1. Eugenics

Category Archives: Eugenics

GOCC Radio ~ CDC’s Racist Eugenics Attack on Black Babies Exposed plus Blacks are the New Terrorist – Video

Posted on by


GOCC Radio ~ CDC #39;s Racist Eugenics Attack on Black Babies Exposed plus Blacks are the New Terrorist
Gathering of Christ Church Phone: 888*334*3330 Email: gatheringas1@aol.com http://www.gatheringofchrist.org/ Blogtalkradio: http://m.blogtalkradio.com/gocchurch YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/use...

By: GOCC NYC

Continue reading here:

GOCC Radio ~ CDC's Racist Eugenics Attack on Black Babies Exposed plus Blacks are the New Terrorist - Video

Eugenics – New World Encyclopedia – Info:Main Page – New …

Posted on by

From New World Encyclopedia

Eugenics is a social philosophy which advocates the improvement of human hereditary traits through various forms of intervention. The purported goals have variously been to create healthier, more intelligent people, save society's resources, and lessen human suffering.

Earlier proposed means of achieving these goals focused on selective breeding, while modern ones focus on prenatal testing and screening, genetic counseling, birth control, in vitro fertilization, and genetic engineering. Opponents argue that eugenics is immoral and is based on, or is itself, pseudoscience. Historically, eugenics has been used as a justification for coercive state-sponsored discrimination and human rights violations, such as forced sterilization of persons with genetic defects, the killing of the institutionalized and, in some cases, genocide of races perceived as inferior. Today, however, the ideas developed from eugenics are used to identify genetic disorders that are either fatal or result in severe disabilities. While there is still controversy, some of this research and understanding may prove beneficial.

The word eugenics etymologically derives from the Greek words eu (good) and gen (birth), and was coined by Francis Galton in 1883.

The term eugenics is often used to refer to movements and social policies that were influential during the early twentieth century. In a historical and broader sense, eugenics can also be a study of "improving human genetic qualities." It is sometimes broadly applied to describe any human action whose goal is to improve the gene pool. Some forms of infanticide in ancient societies, present-day reprogenetics, preemptive abortions, and designer babies have been (sometimes controversially) referred to as eugenic.

Eugenicists advocate specific policies that (if successful) would lead to a perceived improvement of the human gene pool. Since defining what improvements are desired or beneficial is, by many, perceived as a cultural choice rather than a matter that can be determined objectively (by empirical, scientific inquiry), eugenics has often been deemed a pseudoscience. The most disputed aspect of eugenics has been the definition of "improvement" of the human gene pool, such as what comprises a beneficial characteristic and what makes a defect. This aspect of eugenics has historically been tainted with scientific racism.

Early eugenicists were mostly concerned with perceived intelligence factors that often correlated strongly with social class. Many eugenicists took inspiration from the selective breeding of animals (where purebreds are valued) as their analogy for improving human society. The mixing of races (or miscegenation) was usually considered as something to be avoided in the name of racial purity. At the time this concept appeared to have some scientific support, and it remained a contentious issue until the advanced development of genetics led to a scientific consensus that the division of the human species into unequal races is unjustifiable. Some see this as an ideological consensus, since equality, just like inequality, is a cultural choice rather than a matter that can be determined objectively.

Eugenics has also been concerned with the elimination of hereditary diseases such as haemophilia and Huntington's disease. However, there are several problems with labeling certain factors as "genetic defects." In many cases there is no scientific consensus on what a "genetic defect" is. It is often argued that this is more a matter of social or individual choice. What appears to be a "genetic defect" in one context or environment may not be so in another. This can be the case for genes with a heterozygote advantage, such as sickle cell anemia or Tay-Sachs disease, which in their heterozygote form may offer an advantage against, respectively, malaria and tuberculosis. Many people can succeed in life with disabilities. Many of the conditions early eugenicists identified as inheritable (pellagra is one such example) are currently considered to be at least partially, if not wholly, attributed to environmental conditions. Similar concerns have been raised when a prenatal diagnosis of a congenital disorder leads to abortion.

Eugenic policies have been conceptually divided into two categories: Positive eugenics, which encourage a designated "most fit" to reproduce more often; and negative eugenics, which discourage or prevent a designated "less fit" from reproducing. Negative eugenics need not be coercive. A state might offer financial rewards to certain people who submit to sterilization, although some critics might reply that this incentive along with social pressure could be perceived as coercion. Positive eugenics can also be coercive. Abortion by "fit" women was illegal in Nazi Germany.

During the twentieth century, many countries enacted various eugenics policies and programs, including:

Link:

Eugenics - New World Encyclopedia - Info:Main Page - New ...

Editorial – State also should apologize individually to eugenics victims

Posted on by

Published: Monday, August 25, 2014 at 8:19 p.m. Last Modified: Monday, August 25, 2014 at 8:19 p.m.

It's hard to blame Elnora Mills for not feeling terribly grateful. Decades after being forcibly sterilized under the state eugenics program, she and other victims of that cruel social experiment are finally seeing some compensation. Mills has been notified that she soon will receive the first half of a payout that is expected to total about $50,000.

As she told StarNews reporter Jason Gonzales, one thing she has not received is a personal apology.

Mills had a "nervous breakdown" as a teenager, spent some time in a psychiatric hospital and, as a result, was deemed unfit to bear children. Her reproductive organs were removed during an appendectomy, unbeknownst to her. She didn't find out that she couldn't have children until after she married.

Mills was one of an estimated 7,600 North Carolinians who were sterilized against their will between 1929 and 1974, when the forced eugenics program at last was brought to an end.

The legislature capped total payments at $10 million, to be split among victims who are alive and who can prove they were part of the sterilization program that continued in North Carolina for years after other states had abandoned the practice.

Advocates for the victims estimated last year that 2,000 of them may still be alive, but far fewer have been confirmed in the narrow window the General Assembly left for them to apply for compensation approved last year. As of mid-August, only 180 people had been approved to receive payments; Mills was among them.

Seven hundred eighty claims were received, and 500 have been reviewed by the N.C. Industrial Commission, which is overseeing the compensation program; the others are still being researched. Those whose applications were denied may appeal or provide additional information to support their claims.

The state Senate last year finally conceded to the measure that the House already had passed. Much of the credit for pushing this legislation through the General Assembly goes to Rep. Thom Tillis, R-Mecklenburg, who announced during his first term as House speaker that compensation for sterilization program victims would be a priority.

The cap and the amount of compensation do not sit well with those who believe these victims deserved much more. After all, they had something taken from them that can't be stated in monetary terms. It is, however, far more than has ever been done to make amends.

Here is the original post:

Editorial - State also should apologize individually to eugenics victims

Organizations Seek to Raise Awareness of Eugenics Reparations

Posted on by

CHARLOTTE Some 43 years ago, Janice Black of Charlotte underwent a procedure that would prevent her from ever becoming a mother.

She's one of more than 7,000 people who either through force or coercion were sterilized as part of North Carolina Eugenics Board Program between 1929 and 1974.

They didn't really tell me what they really were doing, you know what I'm saying. All they really were saying was that they were taking me to the hospital, said Black, now 62.

Black was 18 in 1971 when she was deemed mentally retarded by the state. She then unknowingly signed a form allowing doctors to sterilize her. She's one of less than 200 estimated survivors of the eugenics program.

In 2013, state lawmakers passed legislation to compensate victims of the eugenics program. Victims and their families can file claims to receive their portion of $10 million set aside for them, but so far only about 400 have been filed.

The NC Civil Rights Commission will be in Charlotte in June to spread the word about that repayment. The Charlotte-Mecklenburg chapter of the NAACP is trying to help.

"When you do something to somebody, it's just inevitable that you should want to compensate them and give them something to show that you want to apologize, some form of reparation for hurting them, Rev. Kojo Nantambu of the NAACP said.

Janice Black said she's already filed to collect her repayment, but that any settlement money she gets won't begin to repair the damage done to her and other victims of eugenics.

Lawyers from the NC Civil Rights Commission will be at the Little Rock AME Zion Church at 401 N. Caldwell Street June 5 from 11 a.m. until 2 p.m. to assist victims with filing their claims.

The rest is here:

Organizations Seek to Raise Awareness of Eugenics Reparations

Red Ice Radio – Zoltan Istvan – The Transhumanist Wager: In Favor of Eugenics – Video

Posted on by


Red Ice Radio - Zoltan Istvan - The Transhumanist Wager: In Favor of Eugenics
http://www.redicecreations.com http://www.redicemembers.com https://twitter.com/rediceradio https://plus.google.com/+RedicecreationsOfficial https://www.facebook.com/RedIceCreations Subscribe...

By: Red Ice Radio

Read more:

Red Ice Radio - Zoltan Istvan - The Transhumanist Wager: In Favor of Eugenics - Video

Clinic to help eugenics victims

Posted on by

North Carolina residents who might have been subjected to a state-sanctioned sterilization program could be qualified for victims compensation under a program seeking victims and their survivors in Greenville.

A free legal clinic is being held from 10 a.m. to 1 p.m. today (doors open until 5 p.m.) at the Lucille W. Gorham Intergenerational Community Center at the corner of Fifth and Tyson streets. The Center for Civil Rights, along with volunteer attorneys and University of North Carolina law students, will assist people in filing claims for compensation from the N.C. Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program. Claims must be filed by June 30.

Eugenics refers to the intentional and selective breeding of humans and animals to rid the population of characteristics deemed unfit by those administering this practice. In the United States, eugenics was carried out by individuals, nonprofit organizations and state governments that felt human reproduction should be controlled.

The N.C. Eugenics Board program was created by the Legislature in 1933 after a 1929 state sterilization law was ruled constitutional by the N.C. Supreme Court. The program was a part of the former N.C. Department of Public Welfare, and petitions for sterilization were considered by a five-member panel of state officials.

In the late 1940s, the Department of Public Welfare began to promote increased sterilizations as one of several solutions to poverty and illegitimacy. In the late 1950s, a dramatic rise of sterilizations occurred among women who did not reside in state institutions and among blacks. Prior to the 1950s, many of the sterilization orders primarily affected people residing in state institutions. All 100 counties in North Carolina participated in the program.

Between 1929 and 1974, nearly 7,600 documented males and females were sterilized by choice, force or coercion. The youngest victims were 10 years old. About 85 percent of victims were female, and 40 percent of victims were minorities, including blacks and Native Americans, according to a report from the N.C. Office of Justice for Sterilization Victims.

The number of victims alive today is unknown, officials said

The N.C. Justice for Sterilization Victims Foundation was established in 2010 as a division of the N.C. Department of Administration to compensate victims who forcibly were sterilized by North Carolinas Eugenics Board program. The foundation functioned as a clearinghouse to assist victims, serving as the primary point of contact for victims, potential victims and the general public seeking guidance about North Carolinas former sterilization laws and program.

In 2011 and 2012, foundation staff also supported the separate Gubernatorial Task Force on Eugenics Compensation established under Executive Order 83. In July, Gov. Pat McCrory signed into law Senate Bill 402, which created the Eugenics Asexualization and Sterilization Compensation Program. The Office of Justice for Sterilization Victims also was established under that law to determine whether an individual qualifies for compensation, to assist an individual filing a claim, and to implement an outreach program to notify possible qualified victims of the claim process.

In addition to todays event at the IGCC, those who believe that they or someone in their family might have been sterilized under the N.C. Eugenics Board can contact the Office of Justice for Sterilization Victims information line at 1-877-550-6013 or 919-807-4270. Callers seeking to have their names checked against N.C. Eugenics Board program records by filing a claim for compensation will be mailed a form. Claim forms also are available at http://www.sterilizationvictims.nc.gov.

View post:

Clinic to help eugenics victims

Creationists now losing their minds because Neil deGrasse Tyson explained electricity

Posted on by

If there is one topic in each weeksCosmosthat sends the Christian fundamentalists into a frenzy, it is evolution.

You see, scientists understand that most sciences cannot be done correctly if you ignore the scientific fact of evolution. Yet, week in and week out, creationists critique the job Tyson and his team of writers are doing, calling them speculative and misleading.

Creationists would have you believe that Tyson and his crew are force-feeding viewers a story of evolution dreamed up in the minds of those who simply want to refute God and spread atheism.

Calling evolutionary biologists names such as evolutionistsa word not used outside of the creationists sphereis an attempt to demean the science as nothing more than a religion; ironically, the very thing they are trying to sell you on.

This weeks episode, titled, The Electric Boy was about scientist Michael Faraday. Faradays study of electricity led to some of the biggest discoveries and inventions in the history of mankind, ranging from the electric motor to the discovery of electromagnetic waves that surround just about everything.

How on earth could creationists be upset with electricity? Well, Tyson had the audacity to mention that Faradays discoveries helped us explain how birds navigate the globe using the earths electromagnetic waves, and that their brains are evolutionarily wired for such a task.

Writing for Answers in Genesis, the young earth creationists organization, Elizabeth Mitchell writes:

Evolutionists assume our existence and theexistence of birdsmusthave an evolutionary explanation. Yet molecules-to-man evolutiondepending as it does on both the spontaneous emergence of life from non-living elements and the evolution of organisms into new, more complex onesdemands that we believe things thatviolatethe laws of nature (e.g., law of biogenesis).

One can assume these words are barely Mitchells, as they puppet the same narrative week after week. First they claim scientists assume these evolved traits, ignoring the evidence behind the claim, and then quickly move on to false naturalistic claims such as broken laws of nature.

What Tyson is saying in this episode is far from controversial; in fact, you would find it very challenging to locate scientists who would want to debate Tysons bird claim because it is so well understood.

The rest is here:

Creationists now losing their minds because Neil deGrasse Tyson explained electricity


  1. Eugenics