Libertarian | Definition of Libertarian at Dictionary.com

[ lib-er-tair-ee-uhn ]SHOW IPA

/ lbrtrin /PHONETIC RESPELLING

maintaining the doctrine of free will.

OTHER WORDS FROM libertarianlibertarianism, nounantilibertarian, adjective, noun

Dictionary.com UnabridgedBased on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, Random House, Inc. 2020

I agree with you, but the youthful energy in the libertarian movement foresees a tipping point.

Had there not been a Libertarian in the race who received over 8,000 votes, Shumlin likely would have lost.

Some Tea Party types who felt that Republican Scott Milne was too moderate supported the Libertarian.

Healey describes his politics as "libertarian in some aspects, Jacksonian, Jeffersonian, socially liberal, fiscally conservative."

Sure, you could end up with a Congress that consists solely of libertarian veterinarians, or elderly communists, or whatever.

So far I concede the Libertarian contention as to the demoralising effect of Determinism, if held with a real force of conviction.

The case has been conceded to him in advance, and the libertarian can only flinch from his logic.

It is chiefly on the Libertarian side that I find a tendency to the exaggeration of which I have just spoken.

At the same time, the difference between Determinist and Libertarian Justice can hardly have any practical effect.

libertarian

/ (lbtrn) /

a believer in freedom of thought, expression, etc

of, relating to, or characteristic of a libertarian

Derived forms of libertarianlibertarianism, noun

C18: from liberty

Collins English Dictionary - Complete & Unabridged 2012 Digital Edition William Collins Sons & Co. Ltd. 1979, 1986 HarperCollins Publishers 1998, 2000, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2012

See more here:

Libertarian | Definition of Libertarian at Dictionary.com

Broome County officials take oath of office to kick off 2020 – WBNG-TV

(WBNG) - Broome County started off the new year with new leadership in several key roles.

Recently elected Broome County District Attorney Michael Korchak and Endicott Mayor Linda Jackson were among the several swearing in ceremonies happening across the county New Year's day.

After a hard fought victory in November, Korchak says he is grateful to serve this community.

"This was a very, very long journey but I have a lot of great people supporting me and I'm ready to get to work and serve the people of Broome County as their district attorney," said Korchak.

After losing the Republican Primary in June, Korchak switched to the Libertarian ticket and won the title by a narrow margin.

"When we were able to make the switch to the Libertarian Party, many of my supporters came along with me because we've been stressing from day one, the D.A.'s office isn't a political office, you're serving the community. There should be no politics involved so that way you're voting for person not party," said Korchak.

At the ceremony, he thanked his supporters, many of whom came to watch the historic moment at Saint Michael's Gym on Clinton Street.

While over in Endicott, Republican and former village trustee Linda Jackson was sworn in as the village's first new mayor in 12 years.

She will be replacing longtime mayor John Bertoni.

"It's so exciting. I can't tell you, when I got to put my name on the door it was a feeling. I drive through Endicott and I think, 'I'm the mayor of this wonderful place.' I'm just so excited, and the people are the most important part. I get to be mayor and I get to help everybody," said Jackson.

With her dream now becoming a reality, Jackson says she is ready to continue revitalization efforts for the village and increase security.

"We're going to work on security and safety first. Get our cameras up on the avenue, get cameras in other strategic places. Make it safe so that people won't mind going out at night in the village of Endicott," said Jackson.

Several village trustees also swore into office Wednesday, including Endicott Democratic Trustee Cheryl Chapman, who will serve as Deputy Mayor.

The newest leadership across the county says they are hoping to start the new decade strong for all residents.

See original here:

Broome County officials take oath of office to kick off 2020 - WBNG-TV

White nationalist who ran for Senate, claimed to have consumed goat blood, is arrested in Florida – FOX 10 News Phoenix

Augustus Sol Invictus was arrested Dec. 30 in Florida on a warrant issued by a police department in South Carolina. ( Brevard County Sheriff's Office )

A white nationalist who spoke at the 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville and once claimed, during a failed campaign for U.S. Senate, to have consumed goat blood,was arrested this week inFlorida.

Augustus Sol Invictus, 36, was taken into custody Monday onchargesof kidnapping, domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature and possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, said Lt. Michael Chavis, a spokesman for theRock Hill, S.C., police department.

Invictus was arrested on a warrant from that departmentby Brevard County, Fla., sheriffs deputies.

According to aredacted Rock Hill police report obtained by Fox News, on Dec. 12Invictus held a gun to his wife's "head and forced her to go with him" to Jacksonville, Fla.

This incident took place in the presence of their children, the report adds, and when in Florida [the woman] was able to separate herself from her husband and escape back to Rock Hill with her children.

Florida officials tracked Invictus to a relative's home, Brevard County Sheriff's Office spokesman Tod Goodyear told the Associated Press. Hereportedly was taken into custody without incident after leaving a gym.

Chavis saidInvictus will be extradited back to South Carolina to face the charges.

During a 2016 Senate bid to unseat U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., Invictus got widespread attention for claiming that he killed a goat and drank its blood as part of a pagan ritual.

I did sacrifice a goat. I know thats probably a quibble in the mind of most Americans, he once told theAssociated Press. I sacrificed an animal to the god of the wilderness... Yes, I drank the goats blood.

Invictus failed, however, to win the nomination from Florida's Libertarian Party to challenge Rubio. The AP says he has changed his given name -- which he declinedto reveal in a 2015 interview -- to a Latin phrase that means majestic unconquered sun.

Invictus, an Orlando-area attorney, has called for violent uprisings,according to the Associated Press. White nationalist Richard Spencer, who organized the deadly Charlottesville rally that refocused attention on the country's frayed race relations, also has credited Invictus with drafting the core tenets behind the rally, it added.

Jail records show that Invictus is being held without bond and is scheduled to appear in court Jan. 15.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

More here:

White nationalist who ran for Senate, claimed to have consumed goat blood, is arrested in Florida - FOX 10 News Phoenix

Republicans are the party of civil liberties as Democrats walk away | TheHill – The Hill

Since the heyday of the civil rights movement, Democrats have touted themselves as torchbearers of the Jeffersonian principles of individual rights of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. The Founders considered it axiomatic that the government should have strict limits and the rights of the individuals were not to be constrained. But Democrats have sadly shifted their priorities. The left wing increasingly favors intrusion in all aspects of American life and advocates policies diminishing personal rights in favor of state power and jeopardizing the social contract.

Joined by activist groups like the American Civil Liberties Union and the Human Rights Campaign, liberals argued for years that the Christian right was coming to take away your personal autonomy. Slogans such as my body my choice underscored a powerful conviction that the government should not interfere with your ability to live your life as you see fit. From marriage to police surveillance and from abortion to free expression, Democrats gained votes by advertising themselves as the defenders of individual rights in this nation. For years, they could claim that title.

In the era after the demise of Jim Crow, the cultural and political left vastly expanded the reach and breadth of institutions and ideologies devoted to the protection of individuals rights and free will. Progressive intellectuals championed the moral imperatives of free speech and expression as keys not only to an effective academic environment but a thriving economy and polity. Universities represented our bastions of learning and debate. During the tumultuous 1960s and 1970s, campuses brimmed with ideas to improve the nation and the world, many of which were wrong, but at least open for discussion. The American Civil Liberties Union had insisted on the fundamental right to speech even for the most odious of causes.

But times have certainly changed. Widespread calls for safe spaces, incessant demands of progressives to be comfortable, and constant disruptions of conservative talks on campuses have replaced the rallies championing the First Amendment. Airing an opinion about biological science, including one universally accepted throughout the entirety of human history barring the last five years, was startingly sufficient for author J.K. Rowling to be exiled from the realm of acceptable speakers. The advocacy of free market principles is even on the precipice of being deemed hate speech. Free speech has firmly given way to groupthink with a constant race to the bottom. Only the most woke survive in this heated political environment, to the detriment of healthy debate in our country.

All of this leads the Democratic candidates competing for 2020 and their counterparts in Congress to increasingly become nanny staters. Against the First Amendment are proposals to restrict the use of money to affect policy under Democratic proposals to constrain lobbying, shut down free speech under Democratic proposals ostensibly aimed at hate speech but which really aim to shut down conservative speech, and reduce the ability to exercise religious conscience under Democratic proposals to strip churches of tax exempt status. Little remains of leaving people free to run their own lives. Instead, the new doctrine is more related to the idea that everything is political. All within the state and nothing outside the state, is not just a frightening concept on its own, but effectively an unintentional carbon copy of the core philosophy of Benito Mussolini.

While Republicans are certainly not perfect on civil liberties by any means, the strong libertarian streak that runs through the party still demonstrates itself in many ways. Although President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump lashes out at Pelosi on Christmas, decries 'scam impeachment' Christmas Day passes in North Korea with no sign of 'gift' to US Prosecutors: Avenatti was M in debt during Nike extortion MORE is a flawed messenger for the argument that Americans should be left to simply pursue their own best interests, he is actively working to move power from the Washington swamp back to the states and to your wallet. If Trump is not good enough on civil liberties for your appetite, the reality is Democrats are far worse.

Their proposals are straight from the Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Jimmy Carter days of seeking to fix everything through federal mandates. Elizabeth Warren wants to set up a series of government funded daycare centers that not only will cost taxpayers $70 billion, but will also replace traditional family bonds with the state. There is no more basic right than familial autonomy, which would sink away if such plans were enacted into law. Bernie Sanders pushes more extreme ideas, opposing the ability for homeowners to control their own dwellings. As the mayor of New York, Michael Bloomberg is most remembered by the long list of activities he chose to ban, from large sodas to styrofoam packaging to loud music.

These are not policies of a civil liberties party. They are inducements to relinquish our autonomy to Washington. Anyone who believes that is a fair trade is marching the nation down the road to serfdom. As Gerald Ford famously declared, A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.

Kristin Tate is a libertarian writer and an analyst for Young Americans for Liberty. She is an author whose latest book is How Do I Tax Thee? A Field Guide to the Great American Rip-Off. Follow her on Twitter @KristinBTate.

Excerpt from:

Republicans are the party of civil liberties as Democrats walk away | TheHill - The Hill

National View Column: Watch for a Trump-Trump ticket and more in 2020 – Duluth News Tribune

JANUARY: Senate Republicans reject both House impeachment articles, but four Republicans join the 47 Democrats to provide a majority voting the president obstructed Congress. The Des Moines Register endorses Joe Biden, saying the former vice president's experience means he'll be "a president we won't have to train." Trump fires FBI Director James Wray, nominating Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan to replace him. Ukraine President Zelenskiy renews plea for White House meeting with Trump.

FEBRUARY: Baltimore Ravens win Super Bowl. Iowa caucuses finish in a tight four-way race with Mayor Pete Buttigieg getting the most votes and Sen. Bernie Sanders the most delegates. Biden is a close third, followed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren. Sanders repeats his New Hampshire primary win, followed closely by Mayor Pete, Biden, and Warren. Biden edges Sanders in Nevada and trounces the field in South Carolina, followed by Sanders, Mayor Pete and Warren.

MARCH: On Super Tuesday, Biden wins Texas, Virginia, and four other states. But Buttigieg wins California, Colorado, Minnesota, North Carolina and Warren's home state of Massachusetts, taking the delegate lead. Sanders, like Alf Landon, wins only Maine and Vermont. Ex-New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg peaks at 8% in California and nets just three delegates. The next week, Sanders edges Biden and Buttigieg in Michigan, and Biden wins two states. But Buttigieg wins four and follows that up March 17 by beating Sanders and Biden in Arizona, Illinois, Ohio, and Florida. Trump clinches the GOP nomination.

APRIL: Mike Pompeo resigns as secretary of state to seek the Kansas Senate seat. Buttigieg edges Sanders and Biden in Wisconsin, extending his delegate lead. Warren and Bloomberg drop out, leaving businessman Andrew Yang, Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and ex-Rep. John Delaney still competing. Cowboys name Troy Aikman as new coach. Trump picks Mike Pence as secretary of state, announcing the vice president asked for a switch. Reports say Trump asked Zelenskiy, still awaiting a White House meeting, if he has any dirt on Mayor Pete. Buttigieg wins New York, Maryland, and Pennsylvania primaries.

MAY: Biden drops out of Democratic race and endorses Buttigieg, who wins Indiana. Sanders, Yang, Gabbard, and Delaney refuse to concede. Trump and Vladimir Putin accept Zelenskiy's invitation for a July summit in Kyiv, during the Democratic Convention. The Supreme Court again upholds the Affordable Care Act's constitutionality, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing the majority opinion.

JUNE: North Korean leader Kim Jong Un rejects Trump bid for new summit, urging withdrawal of all U.S. troops from South Korea. Trump says he is willing to go halfway. The Washington Capitals win their second Stanley Cup in three years while the L.A. Lakers win the NBA title. The Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, says Trump must provide financial information to Congress and New York authorities.

JULY: Polls show Trump leading Pete Buttigieg by 6 points and winning 30% of black and Hispanic votes. Democrats make the former South Bend mayor the youngest major party nominee ever, with Stacey Abrams of Georgia as his running mate. At the Kyiv summit, Trump hails Putin's efforts for global peace. Zelenskiy declines comment.

AUGUST: Trump stuns the Republican Convention by naming Senior Adviser Ivanka Trump his new running mate. After brief flurry for Rep. Mark Meadows, the GOP Convention confirms a Trump-Trump ticket. Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, spurning the Libertarian nomination, endorses the Buttigieg-Abrams ticket. Pompeo loses the Kansas GOP Senate primary to Kris Kobach.

SEPTEMBER: Trump announces he'll only debate ex-Mayor Pete once, but running mate Ivanka Trump will hold three debates with Democrat Abrams. Ukraine President Zelenskiy discloses Buttigieg's grandfather was involved in anti-NATO terrorism. Though Buttigieg denies it, noting his family came from Malta, not Ukraine, Trump invites Zelenskiy to the White House.

OCTOBER: After Abrams wins the first VP debate over Ivanka Trump, she cancels the next two. Zelenskiy admits he fabricated a Buttigieg story to get a White House invite. After the presidential debate, polls show ex-Mayor Pete has evened the race against Trump. The New York Yankees defeat the L.A. Dodgers in the World Series.

NOVEMBER: Democrats' Buttigieg-Abrams ticket, riding a popular vote majority of 4.5 million votes, wins the election with a bare 270 electoral votes. Trump holds Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. But Democrats win Arizona's 11 electoral votes and clinch the election with Abrams' Georgia (16) and Buttigieg's Indiana (11), where analysts blame backlash over Trump dropping Pence for a 9,900-vote Democratic margin. Trump, alleging widespread fraud, challenges Indiana result. Trump edges Buttigieg in Texas, but Democrats regain control of the Texas House, 76-74. Democrats hold the U.S. House and, in a surprise, gain three Senate seats, losing Alabama but winning Arizona, Colorado, Kansas and Maine. By winning the presidency, VP-elect Abrams gives Democrats control of 50-50 Senate.

DECEMBER: Recounts confirm Democrats' Indiana win, and the Electoral College confirms Buttigieg's election. He names Joe Biden as secretary of state, and, seeking bipartisan support, picks Utah Sen. Mitt Romney as secretary of defense. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi retires to become U.S. ambassador to the Vatican. Trump pardons himself, Mike Flynn, Paul Manafort and Roger Stone, but New York authorities say they'll press criminal proceedings against him in January. House Republicans call for impeachment inquiry into Buttigieg's ties to Ukraine.

Carl P. Leubsdorf is the former Washington bureau chief for the Dallas Morning News. He can be reached at carl.p.leubsdorf@gmail.com.

Read more:

National View Column: Watch for a Trump-Trump ticket and more in 2020 - Duluth News Tribune

Holcomb and cell phones: The inch that becomes a mile – Greenfield Daily Reporter

Leo Morris Submitted photo

Back in the dark ages when mandatory seat belt use was relatively new in Indiana, I had a colleague who liked to say that she never nagged people about buckling up when they were riding with her. In fact, she never mentioned it to her passengers.

Why? she was inevitably asked.

Natural selection was her answer.

I like to use that story as a good analogy for what I consider proper government. She gives people the information needed to make good choices, sometimes offers incentives for making good choices and can even provide the mechanisms to make good choices easier. But if people insist on making poor choices anyway, well, thats on them.

Of course, our government driver (to continue the analogy) seldom stops when she should. She employs various coercive tactics to get those passengers in line. (Yes, I am being deliberate in the choice of pronoun; were talking about the nanny state, after all.)

Such as, buckle up or this car isnt moving. Or, if you dont buckle up, I will harangue you mercilessly for the whole trip. Or, the penalty for not buckling up, payable at the end of the journey, will be a hefty fee that I will send collectors out to get from your childrens children into the 10th generation.

In my experience, people who advocate for government solutions, and even bigger and more expensive government when those solutions fail to materialize, seldom have to justify themselves. They are merely following the spirit of the age, no explanations required.

But those of us who advocate government restraint or, heaven forbid, limited government, are always put on the defensive. We are either insensitive to human misery to the point of heartlessness or hopelessly ignorant of the need for immediate action to avert imminent disaster.

In all the response I get to these columns (thank you very much), by far the most common form of criticism is from readers who misinterpret, either carelessly or deliberately, the libertarian thrust of my government critiques.

I always mean, in those pieces, the least government necessary, which, believe it or not, was a founding principle of this country. They always insist I really meant, no government at all, then proceed to deliver the Gotcha! they think I deserve.

What about the fire department when your house is burning down, they will ask, or the police department when youre robbed? What about that pothole you want filled in?

Arent those all socialism, you self-serving hypocrite?

Actually, no, theyre not. They are legitimate government functions.

My favorite Gotcha! showing up in my email with tiresome regularity is, So, I guess youve refused your Social Security payments, huh?

No, I have not. Had I the opportunity to opt out and use the money for my own retirement investments, I would have done so. But participation was mandatory. To whom am I trying to prove what if I dont take money out of the system I was forced to put money into?

The tenet of libertarianism people seem to have the most trouble grasping, though it really should be the easiest, is that government legitimately tries to keep us from hurting each other but risks overstepping its bounds when it tries to keep us from hurting ourselves. Autonomy should be sacred.

So, I find myself having to explain that, no, I do not object to Gov. Eric Holcombs proposal to ban Hoosier motorists from using their cellphones while driving unless theyre hands-free.

There are rules for the road that are open to challenge on libertarian grounds. There is no reason to require me to use seat belts when driving or wear a helmet when riding a motorcycle except to keep me from behaving stupidly.

But there are also rules that protect me from others stupid behavior, such as the one against driving while drunk.

Mandating hands-free-only cellphone use falls into the latter category. I am the one you might run into while youre fiddling with that stupid phone.

See? Simple.

Of course, there are a couple of potholes in the road an earnest libertarian should be aware of whenever he gives in and acknowledges that, yes, OK, fine, government should do this.

One is the maxim that by the time government acts, government action is usually beside the point. Most cellphones today have Bluetooth, and most new cars have systems that sync to it, so its likely the moment you get behind the wheel your phone automatically become hands-free.

The other is when government is given the legitimate inch, it will go the illegitimate mile. Setting reasonable speed limits is a legitimate function, but it requires local knowledge of local conditions. But few were shocked to see a national 55 mph limit that, for a time, was the most ignored law in America.

If Holcomb gets his way with cellphones, all sorts of distracted driving will be on the endangered list, everything from playing the radio to scarfing down those fries you got from the drive-thru. Then dont be surprised if there are hefty fines for talking to your in-car companions and there are calls for hands-free nose-picking.

Government will always always, always, always go too far.

I know you might not believe that. But the evidence is plentiful if you choose to ignore it, thats on you.

I respect your autonomy.

And, you know. Natural selection.

Leo Morris is as columnist for The Indiana Policy Review. Contact him at leoedits@yahoo.com or send comments to editorial@therepublic.com.

See the original post here:

Holcomb and cell phones: The inch that becomes a mile - Greenfield Daily Reporter

Are Conservatives Soul-Searching in the Wrong Places? – CNSNews.com

(Photo byThoas Samson/AFP via Getty Images)

A brutal business climate and societal breakdown have brought major changes to America. In response, many Americans, especially conservatives, are soul searching for something more compassionate for those left behind. Unfortunately, they are looking in the most unlikely places: business and government. They will likely be searching for a long time.

The controversy over this shift in mentality erupted with the publication of a Wall Street Journal advertisement in which major firms pledge a commitment to stakeholder capitalism, which holds businesses should be run having all society, not just shareholders, in mind. Sen. Marco Rubios (R-Fla.) stirred the pot with his recent speech at Catholic University, where he explored what he called common-good capitalism.

The thesis is that the modern American economy does not care for everyone. It falls short by concentrating only on return on investment to shareholders. Businesses need to think in terms of more general obligations to workers and communitystakeholders in the overall economy. Since business cannot provide for all social needs, state systems must also be put in place. The soul-searchers say it is time to admit that the federal government might indeed have a role in helping those left behind.

Challenging the Conservative Orthodoxy

Such thinking is especially hard for conservatives to accept. It challenges the reigning orthodoxy that has long held to low taxation, decreased federal spending, scrapping socialist government meddling and regulation, and free and fair markets as a means of providing for the common good. The movement maintains a Reaganesque distrust of government and a rightful distaste for its eternal programs. The libertarian right relegates the solving of most problems to markets.

However, there is no denying that something is missing from todays superficial and materialistic society. Countless people are suffering materially and especially spiritually, whether it be from anxiety, depression, opioids or family breakup. Society seems to have lost its soul. Hence, the searching.

As a result, many conservatives now question old assumptions about market reliability or the evils of government social largess. They are looking for new models for business and government to help find a soul for society that will help people cope. They assume these are the only two institutions from which all solutions flow.

The Limitations of Markets

These are strange places to look for solutions. Modern economy and government are sterile institutions built upon mechanical models and systems. To have recourse to them is to look for materialistic solutions for spiritual problems.

Modern capitalism, as it now operates, is not meant to be soulful. It is meant to produce material stufflots of stuff. It works like a machine producing efficiently, quickly and abundantly. Modern markets scour the globe looking to maximize efficiency and distribute risks. While such efforts do benefit society greatly, their primary purpose is directed toward trading, not giving.

Markets work in function of commutative justice. This form of justice requires a fair exchange of goods or services between contracting parties. It facilitates transactions by requiring, as nearly as may be, a near equal payment be rendered for the near equal value of a good or service.

Markets do not work in function of charity. Charity cannot govern economic transactions since, for an economy to function justly, each party must be strictly given its due. To insist that charity be made part of economic theory would put the charitable at a disadvantage and leave the marketplace in the hands of the hard-hearted or dishonest.

Thus, efforts to baptize modern capitalism by insisting upon integrating charity into its program will inevitably fail. Soul-searching conservatives might encourage entrepreneurs to practice charity in their dealings, as indeed many do. However, the cold mechanical processes of modern capitalism remain morally indifferent and soulless. They will not renew the face of the earth (Ps. 103:30), no matter how they are tweaked.

The Limitations of Big Government

The same comments can be made about modern government. If any institution can be called soulless, it is the anonymous, bureaucratic machinery of big government. Its bloated systems offer to be everything to everyone while suffering from a lack of the efficiency of business.

A government is supposed to be the political system and institutions by which the State is administered and regulated. It should be oriented toward the common good by providing a general framework by which society can prosper. It also is not directed toward giving but administering.

The sad reality is that modern government is usually big government. It does not provide for the common good but buries it under its massive structures.

Decades of social programs have proven that big government, like markets, is not meant to work in function of charity. Big government distributes its largess with cold indifference and sterile rules. Once entrenched, its self-perpetuating programs tend to prolong not diminish poverty at great cost to the nation.

Looking for Americas Lost Soul

Looking for Americas lost soul in business and government is not the right move. These institutions themselves are not bad, but they are directed to other purposes. The modern versions of these institutions are further handicapped by their cold mechanical structures and systems that can lead to abuse and frenetic intemperance.

Some conservatives have the idea that their message can be more palatable if it is dressed up with secularized systems of charity and government oversight. However, to replace one mechanical system with another does not address the soulless component that is missing.

That is not to say that these institutions cannot be instruments for a return to a more soulful America. Like all instruments, their use depends upon the motives of those using them. The human element is the most crucial part of their functioning.

A Needed Moral Regeneration

If America is to find its soul, a moral regeneration is needed that will address the causes of societys breakdown. It should not focus on symptoms. As it stands, everything is upside down.

Soul-searchers must seek out those institutions that are especially directed toward moral regeneration, not the mechanical workings of society. The God-given institutions of the family and the Catholic Church are two important natural regenerators that work in function of charity. They can transform society.

When all society is infused with family-like relationships and religious, moral observance, business and government can then play their essential role in fostering (not controlling) virtuous life in common.

However, such a message is not what people want to hear. It involves restraint, sacrifice, responsibility and accountability amid a culture that teaches the contrary. It is much easier to solve problems by creating stop-gap aid programs that never stop. Better to tweak the system than revamp fundamentals.

Only true Christian charity can overcome the selfish interests that cloud the soul-searching process. For charity is that supernatural virtue by which people love God above all things for His own sake, and their neighbors as themselves for the love of God.

The present soul-searching must either lead to God or end in failure.

John Horvat II is a scholar, researcher, educator, international speaker, and author of the book Return to Order: From a Frenzied Economy to an Organic Christian Society--Where We've Been, How We Go Here, and Where We Need to Go. He lives in Spring Grove, Pennsylvania, where he is the vice president of the American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property.

Follow this link:

Are Conservatives Soul-Searching in the Wrong Places? - CNSNews.com

The Buzz 12.26.19 – Monterey County Weekly

WHOS IN TOWN?

This week is a good time to visit the shoreline and scan the horizon for the spouts ofgray whalesmigrating southward from their feeding grounds in Alaska to the calving lagoons of Baja California. A few single sightings have been logged this month and more are expected through January. Last year the number of gray whale sightings among local whale watching boats jumped during Christmas week. According to theNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, pregnant females typically come through first. Adults can reach 46 feet in length and weigh up to 35 tons. Calves are about 17 feet long at birth, and by the time they reach Monterey Bay headed north in spring, theyre about 20 feet, according to the Monterey Bay Aquariums gray whales webpage. In total, gray whales travel approximately 10,000 miles each year.

Remember the days in which you had to be a registered Democratic to vote in a Democratic primary election or a Republican to vote in a Republican primary? Those days are over. In 1996, California voters opted to switch to a system of open primaries, but in 2000, Prop. 198 was overturned by theU.S. Supreme Court, which found the voting system violated the First Amendment right of freedom of association. The State Legislature came back with a modified system that took effect in 2001: A political party may choose to let no-party-preference voters (also known as independents) vote in their presidential primaries. For the March 3, 2020 election, NPP voters may request primary ballots from theDemocratic Party,Libertarian PartyandAmerican Independent Party. (Not on that list is theRepublican Party, in which PresidentDonald Trumpis seeking re-election.) In Monterey County, NPP voters outnumber Republicans, but not Democrats. TheMonterey County Elections Departmenthas sent out 36,442 cards to unaffiliated voters asking them if they want a partys primary ballot, and as of press time has received requests from only 2,217 voters.

The Weekly is powered by the generosity of readers like you, who support our mission to produce engaging, independent and in-depth journalism.

Show Your Support

Learn More

Golf can be intimidating for a first-timer. If a novice player would step onto the famedPebble Beach Golf Linksfor a round, he or she might give up the game for good or so saysBryon Bell, the president ofTGR Design. The golf course design firm headed byTiger Woodsis in the process of laying out a new par-3 short course on the site of the formerPeter Hay Golf Courseat Pebble Beach. Bell and his team plan a course that will be family-friendly, playable for young golfers the longest holes measuring just over 100 yards yet still offering a chance for veteran golfers to work on their short game. Its about bringing people together, Bell says. Thats our goal. TGR Design is early in the process (we have some hurdles, Bell adds) but looks to be on track for a fall 2020 grand opening, at which point even hackers can have a go at Pebble Beach.

Pacific Grove Unified School DistrictSuperintendentRalph Porrasbegan noticing a disturbing trend among suspensions coming across his desk this fall, he toldP.G. City Councilon Dec. 18. Over a 60-day period most were connected to tobacco vaping-related products. Ive been in education for 30 years and Ive seen a lot of trends, Porras says. This one is insidious and it worries me a lot. Despite widespread news stories about vaping-related illnesses and deaths, vaping is on the rise among students Porras says its true among all schools in Monterey County. (TheU.S. Centers for Disease Controlreports more than 2,500 hospitalizations and 54 deaths due to the illness.) Porras sent a letter to parents describing what vaping devices look like. We dont know where they are getting them and thats half the concern, he says.

Read more:

The Buzz 12.26.19 - Monterey County Weekly

Libertarianism.org | Exploring the theory and history of …

An exhaustive survey of the Presidents of the United States and everything they did wrong while in office.

Building Tomorrow explores how tech and innovation are transforming culture while creating a freer and more peaceful world.

Out now! Arnold Kling's new book offers a way to see through rhetorical blinders so that we can incorporate new perspectives in to our everyday lives.

columns

by David S. DAmato on Dec 20, 2019

Nowhere in the Constitution does it carve out a spot for secretivebureaucracies that never have to answer to the public.

columns

by Sanford Ikeda on Dec 18, 2019

There is a distinct difference between the cost of things and the price of things. Cost influences price through changes in supply.

columns

by Paul Meany on Dec 9, 2019

Huang Zongxiargued for a constitutional model of government designed to benefit all people, not just the ruling class, and which stressed the importance of respecting private property rights.

Featured Guide

Preble explains the need to question the assumptions that drive American foreign policy in the modern eraespecially the assumption that American politicians can and should forcibly remake the international order to suit their desires. He asks readers to consider whether America and the world would be safer and freer if U.S. foreign policy incorporated libertarian insights about the limitations of government power.

The rest is here:

Libertarianism.org | Exploring the theory and history of ...

Libertarian Party – Ballotpedia

The Libertarian Party is the third-largest political party in the United States after the Democratic and Republican parties. According to the Libertarian Party's website, "Libertarians strongly oppose any government interference into their personal, family, and business decisions."[1]

The Libertarian Party was formed in 1971 in Colorado Springs, Colorado, by David Nolan. The group held its first national convention in 1972. Since its inception, the Libertarian Party has supported and fielded Libertarian candidates in races across the United States. According to the party's website, Libertarians held 202 elective offices throughout the United States as of October 31, 2019.[2]

The Libertarian Party platform is a written document that outlines the party's policy priorities and positions on domestic and foreign affairs. The platform also describes the party's core concepts and beliefs.[3]

Click here to view the full text of the 2018 Libertarian Party platform.

The following tables display the national and regional leadership of the Libertarian Party:[4]

As of October 31, 2019, the following individuals served on the Libertarian National Committee:[5]

Regional representatives are members of the Libertarian National Committee and are elected according to the rules of their respective regions. As of October 31, 2019, the following individuals held regional representative positions with the Libertarian Party:[6][7]

The Libertarian Party supported 262 candidates for federal, state, and local-level offices across the country in the 2019 election cycle.[8]

The Libertarian Party supported 973 candidates for federal, state, and local-level offices across the country in the 2018 election cycle.[9]

The following is an abbreviated list of the party's 2018 U.S. Senate candidates:

The Libertarian Party supported 89 candidates for federal, state, and local-level offices across the country in the 2017 election cycle. [10] Of these candidates 19 were elected or re-elected to public office.[11]

In 2016, the Libertarian Party nominated Gary Johnson as the party's presidential nominee and William Weld as the vice presidential nominee. The party also supported a number of federal, state, and local candidates across the country. The following is an abbreviated list of the party's 2016 U.S. Senate candidates:[12]

The Libertarian Party supported 103 state and local-level candidates in elections across the country in 2015. Of these candidates, 24 Libertarians were elected or re-elected to public office.[13]

The 'Libertarian Party supported 756 congressional, state, and local-level candidates across the country during the 2014 election cycle. An additional 20 Libertarians ran as fusion candidates and appeared on the ballot under a different or multiple party labels. Of these candidates, 23 Libertarians were elected or re-elected to public office, including seven fusion candidates.[14][15]

The Libertarian Party supported 98 congressional, state, and local-level candidates in elections across the country in 2013. An additional six Libertarians ran as fusion candidates and appeared on the ballot under different or multiple party labels. Of these candidates, 16 Libertarians were elected or re-elected to public office, including two fusion candidates.[16]

In 2012, the Libertarian Party nominated Gary Johnson as the party's presidential nominee and Jim Gray as the vice presidential nominee. Johnson and Gray captured 1,275,804 votes in the general election, nearly 1 percent of total votes cast. Johnson's 2012 vote total ranked as the highest number of votes for a Libertarian presidential candidate in history and fell just short of 1960 Libertarian presidential candidate Ed Clark's record of 1.1 percent of total votes.[17][18]

The Libertarian Party also supported 567 congressional, state, and local-level candidates across the country. Of these candidates, 30 Libertarians were elected or re-elected to public office.[19][20]

The 2018 Liberatarian National Convention took place from June 30 to July 3, 2018, in New Orleans, Louisiana. At the convention, delegates are voting on amendments to the party's platform and rules and are electing the party's national leaders.[21]

The Libertarian Party's 2016 National Convention took place in Orlando, Florida, from May 27 to May 30, 2016. The party chose former Governor of New Mexico Gary Johnson and former Governor of Massachusetts William Weld as its presidential and vice presidential nominees, respectively.[22][12]

Day one of the Libertarian National Convention in Orlando, Florida, featured spirited debates on both party platform planks and between four candidates vying for the vice presidential nomination. There were just under 800 credentialed delegates in attendance with Libertarian National Chair Nick Sarwark presiding over the meetings.

Six candidates garnered enough tokens, another name for secret ballots, to be eligible for nomination by the delegation. Of those, five reached the vote threshold for participating in the debate, moderated by Larry Elder and televised on CSPAN. Gary Johnson, Daryl W. Perry, Austin Petersen, John McAfee, and Marc Allan Feldman took the stage to try to earn supporters for Sunday morning's election. Introduced and brought on stage one at a time, Johnson and Petersen received the most applause, though each had a significant amount of support.

Although it took nearly eight hours from the time the first ballots for president were distributed to state delegation chairs, the Libertarian Party ended up with the odds-on favorites Gary Johnson and William Weld winning the ticket as expected. A total of 997 credentialed delegates and alternates were on hand to cast their vote. The meeting was chaired by Nicholas Sarwark, who won re-election as National Chair later in the afternoon.

The link below is to the most recent stories in a Google news search for "Libertarian + Party"

Read this article:

Libertarian Party - Ballotpedia

Green Party, Libertarian Team Up To Fight New Election Rules – WCBS 880

NEW YORK (WCBS 880) There's an unlikely alliance between the Libertarian and the Green Parties in New York State, both fighting new rules they think might box them out of future elections.

It's not often you see leaders of the Libertarian Party and the Green Party sharing a podium, but thats exactly what happened recently, according to WCBS 880s Steve Burns.

The Libertarian Party is pleased to partner with the Green, said Libertarian Party of New York Chairman Jim Rosenbeck.

Rosenbeck says the new rules set up by the Public Campaign Financing Commission are insulting to New Yorkers.

We find it to be a shameless attempt to limit public debate, he said.

In order to have full ballot status parties need to receive at least 50,000 votes in governor's races.

The new rules raise that threshold to a 130,000 votes, or 2% of total turnout whichever is higher.

Those totals have to be attained every two years instead of every four.

Green Party of New York Co-Chairman Peter Lavenia says they'll likely be knocked off the ballot in the next two years over the changes.

Were looking at this as an assault on democracy, he said.

The two parties are filing a joint lawsuit against the commission.

State lawmakers could reconvene and change the rules, though that prospect is looking increasingly unlikely with a deadline at the end of this week.

The rest is here:

Green Party, Libertarian Team Up To Fight New Election Rules - WCBS 880

The government must make sure technology serves public interest. The alternative is a libertarian free-for-all – The Guardian

Falling levels of trust in our public institutions have become the backing track for the demise of the progressive political project and the rise of populist strongmen who promise to take back control.

Government becomes a problem to be solved, a bubble, a swamp of compromised technocrats and bean-counters operating against the interests of hard-working common folk, the quiet Australians whose will for a simple life is constantly being frustrated.

One of the drivers of this collapse has been the impact of technological change on our body politic, the anger-driven echo chambers of social media, the fake news and disinformation, the increasingly sophisticated targeting designed to reinforce what we already think.

Numerous benchmark surveys, including Essentials own, document this decline, which tracks closely the destruction in traditional media models at the expense of these platforms.

But as two reports released in the past week show, when it comes to thinking through the impacts of technology on the future, government leadership is more important than ever.

The first, the governments response to the Australian Competition and Consumer Commissions digital platforms review, is to the point.

On one level the report, initiated as part of the deal to water down the media ownership laws that saw the Nine takeover of Fairfax, is an attempt by media giants to restore the natural order.

But somewhere along the way the ACCC inquiry became more than that. Someone inside the agency seriously put their minds around the existential challenges of Facebook and Google, setting out a detailed framework that would have ended the conceit the social networks did not carry responsibility as publishers.

While limited in scope to exploring the market dominance of the platforms as opposed to the broader social consequences of technological change, the inquiry positioned Australia as a world leader in grappling with the market power of big tech.

The governments response this week may fall short of realising the ACCCs ambition of enforceable standards, opting instead for the sort of voluntary codes that any industry lobbyist yearns, but the intent from the prime minister in launching the report is clear: The rules that exist in the real world need to exist in the digital world.

You can quibble with the ambition, and we have, but when a conservative government invests behind the ACCC to build its capacity to monitor the market operations of the platforms and get to the bottom of their algorithmic marketing model, something interesting is going on.

The second report is, if anything, even more ambitious in its vision of governments need to lead us through profound technological change. The Human Rights Commission discussion paper into AI technology calls for the establishment of rules around the way automated decisions and data-matching develop in Australia.

The report calls for all AI to be subject to scrutiny around its design and impact on users before it is unleashed on to the public, ensuring it complies with existing laws covering both direct and indirect discrimination.

Commissioner Ed Santow argues that human accountability cannot be automated and that facial recognition technology in particular needs to be tested and thought through before it is unleashed on the Australian public. And that this should be the role of a new government body, the AI Safety Commissioner.

In doing so, Santow is challenging some basic tenets of the information economy: that its OK to disrupt, move fast and break things; that the benefits of tech advancement outweigh its cost; and that the role of government is to adapt to change rather than step up and shape it.

Research that Essential has conducted around this report shows Australians are looking for government leadership on the issue, with the majority of the public concerned about the automating of decisions.

Santow argues that placing guardrails around how Australia develops AI will ultimately serve the national interest not just protecting citizens but also developing a uniquely Australian AI that is fair by design and can become a compelling global export.

But to get to that point, government needs to lead: not just being more assertive in taking on the recommendations of its expert bodies, but in the way it too uses its citizens information.

In an era of declining trust in government, it is hardly surprising that the My Health Record program has stalled, with millions of Australians not prepared to share their medical records, especially under a model where entrepreneurs would have been encouraged to access this data to innovate.

More profoundly, the failure of robodebt has reinforced every latent instinct that government is not to be trusted with sensitive information. That the first big government data-matching project was used to chase poor people deemed to have been overpaid says it all.

Imagine the difference in trust dividend if the first application had been to find people who had not claimed benefits they were entitled to and send them a cheque to make good; or to chase down unpaid super; or ensure workers were being paid the right amount of money.

The challenges of rapid technological change provide an opportunity for government to win back public trust, by setting rules that ensure technology serves the public interest and by being a best-practice custodian of our personal information.

As a social democrat thats what I want my government to be doing, regardless of its partisan colours. The alternative is a libertarian free-for-all that will only ensure the disruption, division, distraction and displacement of the times accelerates unabated.

Peter Lewis is executive director of Essential Media and the director of the Centre for Responsible Technology, a new initiative of the Australia Institute.

View original post here:

The government must make sure technology serves public interest. The alternative is a libertarian free-for-all - The Guardian

Here’s what’s on the March 2020 ballot in Stark County – Canton Repository

Heres who met Wednesdays filing deadline.

CANDIDATES

* incumbent

Congressman - 7th Congressional District

Democrat

Patrick Pikus

Libertarian

Brandon Lape

Republican

Bob Gibbs*

Congressman - 13th Congressional District

Democrat

Tim Ryan*

Libertarian

Michael Fricke

Republican

Christina M. Hagan

Duane Hennen

Louis G. Lyras

Richard A. Morckel

Jason Mormando

Robert J. Santos

Donald Truex

Congressman - 16th Congressional District

Democrat

Aaron Paul Godfrey

Ronald Karpus III

Republican

Anthony Gonzalez*

State Representative - 38th Ohio House District

Democrat

Joe Campbell

Republican

Bill Roemer*

Republican

State Representative - 48th Ohio House District

Republican

Scott Oelslager*

State Representative - 49th Ohio House District

Democrat

Thomas E. West*

Republican

James Haavisto

State Representative - 50th Ohio House District

Democrat

Brian K. Simeone

Republican

Reggie Stoltzfus*

Stark County Court of Common Pleas judge, term starting Jan. 1, 2021

Republican

Kristin G. Farmer*

Stark County Court of Common Pleas judge, term starting Jan. 4, 2021

Democrat

Frank G. Forchione*

Stark County Court of Common Pleas judge, term starting Feb. 9, 2021

Democrat

Taryn L. Heath*

Stark County Probate Court judge

Democrat

Angela Alexander

Republican

Dixie Park*

Ohio 5th District Court of Appeals judge, term starting Feb. 9, 2021

Democrat

William B. Hoffman*

Republican

Jeff Furr

Stark County Clerk of Courts

Democrat

Louis P. Giavasis*

Republican

Lynn Miller Todaro

Stark County Coroner

Democrat

Anthony P. Bertin*

Republican

Ronald R. Rusnak

Stark County commissioner, term starting Jan. 2, 2021

Democrat

Katherine Baylock

Republican

Bill Smith*

Stark County commissioner, term starting Jan. 3, 2021

Republican

Richard Regula*

Stark County Engineer

Democrat

Keith A. Bennett*

Stark County Recorder

Democrat

Rick Campbell*

Republican

Jamie Walters

Stark County Prosecutor

Democrat

John D. Ferrero*

Republican

Kyle L. Stone

Stark County Sheriff

Democrat

View original post here:

Here's what's on the March 2020 ballot in Stark County - Canton Repository

How CBD Gummies Gray Areas Should Be Handled – The Libertarian Republic

You may love your CBD gummies from Verma Farms, but most of the CBD products you enjoy sit in a gray legal area. The laws are complicated and confusing, and the history is even more complicated and confusing. With the rising popularity of CBD gummies, and hundreds if not thousands of brands cashing in, the government has taken a very relaxed attitude toward the gray areas, as will likely continue until the full lift on prohibition of cannabis finally happens.

Hemp and its products were made illegal outside of medical use with the Marijuana Tax Act of 1937. It became prohibitively expensive and difficult to grow, harvest, or use any part of any hemp plant. At this time, all hemp plants were seen to be in the same category of marijuana plants, and there was little known about the difference between the types of hemp.

The Controlled Substance Act of 1970 made all use of marijuana completely illegal, and put it on the list of Schedule I Controlled Substances. Types of hemp were still undifferentiated, and all hemp plants were illegal to cultivate. The term, The War on Drugs, was coined by Richard Nixon in a press conference in 1971, and since then, the Federal Government has taken a hard-line stance on all things related to cannabis.

In 1996, California legalized marijuana for medical use. In 1998, Alaska, Oregon, and Washington followed suit. Over the next decade, states began to recognize the medical benefits of cannabis products. They all set up their own laws regulating the use, in defiance of the Federal Government, which still classified hemp and hemp products as a Schedule I controlled substance (this category is reserved for substances that have no medical value, come with significant health risks, and are highly addictive).

More and more states began decriminalizing marijuana. Prohibition had not been completely lifted in these states, but penalties were not as strict as they were before. States recognized the financial and social benefits of not imprisoning everyone who got caught with a small amount of the green stuff for their own personal use.

By 2012, Colorado and Washington voted to legalize the recreational use of marijuana for adults, with actual legal sales beginning in Colorado in 2014. They have seen major financial gains ever since, and Colorado reached $1 billion in tax revenue in just over four years. Crime rates have not been affected, as the bills opposers originally feared, and the benefits have far outweighed the cost.

As of 2019, 11 states have legalized the use of recreational marijuana for adults over 21. Medical use of marijuana is legal in 33 states. A total of 44 states are in direct defiance of federal law, but the Federal Government has decided not to pursue action.

Hemp has been a source of food, textiles, and building materials, for thousands of years. Historical references note its use in Ancient China and Rome as medicine. Early American settlers used hemp to make ropes, oil, and clothing. Even Henry Fords original Model T prototype was fueled by hemp.

The Marijuana Tax Act was likely a matter of corporate competition, and it became illegal in the US to use hemp for anything. What was once an important crop that nearly everyone grew and cultivated, became outlawed. By the 1970s, there was no distinctinction between the stuff people used for food, medicine, and fuel, and the stuff people used to get high.

With global warming becoming more of a reality every day, and solutions to the problems that come with this crisis few and far between, the interest in hemp is growing once again. Hemp is a crop that is easy on the earth. It acts as a biofilter that can clean the soil and the air in its surrounding environment. It is easy to grow, and is one of the most beneficial crops in existence.

Hemp is an excellent source of food, containing essential amino and fatty acids, it can be used to make almost any product that we use petroleum to make now, and it is an efficient source of energy storage. Food shortages, the non-renewable energy crisis, and rising medical costs, can all be mitigated with the hemp plant.

In 2014, the distinction was made between the marijuana plant and industrial hemp. Industrial hemp contains less than 0.3% THC, and cannot get anyone high. A bill passed through the Senate, allowing research to take place on industrial hemp under very restrictive circumstances.

Hemp farming became an important part of Kentuckys economy again, and in 2018, Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell slipped an expansion of the legalization of farming industrial hemp into the Farm Bill.

This means that it is now legal to farm and cultivate industrial hemp, and manufacture hemp products. For certain farmers. Under certain circumstances. With special licensing. And under strict supervision. All CBD produced must be under the guidelines of the Farm Bill of 2018, and the USDA is now in charge of overseeing all regulatory processes related to the plant.

It took more than sixty years, and direct defiance from 44 states, to even begin to clarify key differences between marijuana and hemp. These clarifications have led to a few more gray areas. Now that the USDA is in charge of regulating the farming of hemp, the FDA needs to bring its policies into alignment. Which will likely take quite a bit of time.

As of right now, the FDA is in charge of regulating interstate commerce related to any CBD product marketed as a medicine, supplement, food, or cosmetic. It has determined that CBD cannot be added to food, and it recently released a statement indicating that it will pursue legislation against any company purporting CBD to treat, mitigate, or diagnose serious illnesses like diabetes, cancer, and Alzheimers.

Where does this leave CBD gummies? It seems as though they fit directly in the gray area. Which seems to be where most CBD products fit. 92% of cannabis businesses operate in the gray area. Only 4% are fully legal, and 4% are clearly violating the law.

Brands selling CBD gummies are in the gray area, but there are thousands of brands in it together. While the amazing health benefits of CBD gummies are apparent, it will likely be several years before they can be marketed as a supplement, or to treat medical symptoms. In the meantime, the best thing CBD companies can do, is use their blogs to educate people and point them in the direction of the research that backs their claims.

CBD gummy brands take heart! Legislation is moving fast, and changing in favor of the hemp industry every day.

See original here:

How CBD Gummies Gray Areas Should Be Handled - The Libertarian Republic

Tulsi Gabbard Beamed in to Her Debate Night Alternative Event – The Daily Beast

MANCHESTER, N.H.Tulsi Gabbard wasnt present.

Not physically, at least. But in the small, half-filled Rex Theatre in downtown Manchester, it didnt seem to matter. While seven of her top Democratic rivals prepared to hit the stage in Los Angeles for the sixth primary debate, a group of Gabbards most ardent loyalists were glued to a large-screen projector, where a livestream of Gabbards face, fixed between panels of tulle wrapped in twinkling lights, beamed in from Washington, D.C.

I really wish I could be there to hug you, she said, to no one in particular.

Citing a conflicting House vote in Congress, the Hawaii Democrat wasnt in Manchester for her campaigns much-hyped party alternative to Thursday nights debate, for which she failed to qualify. The party, and the debate, came the day after Gabbard had set Washington ablaze by voting present on the two articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, which occurred for only the third time in the countrys history.

Aides to Democratic presidential candidates often say the topic of impeachment rarely comes up on the campaign trail. Voters, the thinking goes, prefer asking about kitchen table issues, like jobs. But here, it was the first question.

My decision to vote present was a decision to actively protest this zero-sum mentality that rules over our politics today, the four-term congresswoman told a skeptical attendee of her vote on the second article of impeachment, obstruction of Congress.

On top of being a self-proclaimed act of protest, Gabbard explained, to delayed applause, her present proclamation was an attempt to stand for our people, our county, and our future.

Were going to continue to see this spiraling downward, she said.

During the two-hour event, Gabbards fiercest fans praised her dovish foreign and liberal domestic policy, a hallmark of her nearly year-long campaign, and asked whether she would ever ditch the Democratic Party, with which she frequently clashes. No, she strongly implied, brushing off naysayers who speculate she may launch a third-party bid, an idea that she has routinely shot down.

Still, at multiple points in the night, she praised nearly every other conceivable party, in addition to her own.

I appreciate the voice the Libertarian Party brings to this conversation, Gabbard said. It is necessary.

Richard Manzo, the vice chair of the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire, was in attendance, and had mixed reactions about Gabbards impeachment move.

I wish she would have taken a stance one way or another, Manzo told The Daily Beast. But it wasnt enough to change his likely primary vote on Feb. 11. Im leaning towards voting for her, he said.

Mark Colvin, one of Gabbards most passionate supporters who drove from Boston to see her video conference through the projector, had no such reservations. Shes the only one who got it right, he said about her stance. Shes a patriot.

Gabbard has made New Hampshire a top campaign priority in recent weeks, and there are early signs her work is resonating with segments of the electorate, particularly independent voters. As The Daily Beast recently reported, pollsters argue there is evidence to believe Gabbard is already poking holes at the independent bloc that helped sweep Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) to victory here in 2016. In a Suffolk University survey conducted in November, Gabbard receives five times as much support among independents as she does among Democrats.

But Thursday nights set up hardly seemed poll-tested. In fact, the lines between substance and style frequently blurred, with campaign aides moonlighting as singers and poets, and a professional Trump impersonator taking cracks at the commander in chief.

At times, the vibe felt like multiple genres of YouTube were merging on loop: Gabbards sister Vrindavan, also known as V, performed a virtual hula dance, while Gabbard and her husband Abraham Williams reminisced about when they were first dating.

Looking forward to hearing your song later! Gabbard told a volunteer, one of several she publicly acknowledged from a lengthy roster. At one point, a guitarist with long curly blonde hair wearing a pink lei serenaded audience members.

Tul-seeeeee, Tulsi 2020, he sang to attendees, who clapped along enthusiastically. Everyone! Were backing Tulsiiiiii, shes the onlyyyyy choice.

If youre not sure if youre on keyI would say sing louder! Gabbards Deputy Campaign Manager Caitlin Rose Pomerantz instructed the crowd.

Shortly after, lyrics titled, We, The People appeared on the screen, replacing Gabbard. After that, her aide recited a poem with the identical name.

When we get bitter, thats when they win, Rose Pomerantz said. We are the people who are still alive inside.

Read this article:

Tulsi Gabbard Beamed in to Her Debate Night Alternative Event - The Daily Beast

Useful Tips for Writing an Application in College – The Libertarian Republic

You need to write and submit a personal statement as an application if you want to get admission into selective colleges. These college application essays carry a lot of importance. Hence, you should be very serious when writing them. Selective colleges get applications from many bright students who have good grades and scores. They cannot admit all the students that apply. Thus, you have to convince them why they should admit you to their school. The tips in this article will guide you into writing a winning application.

Try as much as you can to avoid repeating yourself in an application essay. Being repetitive does not add any value to your application. Do not waste space and time doing that. Use that space to highlight strengths that will help you stand out from the rest of the applicants. Make sure that whatever you write in your personal statement or application essay does not oppose any other parts of your application. Do not list all your grades and test scores in your application. Be precise and straight to the point when writing to selective colleges.

People write essays to convey a message. People will read and understand the message you are trying to convey if you use the right language. Writing a lot of big words does not help your essay. In fact, it may end up having a negative effect on the whole topic. If you do not understand the meaning of any word, do not use it. If it is a must you use the word, use the dictionary to find out the meaning of the word. Use tools like a thesaurus and check the meaning of the word.

The tone of the words you choose is important too. The words should connect with the audience you are targeting. Do not use words whose tone will make your readers lose interest in the essay. If you want help with your paper, writing services are there to serve you. Contact them and let the best custom writing service write the best essay special for you using the right English vocabulary.

Never be in a rush to answer questions. You may end up giving the wrong answers that will make the admission officers decline your application. Do not give wrong answers to any questions. Take your time, read and understand the questions before you give an answer. If there is any part that you do not understand, ask for assistance from your teachers or friends. Avoid recycling answers even if the question is similar to a question in other applications.

One of the biggest mistakes that people make when writing an essay is that they start with general quotes. In most cases, these quotes are not relevant and appropriate to the topic. To write a successful essay, you need to be specific in your writing. Take time and know which audience you are targeting with your essay. From there, tailor your essay to target this audience. You are always free to find help with your essay. Essay Kitchen writing service will write a perfect paper special for your audience. Contact them and let them take the essay writing task of your hands.

Ask for help from your friends and family when writing the college application. They are the people who know you well. Ask them to read through your essay and edit it. A different set of eyes will help you to rectify any mistakes in the essay. Mates will help to point out the mistakes that you have made in your essay. They can also give you suggestions on how to write a college essay.

Before you start writing the main essay, come up with a couple of drafts that you can read and revise. Read each of the drafts aloud to yourself and see if it makes sense to you. Ask yourself if the essay is interesting and captivating? Is the essay flowing? Try to put yourself in the shoes of the admission personnel and try to see if the essay is convincing. Look for college essay examples from other students. Read through them and see how other students write their applications.

People love reading good stories. Therefore, try to captivate the imagination of the reader by telling a good narrative. Let the story you tell make the reader create a picture of you in their minds. Be creative and tell a story that will stand out from the rest of the applicants.

To get into college, you will have to write a personal statement or an application essay. You do not have to worry about how to write a college essay anymore. Follow the tips in this article and they will assist you to write a winning paper. If you are having trouble with your essay, you can always buy one online.

See the rest here:

Useful Tips for Writing an Application in College - The Libertarian Republic

Here’s what’s on the March 2020 ballot in Stark County – Massillon Independent

Heres who met Wednesdays filing deadline.

CANDIDATES

* incumbent

Congressman - 7th Congressional District

Democrat

Patrick Pikus

Libertarian

Brandon Lape

Republican

Bob Gibbs*

Congressman - 13th Congressional District

Democrat

Tim Ryan*

Libertarian

Michael Fricke

Republican

Christina M. Hagan

Duane Hennen

Louis G. Lyras

Richard A. Morckel

Jason Mormando

Robert J. Santos

Donald Truex

Congressman - 16th Congressional District

Democrat

Aaron Paul Godfrey

Ronald Karpus III

Republican

Anthony Gonzalez*

State Representative - 38th Ohio House District

Democrat

Joe Campbell

Republican

Bill Roemer*

Republican

State Representative - 48th Ohio House District

Republican

Scott Oelslager*

State Representative - 49th Ohio House District

Democrat

Thomas E. West*

Republican

James Haavisto

State Representative - 50th Ohio House District

Democrat

Brian K. Simeone

Republican

Reggie Stoltzfus*

Stark County Court of Common Pleas judge, term starting Jan. 1, 2021

Republican

Kristin G. Farmer*

Stark County Court of Common Pleas judge, term starting Jan. 4, 2021

Democrat

Frank G. Forchione*

Stark County Court of Common Pleas judge, term starting Feb. 9, 2021

Democrat

Taryn L. Heath*

Stark County Probate Court judge

Democrat

Angela Alexander

Republican

Dixie Park*

Ohio 5th District Court of Appeals judge, term starting Feb. 9, 2021

Democrat

William B. Hoffman*

Republican

Jeff Furr

Stark County Clerk of Courts

Democrat

Louis P. Giavasis*

Republican

Lynn Miller Todaro

Stark County Coroner

Democrat

Anthony P. Bertin*

Republican

Ronald R. Rusnak

Stark County commissioner, term starting Jan. 2, 2021

Democrat

Katherine Baylock

Republican

Bill Smith*

Stark County commissioner, term starting Jan. 3, 2021

Republican

Richard Regula*

Stark County Engineer

Democrat

Keith A. Bennett*

Stark County Recorder

Democrat

Rick Campbell*

Republican

Jamie Walters

Stark County Prosecutor

Democrat

John D. Ferrero*

Republican

Kyle L. Stone

Stark County Sheriff

Democrat

See the rest here:

Here's what's on the March 2020 ballot in Stark County - Massillon Independent

Amash says it’s Congress’s duty to impeach Trump | TheHill – The Hill

Rep. Justin AmashJustin AmashThe Hill's Morning Report - Busy week: Impeachment, Dem debate and USMCA First-term Democrats push Amash as impeachment manager: report The 'Green' new deal that Tom Perez needs to make MORE (I-Mich.), who left the Republican partyover thesummer, reiterated his support for articles of impeachment during debate on the House floor shortly before the historic vote took place.

"I rise today in support of these articles of impeachment. I come to this floor not as a Democrat, not as a Republican but as an American who cares deeply about the Constitution, the rule of law and the rights of the people under our system of government," he said in his speech.

"Impeachment is not about policy disagreements or ineffective governance, nor is it about criminality based on statutes that did not exist at the time our Constitution was written. Impeachment is about maintaining the integrity of the office of the presidency and ensuring that executive power is directed toward proper ends in accordance with the law," he added.

Amash went on to say he believed it is lawmakers' "duty" to impeach President TrumpDonald John TrumpWhite House counsel didn't take lead on Trump letter to Pelosi: reports Trump endorses Riggleman in Virginia House race Lisa Page responds to 'vile' Trump attacks: 'Being quiet isn't making this go away' MORE, arguingheviolated the public's trust with his dealings with Ukraine andmisusedhis power for personal gain.

President Donald J. Trump has abused and violated the public trust by using his high office to solicit the aid of a foreign power, not for the benefit of the United States of America but instead for his personal and political gain, he continued.

His actions reflect precisely the type of conduct the Framers of the Constitution intended to remedy through the power of impeachment, and it is our duty to impeach him.

The Libertarian-leaning Michigan congressman has long been a vocal critic of Trump. He announced he was leaving the GOP in a July 4 op-ed in The Washington Post,saying was "disenchanted with party politics" and believed the president demonstrated impeachable behaviorbased on former special counsel Robert MuellerRobert (Bob) Swan MuellerSchiff: Trump acquittal in Senate trial would not signal a 'failure' Jeffries blasts Trump for attack on Thunberg at impeachment hearing Live coverage: House Judiciary to vote on impeachment after surprise delay MORE's report. The move sparked strong backlash from members of his former party.

The House is expected to pass two articles of impeachment one charging the president with abuse of power and a second pertaining to obstruction of Congress largely along party lines on Wednesday evening.

Read more:

Amash says it's Congress's duty to impeach Trump | TheHill - The Hill

Holcomb and cell phones: The inch that becomes a mile – Journal Review

Back in the dark ages when mandatory seat belt use was relatively new in Indiana, I had a colleague who liked to say that she never nagged people about buckling up when they were riding with her. In fact, she never mentioned it to her passengers.

Why? she was inevitably asked.

Natural selection was her answer.

I like to use that story as a good analogy for what I consider proper government. She gives people the information needed to make good choices, sometimes offers incentives for making good choices and can even provide the mechanisms to make good choices easier. But if people insist on making poor choices anyway, well, thats on them.

Of course, our government driver (to continue the analogy) seldom stops when she should. She employs various coercive tactics to get those passengers in line. (Yes, I am being deliberate in the choice of pronoun; were talking about the nanny state, after all.)

Such as, buckle up or this car isnt moving. Or, if you dont buckle up, I will harangue you mercilessly for the whole trip. Or, the penalty for not buckling up, payable at the end of the journey, will be a hefty fee that I will send collectors out to get from your childrens children into the 10th generation.

In my experience, people who advocate for government solutions, and even bigger and more expensive government when those solutions fail to materialize, seldom have to justify themselves. They are merely following the spirit of the age, no explanations required.

But those of us who advocate government restraint or, heaven forbid, limited government, are always put on the defensive. We are either insensitive to human misery to the point of heartlessness or hopelessly ignorant of the need for immediate action to avert imminent disaster.

In all the response I get to these columns (thank you very much), by far the most common form of criticism is from readers who misinterpret, either carelessly or deliberately, the libertarian thrust of my government critiques.

I always mean, in those pieces, the least government necessary, which, believe it or not, was a founding principle of this country. They always insist I really meant, no government at all, then proceed to deliver the Gotcha! they think I deserve.

What about the fire department when your house is burning down, they will ask, or the police department when youre robbed? What about that pothole you want filled in?

Arent those all socialism, you self-serving hypocrite?

Actually, no, theyre not. They are legitimate government functions.

My favorite Gotcha! showing up in my email with tiresome regularity is, So, I guess youve refused your Social Security payments, huh?

No, I have not. Had I the opportunity to opt out and use the money for my own retirement investments, I would have done so. But participation was mandatory. To whom am I trying to prove what if I dont take money out of the system I was forced to put money into?

The tenet of libertarianism people seem to have the most trouble grasping, though itreally should be the easiest, is that government legitimately tries to keep us from hurting each other but risks overstepping its bounds when it tries to keep us from hurtingourselves. Autonomy should be sacred.

So, I find myself having to explain that, no, I do not object to Gov. Eric Holcombs proposal to ban Hoosier motorists from using their cell phones while driving unlesstheyre hands-free.

There are rules for the road that are open to challenge on libertarian grounds. There is no reason to require me to use seat belts when driving or wear a helmet when riding a motorcycle except to keep me from behaving stupidly.

But there are also rules that protect me from others stupid behavior, such as the one against driving while drunk.

Mandating hands-free-only cell phone use falls into the latter category. I am the one you might run into while youre fiddling with that stupid phone.

See? Simple.

Of course, there are a couple of potholes in the road an earnest libertarian should be aware of whenever he gives in and acknowledges that, yes, OK, fine, government should do this.

One is the maxim that by the time government acts, government action is usually beside the point. Most cellphones today have Bluetooth, and most new cars have systems that sync to it, so its likely that the moment you get behind the wheel your phone automatically become hands-free.

The other is that when government is given the legitimate inch, it will go the illegitimate mile. Setting reasonable speed limits is a legitimate function, but it requires local knowledge of local conditions. But few were shocked to see a national 55 mph limit that, for a time, was the most ignored law in America.

If Holcomb gets his way with cellphones, all sorts of distracted driving will be on the endangered list, everything from playing the radio to scarfing down those fries you got from the drive-through. Then dont be surprised if there are hefty fines for talking to your in-car companions and there are calls for hands-free nose-picking.

Government will always always, always, always go too far.

I know you might not believe that. But the evidence is plentiful if you choose to ignore it, thats on you.

I respect your autonomy.

And, you know. Natural selection.

Leo Morris, columnist for The Indiana Policy Review, is winner of the Hoosier Press Associations award for Best Editorial Writer. Morris, as opinion editor of the Fort Wayne News-Sentinel, was named a finalist in editorial writing by the Pulitzer Prize committee. Contact him at leoedits@yahoo.com.

See the original post:

Holcomb and cell phones: The inch that becomes a mile - Journal Review

What types of radios are there? – The Libertarian Republic

Radio: A name that almost we all have heard in our childhood, recently and will listen to it in the future also. Some technologies never get older and Radio is for sure one of them. Being developed in the 20th century, Radio is one of the oldest modes of communication that brings up the feeling of freshness whenever we listen to it. While going through the different landscapes of innovations, this part of technology has changed a lot yet. Woking of radio is quite simple. It just works by transmitting and receiving signals where part of speech and music are being delivered in the coded format.

Ture taste lies in the variety and that this wonderful platform also offers to its listeners. Ranging from serving those old melody songs to todays top numbers from providing information about agricultural tips to introducing you with the latest technologies, there is a huge variety of options that you can easily find out here. Users can easily enjoy 24 hours of streaming here without paying any charges or data packages here. Just get a radio and stay connected with your favourite channel, thats the only rule you have to follow here.

Explore the various types of radios

Right from the launch of radio in the 20s to date, a variety of radio options from various brands are being introduced into the market. Do you know how many kinds of radios are there being available in the market? The options are huge. Ranging from Conventional FM to the latest NXDN there are so many options being present there and if we start on counting the number of brands offering radio services, the list even gets increases more. Searching out one of the best table radios for your home has become quite easier now. You not only ask your buddies or family members for the same but go through various online options and can check out the reviews of your preferred ones as well.

If you are willing to get the best table radio for your home, it would be quite beneficial for you to know about the different types of radio you have in the market. Here are the top listed for you.

Utilization of radios

AM and FM is one of the oldest forms of wireless broadcasting that works on the process of modulation and demodulation throughout. This kind of radio option is quite good to provide fair sound quality but it is vulnerable to electrical noise also.

Shortwave radio works just above the AM radio frequency bands. The frequencies of this kind of radio somewhere lie in between 1.7 to 30 MHz. If you are looking for collecting news, commercial broadcasting, informative channels and sports channels globally, it is surely a great option you can try on.

Satellite radio is based on one of the latest broadcasting techniques where radio signals are being transmitted and received using satellites. The radio option does not include any kind of digital encoding. Users are not allowed to directly get tuned into any channels here. They have to pay what they are willing to get a subscription to. One of the best things about satellite radio is that it offers you amazing sound quality and nationwide coverage to enjoy on.

Ham Radio is a kind of radio option that provides broadcasting into a restricted area and to the set frequencies only. It is a great platform for all those who are willing to improve their operator skills. Moreover, this kind of radio option serves as a great help in case of natural calamities or emergencies.

Walkie-Talkie is one of the most favoured portable and handheld radio options that sends and receives signals in about a distance of a mile. This kind of radio option is usually being used by two persons to communicate with each other. Walkie-Talkie serves as a great help where the phone call services or net services are quite poor.

Read the rest here:

What types of radios are there? - The Libertarian Republic