YES on prop 37 “flashmob” march – Santa Cruz, CA Sept. 2012 – Video


YES on prop 37 "flashmob" march - Santa Cruz, CA Sept. 2012
The Group GMO-Free Santa Cruz marches downtown Santa Cruz in support of Prop 37. "Real people want Prop 37 to have a choice to opt out of this GMO experiment; just like in 61 other countries including Europe, India, even China! Genetic Engineering technology is only 20 years old, we have no idea what this will cause for generations to come. There is no independent long-term studies, Monsanto affiliates forbid testing of their GMOs to the point where anyone buying them has to sign a contract about it. These nasty Chemical Junk-food companies now have over $40 million against us, the PEOPLE! Anger is not a strong enough word to describe how de-moralizing their evil lies conniving propaganda make us Prop 37 volunteers feel. They are spending over $1 million dollars a day to bomb our citizens opinion #39;s. Voter #39;s need to question why they are spending so much to lie!" ~Tarah Locke, Founder of GMO-Free Santa Cruz Song by Lisa Bunin http://www.yeson37.orgFrom:GMOfree SantacruzViews:30 2ratingsTime:02:04More inNonprofits Activism

See the article here:
YES on prop 37 "flashmob" march - Santa Cruz, CA Sept. 2012 - Video

Yes on Prop 37: Animated Video – Video


Yes on Prop 37: Animated Video
Vote YES on Prop 37: We have the right to know what #39;s in our food. Learn more at: http://www.CARightToKnow.org Video by Emie http Illustration by Emie Animation by Emie and Christian Day christianday.net Sound Design by Daniel Kim Birch Voice-over Henna Chou Music: "Aid" by Henna Chou Learn more about GMOs: The Future of Food http://www.thefutureoffood.com Genetic Roulette geneticroulettemovie.com Seeds of Deception http://www.seedsofdeception.com Transcript: "GMOs are "genetically modified organisms." They are created by taking the DNA of one animal, plant or virus, and putting it into another animal or plant. This is different than hybrids or selective breeding. A scorpion and a cabbage do not breed and reproduce in nature. GMOs have not been proven safe to eat. A new study of rats eating GMOs showed an alarming increase in tumors and liver damage. The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act requires that foods produced with genetic engineering be disclosed on food packaging. It has no cost impact on consumers or food producers. Companies change their labels all the time. When they started labeling trans fats, there was no jump in prices. Right now, Aqua Bounty #39;s GE Salmon is seeking approval for human consumption. Without labeling, how do you know you #39;re eating fish or Frankenfish? Yes on Prop 37. It #39;s our right to know.From:byemieViews:153 1ratingsTime:01:01More inFilm Animation

Excerpt from:
Yes on Prop 37: Animated Video - Video

Yes to Prop 37 — James Franco Elijah Wood


Yes to Prop 37 mdash; James Franco Elijah Wood Adrian Grenier
Supporting articles: French study in which rats that were fed genetically modified corn grew tumors: http://www.huffingtonpost.com A short video clip about the above: http://www.youtube.com Germany bans genetically modified corn: http://www.nytimes.com Study showing crop yields not increased by genetic engineering: http://www.ucsusa.org Concerned Citizens: James Franco Elijah Wood Adrian Grenier Rosanna Arquette Daniel Masterson Eric Warehiem Amy Ferguson Ana Calderon Oliver Cantu Sonmanto Team: Richard Head played by John Pick Suey Slinger played by William Lemon III Dr. Rodney Miracle played by Alex Wallman Created by: Alex Wallman Ana Calderon Directed Edited by: Kyle McCullough, Ryan Kuhlman Alex Wallman After Effects by: Ryan Kuhlman Written by : Alex Wallman Corn Man Animation by: Daniel Cardenas "Yes on 37" plate photo by: Bart Cooke Audio techs: Juan Palacio, Ryan Kuhlman and Kyle McCullough Spanish Translation by: Pedro Cheryl Calderon Oliver Cantu This video brought to you courtesy of concerned citizens of California who demand the right to know what #39;s in their food! VOTE YES ON PROP 37!From:Alex WallmanViews:5087 89ratingsTime:04:00More inComedy

Go here to read the rest:
Yes to Prop 37 — James Franco Elijah Wood

Fringe Opening sequence (The Final Season: “Fight For The Future”) – Video


Fringe Opening sequence (The Final Season: "Fight For The Future")
The show #39;s standard opening sequence interplays images of the glyph symbols alongside words representing fringe science topics, such as "teleportation" and "dark matter". Within the third season, with episodes that took place primarily in the parallel universe, a new set of titles was used, following a similar format, though tinted red instead of blue and using alternate fringe science concepts like "hypnosis" and "neuroscience". The difference in color has led some fans to call the prime universe the Blue one in contrast to the parallel Red one. In the third season episode "Entrada", the titles used a mix of both the blue- and red-tinted versions, given the episode taking place equally in both universes. In the show #39;s two flashback episodes, "Peter" and "Subject 13", a variation on the sequence, using retro graphics akin to 1980s technology and phrases like "personal computing" and "genetic engineering", was used. For the dystopian future third season episode "The Day We Died", a black-toned theme, with more dire phrases like "hope" and "water," was used. The fourth season premiere, "Neither Here Nor There" introduced an amber-toned title sequence with additional new terms that is used for nearly all season four episodes. The fourth season episode "Letters of Transit", which returned to the future dystopian universe, and the subsequent fifth season episodes, feature a cold-toned title sequence with phrases such as "joy", "private thought" and "free will", ideas which ...From:Fëdor Nicola MisuriViews:0 0ratingsTime:00:34More inMusic

Read this article:
Fringe Opening sequence (The Final Season: "Fight For The Future") - Video

Is there a difference between GE & GMO?

Enter the rainy season and I turn to my inside chores...removing dried seeds from their seed pods.

And catching up on my reading ... checking up on what is new in the world of seeds. Namely, in the genetic engineering sector.

I stumbled onto an article about the difference between the GE and GMO designation. This author stated there is a definite difference between the two terms ... and she is right to a point.

Technically, GMO ... genetically modified organism ... refers to any plant that has been hybridized through pollen transference ... by humans, bees or any other natural process. So any cultivar such as 'Early Girl' tomato and Hosta 'June' are, in fact, GMOs.

'Early Girl' has been purposely bred by hand pollination to produce an early-ripening tomato. 'June' arrived on the gardening scene as a naturally-occurring sport of another hosta ... 'Halcyon'.

The GMO designation also holds true for those varieties that have been crossed within their own family ... broccoli with kale, apricot with plum, plum with cherry. These have all been done by humans using conventional pollen-transfer methods. Sounds a bit weird perhaps, but a perfectly plausible possibility in nature.

I do not think the pluerry ... the plum/cherry cross ... has been released to the market just yet. But the others are available.

In fact, cherry-plum hybrids have been around since the late 19th century. I found one reference listing over 20 different cultivars.

As for the apricot-plum hybrids ... they are called Pluots if the plant has predominantly plum parentage or Apriums if the parentage leans to the apricot side. Both are registered trademark names.

Then there is broccolini ... also known by several other names such as Asparation, brocoletti and Tenderstem. (The first and last are both trade registered names.) This is a natural cross between broccoli and kai-lan, a Chinese broccoli.

See the original post:
Is there a difference between GE & GMO?

World’s Weirdest Places Discussed – Video


World #39;s Weirdest Places Discussed
World #39;s Weirdest Places Discussed ........................................................................ From the legendary Loch Ness, Scotland, to the slopes of Mount Shasta; from the dark depths of the Solomon Islands to the heart of the Kremlin, paranormal investigator Nick Redfern joined George Knapp for a discussion on how the world #39;s weirdest places reveal an astonishing scale of strangeness on our planet. First Hour: Leading spokesperson on the health dangers of genetically modified foods, Jeffrey Smith, discussed Proposition 37, a California initiative which would require the labeling of GMO foods. ............................................................... Genetically modified foods (GM foods, or biotech foods) are foods derived from genetically modified organisms (GMOs), such as genetically modified crops or genetically modified fish. GMOs have had specific changes introduced into their DNA by genetic engineering techniques. These techniques are much more precise[1] than mutagenesis (mutation breeding) where an organism is exposed to radiation or chemicals to create a non-specific but stable change. Other techniques by which humans modify food organisms include selective breeding; plant breeding, and animal breeding, and somaclonal variation. Commercial sale of genetically modified foods began in 1994, when Calgene first marketed its Flavr Savr delayed ripening tomato.[2] Typically, genetically modified foods are transgenic plant products: soybean, corn ...From:ConspiracyDebatesViews:1814 8ratingsTime:02:35:03More inNews Politics

See the article here:

World's Weirdest Places Discussed - Video

YES on prop 37 "flashmob" march – Santa Cruz, CA Sept. 2012 – Video


YES on prop 37 "flashmob" march - Santa Cruz, CA Sept. 2012
The Group GMO-Free Santa Cruz marches downtown Santa Cruz in support of Prop 37. "Real people want Prop 37 to have a choice to opt out of this GMO experiment; just like in 61 other countries including Europe, India, even China! Genetic Engineering technology is only 20 years old, we have no idea what this will cause for generations to come. There is no independent long-term studies, Monsanto affiliates forbid testing of their GMOs to the point where anyone buying them has to sign a contract about it. These nasty Chemical Junk-food companies now have over $40 million against us, the PEOPLE! Anger is not a strong enough word to describe how de-moralizing their evil lies conniving propaganda make us Prop 37 volunteers feel. They are spending over $1 million dollars a day to bomb our citizens opinion #39;s. Voter #39;s need to question why they are spending so much to lie!" ~Tarah Locke, Founder of GMO-Free Santa Cruz Song by Lisa Bunin http://www.yeson37.orgFrom:GMOfree SantacruzViews:18 2ratingsTime:02:04More inNonprofits Activism

More:

YES on prop 37 "flashmob" march - Santa Cruz, CA Sept. 2012 - Video

Mimic: The Director’s Cut (Blu-ray Trailer) – Video


Mimic: The Director #39;s Cut (Blu-ray Trailer)
Guillermo Del Toro (Pan #39;s Labyrinth, Hellboy) presents "Mimic" like you #39;ve never seen it before in a visually stunning Director #39;s Cut. Starring Academy Award winner Mira Sorvino (Mighty Aphrodite), Charles S. Dutton (A Time To Kill) and Josh Brolin (True Grit), "Mimic" brings the epic battle between man and nature to life when a team of scientists discover that their experiment in genetic engineering has gone horribly awry. Recut and presented with in-depth special features that take you inside the film, "Mimic: The Director #39;s Cut" restores Guillermo del Toro #39;s vision for this chilling modern cult classic. This film is not rated. Produced released by Miramax Films, an Filmyard Holdings company. Distributed by Lionsgate Entertainment.From:BMTPTrailerCentralV4Views:0 0ratingsTime:01:51More inEntertainment

The rest is here:

Mimic: The Director's Cut (Blu-ray Trailer) - Video

editta braun company: planet LUVOS (clip, 4:30) – Video


editta braun company: planet LUVOS (clip, 4:30)
planet LUVOS dance movement research: Scaron;pela Vodeb, Dorota Karolina #321; #281;cka, Andrea Maria Handler, Marcella Mancini, Katja Bablick, Sandra Hofsttter, Martyna Lorenc dramaturgy: Gerda Poschmann-Reichenau, composition: Thierry Zaboitzeff, lightdesign: Peter Thalhamer, choreographic assistance: Barbara Motschiunik, Juan Dante Murillo Bobadilla, choreograpy: Editta Braun What remains is greater than man "planet LUVOS", the editta braun company #39;s fascinating dance premiere at the Bruckner Festival - Upper Austrian News, September 29, 2012 The Salzburg choreographer Editta Braun leads us through a blue underwater world back to the origins of life. In her new piece "planet LUVOS", she completes the round dance of surreal body worlds, which began with "Lufus" (1985) and continued with "Lufus, vol. 2", about the dangers of genetic engineering. The viewer sinks into a blue, bubbling waterworld. The only sign that humans exist is the distant sound of a steamship whistle, somewhere far away. And a woman who suddenly finds herself in a kingdom full of strange, but peaceful beings. Seven dancers (Katja Bablick, Andrea Maria Handler, Sandra Hofsttter, Dorota Karolina Lecka, Martyna Lorenc, Marcella Mancini and Spela Vodeb) constitute this symbiotic, sensitive collective. Their legs wave in the air like anemone arms, each movement reacting as fast as lightning to the other . Their bodies lose their humanness and become entities. Naked torsi move like alien beings across the stage ...From:edittabrauncompanyViews:0 0ratingsTime:04:31More inEducation

Read more:

editta braun company: planet LUVOS (clip, 4:30) - Video

PUT IT IN YOUR MOUTH! Yes to Prop 37 — it’s your right to know what’s in your food! – Video


PUT IT IN YOUR MOUTH! Yes to Prop 37 mdash; it #39;s your right to know what #39;s in your food!
PUT IT IN YOUR MOUTH The Wonderful World of GMO Concerned Citizens: James Franco Elijah Wood Adrian Grenier Rosanna Arquette Daniel Masterson Eric Warehiem Amy Ferguson Ana Calderon Oliver Cantu Sonmanto Team: Richard Head played by John Pick Suey Slinger played by William Lemon III Dr. Rodney Miracle played by Alex Wallman Created by: Alex Wallman Ana Calderon Directed Edited by: Kyle McCullough, Ryan Kuhlman Alex Wallman After Effects by: Ryan Kuhlman Written by : Alex Wallman Corn Man Animation by: Daniel Cardenas "Yes on 37" plate photo by: Bart Cooke Audio techs: Juan Palacio, Ryan Kuhlman and Kyle McCullough Spanish Translation by: Pedro Cheryl Calderon Oliver Cantu Further articles: French study in which rats that were fed genetically modified corn grew tumors: http://www.huffingtonpost.com A short video clip about the above: http://www.youtube.com Germany bans genetically modified corn: http://www.nytimes.com Study showing crop yields not increased by genetic engineering: http://www.ucsusa.org This video brought to you courtesy of concerned citizens of California who demand the right to know what #39;s in their food! VOTE YES ON PROP 37!From:Alex WallmanViews:3779 73ratingsTime:04:00More inComedy

Read this article:

PUT IT IN YOUR MOUTH! Yes to Prop 37 — it's your right to know what's in your food! - Video

Port Townsend Food Coop: A Sad Story of GMO Crop Cross Pollination – Video


Port Townsend Food Coop: A Sad Story of GMO Crop Cross Pollination
In front of the Port Townsend Food Coop, member Jim Salter tells a story of a friend of his in Canada that lost his organic crops because a neighbor #39;s GMO crop spread into his fields. I-522 is an initiative to the Washington State legislature to establish mandatory labeling of foods produced through genetic engineering. As recommended by the Secretary of State, the LabelitWA group needs to turn in at least 320000 signatures to ensure they have 241153 valid signatures by December 31, 2012 in order to get on the November 2013 ballot. I-522, "The People #39;s Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act," is simple. The initiative would require food sold in retail outlets to be labeled if the ingredients are produced through genetic engineering. An estimated 70 percent of non-organic processed foods contain some #9472; or several #9472; genetically engineered ingredients. http://www.labelitwa.org http California 2012 Prop 37 Playlist http://www.youtube.com Sponsor RAAW Foods (Non-GMO Project Verified) http://www.raawfoods.comFrom:digitalreporterViews:0 0ratingsTime:02:42More inTravel Events

Go here to see the original:

Port Townsend Food Coop: A Sad Story of GMO Crop Cross Pollination - Video

For New York Times readers, fairness matters when it comes to paying for content

Public release date: 31-Oct-2012 [ | E-mail | Share ]

Contact: Vicki Cohn vcohn@liebertpub.com 914-740-2100 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc./Genetic Engineering News

New Rochelle, NY, October 31, 2012In a paper published today by Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, a peer-reviewed journal from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers, researchers found that New York Times readers who were led to believe the newspaper's paywall was motivated by financial need were generally supportive and willing to pay, while those who believed it was motivated by profit were generally unsupportive and unwilling to pay. The article "Paying for What Was Free: Lessons from the New York Times Paywall," written by Jonathan Cook, Associate Research Scientist in the Department of Psychology at Columbia University, and Shahzeen Attari, Assistant Professor in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs (SPEA) at Indiana University-Bloomington is available free on the Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking website.

An online survey conducted shortly before the newspaper introduced its paywall found that most readers planned not to pay for access. The same people were surveyed 10 weeks later and the researchers randomly assigned half to read a justification for the paywall based on financial need and half to read a justification for the paywall based on profit motive. They found that most readers did not pay for content. Readers devalued the newspaper, visited its website less frequently, and used loopholes to read New York Times content. However, the researchers also found that readers' attitudes and behavior could be changed by providing a compelling justification that emphasizes fairness. Those readers who were given the justification for the paywall based on financial need said they were more likely to pay for New York Times content.

###

About the Journal

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking is a peer-reviewed journal published monthly online that explores the psychological and social issues surrounding the Internet and interactive technologies. Complete tables of content and a sample issue may be viewed on the Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking website.

About the Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers is a privately held, fully integrated media company known for establishing authoritative peer-reviewed journals in many promising areas of science and biomedical research, including Games for Health Journal, Telemedicine and e-Health, and Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology. Its biotechnology trade magazine, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News (GEN), was the first in its field and is today the industry's most widely read publication worldwide. A complete list of the firm's 70 journals, books, and newsmagazines is available on the Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers website.

Excerpt from:

For New York Times readers, fairness matters when it comes to paying for content

Is there a difference between GE & GMO?

Enter the rainy season and I turn to my inside chores...removing dried seeds from their seed pods.

And catching up on my reading ... checking up on what is new in the world of seeds. Namely, in the genetic engineering sector.

I stumbled onto an article about the difference between the GE and GMO designation. This author stated there is a definite difference between the two terms ... and she is right to a point.

Technically, GMO ... genetically modified organism ... refers to any plant that has been hybridized through pollen transference ... by humans, bees or any other natural process. So any cultivar such as 'Early Girl' tomato and Hosta 'June' are, in fact, GMOs.

'Early Girl' has been purposely bred by hand pollination to produce an early-ripening tomato. 'June' arrived on the gardening scene as a naturally-occurring sport of another hosta ... 'Halcyon'.

The GMO designation also holds true for those varieties that have been crossed within their own family ... broccoli with kale, apricot with plum, plum with cherry. These have all been done by humans using conventional pollen-transfer methods. Sounds a bit weird perhaps, but a perfectly plausible possibility in nature.

I do not think the pluerry ... the plum/cherry cross ... has been released to the market just yet. But the others are available.

In fact, cherry-plum hybrids have been around since the late 19th century. I found one reference listing over 20 different cultivars.

As for the apricot-plum hybrids ... they are called Pluots if the plant has predominantly plum parentage or Apriums if the parentage leans to the apricot side. Both are registered trademark names.

Then there is broccolini ... also known by several other names such as Asparation, brocoletti and Tenderstem. (The first and last are both trade registered names.) This is a natural cross between broccoli and kai-lan, a Chinese broccoli.

Follow this link:

Is there a difference between GE & GMO?

Research and Markets: Therapeutic Antibody Engineering: Current and Future Advances Driving the Strongest Growth Area …

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Research and Markets (http://www.researchandmarkets.com/research/kknlff/therapeutic) has announced the addition of Woodhead Publishing Ltd's new book "Therapeutic antibody engineering: Current and future advances driving the strongest growth area in the pharmaceutical industry" to their offering.

Therapeutic Antibody Engineering examines all aspects of engineering monoclonal antibodies and analyses the effect that various genetic engineering approaches will have on candidates of the future. Chapters in the first part of the book provide an introduction to monoclonal antibodies, their discovery and development and the fundamental technologies used in their production. In the following chapters, the book covers a number of specific issues relating to different aspects of antibody engineering, including variable chain engineering, targets and mechanisms of action, classes of antibody and the use of antibody fragments, among many other topics. The last part of the book examines development issues, the interaction of human IgGs with non-human systems, and cell line development, before a conclusion looking at future issues affecting the field of therapeutic antibody engineering.

Key Topics Covered:

- Introduction to biologics and monoclonal antibodies

- Value proposition for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies and Fc fusion proteins

- Antibody structure-function relationships

- Fundamental technologies for antibody engineering

- Sources of antibody variable chains

- Variable chain engineering - humanization and optimization approaches

Originally posted here:

Research and Markets: Therapeutic Antibody Engineering: Current and Future Advances Driving the Strongest Growth Area ...

We Are Change Fresno TV — Show 1 — Label GMOs – Yes on Prop 37 – Part 2 – Video


We Are Change Fresno TV -- Show 1 -- Label GMOs - Yes on Prop 37 - Part 2
We Are Change TV - Episode 1 -- Host Sam Chaney -- Guess Judy Nelson What is Proposition 37? Proposition 37 is a common-sense November ballot measure that will help consumers make informed choices about the food they eat. Written with broad input from food groups, industry, science, legal and health experts Prop. 37 (The California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act) requires clear labels letting consumers know if foods are genetically modified. What Are Genetically Engineered Foods (GMOs)? A genetically engineered food is a plant or meat product that has had its DNA artificially altered in a laboratory by genes from other plants, animals, viruses, or bacteria in order to produce foreign compounds in that food. This type of genetic alteration is not found in nature and is experimental. Many of the foods we currently eat and feed our families (including certain baby formulas and a high percentage of corn, soy, cotton and sugar beets commonly used in processed foods sold in the US), but we don #39;t know which ones without labeling. If Proposition 37 passes, it will be a huge step toward the transparency we deserve. This is about our right to know what #39;s in our food and the right to choose for ourselves what we eat and feed our families. These are fundamental American values. Join us in helping us win back our right to know about the genetic engineering of our food system. Vote Yes on 37 in November, join our campaign, share our ad, donate if you can (every little ...From:WeAreChangeFresno76Views:36 4ratingsTime:11:26More inNonprofits Activism

Read the rest here:

We Are Change Fresno TV -- Show 1 -- Label GMOs - Yes on Prop 37 - Part 2 - Video

OMD – Video


OMD
http://www.youtube.com OMD 01 Electricity 02 Red Frame/White Light 03 Messages 04 Enola Gay 05 Souvenir 06 Joan Of Arc (Live Top Of The Pops Version) 07 Maid Of Orleans 08 Genetic Engineering 09 Telegraph 10 Locomotion 11 Talking Loud And Clear 12 Tesla Girls 13 Never Turn Away 14 So In Love 15 Secret 16 La Femme Accident 17 Hold You 18 If You Leave 19 (Forever) Live And Die 20 We Love You 21 Shame 22 Dreaming 23 Sailing On The Seven Seas 24 Pandora #39;s Box 25 Then You Turn Away 26 Call My Name 27 Stand Above Me 28 Dream Of Me (Based On #39;Love #39;s Theme #39;) 29 Everyday 30 Walking On The Milky Way 31 UniversalFrom:Joao RochaViews:6 0ratingsTime:01:57:08More inMusic

Read more:

OMD - Video

Dr. Marco Baralla, ICGEB: Amrita Therapeutics Cross-Cultural R


Dr. Marco Baralla, ICGEB: Amrita Therapeutics Cross-Cultural R D Panel, BIO 2012
Dr. Marco Barallo of the International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB) highlights the important role that ICGEB plays in multilateral research collaborations, capacity building and technology transfer at the Amrita Therapeutics panel at BIO 2012 on June 21, 2012, Boston, MAFrom:AmritaTherapeuticsViews:37 0ratingsTime:06:26More inScience Technology

Go here to read the rest:

Dr. Marco Baralla, ICGEB: Amrita Therapeutics Cross-Cultural R

genespire 13 – Video


genespire 13
The symposium aims to bring together Bioengineering students and scholars on a common platform, where they can interact, present their results and exchange information. The symposium focuses on the various modern techniques that are currently developed and applied in the field of life sciences. The topics to be covered for paper poster presentations: #61656; Genetic Engineering #61656; Genomics and proteomics #61656; Tissue Engineering #61656; Environmental Engineering #61656; Chemical Engineering #61656; Biofuels #61656; Biomedical Engineering #61656; Medical Biotechnology #61656; Agricultural Biotechnology #61656; Food Dairy Technology #61656; Fermentation Technology #61656; Nanotechnology in medicine #61656; Downstream processing #61656; BioinformaticsFrom:abi varmaViews:36 0ratingsTime:02:59More inEducation

View original post here:

genespire 13 - Video