Healthcare sets tone for US Rep. Michael Burgess’ contentious town hall – Fort Worth Star Telegram


Fort Worth Star Telegram
Healthcare sets tone for US Rep. Michael Burgess' contentious town hall
Fort Worth Star Telegram
Like other similar events across the country, most of the attendees at Burgess' town hall were upset over Republican plans to repeal and possibly replace the Affordable Care Act, former President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law. Almost no ...
Rep. Michael Burgess Hosts Contentious Town Hall on Health CareNBC 5 Dallas-Fort Worth
Obamacare supporters confront congressman at Flower Mound ...Dallas News (blog)

all 13 news articles »

Read the original here:

Healthcare sets tone for US Rep. Michael Burgess' contentious town hall - Fort Worth Star Telegram

What we know about the GOP’s healthcare bill – The Hill

House Republicans are plowing ahead with their plan to repeal and replace ObamaCare, with committee votes likely next week.

While final legislation has yet to be unveiled, an outline and a leaked draft from last month give a general idea of where House Republicans are headed.

Their bill would dismantle the central elements of ObamaCare, including its subsidies to help people afford coverage, its expansion of Medicaid, and its mandates and taxes.

Democrats warn the bill would jeopardize coverage for the 20 million people who have gained it from ObamaCare, while Republicans argue the health law has failed and needs to be replaced with a less intrusive system.

Here are the main things we know so far about the GOP plan.

It is likely to cover fewer people than ObamaCare

Many Republicans acknowledge that their plan is likely to cover fewer people than the Affordable Care Act.

The GOP plan would provide less financial assistance to people, especially those with low incomes, through a tax credit. The GOP plan would also repeal the expansion of Medicaid, at least for people who are not already grandfathered in, starting in 2020. That expansion has provided coverage for about 11 million people.

The smaller tax credit and repeal of the Medicaid expansion, along with a broader plan to restructure Medicaid to cap federal payments, are likely to result in fewer people being covered.

No question, between the changes in Medicaid and the smaller tax credit for low income people in particular, its pretty clear that this bill would cover fewer people than the ACA, said Larry Levitt, a healthcare expert at the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Republicans say they are not trying to compete with ObamaCares coverage numbers, which rely in part on a mandate that forces people to buy coverage or pay a tax penalty.

Were not going to send an IRS agent out to chase you down and make you buy health insurance, Rep. Michael BurgessMichael BurgessWhat we know about the GOP's healthcare bill GOP takes heat for ObamaCare secrecy GOP Rep: Everyone should have accessible, affordable health coverage MORE (R-Texas), the chairman of the Energy and Commerce health subcommittee, said last month. If the [coverage] numbers drop, I would say thats a good thing, because weve restored personal liberty in this country.

It would provide less help to low-income people than ObamaCare

ObamaCare bases its tax credits on income, meaning that low-income people get extra help. The Republican plan, in contrast, would provide a tax credit based on age, with older people receiving more money.

A study from the Kaiser Family Foundation last week found that the average tax credit to help people buy insurance would be at least 36 percent lower in 2020 under a leaked House GOP bill or a previous plan from then-Rep. Tom Price (R-Ga.) than under the Affordable Care Act.

Avik Roy, a leading Republican health policy expert, wrote in Forbes that not adjusting financial assistance for income is a key flaw in the GOP plan.

It means that millions of highly vulnerable people those near the poverty line and those with poor health status will not receive enough in tax credits to afford the coverage they need, he wrote.

Republicans argue that giving more assistance to people with lower incomes is a disincentive to work and earn a higher income.

You dont get the implicit tax on making more income under the GOP plan, said Doug Holtz-Eakin, president of the American Action Forum.

It would seek to protect people with pre-existing conditions

The GOP bill would keep the ObamaCare protection that bans insurers from rejecting people with pre-existing conditions but with a twist.

Insurers would be allowed to charge people 30 percent higher premiums for one year if they have had a gap in their healthcare coverage.

The penalty for going without coverage would be administered by insurers.

It would let the states decide what insurance plans must cover

The GOP proposal would repeal ObamaCares federal requirements that insurance plans cover a set of 10 healthcare services, and instead give the power to states to decide which benefits a plan must cover.

Republicans argue that the ObamaCare requirements, known as essential health benefits, drive up the cost of insurance by mandating that plans cover certain items that not everybody wants, like maternity coverage. Democrats warn that repealing the requirements could leave people with skimpy coverage that does not cover important things like prescription drugs or mental health services.

Holtz-Eakin noted that without the essential health benefits, insurers would have more freedom to design a health plan that costs exactly the same amount as the tax credit.

It repeals ObamaCares taxes

The GOP plan would repeal all of ObamaCares taxes, including the Health Insurance Tax and the excise tax on medical devices.

The plan would be financed through a new tax on generous healthcare plans that people obtain through their employers. Right now, most employer-provided health coverage is exempt from taxation.

Some Republicans are uncomfortable with the idea, viewing it as a new version of the Cadillac tax on generous healthcare plans.

Other Republicans say the idea is just moving to equalize the tax treatment between people who get insurance through work and those who dont.

Go here to read the rest:

What we know about the GOP's healthcare bill - The Hill

Progress 2017 Heritage Corner in 5th generation of health care – Sentinel-Tribune

After numerous new buildings and expansions, Heritage Corner Health Care Campus is about as big as it will get.

But owner Mark Manley keeps the groundbreaking shovel in his office. Just in case.

Your current subscription does not provide access to this content. Please click the button below to manage your account.

kAmw6C:E286 @776CD 2 H:56 C2?86 @7 D6CG:46D[ 7C@> 2 49:=5 42C6 E@ 2 >6>@CJ 42C6 46?E6C]k^Am

kAm|2C< 2?5 s63C2 |2?=6J C6=@42E65 E@ q@H=:?8 vC66? :? `hha 7C@> u:?5=2J H96? E96J 3F:=E E96 w6C:E286 x?? 2DD:DE65 =:G:?8 46?E6C 2E E96 4@C?6C @7 z=@EK 2?5 t2DE vJADJ {2?6 C@25D]k^Am

kAm%96J 2C6 ?@H :?E@ E96:C 7:7E9 86?6C2E:@? 😕 962=E9 42C6] |2C< |2?=6JD 8C62E2F?E 2?5 8C62EF?4=6 C2? E96 7@C>6C |2?=6J }FCD:?8 w@>6 @? (6DE (@@DE6C 😕 q@H=:?8 vC66? 5FC:?8 E96 `he_D 2?5 `hf_D]k^Am

kAm}@H 96=A:?8 =625 E96 4@>A2?J 2C6 D@? |2E96H 2?5 52F89E6CD |@?:42 |2?=6J 2?5 |:DEJ s:>:4<]k^Am

kAmx? `hhd E96J 6IA2?565 3J 255:?8 @?6 >@C6 2DD:DE65 =:G:?8 H:?8 2?5 282:? 😕 `hhh E@ 255 w6C:E286 }FCD:?8 $F:E6D 2?5 ac9@FC ?FCD:?8]k^Am

kAmx? a__a[ :?56A6?56?E =:G:?8 H2D 25565 E@ E96 AC@8C2>D H:E9 EH@ >@C6 H:?8D 42==65 %96 !:==2CD 2E w6C:E286 r@C?6Cj 2?5 E96 4@??64E:@? @7 v@@5C:49 2?5 qC:89E H:?8D 7@C>65 r@C?6C $E@?6 u:E?6DD r6?E6C[ 762EFC:?8 2 H2C>H2E6C A@@=]k^Am

kAmp== E96 H:?8D 2E w6C:E286 2C6 ?2>65 27E6C 72>:=J >6>36CD 6I46AE 7@C E96 v@@5C:49 H:?8[ H9:49 H2D ?2>65 27E6C (:==:2> v@@5C:49[ E96 D:E6D 7:CDE C6D:56?E]k^Am

kAmx? a__e 4@?DECF4E:@? DE2CE65 7@C 2 49:=542C6 46?E6C @? E96 42>AFD 7@C 49:=5C6? 286D e >@?E9D E@ `a J62CD]k^Am

kAms:D4@G6CJ z:?85@> r9:=5 r2C6 @A6?65 @? y2?] `f[ a__f]k^Am

kAm(2E49:?8 E96 J@F?8DE6CD :?E6C24E H:E9 E96 D6?:@CD 😀 2 ;@J[ 2?5 24E:G:E:6D 2C6 A=2??65 E@ :?4=F56 3@E9]k^Am

kAmxE C62==J 3C:89E6?D E96:C 52J[ D2:5 s:>:4<[ G:46 AC6D:56?E]k^Am

kAm%96C6 😀 2 8C@H:?8 5:D4@??64E 36EH66? 49:=5C6? 2?5 E96:C 6=56CD[ 2?5 92G:?8 E96 EH@ 25;246?E 3F:=5:?8D 2==@HD E96 J@F?8DE6CD E@ :?E6C24E H:E9 D6?:@CD 😕 2 H2J E96J >2J ?@E 6=D6H96C6[ 25565 |2E96H |2?=6J[ AC6D:56?E]k^Am

kAmvC@F?53C62<:?8 7@C E96 Sd >:==:@? 6IA2?D:@? E@ :?4=F56 2 ?6H >6>@CJ 42C6 F?:E[ >@C6 AC:G2E6 A2J D<:==65 ?FCD:?8 DF:E6D 2?5 2? :?A2E:6?E 9@DA:46 42C6 46?E6C H2D DE2CE65 :? a__h 2?5 H2D 4@>A=6E65 😕 a_`_]k^Am

kAmw6C:E286 2=D@ 92D A2CE?6C65 H:E9 qC:586 w@DA:46[ H9:49 ?@H @776CD 2 42C6 46?E6C 25;246?E E@ E96 >2:? 3F:=5:?8]k^Am

kAm%92E 😀 @?6 @7 E96 E9:?8D x> >@DE AC@F5 @7[ D2:5 |2C< |2?=6J 23@FE E92E 255:E:@?]k^Am

kAm%96 72>:=J 2=D@ 92D 4@?EC24E65 H:E9 =@42= 5@4E@CD E@ DE277 E96 w6C:E286 !C:>2CJ r2C6 U2>Aj $A@CED |65:4:?6 46?E6C =@42E65 @? E96 62DE D:56 @7 E96 42>AFD]k^Am

kAm$@>6 @7 E96:C D6CG:46D 4@>A=6>6?E H92E H6 5@ 96C6 @? @FC 42>AFD[ D2:5 s63C2 |2?=6J 23@FE E96 DA@CED >65:4:?6 46?E6C]k^Am

kAm%96J <6AE 6IA2?5:?8 3642FD6 @7 E96 4@>>F?:EJ H6C6 😕 2?5 H6 92G6 E@ 92G6 5:G6CD:EJ 😕 H92E H6 5@[ D96 25565]k^Am

kAm%96C6 😀 2=H2JD D@>6E9:?8 ?6H 2E w6C:E286 r@C?6C]k^Am

kAm(6 ?6G6C DE@A 5C62>:?8[ 25565 |2C< |2?=6J]k^Am

kAm|@H:?8 E96 8C@F?5D FD65 E@ 36 2 49@C6 2?5 2E @?6 E:>6 96 E9@F89E E96J H@F=5 ?6G6C CF? @FE @7 C@@>] w6 92D?E CF=65 @FE 2 7FEFC6 6IA2?D:@?] %96C6 😀 DE:== 6>AEJ DA246 @? E96 ?:?624C6 42>AFD]k^Am

kAm(6C6 4=@D6]k^Am

kAm(:E9 hb 365D 2G2:=23=6 😕 `b 5:776C6?E 2A2CE>6?E DEJ=6D E96C6 EJA:42==J 😀 C@@> 7@C ?6H 4=:6?ED H96E96C 😕 :?56A6?56?E 42C6 @C 2DD:DE65 =:G:?8] %96J 2=D@ A=2? E@ 255 `_ 365D E@ E96 >6>@CJ 42C6 46?E6C]k^Am

kAmpD J@FC 962=E9 42C6 ?665D 492?86[ H6 42? E2:=@C J@FC 42C6[ D2:5 |@?:42 |2?=6J[ |6>@CJ r2C6 >2?286C]k^Am

kAm%96 D:E6 6>A=@JD `a_ A6@A=6 2?5 2=D@ AC@G:56D 42E6C:?8 H:E9:? :ED >66E:?8 C@@>D 2?5 2 D2=@? 2?5 DA2 @A6? E@ E96 AF3=:4j FD6 @7 :ED 7:E?6DD 46?E6C 2?5 H2C>H2E6C A@@= 😀 @A6? E@ @FEA2E:6?ED 2?5 9@>6962=E9 4=:6?ED]k^Am

kAmxE 92D 4C62E65 9F?5C65D @7 DFCC@82E6 8C2?5A2C6?ED 7@C E96 72>:=J[ D2:5 |2E96H |2?=6J]k^Am

kAm(6 6?;@J A6@A=6[ D2:5 |2C< |2?=6J]k^Am

kAmxE 😀 2 5C62> E@ 5@ D@>6E9:?8 J@F =@G6[ 25565 s63C2 |2?=6J]k^Am

kAmw6C:E286 r@C?6C 92D D6E 2? 6I2>A=6 7@C @E96C 2DD:DE65 =:G:?8 46?E6CD] (:E9 2 DE277E@4=:6?E C2E:@ @7 `i`_[ :E 92D 366? C2E65 }@] ` 😕 C6D:56?E D2E:D724E:@? 3J E96 ~9:@ s6A2CE>6?E @7 p8:?8]k^Am

kAmxED 366? 2 C62= ;@FC?6J[ D2:5 |2C< |2?=6J]k^Am

Read more here:

Progress 2017 Heritage Corner in 5th generation of health care - Sentinel-Tribune

Trump Finally Admits He Has No Health Care Plan – Mother Jones

President Trump has been promising a health care plan for months now. But when will we have it? Let's roll the tape:

January 15: "Its very much formulated down to the final strokes. We havent put it in quite yet but were going to be doing it soon."

February 5: "I would like to say by the end of the year at least the rudiments but we should have something within the year and the following year."

February 16: "We're doing Obamacare, we're in the final stages. So, we will be submitting sometime in early March, mid-March."

February 27: "We have come up with a solution that's really, really, I think, very good."

So we've gone from immediately to 2018 to mid-March to all done. Today, however, Politico reports that in reality, Trump has no plan at all: "His team has signaled to House Speaker Paul Ryan that they will embrace his health care bill next week, and aides hoped to get a marked-up bill ready."

Since the House bill is apparently what we're going to get, it's worth repeating something I wrote a few months ago. After describing both Obamacare and Ryancare in broad strokes, I noted that their foundations were basically the same:

If you haven't yet noticed what this all means, let me spell it out. The key parts of Obamacare and Ryan's plan are the same. They both (a) rely on private insurance, (b) require insurance companies to cover people with preexisting conditions, (c) encourage people to buy insurance continuously by penalizing them if they don't, (d) provide billions of dollars in federal subsidies to make insurance affordable for low-income households, and (e) rely on Medicaid for the very poorest.

As liberals have been pointing out forever, any kind of health care plan has to have three parts:

Sure enough, Ryancare has all those things, just like Obamacare. There are differences in the details, but those don't matter very much. What does matter is the difference in cost. Obamacare provides subsidies of about $100 billion per year, while Ryancare provides...something much less. We don't know exactly how much less yet, but certainly less than half of Obamacare, maybe as little as a quarter. This is what makes Ryancare useless, not its overall structure, which is fairly workable. The working poor and the working class can only barely afford insurance even with Obamacare's subsidies. They won't come close with Ryancare's.

But the rich will get a big tax cut, and the middle class will get a nice break on their health insurance. In short order, however, interstate deregulation will almost certainly lead to individual insurance becoming all but useless, and the individual insurance market will probably collapse fairly soon after that. Alternatively, it might collapse even before Ryancare goes into effect, as insurers bail out on Obamacare (why bother with it if it's just going away soon?) and conclude that they can't make money on Ryancare either.

See? It's not so complicated after all. I imagine this is what Paul Ryan has wanted all along.

Read this article:

Trump Finally Admits He Has No Health Care Plan - Mother Jones

Lindsey Graham says he doesn’t know what GOP health care plan is yet – The Denver Post

CLEMSON, S.C. (AP) U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham told a rowdy town hall in South Carolina that health care is going to change in the United States. Just dont ask him for details.

Can I let you in on a little secret? I dont know what the GOP plan is, the Republican Graham told the roughly 1,000 people who packed a theatre at Clemson University on Saturday.

He is still vehemently against a single-payer, government-run health care program saying it costs too much and doesnt provide choices. Instead he would like states to be able to choose whether to keep President Barack Obamas health care plan but with tax breaks to encourage the use of health savings accounts.

Many of Grahams proposals were met by boos and jeers in an audience that was more liberal than Graham appeared to expect.

I didnt know there were this many liberals in South Carolina, Graham joked about his birth state where just 41 percent of voters picked Democrat Hillary Clinton for president in 2016.

But Graham briefly won them back by promising to push for the health care debate to be held publicly. He said he was bothered that Republicans seemed to be making the same mistake Obama made: of coming up with a plan and trying to pass it quickly with as little discussion as possible.

Graham said he used the Affordable Care Act to get his health insurance in South Carolina shortly after it passed, and his deductible rose from $750 to $6,250 and his premiums quadrupled. Thats not health care. That is a redistribution of income, Graham said.

Graham has since moved to the militarys health plan, having retired from the Air Force, where he spent much of his three decade career serving in the reserves.

He asked the crowd if they wanted health care like him. When they yelled yes, Graham said then serve 33 years in the Air Force.

Graham and the audience did agree that insurers shouldnt be able to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions.

Graham covered a wide range of topics Saturday. All the audiences questions were placed in a bucket and randomly drawn, leading to five different queries on whether President Donald Trump should be forced to release his tax returns.

Graham supports a bill requiring presidential candidates to release their taxes starting in 2020.

We can subpoena his tax returns, Graham said of Trump today as the crowd roared.

Ill do that when there is a reason to, Graham followed up, grinning.

Graham said he believes Russia worked to influence the U.S. election in 2016 and is working to tip elections in Europe in 2017. He said they must be punished through sanctions.

The crowd cheered Graham when the town hall ended. Charlotte Holt said she appreciated his time. Some other congressmen in South Carolina have not held in-person town meetings.

Hes as close to a responsible senator as you are going to get in South Carolina, Holt said.

For the most part, the freewheeling Graham appeared to have fun. He stuck out his tongue at a woman who shouted out she didnt like the patriotic video he showed to start off his town hall. He repeatedly reminded the audience that elections have consequences and that he wanted Trump to succeed as president.

___

Follow Jeffrey Collins on Twitter at http://twitter.com/JSCollinsAP . His work can be found at http://bigstory.ap.org/content/jeffrey-collins .

Excerpt from:

Lindsey Graham says he doesn't know what GOP health care plan is yet - The Denver Post

For Seniors and Their Caregivers Navigating Arizona’s Health-Care System, There’s No Place Like Home – Phoenix New Times

Everything is wrong.

My hands dont work properly. I keep stumbling over my feet. I hear distant chatter, but cant make out whats being said. Im supposed to be doing something what was it again? Oh, right. Find a sweater, write a letter, set the table is that the right order? Shit. I cant see very well in here, even though the lights are on. I swear theres someone standing in the corner over there.

Ive been stumbling around an apartment at the Terraces, a senior-living facility, for several minutes now. I have virtual dementia, courtesy of something called Second Wind Dreams, a nonprofit that offers educational programs about aging. This one is called the Virtual Dementia Tour, and its meant to mimic the muddled commotion that demented people endure.

When I arrived, a nice fellow named Dannis gave me a pair of rubber gloves to put on, and then a pair of gardening gloves (one of them inside out) to wear over those. Scratchy inserts went into my shoes, and iPod headphones playing random sounds and a fuzzy radio broadcast were clamped over my ears. Dannis handed me a pair of dark glasses with round stickers over the lenses, and led me to the door of a Terraces unit.

Go inside, hed instructed. Find the tan sweater and put it on. Find the book and turn it to page 73. Set the table for four. Write a letter to your family and put it in an envelope. Locate the phone and call home.

After a while, I emerge in an ugly tan pullover, having arranged plastic flatware and paper plates, scribbled an angry letter (Dear Family, thanks for all your help caring for Mom!) and made a pretend phone call to my own house. It was simple work made unpleasant by the stuff in my shoes, the sight impairment, and the bulky dollar-store gardening gloves.

I get it, I say to Dannis as I peel off the gloves and the sweater. You want to demonstrate how hard it is for demented people to do stuff by altering my sensory abilities. But whats the bigger point?

Instead of answering, Dannis hands me a multiple-choice quiz. Questions include Are you relaxed? and Do people with dementia get the care they need?

At the bottom, an essay question asks, What will you do differently after the Virtual Dementia experience?

I scrawl, Drink rat poison! and head for my car.

Im only half kidding. Suicide seems like a better answer to old age than being shoved into a nursing home, a solution this virtual dementia sideshow is obviously promoting. The idea of keeping our elderly at home the term used in the elder-care industry is aging in place is one Ive found barely supported by anyone, including the agencies charged with making this option a reality.

Its difficult to qualify for Arizonas version of Medicaid, which requires that you be really sick and really broke before they offer strictly controlled and usually inadequate services. Veterans Administration benefits are also hard to come by, and once an old person secures either of these, theyre exempt from receiving services from any other agency.

And anyway, who wants to take care of their aged parents in the first place?

I certainly didnt. But Ive been caring for my 92-year-old mother, who has late-stage Alzheimers disease and whom I refer to as the Duchess of Pela, for going on 11 years now.

During that time, Ive learned just how badly the elder-care system is broken. Underfunded, it relies on an unreliable and mostly unskilled workforce of underpaid babysitters to look after people who want to live out their lives at home. And while the state appears to support this idea with various programs and agencies to finance and promote home health care, those programs and agencies are never enough.

That means that the rest of the work falls on schmucks like me. I maintain two full-time jobs and spend 55 caregiving hours each week to patch the holes in the leaky system of keeping my mom in the house where she has lived for the past 50 years.

Doing so has meant performing bureaucratic backflips while applying for the states version of Medicaid, then working with a case manager to supervise a program contractor who facilitates my relationship with the home-care service contractor who sends respite workers to care for my mother when Im not with her. Then theres training and managing those workers, who often dont show up or leave the agency without notice.

Last year, a study by the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) estimated that more than 800,000 Arizonans are looking after a loved one rather than dumping that job onto an elder-care facility.

The average family caregiver is a 61-year-old female looking after someone 70 or older.

Sixty-three percent use their own money to help provide care, and 68 percent modify their work schedules to accommodate a caregiving plan. According to the study, 87 percent of these people support a proposal that would provide short-term help from a home health aide so they could take a break.

Id like to ask the 13 percent who didnt support the proposal if its because they know theyll likely have to jump through fiery hoops to get that short-term help.

And then I guess Id want AARP to explain just how short-term that short-term help might be. Would this home health aide be trained to care for old, demented people? Could I have the same person each time, so I wouldnt spend a chunk of my time off training a stranger about my mothers needs, and the rest of my respite worrying that this latest stranger isnt up to the job?

Because thats how in-home care tends to work. After beating our brains out on a rock to qualify for financial assistance, those of us looking after loved ones typically wind up spending that assistance in a profoundly unreliable system.

After stumbling through my virtual dementia experience, I head back to my mothers to meet LoCretia, the latest trainee sent by the caregiving agency the sixth such agency Ive hired in two years to sit with the Duchess twice a week. When I introduce them to one another, my mother beams.

Are you half of that other girls spoon wrangler? the Duchess inquires of LoCretia. Her name was Donald and she flew coach.

Her Majestys new caregiver turns to me. Do she always talk that way?

Often, I reply. Have you worked with dementia patients before?

Yes, LoCretia assures me. Thats that thing where they forget stuff, right?

While my mother and her new caregiver become acquainted, I phone the publicist at Second Wind Dreams.

I think youre taking advantage of people with your virtual-dementia thing, I tell him. Youre trying to scare us into putting our loved ones into care facilities. Do you get a kickback from the Terraces for every room they rent after you frighten people?

He swears they dont, but hes dodging my question about the purpose of a virtual-dementia tour.

Are you trying to prove that our loved ones with dementia shouldnt live alone? I persist. Or do you just want us to know that its hard to set the table when youre wearing a polyester V-neck and cheaply made sunglasses?

He promises hell ask somebody and get back with me. He never calls back. When I go to transcribe the recording I made of my virtual-dementia tour, I discover Id left my digital recorder on pause the whole time. I have to re-create the entire experience from memory. Im too tired to enjoy the irony of this.

The Duchess of Pela on her 92nd birthday.

Todd Grossman

To be fair, no state budget is vast enough to offer round-the-clock home health care to those in need. The average payout from the Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS), our states version of Medicaid, is between 20 and 30 hours per week. Lower-income states, particularly those in the South, receive more federal funds. But because those dollars are stretched farther in poorer communities, the cost per case tends to be even lower than it is in Arizona.

Before becoming a caregiver, I suppose I thought my parents would live to be 100 and die quietly in their sleep on the same night, never having been especially sick.

Or maybe I thought when they were no longer able to care for themselves, theyd move into a nice, clean facility where theyd receive loving attention from smiling nurses who felt a calling to look after the elderly. This wonderful place, I suppose I surmised, would be paid for by Medicare and Medicaid, by insurance policies and Social Security and maybe part of Dads monthly pension check. There would be lap blankets and ceramics classes and soft food prepared by a friendly dietitian. Probably thered be shuffleboard.

I dont know what I thought. But heres what Ive come to know: The average old person dies within a year of admission to a nursing home, according to a 2015 study by the Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. The lousy facilities and there are a lot of them cost about $7,000 a month per person, and the better ones typically dont accept payment from either Medicaid or extended-care insurance policies, which usually only pay a percentage of rent, anyway. Even the places that do take these forms of reimbursement only keep a small percentage of beds for clients who arent paying cash.

If she werent demented, the Duchess wouldnt approve of me giving up my old life to care for her in her home. She wouldnt like that my husband has taken a second job to help pay her bills. But according to that JAGS study, she would have died a decade ago if we hadnt.

On good days, Im proud of having prevented that. But most of the time, Im unhappy there isnt more support for people who choose to keep their loved ones at home. I worry about what will happen if our new president makes good on his promise to dismantle the Affordable Care Act, which may affect the Duchesss health coverage. Im angry that my very large family has refused to pitch in. The rest of the time, I try to keep a sense of humor about the mess Ive gotten myself into.

Youre never going to die, are you? I ask the Duchess one night as I help her dress for bed. Im going to be stuck here forever, changing your diapers and baking you quiches.

She has six or seven new pinch-chickens, replies my mother, whos been speaking mostly in third person for several months now. Why does she eat with the shades drawn?

Maybe she likes to dine in the dark, I reply, leading her to her bed with the safety rails that keep her in at night.

Where is her husband? she asks about my father, dead three years now. Whens he coming home?

Hes gone to Poughkeepsie, I tell her wearily. Hell be back last Tuesday.

Ive gotten good at entertaining myself with silly responses to my mothers demented questions.

If only my own questions were so easily answered. Like, What are you supposed to do if youre not wealthy and dont want to put your mom into a nursing home? And Is this as good as it gets?

For people who opt to care for our own family members, the answer to that last one is Pretty much, yes.

There are more caregivers in need every day. And many of them, overwhelmed by the lack of services and the financial and emotional strain of keeping loved ones at home, are ready to be talked into giving up altogether.

Its June, and my aunt has died. Ive traveled to Cleveland for her funeral.

My phone rings as Im trudging through Hopkins International Airport. Its a supervisor calling from the latest home health-care agency Ive hired to help me care for the Duchess.

Listen, Mercy Care didnt tell us you were leaving town and needed respite care, she tells me. We cant send someone over to cover your shift today until we do intake.

I close my eyes.

But Im in Ohio, I reply. And the shift I need covered begins in less than an hour.

Yeah, I know, is her cunning response.

I hang up and call my husband, who agrees to leave work and meet someone from the agency at my mothers house, where hell sign a bunch of forms and then stay to train the latest caregiver.

While were talking, I get a call from my new case manager at Mercy Care, the program contractor that approves the home-care services my mother receives. She says shes decided, after her most recent assessment, to withdraw a big hunk of those services. Because your mom is doing so much better than when ALTCS approved her two years ago! she announces, as if Im winning a nice prize.

I fall onto a bench in baggage claim. People dont get better with Alzheimers, I begin, trying to keep my voice calm. And I was there when you did that assessment. Remember? You spent a half-minute in my mothers company, and the rest of the time with me, discussing how dependent I am on these services. You said hello and shook her hand, and from that youve decided shes the first person in the history of the world to improve with Alzheimers disease?

Well, either way, she replies, shes getting the maximum number of home-care hours we can provide. And ALTCS wants us to trim everyones hours. So were taking six of hers.

She pauses for a moment. Have you thought about placing your mother in a facility?

I occasionally awaken from nightmares in which Im being chased by a box of ALTCS forms.

People assume the worst part of caring for my mother is that she rarely recognizes me. Or that Ive emptied out my savings account and busted my retirement fund to keep her home. Or that I have to change her diapers several times a day.

They think these things are awful because theyve never applied for ALTCS. I have. Eight times.

The first five applications were declined because the Duchess wasnt demented enough.

Then, she wasnt poor enough.

Larry Shafer, public-benefits consultant with Dyer, Bregman, and Ferris PLLC: Theres no clear set of instructions for ALTCS applicants, and even smart, organized people sometimes just give up.

Courtesy of Larry Shafer

And always there wasnt enough evidence that she qualified for anything ALTCS offered. Id deliver a giant box of documents to the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS), which oversees ALTCS, and a month later one of their agents would call and say, We need three more bank statements, a letter from your late fathers last employer, and a receipt for that bottle of aspirin you bought in 1998.

By the time Id get these things together, my application had expired and I had to start over.

Amazingly, Arizona has it better than many other states when it comes to Medicaid programs for the elderly. Here, AHCCCS operates under a federal waiver program that exempts us from certain federal statutes and regulations prohibiting in-home care services to people who would otherwise be in a facility.

Prior to 1991, the federal Medicaid program only compensated those living in institutions. Today, that program has been broken into two federally funded parts: ALTCS, which provides financial services to fixed-income seniors and disabled people, and the ALTCS Acute Care Program, for low-income families who need short-term assistance.

Folks shooting for ALTCS work their way through a complex list of more than 50 demographic categories age, income, sickness, current assets hoping to qualify under any of these. While some populations are covered by all states, not everyone is covered under the same circumstances, nor for the same services. As a result, an old lady eligible in one state might be ineligible in another.

In a recent report from the Kaiser Family Foundation Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured (which refers to Medicaid as lofty in its goals but often miserly in its actual impact on people), 60 percent of Americans who need assistance arent covered by Medicaid.

Arizona ranked among the top 10 states with the toughest eligibility requirements. And on the State Long-Term Services and Supports Scorecard, Arizona placed 21st out of 50 states, based on low scores in affordability, access, and quality of care. (Minnesota tops the list for elder-care assistance.)

Ultimately, ALTCS benefits the state, not the patient or his caregiver: Arizona has figured out how to keep its Medicaid budget neutral by relying on unpaid help by family members while providing them with a minimum of assistance.

What I needed was something more than minimum assistance in order to keep my mother in her home. Medicare provides her primary insurance with separate plans for doctor visits, prescription coverage, and hospitalization. Her grossly expensive and completely useless extended-care policy, which routinely reduced its benefits, repeatedly denied my claims, and socked the Duchess with double-digit annual rate hikes, covers nothing if she lives at home.

And so, in order to qualify for ALTCS, I spent every penny my parents had. I hired $40-an-hour respite workers, which allowed me to go home each day at 3 p.m. and which emptied out savings accounts into which my folks had been stashing money for 67 years.

Once they were broke, I applied for ALTCS, an agonizing process that required hundreds of hours of financial-record gathering and a seemingly endless series of forms that needed filling out. After two years and seven rejected applications, during which time my father died without ever having received benefits, ALTCS came through with what amounted to a little more than two days worth of home health-care coverage each week.

Thats generous, I am told, by ALTCS standards. The other five days each week are up to me.

After qualifying for ALTCS, I selected from a list of three program contractors, which are sort of a cross between an insurance company and a grouchy step-uncle whos stuck babysitting you.

The Duchess was assigned a case manager who decided how many hours per week she needed in order to be cared for in her home a total figured on a per-task, minute-by-minute basis.

Her Majestys case manager sized her up and decided it should take no more than 17 minutes to shower her, so thats how many minutes I got in the bathing category. The Duchess was given 15 minutes of paid assistance each day at breakfast.

But she likes two four-minute eggs, I explained to her case manager. And a good cup of tea should steep for at least 10 minutes.

Try serving her coffee, she replied. Maybe an omelet.

Case managers have to be stingy; theyve only got so many home-care hours to dole out. The paltry amount my mother receives, Ive been told, is the most I can hope for. When she gets worse, Ill have to work more hours caring for her than I already do.

Why? I demand of Larry Shafer, a public-benefits consultant with Dyer, Bregman, and Ferris PLLC, a local elder-care firm. Why do they make it so difficult? Theyre there to help people! Do you know that when my mother dies, Im supposed to give her house to ALTCS, in return for the services they provided?

Shafer knows. He used to work in the AHCCS eligibility department, and his first experience with ALTCS was helping his grandmother qualify for the program back when he was still in college.

Its frustrating, isnt it? Theres no clear set of instructions for ALTCS applicants, and even smart, organized people sometimes just give up. But the process is difficult because the state has to make its ALTCS money last. Those state and federal guidelines are in place to make sure the people who are entitled to this program are the ones receiving it. As a taxpayer, I applaud that. As an advocate working with people trying to qualify for ALTCS, I feel your pain.

Larry tries to tell me about the ALTCS family caregiver program, which pays people a pittance to look after our loved ones, but I interrupt him.

Im on it, I tell him. I took the certification class. They taught me how to wash my hands and how to tell if my mother is dead or just sleeping. The guy who sat next to me talked on his phone the whole time and the instructor spent more time discussing which pizza place we could order lunch from than she did teaching us CPR.

At the end of the day, we were given a 100-question open-book test, I tell Larry. The real lesson was why so many of the caregivers Ive employed are terrible at their jobs: An orangutan could pass this class, which is the only official training these home health-care workers receive. I use the income from the program to pay for a revolving door of respite workers, so I can occasionally go home for a few hours.

Larry chuckles politely. I know how frustrating being a caregiver can be.

I hear that a lot, and I understand that people mean well when they say it. I like Larry, so I leave him alone. But what I want to say is, No, you dont. You couldnt possibly know what being a caregiver is like unless youve done it.

Were a secret society. We recognize one another in grocery store aisles or in line at the bank. We exchange long, meaningful looks of encouragement, nod weary heads in silent greeting. Its not our fatigue that marks us as members of an invisible group. Its the old person by our side, or in a wheelchair in front of us, that gives us away to one another.

Like clumsy spinsters, were forever being paired up by well-meaning pals.

Oh, you have to meet my friend Dave, someone will say to me. Hes taking care of his mom, too.

Or Ive given your number to Lucy; her husband has dementia. You two should talk.

Suzette Armijo, co-founder of Central Phoenix Advocates for Dementia Awareness, with her grandmother in 2012.

Courtesy of Suzette Armijo

Here is the original post:

For Seniors and Their Caregivers Navigating Arizona's Health-Care System, There's No Place Like Home - Phoenix New Times

Why disrupting health care can be tricky – CNNMoney

Entrepreneurs have seen countless opportunities to introduce more consumer-friendly technology to a stodgy industry.

Oscar, launched in 2014, billed itself as the health care provider for the next generation -- one with all the perks of a tech company. Built on the back of Obamacare, it sells insurance directly to consumers.

Collective Health also launched in 2014, but it focuses on helping employers navigate the health care system.

These two distinct paths could mean very different outcomes under the new administration.

Collective Health anticipates it will be unaffected by any health care policy changes.

"We're largely isolated from [the Affordable Care Act]," cofounder Rajaie Batniji told CNNTech. "Our focus has been on working with employers rather than individuals. That's a market that was there before the ACA and will be there after."

In an announcement this week, Collective Health said it has 15 companies using its platform, including Palantir, eBay (EBAY), Red Bull and Zendesk. Their combined 70,000 employees use Collective Health's platform for all their health care and benefits information. And the market for potential clients is vast.

Collective Health targets companies that self-fund employees' insurance, which means employers take on more risk but also have more control over policies. According to the latest Kaiser/HRET Employer Health Benefits Survey, 61% of covered workers are on insurance plans that are at least partially self-funded by their employers. Traditionally, larger companies with 2,000 or more employees tend to self-fund insurance. But Collective Health wants to get smaller startups to go that route as well.

The idea is that for around $30 to $50 per employee per month, Collective Health can help businesses manage and optimize their benefits. Its latest product launch, CareX, is a play to make those savings even greater.

Related: These low income kids could lose access to quality care

CareX is the company's new data and machine learning feature that can proactively suggest services for individual employees based on their health records.

"It can be so helpful just to connect the dots for people," said cofounder Ali Diab, who started Collective Health after his own frustrating experience dealing with insurance after a medical emergency. "The programs and benefits being surfaced are all ones already within an employee's existing health plan."

The idea is that this ultimately helps businesses: Employees that are proactively getting treatment and care will be healthier over time.

Oscar, on the other hand, is in a precarious position given that its core business is based on selling to individuals. It has faced the same challenges as other insurance providers under the Affordable Care Act. Sicker customers and lower premiums can be offset with a bigger customer base, but Oscar is only operating in a few markets, resulting in multimillion dollar losses.

Earlier this week, Bloomberg reported that Oscar suffered nearly $204 million in losses in 2016, which comes to about $1,400 per customer.

Oscar also faces the same uncertainty about the future of health care once the Republicans "repeal and replace" ACA.

To complicate things further, the startup is cofounded by Joshua Kushner, who is the brother of Trump's son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner.

Oscar did not respond to CNNTech's request for comment.

"It's really, really hard to build insurance companies from scratch," Bob Kocher, MD, a partner at Venrock, told CNNTech. "So much of it relies on having scale."

CNNMoney (New York) First published March 4, 2017: 10:51 AM ET

More here:

Why disrupting health care can be tricky - CNNMoney

What would happen to health care coverage under emerging GOP plan? – CBS News

WASHINGTON-- Health insurance tax credits, mandates, taxation of employer coverage, essential benefits. Mind-numbing health care jargon is flying around again as Republicans move to repeal and replace the Obama-era Affordable Care Act. Its time to start paying attention.

The GOP plan emerging in the House would mean less government, and many fear that will translate to less coverage and a step backward as a nation. Still, there would be new options for middle-class people who buy their own policies but dont now qualify for help under the ACA. Some popular provisions such as allowing young adults to stay on a parental plan remain untouched.

Pocketbook alert: People with job-based coverage should keep an eye on a proposal to tax part of the value of the most generous employer plans.

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., told Republican lawmakers at a closed meeting Thursday that leaders would work through the weekend to draft repeal and replace legislation. Expect the bill to change as backers move forward and encounter pushback.

The Senate is seen as a moderating influence. And President Donald Trump, who once promised insurance for everybody, will have to weigh the specifics of what hes lately acknowledged is a complicated issue.

Some questions and answers:

Q: How would the GOP dial back the federal role in health care?

A: The plan would get rid of the Obamacare tax penalties on individuals who remain uninsured. Similar penalties on larger employers that dont offer coverage would be scrapped as well.

Republicans would do away with a requirement that insurers cover 10 categories of essential health benefits, leaving such regulation to the states.

A limit on how much insurers can charge older customers would be eased. Currently older adults can be charged no more than three times what they charge young adults. The new ratio would be 5-to-1.

Medicaid, the federal-state program that currently covers more than 70 million low-income people, would cease to be an open-ended federal entitlement. Though federal funding would be limited, states would get more leeway to run their programs. A richer funding stream for adults newly covered under former President Barack Obamas law would be eliminated.

Medicaid is a very, very significant issue, said Dan Mendelson, president of the consulting firm Avalere Health. That forces states to rethink their programs in a fundamental way.

Q: What could happen if the federal government pulls back funding and cuts down requirements for health insurers?

A: Many fear it would lead to rising numbers of uninsured, higher out-of-pocket costs as benefits get skimpier, and less affordable coverage - especially for older adults who are more prone to health problems.

For example, the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation recently estimated that tax credits for health insurance in the House GOP plan would be smaller on average than what currently subsidized ACA customers are getting. (GOP credits are based on age, not income.)

The study found that lower-income people, older adults, and people living in high-cost areas would get lower subsidies. Im worried that this is going to result in folks losing coverage, said John Meigs, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians.

But people with solid middle-class incomes and upper earners who currently dont qualify for help would get assistance. Consumers could also contribute more money to tax-sheltered health savings accounts for out-of-pocket costs.

Republicans are hoping their ideas will spur insurers to offer more affordable products tailored to younger people and consumers of modest means.

Republican governors, GOP lawmakers in Congress, and the Trump administration are negotiating over Medicaid, with governors who expanded the program trying to keep more federal dollars for low-income people.

Q: What ACA provisions are Republicans going to keep?

A: Among the ACA provisions that appear to be safe are closing the Medicare prescription drug coverage gap, allowing young adults to stay on parental plans until age 26, a ban on lifetime and annual dollar limits on coverage, and maximum limits on out-of-pocket costs.

People with pre-existing health problems would be protected against being turned down. But theyd have to maintain continuous coverage, and a significant break could lead to a 30 percent penalty on top of their premiums, for up to a year.

Q: What about Republicans taxing employer-provided coverage?

A: According to a draft that leaked, the House plan would tax part of the value of the most generous employer health plans, as if it were income. Affected workers would face higher payroll and income taxes, and their employers would see their share of payroll taxes increase.

Employer groups and labor unions are going all out to kill the idea, fearing that taxation will only increase in the future.

Lawmakers will treat the tax-favored treatment of employer-provided health insurance as another piggy bank, said Neil Trautwein, health care policy chief for the National Retail Federation. Frankly, we have trouble trusting them on this.

Workers most likely to be affected include union members, certain government employees, and people who work for thriving tech companies that provide generous benefits.

Q: Will the Republican plans make health insurance more affordable?

A: Obamas law could not hold down premiums, and whether the GOP can succeed remains to be seen.

As insurance rules are loosened, some consumers should be able to find more affordable coverage tailored to their own particular circumstances. For example, an older married couple might not want a plan that includes maternity coverage.

But people with health problems may not see much relief. And many low-income people may be priced out again.

Link:

What would happen to health care coverage under emerging GOP plan? - CBS News

Military families: Health care issues need immediate attention – Daily Press

When Ally Brown's family moves to a new duty station, she spends the first six months filling out stacks of paperwork to set up health care for her two autistic sons.

Tyrone Parish struggled to get mental health care for a man in his husband's unit who was told he'd have to wait six weeks to speak to a counselor. Parish ended up taking the man to the emergency room to prevent him from hurting himself.

Kathryn Leonard waited weeks to see a primary care manager to get a referral for her daughter to see an endocrinologist. After the referral, her daughter had to wait another four weeks to see the specialist.

These and other spouses of local service members shared their health care and other concerns with Sen. Tim Kaine Friday during a roundtable discussion about issues facing Hampton Roads' military families at Thomas Nelson Community College. The event was one of two public meetings for the senator Friday.

Kaine, D-Va., is co-chairman of the Senate Military Families Caucus, along with Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C. The caucus is a bipartisan forum created to address challenges facing military families. Kaine's son is a Marine.

Several people expressed frustration with TRICARE, the health care program of the United States Department of Defense Military Health System. Some families waited two to three hours for prescription refills, had problems setting up care for special-needs children or were upset about what they said was general disorganization when it came to setting up appointments and trying to get referrals.

"The fact that it had to get to the point where a solider had to be taken to the ER so he wouldn't harm himself is unacceptable," Parish said of his recent experience. Others talked about services not covered by TRICARE, including service animals for disabled children and adults with post-traumatic stress disorder.

"If they can pay for a breast pump, they should be able to pay for a service animal," said Tracy Jennings, who is expecting a child soon.

Kaine asked the group if the health care system problems they've experienced were limited to posts in Hampton Roads, but many said they had similar experiences with TRICARE at duty stations across the country and overseas.

Brandi Ogren's husband's medical group helps provide care to local military families. Ogren said medical staffs have shrunk while the number of military personnel, retirees, dependents and some members of the Reserves has grown by leaps and bounds.

"We don't have the doctors. We don't have the nurses. We don't have the specialists needed to address these issues," Ogren said. She suggested more funding be used to bulk up the staffing. Others suggested a more uniform medical records system that did not require service members to have to confirm chronic health conditions at each new duty station.

Kaine said he'd work on breaking down barriers to make the health care system for service members more streamlined and easier for families to manage.

Service members' families also expressed concerns about trying to obtain credentials to work in other states as they moved from duty station to duty station. A pediatric dentist, Chickara Saunders had a difficult time switching her licensing over so she could practice in Virginia after her husband was stationed in Hampton Roads. Parish, who has multiple degrees with a focus on psychology, had trouble finding work in his field because he is not an American citizen.

"After filling out something like 150 job applications, the only work I could find is in retail," Parish said.

After the meeting, Kaine said he hadn't predicted that three-quarters of Friday's discussion would be about health care. "I've got a lot to think about as I leave this one," he said.

Tommisha Wilson said she enjoyed the roundtable discussion and appreciated that Kaine seemed really interested in the group's concerns.

"I think it's great to have an opportunity like this for our voices to be heard," Wilson said. "With everything else that's going on in politics, I'm glad he took the time to talk to us."

Daily Press reporter Dave Ress contributed to this report.

Canty can be reached by phone at 757-247-4832.

Read more here:

Military families: Health care issues need immediate attention - Daily Press

Tennessee’s problems with rural health care linked to poor job prospects, limited education – Chattanooga Times Free Press

Tennessee's problems with rural health care are closely tied to poor economic and educational performance, a group of regional government and health care officials heard Friday.

"By the time someone is 25, you can predict how many more years they will live based on their level of education," Dr. Randy Wykoff, dean of East Tennessee State University's College of Public Health, told attendees at a half-day conference on rural health care organized by the Southeast Tennessee Development District. "There is a 5- to 7-year difference depending on whether they drop out of high school or graduate from college."

Poverty has a similar impact, Wykoff said.

"A poor American is three times more likely to die before age 65 than a rich American," he said.

Wykoff noted that Tennessee ranks in the bottom 10 of all states in most health care rankings, with many more citizens who smoke, abuse drugs or are overweight, and those behaviors are even worse in the Appalachian counties of middle and east Tennessee.

If Tennesseans improved just to the national level of smoking and obesity, the state would save $900 million in health care expenses annually, Wykoff said. "Why should someone born in Appalachia in Tennessee be more likely to die than someone born elsewhere?" he asked.

The challenge is not just to improve health care but also to improve education and economic opportunity, Wykoff said. Whether students graduate from high school, for example, is closely related to their ability to read at the proper grade level, a problem that can start even before elementary school.

Having a well-educated workforce is also critical in convincing companies to move to rural counties, several county officials agreed. And decent access to health care can be the determining factor in whether residents stay or move elsewhere.

Joe Guy, McMinn County sheriff and president of the Tennessee Sheriffs Association, discussed how health care problems affect law enforcement as well as county budgets. Increasingly, he said, sheriff's departments are forced to deal with people with mental health problems, because the state is not spending enough funds on treating them.

"When we pick someone up who is mentally ill and has been committed to Moccasin Bend, they are placed in the back of a sheriff's patrol car and handcuffed," he said. "If we handcuffed a cancer patient and took them to treatment, somebody would lose their mind. And that is after they have sat in the emergency room or in jail for four or five days while waiting for a bed to open up at Moccasin Bend. We are not treating the mentally ill their access to services is not there," he said.

He noted that when someone who is mentally ill or has other medical problems is held at a county jail, taxpayers pick up the tab, adding to the pressure on local government budgets.

The meeting was not all about the problems facing the state. There was also discussion of programs that seem to be working.

Kelly Hill, vice president of GoNoodle, explained her company's success in getting teachers and schoolkids to use videos to exercise in the classroom. The program is free to schools in Tennessee, courtesy of the BlueCross BlueShield Foundation.

Brenda Choate, human resources manager at Cormetech Inc., a Cleveland-based company that makes pollution control equipment, explained her company's wellness program that she said has helped workers lose weight and adopt a more healthy lifestyle. The company offers a $40 reduction in monthly health insurance payments, for example, to employees who earn enough points by exercising or attending health fairs.

Vickie Harden, senior vice president at Volunteer Behavioral Health Care Systems, said she hoped increased use of telemedicine, in which schools or family doctors use a video link to connect doctors who are specialists to those who need them, will allow more efficient use of limited resources. Volunteer, which owns the Joe Johnson Mental Health Center in Chattanooga, has done more than 10,000 telemedicine visits for patients with mental health issues, she said.

Contact staff writer Steve Johnson at 423-757-6673, sjohnson@timesfreepress.com, on Twitter @stevejohnsonTFP, and on Facebook, http://www.facebook.com/noogahealth.

Originally posted here:

Tennessee's problems with rural health care linked to poor job prospects, limited education - Chattanooga Times Free Press

Vice President Mike Pence, Paul Ryan push health care overhaul in Janesville – Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Vice President Mike Pence appeared in Janesville Friday with House Speaker Paul Ryan to push for a Republican plan to replace Obamacare.(Photo: Rick Wood / Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)Buy Photo

JANESVILLE - Vice President Mike Pence spoke here Friday alongside other top Republicans to unite his party around a replacement of Obamacare a challenge that could define the presidency of Donald Trump.

With both conservative and moderate Republicans shaky on the plan, Pence sought to shore up support by headingto the hometown of House Speaker Paul Ryan to visit headquarters for a chain of farm supply stores. It wasa clear signal that the White House wants other Republicans to fall in line behind the House leadership's plans to replace the Affordable Care Act.

Pence held a listening session with local business owners and farmers and thentold hundreds in an invite-only audience that the replacement process would begin in "just a matter of days."

"Let me make you a promise: The Obamacare nightmare is about to end...Obamacare has failed and Obamacare must go," Pence said.

Introducing Pence, Ryan vowed Friday that together the White House and Congress will "tackle our problems before they tackle us."

But not all Republicans agreeon how to do that. Moderate GOP lawmakers are concerned that an Obamacare replacement bill might not cover enough Americans and conservatives say that it would create a new entitlement program by offering tax credits to help the needy afford coverage.

On Thursday and again on Friday, U.S. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) criticizedHouse GOP leadership for not letting him see the bill that Paul calls "Obamacare lite."

To draw attention to that, Paul wheeled a copy machine through the halls of the Capitol and saidhe was looking for the text of the billtactics typically used by politicians againstthe opposing party, not their own.

The further Republicans go in showing open dissent and adopting opposing positions to the House bill, the more difficult compromise could become for the GOP.

Wisconsin Democrats, meanwhile, are seeing a burst of activity following their sweeping defeat last fall.

Mark Fuller, chairman of the Rock County Democratic Party, said local liberals are enthusiastic about working against GOP priorities, including the Obamacare repeal. Fuller said attendance at the county party's monthly meetings in Janesville has increased from about 30 to 50 since Trump's November victory.

"It's really galvanized people and there's a lot of energy," Fuller said. "They want to do things."

Democrats saw similar enthusiasm in the 2011 labor protests against GOP Gov. Scott Walker only to fail to beat him in both the 2012 recall and in 2014. Fuller has no indicationthat 2018 will be different, but he does have a feeling that his party has learned from the string of defeats.

"I think people are more realistic about the work it's going to take," he said. "People have learned that it takes a lot more than just a protest."

Meanwhile, some Republicans are showing more support for the emerging position of Ryan and the White House.

U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson appeared withPence,as did U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price.

"Wisconsin cant afford this mess and neither can the rest of the country. Weve got to fix it right now," Price told the audience.

Walker missedthe event because of a trip to Washington, D.C., but has also said favorable things about the House plan.

Pence's visit comes the day after the Indianapolis Star reported that he routinely used a private email account to conduct public business as governor of Indiana, at timesdiscussing sensitive matters and homeland security issues. Republicans have criticized former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton for discussing much higher level national security issues through a private email account.

Pence press secretary Marc Lotter said Friday that these personal account emails are being compiled to be released under Indiana's open records law.

In Janesville, Pence toured the headquarters of Blain's Farm and Fleet, which offers everything from tools and animal feed to hunting gear and fishing licenses at 36 stores in Wisconsin, Iowa and Illinois. The stores offer a ready made connection to rural life in the Upper Midwest and to the rural voters who were critical to the November victory of Trump and Pence.

Thomas Gibbons, a Twin Lake computer system analyst, said he didn't hear anything new Friday in Pence's speech.

But Gibbons, an early skeptic of Trump during the 2016 GOP primary, said he's already been won over by Trump decisions like the recent immigration order and more military spending that Gibbons said would boost national security.

"I'm really impressed," he said of Trump.

Outside the event that was closed to the public, scores of protesterswaved signs addressing issues ranging fromhealth care to education to the Trump camp's relationship with Russia.

Harry Bennett, 68, of Madison, held a cardboard sign demanding Pence, Ryan and Price reveal their plan to repeal and replace Obamacare.

"I think they would take so much political heat if they throw 20 million off health careat this point," Bennett said of Republicans."I don't envy them, andI don't like Donald Trump, but he's in a hard place right now."

LIVESTREAM REPLAY:Protest outside Paul Ryan and Mike Pence appearance in Janesville

Read or Share this story: https://jsonl.in/2lGSSIG

See the original post:

Vice President Mike Pence, Paul Ryan push health care overhaul in Janesville - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

The GOP and Health Care – New York Times


CBS News
The GOP and Health Care
New York Times
David Leonhardt is right. If Republicans want to provide health insurance through free market competition, their solution will have the same problems as the Affordable Care Act: Healthy, low-risk families will be forced to buy costly policies more ...
What would happen to health care coverage under emerging GOP plan?CBS News
We won't know what's in the Republican health-care repeal plan until they pass itWashington Post
Why Republicans should support universal health careThe Tennessean
The Hill -STLtoday.com -Carroll County Times -Politico
all 439 news articles »

More:

The GOP and Health Care - New York Times

GOP rep: Some people ‘just don’t want healthcare’ – The Hill

Some people just dont want health care, according to Rep. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), who cited the Bible while arguing against former President Obama's Medicaid expansion.

Just like Jesus said, The poor will always be with us, Marshall, a doctor and freshman lawmaker, toldStat Newson Friday.

There is a group of people that just dont want healthcare and arent going to take care of themselves.

Just, like, homeless people. I think just morally, spiritually, socially, [some people] just dont want health care, he said.

The Medicaid population, which is [on] a free credit card, as a group, do probably the least preventive medicine and taking care of themselves and eating healthy and exercising. And Im not judging, Im just saying socially thats where they are. So theres a group of people that even with unlimited access to health care are only going to use the emergency room when their arm is chopped off or when their pneumonia is so bad they get brought [into] the ER.

What to do with the expansion of Medicaid is one of the thorniest issues for Republicans looking to repeal ObamaCare, with some Republicans pressing to keep it. ObamaCare expanded eligibility for the program up to 138 percent of the poverty level, and 31 states have accepted the expansion.

Marshalls office has not yet responded to a request for comment.

More here:

GOP rep: Some people 'just don't want healthcare' - The Hill

Is Abortion ‘Health Care’? Activists Want It Both Ways. – National Review

Earlier this week, BuzzFeed News published an article (Ramesh noted it here in the Corner) about Planned Parenthoods anxieties under the new administration. It included this quote, from Planned Parenthood chief Cecile Richards:

The stakes have become quite clear recently, and theyre very high. . . . The patients I talk to are terrified theyre going to lose their access to health care, and docs and clinicians are terrified that this Senate is going block the women with the least access to health care from getting any at all.

LifeNews.com subsequently tweeted out a summary of the piece under the headline: Cecile Richards: If Planned Parenthood is Defunded Were Terrified Women Wont be Able to Get Abortions. I retweeted that, with a little quip attached, and my tweet went a bit viral.

Since then, several left-wing journalists and activisttypes as well as the author of the original BuzzFeed story have tweeted back that LifeNews.coms tweet misrepresented the original quote. What Richards said is that they were afraid of losing their health care.

Pardon?

Isnt it Planned Parenthoods own contention that abortion is health care? Doesnt Planned Parenthood insist that to deprive women of the right to an abortion is to deprive them of their basic reproductive rights? In fact, isnt Planned Parenthood so committed to this idea that they believe taxpayers should be forced to fund abortions on the grounds that taxpayers fund other basic health-care needs?

Put another way: Wouldnt it contradict what Cecile Richards has spent her adult life advocating to suggest that her understanding of health care excluded abortion?

Dont get me wrong, though: If that iswhats happening, its extraordinarily welcome news.

See the article here:

Is Abortion 'Health Care'? Activists Want It Both Ways. - National Review

Why tech giants are claiming space in healthcare – Healthcare Dive

From cloud platforms for medical data and hospital smart rooms to artificial intelligence and patient-engagement technologies, the giants of the digital world are threatening to disrupt healthcare.

Leading the pack is IBM and its centerpiece offering Watson Health. In just the last six months, the company has announced major initiatives into healthcare including a partnership with clinical consultation provider Best Doctors to add Watsons cancer suite to employee benefits packages, a population health management alliance with Siemens Healthineers and an effort linking IBMs PowerAI deep learning software toolkit with NVIDIAs NVLink interconnect technology. The PowerAI is already being used improve diagnoses and care plans by sifting through patient data.

In October, Big Blue announced a $200 million investment in its Watson Internet of Things global headquarters in Munich, Germany. The money will support a series of IoT collaboratories aimed at bringing researchers, engineers, developers and entrepreneurs together to work on novel healthcare and other solutions.

Apple has also more hinted at plans for a major thrust into healthcare, with high-profile hires and partnerships with large healthcare systems like Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital and Scripts Translational Science Institute. The company also acquired personal health record startup Gliimpse, which hopes to advance interoperability by aggregating health data into a single digital patient record.

Meanwhile, Apple has a patent application for a wearable device that can measure electrocardiographic information across different body areas of provide doctors with actionable readings. A series of emails between Apple and the Food and Drug Administration also shed light on several regulated products Silicon Valley firm is developing.

Microsoft is also expanding its footprint in healthcare with its analytics capabilities. Since jumping into the wearables market in 2014, the company has teamed with Twist BioScience on the capabilities of DNA digital data storage, collaborated with the medical community on numerous health research projects and joined forces with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center to create innovative care delivery products. And just this week, Cigna announced it has leveraged Microsofts HoloLens technology to for interactive game-based health screenings.

And last month, Samsung waded into the digital health space via a partnership with American Well that leverages the Korean tech firms consumer electronics with American Wells Exchange platform to enable providers and payers to connect and share telehealth services online. The company is also launching an IoT senior care solution called Breezie.

Driving these and other large, multinational electronics companies is demand for data-driven information and the shift to value-based models of medicine and payment.

Healthcare has been labeled as ripe for disruption for years, but the combination of government mandates and regulations, technological advancements and financial incentives of the last decade has seemed to finally get the needle moving, Derek Spearing, senior manager at Top Tier Consulting tells Healthcare Dive. Add that to the wave of health IT startups in recent years, and healthcare is cool again, he adds.

One of the things larger organizations bring to healthcare is a perspective on how other economic sectors have handled information challenges. At the same time, theres growing appreciation among IT firms for the enormous complexities of healthcare and the fact that peoples health and lives are at stake.

There is tremendous potential to leverage whats been done in other sectors within healthcare to drive greater clarity in terms of care delivery and to really modernize, streamline and help along the journey toward value-based care where organizations are able to deliver high-quality care at a low cost and in a reproducible fashion, David Delaney, chief medical officer at SAP in Cambridge, MA, tells Healthcare Dive. Last May, the firm launched SAP Connected Health Platform, which leverages its SAP Hana in-memory computing platform with healthcare-specific components.

The runways a little longer, it takes longer to achieve lift and scale in healthcare, but the commitment and journey are very much worth it.

David Delaney

Chief Medical Officer, SAP

However, tech companies need to do their homework and engineer solutions that truly support healthcare, Delaney adds.

Penetration into the healthcare is already high and will grow exponentially over the next five to 10 years, according to Robert Krohn, partner and healthcare practice lead at ISG. Starting with electronic health records and moving to IoT, the quality of predictive analytics and real-time analytics, as well as digital offering that enhance the patient interface, which younger patients are migrating toward, are growing daily, he says.

What this all means for hospitals is improved patient outcomes and patient satisfaction, both of which increase Medicare payments, as well as lower costs and higher margins due to operating efficiencies,Spearing says. But while IT firms are shaking up healthcare with AI and automation and helping doctors better tailor patient treatments, he hesitates to call them disruptive just yet.

As long as the same decades-old issues continue to plague healthcare lack of interoperability, questionable security, over-regulation, over-employment (driven by the tedious manually intensive approaches to administration, claims processing, testing, auditing) misdiagnoses, etc. Ill be pessimistic of any claims of disruption, Spearing says.

With myriad startups and small HIT companies dotting the healthcare landscape and larger companies entering the space, consolidation is only a matter of time, experts say. The health information exchange market, for instance, started with a number of small firms that were bought up by large payers, notes Delaney. And theres talk about consolidation in the EHR sector.

The large multinationals always monitor the smaller firms and will make financial plays at the appropriate time to take these startup ideas and commercialize them and broaden them into grander offerings, Krohn tells Healthcare Dive. We dont think thats a bad idea."

Delaney agrees. Whether its regulatory, administrative or patient engagement, early-stage companies are able to rapidly identify a trend or opportunity and execute on it in a nimble fashion. Larger firms have the customer base to really drive and catalyze those changes. This is a natural kind of movement youll have across all sectors in a time of disruption, he says.

As hospitals and health systems expand their palette of digital partners, should they be thinking and acting more like them? T2Cs Spearing thinks so.Responsiveness, efficiency and user experience are just a few traits of todays successful technology companies and their products, and I dont think any of these immediately come to mind when a patient recounts their experiences with hospitals, health plans and the patient portals offered by either.Spearing says.

I believe that patient experiences and outcomes, as well as the hospitals bottom line, would improve if hospitals were to act more like tech companies.

Derek Spearing

Senior Manager, Top Tier Consulting

Pointing to Yelp, Spearing says complaints of long wait times, lack of price transparency, billing issues and patient privacy could also be addressed and eased to some extent at least with digital solutions.

Organizations should identify their core competencies and where they can invest their people to achieve the greatest return on investment toward their mission, which is caring for people, according to Delaney. Large technology companies do infrastructure well, so its a waste of good talent to focus an organizations IT staff on reproducing that.

Delaney recommends that organizations leverage the platforms tech companies have to offer and then innovate on top of that to create that last mile of capabilities that improves patient interaction and operations.

Partnering with the large multinationals, assuming youve got appropriate scale to do so, is the appropriate approach,Krohn says. That being said, you cant be blind and immune to the emergence of technologies. You need to understand what it is that your partner does at a level where your appreciating it and figuring out how it can help your overall business model and your patient experience, while not necessarily trying to recreate it.

Read the original:

Why tech giants are claiming space in healthcare - Healthcare Dive

Banks, health care companies lead stocks slightly higher – STLtoday.com

Updated at 6:17 p.m.

NEW YORK A late wave of buying helped nudge U.S. stock indexes slightly higher Friday after a day of mostly listless trading.

Banks and health care stocks climbed the most as investors priced in an increasing likelihood that interest rates will rise in the coming months.

Federal Reserve Chair Janet Yellen helped stoke those expectations in a speech in which she said an improving job market and rising inflation would likely prompt the central bank to increase borrowing costs.

"The real takeaway here is if the Fed is willing to start moving, they see the economy as not only doing better but likely to do better going forward," said Brad McMillan, chief investment officer at Commonwealth Financial Network. "The Fed is notorious for waiting until the evidence of growth is absolutely undeniable."

The Dow Jones industrial average rose 2.74 points, or 0.01 percent, to 21,005.71. The Standard & Poor's 500 index gained 1.20 points, or 0.1 percent, to 2,383.12. The Nasdaq composite index added 9.53 points, or 0.2 percent, to 5,870.75. Small-company stocks fell. The Russell 2000 index slipped 1.54 points, or 0.1 percent, to 1,394.13.

Speaking in Chicago on the Fed's economic outlook Friday, Yellen said the Fed will likely resume raising interest rates later this month to reflect a strengthening job market and inflation edging toward the central bank's 2 percent target rate.

Yellen added that the central bank expects steady economic improvement to justify additional rate increases. While not specifying how many rate hikes could occur this year, Yellen noted that Fed officials in December had estimated that there would be three this year.

Investors' expectations of a rate hike this month had been building in recent days as remarks by other Fed officials signaled the central bank is ready to resume raising rates as soon as its next two-day meeting of policymakers on March 14-15.

That's one reason the major indexes moved little before and after Yellen's speech.

Still, the increased likelihood of higher interest rates gave several stocks a modest lift, including banks, which stand to make healthier profits from lending as rates rise. Bank of the Ozarks added $1.09, or 2 percent, to $56.24, while Signature Bank rose $2.79, or 1.7 percent, to $162.24.

Not faring as well were real estate, utilities and phone company stocks, which tend to lose favor among yield-seeking investors when interest rates rise.

"If yields are going up you don't need to buy those stocks to get your yield, you just buy 10-Year Treasury notes," said John Canally, chief economic strategist for LPL Financial.

Bond prices were little changed after pulling back from an early climb. The 10-year Treasury yield held steady at 2.48 percent.

Wall Street's slight gains on Friday left the stock market hovering near its latest record highs set on Wednesday.

Stronger-than-expected earnings from companies, continued improvement in the U.S. economy and expectations for business-friendly policies from Washington have helped propel the market this year to new highs. Should investors be nervous about a pullback?

"In the very short term there is some risk of a pullback," said Randy Frederick, vice president of trading and derivatives at the Schwab Center for Financial Research. "I wouldn't say it's likely to approach anything close to a correction, or a 10 percent pullback. Long-term, we continue to think we're solidly in a bull market."

Airlines were among the stocks that notched solid gains Friday.

American Airlines Group rose $1.10, or 2.4 percent, to $46.82, while Alaska Air Group added $2.58, or 2.7 percent, to $98.94. United Continental picked up $2.31, or 3.2 percent, to $75.59.

Disappointing company earnings and outlooks pulled down several stocks.

Costco fell $7.72, or 4.3 percent, to $170.26. Firearms manufacturer American Outdoor Brands, formerly called Smith & Wesson, declined 55 cents, or 2.8 percent, to $18.83.

Revlon slid $1.40, or 4.1 percent, to $32.65, while L Brands, the parent of Victoria's Secret, fell $1.07, or 2 percent, to $52.34.

Macy's also fell sharply, one of several retailers that closed lower Friday. The department store chain declined the most among stocks in the S&P 500, skidding $1.45, or 4.4 percent, to $31.77.

Big Lots bucked the trend, climbing 3.8 percent after the discount retailer reported a larger profit than analysts expected. The stock added $1.98 to $54.23.

Major indexes in Europe were mixed. Germany's DAX fell 0.3 percent, while France's CAC 40 rose 0.6 percent. Britain's FTSE slipped 0.1 percent. Earlier in Asia, Japan's Nikkei 225 index fell 0.5 percent, while South Korea's Kospi sank 1.1 percent. Hong Kong's Hang Seng index lost 0.7 percent.

Energy futures rose. Benchmark U.S. crude gained 72 cents, or 1.4 percent, to close at $53.33 a barrel in New York. Brent crude, used to price international oils, added 82 cents, or 1.5 percent, to close at $55.90 a barrel in London. Wholesale gasoline picked up a penny to close at $1.65 a gallon. Heating oil added a penny to close at $1.59 a gallon. Natural gas rose 2 cents to close at $2.83 per 1,000 cubic feet.

The dollar fell to 114.04 yen from 114.51 yen on Thursday. The euro rose to $1.0599 from $1.0502.

Gold fell $6.40 to $1,226.50 an ounce. Silver slipped a penny to $17.70 an ounce. Copper rose a penny to $2.69 a pound.

Make it your business. Get twice-daily updates on what the St. Louis business community is talking about.

Read more:

Banks, health care companies lead stocks slightly higher - STLtoday.com

Conservative groups, lawmakers demanding ‘full repeal’ could derail health care rollback – Chicago Tribune

An array of conservative lawmakers, organizations and activists are demanding a swifter and more aggressive remake of the Affordable Care Act than many Republicans are comfortable with, raising questions about whether President Trump and the GOP are headed toward gridlock as they try to fulfill their promise to repeal the health-care law.

Three conservative senators known for bucking GOP leadership during Barack Obama's presidency - Ted Cruz (Texas), Rand Paul (Ky.) and Mike Lee (Utah) - are raising the possibility of doing the same under Trump.

And outside Congress, three prominent groups - FreedomWorks, Americans for Prosperity and Heritage Action for America - plan to increase pressure on lawmakers to repeal the law fully or risk retribution from the conservative grass roots.

If they hold together in the Senate, where Republicans have just 52 seats, the three senators alone could sink a Republican bill.

The current proposal, floated privately this week by House Republicans, repeals portions of the ACA but, due to pressure from constituents who depend on the law, leaves some elements intact that conservatives are not happy about. Few details of the proposal have emerged publicly.

"The repeal bill ought to be a repeal," Paul said Thursday, as he declared about a replacement plan House Republicans presented to GOP senators at a closed-door meeting the previous afternoon. He also raised the possibility that Cruz and Lee might join him. "Talk to the two people that tweeted out with me," he said.

Cruz and Lee used similar language in tweets this week. With reporters, Cruz has been more circumspect, but he has left open the possibility of opposing the Republican plan. "There's agreement and disagreement between the two chambers, but at the end of the day, I believe we will repeal Obamacare," he said.

In addition to starting a game of chicken with Republican leaders on the Hill and the Trump administration, opponents of anything less than full repeal have also created uncertainty for millions of Americans who receive coverage through the ACA.

The strife came as House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., laid out a three-week timeline for the passage of health-care legislation in a closed-door meeting with fellow Republicans Thursday, according to numerous attendees.

For the many Republicans who were elected during Obama's presidency with a mandate to block his agenda, obstruction comes much more naturally than governance. The effort to repeal the ACA is the first major test of whether they can harness the energy they used to oppose the law to actually undo it - or whether ideological divisions will sink the effort.

The coordinated resistance has raised the spectre of a resurgent ideological right wing, which has appeared at least publicly to be in retreat since Trump's victory. Many of the president's positions, including his desire to protect insurance coverage for Americans, run counter to conservative orthodoxy and leave room for a revolt.

But Trump's continued popularity on the right puts these conservatives in a tough spot. should 2the president more fully embrace the emerging House plan.They risk alienating Trump's loyal base - a prospect many lawmakers do not take lightly.

"I don't want to draw a line and say that I'm against this proposal and I will put a 'no' vote up," said Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who prefers full repeal.

The House plan calls for a refundable tax credit to help Americans afford insurance premiums, but conservatives in the House and the Senate think it amounts to an expensive new federal entitlement.

Key House committees are set to take up legislation as soon as next week. The first steps involve parallel action by the House Ways and Means Committee and the House Energy and Commerce Committee.

The following week, the House Budget Committee is scheduled to combine the bills into a "reconciliation" package eligible for Senate debate, with votes on the House floor expected the week after that.

No legislative text has been released by Ryan's office or by the relevant committees. One part of the legislation, handled by the Energy and Commerce Committee, has been made available to members of that panel - but only for inspection behind closed doors.

Paul complained Thursday that House GOP leaders were being too secretive. Democrats voiced similar complaints.

"We're here today because I'd like to read the Obamacare bill," said Paul near the room where the bill was being reviewed. "If you'd recall, when Obamacare was passed in 2009 and 2010, Nancy Pelosi said, 'You'll know what's in it after you pass it.' The Republican Party shouldn't act in the same way."

Paul, Cruz and Lee are not the only ones who oppose some details of the House plan. Some House conservatives, including King, don't like what they have seen and have embraced alternative ideas.

Conservative Republicans have long opposed refundable tax credits because Americans with lower incomes, who pay less in taxes, receive the full credit even if it exceeds their tax bill. Nonrefundable credits can be used only to offset actual tax liability - but would also mean less money in the pockets of Americans who need help paying for health insurance.

As a result of that dispute and others, conservatives have slowly built support for a "full repeal" plan since the start of the year. Paul provided the only Republican "no" vote on January's non-binding budget reconciliation instructions, saying that it would add too much to the national debt; at the time, Lee and Cruz co-signed a letter saying they would oppose a later bill if it did not repeal the ACA.

Conservatives hailed the apparent unity of Paul, Lee and Cruz on pushing for a full repeal - a model based on legislation that passed Congress in 2015 only to be vetoed then-President Obama.

"If people don't credibly think there are 51 votes for a plan, then the plan doesn't go forward," said Michael Needham, the president of Heritage Action for America, speaking of the Senate. "It's very helpful to have this bloc in the Senate, and in the House, saying they're not going to take less than they got in 2015."

At a Heritage Foundation-sponsored roundtable event with House Freedom Caucus members, Lee said that a repeal bill "should not be anything less aggressive than what we were able to pass in 2015."

To many Republicans, the current conflict triggers the feeling of deja vu. The House Freedom Caucus had issued threats to oppose Republican budgets and to unseat then-House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio; Cruz had floated the idea of a government shutdown over Planned Parenthood funding, then backed off.

In interviews, opponents of the current House proposal, which they call "Obamacare-lite," argued that this fight is different. "This has been baking for seven years," said Rep. Mark Sanford, R-S.C., a Freedom Caucus member. Fights in previous years "didn't have the political urgency that repeal does."

Cruz held forth with reporters outside the Senate chamber for 10 minutes earlier this week, seeming to relish in the chance to criticize the House leadership's guidelines and pitch an alternative.

"If we fail to honor our commitment to repeal Obamacare, I believe the consequences would be quite rightly catastrophic," Cruz warned this week in the same apocalyptic tone he often he used as a presidential candidate.

Cheered by that kind of rhetoric, and planning their own push for full repeal, conservative groups have promised to wage a public campaign against Republicans who buckle and save parts of the ACA.

"We're going to be more strongly reminding Republicans of their promises made over the last eight years on the issue of stopping - or at least rolling back, anyway - government-run health care," said Tim Phillips, the president of Americans for Prosperity (AFP). "We're telling them to keep their promises - and they've promised an unequivocal repeal of Obamacare."

Founded by the billionaire donor David Koch, AFP has become an effective grass-roots organization, stopping Republican legislators in Florida, Tennessee and Virginia from expanding Medicaid under the provision of the ACA or building health insurance exchanges. AFP, Phillips said, would demand that lawmakers pass full repeal "both in Washington in a very vocal way" and "also back home in their districts." He declined to be more specific.

Adam Brandon, the president of FreedomWorks, said the group is organizing a "day of action" on March 15, with activists flooding Capitol Hill to "put the heat" on Republicans who don't support full repeal. They take it as a given that the Cruz/Lee/Paul troika will be with them.

"They're damn serious," he said. "It's completely possible that the Ryan-Trump plan, when there is a plan, gets dropped. My jaw kind of hits the floor when I think that we're even having a conversation about this."

On the other hand, some Republicans think they can whittle down the conservative opposition as the chance of repealing the ACA, in part or entirely, becomes more real. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., the sponsor of a bill that would allow states to keep most of the ACA if they want to, told reporters this weekthat Republicans could fulfill their promises if they repealed the most controversial parts of the law.

Cassidy said the mission of Republicans in Congress is not to pitch their ideal plans, but to get right with what the president ran on.

"The American people voted for his vision," he said. "More than any other single person in our country right now, he is in sync with the national mood. If folks want to go their own way, maybe they should run for president."

As the reporters assembled around, Cassidy began to laugh.

"Maybe they did," he said.

The Washington Post's Kelsey Snell contributed to this report.

Read the original:

Conservative groups, lawmakers demanding 'full repeal' could derail health care rollback - Chicago Tribune

VT ranks high on welfare, health care, roads spending – BurlingtonFreePress.com

Art Woolf, Free Press contributor Published 2:02 a.m. ET March 2, 2017 | Updated 2 hours ago

Vermont ranks No. 1 in per capita health care spending, third in welfare spending and fourth in transportation spending. Clover Whitham/Free Press

A bed at the Porter Medical Center in Middlebury.(Photo: FREE PRESS FILE)Buy Photo

Vermonts state government and all of its local governments collect $3.5 billion in taxes, $2 billion in federal revenues, and more than one billion dollars in additional funds from a variety of other sources. Vermont governments'largest single expenditure item is for education, which I will focus on at another time. Lets just look at where governments spend the remaining $4.2 billion.

The single largest expenditure is the $1.7 billion we spend on public welfare, which includes many different programs that primarily go to low income Vermonters. Some of that comes from federal government grants and some from Vermont taxpayers. On a per capita basis Vermonts spending on public welfare is 50 percent more than the 50-state average, ranking us third highest in the nation. We cant tell exactly how much of that spending comes from the federal government and how much from Vermont taxpayers, but compared to most states, we spend a lot more tax dollars to support our low income population.

Double health care costs

Closely related to that is the $343 million the state spends on health care. Although a great deal of health care spending goes to low income people, in Vermont a lot of people who are not poor also get their health care and health insurance from the state. On a per capita basis, Vermonts health spending is thehighest in the nation and we spend nearly twice as much as the average state.

Vermont is not a poor state our incomes are about average so its somewhat surprising that we spend so much more on health care than most states. One reason is that 28 percent of Vermonters under the age of 65 are on Medicaid compared to 20 percent nationally. That difference translates into a higher cost out of the state budget. The state has enacted programs and policies over the past several decades to encourage people to enroll in Medicaid. But that has not significantly reduced the number of uninsured Vermonters. Many of the non-poor people on Medicaid were formerly on their employers health care plans or bought health insurance on the private market. Over time that number has fallen and the number on Medicaid has increased.

Transportation costs are higher

While health and welfare spending go primarily to poor and low income Vermonters, the third largest expenditure item for Vermonts governments, transportation, benefits everyone rich, poor, and especially the middle class. The nearly $700 million we spend, mostly on roads, bridgesand highways, comes to more than twice the national average per person and ranks us the fourth highest spender in the nation. Part of the reason we spend so much is that maintaining highways is expensive in cold, snowy, northern climates. But there is more to our high spending than just climate. Because Vermont is a rural state we have a lot of miles of roads to maintain and not very many people to pay for it.

The bridge carrying Route 2 over I-89 at exit 17 in Colchester, seen on Monday, February 27, 2017, has been classified at structurally deficient by the state.(Photo: GLENN RUSSELL/FREE PRESS)

What do we get for our above-average level of transportation spending? Forty-five percent of our roads, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation, are in either poor or mediocre condition. That sounds bad, but 26 states ranked worse than Vermont. The U.S. Department of Transportation also says one-third of our bridges are in bad shape, but 42 states have higher percentages of poorly maintained bridges. So we spend a lot on our highways, but that spending seems to make our transportation system better than most states.

Those three areas welfare, health, and transportation account for nearly two-thirds of our non-education spending and we spend a lot more than most states on all of those. As far as most other large categories of spending go, Vermont is close to average. We spend slightly less than most states on police and on prisons. Despite our reputation as a green state, we also spend a little bit less on parks, sewage treatment, solid waste, and other natural resource areas. But those three below-average categories account for only 15 percent of total non-education spending so they are relatively small potatoes.

Economies of scale?

Our small size does seem to affect how much we spend on the general cost of governmental administration everything from paying the governors salary, financing the legislature, supporting our town offices, maintaining government-owned buildings, and the judiciary. It costs every Vermonter $472 for those services, 17 percent more than the average state. We may spend more because were a small state and with 250 mostly small towns, we cant realize economies of scale in state or local government. But maybe thats not the case. Two of the largest states in the nation, New York and California, spend even more per capita than Vermont on the government administration.

In general, Vermont government spends a lot on health, welfare, transportationand government itself and is not much different from most states for most other spending items. But the biggest difference is how much we spend on education. More on that later.

MORE FROM ART WOOLF:

THE BURLINGTON FREE PRESS

Are VT taxes high? Art Woolf counts the ways

THE BURLINGTON FREE PRESS

Are VT taxes high? Art Woolf counts the ways

Vermonts future: Raise taxes or eliminate programs

Art Woolf is associate professor of economics at the University of Vermont.

Read or Share this story: http://bfpne.ws/2mbVEsu

Follow this link:

VT ranks high on welfare, health care, roads spending - BurlingtonFreePress.com

Republican Unity on Health Care Is Elusive, Despite Trump’s Support – New York Times


New York Times
Republican Unity on Health Care Is Elusive, Despite Trump's Support
New York Times
While Mr. Trump appeared to back a health plan being drawn up by Republican leaders, it became clear Wednesday that lawmakers were continuing to argue over its details. Republican senators emerged from a closed-door meeting on health care ...
Trump backs healthcare tax credit amid conservative oppositionThe Hill
GOP Urges Trump to Use Bully Pulpit on Health CareRealClearPolitics
No, Steve Bannon is not going to save your health careWashington Post (blog)
Los Angeles Times -Slate Magazine -Newsweek
all 3,846 news articles »

Continued here:

Republican Unity on Health Care Is Elusive, Despite Trump's Support - New York Times

Trump Speech Leaves Health Care a Big Mess – Bloomberg

The health-care goals President Donald Trump mentioned in his address toa joint session of Congress Tuesday night werea high-water mark for policy specificity from this president. But that mark was a low bar.

The lack of detail was still glaring, and Trump either skirted the alligators lurking in the morass of Affordable Care Act repeal and replacement, or just poked them with a long stick. The process remains as chaotic as ever. That's a threat to health insurers who focus narrowly on government programs. It may also hurt those who don't.

Divergent

Some insurers have fared better than others since Trump's election, but a messy ACA fight could impact all of them

Source: Bloomberg

A draft of a possible Republican plan for ACA replacement, leaked last week, is splitting the GOP into factions.Some governors don't like the plan because it could leave too many people uncovered. More conservative membersof the party, meanwhile, find it too generous because it offers refundable tax credits, even if those areless generous than the ACA's.

TheGOP strategy, according to The Wall Street Journal,is to bet hardliners won't ultimately vote against a repeal -- a game of legislative chicken with more than 20 million ACA-insured lives at stake.

Untroubled By Trump's Speech

ACA Repeal Alligators

Trump didn't do much to resolve this stalemate with his address. Trump expressed support for tax credits, but still appears to differ with House leadership on other key points. Thefour biggest insurance-related goals outlined in the speech are vague and riddled with massive political and policy difficulties.

Shifting the Burden

A leaked draft bill suggests the GOP's ACA replacement would substantially favor the wealthy at the expense of older and poorer Americans

Source: Kaiser Family Foundation

The speech also avoided therather important question ofhow to pay for these efforts. A solution proposed by some in House leadershipis to cap the tax break people and employers get for employer-provided health insurance. This proposal was anathema to the GOP when it was made part of the ACA. Now it may be massively expanded under the GOP plan.

Such a cap would still be widely controversial. It could substantially shake up the employer-focused commercial insurance market. So would a repeal of the ACA's employer mandate and expansionoftax credits for individual coverage.

Meanwhile,insurers who participate in Medicaid still have to worry Trump will end up moving toward the House on capping grants and repealing the expansion.

Appetite For Disruption

Large parts of the health insurance market could be disrupted by a GOP effort to repeal and replace the ACA

Source: Bloomberg Intelligence

No one will be immune from the market disruption and policy chaos that has only just begun.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story: Max Nisen in New York at mnisen@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Mark Gongloff at mgongloff1@bloomberg.net

Read the original here:

Trump Speech Leaves Health Care a Big Mess - Bloomberg