People on social media more inclined to believe Coronavirus fake news: Study – India TV News

Image Source : PIXABAY

COVID-19 fake news has spreading like the virus itself

People who get their news from social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter are more likely to have misperceptions about COVID-19 pandemic, warn researchers. The study, published in the journal Misinformation Review, revealed that those that consume more traditional news media have fewer misperceptions and are more likely to follow public health recommendations like social distancing.

"Platforms like Twitter and Facebook are increasingly becoming the primary sources of news and misinformation for Canadians and people around the world," said study co-author Aengus Bridgman from the McGill University in Canada.

In the context of a crisis like COVID-19, however, there is good reason to be concerned about the role that the consumption of social media is playing in boosting misperceptions," Bridgman added. For the findings, the research team looked at the behavioural effects of exposure to misinformation by combining social media analysis, news analysis, and survey research.

They combed through millions of tweets, thousands of news articles, and the results of a nationally representative survey of Canadians to answer three questions. Those three questions were: How prevalent is COVID-19 misinformation on social media and in traditional news media? Does it contribute to misperceptions about COVID-19? And does it affect behaviour? Results showed that, compared to traditional news media, false or inaccurate information about COVID-19 is circulated more on social media platforms like Twitter.

The researchers point to a big difference in the behaviours and attitudes of people who get their news from social media versus news media - even after taking into account demographics as well as factors like scientific literacy and socio-economic differences. Canadians who regularly consume social media are less likely to observe social distancing and to perceive Covid-19 as a threat, while the opposite is true for people that get their information from news media.

"There is growing evidence that misinformation circulating on social media poses public health risks. This makes it even more important for policymakers and social media platforms to flatten the curve of misinformation," said study co-author Taylor Owen.

Latest technology reviews, news and more

Latest News on Coronavirus

Fight against Coronavirus: Full coverage

Go here to see the original:

People on social media more inclined to believe Coronavirus fake news: Study - India TV News

Fake news and COVID-19, a neverending saga – The New Indian Express

By Express News Service

Fakenews witnessed an alltime high during the pandemic. A survey done by Social Media Matters (social media ninjas working for social change), along with the Institute for Governance, Policies and Politics (a think tank initiative dedicated for public policy research and analysis) has revealed that 69 per cent of people received fake news during the lockdown.

The major source of fake news was WhatsApp with 88.4 per cent respondents reporting it, followed by Facebook (reported by 42.5 per cent) and Instagram (reported by 21.96 per cent). The fake news included the details of repatriation flights, preventive measures, and treatment for COVID-19, information regarding containment zones or impending lockdowns in various areas, etc. Social Media Matters Founder Amitabh Kumar says that on witnessing an increase in fake news regarding COVID-19, they decided to do the survey.

Questionnaires in Hindi and English were filled out by 3,752 respondents from across India. While the majority of participants are between 18 to 25 years old (2,766 respondents), it was closely followed by the age group of 25 to 35 with 565 respondents. The survey was supported by Sarvahitey and Youth Online Learning Opportunities. Dr Manish Tiwari, Senior Fellow, IGPP, said, Social media is becoming the new carrier of infodemics in these times of pandemic.

From the figures, it is clear that young people are being targeted to further spread the misinformation and fake news as they are prime users of social media platforms. According to the survey, 69 per cent respondents reported receiving fake news regarding COVID-19 during the lockdown, and 84 per cent stated that they dont trust such news. Since the news is being spread in huge numbers, people have also become vigilant. Seventy percent of the respondents reported cross checking and verifying news which seemed fake.

The major sources of fact checking were Google Search (48.8 per cent) and Government sources (36.6 per cent). A total of 76 per cent people said that they informed others about the fake news, once recognised. While 89 per cent were aware that the dissemination of fake news is a crime as per the law, only 30 per cent reported such news because 68 per cent didnt know the online mechanism to report it. About 95 per cent feel that there is a need to raise more awareness on the reporting mechanisms, informs Kumar, adding, This information will help the government and tech platforms create better policies and tools to curb this infodemic of misinformation. But a lot of work still needs to be done by social media platforms to achieve this. We need to take up a systematic approach to ensure we build capacities of fact seeking.

Survey highlights

According to the survey, 69 per cent respondents reported receiving fake news regarding COVID-19 during the lockdown, and 84 per cent stated that they dont trust such news. Since the news is being spread in huge numbers, people have also become vigilant. Seventy percent of the respondents reported cross checking and verifying news which seemed fake. The major sources of fact checking were Google Search (48.8 per cent) and Government sources (36.6 per cent). A total of 76 per cent people said that they informed others about the fake news, once recognised.

Here is the original post:

Fake news and COVID-19, a neverending saga - The New Indian Express

The news item "SPECIAL REPORT: Janez Jana’s Newest Investment Scared the Government and Big Banks" is an online scam – Gov.si

The news report, which was published on a fraudulent website and is making the rounds on social media, is an online scam. There are statements on the website that were not made or written by Prime Minister Janez Jana and were falsely attributed to him, moreover, the photos were published without authorisation from the authors.

The fraudulent website with the fake news. We ask internet users to be cautious and not to fall prey to the above-mentioned online scam. | Author Ukom

As the website in question is based on fake news and uses fake statements of the Prime Minister and his photos to redirect users to other websites offering services for cryptocurrency trading, we want to alert users not to be fooled by such online scams.

Regarding the above-mentioned website, the Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Slovenia submitted a request to the Slovenian National Cyber Security Incident Response Centre SI-CERT to remove the post. SI-CERT asked the service provider hosting the website to remove or block access to the website, with the decision regarding the removal of the website being in the hands of the hosting service provider.

We also notified the response centre for addressing incidents concerning the information systems of the state administration and its bodies SIGOV-CERT about the online scam, while we filed a charge against an unidentified offender due to misuse of personal information.

The Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Slovenia would like to take this opportunity to specifically ask internet users not to fall prey to this online scam.

Link:

The news item "SPECIAL REPORT: Janez Jana's Newest Investment Scared the Government and Big Banks" is an online scam - Gov.si

Propaganda, fake news and disinformation on the internet could destroy us Susan Dalgety – The Scotsman

NewsOpinionColumnistsThe internet is a wonder of the modern world, but it is being used to spread dangerous conspiracy theories and undermine democracy, writes Susan Dalgety

Friday, 24th July 2020, 4:45 pm

Since lockdown, my life has moved online. My ancient iPhone 6, second-hand when I bought it, is by my side 24 hours a day. (Top tip: always buy refurbished tech, works just as well as the new models and costs far less).

I fall asleep to the sounds of American liberal news channel MSNBC and wake in the middle of the night to listen to Rachel Maddow, patron saint of progressives everywhere. I scroll through Twitter before I get up. I read my newspapers online while eating breakfast, and yes, I subscribe to the Scotsman you should too. What work I do, now that my Malawi projects are on hold because of the pandemic, I carry out online. Zoom meetings, Facetime chats, hours of endless Google searches, some of them useful.

I shop for everything on my phone, from my lockdown workwear leggings to supplies for our new coronavirus tradition, Saturday cocktails. Todays is an Espresso Martini. I stay in touch with friends and family, close by and across the world. It is as easy to have a weekend catch-up with Martha in New Yorks East Village as it is to DM my sister in Dumfries.

And throughout the day I get updates from Malawi about the relentless rise of the virus there. Malawi, with one of the smallest economies in the world, also has most expensive data, at 21.50 for 1GB of data. The cheapest bundle here costs, literally, pennies. But despite the cost, around 40 per cent of the 18 million population has a mobile phone.

Digital life now our real life

Even my 80-something mother, who resisted the lure of the internet until recently, has her smartphone and iPad sitting by her landline. (Top tip: always buy your mother a new piece of tech for a landmark birthday, refurbished wont cut it on special occasions).

Our four grandchildren are, of course, digital natives, born into a world where life happens on YouTube and WhatsApp is their playground.

The advent of lockdown saw schools retreat on to Microsoft Teams. Across Scotland teachers dropped dense PowerPoint decks once a week and parents struggled to coach their kids through them, before giving up and letting little Jack or Olivia watch Netflix.

Our digital life is now our real life. What started as a grand experiment in August 1991, when Tim Berners-Lee loaded the first ever website onto the new-fangled internet, is now as essential to humanity as water and sanitation.

In 2016, a report from the Human Rights Council of the United Nations General Assembly even declared access to the internet a basic human right.

The internet is one of the most powerful instruments of the 21st century for increasing transparency in the conduct of the powerful, access to information, and for facilitating active citizen participation in building democratic societies, the UN said.

It is also one of the most powerful instruments for interfering in democracies, as a report published by Westminsters Intelligence and Security Committee earlier this week shows.

The report said the UK was clearly a target for disinformation campaigns around its elections, and that there was credible open source commentary suggesting influence campaigns from the Russians during the Scottish independence referendum in 2014.

In other words, Putin and his online army may well have flooded Facebook and other social media platforms with fake news to encourage the break-up of the UK. Just as they did in the 2016 presidential elections, which led to the inauguration of Donald J Trump as leader of the free world.

And just as they most likely did during the Brexit campaign. Only it seems the Conservative government couldnt be bothered to investigate that breach of democracy. For fear of what they might expose perhaps?

Fans of Cold War spy novels will not be surprised that Putins Russia interferes in American and British elections. After all, psy ops (psychological warfare) was the main weapon used by the USA and Soviet Russia in their 30-year battle for supremacy.

Vaccine conspiracy theories

America and Nato may have won that war, but Putin is making great advances in this new battlefield.

America is now pitied across the world as the coronavirus burns its way through 50 states, while its President fiddles (allegedly) his tax returns. Britain leaving the EU will damage our economy and weaken our global influence, and Scotland leaving the UK would further diminish Britains standing.

It is not just Alex Salmond, Russia Today TV presenter and former First Minister, who would cheer the break-up of the UK. Vladimir Putin would also raise a glass of ice-cold vodka to toast the new world order.

The speed and global reach of the internet has also fuelled the dystopian debate that insists humans born male can become female, simply by wishing they had a cervix.

It has allowed a cancel culture which sees women, even those as famous as JK Rowling, ostracised for daring to question this new gender orthodoxy. And social media is the seed bed for nonsensical conspiracy theories about vaccines some planted, surprise, surprise, by Putins digital troops.

A third may not use Covid vaccine

Microsoft founder and global philanthropist, Bill Gates, had to go on the record this week to debunk a theory that he is supporting the development of a coronavirus vaccine because he wants to use it to implant tracking devices in the worlds population. You may well laugh, but a recent Yahoo News/YouGov poll found that 28 per cent of US adults believe this nonsense, and here in the UK, a third of people say they are unsure or definitely would not use a coronavirus vaccine.

And it is largely people who prefer social media to TV news who hold such extreme views.

I am no epidemiologist though I do have a PhD in Googling but even I understand that if not enough people take up the vaccine once its found, we will not achieve herd immunity. Life will not get back to normal.

We need to get the truth out there, Bill Gates said during his interview on CBS News on Wednesday.

And the truth is that the internet is one of the worlds greatest ever inventions, up there with the wheel and vaccines.

Social media is one of the wonders of the world, allowing a child in central Malawi to connect instantly with their friend in Orkney. But the network that has transformed the world into a global village also has the potential to destroy us. Now let me check Twitter to see what Trump has been up to today.

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit http://www.scotsman.com/subscriptions now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Read the rest here:

Propaganda, fake news and disinformation on the internet could destroy us Susan Dalgety - The Scotsman

UK trade department to tackle ‘fake news’ with new rebuttal role – The Guardian

Liz Trusss Department of International Trade is to tackle what it views as fake news about the UKs post Brexit trade policy with its own rapid rebuttal expert.

The DIT has just advertised a new position of chief media officer, trade policy and rebuttal to handle the press and denounce stories it believes are false or contain false information.

The term fake news was given international currency by Donald Trump to denounce mainstream media outlets who challenged the US president on his pronouncements.

The job advert confirms the phrase is now being adopted by government in the UK to combat the fast-moving and international commentary on Twitter, Facebook and other platforms.

With less than six months to go before the UK leaves the EUs single market and customs union, the department is also casting for a new director general for trade relations and implementation to lead 800 staff, act as ambassador for UK trade policy at the highest levels and build a pipeline of candidates for future free trade agreements.

According to the advert, the DITs new chief media officer will be asked to advise ministers on reactive media handling and rebuttal, as well as managing rapid rebuttal processes and combatting fake news on social media as well as brief and handle lobby journalists on high-profile reactive and proactive stories, and develop a programme of media briefings to shape stories.

Responsibilities will also include promoting our four priority trade deals, which sources say are the US, Japan, Australia and New Zealand.

Japan recently gave the UK until the end of July to complete a continuity deal which would kick in temporarily after the UK loses access to the EU deals in January.

The vacancy comes as Boris Johnsons chief adviser Dominic Cummings seeks to shake up media relations in Whitehall.

Two weeks ago Downing Street advertised for a 135,000-a-year data expert to set up a skunkworks in No 10, a reference to a pseudo start-up in the vein of those pioneered by aircraft maker Lockheed Martin to fire up innovative projects unencumbered by bureaucracy.

A DIT spokesperson said: Seeking free trade agreements is a key priority for this country.

The government is drawing on the skills of the brightest and best talent to achieve departmental goals and support in securing future trade deals.

More here:

UK trade department to tackle 'fake news' with new rebuttal role - The Guardian

NOT REAL NEWS: A look at fake news that was shared on social media this week – WBTW

A roundup of some of the most popular but completely untrue stories and visuals of the week. None of these are legit, even though they were shared widely on social media. The Associated Press checked them out. Here are the facts:

CLAIM: There is no coin shortage. Coins get recirculated, they dont just disappear. The government is trying to usher in a cashless society.

THE FACTS: Not so, says The Federal Reserve, which manages the countrys coin inventory. Coins arent being circulated because businesses are closed and sales are down during the pandemic. And the government isnt pushing the U.S. into a cashless society, either. The U.S. Mint is actively producing more coins to alleviate the short supply.

Despite that, posts circulating widely on Facebook are suggesting that the shortage of coins in the U.S. is a hoax because it doesnt make sense for the currency to have disappeared. The posts suggest a larger conspiracy is at play to usher us all into a cashless era.

The Federal Reserve has explained that the supply chain is severely disrupted by the pandemic. With establishments like retail shops, bank branches, transit authorities and laundromats closed, the typical places where coin enters our society have slowed or even stopped the normal circulation of coin, the Federal Reserve said in a June statement. The Federal Reserve has asked banks to only order the coins they need and to make depositing coins easy for customers. It also put together a task force of retail, bank and armored cash carrier leaders to brainstorm ways to normalize coin circulation again.

The U.S. Mint, meanwhile, is moving at full speed to mint more coins, while minimizing its employees risk to COVID-19 exposure, the agencys spokesman Michael White told The Associated Press in an email. The Mint produced nearly 1.6 billion coins last month, White said, and is on track to average about 1.65 billion per month for the rest of the year. Thats up from an average of 1 billion coins per month last year, he added.

CLAIM: Former President Barack Obama signed the law authorizing federal agents to snatch protesters off the streets in Portland, Oregon.

THE FACTS: The White House says 40 U.S Code 1315, under the Homeland Security Act of 2002, gives the Trump administration the authority to send armed federal agents to confront protesters in Portland. It was signed into law by President George W. Bush, not Obama.

A false claim circulating on social media says people criticizing President Donald Trump for sending federal agents into Portland to clear protesters are ignoring the fact that Obama signed the law that allows for that to happen. When everyone just blames Trump but forgets who actually signed the law authorizing federal agents to snatch protestors off the streets in Portland, says an erroneous Facebook post shared more than 1,300 times with a photo of Obama smiling.

In early July, Trump sent federal agents to Portland to halt protests, arguing that it was necessary to protect federal buildings from protesters. State and local authorities oppose federal intervention and a lawsuit has been filed to stop the action. Trump is relying on the Department of Homeland Security in unprecedented ways as he tries to bolster his law and order credentials by making a heavy-handed show of force in cities around the nation in the lead-up to the November elections, the AP has reported.

According to Stephen Vladeck, professor at the University of Texas School of Law, social media posts are falsely referencing the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 signed by Obama, saying that law authorizes the Trump Administration to deploy federal agents.

Its simply preposterous, Vladeck said. That statute includes a controversial set of provisions concerning military detention, but it has absolutely nothing to do with whats happening in Portland.

The law, often referred to as NDAA, included detention provisions that could be interpreted to authorize indefinite military detention without charge or trial. When questioned about the legality of sending agents with tactical gear to confront protesters against the will of local officials in those cities, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany cited Section 1315 during Tuesdays press briefing. McEnany claimed that Section 1315 gives DHS the ability to deputize officers in any department or agency, like ICE, Customs and Border Patrol, and Secret Service to protect property owned by the federal government. And when a federal courthouse is being lit on fire, commercial fireworks being shot at it, being shot at the officers, I think that that falls pretty well within the limits of 40 U.S. Code 1315, she added.

CLAIM: A video from a 1985 hearing exposes Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden for using the N-word, stating: We already have a n mayor, we dont need any more n big shots!

THE FACTS: Social media users are twisting Bidens words from a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in 1985 for the nomination of William Bradford Reynolds as U.S. deputy attorney general. Biden was reading a racist statement made by a state legislator during a redistricting process in Louisiana that was overseen by the nominee, who was being questioned under oath.

Biden was using those comments to build a case against Reynolds nomination, pointing out that as the assistant attorney general for civil rights he ignored racist comments by lawmakers and signed off on a plan that gerrymandered Louisianas congressional districts to deprive Black residents of representation. Biden specifically questioned Reynolds about a Louisiana congressional map redistricting proposal called the Nunez plan. C-Span video footage of Reynolds 1985 nomination hearing shows that Biden repeatedly asked Reynolds if he heard or saw any evidence that Louisianas politicians intentionally drew the map in a way that discriminated against Black residents in New Orleans.

Reynolds said he did not find any evidence that this was the case. Biden pointed out that Reynolds did, however, receive a memo from his staff that highlighted racist comments made by legislators who opposed the majority Black district. Using the N-word in the quote, Biden said: They brought to your attention the allegation that important legislators in defeating the Nunez plan, in the basement, said, We already have a n mayor, we dont need any more n big shots.

Biden argued that those comments, as well as other problems with the Louisiana governors plan, should have been a red flag for Reynolds, who should have never signed off on the plan. The Senate Judiciary Committee ultimately rejected Reynolds nomination in a 10-8 vote.

CLAIM: Black tour buses wrapped with Black Lives Matter were seen in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, bringing in Black Lives Matter and antifa rioters for protests.

THE FACTS: The photos being shared online show tour buses that were wrapped with the Black Lives Matter slogan for the Toronto Raptors basketball team.

Social media users are misrepresenting photos online to say they show that Black Lives Matter protesters and activists associated with antifa an umbrella term for anti-fascists are being bused into cities for protests. At a truck stop in Ft. Lauderdale Florida. Notice the number and immense cost of the custom buses bringing in Black Lives Matter and Antifa Rioters. This is huge money and organization. @realDonaldTrump. This should be attacked by going after those with the deep pockets, one post on Twitter with more than 7,000 retweets said. The photo shows a bus yard where tour buses wrapped with the Black Lives Matter slogan are parked.

The buses were part of a Toronto Raptors effort to show support for the Black Lives Matter movement. The team used the buses for only a day and they were moved to a Fort Lauderdale bus yard on July 10. They have not moved since.

A spokesperson for the Toronto Raptors confirmed to The Associated Press that the buses were wrapped for the team and were provided by a bus company that transported the team in Florida from their training camp in Naples to Orlando, where the NBA constructed a social bubble to resume the NBA season and protect 22 teams from COVID-19.

The Toronto Raptors posted photos of the buses with the Black Lives Matter wrapper to Twitter on July 9, tweeting, Silence is not an option. The team also included the buses in an Instagram video where team members boarded them in T-shirts that also said Black Lives Matter.

The bus company that transported the team confirmed to the AP that the buses have been out of service since they were used by the basketball team. The posts misrepresenting the photos online coincided with Mondays Strike for Black Lives, where essential workers picketed during their lunch breaks and held moments of silence in support of Black Lives Matter.

CLAIM: In a July 17 tweet, President Donald Trump says he is SO MAD the Pentagon abolished the Confederate flag and calls the flag a symbol of love.

THE FACTS: This tweet was fabricated. It does not appear on either archived versions of Trumps Twitter feed or databases that track deleted tweets by politicians.

On July 17, the same day the Pentagon announced a policy banning displays of the Confederate flag on military installations, an image of a tweet allegedly sent by Trumps account began circulating on Facebook and Instagram. SO MAD!!! the fake tweet read. Pentagon abolished Confederate flag today. The flag is TREMENDOUS part of our history. Its a symbol of LOVE!! Plantations kept black people employed and gave them free food and housing!!! Black unemployment was VERY low back then like now with ME as your President!!

Several social media users sharing the image posted it alongside criticism of Trump. Remember Trumps Tweets when its time to vote! wrote one Facebook user in a post viewed more than 22,000 times in two days. Another Facebook post with the image, shared without context or a caption, racked up more than 158,000 views.

But there is no evidence Trump ever tweeted this. The alleged tweet does not appear on his Twitter timeline, nor does it show up in a search of archived versions of his profile. In ProPublicas Politwoops, a tool that tracks deleted tweets by politicians, a search for Trumps account does not turn up any deleted tweets with this message, nor any deleted tweets from July 17.

In previous interviews, Trump has defended peoples rights to display the Confederate flag, referring to it as a First Amendment issue. Like it, dont like it, its freedom of speech, he told CBS in a July 14 interview.

CLAIM: NASA has officially announced a 13th zodiac sign, Ophiuchus, after discovering a new constellation, meaning your zodiac star has changed.

THE FACTS: NASA is the federal agency dedicated to studying and exploring astronomy, not astrology, and has not made any such announcement.

Social media users are passing around an old hoax once again, claiming that NASA has officially established a 13th zodiac sign. The claim, which also contends that the entire zodiac system has now been realigned, is circulating in popular Facebook posts.

NASA debunked the social media posts on its website and Twitter account. We see your comments about a zodiac story that re-emerges every few years, NASA said in a July 16 tweet, sharing a link to a 2016 blog post that explains the zodiacs history. No, we did not change the zodiac.

In an online statement, NASA said the Babylonians created the zodiac 3,000 years ago, centering it around 12 constellations to pair with each month of their 12-month calendar. That statement did note that the Babylonians ancient stories identified 13 constellations and they left off one Ophiuchus to match the calendar.

Though thats been known for centuries it isnt a new discovery by NASA or anyone else. So, we didnt change any zodiac signs we just did the math, NASA said in the online post.

CLAIM: In an April 9 interview with CNBCs Squawk Box, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates said he expects 700,000 people to develop negative side effects from a coronavirus vaccine.

THE FACTS: Gates used the number in a hypothetical example, but social media users are misconstruing his words to claim he expects 700,000 vaccine injuries.

Ever since Gates interview about the coronavirus aired in April, posts and false news articles have claimed he had grim projections for the vaccine. Hes expecting 700,000 people to have negative side effects, wrote one Facebook user, in a post viewed by more than 40,000 people in two days.

But these posts dont accurately represent Gates words. Asked about the timeline for the development of a COVID-19 vaccine, Gates said creating effective vaccines for older populations is always a challenge.

He then referred to the number 700,000 in a hypothetical example to illustrate the importance of creating a vaccine that is effective without side effects. Here, we clearly need a vaccine that works in the upper age range because theyre most at risk of that, Gates said. And doing that so that you amp it up so it works in older people and yet you dont have side effects you know, if we have 1 in 10,000 side effects, thats way more, 700,000 people who will suffer from that. So, really understanding the safety at gigantic scale across all age ranges you know, pregnant, male, female, undernourished, existing comorbidities its very, very hard. And that actual decision of, OK, lets go and give this vaccine to the entire world governments will have to be involved because there will be some risk and indemnification needed before that can be decided on.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation confirmed in a statement that the reference was hypothetical. Strong scientific evidence shows that vaccines are safe and they have a proven track record of preventing diseases, the statement said. Experts believe that a vaccine against COVID-19 will be critical to ending this pandemic once clinical trials show that they are safe and effective in a broad group of people.

Originally posted here:

NOT REAL NEWS: A look at fake news that was shared on social media this week - WBTW

Fighting fake news! Actively working on removing misinformation from platform: YouTube – The Financial Express

YouTube on Friday said consumption of videos recommended by the platform containing misinformation is significantly below one per cent, and it is working on strengthening its systems to further reduce such instances to ensure that creators and users are protected.

YouTube Chief Product Officer Neal Mohan said the company has been actively working on removing misinformation, especially amid COVID-19 pandemic and has seen consumption of videos from authoritative sources grow 110 per cent in India during January-March 2020.

striking that balance between an open platform and our community guidelines, designed to protect everybody, is a point of conversation for us every dayOver the past years, weve been working hard to invest in the policies, resources and products needed to protect the YouTube community, he said.

Mohan added that its work has focused on four pillars removing violative content, raising up authoritative content, reducing the spread of borderline content and rewarding trusted creators the 4Rs of responsibility. consumption of borderline content or harmful misinformation videos that comes from our recommendations is significantly below one per cent and were constantly working to reduce this even further, he said.

Mohan said YouTube updated its Hate and Harassment Policies last year to quickly remove any content that violates its policies. Were also making sure that we limit the spread of Coronavirus related misinformation on our site. These efforts are built upon our work to reduce recommendations of borderline content (content that comes close to, but doesnt cross the line of violating our Community Guidelines, he said.

The company has a 24-hour, follow the sun coverage, and these teams sit across time zones, cover different languages and have different areas of expertise. authoritative source content consumption on our platform, ie videos that are coming from authoritative sources, has grown 110 per cent in India during the first three months of 2020, mainly often times because users are coming to YouTube, looking for the most relevant information that they can find about about the crisis, he said.

Last year, YouTube had launched Fact Check information panels in India, the first country where such a feature was launched. These information panels flag misinformation and offer correct insights with the fact checks being done by fact checking organisations.

Raising authoritative information and giving the proper context to users helps reduce and remove content that is violative of YouTubes policies, Mohan said. Since launch, there have been over 300 billion impressions on its information panels globally.

We also updated our policies to remove egregious medical misinformation about COVID. Were consulting with global and local health authorities as we develop these policies and weve been updating them on an ongoing basis to stay current with the science -10 updates in the past two months alone, he said.

These policies prohibit things like saying the virus is a hoax or promoting medically unsubstantiated cures in place of seeking treatment and YouTube has removed thousands of videos under these policies.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know markets Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Continue reading here:

Fighting fake news! Actively working on removing misinformation from platform: YouTube - The Financial Express

[Webinar] #FreeSpeech: Perspectives from the UK and the US on Social Media Liability for Fake News, Damaging Content and Censorship – July 29th, 9:00…

July 29th, 2020

9:00 AM - 10:00 AM PDT

Greenberg Glusker and Farrer & Co are delighted to present a joint webinar during which reputation management and media specialists from both firms will discuss:

On both sides of the Atlantic, the role of social media and search engines has been dominating the news agenda.

The debate over the extent to which Big Tech should be policing content on its platforms is one that has been bubbling for some time, but has recently exploded into the open with Donald Trumps decision to sign an executive order aimed at removing protections for social media platforms and the UK governments plans to introduce legislation to address Online Harms.

Set alongside that is the decision of a number of multinational corporations to cease advertising on Facebook and other platforms in protest at the perceived failure to do enough to remove racist, hateful and knowingly false content.

All this takes place in the context of a global pandemic (where conspiracy theories have abounded), the Black Lives Matter movement and, of course, a forthcoming Presidential election in the United States.

Read the original here:

[Webinar] #FreeSpeech: Perspectives from the UK and the US on Social Media Liability for Fake News, Damaging Content and Censorship - July 29th, 9:00...

Governors who took the virus seriously from the start get a boost – NBC News

WASHINGTON Our new NBC News/Marist polls of Arizona and North Carolina tell a pretty similar story President Trump trails in both battlegrounds, as does the incumbent GOP senator.

But theres a significant difference between the two polls: North Carolina Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper holds a 59 percent approval rating among voters in his state, while Arizona Republican Gov. Doug Ducey has a 39 percent rating in his state.

Whats more, Cooper, whos up for re-election this year in a battleground state, is ahead in his gubernatorial contest by 20 points, according to the NBC/Marist poll.

And the poll shows that North Carolina voters by a 2-to-1 margin say the state was right to prioritize health protocols for the GOP convention that was supposed to occur there, despite Trump calling the protocols too strict. (The poll was conducted before Trump reversed course, canceling the convention speech he had moved from Charlotte to Jacksonville, Fla.)

Its all a reminder that the governors Democratic or Republicans who have taken the coronavirus seriously from the beginning are getting credit from their voters.

And the governors who havent either by originally downplaying it, or reopening their states too early are getting penalized.

See Ducey in our Arizona poll. Or Texas Gov. Greg Abbott in a recent Quinnipiac poll (48 percent approval). Or Gov. Ron DeSantis in another Quinnipiac survey (41 percent approval).

And that reminder of taking the coronavirus seriously from the beginning or not brings us to President Trump, who travels to North Carolina today to participate in a coronavirus briefing at a biotechnology firm.

As we wrote on Friday, he railed at Gov. Cooper for putting restrictions in place to combat the coronavirus.

I love the Great State of North Carolina, so much so that I insisted on having the Republican National Convention in Charlotte at the end of August. Unfortunately, Democrat Governor, @RoyCooperNC is still in Shutdown mood & unable to guarantee that by August we will be allowed...

He ridiculed Democrats who months ago started to plan for a virtual convention.

Joe Biden wanted the date for the Democrat National Convention moved to a later time period. Now he wants a Virtual Convention, one where he doesnt have to show up. Gee, I wonder why? Also, what ever happened to that phone call he told the Fake News he wanted to make to me?

He moved his acceptance speech from North Carolina to Florida.

And then on Thursday, he canceled that in-person event in Jacksonville.

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

The results from our NBC/Marist poll of North Carolina (conducted before that cancellation): Trump trails Biden by 7 points, and his approval rating in the state is 41 percent among registered voters, and just 34 percent of voters say hed do a better job than Biden in handling the coronavirus.

4,257,304: The number of confirmed cases of coronavirus in the United States, per the most recent data from NBC News and health officials. (Thats 207,027 more cases than Friday morning.)

147,821: The number of deaths in the United States from the virus so far. (Thats 2,657 more than Friday morning.)

51.49 million: The number of coronavirus tests that have been administered in the United States so far, according to researchers at The COVID Tracking Project.

11 points: The net drop in Trumps approval rating in North Carolina since March, per our latest NBC/Marist poll.

According to ad spending data from Advertising Analytics, the Trump and Biden campaigns have spent a combined $139 million over the TV and radio airwaves as of last Friday, with the Trump camp spending a total of $95 million throughout the entire campaign and the Biden camp $44 million.

Compare that to 2016, when the combined Trump camp-vs.-Clinton camp ad spending at this same point in the cycle was $94 million $75 million for Clinton and $19 million for Trump.

The Senate Republican/White House coronavirus relief package should be released sometime today, and over the weekend Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin and President Trumps chief of staff Mark Meadows met with staff on the Hill to make final changes to the bill.

Heres Mnuchin on Saturday, per our Hill team.

As we said on Friday, we have a fundamental understanding and we just want to make sure all the paperwork is ready and finished so it can be introduced on Monday, Mnuchin said.

On unemployment benefits, Mnuchin said Let me just say weve actually had a fundamental agreement on this. I think the issue has just been more of a mechanical issue of how we institute it, but the fundamental issue we all acknowledged there was a technical problem, where we were in an emergency last time so we instituted this quickly and in certain cases people were paid more to stay home than they were to work.

He added, Were not going to use taxpayer money to pay people more to stay home. So were going to transition to a UI system that is based on wage replacement. Weve talked about approximately 70 percent of wage replacement. And were just going through the mechanics of that.

Dont miss the pod from Friday, when we looked at how it took Pennsylvania four weeks to count all of its ballots from its June 2 primary.

Heres our teams look at John Lewiss last trip across the bridge in Selma.

Pro-Trump super PAC America First Action is getting outspent by its Democratic rivals.

The biggest terror threat in Europe and the U.S. used to be jihadists. Now its the far right.

The president now says he wont throw the first pitch at a Yankees game in August after all.

Republicans are jockeying for power on the Hill as they eye a possible post-Trump world.

The New York Times takes a look at the Montana Senate race.

Dan Balz assesses the state of Americas global standing during the pandemic.

Local leaders in New Jersey say that Trump isnt telling the whole story about a voter fraud case.

And Politico examines the case against Kamala Harris as VP.

Excerpt from:

Governors who took the virus seriously from the start get a boost - NBC News

Why are millennials and Gen Z turning to Instagram as a news source? – The Guardian

For many young people, clicking on to Instagram to get the latest news is now as second nature as picking up a daily newspaper once was to generations before. For a site that has traditionally been a platform for sharing lifestyle content rather than hard news, this is a shift in millennials and Gen Z, at a time when news updates seem more important than ever.

Recently published data exploring how people accessed news and information about the coronavirus pandemic found, in the US, for 18- to 24-year-olds (the age group most likely to use social media as a source), over a quarter of respondents used Instagram to access news content within the last week, while 19% used Snapchat and 6% turned to TikTok. In comparison, only 17% used newspapers to access information. Globally, figures reached even higher levels in Germany, 38% of 18- to 24-year-olds used Instagram alone to access the news, and in Argentina, this reached as high as 49%.

This trend isnt necessarily harmless. The challenge with Instagram is that its a highly visual space, Jennifer Grygiel, who teaches communications at Syracuse University, tells me, so people share memes that are more about influencing than informing and people need to exercise caution and be aware of who theyre engaging with.

The use of social media as a news source is complicated by the ability for anyone to act as a reporter, sparking concerns about factchecking, and an oft-cited claim that social media tilts influence towards those with the largest followers, regardless of their credentials. Theres also a concern that social media leads to political polarization. A recent poll suggests that just 41% of Americans trust traditional media to report the news fully, accurately, and fairly. Gallup, who conducted the study, have pointed to political rhetoric disparaging news organizations as a potential problem, with Republican voters significantly less likely to trust traditional media as a source.

For disenfranchised individuals social media may offer an alternative to media outlets that they have begun to doubt. Yet the very nature of social media leaves users exposed primarily to others with similar views, which research suggests can create vast echo chambers spaces where our own opinions and biases are reinforced by the voices which are filtered into our social media feed.

Amelia Gibson is an assistant professor and director of the Community Equity Data and Information Lab at the University of North Carolina. She sees the events of recent months as highlighting the ways many young people use social media as a news source. The Covid-19 crisis, combined with renewed interest in the Black Lives Matter movement, increased the desire for instant, first-hand information. Mistrust of mainstream media meant that many young people turned to their social media news feeds for information about protests, police actions and stay-at-home orders. But with a web of algorithms serving up content from news organizations, political groups or even influencers aligned to their own political beliefs and social circles, this also provoked a deepening of already-divided views and cultural rifts.

Our social media environments are still so segmented that some people really do live in different information worlds

Social media offers, on the one hand, a medium for filling what feels like a vacuum of trustworthy information sources, Gibson explains. But on the other hand, our social media environments are still so segmented that some people really do live in different information worlds. In one information ecosystem, people might read this moment [and current social justice movements] as a hopeful international awakening related to anti-racism, others read it as a time of deep existential threat. We see these different worlds clashing when people meet in real life.

For Gibson, the solution lies in a convergence of interests as social media brings attention to previously overlooked stories and rebalances the power to share news, traditional media still has a part to play.

People have always shared the news that mattered to them and their communities, she explains. I think that the difference in this moment is that news corporations are paying attention and are amplifying a moment of shared struggle I think that social media has done a lot to push social justice movements forward in the last decade but that traditional media still has a lot of power to command national and international attention.

For Grygiel, who, as a college professor, sees up close how young people are acting as both content creators and consumers, the relationship between traditional media and social sharing has reached a pivotal point. Content-creation-for-all has democratized news, but it remains an imperfect system dogged with accusations of biases, fake news and increasingly polarized viewpoints.

Although sites such as Instagram currently hold significant sway when it comes to distributing content to an internet-savvy youth, Grygiel hopes that this will push news publications to build better websites, attract advertisers and strive for independence rather than relying on social media shares. In the meantime, the need to exercise caution is of utmost importance.

Its hard to fully realize the benefits of social media because theres so much harmful content out there, they explain. Social media platforms have not always acted as good corporate citizens theyve paid a lack of attention to political advertisements that are harmful, and fail to monitor hate speech. Its important to be critical of them, but also aware that without them we wouldnt have seen the kind of documentation that we have of societal harms and transparency around injustices theres still a lot of opportunity to deliver content without social media, and if social media platforms arent acting as good corporate citizens then we need to find new and better ways of distributing news.

Read more:

Why are millennials and Gen Z turning to Instagram as a news source? - The Guardian

The Misinformation Age Has ExacerbatedAnd Been Exacerbated Bythe Coronavirus Pandemic – TIME

If youre looking for solid information on COVID-19, the Internet is not always your best betequal parts encyclopedia and junkyard, solid science on the one hand and rubbish, rumors and fabulism on the other. Distinguishing between the two is not always easy, and with so much of the time we spend online devoted either to sharing links or reading ones that have been shared with us, not only does the junk get believed, it also gets widely disseminated, creating a ripple effect of falsehoods that can misinform people and even endanger lives.

At its worst, misinformation of this sort may cause people to turn to ineffective (and potentially harmful) remedies, write the authors of a new paper in Psychological Science, as well as to overreact (hoarding goods) or, more dangerously, to underreact (engaging in risky behavior and inadvertently spreading the virus).

Its well-nigh impossible to keep the Internet entirely free of such trash, but in theory it ought not be quite as hard to confine it to the fever swamps where it originates and prevent it from spreading. The new study explores not only why people believe Internet falsehoods, but how to help them become more discerning and less reckless about what they share.

One of the leading reasons misinformation about the COVID-19 pandemic gains traction is that its a topic that scares the daylights out of us. The more emotional valence something we read online has, the likelier we are to pass it oneither to share the joy if its something good or unburden ourselves if its bad.

Our research has shown that emotion makes people less discerning, says David Rand, associate professor at the MIT School of Management and a co-author of the new study. When it comes to COVID-19, people who are closer to the epicenter of the disease are likelier to share information online, whether its true or false.

Thats in keeping with earlier research out of MIT, published in 2018 showing that fake news spreads faster on Twitter than does the truth. The reason, the researchers in that study wrote, was that the lies were more novel than true news [eliciting] fear, disgust and surprise in replies, just the things that provide the zing to sharing in the first place.

Political leanings also influence whats shared and not shared. A 2019 Science study, from researchers at Northeastern, Harvard, and SUNY-Buffalo, showed that neither the left nor the right has a monopoly on sharing fake news or real news, with both ends more or less equally mixing fact and fiction. Just which fact and just which fiction they chose, however, was typically consistent with just which stories fit more comfortably with their own ideologies.

To dig deeper still into the cognitive processes behind sharing decisions, Rand and colleagues developed a two-part study. In the first, they assembled a sample group of 853 adults and first asked them to take a pair of tests. One, known as the Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) measures basic reasoning processes, often with questions that are slipperier than they seem. (For example: If you are running a race and you pass the person in second place, what place are you in? The seemingly obvious answerfirst placeis wrong. Youve simply replaced the second-place runner, but the person in first is still ahead of you.)

The other test was more straightforwardmeasuring basic science knowledge with true and false statements such as Antibiotics kill viruses as well as bacteria (false); and Lasers work by focusing sound waves (false again).

Finally, the entire sample pool was divided in half. Both groups were shown the same series of 30 headlines15 false and 15 trueabout COVID-19, but they were instructed to do two different things with them. One group was asked to determine the accuracy or inaccuracy of the headlines. The other group was asked if they would be inclined to share the headlines online.

The results were striking. The first group correctly identified the truth or falsehood of about two thirds of the headlines. The second groupfreed from having to consider the accuracy of what they were readingreported that they would share about half of the headlines, equally divided between true ones and false ones. If they were taking the time to evaluate the headlines veracity, they would be expected to share at something closer to the rate of the first groupabout two thirds true and one third false. When people dont reflect, they make a rapid choice and they share without thinking. This is true for most of us. says Gordon Pennycook, assistant professor at the University of Regina School of Business in Saskatchewan, and lead author of the study.

Most, but not all. The study did find that people who scored higher on the CRT and basic science tests were a little less indiscriminate, tending to do a better job at both distinguishing false stories and at making better sharing decisions.

The solution, clearly, is not to force everyone to pass a reasoning test before theyre admitted online. Things are actually a lot easier than that, as the second part of the study showed.

For that portion, a different sample group of 856 adults was once again divided in two and once again shown the same set of headlines. This time, however, neither group was asked to determine the accuracy of the headlines; instead, both were asked only if they would share them. But there was still a difference between the two groups: One was first shown one of four non-COVID-9-related headlines and asked to determine whether it was true or false.

That primingasking the participants to engage their critical faculties before beginning the sharing taskseemed to make a dramatic difference: The primed group was three times less likely to share a false headline than the unprimed group.

Nudges like this help a lot, Rand says. If you get people to stop and think, they do a better job of evaluating what theyre reading.

The researchers believe there are easy, real world applications that platforms like Facebook and Twitter could use to provide people the same kind of occasional cognitive poke they did in their study. One idea we like is to crowd-source fact-checking out to users, Pennycook says. Ask people if [some] headlines are accurate or not; the platforms themselves could learn a lot from this too.

Rand cautions against anything that could seem patronizing to readersleaving them feeling like theyre being quizzed by some social media giant. Instead, he recommends a little bit of humility.

You could stick little pop-ups into newsfeeds that say, Help us improve our algorithms. Are these stories accurate? he recommends.

In no event is the Internet going to be scrubbed of all rubbish. For plenty of hucksters, politicos and conspiracy-mongers, the Internets hospitality to inaccuracies is a feature, not a bug, and there is little way to purge them entirely. But small interventions can clearly make a difference. And when it comes to information about the pandemicon which life and death decisions may be madethe stakes for trying could not be higher.

This appears in the August 03, 2020 issue of TIME.

For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.

Write to Jeffrey Kluger at jeffrey.kluger@time.com.

Follow this link:

The Misinformation Age Has ExacerbatedAnd Been Exacerbated Bythe Coronavirus Pandemic - TIME

Cake meme reflects coronavirus absurdity in a world where nothing is what it seems – NBC News

Dont believe everything you see on the internet those are important words to live by, especially for those of us who are very online. Earlier this month, though, a viral video depicting hyper-realistic cakes as everyday items had folks on social media double-guessing every other post, and sometimes even their own realities, effectively launching the next meme: Is this real or is this cake?

The meme began the way so many others have before it: with BuzzFeeds "Tasty" recirculating something completely absurd. On July 8, the brand shared a supercut of chef Tuba Gekil slicing into items that are presumably not cake Crocs, toilet paper, plants and then revealing the delectable dessert center.

Get the think newsletter.

While people have been making hyper-realistic cakes for years, they werent exactly viral. So what changed? It has a lot to do with our shifting sense of reality, as well as the repulsion-fascination matrix that fuels our attraction to viral food videos.

In the early to mid-2010s, the appeal of food videos specifically, short instructional or introductory ones hinged on easy, often trendy, Instagram-friendly foods like avocado toast with a runny yolk or a gooey grilled cheese. But somewhere along the way, food videos made a hard pivot toward spectacle; the more ridiculous and shocking the recipe or the meal, the better, no matter how disgusting it turned out to be.

Somewhere along the way, food videos made a hard pivot toward spectacle; the more ridiculous and shocking the recipe or the meal, the better.

Sometimes these videos encourage absolute stupidity, like this 100-layer lasagna or these cheese and wine shots. Other times, they highlight over-the-top food creations like Jonathan Chebans 24-karat-gold-dusted chicken wings. With the exception of Bon Apptits Test Kitchen videos, which are more about the personality of the cooks, food videos these days rely on a formula contingent on surprise and revulsion.

Thats part of the reason why this round of hyper-realistic cakes is garnering so much attention we derive immense satisfaction watching everyday objects get sliced. In the same way we cannot look away from Dr. Pimple Popper squeezing a vile cyst, we cant help but watch someone take a knife to a hand that is actually a cake.

Besides our morbid fascination with this intersection of the weird and the delicious, another big factor behind the success of the cake meme is more depressing: Collectively, our relationship with reality seems to be declining. The coronavirus pandemic has turned many of our worlds upside down, eroding social structures and work-life routines and blending days into weeks into months.

The internet has also played a huge role in warping our perception of reality, as fake news amplifies misinformation and some of our own politicians gaslight us. Its no wonder we dont know who, or what, to trust. Its not enough to say the cake fascination is simply due to boredom or anxiety. The very realities we exist in are subject to interpretation and politicization. Everything and anything feels up for debate.

The very realities we exist in are subject to interpretation and politicization. Everything and anything feels up for debate.

That skepticism is naturally amplified online (sometimes with good reason). We are acutely aware that weve lost a lot of control, of both our present and our future. For the past four years perhaps not coincidentally, around the time excessive food videos became the norm we have been bearing constant bad news.

Frankly, its exhausting. Sometimes, a Croc should just be a Croc. Thats what makes the meme so effective they are in on just how ridiculous this whole thing is. Some of the memes require familiarity with previous meme formats or pop culture and others turn the joke on its head, like this cake that is actually meat or this Nintendo Switch that turned out to not be cake. Much like the layers of a cake (see what I did there?), the joke is multifaceted: If reality is subjective, why not play along? So what if everything is cake? Wouldnt it be better that way?

While cake memes are trending now, it wouldnt be surprising to see another unsettling food item become the next existential meme. The viral-food-video factory is probably cooking one up at this very moment. Perhaps whats soothing these days is not escapism, but the escalation of spectacle. Absurdity is the name of the game now but at least this absurdity comes with a side of frosting.

Izzie Ramirez is a freelance culture, climate and food reporter based in Brooklyn. You can follow her onTwitter here.

See original here:

Cake meme reflects coronavirus absurdity in a world where nothing is what it seems - NBC News

Turning Fake News on its Head: Stalin Lives Again to Reveal Deep Truth – Canada NewsWire

Despite its widespread adoption, the word used to describe the genocide is unknown to many, which is why the ultimate goal of the campaign is to have the word "Holodomor" (derived from Ukrainian words meaning "to inflict death by hunger") added to English-language dictionaries, as it was to Ukrainian dictionaries after the break-up of the Soviet Union.

Visitors to the "Deeptruth" website (deeptruth.ca) will be invited to sign an online petition to have Holodomor included in future editions of the Oxford and Merriam-Webster dictionaries, as well as Dictionary.com.

"Canada, the United States, Ukraine and 14 other countries recognize the Holodomor as an act of genocide and honour the victims in an annual day of remembrance on the fourth Saturday in November," said Bob Onyschuk, Chair of Holodomor National Awareness Tour. "Yet, most people are still largely unaware of the basic facts of one of the greatest crimes of the 20th Century. Having Holodomor added to the dictionary is more than symbolic; it's an important recognition of this Deep Truth."

The campaign features a 75-second video produced by Toronto-based ad agency Mixtape (MXTP.ca) in collaboration with Paul "The Fakening" Shales (fakening.com), a world-leading pioneer of deepfake technology whose vignettes involving politicians, business leaders and entertainers regularly go viral.

With access to rare colour film footage of Stalin, Shales used Artificial Intelligence to map the Soviet dictator's features onto the face of a modern-day actor and bring Stalin back to life. In the video, Stalin declares himself the true originator of "fake news" for having covered up the magnitude of the 1932-33 famine in Ukraine and concealed from the world the engineered murder of millions of innocent men, women and children.

SOURCE Holodomor National Awareness Tour

For further information: Media Contacts: Graeme Harris ([emailprotected]), tel. 416.402.7050 or Brian Smith ([emailprotected]), tel. 416.822.3130

Read the original:

Turning Fake News on its Head: Stalin Lives Again to Reveal Deep Truth - Canada NewsWire

Police crack down on those spreading fake news – The Hindu

Those engaged in online propaganda against individuals, health workers and local body leaders by spreading false information on COVID-19 have started facing the music with the police cyber cells quick response to such crimes following a recent State-level directive.

The police recently booked an Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) worker from Chalappuram, accused of spearheading a fake campaign against Thuneri block panchayat president C.H. Balakrishnan. According to the complainant, he was portrayed as a COVID-19 carrier in a fake online campaign by the accused.

In Kozhikode city and rural areas, probe is on into a number of such petitions against fake online campaigns that create misunderstanding and panic among the people.

Officials attached to the cyber cell said the tracking of the source of fake messages would be easier with the full-fledged functioning of the Kerala Police Cyberdome. With the opening of its Kozhikode branch, we have the support of a large number of cyber experts to handle such incidents very effectively, they said.

Health activists and doctors have also shared details of suspicious campaigners with the cyber cell. Action has also been intensified against people who recklessly share fake content on social media.

Station house officers have warned that the admins of WhatsApp groups will be held accountable in case they failed to report such fake messages to the police. The persons who post fake messages should be removed from the groups and the incident should be reported to the police with relevant screenshots to avoid legal action.

You have reached your limit for free articles this month.

To get full access, please subscribe.

Already have an account ? Sign in

Show Less Plan

Find mobile-friendly version of articles from the day's newspaper in one easy-to-read list.

Move smoothly between articles as our pages load instantly.

Enjoy reading as many articles as you wish without any limitations.

A one-stop-shop for seeing the latest updates, and managing your preferences.

A select list of articles that match your interests and tastes.

We brief you on the latest and most important developments, three times a day.

*Our Digital Subscription plans do not currently include the e-paper ,crossword, iPhone, iPad mobile applications and print. Our plans enhance your reading experience.

Read the rest here:

Police crack down on those spreading fake news - The Hindu

People are injecting themselves with bleach because of fake news, says senior MP – Telegraph.co.uk

Coronavirus misinformation on social media has resulted inpeople injecting themselves with bleach, a senior MP has revealed as he urged the Government to bring forward the Duty of Care Bill.

Julian Knight, the chairman of Parliament's Digital, Culture, Media andSport select committee, warned that if online fake news was not tackled it could affect the take-up of an eventual coronavirusvaccine, causing "very great harm to society".

Mr Knight said he wanted to see Ofcom named as the new online regulator and given powers to fine or even prosecute social media companies, as well as the resources to investigate the secretive algorithms tech companies use to determine what their users see.

His comments came as the culture committee released a report saying the UK's lack of online regulation had allowed coronavirus misinformation to spread "virulently" on social media.

Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Knight said: "Healthcare professionals told us they even saw people injecting themselves with bleach or taking liquids that were harmful.

"They also said that on a more subtle level but probably even more damaging in terms of numbers many people were not presenting at hospital because they had seen misinformation and disinformation out there that was effectively saying that hospitals were completely overwhelmed and unsafe places."

See original here:

People are injecting themselves with bleach because of fake news, says senior MP - Telegraph.co.uk

Singapore’s Ambassador to the US Responds to Criticism of ‘Fake News’ Law – The Diplomat

The Debate|Opinion

Ambassador Mirpuri refutes accusations that the law is used to target government critics.

Mr. Paul Meyers article, Singapores first election under the fake news law, alleged that the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA) gives considerable leeway to determine what a falsehood is, and that POFMA is wielded by the government to target politically-oriented voices on the internet over modest inaccuracies.

This is untrue. What is fact and opinion are defined by wellestablished jurisprudence. For POFMA to apply, the statement must be a false statement of fact, and must affect public interest. It cannot be applied to opinions nor criticisms of the government that are based on facts. As a further safeguard, the governments determination of falsehood can be challenged in court, in an expedited process, with reduced court fees for individuals. Also, during an election period, ministers powers under POFMA are extinguished, and are instead exercised by senior civil servants.

Contrary to Meyers characterization, the falsehoods corrected thus far were neither trivial nor minor; they concerned issues of importance, relevance and interest to Singaporeans. Failing to deal decisively with such falsehoods will erode, even undermine, public trust in our institutions, with serious consequences for our democracy.

Meyer also suggests that POFMAs Code of Practice for Transparency of Online Political Advertisements led to Googles decision to stop running political advertisements in Singapore. This is spurious. Googles decision, which it has also adopted in Canada and Taiwan, applies equally to all political parties in Singapore, who remain free to use the digital advertising services of other intermediaries, such as Facebook. This was evident during Singapores recent general elections.

We have seen the consequences of falsehoods, including slow-drip falsehoods, circulating unchecked in societies around the world, and have taken a course to guard against them. With POFMA, we hold the principle that public discourse should be built on an infrastructure of facts, not false information or fear mongering. Notably, during Singapores recent general elections, the secretary general of Singapores biggest opposition party and soon-to-be formally appointed leader of the opposition also echoed this same principle when interviewed by the media, and noted that POFMA did not pose any impediment to his partys campaign.

Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month.

It is unfortunate that Meyer has instead chosen to favor the unchecked market of information, without offering any solution to the real and serious problems posed by online falsehoods.

Ashok Kumar Mirpuri is Singapores Ambassador to the United States.

See the rest here:

Singapore's Ambassador to the US Responds to Criticism of 'Fake News' Law - The Diplomat

Wake up, America; discount the fake news – News from southeastern Connecticut – theday.com

Recently I stopped buying the other local paper in our area because it hadbecomeconsumed withpropaganda, losingperspective. That paper has become a full-time publication attacking one particular political party. Itsgoal is to completely destroy that party and all those who identify with itsviewpoint.

I knew that most of the major news organizations havebeen trained to destroy a certain point of view and make it look like their's was the only way and the other views are not acceptable. Their main effort is to steer public opinion their way, without the public realizing what is happening.

And now it quiteobvious to me that The Day has joined the chorus,as their writers are also playing the same tune. It is a shame that we no longer can trust our newspapers to report the news, as they now are creating the news their way. They are using fake polls thatpoll mostly people of one particular party. So,of course you do not get a true picture. Andthey also slant political cartoons.

America is now being betrayed by our news organizations and the big question is, will the American public wake up in time?

Tony Petros

Norwich

Read more:

Wake up, America; discount the fake news - News from southeastern Connecticut - theday.com

Clint Eastwood Sues, Says He Has Nothing to Do With CBD Products – The New York Times

Clint Eastwood is not selling CBD products.

The Academy Award-winning actor, producer and director, 90, filed two lawsuits Wednesday in federal court in Los Angeles against three CBD manufacturers and marketers that had posted online articles falsely claiming that he endorsed CBD products and 10 online retailers who he alleged had manipulated search results to make it look like he had done so. He is seeking millions of dollars in damages and a court order that the companies be forced to give up their profits.

Mr. Eastwood has no connection of any kind whatsoever to any CBD products and never gave such an interview, the court documents say.

The first lawsuit, claiming defamation, targets three CBD companies Sera Labs Inc., Greendios and For Our Vets LLC that produced fake news stories claiming that Eastwood endorsed their products and that he was leaving filmmaking to focus on the CBD business. The second suit argues that 10 companies and individuals are using programming code to insert Eastwoods name into online search results for CBD products, misleading consumers into thinking the filmmaker is manufacturing or endorsing them.

Eastwoods lawyer, Jordan Susman, said that he believed that the first articles appeared last year and that they are still being posted.

According to the first suit, the three companies sent spam emails with the subject line Clint Eastwood Exposes Shocking Secret Today. The body of the messages contained a fake interview with an outlet meant to look like the Today show, the lawsuit said, and had Eastwood claiming to endorse CBD products. The story included a photo of Eastwood from an actual appearance on the Today show, as well as links to buy items from a line of supposed Clint Eastwood CBD products, the suit said.

The companies that sent the emails were not able to be reached for comment.

Celebrities like Tom Hanks, Oprah Winfrey and former President George W. Bush have also been the target of false product endorsement claims by ingestible health supplement companies in recent years. Hanks shared an image on Instagram earlier this year of an ad that claimed that he endorsed a CBD product made by CannaPro. The actor called it an intentional hoax.

Ive never said this and would never make such an endorsement, Hanks wrote. Come on, man!

Eastwoods lengthy Hollywood career ranges from starring in tough-guy roles (Dirty Harry) to directing dramas like the best picture winner Million Dollar Baby (2004). He last directed Richard Jewell (2019), which attracted a storm of media attention for showing the journalist Kathy Scruggs trading sex for a scoop.

Eastwood has no opinion on CBD products or the legitimate CBD industry, his representative, Michael Sitrick, said.

View post:

Clint Eastwood Sues, Says He Has Nothing to Do With CBD Products - The New York Times

Fake news alert: Helicopter-truck crash video doing rounds on social is not from Amritsar. Here’s the truth – Times Now

Screengrab  |  Photo Credit: Twitter

New Delhi: A video is going viral on social media with a claim that a helicopter and a truck collided in Amritsars Ratan Singh Chowk area. The 29-second clip shows a truck driving into the moving blades of a parked helicopter, leaving them damaged.

Due to the collision, debris from both the vehicles scattered on the road.

However, the truth is that the video is not from Punjabs Amritsar but from Brazil.

On January 21, 2020, a news report titled Police helicopter chops off lorry roof when driver smashes into the rotor blades as aircraft prepares for take-off from a Brazilian city street had appeared in Mail Online.

The report had stated that a passing white lorry collided with the blades of a police helicopter, which was readying to take off from a road in a Brazilian city. The footage carried in the report was the same video, which is now being claimed to be from Amritsar.

The incident actually took place in the Second District of Rio Branco, in the northwestern state of Acre (Brazil). The helicopter in the video belonged to the Integrated Centre of Aerial Operations (CIOPAER) of the Military Police. The truck was being used by the office of Secretary of State for Health to ferry hospital waste.

Two of the five people in the helicopter had reportedly got injured.

Check the latest facts on Covid-19here. Times Fact India Outbreak Report by TIMES NETWORK and Protiviti is a comprehensive analysis that highlights the impact of the pandemic in India and projects the possible number of active cases in the weeks ahead.

More:

Fake news alert: Helicopter-truck crash video doing rounds on social is not from Amritsar. Here's the truth - Times Now

Exploring the world: primary approaches to news literacy – The Guardian

A year 5 pupil comes to school anxious and upset about a headline they have seen that morning: Is world war three starting? they ask. What will happen to my family?

Pupils in your class are discussing coronavirus. Our school is closing! Hand sanitiser doesnt work! Can I catch it from my friends?

In situations like these, what is our responsibility as teachers? We cant be expected to have an in-depth knowledge of every news incident, and to debunk every piece of fake news. We cant control the horror of some events, or the inappropriate nature of others. But this shouldnt stop us watching, reading or discussing news with our pupils. In a world where half of all 10 year olds own a smartphone, where young people are exposed to news and online media from the moment they are born, where children have so many questions to ask, schools can be a safe space for young people to address questions and discuss their feelings about what they are seeing, reading and hearing.

So here are seven steps from NewsWise for supporting children to become happy, healthy, engaged news consumers:

Establish ground rules at the outset to develop a safe climate for learning about the news. For example: this is a safe space to talk about the news. Well listen to others opinions respectfully, and we wont share fake news, rumours or guesses as if they were facts. Well only share news stories we know are true, and well use our critical thinking skills to debunk disinformation. We can put questions in a box if we dont want to ask them out loud, and well respect the privacy of our classmates, families and teachers. If were unsure or worried about a news story, we will ask an adult that we trust.

When we think back to iconic news stories such as the moon landing, London 2012, the Boxing Day tsunami or a terror attack, we mainly remember the emotions associated with those moments, whether they are joy, sadness, shock, excitement or fear. Our PSHE Association quality-assured lesson on managing feelings about the news provides lots of strategies for you to use in the classroom, to help your pupils to recognise and manage those feelings, for example talking about concerns, not dwelling on that story and exploring more positive stories to give perspective and to rebalance their worldview. We know from recent research that many children never have an opportunity to discuss news at home. And weve seen some brilliant examples of teachers providing that safe space in their classrooms to ask questions about specific news events such as a local crime, or on a larger scale the Manchester Arena bombing, so we know that this can work. One pupil told us: Thank you for helping me realise that there is no reason to be scared of reading the news. Children dont need you to have all the answers, they just need a safe space to articulate their concerns.

Fake news is designed to manipulate our feelings. It is deliberately hard to spot, and it is created to make us think and behave in different ways. Some fake news is comedic, other fake news is upsetting or difficult. All fake news impacts our wellbeing and destabilises democracy. Two-thirds of teachers (60.9%) believe fake news is harming childrens wellbeing, increasing their anxiety levels. Governments, global organisations and tech companies are all struggling to contain the flow of disinformation. And yet research tells us that nearly all teachers (98.8%) believe it is their responsibility to support children to identify fake news. What a task! Working with the PSHE Association and the National Literacy Trust, NewsWise is supporting teachers by providing free, quality assured lessons written by literacy, PSHE and news experts. Simple techniques in our lesson on how to spot fake news, eg: to make simple checks like questioning the source of a news report and identifying other trusted news sources sharing the same story, are now being used by teachers and children across the UK. By understanding why fake news can be harmful, and giving pupils the skills to identify disinformation, rumour, and opinion, you are giving children techniques to manage their own wellbeing around fake news.

Use scenarios and characters to distance news stories, both for wellbeing (dont encourage children to imagine they are caught up in a distressing incident) and for their own privacy. For example, imagine three individuals with their own values and opinions are reading a particular news report: how might they differ? Why? At NewsWise, as in all news organisations, we have our own values: news should be truthful, fair, balanced and interesting. Fairness means that we should respect others privacy and ensure that children do not report on, or reveal, personal information about themselves or others.

There is so much news in the world, but we know that news doesnt naturally provide us with a balanced range of views. Editors and tech companies use values and algorithms to decide what news we should access, based on our preferences, loyalties and demographics. But how healthy is it for us to only ever to hear one point of view? One of our most popular activities around targeted information is Hook the Reader, a great game (and quite addictive for staff too!) that helps children to begin to unpick this complex concept. We also cover issues around privacy and how to search safely, mapping directly to statutory health guidance on becoming a discerning consumer of information online. Developing a climate in the classroom in which children explore different viewpoints, debate issues and respect different opinions, can be practised by exploring different points of view about news stories.

So youve decided to introduce news into the classroom. Where can you find age-appropriate content? Firstly, lets not dumb down the news reports we share with children. Weve seen that young people arent just interested in football and cats! Actually KS2 children respond brilliantly to issues such as climate change and the Windrush Scandal when they can access those reports with age appropriate language. As well as all of the examples in our free resources, there are an increasing number of brilliant sources of free and subscription news for young people, including CBBC Newsround, First News, The Week Junior and many more listed here on our website. And every Tuesday @GetNewsWise and other organisations share an appropriate story with questions to use in the classroom for #TuesdayNewsDay.

Most importantly, keep news authentic, and keep it fun. At NewsWise we ensure that the news production experience is as realistic as possible. Pupils are briefed into Journalist Training School, with press passes, newsroom terminology, specific roles and teams, and teachers of course overseeing activities as the Chief Editor! The more you can model interest in the news by incorporating news discussions into the school day; sharing breaking news stories where appropriate; including tight deadlines and timers; holding newspaper or online news scavenger hunts; organising press conferences; the more you will encourage children to explore age appropriate news reports and engage with the wider world.

News literacy provides an opportunity for primary schools to embed PSHE and English learning in a real-world setting. As one London-based primary teacher told us:

So much of what NewsWise brings up in its delivery is to do with exploring what sort of person you want these children to become: compassionate, interested, resilient, critical, brave, truthful.

Read more:

Exploring the world: primary approaches to news literacy - The Guardian