Littered with Progress – Pleasanton Express

The other day on the internet, I saw an old commercial of a semi truck that had these words painted on the side: JONNY KAT, KITTY LITTER. For some reason that had a profound affect on me. Imagine a semi full of kitty litter! Forty thousand pounds of scented, colored and packaged cat box contents!

That has to say something about our affluent society, about the shape of our civilization. Some of our past inventions are quite practical and ingenious. The self-sealing, puncture proof tire, mercury lights, insecticide ear tags, microwave ovens, the Salk vaccine, four-wheel drive, frozen orange juice and boxed beef. Pistachio tree roots are susceptible to certain kinds of root rot. But peach tree roots are more resistant. So the pistachio growers graft pistachio trunks onto peach tree roots. Clever.

Consider how much artificial insemination has done to improve the quality of our livestock production. Genetic engineering is space-age technology.

But sometimes when we strive to achieve we go off the deep end. Take the cell phone. When they first appeared on the scene they were expensive, heavy and required two hands to operate. Now you can get a disposable one with a camera that adds, subtracts, calculates square roots, tells you the time in Singapore, wakes you up, plays you a tune, gives you the weather and news, takes your pulse, calendars all your events and reminds you of them all, and controls all appliances in your house! What Id like to find is a cell phone that gives me more hours in a day!

And speaking of rotting edges affluence, how about aerosol cheese spread? I thought plasticwrapped, individual cheese slices were pretty decadent, but you can also foam it onto your crackers like shaving cream.

Yep, weve surrounded ourselves with creations that have gone a step beyond their original purpose; fender skirts, square headlights and veterinarians with PhDs. Some might even include Pekingese, Chihuahua or Appaloosa in that group, but I know how sensitive animal breeders are so I certainly wouldnt include them. Obviously our adventures into the extreme or entertaining are useful. We learn and perfect by doing.

Well, my digital ballpoint pen is playing Mammas Dont Let Your Babies Grow Up To Be Cowboys, so I guess its time to brush my teeth and hit the sack. I hope the batteries are still charged in my computerized flosser. http://www.baxterblack.com

Read more:

Littered with Progress - Pleasanton Express

North America Genome Editing Market is expected to reach US$ 4148.1 Million by 2027 with CAGR of 17.2% – Market Research Correspondent

Genome editing is a method of making specific changes to the DNA of a cell or organism. Enzymes cut DNA at specific sequences that, when repaired by the cell, change or edit into the sequence

Genome editing, or genome manipulation, or gene editing is a type of genetic manipulation in which DNA is inserted, deleted, modified, or replaced in the genome of an organism. Unlike early genetic engineering techniques, which randomly insert genetic material into the host genome, genome editing directs the insert to a specific location.

The North America genome editing market accounted to US$ 1,234.5 Million in 2019 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 17.2% during the forecast period 2020 2027, to account to US$ 4,148.1 Million by 2027.

Biotechnology is a broad field of biology that utilizes biological systems and organisms to develop or manufacture products. Depending on the tool or application, it often overlaps with the relevant scientific discipline. Biotechnology is the technology of developing or creating various products using biological systems, living things, or parts thereof. Baking brewed bread is an example of a process that is part of the concept of biotechnology (using yeast to produce a desired product).

The North America Genome Editingmarketis growing along with the Biotechnology industry, but the market is likely to slow down its growth due to the shortage of skilled professionals, suggests the Business Market Insights report.

The Business Market Insights subscription helps clients understand theongoingmarket trends,identifyopportunities, and make informed decisions through the reports in the Subscription Platform. The Industry reports available in the subscriptionprovidean in-depth analysis on various market topics and enable clients to line up remunerative opportunities. The reportsprovidethe market size & forecast, drivers, challenges, trends, and more.

Ask for FREE Sample Copy of this report at https://www.businessmarketinsights.com/sample/TIPRE00003907

According to International Services for the Acquisition of Agricultural Biotechnology Applications (ISAAA), 2017 statistics show that 53 developing countries plant 53%, which is about 100.6 million hectares of global biotechnology hectares. 47% of the five developed countries, which has a share of about 89.2 million hectares. The growth trend of GM crops is expected to grow in the future. In addition, the data revealed that, out of the 24 countries that cultivated biotech crops in 2016, 18 were considered biotech mega countries. About 50,000 hectares of genetically modified crops are grown in these countries. The United States remained the top producer of genetically engineered crops worldwide. The country planted 75 million hectares in 2017, which covered 40% of the worlds biotech crop planting. Similarly, Brazil is second with 50.2 million hectares, accounting for 26% of world production.

These factors are expected to offer broad growth opportunities in the Biotechnology industry and this is expected to cause the demand for GENOME EDITING assays in the market.

Business Market Insights reports focus upon clientobjectives, use standard research methodologies and exclusive analytical models, combined with robust business acumen, which providesprecise and insightful results.

Business Market Insights reports are usefulnot only forcorporate and academic professionalsbut also forconsulting, research firms,PEVCfirms, and professional services firms.

NORTH AMERICA GENOME EDITING MARKET SEGMENTATION

By Technology

By Application

By End User

By Geography

Company Profiles

Full Report subscription with pay as per requirement at https://www.businessmarketinsights.com/TIPRE00003907/checkout/basic/single/monthly

(30-day subscription plans proveto beverycost-effectivewith no compromise on the quality of reports)

Benefits with Business Market Insights

About Business Market Insights

Based in New York, Business Market Insights is a one-stop destination for in-depth market research reports from various industries including Technology, Media & Telecommunications, Semiconductor & Electronics, Aerospace & Defense, Automotive & Transportation, Biotechnology, Healthcare IT, Manufacturing & Construction, Medical Device, and Chemicals & Materials. The clients include corporate and academic professionals, consulting, research firms,PEVCfirms, and professional services firms.

For Subscription contact

Business Market Insights

Phone :+442081254005E-Mail :[emailprotected]

See the original post here:

North America Genome Editing Market is expected to reach US$ 4148.1 Million by 2027 with CAGR of 17.2% - Market Research Correspondent

Companies That Want To Make Pharmaceutical APIs Will Be Producing Commodities. Heres What They Should Consider – Forbes

U.S. President Donald Trump announced that Eastman Kodak will receive a loan to manufacture ... [+] ingredients used in pharmaceuticals. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

The news that Eastman Kodak Company had received a U.S. government loan to begin the production of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) domestically is recognition of the risks associated with the far-flung supply chain for these critical materials. The Europeans have recognized these risks as well. But that doesnt make the economic challenge of doing this successfully any easier. The problem is that most APIs are commodities.

I spent seven and a half years at Kodak beginning in 1997 running their consumer digital operation, and during that time I got to know the manufacturing people in film and chemicals. The synthetic chemicals team, or Syn Chem as it was known, was an extremely capable crew. They knew what it meant to take a chemical synthesis from the laboratory to an industrial scale, and they practiced their trade on extremely complex materials photochemicals, dyes, couplers complicated molecules that are difficult to make. They knew what solvents (the liquids that you ran the reactions in) you used were important, because when youre done you had to get rid of all the waste products. You couldnt just dump the waste in the local river. You also liked to optimize reaction times (known as reaction kinetics), the amount of energy consumed, the use of dangerous intermediates, all things that were of lesser concern when you were operating at lab scale than when you were doing them at industrial scale. So there is little doubt in my mind that the Kodak team (I hope they havent lost too many of the Syn Chem crew) could make just about anything.

A chemical mixing machine in an Eastman Kodak Corp. manufacturing facility in Rochester, New York. ... [+] Photographer: Daniel Acker/Bloomberg News

But as I said, the first problem with APIs is that most of them are commodities, which means that batches of them are readily substitutable for one another regardless of where they came from. Chemicals are easy to characterize. Modern analytical techniques such as gas chromatography (GC), liquid chromatography (LC), and mass spectrometry (MS), often combined as GC/MS or LC/MS instruments, can be used to analyze a drum or a tank car load of chemical, and tell you exactly what is inside, along with what kinds of impurities and how much of each are mixed in. So if you have the choice among multiple batches that all have a high enough purity level and none of the contaminants that you cant deal with, the only difference is the price.

The second problem with domestic production of APIs is that they are largely tradable. A good is tradable to the extent that it doesnt need to be manufactured close to where it is consumed. Most products are tradable because the cost of shipping them is a relatively small percentage of their value, so if it costs less to make something in China and the shipping cost is less than the difference, it makes economic sense to make it there and ship it. Thats why the U.S. imports so much of everything from China the production costs differentials historically have been much higher than the shipping costs.

The third problem is drug pricing, especially for generics. No consumer likes higher prices, and the President himself have been putting pressure on manufacturers to lower drug prices. But if drugs are made from tradable commodities, that means the companies who formulate the drugs are driven to use the lowest cost sourcing, and that is generally not domestic (usually this means China or India). Once again we face the dilemma we want to make it in the U.S., but we dont want to pay for the higher costs.

Invest in process innovations. Employing newer manufacturing processes historically has been one of the most effective ways to disrupt incumbent manufacturers by offering lower costs. After World War II, European and Japanese steel manufacturers who had to rebuild their industries from scratch were the first to employ new manufacturing processes like basic oxygen and continuous casting. The new processes were more efficient, and their low-cost exports of steel to the U.S. started the long decline of the American steel industry. Korean and Taiwanese flat-panel display manufacturers were able to employ newer, more efficient equipment than the Japanese producers who started the industry, and now the same Korean and Taiwanese companies are under pressure from Chinese companies who are using even newer equipment.

A coming revolution is continuous flow chemical manufacturing, in which compact, continuous flow reactors promise far more efficient reaction processes. I had the opportunity to visit Snapdragon Chemistry two weeks ago, and it is amazing what they are doing. I had to rush back to the Baker Library at HBS and read up on chemical synthesis route design, which is the term used to describe a strategic development process for APIs. I have about 20 more scientific papers to read on this topic to get a better understanding, then you can ask me more. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) has been beating this drum for some time now. Once again DARPA is one of the more visionary agencies we have.

Invest in biomanufacturing. Biomanufacturing uses living systems to produce chemicals and biomaterials. Living things already produce the most complex chemicals imaginable, so the idea is to harness cells by using genetic engineering to make new things. This is already used for many biopharmaceuticals, vaccines, and industrial enzymes, but researchers in the field think much more can be done. DARPAs Living Foundries: 1000 Molecules program is funding a lot of research in this area, so the possibilities are intriguing.

One country we might look to for an example is Denmark, where there is a strong cluster of firms who use fermentation to produce a wide range of products. Novozymes, based inBagsvrd outside of Copenhagen, is the world leader in industrial enzymes. Industrial enzymes have been the source of many advances in household laundry detergents like Tide, and are widely used in industries like textiles. Denmarks cluster of fermentation expertise traces back to the Carlsberg brewing company. The Carlsberg Laboratory, established in 1875, was chartered to develop a scientific basis for malting, brewing, and fermenting operations, and ongoing research there and knowledge spillovers have made the region a world leading cluster.

Where in America might we find people who know how to do this? According to the Brewers Association, the COVID-19 pandemic has been hard on many breweries, and it reports that A majority of breweries do not think their business can last three months given current conditions, suggesting thousands of closings. Brewers were the foundation of a lot of pharmaceutical manufacturing in India. As longs as the U.S. government is spending money at such a prodigious rate, maybe we could fund an agency to help brewers move into manufacturing chemicals.

Leverage FDA certification processes. One other thing the U.S. could consider is the FDA certification process for pharmaceutical manufacturing. How far back in the supply chain should it require certification? It probably doesnt need to start all the way back at earth, wind, fire, and water, but by strategically picking where it requires inspection, it could shape behavior along the supply chain. We would call that a non-tariff barrier.

The global pandemic is reshaping supply chains in many industries. The economics on some of the new designs havent been tested yet, but with some strategic thinking and actions, we could end up in a better place.

See the rest here:

Companies That Want To Make Pharmaceutical APIs Will Be Producing Commodities. Heres What They Should Consider - Forbes

Should Cuba promote introduction of genetically modified organisms in agriculture? – OnCubaNews

Help us keep OnCuba alive

A few days ago, the national press published the news of the approval in Cuba of the regulations to carry out the work associated with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their use in the production of food in agriculture. Undoubtedly, having standards to regulate the investigation and use of these organisms is healthy for the present and the future of our country.

According to the World Health Organization genetically modified (GM) foods are foods derived from organisms whose genetic material (DNA) has been modified in a way that doesnt occur naturally, e.g. through the introduction of a gene from a different organism. The technology is often called modern biotechnology or gene technology, sometimes also recombinant DNA technology or genetic engineering. It allows the outcrossing of selected individual genes from one organism to another, also between unrelated species. Foods produced based on GM organisms or used are often called GM foods.

Cuban scientists Fernando R. Funes-Monzote and Eduardo Freyre Roach in their book Transgnicos, qu se pierde? qu se gana? define it like this:

A GMO is an organism whose genetic information has been manipulated in laboratories, in a deliberate way, in order to confer one or more specific characteristics that make it behave differently to organisms of the same family, genus or species. They can be considered as new organisms that become part of the living beings who cohabit the planet. This fact has generated not a few ethical concerns regarding its biotic behavior and regulation.

Much has been written about the application of these GMOs in agriculture, their advantages and, above all, their dangers.1 In Cuba, opinions are divided, as in much of the world, among those who are for or against.

I summarize below a part of the history of GMOs in Cuba published in the aforementioned book:

* When the text cited above was published, no public report was available on its results.

From 2009 to the present its almost certain that much more has been done in this area, but I dont have that other part of the story.

Cuba opens door to GM crops amid food crisis

A revolution in yields?

Successive reports confirm that the yields of the most important varieties of genetically modified crops are lower or, at best, equal to the yields of traditional varieties. Several studies carried out between 1999 and 2007 undoubtedly reveal that soybean yields decreased between 4 and 12% compared to non-GMO soybeans, while Bt maize yields were up to 12% lower than those of conventional lines.

Up to 100% failures in Bt.21 cotton crops have been reported in India. Recent research from the University of Kansas shows just 10% average yield for Roundup Ready.22 soybeans, which also demands soil fertilization with manganese. Scientists from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) discovered at the University of Georgia that growing genetically modified corn in that country can lead to a drop in income of up to 40% .23.2

However, its true that in todays world, a decisive part of the raw materials used for the production of feed for pigs, poultry and cattle is produced from raw materials (genetically modified corn and soybeans) and, therefore, its also true that, in some way, Cubans and almost the entire world population today have become a great testing laboratory for those two great food producing? monsters Monsanto and Bayer,3 which have shifted their production systems to many third world countries due to the restrictions in developed countries to use GMOs and their accompanying technological package with its star product: glyphosate,4 a sad memory for the Vietnamese.5

Glyphosate is a 50 percent mixture of two herbicides with phenoxy groups: 2.4-D (2.4-dichlorodiphenoxyacetic acid) and 2.4.5-T (2.4.5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid). These chemicals were widely used in the U.S. agricultural sector. Although the two herbicides break down fairly quickly, dioxin is a highly persistent compound that can remain in the environment for decades and cause cancer and other health problems.

For Monsanto6 and Bayer, the main objective is not to produce food, in the end GM corn and soybeans are only a means to increase their profits, an essential purpose of the company whose concern with world nutrition is very doubtful.

Its also true that Cubans have been eating chicken fed with GMOs for at least a decade and we are still here, alive and walking on this earth, without apparently something terrible happening to us, beyond the disappearance of GM chicken itself or not. I am not aware of any documented research examining the relationship between the increase in some diseases and the increase in consumption of GM foods in Cuba.

When presenting the decree law, Deputy Minister Armando Rodrguez Batista said: The essential thing is to incorporate the orderly and controlled use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural development programs as an alternative to develop productivity, consistent with sustainable agriculture and food sovereignty, based on local research.

The new decree law establishes:

According to the CITMA deputy minister: Cuba seeks to use this technology for sustainable development and not practices that in other contexts have had an environmental impact. Cuba can take advantage of the production and technological capacity it has, but doing so with an environmentally sustainable approach.

Achieving a positive synergy between the use of GMOs in agriculture and agricultural and environmental sustainability is in fact a very high goal which, if achieved, will be a relevant innovation on a global scale. Is it possible in Cuba to change the technological paradigm that accompanies GM crops on a world scale? Will we achieve seeds that dont require the massive use of glyphosate or amino glufosinate? So how is it possible to think that the use of GMOs in Cuban agriculture can be compatible with food sovereignty, environmental sustainability, nutritional quality, and local food production systems?

From the furrow to the table: removing obstacles and obstacle-makers in food production in Cuba

Cuban agriculture, that which must provide us with fresh and healthy agricultural products for our consumption and produce raw materials so that the national food industry provides us with other products, good and healthy, has several characteristics:

Analysis on the economic-social strategy approved by the Cuban government (II)

The reforms that the Cuban government has recently announced should, within a reasonable period of time, promote the change of these characteristics with the consequent benefits in terms of yield, productivity and production. Is it necessary, then, to use GMOs in Cuban agriculture?

The yields of Cuban varieties of maize and hybrids (non-GM) obtained by scientific institutions during the last 40 years have shown that they can be achieved in production conditions between 4 and 6 t/ha.10

Recently, in a meeting with scientists who are experts in issues related to food sovereignty, the importance of bioproducts was highlighted, something far removed from GMOs.

That Cuban science should investigate this topic, follow trends and document decision-makers as much as possible, is unquestionable, but I believe there is a distance that must be kept between the above and promoting the use of GMO technologies as a way to raise yields and agricultural production in Cuba, when there are other ways that generate much less uncertainty about human health and biodiversity in our country and that are far from having exhausted their technological borders.

***

Notes:

1 Cultivos transgnicos: a qu riesgos nos exponemos? Fryre E. and Chang M.

Transgnicos. qu se gana? qu se pierde? Texts for a debate in Cuba, Fernando R. Funes- Monzote and Eduardo Freyre Roach, Publicaciones Acuario, 2009.

2 Mae-Wan Ho. Confirmed: genetic modification is dangerous and useless / 228-229. In Transgnicos. qu se gana? qu se pierde? Texts for a debate in Cuba, Fernando R. Funes- Monzote and Eduardo Freyre Roach, Publicaciones Acuario, 2009.

3 The German government, for example, prohibited Bayer from producing GMOs on German territory.

4 In March 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) classified glyphosate as Probable human carcinogen based on numerous scientific studies linking glyphosate with a variety of cancers, including non-Hodgkins lymphoma, kidney cancers, skin and pancreatic cancers. IARC initially published its conclusion in the Lancet Oncology Journal, the leading scientific journal in cancer studies worldwide. https://consumidoresorganicos.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/FICHA-TE%CC%81CNICA-DEL-GLIFOSATO.pdf

5 Main component of the orange agent used by the United States to defoliate Vietnamese forests and causing the birth of thousands of children with different types of deformations.

6 Monsanto was one of the main suppliers of the 76 million liters of herbicide with which Vietnam was sprayed from 1961 to 1972. Under the military project whose secret code was Operation Ranch Hand, the U.S. Air Force sprayed around 2.5 million hectares of the forests of southern Vietnam and cultivated fields to destroy crops. When not applied to crops, the herbicide was used to open large corridors in the jungle, preventing any concealment by Vietcong forces, especially along the roads, and making ambushes difficult.

7 This means that using the resources at hand, greater results could be obtained if done well.

8 That same potato by agroecological methods manages to produce up to 22 tons per hectare, with zero chemicals.

9 Something that will begin to be resolved when the already announced Banco de Fomento Agropecuario is created

10 Divergencia de enfoques entre agroecologa y transgnicos, Fernando R. Funes-Monzote.

Help us keep OnCuba alive

Read more:

Should Cuba promote introduction of genetically modified organisms in agriculture? - OnCubaNews

The Global Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market is Projected to reach USD 11.2 Billion in 2025 from USD 5.1 Billion in 2020, at a CAGR of 17.0 % -…

Dublin, July 28, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- The "Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market by Technology (CRISPR, TALEN, ZFN, Antisense), Product & Service, Application (Cell Line Engineering, Genetic Engineering, Diagnostics, Drug Discovery & Development), End-User and Region - Global Forecast to 2025" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

Rising government funding and increase in the number of genomic projects, especially in the area of rare diseases, and a growing application horizon are all expected to drive the growth of the genome editing/genome engineering market.

Market growth is largely driven by factors such as the rise in government funding, growth in the number of genomics projects, high prevalence of infectious diseases & cancer, technological advancements, increasing production of genetically modified crops, and growing application areas of genomics. However, the high cost of genomic equipment will restrain the growth of this market.

Based on technology, the market is segmented into CRISPR, TALEN, ZFN, antisense, and other technologies. CRISPR accounted for the largest share of the genome editing/genome engineering market in 2019. The large share of this segment can be attributed to the ease of use associated with the CRISPR technology and its ability to multiplex.

By end-user, the genome editing/genome engineering market is segmented into pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies, and academic & government research institutes. The pharmaceutical companies segment accounted for the largest share of the market. The pharmaceutical companies segment accounted for the largest share of the genome editing/genome engineering market in 2019. This is due to the increasing prevalence of infectious diseases and cancer, which is driving research in the pharma sector for drug development.

The Asia Pacific is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period. Factors such as the rapid growth in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industry, the rising number of genomic projects, and the presence of a genetically diverse population have supported the region's high growth rate.

Key Topics Covered:

1 Introduction

2 Research Methodology

3 Executive Summary

4 Premium Insights

5 Market Overview5.1 Introduction5.2 Market Dynamics: Drivers, Opportunities, and Challenges5.3 Value Chain Analysis5.4 Impact of Covid-19 Outbreak on the Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market

6 Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market, by Technology6.1 Introduction6.2 CRISPR6.3 Talen6.4 ZFN6.5 Antisense6.6 Other Technologies

7 Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market, by Application7.1 Introduction7.2 Cell Line Engineering7.3 Genetic Engineering7.4 Diagnostic Applications7.5 Drug Discovery & Development7.6 Other Applications

8 Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market, by Product & Service8.1 Introduction8.2 Reagents & Consumables8.3 Software & Systems8.4 Services

9 Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market, by End-user9.1 Introduction9.2 Pharmaceutical Companies9.3 Biotechnology Companies

10 Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market, by Region

11 Competitive Landscape11.1 Introduction11.2 Market Ranking Analysis11.3 Market Evaluation Framework11.4 Competitive Leadership Mapping11.4.1 Visionary Leaders11.4.2 Dynamic Differentiators11.4.3 Innovators11.4.4 Emerging Companies11.5 Competitive Scenario11.5.1 Key Product Launches11.5.2 Key Partnerships & Collaborations11.5.3 Key Acquisitions

12 Company ProfilesBusiness Overview, Products and Services Offered, Recent Developments, the Author's View12.1 Thermo Fisher Scientific12.2 Merck12.3 Horizon Discovery12.4 Genscript12.5 Sangamo Therapeutics12.6 Lonza12.7 Editas Medicine12.8 CRISPR Therapeutics12.9 Eurofins Scientific12.10 Precision Biosciences12.11 Oxford Genetics12.12 Intellia Therapeutics12.13 Synthego12.14 Vigene Biosciences12.15 Epigenie12.16 Integrated DNA Technologies12.17 New England Biolabs12.18 Origene Technologies12.19 Transposagen Biopharmaceuticals12.20 Creative Biogene

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/xk0ikg

About ResearchAndMarkets.comResearchAndMarkets.com is the world's leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

Research and Markets also offers Custom Research services providing focused, comprehensive and tailored research.

Go here to read the rest:

The Global Genome Editing/Genome Engineering Market is Projected to reach USD 11.2 Billion in 2025 from USD 5.1 Billion in 2020, at a CAGR of 17.0 % -...

An Eco-Terrorist Who Destroyed A Sunflower Field Is Called An Environmental Hero. There’s Just One Problem… – Science 2.0

Marie Gangneux is co-president the organic food company Alterna'Bio so it's no surprise she hates science. It's not even a surprise she commits eco-terrorism.

What is a surprise is that she knows so little science that when she committed eco-terrorism against a "GM" sunflower field she didn't realize they were actually created using Mutagenesis. Which is not a GMO, it has been used for 2,000 different plants, many of them labeled organic. Eat organic lettuce? You're probably eating a genetically modified food, but since organic food activists need to think science began in 1998 to exempt their own products, they leave out awkward facts like that their organic strains were created using chemical and radiation baths to force mutations. If they ignore all genetic engineering they can argue that no science was involved in the creation of their goods.

These people are just goofy. If you think you see Jesus in your food, you are their target customer:

Gangneux is being lauded as a champion of the organic movement because she is willing to commit violence. Again, no surprise. But what is a surprise is that they read us and have started to notice that mutagenesis is science; just different science than GMO or RNAi or CRISPR-Cas9. We have criticized organic industry trade groups for 13 years due to their hypocrisy in putting Non-GMO Project and USDA Organic labels on foods they know were created using a precursor to GMOs; the less precise mutagenesis that transgenes made safer and better.

GMOs literally made impossible the Frankenfoods that mutagenesis or, worse, all natural high-energy cosmic rays in the environment, could allow. And with the battle in Europe against GMOs won or lost, depending on who you ask, they need to find new fields to destroy or else eNGOs and organic food lobbying groups are out of business.

To rationalize terrorism, these groups need to call mutagenesis "new GMOs", as they did with the VrTH sunflowers they ransacked for a publicity stunt. Even though they are using a process common since the 1950s, again with 2,000 plants that can all be considered organic.

Terrorists are never the most literate lot. You don't strap suicide bombs onto your best and brightest. Russian influence in Europe encourages these modern day "useful idiots", because agriculture is one of their largest exports. And with a wave of a pen declaring almost all of their food is "organic" - no outside verification allowed - Russia wants to block its competition in Europe so they can prosper from the label they gave themselves. They love people like Gangneux, Russia Today and Sputnik are probably retweeting articles about her right now. But it's still a criminal act, if Europe would stand against violence the way they stand against science.

See the original post:

An Eco-Terrorist Who Destroyed A Sunflower Field Is Called An Environmental Hero. There's Just One Problem... - Science 2.0

Draper to Build on its Biosecurity Tool Development for IARPA – PR Web

Smaller than a postage stamp, Drapers custom miniaturized microarray can be equipped with up to 10,000 surface probes to help identify genetically engineered organisms in soil and water.

CAMBRIDGE, Mass. (PRWEB) July 28, 2020

Advances in gene editing technology and improved access via the web have substantially increased the prevalence of engineered organisms in our world. Benefits range from pest-free crops to reduction in the spread of infectious diseases, but along with these advantages comes a need to identify good bioengineering from the kind that might pose a threat.

To address this challenge, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has contracted with Draper to develop new kinds of detection systems that can identify whether engineered organisms have been created from natural organisms. Officials at ODNIs Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) have awarded Draper a two-year Phase 2 contract under its Finding Engineering-Linked Indicators (FELIX) program, for a total contract value worth $7.8 million.

The award calls for Draper to continue development of two distinct lab-based genetic tests, custom bioinformatics pipelines that contextualize DNA sequencing data, and miniaturized microarray hardware with a specialized design. The devicesmaller than a postage stampallows multiple rounds of genetic tests on any organism, from a broad variety of sources including soil and water. Potential applications include biothreat detection, environmental monitoring and food inspection.

The microarray can be equipped with up to 10,000 surface probes to help identify genetic engineering. The device and associated lab methods combined are sensitive enough to pick out a ratio of a single engineered organism against a complex environmental background containing millions of natural organismsa signal-to-noise ratio that is a significant improvement over current methods.

Kirsty McFarland, molecular microbiologist and Principal Investigator on Drapers FELIX program, says the technologies under development will be able to detect genetic signatures that are not accessible with current technologies. Current methods for detecting engineered organisms, in soil for example, read only a subset of all the genetic material thats present in the sample, typically through next-generation sequencing. That process inherently misses information and does not reveal important genetic context, she said. She noted that one gram of soil may contain up to one billion microbial genomes.

To accompany each genetic identification system, Draper also developed two custom bioinformatics tools, which include a computational pipeline and visual dashboard that convert lab data into actionable intelligence that users can see on a computer screen.

Drapers FELIX contract is the result of close collaboration between the Synthetic Biology group and Drapers Special Programs Office.

Draper At Draper, we believe exciting things happen when new capabilities are imagined and created. Whether formulating a concept and developing each component to achieve a field-ready prototype or combining existing technologies in new ways, Draper engineers apply multidisciplinary approaches that deliver new capabilities to customers. As a not-for-profit engineering innovation company, Draper focuses on the design, development and deployment of advanced technological solutions for the worlds most challenging and important problems. We provide engineering solutions directly to government, industry and academia; work on teams as prime contractor or subcontractor; and participate as a collaborator in consortia. We provide unbiased assessments of technology or systems designed or recommended by other organizationscustom designed, as well as commercial-off-the-shelf. http://www.draper.com

Share article on social media or email:

See the original post:

Draper to Build on its Biosecurity Tool Development for IARPA - PR Web

RNA and DNA Extraction Kit Market – Expanding Appropriation of Customized Prescription Demand for RNA and DNA Extraction Kits – BioSpace

RNA and DNA extraction plays a crucial role in cancer genetic studies, which involves mutation analysis, comparative genomic hybridization, and microsatellite analysis. The rising incidences of cancer globally are creating a need for the advanced RNA and DNA extraction kit and are expected to drive market growth in the coming years.

Based on the product, the market is expected to segregate into RNA extraction kit and DNA extraction kit. Of these, the DNA extraction kit segment is expected to account for the leading share in the overall RNA and DNA extraction kit market. Additionally, the applications of DNA extraction kits mainly in the genetic engineering of animals and plants in pharmaceutical manufacturing. This is expected to fuel growth of RNA and DNA extraction kit market.

Get Brochure of the Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=B&rep_id=5600

Global RNA and DNA Extraction Kit Market: Notable Developments

Some of the most prominent competitors operating in the competitive landscape of global RNA and DNA extraction kit market include

Global RNA and DNA Extraction Kit Market: Drivers and Restraints

The rise and progress in customized drug have helped social insurance experts create exact sub-atomic focused on treatment dependent on a person's hereditary cosmetics and prescient information explicit to patients. The advancement of customized medication requires genome-mapping investigations of separated cells, which can be completed with the assistance of DNA and RNA extraction kits. DNA extraction kits are utilized to recognize quality polymorphisms identified with sickness or medication digestion though RNA extraction kits are utilized to break down RNA combination in separated cells. With the expanding appropriation of customized prescription, the demand for RNA and DNA extraction kits will likewise develop.

Buy this Premium Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/checkout?rep_id=5600&ltype=S

There is a developing rate of malignant growth over the globe. The inside and out understanding of tumor hereditary qualities given by trend-setting innovations in malignant growth research has empowered the advancement of novel treatments to battle disease-causing qualities. The virtue, amount, and nature of separated RNA assume a huge job in the accomplishment of RNA examination and examination and consequent capacity of specific quality articulation. RNA extraction likewise helps in recognizing circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and non-intrusive observing of cutting edge malignant growths.

Global RNA and DNA Extraction Kit Market: Regional Outlook

On the basis of region, the RNA and DNA extraction kit market is segmented into North America, Europe, Latin America, Asia Pacific, and the Middle East & Africa. Of these, North America is expected to dominate the global RNA and DNA extraction kit market owing to robust innovation procedures running in the region. This factor is expected to offer robust growth opportunities to key players in RNA and DNA extraction kit market. Additionally, increasing demand for the automated systems coupled with the rising need for the RNA and DNA extraction kit across the extraction kits especially in the medical diagnosis is expected to drive growth of the market in coming years.

Get Table of Content of the Report @ https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=T&rep_id=5600

About TMR Research

TMR Research is a premier provider of customized market research and consulting services to business entities keen on succeeding in todays supercharged economic climate. Armed with an experienced, dedicated, and dynamic team of analysts, we are redefining the way our clients conduct business by providing them with authoritative and trusted research studies in tune with the latest methodologies and market trends.

Contact:

Rohit Bhisey

TMR Research,

3739 Balboa St # 1097,

San Francisco, CA 94121

United States

Tel: +1-415-520-1050

Visit Site: https://www.tmrresearch.com/

See the rest here:

RNA and DNA Extraction Kit Market - Expanding Appropriation of Customized Prescription Demand for RNA and DNA Extraction Kits - BioSpace

Viral Vector and Plasmid DNA Testing Services Market Estimated to Expand at a Robust CAGR over 2029 – Owned

Global Viral Vector and Plasmid DNA Testing Services market: Overview

The global viral vector and plasmid DNA testing services market is estimated to be influenced by the increased innovation and spending in research and development activities relating to the field. Viral vectorsare those tools that are popular amongst the molecular biologists and they make wide use of these tools to deliver genetic materials into cells. This same procedure can be conducted in cell culture (in vitro) or inside a living organism (in vivo). Viruses have developed into specialized molecular mechanisms in a bid to carry their genomes inside the cells that they infect. On the other hand, plasmids are small DNA molecules, which are separated physically from the chromosomal DNA and then they are able to replicate on their own. Abundantly found in bacteria as double-stranded, circular DNA molecules, these organisms are utilized widely in laboratories of biotechnology and genetic engineering. It is there where they are utilized for the purpose of amplifying and cloning or expressing certain types of genes.

Get Exclusive PDF Sample Copy Of This Report:https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=B&rep_id=6587

The players in the global viral vector and plasmid DNA testing services market are increasingly focusing on the invention of new techniques in a bid to better the characterization of viral vectors is estimated drive the demand for the testing services over the period of analysis, from 2019 to 2029.

The global viral vector and plasmid DNA testing services market has been segmented based on testing services, end user, and region. The main objective of providing such a comprehensive report is to provide a deep insight into the market.

Global Viral Vector and Plasmid DNA Testing Services market: Notable Developments

The global viral vector and plasmid DNA testing services market has witnessed some of the major developments in the last few years. One such significant development of the market is mentioned below:

Some of the key market players of the viral vector and plasmid DNA testing services market comprise the following

Buy This Report @https://www.tmrresearch.com/checkout?rep_id=6587<ype=S

Global Viral Vector and Plasmid DNA Testing Services Market: Growth Drivers

Inorganic Growth Strategies Likely to Shape Contours of the Market

Viral vectors are customized as per their requirements in certain specific applications but these vectors usually come with a few key characteristics, such as safety, low toxicity, stability, cell type specificity, and identification. These properties of viral vectors are likely to play an important role in supporting growth of the global viral vector and plasmid DNA testing services market. Viral vectors are seldom created from pathogenic viruses and they are altered in such a way that the risk of handling is minimized. Besides, viral vector causes no or minimal effect on the physiology of the infected cell.

A rise in the focus of market players on the development of innovative technologies in an attempt to improve characterization of viral vectors is likely to encourage development of the global viral vector and plasmid DNA testing services market in the years to come. A case in point is the development of Vac-Man 96 Vacuum Manifold by US-based Promega Corporation. This invention supports the processing of SV 96 plates for PCR product, genomic, and plasmid purification. The product finds utilization in Wizard SV 96 plasmid DNA purification system to isolate plasmid DNA.

Global Viral Vector and Plasmid DNA Testing Services market: Regional Outlook

In the global viral vector and plasmid DNA testing services market, North America is likely to emerge as one of the prominent regions in market. Such growth of the region is attributed to the various inorganic growth strategies taken by market players such as acquisitions, partnerships, and mergers. These strategies are taken to strengthen and widen the product portfolio of the market players present in the region. This factor is likely to boost the growth of the North America in the years to come.

The global viral vector and plasmid DNA testing services market is segmented as:

Testing Services

End User

To know more about the table of contents, you can click @https://www.tmrresearch.com/sample/sample?flag=T&rep_id=6587

About TMR Research

TMR Research is a premier provider of customized market research and consulting services to busi-ness entities keen on succeeding in todays supercharged economic climate. Armed with an experi-enced, dedicated, and dynamic team of analysts, we are redefining the way our clients conduct business by providing them with authoritative and trusted research studies in tune with the latest methodologies and market trends.

See the original post here:

Viral Vector and Plasmid DNA Testing Services Market Estimated to Expand at a Robust CAGR over 2029 - Owned

Cosmo the Bull Calf Has Been Genetically Engineered to Produce 75% Male Offspring – Interesting Engineering

Genetic engineering can produce some pretty scary results. Just recently, scientists at the University of California, Davis, developed a bull calf, named Cosmo, who is capable of producing 75%male (or at least male-looking) offspring.

RELATED:11 FACTS ABOUT GENETIC ENGINEERING AND WHY IT'S IMPORTANT

The bull was genome-edited as an embryo using CRISPR technology. This method allows researchers to make targeted cuts to the genome or insert useful genes.

In Cosmo's case, scientists successfully inserted the cattle with the SRY gene. This gene controls the development of male features. The experiment marks the first demonstration of a targeted gene insertion for large sequences of DNA via embryo-mediated genome editing in cattle and it is made to produce cattle that look like males.

We anticipate Cosmos offspring that inherit this SRY gene will grow and look like males, regardless of whether they inherit a Y chromosome, said Alison Van Eenennaam, animal geneticist with the UC Davis Department of Animal Science.

As scary as the procedure may be, it could prove beneficial for the environment. Male cattle are about 15% more efficient at converting feed into weight gain, making them more fuel-efficient than females.

Ranchers could produce some females as replacements and direct a higher proportion of male cattle for market, said Joey Owen, a postdoctoral researcher in animal science who is leading the project with Van Eenennaam.

The project took two and a half years to develop the method to insert a gene into the developing embryo. It then saw another two years dedicated to successfully establishing a pregnancy.

And it is just the beginning of the researchers' work. When Cosmo reaches sexual maturity in a year, he will be bred to study if the experiment was indeed successful in producing offspring that will grow to look like males.

Cosmo and his offspring, however, will never enter the food supply. This is becausethe Food and Drug Administration regulates gene-editing of animals as if they were drugs.

What do you think of this initiative? Can it lead to a more environmentally friendly production of beef or is it a scary development in genetic engineering?

See the original post:

Cosmo the Bull Calf Has Been Genetically Engineered to Produce 75% Male Offspring - Interesting Engineering

Impact of Covid-19 on Genome Editing Market 2020: set to witness adamant growth with Top Key Players Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Merck KGaA,…

Global Genome Editing Market has been brewing up and influencing the international economy with respect to revenue, growth rate, sale, market share, and size. The Global Genome Editing Marketresearch report provides a rational explanation to the reader to understand fundamental attributes of the Genome Editing industry, which includes lucrative business strategies, market demands, leading players of the market, and growth prospects.

This is the only report that is inclusive of the current effect of the coronavirus on the market and its future trends. The coronavirus has widely impacted the world economy, and its aftereffects are elucidated in detail in the report for the Genome Editing market.

The sample of the report can be availed by [emailprotected] https://www.reportsanddata.com/sample-enquiry-form/1052

In the beginning, the report adds market properties, business stratagem, industry structure, issues, and industry effectiveness.The study ensures that the user is made aware of the prevailing market situations and the strategies that are employed for beneficial results. The report conducts a meticulous study of the past trends of the market; therefore, it provides very accurate and realistic speculations of the industry in the forecast period, i.e., from 2020-2026.

In market segmentation by manufacturers, the report covers the following companies-

Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Merck KGaA, GenScript, Horizon Discovery Group Plc, Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc, Lonza, New England Biolabs and Sangamo Therapeutics, Inc.

The Genome Editing report consists of streamlined financial data obtained from various research sources to draw specific and accurate projections, along with an in-depth analysis of the market trends of the Genome Editing industry and the factors that affect its functioning. Also, the factors are segmented into drivers and restraints for increased comprehensibility and understanding.

This research report has all the information you need to device optimum market strategies.

Type Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2016 2026)Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nucleases (TALEN)Zinc Finger Nucleases (ZFN)Others

Application Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2016 2026)Animal Genetic EngineeringTherapeutic ApplicationGenetically Modified OrganismsPlant Genetic EngineeringCell Line Engineering

End User Outlook (Revenue, USD Million, 2016 2026)Pharma-Biotech CompaniesAcademic Institutes & Research CenterAgrigenomic CompaniesContract Research Organizations

Get a discount on your copy of the [emailprotected] https://www.reportsanddata.com/discount-enquiry-form/1052

Major highlights of the global Genome Editing market report:

The report depicts all the analytical details in a well-structured manner, for example, in the statistics, graphs, tables, through which users can more easily grasp detailing. Moreover, it discusses accurate forecasts and gives a detailed research methodology.

Key Questions Answered in This Report Are:

Customization on the report is available according to the requirements of the user to ensure maximum utility to the reader and an increased level of comprehensibility.

Read the full Research Report along with a table of contents, facts and figures, charts, graphs, etc. @ https://www.reportsanddata.com/report-detail/genome-editing-market

To summarize, the global Genome Editing market report studies the contemporary market to forecast the growth prospects, challenges, opportunities, risks, threats, and the trends observed in the market that can either propel or curtail the growth rate of the industry. The market factors impacting the global sector also include provincial trade policies, international trade disputes, entry barriers, and other regulatory restrictions.

Link:

Impact of Covid-19 on Genome Editing Market 2020: set to witness adamant growth with Top Key Players Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Merck KGaA,...

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Market: Diagnostic Labs and Hospitals to Witness Promising Growth – BioSpace

Increasing Investments to Help Market Development

There are several factors that are responsible for the overall development of the global polymerase chain reaction market. One of the key development factors for the global market has been increasing investments in the activities of research and development. In addition to this, emergence of digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technologies have become highly useful for cancer diagnosis as well treatment. This too has emerged as a key driving factor for the development of the global market. Furthermore, innovations and developments in pharmacogenomics and growing trend of self-diagnosis of disorders as a preventive measure are also expected to work in favor of the growth of the global polymerase chain reaction (PCR) market in the coming years of the forecast period. In recent years, the activities of research and development have considerably increased in the field of forensic science, genetic engineering, and advanced molecular biology. This too has worked in favor of the development of the global polymerase chain reaction (PCR) market.

However, there are a few factors that are projected to impede the development of the global polymerase chain reaction (PCR) market in the coming years. These challenges are projected to stop the market from reaching its full potential. One of the key restraining factors for the market development has been the emergence of alternative technologies. Some of the new and upcoming alternative technologies are next gen sequencing. In addition to this, high costs associated with some of the prominent polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technologies are also projected to impede the growth of the market in the near future.

Request Brochure of Report https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=B&rep_id=830

The global polymerase chain reaction (PCR) market is primarily segmented based on type of product and end user. Based on the type of product, the global market is mainly segmented into consumables, reagents, and instruments. Among these, the segment of reagents has been the most dominant one in terms of value. This dominance of the segment is due to its high levels of consumption. This segment is expected to witness a promising CAGR in the coming years of the forecast period because of the rising innovation in the field of specificity of reagents. In addition to this, large scale availability of different types of tests which need different types of reagents, increasing geriatric population, growing prevalence of infectious diseases, and increasing demand for innovation in specificity of reagents are some of the other factors helping to drive overall growth of the reagent segment.

Request for Analysis of COVID19 Impact on Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Market https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=7830

The segment of instruments is further segmented into digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems, RT PCR systems, and standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems. Of these, the sub segment of the RT polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is projected to account for a greater chunk in the global market in the coming years of the forecast period. However, the sub segment of digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is expected to witness a highly promising CAGR in the near future.

Diagnostic Labs and Hospitals to Witness Promising Growth

Based on end user, the global market for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is segmented into research and academic organizations, clinical diagnostics hospitals and labs, and pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. Among these, the segment of pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries account for a larger share in the global market. Constant advancements and developments in the fields of biotechnology as well pharmaceutical is projected to be the key driving factor for the development of the segment. These developments are also helping researchers and scientists to determine new gene expressions, genetic variations, and novel genes in the tissue of an organism.

Request for Custom Research - https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=CR&rep_id=830

On the other hand, the segment of clinical diagnostics labs and hospitals is expected to witness a highly promising CAGR in the coming years of the forecast period. This growth of the segment is primarily driven due to the increasing prevalence of cancer and other prominent infectious disorders across the globe.

North America to Continue Leading Global Market

Based on geography, the global polymerase chain reaction (PCR) market is segmented into five key regions viz. North America, Latin America, Middle East and Africa, Europe, and Asia Pacific. Among these, the regional segment of North America has been the most dominant one in recent years. The growth of the regional market can be attributed to the matured and developed healthcare infrastructure present in North America. In addition to this, in recent years, there has been a growing advent of automated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) instruments. This, coupled with improved spending power and affordability of these instruments have also helped in improving the development of the regional market.

Buy Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Market Report at https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/checkout.php?rep_id=830&ltype=S

Major players operating in the global PCR market include Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., QIAGEN N.V., F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. Becton, Dickinson and Company, Abbott, Siemens Healthcare GmbH (Siemens AG), bioMrieux SA, Danaher Corporation, and Agilent Technologies. Key players are expanding their product portfolio through mergers & acquisitions and partnerships & collaborations with leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and by offering technologically advanced products.

About Us

Transparency Market Research is a next-generation market intelligence provider, offering fact-based solutions to business leaders, consultants, and strategy professionals.

Our reports are single-point solutions for businesses to grow, evolve, and mature. Our real-time data collection methods along with ability to track more than one million high growth niche products are aligned with your aims. The detailed and proprietary statistical models used by our analysts offer insights for making right decision in the shortest span of time. For organizations that require specific but comprehensive information we offer customized solutions through ad hoc reports. These requests are delivered with the perfect combination of right sense of fact-oriented problem solving methodologies and leveraging existing data repositories.

TMR believes that unison of solutions for clients-specific problems with right methodology of research is the key to help enterprises reach right decision.

ContactMr. Rohit BhiseyTransparency Market ResearchState Tower,90 State Street,Suite 700,Albany NY - 12207United StatesUSA - Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453Email: sales@transparencymarketresearch.comWebsite: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/

See the rest here:

Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Market: Diagnostic Labs and Hospitals to Witness Promising Growth - BioSpace

British people won’t thank the NFU for its stance on gene editing – The Grocer

Farmers popularity has shot up. The general public used to ignore them or view them as subsidy junkies. Now, as the people who put food on our plates during the Covid-19 crisis, they are enjoying levels of gratitude unprecedented since the Second World War.

The NFU has increased this goodwill by campaigning to prevent the import of US foods produced in ways that would be illegal here. Its high-profile petition to that effect gathered over one million signatures, and certainly heaped pressure on the multiples to say no to chlorinated chicken.

But this tentative trust the public feels towards farmers would surely evaporate if consumers realised the NFU was lobbying hard for gene editing thats turbocharged genetic engineering, only with a less threatening name. The NFU backed an amendment to the Agriculture Bill that would allow ministers to change the law in England.

It would mean that gene editing would not be classified as genetic modification and could just be slipped quietly into our food system, even though it poses the same potential safety risks.

So if the NFU is truly defending higher UK food standards, why is it simultaneously enabling the introduction of this controversial technology that the British public, if asked, would surely reject? A 2017 survey for The Grocer by Harris Interactive showed 45% of Brits were concerned about genetically modified grain.

The NFU says gene editing will put the UK in a world-leading position to showcase sustainable climate-friendly farming. But as a national organisation, why is it lobbying for a change that would put England at odds with Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, which have banned GM crops and feel no need to change the definition?

Lawyers acting on behalf of the NFU have also been in court battling to overturn an EU ban on neonicotinoid pesticides, linked to harming bees. As lawsuits for alleged human health damage caused by glyphosate pile up in the US, NFU spokespeople take to the airwaves to say that they cant farm without it.

That petition? I signed it, but the NFU is no peoples food champion.

Read the original:

British people won't thank the NFU for its stance on gene editing - The Grocer

Facing taboos: Conversation with GLP’s Jon Entine on sustainable agriculture, race and sports, ‘Jewish genetics’ and social investing – Genetic…

Jon Entine is an American science writer. He is the founder and executive director of the Genetic Literacy Project, a nonprofit that educates the public about the revolution in biomedicine and agricultural biotechnology. He was formerly a fellow at the Institute for Food and Agricultural Literacy at the University of California, Davis, the Center for Health & Risk Communication at George Mason University, and at the American Enterprise Institute. After working as a network news writer, producer and head of documentaries for NBC News and ABC News from 1974-1994, Entine moved into scholarly research and print journalism.

Entine has written seven books, four on genetics and chemical risk, and hasaddressed a range of controversial issues,includingthe genetics of sports; the shared ancestry of Jews, Christians and Muslims; socially responsible investing; and why organic farming will not scale to produce sustainable food. He is a contributing columnist and writer for dozens of newspapers and magazines. He has was won 19 major journalism awards including two Emmys, three CINE, Ohio State Award, Chris Award, Best Feature Film Interntional Sport Film Festival, and a National Press Club Award for Consumer Journalism.Much of this interview appeared originally in European Scientist and was conducted by science journalist Grgoire Canlorbe.

Grgoire Canlorbe:You carefully investigated the genetic underpinnings of the over-representation of blacks in many high profile sports. Could you remind us of the fruits of your inquiry? Why do whites dominate strength related positions and events in so many sportsand why are blacks so poorly represented in some major sports, such as swimming?

Jon Entine:I think its phenomenal, really startling that if you look at the major sports around the world: track and field, football in Europe, American football, baseball, and basketball, which is an international sport, you see a very odd distribution of which athletes do the best in various sports. In many of the sports, the ones that require speed, quick reaction time, things like global and American football or basketball or sprinting, its utter dominance by athletes of West African ancestry.

In long distance running, which requires endurance, you see the dominance of East Africans and a few North Africans, whose ancestors evolved in higher altitudes, shaping their physique and physiology. You look at strength events, and you see dominance of East Europeans and Euro-Asians with very minimal representation of those of African ancestry. These arent just recent aberrations.

These patterns have persisted for decades and have actually become more pronounced as the playing field got more level, so natural talent could emerge and environmental factors were at a minimum. Once the influence of performance enhancement drugs during the 1960s, 70s, and 89s driven by Russia and the Eastern bloc dissipated, which distorted who were the best athletes, we saw these patterns become even more pronounced around the world. And I think the more you research this, the more you understand that at the elite level of athletic competition, we are very much a product of our genetics and the patterns reflect evolution in different geographical areas.

This is not a black/white issue or an issue of race as we have traditionally used the term. Its about regions of evolutionary origin. Phenotypes and genotypes are shaped by thousands of years of evolution. Although some characteristics seem to loosely correlated with traditional, folkloric notions of race, many do not. Just look at the difference in body types and athletic skill sets of distance running East Africans and elite athletes who trace their primary descent to West Africa. The differences in physiology and physique may be small in the case of some characteristics, and there is a great deal of overlap, but those differences are magnified at the elite level of sports competition where a fraction of a second can make the difference between winning a gold medal or being an also ran.

Social factors alone or even significantly cannot explain why the top two thousand all time 100 meter times are held by a person of West African ancestry yet West Africans are almost nonexistent at the elite level of medium and long distance running. I addressed many of these issues, along with the toxic history of race science, in my book Taboo: Why Black Athletes Dominate Sports and Why Were Afraid to Talk About It. Although the book is now 20 years old, and some data are dated, the arguments in the book are now mainstream science and genetics. It was actually based on a documentary that I wrote and produced back in 1989 with Tom Brokaw, Black Athletes: Fact and Fiction.

The idea that anybody can grow up and become an elite athlete with the proper training and opportunities is just not supported by what we know of genetics. Genetics is not destiny, but I would say that genetics is like designing a house. You can tidy up the rooms a little bit, you can move things around, but generally speaking, who you are is like the house itself. Once its built, its set, and these predeterminations are the result tens of thousands of years of evolution.

That said, there are always cultural and genetic factors in play. There is a biocultural feedback loop in sports in which culture helps magnify small but meaningful biologically-based differences. People say, Oh, there are few blacks in ice hockey, for instance. Well, ice hockey is played in northern climates, and there have been relatively few blacks in Canada or in Europe, historically. So, the number of blacks is almost representative of the number of blacks in those regions. And some sports, like gymnastics, for instance, or swimming, require a lot of training. They require facilities, pools that are very expensive. Social opportunity has largely excluded minorities. The more factors that cost a lot of money, like the availability of expensive facilities, then, cultural and social factors come into play.

The sports that I cited: running, football, soccer, and basketball which are usually state sponsored or sponsored by schoolssports like those represent a level playing field. It doesnt require special financial advantages to be a great long-distance runner or sprinter. Its really natural talent that comes to the fore. So, its best to think of sports as a biocultural phenomenonsports success. And the lower the cultural barriers to entry, the more genetic factors come into play. And those genetic based differences are not distributed equally among populations. In running, blacks of West African ancestry dominate the sprints, totally. In long distance running, blacks of East African ancestry dominate. And thats purely a result of our genetic history.

Grgoire Canlorbe:It has been hypothesized that race differences in intelligence and in psychopathy should be connected to the severity of encountered winters over tens of thousands of years of evolutionary timewith Caucasians and a fortiori Northeast Asians having faced the coldest winters and consequently evolved the higher IQs and the lower psychopathy levels necessary to navigate difficult environmental circumstances. Do you endorse this alleged connection?

Jon Entine:Well, there has been some speculation on that controversial issue by evolutionary psychologists and others, as well as some geneticists, that some people embrace and some people do not. One of the suppositions is that evolution does shape who we are physically, and there are group differencesoverlapping but real. We know that. And so, some people have asked, if genetics shape us physically, and we see the examples in sports, it must shape us psychologically and intellectually, as well. And theres belief among many scientists that there are patterns of differences based at IQ testsalthough many people like to dismiss them as unimportant or pseudo-science or racist. I think theres profound evidence and belief within the psychometric community that IQ tests are very real measurements of a kind of intelligence. But how much of the differences are the result of evolutionary factors versus environmental and cultural factors, including those that impact biology, such as natal and childhood development. Obviously environmental factors predominant in explaining patterns of differences.

But there is speculation that evolutionary factors are in play as well. As one theory goes, people who evolved in climates that were more rigorous, cold climates, northern climates, lets say East Asians, Northern Asians, whites from northern Europe, forged unique survival techniques. So that may be a form of intelligence, its claimed by some: how do you survive in that harsh environment? You have to build infrastructures that allow you to survive in harsh winters. But if youre living and evolving in an area where the temperature is more temperate, then you dont have the same survival challenges, and its not as challenging on your brain. Thats a theory anyway. So one of the theories in evolutionary psychology is that that there is some link between certain expressions of intelligence and whether you evolved in a cold climate versus a milder or warmer climate.

As for the alleged population-based differences in psychopathyI think its a very speculative claim. I think its something that science could explore over time, as all issues of what drives behavior is worth understanding. But were not in an area hard evidence. Were in the area of theories that make sense based on what we observe anecdotally

Stephen Gould, a famous, now deceased evolutionary biologist, believed that these kinds of stories were what he called just so stories, meaning that they sound good, but you really cant prove them. And I think this issue falls into that category. But on the other hand, it offers some reasonable explanation, like Occams razor, of why certain factors are reasonably like to be true. And so, I think its definitely something that, if you were someone trying to make sense of the unfolding of history, you would explore this is as a possibility. I dont think we have enough understanding of genetics, though, to say for sure that this his is a really persuasive argument in this case.

Grgoire Canlorbe:It is not uncommon to invoke the Beckerian claim that free competition between economic firms tends to evacuate racial discrimination in that those of firms which are basing recruitment on race rather than on work efficiency are allegedly disadvantaged with respect to their competitors. Does this line of thought capture the actual functioning of market economiesin America and elsewhere?

Jon Entine:I think it depends on what you want in a competition. If its purely an IQ competition, then, youd want the highest IQ people to win. If its a competition, like an athletic one, for the fastest runner, the person could be a total jerk and not be particularly smart, but if theyre the fastest runner, theyre going to win. Now, in a complex society, the leaders who emerge are going to have a whole suite of qualities, not just intelligence, not just drive, personality characteristics like sociability. And so, youre going be wanting many factors, many qualities, in leaders, besides just naked intelligence, if that even exists. And anytime you introduce a qualifying factor like race, it distorts the analysis. Now, you could argue that you want race as a factor because lack of racial diversity leads to a misperception of how the world really is.

So you can make an argument for it. But theres no question that if you only have the tallest people, or you only have the smartest people, or you only have some special factor that you tease out, youre going to leave out other, potentially hugely important, leadership and achievement qualities. I think its potentially dangerous that race be used as a factor if its over-exaggerated and it ends up discriminating against people who otherwise would be better able to perform in that situation.

Grgoire Canlorbe:Please tell us about the DNA of Abrahams Children. Do the genetic and historic data support Arthur Koestlers thesis that Ashkenazi Jews, instead of descending from the Ancient Hebrews, are the descendants of the pagan Khazars who purportedly converted en masse between the 8thand 10thcenturies? Or the claim that Jesus was ethnically Galilean and, also, partially Greekand virtually indistinguishable from Romans in appearance?

Jon Entine:I addressed this issue and the genetic history of Jews in my book,Abrahams Children: Race, Identity and the DNA of the Chosen People.

In the wake of World War II, during which many Jews were killed in the Holocaust, a well-known journalist of the 1950s, Arthur Koestler, tried to take the sting out of the idea that Jews were a race, which he believed was a driving factor behind the Nazi mass killings of Jews. The belief that Jews were a race was widely embraced by most everyone until the Holocaust, including who had long considered themselves a race, for many, many centuries. The word was viewed very loosely, however. It combined cultural factors with alleged physical and sociological factors, some clearly anti-Jewish. But obviously, this racialization of Jews led to a historic conflagration in World War ll.

The concept of Jews-as-race hinged somewhat on the ideas that most Jews of that time shared a common ancestry in ancient Israel. In his book The Thirteenth Tribe, Koestler propagated the idea that overwhelmingly majority of Jews, which were by then scattered around the world, actually were not descendants of the Israelites bur rather were mostly converts from Christianity, or more likely from paganism. He maintained that the large Jewish population in Eastern Europe and in parts of what is now Russia in an area once known as Khazaria were descendants of pagans who had converted to Judaism between the eighth and tenth centuries. That was the thirteenth Jewish tribe, he claimed, riffing on the Bible. Those converted Jews, primarily of Turkic origin, became the core of modern Judaism, gradually growing in number in Eastern Europe and, expanding westward, he maintained.

In essence, in an attempt to destroy the belief that Jews were a coherent race with links to the Middle East, which he believed propped up anti-Jewish racism and gave an excuse for Jews to live in a homeland in the Middle East (like many liberal Jews of the 1950s, he was opposed to the establishment of Jewish State in mostly Arab territories), he pushed the notion that Jews were converts with no ancient links. Koestlers view was widely embraced by many progressive Jews, traumatized by World War II, who wanted Judaism to shed the long-held belief that they were a race separate and apart. And, of course, many Middle Eastern Arabs embraced that theory as well, and went on to claim that it shut the door on the Jewish Biblical claim of a right of return that was a fundamental tenet for the creation of Israel. So you can guess the controversy it stirred then, and it reverberates even today. Far left Israeli radical, Shlomo Sand, wrote a best selling book, The Invention of the Jewish People, in an attempt to resurrect Koestlers speculative thesis. It became a best seller in some circles and has been cited in recent by anti-Israel groups inside and outside of Israel.

Koestler had understandable motivations, but they werent based on science. Genetic research has largely eviscerated his thesis. Weve been able to do a lot of genetic research on both Jewish men and Jewish women over the past two decades. And it appears that, although there is a sliver of truth to what Koestler claimed, its largely wrong. What we now know is that about 80 percent of males who claim Jewish ancestry, by looking at the Y chromosome and other parts of the genome of many thousand of people who claim Jewish ancestry, you can actually trace their ancestry back to the Near East, Middle East. So it indicates that they do have a history along the male lineage that traces back to what was biblical Israel.

On the female side, it looks like many females, about 50 percent, appear by their DNA to be converts, although the genetic evidence here is not as definitive. Its believed that a lot of the men left what was biblical Israel, Palestine, moved through Asia and what is now Italy to Europe and took local wives, either pagan wives or Christian converts. And so, there is a mix in Judaism. It appears there is, on the male line, mostly ancient Jewish ancestry, and on the female line, a mix.

We also do know that there were some converts from Khazaria, but it probably happened only among the elite few and numbered in the hundreds or thousands. Pagans were the majority, 98 percent of the population. By and large, its believed they were not affected by the religious practices of the elite. But the elite did convert to Judaism, based on sketchy historical evidence. It is speculated that many of them aspired to be part of the Jewish priesthood, the Aaronite line, those known as Cohanim. But because they were not born into that line, which is Biblically required, they were not accepted as priests. And so, they became essentially junior priests, a Jewish lineage known as Levites. And there is evidence of that in the genes of maybe, 12 to 15 percent of Jewish males, almost all with anecdotal evidence of Levite lineage, can trace their ancestry to Khazaria. So, there is some small truth in Koestlers claims, which is one reason it got such currency. Yes, there were some conversions in Eastern Europe, but it isnt the major seed of the Jewish population today.

As for the question about Jesus, I dont think we really have any understanding of what Jesus looked like. There are depictions of Jesus that go from light black to very Aryan looking. So, I think this is pure speculation about what Jesus actual genetic background was. But I think most of the biblical accounts, and theyre very sketchy, as I discuss inAbrahams Children, suggest that he was of Israelite ancestry, and that population was a mixture of locals and invading populations. The belief that Jews are a race is clearly flawed by there is powerful evidence that a significant portion of the modern day Jewish population traces their primary ancestry to what is now Israel. Thats science, however, not an endorsement of the Biblical claim.

Grgoire Canlorbe:While it has encountered periods of obscurantist and literalist remnants such as the burning of Maimonidess work in the 13thcentury, Judaismsince, at least, the times of the Jewish community of Alexandriahas been carrying within it Hellenizing principles such as the rationalization of the Torah, and such as the pursuit of knowledge through personal doubt and the confrontation of opinions. Has Islam gone down a similar route (towards interpretation and free inquiry) since the intellectual bubbling of Andalusia under Muslim rule?

Jon Entine:I think that many historical populations go through times of sophistication and then, fall into a retrograde period. It happened to the Egyptians, the Greeks and the Romans. You can actually see that trend in Judaism during the Middle Ages, into the 1600s, when Jews actually became very obscurantist and adopted many mystical beliefs, and were thought of as very irrational by the Christian majority. Now, they were very literate, but they were literate in a mystical kind of way; they read Jewish religious works but little else. The Christian enlightenment actually preceded the Jewish enlightenment by about a hundred years because Jews were caught into this mystical trap. But historically, Jews have always been a very literate culture.

Islam has had a much different history. It arose in the first millennial period. Muslims were by and large quite well educated in the early years of Islam. But over the centuries, theyve been back and forth between kind of a nomadic anti-intellectual history and one of intellectual inspiration. There was a period between the 8thand 14thcenturies when Islam was very dominant in Northern Africa and the Iberian peninsula, and at one point reaching to the area around Barcelona. The Muslims called their Caliphate and homeland Al Andalus. Their cities were great centers of Islamic learning, and the great libraries of the world were Islamic. Medicine advanced dramatically during this period. The period is sometimes referred to as the Ornament of History or The Ornament of the World, as for the most part, Jews and Christians lived mostly safely and in harmony with their Islamic neighbors.

The dominant intellectual group, the doctors, the legal positions of that time and the great intellectual thinkers were mostly Muslim. It is one of the only periods of tolerance among the three Abrahamic religions in history. But the rise of the Christian kingdoms ultimately crushed Muslim strongholds, and Islam never really recovered from there. Theres never been a Muslimsociety that performed at the level of Asian societies or European societies since the collapse of that era. So, there are definitely different traditions among different groups based on their cultural experiences.

Grgoire Canlorbe:As a fine connoisseur of chemophobia you cannot ignore the climate of mistrust surrounding the glyphosate. Why do you judge glyphosate and GMO farming to be far more sustainable, actually, than organic farming? What do you reply to the claim that the proponents of glyphosate should be ready to drink a glass wine of the latter if, truly, they think and intend to show that this product is half toxic as salt?

Jon Entine:Glyphosate was a product discovered literally by mistake in the 1970s, and its been used mostly as an herbicide. Scientists found that it has an ability to kill weeds inexpensively at modest toxic levels. Its toxicity is about equivalent to salt; its quite mild, not carcinogenic based on thousands of studies, and has little to no environmental footprint. Its quite a remarkable chemical concoction. Scientists in the 1980s figured out how to make commodity crops such as corn, soybeans and cotton, that tolerant to glyphosate. In other words, if you sprayed those crops, herbicide-tolerant glyphosate, originally developed and marketed as Roundup by Monsanto, which is now owned by Bayer, was one of two products that were the first out of the gate when GMO crops were introduced in the 1990s.

The other major commodity products were engineered to include a natural bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis, actually used since the 1920s by organic farmers, that made certain crops resistant to many harmful insects. Those were the first two GMO products out of the gateherbicide tolerant and insect resistantand they were enormously successful, sparking the GMO boom that began in 1996. They also became the target of anti-GMO activists for many years, even though both of those products have been found extremely effective and safe.

A problem began to develop with glyphosate, though: many weeds developed a tolerance to it. Just because thats what happens. Evolution is evolution. And if you keep spraying weeds with a certain kind of weed killer, mutations eventually happen that allow the weed to survive. And after a few years, you have a whole bunch of weeds that arent being killed by glyphosate. So, we had this explosion of weed problems by 2010 or so. It was a real issue, although weed resistance is a fact of nature with non GMO-based weed killers as well. But the issue put conventional agriculture and genetic engineering on the defensive, absolutely.

And then, a controversial study came out in 2015 by a sub-agency of the United Nations called IARCInternational Agency for Research on Cancerand it concluded that glyphosate might cause problems for applicators, people who apply glyphosate, and that they could be subject to one specific kind of cancers, non-Hodgkins lymphoma. IARC was a relatively obscure agency before that finding. And its conclusions were contradicted by every other major regulatory and research organization in the world, 18 other international agencies from WHO itself, two other WHO sub-agencies, the European Food Safety Authority, the German Food Safety Authority, the Royal Academy in London, the United States EPA, and academies in Canada, Japan, Australia and New Zealand.All concluded that there was no convincing evidence that glyphosate causes cancer, and none recommended a ban.

Click here to review 19 reviews of glyphosate by independent global regulatory bodies

So, you had one agency, IARC, that said glyphosate might cause cancer under limited circumstances. They didnt say it affected humans when traces were in our food. And all the other major agencies, 18 of them, concluded that IARC was promoting flawed science, and that they selectively misrepresented the data. And many scientists also accused IARC of being politically motivated. Reuters documented that IARC appears to manipulated data. In fact, the main IARC scientist who guided and drafted the report secretly joined the litigation team that sued Monsanto, creating an undisclosed conflict of interest. But because IARC was linked to WHO, even though it was a sub-agency not WHO itself, its conclusions were widely publicized, especially by anti-GMO activists. Its monograph scared a lot of people and has led to a lot of lawsuits. And there have now been legal cases in the US in which juries rejected the overwhelming science evidence that shows that glyphosate is not harmful. But juries can do whatever they want. Plenty of people are convicted or found innocent, independent of what the evidence really shows. And, basically, Monsanto, now Bayer, was found guilty in multiple court cases of claims that it caused non-Hodgkins lymphoma in a number of workers who handled it.

So, basically, many people are now scared of glyphosate and politicians respond to public opinion, not science. There are moves afoot to ban it, even though its the most successful and one of the least toxic herbicides one can use. Its still in wide use. But over time, I think it will be phased out. And farmers are very upset about that. I think most farmers believe its extremely safe. Scientists overwhelmingly believe its safe. The myth that glyphosate is dangerous has been kept alive, and its really part of the ongoing war that exist about what kind of food system we want to have. Yet, there is no herbicide alternative in the organic world that is as safe as glyphosate. Theyre all as or more harmful. Many natural applications suffocate beneficial insects. So, we have a choice.

At some point, we can force farmers to abandon it, have less yield and kill more beneficial insects, or we can keep it, use it appropriately, follow guidelines that are endorsed by every major science organization in the world, from Health Canada to the European Food Safety Authority, and maintain a robust agricultural system. I think that all those people who are so ideological on agriculture and who despise biotechnology, in essence, are modern Luddites. They so reject modern technology that they will sacrifice our food supply for their ideological purism.

Grgoire Canlorbe:The fight against greenhouse gas emissions is most often put on an equal footing with that against nuclear poweras well as with the fight against GMOs and advanced agricultural technologies. Do you think that biotechnology and nuclear industry, on the contrary, should be jointly put at the service of depollution? That GMOs and nuclear technology are actually good for the climate?

Jon Entine:Well, I think organic farming is based on principles that are 100-150 years old, and I cant think of any technology that we embrace today thats 100 or 150 years old and believe that somehow its the cutting-edge way to do things. If you want agriculture to be sustainable; you need to have the most advanced and wisest science-based practices. Organic farming promotes soil health, and thats an emulatable goal. But there are so many other aspects to organic farming that are just outdated. Theres the belief that anything thats natural is betterthat if we put natural chemicals on plants, theyre going to be healthier. But organic farming uses copper sulfate, for instance, which is carcinogenic to humans and very dangerous: it kills beneficial insects. Thats clearly something that we wouldnt want to use if we had alternatives. Biotechnology, GMO farming, can be used inappropriately too, but it also offers many potential advantages because you can use weed killers that are focused specifically on weeds and preserve the crops and dont require tilling, which releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere.

So, from a purely carbon preserving point of view, conventional farming using biotech seeds is much better than organic farming. Organic farming is also about 40 percent less yield efficient. Youre going to have to clear cut forests to get the same kind of yield globally that you can get in farming, using conventional means with GMOs. We cant afford, environmentally, to give up any more of our land to farming or urbanization. The newer gene-edited crops are designed to use fewer and fewer chemicals, and in some cases no chemicals. We are on the verge of developing crops that naturally create nitrogen to fertilize the soil without chemicals. We need fertilized soil to get the kind of yields that are appropriate for an industrial society. But nitrogen can cause all kinds of environmental problems. But gene editing is in the position to address those kinds of things. So, I guess the real question should be: Why dont we have a farming system that is based on sustainable principles rather than choosing organic and pitting it against conventional or GMO farming? We should pick the best elements from each system, and that should be the goal rather than ideologically proposing that either GMOs or organic is the best way to go.

I think nuclear energy and biotechnology are two of the most important tools to fight climate change. Nuclear energy is the only advanced technology we have right now in the energy sector that directly reduces carbon emissions to zero, with limited consequences. If you look at a lot of the renewable energies, they all have other consequences.

Wind towers chop up birds, and hydropower plants dam up rivers and cause mass death among fish. Nuclear energy, if its handled properly, especially the latest generation, is an essential tool in fighting climate change. And were naive to think that we could, through alternative energy alone, meet the challenge of reducing our carbon footprint. And GMOs and gene-edited crops do the same thing. If we have no till agriculture where carbon is not released, we can dramatically reduce the carbon footprint.

If we dont have to clear cut forests to grow organic food, we dramatically cut carbon. If we dont have cows, which burp methane gas, which is 20 times more carbon toxic than carbon itself, thenand we need those cows to generate fertilizer for agriculture or organics, and if we dont have those, we are very much in a better position to fight climate change. So, if we move in the direction of regenerative agriculture, organic agriculture, it will be a disaster in the long run. We need a mix of technologies in agriculture that are respectful of the cultural traditions of various communities, but also are sustainable. Otherwise, were courting long-term climate change disaster.

Grgoire Canlorbe:You openly distrust idiosyncratic ideological screens in investment decisionsand believe that such way of proceeding is more likely to harm people and the environment. Which sociopolitical system in the broad sense is the most immune to the siren voices of socially responsible investing?

Jon Entine:Im all for a system that encourages investments in socially or environmentally progressive activities, but if you become totally focused on systems that dont have an economic return, they ultimately cant survive over time. The socially responsible investing movement, the problem with that is twofold: one, the values that it promoted were very ideological. So, for instance, it determined among most social investment professionals that defense spending was something that should be avoided. I imagine that if people hadnt invested in defensive weapons, we could have lost World War II. So, I dont see avoiding defensive weaponry or protective weaponry necessarily as something thats not socially responsible; its too blunt an idea.

So, its really concerning that were going to develop an investing system based on peoples whims and their ideology. You could have a Muslim investing system, which is competing with a Jewish investing system, which is competing with a Christian one, each one thinking that their particular values are superior. And there are in fact Muslim and Christiana and Jewish social investing funds. Its pandering as it does not influence behavior; its evolved into a money-making gimmick by those who sell the funds. So, I think its best in investing to try to get the best return that we can and empower individuals and organizations to use their money in socially responsible ways. But I think rigging the system so that certain kinds of activities are rewarded, and theres not the economic incentives to provide checks and balances within the system, is a prescription for economic inefficiency.

Grgoire Canlorbe:Many expect neuro-augmentation and genetic manipulation to allow Homo sapiensthrough the taking over of their own biological evolution and the abandonment of the random processes of natural selectionto achieve the Cartesian project to render humans the masters and possessors of nature. Is transhumanism a reasonable dream?

Jon Entine:I think its reasonable to think that were going to change our human genome. Were already able to do that in small ways. Were already able to make micro-changes in the genome, and I think, over time, theres no doubt that well be able to rid ourselves of certain genetic disorders. Huntingtons disease would be one good example, as we know its linked to one gene. But the human genome is very complex. Human behavior and our chemical and genetic makeup are extremely complex. So, the fact that we can manipulate genes doesnt mean we can manipulate them precisely.

There always are consequences. Removing one gene or a suite of genes could have unintended consequences. I think, ultimately, over time, we are going to harness the genome and use it to develop many therapies that dont exist now. Whether we can develop the superhuman Sapiens Sapiens, I think that thats probably not necessarily in the cards. But I do think that we will make a lot of progress in coming decades in fighting many diseases that now seem out of the reach of the medical community.

Grgoire Canlorbe:Thank you for your time. Would you like to add anything else?

Jon Entine:I have nothing else, no. Thank you for the interview.

Grgoire Canlorbe is a journalist specializing in the scientific field. Find Grgoire on his website and on Facebook.

A version of this interview was originally published at the European Scientist@EuropeScientist

Read the rest here:

Facing taboos: Conversation with GLP's Jon Entine on sustainable agriculture, race and sports, 'Jewish genetics' and social investing - Genetic...

The clonal repopulation of HSPC gene modified with antiHIV-1 RNAi is not affected by preexisting HIV-1 infection – Science Advances

Abstract

Despite advances in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) transplant for HIV-1infected patients, the impact of a preexisting HIV-1 infection on the engraftment and clonal repopulation of HSPCs remains poorly understood. We have developed a long terminal repeat indexing-mediated integration site sequencing (LTRi-Seq) method that provides a multiplexed clonal quantitation of both antiHIV-1 RNAi (RNA interference) gene-modified and control vector-modified cell populations, together with HIV-1infected cellsall within the same animal. In our HIV-1preinfected humanized mice, both therapeutic and control HSPCs repopulated efficiently without abnormalities. Although the HIV-1mediated selection of antiHIV-1 RNAi-modified clones was evident in HIV-1infected mice, the organ-to-organ and intra-organ clonal distributions in infected mice were indistinguishable from those in uninfected mice. HIV-1infected cells showed clonal patterns distinct from those of HSPCs. Our data demonstrate that, despite the substantial impact of HIV-1 infection on CD4+ T cells, HSPC repopulation remains polyclonal, thus supporting the use of HSPC transplant for anti-HIV treatment.

The widespread availability of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has significantly reduced AIDS-related mortality and morbidity. Thanks to improved cART and patient care, high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) transplantation, once considered too risky for HIV-infected patients, are now increasingly used in clinic to treat malignancies in patients with HIV (16). A number of recent studies have demonstrated a level of clinical efficacy for HSPC transplant in patients with HIV that is similar to the efficacy in noninfected patients (4, 7). Furthermore, two remarkable case studiesthe so-called Berlin patient, the first case cured of HIV after the allogeneic transplantation of HIV-resistant (CCR532/32) bone marrow (BM) (8), and the recent London patient, potentially the second cure with the same transplant strategy (9)have generated tremendous hope that HIV can be treated by the genetic engineering of a patients own HSPC (1013). Despite these recent clinical successes, however, our understanding of the functions of transplanted HSPC in HIV-infected patients remains unclear and controversial. In particular, a short-term cART interruption, recently recommended to minimize transplant-associated problems, often results in a marked increase in viral load in patients (2, 3, 14), but the impact of ongoing viral replication on HSPC engraftment and tissue repopulation remains poorly understood. It is noteworthy that numerous previous reports have shown both direct and indirect effects of HIV infection on BM niche cells, including HSPC (15), stromal cells (16), and possibly, CD4+ T cells (17). Furthermore, recent nonhuman primate studies have identified perturbations in the immune system following HSPC transplant in simian HIV (SHIV)infected, ART-suppressed animals (14, 18, 19). Nevertheless, most in vivo preclinical studies so far have tested HSPC transplant in the absence of HIV-1 infection (2026). All current and planned trials that include a cART interruption are moving forward without a full understanding of the effects of HIV infection on HSPC behaviors in vivo.

Retroviral tagging (cellular barcoding) has proven useful in evaluating HSPC transplant and the effects of genetic modification on HSPC behaviors in vivo (27). Previous human and nonhuman primate studies using the traditional reporter gene and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays have provided only limited information on HSPC behaviors in the presence of HIV-1 (2, 3, 5) or simian virus infection (14, 18, 19, 25), as these assays measure gene-marked cells as a whole population and thus overlook the clonal complexity that exists within the cells. In contrast, recent retroviral tagging studies, including our own, have shown highly coordinated repopulation by hundreds or thousands of individual repopulating HSPC clones at the systems level (2832). Quantitative sequencing of vector integration sites (ISs), in particular, has been an excellent means of studying the safety and functional diversities of gene-modified CD34+ HSPCs in gene therapy settings (3036). Although the importance of the tremendous regenerative potential and functional heterogeneity of individual hematopoietic stem cells has been well recognized (32, 37), all previous studies have tested hematopoietic reconstitution either in the absence of HIV infection or in the presence of suppressive ART. Thus, polyclonal HSPC repopulation, an important indicator of normal HSPC homing and in vivo function, in the presence of HIV-1 infection remains uncharacterized.

A humanized BM/liver/thymus (BLT) mouse model is arguably the most practical and functional small-animal model with which to test HSPC transplant (38). These mice enable human HSPCs to proliferate and populate the BM, generate various mature and functioning immune lineages, including mature, functional T cells through the transplanted thymic tissue, and repopulate all the lymphoid and nonlymphoid organs (20). We have previously demonstrated effective tissue repopulation and the anti-HIV efficacy of gene-modified HSPCs in BLT mice (2123) using several different types of anti-HIV lentiviral vectors, including dual-combination anti-HIV lentiviral vectors (dual-sh1005/sh516) expressing two anti-HIV short hairpin RNAs (shRNA), one directed at the HIV coreceptor CCR5 (sh1005) and the other at the viral long terminal repeat (LTR) (sh516). These dual-combination vectors showed antiviral efficacy against both R5- and X4-tropic HIV-1 in vivo (21). More recently, we developed a new preinfection BLT mouse model with which the HSPC transplant can be tested in the presence of HIV-1 infection (39). Gene-marking analysis in these mice has revealed the selective advantage of dual-sh1005/sh516engineered T cells over control (nonprotective) HSPCs cotransplanted in the same animal. However, it remains unclear whether and how HIV-1 infection affects polyclonal engraftment of nonprotective HSPC and whether selective repopulation by antiHIV genemodified HSPC occurs via normal polyclonal hematopoiesis.

Here, we have developed a novel LTR indexingmediated IS sequencing (LTRi-Seq) to directly compare and evaluate the homing/engraftment and tissue repopulation of anti-HIV (dual-sh1005/sh516) and control (nonprotective) HSPC in HIV-1preinfected humanized mice. The LTRi-Seq enables unbiased, simultaneous analysis of both anti-HIV and control HSPC clones and HIV-1infected cell clones in the same sample. With the new assay, our study provides novel insights into the competitive repopulation of HSPC clones in HIV-1-infected (HIV+) mice and the cellular proliferation and circulation of HIV-1infected cell clones in the same animals.

Two sets of independent preinfection humanized mouse experiments were performed at different times to evaluate and validate the impact of HIV-1 infection on HSPC transplant (Fig. 1A). The first set included five HIV+ mice and six uninfected (HIV) control mice; the second set included five infected and five HIV control mice. The details of the procedures and experimental results are described elsewhere (39). Briefly, human fetal liver CD34+ HSPCs were injected into irradiated neonatal (1 to 3 days old) nonobese diabetic.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice. At 11 weeks after the first HSPC transplantby which point human CD45+ cells, including CD19 B cells and CD3+CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, had repopulated the bloodhalf of the mice were infected with CCR5-tropic HIV-1NFNSX, while the rest remained uninfected as a control (Fig. 1B). After 3 weeks of infection, the viral load reached 5.10 105 copies/ml (1.48 105 SD) for set 1 and 2.39 107 copies/ml (1.45 107 SD) for set 2 (table S1). Both groups of mice were then subjected to BLT surgery, in which an equal mixture of two pools of human HSPCone engineered with anti-HIV vectors (H1-EGFP-dual-shRNA) and the other with control vectors (H5-mCherry)and a piece of human thymus tissue, all from the same donor, were transplanted into each mouse following the administration of busulfan the previous day. The animals were followed for an additional 12 weeks and euthanized for tissue repopulation analysis. We and others have shown stable multilineage human cell engraftment and gene marking at 10 to 12 weeks following HSPC transplant in NSG and BLT mice (21, 4042).

(A) Cartoon representation of HIV preinfected BLT mouse model. (B) Bar plots showing comparative levels of reconstitution of different human cell populations before HIV-1 infection (10 weeks after the first CD34+ cell transplant) in the two groups of humanized mice. Group 1 animals were used as an HIV control and group 2 animals were infected with HIV-1 on week 11. Set 1 data are shown on the left and set 2 are on the right. Human cell reconstitution levels in groups 1 and 2 mice were similar; P values from Students t tests with Welch correction comparing groups 1 and 2 for human leukocytes (CD45), T cells (CD3), T helper cells (CD4), cytotoxic T cells (CD8), and B cells (CD19) are denoted in purple digits. (C) Gradual enrichment of anti-HIV (H1-EGFP-dual-shRNA)modified T cells in the peripheral blood of HIV+ mice. The line charts show the percentages of EGFP+ (circles connected with a solid green line) and mCherry+ cells (circles connected with a dotted red line) in CD45, CD3, CD4, CD8, and CD19 cells at 6, 8, and 10 weeks (w6, w8, and w10) after BLT surgery. HIV-1infected (HIV+, top) and mock-infected (HIV, bottom) mice for sets 1 and 2 are shown separately. The colors of the circles match the mouse IDs. The average of paired EGFP-to-mCherry marking ratios (H1/H5) for all samples is shown at the bottom of each line chart. The average value is not available (NA) when there is any missing sample data. (D) Boxplots show H1-EGFP/H5-mCherry marking ratios (H1/H5) in each tissue sample, including BM (squares), thymic organelle (TY; triangles), peripheral blood (PB; circles in set 1), and spleen (SP; circles in set 2), at the end point (12 weeks after BLT surgery). The P values in purple were calculated by comparing the H1/H5 ratios between HIV+ and HIV mice using mixed-effects gamma regressions (fig. S8A).

While showing marked mouse-to-mouse variations in human cell repopulation and experiment-to-experiment variations in the baseline gene markings, both sets 1 and 2 experiments demonstrated a gradual enrichment of enhanced green fluorescent proteinpositive (EGFP+) cells over time within the CD4+ T cell population in HIV+ mice (Fig. 1C). These experimental variations are common in BLT mouse studies likely due to donor variations and inherent technical inconsistency in performing the BLT surgery (38, 43). To effectively evaluate the impact of HIV-1 infection in our BLT mouse experiments, we compared paired EGFP versus mCherry marking levels in each sample, taking advantage of our cotransplantation strategy that provides an internal control (mCherry+ cells) in each mouse, using mixed-effects gamma regression models (see Materials and Methods for statistical analysis and fig. S8 for more details). At 12 weeks after the BLT surgery, despite the differences in the baseline data, HIV+ mice in both sets 1 and 2 showed a significant selective advantage for antiHIV geneengineered (EGFP+) cells over control (mCherry+) cells within the CD4+ T cell population (Fig. 1D and fig. S1E), demonstrating 7.6-fold higher EGFP/mCherry ratios than those of HIV mice for set 1 and 3.9-fold higher EGFP/mCherry ratios for set 2 (P = 0.005 for the first set; P = <0.001 for the second set). Other cell types, including human CD45+, CD19+ B cells, and CD3+CD8+ T cells, did not show such significant differences, indicating that the HIV-1NFNSXmediated selection was largely limited to mature CD4+ T cells (Fig. 1, C and D, and fig. S1). We have previously shown that CCR5+CD4+ T cells were primarily depleted in HIV-1NFNSXinfected mice (39). Lentiviral expression of dual-shRNA (sh516 and sh1005) had no obvious cytotoxicity in our previous tests (21). Most of the infected mice showed a similar or slightly increased viral load at the end point compared with their viral load before BLT surgery (table S1), indicating that viral replication continued until the end point.

The clonal-level evaluation of HSPC transplant, unachievable with conventional gene-marking or PCR assays, has been enabled by vector IS sequence analysis. The analysis of IS of multiple types of vectors in the same animal, however, remains challenging. To analyze the competitive clonal repopulation of anti-HIV and control HSPCs, we developed LTRi-Seq using two index sequences (H1 and H5) uniquely labeled at the U5 end of the LTR of the two lentivectors (see Fig. 2A). Distinguishing the unique LTR index sequences for these two vectors and the wild-type LTR of HIV-1 proviruses during IS sequence analysis enabled multiplexed and unbiased analysis of these two vectors and HIV-1 proviruses, all in parallel. The index sequences (H1 and H5) in the LTR did not induce a significant reduction in the efficiency of vector production or vector infectivity, nor did these indexes alter the genomic IS patterns of the lentiviral vectors (fig. S2).

(A) A diagram showing LTR index sequences for the 3-end U5 region (red box) of HIV, H1-EGFP-dual-shRNA, and H5-mCherry LTR. H1 and H5 indexes are two and three bases different, respectively, than the wild-type (WT) HIV-1. These unique index sequences will appear at the junction of the vector and host DNA after vector integration into the host genome and will thus serve as a marker with which to distinguish vector types during vector IS sequence analysis. The IS sequencing method is shown in the box. The LTR genome junction DNAs were PCR amplified by a linker-mediated PCR method using LTR- and linker-specific primers (blue-lined arrows) and then subjected to next-generation sequencing. (B) Table showing representative IS data with examples of collision events, a unique IS detected with multiple indexes (H1, H5, or WT). (C) Fold differences in IS sequence counts between the highest sequence count and the second highest sequence count for IS collision events detected in set 1 Roche 454-pyrosequencing and set 2 Illumina MiSeq sequencing data. For the sake of comparison, IS data from conventional IS sequencing (nonLTR indexed) using flow-sorted samples (flow sort) are shown. (D) A summary table for IS sequence analysis. Of the 729 unique ISs recovered in set 1 experiments and the 5727 unique ISs in set 2 experiments, approximately 7 and 8%, respectively, were collision events. Only five of the set 1 and none of the set 2 collision events showed a less than 10-fold difference; these remained unresolved even after we had conducted a selection process to determine the true index of the collision events.

In an effort to minimize the technical biases that can arise when comparing sample-to-sample IS profiles, we used the same amount of genomic DNA for all of the tissue samples (1 g for set 1 and 2 g for set 2 samples), with only a few exceptions (see table S2), and followed a well-established standard operating procedure for IS sequencing and quantitation (32, 44). Sets 1 and 2 samples were sequenced using different sequencing platforms, 454-pyrosequencing for set 1 and MiSeq sequencing for set 2, with the IS amplification and sequencing procedures kept identical for each set. A total of 729 and 5727 unique ISs were recovered at the end point (12 weeks after BLT surgery) from the tissues of sets 1 and 2 mice, respectively (Fig. 2D).

Given the semirandomness of lentiviral IS selection and the large human genome (3 billion bases), the likelihood of identical IS to occur with different vectors or different animals is negligible. We did, however, find that 51 ISs (7%) and 454 ISs (8%) in the 454-pyrosequencing and MiSeq datasets, respectively, were collision events (or sequence crossovers): In other words, the identical IS appeared in more than one vector (H1 or H5) or the HIV-1 IS sequence group (Fig. 2, B and D). These IS sequence collisions are a common problem for modern high-throughput sequencing (34, 45), likely occurring due to sample cross-contamination or demultiplexing errors (e.g., sequencing errors or mutations within the H1 and H5 index sequences). In contrast to our previous conventional (nonLTR indexing) IS analysis, where EGFP+ and mCherry+ flow-sorted cell pools were used for sequencing (fig. S3), the new LTR indexing approach does not require prior cell sorting and thus eliminates any potential sample cross-contamination that may occur during the cell-separation processes. The LTR indexing approach showed approximately 3.1- to 3.6-fold lower collision rates than those of conventional, nonLTR-indexing IS analysis (Fig. 2D).

LTR index read errors occurred at a rate of 1.92 and 0.73% for sets 1 and 2 individual sequences, respectively (fig. S4A). LTR index collisions can be effectively identified and corrected when identical IS sequences are available for the purpose of index sequence comparison (fig. S4B). A commonly used procedure for handling such collisions is to identify the correct IS by choosing the most frequent IS, that is, one showing a 10-fold higher detection frequency than any of the others (35, 36). The average IS frequency differences between correct and incorrect IS were 92-fold (160 SD) and 192-fold (157 SD) in the 454-pyrosequencing and MiSeq datasets, respectively (Fig. 2C). After applying these criteria, only five ISs (0.7%) in the first set (454-pyrosequencing data) and none in the second set (MiSeq dataset) remained unresolved, reflecting the higher sequencing depth of the MiSeq dataset (Fig. 2D). These unresolved ISs were excluded from the clonal profile analysis. The low-copy IS clones that did not show any LTR index collisions remained in our final data. There remains, however, a low level of uncertainty in LTR index identities for these low-copy IS clones: e.g., about 1.92 and 0.73% (or less) uncertainty due to potential read errors.

We compared IS sequence data with EGFP and mCherry gene-marking data shown above. To better present the frequencies of individual IS clones relative to the total repopulating cell pool, composed of both vector-marked (H1 and H5) and unmarked cells, we used IS clonal contribution data that factor in the % unmarked cells (see Materials and Methods for more details). The total combined IS clonal contribution for anti-HIV and control vectors showed a positive correlation with the marking levels of EGFP and mCherry in CD45+ cells (the Pearson correlation coefficients r = 0.88 and r = 0.84 for the first and second sets, respectively) (Fig. 3A). Similar positive trends between IS data and flow cytometry data have been reported in nonhuman primate studies, showing normal polyclonal reconstitution of HSPCs (32). The baseline H1 anti-HIV and H5 control sequence ratios in HIV mice differed from one set of experiments to the other, but both sets showed increased H1 clonal contribution and H1/H5 ratios in infected mice when compared with baseline H1/H5 ratios in HIV mice, indicating a selective expansion of HIV-protected cells in infected mice (Fig. 3B). Mixed-effects gamma regressions analysis comparing the H1/H5 ratios in HIV and HIV+ mice showed P = 0.039 for set 2 but, despite notable differences, set 1 showed P = 0.27, possibly due to the relatively low number of organ samples available for the set 1 analysis.

(A) A direct comparison of the total IS clonal contribution (sum of all IS frequencies, y axis) for H1-EGFP-dual-shRNA (H1-EGFP; green dots) and H5-mCherry clones (red dots) versus the corresponding EGFP or mCherry gene markings in CD45+ cells (flow cytometry results shown as % vector marking, x axis) from the same organ samples at the 12-week end point. Data indicate a strong correlation between the two parameters [Pearsons r = 0.88 for set 1 (left) and r = 0.84 for set 2 (right)]. The diagonal line is a reference line (r = 1). (B) The two-dimensional (2D) plots showing the total combined contribution of H5 IS clones (y axis) and H1 IS clones (x axis) in HIV+ organs (cyan squares, triangles, or circles) and HIV organs (black squares, triangles, or circles), including BM (squares), TY (triangles), PB (circles in set 1), and SP (circles in set 2). The outline colors of the squares, triangles, and circles correspond to the various mouse IDs. H1/H5 ratios are shown in the box. The P values were calculated using mixed-effects gamma regressions (ME) (fig. S8B). (C) The number of unique IS recovered from each sample was also positively correlated to the vector marking level of the sample. Scatter plots show a correlation between the number of total unique IS recovered from each organ sample (x axis) and respective EGFP or mCherry markings in CD45+ cells from the same organ samples (y axis). (D) Polyclonal repopulation by both H1-EGFP and H5-mCherryengineered cells. The 2D plots show the total number of unique IS of H1- (x axis) and H5-marked (y axis) cells in different organ samples. The shape and line color strategies are identical to those in (B). The average number of H1 IS clones increased approximately twofold in HIV+ samples relative to that in HIV samples, while H5 IS clone numbers remained relatively constant.

The number of unique IS recovered for these two vectors also reflected EGFP and mCherry markings (Fig. 3C). The HIV+ mice showed greater IS recovery rates for H1 anti-HIVprotected cells than did HIV mice, again indicating the potential selective advantage of HIV-protected cells (Fig. 3D). Mixed-effects gamma regressions comparing H1/H5 ratios in HIV+ and HIV mice showed P = <0.001 for set 2, but set 1 showed P = 0.63, probably for the same reasons addressed above. Notably, there was no significant reduction in the average number of unique IS for the control clones in the HIV+ animals; the unique IS showed a 1.3-fold increase in the first set and a 0.8-fold decrease in the second set when compared with those in HIV animals. This observation indicates that polyclonal repopulation by control H5-mCherry HSPCs occurs even in the presence of HIV-1 infection, in turn suggesting that, while HIV-1mediated selection of the anti-HIVmodified cells appears to be evident in infected mice, the impact of HIV-1NFNSX infection on HSPC BM homing and polyclonal hematopoiesis was insignificant in our humanized mouse study.

We next analyzed organ-to-organ clonal distributions in both HIV+ and HIV mice of set 2 (Fig. 4). Set 1 was excluded because of the lack of essential organ data (fig. S5). When we compared the H5 (control mCherry+ cell) IS profiles of BM, spleen, and human thymic implant of each HIV mouse, we found a unique organ-to-organ repopulation pattern (Fig. 4, B and D). BM and spleen showed relatively similar clonal profiles (average Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.587 0.369 SD), whereas the correlation was poorer when thymic organelle was compared with BM or spleen (average r = 0.038 0.063 and r = 0.094 0.103 SD, respectively). Similar organ-to-organ IS distribution patterns were observed for the H1 anti-HIV vectors in HIV mice (Fig. 4B) and for both H5 and H1 in HIV+ mice (Fig. 4C). The observed organ-to-organ IS patterns, in which some of clones were notably expanded only in the thymic organelle, may reflect the unique clonal behaviors of thymocytes resulting from transient and extensive clonal expansion during normal T cell development, which manifest in unique clonal profiles in the thymic organelle, as previously demonstrated by Brugman et al. (46).

(A) Stacked bar plots show the relative clonal contributions (y axis) of H5-mCherry clones (H5) and H1-EGFP-dual-shRNA clones (H1) in the BM, SP, and human TY of HIV and HIV+ mice from set 2. Each color band in a stack represents individual IS clones, and its thickness corresponds to the relative clone frequency. Clones are stacked in a descending order of frequency with the highest frequency clone at the bottom and lowest to the top. The total number of IS clones (gray) and mouse IDs (black or blue) are shown at the top the chart. (B and C) 3D scatter plots show H5-mCherry (H5; red dots) and H1-EGFP-dual-shRNA clonal frequencies (H1; green dots) in BM, SP, and TY of HIV mice (A) and HIV+ mice (B). Each red or green dot represents the individual IS clones of H1-EGFP and H5-mCherry cells, respectively. These dots are positioned in 3D space based on IS clonal frequencies in BM, SP, and TY as three coordinates. Pearsons r values comparing the clonal profiles of BM and TY, BM and SP, and TY and SP are shown on the yellow, blue, and gray panels, respectively. (D) Boxplots of Pearsons r values between BM and SP (BM/SP), BM and TY (BM/TY), and SP and TY (SP/TY) for H5-mCherry (left) and H1-EGPF-dual-shRNA clonal profiles (right) in HIV and HIV+ mice.

To further address the impact of HIV-1 infection on HSPC function, we analyzed intra-organ clone-size variations. In a previous mathematical modeling study, we demonstrated that variations in the shapes of the clone-size distribution of blood repopulating cells reflect differences in the number of engrafted HSPCs and their functional parameters (birth, death, and differentiation rates) (47). All H1 anti-HIV and H5 control repopulating cells in the second set of animals showed highly variable IS clonal sizes (Fig. 4, A to C). When the shapes of clone-size distributions were compared, as described previously (47), all anti-HIV and control cells, particularly in the spleens of both HIV+ and HIV mice, showed similar shapes (fig. S6A). The observed clone-size patterns also mirrored those of the blood repopulating cells of rhesus macaques (32, 47). To further study the impact of HIV infection on clonal distribution, we used Rnyi diversity profiles (48) (details in Materials and Methods). Rnyi diversity plots show sloped diversity profiles in all organs, and the overlapping of Rnyi diversity curves from both HIV+ and HIV mouse samples (fig. S6B) signifies no particular ordering of clonal diversities, likewise suggesting that HIV-1 infection has no significant impact on normal clonal repopulation. These data thus consistently point to the efficient homing, hematopoiesis, and tissue repopulation of both HIV-protected and control HSPCs, even in the presence of HIV-1 infection, as demonstrated in our humanized mouse model.

In parallel with the IS of the two lentivectors (anti-HIV and control), a total of 111 and 1144 HIV-1 proviral DNA ISs were recovered in our first and second sets of experiments, respectively (see Fig. 2D). These HIV-1 ISs account for approximately 15.3 and 19.9%, respectively, of all the unique ISs (lentiviral vectors and HIV-1) recovered in each set. However, the total combined HIV-1 IS sequences constituted only 3.2% of all the IS sequences in set 1 and 2.1% in set 2, respectively, reflecting considerable frequency differences between the HIV-1infected and lentiviral vectorengineered cell clones. Although much smaller, on average, than lentiviral vector clones, individual HIV-1 IS clones also showed varying levels of detection frequencies. Of the 1144 HIV-1 unique ISs recovered from three different organs (BM, spleen, and human thymic implant) in the second set animals, 77 (6.7%) were recovered in at least two different organs.

A two to fourfold higher number of HIV-1 ISs were recovered in the human thymic implant (average 148 ISs, 84 SD) than in BM (33.4 ISs, 19 SD) or spleen (61.4 ISs, 40.4 SD). Overall, we found a consistent and unique organ-to-organ IS pattern, distinct from lentiviral vector IS patterns, in which the HIV-1 IS clones that were detected at a high frequency in one organ were undetectable or detected at a much lower frequency in any of other organs, resulting in poor statistical correlations in organ-to-organ IS comparison for all combinations of organs tested (average r = 0.050 0.131 SD to 0.233 0.091 SD) (see Fig. 5, A and C). This pattern suggests the limited proliferation and organ-to-organ circulation of HIV-1infected cell clones. For example, reflecting the development and circulation of T cells in various lymphoid organs, some of the high-frequency IS clones of the thymic organelle were detectable in the spleen at a lower frequency, whereas other high-frequency clones of spleen or BM were only rarely detectable in the thymic organelle (Fig. 5, B and D). Our data suggest that HIV-1infected human thymocytes may clonally expand and migrate to other organs, whereas HIV-1infected BM or spleen cells (mature T cells mostly) are not imported back to the thymic organelle. It is statistically highly unlikely that these organ-to-organ HIV-1 IS distribution patterns are simply the result of random contamination or sequencing errors (fig. S7). Our data thus provide novel insights into the limited circulation/migration abilities of HIV-1infected cells in different body organs, suggesting that the pathologic impacts of HIV-1infected clones may likewise be locally limited and confined, at least for the short term.

(A) 3D scatter plot shows HIV-1 IS clones (black dots) and their relative contributions (IS frequencies) in the BM, SP, and human TY of five infected mice. Pearson r values comparing the IS profiles of BM and TY, BM and SP, and TY and SP are shown on the yellow, blue, and gray panels, respectively. (B) The frequency differences among the common HIV-1 IS detected in multiple organs are shown. The relative frequencies of all IS clones recovered in BM, SP, and TY were plotted on BM, SP, and TY axes, respectively. Those ISs common to two different organs, linked by colored lines, showed significantly different frequencies in two comparative organs. The two IS clones detected in all three organs are shown in dash lines. The total number of unique IS for each organ is shown in a bracket. (C) Boxplots comparing Pearsons r values for the HIV-1 IS profiles of two organs. (D) Collective HIV-1 IS data from all infected mice. The number of IS common to two comparative organs is shown in blue. The arrows represent the quantities of common IS in the two comparative organs, with the direction of the arrows indicating the direction of higher to lower sequence frequencies of the IS common to the two organs. The two IS found in all three organs are in red. The black numbers indicate the total quantities of recovered IS for each organ.

In this study, the potential effects of HIV-1 infection on HSPC transplant, survival, and organ repopulation were investigated using HIV-1preinfected, humanized mice. LTRi-Seq enabled effective and unbiased analysis of two lentiviral vectors (anti-HIV H1-EGFP-dual-sh1005/sh516 and control H5-mCherry vectors) and HIV-1 proviruses. Our data provide novel insights into the behaviors of HSPC and HIV-1infected cell clones in vivo, insights with important implications for the repopulation of HSPC in the context of HSPC transplant and genetic therapy for HIV-infected patients.

We cotransplanted both H1 anti-HIVmodified and H5 control HSPC pools into the same host to better evaluate anti-HIV modifications in BLT mice, where host-to-host and experiment-to-experiment variations are common (38, 43). The analysis of vector IS in this type of competitive repopulation assay is challenging, particularly when testing lentiviral vectors in the presence of HIV-1 infection, due to the common LTR sequences shared by the therapeutic vectors and HIV-1 proviruses. LTRi-Seq enabled simultaneous analysis of anti-HIV vector (H1 indexed) and control vector (H5 indexed)marked HSPC clones and HIV-1infected cell clones (wild-type LTR) in the same mice. With the new approach, we have evaluated whether anti-HIV and control-engineered HSPC would efficiently engraft and repopulate the blood system in the presence of HIV-1 infection. ISs were sequenced and analyzed on the basis of methods proven effective in quantifying repopulating clones (32, 44).

Here, we demonstrate polyclonal and normal tissue repopulation of both types of HSPCs using our unique HIV-1 preinfection mouse model. By our analysis, we showed that HIV-1mediated selection primarily occurred at the mature T helper cell level and not significantly at the HSPC level. In clonal profile analysis, a complete absence of differences between HIV+ and HIV samples is not expected even if the HIV-1 infection has had no effect on HSPC; a small portion of mature cells will still be killed in infected mice. However, if HIV-1 infection affected HSPC homing and repopulation, then there would be notable differences in the clonal profile analysis. While a selective advantage for the H1 anti-HIV clones was evident, the control H5 cells (those with no anti-HIV modification) showed similarly high levels of polyclonal engraftment in both HIV+ and HIV mice. Despite the known limitations of xeno-transplant models (38, 43, 49), this polyclonal engraftment in infected hosts is noteworthy given the numerous previous reports on the direct and indirect effects of HIV infection on BM niche cells, including HSPC (15), stromal cells (16), and possibly, CD4+ T cells that reside in the niche (17). It appears that, following infusion, both types of HSPCs must have competed normally for the available HSPC niches, which remained functionally normal even in infected hosts, and HIV-1 infection had minimal impact on the polyclonal hematopoiesis and tissue repopulation of transplanted HSPCs.

Our data have important implications for the repopulation of gene-modified HSPC in the context of gene therapeutic clinical studies for the treatment of HIV-1 diseases. Our study is the first to experimentally evaluate the selective engraftment and clonal repopulation of gene-modified HSPCs in the presence of HIV-1 infection using a new preinfected mouse model. The premise of anti-HIV gene therapy is that anti-HIV gene engineering of a patients own HSPC can result in the selection of HIV-protected cells during hematopoietic reconstitution, long-term control of viral replication, and a favorable clinical course leading to a functional cure. Notably, virtually all of the T cells in the Berlin and London patients were replaced with CCR532/32 donor cells and cleared virus (8, 9, 50). Past anti-HIV clinical gene therapy trials, by contrast, have failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit in patients, primarily due to the scarcity of gene-engineered cells repopulating in the blood (1013). Even patients who have received myeloablative preconditioning, a treatment that significantly improves HSPC engraftment, have shown less than 0.32% anti-HIV gene marking in their peripheral blood mononuclear cells (11). Most salient among the many possible explanations for the low gene marking in patients with HIV is the possible impairment of HSPC function by direct HIV-1 infection and/or by an HIV-damaged BM microenvironment (15, 16). However, most in vivo preclinical studies so far have tested HSPC transplant in the absence of HIV-1 infection and only subsequently challenged the repopulating mature cells with HIV-1 to evaluate anti-HIV gene modification (2026). Recent nonhuman primate studies, testing HSPC transplant in SHIV-infected, ART-suppressed animals, have identified perturbations in the immune system following irradiation therapy (14, 18, 19). Our data demonstrate that the HIV-mediated selection for anti-HIVmodified cells was limited to a portion of mature cells, and the effects of viral infection on HSPCs homing and organ repopulation were insubstantial in our humanized mouse study.

Our study showing the normal polyclonal HSPC repopulation in the presence of HIV-1 infection supports the use of planned cART interruption during HSPC transplant. Although cART interruption has been recommended in recent studies (i) to minimize therapy-related toxicity and (ii) to improve anti-HIV gene marking in the peripheral blood, the safety and efficacy of cART interruption remain unclear and controversial (2, 3, 14, 19). Recent human and nonhuman primate studies have shown that autologous HSPC transplant in HIV-1infected patients is well-tolerated and feasible (4, 7, 18), but these studies evaluated HSPC transplant in the presence of cART and lacked a clonality analysis of the repopulating cells.

Furthermore, using LTRi-Seq, we have characterized HIV-1infected cell clones in comparison to repopulating HSPC clones. Clonal expansion of HIV-1infected cells has recently been reported in humans and humanized mice and is suspected to be an important mechanism of HIV-1 persistence (51). The clonal dynamics and organ-to-organ distribution of expended clones, however, remain poorly investigated. Our data demonstrate a unique pattern of organ-to-organ clonal profiles characteristic of HIV-1infected cells, distinct from the clonal patterns of gene-engineered HSPC clones, potentially suggesting strong organ confinement and limited circulation for at least 15 weeks after infection. A recent human case study, by contrast, showed wide anatomic distribution of a few infected clones, likely the result of the effects of years of HIV-1 infection and cancer in the patient (52). A recent humanized mouse study analyzing HIV-1infected cell clones at 15 weeks after infection has shown clonal patterns consistent with our results, identifying only a small fraction of HIV IS common in multiple organs (53).

Preinfection BLT mice are a practical and functional small-animal model with which to directly test therapeutic vectors in the presence of HIV-1 infection. In vitro experiments ignore the impact of complex tissue architecture, while in vivo studies in humans do not permit adequate experimental manipulation. Nonhuman primate models require the use of modified simian-version viruses. Both sets of our BLT mouse experiments have reproducibly demonstrated consistent polyclonal HSPC engraftment in all test animals and for all vector types. The clone-size distribution patterns, in particular, closely resemble those observed in our previous nonhuman primate studies of autologous HSPC transplant (32, 47), indicating the potential relevance of our data for HSPC transplant in HIV-infected individuals.

IS sequencingbased, lentiviral tagging approaches have been widely used to study HSPC clonal repopulation, and the data analytic procedures are well established (3036). Unlike other lentiviral tagging approaches that use short synthetic barcodes to distinguish among different cellular clones, IS sequencing approaches directly compare tagged sequences to the reference human genome and thereby enable highly accurate IS clone identification even for single-copy IS events (27, 54). In our study, IS clones and LTR indexes were determined by independent procedures. We found LTR index collision events in about 7 and 8% of IS clones due to read errors for LTR index sequences (average 1.92% for set 1 and 0.73% for set 2), but most of these index read errors can be readily identified and are correctable. Only 0.7% in set 1 and none in set 2 IS clones remained uncorrected after applying our 10 correction criteria; these were removed from clonal profile analyses. The low-copy IS clones, those that are not showing collision events, remaining in the final clonal profile data have approximately 1.92 and 0.73% (or less) uncertainty in their LTR index identities due to the potential read errors. The application of a threshold for low reads (27) would remove these uncertainties, but needs to be carefully applied as this would remove a significant amount of bona fide low-copy data.

In summary, our LTRi-Seq data provide new information on the repopulation of transplanted HSPCs in the presence of HIV-1 infection and the clonal profiles of HIV-1infected cells in key lymphoid organs. These results are particularly relevant to the issue of ART interruption in the context of HSPC transplant and anti-HIV gene therapy for HIV-infected individuals. The concepts and technological tools arising from this study will be critical for the development of future gene therapy protocols.

The H1-EGFP-dual-shRNA (sh1005/sh516) and H5-mCherry lentiviral vectors were derived from the FG12-sh1005/sh516 (21) and FG12-mCherry lentiviral vector (20), respectively, by introducing point mutations at the 3-end of the left LTR. The primers used for H1 were H1f (5-CAGTGTGGAAAATCTCCAACAGTGGC) and H1r (5-TGTTCGGGCGCCACTGTTGGAGATTT), and the primers for H5 were H5f (5-TGGAAAATATCCAACAGTGGCGCCCGAACAG) and H5r (5-CTGTTCGGGCGCCACTGTTGGATATTTTCCA). All lentiviral vectors were produced by the calcium phosphatemediated transient transfection of 293T cells described previously (20, 21, 55). Briefly, 293T cells, cultured in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 g/ml), were transfected with vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein (pHCMV-G), packaging (pCMVR8.2DVPR), and lentiviral vector plasmids. Virus supernatant was collected on days 2 and 3 after transfection, filtered through a 0.22-m pore-size filter and concentrated 100-fold by ultracentrifugation. Lentiviral vector stocks were titrated by infecting 293T cells (105) with various dilutions of the concentrated virus stock; this was followed by flow cytometry analysis of EGFP or mCherry expression 3 days after infection.

All the mouse experiments and HIV-1 infection procedures are described in detail in our previous publication (39). Briefly, neonatal (1 to 3 days old) nonobese diabetic.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice were irradiated (125 centigrays) and transplanted with human fetal liver CD34+ HSPCs by intrahepatic injection; after 11 weeks, half of the mice were infected with CCR5-tropic HIV-1NFNSX (200 ng of p24 Gag). After 3 weeks of infection, both HIV+ and HIV mice were myeoablated with busulfan (35 mg/kg) and, the next day, transplanted with a piece of thymus and an equal mixture of H1-EGFP-dual-shRNA and H5-mCherry vectortransduced CD34+ HSPCs via a two-step procedure (implantation of the Matrigel-solidified CD34+ cell mix and infusion of the gel-free cell mix through the retro-orbital vein plexus on the same day). Human CD34+ HSPCs isolated from fetal livers and thymus pieces from the same donor were cryopreserved, as previously described (39). Human fetal thymus and fetal livers were obtained from Advanced Bioscience Resources, FPA Womens Health, and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Center for AIDS Research (CFAR) Gene and Cellular Therapy Core. The UCLA Institutional Review Board has determined that fetal tissues from diseased fetuses obtained without patient-identification information are not human subjects. Written informed consent was obtained from patients for the use of the tissue for research purposes. All mice were maintained at the UCLA CFAR Humanized Mouse Core Laboratory in accordance with a protocol approved by the UCLA Animal Research Committee. Flow cytometry and the viral load assay have been described in detail in a previous publication (39).

For IS sequencing, we followed the procedures described in our previous publication (32, 44). In this study, we focused on analyzing only the right LTR junctions. Briefly, 1 mg of genomic DNA for set 1 samples and 2 mg of genomic DNA for set 2 samples, with a few exceptions (see tables S1 and S2), were subject to a linker-mediated PCR method using RsaI and CviQI restriction enzymes. Linker-ligated IS DNA fragments were amplified by a nested PCR strategy using two LTR primers, 1R-primer (5-CTGGCTAACTAGGGAACCCACT-3) and 2R-primer (5-ACTCTGGTAACTAGAGATCC-3) that align 140 and 57 bases upstream of the 3-end of U5 LTR, respectively, and two primers that align on linker DNA. This strategy ensured that both the LTR indexes and vector-host junctions originating from cell clones could be PCR amplified and sequenced without any primer-associated bias. Set 1 samples were sequenced with Roche 454-pyrosequencing (Roche FLX genome sequencer) and set 2 samples were sequenced with a Illumina MiSeq sequencer. To process the 454-pyrosequencing data, we used a previously described python script (32, 44) with the additional feature of enabling identification and separation of IS sequences based on the LTR index sequence. Sequences that included both the 3-end U5 LTR DNA and 25-base host DNA (with 95% homology to the human genome) with the 3-end LTR sequence at the virus-host junction were considered a true IS sequence. Briefly, sequences that showed the 3-end LTR sequence joined to genomic DNA were identified using the Smith-Waterman algorithm [for 454 data, Emboss water tool http://emboss.sourceforge.net/ and for Illumina data, a modified version of SSW library (56) in C++] and then further tested for the presence of LTR indexes (H1, H5, or wild type). Genomic sequences shorter than 25 bases were removed. On the basis of the LTR index, IS reads were assigned to either H1 and H5 vectors or WT HIV-1. We followed similar procedures for the analysis of Illumina MiSeq data. IS sequences were mapped onto the human genome (Version hg19 downloaded from https://genome.ucsc.edu/) using either BLAT (BLAST-like alignment tool) for 454 data or Burrows-Wheeler Aligner software (57) for Illumina data. Sequence-mapping and IS-counting procedures were identical to those in our previous publications (44). To better present the IS clonal frequencies relative to the total repopulating cell pool, we calculated IS clonal contributions that factor in the % unmarked cells. The relative sequence frequencies of individual IS, initially normalized by the total count of H1 and H5 IS sequences combined, were multiplied by the fraction of total vector marked cells (both EGFP+ and Cherry+ cells combined) in CD45+ cells. This approach enabled direct comparison of IS data to flow cytometry gene marking data and direct comparison of IS clones in different organs.

Because of the semirandom nature of vector/virus integration into the host genome, events in which the same IS appeared in multiple animals or in different LTR index datasets were considered collisions or signal crossovers. To identify the correct and incorrect sample identities among the same IS collision events for both 454 and Illumina data, we used a commonly used criterion that identifies sequencing errors (or sample contamination) based on sequence count differences among the same IS collision events (3436). Correct sample identities were established when a sequence count was at least 10 times higher than the counts of all of the others in the dataset sharing the same IS (see Fig. 2C and fig. S4). IS data with an incorrect sample identity were removed from the dataset. Any signal crossover IS events that failed to show >10-fold sequence count differences were considered unresolved and removed from the dataset.

Students t tests with Welch correction were used to compare continuous variables between pairs of experimental conditions, including the levels of cell populations and the H1/H5 ratios between HIV and HIV+ humanized mice. An exact Mann-Whitney test was used to compare organ-to-organ IS crossover rates within the same animal. Pearson correlation (r) was used to compare pairs of continuous variables, including total clonal contribution versus % vector marking and number of unique IS versus % vector marking; clonal frequencies within pairs of organs (BM, spleen, and thymus) in HIV and HIV+ mice; and IS profiles within pairs of organs in HIV+ mice. The randomness of organ-to-organ IS distribution patterns was evaluated by three pair-wise 2 tests (fig. S7). For example, we tested whether the overlap of IS expressions with BM differed between SP and TY tissue types. A similar analytic framework was used for the other tissue pairs (spleen and BM and thymic organelle and BM). To evaluate the impact of HIV-1 infection on anti-HIV vector (H1-EGFP-dual-shRNA) and control vector (H5-mCherry)transduced cells (Fig. 1D and Fig. 3, B and D), we used mixed-effects gamma regression models with a log link and unstructured covariance matrix to compare cell% and IS frequency between H1 and H5 in HIV+ and HIV mice, adjusting for tissue type. Gamma regression was chosen over linear regression because of distribution skew among the cell% and IS frequencies. The models included an interaction term between H1 (versus H5) and HIV status to test whether the effect of H1/H5 differed by HIV status. For cell% and IS%, when the outcome measure was 0, a small number (0.1) was added to meet the range requirement of gamma regression. P values were reported from the models. Statistical significance was assessed at the 0.05 level, and analyses were implemented in R v.3.4.4 (58). More details on statistical analysis can be found in data file S1.

We investigated the impact of HIV-1 infection on the diversity of total clonal repopulation in different organs of HIV and HIV+ mice using Rnyis diversity profiles. The y axis of the Rnyis diversity plot, H, indicates species diversity, such that consistently higher values of H indicate a more diverse clonal sample. The x axis is , which ranges from 0 to infinity (59). If the lines or profiles for two groups cross, then their relative diversities are unknown. Diversity plots also indicate the evenness of the clones, where a horizontal line indicates equal expansion of each clone (i.e., uniform clonal expansion), and steeper slopes indicate greater nonuniform clonal expansion [see Kindt et al. (60), chapter 5 page 56]. Details of Rnyis diversity calculation are in Supplementary Text.

A. Renyi, in Proceedings of the Fourth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Volume 1: Contributions to the Theory of Statistics (University of California Press, 1961), pp. 547561.

L. V. Bystrykh, M. E. Belderbos, Clonal analysis of cells with cellular barcoding: When numbers and size matter, in Stem Cell Heterogeneity: Methods and Protocols, K. Turksen, Ed. (Springer New York, New York, NY, 2016), pp. 5789.

R-Core-Team (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2018).

R. Kindt, R. Coe, Tree Diversity Analysis. A Manual and Software for Common Statistical Methods for Ecological and Biodiversity Studies (Nairobi, World Agroforestry Centre, 2005).

Acknowledgments: We thank the technical support from the UCLA CFAR research cores, including the CFAR Gene and Cellular Therapy Core and the CFAR Humanized Mouse Core. Funding: This work was supported by grants from the NIH (5U19AI117941,AI028697,AI110297, AI100652,AI145038,AI18058, HG010108,HG010318,HL116234,HL125030,HL126544); CIRM (DR1-01431,TRX-01431-1), the James B. Pendleton Charitable Trust, and the McCarthy Family Foundation (I.S.Y.C); and a Junior Faculty Scholar Award from American Society of Hematology (Sa.K.). CIRM (DR1-01431,TRX-01431-1), the James B. Pendleton Charitable Trust and the McCarthy Family Foundation (I.S.Y.C). Author contributions: Sa.K. and I.S.Y.C. designed and supervised the study; G.W.S. and Sa.K. designed and carried out IS sequencing and data analysis; W.K., S.S., and D.-S.A. carried out the animal and cell biology experiments; J.W., H.A., Y.X., H.Y., and Sh.K. performed flow cytometry and IS sequencing data analysis. G.W.S., Sa.K., E.W., and N.K. developed computational workflow; H.C. generated H1 and H5 vectors; A.P.P., C.Z., and G.W.S. performed statistical analysis; Sa.K., I.S.Y.C., and G.W.S. wrote the manuscript and revision; A.P.P., D.-S.A., and N.K. provided critical appraisal of the manuscript. Competing interests: I.S.Y.C. has a financial interest in CSL Behring and Calimmune Inc. No funding was provided by these companies to support this work; D.-S.A. has a financial interest in Calimmune Inc. and CSL Behring that the University of California Regents have licensed intellectual property invented by D.-S.A, which is being used in the research, to Calimmune Inc. No funding was provided by these companies to support this work. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests. Sa.K., I.S.Y.C., and G.W.S. are authors on a patent application related to this work (no. 62/743,247. filed 9 October 2019). Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and the Supplementary Materials. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

See the article here:

The clonal repopulation of HSPC gene modified with antiHIV-1 RNAi is not affected by preexisting HIV-1 infection - Science Advances

COMMUNITY VOICES: Beyond the masks – The Bakersfield Californian

It calls for a celebration that we as a nation can be unified in our response to the virus. Real festivities will await eventual triumph but a significant step has been taken to consolidate the message. A message supported by abundance of science. Its time to coalesce as a nation and aim to win.

At the risk of being redundant, its necessary to reinforce strong safety precautions under three conditions that enable the virus spread: closed spaces, crowds and close contacts the three Cs. Its especially important when loud speech, singing and longer contacts are involved.

Virus has a strike zone, and virus is avoidable.

The path forward is clear. Lets keep it simple. Safe distancing and hygiene will remain foundational. At the very least, these common sense measures will reduce the size of infective dose and mitigate chances of an adverse outcome while lending immunity against future infections. As the number of people recovering from infection increases, building herd immunity becomes a natural barrier against the spread of virus. Preventative measures help slow the dissemination of virus, sparing health care systems from being unduly stressed. COVID-19 related hospitalizations can crowd out non-COVID-19 health care, adding to preventable loss of life.

Pharmaceuticals are evolving rapidly, adding significantly to the toolbox against the virus. Pharmaceuticals can help reduce hospitalizations by safely managing the sick on an outpatient basis.

COVID-19 seems to have two phases. In the first phase, as virus multiplies, the immune system endeavors to battle the virus to submission. Thankfully, most battles end there.

If the battle enters the second phase, the immune system can go into hyperdrive and raise a cytokine storm, inflicting damage at a cellular level that may eventuate in respiratory and multiple system failure. A number of antiviral agents and anti-inflammatory agents are being used with varying degrees of success in both outpatient and in-hospital settings. Convalescent plasma, monoclonal antibodies and cytokine removal devices, akin to dialysis machines for kidney failure patients, are being used to help the critically sick. We have learned to use ventilators more effectively and discriminatingly.

The mortality rate has been falling significantly as doctors have learned to deal with this novel disease. Current evidence suggests that the infection related fatality rate is less than 1 percent. Mortality is mostly concentrated in the elderly and infirm. Fortunately, elderly have received the memo and are scrupulous in practicing preventative measures. This will likely lower the mortality rate further.

We still have unresolved mysteries of lingering sequelae of COVID-19 in many patients.

The real optimistic expectations are centered around successful development of effective vaccines that will offer durable immunity. Embracing existing knowledge and adopting state-of-the-art genetic engineering technologies, a number of viable vaccine candidates have emerged. Challenges to successful stage three trials abound, but hope looks realistic now. We may have more than one successful vaccine in the next six to eight months and put the virus in the rear view.

Its conceivable that based on current labors we may have a platform virus that can be successfully and expeditiously tweaked to defeat the next pandemic.

Its not a bridge too far now. We will hold hands on the other side. For now, lets join our efforts to keep virus at a distance.

Dr. Brij Bhambi specializes in cardiac and vascular intervention, nuclear cardiology, consultative and general cardiology and holds board certification in Interventional Cardiology, Cardiovascular Disease, and Internal Medicine. He is a chief medical officer at Bakersfield Heart Hospital.

Visit link:

COMMUNITY VOICES: Beyond the masks - The Bakersfield Californian

UAE economy is strong and resilient to curb crises: Official – Gulf Today

Younis Haji Al Khoori, Under-Secretary of Ministry of Finance. File

The national economy of the UAE is strong and resilient and has the ability to overcome such crises, he added.

The general framework of the economic strategy of the UAE in facing the pandemic is based on two main phases, he noted, explaining the first - in the short term - is the gradual opening of the economy and business activities while taking into account the health precautions. We also supported the most affected sectors with economic stimulus plans, which, totalled to date, AED282.5 billion, thereby protecting entrepreneurs and SMEs.

This links the funds to the beneficiary sectors based on well-defined plans and effective mechanisms, he said in an interview published in the MoF e-Newsletter for July.

As for the second stage, Al Khoori explained, it is a long-term stimulus plan for the economy to accelerate recovery and advance growth. It works to transform challenges into opportunities and achieve sustainable economic development by enhancing the flexibility and sustainability of the economic model. It also encourages financing and investment in sectors with high future potential.

The focus in future, he added, will be on a digital economy; including artificial intelligence, AI, 5G, Internet of Things, IoT, smart cities, and green economy concepts and industries such as renewable energy, electric cars, and circular economy by enhancing productivity by integrating 3D printing technologies and robotics, promoting food security using advanced technologies such as AI, biotechnology, and genetic engineering.

Speaking about programmes and projects the ministry will launch to manage the next stage, Al Khoori said, The Ministry of Finance is working on proposing the required policies, legislations, and incentives to support opportunities for the industry across the country to ensure self-sufficiency and preparation for any future challenges. We will also launch programmes to support the health, education, technology, and food security sectors - placing the human factor as the basis of comprehensive development. We have also continued to work with the international community to ensure that we build an economic and geopolitical system that addresses and contains health and environmental disasters and mitigates their effects. This is in addition to supporting and encouraging government innovation programmes that grow the UAEs economy and achieves comprehensive development for all sectors, as well as launching a fee-pricing guide for federal government services thus providing a framework that is transparent, consistent, and easy to implement for relevant federal entities, he added.

With regards to the ministrys priorities in the post-COVID-19 phases, he said, Based on the UAEs strategy for the post-COVID-19 phase, the ministrys priorities are to submit proposals for draft laws and legislation that address the effects of the global pandemic on the nation. We are also drawing action plans and setting specific goals to meet urgent development needs. This is in addition to addressing the current challenges posed by the novel coronavirus, and taking into account the developments in the economic, developmental, community, service, and technological sectors.

Furthermore, the ministry is formulating policies to deal with similar challenges, examining deficiencies in sectors that faced more difficulties than others in dealing with the crisis, as well as supporting those that have been more resilient. This has contributed to supporting production and providing services with great efficiency in light of difficult situations we currently face. As for new laws and legislations that can be modified to respond to the current crisis, Al Khoori said, The Ministry of Finance, in coordination with competent authorities, shall study the proposals for issuing new legislation, or make amendments to some texts of the articles of the laws in force, in a manner that supports comprehensive development across sectors. Among the important laws issued in light of the current crisis, he explained, is the UAE insolvency law for natural persons, which eases the burden on anyone facing financial difficulties in paying their debts. This includes both citizens and residents.

WAM

See the rest here:

UAE economy is strong and resilient to curb crises: Official - Gulf Today

How wild rice has sustained the Ojibwe people – MinnPost

Wild rice is a food of great historical, spiritual, and cultural importance for the Ojibwe people. After colonization disrupted their traditional food system, however, they could no longer depend on stores of wild rice for food all year round. In the late 1950s and early 1960s, this traditional staple was appropriated by white entrepreneurs and marketed as a gourmet commodity. Native and non-Native people alike began to harvest rice to sell it for cash, threatening the health of the natural stands of the crop. This lucrative market paved the way for domestication of the plant, and farmers began cultivating it in paddies in the late 1960s. In the twenty-first century, many Ojibwe and other Native people are fighting to sustain the hand-harvested wild rice tradition and to protect wild rice beds.

Ojibwe people arrived in present-day Minnesota in the 1600s after a long migration from the east coast of the United States that lasted many centuries. Together with their Anishinaabe kin, the Potawatomi and Odawa, they followed a vision that told them to search for their homeland in a place where the food floats on water. The Ojibwe recognized this as the wild rice they found growing around Lake Superior (Gichigami), and they settled on the sacred site of what is known today as Madeline Island (Moningwanakauning).

Article continues after advertisement

In the Ojibwe language, wild rice (Zizania palustris) is called manoomin, meaning good berry, harvesting berry, or wondrous grain. It is a highly nutritious wild grain that is gathered from lakes and waterways by canoe in late August and early September, during the wild rice moon (manoominike giizis).

Before contact with Europeans and as late as the early twentieth century, Ojibwe people depended on wild rice as a crucial part of their diet, together with berries, fish, meat, vegetables, and maple sugar. They moved their camps throughout the year, depending on the activities of seasonal food gathering. In autumn, families moved to a location close to a lake with a promising stand of wild rice and stayed there for the duration of the season. Men hunted and fished while women harvested rice, preparing food for their families to eat throughout the following winter, spring, and summer.

Ojibwe people harvested wild rice, and continue to harvest it today, in pairs, with one person pushing or paddling a canoe and the other knocking rice into it with sticks (bawaiganaakoog). When the wild rice is ripe, the grains fall easily into a canoe, and the grains that fall into the water lodge themselves into the mud, then grow into the following years stands of rice.

Freshly harvested manoomin is called green rice. When processed in the traditional way, it is parched (roasted) over a fire, then threshed by being stepped or danced on. This motion, called jigging, loosens and removes the fibrous outer covering of the grain. Finally, to separate the hulls from the grain, wild rice is winnowed or fannedtossed up in the air with birch bark trays (nooshkaachinaaganan) so that the hulls are blown away and only the edible grain is left behind.

The work that goes into preparing wild rice for eating and storage was traditionally carried out collectively. Women marked the areas designated for particular families by binding a number of heads together. This ensured that everyone in the community got the rice they needed, and it also made harvesting easier.

Taking care of the natural world that sustains us forms a central part of the Ojibwe peoples way of seeing the world. Traditional wild rice harvesting practices reflect this, protecting wild rice beds for the long-term wellbeing of the ecosystem as well as the community. Designated elders would, and on reservations still do, carefully monitor lakes to prevent premature or excessive harvests, opening and closing lakes to ricing as necessary, and leaving some mature grains unharvested for re-seeding.

Article continues after advertisement

Loss of a traditional food system

As far back as the early fur trade in the mid-1600s, some Ojibwe families traded wild rice for goods. For the most part, however, they collected it for household consumption or trade between tribes. Processing wild rice is a labor-intensive activity, and families harvested only as much as they could process.

Colonization, land loss, the establishment of reservations, and dependence on government food and payments separated Ojibwe people from their way of life andwith some exceptionsthreatened their traditional food system. As people stopped eating their traditional diets in the mid-twentieth century, major health problems like diabetes emerged. Harvesting practices also changed as they lost access to the lakes and rivers in which wild rice grew, and as they adapted to the changing world around them. Men began to harvest wild rice together with women, gathering it in aluminum canoes rather than birch bark ones and processing it with machines. Until the 1950s, Ojibwe people remained the primary ricers.

Ojibwe people both on and off reservations faced a period of difficulty after World War II. Traditional lifeways could no longer sustain family needs, and jobs were difficult to find. Many people moved to cities; others suffered from poverty on their reservations. At the same time, the North American wild rice market shifted as a new marketing model began to demand products in large quantities to be sold across the nation. The price of wild rice rose as it gained in popularity, and both Natives and non-Natives began to harvest the crop for cash rather than for home consumption. Inexperienced non-Native harvesters used methods that began to put wild rice beds in danger. Technology, including parching, thrashing, and fanning machines, was further developed to process the rice with more ease. Processing plants were set up across the stateprimarily, but not exclusively, by white people.

As the national market for wild rice grew, more people became interested in figuring out how to cultivate it as a crop, like paddy rice. This led to domestication efforts at the University of Minnesota and the expansion of many acres of paddy rice in both Minnesota and California. Wild rice was made the Minnesota state grain in 1977. Unfortunately, however, the cheaper production costs of cultivated wild rice drove down demand for hand-harvested wild rice, leaving Ojibwe people without this source of income.

Article continues after advertisement

As far back as the 1930s, the health of wild rice beds has been a serious concern. In 1939 Minnesota passed a law outlawing mechanized harvest and limiting how and when wild rice could be harvested. Since then, it has enacted other protective policies, including limiting the number of hours in the day during which it is permissible to rice and limiting the length of the canoe used for ricing. In the 1990s, wild rice was identified as an endangered food. The plant is sensitive to water levels altered by dams as well as road construction, pollution, poor harvesting practices, invasive species, genetic engineering (genetic contamination of the wild rice from the paddies), and climate change.

In response to these threats, Ojibwe and other Native people organized. For example, in 1994, the Fond du Lac and Bois Forte bands developed a Wild Rice Restoration Plan for the St. Louis River Watershed designed to restore lost stands of the crop and manage its harvest. In the same decade, the White Earth Land Recovery Project began to sell hand-harvested wild rice, and multiple bands formed reservation wild-rice committees to manage harvests.

In the 2020s, Ojibwe people continue to defend and protect this vital plant and the cultural, health, and spiritual importance that it holds. Individuals as well as tribes organize ricing camps to teach traditional practices of ricing, parching, and finishing. Others are actively fighting against the Enbridge Line 3 oil pipeline replacement project that would cross wild rice habitat, or collaborating in a movement for Native food sovereignty.

For more information on this topic, check out the original entry on MNopedia.

Originally posted here:

How wild rice has sustained the Ojibwe people - MinnPost

Resurrecting the chestnut tree, with cross-breeding or genetic engineering – Concord Monitor

A long-running attempt to resurrect the American chestnut tree from the blight that virtually exterminated it an attempt that can be seen in a Plymouth germplasm conservation orchard among other places is now running on two tracks, one with traditional cross-breeding and one with genetic modification.

Well be harvesting nuts in late September. Hopefully were going to have hundreds if not thousands, said Thomas Klak, a professor at the University of New England in Maine who is about to send modified chestnut tree genes into the wild. The weird weather has not helped us. Flower development on chestnut trees has been relatively slow this year.

At UNE, Klak has built a lab that uses high-intensity light and fertilizers to bring trees to sexual maturity in six months as compared to a few years, speeding up cross-breeding efforts.

Recently his lab has used this process to grow trees developed at the State University of New York that contain a gene common in grasses which neutralizes the fungal toxin, rendering the blight harmless. This month he will perform the first cross-pollination between these genetically modified trees and American chestnut trees in the wild, having obtained permission from the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

If all goes as expected, Klak said, Half of the offspring wont die from the fungal blight and there will be renewed hope of returning the American chestnut to our forests.

Weve got a long way to go. There are four billion trees to bring back, he said.

The chestnut was one of the giants of Eastern forests, so prevalent that foresters joked a squirrel could travel from Georgia to Maine without leaving the chestnut canopy. It was valued both for its wood and for its bounty of nuts that were a major source of wildlife food.

Around 1904, however, a bark fungus was carried here on Chinese chestnut trees and within a few decades it had exterminated the native species. The only American chestnut trees around now are sprouts from stumps that occasionally live long enough to produce flowers and nuts for a year or two before dying.

For decades the American Chestnut Federation has been hunting down these natural remnants to mix their pollen with the flowers of Chinese chestnut trees, which resist the blight but dont have the beauty and heft of the American species. These trees have been grown in orchards around the country, including one in downtown Plymouth that grows pure American chestnuts to preserve the genetics, and mixed back and forth with other American chestnuts or Chinese chestnuts or with each other.

This has gone on for more than six generations in hopes that genes for resistance will be transferred via germplasm, or the heritable DNA, to a tree that looks and grows like the American chestnut.

Earlier this month I saw this process in action when Curt Laffin of Hudson came to my town to pollinate a chestnut tree that my wife had spotted. It probably wont last much longer because it has a big ugly canker, a sure sign of the blight, but for the moment its a handsome, 30-foot tree full of green leaves and long, hanging flowers.

Laffin, a wildlife biologist and American Chestnut Foundation member who Ive interviewed several times over the years, brought male flowers from two surviving chestnut trees in Merrimack and spent a half-hour shaking them next to female flowers on our tree. Part of the work was done with an extendable pole that he designed. Then he cut off some male flowers that hell take back to Merrimack to do the same there.

We collect as much DNA from wild trees as we can, he said.

Hell put small bags over the flowers so they wont be pollinated by anything else, then later will collect the nuts. Theyll be planted and the resulting trees added to the cross-breeding mix at orchards throughout the Vermont-New Hampshire chapter of the American Chestnut Foundation, increasing the genetic diversity of this long-running effort.

It takes a couple of years to grow a mature tree and more years to see if the tree can resist the blight thats present in the environment before deciding which individuals to use for the next generation, so this has been a slow, laborious process.

And its beginning to look like a process that wont succeed.

Originally they thought that it took three or four genes from Chinese chestnut to provide resistance. Now we know dozens of genes are needed, Laffin said. The possibility of transferring that many genes via the random mixing of cross-breeding is beginning to seem very unlikely.

Enter genetic modification, which can pick and choose among the genes that get transferred.

Scientists at SUNYs College of Environmental Science and Forestry were able to insert a gene that lets a plant create an enzyme called oxalate oxidase, written as OxO. The enzyme neutralizes the acid produced by the fungus, which is what destroys the chestnut trees cells and kills it.

Klak said OxO is a good candidate for genetic transfer because it exists naturally in many different plants, from azaleas to bananas the one used at SUNY-ESF came from wheat. Klak said theres hardly a person in the U.S. who hasnt eaten something which contains the gene already.

Just as importantly, Klak said OxO wont push the chestnut tree blight into evolving resistant strains because it doesnt alter the fungal life cycle, but merely neutralizes a side effect.

The blight can function and live well. It doesnt kill the blight, just makes the chestnut tree tolerate it, said Klak.

The resulting tree is normal in all other ways, he said: Dozens of studies have been done to document that transferring it creates a tree that is just like the wild chestnut except it wont die from blight.

That isnt any solace to opponents, who are opposed to the project because of concerns about the unintended consequences of genetic modification, particularly when it transfers a gene from a species that would not naturally cross-breed with the host.

Once a gene becomes released in the wild it is almost impossible to contain it. Thats especially true if the gene jumps to other species, which has happened with some genes inserted into domestic crops, where it might cause a different and unwelcome response.

There is also a concern from opponents that the chestnut program will be used as a sort of biotech Trojan horse. If creating a GMO chestnut helps bring back a beloved and valuable species, it might become a poster boy for other GMO trees and then genetic modification of other wild species, they fear.

As might be expected, Klak thinks these concerns are misplaced.

This doesnt open up a Pandoras box, he said. It doesnt affect other attempts to bring genetically engineered plants into deregulation. They have to go through the same process go through a very rigorous scientific process to ensure there are no dangers of releasing the transgenic species.

As for Laffin and the American Chestnut Federation, they will continue with the decades-old program of crossing Chinese and American chestnuts in hopes that nature will create the solution.

The New Hampshire-Vermont chapter of the ACF is one of 16 around the country. Each is supposed to provide 35 trees that can be fertilized with pollen from the transgenic tree, which is a clone my towns tree and the Merrimack tree will be part of that. The idea is to create a diverse population with traits developed from growing in different parts of the Eastern seaboard, each carrying the OxO gene.

This is a pretty vigorous tree, he commented as he loaded his pickup. Well have to see how it goes.

(David Brooks can be reached at 369-3313 or dbrooks@cmonitor.com or on Twitter @GraniteGeek.)

Link:

Resurrecting the chestnut tree, with cross-breeding or genetic engineering - Concord Monitor

Why are scientists creating genetically modified mosquitoes? – The Week

Scientists plan to release altered mosquitoes designed to sabotage the species' ability to reproduce. Is this safe? Here's everything you need to know:

Who's doing this?The federal Environmental Protection Agency has approved a plan by a British biotech company called Oxitec to release about 1 billion genetically modified (GM) mosquitoes in the Florida Keys and, next year, Texas. The mosquitoes (code-named OX5034) will only be male the gender that does not bite humans and will carry a new gene that will be passed on to their female offspring and cause them to die while they're still larvae. Repeated releases of such "Trojan horse" mosquitoes should kill, in theory, 90 percent of the local population of the Aedes aegypti mosquito, which is capable of transmitting the Zika and West Nile viruses, as well as dengue and yellow fever. Oxitec claims it's safe and notes that the species is invasive to south Florida, anyway. But the plan has drawn protest from residents and some in the scientific community. "People here in Florida do not consent to the genetically engineered mosquitoes or to being human experiments," said Barry Wray of the Florida Keys Environmental Coalition. Henry Greely, a Stanford law professor and bioethicist, said the Oxitec plan reflects the almost limitless possibilities and dangers of genetic technology. "We can remake the biosphere to be what we want, from woolly mammoths to nonbiting mosquitoes," he said. "How should we feel about that? Do we want to live in nature, or in Disneyland?"

How does this technology work?Scientists first genetically modified an animal a mouse in 1974. But the process remained cumbersome and slow until the development of the CRISPR technique and other "gene-editing" technology this decade. Now scientists can target exactly which genes they want to modify using RNA, break the DNA apart at the gene's location using an enzyme, and then insert a new gene. Last year, University of Georgia researchers created the first genetically modified reptile, a brown anole, and an Indiana company, AquaBounty, expects to begin harvesting tons of salmon genetically modified to grow faster at an indoor facility later this year. Critics say this is all moving too fast, without adequate study of risks and unintended consequences. Jaydee Hanson, policy director for the International Center for Technology Assessment and Center for Food Safety, calls Oxitec's project a "Jurassic Park experiment, except without the island."

Where do the plans stand?In May, the EPA greenlighted Oxitec's plans for both Florida and Texas, issuing the company an experimental use permit. Florida state authorities followed suit with their own approval. Texas authorities and the Florida Keys Mosquito Control commission still need to sign off, and may face lawsuits. More than 31,000 people filed objections with the EPA and only 56 expressed support with some accusing the agency of relying solely on data supplied by Oxitec to issue permits. "What could possibly go wrong?" asked Hanson. "We don't know, because they unlawfully refused to seriously analyze environmental risks."

What could go wrong?Some geneticists, including Dr. Ricarda Steinbrecher of EcoNexus, a public-interest research organization, have raised alarms that Oxitec's altered mosquitoes haven't been adequately studied. The researcher said "the underlying mechanism(s) leading to cell death" in the larvae aren't "fully understood" and thus can't yield "precise and predictable results." An independent group of researchers also claimed that some of the larvae produced from an earlier Oxitec field study in Brazil survived to sexual maturity and were able to reproduce introducing the mosquitoes' modified DNA into the local population. (So far, there is no evidence that the resulting hybrid is more robust or dangerous to humans.) Critics also warn that the potential removal of even an invasive species from the food chain and ecosystem could have profound unintentional consequences; many kinds of birds and bats, for example, eat mosquitoes. "I'm not sure I care if mosquitoes suffer, if they can suffer," Greely said. "But mammals or birds, I do care."

What's the upside?Some see world-changing possibilities. Florida witnessed its first mosquito-to-human transmission of the Zika virus (which causes serious birth defects) in 2016, and West Nile is a perennial problem. As these diseases spread northward in a warming world, the elimination of a species that transmits them could prevent many illnesses and save lives. Meanwhile, a team of scientists led by the renowned botanist Joanne Chory is using CRISPR to create plants capable of storing extra carbon dioxide. Theoretically, if applied on a large scale, such plants could suck more greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and arrest the forces of climate change. "I feel like I have the weight of the world on my shoulders," Chory has said. In Australia, researchers are devising a genetically modified coral capable of withstanding rising sea temperatures. "The worst thing that we could do is ignore genetic engineering because it's frightening for some people," said coral geneticist Line Bay, "and then get 10 or 15 years down the road and realize it's the only option."

Oxitec's modified mothsSouth Florida and Texas aren't the only places that Oxitec is testing its genetically modified insects. Earlier this year, Cornell University scientists announced the results of a project they had conducted with the company involving its genetically modified diamondback moths, or Plutella xylostella. The pest reportedly wreaks between $4 billion and $5 billion a year of damage to crops like broccoli, canola, cauliflower, and cabbage. Scientists and farmers are eager to find ways of limiting the damage as well as reducing the $19 billion worth of chemical pesticides sprayed on crops each year. The modified male moths come with a self-limiting gene that causes their female progeny to die. The Cornell team declared the test a success, saying that the modified moths should "effectively suppress populations of pest P. xylostella in the field." The company is also at work developing a modified, self-limiting version of the fall armyworm, which is responsible for terrible crop losses across sub-Saharan Africa and parts of Asia. An Oxitec scientist who co-authored the Cornell report hailed the "immense potential" of protecting plants without resorting to potentially toxic pesticides.

This article was first published in the latest issue of The Week magazine. If you want to read more like it, you can try six risk-free issues of the magazine here.

Continued here:

Why are scientists creating genetically modified mosquitoes? - The Week