Iranian Guards rape and murder young woman for violating Dress Code

A 26-year old woman was raped, beaten and then murdered by members of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards for "improper dress."

From Persian2English website, July 11
"26 Year Old Woman Raped and Murdered by Basij Members for “Bad Hijab”":

Basij forces who had initially stopped her jumped into her car and threatened her with a gun. Two other Basij members joined in and all together they beat and raped her. They murdered Babazadeh and dumped her body close to Emamiyeh cemetery.

After local investigation was conducted by HRANA members in Tabriz, it was confirmed at Babazadeh’s funeral that the person who killed her was the son of a high-ranking Revolutionary Guards member.

The intentions of the savage Basij members was to put a stop to the “improper” way women in society dressed. Basij members believe this is their duty to God.

Ayn Randian Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs notes:

Raping their people to death is a popular tool of Iranian law enforcement...

This is the horse Obama backs .......... this is all so heinous and barbaric, and the US tacitly supports the mullahcracy. He says nothing, does nothing

(H/t Memeo)

Mike Stopa for Congress – Libertarian Republican, but not like Ron Paul on Foreign Policy

A Milton Friedman, Frederich Hayek follower

Mike Stopa candidate for US Congress, 3rd District in Massachusetts declared himself a "libertarian" in a radio interview rebroadcast on YouTube in June. He separated himself from the views of GOP moderates, but also distanced himself from the tendencies of the GOP's small non-interventionist wing.

From YouTube interview released June 19:

From time immemorial I have been a libertarian, deeply free market activist, a Milton Friedman follower, a Frederich Hayek follower. Someone who believes in the free market. And this is all from my Polish upbringing. My father was a small businessman. I learned early on of the importance of the free market, not taxing people to death as they aspire to get higher in society.

I have a very critical stance on people like McCain, Lindsay Graham, particularly on their stance on illegal immigration.

On foreign policy:

Ron Paul does not seem to understand the need for America to play a leading role on the international stage. He never says it, but what he really wants to do is draw us back to our borders.

I admire Ron Paul for a lot of reasons. His critique of the Fed for instance, very well taken... Austrian economics. I've got a lot of good things to say about him. But I would not follow him off the edge of the cliff on foreign policy."views.

Michael Stopa is a Physicist specializing in computation and nanoscience in the Physics Department at Harvard University. He describes himself as one of the only, if not the only "fiscal conservative" professors at Harvard.

http://www.stopforusrep.com

Sharia Law – now a greater threat to Americans says Massachusetts Republican

Saudis funding building of Mosques in U.S.

"The thing that gets me most upset is the stone age treatment of women..."

"That Mosque that's going up in Roxbury is supported by the Muslim Brotherhood... it's getting Saudi money. And the Saudis are ridiculously intolerant of other religions in their society. We need to stand up to Saudi Arabia, even if that means the price of oil goes up. I'm not saying we need to invade Saudi Arabia. I am saying we've got to stop them from invading us."

Holder lawsuit against Arizona – an unintended consequence

Arizona Republicans uniting behind Brewer

Arizona state Treasurer Dean Martin was presenting a stiff primary challenge to incumbent Republican Governor Jan Brewer. But since the lawsuit against his State by Attorney General Eric Holder, he has decided to drop out.

From Politico "Martin drops challenge to Brewer" July 9:

“The Obama Administration's lawsuit is a blatant attempt to divide us and I will not be part of the problem; rather I intend to be part of the solution,” Martin wrote. “Governor Brewer is going to need all our help to shoulder the burden of defending Arizona from the federal government. It is our duty to stand together as Arizona residents against an intrusive federal bureaucracy.”

Brewer reacted:

"I respect Mr. Martin’s decision to suspend his campaign for Governor. I am grateful to have his support in our fight against the Obama administration and their failed policies including border security, health care, and job creation. I agree with Mr. Martin that the greatest threat to Arizona’s economic recovery is from the Obama administration and those who embody his agenda"

Japanese Democrats lose big in upper house elections

Economy permently stuck in neutral

by Clifford F. Thies

The ruling, center-left Japanese Democratic Party lost big in the just concluded elections of half of the upper house of their country's national parliament. Even with its large number of holdovers, the Democrats and their junior coalition partner have lost their majority in that house. As to whether they will be able to bring in new coalition partners so as to regain a majority or with merely a plurality is unclear at this time. The Liberal Democrats and the life-minded New Komieto and Your parties (like that name), picked up seats, but not enough to constitute a majority. There are also a handful of independents and the Social Democrats and Communists.

This defeat of the Japanese Democratic Party in the upper house elections, will make advancing their political agenda more difficult (if the party could be said to have an agenda), even though they continue to dominate in the more powerful lower house. The Democrats surged into majority status after the country had grown weary of the center-right Liberal Democrats continuous deficit-spending, cronyism, and creeping tax increases, especially after the departure of the personally popular and reform-minded Junichiro Koizumi. The problem for the Democrats is that what they stand for is not clear other than being the alternative major party to the Liberal Democrats.

At this time, there is widespread disagreement about basic policy matters such as raising the sales tax, lowering the corporate tax, cutting the deficit and re-nationalizing the post office (and its ginormous postal savings department). The economy of the country seems to be in a deep funk, burdened by the largest national debt by far of any advanced economy, a very complicated tax structure featuring high marginal tax rates, as well as geopolitical uncertainties. With its rapid turnover of prime minister during the past several years, the country looks ungovernable, the way ours did during Jimmy Carter's failed presidency.

Photo of Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan

Michelle Pulls The Race Card

By The Right Guy

In a keynote speech before the NAACP (NAALCP for those familiar with Rush Limbaugh), Mobama condemned racist elements within the Tea Party movement. Really? This is a woman from a party that  championed Robert Byrd, who was a klansman and dismissed it as a election ploy. This same klansman was against the civil rights act of 1964. How convenient.

The truth is, is that The Tea Party is making such huge inroads with the voting public and is a vehicle for the repudiation of her incompetent and feckless husband, the Mountebank in Chief, Barack Hussein Obama, hmmm, hmmm hmmm.

The Tea Party, which espouses the philosophy of our founders, which is small government, low taxes, protection of natural rights, elimination of entitlements, and strong national defense. These are everyday people of all colors, races, and national origins as well as ethnic identities and it transcends identity politics as espoused by organizations such as the NAACP and the democrat party.

Right now Obama is sinking in the polls faster the W on a 24/7/365 Katrina-like groundhog day movie. He's proven feckless in fixing any problems or even being involved in such a way to give the impression he is trying to anything other than play another round of golf or eat a cheeseburger with a foreign dignitary.

This is truly a desperate attempt by a many that will hide behind his wife's big behind (would you prefer skirt?), instead of confronting the issues and using reason instead of a marxism template that has been proven not to work, time and time again.

Right now this administration is playing out like a bad episode of Boondocks except there's no comic relief from Uncle Ruckus. Obama is doing his best to ruin this country, like a driver white knuckled on the steering wheel of a bus going over a cliff. It's not that he doesn't have a clue, it that he refuses to admit he is wrong, that his philosophy is wrong and that the country knows this. He truly is not one of our own. We might as well have Lars Rasmussen or Frederik Reinfeldt in the White House.

So, Lady Back can complain all she wants, but if she wants to confront racism, look in the mirror. If she wants this country to do better, she she ask her husband to resign.

Thank you for reading this blog.

Tim Scott statement on NAACP condemning Tea Party as "Racist"

Tim Scott, Republican candidate for Congress in South Carolina’s First Congressional District, issued the following statement today:

“I understand that the NAACP, at its annual conference in Kansas City, will vote today on a resolution condemning the Tea Party movement as “racist”. I believe that the NAACP is making a grave mistake in stereotyping a diverse group of Americans who care deeply about their country and who contribute their time, energy and resources to make a difference.”

“As I campaign in South Carolina, I participate in numerous events sponsored by the Tea Party, 9/12, Patriot, and other like-minded groups, and I have had the opportunity to get to know many of the men and women who make up these energetic grassroots organizations. Americans need to know that the Tea Party is a color-blind movement that has principled differences with many of the leaders in Washington, both Democrats and Republicans. Their aim is to support the strongest candidates – regardless of color or background – who will fight to return our country to its Constitutional roots of limited government, fiscal responsibility, and free markets.”

Note - Tim Scott is virtually Congressman-elect for South Carolina's 1st District. (He faces only a paper candidate on the ballot for the Fall in a heavily Republican District.)

VoteTimeScott.com

Legalize Marijuana bill in Congress has two Republican co-sponsors

No surprises - Ron Paul and Dana Rohrabacher

From Esquire Magazine interview with Barney Frank, July 12:

BF: By the way, the bill is bi-partisan: I’ve got two Democrats and two Republicans.

ESQ: Who are the Republicans?

BF: Ron Paul. And Dana Rohrabacher from California.

ESQ: Isn’t Rohrabacher pretty hard-right?

BF: He’s a very conservative guy, but with a libertarian streak.

But two other Republicans are fiercely opposing the bill; Senate candidate and moderate Republican Rep. Mark Kirk of Illinois and Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana.

Ron Paul disclaimer - While this website supports fully Cong. Paul on domestic issues, we are stridently opposed to his foreign policy views.

POLL SHOCKER!! Carly overtaking Barbara Boxer in new California poll

From Eric Dondero:

Not the top tier of polling firms, but SurveyUSA is the first to show Fiorina ahead of incumbent Democrat Senator Barbara Boxer.

From CBS 5 San Francisco:

A new SurveyUSA poll in California finds Carly Fiorina (R) edging Sen. Barbara Boxer (D) in the U.S. Senate race, 47% to 45%, a lead which is within the poll's four point margin of error.

Key finding: The poll found twice as many Democrats cross-over to vote Republican as Republicans who cross-over to vote Democrat in the race.

If all other current polls hold for the GOP Senate races, particularly key races in Nevada, Kentucky, and Florida, with a Boxer win that would secure the Senate for Republican control. (With Independent - Lieberman as a possible tie-breaker.)

STUNNER! Louisiana’s Cao, ahead of all Dems for reelection in the heart of New Orleans

From Eric Dondero:

The only single incumbent Republican considered vulnerable for reelection in the entire country is first-termer Rep. Joseph Cao, who represents heavily Democrat New Orleans. Cao was elected in a bit of a fluke, after longtime incumbent Democrat William Jefferson was busted for taking bribes. ($90,000 stashed in his freezer.)

(Republicans may lose a House seat in Delaware, as Rep. Mike Castle is moving up to the Senate.)

Now this Total Shocker from The Hotline:

Conventional wisdome suggests Rep. Joseph Cao (R-LA) is the most vulnerable GOPer in Congress, seeking re-election in a heavily African-American district in which any scandal-free Dem should easily top half the vote. But conventional wisdom has been wrong before, and a new poll for Cao's campaign hopes to prove it wrong again.

Cao led state Rep. Cedric Richmond (D) by a 51%-26% margin, according to a survey conducted May 27-June 2 by LA pollster Verne Kennedy. Cao leads Richmond by a 67%-13% margin among white voters, and by a narrower 39%-36% margin among African American voters.

IMPORTANT NOTE!

The liberal media is spreading a wrong number needed for Republicans to win the House. The conventional line is 40, which is incorrect. Actually, only 39 seats are needed for Republicans to win control. And that number maybe 38, for a West Virginia conservative Democrat who is assured election to his first term, has already stated for the record that he would not vote to reelect Pelosi as House Speaker.

Drug Legalization backed by Tea Party, at least in one Michigan affiliate

Tea Party's roots likes in libertarian politics

From Eric Dondero:

Some libertarians often complain that social issues are absent on the Tea Party agenda, and that Tea Party rallies are "too dominated" by social conservatives. Not in one major Michigan affiliate.

From the Detroit Free Press, July 11, Tea party has GOP candidates' attention Groups have zeal, but will they back specific candidates?":

As Michigan heads to its Aug. 3 primaries, Republicans running for governor and Congress from the U.P. to southeast Michigan are paying attention and -- in some cases -- homage to the growing influence of the nascent, largely anti-government movement.

In Sault Ste. Marie, the tea partiers meet Wednesdays at Cup of the Day on Ashmun Street. Looks nice enough from the outside, but Tom Stillings -- a Republican candidate for Michigan's 1st Congressional seat -- says it's like facing the Spanish Inquisition in there.
It's easy to see why.

When the members of the Northern Michigan Liberty Alliance start asking questions, they mean business: Which laws is the candidate prepared to get rid of? Which government agencies would go? Should people be allowed to carry a gun in church? And under what constitutional authority does the federal government pursue the war on drugs?

"They're very tough," Stillings said.

The article went on to note:

The tea party's roots lie in libertarian politics, strict constitutional constructionism and a belief that in recent years -- particularly since Democrats took control of Congress in 2007 and Barack Obama was elected president in 2008 -- that government has run amok.

The Northern Michigan Liberty Alliance lists supported groups such as the Cato Institute, Macinac Center, and Andrew Breitbart's BigGoverment.com. A major rally for Northern Michigan Tea Party Patriots is scheduled for July 17 in Escanaba.

Idaho Republicans take middle road on Marijuana Legalization proposal

LR BREAKING NEWS!!

From Eric Dondero:

The greatest advancement for pro-marijuana legalization Republicans in the last few months has been in Idaho. Other positive developments have occured in other states.

For instance, pro-marijuana advocate Bob Ehrlich is the Republican nominee for Governor. He is now leading in his race over Democrat incumbent Martin O'Malley. (Ironically, RNC Chair Michael Steele served as Lt. Gov. under Ehrlich.) Maryland is also the state where a Republican State Senator managed to get passed through committee a medicinal marijuana bill.

There has been some progress on the medical marijuana front in the New Jersey legislature as well, with a few Republicans joining in.

But it is in Idaho where the widest amount of success has occured. State Rep. Tom Trail has seen his medicinal marijuana legislation receive major support in the legislature. Now comes word from a regular reader of Libertarian Republican, that the Idaho GOP may be moving closer to backing legalization.

From LR Reader Ryan Davidson, Idahoans for Liberty:

I was asked to submit a resolution to the Republican State Convention in support of Tom's bill. I, along with 9 other co-sponsors, filed a proposed resolution which was debated in the resolutions committee in Idaho Falls. I was unable to be there when the resolution came up, as I was serving on the credentials committee at the same time.

As I heard it, the medical marijuana resolution was not adopted, but it was not voted down. It was essentially voted "return to sender" for lack of information. The fact that it was not outright voted down is a positive sign, in my opinion.

This was a project that definitely could have used more coordination and effort in order to be successful. I simply did not have the time myself to coordinate the effort. One of the reasons the resolution was voted "return to sender" was because it referenced Tom Trail's bill, but a copy of his bill was not attached. None of the other 9 co-sponsored spoke in favor of the bill at the committee. (However, some resolution committee members spoke in favor.) Given the short amount of time the committee had to debate each resolution (they had 2 hours to vote on over 40 resolutions) its possible that even if we had prepared an effective presentation, we would not have been able to give it.

This does not mean that the issue is dead until the next convention. The Idaho Republican State Central Committee meets three times a year, and they also vote on resolutions. Their next meeting will be around the time the next Legislative session begins.

World Cup: Muslim Terrorist Bombing in Uganda; African Press reporting over 50 Dead; Three different locations, Restaurants, Rugby field

40 Reported Dead at Kampala's Kyaddondo Rugby Grounds (photo)

The East Africa Daily Monitor is reporting that more than 50 people are dead as a result of three separate attacks on the Ugandan capital of Kampala. Those killed were watching the World Cup final on giant screens at crowded restaurants and at a sports stadium.

From The Daily Monitor:

Police confirmed that 13 people, more than half of them foreigners were killed at Ethiopian Village Restaurant in Kabalagala, a Kampala suburb, while Daily Monitor reporters counted about 40 bodies at Kyaddondo rugby grounds where a huge crowd was watching the Spain Vs Netherlands Word Cup final.

Another blast was reported to have gone off in Ntinda, another Kampala surburb, as more than 100 were reported admitted in hospitals and clinics in the capital including the national referral hospital - Mulago.

GRAPHIC PHOTO! of bombing victims at African Daily Monitor news site.

Meanwhile the AP (via Daily Caller) is reporting that Al-Shabab is most likely responsible:

Police Chief Kale Kaihura said he believed that Somalia’s most feared militia — al-Shabab, which has pledged loyalty to al-Qaida — could be behind the attacks.

Al-Shabab is Somalia’s most dangerous militant group, one that militant veterans of the Afghan, Pakistan and Iraq conflicts have helped train, according to international officials.

If Kaihura’s early suspicions that al-Shabab was responsible prove true, it would be the first time the group has carried out attacks outside of Somalia.

In Mogadishu, Sheik Yusuf Sheik Issa, an al-Shabab commander, told The Associated Press early Monday that he was happy with the attacks in Uganda.

UPDATE!

Channel 6 BNO News out of Kampala is now reporting "51 Dead," and "Hundreds injured."

UPDATE!

Jihad Watch is calling the attacks "synchronized," and is reporting that Al-Shabab had "threatened Uganda and Burundi in the last few days."

UPDATE!

Various media now reporting Death Toll has risen to 64.

DEACE: No turning back from change in the GOP: We’re not satisfied with leaders who put party above principle

From The Right Guy Show
of July 4

This appeared in the Washington Times today. Steve is a conservative talk radio show host in Des Moines. While we share a lot of views, Steve is pretty much a purist and I will leave it at that. Let's just say we don't exchange Christmas cards. Anyway, he has some good points here, but I would like to comment that what he describes as the ascendancy of the Tea Party hasn't led to a legitimate third party, or even a huge shift within the party, as Michael Steele tries to co-opt them in the same way the GOP did with the Socons. Unless the spine is ripped out of the GOP by Tea Party people or they become a third party that supplants the GOP, I don't see this as a long term prospect. Furthermore, as more people become enculturated by marxist professors and people that are Tea Party types die off, it will be seen as the last gasp of a free will political movement anywhere. I'd like to be wrong, but only time will tell. As far as the co-opting goes, look at Palin endorsing Branstad. Need I say more? If I am wrong, rationally show me how I am wrong.
What's going on in the Republican Party across the country isn't a civil war as much as it's a tale of two paradigms.
When you remove the names, personalities, egos, candidates and factions that are being discussed constantly, what this represents is a seismic shift in the political preferences of the Republican base as theGOP has squandered the power voters lavished upon it over the past decade.
Instead of taking their majorities in both houses of Congress and teaming with the presidency to stem the tide of pagan socialism incrementally implemented by the Democratic Party for generations, Republicans punted on nearly every cultural issue while simultaneously cashing the check at the taxpayers' expense, creating a sense of betrayal that many Americans - including the party's own grass-roots supporters - still haven't gotten over.
This is why people aren't buying into new top-down leadership, seeing it as a repackaged version of that in which they already have lost trust. Attempts to unify the party come across as clumsy or condescending, at best, without recognizing that both conservatives focused on economics and conservatives focused on social issues have seen their core beliefs trampled by leaders who claimed to be their champions.
Unification as it was defined in the previous era is impossible. Trust is gone. As is the case with the breakup of any long-term relationship, both sides try to exert pressure on each other to avoid the fear of what comes next before finally letting go.
To put it in Facebook vernacular, the relationship status of the oldReagan coalition in America could best be described by the phrase "it's complicated."
The old Reagan coalition was the last seismic shift in American politics, mainstreaming born-again Christians and their domestic concerns while rebuilding a tough containment policy in the Cold War. That renewed, confident America crushed the Soviet Union.
However, once that external threat was neutralized, those new activists in the Reagan coalition expected cultural threats from within to become a higher priority. Marxists on college campuses were every bit as dangerous as the ones in Moscow.
But ever since Pat Buchanan's infamous "culture war" speech at the 1992 Republican National Convention, the divide between the party establishment and grass-roots social conservatives has grown. Conservatives put aside their concerns in the days following Sept. 11, 2001, once again giving ground on their priorities to face down an external threat. As social conservatives saw their issues drift into the background, economic conservatives found their core values under assault by their own administration.
Now that many Americans no longer sense a clear and present danger from Islamic radicalism as the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq rage on and on with no end in sight, the cultural divide between traditional party-focused Republicans and issue-focused conservatives has returned with a vengeance.
This time, for the first time, both sides seem willing to see how life could be without the other.
The lines are being drawn, and everyone is going to be forced to choose which side he or she is on. Even some good people who have spent the past few years trying to bridge this divide are going to find themselves caught in the middle.
This is always what happens when paradigms clash within a movement. At first, those in favor of the new paradigm try being puritans, believing that those perpetuating the old paradigm are just misinformed and would see things the new way if the new-paradigm people established a rapport with them or shared the truth with them. After a while, though, it becomes obvious to those advocating a new paradigm that many in favor of the old one are financially vested in keeping failure alive, so the puritans eventually become separatists.
Here's what divides the party-focused old guard and the issue-focused new-paradigm conservatives, whose most visible expression is the stridently independent Tea Party movement:
Party unity
Old paradigm: The threat that Democrats pose to the country's future requires everyone to work together toward the common goal of defeating them.
New paradigm: If we're not going to stand for anything in stark contrast to the Democrats, what's the point?
Philosophy
Old paradigm: The person who is my 80 percent friend isn't my 20 percent enemy.
New paradigm: Electing people who don't share my core convictions is a loser - period.
Tactics
Old paradigm: In the real world, the Republican Party is the only weapon Americans have against the encroaching loss of liberty that occurs whenever Democrats win elections.
New paradigm: Because the Republican Party has demonstrated it won't defend Americans from Democrats, Americans may have to form their own movements independent of the Republican Partyin order to protect their liberty.
Ideology
Old paradigm: It's about the party platform.
New paradigm: It's about the Constitution.
Relationship
Old paradigm: Conservatives must take over the Republican Party from within and build it up over the long haul.
New paradigm: Instead of wasting our time with a party that doesn't want us, we'll just help specific candidates we like in spite of the party.
Social issues
Old paradigm: We need to chip away incrementally at what's happened to our culture.
New paradigm: We want to defeat evil, not regulate it.
Taxes
Old paradigm: Across-the-board tax cuts, tax credits and subsidies to corporate America stimulate economic development.
New paradigm: Get the government out of the business of choosing winners and losers and pass either the Fair Tax or the Flat Tax.
Judicial activism
Old paradigm: Legal positivism with "conservative" judges appointed by Republicans.
New paradigm: We need to limit the jurisdiction of the courts as our Founders intended and instead appoint judges who understand that any law that conflicts with God's Law is no law.
Leadership
Old paradigm: Chiefs are anointed to speak for their tribes and then given a seat at the table of power to represent their specific constituency while also making their constituents' decisions for them.
New paradigm: I think for myself and trust neither the party nor the "leaders" it selects to think for me.
Mouthpiece
Old paradigm: Rush Limbaugh.
New paradigm: Glenn Beck.
Heroes
Old paradigm: William F. Buckley Jr. and Milton Friedman.
New paradigm: Founding Fathers.
Elections
Old paradigm: It's all about winning in November.
New paradigm: If the right type of candidate doesn't win the primary, November is irrelevant.
Morality
Old paradigm: traditional values.
New paradigm: biblical worldview.
Eventually, this new paradigm is going to replace the old one - it's just a matter of time. Some of our closest allies and confidants will be among the last to make this transition because of old-paradigm inertia. But they will eventually come to the realization that what's past is prologue, too. They're going to need grace and patience from us, and the credibility they've earned fighting for righteousness under the old paradigm over the years grants them that.
Others will continue deceitfully to try to sell us on the old paradigm, but they had better cash the check now while they still can - because they're just whistling past the graveyard. You can't stop a force of nature.
In the meantime, the only unsolved mysteries are how long it will take for this new paradigm to take over, how many relationships will be damaged or lost in the process and whether it will be too late to save this republic by the time this new paradigm becomes the paradigm.
Steve Deace hosts the afternoon drive program on WHO-AM in Des Moines, Iowa, where Ronald Reagan was the station's first sports director.
© Copyright 2010 The Washington Times, LLC. 

Colorado’s Jane Norton sides with Tancredo – Obama greatest threat to America

Tea Party backing the wrong candidate?

From Eric Dondero:

In a stunning role reversal, the Colorado Republican candidate for US Senate, viewed as the more moderate of the two primary candidates, is siding with Tom Tancredo. The former Colorado Congressman said at a picnic rally last Thursday, that Obama was a greater threat to America than the former Soviet Union, or even Al Qaeda.

Ken Buck, the Tea Party favorite in the Senate primary was reserved. He was in attendence at the rally. Afterwards, he commented to a local reporter that although he is friends with Tancredo, he tends "to exaggerate" at times.

For her part, Norton released a statement on her Facebook page (via Fox 31 KDVR - Denver):

"There was a real measure of truth to what Tancredo said. Obama is spending this country into bankruptcy. Admiral Mullen said our debt is a greater threat than terrorism. It's time to end the culture of political correctness.

"Obama's brand of big government is a threat to America."

Meet the Pro-Tax Candidate for Minnesota Governor – and he’s not ashamed to admit it

For Mark Dayton Big Tax Increases make the most sense

From Eric Dondero:

Minnesota's favorite son Walter Mondale, famously remarked that he would absolutely "raise your taxes," in a 1984 presidential debate with Ronald Reagan. Now another Minnesotan is doing the same - unashamedly so.

From the AP (via NewsMax):

Dayton, who is a millionaire thanks to the family department store chain that spawned Target, says he'd impose at least $4 billion in new taxes on people who take home more than $130,000 a year.

Dayton argues that middle-class taxpayers are disproportionately picking up the slack through higher state fees for a range of services and rising property taxes to offset deep cuts to local government allowances.

"It's not a question of taxes or no taxes, it's which tax on whom," Dayton said.

Sarah Palin-backed GOP nominee Tom Emmer says No Way!

"I don't think they understand the ramifications when you throw that pebble into this pond where those ripples are going to go," Emmer said of the Democrats' tax plans. "It's not a matter of being wealthy, it's a matter of trying to create opportunity."

The AP goes on to report that Emmer is light on specifics on revenue and spending. However, a simple check of Emmer's campaign website shows the details of his program:

Minnesota’s tax system has become more regressive in recent years. We have become far too reliant on income taxes to supply our state’s coffers. Over 40% of state revenues come from them, the sixth highest in the nation! The top 10% of income earners pay more than half of Minnesota’s income taxes – the top 1% of income earners pay over 25%, while earning only 15.6% of total income. Raising income taxes will only result in high-income earners leaving the state. This would be a disaster. To recover the taxes paid by one household in the top 1%, Minnesota would have to attract over 400 new households with an income ranging from $53,000 to $67,000. However, since our tax structure is not business friendly, it is unlikely there would be jobs to attract those 400 new households.

By reforming our tax structure and reducing the size of government, we empower the individual. Lowering individual and corporate income taxes will attract high-income individuals and businesses to Minnesota. This will result in more jobs being created, which will lead to more Minnesotans making a higher income. With a tax system focused on consumption, rather than income, these newly employed Minnesotans will have more money to spend

Libertarian-Conservative Wyoming State Rep. represents Tea Party/RLC ideals ideally

"Public welfare as practiced this day and age... is un-American!"

Gerald Gay is a two-term state rep. running for reelection, District 36 - Casper. He's running on a "Republican / TEA Party platform." Gay describes himself as a "Strong advocate for sportsmen." He's got an 'A' Rating from the NRA, and he's a proud member of Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership (JPFO).

He also favors "Preserving our excellent, free-market medical care is top priority."

On government welfare:

FAR too many people in the USA are on "The Dole" in its various forms. Including government health care and retirement.

Public welfare as practiced in this day and age is simply re-distribution of wealth. That is most un-American!

But it's not only economics and gun ownership where Gay supports individual rights. In a recent interview with the Wyoming Republican Liberty Caucus, Gay answered in response to a question on Drugs, Food, and Pharmaceuticals:

"you should be free to put anything you want into your body, it's your body."

He also favors the All-Volunteer Armed Forces:

"Conscription is no longer appropriate for the types of conflicts and fighting we may do. We are very well served with the volunteer military as it stands."

More on Gay at votegeraldgay.com

For a video on Gay shooting up Cap & Trade PunkLibertarian.com