The North Korea detainee’s final moments of freedom – New York Post

Newly released images show former North Korea detainee Otto Warmbier smiling with his tour group and throwing snowballs, before he was taken prisoner by the hermit nation.

A short video clip, released Thursday by Warmbiers brother, shows the 22-year-old University of Virginia student playing in the snow with friends in North Korea sometime in January 2016.

I wanted to share one final thing today before we take time to be alone as a family. This is the last video we have of Otto enjoying life before his imprisonment.

It was taken in North Korea with members of his tour group, Warmbiers younger brother Austin said as he released the video, according to The Daily Mail.

This is the Otto I know and love. This is my brother.

The video is believed to be the last clip of the Wyoming native before he was jailed for removing a propaganda poster from a hotel in 2016 and left comatose after 18 months in a North Korean prison.

Warmbier was released from the rogue country on Tuesday.

His father, Fred Warmbier, said his son had been brutalized and terrorized by Kim Jong Uns regime.

Doctors at a Cincinnati hospital where Warmbier is being treated said the young man is suffering from severe brain injuries.

He is in a state of unresponsive wakefulness, his doctors said.

Read this article:

The North Korea detainee's final moments of freedom - New York Post

Freedom Caucus Conservatives Break from Trump, Want More Surveillance Reform – Reason (blog)

PhotojogtomThe White House and several prominent Senate Republicans want to keep the scope of federal surveillance powers intact, but there's a rebellion afoot. The House Freedom Caucus has said it does not want to renew some federal snooping powers unless there's reform that better protects Americans from unwarranted data collection.

Earlier this month, such Republican senators as Tom Cotton of Arkansas, Marco Rubio of Florida, John McCain of Arizona, and Susan Collins of Maine, among others, announced they were introducing a bill to make permanent some temporary surveillance powers granted by amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). The White House has formally declared its support for this bill.

The powers under dispute fall under Section 702 of FISA amendments. Section 702 is intended to allow the National Security Agency (NSA) to snoop on the communications of foreign targets. But this surveillance often ends up drawing in data and records and communications from United States citizens as well, all collected without a warrant.

While there's a "minimization" process intended to protect U.S. citizens' privacy and due process rights, there's also an "unmasking" procedure government officials have used to investigate domestic crimes beyond threats of terrorism and espionage. Such a process appears to run afoul of the Fourth Amendment's protections, and civil rights advocates across the political spectrum want to reform Section 702 to protect against these "backdoor" searches.

Section 702 wll expire at the end of the year if Congress does nothing (or is unable to get enough votes to pass something). So this short announcement from House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) is a warning to President Donald Trump, Sen. Cotton, and others that the party is not in total agreement:

Government surveillance activities under the FISA Amendments Act have violated Americans' constitutionally protected rights. We oppose any reauthorization of the FISA Amendments Act that does not include substantial reforms to the government's collection and use of Americans' data.

If this conflict within the party sounds familiar, it's because it played out after Edward Snowden's leaks too. At that time, several privacy-minded Republicans resisted efforts to renew a part of the Patriot Act that was being used to justify the mass collection of Americans' private phone call and online activity metadata.

The end result of that fight was that part of the Patriot Act was allowed to sunset and was replaced by the USA Freedom Act, which formalized but also put some restrictions on how the government was able to access that metadata.

I noted earlier in the week that the pro-surveillance senators who support the unchanged renewal of Section 702 were in a difficult situation because they did not have a lot of leverage: All opponents have to do to make them fail is nothing at all. This warning by the Freedom Caucus, which has about three dozen members, will let the Senate and the White House know that Republican control over Congress doesn't mean reauthorization is going to be easy. This may be the first step in a USA Freedom Actstyle compromise.

Read the original here:

Freedom Caucus Conservatives Break from Trump, Want More Surveillance Reform - Reason (blog)

With freedom and prosperity for all – Inquirer.net

One concrete output from the Philippines Asean hosting is the recently launched, business-sector-driven Prosperity for All Alliance. With GoNegosyo as its secretariat, the alliance includes groups like AmCham, Bankers Association, Filipino Chinese Chamber of Commerce, Financial Executives of the Philippines, Indian Chamber, Makati Business Club, Management Association of the Philippines, Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Semi-Conductor and Electronics Industries in the Philippines Foundation, among others. I understand the alliance now has 18 of the most influential business groups in the country, so apologies to the others I did not name. You are all doing Gods work!

The alliance will focus on micro, small and medium enterprises, or MSMEs.

Focus is actually not precise as MSMEs comprise 99.5 percent of all registered businesses in the country today. Combined they employ almost 62 percent of the workforce. They account for 25 percent of the countrys total export revenue and comprise 60 percent of all Philippine exporters. So our focus is actually a humongous one. The key implication, therefore, is that achieving positive and far-reaching impact on MSMEs will almost surely bring us closer to realizing our shared goals of inclusive growth and zero poverty.

Leading the effort to finally make the private and public sectors more aligned in addressing MSME development and sustainability is Joey Concepcion, presidential adviser for entrepreneurship and chair of the Asean Business Advisory Committee (BAC). But Joey has always attributed his and GoNegosyos successes to very effective people on the ground, like former trade undersecretary Merly Cruz and Sulu initiatives dynamo Ginggay Hontiveros. It certainly was Joeys leadership in the Asean BAC that convinced big business in the region to adopt a prosperity-for-all agenda on the Philippines Asean hosting year. And it was his calls and viber messages that brought together the 18 business groups to unite on a common purpose to help MSMEs.

Worth highlighting is the fact that this very young alliance has mobilized to support not only the Marawi evacuees but also the soldiers and policemen on the frontline, who are risking life and limb to liberate the city from terrorists. The fallen heroes now number 58 and the alliance has made a commitment to recognize their supreme sacrifice by at least taking care of the families left behind.

But it doesnt stop there. The soldiers and policemen need what has been dubbed as care packages to help them cope with the terrible conditions in the battle zones. The packages even include messages from children and youth who need to understand at a very young age that securing their freedom does come at significant costs and with much sacrifice.

Once the freedom of Marawi is regained, the alliance is committed as well to help rebuild the city together with the government. What programs have been launched and sustained in Sulu will be replicated in Marawi so that families can quickly recover from the ravages of war. It will not be easy, but the commitment to roll out projects and programs soon after our troops accomplish their mission will be key to ensuring that there will be no more left behind.

On the ground, we will have to rely on initiatives like the public-private Kapatid Program and groups like the Philippine Business for Social Progress, which incidentally is now being steered by former education secretary Br. Armin Luistro. To honor the soldiers who made the supreme sacrifice, scholarships for their children through the Hero Foundation will be the best vehicle to ensure a future of prosperity for the orphaned. There are many groups ready to bring the proper and well-calibrated response on the ground, and the business community must help them deliver and scale up their efforts. These can be done through funds as well as mentorship, technical assistance and logistics support, not to mention the mobilization of employees as volunteers.

There can be no better way to secure freedom in Marawi and the rest of the country than to ensure prosperity for all.

Peter Angelo V. Perfecto is executive director of the Makati Business Club and vice president of Integrity Initiative Inc.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

See the article here:

With freedom and prosperity for all - Inquirer.net

The Personal Freedom Index – Inquirer.net

The latest global compilation of statistics for advocacy to come my way is The Human Freedom Index 2016 by Ian Vsquez and Tanja Porcnik, published by the CATO Institute, Fraser Institute, and Friedrich Naumann Foundation for Freedom.

The Human Freedom Index merges the Economic Freedom Index and a Personal Freedom Index. The first is an older construction by the Fraser Institute (The Economic Freedom Index, Opinion, 11/21/15); the second is my topic today. Both indexes are instrumental to the state of democracy (see The Democracy Index, Opinion, 11/15/14).

The Personal Freedom Index (PFI) has seven dimensions, as listed in the table here, with figures for the six major Asean countries as of 2014, the latest available data point. The scores are on a scale from 0 to 10, or the range from no freedom to full freedom; I would read a score of 5.0 as half-free.

The Philippine PFI of 6.05 in 2014 ranks 113th of the 159 countries that were indexed; the average PFI for all countries is 7.01. Over time, the Philippine score rose at first, but later fellit was 7.37 in 2008. 7.37 in 2010, 7.77 in 2011, 6.75 in 2012, 5.75 in 2013, and 6.05 in 2014. The world average PFI also fell steadilyit was 7.18 in 2008, 7.13 in 2010, 7.13 in 2011, 7.06 in 2012, 7.04 in 2013, and 7.01 in 2014. These are alarming trends, calling for serious assessment.

Within Asean, as of 2014, the Philippine PFI is in fourth place, behind Singapore, Indonesia and Thailand, and ahead of Vietnam and Malaysia. The Philippines is fifth with respect to Rule of Law, and sixth in Security and Safety; these first two dimensions have half the weight of the PFI. Much of the basic data for these dimensions is from the same sources as the WJP Rule of Law Index (see Opinion, 4/8/17). Other sources are the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, the Uppsala Conflict Data Program, the Economic Intelligence Unit, the CIRI Human Rights Data Project, and the University of Marylands Global Terrorism Database.

The other half of the PFI is made up of the scores on the next five dimensions, pertaining to specific freedoms. The Philippines is tied for second, with Indonesia and Singapore, in freedom of Movement. It is second to Indonesia in freedom of Religion. Third in freedom of Association, behind Indonesia and Thailand. Second to Indonesia in freedom of Expression. And tied for third, with Indonesia, in freedom of Relationship, behind Vietnam and Singapore.

The scores for the specific freedoms are from many sources, among them the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), the Committee to Protect Journalists, the French Development Agency, Freedom House, and the International Lesbian and Gay Association. What they have in common is advocacy for certain aspects of personal freedom, and an understanding of the role of statistics in pursuing their mission.

Contact mahar.mangahas@sws.org.ph.

(Editors note: This has been updated to reflect the Personal Freedom countries of major Asean countries in 2014. Our apologies for the oversight.)

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

Go here to read the rest:

The Personal Freedom Index - Inquirer.net

Route 65 in Freedom to close again this weekend – Timesonline.com

FREEDOM -- PennDOT has announced northbound Route 65 in Freedom will be closed Friday night through Monday morning, weather permitting.

The northbound lanes will close to traffic 6 p.m. Friday and reopen 6 a.m. Monday as crews conduct painting on the bridge that carries traffic from Third Avenue to southbound Route 65 in Freedom. All northbound traffic will be detoured.

As the posted detour, northbound traffic will take the Freedom exit and follow Third Avenue to the northbound Route 65 ramp.

Additionally, southbound Route 65 traffic will be restricted to a single 10-foot, 6-inch lane during the entire weekend. Third Avenue will also be restricted to 10-foot, 6-inch lanes.

Four additional weekend closures are necessary to complete the bridge-painting operation.

This $20.21 million roadway project includes milling and resurfacing, concrete pavement patching, drainage and guardrail updates, ramp reconstruction, curb and sidewalk work, bridge and retaining wall preservation, sign structure maintenance and signal improvements. The overall project will conclude in late October 2017.

Gulisek Construction Co. is the prime contractor.

Read the rest here:

Route 65 in Freedom to close again this weekend - Timesonline.com

Wings of Freedom tour visits Corvallis | KVAL – KVAL

World War II era aircraft are at the Corvallis Airport through noon Friday as part of the Wings of Freedom tour put on by the Collings Foundation. (Ray Whittemore Photography)

CORVALLIS, Ore. - World War II era aircraft are at the Corvallis Airport through noon Friday as part of the Wings of Freedom tour put on by the Collings Foundation.

Walk-through tours of the aircraft are available until 5 p.m. Thursday and from 9 to noon Friday.

Tickets are $15 for adults and $5 for children 12 and under.

Flights are available for a fee.

The tour moves on to Aurora, Oregon, on Friday. The planes will be available for tours and flights starting at 2 p.m. Friday and through 5 p.m. on Sunday.

After that the tour moves on to Bremerton, Wash., on June 19; Port Angeles, Wash., on June 21; and Seattle on June 23 before heading east to Yakima on June 26 and Pasco on June 30.

Flights are available before and after the ground tours.

The advertised rates are:

Call 978-562-9182 for flight reservations.

See the article here:

Wings of Freedom tour visits Corvallis | KVAL - KVAL

Freedom Caucus will oppose FISA reauthorization without reforms – Washington Examiner

The House Freedom Caucus announced Thursday it will oppose reauthorizing the FISA Amendments Act, the legal basis for U.S. surveillance programs, without "substantial" reforms to the law.

Section 702 of that law has come under fire recently after revelations that this provision was used to capture communications of President Trump and his transition team as it had conversations with foreign officials. Under the law, this kind of incidental collection of information from U.S. citizens occurs, but U.S. citizens caught up in that surveillance are usually masked, unless intelligence officials decide there is a good reason to unmask that person.

Republicans argue the outgoing Obama administration unjustifiably unmasked and then leaked conversations involving Trump's team, which has created demands among conservatives for reform.

"Government surveillance activities under the FISA Amendments Act have violated Americans' constitutionally protected rights," the Freedom Caucus board said in a statement. "We oppose any reauthorization of the FISA Amendments Act that does not include substantial reforms to the government's collection and use of Americans' data."

The Freedom Caucus has not said what specific reforms it will pursue.

But Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., who is close with the Freedom Caucus despite not being a formal member of the conservative group, has proposed for three years in a row an amendment to Section 702 to prohibit warrantless searches of government databases for information on U.S. citizens.

Other changes to the law proposed by civil liberty advocates include narrowing the pool of foreigners that the government can legally target for surveillance, thereby limiting Americans who could be caught in the web, to include only those who may pose a threat to U.S. interests.

Congress also could require the circle of officials who can authorize unmasking to be smaller, and tighten the constraints on doing so.

Section 702, which expires Dec. 31 along with other portions of the law, has been reauthorized in past years despite hand-wringing from libertarians and some Democrats. This year's effort is more difficult given the political fighting over the law.

In April, numerous news outlets reported that Susan Rice, former President Barack Obama's national security adviser, sought the identities of people close to Trump whose communications were captured after the election in surveillance of foreigners by U.S. spy agencies.

Intelligence and national security experts say that it's both legal and normal for someone in Rice's position to unmask people.

See original here:

Freedom Caucus will oppose FISA reauthorization without reforms - Washington Examiner

A unique restaurant experience in the town of Freedom – WCSH-TV

A unique restaurant experience in the town of Freedom

Rob Caldwell and Krister Rollins, WCSH 7:17 PM. EDT June 15, 2017

A renovated grist mill that's been in the town of Freedom since 1834 is home to Maine's buzziest restaurant: The Lost Kitchen.

Over the years, 207 has done a lot of stories on restaurants in Maine. The range is extraordinary - from donut shops to elegant inns where wine and dinner for two can run a thousand dollars.

So we have some authority when we say there is no other restaurant in Maine like The Lost Kitchen in the town of Freedom.

Its set in a renovated grist mill an hour and a half from Portland. And this April, they booked every reservation for the 2017 season in a matter of hours.

Erin French is the owner and chef. Her first job was in her parents' diner. She tried to get away from food but always found herself coming back to it.

She created a pop-up restaurant in her apartment and lost that in a nasty divorce. She moved back home with her parents, found an Airstream trailer and gutted that and started her pop-up again.

Then the old grist mill - which she had walked by on her way to Girl Scout meetings as a kid - was renovated. And now in the town of Freedom, with a population of 700, under the direction of an owner and chef who has always cooked but has no formal training, you can find The Lost Kitchen.

2017 WCSH-TV

Read more:

A unique restaurant experience in the town of Freedom - WCSH-TV

US bishops vote to make religious freedom committee permanent – Catholic News Agency

Indianapolis, Ind., Jun 15, 2017 / 01:57 pm (CNA/EWTN News).- The U.S. bishops voted on Thursday to make their Ad Hoc Committee on Religious Liberty a permanent committee of the national bishops conference.

The very idea of religious freedom and its root in human nature is challenged today, said Archbishop Lori, chair of the ad hoc committee, at a meeting of the U.S. bishops Thursday.

He added, how important it is that we remain in the public square through advocacy for the freedom of religious institutions to fight poverty, provide health care and education, serve immigrants, and protect human life.

In 2011, the ad hoc committee was formed for a period of three years, as the bishops were deeply concerned about a broad trend of threats to religious freedom on the local and national level, Archbishop Lori noted, speaking at the annual spring general assembly of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in Indianapolis.

Pope Benedict XVI, in his address to U.S. bishops in January of 2012 during their ad limina visit, warned of grave threats to the Churchs public moral witness presented by a radical secularism where there were certain attempts being made to limit that most cherished of American freedoms, the freedom of religion.

Many of you have pointed out that concerted efforts have been made to deny the right of conscientious objection on the part of Catholic individuals and institutions with regard to cooperation in intrinsically evil practices, the Pope said. Others have spoken to me of a worrying tendency to reduce religious freedom to mere freedom of worship without guarantees of respect for freedom of conscience.

The U.S. bishops voted in 2014 to extend the committee for another three-year period. Then on Thursday, they voted to make the committee permanent by a vote of 132-53, with five bishops abstaining.

Most notably, the committee established the annual Fortnight for Freedom, a two-week campaign of prayer, penance, and advocacy for the Churchs continued freedom to serve in the public square, starting on June 21, the eve of the feasts of Sts. Thomas More and John Fisher, and ending on July 4, Independence Day.

One of the most notable threats the ad hoc committee warned of was the contraceptive mandate. The Department of Health and Human Services, interpreting the Affordable Care Act, had issued rules under the Obama administration that employer health plans had to cover sterilizations, contraceptives, and drugs that can cause abortions.

While churches and their immediate auxiliaries were exempt from the mandate, many religious institutions, including hospitals, universities, and charities, were not. Changes to the regulation offered by the Obama administration still violated the religious beliefs of the Catholic organizations, bishops and Church leaders contended.

In May, President Donald Trump promised regulatory relief from the mandate for religious non-profits like the Little Sisters of the Poor.

The struggle against the HHS mandate is not over, Archbishop Lori warned on Thursday. Victory is not assured.

The promised relief could change with another presidential administration who could again enforce the mandate against religious groups, the archbishop said.

And other threats to religious freedom persist, he said, like the legalization of same-sex marriage, which could pose problems for religious institutions that uphold the Churchs teaching on marriage.

The archbishop cited then-Solicitor General Donald Verrilli, who admitted during oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 Supreme Court case that legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states, that there could be an issue with the tax-exempt status of religious universities teaching that marriage is between one man and one woman, if same-sex marriage were the law of the land.

Some bishops voiced their strong support for the committee on Thursday, including Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York, who chaired the USCCB when the committee was formed, and Cardinal Donald Wuerl of Washington, D.C. The most recent president of the USCCB, Archbishop Joseph Kurtz of Louisville, also supported making the committee permanent.

The bishops of the world look to us, Cardinal Dolan told his fellow bishops, to be the real quarterbacks in defense of religious freedom.

A few bishops voiced objections to making the committee permanent in the discussions before the vote on Thursday.

Several were concerned about how it would appear to make the religious liberty committee permanent at the same time that the bishops working group on immigration, begun in November, finished its formal work.

However, Archbishop Jose Gomez of Los Angeles, vice president of the conference, clarified later on Thursday at an afternoon press conference that the working group will continue, although Cardinal Daniel DiNardo of Houston-Galveston, president of the conference who had begun the working group last November, had not specified a timeline for how long it would continue.

Furthermore, Archbishop Lori stressed, the conference already has a standing Committee on Migration. The important thing is that as the sun sets, theres a permanent committee in place, because we understand the questions of migration are permanent, he said.

Bishop Christopher Coyne of Burlington, Vt. also voiced concerns that funding for the religious freedom committee could eventually dry up, while Cardinal Joseph Tobin of Newark said that domestic religious freedom concerns can be handled by the domestic policy committee, referring to the USCCB Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development.

I am not convinced that there is a need at this time for it, he said of the religious freedom committee.

Bishop Francis Kalabat of the Chaldean Eparchy of St. Thomas the Apostle in Detroit strongly supported extending the committee, however.

There are currently 60 million refugees in the world, he said. What percentage of them came as a result of a lack of religious freedom?

Who you back up, or who backs you up, is who gives you the strength in the Middle East, he said, noting that if the U.S. shows strong support for religious freedom, it also shows support for persecuted Christians elsewhere.

Religious freedom, Archbishop Lori stressed, covers a wide spectrum of ministries, a wide spectrum of advocacy, and there is need for some consistency for a clearing house and a clear voice.

Religious liberty is a concept that really relates to ones fundamental stance towards God, he said, that first and primal relationship towards God. As Dignitatis Humanae states, he noted, religious freedom is rooted in human nature and granted by God as a fundamental human endowment.

On Thursday, the bishops also voted to approve new guidelines for the celebration of the sacraments of persons with disabilities.

The new guidelines were said to pay deeper attention to allergy problems, for example the gluten intolerance or alcohol intolerance of a communicant. They encouraged parishes to be more aware and accommodating of persons with disabilities in the distribution of the sacraments.

Archbishop Kurtz tweeted on Thursday that the National Catholic Partners on Disability were excited about the revised guidelines.

See the rest here:

US bishops vote to make religious freedom committee permanent - Catholic News Agency

Freedom or freedom porn? The reality of Instagram’s #vanlife – ABC Online

Updated June 16, 2017 15:59:05

A highway with no-one on it. Balmy nights and a glassy sunrise swell. Bikinis, a vintage kombi, young love and freedom.

That's the "Van Life" movement, a bohemian revival of living in a van, now being showcased by 20- and 30-somethings on social media under the hashtag "#vanlife".

While its beginnings lie in the high cost of housing or employment itinerancy, it's now become so popular and stylized in the US that "Van Lifers" are using social media to market their carefree lifestyle to people like you and me who are hungry to live vicariously through them.

It's given rise to a surprising kind of existential crisis: is it freedom or just a paid-for, Instagrammed version of freedom? And does the reality of freedom outweigh the limitations?

I met with "van lifers" at a gathering of these normally solitary road folk in northern NSW to find out.

One of brains behind the community in Australia is Jonny Dustow from the website "Van Life Diaries".

The schoolteacher/musician/marketing entrepreneur has been living out of his van for the past six years on and off.

"You've always had the grey nomads and you've had the hippies in the '60s and '70s," Mr Dustow said.

"But there's been a change where uni students [and] young professionals are getting on the roads and spending more time in vans exploring."

The pull of Instagram images reflecting the lifestyle are what has spurned the revival and he's hoping to use it to expand the movement as a self-sustaining lifestyle brand.

"From my marketing standpoint, because I studied that and work in that, I was like, 'oh this is awesome, I can help you guys get more work through that'," he said.

"I know girls that get paid $500 to just take a pictures of them in their bikini and I've seen that coming into the van life community now."

So powerful is the draw of freedom as a brand that luxury goods, tourism regions and food brands are creeping into the market overseas as an opportunity to leverage van life's popularity for commercial purposes; an irony for a movement that largely rejects corporate, materialistic values.

A sign of the growing sophistication of the movement is the weekend's ticketed event, replete with an ATM, two stalls and a sponsor display.

"We are really picky with our brands that we work with." Mr Dustow said.

"I mean any lifestyle could be marketed if there's products we're all consumers."

But not all van lifers see it that way.

Cristal Cachia, 36, recently gave up her corporate life in Melbourne, bought a van and hit the road solo with her dog, Henry.

She sees the commercial influence in van life, together with the fact that photos with strategically placed girls in them seem to get more likes, as "a big pile of garbage".

"If you look at most of the Instagram photos of girls in bikinis who are perfectly tanned with their perfectly lumberjack-looking partners, hitting the road with amazing landscapes how real is it?" she asked.

"It's all there for sponsorship.

"If you have a look they are usually hashtagging the packet of chips they're eating or the brand of clothing that they've been given. It's not just real.

"The reality of it is you've got to stop for petrol, you are going to hit some in-between towns, you are going to stay in some fairly unspectacular places.

"You're not going to shower every day, you are not going to look like that.

"I don't know how those girls look like that.

"They may look like that but they may not smell like that."

Ms Cachia says she has to battle the impression that she has no better work or housing options and that van life is her choice.

"When I tell people I don't work that much, they usually look at me and maybe they get jealous, or they don't understand," she said.

"They kind of think, 'why the f*** should you get to not work really hard like I do' not knowing that I worked really hard to pay off my house.

"I just don't get this Australian need to work really hard to be a good human, it just doesn't make any sense to me."

It's not all sunsets and romance all of the time, according to Jared Melrose and Ash, who've been living van life as a couple for nearly two years.

"The reality of van life is it's tricky. It's not a, 'get in the car and your life will change'," Mr Melrose said.

The tradesman/musician hopes to sustain the lifestyle by offering van fit-out "consultations" for the "groundswell" of newbie van lifers.

His partner Ash says bad weather and a lack of personal space can put pressures on a relationship that are not shown on Instagram.

"We're kind of 'this' far away from each other for substantial amount of time," she said, holding her fingers an inch apart.

"So when we need space Jared kind of sits on the chest, and the other day I lay down and listened to this meditation CD and we were kind of like a bit cranky with each other.

"You can't shut a door!"

Families are also making a go of van life, like Jay, Trip, their home-schooled children Hunter and Ace, and rottweiler Gypsy, who live in a designer yellow Bedford school bus called "Margie".

"We've got enough space for everything and our whole mentality was to keep it simple," Trip said.

"Clear home, clear head.

"The kids are never bored, the kids are always outside, they are always learning."

Jay said: "As for the lifestyle, I think it's much easier than we imagined because we can go wherever we want, whenever we want. So it works for us.

"We don't have Facebook, our Facebook is the ceiling, there's photos of where we have been weddings, birthday, babies."

Trip said: "I don't think a lot of people are awake enough."

While the downsides of van life, such as tedious roads, mechanical troubles and the anxiety of where to sleep tonight are as present on social media as any of the downsides of our own housebound lives, even van life's Australian evangelist, Mr Dustow, admits that it's not all sunshine and rainbows.

Like the fact that he recently crashed his home into a pole.

"Now I'm vanless, and it does mean I'm homeless at the moment," he laughed.

"It definitely doesn't suit everyone, [just] like the pictures definitely suit everyone.

"It's that feeling of that lifestyle is better than my lifestyle when that's not the truth and the grass is not always greener."

Topics: community-and-society, australia

First posted June 16, 2017 14:31:47

Read the rest here:

Freedom or freedom porn? The reality of Instagram's #vanlife - ABC Online

Trump’s expected reversal on Cuba is a victory for freedom – Washington Examiner

President Trump is expected this Friday to reverse the Obama administration's policy of opening up political and economic relations with Cuba. Thanks in part to the advocacy of Florida's Senator Marco Rubio and Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart, America will likely return to a policy that allows us to exert our political, moral, and economic strength to push for freedom and human rights in an authoritarian regime just a hundred miles from America's shores.

It has already been over half a year since Fidel Castro passed away at age 90 as a seemingly out-of-place historical icon, with a peace that few of his victims knew. Just like when Venezuela's Hugo Chavez passed away in 2013 or North Korea's Kim Jong-Il in 2011, there was briefly a flash of hope that this would be an opportunity for the repressive police state and command economy to finally unravel itself.

Yet Cuba continues to remain an authoritarian regime that has little room for freedom of any kind, whether political, economic, religious, or otherwise. For America to reward a regime that has steadfastly refused to move in the direction of freedom with sudden political and economic legitimacy would be a surrender of the moral struggle we've waged with Cuba for the past half-century.

Proponents of President Obama's Cuba-opening policy cite precedent in how America has regularly established relations with authoritarian regimes, including Communist ones such as China and Vietnam and otherwise. Proponents further cite the theory that increased interrelation pushes authoritarian nations to slowly edge towards human rights and international cooperation.

Yet it would be difficult to back up such claims with historical examples. Nations such as Vietnam and China are deeply immersed in the world economic system, yet their human rights abuses continue just as frequently as before. In fact, often our ability to condemn such abuses becomes limited because of how deep our economic interrelation now is with them.

With no change in human rights in Cuba, American dollars will be spent funding authoritarian repression and a regime that has historically supported insurrectionism across Latin America and the world against America's interests. That tarnishes America's moral authority in exchange for a small economic gain.

We see in a nation like Venezuela how the socialist regime has been able to survive in large part because of foreign financing and aid. While Cuba continues to slog on economically, nonetheless by establishing economic relations with the regime it is almost certain it will never collapse economically of its own accord. In a terrible irony, America would be indirectly subsidizing socialist repression.

Lastly, while America has in the past opened up to nations such as China and Yugoslavia, those decisions were based significantly due to incredible geopolitical concerns at the time due to the Cold War and the Soviet Union's threat. There is no current excruciating geopolitical situation that demands that we must make the difficult decision of compromising our commitment to freedom and opening up to Cuba.

Furthermore, the same argument for establishing relations with Cuba could very well be applied to a nation like North Korea. North Korea differs from Cuba by degree, not by type. North Korea's repression reaches a level beyond even the tastes of the Cuban regime, but nonetheless once a rationale is embraced that so easily puts aside our commitment to human dignity, that is the natural end.

America has stood firmly on the side of freedom for the Cuban people for over half a century. Our strong stand against Cuba's regime has been undoubtedly a bulwark in preventing socialist repression from spreading across South America, as was a real concern during the Cold War.

President Trump and Senator Rubio are wise and right in continuing to push the cause of liberty in Cuba. While it may be a long time before the Cuban people see freedom, we cannot abandon their cause so easily.

Erich Reimer is a Republican activist and freelance writer.

Thinking of submitting an op-ed to the Washington Examiner? Be sure to read ourguidelines on submissions.

Follow this link:

Trump's expected reversal on Cuba is a victory for freedom - Washington Examiner

Meadows: Freedom Caucus eyeing $1.5 trillion debt ceiling increase – Politico

Mark Meadows said thats smaller than the $2.5 trillion he believes the White House wants. | AP Photo

Some House Freedom Caucus conservatives want to raise the debt ceiling by a smaller amount than the Trump administration would like just long enough to clear the 2018 mid-term elections, the groups leader said Tuesday.

The Freedom Caucus has not taken an official position on a specific number. But Chairman Mark Meadows emerged from a group meeting Tuesday night saying some of his conservative colleagues are looking at a $1.5 trillion lift in the nations borrowing cap.

Story Continued Below

The North Carolina Republican said thats smaller than the $2.5 trillion he believes the White House wants.

The White House wants $2.5 trillion, is what I heard. Were more in the $1.5 trillion range, Meadows said. Its not an official position, but some members of the Freedom Caucus have been discussing $1.5 trillion as a specific amount in a debt ceiling increase.

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin has asked Congress to raise the debt ceiling before the August recess, leaving Republicans just a few weeks to cobble together a plan. Freedom Caucus members want to address the matter before the recess, but theyre asking for spending reforms and debt-payment prioritization to accompany any lift in the nations borrowing limit.

Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

GOP leaders, however, have all but thrown out that idea and are signaling that theyre more likely to work with Democrats since the debt ceiling has to pass the Senate, meaning it will need eight Democratic votes.

While few have discussed numbers, let alone settled on a plan, Meadows suggested the $1.5 trillion would push the deadline for addressing the contentious issue again past the mid-term elections.

Missing out on the latest scoops? Sign up for POLITICO Playbook and get the latest news, every morning in your inbox.

Continue reading here:

Meadows: Freedom Caucus eyeing $1.5 trillion debt ceiling increase - Politico

Freedom of Expression and the Digital Access Industry: Five Key Takeaways – Just Security

Archives: By Topic Select a Topic 113th Congress 114th Congress 1267 terrorist sanctions 1997 Mine Ban Treaty 2001 AUMF 2002 AUMF 2016 Presidential Electio 9/11 Commission Review Aamer v. Obama Abdirahman Sheik Mohamud Abdullah al-Shami Abraham Lincoln Abu Ghaith Abu Ghraib Abu Khattala Abu Omar Abu Wa'el Dhiab Abu Zubaydah v. Poland Accountability ACLU ACLU v. CIA ACLU v. Clapper ACLU v. DOJ act of state Adam Schiff Additional protocol I Adnan Syed Adobe Afghanistan Africa African Commission on Hum African Court of Human an African Court of Justice African Union African Union Mission in African Union Regional Ta Aggression Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi Ahmed Ghailani Ahmed Godane Ahmed Warsame Airstrikes Ajam v. Butler Akbar Akhtar Muhammad Mansur Al Bahlul IV Symposium Al Qaeda Al Shabaab Al Shumrani Al-Bahlul al-Iraqi Al-Janko v. Gates Al-Libi Al-Maqaleh v. Hagel Al-Nashiri Al-Nashiri v. Poland Al-Shimari v Caci et al. Al-Skeini v. United Kingd Al-Zahrani v. Rodriguez Alexander Litvinenko Algeria Ali v. Obama Alien Tort Statute All Writs Act Ambassador Robert Ford Ambassador Stephen Rapp Amends Amerada Hess American Law Institute American Samoa American Society of Inter Americans Amicus Brief amnesty Amnesty International Amos Guiora and Ibrahim al-Qosi Andrew Kleinfeld Andrew McCabe Andy Wright Angela Merkel Anonymity Ansar Dine Anthony Kennedy Anti-Muslim discriminatio Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) Anti-Torture Amendment Antonin Scalia Anwar al-Awlaki AP I AP II APA Appellate Jurisdiction Apple AQAP AQIM Arab Spring armed attack armed conflict Armed Opposition Groups Arms Control army field manual Artesia Article 51 Article II Article III Ash Carter Ashraf Ghani Aspen Publishers Assad Assassination Ban Associated Forces asylum Atomic Energy Act atrocities prevention Attacks on Cultural Herit Attorney General attribution Auden AUMF AUMFs Australia authorization for the use autocracy Automated Searches Automated Weapons Autonomous Weapons Autonomous Weapons System Avril Haines Ba Odah v. Obama back doors Bagram Air Force Base Bankovic v. Belgium Baraawe Barack Obama Barbara Tuchman Barrel Bombs Barton Gellman Bashar al-Assad Bashir Belfast Peace Agreement Belgium Belhaj v. Straw Bemba Ben Emmerson Ben Wittes Benghazi Bernand Kleinman Bill Banks Bimenyimana Biodefense Bioterror Bivens Suit Black Sites Blackwater Blue Ribbon Study Panel o BND Boasberg body cameras Boim v. Holy Land Foundat Boko Haram Bond v. US Book Reviews Books We've Read Borders Bosnia-Herzegovina Botnets Boumediene v. Bush Brad Heath Brazil Brett Kavanaugh Brexit Brian Egan British Library Bruce Ackerman Brussels Attacks BSA budget bulk collection Burkina Faso Burundi Bush Administration CAAF CALEA California Call for Papers Cambodia Cameron Munter Canada Canadian Security Intelli Canadian Supreme Court cardin Cardozo Law Review Carly Fiorina Carnegie Mellon Universit Castro v. DHS CAT Ceasefire Cell Site Location Inform cell tracking Censorship Center for Civilians in C Center for Constitutional Center for Democracy and Center for National Secur Center for Naval Analysis Central African Republic Central District of Calif cert petitions Cessation of Hostilities Chad Chapter VII Charles Taylor Charleston Church Shootin Charlie Hebdo Charlie Savage Chatham House mini forum Chelsea Manning Chemical Weapons Chilcot Report children in conflict Chile China Chivalry Chris Jenks Church Commission CIA CIDT CISA Cisco Civil Liberties Civil service Civilian Casualties Civilian-Military divide Civilian-Military relatio Claire McCaskill Clapper Clapper v. Amnesty Intern Clarence Thomas Classified Information Clipper Chip Cluster Munitions CMCR collective self-defense Colombia Colvin v. Syria combat troops Commission on the Wartime Committee Against Torture Committee on the Eliminat Common Article 1 Common Article 3 Community Outreach Compliance with Court Ord Complicity Computer Security Inciden Conflict of interest conflict resolution Conflicts of Interest Congress congressional authorizati Congressional Hearing Congressional Hearings Congressional Investigati Congressional Oversight Consolidated Appropriatio Conspiracy Constitution constitutional law Contempt Content Continuous Combat Functio Convention Against Tortur Convention on Cluster Mun Convention on Conventiona Corporate Liability corporations Corruption Council of Europe Council on Foreign Relati Countering Violent Extrem Counterinsurgency counterintelligence Counterterrorism Court of Appeals for the Court of Military Commiss Courts Martial Couture-Rouleau Covert Action CQ Roll Call crime crime of aggression Crimea Crimes Against Humanity criminal trial Critical Infrastructure Cross-Border Data Request cross-ruffing Cruel cryptography CSIS Cuba Cully Stimson Customary International L CVE CWC Cy Vance Cyber Cyber Bonds Cyber Warfare Cyberattacks Cybersecurity Cybersecurity Act of 2015 Daily News Daily News Roundup Dan Markel Data Data Localization Data Protection Data Sharing David Barron David Ellis David Golove David Hicks David Kaye David Kris David Medine David Miranda David Sentelle David Tatel DC Circuit DC District Court DDoS DEA Deborah Pearlstein Deep Web Defense Directive 2310.01 Defense Select Committee Democracy Democratic Republic of Co Denmark Department of Defense Department of Homeland Se Department of Justice Department of State deradicalization detainee treatment Detention Detention Review Boards development Device Encryption DHS DIA Dianne Feinstein Diarmuid O'Scannlain Diplomacy diplomatic assurances Direct Participation in H Disinformation Dissent Dissent Channel Cable Distinction Division 30 Djibouti DNC DNC Hack DOD DoD Directive 2310.01E DOD Directive 5230.09 DOD Instruction 5230.29 DOJ Domestic Surveillance Dominic Ongwen Donald Trump Dreyer drone court Drone Papers Drones Drones Report due process Duncan Hunter Dustin Heard Dylann Roof Early Edition Ebola ECHR Economic Espionage ECPA ECPA Reform Editors' Picks EDNY Edward Snowden EFF v. DoJ Effective Control Egypt el salvador Electronic Frontier Found Elena Kagan Email Privacy Act Emergency Powers Emoluments Clause Empirical Research Encryption End-to-End Encryption Enemy Belligerents Engines of Liberty EO 12333 EPIC Eric Garner Eric Holder Eritrea Espionage Act Establishment Clause Ethics EU Data Retention Directi Europe European Commission European Convention on Hu European Convention on Na European Court of Human R European Court of Justice European Parliament European Union Evan Liberty event Events evidence Executive Order 12333 Executive Order 13470 Executive Order 13567 Executive Orders Executive Power Executive Privilege extradition Extrajudicial Release Extraordinary African Cha Extraordinary Renditions Extraterritoriality Extreme vetting F Facebook FARC Fast & Furious Fatou Bensouda FBI FBI Director FBI v. Apple Featured Federal Communications Co Federal Courts federal program Federal Trade Commission federalism Feminism Ferguson Fifth Amendment Filartiga financing First Amendment FISA FISA Amendments Act of 20 FISA Improvements Act FISA Reform FISC Five Eyes Florence Hartmann FOIA force-feeding Foreign Affairs Foreign Claims Act Foreign Fighters Foreign Law Foreign Policy Foreign Sovereign Immunit foreign sovereign immunit Foreign Surveillance foreign terrorist fighter Foreign Terrorist Organiz Forever War Fourth Amendment Fourth Circuit France Frank Wolf Fred Korematsu Freedom of Association freedom of expression Freedom of the Press FSIA FTC fugitive Gabor Rona Gabriel Schoenfeld Gag Order Garcetti v. Ceballos Gaza GCHQ Gender General Warrants Geneva Conventions genocide Geoff Corn George W. Bush Georgia Gerald Seib Germany Gideon v. Wainwright GJIL Summit Glenn Greenwald Going Dark golden key golden number Google Goran Hadi Gorsuch Government Shutdown Greece Group of Governmental Exp Guantanamo Guardian Guatemala Guest Post Guide to Torture Report Gulf War Guns of August Guns of September H.R. McMaster Habeas Habre hacking Hae Min Lee Hagel Haiti Hamdan Hamdi v. Rumsfeld Hamid Karzai Handschu Agreement Harold Koh Harvard Law Review Harvard Law School Hassan v. City of New Yor Hate Crimes Hate Speech Hatim v. Obama Heikkila v. Barber Helms Amendment Hernandez v. United State Hezbollah Hicks High commissioner for hum High-Value Detainee Inter Hillary Clinton Hoffman report Holder v. Humanitarian La Holidays Holocaust Holy See Hossam Bahgat Hostage Act Hostile Intent House Armed Forces Commit House Committee on Foreig House Demolitions House Judiciary House lawsuit House Permanent Select Co House Un-American Activit HPSCI HTTPS Huawei Human Right Law human rights Human Rights Committee Human Rights Council Human Rights First Human Rights Law Human Rights Watch Human Shields human trafficking Humanitarian Intervention Humanitarian Law Humanitarian relief opera Hussain v. Obama Hybrid Justice IACHR Ibrahim v. DHS Ibrahim v. US ICC ICCPR ICRAC ICRC ictr ICTY IDF IHL IHR immigration Imminent Threat Immunity immunity for official act Impeachment Imran Khan Incendiary Weapons India individual self-defense Information Sharing inhuman and degrading tre injury in fact INS v. St. Cyr Inspector General Insular Cases Insurance Intelligence activities Intelligence and Security intelligence community Intelligence Community Di Intelligence Reform International Arm International Armed Confl International Convention international court International Court of Ju International Courts International Criminal Co International Criminal La International Law International Law Commiss International Right to En International Right to Pr internet Internet freedom Internet of Things Interrogation Investigatory Powers Bill Investigatory Powers Trib Iqbal Iran Iran Negotiations Act Iran Nuclear Agreement Re Iran nuclear deal Iran nuclear negotiations Iran Nuclear Negotiations Iraq Iraqi Kurdistan Irek Hamidullan Ireland ISAF ISIL ISIL AUMF Islam Islamic Islamic State Israel Italy Jack Goldsmith James Clapper James Comey James Foley James Risen Jamie Orenstein Jamshid Muhtorov Janice Rogers Brown Jared Kushner Jason Smith Jay Morse Jean Pierre Bemba Jeff Sessions Jeffrey Brand Jeh Johnson Jennifer Granick Jeremy Ridgeway Jerry Brown Jim Sensenbrenner Joe Biden John Bellinger John Brennan John Gleeson John Kerry John McCain John Reed John Walker Lindh John Yoo Joint Committee on Human joint criminal enterprise Jon Cornyn Jonathan Horowitz Jones v. UK Jordan Joseph McCarthy Joshua Arap Sang journalism Journalist journalists JSOC Judge Bates Judge Raymond Randolph Judicial Appointments Judicial Review Judith Rogers Junaid Hussain Jus ad Bellum jus cogens violations jus in bello Just Security Just Security anniversary Just Security Candidates Just Security interns Just Security internship Just security jobs Just War Justice Against Sponsors Justin Raimondo Karen Greenberg Karen LeCraft Henderson Katz v. United States Kazemi v. Iran Keith Alexander Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martin Kenneth Dahl Kenya Kevin Heller Khadr Khalid Sheikh Mohammed Khouzam Killer Robots Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Pet Kiyemba v. Obama Klayman v. Obama Korean landmines Korematsu Korematsu v. United State Kristen Gillibrand KSM Kunduz Kyrgyzstan Laird vs Tatum Lakhdar Brahimi landmines Latif v. Holder Laurence Silberman Lavabit Law enforcement Law Enforcement Hacking Law of Armed Conflict Law of War Manual Law of War Manual Forum Law of War Manual. ICRC Lawfare Lawful Hacking Laws of War Leak Investigations Leaks Lebanon Legal Adviser Legal Adviser, DoS legal offices Legal Services Corp. v. V Letters to the Editor Lewis Kaplan Lex Specialis LGBT Libertarianism Libya Limburg Lindsey Graham Lithuania Livestream Logan Act Lord Peter Goldsmith Lords Resistance Army LTTE Luban Lujan v. Defenders of Wil Luther v. Borden Mac Thornberry Magistrate Judges Maher Arar Mahmoud Abbas Majid Khan Mali Manmohan Singh Mar-a-Lago Marco Rubio Marcy Wheeler Margo Brodie Marine Corps Mark Martins Mark VIsger Marketplace of Ideas Marne Marsha Berzon Martin Luther King Jr. Marty Lederman Material Support Matt Blaze Matthew Waxman Mauritania Mavi Marmara MCA McCain-Feinstein Amendmen McCarthyism McClatchy Mdecins Sans Frontire Media Media Shield Law Medical Personnel membership Memorial Day Mercenaries Merrick Garland Meshal v. Higgenbotham Metadata Mexico Michael Brown Michael Flynn Michael Ratner Michael Weiss Michel Foucault Microsoft Microsoft v. DOJ Microsoft Warrants Case Middle East midterm elections midterms Migrant migration Mike Pence Mike Rogers Military Military aid Military Commissions Military Extraterritorial Military Justice Review G military justice system Military Objective Minimization Procedures Ministry of Defense v. Ra Mitch McConnell MLAT Mohamed v. Jeppesen Datap Mohammed v. MOD Monday Reflection Money Money Laundering Monsanto Montreaux Document Mootness Mosaic Theory Mosul Mother of All Bombs Mueller investigation Munitions murder Muslim Brotherhood Mustafa al-Shamiri Mutual Legal Assistance namibia narco-trafficking Nasr v. Italy Nathalie Weizmann National Archives National Institute of Sta national security National Security Council National Security Lawyeri National Security Letters NATO Nawaz Sharif NCIS NCTC NDAA NDU Speech negotiations Nepotism Network Investigative Tec New York Times New York Times v. DOJ Nicholas Lewin Nicholas Merrill Nicholas Slatten Niger Nigeria No-Fly List Non-international Armed C non-refoulement non-self-executing treati Nonproliferation Treaty Noor Uthman Muhammed Norms Norms Watch North Korea Northern Ireland Notice NSA NSA Reform NSLs Nuclear Nuclear Weapons Nuremberg NYPD Obama administration obstruction of justice occupation October Office of Legal Counsel Office of the Director of official act immunity OLC Drone Memo Oman Omar al-Bashir Omar Khadr Oona Hathaway Operation Operation Barkhane Operation Inherent Resolv Operation Protective Edge Operation Storm of Resolv Opinion Poll OPM Organization for Security Organization for the Proh Orin Kerr Osama bin Laden OTP Strategic Plan Ottawa Convention Ottawa shootings Oversight Oversight v. Holder Pakistan Palestine Palmer Raids Panetta Panetta Review Paris Attacks Paris Climate Accord parli Particularity Partition Parwan Patrick Leahy Patrio Patriot Act Paul Slough Paul Wolfson PCLOB Peace Talks Peacekeeping Pen Registers Pentagon Pentagon Papers perfidy Periodic Review Boards Periodic Review Boards (P persecution Peter Burke Peter Margulies Peter Raven-Hansen Philippines Pinochet Plea Agreement PMC PNSDA Poland Police militarization political question doctri Portugal Posse Comitatus Power Wars Symposium PPD-28 PPD-30 PPG PRB Pre-publication Review Pr President Obama President's NDU Spee President's Review G Presidential Campaign 201 Presidential Policy Guida Presidential Powers Presidential Review Board Presidents Day PRISM Privacy Private Military and Secu private military contract Propaganda proportionality protected persons Provisional measures Public Surveys Putin Q+A Qualified Immunity Queen's Speech R2P Rachel Kleinfeld racial discrimination Radovan Karadi Ramzi Bin al-Shibh Rand Paul Raner Collins Ranger School Ransomware rape Rasul v. Bush Ray Mabus Raza v. City of New York Readers' Guide Reagan Real Estate Recusal Red Scare reddit Reengagement Assessment refugee Refugee Crisis Religion remedies Rendition Rep. Adam Schiff Republic of Korea Resolution 2170 Responsibility to Protect Restis Restis v. United Against Rewards for Justice Rex Tillerson Reyaad Khan Rhetoric Richard Burr Richard Leon Right to Be Forgotten Right to Life Right to Privacy Right to Truth Riley v. California Robert Gates Robert H. Jackson Robert Litt Robert Sack Rodriguez v. Swartz Rogue Justice Rome Statute Ron Wyden Roof Knocking Rosenberg vs Pasha Rothstein v. UBS AG Roy Cohn Royce Lamberth Rule 41 Rules of Engagement Rumsfeld v. Padilla Russia Russia Investigation Rwanda Ryan Vogel Saddam Hussein SAFE Act of 2015 Safe Harbor safe zones Sahel Salahi Saleh v. Titan Corp Salim v. Mitchell Samantar v. Yousuf San Bernardino Shooting sanctions Sarah Cleveland Sarah Koenig SASC Saudi Arabia Schengen Zone Schlesinger v. Councilman Schrems Scotland Scott Shane SCOTUS SDNY Second Circuit Secrecy Secret Law Secret Service Section 215 Section 702 Security security agreement Security Assistance security clearance self-defense Senate Senate Armed Services Com Senate Foreign Relations Senate HSGAC Senate Intelligence Commi Senate Judiciary Committe Senegal Separation of powers Serdar Mohammed v. SSD Serial Service Providers Sexual Assault Sexual Violence Seymour Hersh SFRC SGBV Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl Sharia shooting Siege Warfare signals collection Silicon Valley Sir John Chilcot SJC Slahi slavery Smith v. Maryland Smith v. Obama Snooper's Charter Snowden Snowden Treaty social Social Media Solicitor General Somalia Sonia Sotomayor Sony South Africa South Ossetia South Sudan Space Special Forces special rapporteur Spying Sri Lanka SSCI SSCI Report SSCI Torture Report standing Stanley McChrystal Starvation state immunity State of the Union State Responsibility state secrets state secrets privilege State v. Andrews Statehood Staten Island Status of Forces Agreemen status-based immunity statute of limitations StellarWind Stephen Bannon Stephen Williams Steve Dycus Stimson Center StingRays Stored Communications Act Sudan Sunshine Week superior responsibility Supreme Court Supreme Court of Canada Surveillance Suspension Clause Sustainable Development G Sweden Syria Syrian opposition Syrian refugees Szabo v. Hungary TACT 2000 Tadic Tahir-ul-Qadri Taliban Taliban Sources Project Tallinn Manual target Targeted Killing Targeting Decisions Taylor v. KBR Teaching Technology Ted Cruz term limits terrorism terrorist Terrorist Expatriation Ac Third Circuit Thomas Ambro Thomas Griffith Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Tim Kaine Tim Starks Title III Tony Blair Tor Tor Browser torture Torture Report torture victim protection trafficking transitional justice Transparency transparency reports Travel ban Treasury Department Treaties Treaty Implementation Treaty Law Trump Trump Administration Trump Administrations truth commission Tuaua Tunisia Turkey Turkmen Turkmenv.Hasty Turner v. Safley Tweet Roll Twitter UAE UANI UDHR Uganda Uhuru Kenyatta Uighurs UK UK Elections UK High Court UK Parliament UK Supreme Court UK Terrorism Act 2000 Ukraine Umm Sayyaf UN Assistance Mission in UN Charter UN High Commissioner for UN High Commissioner on H UN Human Rights Committee UN Security Council Uniform Code of Military United Kingdom United Nations United Nations General As United Nations Human Righ United Nations Human Righ United States ex rel. Acc United States v. Graham United States v. Moalin Universal Declaration of Universal Jurisdiction Universal Periodic Review Unlawful Combatants UNMISS UNSC UNSC Resolution 1441 UNSC Resolution 2178 UNSC Resolution 2249 unwilling or unable US AID US Army US Holocaust Museum and M US v. al-Darbi US v. al-Shibh US v. Garcia US v. Khadr US v. Mehanna US v. Mohammed US v. Warshak USA Freedom USA Freedom Act USAID Use of Force USS Cole Vance v. Terrazas Verdugo-Urquidez Veterans Veterans Day Veto vetting Victor Restis Video Vietnam Vladimir Putin Vojislav eelj voluntary manslaughter voting rights Vulnerabilities Equities war War Crimes War Crimes Act war memorial War on Drugs War on Terror War Powers War Powers Resolution Warafi warrant canary Warsame Wartime Contracts Washington Post Wassenaar Arrangement Waziristan weapons Weapons of Mass Destructi Weekly Recap West Bank Westgate WhatsApp Whistleblowing White House Wikileaks Wikimedia v. NSA William Bradford William Ruto William Samoei Ruto Wiretap Women Women in combat Women's Rights Wong Kim Ark Yahoo Year End 2015 Year End 2016 Yemen Yezidis Yugoslavia Zakharov v. Russia Zehalf-Bibeau Zero-Day Vulnerabilities Zimbabwe Zivotofsky v. Clinton Zivotofsky v. Kerry

The Internet, a historically unparalleled source of information and expression, has also become a playground for censorship, punishment and propaganda. Not a day goes by where an individual is not arrested, prosecuted or threatened for the content of a tweet or a post. States are ordering internet shutdowns in times of public protest, elections, and even school exams. Governments enjoy surveillance capabilities that drill deep into the lives of journalists, activists, political opposition, and regular citizens.

These threats, and many others, are typically driven by states, in violation of their obligations to respect everyones right to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, as both the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights provide. While states are undoubtedly obliged to protect human rights online, what are the roles and responsibilities of the companies that comprise the Information and Communications Technology (ICT) sector a multi-trillion-dollar industry that has become an essential pillar of democratic life today?

Last year marked the beginning of an attempt to flesh out the UN Human Rights Councils important recognition that human rights apply online as well as offline. David, the councils special rapporteur for freedom of expression, conducted an initial survey of chokepoints to free expression on the Internet that identified several areas where clarification of State obligations and private sector responsibilities is most needed. This years report follows up by exploring how global free expression is both supported and undermined on the networks that enable us to connect to the Internet the most basic level of the digital infrastructure. The report not only analyzes the role of States, but also the companies that build and operate these networks everything from telecommunications and Internet service providers, to Internet exchange points and content delivery networks, which ensure faster and more efficient exchange of Internet traffic, to network equipment vendors, which build and configure networks.

This week, states and NGOs got a first chance to react to the reports findings and recommendations when David presented them to the council in Geneva the culmination of more than a years worth of study and consultations. Here are five takeaways that we hope States and others address:

Read the full report, which also discusses the erosion of net neutrality, and the human rights impact of standards developing organizations like the Internet Engineering Task Force, and its supplementary materials, here. We are already turning to the next phase of this effort to explore freedom of expression in the digital age, which will focus on content regulation and Internet platforms. A prospectus and call for submissions will be circulated this summer, and we encourage everyone whos interested to engage.

Image: Getty/Omar Havana

Originally posted here:

Freedom of Expression and the Digital Access Industry: Five Key Takeaways - Just Security

Stanley the catfish swims to freedom – Tribune-Review

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

Continue reading here:

Stanley the catfish swims to freedom - Tribune-Review

Does President Trump Support Unrestrained Freedom? – Cato Institute (blog)

The Republican National Committee, in the person of Chairwoman Ronna Romney McDaniel, informs me that I have been selected to represent the Commonwealth of Virginia as a member of The Presidents Club. I know that this is an important responsibility because it comes with a Priority Mail BRE and a request for $750. Theres a lot of boilerplate in the letter about fake news and the Democrats and their radical left-leaning allies. (Really, if theyre radical, surely theyre more than left-leaning. Why not just come out and say it theyre left-wingers!)

But Im particularly struck by this line:

I believe you share President Trumps objectives of smaller government, fiscal discipline, lower taxes, secure borders, conservative judges, a stronger military and unrestrained freedom.

Seriously President Trumps objective is unrestrained freedom?

Some of those objectives I can see. Fiscal discipline is a presumptuous claimwhen youve promised not to touch the biggest spending programs. Some of the administrations programs might make government smaller, but others clearly would not. But seriously, unrestrained freedom?

For nearly two years now Donald Trumps main policy themes have been to close our borders, to deport millions of our neighbors and co-workers, and to stop Americans from buying products made overseas. He has bullied, subsidized, and threatened businesses into making uneconomic decisions. He has also talked at length about his desire to limit freedom of speech, frustrated as he is thatour press is allowed to say whatever they want.While Republicans and Democrats in Congress and the states work on criminal justice reform Attorney General Jeff Sessionssteps up the drug war. Trumps acceptance speech at the Republican National Convention was described in Reason as easily the most overt display of authoritarian fear-mongering I can remember seeing in American politics.

The idea that President Trumps objectives include unrestrained freedom is ludicrous even in the context of political fundraising letters.

Read more:

Does President Trump Support Unrestrained Freedom? - Cato Institute (blog)

Japan accused of eroding press freedom by UN special rapporteur … – The Guardian

The government of Shinzo Abe has been vocal about unfair reporting. Photograph: Yoshitaka Sugawara/AP

The UNs special rapporteur on freedom of expression has accused Japan of eroding media freedoms and stifling public debate of issues such as the Fukushima nuclear meltdown and the countrys actions during the second world war.

In a report submitted to the UN human rights council, David Kaye said he had identified significant worrying signals about Japans record on freedom of expression.

His investigation the first into freedom of the press in Japan was prompted by concern over mounting government pressure on the countrys media.

Critics have cited the domestic medias delay in reporting that the March 2011 accident at Fukushima had caused a nuclear meltdown a decision believed to reflect official attempts to play down the severity of the disaster.

In 2014, the Asahi Shimbun, under pressure from the administration of the prime minister, Shinzo Abe, retracted an article claiming 650 workers had fled the Fukushima Daiichi plant soon after the disaster, defying an order by its then manager, Masao Yoshida, to stay and make a last-ditch effort to regain control of the reactors.

The paper later admitted its account, based on the newspapers interpretation of leaked testimony by Yoshida, was mistaken. Significantly, however, the reports retraction led to the breakup of an Asahi investigative team that had produced several scoops critical of the governments handling of the crisis.

While Kaye did not refer to specific reports on the Fukushima meltdown, he did voice concern over the removal from school textbooks of references to Japans wartime use of sex slaves.

Kaye noted the gradual disappearance of references to comfort women tens of thousands of women, mostly from the Korean peninsula, who were forced to work in Japanese military brothels before and during the war.

In 1997, all seven history textbooks approved for use in junior high schools addressed wartime sexual slavery, yet none referred to the issue between 2012-15, and only one mentioned it last year.

Kaye said the lack of public debate over Japans wartime role, restrictions on access to information, and government pressure that has led the media to practise self-censorship require attention lest they undermine Japans democratic foundations.

Japan responded angrily to claims that media freedoms were at risk under Abe.

Its ambassador to the UN, Junichi Ihara, accused Kaye of peddling inaccuracies about the governments commitment to a free press. In a statement to the UN human rights council on Monday, he said: It is regrettable that some parts of [Kayes] report are written without accurate understanding of the governments explanation and its positions.

Ihara rebutted Kayes claim that a law permitting the government to suspend broadcast licences for TV and radio networks for unfair reporting was being used to pressure senior editors into underplaying or ignoring sensitive political stories.

Last year, the internal affairs minister, Sanae Takaichi, prompted an outcry after saying that broadcasters that repeatedly failed to show fairness in their political coverage, despite official warnings, could be taken off the air.

Soon after, three veteran news anchors all with a reputation for grilling government politicians left their jobs almost simultaneously, sparking allegations that they had been pressured to quit after Abe and his colleagues complained about them during private dinners with media executives.

Ihara noted that no minister had ever suspended a broadcasting licence, adding that the law does not give rise to any pressure on the media.

Kayes report was similarly critical of the 2014 state secrets law, under which journalists can be imprisoned for up to five years for reporting classified information passed on by whistleblowers. He said the law was overly broad and risked being applied arbitrarily, adding that the government should not be in the position of determining what is fair.

Ihara countered: Information designed as specially designated secrets is limited under strict conditions, adding that information-gathering activities performed by journalists are not punishable under the act.

The rift between Japan and the UN widened after Joseph Cannataci, special rapporteur on the right to privacy, said an anti-conspiracy bill being debated in parliament could lead to undue restrictions to the rights to privacy and to freedom of expression.

The government insists the new law is necessary for Japan to fulfil its international obligation to deter acts of terrorism. Abe denounced Cannatacis assessment as extremely unbalanced and said his conduct was hardly that of an objective expert.

Confrontations between Japanese and UN representatives have grown more heated in recent years. In 2015, Tokyo suspended payments to Unesco after it included disputed Chinese documents about the Nanjing massacre in its World Memory List.

Yoshihiko Noda, the secretary general of Japans biggest opposition party, accused Abes government of slamming the door in the faces of UN special rapporteurs, according to the Mainichi Shimbun.

Earlier this year, Reporters Without Borders ranked Japan 72nd in its global press freedom index the lowest among the G7. The country has slid down the rankings since 2010, when it was placed 11th.

Read the original here:

Japan accused of eroding press freedom by UN special rapporteur ... - The Guardian

Notebook: Healthy Laquon Treadwell Practicing with ‘A Mental Freedom’ – Vikings.com

EDEN PRAIRIE, Minn. Laquon Treadwell listened to the question and looked skyward.

Up there, the second-year receiver said in response to a question about his confidence level.

The sun began peeking through a blanket of clouds on a dripping muggy morning at Winter Park Tuesday when the Vikings opened their mandatory minicamp.

Treadwell had an impressive catch over the middle during the session, made several other plays and ran well. There was also a near miss on a nice deep route against Xavier Rhodes.

On his final day as a 21-year-old, the 2016 first-round pick described playing with a mental freedom that comes with being healthy and another year removed from a significant leg injury in 2014 as a sophomore at Mississippi.

This year, hes stayed healthy in the offseason program and has taken substantial reps with the first team when the Vikings use a three receiver set.

It helps you relax mentally when you know youre all the way healthy and able to take some of those hits on your legs, Treadwell said. That was a big thing for me even in college. I got hits on my legs and was able to bounce back. Its a mental freedom.

Its just playing ball now and making plays, Treadwell added.

Treadwells rookie season wasnt quite what he expected. He appeared in nine games and finished with one catch for 15 yards after catching two or more passes in every college game he played.

Vikings Head Coach Mike Zimmer said earlier this offseason that last seasons results didnt stem from a lack of work by Treadwell. Zimmer said maybe he works too hard.

Vikings.coms Eric Smith tracked the work that Treadwell was doing after training camp practices last season, counting 277 post-practice catches of passes launched at him by a machine.

Zimmer also said that Treadwell has looked much different than he did a year ago.

Yeah, I think he looks good, Zimmer said. Hes stopping and starting. Some of the routes that hes been running as far as when he has to plant and comeback, I thought hes done pretty well. Hes run some good routes to accelerate over the middle. So, I think he just feels so much more comfortable now.

Vikings Offensive Coordinator Pat Shurmur said hes seen progress in the receiver who led the SEC with 11 touchdown receptions and 1,153 yards in 2015.

He came back, and he was really on point with what hes supposed to be doing mentally, Shurmur said. Hes been out here competing and doing a nice job running routes and catching the ball. Understanding where he fits in the running game and who to block. To this point, weve been really pleased with his progress based on a year ago.

The Vikings have two more days of minicamp before wrapping their offseason program. The team will then break before reporting to training camp next month.

Its safe to say that Treadwell wont be looking too far ahead of the break.

Weve got to come out here and get to work, Treadwell said. Ive just got to continue to do it and find my role in this offense and help the team win some ball games.

Encouraged by Bridgewater

As mentioned, Treadwell suffered a fractured tibia and dislocated left ankle in a game on Nov. 1, 2014, so hes no stranger to bouncing back from a major injury.

The recovery efforts of another teammate, quarterback Teddy Bridgewater, have impressed Treadwell and others.

Bridgewater suffered a dislocated knee during a practice last August and has been doing rehab work since. Part of Bridgewaters rehab work includes dropping back and throwing the football, but he has not been cleared to practice with the team.

He looks great, really great, like he was never hurt, Treadwell said. Thats God-given talent, and hes a worker. Hes a fighter. Hes shown us a lot off the small time that weve seen him, and for him to bounce back so fast, thats been a blessing.

With anybody who takes an injury like that, it will take a couple of hits to overcome it, Treadwell added. Hes strong-minded and hes just ready to overcome that obstacle.

Valuable time

Injuries ravaged the Vikings offensive line last season, causing Minnesota to use eight different combinations of starters and five different players at left tackle.

The Vikings brought in tackles Riley Reiff and Mike Remmers early in free agency. Reiff has been at left tackle since arriving, and Remmers has been the other bookend. In between, the brunt of first-team reps have gone to Alex Boone at left guard, Nick Easton at center and Joe Berger at right guard.

Remmers said the offensive linemen have appreciated the opportunity to work together and build cohesion during the offseason program so that they will be better prepared for camp and the preseason.

This time of year is absolutely critical, Remmers said. Youre getting little things down, communication, technique, footwork and everything. This time is critical so when we go into August were all in a groove together and continue to grow from there.

Read more:

Notebook: Healthy Laquon Treadwell Practicing with 'A Mental Freedom' - Vikings.com

Those who fought for freedom honored at Fall River Flag Day ceremony – Fall River Herald News

Sarah Sousa Correspondent

FALL RIVER A Flag Day ceremony held outside of Government Center honored individuals who currently serve, have served and those who have lost their lives fighting for the nations freedom.

City Councilor Raymond Mitchell invited the community and students from Doran school to commemorate the countrys 240th Flag Day.

Mitchell said the American flag is more than just a flag. The flag represents freedom all of us have.

The flag raised was flown over the United States Capitol, according to Mitchell.

Mitchell emphasized that the people and students standing before him would not be able to have been present if it werent for the dedication and commitment of the individuals who fought for freedom.

Carlene Barret and Sue Galloway were invited to the podium by Mitchell to receive an American flag honoring Barretts son and Galloways grandson, Sgt. Robert Barrett, who was killed in Afghanistan in 2010.

Traffic Officer Rachel Rapoza sang The Star Spangled Banner accompanied by first grade students, Nevaeh Dumont, Melissa PegaJesus, Jayden Williams and Tate Reth from the Doran school, who led the crowd in the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance.

City Council Vice President Linda Pereira emphasized the importance of remembering when looking at the American flag.

Pereira, directing her speech toward the Doran students, said she wants them stopping to pay tribute to the nations flag whenever they come upon the flag.

Doran students should be proudly waving the flags they received at the ceremony, according to Pereira.

She emphasized how important it is to remember and understand exactly what the flag stands for every single time it is looked at.

I hope you remember all the love you have in your heart for the United States of America, said Pereira.

She listed what quality of the United States of America each color on the flag represents.

White represents freedom. Blue represents loyalty of the military and first responders. Red represents bravery.

Seventh-grade students from the Doran school, Mackenzie Brito, Cassandra Franca and Isaac Paiva recited facts pertaining to the American flag such as its origins and the general uses of flags throughout history.

According to the students, the flag represents strength and freedom.

To conclude the ceremony, Rapoza sang America the Beautiful before students from Doran school released doves and pigeons into the air.

The doves released represent peace according to Mitchell.

During this event, State Rep. Alan Silvia was also hosting a Flag Day event at Battleship Cove. Flags were distributed to veterans and constituents of the 7th Bristol District.

Originally posted here:

Those who fought for freedom honored at Fall River Flag Day ceremony - Fall River Herald News