Coronavirus and red tape are costing lives in Indian Country | TheHill – The Hill

The coronavirus pandemic has upended the daily lives of most Americans in ways we have never imagined. For Indian Country, this crisis has shined a bright light on problems that have long existed problems that not only make American Indian and Alaska Native communities particularly vulnerable to a health crisis of this scale, but are as old as the United States itself. It has laid bare the ways the United States has consistently failed its trust responsibility to tribes and Native people by chronically underfunding essential programs including health, housing, and economic development.

Now more than ever, Native people are suffering the consequences of that systematic neglect.

American Indian and Alaska Natives are particularly at risk to the coronavirus due to the high rate of underlying health issues in the communities. These include diabetes as well as heart and respiratory disease. This, combined with a lack of resources, trained staff, and necessary funding, ensure American Indian and Alaska Native people will continue to be hit hard with little ability to properly treat and control the spread of the coronavirus.

The United States has an existing federal trust and treaty responsibility to tribes. This obligation includes providing health care to American Indian and Alaska Native people through the Indian Health Service (IHS), tribal, and urban Indian health facilities. The health care needs of Indian Country continue to go unmet due to inadequate and short-term funding levels. IHS hospitals, among the countrys oldest, have repeatedly failed to meet the most basic patient needs and health care standards. These facilities, perennially understaffed and overburdened, are now forced to deal with a pandemic thats overwhelming even the countrys best hospitals.

In addition to inadequate health care, insufficient resources in other areas of Indian Country are making it difficult for tribes to prevent the spread of COVID-19, even when tribes implement stay at home orders. Where there is no access to clean water to wash hands, an inability to properly practice social distancing due to overcrowding in homes, and limited internet access to receive the latest pertinent information, there is little chance in combating a pandemic already ravaging communities with all those advantages.

So whats clear is Native America is not standing on equal ground. We are starting from a place of more than 500 years of oppression. We are set up to fail.

But there is another important Indian Country element at risk: our elders and traditional values. With older Americans and those with compromised immune systems most at risk for serious coronavirus complications, we fear for our elders. They are often the carriers of our languages and cultural traditions as they practice and maintain them. We are also acutely aware of the isolation that comes with the practice social distancing, which goes against our belief in the strength and importance of community living, especially during such difficult times. This virus, aided by centuries of systematic oppression, feels as if it is attacking us from all sides. But we have also raised our collective voice to call attention to our needs and our rights as indigenous people.

Tribes and Indian health organizations have in theory - received emergency funding in the first three coronavirus stimulus packages. However, most tribes have yet to receive any funding. There is currently no mechanism to distribute funds from the CDC to IHS and Indian health organizations. This has resulted in a dangerous delay in tribes ability to take action and provide care for their community.

Congress must make it a priority for tribes to be on par with state and local governments. This will remove many bureaucratic hurdles to receiving necessary resources and funding.

Most importantly, what Indian Country needs at this time is maximum flexibility to determine how those funds are to be used. As sovereign nations, tribes are in the best position to determine what is right for their people. In a crisis, the federal government must do its best to aid, rather than hinder, those rights.

Kerri Colfer manages the Native American Advocacy Program, lobbying on legislation that affects Native communities. Kerri is a member of the Tlingit tribe of Southeast Alaska.

See the rest here:

Coronavirus and red tape are costing lives in Indian Country | TheHill - The Hill

Andrew Cuomo, The Virus King | 570 WSYR | Bob Lonsberry – KFI AM 640

Beyond the carnage on his watch in New York City, where public health measures were seemingly less effective per capita than anywhere else in the world, his dictatorial control of every aspect of New York life has crippled the liberties and livelihoods of a state.

He denied people the right to work, worship, socialize and use their time and their resources as they wished.

And now he threatens to send the State Police against people who dont wear face masks, or who go to parks or congregate in unacceptable numbers.

All in the name of fighting a virus whose potential impact has been dramatically and manipulatively overblown to aggrandize power and advance a political agenda.

And no one has exploited this virus more for his own megalomaniacal arousal than Andrew Cuomo.

And no one has suffered more from the oppression of government overreach than the people of upstate New York.

Here are examples.

He decreed that the academic year was officially over and that no schools in New York could reopen. No exceptions, no local input, no variance for presence or absence of the disease.

And so it is that communities that have literally had no coronavirus in their midst whatsoever must deny their sons and daughters a graduation ceremony. Local superintendents and parents cannot be allowed to decide, it must be handed down by one man, with no personal experience as a public school student or parent.

And stores and businesses are arbitrarily shut down by his dictate, eliminating the jobs of some and destroying the lifes savings and labors for others. When two stores in a five-store plaza are allowed to open, but the other three arent, thats not public health, thats political arrogance.

If any store is safe, then all stores are safe.

And if we can go to Walmart and Costco, we can go to church and synagogue.

If he can have a hundred healthcare workers crowd together to cheer his mask-less arrival at a press conference, people can gather for Ramadan dinner.

But New Yorkers can do none of these things.

They may not go to funerals, they may not attend weddings, they may not celebrate gramas 100thor mom and dads 50th.

They may only look ahead at the cascading collapse of their lives and communities, all caused by the overreaching dictate of Andrew Cuomo. Because it is not just lives being shattered by this dictators arrogance, it is institutions.

Hospitals will be bankrupted, local governments and schools will be bankrupted, businesses will be bankrupted. Not because of a virus, but because of a tyrants exploitation of a virus.

An exploitation that allows him to impose a political agenda that is nothing less than a restructuring of New York society to serve his vanity and Marxist aspirations.

He wants the state to control hospitals, and so in the name of fighting the virus he imposes occupancy and practice restrictions that plunge hospitals deep into deficit and inexorably into insolvency, to be saved in a few months by being brought under his control. Likewise, a governor who has been at war with local government since his inauguration has choked off sales tax revenues, putting countless teachers and municipal employees out of work, and dooming their school districts, towns and counties to economic collapse.

All to be rescued by the all-powerful governor whose state government will take over everything.

People are denied medical treatment by his only slightly reduced ban on elective procedures. They must suffer alone in hospitals because of his guidelines for visitation.

And they lose the right to support themselves and their families because he arbitrarily controls their jobs and their businesses. He dooms them, through this period of oppression, to a financial slump from which they may never emerge. He pushes them toward government dependence, so that he might enslave them and their children, and their childrens children.

All in the name of a virus.

And a cure that is far worse than the disease.

He said the virus is death. And yet, from the standpoint of liberty and prosperity, his dictates are death.

And his personal motto, now emblazoned on the states seal, E pluribus unum.

Out of many, one.

Out of many New Yorkers, just one gets to decide.

Many must follow, one must dictate.

Andrew the Pierced, the virus king.

Read more:

Andrew Cuomo, The Virus King | 570 WSYR | Bob Lonsberry - KFI AM 640

Tehran Times: An audible voice of the oppressed people worldwide – Tehran Times

Fourty-one years ago on May 4, the first edition of the Tehran Times was published in eight pages. Tehran Times was registered as the first paper that managed to gain publication license after the victory of the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

The founding father, manager-in-charge, chief editor, editorial board's director, head of the public relations and technical department's manager of the newly-established Tehran Time was a young man named Irfan Parviz Ansari Javid.

He was born in the central Indian city of Bhopal. Parviz left his homeland in 1969 to join a number of his relatives who were living in Iran. Parviz began his career in journalism in Tehran as a reporter for the Tehran Journal, one of Irans two English language newspapers at that time.

After the 1979 Islamic Revolution all English language newspapers were shut down.

Parviz, in line with the revolution's nature, had come to the conclusion that the nations' independence, the nations' access to the God-gifted resources, cutting the hegemonic world powers' hands from other nations' wealth, the fight against oppression and discrimination, living within the moral-based framework, paving the ground for the entire nations to take giant strides towards growth and glory, liberating the mankind from the jail of fruitlessness, libido and drunkenness, believing in the God as the creator of the mankind and the nature, and obeying the almighty God, all together were capable of enabling the human being to enjoy the entire material and spiritual capacities which would lead the mankind towards utilizing his or her own dignities as well as the surrounding world's privileges.

Parviz's sense and feelings impacted his family members too. Perhaps, they could not analyze those days' developments in Tehran based on their previous memories, but the character and stances of Late Imam Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, were very interesting for Parviz and his family members.

Parviz was proud of his son, Aman. He was among the first people who became Imam Khomeini's translator in an interview conducted by the CBS news network in the first weeks of the Imam's stay in Qom city. At the end of the interview, Imam Khomeini had warmly encouraged Aman, had asked his name and had called on Aman to talk about his activities.

Tehran Times resumed its mission based on the belief that it would reflect Iran's point of views and stances amid the unique situation in the country following the Islamic Revolution's victory.

Post-revolution viewpoints were clearly differently from before which were tainted with pro-U.S. news outlets. As a result the media was faced with a void which needed to be filled with alternatives to inform the world about the developments in the post-revolutionary Iran.

Those days, the foreign embassies in Tehran were the only sources of transmission of news and developments abroad. The audience overseas was receiving Iran's news via the embassies' translators who had collected news and reports, publishing them via telex.

The emergence of the Tehran Times was very timely, especially for the English language audience. The newly-established daily found rapidly its own audience across the globe.

Running the affairs of such an important daily was not an easy task. Responsibilities included managing all the affairs of the daily, including distribution, training of staff and handling of the monetary affairs, etc. were handled by Parviz.

Ayatollah Mohammad Beheshti, who was one of the main leaders of the Islamic Revolution, came to know that certain people were trying to gain influence in the daily. Martyr Beheshti managed a meeting with Parviz and called on him to resist against the problems and meantime expressed the hope to save Tehran Times from a shutdown and possible deviation.

Ayatollah Beheshti further called on Ayatollah Ahmad Janati, the then head of the Islamic Development Organization, to provide financial and administrative supports for the Tehran Times.

In the meantime, Beheshti initiated a weekly meeting with Parviz to set guidelines for the dailys policy analysis.

Parviz was regularly praising Beheshti's accurate analysis and viewpoints in the mentioned meetings. At first, the meetings were attended only by Parviz but later chief editor of the Islamic Republic daily joined the meetings.

Ayatollah Beheshti knew well that if the newly-established Islamic Republic wanted to stand on its own feet and protect itself against the problems and difficulties posed by the enemies and that it would face long term inefficiencies inherited from the past. He knew that the officials who had been employed by the new government would not be the ultimate representatives of the country's self-sacrificing people. Therefore, the government's officials and representatives would not reflect a complete image of the people's ideals in the media.That is why, Beheshti underlined, "Tehran Times must manifest the original intentions (of people) on its pages, it should not be turned into the government's noticeboard or advertisement bill.

"The Tehran Times must not become the government's spokesperson, but it must be the loud voice of the world oppressed people," Beheshti told Parviz in a meeting.

Now, Tehran Times daily should pay required attention to its current and past records as it is turning 41 years old. If Tehran Times has been honest to Beheshti's strategy from the viewpoints of its audience, then it is entitled to be proud of its records. We hope so.

It should be mentioned that Irfan Parviz died at his home in Tehran in May 2015. He was 85.

See original here:

Tehran Times: An audible voice of the oppressed people worldwide - Tehran Times

2020 Pulitzer Prizes Won by Photos of Protests in Hong Kong and Oppression in Kashmir – PetaPixel

The Pulitzer Prize has officially revealed the winners for 2020. The prize for Breaking News Photography went to the entire Reuters photography staff for their coverage of pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, while the prize for Feature Photography was awarded to Channi Anand, Mukhtar Khan and Dar Yasin of the Associated Press for their striking documentary photos of life in Kashmir.

The entire Reuters photography staff was awarded this years prize for Breaking News Photography, for their wide-ranging and illuminating photographs of Hong Kong as citizens protested infringement of their civil liberties and defended the regions autonomy by the Chinese government.

In addition to the award itself, the Reuters staff takes home a $15,000 cash prize in recognition of their achievement. You can view the full gallery of winning photos with captions here.

The photography staff of @Reuters has won the Pulitzer Prize for breaking news photography for its coverage of last year's violent protests in Hong Kong. More images: https://t.co/uvENRgibZW pic.twitter.com/GIxpmSSZuW

Reuters Pictures (@reuterspictures) May 5, 2020

Congratulations to the @Reuters team, including @jamespomfret, @GregTorode, David Lague, @TomLasseter, @a_roantree, @QiZHAI, @DavidKirton_, @farahmaster, @clarejim & @stecklow for being a #Pulitzer Prize finalist in International Reporting for 'The Revolt of Hong Kong' series! pic.twitter.com/mMcLSjxQ7f

PR Team at Reuters (@ReutersPR) May 4, 2020

The prize for Feature Photography was awarded to three photographers from the Associated PressChanni Anand, Mukhtar Khan and Dar Yasinfor their striking images of life in the contested territory of Kashmir as India revoked its independence, executed through a communications blackout.

As with the Breaking News Pulitzer, the photo agency will also receive a $15,000 cash prize in recognition of their Feature Photography award. You can view the full gallery of winning photos with captions here.

Associated Press photographers @daryasin, Mukhtar Khan and Channi Anand found ways to let outsiders see what was happening. Now, their work has been honored with the 2020 Pulitzer Prize in feature photography. https://t.co/0Nf4FMG4xn

AP Images (@AP_Images) May 4, 2020

Dear colleagues and friends I just want to say Thank you and that this award @PulitzerPrizes an honor for us. I could never have imagine in my life time. it could have also been impossible without my family both at home and AP Thank you for always sanding by us.

mukhtar khan (@muukhtark_khan) May 4, 2020

Thank you Colleagues, friends, brothers. I would just like to say thank you for standing by us always. Its an honour and a privilege beyond any we could have ever imagined. Its overwhelming to receive this honor.

Dar Yasin (@daryasin) May 4, 2020

Thankyou everyone https://t.co/4Sh4EP9s68

Channi Anand (@channiap) May 5, 2020

To find out more about the prizes or see the full galleries for each prize, head over to the Pulitzer website. And if you want to see how the 2020 winners stack up compared to last year, check out our coverage from 2019 here.

The rest is here:

2020 Pulitzer Prizes Won by Photos of Protests in Hong Kong and Oppression in Kashmir - PetaPixel

Modi’s Government Is Exploiting the Pandemic to Ramp up Repression in Kashmir – Jacobin magazine

India may be the worlds largest democracy, but it also has other claims to fame: according to a recent report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, it is the worlds second-largest importer of arms. With its allocation for defense almost five times as much as that for health, the country also spends a significant part of its budget manufacturing as many weapons as it can domestically.

The Indian authorities transport much of this weaponry to the northern valley of Kashmir, where it is deployed on the streets against unarmed protesters demanding their right to self-determination. Indian forces have experimented on the people of Kashmir with a whole range of weapons over the years.

They have used pellet guns which they claim are nonlethal to maim and blind tens of thousands of ordinary people. They routinely fire tear gas canisters of various kinds which have, along with many other casualties, resulted in the deaths of two schoolboys after military men shot them in the head at point-blank range. Indian forces have killed thousands with the weapons they consider nonlethal and countless more with the lethal ones. All with complete impunity.

On the streets of Kashmir, the excessive use of tear gas has predictably caused grave damage to the respiratory systems of the civilian population, who find their homes engulfed in smoke and pepper gas, even with the windows closed. A paper published by Turkish researchers showed that inhaling tear gas over a period of time can have a significant harmful effect on a persons lungs. The people of Kashmir have been breathing it in for decades now.

In this place of sadness and defiance, news of the first confirmed COVID-19 case in March spread like the smoke of a tear gas canister. It stoked up panic and chaos in the immediate vicinity, while in regions further afield, people initially scoffed at those who displayed signs of alarm.

Soon, however, people stocked up on rice, pulses, and potatoes and sat inside their homes, perhaps aware that no one in power would want to save a people under occupation if the pandemic took hold, and also conscious of the shortcomings of Indias malformed health care system.

Medical experts and health organizations have insisted that in most cases, only people with an underlying medical condition succumb to the virus: hypertension, diabetes, or respiratory problems. Unfortunately, this means that the people of Kashmir are especially vulnerable to this deadly virus, because of their ruined lungs and the hypertension caused by years of conflict.

Only last year, on August 5, when Indias far-right Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government officially (but illegally) revoked what was left of Kashmirs autonomy, it also implemented one of the longest and most rigorous clampdowns in history throughout the region. Any space for dissent was eliminated. The authorities detained thousands of activists, academics, and journalists, including even politicians who are considered apologists for the Indian government; most of them are still locked up.

They also booked tens of thousands of ordinary people under draconian laws, including children as young as nine years old, many of whom were tortured. Life as we know it, already precarious in Kashmir, came to a standstill.

The government withdrew some of the restrictions on physical movement after months of international pressure. But the constraints on mobile communication have only recently been relaxed, and internet coverage is still limited to an ancient and tortoise-paced 2G.

Even in the midst of a global medical emergency, after eight long months, the Indian state is not allowing people access to reliable high-speed internet. Because of this, doctors and medical experts in Kashmir are unable to obtain the latest information about COVID-19.

Students, who have been out of school since August 5 last year, have no facilities to study online. Working from home for professionals is out of the question. People associated with handicrafts and the tourism industry the majority of the population in Kashmir have been out of work since August, too, not merely since the start of the pandemic. They are increasingly forced to take up odd jobs to make ends meet.

The never-ending conflict has left Kashmirs health care system in ruins, if it can even be said to exist at all. At a time when the World Health Organization has been urging states to carry out tests on a grand scale, fewer than 15,000 tests had been carried out in Jammu and Kashmir by April 27, for a population of 12.5 million.

There are just ninety-seven ventilators and a handful of functioning hospitals that are ill-equipped, as patients have repeatedly complained. A senior doctor warned Al Jazeera that if the pandemic takes root in Kashmir, we will die like cattle.

To add to the crippling shortcomings of the health care system, the Indian state has threatened the doctors and health care workers in Kashmir who had spoken out against poor management and the lack of proper equipment by telling them that strict action would be taken against anyone who publicly criticizes the efforts of the authorities to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. After this statement, the state-run media interviewed doctors and health care workers on a regular basis to back up an apologetic narrative, praising the authorities for doing an excellent job.

Outside, on the streets, the Indian forces have been harassing and beating up health care workers, even though they are exempt from the lockdown. A person who was on his way home from the hospital told a national publication that he was brutally roughed up and hit on the head with a rifle butt.

Soldiers stopped a journalist who works for a local magazine at a checkpoint and demanded that he open up his bag. When he tried asking questions, the Indian soldier cut him short: This is not the virus curfew, this is our curfew.

The Indian states approach to the COVID-19 outbreak in Kashmir reeks of its imperial and militaristic attitude. Further proof of this came when it issued a new set of domicile orders, taking advantage of the pandemic and the lockdown, in the full knowledge that popular resistance in a time of emergency would be minimal.

Indian military forces have already occupied thousands of acres of land in Kashmir for decades, but the new rules make it possible for any Indian citizen to own land or acquire a much-coveted government job in the region. This poses a serious demographic threat, as the BJP and its parent organization Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) have vowed to turn India into a Hindu nation. This act of pulling Kashmir completely under the dominance of the Indian constitution also makes the question of self-determination yet more difficult.

Even in the midst of a pandemic, the Indian state still finds the time to persecute Kashmiri journalists. Only last week, the authorities booked a female photojournalist under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) which allows the government to designate any individual as a terrorist without evidence for sharing her previously published photographs on social media.

Within twenty-four hours, police had booked two more senior journalists, also using the UAPA in one case, for equally fatuous reasons. This brazen attempt to intimidate journalists who are trying to cover the Kashmir conflict is not a new development, but the fact that those journalists are now being branded as terrorists is deeply concerning.

Even scarier, perhaps, is the way that the Indian state is exploiting this opportunity to normalize a pervasive regime of surveillance, both physical and electronic, which will remain in place even after the pandemic is over. Although surveillance has long been a major tool for perpetuating the occupation of Kashmir, the authorities are taking such measures to a qualitatively higher level, with every action of every individual now being monitored.

A senior police officer said that he felt like he was chasing a militant while tracing peoples travel histories via call records and bank transactions. This comment underlines how the Indian state is building in the phrase of Edward Snowden the architecture of oppression.

This intensified surveillance regime is just one aspect of a broader reality: the Indian state has approached the task of containing the pandemic in Kashmir as if it were a military operation. In response, people have been trying to avoid being taken by the authorities to quarantine centers.

They distrust these state-controlled centers intensely, associating them with detention camps where torture is routine. The idea of a quarantine center evokes not hope, as it should, but fear: in the minds of Kashmiri people, it looks like a jail.

Meanwhile, in faraway villages of South Kashmir, the Indian forces continue to kill rebels fighting against the state (or as the Indian media likes to put it, they eliminate terrorists). On April 12, as the world was still preoccupied with the humanitarian crisis, Indian soldiers moved into a mountain village in North Kashmir and used the poor villagers as human shields, firing at Pakistani forces across the Line of Control (LoC).

The two countries, which dont have enough face masks to contain the virus, still had the resources for an exchange of heavy artillery fire, which resulted in the death of at least four people on both sides of the border, including two children aged eight and two.

This helps the Indian state in more ways than one: as well as driving home the message to the people of Kashmir that nothing, not even a medical emergency, can prevent the state from doing what it wants to do with them, it also diverts the attention of Indias Hindu majority from the countrys collapsed health care system and an economy whose condition is even worse, toward an enemy who wants to attack us.

In spite of these horrors, the Kashmiris are holding up with a sense of harmony, perhaps rooted in years of conflict and shared suffering. Many people from different organizations as well as individuals have come forward to provide money and supplies to people who might not be able to survive the lockdown without assistance.

Such groups took the initiative to provide thousands of doctors and medical workers with personal protective equipment (PPE). The administration has rewarded these efforts with constant harassment and attempts to regulate their work.

As much of the worlds population sits with their fingers crossed, hoping for the pandemic to disappear as unexpectedly as it arrived, they at least have the luxury of thinking that once this is all over, they will again be able to walk without fear on the roads, meet their loved ones, and lead a normal life.

However, the people of Kashmir know that the current lockdown is just the latest in a long series of curfews. Even if the COVID-19 pandemic is halted and life returns to normal elsewhere, for them, life is only going to get worse.

See the original post here:

Modi's Government Is Exploiting the Pandemic to Ramp up Repression in Kashmir - Jacobin magazine

‘We’re forgetting the lessons of 1945’: young people on VE Day – The Guardian

This weekend marks 75 years since the end of the second world war in Europe, and 70 years since the foundations were established of what became the European Union. With the continent facing its biggest challenge since 1945, do the lessons of the war and its aftermath have any resonance for young people? Millennials from around Europe share some of their thoughts and fears.

At times of crisis, populism, racism, xenophobia and fascism rise. After the coronavirus economic crisis really hits, we will witness an unbearable climate of pro-nationalist sentiment. In a world of global challenges nations are the wrong scale to solve those problems.Isabel, scientist, 32, Spain

The fraying of the European project recently has made the second world war suddenly more relevant. For a long time we thought the continents bloody divisions were consigned to the past along with slavery or the guillotine. Now it feels like Europes tormented history was merely suspended for a few decades. Im not frightened of a return to armed conflict, but the potential of destructive disunity feels very real. I have no sentimentality for VE Day but I do think that it should be commemorated.Aleks, 20s, Serbian, living in the UK

Of course there are lessons for my generation from the second world war. I grew up in Germany after all, and what thoughts of racial elitism can do was shockingly impressed on me. How people are turning back to far-right groups all over Europe is very scary.Sophia, 22, Brandenburg, Germany

I am sick of hearing about the war. The allies committed atrocities, war brings out the worst in all people. My friends grandad took part in the D-day landings. He said they hit the legs of the soldiers to get them out on the beaches, they were not brave or heroic willingly and they all shit themselves literally. It was hell, not our finest hour. The lesson to learn is no one should think they are better than anyone else and that peace is the most valuable thing we can possibly have.Jennifer, 35, London

I feel like its our moral responsibility to not let history repeat itself. Im very fearful of the nationalism, populism, isolationism and the rise of hard-right parties in Europe (and in the world of course) that we face currently. I live in constant fear that this degradation will eventually evolve and lead to WW3. From the pandemic I see a lot of great humanity, empathy, solidarity. But I also see terrible things: self-centredness, selfishness, disinformation, intolerance, etc. And I see countries that are absolutely not ready for whats coming.Nina, legal assistant, 27, Montpellier, France

Austria in particular has a tragic past when it comes to nationalism, and people here are acutely aware of this. On the other hand, history never exactly repeats itself and I doubt the horrors of the past would really take place in the same way. Nevertheless, what hides behind nationalism is a profound division between groups of people, which is the antithesis of the European project.Louis, mid-30s, Vienna

I think its good we talk about the second world war in the UK. My boyfriend is Danish and says that despite the country being occupied, and he has family who were young adults at that time, it isnt talked about. Hes never had a conversation with them about it, or how it impacts their views today. Nationalism worries me very much. You see it across Europe, in ways more subtle than Brexit. Freedom of movement seems to be viewed very negatively by many people. When visiting my boyfriends family in Denmark multiple acquaintances or random people have expressed negative feelings about the fact hes dating a foreigner.Heather, Edinburgh

This was a traumatic experience and has taught me, as a millennial, not to take peace for granted. Our national curriculum is flawed, however. At school we are taught predominantly about Britains role in the war, as if it defeated the Nazi regime singlehandedly. In reality, Britains success depended entirely on our continental and global alliances.Sonia 22, British, living in Paris

The second world war still divides my nation today. Politicians have been using it divide the nation. Its like a continuous witch-hunt ever since the breakup of Yugoslavia that shifts the focus away from the real lessons of the war. The pandemic too has made me pessimistic. It has enabled a rise in rightwing governments in many parts of Europe which used the lockdown to start implementing their draconian laws.Andreja, 30s, Ljubljana, Slovenia

VE Day symbolises an important victory indeed. People were happy not to be under German oppression anymore, but in Italy most people do not feel it or dont even know it exists. We mark our own liberation day on 25 April. I can see first hand in Italy what nationalistic propaganda is like and what nationalism-oriented communication is like. Its scary.Lorenzo, 20s, Milan

I think its important to acknowledge those who gave up so much for our freedom. My dad lives in South Yorkshire and they have been celebrating VE Day in their socially distanced front gardens! My generation should still learn the lessons of the war. But as our government refused PPE from the EU procurement agreement, it makes me pessimistic about the idea of Britain working with Europe.Rosie, primary teacher, 30, South Yorks, based London

I think we need to get away from the second world war as a cultural touchstone. Not forget that it happened but with every passing day the context we live in is further removed from it. It has become warped into a nationalist icon, removed from the reality of what actually happened. The lessons people use it to teach are that Britain is special in Europe because we werent invaded, fuelling the delusion that we can do everything alone. The tub-thumping pseudo-patriotism of wannabe demagogues is terrifying.Nick, PhD student, 26, Manchester

For a Croat in particular, the second world war continues to mark my generation as we havent been able to transcend divisions dating from then. Some in my generation still struggle to make sense of the lessons of the war. For me it is clear: after the worst modern atrocities on the continent, we as Europeans committed to creating a more peaceful continent. One thing that the Covid crisis might bring is to reveal the inability of nationalist governments to manage the pandemic on their own.Luka, 22, Zagreb

Captain Tom and my grandfather exemplify VE Day to me. That stiff upper lip determination that were are not alone and all in this together. Or the Queen saying we will meet again. This crisis shows that the level of support forged in the cauldron of the second world war are still with us. Whether the staff of the NHS or carers, volunteers racing around to deliver food parcels.Ben, engineer working as a bin collector, 20s, Carlisle

I am anxious about VE Day. My fear is that the loudest voices will be those who want to shout about Britain standing alone and using that to justify a nationalist agenda despite the passage of 75 years. Britain seems obsessed with the war in a way no other European country is.Peter, 29, London

I am the grandchild of a Holocaust survivor, and my Dutch grandparents both suffered under German occupation. Being Jewish and living in Amsterdam, the scars of the Jewish community are all over the city. I cant speak for my generation, but I can say that for me it feels like peace is conditional, it is hard-fought. The fact that many of my best friends are now Germans is a blessing I never take for granted.Software engineer, 25, Amsterdam

The second world war teaches us never again. The trouble is, most people take that to mean just the gas chambers; everything leading up to that point is apparently acceptable. I also think the UK looks on WWII as a glorious victory of the British against the Germans, rather than a collaborative effort against fascism. The UK has cherrypicked and romanticised history, which makes it impossible for us to learn from it.Sarah, 31, Milton Keynes

I would say the second world war taught us that no country can make it alone and left us with a deep mistrust of nationalism. However, I look around and I see how little of these two lessons has actually stuck.Michaela, scientist, 32, Italy

Too many people my age do not even know about the Holocaust, and just how easily European countries slid into horrific persecution and violence. I think our generation needs to contend with this now more so than ever, with razor-wire fences going up all over European and racism, Islamophobia, anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination and gender-based discrimination all on the rise in recent years. A better understanding of this history will remind our generation how easy it is for a society to fall into the abyss.Adam, 25, Helsinki

The narrative often portrayed in our history lessons was of national pride and British exceptionalism. Having been fortunate to speak to a number of elderly relatives who played a part in the war their stories didnt match what we were taught, rather they focused on the horrors experienced, and the need for co-operation. I think our generation needs to be aware that the memory of the war has been corrupted to encourage nationalism and British exceptionalism.Oliver, student, 21, Norfolk

The rest is here:

'We're forgetting the lessons of 1945': young people on VE Day - The Guardian

Bobby Sands to be remembered on 39th anniversary of his death – Morning Star Online

COMMEMORATIONS will be held in honour of Irish republican hunger striker Bobby Sands, who died 39 years ago on Tuesday after 66 days without food in the notorious Maze prison.

Vigils will be muted because of Covid-19, but people will pay their respects to Mr Sands, who led the 1981 hungerstrike protests demanding the reinstatement of political status for republican prisoners.

He was the first to start the action and was prepared to see his hunger strike through to the end in what became seen as a bitter struggle between the Irish republican movement and the government of British prime minister Margaret Thatcher.

Mr Sands was elected MP for Fermanagh & South Tyrone during the campaign, dispelling the myth that the hunger strikers had no support in Ireland.

More people voted for him than did for Mrs Thatcher in her own Finchley constituency. His death led to international protests and condemnation of the callousness of thegovernment.

Iranian authorities changed the name of the road that housed the British embassy from Winston Churchill Street to Bobby Sands Street, and he continues to inspire oppressed people across the world.

Mr Sandss last diary entry was: Tiocfaidh ar la our day will come.

The legacy of the hunger strikers, 10 of whom died, paved the way for the emergence of Sinn Fein as a serious political party. Many credit their action for precipitatingthe 1998 Good Friday Agreement.

Speaking in the latest issue of An Phoblacht, MLA for West Belfast Orlaithi Flynn said: Bobby Sands,like many men and women in our community, was an ordinary person who, as a result of British oppression, went on to do extraordinary things and leave an extraordinary legacy.

Read the rest here:

Bobby Sands to be remembered on 39th anniversary of his death - Morning Star Online

Karrabing Film Collective Tackles the Cultural and Environmental Devastation of Settler Colonialism – ARTnews

The word karrabing, from which the Karrabing Film Collective takes its name, means tide out in the Emmiyengal language, invoking the northwest coastline of Australia that connects the members of the collective, an intergenerational group of around thirty artists and filmmakers, most of whom are indigenous to the Northern Territory of Australia. Their use of the word offers an immediate insight into their work. As Karrabing member Natasha Bigfoot Lewis puts it, We are all saltwater from the same coastconnected lands from the same coast.

Karrabings films are varied in style, but the group members have adopted an approach that they refer to as improvisational realism. Shooting with iPhones or handheld cameras, they typically begin with a loose idea rooted in their everyday experiences rather than a fixed script, developing the plot and dialogue as they go, incorporating input from each participant. While their immediate community and environment are the foundation of Karrabings films, often positioning viewers as fly-on-the-wall observers, these are not straightforward documentaries: realism is interwoven with alternative histories, speculative futures, and Dreaming narratives. As Nhanda and Nyoongar artist and curator Glenn Iseger-Pilkington explains, the Dreaming is the realm of ancestral spirits who formed Australia, giving plants, animals, language, lore, and law to the land. It operates beyond Western constructs of time, as a realm of cultural manifestation and unfolding that exists concurrently in our past, our present, and our future.

One main catalyst for the groups formation was the 2007 Northern Territory National Emergency Response, commonly known as the Intervention, a set of policies implemented by a federal government task force in response to a report commissioned by regional authorities on child sexual abuse and neglect in Aboriginal communities. The federal government enacted broad new legislation that gave it heightened control over Aboriginal communities, including restrictions on alcohol consumption, mandatory child welfare inspections, and a significant rise in policing.

The Intervention coincided with the fallout from a riot at the Belyuen settlement, a rural Aboriginal community where many of the Karrabing members lived. The riot had attracted the attention of mainstream media outlets, and the membersmany of whom had been left temporarily homelessdecided to produce their own accounts representing their perspective on issues affecting their communities. Along with American anthropologist Elizabeth A. Povinelli, a professor at Columbia University who first visited Belyuen in 1984 and has maintained a close relationship with the community since, they formed the Karrabing Film Collective and made their first short film, Karrabing! Low Tide Turning, in 2011.

As a Mori person from Karrabings neighboring country, Aotearoa (New Zealand), I have certain historical commonalities with Aboriginal Australians and Torres Strait Islanders, Australias two distinct Indigenous groups. We are all also citizens of Commonwealth countries with a long and sustained relationship built on geographical proximity, and we share a head of state, Queen Elizabeth II. Indigenous communities around the worldwhat Mori refer to as iwi taketake, or the long-established peoplehave similarities in terms of our relationships to our environments, and how our cultures are sustained by intergenerational connection. Despite a sense of solidarity in these shared values and the dubious honor of having experienced colonization, however, we reject a simplistic view of global Indigenous homogeneity. We are not the same and cannot speak for one another; what we can do is speak with adjacency.

This is something I consider when approached to write about an Indigenous culture that I dont whakapapahave a kin connectionto: I mustnt oversimplify our similarities, nor overstate the closeness of our connections. Instead, I want to focus on what is most compelling to me about the Karrabing Film Collectives work: the way they tell their histories, unashamedly from their own perspectives. They have what I would call mana motuhake in their approach, mana motuhake being self-determination of your future.

Karrabings most recent film, Day in the Life (2020), charts a day, presumably like many others, in which the authoritative hand of the government is a constant, shadowy presence over the community. The film comprises five satirically titled vignettesBreakfast, Play Break, Lunch Run, Cocktail Hour, Takeout Dinnerillustrating the ways in which the communitys everyday lives are shaped by external influences and constraints, in the form of state agents policing their behavior or private mining companies stealing resources and polluting their lands. In the work, the perspectives of the Karrabing cast are always central, creating an empathetic viewing experience that flips mainstream assumptions about Aboriginal communities on their head.

The films dialogue is interspersed with a rap soundtrack composed by younger members of the collective and audio clips from radio and television programssourced predominantly from the Australian Broadcasting Corporationrepeating deficit statistics about Aboriginal communities. These samples mention community impoverishment, overcrowded housing, and, most tellingly, the amount of money provided by state and federal governments, illustrating how the mainstream media and Australian politicians perpetuate negative stereotypes about Aboriginal communities squandering government aid. The effects of one particularly damaging stereotypethat Aboriginal parents are unable to care for their childrenare highlighted in the Play Break segment of Day in the Life: two women enjoying an idyllic afternoon playing outdoors with their kids are abruptly interrupted by the arrival of government authorities.

It is in these mothers fear that the effects of governmental oppression are felt most keenly. Fear accelerates their movements as they seek to hide the children. The segment reveals the double-edged sword of living under a government that provides significant welfare: it also determines what good parenting looks like and will enforce that model accordingly. When the authorities ultimately take one womans children, she morphs from close kin to pariah. The fear and stigma surrounding her make her repellent to others: will the events that befell her rub off on the community? This is a victory for colonization: Indigenous families turning on each other in order to protect themselves.

The mothers fear is an inherited one, evident in a refrain repeated throughout the film: Were gonna do what our old people did, were gonna hide our kids. This is one of many references Karrabing filmmakers make to the Stolen Generations, the thousands of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander children who were forcibly removed from their families between roughly 1905 and the 1970s. The effects of these removals are everywhere in Karrabing films, regardless of whether they are explicitly mentioned. The consequences are seen in the dependence on welfare, the overcrowded housing, and the fear of government authorities. They are also evident in the quest to reclaim traditional knowledge and relationships to country. As Karrabing films increasingly circulate internationally, perhaps their focus on the social inequity experienced by Indigenous people will compel audiences around the world to examine how their own governments legislated the assimilation of dying Indigenous peoples into dominant settler power structures. After all, knowledge is a collective responsibility.

One Scene in Day in the Life follows a young man who wakes to find he is unable to cook breakfast and have a shower, as the utilities in his house have been cut off. As he walks from house to house along seemingly deserted streets, it becomes evident that other households are in the same impoverished predicament: pipes are blocked and the residents are waiting for assistance, or the electricity has gone out. A refrain from the accompanying rap soundtrack lodged itself squarely in my brain: Forward to the bush, but wheres he going to go? There is a popular belief, even among Indigenous people, that we know best how to live harmoniously, symbiotically, with the environment. Frankly, its a romanticized view. The reality is that as Indigenous individuals, we dont inherently hold that knowledge. Because of colonization, which systematically removed Indigenous people from their lands and subsequently stripped them of their languages and cultures, we dont all know how to survive on our own land. One of the most devastating pieces of legislation passed in Aotearoa was the Tohunga Suppression Act (1907), which outlawed Mori cultural and spiritual practices, dismantled our traditional wnanga teaching systems, and led to the eventual banning of our language in schools. As with the Stolen Generations in Australia, it is impossible to quantify how government interventions have contributed to shorter life expectancy, lower quality of life, and Mori overrepresentation in prisons. So, forward to the bush, but whats he going to eat, and wear, and wheres he going to live?

My iwi (tribe) are bush people from the Te Urewera mountains, and many of my family members are hunters, a role that feels completely entwined with who we are as Mori. However, the animals that we hunt in the twenty-first centurywild pigs, deer, tahrare all animals that were introduced by European settlers in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. There are no mammals (apart from bats) endemic to Aotearoa: native birds, which would have traditionally been hunted, are now protected species. Knowledge of edible flora, another traditional food source, has eroded due to violent disruptions to our cultural well-being such as land confiscations, postwar migration from tribal homelands into urban centers, and the convenience of the supermarket. Meticulous crafting of bird snares and spears has been eschewed in favor of guns. As is likewise seen in Karrabing films, displacement from land and the removal of younger generations also disrupts another foundation of Indigenous life: intergenerational living. If this way of life is interrupted, so too is the ability to pass knowledge down.

This predicament is portrayed in the Takeout Dinner segment of Day in the Life, wherein an elder is taking a younger family member on country to teach him the ways of the land when they are distracted by the discovery of a lithium extraction site. Both the elder and his protg question how theyre meant to learn from and protect their land if its being dug up and poisoned by white people. As portrayed here, the health of the land and the health of the people are inextricably linked. But, as is often the case in Karrabing films, the rather depressing storylines in Day in the Life are saved when Indigenous peoples own stories and ways of life are asserted. In the films closing scene, the protagonists initiate a corroboree, creating a swirl of time in which the ills of the past are undone. Karrabing stories become powerful catalysts for survival itself.

One Karrabing film, Night Time Go (2017), addresses the past directly, posing as a documentary depicting an alternative history of Australias domestic experience of World War II. Combining archival newsreel footage with grainy, black-and-white reenactments staged by Karrabing members, the film narrates the wartime experiences of Karrabing ancestors who were forcibly relocated to inland internment camps in anticipation of an imminent Japanese invasion, lest their simple minds be manipulated by Axis influences to undermine the Australian government. The Karrabing ancestors escaped from the camp in September 1943 and returned to their homes on foot, a journey of more than two hundred miles. A title card at the beginning of the film states, No record of their journey, or others like it, exists in the settler archive.

This film is an intervention into what mandated truth looks like, speaking back to the settler governments portrayal of official history. Researching the Katherine internment camp depicted in the film, I came across the following description on the government-run Northern Territory Tourism website: The Mataranka Aboriginal Army Camp was established by late 1943 comprised of 350 Aboriginal workers who were supporting the war effort by working for the Army.4 Supporting the war effort and working for the Army is an interpretation of events far different from the one portrayed in Night Time Go.

The government voice in the film, represented through archival clips, presents a picture of Australia that is pastoral and patriotic: the government is the benevolent patron of Aboriginal peoples, who are enjoying their simple lifestyle . . . under the shelter of our great nation. But Karrabing subverts this government archive, bringing historic photographs to life in reenactments. Settler histories have often ignored the fates of the people depicted in these images, but the film shows them as fully fledged individuals on a mission to re-chart their futures. In the process, Karrabing members also rewrite history, imagining an alternative course of events in which their ancestors not only escape the internment camp but expel the whitefulla from their lands on their journey home. At the end of Night Time Go, the Karrabing Free Broadcast System announces: Australian North Falls. Army Retreats to Brisbane Line. Indigenous Peoples Celebrate Freedom. Though the film borders on mockumentary, its satire isnt done for the sake of humor. Rather, Karrabings re-creations elicit hope for what an alternative, mana motuhake, future would look like for Karrabing members and their families. It also illustrates that for Indigenous peoples living in settler states, participation in the World Wars meant turning attention to fighting external enemies at times when their own freedom was still under internal threat.

The Karrabing Film Collective has shown me that hope lives and dies on belief. For Indigenous peoples, this belief is tied to knowing our land, our kin, and our stories. To believe in ourselves is to unlearn much of what is told to us by the dominant media, and to escape all the tentacles of government that find their way into our schools and homes. The swirling circularity of history that Karrabing so deftly foregrounds in their work reminds us that our story has not yet ended.

1 Growing up Karrabing: a conversation with Gavin Bianamu, Sheree Bianamu, Natasha Bigfoot Lewis, Ethan Jorrock and Elizabeth Povinelli, UN Magazine, 2017, unprojects.org.au.2 Glenn Iseger-Pilkington, email to the author, April 6, 2020.3 Elizabeth A. Povinelli, Geontologies: A Requiem to Late Liberalism, Durham, N.C., and London, Duke University Press, 2016, pp. 2425.4 Katherine in WWII, Northern Territory Tourism, northernterritory.com.

This article appears under the titleSurvival Stories in the May 2020 issue, pp. 5053.

See more here:

Karrabing Film Collective Tackles the Cultural and Environmental Devastation of Settler Colonialism - ARTnews

Land rights sand castle in a wind storm | – IndigenousX

When I am asked about the land rights struggle in this country, I often liken the struggle to trying to build a sandcastle in a wind storm and how even when we get some foundational structure in comes the government to knock it down.

The struggle for land rights has been a long one and one that has been hard fought and continues to me so. One of the most pivotal protest chants is what do we want? Land Rights. When do we want them? Now! and this continues during protests to this day.

Why? Because the struggle continues.

Every step in the direction of meaningful reform to address the issue of theft of this land is then countered through government legislation and this mean spirited response to every small victory we have has become emblematic of the Australian government.

There are no shortage of examples of this greedy entitlement, but perhaps one of the most disgraceful examples is the government response to the case of TheWik Peoples v The State of Queensland in which, on this day in 1997, it announced its 10 point plan.

The Wik case was an incredibly important one not solely for the cultural importance of the Wik peoples being recognised but it was also important from a legal perspective in considering the discreet point of law regarding extinguishment because there had been so many cases where lands were being leased without regard to Indigenous people.

In summary, for those not across the detail of this case, the High Court rightly determined that the mere grant of a pastoral lease does not necessarily extinguish any remaining nativetitle rights. The High Court stopped short of stating that the leases were extinguished. They determined that if there was a conflict of rights, the native title holders came off second best. If there was noconflict, the rights of each co-exist.

Despite this nuanced legal decision, the government and its biggest constituents farming and mining scrambling for control. They set about on a propaganda campaign that vilified Aboriginal people and the response was devastating as reactionary behaviour showed the true nature of the greedy capitalist.

At all times the Wik people conducted themselves with dignity. They used the colonial legal structures to affirm what was known at a cultural level in order to make the government see and understand that the Indigenous peoples of this country are not interested in land grab or commoditisation of land we want the non-Indigenous community to understand the responsibility of caring for the land, of belonging to it and maintaining the synergistic relationship which gives life to our cultural, communities and ceremonies.

Instead, the government set out on a deliberate campaign to mislead the mainstream as they termed everyone other than Indigenous people. The Deputy Prime Minister, Tim Fisher, and Queensland Premier, Rob Bobridge, made claims that the High Court decision went beyond their duties and attacked the High Court for purported judicial activism against mainstream interests. Freshly elected Howard government went into battle for the mainstream and forged ahead with their 10 point plan to amend the Native Title Acta plan which led to one of the longest debates in the Australian Senates history.

The reason for the outcry from the political heavyweights was not the decision itself because the cost was nought. It was no great victory for Indigenous people, it was no civil rights victory, but merely a decision that the grant of a pastoral lease did not necessarily extinguish Native Title and in fact,wouldextinguish Native Title to the extent of any inconsistency. There was no loss in a capitalist sense, but this was an extraordinary loss of face for the government who were used to being in the drivers seat steering public opinion with respect to Indigenous people. The Indigenous people using the system in this manner for a moral victory with no interest in finance did not fit the narrative being pedalled since invasion.

Howard and his cohort spoke about the government fighting for the mainstream and trying to to protect land owners. Yes he said that. He then announced the Wik 10 point plan with full support from the mainstream public who believed the nonsense being circulated by the government and media that had no factual or legal basis.

The Wik 10 point plan undermined the nature of the native title legislation enacted under the Keating government. Although imperfect, the intent of the Keating enacted native title legislation was to confer a benefit whereas the Howard 10 point plan cut across this and acted more as a sanction or tool to extinguish.

In fact, those within the ranks of the Howard government were spruiking that the 10 point plan would bring bucketloads of extinguishment with the intent to undermine Indigenous people apparent from the outset.

Mick Dodson said at the time, By purporting to confirm extinguishment by inconsistent grants, the Commonwealth is purposely pre-empting the development of the common law not allowing sufficient time to integrate the belated recognition of native title into Australias land management system. This does not require the obliteration of indigenous interests so as to favour non-indigenous interests.

Exactly! And yet, they did it any way. They set about to obliterate the chances of native title claims for so many by ensuring inconsistency and fixing the laws to make it so and this has been the devastation we have been trying to claw back from since.

This behaviour from Howard, he has since reflected upon and said that he could have handled better but that it had unnerved us and I dont think I handled that next six months all that well.

Understatement but important when you consider this is about as close to a mea culpa as you could get from a man famous for refusing to apologise and digging his heels in. So as Howard spent many years undermining us and teaching his successors how to do the same, we know our fight continues.

TheWik 10 point plan set us back, demonstrated the lengths that the power structures in this country will go to in order to ensure that their power remains along with our oppression. What they didnt count on was that this serves only to solidify our resolve to keep going.

Visit link:

Land rights sand castle in a wind storm | - IndigenousX

Ubuntu, privilege and sheer ignorance thrive in the midst of Covid-19 – News24

On March 15, with 62 confirmed cases of the Covid-19 coronavirus, President Cyril Ramaphosa declared a state of national disaster.

This marked the first vast government response to the virus. No one anticipated where this pronouncement would lead us towards. Its almost as if some were in a state of denial for what was to come, and some were in a state of readiness for a nationwide lockdown to follow suit because they saw what was happening around the world.

South Africa was conditioned to understand the gravity of the situation at hand. A week later, a 21-day national lockdown was declared. Meaning, the old was gone and a rather different South Africa was about to materialise.

This, of course, hit the vulnerable the hardest and the people in relevant industries. Jobs were affected leading to salary/wage cuts or no payment at all. Household incomes were and are still shifted, and this almost crushed those who took to the streets to perform the little they could to put food on the table.

Privilege is when you think that something is not a problem because its not a problem for you personally.

David Gaider

However, the governments prime approach was people first, the economy later. The aim was to flatten the curve, reduce the spread of the virus and keep the people of South Africa safe. The Batho Pele concept was shifted onto a different state of affairs and the people of South Africa were literally put first their health was put first.

The spirit of ubuntu was one of the first things to come into light during this plight. Society thought of the vulnerable who would go hungry and one began to see the beginning of positive initiatives such as food parcel drives taken by government, individuals and foundations.

A video also emerged and trended on social media platforms of a man from the Mamelodi hostel in Pretoria, who asked a SABC journalist on live TV for R20 because he was hungry and depended on collecting scrap metal to put food on his table. This led to an outpour of donations to him and many more who took to many platforms to share their pain.

Canadian writer David Gaider said: Privilege is when you think that something is not a problem because its not a problem for you personally.

This was the case when the scenes of the queues, on the first day of lockdown, ensued. Many criticised them, while sitting in their comfortable homes, filled with food in the fridge, as if those fellow citizens chose to be stuck in such difficult lives.

Even when the social grants were provided and the long queues prevailed, some said that those were the ignorant South Africans who wanted to contract the virus.

The purpose of the national lockdown is not to maltreat and victimise South Africans, but it is to protect them and others.

Andisiwe Kumbaca

They were called all sorts of names, some called for their arrest while others portrayed them as oblivious people who undermined the rules of government. However, that was not the case. Firstly, this exposed the asperity of inequality in our nation.

The majority congested in queues were from the township and rural areas. It was not because they wanted to be, but this was their only choice because of the vulnerability they have been subjected to due to by our history. However, to others, this seemed like a ignoramus actions.

Then we reached level 4, thats when the skyf battalion ascended. This also bred many more other pseudo-revolts, such as the surfers accord. Those who were throwing their toys around, conducting social media protests on the ban of cigarettes, those who staged their disapprovals on the banning of water sports and many others failed to realise that their place of comfort was making them utter words such as those they indicated.

Then there is the ignorant division who seem to think that the lockdown regulations are synonymous to the apartheid-era.

Now, why would anyone compare regulations meant to curb the spread of a deadly virus to the brutal oppression of millions of marginalised groups, which has still life-lasting effects on these groups today. The socio-economic impact of apartheid is the reality you see in many black lives.

The purpose of the national lockdown is not to maltreat and victimise South Africans, but it is to protect them and others.

The strict regulations are set in place to condition South Africans on the seriousness of what Covid-19 entails. So the nescient statements which come from a place of privilege are unfortunate when we were doing so well as country by spreading the spirit of ubuntu and kindness during this trying time. Every life is more than important and we are all equal in the Covid-19 context. This is the fight to make sure everyone lives.

*Andisiwe Kumbaca is a Bachelor of Social Science graduate, a public servant and community activist.

The rest is here:

Ubuntu, privilege and sheer ignorance thrive in the midst of Covid-19 - News24

Ahmaud Arbery and the Trauma of Being a Black Run… – ChristianityToday.com

I was on my morning run as the sun was rising in the blue California skies. There was hardly anybody out at that time. You learn real young not to run too early in the morning or too late at night.

I guess I forgot the lessons, the safety agenda my parents taught me. They knew what would happen. I brought my identification like my wife tells me to every time I leave. During the run, I wasnt worried about anything, and I felt good. I couldnt wait to check my pace on my fitness tracker.

Then it happened. I looked in the distance, and there was this white man on his porch taking photos of me. Every shot he took, I got more confused. I said, Its a good morning out here, isnt it? as if me being respectable was going to shield me in this situation or get him to finally see me as a human.

He didnt answer. Here we go again.

My fear quickly turned to rage. I wanted to fight for my dignity in the face of being documented by a stranger and being told I didnt belong here. Policed by a man standing on his front porch. Right there in Southern California, the ghost of Jim Crows What are you doing here, nr? showed up.

But ultimately, I felt powerless. I couldnt even call the cops because they mightve mistaken me for the aggressor. This is what black men have to deal with, while others can enjoy their runs. Again and again, year after year. This rage forces me to be angry about our reality and have the faith to believe that better is possible.

But on that day last year, my rage that turned into deep sadness. On the walk home, I stopped, bowed my head, and cried. These were not tears of weakness. I cried because I felt what many of those who looked like me have felt: the violence of an unloving world. He robbed me that day. He stole something from me in his cruelty.

I was a college athlete; now I run and bike. Ive run half marathons and completed an Ironman. But I cant enjoy it like I used to. Where is the joy and freedom of getting out on the road, of training my body, when I have to wonder if one day I wont make it to the end? Ive been running all my life, and in some ways now, I have to run to keep it. My wife is legit afraid of getting that call: Your husband is dead.

Many believe that cases like the attack on Ahmaud Arbery are isolated. Or that theyre the kind of thing that can only happen in the South. No, this society has been taught anti-blackness. We see it in how they police our movements, criminalize our humanity, and avoid racial reckoning while enjoying the fruit that came from rotten treestrees from which my ancestors hung lifeless.

Those wounds run deep even as I run today for my future, for my people, and even for my life. Its a trauma that black Americans are forced to face, the tragic conditions of oppression, the audacity of whiteness. I couldnt help but wonder: Why do they hate us so much?

Not long before I was accosted during my run last summer, I had written in a journal how I wished that when I stepped out into the world, the people around me would see me as fundamentally Christian. But the truth is that no matter how many Bible verses I quote, how many great books I read and post, how morally excellent I am, what degree I hold, or any other trait that is successful, none of that can shield me from the tragedy of being black.

And dont we know tragedy.

In recent weeks, armed activists have stormed the streets to protest, protected by their whiteness, while innocent and unarmed black people are attacked for living their lives. Arberys name joins a long list of black victims who never should have been killed, challenged, or even suspected, people who have done nothing wrong.

We have witnessed once again the public display of what Eddie Glaude calls the value gap: the belief that black lives are less valuable than others. The black experience with COVID-19 has revealed inequalities that have been there all alongin health care, power, wealth, education, income, and incarceration.

Arbery ran. He fought for his life, for his blackness, but white rage stole it from him. Its been two and a half months since he was killed, and his assailants have finally been arrested. When I watched the video, my heart sank. My mind went back to what that man did to me, the pictures, the walk back home, the tears. I made it, but Arbery didnt. He doesnt live to tell the story. He cannot be angry or do anything about it. He has become a hashtag, a memory, a prayer. He died alone that day. His last memory was lying on the asphalt.

After his death, the citys district attorney, George Barnhill, declared that Arberys mental health and prior convictions explained his aggression toward an armed man positioned to confront him in the street. Barnhill blamed the victim, not the bloodlust of a lynch crew. The cruelty.

Every year, something reminds us that black lives dont matter. At this point we are running out of outrage. History shows us that the greatest threats to black lives are white supremacy, white power, and white terrorism. Who will fight for us when we are fighting for ourselves and we still get lynched? Who will hold the murderers to account? How much black blood must be sacrificed to white supremacy? Why must our families be terrorized while they live at peace? These are the questions that find expression in my silent prayers and fearful tears.

As Miroslav Volf wrote about remembering rightly in a violent world, To remember a wrongdoing is to struggle against it. To be black and to be Christian is to remember the violence and our dead, to honor them as we look at our children, and to struggle as we ask these questions. It is to remember, as James Cone writes, Gods message of liberation in an unredeemed and tortured world.

Memory calls us to work for a better future. It forces us to stand in the world as Christians and do something to change it.

We black people want change. Glaude, an African American religion scholar at Princeton, writes, We have to break the racial habits that give life to the value gap, and that starts with changes in our social and political arrangements. We need a revolution of valuein government, in our communities, in our personal lives. We have done the work, and we are tired.

People like to say, This is not the America I know. We heard it with slavery, Jim Crow, civil rights, the 90s, the white backlash to Obama, the brutal murders of children, women, and men in the Black Lives Matter era, and even the white rage in support of Trump. Weve heard it before. And you know what? Those people are exactly right. The shield of whiteness has protected many from the devastating experience of a world we knew the whole timeone in which white lives and white communities and white pain matter much more than ours. I just wish those thoughts and prayers were prayed against a world that has protected you and killed us.

If our theology today has nothing to say or do about the terror of being black in a world made for whiteness and the tragic structures of oppression, as one of my friends said, You have nothing to offer black people.

Im far less concerned about what people put on a hashtag. Every year comes another hashtag, and every year it keeps happening. Im more concerned with how were advocating in our congregations, families, and board meetings, and with what happens in the ballot box. It is those places where the integrity of love meets the demands of liberation. Now is not the time for quaint phrases, empty calls to unity, or inviting guests to make white people feel good. No. This is not a call to salvation, a belief that whiteness can save us. No, it is killing us. This is a call to liberation and a call to love.

How long do we have to wait for progress? How many have to be brutally murdered before people believe that we are actually telling the truth? What is the cycle of violence and apathy costing us? Why are we the ones who have to believe God has a good plan for us in the future but the best plan for them in the present? How long do we have to endure these types of talks until people realize that white supremacy is not ours to solve but their problem, their childrens problem?

I want my son to survive. I want to know that many of your children will stand up for him when he needs it. I dont want the fear of him not returning home. I dont want to tell him how to protect his humanity. I want him to live. I want him to be free as Christ has promised. I want to know that change is going to take place, but history tells another story.

Thank God the final word about black life in America is not death on the lynching tree but redemption found in the cross. The cross was Gods rebuke of abusive powerwhite power in Americausing what Cone calls powerless love, snatching victory out of defeat. Cone powerfully argues that the lynching tree is the metaphor for white Americas destruction of black people. Yet God took the evil of the cross and the lynching tree and transformed them both into the triumphant beauty of the divine. God can take pain and transform it into power.

The transformation is what James Baldwin speaks of when he writes, It demands great spiritual resilience not to hate the hater whose foot is on your neck, and an even greater miracle of perception and charity not to teach your children to hate. I really dont know how much more we can take.

We have faith, but we need to fight.

We have prayer, but we need to protest.

Were trying to love Jesus, yes, but were also trying to live.

Were trying to survive the run. Because some of us dont.

Dant Stewart is a writer and preacher currently studying at the Reformed Theological Seminary. His previous pieces for CT include Why We Still Prophesy Hope and Martin Luther King Jr.: Exemplar of Hope.

Speaking Out is Christianity Todays guest opinion column and (unlike an editorial) does not necessarily represent the opinion of the publication.

Continued here:

Ahmaud Arbery and the Trauma of Being a Black Run... - ChristianityToday.com

Journalism without fear importance of 2020 World Press Freedom Day theme amid Covid – ThePrint

Text Size:A- A+

New Delhi: World Press Freedom Day was started by the UN General Assembly in December 1993 in accordance with recommendations by UNESCOs General Conference. This particular date, 3 May, was chosen to coincide with the anniversary of the Declaration of Windhoek the declaration of free press principles put together by newspaper journalists in Africa during a UNESCO seminar called Promoting an Independent and Pluralistic African Press, in Windhoek, Namibia, in 1991. The journalists statement called for an independent and pluralistic media across the world. It saw a free press as essential to democracy and a fundamental human right.

This special day is meant to be a reminder to governments about their need to commit to a free press. It also serves as a day for media professionals to reflect on issues of press freedom, professional ethics and their role.

The theme for 2020s World Press Freedom Day is Journalism without Fear or Favour, an idea that becomes especially significant during the Covid-19 crisis, when the press has been declared an essential service, and journalists deemed a vital part of the frontline battle against coronavirus.

The Netherlands was to host this years conference that was slated to happen in April at the World Forum in The Hague, but the event has been postponed to October for the time being due to the pandemic. But in India, the celebrations will take place virtually through a talk show about Reporting in the Times of Covid-19, that will aim to discuss the issue of safety for media workers, the importance of an independent press during such a health crisis and what professionalism means at a time when information is primarily sought online.

Previous years campaigns have revolved around the role of the media in democracy and elections in the time of disinformation, the intersection of media with law, how to ensure gender equality and safety in media in the digital age and the role of the media in advancing peace and inclusivity in societies.

Also read: Assault on press freedom Editors Guild seeks MHA action against attack on journalists

Apart from its yearly campaigns and conferences, the UNESCO also proactively plays a role on this day through the UNESCO-Guillermo Cano World Press Freedom Prize. The honor was named after Guillermo Cano Isaza, a Colombian journalist who was assassinated by drug gangs, right outside his newspaper El Espectadors office in Colombia in 1986.

Since 1997, the award has been awarded to facilitate one press member who has withstood media oppression and danger and been fearlessly committed to the cause of press freedom. Every year. a winner is selected by a jury consisting of 14 media personalities, and is conferred the honour by the Director-General of UNESCO. In the year 2019, two media personalities were awarded Kyaw Soe Oo and Wa Lone from Myanmar. The Reuters journalists, who were serving seven-year prison sentences at the time of being awarded, were arrested in the city of Yangon in 2017 while reporting human rights violations against Rohingya Muslims in Myanmars state of Rakhine.

Also read: On World Press Freedom Day, a look at what Indian journalists have to deal with

For the last decade, the annual World Press Freedom Index, produced annually by the campaign group Reporters Without Borders (Reporters sans Frontires), has also come to be seen as an important watchdog to track the role of different governments and their response to press freedom. The independent group surveys the state of the media in 180 countries and territories, and records parameters such as the number of journalists killed, imprisoned, put under pressure or assaulted, apart from more qualitative reports on the track record of different governments. The 2020 World Press Freedom Index was released in April, and revealed that India has dropped to rank 142, two points below its 2019 rank.

The report attributed Indias rank to the Narendra Modi government tightening its grip on the media, and pressuring it to toe the Hindu nationalist governments line. It also reported coordinated social media hate campaigns against journalists reporting on issues that annoy Hindutva followers, criminal prosecutions to gag journalists critical of authorities and police violence against journalists, and the lack of press freedom in Kashmir.

The best ranks were given to Scandinavian countries like Norway, Finland and Denmark, with Norway in particular maintaining its top rank because of its governments cognisance of the importance of free press in a democracy. It has recently also formed a special commission to look into the issue of freedom of speech, safeguarding journalists and curbing fake news and hate speech.

At the bottom of the list was North Korea, for leader Kim Jong-Uns totalitarian regime that has kept its citizens in a state of ignorance, and even sends citizens to concentration camps if caught viewing, reading or listening to content provided by a media outlet based outside the country. The RSF report also was critical of Jong-Uns regime for maintaining that the countrys Covid-19 cases are at zero, while his capital appeals for help to the international community in battling the virus, along with China whose government has come under fire for enabling the spread of the virus through its censorship and continued suppression of the media.

Also read: Im speechless, says J&K journalist Masrat Zahra after being booked for anti-national posts

The issue of press freedom has often found its way in popular culture as well, with Hollywood movies such as Spotlight (2015), based on the real-life story of an investigative team of reporters from the Boston Globe who uncovered a history of systemic sexual abuse by the Roman Catholic Church. The Post (2017), starring Meryl Streep and Tom Hanks, was based on the role of the American publication the Washington Post in publishing the controversial Pentagon Papers that indicted the US government for its role in the Vietnam war.

The German movie Die Spiegel Affaire (The Spiegel Affair, 2014) explored the political scandal that erupted after writer Der Spiegel published an article about Germanys armed forces, while Velvet Revolution, is a 2017 documentary by filmmaker Nupur Basu that explores hardships faced by female journalists from all over the world reporting in areas of conflict and about controversial issues.

ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

View original post here:

Journalism without fear importance of 2020 World Press Freedom Day theme amid Covid - ThePrint

Government Oppression in George Orwell’s 1984 …

The novel Nineteen Eighty-Four by George Orwell is an American classic which explores the human mind when it comes to power, corruption, control, and the ultimate utopian society. Orwell indirectly proposes that power given to the government will ultimately become corrupt and they will attempt to force all to conform to their one set standard. He also sets forth the idea that the corrupted government will attempt to destroy any and all mental and physical opposition to their beliefs, thus eliminating any opportunity for achieving an utopian society.

The novel shows how the government attempts to control the minds and bodies of it citizens, such as Winston Smith who does not subscribe to their beliefs, through a variety of methods. The first obvious example arises with the large posters with the caption of Big Brother is Watching You (page 5). These are the first pieces of evidence that the government is watching over its people. Shortly afterwards we learn of the Thought Police, who snoop in on conversations, always watching your every move, controlling the minds and thoughts of the people. (page 6). To the corrupted government, physical control is not good enough, however. The only way to completely eliminate physical opposition is to first eliminate any mental opposition. The government is trying to control our minds, as it says thought crime does not entail death; thought crime is death. (page 27). Later in the novel the government tries even more drastic methods of control. Big Brothers predictions in the Times are changed. The government is lying about production figures (pages 35-37). Even later in the novel, Symes name was left out on the Chess Committee list. He then essentially vanishes as though he had never truly existed (page 122). Though the methods and activities of the government seem rather extreme in Orwells novel, they may not be entirely too false. Nineteen Eighty-Four is to the disorders of the twentieth century what Leviathan was to those of the seventeenth. (Crick, 1980). In the novel, Winston Smith talks about the people not being human. He says that the only thing that can keep you human is to not allow the government to get inside you. (page 137). The corruption is not the only issue which Orwell presents, both directly and indirectly. He warns that absolute power in the hands of any government can lead to the deprival of basic freedoms and liberties for the people. Though he uses the Soviet Union as the basis of the novels example, he sets the story in England to show that any absolute power, whether in a Communist state or a Democratic one, can result in an autocratic and overbearing rule. When government lies become truths, and nobody will oppose, anything can simply become a fact. Through the control of the mind and body the government attempts, any hopes of achieving an utopian society are dashed. The peoples minds are essentially not theirs anymore. The government tells them how to think. Conformity and this unilateral thinking throughout the entire population can have disastrous results. Orwell also tells us it has become a world of monstrous machines and terrifying weapons. Warriors fighting, triumphing, persecuting 3 million people all with the same face. (page 64).

George Orwell was born in India and brought up with the British upper class beliefs of superiority over the lower castes and in general class pride. A theme very prevalent in his novels, Nineteen Eighty-Four certainly no exception, is this separation in the classes. The masses are disregarded by the Party. This is a theme which is fundamental to the novel, but not demonstrated as fully as the devastation of language and the elimination of the past. (Kazin, 1984). Kazin also states in his essay that:

Orwell thought the problem of domination by class or caste or race or political machine more atrocious than ever. It demands solution. Because he was from the upper middle class and knew from his own prejudices just how unreal the lower classes can be to upper-class radicals, a central theme in all his work is the separateness and loneliness of the upper-class observer, like his beloved Swift among the oppressed Irish. (Kazin, 1984).

This feeling of superiority somewhat provokes and leads to the aforementioned corruption of absolute power. As the saying goes, absolute power corrupts absolutely. It is not even so much that the rulers want to become corrupt, but they cannot grasp the idea of an absolute rule. They, as Kazin stated, cannot comprehend the differentiation within the system, and thus become corrupt. This ultimately prevents achieving an utopian society where the upper class people want to oppress and the lower class want to rebel.

Orwell had strong anti-totalitarianism points of view and greatly satires Socialism, even though he still insisted he was a Socialist in its pure form, in this novel and in Animal Farm. Many consider that Nineteen Eighty-Four is actually an extension of Animal Farm. In Animal Farm, Orwell

left out one element which occurs in all his other works of fiction, the individual rebel caught up in the machinery of the caste system. Not until Nineteen Eighty-Four did he elaborate on the rebels role in an Animal Farm carried to its monstrously logical conclusion. (Woodcock, 1966).

The two books primary connection is through the use of the totalitarian society and the rebel, and as stated some believe Nineteen Eighty-Four to simply be an extension of Animal Farm. Nineteen Eighty-Four, however, brings everything to an even more extreme but even scarier is the fact that is more realistic, such as in a Nazi Germany environment. Nineteen Eighty-Four is considered to have great pessimistic undertones, Orwells prophecy if you will. It is also not known whether it was intended as a last words, though it was his final work, as he collapsed and was bed-ridden for two years before he died. He did marry several months before his death saying it gave him new reason to live. Orwells creation of Winston Smith shows a character who is:

in struggle against the system, occasionally against himself, but rarely against other people. One thinks of Orwells having thrown his characters into a circular machine and then noting their struggle against the machine, their attempts to escape it or compromise themselves with it. (Karl, 1972).

Orwell writes more about the struggle as a piece of advice than anything else. This novel was widely considered prophetic, a warning of what could be to come if we did not take care. Orwells method was to introduce the questions, not propose solutions. Most likely he did not have the solution, but it was his solution to help bring about the awareness of the existing problem.

The corrupt government is trying to control the minds of their subjects, which in turn translates to control of their body. Orwell warns that absolute power in the hands of any government can deprive people of all basic freedoms. There are similar references in another of Orwells novels, Animal Farm, supporting the ideas of corruption and an unattainable utopian society which were presented here in Nineteen Eighty-Four. With this novel, Orwell also introduced the genre of the dystopic novel into the world of literature.

Original post:

Government Oppression in George Orwell's 1984 ...

Government oppression? Make it known

The evolution of the dominant collectivist zeitgeist appears to be approaching a singularity:

20,000 BC - We cannot allow anyone to anger the volcano, or else the volcano might punish all of us.

5,000 BC - We cannot allow anyone to anger the gods, or else the gods might punish all of us.

1 AD - We cannot allow anyone to anger the Romans, or else the Romans might punish all of us.

1500 - We cannot allow anyone to anger God, or else God might punish all of us.

1900 - We cannot allow individualists into positions of influence.

1920 - We cannot allow just anyone to reproduce, or else they might pollute the gene pool.

1930 - We cannot allow anyone to be different, or else they might be subversive.

1935 - We will clean your gene pool for you.

1945 - We cannot allow genocide, slavery, invasion, ethnic cleansing, apartheid states, atrocities--all of it--Never Again.

See the rest here:

Government oppression? Make it known

Israel’s New Government Is Exploiting Pandemic to Annex 30 Percent of West Bank – Truthout

After three indecisive elections, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his opponent Benny Gantz agreed to form a unity government in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

One of the central pillars of this new regime is the unlawful annexation of the Jordan Valley and illegal Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank. The annexation has the full backing of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Using the time when the world has been busy confronting the COVID-19 pandemic to commit more war crimes is immoral and poses new challenges for the rule of law and human rights, Raji Sourani, director of the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR), told Truthout.

Never miss the news and analysis you care about.

The annexation, slated to begin in July, will ostensibly include about 30 percent of the occupied West Bank, including the Jordan Valley, and Jewish settlements containing over 620,000 settlers.

Both the United Nations and the European Union cautioned Israel that annexation of parts of the occupied West Bank would be illegal. Nickolay Mladenov, UN special Middle East envoy, said such action would constitute a serious violation of international law. Josep Borrell, EU foreign policy chief, noted that EU countries dont recognize Israels sovereignty over the Palestinian territory, adding it would continue to closely monitor the situation and its broader implications, and will act accordingly.

Moreover, the new deal requires that the U.S. government agree to Israels illegal annexation, making Trump complicit in the commission of Israels war crimes.

As an occupying power, Israel has transferred more than 600,000 Israelis into settlements in the occupied West Bank, including occupied East Jerusalem. These actions are illegal. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention forbids an occupying power from transferring parts of its own civilian population into the territories it occupies.

The International Court of Justice stated in a 2004 advisory opinion that the Israeli settlements have been established in breach of international law. The Court agreed with the United Nations Security Council that Israels establishment of settlements in occupied Palestinian territory constitutes a flagrant violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Since 1967, Israel has maintained an illegal military occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem. Israel claims it acted in self-defense when it attacked Egypt, Syria, and Jordan in the Six-Day War and seized the Palestinian territories.

But Egypt, Syria and Jordan were neither poised to attack nor did they ultimately attack Israel. The initial assault was conducted by Israel in order to annihilate the Egyptian army and seize the West Bank.

Furthermore, it is well-established that territory cannot be lawfully acquired by war. Accordingly, in 1967, Security Council Resolution 242 enshrined the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war. In 2016, the Council reiterated that language in Resolution 2334, which condemned Israel for building settlements in the occupied Palestinian territories, including East Jerusalem. Resolution 2334 states that Israels creation of settlements on Palestinian land has no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law.

Moreover, Israels establishment of settlements in Palestinian territory constitutes a war crime. The International Criminal Courts Rome Statute classifies an occupying powers direct or indirect transfer of parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies as a war crime.

Trump is aiding and abetting Israels war crimes of annexation of Palestinian lands. In January, his administration unveiled its Deal of the Century, supposedly aimed at achieving peace between Israel and the Palestinians. But the so-called deal, which Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas called the slap of the century, grants Israels wish list and promises to facilitate Israels repression of the Palestinians.

The Trump deal, fully supported by both Netanyahu and Gantz, formalizes the Netanyahu doctrine, which is based on the gradual and complete defeat of the Palestinian national movement and the subsequent achievement of Greater Israel through permanent occupation and annexation of land, Yaser Alashqar wrote at Mondoweiss.

BTselem, the Israeli human rights organization, warns that Trumps plan will lead to the permanent denial of Palestinians political rights and eternalize conditions similar to those of the Bantustans of South Africas Apartheid regime.

The Rome Statute provides for prosecution of an individual who aids, abets or otherwise assists in the commission or attempted commission of a crime including providing the means for its commission. By issuing his deal of the century advocating that Israel annex Palestinian territory, and ratifying Israels illegal annexation, Trump is assisting and thus aiding and abetting Israels war crimes.

Trumps approval is key to Israels ability to commit the war crime of annexation with impunity. The U.S. government bankrolls Israels illegal occupation to the tune of $3.8 billion annually. In fact, the Netanyahu-Gantz unity deal requires that Trump assent to its terms, which is all but certain.

Israel is the occupying power and thus has a legal duty to protect, not facilitate the oppression of, the occupied Palestinians.

As the World Health Organization stated, Israel, as occupying power, retains the primary responsibility to respect, protect and fulfill the right to the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health in the occupied Palestinian territory, comprising the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip.

Indeed, the Fourth Geneva Convention establishes Israels duty to provide medical and hospital establishments and services, public health and hygiene in the occupied territory, with particular reference to the adoption and application of the prophylactic and preventive measures necessary to combat the spread of contagious diseases and epidemics.

Yet by April 24, there were more than 300 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the occupied Palestinian territories, and the Israeli settlers, with government backing, have only increased their violent attacks on Palestinians throughout the West Bank.

PCHR issues weekly reports on Israels human rights violations in the occupied Palestinian territories. Its April 23-29, 2020 edition documents in detail Israels interference with Palestinian efforts to combat the coronavirus.

As he campaigns for the November presidential election, Trump is likely to support annexation in an appeal to his Evangelical base. Coronavirus or not this much is clear: Trump will greenlight the annexation to secure his Evangelical base going into the election, Israel lobbyist Martin Indyk tweeted.

Even liberal Zionist organizations oppose Israels annexation plan. The Israel lobby group J Street favors placing conditions on some of the billions of dollars the United States provides to Israel if it proceeds with annexation.

Annexation will turn Israel into an international pariah that perpetuates the occupation and the conflict with the Palestinians, and that thumbs its nose at international law and the international community, Ori Nir of Americans for Peace Now said. Annexation will send a message to the citizens of Israel, the Palestinians and the entire world that Israel favors continuing its bloody conflict with the Palestinians and an apartheid-like reality in the West Bank over democracy and peace.

In a letter to Gantz, 220 former high-ranking Israeli security officers, including an ex-military chief, sounded the alarm. Unilateral annexation has the potential to ignite a serious conflagration, they wrote. Any partial annexation is likely to set in motion a chain reaction over which Israel will have no control, leading to the collapse of the Palestinian security agencies and of the Palestinian Authority. This, in turn, would require Israel to take full control over the entire West Bank.

There is opposition in Congress to Israels annexation of the West Bank. On December 6, 2019, in a bipartisan vote, the House of Representatives passed H.R. 326, which discourages steps by either side that would put a peaceful end to the conflict further out of reach, including unilateral annexation of territory.

On April 8, 11 Democratic Congress members released a statement invoking H.R. 326 and opposing Israels planned annexation. Amidst the current global health pandemic and financial crisis, they urged the new Israeli government not to create an additional crisis, by agreeing to move forward with unilateral annexation, the effects of which could yield additional catastrophic consequences for all parties in the region and beyond.

See the article here:

Israel's New Government Is Exploiting Pandemic to Annex 30 Percent of West Bank - Truthout

Where coronavirus violence is more likely | TheHill – The Hill

Armed groups in Libya attacked medical warehouses belonging to a hospital treating COVID-19 patients. Gender-based violence, cable theft and vandalism are on the rise in South Africa amid food shortages. In Burkina Faso, theres no safe haven from militants. People in Afghanistan, Venezuela and Brazil face extreme instability and could be the next to appear on our nightly news in unsettling images of violence.

Globally, acts of violence and coercion are occurring due to the impact of the novel coronavirus. In most places, however, stress and anxiety over the pandemic have not led to violence. For a virus that spreads globally and seems to show no mercy based upon wealth, lifestyle or the presence of insects and rodents, why are some people suffering the impact of violence and others not? And what lessons can we learn from these observations?

What Ive discovered over two decades studying the origins of violence is that violence emanates from a persons struggle for survival. Expected survival for self and kin is threatened during times of important scarcity, a topic that is uniquely front of mind for us today as we struggle under the oppression of COVID-19 uncertainty.

Governance provides security during times of scarcity. Humans engage in violence when facing a scarcity of resources. Scarcity, or fear of scarcity, triggers the human instinct for self-preservation. Without strong governance, from either the recognized government or other governing organizations, licit or illicit, violence will likely occur.

In many cases, scarcities right now will either keep tyrants in power, empower political entrepreneurs to consolidate power in weak states (the rise of more tyrants) or empower criminal networks to fill the gaps. If these do not occur, then people will organize and find their voices and power. Leaders will emerge and create new stronger institutions of civil society. In the absence of governance, we get violence.

The risk for violent outbreaks is significantly higher when a combination of scarce resources and weak governance is present. Thats one of the reasons why leaders are imposing stricter and harsher orders. North Korea, unsurprisingly, has not experienced outbreaks of violence. President Duterte of the Philippines gave a "shoot to kill order to police and military officials for anyone "who creates trouble" during the lockdown; so we dont see much trouble. Russia has instituted jail time for violating quarantine. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbn essentially declared himself a temporary dictator. While the threat of violence is probably stifled under these iron fists, democracy is jeopardized.

In the absence of strong governmental authority, there is a power vacuum, and other groups like gang leaders, drug lords or militias assume that authority. For example, drug kingpins, who dont want their industry disrupted, will quell violence. Others will incite it. In Libya, as Carnegie reports, multiple armed groups are likely to weaponize the public health crisis to further their own political and social influence and could act as de facto police and enforce public hygiene as a pretext for increased power.

Similarly, the BBC predicted that coronavirus could be catastrophic for Venezuela, with its political chaos, hyperinflation and hospital shortages. Brazils president defied his own social distancing recommendations when he joined a protest in April, significantly weakening his leadership. In Latin America, drug cartels are turning these weaknesses into an opportunity, by distributing food and supplies to the people in order to increase their political capital, according to political scholar Nicola Morfini.

The U.S. is not exempt; we saw similar problems in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina, when an ineffective and corrupt police force led to lawlessness, looting and the formation of quasi-militia groups. But we have fewer shortages and have a combination of a strong local, state and federal government structure that makes pandemic-related violence unlikely here. Any violence we do experience will be due to a scarcity of livelihood the government-imposed shutdown that has thrown millions into economic distress.

On the other hand, governments can use a pandemic to strengthen their legitimacy if they respond capably. Were seeing less violence in the Palestinian territories, for example, where the Palestinian Authoritys president and Israels president cooperated to create a joint operations center for information sharing, coordination and delivery of scarce test kits. This competent initial reaction to COVID-19 seems to have brought some respite in the form of increased public support and decreased violence.

Studying violence in the time of COVID-19 gives us great insights. Political entrepreneurs will exploit real and perceived shortages to gain power, wealth and revenge where they perceive an opportunity. People living under strong-arm regimes will avoid violence, but they will live under coercion and corruption. People who live in places with weak institutions of governance will see the violence of this power grab. Our opportunity is to support civil society, encourage collaboration and empower the voices of the people. If we cannot avoid the violence, we can work to ensure the price was worth paying.

Gary M. Shiffman, Ph.D., is founder and CEO of Giant Oak, the creator of Giant Oak Search Technology (GOST) and the author of The Economics of Violence: How Behavioral Science Can Transform our View of Crime, Insurgency, and Terrorism (Cambridge University Press, March 2020). He teaches economic science and national security at Georgetown University.

Visit link:

Where coronavirus violence is more likely | TheHill - The Hill

Serbs Bang Pots to Protest Government and Strict Coronavirus Measures – The New York Times

BELGRADE For two nights, a cacophony of tin pans, drums, whistles, and horns has reverberated through much of Serbia as citizens, stuck at home under curfew, vent their anger at the government and its tough containment measures to curb the new coronavirus.

Serbia, which has reported 8,497 confirmed cases and 173 deaths from COVID-19, introduced stringent measures last month, including a state of emergency, closure of borders, daily curfew from 1600 GMT, and total lockdowns all weekend, including all four days of the Easter holiday.

The government has started to lift restrictions as the rate of infections slows, but said that a lockdown during the Labour Day holiday on May 1, a important celebration in Serbia, should remain in place.

The banging is due to continue on Wednesday evening, and recalls similar popular protests from 1996 to 1997 when Serbians rebelled against election fraud and the former strongman Slobodan Milosevic.

At the balcony of his apartment in Belgrade's Vracar neighbourhood, Dragan Djilas, the head of the opposition Alliance for Serbia, and a former leader of the student protests of the 1990s, used a wooden spoon to bang a pot.

"This energy (from the 1990s) has re-emerged as the people cannot endure any longer ... these lockdowns, these 80-hour incarcerations," Djilas told Reuters.

The protests also express many people's discontent with the policies of President Aleksandar Vucic, a former nationalist firebrand and former information minister under Milosevic who later adopted pro-European values, and with his Serbian Progressive Party.

PENT-UP DISCONTENT

Many in Serbia accuse Vucic and the ruling coalition of autocracy, oppression against political opponents, stifling of media freedoms, corruption, cronyism, and ties with organised crime. Both Vucic, in power since 2012, and his allies deny such accusations.

Most of Serbia's opposition parties, which are frequently divided and bickering, have boycotted parliament. They have said they will not take part in elections initially set for April and postponed until later in the year.

Bojan Klacar, the executive director of the Belgrade-based pollster CESID said the protest could damage the Serbian president and his allies, but added that a divided opposition was unable to tap into its energy. He added that heavy-handed handling of the crisis did not dent popularity of Vucic among his supporters.

From his window in a concrete, Communist-era building in the Novi Beograd neighbourhood, Dobrica Veselinovic, a prominent activist of the Ne Davimo Beograd (Do Not Drown Belgrade) rights group, played Bella Ciao, a song of Italian antifascist fighters during the World War II.

He also projected a banner reading "noise against dictatorship" and "raise your voice every evening from 2005" (1805 GMT) onto the wall of a nearby building.

"The most important thing is that people (who disagree with the government) realize that they are not alone.... We invited people to raise their voice against what is happening in society," Veselinovic said.

(This story corrects number of fatalities in paragraph 2 to 173 from 1,678)

(Additional reporting by Ivana Sekularac; Editing by Alexandra Hudson)

Read more:

Serbs Bang Pots to Protest Government and Strict Coronavirus Measures - The New York Times

Why Keir Starmer cosying up to Indias far-right government is utterly unacceptable – The Canary

On 30 April, UK Labour leader Keir Starmer faced criticism for backtracking on the partys previous commitment to Kashmiri people living under Indian occupation. This comes amid rising far-right nationalism in India, and the erosion of the countrys democratic values.

Many Labour supporters of Indian heritage were clearly disappointed with Starmers decision to cosy up to Indias nationalist regime. Tribune, meanwhile, wrote that:

By folding to a pressure campaign orchestrated by the far-right BJP government, Keir Starmers statement on Kashmir today not only betrayed Labour members it abandoned a people living under brutal oppression.

On 5 August 2019, the people of Muslim-majority Jammu and Kashmir awoke to find that their mobile phones were not working. Their streets were dotted with police and army personnel; a mass communications and internet blackout had taken place. The government of Indian prime minister Narendra Modi had made the highly controversial unilateral move to repeal Article 370 of Indias constitution, splitting the disputed territory of Jammu and Kashmir into two Union territories. Article 370 previously gave Indian-occupied Kashmir relative autonomy, allowing it to enact laws in all areas other than finance, defence, foreign affairs, and communications.

The same day that Article 370 was repealed, the Indian government placed Kashmir into a state of indefinite lockdown and mass-deployed troops. 4,000 Kashmiris were arrested, including some children; 200 politicians in the region were also arrested, including three former Chief-Ministers of the region; and hundreds of activists were arrested and detained without charge under the draconian Public Safety Act, which allows detentions of up to two years without charge.

Press freedom in Kashmir, long stifled by draconian laws, has been further muzzled in recent weeks. Independent Kashmiri photojournalist Masrat Zahra, and many others, are facing charges of anti-national activities under Indias Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Zahra faces these charges for one simple reason: she took photographs that exhibited the agonies faced by Kashmiri men, women and children under the Indian governments lockdown. She was kind enough to let me use one of her photos for this article. Indias increasingly authoritarian, far-right government will be using the photo as evidence against her with the aim of putting her behind bars for seven years.

India is facing an unprecedented rise in anti-Muslim lynchings and violence against minorities. And Islamophobic bigotry extends its arms into the modern Indian state. Indias chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, Yogi Adityanath, is a key example of this. In an undated video from 2014, he said that if [Muslims] take one Hindu girl, well take 100 Muslim girls. If they kill one Hindu, well kill 100 Muslims. He also stated in 2015 that he would (if given the chance) install Hindu idols in every Indian mosque.

The first portion of his hate speech in 2014 referred to love jihad, a concept he helped popularise in India which holds the belief that male Indian Muslims somehow secretively plot to seduce Hindu women with the aim of converting them to Islam. Conspiratorial claims such as these have no statistical backing but are widely considered among Indias political right and far right to be social norms. Adityanath has a history of contributing to communal tensions in Uttar Pradesh, with his followers once proclaiming their desire to exhume the graves of Muslim women and rape them at a mass rally.

As of April 2020, Subramanian Swamy a member of Modis governing Hindu nationalist BJP openly told VICE that he and his party see Muslims as not in an equal category to other Indian citizens under Article 14 of Indias constitution. The constitutional article right says that the State shall not deny to any person equality before the law or the equal protection of the laws within the territory of India. Once a professor at Harvard, Swamys courses were dropped by the internationally renowned university after he published articles suggesting that Muslim Indians should have their right to vote revoked while simultaneously calling for the demolition of Muslim houses of worship.

Swamy and Adityanath continue to prosper as public figures despite their politics of hate.

As February was reaching its end just this year, a pogrom took place in Delhi. It saw Muslim men and women murdered, elderly Muslims burned alive by Hindu nationalists, and it saw arson against mosques. Qurans were defiled and burned. Muslim shops, from bakeries to clothing stores, were looted by rioters. Delhis police faced accusations of conspiring with Hindu nationalist (Hindutva) groups. And Hindu and Muslim journalists alike were harassed or attacked for trying to report on the violence. Hindutva goons even climbed atop a Delhi mosque as they set it ablaze and rooted a flag of a Hindu god (Hanuman) into its spire as a mark of intimidation.

It is not just Muslims who suffer in India, though. Christian persecution in India is also extreme. Indian Christians, like Indian Muslims, are often victims of what is termed Ghar Wapsi (home-coming) attacks by Hindu nationalists; facing violence and sometimes death for not returning to Hinduism after being pressured to leave their faith. In 2008, Indian Christians were victims of one of the worst pogroms in Indias recent history. In response to a pre-planned attack by Hindu radicals, 55,000 Christians fled the Kandhamal district of the state of Odisha. 5,600 houses and 415 villages were set ablaze; over 90 people were killed, and two women were raped. Scores of people were injured and permanently maimed. Churches and social activists reported on the destruction of almost 300 churches, as well as convents, schools and welfare facilities. The victims never found justice, just as the victims in Delhi have found no justice.

The far-right Hindu nationalism at the heart of modern Indian politics represents a potentially fatal erosion of Indias democracy. It is the greatest threat to the fabric of the countrys freedoms freedoms that are rapidly becoming more and more religiously and ethnically exclusive. And Keir Starmer should be ashamed of himself for cosying up to Modi and his anti-democratic regime.

Featured image via screenshot and Kashmiri photojournalist Masrat Zahra (with permission)

Originally posted here:

Why Keir Starmer cosying up to Indias far-right government is utterly unacceptable - The Canary

Amnesty International Warns of Human Rights Abuses Tied to COVID-19 – WTOP

Human rights advocates are sounding the alarm about what they see as a growing number of human rights abuses tied

Human rights advocates are sounding the alarm about what they see as a growing number of human rights abuses tied to the COVID-19 pandemic.

[SEE: The Latest News on the Coronavirus Outbreak]

The novel coronavirus is being exploited as a pretext for oppression in nearly every region of the world, Amnesty International USA, the U.S.-based arm of the international rights group, said in a teleconference briefing on Wednesday. Leaders from South America to Southeast Asia are using the virus as an excuse to crack down on their opponents, the group said, while doing little to protect vulnerable populations such as prisoners, refugees and migrant workers.

More than 80 countries have declared states of emergency and there are growing reports of human rights abuses around the globe, said Joanne Lin, AIUSAs national director of advocacy and government affairs. Some world leaders are taking advantage of contagion in order to crack down on civilians in ways previously not seen pre-COVID-19.

The organization also raised concerns about governments that have tried to squash information about the virus, which has spread to all but one continent and killed more than 228,200 as of Thursday morning. In some cases, it said, governments have used jail time, harassment or other measures to silence media, doctors and other critics who have tried to shine light on the pandemic.

For many parts of the world still reeling from war, civil unrest, migration crises and other disasters, the COVID-19 pandemic adds yet another layer of emergency to which leaders may be unwilling or unable to respond, the group said.

While the threats to human rights vary by country, AIUSA said nearly every region of the world has cause for concern.

[MORE: The 10 Countries Seen to Care the Most About Human Rights]

Africa

Afrca, a continent of 1.3 billion people, recently saw a 43% jump in reported COVID-19 cases, according to Lin. The World Health Organization has warned that Africa could become an epicenter for the outbreak, but its health care system is already fragile, and a shortage of doctors make it even more ill-prepared for COVID-19, said Adotei Akwei, AIUSA deputy director for advocacy and government relations.

The pandemic could also cut Africas economic output in half, Akwei said, causing widespread food insecurity and putting people in extreme poverty at even greater risk.

In the meantime, Akwei expressed concern over how police across the continent are administering curfews. More than a dozen people have been killed by police enforcing curfews in both Kenya and Nigeria more than have died from the virus. In South Africa, he noted, there have been reports of police using rubber bullets, tear gas, water bombs and whips to enforce social distancing.

Asia and the Pacific

In Asia, where the virus was first detected, some officials are using the virus as a cover for oppression and disregard for human rights, said Francisco Bencosme, AIUSA Asia Pacific advocacy manager. Philippines President Rodrigo Duterte has given police shoot to kill orders for those who resist the lockdown. Amid calls to lessen jail overcrowding by freeing petty offenders, Sri Lankas government pardoned a notorious war criminal. In Bangladeshs refugee camps, where crowded conditions increase the risk of disease spread, older residents are left behind.

In some countries, such as India, Sri Lanka and Cambodia, discrimination against Muslims is also increasing as people begin to blame them for spreading the virus, Bencosme said. Some Muslims have had their businesses boycotted or have been denied medical care. In Sri Lanka, Muslim COVID-19 victims were cremated against family wishes.

Eurasia

As the virus moves east through Europe, some politicians are attacking the rule of law and using arrests and threats to silence critics, according to Daniel Balson, AIUSA advocacy director for Europe and Central Asia.

One of the most blatant examples is in Hungary, where the Parliament used the pandemic as justification to give Prime Minister Viktor Orban authority to rule by decree with no end date, Balson said. The government is also using the moment to pass controversial legislation, such as ending the legal recognition of trans people.

In Russia, a journalist received a death threat by the head of Chechnya after writing about the pandemic, Balson added. And in Azerbaijan, the government is using COVID-19 restrictions to justify a crackdown on opponents and critics.

Middle East and North Africa

Syria and Yemen, two countries plagued by ongoing conflicts, were in particularly dire straits before the pandemic, and the virus is likely to make the humanitarian situation in them even worse, according to Philippe Nassif, AIUSA advocacy director for the Middle East and North Africa.

War has shattered Syrias health care system, he said. And in Yemen, 11 million people are already under the threat of famine.

Countries such as Syria, Libya and Egypt also have thousands of detainees and prisoners at risk of contracting the disease, Nassif said. Refugees from Syria and elsewhere are stuck in crowded camps with poor sanitation. The regions migrant workers, who often live in overcrowded and unsanitary accommodations, are also at greater risk of infection.

While its clear the virus has moved beyond Iran, the epicenter in the region, Nassif said Egypt had been less than forthcoming about the extent of its spread within the countrys borders.

[MORE: U.N. Official Warns of Excessive Use of Force in Latin America]

The Americas

Ongoing deportations from the U.S. to Latin America continue to be an issue for the region, as many migrants have spent time in U.S. deportation centers where its easy to acquire the disease, said Charanya Krishnaswami, AIUSA advocacy director for the Americas. Earlier in April Amnesty released a report stating that U.S. immigration officials are failing to provide detainees soap and sanitizer at detention centers, or introduce social distancing.

Prisoners in the region face the similar challenge of being confined to crowded jails, she added. One recent photo showed hundreds of inmates in El Salvador stripped and placed close together.

Several governments in the region have been dismissive of the virus or used it as a cover for oppression, Krishnaswami said. Brazils President Jair Bolsonaro has downplayed COVID-19 and, like U.S. President Donald Trump, speculated openly about unproven cures.

In Venezuela, the government of Nicols Maduro has cracked down on people trying to spread information about the virus because it doesnt want the public to know how bad things are, Krishnaswami said, adding, A global emergency is an authoritarians best friend.

On Wednesday, Michelle Bachelet, the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, warned of excessive use of force across Latin America against people seeking access to basic human rights during the pandemic. The former president of Chile said her office has received reports of arrests and detentions in various countries by police and the military while enforcing lockdowns.

More from U.S. News

The 25 Best Countries in the World

20 Pandemic And Epidemic Diseases, According to WHO

The 10 Countries That Care the Most About Human Rights, According to Perception

Amnesty International Warns of Human Rights Abuses Tied to COVID-19 originally appeared on usnews.com

See the original post here:

Amnesty International Warns of Human Rights Abuses Tied to COVID-19 - WTOP

World Press Freedom Day: The Dangers Journalists Have Faced Reporting On the Coronavirus Pandemic – Newsweek

As the world continues to grapple with the coronavirus pandemic, journalists have been tasked with a key role in helping to create awareness around the virus and inform communities on what their governments are doing to prevent its spread.

However, as press freedom advocacy groups mark World Press Freedom Day on Sunday, they are also using the day to raise awareness around the dangers and challenges journalists around the world, including in the U.S., have faced in reporting on the pandemic.

"Now more than ever, truth-tellers play a vital role in maintaining free expression and free societies," Summer Lopez, the senior director of free expression programs at PEN America, said in a statement.

Yet, she said, "increasingly, their lives are imperiled. We've seen reporters risk their own lives in emergency rooms in Queens, New York; face detention for reporting on the COVID-19 outbreak in China; seen their work criminalized in Bolivia and Thailand.

In China, PEN America said in a press release, information about the coronavirus outbreak has been "suppressed" while the whereabouts of Chen Qiushia, a former human rights lawyer turned video journalist, and Fang Bin, a businessperson who began reporting on the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, are unknown after both disappeared in February after reporting on the Chinese government's handling of the coronavirus outbreak.

Meanwhile, PEN America said, "reporters from The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Voice of America, and TIME were expelled in March 2020."

Further, the organization said, "journalists in the Philippines, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Ghana, Russia, Venezuela, and Haiti have been threatened, harassed, attacked, and arrested for their COVID-19 reporting."

"Journalism has never been more vital and has never been more at risk," Lopez said.

However, she said that while abuses were happening abroad, it was also important for Americans to "pay special attention to the threats here in the United States."

Nora Benavidez, PEN America's U.S. free expression director told Newsweek in an interview on Friday that part of that threat stems from the growing trend of government officials "at all levels of government" refusing to cooperate with journalists.

"Communities are wanting and turning to news more and governments are targeting news outlets and reporters in a growing fashion, including the president himself, who removes reporters from press briefings and denigrates reporters when he doesn't like them," Benavidez said.

Such behavior, Benavidez said, should be considered "deeply troubling". "It is not authoritarianism, but it is the kind of tactic we see that can lead to that kind of oppression," she said.

The PEN America U.S. free expression director also warned that local reporting in the U.S. has been hardhit by years of declining revenues.

That is why PEN America has launched a campaign on Capitol Hill seeking to include support for local reporting in future economic stimulus bills. The organization has further called on all 50 state governors and the mayor of the District of Columbia to also provide funding for local reporting initiatives.

"Local reporting has faced a cataclysm, now exacerbated by the COVID-19 crisis," Lopez said in her own statement."And yet every day, journalists are plowing into the most serious health crisis of our lifetimes to provide truly life-saving work."

See the article here:

World Press Freedom Day: The Dangers Journalists Have Faced Reporting On the Coronavirus Pandemic - Newsweek