During a conversation I had with a doctor a couple of years      ago, the subject of cancer diagnoses came up, in a tangential      way. She said that not all that many decades ago, a physician      who had established that a patient had cancer often wouldnt      bother investigating further: since there werent any      effective treatments for any kind of cancer, there wasnt      much point in finding out what kind of cancer it was. You      could try to cut it out, or you could leave it in and see      what happened, and that was about it.    
      Now, of course, that has changed. It matters what cancer you      have, because different cancers respond differently to      different treatments. As we get better at treating the      disease, it pushes us to get better at differentiating them;      as we establish the various kinds, it allows us to target      drugs more precisely at the ones they work on, so that the      drugs themselves become more effective. There is a virtuous      circle between diagnostics and treatment that improves both.            Thats why the news that the NHS is to open 11 major      genomics centres with more to follow  around      the country is so hugely positive.    
      Over the past few years, genomics  the study of our genetic      code  has taken off in spectacular style: while it took      decades and billions of pounds to sequence the first human      genome, now the information in a human cell can be catalogued      in a few days for about a grand. This, obviously, opens up      huge possibilities for medicine. It renders it practical to      record and analyse the genetic code of thousands of people,      and to see how small differences in our DNA change our      vulnerability to different diseases.    
      And thats exactly what the NHS plan, with Genomics England,      involves. The centres will take the genetic data of 100,000      people, all suitably anonymised, and analyse and record them,      making them available to researchers at universities and drug      firms. They will also sequence the DNA of 25,000 cancer      sufferers, and the DNA of the cancers themselves. Cancer is a      disease of the genes  the product of mutations which send      the cell into uncontrolled reproduction  and establishing      which genes are vulnerable to which mutations will be vital      in defeating its various incarnations.    
      This has possibilities far beyond cancer, though. To a      startling degree, we are freed from the crippling burden of      infectious disease. Thats not the case in developing      countries, where more than half of all deaths are caused by      infection, according to the World Health Organisation; but in      the rich West, nearly nine out of 10 of us will die of a      non-communicable disease, when something simply goes wrong      with our bodies. Sometimes that something goes wrong because      of environmental factors  smoking, drinking, obesity  and      sometimes were just unlucky, but our risk of suffering      pretty much any non-communicable disease, from heart disease      to diabetes to stroke, is influenced by our genes. If we can      see which genes tend to be associated with which diseases,      doctors can help those at the greatest risk to take steps to      avoid it.    
      An obvious example is breast cancer, which oncologists now      think of as at least 10 different diseases. While the average      lifetime risk for a woman in the UK is about 12.5 per cent,      according to Cancer Research UK, if they have a particular      mutation in a gene called BRCA1, that risk goes up to between      60 and 90 per cent. Angelina Jolie was tested and found to      have this mutation, and chose to have a double mastectomy as      a preventive measure. Less dramatically, statins could be      prescribed specifically to those people who are found to be      more susceptible to high blood pressure or heart disease,      instead of  as now  giving them to a huge swath of the      population in order to help the minority who actually need      them. It is the difference between a sniper rifle and a      shotgun.    
      The trick with the genomics revolution will be tying it in to      the everyday business of health care in England, and that is      where these centres will become vital. When doctors are able      to look at a patients genetic information as easily as they      can their height and weight, they will be able to target      those patients with the interventions that will work best on      them  true individualised medicine. But that involves making      genome sequencing routine, calming understandable fears about      privacy, and convincing people to take that first scary step      and look at what their genes hold in store for them.    
      A year or so after my conversation with the doctor about      cancer, a close relative was diagnosed with malignant      melanoma. It was a horrible, terrifying time. Skin cancer      comes in various forms, many of them relatively benign, but      melanoma is a killer. And until recently there were no drugs      that were effective against it. If caught early, it could be      cut off, and you were usually all right; later, once it had      got into your system, you were in real trouble. Like the      cancers a century ago, there was little point knowing more      about what kind of melanoma it was, because you couldnt do      much about it.    
      Luckily (touch wood) my relatives cancer was caught early,      and the prognosis is good. But if, heaven forfend, it comes      back, there are now drugs that can be used, with some success       and the choice of which drug depends on your genes. The      genomic revolution is already transforming medicine, and      saving the lives of people right now. This is an      extraordinary time for medicine.    
Read more from the original source: 
Genomics: the revolution that's transforming medicine