Media freedom must accompany responsibility

Feature Article of Tuesday, 13 January 2015

Columnist: Blege, Alex

Stroke of my pen: Media freedom must accompany responsibility.

Alex Blege

No individual desires to have his or her freedom clipped. Everyone desires that he or she should be allowed to do whatever pleases him or her. This is how the human race was made. On the contrary, freedom does not walk alone, it walks with responsibility. It can be compared to a child and its mother; separating them is an attempt to deny the child a motherly love and the mother, the exercising of a natural duty to show love, care and concern. The above analogy can be used to discuss media freedom and responsibility in Ghana. Media analysts have posited that the media is the fourth estate of the realm, the media is a watchdog of society; who watches the watchdog? In all of the above, the media seeks to create a bar of responsibility in all spheres of society, thereby seeking to create pretty nearly a utopia society. This is worth the plaudits of all and sundry. However, as the media seeks to create a pretty nearly utopia society, what are the guiding principles that inform how far, how wide, or how deep the journalist should go or what are the values that define our society in the course of exercising a professional right? As stated in the beginning paragraph, no individual wants to have his or her freedom clipped, it is of much concern to acknowledge that media is an aspect of society; therefore, the media itself must seek to consistently see how it is unfair to divorce freedom of the media from the responsibility of the media. Every society is guided by legal principles and moral values. It is not wrong to learn from others, but it is a sign of innovation and lack of self-esteem to copy others exactly without taking into consideration the legal, cultural and moral values that informs the ideas we tend to copy. Media freedom and responsibility is a universal phenomenon. We interact with other peoples of the world; the world is a global village and what relates to one group of people is probable to relate to another group of people. Be that as it may, as we live in the globalised world, we as professionals should identify how our intrinsic values that define us as Africans and Ghanaians relate with the norm and charters of the larger world when it comes to media freedom and responsibility. Media theorists have argued that, audiences are discerning; the audiences have the ability to determine what is false and true. Again, it is worthy to note that the power of the media to influence their audience is very high. In fact, people take whatever the media puts out as wholly true. Our values that are transmitted to us through African folktales never extols acts of telling lies about people or trying to making heavier the emotional burdens of our kith and kin. The African lives by the principle of the Bantu dictum, umuntu, ngumuntu nquabantu to wit, a human is human because of other humans. In Ghana, among the Ewes of the Volta Region, it is am3n) vi eny3 am3. Albeit, this principle has sometimes been used to further selfish interests, it still upholds the value that guides our positive attitudes and behaviours which we show towards our own families and friends in times of emotional distress. Chinua Achebe, noted at one point that, it is not enough for us that our art should merely report the nature of things; it should change it. As the media reports attacks on itself, the media should begin to take a deep look into its activities and pragmatically make efforts that will make responsibility a twin of the freedom that is sought. Responsibility should be consistently discussed; when the media seeks to be free from all the checks that sections of society desire to place on it, the media can make a case of checking its self. In addition, the emergence of social media poses a great burden of showing how responsibility is upheld by the media. Journalism in the social media is slightly different from what goes on in the traditional media. This call for discussion on how issues that are reported in social media can meet responsible standards without gagging the new media. The Ghana Journalists Association must begin to initiate this discussion of self-regulating its members to avoid the issue of the consistent attacks that are meted out to members of the media. Journalism is a dignified profession that must not be seen advocating being only free to operate; it must equally check itself and behave responsibly. This gives the impetus to the media to be professionally aggressive in the course of their duty to do follow-up on running stories, demand accountability from all those who have been given the privilege to serve the interest of society at one level or the other. Writers blog address & email address http://www.gudzetsekomla.blogspot.com/kw.ameblege@hotmail.com

Go here to read the rest:

Media freedom must accompany responsibility

The complicated world of blasphemy laws

A woman shows a banner reading I am Charlie for the victims of the shooting at the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris.

Martin Meissner, Associated Press

Enlarge photo

Freedom of speech has taken center-stage in the wake of last weeks shooting at the headquarters of Paris based satirical newspaper, Charlie Hebdo. The attack is assumed to be a response to Hebdo printing caricaturized images of Mohammad, according to the New York Times.

The hashtag #JeSuisCharlie, a movement aimed to show solidarity for the victims of the shooting and their families, the weekly, and the Parisian community and its right to freedom of expression, continues to trend on Twitter. The Daily Mail reported the hashtag was tweeted over 250,000 times within four hours of the incident.

Few issues have so successfully united both the left and the right in American politics, with almost universal outrage over what most commentators believe to be an attack on the basic human right of freedom of speech.

But freedom of speech, and blasphemy in particular, isnt universally protected around the world, even among many liberal democracies. According to a 2011 study published by the Pew Research Center, 47 percent of the worlds countries have laws against blasphemy, apostasy and/or defamation of religion, including religious hate speech.

These laws are not limited to the countries one might typically expect. European countries such as Ireland, Germany and Denmark, among others, currently have laws against blasphemy and defamation of religion.

See the original post:

The complicated world of blasphemy laws

Freedom, I hear you say?

The murder of12 peoplein ParisMUSTbe condemned. Nothing justifiesthe killing of innocent people in the name of anything: Imaginary friend, Ideology, Politics (you pick). However when the dust settles, a few questions have to be answered. We can all look at the attacks on Charlie Hebdo and be outraged that such barbarity exists.The attacksshould not,however,only be understood in the context of aretaliation for a perceived offense againstIslam. The HYPERLINK "http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001533" t "_blank" human tragedythat areIraq and Afghanistanis real and ongoing. Droneattacks in Yemen and Pakistan HYPERLINK "http://www.livingunderdrones.org/" t "_blank" killingciviliansare routine.Unconditional support for a decade long illegal military occupation has not faltered. HYPERLINK "http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/defence/9656393/David-Cameron-defends-arms-deals-with-Gulf-states.html" t "_blank" Silence on human rightabuses in Saudi Arabia for HYPERLINK "http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/industry/10935491/BAE-restructures-its-businesses-in-Saudi-Arabia.html" t "_blank" business reasonsis official policy.The recently released CIA Torture report is ignored. These are not conspiracies. They are facts. It wouldbe hypocriticalforus to standwiththe defenders of freedom of speechandignore what else could have causeda couple ofidiots to do what they did on the day and conclude that this wasONLYabout freedom of speech. You dont wake up one day and decide to be an extremist. Freedom of speech,is also about theDUTYof the press to tell theTRUTHwhenever we are guilty of atrocities or whenever we HYPERLINK "http://www.bbc.co.uk/turkish/iraqdossier.pdf" t "_blank" are prepared to lie before or after committing atrocities. What is it about the things we do that makes so many idiots want to blowback at us? Do we only cause offense occasionally by making fun of the Prophet or are we guilty of the same sort of atrocities that we are so quick to condemn when a crazy fanatic decides he wants to take matters in his own hands? Do people hate us because we have freedom? Or is it because we routinely kill and maim without impunity, in the name ofthesame freedom? Some questions are perhaps hard to answer,but if we are honest about it, we should take a good look at ourselves! In our so-calledfree world,where we stand for the freedom to offend, we have, through our foreign policy of the last decades, been guilty of the worst atrocities against Muslims, HYPERLINK "http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1001533" t "_blank" half a million dead by the most conservative estimate. This isNOT ONLYabout freedom of speech. Any condemnation of the killings at CH, should not be devoid ofcontext. Religious extremism exists. There is no denying this.While drawing offensive cartoons is not the sole cause of terrorism,killing innocent people in the Middle East certainly does not stop it. Before the righteous among you get back to me and accuse me of justifying what happened, Ill use an example that former CIA agent, Barry Eisler,used in explaining blowback: If Person X walks up to Person Y on the street and spits in his face, and Person Y then pulls out a gun and shoots Person X in the head and kills him in retaliation, one can observe that Person X's spitting was a causal factor in Person Y's behavior without remotely justifying Person Y's lethal violence. One can point out that a potential cost of walking up to people on the street and spitting in their face is that they are likely to respond with similar or worse aggression - and that this is one reason not to engage in such behavior - without justifying or legitimizing the response that is provoked and without denying (or even minimizing) the agency or blame of the person who responds. The barbarity of onedoes notjustify the other. It can however explain it. Yes, I AM for freedom to offend. But I am ALSO for the freedom to not be murdered, to not have your wives and daughters raped and your country pillaged. Freedom is not only at stake when bad things happento US. And if you think that the above should be not told because it is insensitive, I hope the irony is not lost on you. JE SUIS CHARLIE,TOO!

Read the original post:

Freedom, I hear you say?

Let’s Play Monster Hunter Freedom Unite Part 290 Grundkenntnisse des Physikers – Video


Let #39;s Play Monster Hunter Freedom Unite Part 290 Grundkenntnisse des Physikers
Zum Test der neuen Rstung und Waffe gibts dieses mal eine epische G-Rang Jagdquest, welche leider ab der Hlfte nicht mehr mit aufgenommen wurde... ---------------------------------------------...

By: DeusNemesiX

Read this article:

Let's Play Monster Hunter Freedom Unite Part 290 Grundkenntnisse des Physikers - Video

[06] Frost team vs Rukrarea team 4v4: Freedom Wars Potato Quality Series – Video


[06] Frost team vs Rukrarea team 4v4: Freedom Wars Potato Quality Series
this is part 6 of the 7 matches we played. Rukrarea team: Miyuko, Aera, Akane Frost team: Zao, Elder, Lastlag I was requested to upload the matches, since there was a lot I decided...

By: Rotten Cheese

Excerpt from:

[06] Frost team vs Rukrarea team 4v4: Freedom Wars Potato Quality Series - Video

Press freedom can also deliver horror, which makes it all the more precious

Demonstration in Place de la Republique, Paris, the evening after the Charlie Hebdo attack. Photograph: Nigel Dickinson/Polaris/Eyevine

The standard mantra begins: Of course Im in favour of press freedom, BUT And you always mind the but. You watch for the qualifications and thus for some separate, limiting agenda. Yet the fascinating thing, this Charlie Hebdo time around, is that there are no buts, no caveats, no excuses, no ritual citing of codes and reservations. It is deemed absolutely right to hold the prophet (or anyone else) up for ridicule. It is absolutely wrong to threaten journalists with violence in return. As for killing a dozen cartoonists, writers, visitors and police at their editorial offices, who can possibly excuse such berserk vileness? Press freedom is under manifest threat. Crowds around the world demonstrate their grief and resolve. Politicians, priests and editors march together down Charlies freedom road.

Count the absence of buts, then, as affirmation, as a question of principle. And if theres principle here, theres also the clear Gallic logic of right and wrong. It is wrong to kill journalists because of what they write or draw. It was therefore wrong for a local group that calls itself al-Qaida to kill Khalid Mohammed al Washali, a Yemeni TV reporter, on a road outside Sanaa just one week ago. It was wrong to see cameraman Zubair Hatami assassinated by bomb blast in Kabul a few days before.

It was wrong, wrong, wrong a hundred times over through a hundred murders in 2014. At least 38 journalists died in the Middle East last year: 18 of them in Syria. Six Palestinians perished in Gaza. Range further east to six dead Pakistani correspondents, six dead Afghans, four dead Bangladeshis and something else is absolutely evident. This is not some inchoate war of Muslims against those who clutch the pen of truth. Here are Muslims dying, in chilling numbers, to hold that pen, to expose brutality, crime, corruption and the rest.

Press freedom knows no bounds and has no religion. Press freedom is your right to be informed, educated, entertained, stirred to laughter or action. Press freedom is every societys safety valve. The context of the Charlie Hebdo massacre makes that point in the most desolate way possible.

This does not mean, naturally, that journalism in every society is the same, rattling identical cages. Take the most obvious difference. France is an insistently secular state. If we say to religion You are untouchable then were fucked, according to Grard Briard, Charlies surviving editor-in-chief. Cartoons of the prophet naked or the pope holding a condom and proclaiming This is my body are prime targets for Charlie artists week after week. It is serious, acrid stuff images that do far more than spit in the whimsical, Oxbridge British tradition (which mostly wouldnt bother with religion much anyway, because C of E-ness doesnt shift many copies on newsstands).

Theres even a specific French name for it gouaille. Arthur Goldhammer, the brilliant Harvard-based translator explained to al-Jazeera and Vox: Its an anarchic, populist form of obscenity that aims to cut down anything that would erect itself as venerable, sacred or powerful.

So does this, on examination, represent the absolutism of press freedom the crowds muster to defend? Yes, as a concept and a creed. Freedom in a defined cultural context; freedom that makes sense within traditional borders and traditional terms of reference. It doesnt travel naturally to bookstalls in Manchester or Miami, but thats not the point.

Charlie Hebdo and a whole tradition of scabrous satire are part of France, part of the French definition of freedom and part of the bill of goods foreigners who settle there sign up for. In short, it isnt the cartoons themselves, taken one by one, that count; nor is it their differing capacity to shock as you travel from nation to nation. It is what they mean for France; and for what this whole desperate episode means for press freedom every time a politician hastens to hymn it.

There is no absolute conformity here, but there is the sudden appearance of absolute solidarity, positioning free media at the heart of a free society. Thats why journalists across the globe have been so moved and so shaken by the tragedy in Rue Nicolas-Appert. Its scale seems to stun all of us. And the message we register and pass on in turn has the force of momentum at last.

The rest is here:

Press freedom can also deliver horror, which makes it all the more precious

Interview with Amsterdam Mayor Eberhard van der Laan on freedom and security – Video


Interview with Amsterdam Mayor Eberhard van der Laan on freedom and security
An interview with the Mayor of Amsterdam, Netherlands, Eberhard van der Laan, conducted by NL Times Managing Editor, Zachary Newmark. The interview took place at a rally for free speech days...

By: NL Times

See more here:

Interview with Amsterdam Mayor Eberhard van der Laan on freedom and security - Video

ArcheAge Music #60 – Jiyuu no Tsubasa v2 (Wings of Freedom) – Video


ArcheAge Music #60 - Jiyuu no Tsubasa v2 (Wings of Freedom)
Me playing "Jiyuu no Tsubasa" from Attack on Titan (Shingeki no Kyojin) - (Server Kyprosa). Have fun! 🙂 Difficulty: Expert (max. 800) MML Code: http://www.archeagemmllibrary.com/attack-on-titan-...

By: cannedbreadLP

See the article here:

ArcheAge Music #60 - Jiyuu no Tsubasa v2 (Wings of Freedom) - Video

U.S. concerned Koreas National Security Law restricts freedom of expression – Video


U.S. concerned Koreas National Security Law restricts freedom of expression
The United States has expressed concern that South Koreas National Security Law infringes on freedom of speech,... after Seoul said it was deporting a Korean-American woman for violating...

By: ARIRANG NEWS

Excerpt from:

U.S. concerned Koreas National Security Law restricts freedom of expression - Video