Body-Altering Mutations In Humans and Flies

I became a science writer, circa 1980, because I didnt think flies with legs growing out of their heads my PhD research had much to do with human health or biology. So when I spied the words A Human Homeotic Transformation way down on the Table of Contents in the May issue of the American Journal of Human Genetics, I was as riveted as a normal person would be getting a copy of People with a celebrity on the cover.

Of Homeotic Mutations and The X-Files

Mutations in four genes give the fly in the lower right an extra pair of wings (Credit: FlyBase)

A homeotic mutation mixes up body parts, so that a fly grows a leg on its head, antennae on its mouth, or sports a double set of wings. Designation of body parts begins in the early embryo, when cells look alike but are already fated, thanks to gradients of morphogen proteins that program a particular region to elaborate particular structures. Mix up the messages, and a leg becomes an antenna or, as in the AJHG article, a child develops two upper jaws, instead of an upper and a lower.

I once knew the homeotic mutants of Drosophila melanogaster intimately, as I archaically mapped their genes. Shortly after I left Thom Kaufmans lab at Indiana University (where I penned a fruit fly romance novella, in addition to my thesis), post-doc Matt Scott and fellow grad student Amy Weiner were homing in on the homeobox, a 180-base-sequence that encodes a protein part that binds other proteins that turn on sets of other genes crafting an embryo, section by section.

Soon, homeoboxes turned up in all manner of genomes, affecting the positions of petals, legs, and larval segments, the genes mysteriously arrayed on their chromosomes in the precise order in which theyre deployed in development. Homeotic mutants even starred in an episode of the The X-Files.

Homeotic mutations cause a few human diseases. In lymphomas, white blood cells detour onto the wrong lineage, and in DiGeorge syndrome, the missing thymus and parathyroids and abnormal ears, nose, mouth, and throat echo the abnormalities in Antennapedia, the legs-on-the-head fly in the photo. Extra and fused fingers and various bony alterations also stem from homeotic mutations.

Alas, no human homeotic seemed as compelling to me as a double-winged fly until I saw photos of the tiny faces of the children with upper lower jaws.

Two Upper Jaws

3D CT scan of child with ACS. Lower jaw is small and malformed (left); same aged child with normal jaw (middle); lower jaw of child with ACS inverted over upper jaw of normal skull (right). (Credit: Image courtesy of Seattle Childrens).

Link:

Body-Altering Mutations In Humans and Flies

Naturally blond hair in Solomon Islanders rooted in native gene

ScienceDaily (May 3, 2012) The common occurrence of blond hair among the dark-skinned indigenous people of the Solomon Islands is due to a homegrown genetic variant distinct from the gene that leads to blond hair in Europeans, according to a new study from the Stanford University School of Medicine.

"This is one of the most beautiful examples to date of the mapping of a simple genetic trait in humans," said David Reich, PhD, a professor of genetics at Harvard University, who was not involved in the study.

The study identifying the gene responsible for blond hair in the Solomon Islands, a nation in the South Pacific, represents a rare case of simple genetics determining human appearance, and shows the importance of including understudied populations in gene mapping studies, said co-senior author Carlos D. Bustamante, PhD, professor of genetics at Stanford. The findings were published May 4 in Science.

"Since most studies in human genetics only include participants of European descent, we may be getting a very biased view of which genes and mutations influence the traits we investigate. Here, we sought to test whether one of the most striking human traits, blond hair, had the same -- or different -- genetic underpinning in different human populations," Bustamante said.

Globally, blond hair is rare, occurring with substantial frequency only in northern Europe and in Oceania, which includes the Solomon Islands and its neighbors. "Its frequency is between 5 and 10 percent across the Solomon Islands, which is about the same as where I'm from," said co-first author Eimear Kenny, PhD, who was born in Ireland.

Many assumed the blond hair of Melanesia was the result of gene flow -- a trait passed on by European explorers, traders and others who visited in the preceding centuries. The islanders themselves give several possible explanations for its presence, said co-senior author Sean Myles, PhD, a former Stanford postdoctoral scholar who is now an assistant professor at the Nova Scotia Agricultural College. They generally chalked it up to sun exposure, or a diet rich in fish, he said.

After researchers at UCSF generated genetic data from the samples, Kenny, a postdoctoral scholar in Bustamante's lab, began the analysis in September 2010, the week she started at Stanford. "Within a week we had our initial result. It was such a striking signal pointing to a single gene -- a result you could hang your hat on. That rarely happens in science," she said. "It was one of the best experiences of my career."

In terms of genetic studies, the analysis was straightforward, said Kenny. But gathering the data, accomplished in 2009 by Myles and co-first author Nicholas Timpson, PhD, was more difficult. Much of the Solomon Islands is undeveloped, without roads, electricity or telephones. It's also one of the most linguistically diverse nations in the world, with dozens of languages spoken.

It was a return trip for Myles who had been there in 2004 as a graduate student with Max Planck Institute molecular anthropologist Mark Stoneking, PhD, (also a co-author of the study) to investigate whether the language variations correlated with genetic variations. While there, Myles was fascinated by the ubiquity of blond hair, which was especially common among children.

"They have this very dark skin and bright blond hair. It was mind-blowing," said Myles. "As a geneticist on the beach watching the kids playing, you count up the frequency of kids with blond hair, and say, 'Wow, it's 5 to 10 percent.'"

Visit link:

Naturally blond hair in Solomon Islanders rooted in native gene

Genetics may explain some people's dislike of meat

Do you pass when it comes to pork? If you do, the reason you dont like the taste of bacon or ham may lie in your genes.

According to a new study from Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C., researchers have discovered that about 70 percent of people have two functional copies of a gene called OR7D4. The gene is linked to an odor receptor that detects a compound called androstenone a chemical in male mammals, most commonly in pork.

People who have only one or no functional copies of OR7D4 dont mind the scent of pork; those with two copies, however, turned their nose up at the smell.

Even though we found this gene, we didnt expect to see such strong food preference, said Hiroaki Matsunami, a Duke associate professor of molecular genetics and microbiology and one of the lead researchers for the study. With any food if its meat or bread or fruit you find hundreds of volatile chemicals, and this gene only interacts with one of these hundreds of chemicals.

But we found this nice, surprisingly clear answer to this, showing this OR7D4 would explain or predict how you like the meat.

For the study, researchers added different amounts of androstenone to existing pork meat samples, then asked 23 participants rate the meat based on the smell and whether or not they liked the taste.

After each rating, DNA samples were collected from the participants to determine the genotype of their OR7D4 gene. Every single person sensitive to the androstenone had the RT/RT genotype or two copies of the RT gene.

According to Matsunami said this gene could be responsible for certain peoples aversion to other kinds of meat as well.

The male pork meat contains relatively high levels of androstenone, but you can also find it in other types of meat, said Matsunami. In fact, androstenone is also found in human sweat, so its not a pig specific chemical.

Androstenone is a well known pheromone created during the mating process in pigs, giving much more significance to Matsunamis findings. Currently both Europe and the U.S. only sell pork from females or castrated males, meaning the meat contains very low levels of androstenone. In non-castrated pigs, the androstenone levels are over 30 times as much

Read the original:

Genetics may explain some people's dislike of meat

Myriad Genetics to Present at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2012 Health Care Conference

SALT LAKE CITY, May 2, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Myriad Genetics, Inc. (MYGN - News) announced today that Peter D. Meldrum, President and CEO, is scheduled to present at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2012 Health Care Conference, at 4:20 p.m. Pacific Time on Wednesday, May 16, 2012. The conference is being held at The Encore at the Wynn Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada.

The presentation will be available to interested parties through a live webcast accessible on the investor relations section of Myriad's website at http://www.myriad.com.

About Myriad Genetics

Myriad Genetics, Inc. is a leading molecular diagnostic company dedicated to making a difference in patients' lives through the discovery and commercialization of transformative tests to assess a person's risk of developing disease, guide treatment decisions and assess risk of disease progression and recurrence. Myriad's portfolio of nine molecular diagnostic tests are based on an understanding of the role genes play in human disease and were developed with a focus on improving an individual's decision making process for monitoring and treating disease. With fiscal year 2011 annual revenue of over $400 million and more than 1,000 employees, Myriad is working on strategic directives, including new product introductions, companion diagnostics, and international expansion, to take advantage of significant growth opportunities. For more information on how Myriad is making a difference, please visit the Company's website: http://www.myriad.com.

More:

Myriad Genetics to Present at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2012 Health Care Conference

Research and Markets: Genetics, 6th Edition International Student Version Continues To Educate Today's Students for …

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Dublin - Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/z2qzpp/genetics_6th_edit) has announced the addition of John Wiley and Sons Ltd's new book "Genetics, 6th Edition International Student Version" to their offering.

Genetics is one of the most popular texts in use for the introductory course. It opens a window on the rapidly advancing science of genetics by showing exactly how genetics is done. Throughout, the authors incorporate a human emphasis and highlight the role of geneticists to keep students interested and motivated. The sixth edition has been updated to reflect the latest developments in the field of genetics. Genetics continues to educate today's students for tomorrow's science by focusing on features that aid in content comprehension and application.

New to this Edition:

- A new one-column design better showcases important pieces of art and avoids the overwhelmed reaction readers have to the crowded layouts found in many other texts. Boxed sections will be reduced in size to help maintain the flow of the text.

- The Focus On boxes (one per chapter) have been revised to include the most current developments in genetics as well as the most relevant topics to students.

- A streamlined topical coverage, vetted by a panel of Genetics instructors, makes for a text that is manageable in size. Snustad 6e will provide instructors and students with in-depth explanations of only those topics frequently covered in a one-semester course.

- Animated solutions to the solve it problems in the text, utilize Camtasia software. These tutorials provide step-by-step solutions that appear as if they are written-out by hand as an instructor voice-over explains each step.

- Supported by the Wiley Resource kit. The Wiley Resource Kit provides an easy way to provide you with media & assessment. The Resource Kit can be delivered through any Learning Management System (LMS). The offer is free to students, requires no cartridge or CTB license fees from Wiley.

For more information visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/z2qzpp/genetics_6th_edit

View post:

Research and Markets: Genetics, 6th Edition International Student Version Continues To Educate Today's Students for ...

C2CAM – The Nephilim, Genetic Manipulation

24-02-2012 05:39 Hebrew scholar and expert in biblical prophecy, Douglas Hamp, warned that we're entering into an era of genetic manipulation that will set the stage for celestial intervention into the affairs of mankind. He predicted that within the next ten years a major disclosure event will take place which will convince the public to cooperate with aliens (who are actually demons rather than ETs) to participate in the next level of evolution. These aliens are using a hybridization program, mixing human genetics with the Satanic, in order to create an army to fight Jesus upon his return, he postulated. Further, he suggested that the hybrids might be currently kept in underground facilities. He correlated such beings with biblical accounts, in which the Nephilim or fallen angels, mated with human females, and had offspring, some of whom were said to be giants. Scientific tampering with the genetic code, such as with recombinant DNA, may lead to the possibility that people will be offered genetic enhancements, and if they accept them they'll be turned into Satanic hybrids, akin to the Bible's 'mark of the beast,' Hamp commented. News segment guests: Mish Shedlock, Hossein Hedjazi Website(s): Book(s): Corrupting the Image: Angels, Aliens, and the Antichrist Revealed The Monuments of Mars: A City on the Edge of Forever Dark Mission

The rest is here:

C2CAM - The Nephilim, Genetic Manipulation

Red Ice Radio – David Icke – Hour 1 – The Manipulation of Humanity – Video

30-03-2012 11:03 British author David Icke has written 20 books and traveled to over 55 countries since 1990. His books reveal how a hidden hand is behind world-changing events like the attacks of 9/11 and the manufactured wars in the Middle East, as part of a mass mind manipulation technique he has dubbed problem-reaction-solution. While being controversial and often heavily attacked, David Icke has driven on with his unrelentless investigation into subject areas that others don't dare touch. He reveals information that has been kept from a "dumbed down" population and has allowed the establishment to treat them as nothing more than slaves to a sinister hidden agenda. David returns to Red Ice to talk about his newest book, Remember Who You Are. First, we begin the interview discussing Robert Green's campaign and ritualistic child abuse. Then, David speaks about reality within our holographic universe. Later, David gives his perspective on aliens manipulating human DNA. Lastly, we discuss archetypes as software programs. David explains how human emotion is tied to genetics and using consciousness to override manipulation from external sources.

Continue reading here:

Red Ice Radio - David Icke - Hour 1 - The Manipulation of Humanity - Video

ReproSource Comments on New Study Linking Infertility to Genetics

A new study, finding a connection between infertility and key genetic markers, wins the praise of clinical research company ReproSource.

WOBURN, Mass., April 25, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) --

Infertility is a complicated medical issue that can affect both men and women; while there are many testing and treatment options available for those suffering from infertility, it can sometimes prove difficult even to determine the true cause of infertility. The cause of the condition could be anything from a lifestyle factor to a hormonal imbalance. According to a new scientific study, however, genetic markers can play an important role in tracking and predicting a decline in infertility. This study has won the affirmation of many within the medical community, including clinical research company ReproSource.

The study, reported in the February edition of Human Reproduction, says three key gene variants might be associated with the age at which a woman's infertility begins to decline. This information can be used to effectively predict when a woman will begin to experience a loss of fertility, and with it declining chances of conceiving.

ReproSource, a leading clinical laboratory and research organization that performs research and develops diagnostics like the Ovarian Assessment Report(TM), has issued a statement in praise of the new study. "This is valuable research to help determine why the age and rate of fertility decline can vary so dramatically among women," says Charles Jenkins, Vice President of ReproSource. "Fertility is a complex combination of hormones, immune factors, and genetics. The ability to identify genetic risk factors that affect fertility is critically important research."

Ultimately, Jenkins says, this new study is a critical step in the right direction for effectively predicting and treating infertility. "Although genetic factors for infertility are difficult to correct, identifying these risk factors provides patients and clinicians with valuable information to help them make timely and informed decisions about family planning," Jenkins notes.

The study itself draws similar conclusions to those made by ReproSource. The report indicates that these new findings may ultimately allow individual women to predict the age at which their fertility will begin to decline, and to plan accordingly.

"Many women now are delaying childbirth until their mid to late 30s, which is getting very near the edge of the usual fertility window," says Sonya Schuh-Huerta, PhD, a postdoctoral scholar and one of the authors of the new study. She continues by saying that many of these women are genetically destined to have diminishing fertility as they age, but, currently, they have no way of knowing this.

Another author of the study, Renee Reijo Pera, PhD, elaborates, noting that the age of menopause is largely determined by genetics--a fact many women do not know. Pera's hope for the new study is that it will help women to realize that their "reproductive biology is relatively fixed," and that planning their family in advance is typically the prudent plan of action.

ABOUT:

Read more:

ReproSource Comments on New Study Linking Infertility to Genetics

Amazon And The NIH Team Up To Put Human Genome In The Cloud

Amazon and the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) announced today that the complete 1000 Genomes Project is being made available on Amazon Web Services as a public data set. The announcement, made at the White House Big Data Summit, will make the largest collection of human genetics available to anyone free of charge.

In case youre light on the details, the 1000 Genomes Project is an international research effort started in 2008 that involves 75 companies and organizations working together to create a detailed catalog of the human genome, and all its 3 billion DNA bases. To date, over 200 terabytes of data have been created since the projects start.

Theres now DNA sequenced from over 2,661 individuals from 26 populations, and the NIH is planning to add more samples this year. The effort led to the techniques used to sequence the DNA of other species, going from the mouse to the gorilla.

The project started off with three pilot studies. Amazon began hosting the initial pilot data on Amazon S3 in 2010, so its not surprising to see the remainder of the data added today. The latest dataset is the most current, containing the DNA of 1,700 people.

The move to put the data up on Amazon, specifically, Amazon Web Services, aims to help speed up access to the research. Previously, researchers had to download data from government data centers or their own systems, or even snail mail it on discs.

The data will be stored on Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3) and Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) and can be accessed from AWS services such as Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) and Amazon Elastic MapReduce (Amazon EMR).

The 1000 Genomes Project is only one of many of the publicly hosted datasets found on Amazon. Others include data fromNASAs Jet Propulsion Laboratory,Langone Medical Center at New York University,Unilever,Numerate,Sage BionetworksandIon Flux.

More details on the data itself are here.

Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN), is a leading global Internet company and one of the most trafficked Internet retail destinations worldwide. Amazon is one of the first companies to sell products deep into the long tail by housing them in numerous warehouses and distributing products from many partner companies. Amazon directly sells or acts as a platform for the sale of a broad range of products. These include books, music, videos, consumer electronics, clothing and household products. The majority of Amazons...

See the original post here:

Amazon And The NIH Team Up To Put Human Genome In The Cloud

FDA sends letters to 5 genetic testing companies

It appears that the FDA sent letters to several different direct to consumer genetic testing companies. They are 23andme, Navigenics, DeCode, Illumina, and Knome, which provides whole genome sequencing. The FDA is claiming the tests must undergo approval as a medical device, but did not say anything about removing them from the market. The article also mentions that Pathway Genomics, the company producing the genetics tests that Walgreens considered selling in its stores, also received a letter.

Having recently received my 23andme results, I’m a little concerned by this statement:

Concern about the tests was also raised this week when 23andMe said that because of a laboratory mix-up, up to 96 customers might have received genetic information belonging to someone else.

I certainly hoped that they notified these customers of the potential error…

OpenPCR: DNA amplification for anyone

OpenPCR is a cool new project dedicated to building plans for an open source PCR machine. There’s not much inherently complicated about a PCR machine and it’s about time — a PCR machine built with $300 in parts using a modern software controller will likely be as powerful as any non-realtime PCR out there. Of course, the reagent pricing is what gets you.

Josh and Tito are raising money for this project using Kickstarter. $1024 gets them to build you a PCR machine, which is a reasonably good deal in the scheme of scientific equipment. I gave them $8, because I like stickers and already have a PCR machine that doesn’t exactly get a lot of use.

Singularity Summit 2010 in San Francisco to Explore Intelligence Augmentation

Kevin: I’ve been volunteering for the Singularity Institute these last few months. Each year, the Singularity Institute hosts the Singularity Summit, a two-day conference in San Francisco this August that may be of interest to many of the readers of this blog.

Will it ever become possible to boost human intelligence using brain implants, or create an artificial intelligence smarter than Einstein? In a 1993 paper presented to NASA, science fiction author and mathematician Vernor Vinge called such a hypothetical event a “Singularity“, saying “From the human point of view this change will be a throwing away of all the previous rules, perhaps in the blink of an eye”. Vinge pointed out that intelligence enhancement could lead to “closing the loop” between intelligence and technology, creating a positive feedback effect.

This August 14-15, hundreds of AI researchers, robotics experts, philosophers, entrepreneurs, scientists, and interested laypeople will converge in San Francisco to address the Singularity and related issues at the only conference on the topic, the Singularity Summit. Experts in fields including animal intelligence, artificial intelligence, brain-computer interfacing, tissue regeneration, medical ethics, computational neurobiology, augmented reality, and more will share their latest research and explore its implications for the future of humanity.

“This year, the conference shifts to a focus on neuroscience, bioscience, cognitive enhancement, and other explorations of what Vernor Vinge called ‘intelligence amplification’ (IA) — the other route to the Singularity,” said Michael Vassar, president of the Singularity Institute, which is hosting the event.

Irene Pepperberg, author of “Alex & Me,” who has pushed the frontier of animal intelligence with her research on African Gray Parrots, will explore the ethical and practical implications of non-human intelligence enhancement and of the creation of new intelligent life less powerful than ourselves. Futurist-inventor Ray Kurzweil will discuss reverse-engineering the brain and his forthcoming book, How the Mind Works and How to Build One. Allan Synder, Director, Centre for the Mind at the University of Sydney, will explore the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation for the enhancement of narrow cognitive abilities. Joe Tsien will talk about the smarter rats and mice that he created by tuning the molecular substrate of the brain’s learning mechanism. Steve Mann, “the world’s first cyborg,” will demonstrate his latest geek-chic inventions: wearable computers now used by almost 100,000 people.

Other speakers will include magician-skeptic and MacArthur Genius Award winner James Randi; Gregory Stock (Redesigning Humans), former Director of the Program on Medicine, Technology, and Society at UCLA’s School of Public Health; Terry Sejnowski, Professor and Laboratory Head, Salk Institute Computational Neurobiology Laboratory, who believes we are just ten years away from being able to upload ourselves; Ellen Heber-Katz, Professor, Molecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program at The Wistar Institute, who is investigating the molecular basis of wound regeneration in mutant mice, which can regenerate limbs, hearts, and spinal cords; Anita Goel, MD, physicist, and CEO of nanotechnology company Nanobiosym; and David Hanson, Founder & CEO, Hanson Robotics, who is creating the world’s most realistic humanoid robots.

You can watch videos from past summits and register at http://www.singularitysummit.com.

Dan Vorhaus, Attorney At Law, Legally Advises Medical Doctors Can Use 23andMe To Provide Medical Advice

Daniel B. Vorhaus, Harvard Law School, J.D., editor of Genomics Law Report, and practicing attorney in North Carolina at Robinson, Bradshaw & Hinson, gives the following legal advice to Dr. Steven A. R. Murphy regarding possibility of using 23andMe in clinical practice. In the following quote, Dan Vorhaus advises Dr. Steven Murphy with “no ambiguity” that the 23andMe Terms of Service ”aren’t binding.”

@Andrew Evans is correct. Steve, the [23andMe] ToS aren’t binding on you. You do with the 23andMe data – and any other piece of information provided by one of your patients – what your professional judgment dictates. There’s no ambiguity there.

According to Dan Vorhaus, the 23andMe Terms of Service do not exclude its use for health ascertainment. He further implies that intended use for 23andMe service should be inferred from the contents of the test results themselves and not solely defined by the 23andMe Terms of Service.

There’s no ambiguity to me here, either. Here Dan Vorhaus has published what I consider to be written advice from a lawyer in his professional capacity to a medical doctor in response to a specific complaint regarding the legality of the application 23andMe service for use in health ascertainment or disease purposes in a clinical setting for medical application.

Further, while Dan Vorhaus did not state so explicitly, I have implied as a layperson from this comment thread that Dan Vorhaus publicly advises 23andMe users to share 23andMe results with medical doctors to communicate clinically useful information for intended possible medical application in a clinical application despite the 23andMe Terms of Service which state that the 23andMe service “cannot be used for health ascertainment or disease purposes.”

Dan Vorhaus has published that the 23andMe Terms of Service are not binding.

Maybe I’m mistaken —but I’m just a layperson. I don’t see any ambiguity regarding how lawyer Dan Vorhaus has advised doctors that 23andMe can be used in the provision of medical advice within the professional capacity of licensed medical practice. Despite that the 23andMe Terms of Service explicitly forbids this use, Dan Vorhaus advises that these terms in the 23andMe contract are not binding in a medical setting when the test results are provided by a patient to a medical doctor.

23andMe is an egregious attack on civil liberties and I have yet to read a compelling argument otherwise. Freedom with Terms of Service like 23andMe’s is not freedom at all.

Note: I do understand that a third party is not necessarily bound to the 23andMe Terms of Service when presented with unsolicited information derived from the 23andMe service. However, I also understand that this 23andMe legal strategy is unethical because it distorts the law with a bad faith contract intended to evade regulation at the expense of public health and in favor of arbitrary federal enforcement at the expense of independent medical institutions and professionals.

Reference: 23andMe Terms of Service

3. Description of What the Services Are and Are Not: 23andMe Service Is For Research and Educational Use Only. We Do Not Provide Medical Advice, And The Services Cannot Be Used For Health Ascertainment or Disease Purposes

Please Stop Antagonizing the AMA

The American Medical Association (AMA) has one real function:

To Defend the Language of Medical Procedures (CPT codes).

They have done this by regularly publishing standard definition, enforcing access to licensing, cooperation with Center for Medicare / Medicaid Services (CMS), and aggressively defending their copyrights and trademarks.

They do not do this by “reorganizing a community of doctors.”

Please stop antagonizing the AMA by accusing it of ineffectiveness and corruption. It’s not relevant if these accusations could be true because these accusations are self-fulfilling. Empty accusations of ineffectiveness pressures the AMA to raise even more dubious funding to further purchase its own overextension. Then, to medical doctors, the more an organization resembles a pharmaceutical campaign, the less they will believe that organization legitimately represents them. Every glossy brochure, every phone call, every fax, every campaign further alienates doctors.

Eventually, somebody will breach the CPT wall and decades of wisdom will be dumped into the digital sea of craven monsters. Think: Napster. Imagine a world where musicians could effectively print their own cash by recording music and selling it online. Napster utterly destroyed that dream.

Is that what you want? To bring down medical doctors down to your level where everything you make is valued only by what it costs for other people to take it from you? That’s bad.

If you want to help doctors “organize,” then apply for a $30k receptionist job at a medical office and, from there, use your skills and vision to organize their operations. That’s a start.

Meanwhile, if continue to call people “Beezlebub” casually enough in passing conversation, then somebody will eventually believe you. That’s bad. There’s no mercy for people whom other people think are evil.