Another election cycle, another social media platform threatening democracy.

According to a new report from Global Witness and NYU's Cybersecurity for Democracy team, TikTok is absolutely terrible at filtering out harmful misinformation regarding elections and politics.

The report actually tested TikTok, Facebook, and YouTube, all of which performed pretty poorly at detecting and removing misinformation-laden advertising content uploaded by researchers. Out of those, TikTok proved to be the worst. After uploading droves of ill-informed, potentially-dangerous advertisements for approval, the researchers found that 90 percent of those fake ads were ultimately approved by the popular video app.

Although the report is still preliminary, that's an alarming figure — especially considering how quickly TikTok's growth has outpaced that of other platforms in recent years, not to mention how wildly popular it is with younger people.

"This year is going to be much worse as we near the midterms," Olivia Little, a coauthor of the report, told The Guardian. "There has been an exponential increase in users, which only means there will be more misinformation TikTok needs to proactively work to stop or we risk facing another crisis."

Per the report, the fake advertisements ranged in what might be considered severity. Some, for example, contained misleading details like incorrect election dates; some included misleading or false voting requirements; others still used language that outright discouraged citizens from voting in the midterms at all.

And while a failure to filter out that much false — and therefore, inherently dangerous — material is a bad look for any platform, it seems especially so for one that's prided itself on its policies regarding election content and political advertisements. TikTok's loudly made clear that its policies don't allow for any paid political ads; any verified political accounts are automatically disqualified from using pay-to-play tools available to influencers, and just this past August, midterms in sight, the platform announced new-and-improved policy changes designed to tackle the misinformation threat.

"At TikTok, we take our responsibility to protect the integrity of our platform — particularly around elections — with the utmost seriousness," Erik Han, the app's head of US safety, wrote in an August blog post. "To bolster our response to emerging threats, TikTok partners with independent intelligence firms and regularly engages with others across the industry, civil society organizations, and other experts."

It's worth noting that this is the second time that TikTok has very explicitly come under fire for, um, threatening American democracy in recent days. On Thursday — the same day that this report was officially released — it was revealed that TikTok's parent company, ByteDance, had been planning on using the app's location data to spy on the physical locations of specific US citizens. (It's still unclear if they actually got around to it or not.)

As the Guardian points out, the app's remarkably tailored algorithm is inextricably linked to its misinformation failures. Like any of the platform's popular dance trends, misinformation can go very viral, very quickly, as was recorded in a report from the nonprofit Mozilla during Kenya's contentious August elections.

That being said, though, TikTok's virality-happy algorithm is central to app's success. And if that's how it keeps eyeballs on its pages, it's unlikely the company will make any serious changes that jeopardize that business reality — even if, at the same time, it's struggling to keep up with the spread of mis- and disinformation.

"If the TikToks of the world really want to fight fake news, they could do it," Helen Lee Bouygue, who heads a media literacy platform called Reboot Foundation, told the Guardian. "But as long as their financial model is keeping eyes on the page, they have no incentive to do so. That's where policymaking needs to come into play."

The post Research Confirms TikTok Is a Cesspool of Misinformation appeared first on Futurism.

More:
Research Confirms TikTok Is a Cesspool of Misinformation

Bad Reaction

Europe's energy crisis may have just gotten worse.

The Wall Street Journal reports that dozens of France's nuclear reactors — which, amid Russia's devastating stranglehold on the continent's natural gas supply, are essential to the nation's energy security — remain offline following a series of troubling outages believed to be caused by stress-induced pipe corrosion. Fixes are reportedly taking longer than anticipated, but for a struggling continent on the brink of winter, those fixes can't come quickly enough.

"It's important that this work restarts as soon as possible," Emmanuelle Wargon, head of France's energy regulator, told the WSJ. "If not, the risk of not having electricity rises."

High Pressure

The nuclear fleet in question, owned by the energy provider EDF, is comprised of 56 reactors, of which 26 are currently out for the count.

According to the WSJ, the pipe problems trace back to late last year, when a crack was discovered in a high-pressure pipe close to the reactor's core at the nation's youngest nuclear plant. Other plants, which then launched their own investigations, discovered their own stress corrosion issues shortly thereafter.

"It is only possible to identify [stress corrosion's] presence once cracking has begun," read a note from France's Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety, the WSJ reports. "Regular inspections of the pipes can only identify the phenomenon once a fault is present."

Importantly, these aren't simple fixes. Because the majority of the cracks are so close to the reactor core, radioactivity is a very real threat for technicians, whose exposure has to be limited.

And given how complicated the repairs are, French power experts are reportedly quite pessimistic about the EDF's ability to get their reactors back online for the winter, especially given that, per the WSJ's sources, the timelines for several reactor fixes have already been pushed back by at least six weeks.

Beyond the Border

These outages are clearly terrible for France, but they're just as bad for the rest of Europe, too.

Natural gas prices have skyrocketed as a result of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, which sparred a barrage of Western sanctions and Russia's subsequent retaliation by way of natural gas restriction. Nations are asking a lot of their citizens, and the continent needs any ounce of energy that it can scavenge to at least somewhat comfortably — let alone safely — get through the winter.

READ MORE: France's Nuclear Reactors Malfunction as Energy Crisis Bites [The Wall Street Journal]

More on Europe's energy crisis: Europe's Energy Crisis Is so Bad It May Have to Idle Cern's Large Hadron Collider

The post France Discovers Ominous Cracks in Dozens of Nuclear Reactors appeared first on Futurism.

See the rest here:
France Discovers Ominous Cracks in Dozens of Nuclear Reactors

Doo Doo Doo Doo

Someone deepfaked a video of President Joe Biden singing "Baby Shark" and calling it our "national anthem" — and as scary as that precedent is, the video itself is pretty amazing.

"Ladies and gentlemen, and now, our great national anthem," the president is heard saying in the video before busting out into a rendition of the worst children's song earworm since "Do You Want to Build a Snowman?"

Concern Quotient

Shortly after the edited video began circulating — with right-wingers claiming alongside it, of course, that it was evidence that Biden was suffering from dementia — the Associated Press debunked the disinformation associated with the video and confirmed that it was, indeed, a deepfake.

The concept that bad actors could morph footage to make anyone say anything they want is, in a word, terrifying. When applied to a figure as powerful as an American president, those issues go from concerning to alarming, with fears that phony videos could have long-lasting repercussions or be used to control public people a la "Black Mirror."

Feats of Tech

In spite of the high creepiness factor, however, it's worth taking a moment to recognize how impressive this technology is.

While it's fairly clear that the president's voice and mouth have been edited in this specific example, an untrained eye or a cursory glance — such as on TikTok, where the video also circulated heavily — might not catch that it's a fake. That, in an of itself, is a huge feat of technology that has only just begun being perfected.

We've entered a brave new world of AI — and it's able to make creepy, hilarious, and alarming videos of the president singing children's songs and calling them the national anthem.

More AI: People Can't Stop Feeding Their Selfies Into a Super Mean AI

The post Creepy Deepfake Shows Biden Sing the "National Anthem": Baby Shark appeared first on Futurism.

Visit link:
Creepy Deepfake Shows Biden Sing the "National Anthem": Baby Shark

Israeli biotech company BioHarvest claims to have grown a substance that features all the active ingredients of cannabis inside a bioreactor — and it's 12 times more potent than nature's best, The Times of Israel reports.

The company is heralding the invention as a breakthrough that could make medical cannabis cheaper and more environmentally friendly as well, since it doesn't need nearly as much water or any fertilizer at all.

"We don’t grow the plant at all," BioHarvest CEO Ilan Sobel told The Times of Israel, explaining that cells from the hemp plant are cultivated inside massive bioreactors in a lab.

The process is surprisingly quick as well.

"We grow them in huge bioreactors in just three weeks — while regular cannabis takes 14 to 23 weeks," he added. "Our tech can also significantly increase the levels of active ingredients, as a percent of the weight, versus what is found normally in the plant."

In other words, the resulting THC substance can be extremely potent — but it doesn't necessarily have to be.

"By adjusting specific conditions to which the cells are exposed, we can create different desired compositions of active ingredients, meaning we can dial up and down the various cannabinoids [compounds]," Sobel told the newspaper.

The substance also doesn't require any genetic modification and perfectly replicates all the CBD, THC, and "minor cannabinoid" compounds found in naturally grown weed, he said.

According to BioHarvest's calculations, it only needs one gallon of water to produce the same amount of material that it'd take 54 gallons to grow in plant form — and in 90 percent less space.

So what's the drawback? While the company has applied for licenses to sell its product in both the US and Israel for medical purposes, it will likely be a long and drawn-out process.

Then there's the question if people will actually be open to try it. BioHarvest claims its substance can be smoked, taken in pill or drop form, or used in chewing gum — but that's not a guarantee that consumers will embrace the new option.

Nonetheless, it's a fascinating look at a burgeoning industry. BioHarvest is even planning to test its products out in outer space, after partnering with retired Canadian astronaut Chris Hadfield.

Perhaps one day, space travelers will be able to still enjoy some recreational marijuana — without the need of maintaining an entire orbital greenhouse.

READ MORE: Cloned cannabis cells with 12 times more potency are grown in Israeli bioreactor [The Times of Israel]

More on BioHarvest: Former Astronaut Details Quest to Grow Cannabinoids in Space

The post Scientists Grow Superpowered THC Substance Inside Bioreactors appeared first on Futurism.

See the original post:
Scientists Grow Superpowered THC Substance Inside Bioreactors

Let That Sink In

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has shared a video of himself carrying what appears to be a ceramic bathroom sink into the lobby of Twitter HQ in San Francisco.

"Entering Twitter HQ — let that sink in!" the enigmatic billionaire wrote in the caption, clearly amused by his own dad joke.

Musk appears to be imminently ready to close the deal to buy the social media company, news that comes on the heels of months of chaotic negotiations, drama in the courts, and Musk's repeated and increasingly desperate attempts to get out of the $44 billion deal he signed with Twitter back in April.

Entering Twitter HQ – let that sink in! pic.twitter.com/D68z4K2wq7

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 26, 2022

Say Hi

Employees only got very short notice of Musk's impromptu visit. According to a shared screenshot of an email reportedly sent out to staff, "Elon is in the SF office this week meeting with folks, walking the halls, and continuing to dive in on the important work you all do."

"If you're in SF and see him around, say hi!" the email reads. "For everyone else, this is just the beginning of many meetings and conversations with Elon, and you'll hear directly from him on Friday," referring to the date Musk is rumored to close the deal.

Earlier this week, Musk notified co-investors that he will close his acquisition deal on Friday. Shares jumped following the news, nearing the original acquisition price of $54,20, Reuters reports.

A lot is at stake for Twitter. The Washington Post reported last week that Musk is planning to gut the company, firing up to 75 percent of staff.

In short, Twitter employees only have days for a new reality to "sink in" — the company almost certainly has some rocky weeks and months ahead of it.

More on the debacle: Investors in Elon Musk's Twitter Deal Horrified It Might Actually Go Through

The post Elon Musk Spotted Carrying Sink Into Twitter Headquarters appeared first on Futurism.

See the original post:
Elon Musk Spotted Carrying Sink Into Twitter Headquarters

Burger Kings

Rejoice, burger lovers! According to a new report from the World Resource Institute (WRI), those who live in the developed world can still eat delicious burgers and not entirely destroy the planet— as long as they make sure to cap consumption at about two normal-sized patties per week.

One catch, though: those two burgers will have to be the only meat you eat at all that week. So, uh, maybe tone down the celebration just a little.

Bunbelievable

This revelation, among many others, was found in the WRI's annual State of Climate Action report, the latest installment of which was published earlier today by the global nonprofit. For the report, researchers examined exactly how much — or, rather, how little — progress was made in 40 different key climate indicators, ranging from transport to renewable energies to, yes, meat consumption and more.

Burgers aside, we aren't exactly doing so hot in any of the categories.

Per the report, if humans are to avoid the worst of climate catastrophes, we'll have to do a lot of difficult things a lot faster than we're doing them today. Among other very tall tasks, coal will need to be phased out six times more quickly than is being done so today; the amount of available public transport has to expand, also at rates six times faster. Deforestation rates, too, must drop dramatically, while a rapid increase in the use of fossil fuels is cause for alarm as well.

"The world has seen the devastation wrought by just 1.1 [Celsius] of warming," Ani Dasgupta, the chief executive of the World Resources Institute, told The Guardian. "Every fraction of a degree matters in the fight to protect people and the planet."

Eat Your Veggies

As far as limiting meat goes, the researchers, like many others, cite agricultural emissions — a phenomenon that's been well on the rise since the dawn of the industry's industrialization — as a main cause for concern within the sector.

That being said, for cholesterol's sake, you probably shouldn't eat more than two burgers a week anyway. In any case, though, maybe this week, in the spirit of the State of Climate Action 2022, sub at least one meaty meal — burger or otherwise — for a vegetable dish instead.

"We are seeing important advances in the fight against climate change," Dasgupta continued to the Guardian, "but we are still not winning in any sector."

READ MORE: Cut meat consumption to two burgers a week to save planet, study suggests [The Guardian]

More on meat consumption: Scientists Cook Comically Tiny Lab-Grown Hamburger

The post Scientists Identify Exact Number of Burgers You Can Eat Without Destroying the Earth appeared first on Futurism.

Original post:
Scientists Identify Exact Number of Burgers You Can Eat Without Destroying the Earth

Death Drive

Tesla is reportedly under criminal investigation by the Justice Department over misleading marketing of its driver assistance system called Autopilot, Reuters reports.

According to Reuter's sources, the department launched an undisclosed probe last year, investigating more than a dozen crashes involving Tesla's notorious driver assistance feature, some fatal.

While we've heard of other regulators such as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) also investigating the company over the same issue, a criminal probe could signify an even higher level of scrutiny for the electric car company.

Take the Wheel

The news also comes a week after Musk announced during an earnings call that an upcoming version of the company's dubiously-named "Full Self-Driving" feature would allow owners to drive "to your work, your friend’s house, to the grocery store without you touching the wheel."

Musk also said that "it won't have regulatory approval at that time," adding that he hopes to eventually convince regulators that it is indeed safe.

It sounds like the DOJ investigation is looking at Autopilot rather than Full Self-Driving, but autonomous vehicles are clearly part of his vision — which means this probe represents a threat.

READ MORE: Exclusive: Tesla faces U.S. criminal probe over self-driving claims [Reuters]

More on Autopilot: Overwhelming Majority of Automated Driving Deaths Caused By Tesla Vehicles

The post Tesla Reportedly Under Criminal Investigation for Claiming Its Cars Can Drive Themselves appeared first on Futurism.

The rest is here:
Tesla Reportedly Under Criminal Investigation for Claiming Its Cars Can Drive Themselves

When Boots Riley's "Sorry To Bother You" dropped in 2018, we knew it was only a matter of time before some of the film's dystopian predictions started to come true. But we've gotta admit, AI technology that converts realtime speech into a cookie cutter, white-coded accent is pushing it.

AsSFGATE reports, a startup called Sanas is offering "accent translation" that makes call center employees many of whom are hired overseas, where labor is cheaper, and hence have non-American accents sound more palatable to American ears.

In short: yes, this startup really does make call center workers sound more white, and judging by the $32 million it's raised in its first series of funding, investors think there's a big business opportunity there.

Using artificial intelligence, Sanas claims on its website that it'll provide call center employees with the choice whether or not to make their accents sound more like "standard American English" a choice that will, per the company's marketing, help these workers "take back the power of their own voice."

That choice, as experts who spoke to theSFGate note, would likely be illusory. Call center works are deeply beholden to customer feedback, and if they realize that customers prefer the non-accented AI version of their speech, the incentive structure will almost certainly force their hand. And as Sanas president Marty Sarim admitted to the paper in an email, company owners "will hold the admin rights" to the technology.

"There is virtually nothing in the labor process of call centers which involves choice by the workers in terms of technology," Winifred Poster, a sociology professor at Washington University in St. Louis, toldSFGate.

Beyond those issues is the company's demo voice itself, which frankly doesn't sound all that human. The University of Toronto's Kiran Mirchandani, whose research was on the treatment of Indian call center employees, predicts that the type of callers who would be likely to be racist or angry towards accented call center workers are also likely to get abusive if they hear a robotic app voice.

"Customer racism is likely to increase if workers are further dehumanized when an app is placed between worker and customer," she told the SFGate, "especially since there will no doubt be errors made by the app."

Sanas' president,however, told the paper that he doesn't "foresee anything bad coming out of this."

"We don't want to say that accents are a problem because you have one," Sarim told SFGate. "They're only a problem because they cause bias and they cause misunderstandings."

Sorry to bother you, dude, but that seems dubious.

READ MORE: Sanas, the buzzy Bay Area startup that wants to make the world sound whiter [San Francisco Gate]

On the brighter side of AI voice tech:Val Kilmer's Dialogue in "Top Gun: Maverick" Was Read By An AI Because He Can't Speak Anymore

See the rest here:

Cursed Startup Using AI to Remove Call Center Workers' Accents - Futurism

Kinda sad, sorry.NFT Come Lately

Iconic rappers Calvin "Snoop Dogg" Broadus Jr and Marshall "Eminem" Mathers took the stage at this year's MTV Music Video Awards to perform their single "From the D 2 the LBC," with each performer rendered as a Bored Ape Yacht Club NFT they own.

It was an uncomfortable attempt to blend the real world and the "metaverse," brought to life in a cringe-inducing NFT extravaganza that felt more like a hastily assembled marketing pitch than a music performance.

The low effort rendering of Snoop Dogg in particular almost seemed like an afterthought, with his virtual chain, a nod to the classic label Death Row Records which he acquired earlier this year with an eye toward web3 monetization repeatedly clipping through his torso, like a character in an poorly designed video game.

As such, the event seemed to typify the challenges faced by both the metaverse and NFTs, each of which has managed to build substantial investment and hype even though neither has necessarily demonstrated the merit to justify that interest.

But hey, at least we got to see Em and Snoop shuffling around like characters from "The Sims."

A whole host of celebrities many aging, like Broadus and Mathers have jumped on the Bored Ape bandwagon as of late, spending tremendous sums on the exclusive rights to cartoon illustrations of simians.

But the overall NFT market isn't looking too great these days. According to recent estimates, the number of NFT transactions has fallen off a cliff this summer, leading to renewed speculation about an impending NFT bubble.

Even the Bored Apes, one of the biggest NFT collections out there by transaction volume, has been facing plummeting prices.

Will Snoop and Em's thinly-veiled attempt at riding that wave prove to be a saving grace? Anything can happen in the music business, but don't hold your breath.

More on the song: Eminem and Snoop Dogg Make Music Video Where They Appear As Their Bored Apes

Read more here:

Snoop Dogg Did a Song in the "Metaverse" and His Bling Kept Clipping Through His Torso - Futurism

Were guessing that among Hackadays readership are plenty of futurists, and while the past might be the wrong direction in which to look when considering futurism, we wouldnt blame any of them for hankering for the days when futurism was mainstream.

Perhaps one of the most globally iconic buildings of that era could have been found in Tokyo, in the form of the Nakagin Capsule Tower, Kisho Kurokawas 1972 Metabolist apartment block. This pioneering structure, in which individual apartments were conceived as plug-in units that could be moved or changed at will, never achieved its potential and was dismantled, looking more post-apocalyptic than futuristic in early 2022, but it could live on in both digital form and reconstructed elsewhere as the rights to its design are being auctioned.

Unfortunately there appears to be some NFT mumbo-jumbo associated with the sale, but whats up for auction is a complete CAD model along with the rights to build either real or virtual copies of the building. Its unlikely that any Hackaday readers will pony up for their own Metabolist skyscraper, but the interest lies not only in the love of a future that never quite happened, but in the engineering behind the structure. Where this is being written as in many other places there is simultaneously a chronic housing shortage and a housing system wedded to the outdated building techniques of a previous century, so the thought of updated equivalents of the Nakagin Tower offering the chance of modular interchangeable housing in an era perhaps more suited to it than the 1970s is an intriguing one. Now that were living in the future, perhaps its time to give futurism another chance.

Regular readers will have spotted this isnt the first time weve brought you a taste of futuristic living.

Header: Svetlov Artem, CC0.

Read the original:

Buy The Right To Build A Nakagin Tower Anywhere - Hackaday

Remember when John McAfee died last summer in an apparent suicide? According to a dubious claim by one of his exes, it was all an elaborate hoax.

In a new Netflix documentary titled "Running With the Devil: The Wild World of John McAfee," McAfee's Belizean ex Samantha Herrera claims that the fugitive tech entrepreneur called her after his reports of his death by suicide in June 2021 and asked her to run away with him.

"I dont know if I should say," Herrera told the cameras, "but two weeks ago, after his death, I got a call from Texas: 'Its me, John. I paid off people to pretend that I am dead, but I am not dead.'"

"'There are only three persons in this world that know Im still alive,'" Herrera claims that McAfee told her.

Let's be clear: in one way or another, this is almost certainly shenanigans. It's possible that Herrera is the victim of a hoax herself, that she's making stuff up for publicity, or some other strange explanation. But it's very, very unlikely that McAfee is still alive.

The claims are notable, though, because Herreradoes have something akin to credibility given that the pair were together in her native Belize in 2012 when McAfee's neighbor, Gregory Faull, was murdered execution-style after fighting with the antivirus pioneer over his dogs.

She then went on the lam with him when authorities began seeking him for questioning in the Florida-born Faull's murder, though McAfee claims in the documentary footage thathe was really running from the Belizean prime minister, who'd put a $150,000 bounty on his head.

"His side of the story is that theyre after him because he didnt pay off the government," Herrara said in the documentary. "They wanted to hurt him, to get rid of him."

Herrara not only got her big-time lawyer relative Telsforo Guerra to defend her infamous American boyfriend, the New York Post notes in a summary of the documentary, but helped McAfee flee the country and was at his side when he had a heart attack while hiding out in Guatemala City.

When the pair relocated to the United States, however, McAfee broke things off with her, marrying a woman named Janice Dyson who, it should be noted, believes he was murdered and did not commit suicide.

In an interview withEsquire, documentary director Charlie Russell said he can't make heads or tails of Herrera's claim that McAfee called her after he reportedly had died.

"I dont know what I think and I dont think she does," Russell said. "She says it, then she looks at the camera, and I cant work out whether she thinks its real or not."

And sure, the whole story sounds too outrageous to be believed but then again, so did the rest of the antivirus entrepreneur's drug-fueled fugitive life.

READ MORE:What if Hes Still out There?: John McAfee Documentary Director on That Call From Beyond the Grave [Esquire]

More death-faking:Chimpanzee Star of "Buddy" Found Alive After His Owner Allegedly Faked His Death

The rest is here:

John McAfee Faked His Death and Is Still Alive, Ex-Girlfriend Claims - Futurism

"You can't have a fancy house near a rocket site."Mamma Mia

In spite of being the richest person on Earth and hence more than able to afford the finest things in life Elon Musk purportedly puts his mom up in his garage when she visits his demure home near SpaceX's Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas.

"I have to sleep in the garage," Maye Musk, the billionaire's supermodel mom, told The Times of London. "You can't have a fancy house near a rocket site."

In the wide-ranging interview, the elder Musk said that her "genius boy" son had always been disinterested in owning possessions a characterization that fits with his 2020 declaration that he was going to sell all his properties and have no "main residence."

If it sounds a little bit bizarre that Musk's 74-year-old mother has to stay in her son's garage, it's possible she's indulging in her son's penchant for exaggeration.

To wit, Musk said earlier this summer that that his South Texas residence is "technically a three-bedroom but it used to be a two-bedroom" until he converted the garage. So maybe she meant a bedroom that was formerly a garage.

Regardless, mystery has haunted Musk's living situation for several years. For a while, he was making a big deal out of living in a tiny prefab shack near SpaceX's launch site. Last winter, though, the Wall Street Journalpublished a report based on information from unnamed sources that the SpaceX CEO had actually been living in his friend and fellow "Paypal Mafia" member Ken Howery's lavish waterfront mansion in Austin. In the face of such intrigue, both Musk and Howery denied the WSJ's claimand the story eventually faded away.

But then again, we wouldn't put it past her uber-famous son to actually make his mother stay in his garage, which would rank incredibly low on the list of bizarre things about Musk that we'll never understand.

READ MORE: Maye Musk: I called Elon Genius Boy. He remembered everything [The Times of London]

More on weird Elon: Experts Say Elon Musk Messed Up by Having Secret Children With His Employee

See the original post:

Elon Musk's Mom Says She Has to Sleep "in the Garage" When She Visits Him - Futurism

This feels like a recipe for disaster.Sure, Guy

A crime-prognosticating AI now exists, and it's been implemented in a number of American cities. But don't worry, it definitely won't be misused by city police forces at least according to its lead creator, University of Chicago professor Ishanu Chattopadhyay.

Chattopadhyay recently sat down with BBC Science Focus to discuss the AI system, which, as a study published in the journal Human Behavior claims, can predict where and when a crime might occur with 80 to 90 percent accuracy. But whether the predictions hold up in the real world, while of course important, isn't necessarily the core question here: really, the question is whether AI can be successfully incorporated into a police force without abuses and while Chattopadhyay believes his system can be, AI's track record in policing says otherwise.

"People have concerns that this will be used as a tool to put people in jail before they commit crimes," Chattopadhyay told BBC. "That's not going to happen, as it doesn't have any capability to do that."

The incorporation of AI into policing is hardly new, and neither is the controversy surrounding it similar software has already been implicated in wrongful imprisonment and even the wrongful death of an unarmed 13-year-old child. More generally, AI across the board is known to be fickle, riddled with racial and otherwise discriminatory biases, and is notoriously difficult to explain, even by those who build it.

Speaking to the BBC, Chattopadhyay who says that he hopes his AI will be used to curb crime through social and political measures, not just excessive policing acknowledged some of these concerns, particularly AI's well-documented racism problems. He believes that other AI systems are just too simplistic, relying far too heavily on information like arrest histories and individual characteristics. In contrast, his system uses only event log data, which he claims helps to "reduce bias as much as possible."

"It just predicts an event at a particular location," he added. "It doesn't tell you who is going to commit the event or the exact dynamics or mechanics of the events. It cannot be used in the same way as in the film 'Minority Report.'"

Sure. Look, we're never ones to shy away from optimism, but given the record of systemic abuses of similar experimental cop-assisting softwares not to mention the systemic abuses against vulnerable populations that already exist within American policing, minus any AI this optimism seems far fetched.

READ MORE: An algorithm can predict future crimes with 90% accuracy. Heres why the creator thinks the tech wont be abused [BBC Science Focus]

More on AI projects we don't need: Cursed Startup Using AI to Remove Call Center Workers' Accents

Original post:

Professor Says He Foresees No Issues With His AI That Predicts Crimes Before They Happen - Futurism

If youre into ebooks, mobile games, and saving money (who isnt?), these back-to-school deals on tablets are a dream come true. All of the top brands are joining in on the discounts, so its prime time to find a great tablet for a fraction of the cost.

Cheaper than a laptop and bigger than a phone, tablets are a great choice for entertainment or work at home and on the go. With the apps and features you love available at the push of a button, having a tablet to hand can open many possibilities. Connecting these gadgets to a wireless keyboard makes for a super affordable laptop, or stream straight to your TV and youve got yourself a universal remote. Whatever you use your tablet for, be sure to grab one of these back-to-school deals to avoid overpaying.

Amazons Fire tablets have been in competition with Apples iPads for some time now, but given the capabilities and major discounted price of the Fire HD 10, it might be the reigning champ of this back-to-school season. This tablet gives you access to all of the apps available on Amazons app store, including social media, video streaming, music streaming, Office, Kindle, and many more. The Fires 1080p full-HD display is now 10 percent brighter than previous models, making it a great choice for catching up on the latest shows, or using its split-screen feature that allows you to multitask with ease.

This thin, lightweight tablet was built with energy efficiency in mind, allowing up to 12 hours of use between charges. With the hands-free Alexa mode, you can pause your show, ask a question, or make calls all with your voice and when youre done, switch this feature off with the toggle for privacy. The optional keyboard add-on will transform your Fire HD 10 into the perfect device for school work or office work, allowing you to type up an essay or catch up on emails easily. This tablet is going for $50 off the original price, and if you know anything about Amazon sales, youll know its for a limited time. So, take advantage of this great deal while you can.

Kindle, $64.99 (Was 89.99)

Fire HD 10 Kids Pro, $139.99 (Was $199.99)

Fire HD 8, $69.99 (Was $89.99)

Fire HD 8 Kids, $109.99 (Was $139.99)

iPad (2021), $279.99 (Was $329)

iPad Mini (2021), $599 (Was $649)

MEBERRY Android 10.0 Tablet, $124.09 (Was $199.99)

Samsung Galaxy Tab A8, $275 (Was $329.99)

For more discounts, check out our coverage of back-to-school deals and early Labor Day sales.

This post was created by a non-news editorial team at Recurrent Media, Futurisms owner. Futurism may receive a portion of sales on products linked within this post.

Go here to see the original:

Save $50 on a Fire HD 10 and More With Back-to-School Deals on Tablets - Futurism

Although abortion is still legal in Michigan, Facebook decided to heavily restrict a post on Planned Parenthood of Michigan's (PPMI) Facebook page this week.

The group shared an article about ordering the abortion pill online, but it was made visible only to page managers, not its audience totally curtailing the dissemination of perfectly accurate and reasonable information from a trusted authority on the topic.

"The Supreme Court cast our nation into an abortion access crisis when they discarded half a century of precedent and opened the door for politicians to pass sweeping abortion bans," PPMI spokesperson Ashlea Phenicie told local news outlet Michigan Advance this week. "Millions of Americans are now scrambling to find information about the legal status of abortion in their state and how to access care. Social media corporations like Meta are piling on to the crisis by removing content related to medication abortion and other services."

Phenicie shared a screenshot of the now-unavailable post and said the decision went further than the overturn of Roe v. Wade requires.

Since the Supreme Court reversed Roe v. Wade, getting information about abortions or abortion pills has become increasingly difficult. Many people worry their browser and search histories could get them arrested, and it's already happening. Earlier this month, NPR reported that Facebook had turned over private messages that led to a teen being prosecuted for having an abortion.

It's bad enough to lose access to bodily autonomy and doubly so in heartbreaking cases where difficult pregnancies are doomed to fail but legally mandated.

And in light of all that, Facebook removing legal, safe information about abortion, posted to a specific regional organization's page, is just rubbing salt in the wound.

More on questionable medical decisions: Kids Born Near Fracking Sites More Likely to Have Leukemia, Study Says

Link:

Facebook Restricts Perfectly Reasonable Abortion Info from Planned Parenthood - Futurism

Its important to take the safety of your home seriously, and Blink has a 50 percent discount on its Blink Mini security camera for Labor Day weekend. Right now, you can get two of its Blink Mini smart security cameras for $35, which is the price it typically charges for one. The company is also offering a three-pack of Blink Mini cameras for $50, which is helpful if you have an especially big place.

The Blink Mini stacks up well when directly compared to similar smart security cameras despite its small size and price. It can record clear-looking 1080p video in any lighting condition thanks to its night-vision mode, and will automatically start creating a clip any time its motion sensor has been triggered.

The Blink Mini will also send your phone a notification that the camera has detected something, so you can watch a live feed in a couple of taps using the Blink app. Once the camera is done recording, itll send its clip to the cloud, where it can be watched, shared, and downloaded at your earliest convenience.

Storing clips from the Blink Mini on the cloud requires a subscription service, which costs $10 per month or $100 per year. You also have the option to save your video locally by picking up a Blink Sync Module 2 and USB drive, which will set you back about $50 but save you money in the long run. You can get Blinks three-camera bundle along with those two accessories for a total of $100.

One of the Blink Minis greatest strengths is its small size. Its tiny enough to be hidden on a shelf in an entertainment center without drawing much attention to itself. A would-be burglar could easily pass right by one of these cameras without noticing. If you can find an out-of-the way part of your room for the camera while still being able to get the angle you need to keep a would-be thief in frame, all the better.

There are a bunch of great Labor Day Weekend deals, but Blinks stands out as one of the best weve seen because of the depth of the discount and sheer utility of its Mini cameras.

Kasa Smart Plug Power Strip, $54.99 (Was $79.99)

Leviton Decora Smart Wi-Fi Light Switch, $49.99 (Was $80)

NETGEAR Nighthawk Pro WiFi 6 Router, $189.97 (was $246.99)

GE Cync Smart Bulb (2-Pack), $24.99 (Was $33.99)

Echo Dot (4th Gen), $39.99 (Was $49.99)

Ring Video Doorbell, $84.99 (Was $99.99)

Eufy Security Floodlight Camera, $99.99 (Was $199.99)

Rachio 3 Smart Sprinkler Controller, $180 (Was $229.99)

For more discounts, check out our coverage ofback-to-school dealsandearly Labor Day sales.

This post was created by a non-news editorial team at Recurrent Media, Futurisms owner. Futurism may receive a portion of sales on products linked within this post.

See the article here:

Get Two Smart Security Cameras For The Price Of One With Blink's Labor Day Deal - Futurism

It's chaos over there.Metamates

Less than a year after Facebook rebranded as Meta and launched its Metaverse efforts, the head of its virtual reality platform is leaving the company for greener pastures.

Vivek Sharma, who until this weekend headed up Meta's Horizon VR platform as a vice president at the tech giant, confirmed toReuters that he's leaving the company to pursue outside opportunities.

"Thanks to [Sharma's] leadership," a Meta spokesperson said in a statement circulated by CNBC, "the Horizon product group has built a strong team with an ambitious vision, and it is just getting started."

The spokesperson also confirmed to news outlets that those who worked under Sharma, whose teams created the company's Horizon Worlds world-building VR and its virtual events division Horizon Venues, will now report to Metaverse vice president Vishal Shah.

So far, Meta has struggled to make its Metaverse vision compelling to a meaningful chunk of the population. The question now is whether Sharma's departure will help or hinder that potential transition.

Since announcing its Metaverse in October 2021 and changing the company name to Meta the following month, the ostensible transition has been rocky.

From a scary whistleblower warning and lots of expert detractions to the arguably more-damaging fact that everything we've seen so far of the Metaverse looks pretty "basic" the term used just this month by CEO Mark Zuckerberg himself to describe the graphics of his much-clowned-upon avatar it hasn't been an easy road for the nascent Metaverse, even as the company has poured billions into making it viable.

Sharma has so far declined further about his exit, so it's unclear whether he was force out or jumped ship, nevermind how the departure will effect Zuckerberg's vision long term.

From an optics perspective, though, it certainly doesn't look great.

READ MORE:Meta head of virtual reality platform Horizon leaving company [Reuters]

More on the Metaverse:People Are Going on Dates In the Metaverse and it Sounds Very Strange

Visit link:

The Head of Facebook's Beleaguered "Metaverse" VR Platform is Leaving the Company - Futurism

NASA says SpaceX is sending only a "skeleton" version of its lunar Starship spacecraft to the surface of the Moon during an upcoming, uncrewed test mission.

It'll be so stripped down,in fact, that it won't even be required to demonstrate that it can take back off after landing.

"For the uncrewed demo, the goal is to have a safe landing," said Lisa Watson-Morgan, manager of NASA's Human Landing System (HLS) program, during a presentation this week, as quoted by SpaceNews.

"The uncrewed demo is not necessarily planned to be the same Starship that you see for the crewed demo," she added. "Its going to be a skeleton because it just has to land. It does not have to take back off."

Perhaps anticipating that her comments may stir some debate over whether SpaceX will actually be required to return astronauts safely, Watson-Morgan added that "clearly we want it to" take off from the Moon, "but the requirements are for it to land."

"We dont tell them to do anything with it," Logan Kennedy, HLS surface lead at NASA, said at the event, referring to the Starship spacecraft once astronauts are returned from the Moon's surface. "Thats going to be up to SpaceX."

Back in 2021, NASA's HLS program chose SpaceX as its private partner for developing a spacecraft capable of returning astronauts to the Moon for its Artemis program.

Despite plenty of drama surrounding NASA's decision, SpaceX has emerged as the space agency's de facto collaborator, receiving billions in funding to turn its super heavy lift Starship into a lunar lander.

But Artemis 3, NASA's first planned crewed mission to the lunar surface, is still a long way out. And while SpaceX has made strides in developing Starship, it has yet to successfully launch it or its accompanying Super Heavy booster to orbit.

During the upcoming uncrewed mission, NASA and SpaceX may chose to take along "potentially one payload," according to Watson-Morgan, landing near the south pole of the Moon.

Artemis 3, however, will be far more involved. For one, there's the size of the Starship itself. Astronauts will have a very unique perspective once the 165 feet-tall spacecraft lands upright on the surface.

That also means getting in and out will prove a lot more difficult than simply climbing up and down the ladder attached to the outside of Apollo-era lunar landers.

SpaceX has been working on an exterior elevator that take crews down to the surface. The company already built a full-scale mockup of the system, allowing astronauts to test it out while wearing simulated spacesuits, SpaceNews reported that Kennedy said.

"Its a very tall lander," Watson-Morgan said during this week's meeting. "It doesnt look like the traditional landers that weve all seen in the past, so it can be hard to reconcile that mentally."

NASA and SpaceX have their work cut out for them. For instance, SpaceX is still figuring out how many Starship spacecraft it will have to launch into orbit to actually get to the Moon. The company is envisioning the spacecraft to also serve as a mobile fuel tank, providing a place for other Starship to refuel in orbit before headed to Moontown.

Last year, SpaceX CEO Elon Musk wagered a guess, estimating that it will take "max of eight" Starships worth of fuel to get to the Moon and back.

And then there's still the considerable task of safely getting humans down to surface, back into the spacecraft, and safely launch back into orbit a gargantuan task in and of itself.

READ MORE: Starship uncrewed lunar lander test a skeleton of crewed lander [SpaceNews]

More on Starship: Elon Musk: Starship Orbital Launch Could Happen "Next Month" Despite Unexpected Explosion

More:

NASA: SpaceX Only Has to Prove It Can Land Astronauts on Moon, Not Bring Them Home Again - Futurism

"We want to do what we can to stem contagion..."Showboat

It's been a banner month for billionaire crypto whisperer Sam Bankman-Fried, and now he's hinting at some provocativenext moves.

In an interview withThe Wall Street Journal, the CEO and founder of the cryptocurrency exchange FTXhe intends to spend a full $1 billion bailing out the ailing crypto industry. Whether the bet will pay off for the 30-year-old, who's worth $11.9 billion now and was worth more than double that last year, is anyone's guess. But after providing a $400 million loan to BlockFi and buying the entire exchange Liquid after it was hit by a huge hack, he's certainly putting his money where his mouth is.

"We want to do what we can to stem contagion, and sometimes thats going to mean that we try to help out in cases where its not enough," Bankman-Fried told the newspaper. "If that never happened, Id feel that we were being way too conservative."

Bankman-Fried, who's garnered headlines for everything from becoming a political megadonor to apparently being uninsured, told the paper that although he believes the worst of the industry's ills have been "flushed out of the system," he's betting a billion dollars that he can save it from further self-harm.

FTX executive Ramnik Arora told the WSJ, that the company fielded calls from more than two dozen doomed crypto firms seeking Bankman-Fried's generosity. Among the callers, Arora claims, was the now-infamous Celsius exchange, whose withdrawal suspension is believed to have caused much of the whole domino effect crypto crash in the first place.

And it doesn't end there. Bankman-Fried told the paper that FTX keeps "a few billion" in US dollars to cut deals, though he wasn't specific about what further bailouts he's planning.

Like in traditional finance, confidence is everything in the crypto world. If this 30-year-old billionaire's sangfroid is to be believed, the industry only needs a billion dollars worth of help to bounce back.

READ MORE:The 30-Year-Old Spending $1 Billion to Save Crypto [The Wall Street Journal]

See the original post here:

Millennial Says He's Spending $1 Billion to Bail Out the Crypto Industry - Futurism

Tesla is calling new videos that show its vehicles mowing down child mannequins while on Autopilot defamatory and has sent a cease-and-desist letter to the videos' creators, The Washington Post reports.

In other words, has the company never heard of the Streisand effect?

It's a messy back and forth that's bound to draw even more attention to Tesla'sFull Self-Driving (FSD) feature, a controversial $12,000 add-on that allows Tesla vehicles to take care of changing lanes and navigate complex city intersections, among other capabilities though it still frequently makes serious errors and requires drivers to be ready to take over at any moment, making its name an apparent misnomer.

The company has started rolling out a beta software of the feature for its customers to test on public roads, a decision that's already proven highly controversial.

The mannequin videos were put together by the Dawn Project, a campaign founded by tech mogul and billionaire Dan O'Dowd to stop "Elon Musks reckless deployment of unsafe Full Self-Driving cars on our roads," according to its official website.

O'Dowd, who owns an airplane and car operating systems company and ran for US Senate this year, broadcasted ads, including several that show Tesla vehicles striking child mannequins with the car company's FSD feature allegedly turned on.

The billionaire told WaPothat "we have been busy hooking up and putting computers in charge of the things that millions of peoples lives depend on: self-driving cars is one of those."

Now, in light of the case-and-desist letter, O'Dowd didn't mince words.

"This letter is so pathetic in terms of whining: Mr. Free Speech Absolutist, just a crybaby hiding behind his lawyers," he told WaPo, referring to the fact that Musk has repeatedly painted himself as a "free speech absolutist," despite his actions often suggesting otherwise.

In the letter, the Musk-led company argued that O'Dowd's videos are misrepresenting its driver-assistance software.

The company stands firmly behind its belief that both Autopilot and FSD make streets safer. Musk has gone as far as to say that driving on Autopilot is "on balance... unequivocally safer."

Some of Tesla's fans were equally outraged at the videos and even chose to place their own offspring in front of moving Teslas with FSD turned on, sparking outrage. YouTube, for instance, took down the videos to ensure others weren't inspired to try it for themselves.

According to WaPo, Tesla referenced a report by Electrek in its letter, which stated that FSD was "never engaged" during Dawn Project's tests despite the Dawn Project claiming otherwise.

"The purported tests misuse and misrepresent the capabilities of Teslas technology, and disregard widely recognized testing performed by independent agencies as well as the experiences shared by our customers," Tesla deputy general counsel Dinna Eskin wrote in the letter, as quoted by WaPo.

The company even went as far as arguing that the videos "put consumers at risk."

The letter marks an escalation in Tesla's efforts to manage the public's expectations of its driver-assistance software. But, as countless videos have demonstrated, there's at least some cause for concern, despite the company's best efforts to vet those who have early access.

The fact remains: Tesla is testing its unfinished driver assistance feature on public roads, whether other drivers agree with that decision or not.

Trying to silence its critics is only bound to draw even more attention to the issue and that's clearly not in Tesla's best interest.

READ MORE: Tesla demands removal of video of cars hitting child-size mannequins [The Washington Post]

More on FSD: California Wants Tesla to Stop Calling Half-Finished System "Full Self-Driving"

Read more from the original source:

Hurry Up and Watch These Videos Tesla Wants Removed From the Internet - Futurism