ISO Shipping Container Market Predicted to Witness Sustainable Evolution in Years to Come – Jewish Life News

Latest released the research study onGlobal ISO Shipping Container Market, offers a detailed overview of the factors influencing the global business scope.ISO Shipping ContainerMarket research report shows the latest market insights, current situation analysis with upcoming trends and breakdown of the products and services. The report provides key statistics on the market status, size, share, growth factors of theISO Shipping Container Market. The study covers emerging players data, including: competitive landscape, sales, revenue and global market share of top manufacturers.

Top players in Global ISO Shipping Container Market are:

COSCO (China)

3M Company (United States)

CIMC (China)

SINGAMAS (China)

CXIC Group (China)

Shanghai Universal Logistics Equipment (China)

Maersk Container Industry (Denmark)

Charleston Marine Containers (United States)

Sea Box (United States)

Hoover Container Solutions (United States)

Hapag-Lloyd (Germany)

Free Sample Report + All Related Graphs & Charts @: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/sample-report/24034-global-iso-shipping-container-market

Keep yourself up-to-date with latest market trends and changing dynamics due to COVID Impact and Economic Slowdown globally. Maintain a competitive edge by sizing up with available business opportunity in ISO Shipping Container Market various segments and emerging territory.

Brief Overview on ISO Shipping Container

ISO shipping container is an intermodal container is made in a same specifications of height width and length. They are made according to the international organization for standardization. This standard includes size, quality and the weight of the container. The ISO shipping containers can be used for transportation of goods through different modes such as ship, rail or truck. Through these containers the goods cans be handled easily. Hence it is widely used for shipping which will propel the market of the containers.

Recent Development in Global ISO Shipping Container Market:

In March 2019, Singamas has agreed to dispose its wholly owned subsidiaries which are Qidong Singamas Energy Equipment, Qingdao Pacific Container, Ningbo Pacific Container, Singamas Container Holdings (Shanghai) Limited, and Qidong Pacific Port.

Market Drivers

Market Trend

Market Challenges

Market Restraints:

Market Opportunities:

Region Included are: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Oceania, South America, Middle East & Africa

Country Level Break-Up: United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, South Africa, Nigeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Germany, United Kingdom (UK), the Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Austria, Turkey, Russia, France, Poland, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, China, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, India, Australia and New Zealand etc.

Enquire for customization in Report @: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/enquiry-before-buy/24034-global-iso-shipping-container-market

Strategic Points Covered in Table of Content of Global ISO Shipping Container Market:

Chapter 1: Introduction, market driving force product Objective of Study and Research Scope the Global ISO Shipping Container market

Chapter 2: Exclusive Summary the basic information of the Global ISO Shipping Container Market.

Chapter 3: Displaying the Market Dynamics- Drivers, Trends and Challenges of the Global ISO Shipping Container

Chapter 4: Presenting the Global ISO Shipping Container Market Factor Analysis Porters Five Forces, Supply/Value Chain, PESTEL analysis, Market Entropy, Patent/Trademark Analysis.

Chapter 5: Displaying the by Type, End User and Region 2013-2020

Chapter 6: Evaluating the leading manufacturers of the Global ISO Shipping Container market which consists of its Competitive Landscape, Peer Group Analysis, BCG Matrix & Company Profile

Chapter 7: To evaluate the market by segments, by countries and by manufacturers with revenue share and sales by key countries in these various regions.

Chapter 8 & 9: Displaying the Appendix, Methodology and Data Source

Finally, Global ISO Shipping Container Market is a valuable source of guidance for individuals and companies.

Data Sources & Methodology

The primary sources involve the industry experts from the Global ISO Shipping Container Market including the management organizations, processing organizations, analytics service providers of the industrys value chain. All primary sources were interviewed to gather and authenticate qualitative & quantitative information and determine the future prospects.

In the extensive primary research process undertaken for this study, the primary sources Postal Surveys, telephone, Online & Face-to-Face Survey were considered to obtain and verify both qualitative and quantitative aspects of this research study. When it comes to secondary sources Companys Annual reports, press Releases, Websites, Investor Presentation, Conference Call transcripts, Webinar, Journals, Regulators, National Customs and Industry Associations were given primary weightage.

Get More Information: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/reports/24034-global-iso-shipping-container-market

What benefits does AMA research study is going to provide?

Definitively, this report will give you an unmistakable perspective on every single reality of the market without a need to allude to some other research report or an information source. Our report will give all of you the realities about the past, present, and eventual fate of the concerned Market.

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia.

About Author:

Advance Market Analytics is Global leaders of Market Research Industry provides the quantified B2B research to Fortune 500 companies on high growth emerging opportunities which will impact more than 80% of worldwide companies revenues.

Our Analyst is tracking high growth study with detailed statistical and in-depth analysis of market trends & dynamics that provide a complete overview of the industry. We follow an extensive research methodology coupled with critical insights related industry factors and market forces to generate the best value for our clients. We Provides reliable primary and secondary data sources; our analysts and consultants derive informative and usable data suited for our clients business needs. The research study enables clients to meet varied market objectives a from global footprint expansion to supply chain optimization and from competitor profiling to M&As.

Contact Us:

Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)AMA Research & Media LLPUnit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJNew Jersey USA 08837Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218[emailprotected]

Connect with us athttps://www.linkedin.com/company/advance-market-analyticshttps://www.facebook.com/AMA-Research-Media-LLP-344722399585916https://twitter.com/amareport

See the rest here:

ISO Shipping Container Market Predicted to Witness Sustainable Evolution in Years to Come - Jewish Life News

From boy band to men: A decade of One Directions musical evolution in 60 minutes – The A.V. Club

On July 23, 2010, there was a ripple across the pond. During production of the seventh series of the U.K.s The X Factor, five young ladsNiall Horan, Zayn Malik, Liam Payne, Harry Styles, and Louis Tomlinsonfailed to make enough of an impression on the judges to advance to the next round as individuals. But in a savvy move, X-Factor judge and V-necked superproducer Simon Cowell pulled the five teenagers aside and gave them a second chancethey would continue on in the competition as a group under Cowells tutelage. The boys were elated and quickly united in their mission, unanimously agreeing over text (as the story goes) to be known as One Direction. When the series hit British airwaves, fans immediately took to the mop-haired teens, watching their real-life friendships blossom as they tore their way through the competition. On December 12, 2010, they finished third on The X-Factor; their consolation prize: A reported 2 million record deal with Cowells Syco Records.

A decade later, its hard to believe that the members of One Direction1D for shortwere once the underdogs. By the time they arrived in America for their first stateside tour, the buzz over pop musics next big thing was already deafeningsome even likened it to Beatlemania. While their refusal to dance meant they werent exactly following in the choreography-heavy footsteps of the boy bands before them, it only helped make them that much more appealing: They were the every-lads, just five young guys who wanted to make music and have a good time. Mischievous, but not dangerous. Charming and crush-worthy, but relatable. Their music and image was perfectly manufactured to lean into these qualities, the boys maintaining a sense of goofy realness even under all the glossfor a while there, it really did seem like they were having a blast. But the nonstop cycle of albums and globe-trotting took its toll, and during the groups fourth world tour in five years, it was announced that Zayn Malik would leave 1D in early 2015. Later that year, the group released Made In The A.M. (which some suggested stands for After Malik), shortly followed by the announcement of a hiatus starting in 2016. In the years since, Niall, Zayn, Liam, Harry, and Louis have all released solo singles and albums, carving out space for themselves and defining their personal sounds in the shadow of One Direction.

If youre reading this, its safe to assume that youre either holding on to some affection for the former reigning boy band (without a doubt, BTS now claims that crown), or you cant believe were about to argue that they have enough worthwhile songs to fill out an hour-long playlist. Either way, welcome! Whether you love or loathe One Direction and their record-breaking career, venturing back through their discography provides a fascinating look at the evolution of a boy bandhow five young performers grew up within the contract-laden confines of the mainstream music machine, and how they found their voices while millions of Directioners (the moniker for self-described 1D stans) clung to their every word. From the starry-eyed teenage debut, Up All Night, to the (varyingly successful) string of solo adult albums, this Power Hour distills a decade of One Direction down to the tracks that highlight their growth as a quintet, eventually a quartet, and then as individuals. These are the enduring songs that define their legacy and prove that, once these five set their sights on music stardom, the only direction they could go was up.

There are more than a few similarities between One Thing and One Directions inescapable breakout hit What Makes You Beautiful, both from the debut album Up All Night: Both are driven by a clap-heavy beat and a buoyant guitar riff, and both have a chorus that begs to be shouted by adoring fans. Aside from giving all of the members their moment to shine vocally, One Thing ultimately stands out as the groups definitive early single because of its intriguing ambiguity. What is that one thing, anyway? Like Meatloafs Id Do Anything For Love (But I Wont Do That), the lyrics keep things vague, allowing the listener to imagine theyre the one One Direction cant get out of their heads.

After the runaway success of the groups debut, One Direction turned it all the way up for album two: Take Me Home is a proper charm offensive with the goal of world domination. Its third single Kiss You leans hard into their goofball personas, a gonzo love song that promises to, show you off to all of my friends, making them drool down their chinny-chin-chins. Childish? Maybe so, but the song relishes in its youthful energy. By the time it reaches the na na nas of its final bridge, youre putty in the hands of one of 1Ds catchiest tunes. Frenetic yet perfectly polished, Kiss You is a sugar rush from start to finish.

When laying out the groundwork for Take Me Home, Simon Cowell reportedly challenged industry hit-makers to submit potential No. 1s, effectively tasking top songwriters to compete for their slot on One Directions sophomore album. This go-big-or-go-home approach meant that the record was a near-exhausting barrage of bumping back-beats and radio-ready hooks. Still, Cmon, Cmon stands outits One Direction at the groups most celebratory and joyful. Indicative of the albums more electronic sound, the song emphasizes its drum-machine wallops and New Wave synths to irresistible effect, and then drops them out for a split-second before launching into a soaring chorus. Its all over in less than three minutes, but Cmon, Cmon is the kind of song that buzzes in your head for much longer.

Now certified global pop stars with a splashy tour documentary under their belts, the members of One Direction were out to prove that they could adapt to a more mature milieu for 2013s Midnight Memories. With artists like Mumford & Sons and The Lumineers giving the years adult contemporary charts a folksier makeover, a number of the albums cuts followed suit. Midnight Memories most successful foray into folk-rock, Through The Dark, doesnt shy away from its influences; following Little Lion Mans formula, it kicks off with a lone acoustic guitar, gradually building to a rollicking chorus built for boot-stomping (its pop sheen also means it holds up better than a lot of that eras hits, which already sound like relics). The song had its broadcast debut on a Paul Rudd-hosted episode of SNL wheredespite some visible discomfortthe quintet showcased their knack for harmonies, proving to the shows late-night audience there was talent behind all the hype.

Along with the groups new, grown-up sound, Midnight Memories found One Direction ditching the playful innuendos for (slightly) more overt pillow talk. Near the albums midpoint, on Happily, Payne sings, Its four A.M. and I know that youre with him; I wonder if he knows that I touched your skin. Its not quite scandalous, but the guys music had to go past puppy love if they wanted to be taken seriously as artists. Elsewhere, the refrain exclaims, I dont care what people say when were together, painting the picture of a forbidden romance, giving the bands young queer fans (of which there were many) enough wiggle room to find themselves in its narrative. With its clap-and-shout catharsis, Happily might be the closest thing 1D has to a queer anthem.

While some cited One Directions fourth album Four as evidence the group was losing a bit of its luster (the unimaginative title only highlighting this inevitability), in retrospect, it also produced some of their most potent and thoughtfully constructed tracks. Fireproof, for example, channels breezy 80s Fleetwood Mac for a tambourine-fueled testament to a love built to last. That a guitar riff takes the spotlight for its second bridge instead of another round of na na nas showcases a wizened restraintthat the group had grown beyond the need for another radio-ready sing-along. Noted Directioner Mitski (who once tweeted, disrespect 1D, disrespect me) also gave the song her stamp of approval with a killer, fuzzed-out cover, showing that even indie rockers couldnt resist the charms of One Direction.

Boy band music videos have traditionally served up big concepts and even bigger budgets, but One Directions date-night clip for Night Changes displays simple brilliance. With the videos handheld point-of-view cinematography, viewers are given the opportunity to spend a special moment with each band membera wine-and-dine with Zayn, ice-skating with Harry, cozy board games by the fire with Nialluntil they all go a bit off the rails. Indulgent, earnest, and goofy, it endures as 1Ds definitive video. Musically, Night Changes creates a similar romantic atmosphere, employing ooh ooh backing vocals and a heartbeat bass drum to woo listeners into its mid-tempo easy-listening before sealing the deal with an irresistible key change.

With its insinuation that falling in love can feel a bit like its titular psychological condition, Stockholm Syndrome has some questionable sexual politics. Nevertheless, the song is an absolute pop banger, putting some arena-ready oomph behind another classic One Direction hook. Like many of the groups later tracks, Stockholm Syndrome wears its influences on its sleeve, recalling The Polices post-punk energy with its bouncing guitar riff that swells to match the whoas! of its chorus. It should come as no surprise that the song became one of the rare 1D covers Harry Styles would trot out on his first solo world tourit highlights both his lower-register timbre and his powerful belt, planting the seeds for the rock star to come.

Throughout its tenure, One Direction endured many comparisons to The Beatles, largely in terms of the groups status as an inescapable global phenomenon. But if there was ever a track that sounded like kin to a Sgt. Peppers diddy, its the vibrant, utterly sunny Olivia. Co-written by Styles, the exuberant love song is a time machine unto itself and a joyful standout among the bands winding discography. Backed by a full orchestra, the track is an indulgent celebration of all-consuming devotion. With the power of hindsight, it would be fair to also view it as foreshadowing for what could be expected from Styles then-forthcoming solo effort: something vintage and infectious.

The bands announcement of an impending extended hiatus was met with global devastation from long-time devotees, but not that much shock. Even before Maliks abrupt departure in March 2015, the young men had been ruminating on their inevitable transition into solo work since the year prior. History was more than a folksy, guitar-driven culmination of years of hard work; it was also a fitting sign-off. Equipped with a rousing hook, the final single from the then-quartet rang like a cozy bars last-call anthem and a loving farewell to the bands historic era.

Malik explained his exit from one of the biggest modern musical acts in pop culture as an opportunity to show off his more authentic self, a way to make the music that he actually stood behind. As the first 1D member to build up his solo persona, his Mind Of Mine may have caused some understandable whiplash for those familiar with the music he was making just a year prior. Leaving the palatable, family-friendly rock-pop archetype behind and leaning more into hazy R&B and sensual soft funk, BoRdErZ bared no hints of Maliks glossy boy band roots and became one of the stronger songs among the bunch. It was also one of eight collaborations with Grammy-winning songwriter-producer Malay, and a promising look at Zayns growth as an artist (groan-inducing stylization of track titles aside).

Not every One Directioner has managed to comfortably find a distinctive sound beyond their boy band roots. Since the bands break, Louis Tomlinson has released a handful of singles and, as of this year, a debut album with Walls, although none of it has really resonated on the same scale as his former bandmates. But in 2016, Tomlinson teamed with super DJ Steve Aoki for his first official solo venture. Just Hold On was everything a listener would need from an EDM-pop jaunt: catchy, uplifting, and a solid addition to any festival lineup. It was also a sound that Tomlinson never fully revisited, later opting for the more rock-driven soundscape that underscored the majority of 1Ds discography. Now the track largely exists as a memento of a fairly untrodden path toward house and dance stardom that very well could have set him apart from the rest of his former bandmates.

Of the five original 1D members, Styles, unsurprisingly, has managed to cultivate the biggest solo career. With his boisterous style and generation-defying sound, critics often cite classic rock tentpoles like Mick Jagger and Paul McCartney in their praises. Carolina crystallized Styles appreciation of 60s and 70s rock in a rollicking ode to a girl he met once. Upbeat and reverent, the song became a tour favorite and a late-blooming summer jam. Years later, it endures as a testament to Styles determination to make music that could fit in any decade and possibly outlast us all.

Easily the star of Styles debut, Kiwi is nothing but fun, unabashed rock. The opening verseShe worked her way through a cheap pack of cigarettes / Hard liquor mixed with a bit of intellect / And all the boys, they were saying they were into it / Such a pretty face, on a pretty neckworked hard to cement a much older point of view for 1Ds breakout star. Its energetic spirit also signaled a budding soloist who was willing to exist outside of a single box, setting him apart from his former bandmates as one of the strongest songwriters in the group.

Chalk it up to his ever-present grin, but Niall Horan certainly earned a reputation as the cheekiest of One Directions merry pranksters, which made his folksy, assured solo debut that much more surprising. Flicker had one hell of a saucy single in Slow Hands, but its Seeing Blinda swooning duet with country superstar Maren Morristhat best carved out a niche for Horan in a post-One Direction world. His reedier voice trades off with Morris full-bodied twang in the verses before the two combine for a gorgeous harmony in the songs sweeping refrain. Seeing Blind is a honest-to-goodness country love song with crossover appeal that, like Tomlinsons EDM dabbling, proves the guys didnt need to stay in their former bands pop-rock lane to succeed.

With Icarus Falls, Malik offered a lengthy, 27-track followup to Mind Of Mine that truly highlighted his solo potential. It didnt quite garner the same commercial success as his debut, but it did carve a viable path forward for a growing alt-R&B artist. Its a shame that we never saw a more robust celebration of Maliks second album outside of its more favorable critical reception: Icarus Falls provided more than its fair share of both genre-bending entries and straightforward grooves like Imprint. Sleek and laid-back, the easy tune was a nice bridge between the two projects, changing the pace of the album and solidifying his signature sound.

There are a few genres at work in Fine Lines second single, the ever-charming Adore You. Rock, pop, disco, and funk have ways of registering a little differently with each listen, but all are bolstered by a thumping baseline and Styles soulful vocals in a true go-for-broke love jam. Though the subject of an elaborate (and rather brilliant) viral marketing campaign, Adore You absolutely sells Styles abilities as a wide-ranging artist on its own merit, employing lush background harmonies and an alluring energy that makes it difficult not to fall for his inherent charm. Of all the mellifluous things to come out of One Directions break, this track is by far one of the best.

If 1D were still around to grow the bands collective sound, its current music would likely be comparable to Horans Heartbreak Weatherthat is, breezy, guitar-heavy, and pleasantly melodic. Its snappy (figuratively and quite literally) bridge is so reminiscent of a One Direction hit that it sounds like a Made In The A.M. bonus track in the best way. Out of everyone, Horan held tightly to the playful spirit that catapulted the band into superstardom while injecting his own innate folksy musicality, crafting an ethos that is still very much his own. Heartbreak Weathers title track was not only an ideal opening track for casual listeners, but a security blanket of sorts for fans who still miss the spirited group that started it all.

Since were just shy of 60 minutes, theres time to wrap up this Power Hour with One Directions most meme-able moment to date. When Act My Age was released as an extra track on the Ultimate Edition of 2014s Four, it felt like something of a lark: The band sings about getting fat and old over what is, essentially, an Irish jig on adrenaline. According to Knowyourmeme.com, Twitter user @hozierlesbianin a stroke of geniusspliced the songs raucous strings over video of a familys impressive synchronized dance to Freco and Merlos Drop. Then, in early 2019, the edit fell into the right hands on Twitter, and a brand new reaction meme was born. Those unfamiliar with the One Direction deep cut were mystified by the clips pirate music, but longtime Directioners clocked the song immediately. The surprising viral moment for Act My Age may have spiked over a year ago, but it speaks to the fact that the earnest, irresistible spirit of One Directions music lives on, even if the bands in no hurry to come back from hiatus any time soon.

Read more from the original source:

From boy band to men: A decade of One Directions musical evolution in 60 minutes - The A.V. Club

Baby Pushchairs Market Predicted to Witness Sustainable Evolution in Years to Come – 3rd Watch News

Latest released the research study onGlobal Baby Pushchairs Market, offers a detailed overview of the factors influencing the global business scope.Baby PushchairsMarket research report shows the latest market insights, current situation analysis with upcoming trends and breakdown of the products and services. The report provides key statistics on the market status, size, share, growth factors of theBaby Pushchairs Market. The study covers emerging players data, including: competitive landscape, sales, revenue and global market share of top manufacturers.

Top players in Global Baby Pushchairs Market are:

Goodbaby International Holdings Limited (China)

Newell Brands (United States)

Artsana Group (Italy)

Combi USA (United States)

Stokke AS (Norway)

Hauck group (Germany)

Dorel Industries Inc. (Canada)

Emmaljunga Barnvagnsfabrik AB (Sweden)

UPPAbaby (United States)

Peg Perego (Italy)

Free Sample Report + All Related Graphs & Charts @: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/sample-report/31722-global-baby-pushchairs-market-1

Keep yourself up-to-date with latest market trends and changing dynamics due to COVID Impact and Economic Slowdown globally. Maintain a competitive edge by sizing up with available business opportunity in Baby Pushchairs Market various segments and emerging territory.

Brief Overview on Baby Pushchairs

Baby pushchair also known as baby stroller, is defined as the small folding chair on wheels which a child sits in and is pushed around in. It is very flexible and provides a strong and sturdy frame. It is also convenient for turning in any direction. There are various benefits of using Baby pushchair products such as greater convenience and comfort, convenient transportation, durable childcare products last for a long time, offers safety features, among others. An increasing number of customer from the online channel and rising disposal income of consumer among middle-class families are some of the major factors which affect the growth of the market in the future. While some of the factors like issues associated with roads having complex path can affect the light weight baby pushchair product market. Around 40% of baby pushchair market is contributed by the APAC region, one of the main reason for this is technical innovation and extension portfolio of the product.

Recent Development in Global Baby Pushchairs Market:

Baby Jogger Company has launched a new city select LUX Stroller. It is available in single to double stroller on the market. Hence, this launched will increase the product portfolio of the company.

Market Drivers

Market Trend

Market Challenges

Market Restraints:

Market Opportunities:

Region Included are: North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Oceania, South America, Middle East & Africa

Country Level Break-Up: United States, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Colombia, Chile, South Africa, Nigeria, Tunisia, Morocco, Germany, United Kingdom (UK), the Netherlands, Spain, Italy, Belgium, Austria, Turkey, Russia, France, Poland, Israel, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, China, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore, India, Australia and New Zealand etc.

Enquire for customization in Report @: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/enquiry-before-buy/31722-global-baby-pushchairs-market-1

Strategic Points Covered in Table of Content of Global Baby Pushchairs Market:

Chapter 1: Introduction, market driving force product Objective of Study and Research Scope the Global Baby Pushchairs market

Chapter 2: Exclusive Summary the basic information of the Global Baby Pushchairs Market.

Chapter 3: Displaying the Market Dynamics- Drivers, Trends and Challenges of the Global Baby Pushchairs

Chapter 4: Presenting the Global Baby Pushchairs Market Factor Analysis Porters Five Forces, Supply/Value Chain, PESTEL analysis, Market Entropy, Patent/Trademark Analysis.

Chapter 5: Displaying the by Type, End User and Region 2013-2020

Chapter 6: Evaluating the leading manufacturers of the Global Baby Pushchairs market which consists of its Competitive Landscape, Peer Group Analysis, BCG Matrix & Company Profile

Chapter 7: To evaluate the market by segments, by countries and by manufacturers with revenue share and sales by key countries in these various regions.

Chapter 8 & 9: Displaying the Appendix, Methodology and Data Source

Finally, Global Baby Pushchairs Market is a valuable source of guidance for individuals and companies.

Data Sources & Methodology

The primary sources involve the industry experts from the Global Baby Pushchairs Market including the management organizations, processing organizations, analytics service providers of the industrys value chain. All primary sources were interviewed to gather and authenticate qualitative & quantitative information and determine the future prospects.

In the extensive primary research process undertaken for this study, the primary sources Postal Surveys, telephone, Online & Face-to-Face Survey were considered to obtain and verify both qualitative and quantitative aspects of this research study. When it comes to secondary sources Companys Annual reports, press Releases, Websites, Investor Presentation, Conference Call transcripts, Webinar, Journals, Regulators, National Customs and Industry Associations were given primary weightage.

Get More Information: https://www.advancemarketanalytics.com/reports/31722-global-baby-pushchairs-market-1

What benefits does AMA research study is going to provide?

Definitively, this report will give you an unmistakable perspective on every single reality of the market without a need to allude to some other research report or an information source. Our report will give all of you the realities about the past, present, and eventual fate of the concerned Market.

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia.

About Author:

Advance Market Analytics is Global leaders of Market Research Industry provides the quantified B2B research to Fortune 500 companies on high growth emerging opportunities which will impact more than 80% of worldwide companies revenues.

Our Analyst is tracking high growth study with detailed statistical and in-depth analysis of market trends & dynamics that provide a complete overview of the industry. We follow an extensive research methodology coupled with critical insights related industry factors and market forces to generate the best value for our clients. We Provides reliable primary and secondary data sources; our analysts and consultants derive informative and usable data suited for our clients business needs. The research study enables clients to meet varied market objectives a from global footprint expansion to supply chain optimization and from competitor profiling to M&As.

Contact Us:

Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)AMA Research & Media LLPUnit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJNew Jersey USA 08837Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218[emailprotected]

Connect with us athttps://www.linkedin.com/company/advance-market-analyticshttps://www.facebook.com/AMA-Research-Media-LLP-344722399585916https://twitter.com/amareport

Visit link:

Baby Pushchairs Market Predicted to Witness Sustainable Evolution in Years to Come - 3rd Watch News

Biophysicists Find Water Wires Are Biological Information Channels – Discovery Institute

Image: Water wire, by Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, via Poul Petersen, Cornell University/EurekAlert!

Water conducts electricity; it can also conduct energy and information. Biophysicists are finding that water wires at the nanoscale fine-tune enzymatic actions indeed, can be indispensable for function.

In a post here back in April, Evolution News shared a remarkable fact about dynein, one of the molecular machines that walks on microtubules. The scientist in that story theorized that water molecules bind to the stalk and help transmit kinetic energy via water waves from the reaction center, where ATP is spent, to the feet where walking takes place. The water molecules are so positioned as to create a virtual tsunami of energy from one end of the machine to the other, which causes the feet to move. Obviously, this requires very precise cooperation between the water molecules and the amino acids in the stalk. Now, other instances are coming to light of biological systems incorporating water molecules into their functional specificity.

Biophysicists have long suspected that water molecules facilitate the passage of substrates through membrane channels. The purpose of membrane channels is to permit certain molecules through the cell membrane but prohibit others. This is called active transport, because normally molecules would move by diffusion (passive transport). Cells need to both attract the right molecules to go through the channel and authenticate them through the selectivity filter. Water can assist this process via electricity. Since H2O is bipolar, single water molecules in a chain, held together by hydrogen bonds, become a sort of wire through which ions can pass. Additionally, the fact that some amino acids are hydrophilic allows biological channels to attract water molecules to the exact positions inside the channel where they can assist the selectivity filter.

In 2009, scientists in India constructed an artificial peptide nanotube just wide enough to hold a chain of water molecules. Chemistry World explains how achieving this in practice was harder than in theory:

Water behaves differently at the nanoscale, forming into single-file arrangements known as water wires. These are important in biology as they ferry protons through cell membranes, which is a crucial step in how most organisms produce energy.

The mechanism behind this proton transfer is the classic Grotthuss chain, where hydrogen bonding lets protons hop between water molecules very rapidly. But predicting how this mechanism affects a single line of molecules has been challenging. Now, a team led by Padmanabhan Balaram at the Indian Institute of Science in Bangalore has taken a first-hand look at how the molecules are configured, providing a useful template for future studies. [Emphasis added.]

The experiment in this early attempt did not attract water molecules to the sides of the channel but demonstrated the feasibility of doing so. In 2018, scientists from Cornell and Rensselaer made further progress in constructing artificial water wires. The news from Rensselaer, Proof of Water Wires Motivated by a Biological Water Channel, says that biological water channels called aquaporins provided the inspiration for their biomimetic experiments.

Aquaporins are proteins that serve as water channels to regulate the flow of water across biological cell membranes. They also remove excess salt and impurities in the body, and it is this aspect that has led to much interest in recent years in how to mimic the biochemical processes of aquaporins potentially for water desalination systems.

The experimenters built an artificial channel with stacks of imidazole, a ring-shaped nitrogen-based organic compound, and demonstrated for the first time that water molecules can be induced to stick to the sides of the channel in order to form a water wire. Cornell says that until then, water wires had been predicted theoretically but never seen.

I would call this the first real observation of a water wire, [Poul] Petersen said. Were not just seeing the oxygen [atoms], we see the protons, as well. Its the first observation of the hydrogen bonding in a water wire.

A key finding of this work was that the net dipolar orientation of water molecules in confined channels induced specific polarization of the channel, which drives the substrate through. The ability to mimic this action would be the gold standard for desalination technology, they say. But is this how water wires work in biological systems?

One challenge of observing biological water wires is peering inside the narrow confines of a membrane channel. Another challenge is slowing down the action. Hydrogen bond formation is predicted to change billions of times a second. This year, an international team used the ultra-high-intensity magnet at the National High Magnetic Field lab in Tallahassee, Florida, to achieve a breakthrough. Considering that the field energy of MRI machines in hospitals runs about 1 to 3 teslas (T), the power of the magnet at Tallahassee, 35.2 T, is truly astonishing. That is orders of magnitude stronger than the magnetic field of the earth or the sun.

Their paper in PNAS, Functional stability of water wirecarbonyl interactions in an ion channel, tells how they were able to pull off this feat in a well-characterized membrane channel named gramicidin A.

Water wires are critical for the functioning of many membrane proteins, as in channels that conduct water, protons, and other ions. Here, in liquid crystalline lipid bilayers under symmetric environmental conditions, the selective hydrogen bonding interactions between eight waters comprising a water wire and a subset of 26 carbonyl oxygens lining the antiparallel dimeric gramicidin A channel are characterized by 17O NMR spectroscopy at 35.2 T and computational studies.

Gramicidin A (gA), discovered in 1939, is a linear peptide antibiotic produced by Bacillus brevis. Unlike most peptides, gA consists of alternating left- and right-handed amino acid residues. This gives it a spiral helical shape that penetrates the bacteriums membrane, forming a pore that looks like a spiral staircase. This allows for the free passage of cations (positively charged ions) to neutralize the pH of the interior and exterior. The antimicrobial activity, the authors explain, derives from its ability to form a transmembrane channel that is selective for monovalent cations. It is a simple channel to use for studying the activity of a water wire.

The single file aqueous pore, terminated by the two L10 carbonyls, is only wide enough to host a single file of hydrogen-bonded water molecules: i.e., a water wire, as well as various monovalent cations ranging from Li+ to Cs+. The peptide planes of gA are nearly parallel to the pore axis, with odd-numbered carbonyls in both subunits oriented toward the bilayer center and even-numbered carbonyls toward the bilayer surfaces. Upon entering the water wire region of the channel, a cation interacts with only two waters and possibly pairs of carbonyl oxygens following a spiral path through the pore.

One surprising finding was that the hydrogen bonds in the wire are much more stable than predicted. Instead of changing in nanoseconds in the strong magnetic field, they lingered for milliseconds six orders of magnitude longer.

The results reveal that selective pore-lining carbonyl oxygens form remarkably stable hydrogen bonds with waters in the wire, such that the water wire does not change its orientation on the millisecond NMR timescale. The stable orientation of the water-wire dipole also provides a simple explanation for the low affinity of the second cation binding site in this dimeric channel, despite a separation of 24 from the first binding site at the opposite end of the pore.

The dipole formed by the 24-fold difference in binding affinity forces the cation down the channel. The water molecules are placed at the precise positions to provide optimum stability.

The water wire itself has a stability gradient from the negative end of the electric dipole to the positive end, based on optimal hydrogen bonding of the waters at the negative end of the electric dipole. The water interactions at this end of the dipole over the first three waters of the water wire are particularly stable.

Is there a reason why the hydrogen bonds need to be stable? Yes; the timing of passage of cations requires that the binding sites not flip too quickly. You can skip this passage after the first sentence unless you like the details:

Water wires are critical biological assemblies supported by membrane proteins for the purposes of transporting charge and ions across membranes. The present unique high-resolution characterization of the gA water wire provides insights into the dynamics, structure, and functional mechanism of this ion channel. In liquid crystalline lipid bilayers, the gA water wire and its associated electric dipole are stable on the millisecond timescale, both with and without cations present. Upon single cation occupancy, the influence of the electric dipole extends even further into the terminal region of the second subunit than in the absence of cations. The K+ interactions upon double occupancy do not result in symmetrization of the channel; however, there are significant impacts on water carbonyl interactions in the pore and hence on the resultant electric dipole that stabilizes the high affinity cation binding state. Furthermore, under double occupancy, the cations in the high- and low-affinity sites do not exchange sites at their respective ends of the channel on the millisecond timescale. Such exchange would flip the water wire and its associated electric dipole, resulting in averaging of the 17O spectral frequencies of the two subunits into a single value. Consequently, these cation binding sites are also stable at least on the millisecond timescale. Indeed, the water-wire orientation and its associated electric dipole dictates the high-affinity and low-affinity sites of the dimer.

In short, the spacing of all the amino acids and water molecules is optimized for function. The first ion is sucked in, forming its stable hydrogen bonds with the water, so that the second ion entering the channel doesnt flip the dipole over and break the flow. That requires precision foresight both positionally and temporally. And this is one of the simplest examples found in a bacterium! It is fair to expect even more optimization will be found in future studies of water wires in more complex membrane channels. Do the authors think this is intelligently designed? They almost say so:

The profound influence of the water wire in this model system and the stable watercarbonyl interactions illustrate the significance and functionality for such wires in many channels and materials. In particular, the stability of the water wire and its electric dipole suggests that its influence in many other systems could be more significant than generally recognized. To achieve such an understanding, unique 17O spectroscopy as reported here at a field strength of 35.2 T demonstrates the exquisite sensitivity to the chemical environs surrounding oxygen sites where so much of biological chemistry takes place.

Their awe at this system might explain their failure to attribute it to evolution.

View original post here:

Biophysicists Find Water Wires Are Biological Information Channels - Discovery Institute

Lynch: A History traces the evolution of former Seahawks running back Marshawn Lynch and the use of his voice – Seattle Times

In a time when athletes feel increasingly compelled to speak out, Marshawn Lynch remains unique for making provocative statements by barely saying anything.

Not that Lynch was always as reticent with the NFL media as his career progressed, a career that may not yet be over, though at the moment he is a free agent.

Its Lynchs path from reluctant-if-usually-dutiful interview subject to one who talked only on his own terms that is the primary topic of the documentary film Lynch: A History.

The film, which was written, produced and directed by David Shields, who is the Milliman Distinguished Writer-in-Residence at the University of Washington, premiered last fall at the Seattle International Film Festival, where it won the Golden Sunbreak Award for Best Documentary, and is now available on the streaming service Topic.

Shields has written books on Gary Payton and Ichiro, each athletes who captivated for the manner in which they communicated as much as what they said.

Obviously Im very interested in athletes and their language, Shields said.

That led him in 2015, after watching Lynch play for the Seahawks for five seasons, to begin planning a film on Lynch. He approached Lynch a few times and never got an interview but was told Lynch wouldnt impede his efforts.

The result is an 85-minute film categorized in a news release as a video collage.

Indeed, the film is a montage of Lynch through the years on and off the field, interspersed with scenes of his hometown of Oakland as well as cultural events of the time, such as Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the anthem in 2016. Lynch sat during the anthem on a few occasions in 2017, including during a game in Mexico City when he stood for Mexicos anthem, a sequence portrayed in the film.

Lynch is shown giving some straightforward interviews during earlier stages of his career, including at Cal and with the Buffalo Bills, and even in his first years with the Seahawks (in one clip from shortly after his trade to Seattle in 2010 Lynch jokes how he didnt like Seahawks coach Pete Carroll when Carroll tried to recruit him at USC). He essentially took a vow of silence by the time the Seahawks won the Super Bowl in 2013 (for what its worth, while Lynch was reported to have been fined a few times by the NFL for not talking, its thought he never actually has had to pay any money to the league).

But Shields says he thinks many of the conclusions for why Lynch began eschewing traditional interviews are mistaken. Shields says many observers tried to paint Lynch as either petulant or shy or random.

But to Shields, there was a pretty clear method to Marshawns seeming madness.

And that, he says, is Lynch making clear that, Ill speak in my own damn voice, thank you very much. Im definitely not going to speak in the masters voice.

As the film shows, Lynch was happy to appear on national late-night talk shows and commercials during the time he was refusing interviews in traditional NFL media settings.

When it came to media duties he felt were required by the league, he largely clammed up by the end of his second full season with the Seahawks in 2012.

Shields says the moment he decided he really wanted to try to pursue something on Lynch was watching the 2014 Super Bowl media day and Lynchs memorable interview with Deion Sanders, when Lynch uttered his famous Im just bout that action, boss, line.

It was a moment that perfectly encapsulated Lynch. He didnt answer questions in the conventional manner as did the other 100-plus players there, yet he said the only thing that day that anyone may still remember.

While Lynch was never an enthusiastic interview giver, Shields concludes it was his time in Buffalo from 2007-10 that made him distrust the media, and the NFL machine, that much more.

Lynch had never lived outside the Bay Area and found himself in about the most foreign NFL city he could have (as lots of shots of the Buffalo snow make clear).

Lynch was also suspended by the league for three games in 2009 after being arrested on a misdemeanor gun charge, and the coverage of that and a few other events in his time in Buffalo, Shields says Lynch felt was unfair, with Lynch feeling media often took his words and kind of falsified what he said.

Buffalo was a big change for him, Lynch said.

Shields, in a clip not in the film, cites a quote Lynch once gave on a talk show hosted by former NBA player Matt Barnes that I realized if I didnt talk they couldnt mangle my words.

Watching the progression of Lynch taking power of his own voice, as well as scenes of civil rights protests in the Bay Area in the 60s and Kaepernick and others in the NFL, makes the film seem even more prescient given events of the last few months (and it should be noted that since the film deals in some harsh realities, there is language that matches).

I think if the film feels slightly timely its largely because Marshawn has better antenna than most people, Shields says.

So what did Lynch think of the film?

Shields says he ran into Lynch last August following a screening in Oakland (Lynch had earlier been sent a Vimeo link of the film to watch, as well).

I wanted to hate on you, Shields says Lynch told him. But I couldnt, cause you did a damn good job with it.

Read the original:

Lynch: A History traces the evolution of former Seahawks running back Marshawn Lynch and the use of his voice - Seattle Times

The Evolution of Rhys Hoskins Swing Leads To Hybrid Setup – Crossing Broad

For a time during the 2019 season, Rhys Hoskins was excellent. Then, well, he wasnt.

Over 89 first half games a season ago, Hoskins slugged 20 homers to go with an impressive .401 on-base percentage and .931 OPS.

And then all hell broke loose.

Over 71 second half games, Hoskins added only nine more homers while posting an uncharacteristic .318 on-base percentage and a brutal .679 OPS. If batting average matters to you, and in this case I believe it should, Hoskins hit a National League-worst .180 during that same stretch.

Unsurprisingly, the Phillies, too, faltered in the second half. In attempt to spark both the first baseman and the team, hitting coach John Mallee was replaced with Charlie Manuel. But not even that change could stop the synchronized collapses of team and player.

Over the winter, Hoskins began implementing a new setup in which he lowered his hands with a downward-pointed elbow. He also opened up his base a bit and kept his lead arm rested along his front side. A look at the reworked setup:

Certainly, the new setup was quite a deviation from his previous one. In particular, note the differences in the first frame here:

Hoskins talked about the adjustments back in February at the start of spring training:

In the above video, he discusses wanting to be more consistent and repeatable with his mechanics. Unfortunately, live reps (paired with cage and tee work) are required to obtain consistency with a pretty dramatic change in setup. As it turns out, a pandemic doesnt help in that regard.

I was a bit surprised by the changes. Obviously, Hoskins experienced what, for him, had to be unprecedented struggles over the final two-plus months of 2019. Still, I wondered how much of those struggles were more about a snowball effect of doubt, one that caused an erosion of confidence rather than an erosion of his hitting skillset.

I dont think its fair to call his change in approach a panic move because a great deal of thought and reason when into the new setup, but I did wonder about the necessity of such alterations.

For what its worth, Hoskins struggled in limited Grapefruit League action. From my perspective, Hoskins also struggled in the early days of the teams summer camp. He was under a lot of pitches and wasnt consistently squaring balls up. More importantly, he didnt strike me as a player particularly comfortable or confident.

In recent days, hes made some noticeable adjustments with his hand placement. Hoskins talked about the recent swing tinkering with reporters on Tuesday afternoon.

You know, obviously, it was well documented over the offseason. I experimented with some changes in my setup, Hoskins said. Thought it was going well in the spring, but then, obviously, the pandemic hit, and I was unable to get some live reps. Since weve gotten back, its kind of turned more hybrid between those changes and what Ive done in the past.

Again, it has been an extremely limited sample of intrasquad and exhibition action, but Hoskins has looked better leading up to tonights intrasquad game. Apparently, he feels better, too.

Right now, Im feeling pretty good. Im feeling pretty comfortable with it. I feel strong in the box, I feel like Im seeing the ball pretty well, trying to swing at strikes and go from there.

One thing Hoskins has going for him as the 2020 season draws near is the presence of new hitting coach Joe Dillon.

While it is isnt fair to solely lay blame for Hoskins personal struggles (or the struggles of several young Phillies) in 2019 on the previous coaching staff, there does seem to be more confidence in the new regime across the board.

Hoskins, for one, is a believer in Dillon.

I think hes going to have a pretty tremendous impact, honestly. I think a lot of the work that he likes to do and suggests that we do are going to make the game a lot simpler, he said. He really tries to make it hard on us in the cage and in practice, so that when we get in a tight situation in a game against a guy that has 98 and with sink, well have seen something pretty similar to that already in the cage and feel a lot more comfortable when we step in the box.

As we saw throughout the Phillies underwhelming second half a season ago, theyneed Hoskins to be productive.

From this perspective, he needs to be confident in his approach and setup in order for this to happen.

An optimist will tell you these latest changes are a sign that hes getting closer in that regard.

A pessimist will tell you the changes signal self-doubt ahead of a 60-game season in which theres no time to wasteespecially in light of this:

So, whos right?

Ultimately, given his past production and recent comments, Im willing to take a more positive outlook. But were soon going to find out.

See the rest here:

The Evolution of Rhys Hoskins Swing Leads To Hybrid Setup - Crossing Broad

How Jurgen Klopps beautiful evolution led Liverpool back to the top and led fans to believe again – This Is Anfield

So the day finally came, a day many of us thought might never arrive. But here we are, Liverpool are the newly coronated Premier League champions.

I have a slightly obvious theory that the Premier League was a psychological block for Liverpool FC.

Had the old First Division, as it was, continued beyond 1992, then I dont think it would have taken Liverpool 30 years to turn title No. 18 into title No. 19.

The old First Division belonged to Liverpool and the newly formed Premier League didnt. Natural order and old inferiority complexes of others would have soon kicked in.

In the same manner, the old First Division became a weight around the neck of Man United.

An unattainable entity, of which they blew the very last iteration of in 1991/92, when it was theirs for the taking.

Had the old First Division continued, then that psychological barrier would have been harder for Alex Fergusons team to break in 1992/93 than a brand-new league was.

The Premier League represented a blank canvas for a club on Merseyside that was eroding, just as much as it was for a set of habitual underachievers that were finally letting loose in Salford.

The more the Premier League title proved to be agonisingly out of reach, the more impossible the dream seemed to become. While it was a prize that was the same thing as before with a different name, it became an irritation.

If the Premier League was an itch, it was one that was situated right between the shoulder blades.

Roy Evans and Gerard Houllier held fleeting hopes of soothing that itch, while Rafa Benitez and Brendan Rodgers came so very close to doing so.

While Rafa Benitez and Brendan Rodgers would have done it had the wind been blowing in a marginally different direction, given that they didnt, I think it had gotten to the point where nobody other than Jurgen Klopp could have generated the successes of the last 14 months, culminating in this, our first league title in three decades.

Yet here we have a potential springboard now that can not only bring other Klopp successes, but also for those that follow him into the job as Liverpool manager.

A scene has been set for the decade ahead and there is a horizon in view that can be anything Klopp and Liverpool want it to be.

There is no bigger game in football today than Liverpool FC.

They have created a blueprint for others to imitate; they have become the benchmark for what can be achieved if you are a football club that isnt blessed with the biggest chequebook.

Klopp has been shrewd and meticulous in not only the composition of his squad, but in his creation of a community that he has compelled to fight for a cause.

Klopp has invented ingredients that no chequebook can buy and along with hard work, determination and sheer bloody-mindedness, he has delivered the league title.

Frank Lampard is a case in point.

A frustrated Chelsea manager who grouses about arrogance, without the hint of irony of a man who was Jose Mourinhos midfield dynamoMourinho being the only individual that can challenge Fergusons legendary levels of antagonism.

There was also that questionable holiday Lampard took with a couple of England team-mates that spoke of his expertise in arrogance, I suppose.

Petty strops aside, what hurts rivals almost as much as seeing us lift the Premier League trophy is that we have done it on our own terms, in our own way.

For every angst-ridden rival, there is an unashamed admirer of what Klopp has done at Anfield. For instance, AC Milan have approached Liverpool for pointers in how they can break the Juventus stranglehold on Serie A.

Klopps brand of inspiration is infectious.

Liverpools marketing department have run tirelessly with Klopps throwaway remark of turning doubters into believers, but I think there are other, more accurate descriptions that better explain what he has achieved at Anfield.

Trust is everything.

It took the supporters a lot to trust again, after they had bought so emphatically into Rodgers 2013/14 bandwagon. Many of us truly believed that that was going to be the one, only for failure to arguably prove more painful than it had in 2008/09.

After the League Cup final, Europa League final, Champions League final and 97-point Premier League losses, it took a certain sense of endurance to rise again and shake off each new disappointment.

Mentality Monsters is another tagline that has been attached to this Liverpool of ours. A line that is brutally apt for Klopp and his players psychological disposition, which also, handily, fits perfectly on a t-shirt and countless other types of merchandise.

There will undoubtedly be much more to come.

This Liverpool isnt going to be like the Leeds United of 1992 or the Blackburn Rovers of 1995, or even the Leicester City of 2016, whereupon each occasion they climbed their respective mountains only to freewheel it back down the other side straight away.

We have a core of players who are the very best their positions can boast, and an aroma of evolution is in the air.

When it comes to new arrivals or those who choose to go elsewhere, it is the brain more than the brawn that is the most important thing.

Liverpool are a team of thinkers and dancers. Those who fall somewhere between the two need not apply.

We might not have been able to go to the party that was thrown at Anfield on Wednesday night, but it looked the part from my spec, sat at my dads house, where my brother also joined us.

Caught by the emotion of it all, given my dads advancing years, it was a title win that we doubted wed get to share.

Now we believe though.

More:

How Jurgen Klopps beautiful evolution led Liverpool back to the top and led fans to believe again - This Is Anfield

COVID-19 has disrupted the evolution of US equity market structure, says report – The TRADE News

The global pandemic has interrupted a period of significant change for US trading venues, while also minimising volumes and pushing activity off-exchange, a new report has highlighted.

Greenwich Associates highlighted how coming into 2020, three new stock exchanges had announced their planned entrances and a host of regulatory actions loomed on the horizon.

These included new order-routing disclosures, a delayed Transaction Fee Pilot, potential changes to unlisted trading privileges, and a proposed overhaul of the securities information processors (SIPs) for market data.

The pandemic has halted some of these transformative developments, the research outfit explained.

The report also revealed a major shift in US equity trading volumes away from the exchanges. In 2019, the Trade Reporting Facility (TRF) reported a stable level of off-exchange trading between 35 and 40%. Only 16 days reported having TRF volume above 40%.

However, the Greenwich Associates report confirmed that as of June 2020 reported TRF exceeding 40% had already been recorded 58 times.

Standard market analysis would say that in such volatile times there would be a flight to the stability of the lit exchanges, and initially, this did indeed occur, said author of the report and senior analyst at Greenwich Associates market structure and technology, Shane Swanson. However, as the US equities marketplace proved its overall resilience, off-exchange volume not only rebounded but expanded.

The report confirmed that the role of market makers and retail trading was having a significant impact on this increase of off-exchange trading.

With proper systems, risk hedging and management, some market makers appear to have been able to internalise more trades with the retail market, resulting in the increase in market share moving away from the exchanges, said the Greenwich Associates report.

The pandemic has also halted plans for several exchanges to launch. The new exchange entrant Members Exchange (MEMX) was set to go live this month after receiving regulatory approval from the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in May and financial backing from Citi, BlackRock, Wells Fargo, Flow Traders, Bank of America, Morgan Stanley, Virtu Financial, Citadel Securities, Fidelity Investments, and others.

However, MEMX will now launch in September this year. Other exchanges to experience delays include MIAX PEARL Equities and the Long-Term Stock Exchange (LTSE).

With massive proposed changes to market data infrastructure on the SIPs, new exchange entrants eager to prove their value, and, of course, the coronavirus itself, the most certain bet is that 2020 will be one for the books, added Swanson.

Read the original:

COVID-19 has disrupted the evolution of US equity market structure, says report - The TRADE News

Evolution of the Volkswagen Polo | Pasts entwined – EVO India

If there was a car that was solely responsible for kick-starting evo India magazine back in 2013, it was the humble Volkswagen Polo. You would think a performance car magazine was inspired by the high-octane, fire-breathing supercars of the day but no it was a humble hatchback with aspirations far beyond the daily commute that did the job. Four car enthusiasts from Pune, including editor Sirish, had formed a team called Slideways Industries to participate in the national rally championship. They were the first to develop the Polo for the INRC, the first to rally it, and the first to claim a class win with it as well in its debut rally, no less. While hooning around in the Polo, they realised that despite the abundance of automotive media in India, none of them quite portrayed the enthusiasm they had for cars. They decided to put together a magazine that authentically captured the joy they had rallying, but more importantly, reflected the joy of motoring and the fun that you can have with cars. With their combined expertise, they put together the first issue of evo India in October 2013 and there has been no looking back since!

See the original post here:

Evolution of the Volkswagen Polo | Pasts entwined - EVO India

Faith-based Groups Must Evolve Messaging to Engage COVID Generation – MissionsBox

CHARLOTTE, NC Faith-based organizations, such as churches and nonprofit ministries, must evolve the way they communicate to engage the COVID generation or risk becoming irrelevant, a leading communications agency said today.

Many of Americas Christian organizations churches, mission agencies, schools, rescue missions and other ministries are looking for effective ways to connect with their audiences and supporters as COVID-19 continues to dominate the news, with no immediate end in sight, according to InChrist Communications (ICC, http://www.InChristCommunications.com), a national branding, marketing, public relations, and crisis communications firm.

The North Carolina-based agency is staging a free, live webinar and panel discussion COVID-19: Your Message for the Next Season July 22 at 2 p.m. EDT to help faith-based organizations develop their own plan to break through the media clutter. Communications and ministry leadership teams can register at http://www.inchristcommunication.com/inchrist-communications-webinar-panel.

Panel experts will include communications leaders from high-profile media organizations, mission agencies, faith generosity movements, donor development consultancies, and churches.

Our research shows many organizations were completely blindsided by COVID-19, and many are still struggling to find their voice, said ICC President Diane Lonsdale. However, three-quarters of those surveyed say theyve increased their marketing and communications during the pandemic, because they realize its vital to keep their audiences engaged.

Whats clear, Lonsdale says, is that faith-based organizations will have to change the ways they communicate with the COVID generation especially with rapidly evolving technology if their message is to stand out and theyre to stay relevant.

Its evident that brand messaging and methods will have to change to accommodate the emotional mindset of the public and the evolution most ministries are going through right now, said Lonsdale, a veteran marketing pro.

Our survey shows three out of every four organizations plan to change the ways they communicate in the coming 6-12 months, Lonsdale said, and more than 80 percent of Christian communications professionals are looking to new ways to use video, social media, and other digital strategies to create the dynamic online connections this generation craves.

Established in 2002, InChrist Communications (ICC, http://www.InChristCommunications.com) provides strategic integrated communications services branding, marketing, advertising, media relations, crisis communications, donor communications, social media, digital media, web for faith-based ministries, missions, churches, and businesses. A free strategy session is available at http://www.inchristcommunication.com/inchrist-communications-webinar-panel.

CONTACT: Ty Mays, 770-256-8710, tmays@inchristcommunications.com

Read more news on World Missions and the COVID 19 Pandemic on Missions Box.

GFAs Statement About Coronavirus

Follow this link:

Faith-based Groups Must Evolve Messaging to Engage COVID Generation - MissionsBox

Evolution (2001) – IMDb

2 nominations. See more awards Learn more More Like This

Adventure | Comedy | Sci-Fi

The alumni cast of a space opera television series have to play their roles as the real thing when an alien race needs their help. However, they also have to defend both Earth and the alien race from a reptilian warlord.

Director:Dean Parisot

Stars:Tim Allen,Sigourney Weaver,Alan Rickman

Adventure | Comedy | Sci-Fi

Mere seconds before the Earth is to be demolished by an alien construction crew, journeyman Arthur Dent is swept off the planet by his friend Ford Prefect, a researcher penning a new edition of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy."

Director:Garth Jennings

Stars:Martin Freeman,Yasiin Bey,Sam Rockwell

Comedy | Fantasy

Hopeless dweeb Elliot Richards is granted seven wishes by the Devil to snare Allison, the girl of his dreams, in exchange for his soul.

Director:Harold Ramis

Stars:Brendan Fraser,Elizabeth Hurley,Frances O'Connor

Action | Adventure | Sci-Fi

Hoping to alter the events of the past, a 19th century inventor instead travels 800,000 years into the future, where he finds humankind divided into two warring races.

Director:Simon Wells

Stars:Guy Pearce,Yancey Arias,Mark Addy

Action | Comedy | Fantasy

A group of inept amateur superheroes must try to save the day when a supervillain threatens to destroy a major superhero and the city.

Director:Kinka Usher

Stars:Ben Stiller,Janeane Garofalo,William H. Macy

Comedy | Sci-Fi

Earth is invaded by Martians with unbeatable weapons and a cruel sense of humor.

Director:Tim Burton

Stars:Jack Nicholson,Pierce Brosnan,Sarah Jessica Parker

Comedy | Mystery | Sci-Fi

Two potheads wake up after a night of partying and cannot remember where they parked their car.

Director:Danny Leiner

Stars:Ashton Kutcher,Seann William Scott,Jennifer Garner

Adventure | Comedy | Sci-Fi

A star pilot and his sidekick must come to the rescue of a Princess and save the galaxy from a ruthless race of beings known as Spaceballs.

Director:Mel Brooks

Stars:Mel Brooks,John Candy,Rick Moranis

Action | Comedy | Fantasy

The discovery of a massive river of ectoplasm and a resurgence of spectral activity allows the staff of Ghostbusters to revive the business.

Director:Ivan Reitman

Stars:Bill Murray,Dan Aykroyd,Sigourney Weaver

Adventure | Comedy | Drama

An abortion clinic worker with a special heritage is called upon to save the existence of humanity from being negated by two renegade angels trying to exploit a loop-hole and reenter Heaven.

Director:Kevin Smith

Stars:Ben Affleck,Matt Damon,Linda Fiorentino

Action | Adventure | Comedy

A Las Vegas casino magnate, determined to find a new avenue for wagering, sets up a race for money.

Director:Jerry Zucker

Stars:Breckin Meyer,Amy Smart,Whoopi Goldberg

Adventure | Comedy | Sci-Fi

Private Joe Bauers, the definition of "average American", is selected by the Pentagon to be the guinea pig for a top-secret hibernation program. Forgotten, he awakes five centuries in the future. He discovers a society so incredibly dumbed down that he's easily the most intelligent person alive.

Director:Mike Judge

Stars:Luke Wilson,Maya Rudolph,Dax Shepard

When a meteorite falls to Earth two college professors, Dr. Ira Kane and Prof. Harry Phineas Block, are assigned the job of checking the site out. At the site, they discover organisms not of this planet. Soon the site is taken over by the government, forcing Ira and Harry to the side. As the new life-forms begin to evolve and start to get more and more dangerous, it's up to the two professors to save the planet. Written byFilmFanUK

Budget:$80,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend USA: $13,408,351,10 June 2001

Gross USA: $38,345,494

Cumulative Worldwide Gross: $98,376,292

Runtime: 101 min

Aspect Ratio: 1.85 : 1

Looking for something to watch? Check out IMDb's "What to Watch" series to find out what's really worth watching.

Follow this link:

Evolution (2001) - IMDb

human evolution | Stages & Timeline | Britannica

Human evolution, the process by which human beings developed on Earth from now-extinct primates. Viewed zoologically, we humans are Homo sapiens, a culture-bearing upright-walking species that lives on the ground and very likely first evolved in Africa about 315,000 years ago. We are now the only living members of what many zoologists refer to as the human tribe, Hominini, but there is abundant fossil evidence to indicate that we were preceded for millions of years by other hominins, such as Ardipithecus, Australopithecus, and other species of Homo, and that our species also lived for a time contemporaneously with at least one other member of our genus, H. neanderthalensis (the Neanderthals). In addition, we and our predecessors have always shared Earth with other apelike primates, from the modern-day gorilla to the long-extinct Dryopithecus. That we and the extinct hominins are somehow related and that we and the apes, both living and extinct, are also somehow related is accepted by anthropologists and biologists everywhere. Yet the exact nature of our evolutionary relationships has been the subject of debate and investigation since the great British naturalist Charles Darwin published his monumental books On the Origin of Species (1859) and The Descent of Man (1871). Darwin never claimed, as some of his Victorian contemporaries insisted he had, that man was descended from the apes, and modern scientists would view such a statement as a useless simplificationjust as they would dismiss any popular notions that a certain extinct species is the missing link between humans and the apes. There is theoretically, however, a common ancestor that existed millions of years ago. This ancestral species does not constitute a missing link along a lineage but rather a node for divergence into separate lineages. This ancient primate has not been identified and may never be known with certainty, because fossil relationships are unclear even within the human lineage, which is more recent. In fact, the human family tree may be better described as a family bush, within which it is impossible to connect a full chronological series of species, leading to Homo sapiens, that experts can agree upon.

Top Questions

Humans are culture-bearingprimates classified in the genusHomo, especially thespeciesHomo sapiens. They are anatomically similar and related to the greatapes (orangutans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas)but are distinguished by a more highly developedbrain that allows for the capacity for articulatespeechand abstractreasoning. Humans display a marked erectness of body carriage that frees thehandsfor use as manipulative members.

The answer to this question is challenging, since paleontologists have only partial information on what happened when. So far, scientists have been unable to detect the sudden moment of evolution for any species, but they are able to infer evolutionary signposts that help to frame our understanding of the emergence of humans. Strong evidence supports the branching of the human lineage from the one that produced great apes (orangutans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas) in Africa sometime between 6 and 7 million years ago. Evidence of toolmaking dates to about 3.3 million years ago in Kenya. However, the age of the oldest remains of the genus Homo is younger than this technological milestone, dating to some 2.82.75 million years ago in Ethiopia. The oldest known remains of Homo sapiensa collection of skull fragments, a complete jawbone, and stone toolsdate to about 315,000 years ago.

No. Humans are one type of several living species of great apes. Humans evolved alongside orangutans, chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas. All of these share a common ancestor before about 7 million years ago.

Yes. Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis) were archaic humans who emerged at least 200,000 years ago and died out perhaps between 35,000 and 24,000 years ago. They manufactured and used tools (including blades, awls, and sharpening instruments), developed a spoken language, and developed a rich culture that involved hearth construction, traditional medicine, and the burial of their dead. Neanderthals also created art; evidence shows that some painted with naturally occurring pigments. In the end, Neanderthals were likely replaced by modern humans (H. sapiens), but not before some members of these species bred with one another where their ranges overlapped.

The primary resource for detailing the path of human evolution will always be fossil specimens. Certainly, the trove of fossils from Africa and Eurasia indicates that, unlike today, more than one species of our family has lived at the same time for most of human history. The nature of specific fossil specimens and species can be accurately described, as can the location where they were found and the period of time when they lived; but questions of how species lived and why they might have either died out or evolved into other species can only be addressed by formulating scenarios, albeit scientifically informed ones. These scenarios are based on contextual information gleaned from localities where the fossils were collected. In devising such scenarios and filling in the human family bush, researchers must consult a large and diverse array of fossils, and they must also employ refined excavation methods and records, geochemical dating techniques, and data from other specialized fields such as genetics, ecology and paleoecology, and ethology (animal behaviour)in short, all the tools of the multidisciplinary science of paleoanthropology.

This article is a discussion of the broad career of the human tribe from its probable beginnings millions of years ago in the Miocene Epoch (23 million to 5.3 million years ago [mya]) to the development of tool-based and symbolically structured modern human culture only tens of thousands of years ago, during the geologically recent Pleistocene Epoch (about 2.6 million to 11,700 years ago). Particular attention is paid to the fossil evidence for this history and to the principal models of evolution that have gained the most credence in the scientific community.See the article evolution for a full explanation of evolutionary theory, including its main proponents both before and after Darwin, its arousal of both resistance and acceptance in society, and the scientific tools used to investigate the theory and prove its validity.

Read the original post:

human evolution | Stages & Timeline | Britannica

Darwin’s Theory of Evolution: Definition & Evidence | Live …

The theory of evolution by natural selection, first formulated in Darwin's book "On the Origin of Species" in 1859, is the process by which organisms change over time as a result of changes in heritable physical or behavioral traits. Changes that allow an organism to better adapt to its environment will help it survive and have more offspring.

Evolution by natural selection is one of the best substantiated theories in the history of science, supported by evidence from a wide variety of scientific disciplines, including paleontology, geology, genetics and developmental biology.

The theory has two main points, said Brian Richmond, curator of human origins at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City. "All life on Earth is connected and related to each other," and this diversity of life is a product of "modifications of populations by natural selection, where some traits were favored in and environment over others," he said.

More simply put, the theory can be described as "descent with modification," said Briana Pobiner, an anthropologist and educator at the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C., who specializes in the study of human origins.

The theory is sometimes described as "survival of the fittest," but that can be misleading, Pobiner said. Here, "fitness" refers not to an organism's strength or athletic ability, but rather the ability to survive and reproduce.

For example, a study on human evolution on 1,900 students, published online in the journal Personality and Individual Differences in October 2017, found that many people may have trouble finding a mate because of rapidly changing social technological advances that are evolving faster than humans. "Nearly 1 in 2 individuals faces considerable difficulties in the domain of mating," said lead study author Menelaos Apostolou, an associate professor of social sciences at the University of Nicosia in Cyprus. "In most cases, these difficulties are not due to something wrong or broken, but due to people living in an environment which is very different from the environment they evolved to function in." [If You Suck at Dating, It's Not You It's Evolution]

In the first edition of "On the Origin of Species" in 1859, Charles Darwin speculated about how natural selection could cause a land mammal to turn into a whale. As a hypothetical example, Darwin used North American black bears, which were known to catch insects by swimming in the water with their mouths open:

"I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale," he speculated.

The idea didn't go over very well with the public. Darwin was so embarrassed by the ridicule he received that the swimming-bear passage was removed from later editions of the book.

Scientists now know that Darwin had the right idea but the wrong animal. Instead of looking at bears, he should have instead been looking at cows and hippopotamuses.

The story of the origin of whales is one of evolution's most fascinating tales and one of the best examples scientists have of natural selection.

To understand the origin of whales, it's necessary to have a basic understanding of how natural selection works. Natural selection can change a species in small ways, causing a population to change color or size over the course of several generations. This is called "microevolution."

But natural selection is also capable of much more. Given enough time and enough accumulated changes, natural selection can create entirely new species, known as "macroevolution." It can turn dinosaurs into birds, amphibious mammals into whales and the ancestors of apes into humans.

Take the example of whales using evolution as their guide and knowing how natural selection works, biologists knew that the transition of early whales from land to water occurred in a series of predictable steps. The evolution of the blowhole, for example, might have happened in the following way:

Random genetic changes resulted in at least one whale having its nostrils placed farther back on its head. Those animals with this adaptation would have been better suited to a marine lifestyle, since they would not have had to completely surface to breathe. Such animals would have been more successful and had more offspring. In later generations, more genetic changes occurred, moving the nose farther back on the head.

Other body parts of early whales also changed. Front legs became flippers. Back legs disappeared. Their bodies became more streamlined and they developed tail flukes to better propel themselves through water.

Darwin also described a form of natural selection that depends on an organism's success at attracting a mate, a process known as sexual selection. The colorful plumage of peacocks and the antlers of male deer are both examples of traits that evolved under this type of selection.

But Darwin wasn't the first or only scientist to develop a theory of evolution. The French biologist Jean-Baptiste Lamarck came up with the idea that an organism could pass on traits to its offspring, though he was wrong about some of the details. Around the same time as Darwin, British biologist Alfred Russel Wallace independently came up with the theory of evolution by natural selection.

Darwin didn't know anything about genetics, Pobiner said. "He observed the pattern of evolution, but he didn't really know about the mechanism." That came later, with the discovery of how genes encode different biological or behavioral traits, and how genes are passed down from parents to offspring. The incorporation of genetics and Darwin's theory is known as "modern evolutionary synthesis."

The physical and behavioral changes that make natural selection possible happen at the level of DNA and genes. Such changes are called mutations. "Mutations are basically the raw material on which evolution acts," Pobiner said.

Mutations can be caused by random errors in DNA replication or repair, or by chemical or radiation damage. Most times, mutations are either harmful or neutral, but in rare instances, a mutation might prove beneficial to the organism. If so, it will become more prevalent in the next generation and spread throughout the population.

In this way, natural selection guides the evolutionary process, preserving and adding up the beneficial mutations and rejecting the bad ones. "Mutations are random, but selection for them is not random," Pobiner said.

But natural selection isn't the only mechanism by which organisms evolve, she said. For example, genes can be transferred from one population to another when organisms migrate or immigrate, a process known as gene flow. And the frequency of certain genes can also change at random, which is called genetic drift.

Even though scientists could predict what early whales should look like, they lacked the fossil evidence to back up their claim. Creationists took this absence as proof that evolution didn't occur. They mocked the idea that there could have ever been such a thing as a walking whale. But since the early 1990s, that's exactly what scientists have been finding.

The critical piece of evidence came in 1994, when paleontologists found the fossilized remains of Ambulocetus natans, an animal whose name literally means "swimming-walking whale." Its forelimbs had fingers and small hooves but its hind feet were enormous given its size. It was clearly adapted for swimming, but it was also capable of moving clumsily on land, much like a seal.

When it swam, the ancient creature moved like an otter, pushing back with its hind feet and undulating its spine and tail.

Modern whales propel themselves through the water with powerful beats of their horizontal tail flukes, but Ambulocetus still had a whip-like tail and had to use its legs to provide most of the propulsive force needed to move through water.

In recent years, more and more of these transitional species, or "missing links," have been discovered, lending further support to Darwin's theory, Richmond said.

Fossil "links" have also been found to support human evolution. In early 2018, a fossilized jaw and teeth found that are estimated to be up to 194,000 years old, making them at least 50,000 years older than modern human fossils previously found outside Africa. This finding provides another clue to how humans have evolved.

Despite the wealth of evidence from the fossil record, genetics and other fields of science, some people still question its validity. Some politicians and religious leaders denounce the theory of evolution, invoking a higher being as a designer to explain the complex world of living things, especially humans.

School boards debate whether the theory of evolution should be taught alongside other ideas, such as intelligent design or creationism.

Mainstream scientists see no controversy. "A lot of people have deep religious beliefs and also accept evolution," Pobiner said, adding, "there can be real reconciliation."

Evolution is well supported by many examples of changes in various species leading to the diversity of life seen today. "If someone could really demonstrate a better explanation than evolution and natural selection, [that person] would be the new Darwin," Richmond said.

Additional reporting by Contributor Alina Bradford and Staff Writer Tanya Lewis, Follow Tanya on Twitter. Follow us @livescience, Facebook & Google+.

Additional resources

Related:

More:

Darwin's Theory of Evolution: Definition & Evidence | Live ...

The Evolution of ML Infrastructure Gigaom – Gigaom

Data is the new oil for modern tech, transforming countless industries and providing invaluable insight as organizations leverage artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning. But this data-rich futurewhere information once bound for cold storage becomes an actionable, strategic assetcomes with challenges. More data must be stored safely at reasonable cost over longer time spans, even as enterprises forge a data foundation layer to transform every type of data they own from a liability to be stored and defended into an asset to be leveraged.

Enterprises need the right storage infrastructure to manage this transition and unlock the potential value in their data. In this blog post, we outline how storage has evolved to combat the challenges of AI, ML, and big data and how the new generation of data storage offers a better solution than traditional stacks.

To make a successful data storage layer for AI and ML operations using large amounts of data, your infrastructure must provide:

It is tough to find all of these characteristics in a traditional storage system. In fact, they look incompatible at first glance. Often, we must stack several different technologies to accomplish this:

Rather than create a complicated stack, a new answer has emerged over the last few years: Next-Generation Object Storage. This solution uses all-flash and hybrid (flash and spinning media) object stores to combine the characteristics of traditional object stores with those usually found in block and file storage. The result:

The challenges posed by AI and ML to data infrastructure have been resolved to some extent by the new generation of object stores.

Object storage now offers much more than it did in the past. It can offload several tasks from the rest of the infrastructure. It is faster and can form the data foundation layer for todays capacity needs and tomorrows next-generation and cloud-native applications. Finally, next-generation object stores make it easier to implement new initiatives based on ML and AI workloads. It allows for a quick start with the potential to grow and evolve the infrastructure as required by the business.

Read more from the original source:

The Evolution of ML Infrastructure Gigaom - Gigaom

Evolution Health Partners with Dina for Employee COVID-19 Screening – HomeCare

CHICAGO (July 21, 2020)Evolution Health, a home health, hospice and infusion therapy provider, has selected Dinas new Staff Screening and Check-In solution to automate its employee wellness and health screening process.

Digital health care company Dina is an artificial intelligence-powered care coordination platform that recently expanded its product line to include employee engagement, health screening and remote patient monitoring solutions.

Evolution Healths family of companies has implemented Dinas Staff Screening and Check-In technology to remotely engage and monitor approximately 1,000 clinicians in four states, with plans to expand to the entire organization. Headquartered in Dallas, Evolution operates Guardian Healthcare, Millennium Health Care, Gem City Home Care, Care Connection of Cincinnati, and The Valley Health Home Care.

Developed in response to the spread of COVID-19, Dinas solution helps employers:

Between 10% and 20% of U.S. coronavirus cases are health care workers, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

These solutions fit with our mission of helping people age in place and stay safe and healthy at home, said Dina CEO Ashish V. Shah. This starts with keeping our professional caregivers healthy. We believe this will be critical well beyond COVID-19, as states introduce mandates for proactive health care worker safety.

Dinas screening and engagement tools are currently operating in 20 states and managing more than 300,000 daily check-ins for hospitals and home health agencies.

Dinas screening solution helps us create a safe work environment and a safe patient-care environment, said Tom Wilken, Evolutions Vice President of Human Resources. The tool automates what was a tedious paper record-keeping process and frees up our clinicians and operators to spend more time on patient care.

Visit dinacare.com for more information.

See the original post:

Evolution Health Partners with Dina for Employee COVID-19 Screening - HomeCare

What works of art can tell us about the evolution of food – DW (English)

With food pictures filling the internet, often under the attention-grabbing tagline of #foodporn, future generations will have no trouble knowing what we've been chowing down on in the 21st century.

Yet the trend of admiring food in an artistic context is nothing new. Artists began depicting food in paintings centuries ago. The painting "Obststand" by the Flemish painter Frans Snyders, for example, depicts an abundance of fruit, including apples, grapes, peaches and an unusual-looking half melon with a white interior, which recently caught the attention of researchers.

Researchers David Vergauwen and Ive De Smet look fruit and vegetables on canvas during museum visits in their quest to learn more about the origins of our fruits and vegetables

When art history meets biology

"This is what watermelons must have looked like back then," art historian David Vergauwen conjectured when he saw the painting hanging in the Hermitage art museum in St. Petersburg, Russia. His colleague, Ive De Smet, a professor of molecular biology, was skeptical and countered that perhaps Frans Snyders simply wasn't a particularly good painter. Vergauwen explained that Snyders was one of the best artists of the 17th century.

Intrigued, the researchers decided to investigate. "We agreed that there must be dozens of fruit and vegetable varieties with interesting developmental histories that we do not know in detail," said Vergauwen. They decided to combine their disparate fields of research biology and art history to trace the evolution of plant foods, from their wild beginnings to modern varieties.

Wild bananas with seeds? No, thanks!

Many of the plant-based foods we use in our kitchens today once looked completely different. Once wild, over the years they were domesticated, cultivated and adapted to suit our taste. Scientists have bred larger plants that bear more fruit, even making undesirable characteristics disappear over time by genetic modification. Wild bananas have large seeds, for example, something one will never find in the supermarket variety.

The researchers hope that the interdisciplinary approach will give them a concrete idea of what wild fruit and vegetable varieties might have looked like and how they might have developed over the years. Although tracing DNA can be very helpful in evolutionary research, it does not paint a clear picture of the past. "We may have part of the genetic code for certain ancient plants, but we often don't have well-preserved specimens," explains De Smet, who works at the Flemish Institute of Biotechnology in Ghent, Belgium.

Too abstract: Picasso's "Pitcher and fruit bowl"

This is where art history comes into play. Over the centuries, numerous artists have depicted plant foods, often in detail. With the help of works of art, scientists have gained insights into the domestication and color of carrots, the production of modern wheat, the cultivation of strawberries and the origin of watermelon, according to the journal Trends in Plant Science.

But the method also has its pitfalls. For example, the reliability of depictions in old paintings is questionable, says Vergauwen. "If, for example, we were to study the phenotype of fruits at the beginning of the 20th century on the basis of Pablo Picasso's Pitcher and Bowl of Fruit, we would probably draw false conclusions." Even the Old Masters could be misleading. Although Hieronymus Bosch's work Garten der Lste (The Garden of Earthly Delights, 1503-1515) correctly depicted the strawberry in its shape and color, the size was clearly disproportionate.

In Hieronymus Bosch's "Garden of Earthly Delights" strawberries are sometimes as big as people

It is up to art historians to determine which artists are reliable and why, explains Vergauwen. "If an artist painted a building that still stands today, or a musical instrument that still exists today, it is likely that he or she did the same with perishable food.

A new hashtag

In order to create an extensive database of fruit and vegetable artworks, Vergauwen and De Smet are now counting on the help of museums and art lovers around the world. "It's easy for us to go to European collections like the Louvre in Paris, but there are museums in Asia or Central and South America that could teach us a thing or two," said Vergauwen.

As a result, they have launched the hashtag #ArtGenetics and are calling on people around the world to tag the artworks that depict plant food to help them in their quest.

While it may not be as catchy as the popular #foodporn hashtag, it's sure to provide some appetizing results.

See the rest here:

What works of art can tell us about the evolution of food - DW (English)

In Cells and Whole Organisms, Repair Mechanisms Imply Foresight, Not Evolution – Discovery Institute

Photo credit: JC Gellidon via Unsplash.

Cells and organisms come pre-equipped with repair mechanisms. It takes foresight to make complex tools and procedures that can restore the functions of other tools. A blind process like evolution can only see the immediate present; it would be unconcerned about what happens next. Repair implies something worth saving. The more delicate the product, the more elaborate the maintenance. Life is worth saving and it is delicate. Logically, therefore, the persistence of life presupposes elaborate repair systems are at work. The following research findings show just how complex some of these repair mechanisms are.

Here is a kind of repair strategy that truly would require foresight. A skilled orthopedic surgeon can look at a broken bone and, through years of training, know that before setting it, he needs to make the break worse. In a compound fracture, for instance, bending the bone farther can allow splintered bones to be put back together. Additionally, assistants in the operating room can apply materials or medicines while the surgeon holds the fracture open. Something like that happens in the nucleus or our cells, scientists found at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. Sometimes, when something is broken, the first step to fixing it is to break it even more. A molecular machine named XPG could be dubbed an orthogenic surgeon (ortho- meaning straight).

We saw that XPG makes a beeline for discontinuous DNA places where the hydrogen bonds between bases on each strand of the helix have been disrupted and then it very dramatically bends the strand at that exact location, breaking the interface that connects bases stacked on top of each other, said Susan Tsutakawa, a structural biologist in the Biosciences Area at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and first author on the work, published this month in PNAS. The bending activity adds to an already impressive arsenal, as XPG was first identified as a DNA chopping enzyme, responsible for cutting out nucleotide bases with chemical and UV radiation damage. [Emphasis added.]

Natural selection would never do this. First of all, how would XPG recognize a problem that doesnt affect it directly, and how would it know to make a beeline for something elses problem? Then, if by some accident of chance it bent the DNA strand, how would it know how to perform the next surgical step? XPG would be out of a job, rushing toward discontinuous DNA like a blind driver on a demolition derby, breaking genes here and there, killing the organism by a thousand cuts. Instead, look what it does:

An unexpected finding from our imaging data is that the flexible parts of the protein which were previously impossible to examine have the ability to recognize perturbations associated with many different types of DNA damage, said co-author Priscilla Cooper, a biochemist senior scientist in the Biosciences Area. XPG then uses its sculpting properties to bend the DNA in order to recruit and load into place the proteins that can fix that type of damage.

The scientists call this a protein with many jobs that is more like a master sculptor than a demolition crew. Without XPG, a person can incur devastating symptoms of diseases. Some of these fatal syndromes caused by faulty XPG are described in the press release. Often single amino acid substitutions can destabilize the entire protein, they say. If that doesnt clinch the case for design, consider also that the Lawrence Berkeley team found that XPG cooperates with other repair machines like BRCA1 and BRCA2. An entire operating-room team has the foresight to perform orthogenic surgery on DNA. The Darwin-free paper is published in PNAS.1

The brain is busier than a city all the time, even in sleep. Amidst all the clamor, one issue cannot be overlooked: how to dispose of dead cells. A recent article at Evolution News described how the cellular morgue takes care of the problem. In the brain, it is even more vital to quickly eliminate dead cells. A team at Yale School of Medicine heard music inside the skull: they found that astrocytes and microglia perform orchestrated roles and respect phagocytic territories during neuronal corpse removal in the brain. Each player knows its part.

Cell death is prevalent throughout life; however, the coordinated interactions and roles of phagocytes during corpse removal in the live brain are poorly understood. We developed photochemical and viral methodologies to induce death in single cells and combined this with intravital optical imaging. This approach allowed us to track multicellular phagocytic interactions with precise spatiotemporal resolution. Astrocytes and microglia engaged with dying neurons in an orchestrated and synchronized fashion. Each glial cell played specialized roles: Astrocyte processes rapidly polarized and engulfed numerous small dendritic apoptotic bodies, while microglia migrated and engulfed the soma and apical dendrites. The relative involvement and phagocytic specialization of each glial cell was plastic and controlled by the receptor tyrosine kinase Mertk Thus, a precisely orchestrated response and cross-talk between glial cells during corpse removal may be critical for maintaining brain homeostasis.

Their research is published in Science Advances.2 This paper was also Darwin-free except for an opening pinch of incense in the first sentence, Cell death is an evolutionarily conserved and ubiquitous process a useless offering that contributes nothing to the science except to show that evolution was not observed.

Every human life has value, even those with genetic defects (and which human being does not suffer from several?). Whats important to the argument for intelligent design from foresight is how carefully the body practices preventative medicine on the developing embryo. Scientists at Caltech point out,

The first few days of embryonic development are a critical point for determining the failure or success of a pregnancy. Because relatively few cells make up the embryo during this period, the health of each cell is vital to the health of the overall embryo. But often, these young cells have chromosomal aneuploidies meaning, there are too many or too few chromosome copies in the cell. Aneuploid cells lead to the failure of the pregnancy, or cause developmental defects such as Down syndrome later in gestation.

Fortunately, these young embryos perform their own quality control before most genetic abnormalities become established:

Researchers have found that the prevalence of aneuploidy is drastically lower as the embryo grows and develops. Using mouse embryos, scientists from the laboratory of Magdalena Zernicka-Goetz, Caltechs Bren Professor of Biology and Biological Engineering, now show that this is because embryos are able to rid themselves of abnormal cells just before and soon after implantation into the uterus, thereby keeping the whole embryo healthy.

It is remarkable that embryos can do this, says Zernicka-Goetz. It reflects their plasticity that gives them the power to self-repair.

The scientists found a double-protection mechanism. Not only are aneuploid cells detected and eliminated, but healthy cells are stimulated to proliferate, compensating for the loss of unhealthy cells. The research paper, which also fails to give credit to evolution for this wonderful example of foresight and design, appeared in Nature Communications on June 11.3

Even plants, lacking eyes and brains, know how to repair damage. Plants have a handicap that makes repair more difficult: their repair teams cannot migrate to the site of the injury. Austrian scientists discovered a clever way that a plant can send repair enzymes to the rescue when a stem gets wounded.

Plants are sessile organisms that cannot evade wounding or pathogen attack, and their cells are encapsulated within cell walls, making it impossible to use cell migration for wound healing like animals. Thus, regeneration in plants largely relies on the coordination of targeted cell expansion and oriented cell division. Here we show in the root that the major growth hormone auxin is specifically activated in wound-adjacent cells, regulating cell expansion, cell division rates, and regeneration-involved transcription factor ERF115. These wound responses depend on cell collapse of the eliminated cells presumably perceived by the cell damage-induced changes in cellular pressure. This largely broadens our understanding of how wound responses are coordinated on a cellular level to mediate wound healing and prevent overproliferation.

The research is published in PNAS.4 Its satisfying to say, again, that their paper did not give any credit to evolution. This is one way design wins by default: the repeated failure by Darwinists to show up for the game constitutes abdication.

The concept of repair presupposes foresight.5 How would a blind, unguided process recognize a problem? Even if a working plant or animal were granted a hypothetical existence by evolution, the easiest thing for natural selection to do when a problem occurs is to let the organism die. Uncaring selection owes it no further existence. As these examples show (and there are many, many more), life comes equipped with repair teams that are even more complex than expected. It is remarkable that embryos can do this, Caltech scientists said. Yale scientists watched a precisely orchestrated response to cell death in the brain. Lawrence Berkeley scientists did not expect to see a master sculptor in the nucleus already known to have an impressive arsenal of abilities able to surgically straighten DNA before their eyes. These are the emotional responses of people astonished by design beyond their dreams. If they assume these wonders emerged by evolution, their silence about how it did so speaks volumes.

Continue reading here:

In Cells and Whole Organisms, Repair Mechanisms Imply Foresight, Not Evolution - Discovery Institute

Unsolved Mysteries Is a Story of American Television’s Evolution – The New Republic

Unsolved Mysteries was made in the opposite style. Its episodes spooled through schlocky reenactments done by actors (including Matthew McConaughey, in his first credited screen role), extracting maximum drama from minimal fact. One segment, building on the eras Satanic Panic, argued that a teenage boys suicide was a Dungeons and Dragonsbased murder plot. By the time home footage became a part of TVs language (Candid Camera, etc.), those who might have watched Unsolved Mysteries were switching to fiction: The X Files scooped up the UFO-enthusiast market as soon as it aired in 1993, and helped mold anti-government conspiracy speculation into its own entertainment genre. Unsolved Mysteriesa show that despite its fantastical mix of genres saw 260 of its featured cases later resolved, sometimes through viewer tips, according to The New York Timessimply didnt feel novel anymore.

Elsewhere on television, a new genre with a different and more compelling spin on blurring fact and fiction would soon undercut the whole mystery genre: reality TV. From Judge Judy to 1992s smash hit The Real World, American entertainment in the 1990s took all that was most engaging about mystery documentary shows (real personalities, real stakes, a constant revolving door of content) and made it personal. Where shows like Unsolved Mysteries or Forensic Files had run on a strange mix of voyeurism and altruism, with the viewer at home playing star witness, reality television would run on voyeurism alonewhile proving easier and less expensive to make than documentaries.

The rise of true crime in recent years makes a lot of sense when you consider how fragmented American nonfiction television programming had become by the end of the 2010s. In 2009, for example, when recession and the prospect of perpetual war were rocking the United States, viewers looking for real life content were offered bafflingly stylized, even surreal shows like Cops, Jersey Shore, Teen Mom, and Toddlers and Tiaras. Quality documentary television was rare.

The decades-long progression from reenactments to amateur video footage and reality TV is, in part, a history of what makes on-screen events seem true in U.S. television. But its also, in Netflixs hands, data for an ever-churning algorithma way of predicting the next success. The new Unsolved Mysteries feels precision-engineered for a 2020 audiencelong-form, detailed, and bingeablebut devoid of all the flair and atmosphere that made the original seem untrue and yet interesting to watch.

Now there is no presenter or voiceover, and each hourlong episode focuses on a single, reality-style mystery; more like the chilling, unbelievable truth of The Jinx than the swirling dry ice of The X Files. Of six episodes, five revolve around people whose mysterious deaths were never solved, and one is about a UFO sighting. We meet the families of murder victims, see photos of their lost beloveds, and in one case hear what its like to discover your own brothers body rotting in a rural ditch.

Shawn Levy, who made Arrival, Night at the Museum, and Stranger Thingsalso for Netflix, and also rooted in the genre we could call 1980s paranormalis the shows executive producer. In press notes distributed by Netflix, he wrote that his new program is very loyal to the things we all love about the [Unsolved Mysteries] brand, citing its blend of supernatural with criminal topics and his retention of the old theme tune.

This reference to the shows brand reveals something hollow at the core of the reboot, a kind of cynical nostalgia out of sync with todays sensibilities. The final episode, Missing Witness, for example, is about a young girl whose mother almost certainly killed her. The dead girls sister says to the camera that she will devote her life to bringing her mother to justice. The previous episode was all about a group of people who claim, without much evidence, to have seen an enormous unidentified aircraft in September 1961. That contrastbetween a murdered child and a spaceshipfeels much more jarring than similar contrasts in the original show, in part because this shows new framing is otherwise very serious and intimate. The shows chemistryits balance of light and dark, schlock and the human heartis just plain strange, as if some robot at Netflix HQ were commissioned to create the most engaging possible TV show but had his empathy screw left loose.

Being unable to choose one documentary approach and stick with it, the new Unsolved Mysteries turns out to be a curiously soulless product that will leave viewers suspecting that one of their basest instincts (voyeurism) has been exploited in the name of one of their noblest (the desire to solve crimes, after all, is also an instinct toward justice). Theres nothing more ethical or truthful about this show compared to its predecessorits production is simply truthier in style. Were all smarter, more suspicious consumers of true crime than we were five years ago; we know now that DNA testing is a highly politicized technology, for example, and that Netflix will happily play fast and loose with the facts if it rakes in more viewers. In todays world, where cold case files are more likely to lead to a conversation critiquing the criminal justice system than a tangent on alien abductions, Unsolved Mysteries smacks of yesterdays news.

See the rest here:

Unsolved Mysteries Is a Story of American Television's Evolution - The New Republic

Fear Revisited: The Thrilling Evolution of the ‘[REC]’ Quadrilogy – Bloody Disgusting

Its been five years since the stateside release of[REC] 4: Apocalypse, the closing entry to a standout franchise in modern horror. Starting with 2007s[REC], this unique quadrilogy shook up the zombie formula and proved just how effective found footage could be at delivering visceral terror; at least at the start.

As with most franchises, each subsequent entry released saw diminishing returns, but that doesnt speak to the creativity or innovative mythology created by filmmakers Jaume Balaguer and Paco Plaza. Looking back, the [REC] series took some daring risks and delivered a cohesive four-film series that evolved in surprising ways.

[REC]

The idea behind 2007s[REC] was born from Balaguer and Plazas desire not just to make a terrifying horror movie but to make the audience an active participant in the fear unfolding on screen. The aim was to attempt to capture the same level of terror fans get from playing a horror video game. So, they decided upon a familiar horror story told through a single camera, treated almost as its if a character itself, relaying the narrative in real-time.

Using that conceit, the film follows reporter ngela Vidal (Manuela Velasco) and her cameraman Pablo, played by unseen actor Pablo Rosso, as they cover the night shift of a local fire station for their television series While Youre Sleeping. What begins as a quiet, dull evening inside turns harrowing when the pair accompany firefighters lex (David Vert) and Manu (Ferrn Terraza) on a call for a domestic disturbance at an apartment building. There they find an incoherent, sickly woman that aggressively attacks an officer, and the event sparks a deadly outbreak that leaves them trapped thanks to an unexpected quarantine.

On paper, that sounds like a generic zombie setup that weve seen countless times before. What transpires, however, thanks to the found footage technique and sense of realism the filmmakers introduce here, is every bit of the visceral thrill ride Balaguer and Plaza intended. The handheld camera provides the necessary limitations not just in the viewers range of sight but in how much of the story we can absorb and when. Balaguer and Plaza envisioned video game levels of unrelenting dread, and they essentially created a rail shooter with the film.

The audience knows about as much as poor ngela knows, and we learn more about whats happening within the building as she does, all while dodging and fleeing from increasingly infected residents. That the infection sets in at different rates for different people gives an unpredictability that keeps everyone on their toes. The sense of realism comes from the naturalistic way these characters interact, talk, and behave. Thats no accident, either. Velasco, who would win a 2007 Goya for her performance, spent years as a TV presenter, which translated seamlessly to her character.

As effective as the scares are, what solidified[REC]as a modern horror classic is that it changes the rules and mythology of the zombie outbreak by way of one unnerving final act. All alone in the penthouse suite, sole survivors ngela and Pablo are desperate for a way out. They soon discover that theyve entered the den of the outbreaks source; an agent of the Vatican brought a possessed girl, Tristana Medeiros, there to isolate the demonic enzyme within her. It mutated and became contagious, so the agent sealed her up in the attic to die. She infects mice, which in turn spreads to a residents pet, and thus the outbreak is unleashed. [REC] concludes with one brilliant payoff, in which a ghoulish Tristana (Javier Botet) descends from the attic and drags a screaming ngela off into the pitch-black darkness.

[REC] 2

How do you top that in a sequel released two years later? By picking up almost immediately where[REC]s end credits began. 2009s[REC] 2, working more like a continuation than a traditional sequel, starts about fifteen minutes after its predecessor, this time following Dr. Hunt (Jonathan Mellor) and a GEO team sent into the quarantined apartment building to control the infection. Concurrently, the father of Jennifer (from the first film) persuades a firefighter to sneak him back into the building from an underground tunnel so he can bring her prescription medication. Curious teens follow them. All characters, at least the surviving ones, eventually converge and stumble upon a miraculously safe but shocked ngela.

This sequel sustains the same level of terror as the first film but expands the demonic mythology in exciting ways. Dr. Owen is secretly a priest sent from the Vatican for a blood sample. The infected are revealed to respond to prayer and crucifixes, like the possessed. More intriguingly is that the infected share a connection with the source demon, Tristana, whos taken up residence in plucky reporter turned survivor ngela. Tristana wants out, to freely spread her demonic contagion.

[REC] 2, stylistically and technically, is more of the same. But the clever ways Balaguer and Plaza expand the mythos and introduce multiple character perspectives keep things feeling fresh. The impressively sustained intensity goes a long way, too. Knowing this format wouldnt work three times in a row, the filmmakers shook up the franchise with big swings that proved polarizing.

[REC] 3: Genesis

For the third and fourth entry, the dynamic duo split custody of their horror baby. Plaza took on the immediate follow-up,[REC] 3: Genesis. In terms of timeline, Genesis overlaps with the first two films, set at a large church for the wedding of Clara (Leticia Dolera) and Koldo (Diego Martin). Among the hundreds attending is an uncle who happened to be the veterinarian of Jennifers infected pet dog referred to in[REC]. It turns out that infected dog bites take a little while to transform a human into a rabid monster, and Clara and Koldo are at least allowed to make it through their ceremony and well into their reception before all hell breaks loose.

The most obvious shift inGenesis is from found footage to traditional film. Its a move that polarized upon release, but its the perfect antidote to the age-old found footage question; why dont they just put down the camera? It makes sense for cameras to be involved at a wedding, to capture the events for memories sake, and interview the guests. Once thats done, the party is in full swing, and when deadly chaos erupts, well, no one attending is going to want to keep filming.

The second most apparent shift is in tone. Genesisbears more in common tonally withEvil Dead 2than[REC]. Its another polarizing move. The gore for an already gory franchise is dialed up to splatstick levels, especially as Clara shreds her dress to wield chainsaws more handily and Koldo dons armor in attempts to hack his way to his bride. Plaza never loses sight of the series mythos, though, including subtle nods like the news footage outside of the original films building in the background of individual shots. More overtly, the priest freezing the infected in place via loudspeaker prayer is a nice touch. All of which to say that this sequel deserves far more credit than it received upon release. Think of it more as a fun sidequel.

[REC] 4: Apocalypse

Balaguer took the reins for the final film,[REC] 4: Apocalypse. Picking up after the second film, Apocalypse opens with a thrilling scene that sees a special ops team rescue ngela and destroy the building. Shortly after, she and the teams survivors, Lucas (Crspulo Cabezas) and Guzman (Paco Manzanedo), wake on board a ship quarantined at sea. The doctors there are determined to find a cure by any means necessary, using ngela as a guinea pig. Naturally, the contagion has followed her, and the vessel descends into a claustrophobic nightmare.

Of all the films in this franchise,Apocalypse fared the worst critically and financially. Balaguer continued where Plaza left off, in terms of traditional filmmaking over handheld found footage, and some less than spectacular effects work Im looking at you, dumb zombie monkeys- left a lot to be desired. That Balaguer tended to shoot high action scenes with shaky camera work frustrated many as well.

The director did play around with expectations in a fun way, though. From the get-go, its expected that ngelas role remains the same as in the previous installment, which is that of a demon using its host to gain freedom. It becomes a waiting game to see precisely when ngela will drop her innocent faade and let Tristana loose. Its not until the final act that it becomes clear our plucky heroine regained her agency from the thrilling opening scene, with Tristana latching on to a more reliable host in Guzman. Its also worth noting that this entry allows ngela to have one of the more fulfilling Final Girl arcs of all time, going from scared bystander to villain to fierce survivor throughout three films.

Apocalypse wraps up with an epic action-heavy spectacle, resulting in ngela finally free from Tristanas hold once and for all. Naturally, it also ends with a tease that the Tristana worm lives on, somewhere in the oceans food chain, with the potential to wind up inside a human again. The box office returns, however, say that no one should expect any follow-up to that dangling thread.

Its hard not to wonder what the reception wouldve been like forApocalypsehad it been a standalone release unaffiliated with the high standard of the[REC]series. Its heavily flawed, but its still a solid effort. At least compared to many other zombie films.

Each installment plays like an experiment for the filmmakers; the first two films are experiments in visceral, unrelenting horror, the third Plaza considered to be his adventure film, and the final movie goes full-throttle on the action. Its worth noting that they manage to be cohesive narratively throughout all the tonal shifts, style changes, and narrative expansions. Whether the latter half of the series works for you or not, I appreciate the risks taken and that Balaguer and Plaza understood they couldnt keep attempting to duplicate the success of the first film every single time.

Its been thirteen years since [REC]shook up horror, and only five since the quadrilogy concluded, but its a series I foresee creating great discussion and analysis for years to come.

Link:

Fear Revisited: The Thrilling Evolution of the '[REC]' Quadrilogy - Bloody Disgusting

Meet the man whos been behind nearly every evolution of the fund industry for two decades – MarketWatch

To call him financial services Forrest Gump might be a stretch, but Carlos Diez has been behind the scenes of just about every big fund-industry pivot for the past two decades. At the height of the dot-com boom, he saw the business opportunity of a growing consumer class interested in investing, then, a few years later, anticipated the future in indexing.

Hes had some crummy timing, though: It took so long to get his firm, MarketGrader, off the ground that the dot-com bubble popped and the U.S. entered a bear market. Several years later, an asset manager launched a suite of funds based on MarketGrader indexes. That was in October 2007 just as the cracks were starting to form in the global financial system, and at the very peak of that market cycle.

Diez says hes learned from the downs as well as the ups, and hes humble about it: The funds were closed in March 2009, just as the longest bull market in history was starting up. In the following decade, those indexes outperformed their benchmarks, returning 374%, compared to 318% for the S&P 500 SPX, +0.16% .

MarketWatch spoke with Diez about his career starting new things, and then starting again, as well as what hes thinking about now. The interview that follows has been edited for clarity.

MarketWatch: Could you share your biography?

Carlos Diez: I actually started the company right out of college. I went to college in California and graduated in 1999, so I went through all the dot-com experiences as a student. A lot of buddies of mine in college were, quote-unquote, investing in the stock market. I remember teammates on my soccer team would come and say, I bought this or that, and I would say what do they do? They would say I have no idea, but theyre up 30%.

I thought I could build a tool that would help investors understand what theyre buying. That was the genesis of MarketGrader. It took a little bit longer than I thought to get all the pieces together. And there was a big bear market that affected our launch plans. When we launched, in 2003, we started research for some institutions, some sell-side, some investment banks, and in parallel to that we started building our indexes. It was accidental, if you will. We were putting out ratings on companies in the U.S. and Canada and only 15% of companies were a buy, and people said, whats going on here? So we said, lets build a model portfolio of the best companies in MarketGrader. We didnt want to overweight the largest companies because we saw what happened in the late 1990s and early 2000s. So it was the 40 best companies in MarketGrader, equally weighted, and we rebalanced every six months. Dumb luck had it that that happened to be a banner year for stocks, so we did very well. This was well before smart beta and things that are so hot today.

We had built a good relationship with (asset manager) London & Capital and plowed head-on into the ETF space. I had always thought ETFs were going to be the next big thing in the space. We launched our first ETFs in October 2007 at the very top of the market. We rode the 2008-2009 market down and eventually the company (closed the funds). That was a big hit to our business.

Concurrently, we were developing a relationship with Dow Jones. We met the editors of Barrons in 2004. At the time, Barrons online was a novel product. Barrons wanted to find a tool that rated stocks like we did to complement their writers analysis. We built a tool called StockGrader to go alongside the new Barrons.com that launched in 2005. And because we were having success in the index business, we met with Dow Jones Indexes in 2007 and created the Barrons 400. (MarketWatch note: an ETF based on the index, the Barrons 400 ETF BFOR, +0.85% , launched in 2013.)

About six years ago, we really started focusing on building out our company globally. We were particularly focused on Asia, specifically China. I started visiting China in 2004-05, and we built a family of A-share indexes there. CSI (China Securities Index Co.) is owned by the two stock exchanges which are, by extension, owned by the state. We co-created two indexes that they started publishing and eventually we licensed one to VanEck in Australia, which has been doing really well. That was the beginning of our global expansion. VanEck in New York converted two of their ETFs to use MarketGrader benchmarks, one on China and one on India.

Related:The man behind Case-Shiller on why the housing index has no Houston and why thats no problem

MarketWatch: Can we go back to the October 2007 launch, and could you just talk a little about your feelings about being at the mercy of timing?

Diez: A few years ago, that was a big source of frustration for me personally and professionally. I felt like we were on our way and things happened that we couldnt control, not just a huge market event, but the fact that our client decided to exit the business. It was very frustrating. But now in hindsight, it was actually a good experience. I know that might sound masochistic, but we learned a lot. We learned about how to get involved and when not to get involved in the development of products, and how important it is, if someone goes out to offer an investment product to a client, its as important for the provider of that fund to know theres a match between the two as it is for the seller of the fund. If you sell someone a long-term capital appreciation strategy but the client is maybe focused on making money in the next couple of weeks or jumping on a bandwagon that might be doing well, its bound to wind up disappointing the client. We learned a lot about that process. Were not a product provider but weve try to work very closely with them London & Capital, VanEck and ALPS (the distributor of the Barrons 400 ETF.)

From a company-specific perspective, to be honest, in those early years we were doing fairly well and growing organically and thought that could continue, so we never sought a bigger partnership or more capital from a larger institution, we thought we could do it alone. In hindsight that was a mistake. Its important to have the capital and the right partners. We were flying on our own.

MarketWatch: Has that changed?

Diez: We have taken on more capital from our existing investors, not from a larger institution. But thats something that might happen at some point. In China specifically, we are making a concerted effort to find a partner, because for us to have success in China, although were fairly well-known, for us to go it alone in China is very difficult, almost impossible All the negative things you hear about, in terms of access for foreign firms, those are all very real.

MarketWatch: You didnt mention this much, but Ive heard from other people that you were pretty early to the idea of smart beta, even though some other companies, like Research Affiliates, have gotten a lot more attention for their work on it.

Diez: It was partly accidental, but we did feel that it was important to offer investors something different than what was out there, meaning purely market-cap-weighted stocks in indexes. At the time, people thought stock selection in passive strategies was anathema. Theyd say, oh, it goes against our creed. But I thought our process was transparent and it worked well, and you could call it an index because it was not one person selecting stocks. It was just an index that behaved differently.

We had latched on to London & Capital and we were a small company, growing, and they were opening up opportunities for us. Why not ride that opportunity while it lasted? So obviously things played out differently and thats why people dont know about us being in it early. Rafi has a very strong product. Very shrewdly and very smartly, rather than becoming a product company, they said, were going to license this and you can brand them your own thing, whether Pimco or Schwab or whatever. I think that was genius. I attribute a lot of their success as much to that as much as to the methodology.

MarketWatch: One of the biggest issues in the ETF ecosphere has to do with intellectual property. How do you think about that?

Diez: Long and hard. (Laughs.) I think about that often and I think, more than someone taking your idea and replicating it, theres also the risk, especially nowadays, of someone taking your message and taking ownership of it, even if the underlying exposure isnt as good as yours. In the early days of an ETF launch, the perception is just as important as reality. A lot of companies have the resources to go out and blast out a message that maybe might not be as much a part of their DNA as it is yours. At the end of the day, what matters is the perception from investors. Thats the biggest challenge for us, the ability to communicate is what allows people to try you out and test what youre offering.

I spend a lot of my time helping my clients. VanEck is the perfect example. Theyre a very good client to work with, and theres a lot of overlap between our views and theirs, especially on emerging markets and on China. They see the value that MarketGrader brings to the table but theyre big enough that they have the resources to do things their way. But they dont want to have another me-too product out there. Theyd rather have something that they think is unique, and Id like to think thats what they see in us.

MarketWatch: We talked a lot about your interest in China, but whats the next-next thing?

Diez: From a country-regional perspective, I think whats happening in China will continue to be front and center for some time. Weve made a strong case for investors having a good exposure to China, being there for a long time. It would be a mistake not to, in our opinion. But separate from that, based on whats happened geopolitically, theres been a clear separation of economies and markets which will continue. I dont think there is going to be a full disengagement between the U.S. and China, but were starting to see some countries pushing back on some of the things China has done. India (which just banned dozens of Chinese mobile apps), for example. The U.K. announced Huawei (will be excluded from its 5G wireless network).

That will have repercussions for investors. I think there will be an opportunity to build exposures around those themes. I feel strongly about growth in some Asian countries besides China, and I think investors may choose to invest in those. I think the indexes and products out there still leave room for companies like us to build products that are differentiated.

Read next:Coronavirus was the perfect storm for tech innovation, and this fund manager made out

The rest is here:

Meet the man whos been behind nearly every evolution of the fund industry for two decades - MarketWatch