Can US health care contain Ebola?

Hazmat crew decontaminating the apartment in Dallas where Thomas Eric Duncan stayed. JIM YOUNG/Reuters/Corbis

The death of Thomas Eric Duncan, the first person to be diagnosed with Ebola on U.S. soil, leaves America's health care infrastructure shaken but resolute to be prepared to swiftly recognize, contain and treat a virus with no known cure.

That's a tall order for any health care system, especially a private-market one like ours that, until recently, has had limited incentive for everyone to play well together.

Don't misunderstand: We manage to get the job done hospital to hospital and physician to physician. It's just that the sheer multitude of proprietary medical communications channels and software can make presenting a united front for something like Ebola a logistical nightmare.

The Centers for Disease Control -- and let's be sure to tack on its last name, "and Prevention," in this context -- knows well what it's up against here and has been working around the clock to prepare Main Street health care for what has the potential to be the Godzilla bug of our day.

The CDC's Health Alert Network, which keeps providers up to date and on the same page, has been stuffed with briefings, guidelines and protocols to keep everyone from 911 operators and emergency room docs to EMS crews and front desk staff apprised on how to corral this monster should it saunter into their town. The CDC now even offers a weekly course to clinicians on safety and infection control.

The agency also has closed ranks with the Department of Homeland Security to enhance security screening for Ebola at the five U.S. airports that receive 94 percent of the inbound traffic from the west African nations hardest hit by the virus. The five international hubs include:

One also can easily imagine the board meetings being hastily called at hospitals, physician groups and, yes, health insurance companies that will ultimately be called upon to settle the monetary bills to fight this mortal threat. The cost to care for Duncan, an uninsured Liberian, ran in the neighborhood of $500,000. Suffice to say, that's a very uncomfortable neighborhood if you're a health insurance company.

While specialty-lines insurers have offered group coverage to non-governmental humanitarian organizations such as Doctors Without Borders that cover all diseases, including Ebola, claims have been relatively few. That said, the cost of the experimental drugs that were used to treat American volunteers Dr. Kent Brantly and Nancy Writebol typically would not be covered.

The rest is here:

Can US health care contain Ebola?

Health care crippled as Ebola overwhelms hospitals in Liberia

A banner reading: Ebola is real, Protect yourself and your family, warns people of the Ebola virus in Monrovia, Liberia, Saturday Aug. 2, 2014. (AP Photo/Abbas Dulleh)

The two women came from opposite ends of Liberian society - one a beauty queen and daughter of a prominent lawmaker, the other an ordinary home maker from a remote northern town.

When they both needed urgent healthcare, however, these differences meant little. Neither had the deadly Ebola infection, but both were turned away from hospitals overrun by an outbreak that has killed more than 3,800 people, 2,200 in Liberia alone.

In the end, it was Comfort Fayiah, the ordinary 27-year-old, who survived, giving birth to twins in the street as passers by did what they could to provide some privacy.

Nikita Forh, 21, died at her father's plush Monrovia home, unable to secure the treatment she needed to fend off an asthma attack because doctors at the JFK hospital in the capital requested a certificate proving she did not have Ebola.

"I told them that if I carried my daughter home she would not make it through the night, but they did not listen," Edward Forh, a member of the house of representatives for Montserrado County, told national radio.

"My daughter died before my eyes like a dog. Those nurses killed my child," he said. "I will sue the government."

Liberia's Medical and Dental Council says it is investigating Forhs case and warned that any medical staff caught rejecting or refusing sick people would be investigated.

"We took an oath to restore or protect lives," Dr John Mulbah, the council's director, told a news conference.

With Ebola, that oath has become much more complicated. Medics lacking equipment and training fear unwittingly exposing themselves and other patients to Ebola in caring for other healthcare needs.

View post:

Health care crippled as Ebola overwhelms hospitals in Liberia

Can Placebos Lower Health Care Costs?

An enormous amount of research has been done on placebos. If the results are to be believed, we could save a great deal of money by substituting placebos for traditional medical care. But so far as I know, I am the only person suggesting this as a realistic possibility.

Estimates vary, but around one third of people taking placebos for complaints (including pain, headache and seasickness) will experience relief from symptoms. Here are some amazing facts about placebos:

Aaron Carroll has an excellent summary of the research on placebo surgeries at The Incidental Economist. Take arthroscopic surgery:

A total of 180 patients who had osteoarthritis of the knee were randomly assigned (with their consent) to one of three groups. The first had a standard arthroscopic procedure, and the second had lavage. The third, however, had sham surgery. They had an incision, and a procedure was faked so that they didnt know that they actually had nothing done. Then the incision was closed.

The results were stunning. Those who had the actual procedures did no better than those who had the sham surgery. They all improved the same amount. The results were all in peoples heads.

Carroll gives other examples:

Carrolss solution to all this: stop doing procedures that work no better than a placebo. My solution: substitute placebos and placebo surgeries. Theyre cheaper.

Photo Credit: Google Images

Excerpt from:

Can Placebos Lower Health Care Costs?

Health care divides Stewart, Robles in congressional debate

Rep. Chris Stewart and challenger Luz Robles meet for a debate at Southern Utah University in Cedar City, Thursday September 25, 2014. The two are contending for Utah's 2nd Congressional District.

Trent Nelson,

SALT LAKE CITY Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, and state Sen. Luz Robles, D-Salt Lake, candidates for Utah's 2nd Congressional District, talked health care as they took questions from potential voters Thursday morning on KSL Newsradio.

Stewart, a Republican seeking a second term in Congress, repeatedly denounced President Barack Obama's Affordable Care Act during the debate on KSL's "The Doug Wright Show," insisting the entire legislation should be scrapped.

"It sounds overly partisan, but this is the worst piece of legislation written in generations," said Stewart, who insists there are other options for helping Americans who can't access health care. "I just think we have to start over on this."

Robles, his Democratic challenger and six-year state senator, called the Affordable Care Act imperfect but said it took important first steps in helping Americans, including many people across Utah, to afford health insurance.

"It's moving in the right direction. More people are covered now than we have ever seen in this nation," she said. "There are issues with cost containment that I think Congress should be addressing but I don't know that just repealing, which a lot of people continue to speak on, is the solution."

Stewart voiced support for Gov. Gary Herbert's Healthy Utah proposal, an alternative to Medicaid expansion that would use federal funds available under the Affordable Care Act to help low-income Utahns. Robles said she believes accepting full Medicaid expansion would have been a more expedient solution, but in the absence of that option, she also supports the governor's plan.

Stewart went on to praise a "work effort" that will likely be necessary for Healthy Utah to pass the Legislature as a way for those receiving help to maintain dignity. Robles called the work element a difficult caveat to hold over people who aren't healthy.

The governor's plan also requires approval from the Obama administration.

Go here to read the rest:

Health care divides Stewart, Robles in congressional debate

City council looks at health care costs 10-10-14

City council members got a detailed briefing on the citys health insurance program during their work session Thursday.

The hour-long presentation was directed by Susan Smith, executive director of Texas Municipal Leagues Intergovernmental Employee Benefits Pool, which administers the citys health coverage through United Health Care.

Health care plans are very expensive, Smith admitted to councilmembers as she reviewed the citys medical cost experience since TML took over health coverage in June 2012.

During that period, the city had unusually high costs, largely due to higher than anticipated medical costs for several employees and retirees covered under the citys policy.

Weve experienced several bad years where weve had a number of catastrophic illnesses, Smith explained. And premiums from your current employees are subsidizing your pre-65 retirees.

For the period of June 2012 to May 2013, the citys health care program paid out almost $2.4 million in medical benefits while recovering $1.4 million in premiums. From June 2013 to May 2014, costs were almost $2.3 million while contributions were at $1.4 million. Since June 2014, projected costs have been almost $1.8 million with contributions of $1.4 million.

The number of covered individuals falling into the high reserve/high risk pool, who had medical charges at or near the $50,000 point where the citys stop-loss reinsurance coverage comes into play, has been unusually high in recent years.

In 2012-13, there were 32 in the high-risk category. That increased to 33 during 2013-14, including 11 that rolled over from the previous year. Thus far this year, there are eight individuals in that high-risk category, including four who rolled over from the previous year.

We are trending much better than we were the first two years, Smith notes. However, the administrative costs for health insurance programs in general will be increasing significantly under the federal Patient Protection Affordable Care Act. Currently about $1 per covered individual, those administrative costs will rise to $63 per person next year.

Health care coverage is not going to get any cheaper in the future, she said.

See original here:

City council looks at health care costs 10-10-14

Health Care: U.S. vs. Canada, Sen. Sanders (full text in description) – Video


Health Care: U.S. vs. Canada, Sen. Sanders (full text in description)
http://goo.gl/LiRGfS Sen. Byrr: Dr. Martin, in your testimony you note that Canadian doctors exiting the public system for the private sector. They said the effect is creating increasing waiting...

By: InsuranceRipOff

See original here:

Health Care: U.S. vs. Canada, Sen. Sanders (full text in description) - Video

How do I determine if a health care provider caused birth injury? Indianapolis Attorneys | WKW – Video


How do I determine if a health care provider caused birth injury? Indianapolis Attorneys | WKW
This video is about how to determine if a health care provider caused a birth injury or not in Indiana: http://www.wkw.com With a birth trauma case you have to prove the three ingredients...

By: Wilson Kehoe Winingham

See the original post here:

How do I determine if a health care provider caused birth injury? Indianapolis Attorneys | WKW - Video