Illinois Budget Crisis: Libertarian candidate Lex Green offers alternative to Tax Hike

The deadline for reaching an agreement on the mounting Illinois budget deficit has passed. Democrat Governor Pat Quinn is pushing for a significant income tax increase.

From the AP via THOnline.com:

CHICAGO -- Gov. Pat Quinn said Saturday that lawmakers are "pretty close" to passing a new state budget but offered no explanation for his optimism or even why he now backs a budget that rejects his top legislative priority: a tax increase.

Although Democratic leaders had hoped to pass a new budget by Friday, they could not agree on how to address a $13 billion budget deficit. Lawmakers ignored Quinn's call to raise income taxes...

Reached for a comment by Libertarian Republican, Libertarian Party nominee for Governor Lex Green had this to say:

Albert Einstein once said "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." The build up of spending that Illinois has seen for
the last several decades cannot be fixed by scheming to get re-elected. It is time for lawmakers to make some hard decisions and roll back the programs that have gotten us into the current financial mess.

Illinois government spending has gone up over $1000 per citizen over the last decade, adjusted for inflation. We don't have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem. I don't know how this affects lawmakers, but my budget can't take another $1000 hit.

Green's proposed budgets calls for an "immediate freeze on new spending and the elimination of non-essential state programs."

Additionally, Green would move in the complete opposite direction on taxes:

I want to eliminate the 3% income tax. Many states do not have an income tax. I also want to eliminate the gasoline tax, cigarette tax and taxes on alcoholic beverages. I also want to eliminate corporate taxes.

Finally, Green adds:

Illinois’ government spending needs to be drastically reduced to balance the budget within the limits that tax revenues supply.

LexGreenforGovernor.com

Jim DeMint may be preparing to challenge McConnell in the fall

South Carolina's rebel conservative eyeing Majority leader position?

The nomination for the GOP primary of staunch conservative Mike Lee over incumbent Bob Bennett in Utah over the weekend, raises the possibility of a race for Senate majority leader. The Washington Post (via Memeo) called the win a "Victory for the Tea Party."

South Carolina Senator Jim DeMint has been heavily rumored to be seeking a showdown with Mitch McConnell. Assuming the Republicans take the Senate, such a fight could be likely.

DeMint was backing Lee, while McConnell sided with Bennett.

From the Salt Lake Tribune:

"We need a senator who is committed to balanced budgets, constitutional limits and individual liberty. I believe that person is Mike Lee," DeMint said.

Additionally, weeks ago DeMint broke ranks and was one of the first prominent Republicans to back libertarian Republican Rand Paul in Kentucky's senate primary. McConnell recently endorsed Paul's opponent Trey Grayson.

Larry Dale Keeling, political reporter for the Lexington Herald wrote:

DeMint is backing Tea Party challengers to establishment Republican candidates in other states as well. Going head-to-head with your party's floor leader in his home state just removes any doubt that something's afoot.

Notably, Paul has been consistently ahead in the primary polls.

Vogel Enters 2nd District Race

South Bend – 2nd District Voters will again see a Libertarian on the ballot in November.  As of Saturday, Mark Vogel was nominated as the Libertarian candidate to oppose Jackie Walorski andJoe Donnelly.
Vogel, a ten year veteran of the US Navy and US Air Force Reserves, said, “I will focus on sound money, constitutional government, free markets, non-interventionist foreign policy, and [...]

Three Way Race for U.S. House Seat

Scott Wise announced this morning he intends to be the next U.S. Representative for Indiana’s 3rd district.  Wise points out that most Republicans voted against Mark Souder in the May 4, 2010 primary, and in that same primary, Tom Hayhurst received only ¾ of the votes that Wise received in the 2008 GOP primary.
Wise was selected [...]

One Republican on record for Prostitution Legalization

From Eric Dondero:

No doubt there are a few Republican legislators in Nevada who favor legalized prostitution, and perhaps a few more in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, where it is entirely legal. However, it's a bit unusual for a New Mexico-based Republican to come out for such a policy, particularly one who is running for President.

Gary Johnson, former New Mexico Governor in an interview on Hannity, Fox News, Friday night (via GOP12):

"It's never been a consideration that I would enlist the services of a prostitute, myself personally.

But if I were to do that, where would I want to enlist that service? Well, it would probably be in Nevada, where it's legal, because it would be safe."

Johnson is also a passionate defender of Marijuana legalization.

UK ELECTIONS: What about a Conservative-Liberal Democrat Deal?

Tories just days away from leading Parliament

by Clifford F. Thies

The United Kingdom, like the United States, has a first-past-the-gate system, reflecting that it is one of the older democracies in the world. Most of the newer democracies have some form of proportional representation voting or, in the case of France, have run-off elections. In seeking to make a deal with the Liberal Democrats, it is possible the Conservatives will agree to a national plebiscite on replacing the U.K.’s first-past-the-gate system with some alternative.

No voting system is without flaws, but proportional representation can be shown to be relatively robust. In its pure form, as in Israel, where voters only choose among parties (not individual candidates), and where the threshold for representation is merely one seat, we seem to wind up with excessive fractionalization. Various hybrids of proportional representation seek to gain the advantage of robustness while avoiding excessive fractionalization.

In a one hybrid form of proportional representation, Germany’s, voters choose among individual candidates on a district basis and additional seats are awarded from party lists to approximate proportional representation subject to a significant threshold. In such a system, we seem to get a good mix of results in terms of the number of parties, with a small, first tier of major parties and a small, second tier of minor parties that gain representation.

A contrasting hybrid form of first-past-the-gate voting involves run-off elections where no candidates received a majority or perhaps something close to a majority in the first round. In the French system, which involves run-off elections, it is typical that the conservatives and liberals (i.e., the non-socialists) coalesce about whomever from the center-right finishes in the top two, and the various Trotskyites, progressives, socialists, communists, radicals, Greens, secular humanists, pagans, utopians, and others of the left coalesce about the Socialist candidate.

In the U.K., a German-style system of proportional representation would result in several large nationwide parties (the Conservatives, Labour and Liberal Democrats), and several smaller national parties (UK Independence and Greens) and regional parties (Scottish and Welsh nationals, Irish Republicans and Unionists). That is, I suspect the UK Independence and Green parties would gain supporters from those who, from a tactical basis, currently vote for their second choice candidate. I also suspect the radical-left and market-liberal wings of the Liberal Democrats would eventually fracture. Aside from the regional parties, the resulting configuration of parties might look very much like the configuration of parties in Germany; i.e., large parties of the center-right and center-left, and smaller market-liberal, left-socialist and Green parties. This reform would align the country's national system of voting with the EU system for representation in the European Parliament already practiced, as a parallel voting system, in the UK.

Contrariwise, a French-like system of run-off elections would work to the advantage of the large parties (who will be the ones fashioning the deal) at the expense of the minor parties such as the UK Independence and Green parties, and might keep the disparate wings of the Liberal Democrat Party from fracturing. Furthermore, it would be a relatively simple reform to implement. The only real consequence is that, when elections are held, the current government would remain in place for another two weeks or so, during the conduct of the run-off election. The only problem with this reform is that it’s French.

Dr. Phil and California Democrats on a mission to outlaw being a Teenager

NANNY-STATE WATCH

"We have to protect the Teens from themselves"

From Eric Dondero:

The Ninnies are at it again. And predictably, it's a coalition of touchy-feely TV Hosts and do-gooder Democrat lawmakers. Of course, only Republicans stand in their way.

From the LA Times "Protecting the Teens, or expanding the Nanny State?" May 7:

Barring high school students from buying Gatorade on campus, banning metal bats from their baseball games, making it illegal for adolescents to have themselves "branded" with a hot iron: Regulating teenage behavior has become an attractive topic for California's legislators.

Some lawmakers also want to outlaw nipple piercings for teenagers, and prohibit them from snowboarding and skiing without a helmet or reentering a football game too quickly after taking a hard hit to the head.

State Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Pacoima) is the author of SB 1255, which would ban the on-campus sale of Gatorade and other sugary sports drinks during school hours but allow them at practices and games. He cited studies indicating that many teenagers are switching from sugary sodas, which have already been banned from campuses, to electrolyte-replacement drinks, which can be high in sugar and sodium and can make kids fat.

The always sappy and thoroughly unwatchable Dr. Phil of course chimes in. Continuing:

Supporters of the bills have some influential voices on their side. Among them is TV talk show host Dr. Phil McGraw, who recently told his national audience that he supports the California proposal to require helmets for snowboarding kids.

The reasoning ability of teenagers is not fully developed, McGraw said, and they don't always make good decisions: "We have to protect these kids from themselves."

Republicans firmly on the side of Freedom of Choice

Libertarian-Conservative State Senator Tony Strickland (photo) responds:

"This is a nanny state that tells you what you can eat, what you can drink, what you have to wear during your outdoor recreation," said state Sen. Tony Strickland (R-Thousand Oaks). "I believe it's the parents' responsibility to decide what is best for their children. It is arrogance having government officials telling you, 'You're not smart enough, so we're going to tell you what is right and wrong for you.' "

And then there's the metal bat controversy. Once again, it's a Democrat proposing the Nanny-State legislation, and a Republican opposed. Continuing:

A Senate committee on Wednesday recommended a three-year moratorium on the use of metal bats in high school baseball. Assemblyman Jared Huffman (D-San Rafael) introduced the measure, AB 7 after a 16-year-old student at Marin Catholic High School was badly injured when a line drive from a metal bat struck him in the head.

"It's time to seriously consider the safety of allowing kids to use performance-enhancing metal bats with the pitcher standing just 60 feet away with virtually no protection," Huffman said before the Senate Education Committee passed the measure on a 3-1 vote.

Two Republicans strongly opposed such a ban:

Sen. Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar) opposed the bill, saying it is nwarranted meddling by lawmakers in a sport already regulated by a regional federation.

"You have more injuries from fielding, running the bases, than you do from this, and so that begs the question: At what point are we as the Legislature going to step in to [regulate] team sports? Where do we stop?" Huff asked.

Two veteran high school coaches testified against the bill, saying they have never seen a player hurt because of a metal bat. Sen. Mark Wyland (R-Escondido) sarcastically said that if there is a safety justification for such a ban, the state should ban Pop Warner football...

Emmer-Mania! Libertarian-Conservative ticket pulls ahead in Minnesota Gov’s Race

From Eric Dondero:

We were one of the very first national political blogs to talk up the candidacy of libertarian-leaning conservative Tom Emmer for Governor. Emmer caught our eye early on as a uniquely hardline constitutionalist conservative, with some definite libertarian instincts. This won him the endorsement of fellow constitutionalist and libertarian-leaner Sarah Palin two weeks ago.

A week later he picked a movement free marketeer who has attended explicitly libertarian conferences such as the Sam Adams Alliance and Americans for Limited Government, as his running mate Annette Meeks.

Now, he appears to be in increasingly good shape to win the Minnesota Governorship.

From Survey USA (via Hedgehog):

Tom Emmer (R) 41%
Margaret Kelliher (D) 33%
Tom Horner (I) 9%

Tom Emmer (R) 42%
Mark Dayton (D) 34%
Tom Horner (I) 9%

Tom Emmer (R) 42%
Matt Entenza (D) 31%
Tom Horner (I) 10%

The Left absolutely despises Emmer, and they hate Meeks even more. They (MN Publius) have called Emmer the "extreme right candidate,"from the "Tea Party wing," and Meeks even "further right." How fitting that the same State that gave us ultra-Leftist looney tune Al Franken, may soon be governed from the Hard Libertarian Right.

EmmerforGovernor.com

Sarah’s endorsement of Carly over Chuck gains "liberal" charge for Tom from DeVore

From Eric Dondero:

Sarah Palin officially endorsed Carly Fiorina in the California GOP Senate Primary, over former Congressman Tom Campbell, and State Senator Chuck DeVore. In doing so, DeVore gave what blogger Stacy McCain described as a "classy response." Though, DeVore managed to take a potshot at rival Campbell at the same time using the dreaded "liberal" term.

From TheOtherMcCain:

Don’t get me wrong, if a liberal Republican like Tom Campbell or a moderate Republican like Carly Fiorina win the primary instead of me, I will support them against Barbara Boxer.

The latest polls have all three Republican challengers within 3 to 4 points of Boxer.

Abolish Public Sector Unions, or risk Greek’s fate

by JB Williams

As Rasmussen reports – “New Jersey and California are just two of the states that are wrestling with high numbers of well-compensated unionized public employees as they try to reduce growing budget deficits. But a new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that Americans are generally favorable toward these unions…”

Dow Jones Newswire reports – “Greek Police Clash With Protesters As March Turns Violent - police have fired tear gas and stun grenades as groups of angry youths rampaged through the city center smashing shop windows, overturning garbage bins, and setting fire to at least two businesses.”

The Greek protests are led by government employee labor unions. In the states, we know SEIU (Service Employees International Union) under the AFL-CIO. And as the New York Times reported back in January, most U.S. union members now work for the government.

“The clashes come as tens of thousands of protesters gathered to protest the government's recently announced austerity measures in one of the largest protests in recent years, and coinciding with a nationwide general strike that has paralyzed the country.”

Overtaxed and still over spent, Greece’s public sector labor unions are revolting against government cutbacks. Obama and SEIU have the good ole USA poised to follow that utopian trail into national bankruptcy. In both countries, the majority of union employees now hold taxpayer funded government jobs, the only kind of jobs that government can create.

The labor union protests in the streets of bankrupt Greece are in opposition to forced cutbacks in government spending and related services, all necessary to securing additional bailout funds from the EU and IMF in excess of $100 billion to keep Greece from sinking into complete anarchy.

Protesters who have already bled the nation dry of resources in their endless demand for socialist government handouts, are angry over the fact that it is government jobs, protected by public employee labor unions and paid for by Greek taxpayers, that must be cut in order to stop the excessive deficit spending that left Greece the first of many nations to collapse under the weight of socialized economics.

Right-to-Work States in US much better off

California and New Jersey are the first to follow in the economic-suicide footsteps of Greece and if it weren’t for ongoing multiple federal bailouts of these two states, all at U.S. taxpayer expense, streets in the U.S. would look just like the streets of Athens.

To no surprise, states with the most labor union influence are first to belly up in America. So-called “right to work” states (aka, states where workers can reject labor unions) seem to be faring much better, even in the economic downturn.

Still, according to Rasmussen, 53% of U.S. citizens support labor unions for public employees, without connecting the dots between labor union demands for ever shrinking worker productivity and ever increasing pay and benefits, and the fact that the U.S. economy is only months behind Greece, Iceland and much of the EU, at best…

Americans Had Better Connect the Dots Soon!

Labor unions have destroyed manufacturing in America. They made U.S. students the most under-educated lot on earth. Now they are driving the cost of government through the roof, just like in Greece and there is NO way for this to end well.

When labor unions demand every increasing wages and benefits for government employees, the taxpayer takes a direct hit every time. When the economy stumbles, and tax revenues shrink, the cost of government and welfare services in particular, become unsustainable.

Protesters in Greece are right about one thing - it is the lowest people in the economic pecking order which will get hurt the most when oversized government has no choice but to shrink in size and scope. Said another way, government dependents don’t know what to do when the public trough runs dry.

But they fail to make the connection between lack of productivity, increasing cost and shrinking resources. The end is inevitable for any government that tries to become all things to all people, while robbing the most productive members of society of their rightful earnings to keep it all afloat.

In the end, no nation has access to a bottomless well of resources.

For the record, Greece was already one of the highest taxed nations on earth, with 33.5% of GDP burned up in taxes. The United States is not far behind with 28.2% of GDP swallowed up in taxes, while red ink still runs all over the page in unfunded promises as far as the eye can see, with more unfunded promises made daily.

Only a handful of communist/socialist nations have a higher tax rate than Greece, yet Greece was unable to sustain its government no matter how much money they robbed from their productive members of society.

Yet many Americans don’t seem to have the critical thinking skills to connect these dots and predict their own demise, even as other nations begin to collapse under the weight of excessive government and related taxation without real representation for taxpayers.

No FREE Lunch

The FREE-LUNCH mentality of the “entitlement generation” in America is driving the United States right off the same cliff that Greece just fell off.

However, Americans, believe they hava a birthright to big screen TV’s, fancy cars and homes they can’t afford.

The Unites States was once the most prosperous and powerful nation on earth, largely because it was the only nation on earth that didn’t fall for the false promise of equal free stuff. But today, our “entitlement generation” has fallen for the lie and they won’t be set free until they are once again able to separate fact from fiction.

Bottom line… if we don’t do away with public sector labor unions, we cannot reel in our runaway government or the high cost of bailing out the unions while the nation goes under.

Just ask the folks in Greece!

ATTENTION LIBERTARIANS USA! Geert Wilders needs our Help!

From Eric Dondero:

We don't do this often. Instead, we urge our readers to support the Republican Liberty Caucus and the RLC PAC for Libertarian Republican candidates. But this is an election overseas, where there is no RLC affiliate. (Maybe there should be one?).

The PVV issued the following appeal on their website:

With four weeks to go before the general elections in the Netherlands, Geert Wilders and the Party for Freedom are now engaged in a life-and-death struggle against the forces of jihad. In the last couple of years Geert Wilders has emerged as the international symbol of the struggle against Islam.

The Party for Freedom (PVV) refuses government subsidy in order to remain independent. All other Dutch parties receive government money. Therefore, the PVV is facing a serious challenge in order to survive this election season. Dutch state television is engaged in a massive campaign to smear the PVV.

The Party for Freedom needs your help urgently. Every donation is welcome.

ING bank account of the Stichting Vrienden van de PVV in The Hague: 67.04.72.344

IBAN: NL98 INGB 0670 4723 44
BIC: INGBNL2A

Postal address:
Postbus 20018
2500 EA Den Haag

Note, the PVV does not accept Government Subsidies on principle, similar to the Libertarian Party USA. They rely solely on individual and corporate donations.

Please send a contribution, and make sure you tell them that it's coming from Libertarian Republicans USA.

There is also a Paypal application on the English-language website:

To Make Contribution: PVV Website

PERSONAL APPEAL

I am planning to fly to Paris and then travel by Eurail to the Netherlands before the Dutch elections, to assist with Geert's campaign, precinct walking, phone banking, sign waving. My Dutch is mid-level (my German much better), so I should be fine.

I figure the total cost of the trip will be around $1,500, about half of that for the flight. Would you all be willing to assist me in helping to defray the costs?

There are 800 to 1,000 visitors a day here at LR. If just a small portion of you all sent in a $20 to $50 contribution I could certainly make it. If just one of you made a substantial contribution, $250 to $500, I'd be able to do it for sure.

And a Big Thank You to the three individuals - VA, IA and CA - who have already made pledges.

Of course, I'd be blogging on scene from Amsterdam of all my campaigning. And perhaps I could even be there on election night?

Please contact me personally, if you are able to make a contribution; ericdondero@yahoo.com or call 979-583-6875.

Thank you.

Congressman Steve King Debates Arizona SB1070 on Libertarian Politics Live

By Jim Lagnese of The Right Guy Show

Congressman Steve King from Iowa's 5th congressional district was a special guest last night on Libertarian Politics Live.  Congressman King entered the debate in the second segment, which was begun by Dan Gainor of The Business and Media Institute and Dee Dee Blase of Somos Republican.

The discussion was heated and emotional, and you can listen to it here en toto. Congressman King was very civilized and tried to bring rationality and clear headedness to a topic that seems to polarize many: The Arizona Bill SP1070.

The crux of the argument when congressman King entered the fray was what is reasonable suspicion? Dee Dee Blase seemed to think that there is no reasonable suspicion as she believed that anyone of color would be pulled over for that very reason, regardless of their citizenship status. Congressman King told the audience of his expertise and how it relates to his support of the law:

"Well, I have some experience with reasonable suspicion for one thing I drafted the work place drug testing  legislation in Iowa and it's been law since 1998. It's got reasonable suspicion in it and since that period of time we didn't rely on law enforcement officers to require that employees undergo a drug test, we just required that the employers set someone up that was educated in the standards that we had and for all these years now, it's 12 years it's been in place, we haven't had a single constitutional complaint or a single piece of litigation on reasonable suspicion...I am comfortable on the standards on reasonable suspicion."

Mr. King continues:

"As I read the Arizona law, it mirrors federal law, it supports federal law". "I cannot imagine a society functioning if local law enforcement just simply ignored or refused to enforce federal law of all kinds including immigration law...There's nothing about this that is draconian, but I do see that the intensity of the opposition to it is causing a problem with regard to race.  They are doing this on purpose. The left is ginning this up on purpose for political purposes. They are driving wedges between people and they are undermining America's unity and our unity should be behind the rule of law".

The argument ensued as to whether probably cause or reasonable suspicion is necessary to inquire about someone's immigration status. Dee Dee asked the congressman "What an illegal alien looks like" in regards to what reasonable suspicion or probable cause is when pulling someone over. She talked about beliefs, but not of the law, which she and the Mr. King obviously disagreed. Congressman King asserted that "this is not about race, but about the rule of law".

Dee Dee insisted it was about race, talking over the congressman. She wanted an example of how a police officer could ascertain someone's legal status without involving race. She wouldn't respond to his answer and he reiterated through continuous interruptions by ms. Blasé: "If an officer pulls someone over for speeding, a tail light out, for some activity that is clearly illegal, and that individual,  when asked for their identification, have probable cause at this point (the police. ed.), when asked for their identification, if their identification is not the identification of the typical of an american citizen, if it happens to be as I said earlier, a metricular counselor card, I say that's probable cause and goes above reasonable suspicion".  Dee Dee's response was "He  can't even articulate what an illegal immigrant looks like either".  He then asked her if she considered a matricular counselor card reasonable suspicion or probable cause or both. At this point, the air went dead and we actually thought that either she dropped dead, or was apoplectic at having to answer the question. May be it's just seminar called tactics.

Touché.

What happened then was that she feigned, in my opinion, not hearing the question and asked the congressman to reiterate it.

Basically, she eventually said that she did not agree with the officer asking me,  based on reasonable suspicion, my immigration status". She then asked what should happen if she got pulled over as an american, but left her license home and only offered a matricular counselor card (such cards are not given to American citizens, but foreign nationals) as she goes back and forth to Mexico all the time. Forgive me here, but don't you need a passport to enter Mexico and then enter back into the US?

At this point it became a matter of personal opinion on the part of Dee Dee Blasé and informed opinion on the part of the congressman. Being a co-host on the show and being part of it and witness to the conversation, the a priori nature of ms. Blasé's position had become apparent: No matter what, anyone that is not white can and will be pulled over to check their immigration status. Since the hosts are white and the law doesn't affect us, obviously we can't understand. It's another version of the race card. What was is surprising to me, is that these types of arguments I heard from ms. Blasé are the typical emotional strawman arguments we hear from the left. I am surprised she calls herself republican and honestly, may be the tent is too big.

No long after this, because of being talked over by Dee Dee, congressman King left the show abruptly, as he felt Dee Dee was being rude. So did I.

Thank you for reading this blog.

Leading Brit libertarian-conservative Daniel Hannan being oh so gentlemanly to rival Nigel Farage

UK Independence Party libertarian receives best wishes from leader of the Tory libertarians

Nigel Farage, leader of the libertarian-leaning UK Independence Party, had a light plane crash last night. He is in fair condition.

From UKConservatives blog:

May 06, 2010 — Election day in the U.K has been marked by a minor plane crash involving a former political party leader. UK independence party leader Nigel Farage was on board the two seater aircraft which was carrying a banner when it had to make an emergency landing in Northamptonshire.

Daniel Hannan, hero of the UK libertarian Right was quick to react. From the UK Telegraph:

Nigel is, I suppose, my chief rival in the South East. But he has always acted as a gentleman towards political opponents, and I like to think we have become friends. Nigel is in politics for the best possible reason: patriotism. He gave up a lucrative career to stand for the European Parliament, and there are plenty of other, more rewarding, things he could be doing.

It is typical of the man that, as he came round, his first words were to ask after the pilot. I hope all of us, whatever our parties, will join in wishing him a speedy and complete recovery.

Farage in photo

How did UK Independence fare?

From Eric Dondero:

The pro-free market, pro-sovereignty UK Independence is arguably the most libertarian-leaning party in the United Kingdom, save of course, the tiny UK Libertarian Party.

Perusing the election results, it appears UKIP polled 3 to 5%. Here's a sampling from one district - West Sunderland (via 538 blog):

Labour 19,615 (53%)
Conservatives 8,157 (22%)
LibDems 6,382 (17%)
BNP 1,913 (3%)
UKIP 1,267 (5%)

It is difficult at this point to discern if they gained any seats in Parliament. The total Minor Party vote, which includes UKIP, rose by a full 1% over 2005 to 6.5%.

(H/t Memeo)

UK Election Results: Boris chimes in

The final results appear to give the Conservatives a near majority of 307 seats in Parliament to 255 for Labour, and 49 for Nick Clegg's Liberal Democrats. The Conservatives thus fall 16 seats short of an outright majority. Gordon Brown is already talking of a majority coalition with the Lib-Dems. However, minor parties, such as the Scottish Independence Party constitute another 26 seats.

The BBC (via Memeo) describes the elections as "Tories just short of a majority."

Meanwhile, the unofficial leader of the Conservative Party's libertarian wing, London Mayor Boris Johnson was quoted in the Financial Times:

Boris Johnson, Tory mayor of London, said: `I think we’ll have a strong Conservative victory tonight. The public are in the mood for change.”

Uninspiring Conservative Dan Coats wins Indiana GOP Primary, could spark vote for Libertarian Party in Fall

From Eric Dondero:

Longtime establishment Republican Dan Coats won the GOP nomination for US Senate on Tuesday. He beat two libertarian-leaning candidates; Jon Hostetler, endorsed by the Republican Liberty Caucus, and Tea Party favorite Marlin Stutzman. Coats won with 54%.

A local Tea Partier in Indiana gave an amazingly frank assessment of the results. From the Pali-item, Richmond, IN:

Diane Hubbard, an active member of the Indianapolis Tea Party group, said it's hard to say whether tea party voters would support Coats, vote Libertarian or stay home in November.

"I don't think they're going to be excited about Coats, but they very well may vote for Coats," Hubbard said. "We hope people will get out and vote for the most conservative candidate."

The Indiana Libertarian Party is one of the strongest and most organized LP affiliates in the Nation. Over 20 Libertarians hold elective office in the State, including a local Judge, Mayor, Town Councilman, and most well-known Edward Coleman who is an elected Libertarian member of the Indianapolis City Council.

Dennis Miller comes out of the closet as a Tea Partier

NewsMax interviewed libertarian comedian Dennis Miller. One question in particular broke some news. Miller's former colleague from SNL days, Victoria Jackson is a prime speaker on the Tea Party circuit. Now Miller joins his old pal, coming out officially as a Tea Party supporter.

From NewsMax:

Dennis Miller is one busy guy. Ever the comedic observer of the human condition, the Saturday Night Live alum and multi-Emmy winner has hosted shows on HBO and CNBC, appeared in several films, and even did a stint on Monday Night Football. For three hours each weekday, he delivers his eclectic blend of yuks and conservative rants on his syndicated Westwood One radio show. And he still finds time to take his stand-up act to Vegas.

Miller sat down recently with Newsmax contributing editor James Hirsen to discuss comedy, politics, and how to be a Hollywood conservative and still get work.

Newsmax: Are you a tea partyer [sic]?

Miller: Yes, I would go in a second. I like the tea party people; I admire them. Yes, you can put me down for that. I like the fact that it stays small. Those big marches peter out the next day. I like the fact the tea party happens in people’s drawing rooms.

(H/t GOP 12)