metric tons, or more than 230,000 pounds, into lower Earth orbit. And the final version of SLS, Block 2, will have even more powerful boosters attached to it during launch, giving it a lift capacity of 130 metric tons, or close to 290,000 pounds.

While the rockets stats may seem impressive, the SLS has suffered a lot of criticism since it was first announced in 2011. It represents an old way of doing business at NASA, where the space agency heavily oversees the design and development of the rocket. But the main issue has always been the rockets costs. Initially, NASA estimated that developing SLS would cost $18 billion through 2017. And in 2014, the space agency estimated that it would cost $7 billion just to develop the SLS from February of that year through the rockets first launch in 2018. Many early opponents, including the Space Frontier Foundation, called for the cancellation of the program, arguing that the vehicles development would suck up a sizable portion of NASAs already limited budget. That would leave very little money leftover for other projects at NASA, including new, innovative partnerships with the private sector.

Another critique was that commercial companies are developing new, heavy-lift rockets that could be just as capable as the SLS but would be potentially much cheaper. For instance, SpaceX is currently developing a heavy-lift version of its Falcon 9 rocket called the Falcon Heavy. It has yet to fly, though, and SpaceX claims it will be able to lift 54 metric tons, or more than 119,000 pounds less capability than what NASA promises for SLS. However, SpaceX says the starting cost of the Falcon Heavy is $90 million, whereas one launch of the SLS is estimated to be $1 billion, according to Bill Gerstenmaier, the associate administrator for NASAs human exploration and operations, who spoke at the FAA conference yesterday.

Stern wanted to get this perception off the table that the CSF is strongly against the vehicle

However, Stern says that the extra capability of SLS will enable missions and partnerships with the private sector that cannot be achieved on commercial heavy-lift vehicles that are currently in development. Because of this, he wanted to get this perception off the table that the Commercial Spaceflight Federation is strongly against the vehicle when the organization is actually in favor of it. Stern sees the potential of the SLS being used to put something like a commercial lunar outpost on the surface of the Moon (that is if NASA sets its sights on returning to the Moon again).

Its a crucial affirmation from the private sector, since public-private partnerships are poised to be a major focus of NASA moving forward. Under the Obama administration, the space agency experimented with new models of doing business with the commercial spaceflight industry, by doing a more hands-off approach when working with the private sector; instead of intense oversight of vehicle design, NASA has tried purchasing spaceflight services from private companies with less scrutiny on how the vehicles are made. Some of President Trumps space advisors have heralded this new way of partnering with spaceflight companies, so its something we could see more of in the future.

Go here to read the rest:

NASA's future deep space rocket gets critical endorsement from commercial space group - The Verge

NASA Begins Tornado Recovery at Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans – Space.com

NASA has begun recovery efforts at its Michoud Assembly Facility after a tornado hit the New Orleans location yesterday.

The twister, which NASA captured on camera, hit at 11:25 a.m. local time (12:25 p.m. EST/1725 GMT) Tuesday (Feb. 7). All of the facility's 3,500 employees survived, but five suffered minor injuries from the weather event, NASA officials said in a statement yesterday.

"Our hearts go out to our employees and the people in New Orleans who have suffered from this serious storm," Keith Hefner, Michoud's director,said in the statement. "The safety of our team is always our main concern, and we are pleased to report that we've identified only minor injuries." [In Photos: Tornado Damage at NASA's Michoud Assembly Facility]

Roof and equipment damage was sustained at NASAs Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, La., when a tornado touched down at the facility at 11:25 a.m. CST (1725 GMT) Tuesday, Feb. 7.

The facility is closed today, and everyone not involved in the recovery has been evacuated while emergency personnel assess the damage. As of yesterday, damage had been identified in a few buildings, including roof damage in Building 103, which is the facility's main manufacturing building. Approximately 200 parked cars were damaged as well.

"Michoud has a comprehensive emergency plan that we activated today to ensure the safety of our people and to secure our facilities," Hefner said. "I am proud of our dedicated team on-site who are successfully implementing that plan."

Recovery efforts are underway at NASAs Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, La., where several facilities suffered damage by a tornado at 11:25 a.m. CST (1725 GMT) Tuesday, Feb. 7.

The core stage of the enormous next-generation Space Launch System (SLS) rocket, the system's main propulsion system and manufacturing structures for its corresponding crewed spacecraft, Orion, are slated to be built at the Michoud facility.

NASA officials confirmed that hardware for the rocket and spacecraft is secure and that no damage has been identified. Furthermore, no damage has been found on NASA's historic Pegasus barge, which transported space shuttle components from New Orleans to the launch site in Florida and is being refurbishedto transport SLS components.

Debris, fence and building damage are seen at NASAs Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans, La., after a tornado touched down at 11:25 a.m. CST (1725 GMT) on Tuesday, Feb. 7.

Email Sarah Lewin at slewin@space.com or follow her@SarahExplains.Follow us@Spacedotcom,FacebookandGoogle+. Original article onSpace.com.

Go here to see the original:

NASA Begins Tornado Recovery at Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans - Space.com

NASA tests next-generation air traffic software in Washington state’s skies – GeekWire

A tablet computer displays air traffic data during ATD-1 flight simulations. (NASA Photo / David C. Bowman)

Landing planes at busy airports can be a challenging work of aerial ballet, and this week, NASA is testing a computerized choreographer to handle the job in the skies over Washington state.

The tests, supervised by NASAs Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, are part of a series of flights known as Air Traffic Management Technology Demonstration, or ATD-1.

Three research airplanes have been outfitted with NASA-developed software that keeps track of the speed and position of the airplanes as they approach an airport.

The flight deck interval management software automatically calculates how fast the planes should be traveling to maintain the proper spacingbetween them, and displays that information on a tablet in the planes cockpits.

The software can predict the moment when an airplane touches down within a few seconds. That information should help pilots and ground controllers plot the planes routes more easily and efficiently. The payoff comes in the form of fuel savings, noise and pollution reduction and fewer flight delays.

NASAs Langley Research Center in Virginia and Ames Research Center in California played key roles in developing the software, but the Pacific Northwest provides more open space for trying out the system under real-world conditions.

A Honeywell Dassault Falcon business jet is taking onthe role of prima ballerina for this weeks tests. It broadcasts speed and position data to a Honeywell Boeing 757 based out of Seattles Boeing Field, and to a United Airlines Boeing 737 based out of Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.

During each test flight, the three jets conduct the aviation equivalent of a pas de trois with Grant County International Airport in Moses Lake, Wash., serving asthe primarystage.

Its a very simple follow the leader operation that is easy to execute by the flight crew, Sheri Brown, ATD-1 project manager at Langley Research Center, said in NASAs preview of the tests.

Performances are taking place all this week, but NASA says the initial ATD-1 flights were already very successful. Heres a Twitter recap of todays test:

Stay tuned for more about ATD-1 as the test flights continue. And stay tuned for the sequel as well: NASA researchers already have started putting ATD-2 through its paces in a 360-degree airport simulator at Ames Research Center.

For more about the ATD-1 flights, check out the report onBoeing Fields Centerline blog and NASAs media advisory.

Read more:

NASA tests next-generation air traffic software in Washington state's skies - GeekWire

The Bizarre Case of NASA’s ‘Stolen’ Moon Rocks – Atlas Obscura

Buzz Aldrin on the moon. NASA/Public Domain

A versionof this storyoriginally appearedonMuckrock.com.

Through FOIA, Motherboards Jason Koebler managed to receive a handful of investigatory reports from NASA regarding missing property, covering cases as weird as satellite parts ending up on eBay or a wheelbarrow full of sensitive documents ending up in a off-site dumpster. However, no case is stranger - or sadder - than the stolen moon rocks.

Back in 2014, NASA received a tip from a woman, name redacted, that her now-dead step-father had received a moon rock as a gift while working at Texas A&M. She claimed that this moon rock was the size of a large apple and weighed a little over a pound. The most conservative estimate would put the value around $2.5 million - at an estimated $275,000 per gram (the 1973 valuation adjusted for inflation), that would put the rocks total value in the range of $125 million dollars.

So of course her step-dad made necklaces with it.

The informant gave said necklace - which, for maximum emotional value we must assume was a heartfelt gift - to NASA for analysis. Whereupon they quickly determined it was not, in fact, a moon rock, but a terrestrial rock - also known as a rock.

Which NASA then FedExd back to its sender, with all participants sadder and wiser for the experience.

So, what happened - did somebody at Texas A&M prank the unsuspecting step-father with an authentic moon rock, or was it his own private in-joke? While well likely never know, at least the lesson here is clear enough: never look a gift moon rock necklace in the laser-induced breakdown spectrometer.

The full list of NASA investigation reports is embedded below:

The rest is here:

The Bizarre Case of NASA's 'Stolen' Moon Rocks - Atlas Obscura

According To NASA An Asteroid Nearly Struck The Earth In January [Infographic] – Forbes

According To NASA An Asteroid Nearly Struck The Earth In January [Infographic]
Forbes
On Jan 30th a small asteroid came close to hitting the Earth. Close in space terms means about 40,000 miles, and small in asteroid terms means 15-32 feet wide. This will be the closest an asteroid has come to hitting the Earth since September 6, 2016.

View original post here:

According To NASA An Asteroid Nearly Struck The Earth In January [Infographic] - Forbes

NASA Official Highlights Risk of Manned-Spacecraft Efforts – Wall Street Journal


Wall Street Journal
NASA Official Highlights Risk of Manned-Spacecraft Efforts
Wall Street Journal
WASHINGTONWith the U.S. developing a handful of new rockets and spacecraft intended to transport astronauts into space, NASA's top human exploration official issued a somber warning Tuesday about potentially fatal risks associated with the programs.

and more »

Original post:

NASA Official Highlights Risk of Manned-Spacecraft Efforts - Wall Street Journal