Oregon’s Euthanasia Bill Is Intentionally Ambiguous – National Review

Savagery can be subtle.

Oregon, which in 1997 became the first state in the U.S. to legalize assisted suicide, is considering tweaking the laws surrounding advance directives, the legal documents by means of which a person can dictate ahead of time his desires for end-of-life care. The innocuous-seeming changes that Senate Bill 494 proposes would permit the state to starve certain patients to death.

Under current state law, artificially administered nutrition and hydration intravenous feeding by tubes does not include food administered normally: by cup, hand, bottle, drinking straw or eating utensil. The latter category, unlike the former, is considered part of the basic provision of care required for the sick, and required by law as long as the patient is mentally incompetent to say otherwise.

In 2016, Bill Harris of Ashland, Ore., asked a state court to order a nursing facility to stop providing food and water to his wife, Nora, who suffers from Alzheimers disease. Nora could no longer communicate and had lost use of her fine-motor skills, making it impossible for her to use utensils, so the facility had begun spoon-feeding her. According to the nursing facility, Nora continued to choose whether she wanted to eat or not, and the facility never coerced her. Nonetheless, her husband maintained that when she stated in her advance directive that she did not want artificial nutrition, she intended all forms of feeding.

The courts decided against Bill Harris, but S.B. 494, introduced last month and currently under consideration in committee, would reshape the law to suit him. The bill removes the statutory definition of tube feeding and life support, and replaces the word desires with preferences. To the requirement in its advance-directive forms that my healthcare representative must follow my instructions, the bill adds: to the extent appropriate. It also removes the statutory definition of health care instruction.

These understated changes are intended to create interpretive ambiguity. Under the amended bill, would Nora Harriss rejection of artificial nutrition and hydration include being fed by a nurse at her bedside? Even though she is conscious, willful, and able to eat, does continuing to feed her constitute life support? Under S.B. 494, these questions would be left up to the courts, or to regulatory bodies such as the Advance Directive Rules Adoption Committee, which the bill creates ex nihilo. The committees members would be appointed by the governor and have sole authority to revise the states advance-directive forms that is, to continue the subversive work of the legislature without meaningful oversight.

The state of Oregon is, in a word, making it easier for the state of Oregon to kill its most vulnerable citizens.

It seems of little interest to the states legislators that their enterprise is a reversal of the states purpose to protect the preexisting right to life, not to bestow that right on citizens of its choosing. Likewise, Oregons legislators seem little concerned with the possibility that the expansion of a governments claim to its citizens lives accrues a momentum of its own; there is a straight line between this bill and a recent incident in the Netherlands, where the family of a dementia patient held her down as she resisted euthanasia.

But it is worse. Having destroyed the professional oath to which doctors are bound, Oregon would destroy the basic ethic of care that is the mark of a humane society the expectation that says to tend the sick, to clothe the naked, to shelter the homeless. I was hungry and you gave me food. Under the auspices of a false mercy, Oregon would demand the opposite: to greet Nora Harris, or someone like her a person who is conscious, who is mobile, who expresses emotion and harbors desires and to reject her. Human beings meet each other in the recognition of mutual vulnerability. Oregon would craft a society only for the strong.

That has been attempted before, of course, many times, and it has effected only more brutality. Weakness, by contrast, is an occasion for love to reveal itself, unfolding in a moment of grace. No suffering can entirely occlude this hope. In the final accounting, life is always and everywhere good, and so it is where it is most vulnerable that it demands the fiercest defense.

Ian Tuttle is the Thomas L. Rhodes Fellow at the National Review Institute.

More:

Oregon's Euthanasia Bill Is Intentionally Ambiguous - National Review

FDA confirms euthanasia agent pentobarbital in dog food | Food … – Food Safety News

Pet owners warned to avoid certain Evangers and Against the Grain dog food By Phyllis Entis | February 17, 2017

The Food and Drug Administration is advising pet owners and pet caretakers not to feed their pets with certain lots of Evangers and Against the Grain dog food after confirming the presence of the euthanasia agent pentobarbital in both products.

Following discussions with FDA, Evangers announced a voluntary recall Feb. 3 of five lots of its 12-ounce Hunk of Beef canned dog food, all with an expiration date of June 2020: 1816E03HB, 1816E04HB, 1816E06HB, 1816E07HB, and 1816E13HB.

At least five dogs became ill after eating the Evangers food. One of them died.

On Feb. 9 Against the Grain voluntarily recalled lot number 2415E01ATB12, BEST DEC 2019, of its Grain Free Pulled Beef with Gravy dog food after the FDA detected pentobarbital in it. The Pulled Beef with Gravy was manufactured in the same facilities as Evangers products and using beef from the same supplier.

In addition to the presence of pentobarbital, FDA reports a bill of lading from Evangers supplier of Inedible Hand Deboned Beef For Pet Food Use Only. Not Fit for Human Consumption. This is despite Evangers claim that the beef in its Hunk of Beef product came from a USDA approved supplier.

FDA also has determined that the suppliers facility does not have a grant of inspection from USDAs Food Safety and Inspection Service. The meat from the supplier does not bear a USDA inspection mark and would not be considered human grade. Lab testing by USDA of Evangers Hunk of Beef confirmed that the meat in the product was beef.

Other issues cited in a preliminary investigation report, an FDA Form 483, released today by FDA included evidence of unsanitary conditions, inadequate refrigeration, improper storage and inadequate control of ambient temperature during hand-packing operations at Evangers Wheeling, IL, facility and unsanitary conditions and avian activity at its Markham, IL, manufacturing location.

FDAs investigation is ongoing and will include examination of the suppliers of beef to Evangers and Against the Grain to determine the source of the pentobarbital. The agency is coordinating with USDA to address possible areas of shared jurisdiction.

Consumers with cans of the recalled product should refer to the Evangers and Against the Grain recall notices for information on returning the product.

(To sign up for a free subscription to Food Safety News, click here.)

More Headlines from Enforcement

Read the original here:

FDA confirms euthanasia agent pentobarbital in dog food | Food ... - Food Safety News

Brigit Forsyth on euthanasia, internet dating and whether she’d consider Likely Lads revival – ChronicleLive

Likely Lads star Brigit Forsyth has revealed her GP grandfather helped dying patients end their lives - and that she supports euthanasia.

Brigit is playing a terminally ill musician in her latest venture, so perhaps it is that which sparked her bare all interview.

The star, who played Thelma Harris in Whatever Happened To The Likely Lads? disclosed that her grandad helped patients end their lives.

Her mother, Anne, told her that Dr Noel Forsyth carried out a long line of mercy killings.

The actress says: I know for a fact, and Im sure its true of all doctors at the time, he bumped off probably loads of people with doses of morphine.

When they were having a horrific death from cancer or something, in terrible pain.

He would just up the morphine and then they died. I dont see anything wrong with that. Hed be called a murderer today, but thats what people were doing.

The law says youre not allowed to help people get off this planet. Well, I think it probably needs to be looked at.

Brigit was delivered by her grandfather, who brought hundreds of infants into the world during the time he practised, from around 1906 up to his death in 1948.

But she believes Dr Forsyth also helped hundreds of people to die, in and around the town of Malton, North Yorkshire.

He probably did. But surely its better people go nicely than have a horrible, strung-out death.

I think its terrific that he did that. I think euthanasia is a very good idea. To me, its a nightmare if youre kept going as a sort of vegetable, or in pain.

Is it so bad to say, I cant walk, I cant see, I cant hear so Id like to get off this planet now. I would take myself off to Dignitas . I would make it very clear that was what I wanted.

Brigit, 76, spoke about euthanasia as she was preparing to star as a dying musician in Killing Time, which is now playing in London.

Discussing death also prompted another revelation, this time about her late husband, the TV director Brian Mills.

After they wed in 1975, he became an alcoholic, which destroyed their marriage and eventually killed him in 2006, aged 72.

For the first time, Brigit says it was his addiction that led to her walking out on him in 1999.

She said: I woke up one morning and I thought, Im going to have to go. I never, ever thought I would leave him and it was awful. But it was the right thing to do.

I would have stayed if hed gone for help. But he didnt want to stop drinking. He didnt think there was a problem. You cant live with it I couldnt.

We had some super laughs before the booze kicked in. He was such a lovely guy and the humour was terrific.

But its just heartbreaking, it completely alters peoples personalities.

After I left we became friends. We never divorced, we just separated. He was still my husband when he died. I thought, We dont need to do that. I just dont want to live with him anymore.

The couple had a son, Ben, and daughter, Zoe, and Brigit now has grandchildren.

But despite having her family around her, she still mourns the loss of a partner.

I never thought Id be in my 70s and not have a partner. Thats the sad bit, but Ive got used to it, she reveals.

Brigit feels the absence of a man particularly keenly as she hasnt lost her sex drive.

Things do change. Im talking about sex, she says. It fades, but not entirely.

Theres still a bit of me thats still ticking. I see a lot of men and think, I wouldnt kick you out of bed. And if Brad Pitt turned up on my doorstep, I wouldnt close the door. Id invite him in for a drink.

Brigit has tried internet dating, but its yet to prove successful.

My daughter and niece made me do it. I never would have done it by myself, she admits.

Unfortunately, Ive met some boring old sods who just want to talk about themselves.

But while she may not have an active love life, Brigits works keeps her busy.

Along with Killing Time, shes currently on TV screens as Madge in BBC Ones Still Open All Hours. Born in 1940, she trained at the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art in London.

She starred in TV drama Adam Smith, where she met Brian, in 1972.

A year later she got her big break, as Thelma in the hit BBC sitcom, Whatever Happened To The Likely Lads?, which ran from 1973 to 1974, with a film in 1976.

Since then, shes been in everything from Boon and Poirot to Coronation Street and Holby City. On stage, shes starred in Calendar Girls and Single Spies, Alan Bennetts acclaimed stage show, in which she played the Queen.

But would she consider taking part in a revival of Whatever Happened To The Likely Lads?

She replies: I cant imagine wanting to play Thelma again. It was wonderful for its time and its the reason why Im still working today. Theyre obsessed with bringing stuff back. I think its because theyre terrified of not having a hit. But they should explore new material, because theres loads of talented people out there.

Speaking of talented people, Brigits daughter, Zoe Mills, is both the author of Killing Time and her co-star in the show. Brigit plays the terminally ill former cellist, Hester, while Zoe takes on the role of her social worker.

And, despite the dark subject matter, the play is actually a comedy.

Brigit explains: Theres this woman is a feisty ex-musician whos very sorted about it all. She thinks, Oh well Im dying, so what?. But everybody around her is saying, Oh dear, it must be awful for you. But these two women gradually form a very prickly friendship and thats where the comedy comes from, which was a huge relief.

Because I was worried about it simply being advertised as a play about a woman dying because I thought, People need this like a hole in the head.

Killing Time is on at the Park Theatre, Finsbury Park, London, until March 4.

Read more here:

Brigit Forsyth on euthanasia, internet dating and whether she'd consider Likely Lads revival - ChronicleLive

Pauline Hanson and Derryn Hinch get riled up about euthanasia – Starts at 60

Pauline Hanson and Derryn Hinch launched emotional arguments in favour of euthanasia, describing the relief it would have given to their families.

The senators were speaking during a debate on a private members bill that would cut federal interference with laws in the territories on assisted suicide, The Daily Telegraph reported.

She weighed about 30 kilos, and looked like a Biafran refugee, Hinch revealed of his mothers appearance as she suffered from lung cancer 26 years ago. Hinch himself has fought liver cancer.

Hanson, meanwhile, spoke of watching the impact on her father of Parkinsons disease, The Daily Telegraph wrote.

We have more compassion for animals than we do for people, Hanson said,adding that euthanasia opponents had never watched a family member lose the ability to care for themselves.

The private members bill would allow the Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory legislative powers to bring in assisted suicide and repeal the Euthanasia Laws Act 1997 that prevents them from doing so.

The Restoring Territory Rights (Dying with Dignity) Bill 2016was brought by Greens leader Richard Di Natale. Announcing the bill in August, Di Natale said: Dying with dignity is a social justice issue, its a human rights issue, its a public health issue and it should not be pushed to the political margins.

Hinch and Hanson have been vocal in their support for euthanasia for some time.

Hansons One Nation party has a policy advocating euthanasia, that proposes any person of voting age be permitted to have a document written up that appoints two people as executors who could carry out that persons wish for assisted suicide should they be unable to take action themselves.

I and only I, will determine when my time is up and if I am not in a position to do so, then loved ones of my choosing will, Hanson has written of the policy.

Hinch has argued in the past that the right to decide on ones time of death was robbing older Australians of their dignity.

Being deprived of the legal right to decide that their quality of life has deteriorated to such an extent that they want to say goodbye, he has written of the current laws.

See the original post here:

Pauline Hanson and Derryn Hinch get riled up about euthanasia - Starts at 60

Hanson, Hinch launch passionate arguments for euthanasia law – Starts at 60

Pauline Hanson and Derryn Hinch launched emotional arguments in favour of euthanasia, describing the relief it would have given to their families.

The senators were speaking during a debate on a private members bill that would cut federal interference with laws in the territories on assisted suicide, The Daily Telegraph reported.

She weighed about 30 kilos, and looked like a Biafran refugee, Hinch revealed of his mothers appearance as she suffered from lung cancer 26 years ago. Hinch himself has fought liver cancer.

Hanson, meanwhile, spoke of watching the impact on her father of Parkinsons disease, The Daily Telegraph wrote.

We have more compassion for animals than we do for people, Hanson said,adding that euthanasia opponents had never watched a family member lose the ability to care for themselves.

The private members bill would allow the Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory legislative powers to bring in assisted suicide and repeal the Euthanasia Laws Act 1997 that prevents them from doing so.

The Restoring Territory Rights (Dying with Dignity) Bill 2016was brought by Greens leader Richard Di Natale. Announcing the bill in August, Di Natale said: Dying with dignity is a social justice issue, its a human rights issue, its a public health issue and it should not be pushed to the political margins.

Hinch and Hanson have been vocal in their support for euthanasia for some time.

Hansons One Nation party has a policy advocating euthanasia, that proposes any person of voting age be permitted to have a document written up that appoints two people as executors who could carry out that persons wish for assisted suicide should they be unable to take action themselves.

I and only I, will determine when my time is up and if I am not in a position to do so, then loved ones of my choosing will, Hanson has written of the policy.

Hinch has argued in the past that the right to decide on ones time of death was robbing older Australians of their dignity.

Being deprived of the legal right to decide that their quality of life has deteriorated to such an extent that they want to say goodbye, he has written of the current laws.

Here is the original post:

Hanson, Hinch launch passionate arguments for euthanasia law - Starts at 60

Law students accuse Medical Council of twisting their euthanasia arguments – MaltaToday

'As harsh as it may seem, an educated debate on euthanasia requires us to look at facts...which include aspects such as its economical effects on health services'

The Medical Council on Tuesday criticised the students report, which found that 69% of university students agreed with euthanasia as proof that the younger generation view euthanasia as a foregone conclusion.

The students were also taken to task by government Whip Godfrey Farrugia and Opposition MP Robert Cutajar for including in their policy paper economic arguments in favour of euthanasia, namely as a cost control on the public health system.

The MaltaToday stand on euthanasia | A question of dignity

As with a very large number of social issues that tend to upend the apple cart, the moral aspect on euthanasia has been widely documented and seemingly never-ending, as the rest of this policy paper tries to explain in detail, the reports introduction to the economic argument reads.

However, at the committee session, the two MPs strongly warned the law students that economic arguments can never be used to justify ending human life.

However, GHSL president Jacob Portelli told MaltaToday that the organisation had not taken a stance in favour or against euthanasia, but merely analyzed the possible impact of the legalization of euthanasia in Malta.

As harsh as it may seem, an educated and serious debate on this subject requires us to look at facts, to look at the reality of things of, which unfortunately include certain aspects such as the economical effect euthanasia will have, he said. As students, as an organisation and as possible future law makers we must not shy away from debating on issues such as these.

In a survey amongst 313 university students, a vast majority of 69% said they agreed with the introduction of voluntary euthanasia. 28 students (9.8%) disagreed, while the rest (21%) said maybe. Those who disagreed mainly said that euthanasia ran counter to their religious faith, or that it was a form of direct killing.

Students hold euthanasia debate

Earlier today, the University Students Council held a debate amongst students on campus on whether euthanasia should be legalised, reported on by student media group Insite.

University students hold a debate on euthanasia on campus

We are told to take charge of life, so why are we then condemned when we take charge of death too? she asked.

John Navarro from Gender Equality Malta said that euthanasia should be legalised, warning that people who are denied that option are likely to commit suicide.

However, Jef Cuschieri from the University Bible Group warned that euthanasia will give doctors permission to murder people, and run counter to Gods will and the sanctity of life.

Jean-Claude Schembri from the theology students association said that a dignified death is one in which the person is supported by their loved ones and a caring society till the end.

Ultimately what we all need is the resilience to find meaning in the suffering we can do little about.

Read more:

Law students accuse Medical Council of twisting their euthanasia arguments - MaltaToday

More dog food recalled because it may contain euthanasia drug … – Q13 FOX

From FDA.gov.

WASHINGTON D.C. A second brand of dog food has been recalled because it might contain a drug that is used to put dogs down.

Against the Grain Pet Food is voluntarily recalling one lot of Against the Grain Pulled Beef with Gravy Dinner for Dogs in 12-ounce cans, the U.S. Food and Drug Administrationsaid. The food may contain pentobarbital, a drugthat is commonly used to put dogs down.

The FDA says the food was manufactured and distributed in Washington state and Maryland back in 2015. The food was distributed to independent pet retail stores.

The food is no longer on store shelves. However, it has a best by date of December 2019.

This is the second dog food recall in recent weeksdue to the presence of pentobarbital. An Illinois pet food company voluntarily recalled one of their products after the powerful sedative sickened five dogs and killed another. According to the Seattle Times, the dog killed after ingesting the food lived in Washington state.

Against the Grain can be reached at 708-566-4410 for questions on the recall.

Go here to read the rest:

More dog food recalled because it may contain euthanasia drug ... - Q13 FOX

Medical Council against euthanasia: ‘We don’t want youths euthanising their grandparents’ – MaltaToday

'Patients have a changing journey of hope throughout their illnesses and their positions on euthanasia will be in a state of flux'

Philip Borg, David Muscat and Doreen Cassar of the Medical Council address MPs

Patients suffering can be cared for through palliative care, and therefore we believe that euthanasia cannot be considered an option, council member David Muscat said. Patients have a changing journey of hope throughout their illnesses and their positions on euthanasia will be in a state of flux. It is the patient who is at his or her most vulnerable, and prudence must be the virtue that guides the doctors actions.

The Medical Council is a legally-instituted body that promotes public health and standards in the medical and dental professions. The Council was invited to address a joint parliamentary committee debating euthanasia, that will now draft a report after hearing several witnesses. At the end of the session, government Whip Godfrey Farrugia and Opposition MP Robert Cutajar both confirmed that their respective parties are fully opposed to euthanasia.

The joint committee wrapped up its debate on euthanasia today

It is scary that there are some youths who already looking at euthanasia as a foregone conclusion, he said, referring to a policy paper on the subject by the law students association. We are in favour of life in all its forms and if we start deciding when people should be killed and when they shouldnt, then we will effectively be sending out a message that medical services are ultimately useless because sooner or later we will all reach that moment.

Fellow council member Doreen Cassar similarly warned that Malta risks going down a slippery slope if it legalises euthanasia, arguing that health professionals in other countries are being encouraged to look at euthanasia in terms of its economic benefit to the national health services.

I want to live, but I respect everyones opinions Bjorn Formosa

The MPs also had a brief telephone conversation with Bjorn Formosa, the 30-year-old ALS sufferer and activist who has frequently expressed his desire to remain alive for as long as possible.

Sometimes the problems are exacerbated because the patients dont have people to look after them, or they lack the necessary health structures or finances to treat their illnesses. For example, ALS patients have to spend over 100,000 a year in treatment, he said.

Godfrey Farrugia questioned whether he believes the state should fork out the costs for ALS treatment, noting that it already pays 300,000 a year to store extremely rare blood types.

I am not privy to the health ministrys budget, but of course it would be ideal and easier if treatment was paid for by the state, Formosa responded.

The Institute of Maltese Journalists also gave a presentation, with its chairman Karl Wright warning that journalists should avoid sensationalising stories related to euthanasia and suicide. TVM broadcaster Norma Saliba said that journalists should strive to educate the public over the facts on euthanasia and seek variousopinions.

The Law Students Association (GHSL) presented a policy paper, outlining its view on how euthanasia should be legalised without coming out in favour or against it. The paper included a survey amongst 313 university students, in which 69% said they agreed with euthanasia.

Read the original:

Medical Council against euthanasia: 'We don't want youths euthanising their grandparents' - MaltaToday

Another company issues recall after euthanasia drug found in dog … – KATU

Another company has issued a voluntary recall after a drug sometimes used to euthanize pets was found in one of its batches.

Against the Grain pet food announced the recall of one lot of their Pulled Beef with Gravy dinner for dogs that was manufactured and distributed in 2015.

Pentobarbital, a drug that is often used to euthanize pets, was found in lot number 2415E01ATB12 (the second half of the UPC code is 80001, which can be found on the back of the product label) with an expiration date of December 2019.

If a pet consumes Pentobarbital, they could experience side effects like dizziness, excitement, nausea, inability to stand and coma. In some occasions, it could lead to death.

No complaints have been filed to Against the Grain about the food.

Earlier this month, Evanger's issued a similar voluntary recall after Pentobarbital was found in a batch of their food. A Washington woman said Evanger's Hunk of Beef sickened her pugs, even killing one of them.

Go here to read the rest:

Another company issues recall after euthanasia drug found in dog ... - KATU

Euthanasia’s march Down Under – Catholic Herald Online (blog)

Stories of suffering are the currency use to validate assisted suicide (Getty)

A coalition of academics, journalists and celebrities is trying to convince Australians that legalisation is overdue. But were fighting back

The internationally renowned psychiatrist and Holocaust survivor Viktor Frankl experienced first hand the utter depravity of Auschwitz and Dachau. He knew the immense physical torment, psychological torture and spiritual desolation of those most inhuman of places. They were not called death camps for figurative effect.

Suicide was not unknown among those sent there to suffer grievously and die. Yet, strikingly, Frankl writes in his autobiographical study, Mans Search for Meaning, of the obligation fellow inmates accepted to frustrate such occurrences: A very strict camp ruling forbade any efforts to save a man who attempted suicide Therefore, it was all-important to prevent these attempts from occurring.

In naming the reason for this paramount calling, Frankl said: When a man finds that it is his destiny to suffer, he will have to accept his suffering as his task; his single and unique task His unique opportunity lies in the way in which he bears his burden.

As words such as compassion and dignity and care become (mis)appropriated by advocates for legalising euthanasia and assisted suicide (EAS), I have often thought of Frankls enduring insight that human life is essentially a quest for meaning. Advocates of legalised EAS seem unable to grasp the deep meaning to be discovered by a person in that uniquely human project of embracing what Frankl called the wider cycles of life and death, of suffering and of dying.

It is realistic to acknowledge that some individuals, in the midst of their own mortal suffering, will seek out euthanasia, and that others will be willing to assist in that desperate act. God only knows and only God can judge the existential torment that might overwhelm a person, and their loved ones, as they suffer in dying. But when societies start to legislate for this, when they actively chose killing over living as the better way, then much will be lost of our common human project. Legalising EAS is a society giving up on its own people.

Unlike in Britain, where debate happens on a national level, the question of legalising EAS in Australia is a state-based issue. This is because healthcare is the responsibility of the eight states and territories, and not the single Commonwealth. Consequentially, there is a rolling debate on euthanasia across the country, depending on which parliament is considering legislative action at any particular time. The parliament of South Australia, for example, has recently defeated (by a single vote) the 13th attempt at legalising EAS. The State of Tasmania has had several goes at pushing through legalisation. A cross-party bill will be considered in the parliament of New South Wales this year, and parliamentary advocates in Queensland and Western Australia are testing the waters. This creates difficulties in rallying resources and people to counter such developments.

The major battleground, however, is Victoria. It is in this state that, for the first time, a government-sponsored bill will be tabled in the second half of this year, following a parliamentary inquirys recommendation to legalise EAS.

Who is supporting this move? There is a socially liberal disposition among many academics and the media, which is being encouraged by a handful of celebrity campaigners and supported by some professional bodies of medical practitioners.

EAS is spoken of by these advocates as a step forward, overdue and an idea whose time has come. It is presented as the morally decent thing to do, demanding of those who resist change the justification of their unenlightened position. Those who do not support EAS are quickly dismissed as either religiously motivated or doctrinaire.

It is telling that this most basic question of our common humanity is couched by EAS advocates in bygone sectarian images and language. Yet that is the nature of the debate in Australia: euthanasia is but one flank of a wider front in a battle for radical cultural change.

It is in the stories we tell that our humanity will be revealed. Personal stories of suffering are the currency used to validate the wielding of a blunt and crude legislative instrument over the lives of the dying. In telling only of ordeal and despair, advocates of EAS seek to privilege the reduction of a persons entire life to the end part only. The task is no longer how to support someone in the living of their life, but how to effectively bring about their death. In the legalising of EAS, dying is no longer viewed as a uniquely human dimension of living, but rather as a process to be brought about as proficiently as possible.

Might we not find a more truthful storytelling of our humanity in Viktor Frankl? And finally, he wrote, I spoke [to my comrades] of our sacrifice, which had meaning in every case. It was in the nature of this sacrifice that it should appear to be pointless in the normal world But in reality our sacrifice did have a meaning The purpose of my words was to find a full meaning in our life, then and there, in that hut and in that practically hopeless situation.

To legalise EAS is to give up on telling the story of the full meaning of our lives. This story is not always easily told, but it is a true story in need of listening ears.

The Most Rev Dr Peter Comensoli is Bishop of Broken Bay and the Australian Bishops Delegate on Euthanasia

The rest is here:

Euthanasia's march Down Under - Catholic Herald Online (blog)

Speaker receives citizens’ initiative on legalisation of euthanasia – YLE News

Sponsors of the citizens' initiative on euthanasia handed the motion over the Parliamentary Speaker Maria Lohela. Image: Vesa Moilanen / Lehtikuva

The sponsors of a citizens' initiative calling for the legalisation of euthanasia handed over the motion to Parliamentary Speaker Maria Lohela on Tuesday.

The initiative first went public on the Kansalaisaloite.fi website, the online service for launching legislative proposals, at the beginning of November last year. It gathered the 50,000 signatures required to take it to the parliament for consideration in just four weeks.

The sponsors of the initiative are former MPs Esko Seppnen, Iiro Viinanen, Henrik Lax, Oslo Soininvaara and Ilkka Taipale.

Supporters of the motion are calling on Finnish legislators to begin preparations to develop laws to regulate the practice of euthanasia or mercy killing, in Finland.

During the handing over ceremony, ex-MP Seppnen said he hoped that parliamentary groups would not make partisan decisions on the motion, but would cast a conscience vote according to their personal convictions.

A straw poll conducted ahead of the last general election indicated that a clear majority of MPs supported legalising euthanasia. Altogether 119 parliamentarians or 59.5% said they backed the measure.

However a survey conducted in January by the Finnish Medical Association showed that only one in six doctors working with terminally-ill patients said they supported legalising euthanasia. Opponents of the proposal expressed concerned over a slipping threshold for euthanasia over time.

Lawmakers will discuss the motion next week, after which it will be taken up by Parliament's social and health care committee.

13.2.

13.2.

13.2.

13.2.

13.2.

See original here:

Speaker receives citizens' initiative on legalisation of euthanasia - YLE News

Could laser therapy help dog owners avoid euthanasia? – 12news.com

Rich Prange, KPNX 3:48 PM. MST February 13, 2017

(Photo: Rich Prange/12 News)

SCOTTSDALE, Ariz. - When John and Susan Davenport were traveling from California to their winter home in Buckeye, they noticed something was wrong with Rosie, their 11-year-old longhair dachshund.

In the middle of the night, I woke up to find she couldnt move at all," said John. "Rosie was pretty much paralyzed in her back legs.

Rosie had suffered a slippeddisc, a devastating condition her owners had seen before. Rosie's mother had been put down a few years ago for a similar back issue.

It was a choked up feeling," John said. "We kind of didn't want to think what the outcome would be.

The outlook was grim: Rosie would need back surgery which would've cost thousands of dollars with a 50/50 chance of success.

The Davenports decided to try cold laser therapy. Their veterinarian in California had used it before when Rosie had an issue with one of her hind legs.

Watching her mom suffer just wasnt something we wanted to do. It was something we wanted to try, said John.

Cold laser therapy is a less invasive procedure than surgery. Fitted with a pair of sunglasses to shade her eyes, all Rosie has to do is lay on the table and relax as the technician massages her back with laser that looks similar to a ultrasound.

This session lasted about 10 minutes.

It helps to reduce swelling and inflammation and pain, said Benjamin Savard, a veterinarian at Raintree Pet Resort & Medical Center.

Savard says hes been using the new laser therapy for about three years. He says the laser feels warm and can also increase the blood flow to the injured area and speed up the recovery.

The Davenports say Rosie was able to walk again after a few sessions and is now back to normal. The laser therapy worked and was more affordable than surgery.

We did a series of six treatments, about $250," Savard said. "We're doing the individual ongoing treatments, which works out to $40 apiece."

Oftentimes when a pet parent has to choose between paying an expensive procedure for their pet or euthanasia, sadly, they choose the latter.

Dr. Savard estimates hes has been able to save more than a dozen dogs from being put down because of the success and affordability of the laser. He also says the laser therapy is not the cure-all for all pets; it's just another tool in treating man's best friend.

It's another way we can bring some relief to many of our patients, often without having to use drugs that have lots of side effects because it's a perfectly safe treatment, said Savard.

The cold laser therapy can also be used to treat a number of other issues your pet may face like arthritis and gum disease.

For more information, visit theRaintree Pet Resort & Medical Center's website.

( 2017 KPNX)

See the original post:

Could laser therapy help dog owners avoid euthanasia? - 12news.com

MP’s personal story behind euthanasia support – Clarence Valley Daily Examiner

GEOFF Provest tries to remember only the good parts but there's a small piece of him that can't forget the way it ended.

The Tweed MP, like many in favour of voluntary euthanasia, has been forced to sit by and watch someone he loved - in his case his father, Sidney Keith Provest - very slowly and very painfully leave this world.

It's a story the Bowraville-born man finds difficult to tell and because of this is one not many have heard.

But with a draft Voluntary Assisted Dying Bill in planning and debate due in the NSW Parliament's spring session, the MP has opened up - not to sway people one way or the other but to share with his electorate why he supports the controversial option.

The MP's father was a teacher and a principal.

An ordered man, he wore a suit and tie and was part of what is now considered the 'old brigade'.

He was a man who valued his intellect and, somewhat ironically, in the end a mental illness led to his death.

The Provest family watched as across several years their leading man was robbed of everything important to him: his mind, the order that underpinned his life, and even himself, before he was eventually moved and spent his final 10months in hospital.

"His quality of life wasn't there," the Tweed MP said.

"It affected my mother and had an impact on her. He just suffered a great deal. It really was heartbreaking.

"In the end the doctors came to us and said, 'We're just going to keep upping the morphine here, but you've got to bear in mind eventually the organs shut down.'"

It took three months but they eventually did. In that time, Mr Provest and his two brothers worried about their mother, who was in her 70s.

They talked about how if there'd been an option to end his pain and take away their mother's burden, they would have taken it.

"My father didn't want to be here," he said.

"He was in and out of consciousness, he was soiling himself in the bed, he had catheters in - it was dreadful, there was no quality of life."

It's the quality of life part the MP will focus on when deciding to support the bill - not only of the patients but those who must watch on.

Go here to read the rest:

MP's personal story behind euthanasia support - Clarence Valley Daily Examiner

Labour will not introduce private members bill on euthanasia – Scoop.co.nz (press release)

Labour will not be introducing a private members bill on euthanasia Andrew Little MP, Leader Labour Party.

MEDIA RELEASE FEBRUARY 11, 2017

Andrew Little MP, leader of the Labour Party recently advised Right to Life in a letter that It does not reflect Labours view and Labour will not be introducing a private members bill on Euthanasia. Right to Life commends Andrew Little for his integrity and courage in emphatically rejecting the threat of Euthanasia which would permit doctors to kill their patients or assist in their suicide. This is a victory for a culture of life. Right to Life is hopeful that the Labour caucus will fully support their leader on this important issue.

The Labour Party has a long and illustrious history of defending life. Andrew Littles stand is in the tradition of its great leaders who defended life; Michael Savage, Peter Frazer, Walter Nash, Arnold Nordmeyer, Bill Rowling, David Lange and Mike Moore.

The first duty of government is to protect the right to life of every member of the human family from conception to natural death.

Andrew little also stated that Euthanasia is a conscience issue, not a party political issue and it is not one of Labours priorities. This is a welcome assurance, that should Labour be elected to govern at the general election on Saturday 23rd September 2017, a Labour government would not present a bill promoting Euthanasia. It is also reassuring that should a private members bill on Euthanasia be drawn from the ballot, Labour members would have a conscience vote.

The Labour Party has traditionally defended the weak and the marginalised in society. The assurances of Andrew little will be of comfort to the most vulnerable members of our community, the aged, the disabled and the seriously ill.

Andrew little has previously shown integrity and courage in refusing to allow Ian Lees-Galloway MP permission in December 2015, to return to the ballot the Euthanasia bill drafted by Maryan Street, a list MP who lost her seat at the last general election.

The petition of Maryan Street and 8974 others on Euthanasia is currently being considered by the Parliamentary Health Select Committee. There were an unprecedented 21,435 written submissions to this petition. The Committee has recently completed hearing oral submissions. A scientific random analysis of the written submissions revealed an overwhelming 78 per cent of submissions in opposition to Euthanasia and assisted suicide. David Seymour MP Leader of ACT is pushing hard for Euthanasia and currently has a bill in the ballot; its title is End of Life Choice bill

Ken Orr

Spokesperson

Scoop Media

Just in case war breaks out over the weekend for the past 10 days or so, the court rulings on President Trumps travel ban have dominated the news out of the United States. At the same time, a more serious threat has been gathering in intensity.

Iran and the Trump administration are on a collision course over Irans testing of ballistic missiles, which Iran maintains are a valid part of its domestic defence planning. The US, via Trumps national security adviser Michael Flynn, has put Iran on notice and imposed fresh sanctions. Undaunted, Iran has continued to test more missiles. More>>

See the original post here:

Labour will not introduce private members bill on euthanasia - Scoop.co.nz (press release)

New euthanasia debate in Spain – BioEdge

Spains Congress of Deputies is debating new euthanasia legislation, as right-to-die lobbyists intensify their campaign in the country.

Unidos Podemos (UP), a political coalition of the the Communist Party and the major party Podemos, presented a bill to Congress in mid-January that would permit assisted dying under certain circumstances.

The Unidos Podemos bill proposes that terminally ill patients over the age of 18, and also adults suffering from unbearable psychological or physiological pain, be allowed to access medical assistance in dying.

There is also another bill shortly to be registered in Congress by representatives from Catalonias regional parliament. Late last month the Catalonian parliament resolved to move a federal bill -- similar to the UP proposal -- that would modify the federal penal code to permit medical assistance in dying.

Human freedom lasts until the end of life, said Isabel Alonso, the president of the Right to a Dignified Death Association, which is behind the Catalonian motion.

Continue reading here:

New euthanasia debate in Spain - BioEdge

Patients Rights Council

SUPPORT THE PATIENTS RIGHTS COUNCILLatest additions to web site: 2/10/17.. Site Map ..

2017 Doctor-Prescribed Suicide Bills Proposed Note: New Mexico is also considering giving non-physicians the power to prescribe lethal drugs for suicide.

New Mexico The New Mexico End of Life Options Act (HB 171) would permit a non-physician to diagnose a patient with a broadly defined terminal illness. It would permit that non-physician to prescribe drugs for the patients suicide on the same day as the diagnosis. Text of HB 171 Analysis of HB 171 More on New Mexico

Scroll down for more of the latest developments and featured articles.

Scroll down for other Recent Developments, and for Featured Articles. For additional information, see Site Map.

The Latest PRC Update (2016 Volume 30, No. 5):

Who will speak for you? Imagine you are in an accident tomorrow and so seriously injured that you arent able to communicate about your health care wishes for several weeks. Who would make health care decisions for you during that time? Do you need an advance directive?

To obtain a durable power of attorney for health care for the state in which you are a resident, call the Patients Rights Council (800-958-5678 or 740-282-3810) between 8:30am and 4:30pm (eastern time).

Recent Major Developments

House To Take First Step Towards Blocking D.C. Assisted Suicide Bill(WAMU February 7, 2017) A U.S. House committee will take the first step on Monday evening towards blocking a D.C. bill that legalizes assisted suicide..{T]he bill was sent to Congress for the 30-day review required under the D.C. Home Rule Act, which gives Congress the right to override the Districts elected representatives. Text of House Joint Resolution 27 More on D.C.

Doctor who made an 80-year-old dementia patients family hold her down while he gave her a lethal euthanasia injection acted in good faith, rules Dutch review panel(Daily Mail February 2, 2017) As the doctor went to administer the injection the woman tried to fight him off. the doctor then ordered the womans family to hold her down to give the drugs. More on Holland

AG, OKeefe seek dismissal of right-to-die case(Cape Cod Times January 10, 2017) A push by two Cape physicians for the right to use medical assistance in dying doesnt belong in the courts, according to Cape and Islands District Attorney Michael OKeefe and Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey. The law firm representing the two physicians worked with Boston-based legal firm Morgan Lewis to help Denver-based Compassion & Choices file the suit. More on Massachusetts

DC mayor signs assisted suicide bill(Washington Examiner December 20, 2016) District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser signed into law Tuesday a bill that would make assisted suicide legal in the district, if it gets through Congress. It is not clear if Congress will approve the legislation. It has blocked D.C. legislation before, most recently the citys recreational marijuana law. Under the Constitution, Congress has to sign off on all D.C. Laws.Note: The DC bill was originally Docket No. B21-38. It is now titled D.C. Act 21-577. More on District of Columbia.

Mexico City legalizes right to euthanasia(Global Times January 6, 2017) Mexico City has become the first entity within Mexico to legalize euthanasia, after the issue was approved Wednesday by the citys constitutional assembly The right to euthanasia will be enshrined in Article 11 of Mexico Citys new constitution, which will come into force in 2018. In January 2016, Mexican President Enrique Pena Nieto signed a law, allowing Mexico City to have its own local constitution.

A measure to permit doctor-prescribed suicide in South Dakota could appear on the states 2018 ballot if sufficient signatures of registered voters are collected by November 2017.More on South Dakota

Governor Kasich Signs Bill Making Assisted Suicide a Felony(WMFD December 20, 2016) Governor Kasich signed House Bill 470, making assisted suicide a third degree felony in Ohio, punishable by up to five years in prison. The bill strengthens Ohios protections against assisted suicide, which previously only permitted a court to issue an injunction against anyone helping people to kill themselves.

California Tests Electronic Database For End-of-Life Wishes(Kaiser Health News December 7, 2016) A coalition of emergency and social service providers is working to create an electronic registry for POLST forms in California. California has been using them for nearly 20 years. Filling out the forms is voluntary, but once they are completed and signed, they must be followed, and providers have immunity from criminal prosecution or civil liability when they do so in good faith. (Emphasis added.) More on POLST

Dutch euthanasia law is used to kill alcoholic, 41, who decided death was the only way to escape his problems(Daily Mail December 6, 2016) Mark Langedijk joked and drank before GP administered injections. Dutch euthanasia practice killed more than 5,500 people last year. Dutch law now includes those enduring social isolation and loneliness. More on Holland

Healthcare groups urge repeal of death panel'(Modern Health Care December 1, 2016) The Independent Payment Advisory Board [IPAB] was created by the Affordable Care Act. It is actually mean to make cuts to Medicare in the case that spending growth exceeds projections The 16 member board has never been appointed. The law stipulates that if the board is not appointed, the HHS Secretary would then be charged with making the cuts. The cuts could then only be overridden by a supermajority of Congress. More on Obamacare

For additional articles and information, see Site Map.

Featured Articles

Physician-assisted suicide is too risky(Albuquerque Journal November 30, 2016) By providing cheap and early deaths, insurance companies can save millions of dollars each year. The elderly, the poor, and minorities are also prone to abuse, especially if younger family members view them as a financial burden instead of an honored elder. The dying person is guilted into their duty to die. More on New Mexico

Everyone should have the right to assisted suicide or no one should (VOX November 21, 2016) Equal rights means equal suicide protection.Are you healthy? Do you think that your health makes your life more valuable that a terminally ill persons? Do you think that his life should get less protection from suicidal desires? If so, the disability rights movement has a bumper sticker for you: I support the right to die. You go first. More on Disability Perspective

A Bad Recipe for D.C. (November 2016) Ingredients and directions for doctor-prescribed suicide. More on District of ColumbiaDoctor-assisted suicide? Neutrality is not an option(Orlando Sentinel November 13, 2016) A medical ethicist says its cowardly to be neutral about doctor-assisted suicide. And as for medical societies if those organizations make even a passing effort to set ethical standards and codes for the medical profession, then they should not tell society that they are neutral on physician-assisted suicide.

Elderly Hospital Patients Arrive Sick, Often Leave Disabled (Kaiser Health News- August 9, 2016) Hospital staff often fail to feed older patients properly, get them out of bed enough or control their pain adequately. More on Medicare

Automatic sign-ups for Medicare Advantage coverage surprise seniors (Pittsburgh Tribune-Review August 1, 2016) Only days after Judy Hanttula came home from the hospital after surgery in November, her doctors office called with bad news: Records showed that instead of traditional Medicare, she had a private Medicare Advantage plan, and her doctor and hospital were not in its network. Neither the plan nor Medicare now would cover her medical costs. More on Medicare

Do patients pay when they leave against medical advice? Patients who are leaving the hospital against medical advice are often told by hospital staff that doing so will leave them liable for the entire bill because insurance will not pay if they leave against medical advice. As described in a study, that is a myth, a medical urban legend, and one which is widespread.

Brain scans reveal hidden consciousness in patients(AP Central Ohio, The Source May 26, 2016) A standard brain scanning technique is showing promise for helping doctors distinguish between patients in a vegetative state and those with hidden signs of consciousness.The researchers checked the patient status again a year later. They found that 8 of the 11 vegetative patients who had scored above the cutoff, which had been associated with minimal consciousness, had in fact recovered consciousness.

Cancer breakthrough: Duke clinical trial destroys SC womans brain tumor(WNCN television CBS May 16, 2016) The FDA is calling a clinical trial that killed a cancerous brain tumor (Stage 4 Glioblastoma) a medical breakthrough. Stephanie Lipscomb, now a nurse has now been cancer free for 4 years and considers herself cured. Dozens of patients responded positively to the trial and because of the success with Stephanie, the FDA has deemed the trial a medical breakthrough. [Note: This was the same type of cancer that Brittany Maynard had.]

Where the prescription for autism can be death (Washington Post February 24, 2016) Thus did a man in his 30s whose only diagnosis was autism become one of 110 people to be euthanized for mental disorders in the Netherlands between 2011 and 2014. Thats the rough equivalent of 2,000 people in the United States. More on Holland

The sole survivor: Fort Lee woman beats the deadliest form of brain cancer(NorthJersey.com December 13, 2015) Nearly a decade after learning she had only three months to live, Sandy Hillburn grabbed a taxi last Sunday to LaGuardia Airport for one of her regular business trips to North Carolina.

Previously Featured ArticlesAlso see site map to access specific topics which include previously featured articles.

Have you heard about VSED? It stands for voluntarily stopping eating and drinking. VSED is being promoted by assisted-suicide activists who are also working to force health care providers to participate in it. Important Questions & Answers about VSED

From the bookshelfTwenty-six years ago, Ann Humphry, the co-founder of the Hemlock Society (now called Compassion and Choices) committed suicide. Her death made headlines worldwide.

Prior to her death, Ann contacted Rita Marker, a staunch euthanasia opponent. Over time, the two became close friends, and Ann asked Rita to make public secrets about the right-to-die movement secrets that had weighed heavily on Ann.

Two years after Anns tragic death, the book, Deadly Compassion: The Death of Ann Humphry and the Truth About Euthanasia was published. It recounts Anns personal story, the founding of the Hemlock Society, and activities of euthanasia and doctor-prescribed suicide advocates. Thousands of copies of the book were sold in the United States, England, Canada and Australia. (Read excerpts from reviews of the book.)

Now, for the first time, you can read Deadly Compassion in its entirety on line in PDF format.

Read the rest here:

Patients Rights Council

Pug Dies After Eating Dog Food Contaminated With Euthanasia Drug – Huffington Post

Pet food company Evangers is recalling five batches of its Hunk of Beef dog food after one batch tested positive for pentobarbital, a drug thats used in euthanasia as well as for other medical purposes.

At least one dog, a pug in Washington state named Talula, died after consuming the food.

Nikki Mael, Talulas owner, told KATU last month that her four dogs all became ill shortly after she fed them the Hunk of Beef canned food on New Years Eve. Talula died at the emergency vet, and a second dog, Tito, continued to suffer from seizures after going back home with Mael.

Evangers launched an investigation into possible food contamination, and ultimately detected pentobarbital a barbiturate used in the euthanasia of animals in one batch of the product. As a result, the company announced on Feb. 3 that they would be recalling all batches produced the same week.

The recall affects Hunk of Beef products with lot numbers starting with 1816E03HB, 1816E04HB, 1816E06HB, 1816E07HB, and 1816E13HB, with a June 2020 expiration date. It applies to products in Washington, California, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, New York, Massachusetts, Maryland, South Carolina, Georgia and Florida. (Read more information about the recallhere.)

Evangers also said they are paying for Maels vet bills are making a donation to a local shelter in honor of Talula the Pug.

The companys statement indicates that they suspect meat from a euthanized animal likely ended up in the food, causing the presence of pentobarbital.

Though pentobarbital has shown up in pet food before, those cases have involved pet food with ingredients sourced from rendering plants that grind up a slew of animal carcasses from a variety of sources. Evangers states that their Hunk of Beef product contains only beef, and does not include any ingredients from rendering plants.

However, the company notes in their statement that while the use of pentobarbital is tightly regulated, there is absolutely no regulation that requires a veterinarian to mark a euthanized animal to prevent it from entering the food chain. As a result of the contamination, Evangers terminated their relationship with the beef supplier that provided the contaminated meat.

Read more here:

Pug Dies After Eating Dog Food Contaminated With Euthanasia Drug - Huffington Post

Canadian study touts euthanasia’s cost ‘benefit’ – Brnow

Canada legalized euthanasia in June 2016, declaring assisted suicide a humane way to end the suffering of already dying patients. Opponents warned it wouldnt be a far jump from legalizing euthanasia to manipulating patients into believing they have an obligation to die and stop draining medical system resources. Eight months later, researchers at the University of Calgary have released a study extolling assisted suicides cost benefits: If Canadians adopt medical assistance in dying in a manner and extent similar to those of the Netherlands and Belgium, we can expect a reduction in healthcare spending in the range of tens of millions of dollars per year. The authors of the study denied any suggestion cost should factor into end-of life-decisions, despite the obvious connection. We are not suggesting medical assistance in dying as a measure to cut costs, they wrote in the Canadian Medical Association Journal. But critics note the utilitarian view of euthanasia, that it can benefit the general public, gives society a stake in the death of vulnerable people. I cant imagine anything more dangerous than that, Wesley J. Smith, senior fellow at the Discovery Institutes Center on Human Exceptionalism and a consultant for the Patients Rights Council, told me. Bioethicists already link the medical cost savings of euthanasia with organ harvesting. A recent article in the Journal of Medical Ethics suggested euthanasia in Canada has the potential to provide organs for transplantation. The article even suggested it would be acceptable if the organ harvest was the cause of death, Smith noted in National Review. In the Netherlands and Belgium, people who choose euthanasia because of disability or mental illness are being targeted as potential organ donors, Smith said. Such thinking exploits vulnerable people worried about being a burden and losing their dignity. This is not just a cold issue of choice, this involves deep emotions, this involves deep fear, Smith said. Canadas laws legalize medical aid in dying for any seriously ill or disabled adult whose condition is incurable and who is in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability. Doctors must determine no alternatives acceptable to the patient can relieve the suffering and the patient has to believe the physical or psychological suffering is intolerable. The patients natural death needs to be reasonably foreseeable but the law does not require a prognosis specifying the time period within which death is expected. Smith isnt certain the United States will follow the euthanasia prescription of its Northern neighbor. So far, five states have legalized physician-assisted suicide, which allows a doctor to provide the means for death, usually prescription medication, but the patient must administer it. Canada's Medical Assistance in Dying law takes physician-assisted suicide a step further and allows practitioners to administer the means of death for patients who have requested it but are physically unable to do it themselves. At least in the United States we still dont know what the outcome is going to be, Smith said. Assisted suicide advocates are far less candid in the United States than they are elsewhere precisely because the United States is still up for grabs on this issue. (EDITORS NOTE Julie Borg writes for WORLD News Service, a division of WORLD Magazine, worldmag.com, based in Asheville. Used with permission.)

Original post:

Canadian study touts euthanasia's cost 'benefit' - Brnow

Dutch doctors against euthanasia for advanced dementia patients – NL Times

A group of 220 Dutch doctors took out an advertisement in NRC on Friday to show that they are against granting euthanasia to advanced dementia patients. The doctors believe it's wrong to give euthanasia based on a statement which the patient can no longer confirm.

"Our moral reluctance to end the life of a defenseless human being is too big", the ad reads. Among the signers are also doctors specialized in helping patients die.

The doctors want to restart the conversation about euthanasia for severely demented people, according to NOS. Since2015 there were three cases of euthanasiagranted to patients with advanced dementia. Initiator and geriatric doctor Boudewijn Chabot wants a court to decide whether these cases were carefully handled according to the rules.

The rules for euthanasia for elderly people with dementia were adjusted in December 2015. The Ministries of Public Health and Security and Justice changed the euthanasia guidelines to state that euthanasia can be granted to advanced dementia patients if they made a written declaration with this wish while they were still lucid. Before this adaption, a patient had to express the desire for death himself. But this is no longer required.

A Dutch doctor was recently rebuked for granting euthanasia to a dementia patient, the first time in Dutch history that this happened. The Regional Review Committee concluded that the patient's wish for euthanasia was not clear enough.

See the rest here:

Dutch doctors against euthanasia for advanced dementia patients - NL Times

Religion in the courtroom: Neil Gorsuch’s faith and writings draw close attention – The Denver Post

He defended the rights of a man, convicted of killing his young daughter, to worship in a prison sweat lodge. He wrote that human life is fundamentally and inherently valuable in the context of assisted suicide. And he argued a companys owners are allowed to deny health care coverage for birth control that violatestheir faith.

More than most issues, U.S. Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuchs writingsonthe intersection of religion and the law have faced intense scrutiny before his expected confirmation hearings. So too have his personal beliefs as a Catholic turned Episcopalian and conservative who worships at a self-described largely liberal church in Boulder.

The focus is more than just a philosophical interest. With the court split between liberals and conservatives, his approach and future votes could impact cases dealing with religious liberty, transgender discrimination and reproductive rights.

Eugene Volokh, a University of California, Los Angeles law professor with a background in church-state relations, said Gorsuchs judicial record shows hevalues federal laws that givea wide berth to religion.What Gorsuch is saying is that Congress has told us that religious exemptions ought to be granted where feasible, Volokh said.

In addition, he said Gorsuch is similar tothe late Justice Antonin Scalia who he would replace in believing its not the role of judges to scrub religious symbols from all cornersof public life.

Courts shouldnt step in and try to eliminate religious references from American tradition, Volokh said of Gorsuchs position noting one case in which Gorsuch disagreed with a court decision against roadside crosses that honored fallen Utah state troopers.

His nomination by President Donald Trump has invigorated like-minded legal scholars even as it troubles critics who express concern that a conservative majority on the nations highest court would erode protections for the LGBTQ community and reproductive rights for women.

His history on these two issues is relatively thin, only fueling the speculation on how the fourth-generation Coloradan would rule as a Supreme Court justice. A deeper review of Gorsuchs record as a judge on the Denver-based 10th Circuit Court of Appeals and his life in Colorado offers a more complicated picture.

In one case known as Yellowbear, the judge overturned a lower court ruling and found a Wyoming prison had no compelling interest to prevent an American Indian inmate from accessing the sweat lodge to practice his religious beliefs. In another ruling, the judge maintained an Oklahoma prison needed to accommodate a Muslim inmate who demandedhalal meals.

Michael Norton, a conservative and former U.S. attorney for Colorado who has analyzed many of Gorsuchs rulings, said the judge is sympathetic to religious freedom given its prominence in the constitution.

Hes just particularly focused on assuring the values espoused by the religion clauses of the First Amendment are in fact applied for what they are meant to be applied for, Nortonsaid.

The cases that draw the most attention are his rulings in Hobby Lobby and Little Sisters of the Poor, in which he challenged the Affordable Care Acts mandate that employer health plans cover contraception for women because itconflicted with a business owners religious beliefs.

In Hobby Lobby, Gorsuch argued that the requirement would force business owners to underwrite payments for drugs or devices that can have the effect of destroying a fertilized human egg, despite arguments from the laws supportersthat an exemption would allow owners to impose their faith on employees.

In Little Sisters, he suggested that the opt-out allowedin the federal health care law imposes a substantial burden on that persons free exercise of religion.

Gorsuchs rulings are very promising from a conservative perspective, said Jeff Hunt, the Centennial Institute director at Colorado Christian University in Lakewood, who spoke to Gorsuch days before his nomination. He understands the role of the government and the role of the courts.

But his critics, such as liberal advocacy organization Alliance for Justice, use the cases to suggest Gorsuchis hostile to a womens access to reproductive health care, labeling him a far-right extremist.

Sarah Warbelow, legal director at the Human Rights Campaign, said she and other activists are concerned that Gorsuchs approach to the Hobby Lobby case could open the door for the use of religion as an excuse to discriminate against LGBTQ people.

As an example, Warbelow cited coverage of hormone therapy for transgender people or infertility treatment for lesbian couples.

Whether Gorsuch is open to upending Roe is a matter of debate among legal scholars. Some see his textualist interpretation of the law as a threat to abortion rights. Others suggest he would defer to existing court doctrine.

In his 2006 book The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia, Gorsuch offers a robust discussion of the landmark case and abortion in the context of determining the value of life, all while avoiding an overt stance.

The 311-page text, a mix of philosophical discussion and legal analysis, ultimately positions Gorsuch in opposition to assisted suicide and euthanasia.

He wrote that human life is fundamentally and inherently valuable, and that the intentional taking of human life by private persons is always wrong. The argument, he continued, is based on secular moral theory and consistent with common law and long-standing medical ethics.

He made clear in a footnote that he did not seek here to engage the abortion debate and cited Roe as the reason assisted suicide and abortion are separate matters.

Abortion would be ruled out by the inviolability-of-life principle if, but only if, a fetus is considered a human life. The Supreme Court in Roe, however, unequivocally held that a fetus is not a person for purposes of constitutional law, he wrote in the footnote.

Religion has been a constant presence, but not a dominant one, in Gorsuchs own life, several friends and acquaintances said. He grew up Catholic and attended weekly Mass during his years at Georgetown Prep, a Jesuit school in the Maryland suburbs of Washington.

My mother was a Catholic. My father wasnt particularly religious, and so we were raised Catholic, said J.J. Gorsuch, Neils younger brother who lives in Denver. Headded that spirituality has always been a part of our lives.

Neil Gorsuch later would join an Episcopal Church in Boulder and, after Trump announced his nomination at the White House, he gave passing mention to his beliefs. I am so thankful tonight for my family, my friends and my faith. These are the things that keep me grounded at lifes peaks and have sustained me in its valleys, Gorsuch said at the White House.

At Georgetown Prep, faith was part of the conversation but so were the usual topics of politics and literature, said Michael Trent, a former classmate and longtime friend. Neil loved to discuss things, said Trent, who now lives in Atlanta.

He said Gorsuch is godfather to both his sons and a doting one at that. Not a birthday has gone by, or a Christmas, in which a package has not shown up from godfather Neil, he said.

Trent added that Gorsuch never was one to proselytize, or even talk much about his own religious beliefs, but said Gorsuchsfaith was evident in his actions. Its hard to be as caring and compassionate as he is without giving credit to a higher source, Trent said.

That sentiment was echoed by Tracy Ashmore, a Colorado attorney and fellow member of a legal club called the Doyle Inn of Court. She said Gorsuchs religion is one reason she thinks hes humble. I think he knows hes not God, which is pretty nice, she said. Because thats not always the case at the federal circuit level.

Gorsuch now attends services at St. Johns Episcopal Church in Boulder, which has described itself as largely liberal in a largely liberal city.

The first word the church uses to describe itself on its website and Facebook page is inclusive, and St. Johns is led by a female rector. On its website, the church encourages members to write letters to Congress asking for actions addressing climate change. And after the gay nightclub shooting in Orlando, Fla., St. Johns rang its bells 49 times each Wednesday from July 6 to the presidential election, as a way of asking members of Congress to pass stricter gun restrictions and remember each victim.

The Sunday after Gorsuchs nomination, the early service at the church included a sermon praising diversity as Gods intent and warning against the divisiveness evident in the dysfunction in Washington.

The Gorsuch family is actively involved in the church. The judge occasionally ushers at the 9:30 a.m. service, and his wife, Louise, frequently leads prayers and reads the weekly Scripture. His two teenage daughters have assisted in ceremonial duties as acolytes.

During the service, a clergy member had only praise for Gorsuch, saying he was humble and thoughtful and very sincere in his beliefs.

Gorsuch also has presided over weddings.

It meant a lot to me at the time still does, said Ed Hamrick, who attended Columbia University as an undergraduate with Gorsuch.

Hamrick said Gorsuch helped arrange a ceremonyat the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals and made sure his bride could enter the courthouse through the judges parking lot, so Hamrick wouldnt see her before the ceremony began.

At the time it was an awfully nice thing to do for a friend, Hamrick said. Now all my wedding guests are calling me again. Is that the guy who married you?

See more here:

Religion in the courtroom: Neil Gorsuch's faith and writings draw close attention - The Denver Post