Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao Says Bitcoin ‘Has Been Really… – Coinspeaker

Despite BTC price moving between $9,000 and $9,500 recently, the CEO of Binance said Bitcoin is stable and the traditional market has a drag down effect on it.

Changpeng Zhao (CZ), CEO and founder of Binance, commented on the Bitcoin price movement in an interview with Bloomberg Daybreak: Asia. Recently, the price of Bitcoin has not been increasing like investors expected as the coin has been trading at less than $10,000 for a while. In the past month, the price has been between $8,975.53 and $9,680.37. Regardless, CEO Zhao said that the coin is really stable now.

He stated:

I think sooner or later its going to break out. But right now, Bitcoin has been really stable. People have been calling it a stablecoin now.

Many investors see Bitcoin as a safe-haven asset for when traditional markets plunge. However, the Binance CEO has revealed that the traditional market has a drag down effect on Bitcoin.

The stock market is probably a thousand times bigger than the crypto market. When that goes down, and a lot of people are losing a lot of money, many of those people who have crypto investments will want to convert those investments into cashthe safe haven properties of Bitcoin will come through over time.

For a long time, there have been several unmet predictions about the price of Bitcoin. Earlier in 2017, John McAfee, founder of McAfee software,said in a tweetthat he would eat his own dick if Bitcoin hits 500k $ within 3 years. However, Bitcoin has not been close to McAfees prediction of $500,000 in the last three years.

Despite therecent Twitter hack to promote a Bitcoin scam, Bitcoin did not rise above $9,500. On a possible price catalyst for the king coin, Zhao says hes unsure what could drive Bitcoin to $10,000.

Reacting to the Twitter hack, Zhao said it was net positive for the cryptocurrency. The CEO believes that Bitcoin gained more recognition because many verified accounts posted and commented about the coin.

According to Zhao, most platforms do not have effective security measures. He referred to Google as probably the strongest in terms of account security. Headded:

Most platforms today arent equipped to deal with crypto securely. Twitter is targeted first because it has a more active crypto community. There are plenty of scams wanting crypto on other platforms. YouTube/Google Ads, Facebook, etc.

The recent Twitter hack to run Bitcoin giveaways is not the first online crypto scam in 2020. In January, Czech Youtuber Adam Jichatweetedabout a hack on his gaming channel, with his name changed to Changpeng Zhao. The hacker then ran a livestream called BINANCELIVE: interview with Binance CEO, Announce BTC Giveaway. After three days, the YouTubertweetedagain, calling the attention of the online video-sharing platform.

Also, in April, RippleaccusedYouTube of profiting from an XRP giveaway on the platform by aiding and abetting the scammers. Brad Garlinghouse, the CEO of Ripple, said:

YouTubes inertia is indicative of an industry-wide problem of lack of accountability. Victims are forced to jump through hoops to report these scams, and oftentimes, that doesnt even work.

Read crypto news daily on Coinspeaker.

Tolu is a cryptocurrency and blockchain enthusiast based in Lagos. He likes to demystify crypto stories to the bare basics so that anyone anywhere can understand without too much background knowledge.When he's not neck-deep in crypto stories, Tolu enjoys music, loves to sing and is an avid movie lover.

You have successfully joined our subscriber list.

Follow this link:

Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao Says Bitcoin 'Has Been Really... - Coinspeaker

Bitcoin hasn’t hit $500K, so now John McAfee has to eat his own…well, just click – Mashable

2020 sure does suck so far. But the year might not yet be a complete wash.

John McAfee still has to eat his dick on live television.

Three years ago on this date, on July 17, 2017, McAfee, the eccentric founder of the antivirus software company bearing his name, made the bet of a lifetime.

McAfee made a bet that in three years a single bitcoin (1 BTC) would be worth $500,000.

Now while most people would throw down money to make this bet, McAfee had a very different idea.

In a reply to Twitter user @DogMagUra, who was simply double-checking McAfees claim that 1 BTC would be worth $500,000 in three years, the unconventional software millionaire and former "person of interest" in a murder investigation responded:

If not, I will eat my dick on national television.

McAfee probably thought it was a winning bet at the time. The cryptocurrency news on July 17, 2017 wasnt great Bitcoin had just fallen below $2,000 after a big uptick but later that year it would hit its all-time high: $19,800.

Fast forward to July 17, 2020, three years from the day McAfee made his bet. Today, a bitcoin is worth around $9,150. Its certainly up from three years ago, sure. But were far away from $500,000. The world may be very different from the one we were living in three years ago, but a bet is a bet.

Many on Twitter reminded McAfee that it was time to make good on his bet.

McAfees response? He appears to be chickening out.

The former antivirus software mogul is now saying that we have the timeframe all wrong. Several months after his initial tweet, in November 2017, he tried to say that he meant the end of 2020.

But in July of 2017, McAfee agreed to a term of three years. Thats it. You start the clock on the day the bet is made. We dont celebrate our birthdays at the end of the year. We turn a year older on the day we were born. Thats how this works.

McAfee is certainly a bizarre dude. He most recently ran to be the Libertarian Partys presidential candidate in 2016 and 2020. The party didn't nominate him for either of his bids.

McAfee made headlines in 2012 when was wanted as a person of interest in the investigation of the murder of his neighbor in Belize. He was later tracked to Guatemala where he claimed he was seeking political asylum. McAfee was arrested for illegally entering the country and eventually deported back to the U.S. Officials in Belize did not proceed with charging McAfee with a crime. Hes also been accused of rape.

So, yeah, McAfee is certainly not a good guy. I can think of no greater punishment than McAfee eating his own dick, on live television no less. Its time for McAfee to pay the piper.

Excerpt from:

Bitcoin hasn't hit $500K, so now John McAfee has to eat his own...well, just click - Mashable

Post Twitter Hack: The Advice of McAfee To Jack Dorsey – CryptoPotato

Wednesday, July 15th, 2020, will forever be remembered as the day Twiter became a puppet in the hands of a mischievous hacker.

Twitter was hacked. And the accounts of some of the most prominent people in crypto and the world were compromised and used to steal Bitcoin in giveaway scams.

Although the micro-blogging platform has regained control and is currently investigating the matter, industry experts are still sharing their thoughts and opinions about the unceremonious, yet chaotic incident.

One of those experts is the American computer programmer and crypto proponent, John McAfee. For McAfee, security is his expertise, and he is known as the founder of one of the worlds largest computer security firms.

He took it to Twitter to share what he thinks about the hack from a security angle while also advising the platforms founder and CEO, Jack Dorsey.

According to the security expert, Twitters security Achilles heel lies in the Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) as it exposes users to trivial SIM Swap hack.

Dorsey was once a victim of a sim swap hack sometime last year, and his personal Twitter account was compromised for about 20 minutes.

Advising the Twitter boss, McAfee said:

I may be crazy, but Im still the founder of the worlds largest computer security firm, and Im telling you:

2-factor authentication is Twitters worst security threat. It exposes users to the trivial SIM Swap hack, which @Jack was a victim of.

Wake up, Jack!

He then warned users not to give companies their phone numbers if they were used for authentication. Explaining further, McAfee noted that even a 12-year-old could socially engineer the phone company and gain control over users numbers.

It is the simplest of all social engineering hacks. Are you listening, Jack? he asked.

Sim Swap theft is a common but effective hacking technique. Several stories have been reported about traders and investors who lost millions of dollars worth of cryptocurrencies in sim swap hacks.

In May, blockchain investor Michael Terpin sued an 18-year-old boy for hacking his phone through a sim swap to steal $24 million worth of cryptocurrencies. Terpin had earlier sued his phone provider, AT&T, for aiding and abetting the theft.

Enjoy reading? Please share:

Click here to start trading on BitMEX and receive 10% discount on fees for 6 months.

Continue reading here:

Post Twitter Hack: The Advice of McAfee To Jack Dorsey - CryptoPotato

Bitcoin (BTC) Adoption is Crawling Walking Running or Rocking Based on Opportunity – The Cryptocurrency Analytics

There were days when investors put their money in to Bitcoin and the money simply doubled in just a couple weeks. However, those times are now over. The Market has matured. Investors are looking in to the why of the price movement. Prices tend to move sideways for too long than day traders would like to see it be that way.

The Bitcoin mining difficulty has its part to play. Several bitcoin miners very clearly display what is under their hoods and this gives an insight into what those who are mining Bitcoin are up to.

The logic behind cryptocurrency per some propaganda is that everyone will be able to be their own bank. However, that need not be the actual case. Bitcoin is all about freedom of choice. Those who do not like it need not use it. Those who think they can improve Bitcoin can contribute to it. If those in the network are not able to convince the rest in the network about a particular technological upgrade, they simply fork off.

Several thought leaders are popping up in social media channels. Cryptocurrency influencers as named by Bitcoin.com in terms of their follower count on Twitter for instance Justin Sun (2M), John McAfee (1M), Vitalik Buterin (892.7K) and Charlie Lee (831.3K).

This just means the cryptocurrency influencers have a method of creating an impression in the minds of the people about the Bitcoin. Named above, are just a few from a big bunch of them doing the spreading the news about crypto capabilities in one way or the other.

Sydney Ifergan, the crypto expert tweeted: Bitcoin (BTC) does not wait for anyone to come or go. It is here and those who are smart make use of it. Those who naysay continue to do it while others make hay while the sun shines.

There is a golden period for every token. The days of hype of Bitcoin are over. Though several other cryptos are coming to win their share of investors, Bitcoin continues to be the king.

The most recent news is that it is becoming possible to buy Bitcoin in India and the demo videos are available in several Indian languages through Wazirx. Though the regulatory scene is not clear, adoption is either crawling, walking, running, or rocketing based on opportunity.

Bitcoin is getting a multi-linguistic exposure in a country like India where the population is super high. The results are yet to unfold. When the adoption happens, it is sure going to be dramatic.

View original post here:

Bitcoin (BTC) Adoption is Crawling Walking Running or Rocking Based on Opportunity - The Cryptocurrency Analytics

Twitter scrambles as celebrities are hit in bitcoin attack – Los Angeles Times

The attack announced itself one account at a time. Elon Musk. Kanye West. Bill Gates. Joe Biden. Barack Obama. Within a span of minutes Wednesday, some of social medias biggest power users posted near-identical messages soliciting bitcoin payments with an offer to pay back twice as much.

As more and more giant accounts chimed in Warren Buffett, Jeff Bezos, Apple it quickly became apparent the tweets were part of a coordinated attack, although it wasnt immediately clear who was behind it, how it was perpetrated or whether it had a purpose beyond bilking some gullible Twitter users out of cryptocurrency.

By late afternoon, with the scam having already extracted more than $100,000 in cryptocurrency, Twitter determined the only way to protect its most prominent users was to silence them, at least temporarily. We are aware of a security incident impacting accounts on Twitter, the company tweeted. We are investigating and taking steps to fix it.

Among those steps was blocking accounts of verified users a group that includes most celebrities, news organizations and major brands from tweeting.

Social media has often been styled a great equalizer, a tool that gives nobodies the kind of broadcasting power once limited to presidents and sports stars. In reality, internet fame has mostly served to amplify the voices of the already famous.

But for the two hours before Twitter restored tweeting privileges to so-called blue checkmarks (the badge indicating an account is verified), the timelines belonged to the little people. Meanwhile, massive accounts such as NBC News, with followings in the millions, were left to tweet from alternate or temporary handles to cover the story of the hack.

Twitter, which saw its shares decline as much as 3.8% after the market closed, blamed a coordinated social engineering attack by people who successfully targeted some of our employees with access to internal systems and tools.

Tough day for us at Twitter, Chief Executive Jack Dorsey tweeted. We all feel terrible this happened.

This is definitely one of the largest hacks of high-profile accounts on a single day that I can remember, said Theresa Payton, former White House chief information officer and now chief executive of Fortalice Solutions, a cybersecurity consulting firm.

The question is was this an inside job, or was it sophisticated cyber operatives perhaps nation states who took advantage of Twitter authorization? Payton said.

The effect on Twitters reputation will depend on how the company follows up, she said. Beyond repaying anyone who fell victim to the bitcoin fraud, Payton said the company owed a complete investigation to the people whose accounts were hacked, adding that the bitcoin scam messages could be just the most obvious sign of malicious activity.

They also serve as a wake-up call. If today had been a week before the presidential election and the accounts of Bill Gates and Barack Obama and Joe Biden were taken over and they said something completely outrageous, that could have had an impact on the psyche of voters going into the voting booths, Payton said. If today was not the tsunami bell going off for all social platforms and all political campaigns, I dont know what will be.

Twitter users have been subject to hacks before, but theyve often taken the form of broad data leaks or takeovers of individual high-profile accounts.

A 2013 hack gave attackers access to 250,000 users email addresses and usernames, and in 2016 news outlets reported that 32 million users login credentials had been hacked and posted online, but the accuracy of the compromised data came under dispute.

Targeted hacks of major accounts have also plagued the site over the years. In 2011, Fox News Twitter account was taken over to tweet false news that President Obama had been assassinated, PayPals British account was hacked and the profile photo changed to a pile of feces, and hackers took over NBC News account to tweet fake news of a plane crash at Manhattans Ground Zero.

Similar hacks occurred in 2013, when the accounts of Burger King and Jeep were taken over to tweet that they were being acquired by McDonalds and Cadillac, respectively. That year, Twitter added two-factor authentication, which requires users who enable it to verify their identity with a phone number.

Although that measure improved security for accounts that enabled it, hackers were able to take over the account for the U.S. militarys Central Command in 2015 to tweet pro-Islamic State messages and hints they had access to military documents and private information on military personnel.

After a large hack of LinkedIn user data in 2016, attackers used that information to gain control of the accounts of celebrities such as Mark Zuckerberg and Kylie Jenner. And in 2017, a number of prominent Twitter accounts, including Duke University, Forbes, and Amnesty International, were taken over to tweet a message that included swastikas and a Turkish message accusing the Dutch of being Nazis.

The highest-profile hack in recent memory came in the summer of 2019, when Dorseys account was taken over and used to retweet pro-Nazi and hacking-related tweets.

Twitter has also faced a number of cryptocurrency-related hacks. In 2017, controversial antivirus and cryptocurrency entrepreneur John McAfee saw his account hacked and used to promote obscure cryptocurrencies, and in 2018 hackers took control of Targets Twitter account to tweet a bitcoin scam message similar to the one deployed Wednesday.

In 2017, a contract worker in Twitters Trust & Safety division used his access to briefly deactivate the personal account of President Trump. After restoring Trumps account, Twitter said it had put in place additional safeguards to prevent this from happening again. Trumps account was not among those compromised in Wednesdays attack.

Originally posted here:

Twitter scrambles as celebrities are hit in bitcoin attack - Los Angeles Times

Facebook removes 3 white supremacist band pages leaves 117 others – The Next Web

Facebook has removed pages of the heavy-metal bands SoldierSS of Evil, Whitelaw, and Frangar for violating the platforms hate speech policies.

The ban follows a new Al Jazeera investigation that identified 120 Facebook pages with a total of over 800,000 likes of mostly heavy-metal bands and record labels with direct ties to white supremacist ideology. Al Jazeera flagged five of these pages to Facebook for breaking the platforms hate speech rules by displaying white supremacist ideology, but two are still under review.

According to Al Jazeera, the majority of the pages have been online for years, actively posting updates and advertising their merchandise, sometimes using white supremacist imagery. One of the bands whose infringing page is still up is M8l8th, a black metal music act from Ukraine whose full name means Hitlers Hammer.

The bands founder has ties to far-right nationalist movements and the band uses Nazi propaganda in its songs, such as parts of a speech by Joseph Goebbels and the official anthem of the Nazi party, Horst Wessel-Lied.

[Read: Facebook issues $100K challenge to build an AI that can identify hateful memes]

Yarno Ritzen, the journalist who led Al Jazeeras investigation, told TNW that they only flagged five of the pages, but Facebook should be aware of all 120 as most examples were simply found through Related pages.

So it shouldnt be too hard for Facebook to identify the majority of these pages by going down its own rabbit hole, Ritzen wrote in reply to TNW.

The bigger bands on the list are smarter about obscuring their obvious ties with racist ideologies like trying to blur some of the content that goes against Facebooks policies, such as swastikas, SS logos, etc. but others remain flagrantly racist. SoldierSS of Evils lyrical themes are, for example, commonly categorized as National Socialism, Antisemitism, so TNW asked Facebook why it hadnt removed the pages years earlier.

Weve yet to receive a reply, but Ritzen points out that Facebook frequently talks up its algorithm and moderators for catching a lot of hateful content but this doesnt appear to be as effective as the company would like to believe, given that some of these pages have been online for a decade.

In a statement to Al Jazeeras inquiries, a Facebook spokesperson said that hate speech is not allowed on the platform including white supremacist content and that the company would continue to improve its technologies and policies to remove hate from its platform.

Unfortunately zero tolerance doesnt mean zero incidents. We have removed three of these Pages for breaking our rules and are reviewing the remaining two against our policies, the spokesperson told Al Jazeera.

Al Jazeeras revelation comes just a week after more than 500 advertisers announcing they were boycotting Facebook for not responding sufficiently to hate speech on its platform.

That didnt seem to phase Mark Zuckerberg though. In an internal Facebook meeting, the company CEO said my guess is that all these advertisers will be back on the platform soon enough.

While boycotting companies include some major names such as Coca-Cola, Microsoft, Starbucks, and Target, they are not the biggest spenders on the platform. Only three out of the top 25 ad spenders joined the boycott, which might explain Zuckerbergs bravado response.

Were not gonna change our policies or approach on anything because of a threat to a small percent of our revenue, or to any percent of our revenue, Zuckerberg said in the internal meeting, according to The Information.

While COO Sheryl Sandberg says the companystands firmly against hate and Facebooks anti-hate speech measures are being improved, Zuckerbergs comments beg the question as to how seriously the company takes the issue if it doesnt affect its bottom line.

Read next: Coronavirus has changed travel in European cities for good heres how

Do you want to get the sassiest daily tech newsletter every day, in your inbox, for FREE? Of course you do: sign up for Big Spam here.

Visit link:

Facebook removes 3 white supremacist band pages leaves 117 others - The Next Web

Zac Efron’s Upcoming (And Rumoured) Films And TV Shows – Capital

7 July 2020, 14:22

Zac Efron is set to have a few busy years ahead of him, as he stars and produces several projects.

Zac Efron isn't just hiding and surprising eagle-eyed fans in Australia; he's also working on some huge film and television projects.

Fresh from his release of Down to Earth with Zac Efron, the The Greatest Showman star has his own reality series, as well as several movies in the works.

You may have read of the High School Musical star contracting a deadly illness whilst in Papua New Guinea.

That all happened as he filmed his adventure series Killing Zac Efron, which will air on Quibi.

Not only will Zac star in Killing Zac Efron, but he will also act as an executive producer, as he ventures into remote, dangerous jungles "through remote locations in search of adventure."

Zac is said to have replaced his Bad Neighbours co-star, Seth Rogen, in the comedy about tech tycoon John McAfee, King of the Jungle.

While Michael Keaton will star as McAfee, creator of the McAfee Antivirus software, Zac Efron is portraying Wired Magazine investigator, Ari Furman, who arrives in Belize, believing he will do a typical report on McAfee, only to be dragged into his chaotic world.

Very little is known about this project, but it is rumoured that Zac Efron is set to produce and possibly star in an adaptation of John LeFevre's book, Straight to Hell: True Tales of Deviance, Debauchery, and Billion-Dollar Deals.

According to sources, this film is in early development, and is said to focus on the character's darkly comedic life as a successful investment banker.

Excerpt from:

Zac Efron's Upcoming (And Rumoured) Films And TV Shows - Capital

Is Zac Efron the latest celeb to move here? – Northern Star

ZAC Efron, teenage heart-throb of the early 2000s and star of American media franchise High School Musical, could be the latest Hollywood actor to call Byron Bay home.

Speculation is rife after the 32-year-old actor was reportedly spotted around town numerous times in recent weeks.

SUNDAY TELEGRAPH SPECIAL. Zac Efron as seen in instagram posts. https://www.instagram.com/p/Bz6IuYQFgDf/?hl=en

Efron began acting professionally in the early 2000s and rose to prominence for his leading role as Troy Bolton in the High School Musical trilogy.

His latest films to hit the big screen include The Greatest Showman and Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile, where he played serial killer Ted Bundy.

A new action series produced by the actor, Killing Zac Efron, is in post-production.

This adventure series will show the actor venturing "deep into the jungles of a remote, dangerous island to carve his own name in expedition history", according to IMBD.

The actor confirmed he fell ill while fliming the series after media had reported that Efron was flown by helicopter for treatment in Australia after contracting a bacterial infection, possibly typhoid.

https://chp.edtech.news.com.au:443/CHP/JSP/Drop/Drop.jsp?user=burkej1&service=Drag_To_Application&db=CHP&r=1592358935295&id=NEWSMMGLPICT000192245750&eomImport=http%3A%2F%2Fmain-prod-meth03-core.edtech.news.com.au%3A6410%2Fchp%2Fchp2methode.jsp&wsurl=http%3A%2F%2Fprd-otwebservicesvip.news.newslimited.local%2FCMIS%2Fatom%2FOpenTextCHP&eomFileName=NEWSMMGLPICT000192245750.unknown&eomMimeType=picture&title=(Sent%20to%20Methode%3A%20meth03)&j=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%3D

IMBD also lists Efron is involved in a comedy drama is in pre-production stage called King of the Jungle, which follows the story of software engineer and former NASA programmer, John McAfee.

In any case, we are fans of you, Zac, and hope you enjoy your stay on the Northern Rivers.

Go here to see the original:

Is Zac Efron the latest celeb to move here? - Northern Star

Is Zac Efron the latest celeb to move here? – Byron Shire News

ZAC Efron, teenage heart-throb of the early 2000s and star of American media franchise High School Musical, could be the latest Hollywood actor to call Byron Bay home.

Speculation is rife after the 32-year-old actor was reportedly spotted around town numerous times in recent weeks.

SUNDAY TELEGRAPH SPECIAL. Zac Efron as seen in instagram posts. https://www.instagram.com/p/Bz6IuYQFgDf/?hl=en

Efron began acting professionally in the early 2000s and rose to prominence for his leading role as Troy Bolton in the High School Musical trilogy.

His latest films to hit the big screen include The Greatest Showman and Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile, where he played serial killer Ted Bundy.

A new action series produced by the actor, Killing Zac Efron, is in post-production.

This adventure series will show the actor venturing "deep into the jungles of a remote, dangerous island to carve his own name in expedition history", according to IMBD.

The actor confirmed he fell ill while fliming the series after media had reported that Efron was flown by helicopter for treatment in Australia after contracting a bacterial infection, possibly typhoid.

https://chp.edtech.news.com.au:443/CHP/JSP/Drop/Drop.jsp?user=burkej1&service=Drag_To_Application&db=CHP&r=1592358935295&id=NEWSMMGLPICT000192245750&eomImport=http%3A%2F%2Fmain-prod-meth03-core.edtech.news.com.au%3A6410%2Fchp%2Fchp2methode.jsp&wsurl=http%3A%2F%2Fprd-otwebservicesvip.news.newslimited.local%2FCMIS%2Fatom%2FOpenTextCHP&eomFileName=NEWSMMGLPICT000192245750.unknown&eomMimeType=picture&title=(Sent%20to%20Methode%3A%20meth03)&j=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%3D

IMBD also lists Efron is involved in a comedy drama is in pre-production stage called King of the Jungle, which follows the story of software engineer and former NASA programmer, John McAfee.

In any case, we are fans of you, Zac, and hope you enjoy your stay on the Northern Rivers.

Link:

Is Zac Efron the latest celeb to move here? - Byron Shire News

John McAfee Privacy Focused Ghost Coin To Go Live On May 25 – CryptoTicker.io

The privacy focused Ghost coin backed by famous crypto personality and security researcher John McAfee will go live on May 25. The consensus algorithm is Proof of Stake (POS) and the project supports masternodes. It will be powered by zero knowledge proofs and use escrow pool to shield/erase the history of transactions. Initially, 25% of the supply will be distributed to ESH token holders on the launch day, the rest will be generated by staking and running masternodes.

The whitepaper for GHOST is live! To claim your GHOST at launch, you must hold $ESH token on May 25th during the snap shot. Token swap instructions, roadmap, and more coming May 24th!https://t.co/cApgNt56oZ. pic.twitter.com/B6mYqKoC6W John McAfee (@officialmcafee) May 16, 2020

The released whitepaper notes that privacy is an important right and its vital to preserve it. It defines the mission as provide users entirely private, secure, affordable and reliable means to transact over the network. Ghost coin is being pioneered as an amalgamation of best features of different crypto-assets. For instance, it uses the distributed ledger technology from Bitcoin, InstantSend and Masternodes from Dash, plus custom zk-SNARKs from Zcash and general staking function. It also features a dynamically calibrated coin supply, that will operate by burning transaction fees, to adjust supply elastically in response to economic pressure.

Block Size: 2 MB

Block Time: 60 seconds (re-targeting every block)

Coin Emission Rate: 6 GHOST maximum per block

Maximum Coin Supply: 13,573,415 GHOST (May 25, 2020) / 15,087,292 GHOST (June, 2020) / 30,226,069 GHOST (June, 2040)

Total Coin Supply: 55,000,000 GHOST (elastic supply, controlled by burning of transaction fees)

Minimum GHOST Required To Run Masternode: 20,000 GHOST

Accumulator Modulus: RSA-2048

In order to support and motivate the CryptoTicker team, especially in times of Corona, to continue to deliver good content, we would like to ask you to donate a small amount. Independent journalism can only survive if we stick together as a society. Thank you

Instant Crypto Credit Lines from only 5.9% APR. Earn up to 8% interest per year on your Stablecoins, USD, EUR & GBP. $100 million custodial insurance.

Ad

This post may contain promotional links that help us fund the site. When you click on the links, we receive a commission - but the prices do not change for you! 🙂

Disclaimer: The authors of this website may have invested in crypto currencies themselves. They are not financial advisors and only express their opinions. Anyone considering investing in crypto currencies should be well informed about these high-risk assets.

Trading with financial products, especially with CFDs involves a high level of risk and is therefore not suitable for security-conscious investors.CFDs are complex instruments and carry a high risk of losing money quickly through leverage. Be aware that most private Investors lose money, if they decide to trade CFDs. Any type of trading and speculation in financial products that can produce an unusually high return is also associated with increased risk to lose money. Note that past gains are no guarantee of positive results in the future.

Posted By

The Bitcoin Halving week is over. The event took place last week and the Bitcoin price has improved splendidly over

The crypto community is finally starting to understand, how to value crypto-assets employing the same techniques and methods used in

Enjin announced the launch of a major Software Development Kit (SDK) for the famed Godot game engine on May 06.

Read this article:

John McAfee Privacy Focused Ghost Coin To Go Live On May 25 - CryptoTicker.io

Bitcoin Claimant Craig Wright Warns Opponents: The Axe Is In My Hand, And About To Fall Hard – CryptoPotato

The self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto, Craig Wright, took the opportunity to publish a blog post on May 11, the day of the third Bitcoin halving, to warn his opponents in the Bitcoin space and beyond that, the axe is now in his hand and its about to fall hard.

Thats according to Wrights latest rant titled, How the World Works; or, A Discourse on Fake News, in which he takes swings at Bitcoin, crypto YouTubers, John McAfee, Ira Kleiman, the fake news media, and much more.

In one section of the 14,000-word opus, Wright said documents about the ongoing legal battle with Ira Kleiman were forged by a former employer of his, whom he named as Mr. Jamie Wilson.

Wright claimed his team performed handwriting analysis on the supposedly forged signatures. He wrote:

Unfortunately for him, Ira Kleiman, and a few other people who have worked for me in the past, we have had the signatures and handwriting analysed, and the contracts were not changed or created or signed by me.

According to Wright, this sudden reversal will result in a swing of the pendulum in his favor or, instead, a swing of the axe in the Kleiman trial, where over one million Bitcoins is potentially at stake.

For now, I will leave you hanging on whom the result will fall upon. But I will say that the axe is about to fall hard, and right now, the axe is in my hand.

In Wrights mind, for Bitcoin to work, it has to scale towards the level of millions of transactions a second. For that reason, he doesnt see the current version of BTC succeeding, claiming it is without utility. Wright wrote:

BTC, on the other hand, is a speculative good. It has no use; it has merely a false narrative that appeals to dumb criminals who do not understand that Bitcoin is easily traced and, as government starts to understand it, easily taxed.

In the sprawling blog post, Dr. Wright also goes after popular crypto personality John McAfee, whom he refers to as a con-man.

Long-term conmen and criminals such as John McAfee are long-term promoters of pump-and-dump schemes.

Wright also celebrated the recent Google crackdown on crypto-related videos and expressed his disappointment that Google didnt act sooner.

In between slinging dirt at anyone and everyone, Wright presents various pieces of evidence which he claims to verify his status as Satoshi Nakamoto. As has always been the case in the search for Satoshi, Wrights evidence remains typically inconclusive.

Wright regularly proclaims that he has Aspergers. His massive screed makes interesting reading for obsessive types, and those interested in reading the man behind the text.

But for everyone else, its just more of the same.

Enjoy reading? Please share:

Click here to start trading on BitMEX and receive 10% discount on fees for 6 months.

View original post here:

Bitcoin Claimant Craig Wright Warns Opponents: The Axe Is In My Hand, And About To Fall Hard - CryptoPotato

Project management tools could be a sign of your company’s true health. – The Next Web

TLDR: The training in The Accredited Agile Project Management Bundle by SPOCE explains the mindset and actual process for leading any organizations projects to ultimate success.

A company that isnt using some type of project management tool or framework might want to start asking some tough questions about why. Because believe it or not, that omission may already be telling you something critically important about your business.

In a recent survey of marketers, companies using a project or workflow management system were nearly 30 percent less likely to identify staff realignments and changing priorities among their business biggest challenges. The bottom line: companies who ran major initiatives from a structured, organized playbook appear to be better organized themselves.

For companies in need of that structure or for workers looking to break into the field, The Accredited Agile Project Management Bundle by SPOCE ($99, over 90 percent off from TNW Deals) offers an in-depth look at how top professionals ensure their key projects happen on time and on budget while meeting everyones expectations.

The training is assembled by SPOCE, who have spent the past decade perfecting their methods for turning any motivated student into a seasoned, accredited project manager.

This package of courses including over 350 lectures and more than 100 hours of content can help even a novice project leader build the mindset for success and follow a battle-ready gameplan for making sure project goals always stay paramount and processes are followed.

The Agile way of thinking is at the center of the AgilePM Project Management Foundation and Practitioner Course, which gives students a look at the Agile approach for fostering a highly collaborative team environment thats constantly heading toward short-term guideposts while making sure everyone is engaged and constantly analyzing the final work.

Meanwhile, PRINCE2 Project Management Foundation and Practitioner Course puts the theories of Agile into a formal practical structure. Through interactive exercises and exam simulations, students get hands-on experience using the firm guidelines, predictive goals and close monitoring of the PRINCE2 methodology so they can be applied to your own projects.

Finally, PRINCE2 Agile Project Management Foundation and Practitioner Course explains how to best integrate the two together so team members know their roles, timelines get met, risks are appropriately handled, change is incorporated and everyone heads toward a successful end goal.

The Accredited Agile Project Management Bundle by SPOCE is usually $1,632, but with the current offer, its now over 90 percent off that price at just $99 while this deal lasts.

Prices are subject to change.

Read next: Democrats demand answers from Google on diversity training cuts

Read our daily coverage on how the tech industry is responding to the coronavirus and subscribe to our weekly newsletter Coronavirus in Context.

For tips and tricks on working remotely, check out our Growth Quarters articles here or follow us on Twitter.

Visit link:

Project management tools could be a sign of your company's true health. - The Next Web

John McAfee Predicts Hyperinflation, Names Coins That Will Act as Safe Haven During COVID-19 Crisis – U.Today

Alex Dovbnya

John McAfee thinks that privacy coins could protect investors from the looming hyperinflation of fiat currencies

Crypto baron John McAfee is convinced that Monero and lesser-known privacy coins in the likes ofSafex andApollo could be a perfect choice for investors who are seeking safe haven during the looming financialcrisis.

McAfee, who routinely downplays the threat posed by the novel coronavirus,believes that the ongoing quarantine will 'wreak havoc' with the global economy. Particularly,government-issued currencies could reach hyperinflation, which has already happened to such failed states like Zimbabwe and Venezuela.

As reported by U.Today, central banks around the globe recently embarked on egregious monetary policies. The U.S. Federal Reserve recently announced an unlimited quantitative easing.

McAfee denounced Bitcoin (BTC) in early January after famously predicting that its price could reach $1 mln by the end of 2020. He compared the first cryptocurrency tothe FordModel Tto back up his argument that it will not be the future of the industry.

Back then, he mentioned that Monero was his new favorite cryptocurrency, which is why he also included it in his latest tweet.

Read more from the original source:

John McAfee Predicts Hyperinflation, Names Coins That Will Act as Safe Haven During COVID-19 Crisis - U.Today

McAfee Finally On The Right Path – Forbes

McAfee, like Symantec, has played an important role in the cybersecurity industry. Its history is replete with pivots. First it was McAfee Associates, founded by John McAfee who by all reports was actually relatively sane back in 1989. Then it combined with Network General in 1997, after its 1993 IPO, and became Network Associates (NAI). It continued to make acquisitions. Like Symantec the strategy of the early days of anti-virus companies was to establish a brand for desktop software and sell as many products as possible. Symantec was the yellow box, McAfee was the red box, and when Webroot Software got into the game, they chose to be the green box.

Eventually, under Gene Hodges, NAI spun off just about everything in its portfolio other than the ePO, the endpoint protection orchestration suite of products. Gene asked for Gartners input on the wisdom of re-branding NAI to McAfee. I am so sorry that we told him it was a good move.

Then disaster struck. McAfee brought on a new CEO who was apparently really good at generating shareholder value, because after acquiring Secure Computing he sold McAfee to Intel for $7.68 billion. (See: Intel Should not Consummate McAfee Acquisition).

McAfee became a wholly owned subsidiary of a chip manufacturer. Crazy right? That lasted 4 years and created a window of opportunity for the 223 other vendors of endpoint security products. If Symantec had not been having its own issues at the time it would have grabbed a lot of market share.

Here is how the market for desktop AV used to work. Every large enterprise would choose an AV product for its desktops. Sometimes they would go all-in and buy a lot of products from the same vendor in a misguided sense that vendor rationalization was a good idea. Its not a good idea in security. They would typically sign three year contracts with the vendor of choice. That would be either Symantec, McAfee, or a third choice, most often Trend Micro. Every IT department in the world hated its AV product. On the desktop it slowed machines down. Updates would bog down the network and dealing with alerts and cleaning machines took up 95% of the time of the internal help desk. So, every three years they would go through a process of choosing another vendor and pick one of the other two. That meant that 33% of the entire market was up for grabs every year. If a vendor faltered along the way it would lose market share to the other two.

Here is a brief history of McAfee drawn from Security Yearbook 2020.

Network Associates was formed from the combination of McAfee Associates and Network General with its Sniffer product. This was one of the early attempts to create a security company that would cover both endpoint and network security, a combination that continues to fail as a strategy. (See: Why Network Security Vendors Should Stay Away from Endpoint Security and Vice Versa. ) Back then the goal was to dominate the enterprise software space. Security had not become a big enough sector to inspire pure play roll ups. That would change.

Aryeh Goretsky, now Distinguished Researcher at ESET, was the first employee of John McAfee. He conducted a reddit AMA (Ask Me Anything) in 2019. [22] He also provided this short summary of his experience in the AV industry:

Heady days, indeed. When I entered the field in 1989, the number of computer viruses was in the tens, with slightly more of them targeted at the Classic Mac OS than for DOS. That flipped in a year or so to DOS, and hasn't changed back since.

We used to advise customers to update their software once a quarter, and monthly for high-risk computers like those belonging to secretaries and technicians who might be accessing floppy diskettes from untrusted sources. That recommendation changed to two months and then a single month as the number of new viruses being seen increased. When I left McAfee in 1995, there was already work underway to automate the download of updates by dialing into a dedicated BBS system. These days, anti-malware programs update themselves hourly with continuous checking between that for additional types of telemetry, which might mean a threat was detected.

At the beginning, we might have received 2-3 floppy diskettes a month with new viruses on them. That increased to weekly, and uploads of suspect files were occurring multiple times a day to our BBS.

Computer viruses were initially spread mostly through floppy diskettes at the speed at which they could be couriered around the globe, and sometimes through BBS (intentionally or otherwise). Worms like the Morris Worm were not really thought about in the same way as computer viruses, and would not be for years until internet access started to become ubiquitous, and consumer desktop operating systems started to come with TCP/IP stacks, and dial-up networking began to replace BBS.

Dozens became hundreds and hundreds became a couple of thousand by the time I left McAfee Associates in 1995. That was a steep hockey curve back then, but a blip by today's standards, where you might see 250,000-300,000 malware samples arrive on a daily basis.

In his AMA Goretsky credits John McAfee with the successful growth of one of the first AV vendors, going from one employee to an IPO in three years. He formed McAfee Associates in 1989 and raised $42 million in its IPO in 1992. Mcafees AV software was one of the first to be distributed over a network rather than shrink wrapped boxes of instruction manuals and floppy disks (later CDs).

In 1993 John McAfee suffered a mild heart attack and turned the reins of McAfee Associates over to Bill Larson, who became CEO. Larson had been VP of Sales and Marketing for Sun Microsystems. He proceeded on an acquisition binge. He acquired Brightwork Development in 1994 and Saber Software in 1995, both LAN management companies. In 1997 he acquired Jade KK, a Japanese AV company for $21 million. And finally he merged the company with Network General later that year. The company was renamed Network Associates.

Network Associates continued to operate as a collection of endpoint and network solutions until 2003, when the newly appointed President, Gene Hodges, embarked on a major restructuring. The plan was to double down on security and divest the desktop management, LAN management, and other tools. The Gauntlet Firewall product line was handed over to Secure Computing and the other divisions spun out. Left with only the AV product, the company was re-branded as simply McAfee, which seemed like a logical move until John McAfee reemerged from Belize and came into the spotlight.

McAfee, the company, focused on security. It acquired Foundstone, the vulnerability scanning software company along with its founders. Kevin Mandia later left to form Mandiant, now part of FireEye, where Mandia is CEO. Stuart McClure left McAfee to found Cylance, which sold to BlackBerry in late 2018 for $1.4 billion. George Kurtz left to found Crowdstrike. After an IPO in 2019 Crowdstrikes market cap hit $21.7 billion before settling down to $12 billion. Crowdstrike found itself caught up in the news in 2019 as the US President and Republican leadership promulgated a Russian disinformation narrative that somehow Crowdstrike was a Ukrainian company and it had transferred a server containing hacked Democratic National Committee emails to Ukraine.

Hodges also acquired an endpoint intrusion prevention company, Entercept, and a network intrusion prevention company, IntruVert in 2003, led by Parveen Jain.

In 2007 Dave DeWalt took over at McAfee. Gene Hodges moved on from McAfee to become CEO of Websense, a content URL filtering company where he acquired PortAuthority, one of the leading Data Leak Prevention companies. Gene retired in 2013 and passed away in 2018 at the age of 67. [23]

Dave DeWalt had been president of Documentum before joining McAfee. He inexplicably acquired Secure Computing, bringing the Gauntlet Firewall back into the fold in addition to multiple other firewall brands that Secure Computing had consolidated. He then went on to sell McAfee to Intel for $7.68 billion, where it was branded as Intel Security.

The Intel acquisition made no sense at all, although all of the executives involved spun a story of how Intel would somehow embed security into its chips. The last year before the acquisition McAfee reported just over $2 billion in revenue. Even four years later the Intel Software and Services Group was reporting $2.216 billion in revenue. McAfee sales completely stalled out while it was part of Intel. [24]

In 2016 Intel spun out McAfee to TPG, a private equity firm, at a valuation of $4.2 billion, a $3.48 billion dollar loss from when it acquired McAfee in 2011. Intel maintained a 49% ownership and continued to finance $2 billion in debt from the acquisition. [25]

Since the spin-out and being re-re-branded as McAfee, the company appears to be healing its corporate chair ball inflicted wounds.

Just two years ago McAfee had 9,000 employees and it reports about 7,000 today, a 22% drop. This is actually an indication of efficiencies that well-run organizations are able to achieve with streamlined costs and a focus on a cloud-first portfolio. Some blood letting is always necessary when restructuring a company, especially under the tutelage of a private equity firm like TPG which also has investments in Gaurdicore, Tanium, and Zscaler in its $119 billion portfolio.

The past ten years has seen two of the top three contenders for enterprise AV experiencing disruptive fumbling at the hands of misguided leadership. The third, Trend Micro, is the only one that has seen continuous leadership. But this is a great time for McAfee, freed of Intel, to get its house in order, formulate a strategy, and execute. They appear to be doing just that.

McAfee has two business divisions: Consumer and Enterprise.

McAfee Enterprise launched its cloud-native MVISION Platform in October to help organizations protect data and stop threats across devices, networks and the cloud. It includes a unified Endpoint Security solution, MVISION Endpoint, which embeds integrated cloud native EDR .

At the RSA Conference in San Francisco this February, McAfee announced an MDR offering (managed detection and response) giving them the ability to leverage the rapidly evolving Managed Service channel to address cloud managed security for those that cannot maintain their own security operations center.

A cloud first strategy is becoming a requirement for all technology vendors and McAfee Enterprise has adopted that as their slogan. While they have hardware appliances in their portfolio, they have quickly moved to build what certainly looks like a cloud-native SASE (secure access service edge) offering. It includes their secure web gateway technology, now deployed to 50+ cloud points of presence around the world, browser isolation, an industry leading CASB (cloud access security broker), and DLP (data loss prevention). McAfee has also begun to make strategic acquisitions to build on a cloud first strategy: SkyHigh in 2018 for that CASB solution, Nanosec in August, 2019, for container security, and announced a definitive agreement to acquire Lightpoint Security in February, 2020, for remote browser isolation*.

The demise of Symantec could not have come at a better time for McAfee. With its house in order, McAfee should be able to pick up many of Symantecs customers and channel partners. With the right products, a viable strategy, and good people, the only remaining factor that will determine McAfees success is execution.

*McAfee announced that the acquisition of Lightpoint was finalized on March 31, 2020.

22. u/goretsky, IamA Aryeh Goretsky, r/IamA, Reddit, September 20, 2019, https://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/d6z3km/iama_aryeh_goretsky_today_im_the_distinguished/

23. Gene Hodges, Forever Missed, accessed November 27, 2019, https://www.forevermissed.com/gene-hodges/#about

24. Richard Stiennon, Five Reasons Intel Should Spin Off McAfee, Forbes, July 21, 2015, https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardstiennon/2015/07/21/five-reasons-intel-should-spin-off-mcafee

25. John Mannes, Intel Spins Out Intel Security, Tech Crunch, September 7, 2016, https://techcrunch.com/2016/09/07/intel-spins-out-intel-security-with-tpg-to-form-new-mcafee-valued-at-4-2b/

See the original post:

McAfee Finally On The Right Path - Forbes

Social media platforms caught up in information overload amid coronavirus pandemic – The Sociable

That medicine, hydroxychloroquine, its working, said Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro in a video posted on his Facebook page on Sunday, March 29, in which he referred to a potential remedy for the symptoms of COVID-19.

The anti-malarial drug, which has recently been given emergency use authorization by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), works to relieve the respiratory symptoms of COVID-19, although health experts recommend a health screening before prescribing it.

Scientists are still carrying out clinical trials of the drug.

Although limited scientific information is available, it is reasonable to believe that hydroxychloroquine sulfate may be effective for treatment FDA

A day after Bolsonaro touted the drug, Facebook and Instagram announced their plans to delete the Brazilian presidents video, claiming it promoted misinformation.

We will remove content that violates our Community Standards, which do not permit any type of misinformation which could cause real harm to people, Facebook wrote in a statement tothe BBC.

Twitter also deleted the same video the day it was posted.

And Bolsonaro is not the only user Twitter has chosen to take action against. According toThe Verge, the social network has also removed posts from former US law enforcement official David Clarke, actress Alyssa Milano, and programmer John McAfee.

Likewise, Politico reported that both Fox News host Laura Ingraham and former NYC Mayor Rudy Giuliani were forced to remove tweets that touted the drug that has since been approved by the FDA for emergency use.

Although limited scientific information is available, it is reasonable to believe that hydroxychloroquine sulfate may be effective for treatment of adults and adolescents who weigh 50 kg or more and are hospitalized with COVID-19 for whom a clinical trial is not available, or participation is not feasible, the FDA said.

Therefore, what Bolsonaro had tweeted was not entirely false information, it was just unconfirmed.

On Sunday March 29, Twitter deleted another of Bolsonaros tweets in which he called for the flexibilization of social distancing, according to BuzzFeed News.

Speaking to BuzzFeed News, a spokesperson for Twitter said that the social network had recently announced the expansion of its rules to cover content that could be against public health information provided by official sources and could put people at greater risk of transmitting COVID-19.

Bolsonaros government believes that only the sick and most vulnerable members of the population should be self-isolating to prevent the spread of COVID-19, and the rest of the population should carry on their lives as normal, a technique he refers to as vertical isolation.

The government decided to diffuse its stance around this recent policy update in a recently-launched campaign, which will be spread using social media, entitled Brazil Cannot Stop.

In an effort to slow the spread of coronavirus, current public health advice from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that people avoid discretionary travel, eating out in public restaurants and cafes, to work from home wherever possible, and restrict social gatherings to maximum 10 people.

While Facebook does have a policy in place to control the spread of misinformation which includes using third-party fact-checking organizations to limit the spread of false data Twitter is well-known for having much looser content regulations.

According to a Twitter blog, the social network is broadening its definition of harmful content during the global coronavirus pandemic, redefining it as content that goes directly against guidance from authoritative sources of global and local public health information.

On top of Facebooks existing mission to address fake news, it has also implemented similar temporary measures to make sure everyone has access to accurate information, stop misinformation and harmful content, and support global health experts, local governments, businesses and communities.

However, in this time of constantly-changing information and advice, just as social media users which include government leaders can get it wrong, so too can official sources.

The question, then, is about how each social network defines harmful content. Is the content false, or just unconfirmed?

Amid the uncertainty of this pandemic, during which information updates and health advice seem to be changing daily, Twitter has publicly recognized the importance of its platform for journalists looking to the site for story ideas.

Journalism is core to our service and we have a deep and enduring responsibility to protect that work, wrote a representative from Twitter, via a blog post on its platform, which also communicated the social networks decision to distribute a donation of one million dollars between the Committee to Protect Journalists and the International Womens Media Foundation.

However, according to a recent Gallup poll on coronavirus, the public approval rating of media handling and coverage of the pandemic is currently 44 percent, as opposed to an 88 percent approval rating of medical professionals.

And so, as media distrust grows, the never-ending struggle between free speech and censorship on social networks continues.

Despite social medias united front to control the spread of misinformation and what it defines to be harmful content, regardless of whether the content is misinformed or harmful, the spread of how users interpret it still lies outside of regulatory control.

Symptoms of shadowbanning on social media for your diagnosis

Original post:

Social media platforms caught up in information overload amid coronavirus pandemic - The Sociable

Over $7 Billion In Investments Expected to Enter the Cryptocurrency Market – Coin Idol

Apr 01, 2020 at 08:26 // News

Amidst the chaos on the markets, stablecoins seems to have been least affected by the market crash. Analysts predict that over $7 Billion in investment funds will flow into the cryptocurrency market in the coming months.

Traders of all commodities including Bitcoin, gold and stocks have experienced a rough time in the last few weeks amidst the economic effects of the coronavirus pandemic. However, not all markets are suffering from the wave of volatility caused by COVID-19. The stablecoin market specifically has been flourishing during this period and continues to do so, as BeInCrypto outlet informs.

Commodity prices are being reflected in the cryptocurrency markets. High price volatility and the high amount of capital investments in stablecoins indicate signs of investors hesitation.

The sudden increase in the market value of stable coins indicates that investors involved with other cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum banked their money in stable coins following the cryptocurrency market crash. However this is just a short-term behaviour, traders will gradually reinvest back into cryptocurrency as the market shock dispenses.

Besides, soon enough the cryptocurrency market might see a flow of new investors from traditional sectors. The new coronavirus relief bill adopted by the US government could possibly cause a significant devaluation of the dollar, according to John McAfee.

As coinidol.com, a world blockchain news outlet has reported, this might cause traditional investors switching to alternative markets due to traditional assets volatility. During the current economic recession, it seems only natural that traditional asses have a lack of trust because of their increased volatility. On the other hand, there is a strong global trend of going digital amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.

There are also rumours of the reduction of fiat money circulation as people are trying to minimize physical contacts by every means. In such a situation, cryptocurrency might be a good alternative. Besides, with the inflow of investors, the market might become less volatile, which can make it even better.

See the rest here:

Over $7 Billion In Investments Expected to Enter the Cryptocurrency Market - Coin Idol

Social media companies are taking steps to tamp down coronavirus misinformation but they can do more – Alton Telegraph

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)

Bhaskar Chakravorti, Tufts University

(THE CONVERSATION) As we practice social distancing, our embrace of social media gets only tighter. The major social media platforms have emerged as the critical information purveyors for influencing the choices people make during the expanding pandemic. Theres also reason for worry: the World Health Organization is concerned about an infodemic, a glut of accurate and inaccurate information about COVID-19.

The social media companies have been pilloried in recent years for practicing surveillance capitalism and being a societal menace. The pandemic could be their moment of redemption. How are they rising to this challenge?

Surprisingly, Facebook, which had earned the reputation of being the least trusted tech company in recent years, has led with the strongest, most consistent actions during the unfolding COVID-19 crisis. Twitter and Google-owned YouTube have taken steps as well to stem the tide of misinformation. Yet, all three could do better.

As an economist who tracks digital technologys use worldwide at The Fletcher School at Tufts University, Ive identified three important ways to evaluate the companies responses to the pandemic. Are they informing while simultaneously curtailing misinformation? Are they enforcing responsible advertising policies? And are they providing helpful data to public health authorities without compromising privacy?

Tackling the infodemic

Social media companies can block, demote or elevate posts. According to Facebook, the average user sees only 10% of their News Feed and the platforms determine what users see by reordering how stories appear. This means demoting and elevating posts could be as essential as blocking them outright.

Blocking is the most difficult decision because it bumps up against First Amendment rights. Facebook, in particular, has recently been criticized for its unwillingness to block false political ads. But Facebook has had the most clear-cut policy on COVID-19 misinformation. It relies on third-party fact-checkers and health authorities flagging problematic content, and removes posts that fail the tests. It also blocks or restricts hashtags that spread misinformation on its sister platform, Instagram.

Twitter and YouTube have taken less decisive positions. Twitter says it has acted to protect against malicious behaviors. Del Harvey, Twitters vice president of trust and safety, told Axios that the company will remove any pockets of smaller coordinated attempts to distort or inorganically influence the conversation. YouTube removes videos claiming to prevent infections. However, neither company has a transparent blocking policy founded on solid fact-checking.

While all three platforms are demoting problematic content and elevating content from authoritative sources, the absence of consistent fact-checking standards has created a gray area where misinformation can slip through, particularly for Twitter. Panic-producing tweets claimed prematurely that New York was under lockdown, and bots or fake accounts have slipped in rumors.

Even the principle of deferring to authoritative sources can cause problems. For example, the widely read @realDonaldTrump has tweeted misinformation. Influential figures who are not officially designated authoritative sources have also managed to circulate misinformation. Elon Musk, founder of Tesla and SpaceX, tweeted a false assertion about the coronavirus to 32 million followers and Twitter has declined to remove his tweet. John McAfee, founder of the eponymous security solutions company, also tweeted a false assertion about the coronavirus. That tweet was removed but not before it had been widely shared.

Harnessing influence for good

Besides blocking and re-ordering posts, the social media companies must also ask how people are experiencing their platforms and interpreting the information they encounter there. Social media platforms are meticulously designed to anticipate the users experience, hold their attention and influence actions. Its essential that the companies apply similar techniques to influence positive behavior in response to COVID-19.

Consider some examples across each of the three platforms of failing to influence positive behaviors by ignoring the user experience.

For Facebook users, private messaging is, increasingly, a key source of social influence and information about the coronavirus. Because these groups often bring together more trusted networks family, friends, classmates there is a greater risk that people will turn to them during anxious times and become susceptible to misinformation. Facebook-owned Messenger and WhatsApp both closed platforms in contrast to Twitter are of particular concern since the companys ability to monitor content on these platforms is still limited.

For Twitter, its essential to track influencers, or people with many followers. Content shared by these users has greater impact and ought to pass through additional filters.

YouTube has taken the approach of pairing misleading coronavirus content with a link to an alternative authoritative source, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or World Health Organization. This juxtaposition can have the opposite of the intended effect. A video from a non-authoritative individual appears with the CDC or WHO logo beneath it, which could unintentionally give viewers the impression that those public health authorities have approved the videos.

Responsible advertising

There is money to be made from ads offering products related to the outbreak. However, some of those ads are not in the public interest. Facebook set a standard by banning ads for medical face masks and Google followed suit, as did Twitter.

All three companies have offered free ads to appropriate public health and nonprofit organizations. Facebook has offered unlimited ads to the WHO, while Google has made a similar but less open-ended offer and Twitter offers Ads for Good credits to fact-checking nonprofit organizations and health information disseminators.

There have been some policy reversals. YouTube initially blocked ads meant to profit from content related to COVID-19, but then allowed some ads that follow the companys guidelines.

Overall, the companies have responded to the crisis, but their policies on ads vary, have changed and have left loopholes: Users could still see ads for face masks served by Google even after it had officially banned them. Clearer industry-wide principles and firm policies can help keep businesses and people from exploiting the outbreak for commercial gain.

Data to track the outbreak

Social media can be a source of essential data for mapping the spread of the disease and managing it. The key is that the companies protect user privacy, recognize the limits of data analysis and not oversell it. Geographic information systems that build on data from social media and other sources have already become key to mapping the worldwide spread of COVID-19. Facebook is collaborating with researchers at Harvard and National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan by sharing data about peoples movements stripped of identifying information and high-resolution population density maps.

Search and location data on YouTube and its parent, Google, are invaluable trend-trackers. Google hasnt offered its trends analyses for COVID-19 in any systematic manner to date, perhaps out of reluctance because of the failure of an earlier Google Trends program that attempted to predict the paths of transmission of influenza and completely missed the peak of the 2013 flu season.

Think with Google, the companys current data analytics service for marketers, offers a powerful example of insights that can be gleaned from Googles data. It could help with projects for contact tracing and social distancing compliance, provided its done in a way that respects user privacy. For example, as users locations are tagged along with their posts, the people theyve met and the places theyve been can help determine whether people on the whole or in a location are complying with public health safety orders and guidelines.

Moreover, data shared by companies stripped of identifying information could be used by independent researchers. For example, researchers could use Facebook-owned Instagram and CrowdTangle to correlate travelers movements to COVID-19 hotspots with user conversations to locate sources of transmission. Research teams I direct have been analyzing coronavirus-related Twitter hashtags to identify the primary misinformation sources to detect patterns.

The expanding footprint of the pandemic and its consequences are evolving quickly. To their credit, the social media companies have attempted to respond quickly as well. Yet, they can do more. This could be their time to rebuild trust with the public and with regulators, but the window to make the right choices is narrow. Their own futures and the futures of millions may depend on it.

[You need to understand the coronavirus pandemic, and we can help. Read our newsletter.]

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here: https://theconversation.com/social-media-companies-are-taking-steps-to-tamp-down-coronavirus-misinformation-but-they-can-do-more-133335.

Link:

Social media companies are taking steps to tamp down coronavirus misinformation but they can do more - Alton Telegraph

Conservative Voices Are Pumping Out Coronavirus Misinformation on Twitter – Vanity Fair

Twitter has frequently been criticized for acting slowly, if at all, to curb the spread of misinformation. But with an unprecedented pandemic sweeping the U.S., the social media platform is taking unprecedented steps to rein things in, particularly when it comes to world leaders and the top rung of right-wing crankery. Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro had two of his tweets taken down on Sunday after he touted hydroxychloroquine, a drug used to prevent and treat malaria, as a miracle cure for COVID-19. One tweet featured a clip of Bolsonaro walking through Braslia while arguing that the drug, which is being tested on some COVID-19 patients but is still unproven, would allow the country to return to work, lest its stalled economy result in Brazil turning into Venezuela. Last week Venezuelas Nicols Maduro had a snake oil tweet of his own deleted after he claimed to have discovered a natural brew cure la Alex Jones.

To prepare for the wave of coronavirus news, Twitter published a blog post earlier this month announcing a zero-tolerance approach to platform manipulation and any other attempts to abuse our service at this critical juncture. In response to an inquiry from BuzzFeed News, which reported on the Bolsonaro deletions, a spokesman for Twitter said the site is making good on its word. Twitter recently announced the expansion of its rules to cover content that could be against public health information provided by official sources and could put people at greater risk of transmitting COVID-19, the spokesperson said.

The crackdown is notable given that Twitter often lets top dignitaries play by their own set of rules when it comes to disseminating lies. Last year the site issued a new term of service stating that if a world leader does violate the Twitter Rules but there is a clear public interest value to keeping the Tweet on the service, we may place it behind a notice that provides context about the violation and allows people to click through should they wish to see the content. That leeway has allowed people like Donald Trump to continue to spread misinformation unabated. HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE & AZITHROMYCIN, taken together, have a real chance to be one of the biggest game changers in the history of medicine, he tweeted just over a week ago, presaging the claim that got Maduro and Bolsonaro in trouble. The FDA has moved mountains - Thank You! Hopefully they will BOTH...be put in use IMMEDIATELY. PEOPLE ARE DYING, MOVE FAST.

Some of the presidents lackeys are following his lead but facing the consequences hes avoided. Fox News host Laura Ingraham was forced to delete a March 20 tweet claiming that hydroxychloroquine had shown very promising results. One Patient was described as Lazarus who was seriously ill from Covid-19, already released. Rudy GiulianiTrumps cybersecurity adviser, among other thingstweeted a quote insisting that hydroxychloroquine had been shown to be 100% effective in helping coronavirus patients. Twitter temporarily locked him out of his account and deleted the claim on Saturday, but he is still touting the drug in tweets and telling followers to learn more about its efficacy by subscribing to his personal website.

Right-wing youth leader Charlie Kirk had tweets removed that made the original claims about hydroxychloroquine quoted by Giuliani. Conservative blog The Federalist faced similar repercussions; its Twitter account was temporarily locked down after promoting an article calling for Americans to throw coronavirus-themed chickenpox parties, i.e., herding large groups of people into confined spaces with COVID-19 patients so that everyone contracts it, allowing those who dont die or fall severely ill to return to their normal lives. Non-Trumpworld figures like progressive activist Alyssa Milano and fugitive libertarian icon John McAfee have also had misleading tweets related to coronavirus scrubbed by Twitter.

More here:

Conservative Voices Are Pumping Out Coronavirus Misinformation on Twitter - Vanity Fair

Social media companies are taking steps to tamp down coronavirus misinformation but they can do more – Middletown Press

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)

Bhaskar Chakravorti, Tufts University

(THE CONVERSATION) As we practice social distancing, our embrace of social media gets only tighter. The major social media platforms have emerged as the critical information purveyors for influencing the choices people make during the expanding pandemic. Theres also reason for worry: the World Health Organization is concerned about an infodemic, a glut of accurate and inaccurate information about COVID-19.

The social media companies have been pilloried in recent years for practicing surveillance capitalism and being a societal menace. The pandemic could be their moment of redemption. How are they rising to this challenge?

Surprisingly, Facebook, which had earned the reputation of being the least trusted tech company in recent years, has led with the strongest, most consistent actions during the unfolding COVID-19 crisis. Twitter and Google-owned YouTube have taken steps as well to stem the tide of misinformation. Yet, all three could do better.

As an economist who tracks digital technologys use worldwide at The Fletcher School at Tufts University, Ive identified three important ways to evaluate the companies responses to the pandemic. Are they informing while simultaneously curtailing misinformation? Are they enforcing responsible advertising policies? And are they providing helpful data to public health authorities without compromising privacy?

Tackling the infodemic

Social media companies can block, demote or elevate posts. According to Facebook, the average user sees only 10% of their News Feed and the platforms determine what users see by reordering how stories appear. This means demoting and elevating posts could be as essential as blocking them outright.

Blocking is the most difficult decision because it bumps up against First Amendment rights. Facebook, in particular, has recently been criticized for its unwillingness to block false political ads. But Facebook has had the most clear-cut policy on COVID-19 misinformation. It relies on third-party fact-checkers and health authorities flagging problematic content, and removes posts that fail the tests. It also blocks or restricts hashtags that spread misinformation on its sister platform, Instagram.

Twitter and YouTube have taken less decisive positions. Twitter says it has acted to protect against malicious behaviors. Del Harvey, Twitters vice president of trust and safety, told Axios that the company will remove any pockets of smaller coordinated attempts to distort or inorganically influence the conversation. YouTube removes videos claiming to prevent infections. However, neither company has a transparent blocking policy founded on solid fact-checking.

While all three platforms are demoting problematic content and elevating content from authoritative sources, the absence of consistent fact-checking standards has created a gray area where misinformation can slip through, particularly for Twitter. Panic-producing tweets claimed prematurely that New York was under lockdown, and bots or fake accounts have slipped in rumors.

Even the principle of deferring to authoritative sources can cause problems. For example, the widely read @realDonaldTrump has tweeted misinformation. Influential figures who are not officially designated authoritative sources have also managed to circulate misinformation. Elon Musk, founder of Tesla and SpaceX, tweeted a false assertion about the coronavirus to 32 million followers and Twitter has declined to remove his tweet. John McAfee, founder of the eponymous security solutions company, also tweeted a false assertion about the coronavirus. That tweet was removed but not before it had been widely shared.

Harnessing influence for good

Besides blocking and re-ordering posts, the social media companies must also ask how people are experiencing their platforms and interpreting the information they encounter there. Social media platforms are meticulously designed to anticipate the users experience, hold their attention and influence actions. Its essential that the companies apply similar techniques to influence positive behavior in response to COVID-19.

Consider some examples across each of the three platforms of failing to influence positive behaviors by ignoring the user experience.

For Facebook users, private messaging is, increasingly, a key source of social influence and information about the coronavirus. Because these groups often bring together more trusted networks family, friends, classmates there is a greater risk that people will turn to them during anxious times and become susceptible to misinformation. Facebook-owned Messenger and WhatsApp both closed platforms in contrast to Twitter are of particular concern since the companys ability to monitor content on these platforms is still limited.

For Twitter, its essential to track influencers, or people with many followers. Content shared by these users has greater impact and ought to pass through additional filters.

YouTube has taken the approach of pairing misleading coronavirus content with a link to an alternative authoritative source, such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or World Health Organization. This juxtaposition can have the opposite of the intended effect. A video from a non-authoritative individual appears with the CDC or WHO logo beneath it, which could unintentionally give viewers the impression that those public health authorities have approved the videos.

Responsible advertising

There is money to be made from ads offering products related to the outbreak. However, some of those ads are not in the public interest. Facebook set a standard by banning ads for medical face masks and Google followed suit, as did Twitter.

All three companies have offered free ads to appropriate public health and nonprofit organizations. Facebook has offered unlimited ads to the WHO, while Google has made a similar but less open-ended offer and Twitter offers Ads for Good credits to fact-checking nonprofit organizations and health information disseminators.

There have been some policy reversals. YouTube initially blocked ads meant to profit from content related to COVID-19, but then allowed some ads that follow the companys guidelines.

Overall, the companies have responded to the crisis, but their policies on ads vary, have changed and have left loopholes: Users could still see ads for face masks served by Google even after it had officially banned them. Clearer industry-wide principles and firm policies can help keep businesses and people from exploiting the outbreak for commercial gain.

Data to track the outbreak

Social media can be a source of essential data for mapping the spread of the disease and managing it. The key is that the companies protect user privacy, recognize the limits of data analysis and not oversell it. Geographic information systems that build on data from social media and other sources have already become key to mapping the worldwide spread of COVID-19. Facebook is collaborating with researchers at Harvard and National Tsing Hua University in Taiwan by sharing data about peoples movements stripped of identifying information and high-resolution population density maps.

Search and location data on YouTube and its parent, Google, are invaluable trend-trackers. Google hasnt offered its trends analyses for COVID-19 in any systematic manner to date, perhaps out of reluctance because of the failure of an earlier Google Trends program that attempted to predict the paths of transmission of influenza and completely missed the peak of the 2013 flu season.

Think with Google, the companys current data analytics service for marketers, offers a powerful example of insights that can be gleaned from Googles data. It could help with projects for contact tracing and social distancing compliance, provided its done in a way that respects user privacy. For example, as users locations are tagged along with their posts, the people theyve met and the places theyve been can help determine whether people on the whole or in a location are complying with public health safety orders and guidelines.

Moreover, data shared by companies stripped of identifying information could be used by independent researchers. For example, researchers could use Facebook-owned Instagram and CrowdTangle to correlate travelers movements to COVID-19 hotspots with user conversations to locate sources of transmission. Research teams I direct have been analyzing coronavirus-related Twitter hashtags to identify the primary misinformation sources to detect patterns.

The expanding footprint of the pandemic and its consequences are evolving quickly. To their credit, the social media companies have attempted to respond quickly as well. Yet, they can do more. This could be their time to rebuild trust with the public and with regulators, but the window to make the right choices is narrow. Their own futures and the futures of millions may depend on it.

[You need to understand the coronavirus pandemic, and we can help. Read our newsletter.]

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here: https://theconversation.com/social-media-companies-are-taking-steps-to-tamp-down-coronavirus-misinformation-but-they-can-do-more-133335.

More here:

Social media companies are taking steps to tamp down coronavirus misinformation but they can do more - Middletown Press

Elon Musk Just Sent The Best Cryptocurrency And Prank Bitcoin Rival Sharply HigherHeres Why – Forbes

Elon Musk, who's still running his victory lap after his electric car company Tesla proved its detractors wrong, has once again gone out to bat for his "fav" bitcoin alternativesending its price sharply higher.

Musk, the chief executive of both Tesla and aerospace manufacturer SpaceX, yesterday tweeted his support of minor bitcoin rival dogecoin, saying "dogs rock" and "they have the best coin."

Elon Musk has previously voiced his support of bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies but has a special ... [+] place in his heart for the "joke" bitcoin rival dogecoin.

Musk's tongue-in-cheek comments, which sent the dogecoin price up by around 5% yesterday, come after a thumping 12-months for dogecoin, one of the oldest alternatives to bitcoin.

The dogecoin price is up around 30% on this time last year, with the price of dogecoin being significantly boosted by Binance, the world's biggest bitcoin and cryptocurrency exchange, last July, when it added dogecoin to its list of supported digital tokens.

It's not the first time Musk and voiced his support for dogecointhough he has heaped praise on bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies as well.

In April last year, Musksurprised bitcoin and cryptocurrency watchers by saying that the meme-based dogecoin is his "fav" cryptocurrency in response to a Twitter poll that found him to be the favorite to take on the mantle of dogecoin CEO, with 49% of the vote.

However, Musk has recently rowed back his previous bitcoin praise, telling the Tesla-focused podcast Third Row in January he is "neither here nor there on bitcoin," raising concerns about its use for illegal transactions.

The price of dogecoin jumped yesterday after Elon Musk shared his ongoing support for the minor ... [+] bitcoin rival.

Dogecoin has found other high-profile supporters as well as Musk. Last year, John McAfee, the millionaire creator ofMcAfee security software-turned U.S. presidential hopeful and globe-trotting adventurer,praiseddogecoin as "one of the fastest growing coins based on use."

"Doge started life as joke/prank coin," McAfee said viaTwitter. "The coin now has a market cap of $360 million. The crypto market is, in no way, related to the stock market. Inherent value is, ultimately, based on usage. Go figure."

Dogecoin, surprisingly one of the oldest bitcoin rivals,was created in 2013 by a then 26-year-old Australian Jackson Palmer and American programmer Billy Markus after joking about it on Twitter.

See original here:

Elon Musk Just Sent The Best Cryptocurrency And Prank Bitcoin Rival Sharply HigherHeres Why - Forbes