Audius Rallies EDM Artists, Crypto VCs to Back Vision for Music Payments on Ethereum – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Music is back on the blockchain.

Audius, a streaming service that connects music fans directly with artists, has raised $3.1 million in a strategic round co-led by Multicoin Capital and Blockchange Ventures, with participation from Pantera Capital and Coinbase Ventures.

Audius has now raised a total of $8.6 million as the platform prepares for prime time, having grown in less than a year to over 250,000 monthly users and 40,000 artists. EDM artists seem to be the sites burgeoning specialty with notables including RAC, deadmau5, Lido, 3LAU, Zeds Dead, Mr. Carmack and REZZ all signed on.

The blockchain use case for music is a familiar one: the inequity and tardiness of the revenue model of streaming services like Apple Music and Spotify.

It shouldnt take a year and a half to get paid, and its just crazy that the people creating the music only take 12%, Audius CEO Roneil Rumburg said in an interview. After this extreme time delay, the artist just gets this check, so they dont actually see whos listening to them. There is no visibility because the artist doesnt own their own data or their audience.

The Audius P2P network allows artists to be paid in full by their fans, directly and instantly for every stream with the ability to cash out daily or hourly if they want, Rumburg added.

Fair trade but for music

Ethereum-based Audius picks up the mantle carried by ConsenSys-backed Ujo Music and groundbreaking projects like Imogen Heaps Mycelia, which the artist described as fair trade music.

Indeed, folks such as Jesse Grushack, co-founder and CEO of the now-shuttered Ujo Music, have helped and advised Audius, as has Ujos former artist-in-residence, Andr Allen Anjos, better known by his stage name RAC, a Grammy Award winner who has remixed the likes of New Order, Lady Gaga and the Kings of Leon.

Anjos, who worked with Ujo for over a year and released an album on Ethereum, said the problem was the complexity of onboarding users.

We used to kind of joke that it could take like 36 steps to get ether into MetaMask, Anjos said in an interview. Just to interact with these systems you needed to go through this crazy setup, and I think Ujo kind of suffered from that. But today, if you go to Audius its a pretty similar experience to any other platform, arguably better. That initial barrier to entry is not a problem anymore.

Audius, which was founded in 2018 by Stanford University buddies Rumburg and Chief Product Officer Forrest Browning, has benefitted from a kind of diaspora of talent that had already been working on this problem, said Rumburg.

Back in 2016, when these projects came about, was just really early, he said. The amount of stuff that [ConsenSys founder] Joe [Lubin] had to build from scratch was just this astronomical ask.

The Audius team may have built the music player with a user interface that looks and feels like Spotify or SoundCloud, but it couldnt be more different under the hood.

Decentralized streaming

The network consists of indexing nodes, which provide a discovery service, and content-posting or creator nodes. This intersection of fans, artists and infrastructure providers who host and index content (stakers in blockchain parlance), uses both the Ethererum public blockchain (which is where all the staking and look-up nodes are running) and a second, permissioned network where the uploaded content lives.

Its fully community-operated and hosted, said Rumburg. Today, if we shut down Audius, the company, all of this could keep working and keep running so long as the community wants to keep it up and running.

Following on from a minimum viable product mainnet launch in the next couple of months, the next stage is to add instant payments for monetized content, which will use a system of stablecoins and be in place before the end of the year, said Rumburg.

Payments will be done with a kind of stablecoin mechanism. So thats not like an Audius native token, but a basket of third-party tokens. Itll probably be a couple of the bigger ones, he said. Were looking for good fiat to crypto on-ramp options. From the users perspective, they dont even know this is happening. They just put in a credit card and top up that account and see a balance.

The user interface for artists is just as simple, said Audius CPO Forrest Browning.

As an artist, if you decide to monetize some of your content, your Audius dashboard might show you have $500 or whatever is your local currency, and with a one-click direct deposit you can pull that out, without knowing a stable token system was integrated, Browning said.

Deep cuts

Music distribution on the internet has moved on since the time of Napster, but when an artist is signed to a label the label owns the rights to the artists master copies and gets to decide where that content is distributed. There seems to be more opportunity for negotiation these days, particularly between artists and forward-thinking independent labels.

The majority of our usage right now is coming from independent artists who are not signed, said Rumburg. Those that are signed to progressive labels have gone and got permission from their label. I think the mentality is, the sooner you sign up to a system like this, the more following and momentum you build, similar to early accounts on SoundCloud or anything else like that.

RAC, who is signed to iconic U.K. indie label Ninja Tune, said the conversation about him releasing an album on Ethereum back in 2017 was very easygoing, because the label is tech savvy.

The way to go is obviously to ask the label for permission, but I feel like it would be a non-issue in most cases. I think most labels would say, Why not? and just approach this as another distribution platform, he said.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Link:

Audius Rallies EDM Artists, Crypto VCs to Back Vision for Music Payments on Ethereum - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

CoinDesk Live Recap: Ethereum’s DeFi Luminaries Discuss What’s Next – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

For decentralized finance (DeFi) to make its mark, it must reach beyond the crypto bubble, said MakerDAO founder Rune Christensen.

Compared to where were going next, weve still just scratched the surface of what this technology will do, Christensen, whose lending platform recently topped $1 billion in committed assets, said.

He was joined by fellow DeFi luminaries Robert Leshner and Hayden Adams on Wednesday in a live-streamed conversation on the state of the $3.8 billion DeFi market. The session, part of CoinDesks Ethereum at Five series, was moderated by reporter Will Foxley.

It will certainly be a hard row to hoe, but the craze for yield farming and other middleman-less innovations could yet subvert traditional lenders. To date, DeFi has arguably been Ethereums best use case.

Were moving towards a world of mass tokenization, where everything that has value is going to be tokenized, said Adams, the founder of Uniswap, a platform for exchanging ERC-20 tokens. At the moment it looks like Ethereum is at least in the lead in terms of where its going to be tokenized.

Leshner, the founder of the Compound lending protocol, said DeFi has the potential to transform the opaque, expensive and slow systems of traditional finance.

The best things that work in traditional finance are the things that you know are there, they work and theyre not that exciting, Leshner said. Can you supply $100 million of assets and begin earning interest on them immediately? Or can you borrow$100 million of assets instantaneously and note that the entire system works?

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Here is the original post:

CoinDesk Live Recap: Ethereum's DeFi Luminaries Discuss What's Next - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis July 30th 2020 – Yahoo Finance

EOS

EOS rose by 0.79% on Wednesday. Following on from a 5.06% rally on Tuesday, EOS ended the day at $3.0292.

It was another mixed start to the day. EOS fell to an early morning intraday low $2.9560 before making a move.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $2.8319, EOS rallied to a late morning intraday high $3.1603.

EOS broke through the first major resistance level at $3.1288 before falling back to an afternoon low $3.0200.

Steering clear of sub-$3.00 levels, EOS found late support briefly revisit $3.11 levels before wrapping up the day at $3.02 levels.

At the time of writing, EOS was down by 0.48% to $3.0148. A bearish start to the day saw EOS fall from an early morning high $3.0286 to a low $2.9762

EOS left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

EOS would need to avoid a fall through the $3.0485 pivot level to support a run at the first major resistance level at $3.1410.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for EOS to break back through to $3.10 levels.

Barring another extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level at $3.1410 would likely cap any upside.

Failure to move through the $3.0485 pivot would bring the first major support level at $2.9367 into play.

Barring an extended sell-off, EOS should steer well clear of sub-$2.90 levels and the second major support level at $2.8442.

First Major Support Level: $2.9367

Pivot Level: $3.0485

First Major Resistance Level: $3.1410

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $6.62

38% FIB Retracement Level: $9.76

62% FIB Retracement Level: $14.82

Ethereum rose by 0.20% on Wednesday. Reversing a 1.49% fall from Tuesday, Ethereum ended the day at $318.16.

A mixed start saw Ethereum fall to an early morning intraday low $312.66 before finding support.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $306.81, Ethereum rose to an early afternoon intraday high $325.85.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $327.86, Ethereum fell back to sub-$320 levels before finding late support.

A move back through to $323 levels was brief, however, with Ethereum falling back to sub-$320 late in the day.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was down by 0.35% to $317.06. A bearish start to the day saw Ethereum fall from an early morning high $318.16 to a low $315.38.

Ethereum left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Story continues

Ethereum would need to move through the $319 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $325.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ethereum to break back through to $325 levels.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Wednesdays high $325.85 should cap any upside.

Failure to move through the $319 pivot would bring the first major support level at $312 into play.

Barring an extended sell-off, however, Ethereum should steer clear of the second major support level at $306.

First Major Support Level: $312

Pivot Level: $319

First Major Resistance Level: $325

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP rallied by 5.57% on Wednesday. Following on from a 2.67% gain on Tuesday, Ripples XRP ended the day at $0.2437.

A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP rally to an early morning high $0.24459 before easing back.

Ripples XRP broke through the first major resistance level at $0.2379 before falling to an afternoon low $0.2369.

Finding late support, however, Ripples XRP rallied to a late intraday high $0.24988. Ripples XRP broke through the first major resistance level and the second major resistance level at $0.2451 before pulling back.

The late pullback saw Ripples XRP fall back through the second major resistance level.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was down by 1.48% to $0.24010. A bearish start to the day saw Ripples XRP slide from an early morning high $0.24382 to a low $0.24010.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Ripples XRP will need to move back through the $0.2412 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.2530.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ripples XRP to break out from Wednesdays high $0.25049.

Barring another broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level should cap any upside.

In the event of a breakout, Ripples XRP should test the second major resistance level at $0.2622 before any pullback.

Failure to move back through the $0.2412 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.2320 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, Ripples XRP should avoid sub-$0.23 levels and the second major support level at $0.2202.

First Major Support Level: $0.2320

Pivot Level: $0.2412

First Major Resistance Level: $0.2530

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.3638

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.4800

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.6678

Please let us know what you think in the comments below.

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

The rest is here:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis July 30th 2020 - Yahoo Finance

First Mover: Ethereums Transition to Staking Could Push More Traders to Use Derivatives – Yahoo Finance

Ethereums biggest-ever upgrade is supposed to make the blockchain network faster and more efficient. But the new staking system could lock up so many of the networks native ether tokens that investors who want to trade them may have to rely on derivatives markets.

The blockchain, the worlds second-biggest, currently uses a validating mechanism similar to larger Bitcoins known as proof-of-work, where new data blocks and transactions are confirmed via power-hungry computers solving complex cryptographic puzzles.

Under Ethereums multi-year upgrade now underway, the network would shift to a proof-of-stake model, where investors validate transactions by staking ether on the blockchain in exchange for token rewards. Its a bit like depositing dollars into a bank account for interest, paid out in dollars.

Related: Bitcoin Price Rises 3% as Gold Trades Above $2K for First Time

A possible consequence, though, is the new staking system could soak up as much as 30% of the ether tokens in circulation, based on estimates from Adam Cochran, a partner at MetaCartel Ventures, a decentralized investment firm. An address needs to stake at least 32 ether tokens, worth about $12,400 at the current price, to become a validator in the proof-of-stake model.

Its possible to see a future scenario where the incentive to keep assets locked up on-chain is so great as to remove some liquidity from the market, says Diogo Monica, co-founder and president of the digital-asset custodian Anchorage, told CoinDesk in an email.

In May, a survey by the Ethereum developer Consensys found that 65% of ether investors were planning to stake the cryptocurrency under the new system, known as Ethereum 2.0, and half of those wanted to run validator nodes.

Most staking mechanisms have a lock-up period. Rocket Pool Staking, an Ethereum 2.0 staking service, offers staking terms ranging from three months to a year.

Related: US Lawmakers Don't Want Proof-of-Stake Networks to Get Overtaxed

Some ether tokens might get locked in staking as the network upgrade proceeds. Ethereum 2.0 is being rolled out in three phases of what could end up being a multiyear process, with the original proof-of-work blockchain running in parallel until the two networks are merged at Phase 1.5.

Wilson Withiam, a research analyst at the cryptocurrency data firm Messari, told CoinDesk that ethers sent to the deposit contract will likely remain locked up until Phase 1.5, and that could cause a decline in the amount of ether readily available.

Cryptocurrency analysts say ether-staking yields of 3% to 5% would be so tantalizing at a time when government bonds carry near-zero or even negative yields that few investors would opt to leave their tokens in Uniswap or other decentralized trading systems where they could be accessed by traders.

In that case, people will have an incentive to create ways to buy and sell ether shares that abstract whether the underlying asset is currently being staked, Monica said.

Derivatives might be a solution.

Fixed income from staking could even be packaged as a distinct product. Holders who stake their coins could create voucher tokens representing a claim on the stake. Then they could trade the tokens for ether or other cryptocurrencies. So buyers could capture the yield without having to own the underlying asset.

As an alternative to selling voucher tokens, holders could deposit ether as collateral on decentralized lending and borrowing platforms.

Messaris Withiam says he thinks staking derivatives are inevitable.

It will give traders access to tradable assets so that they can continue to do what they do best, Withiam said. Exchanges will be able to offer new markets around these assets and potentially lock customers within their product suite if the synthetic assets arent transferable outside of the exchange.

For now, all this really just amounts to speculation over how speculators will want to speculate on ether.

But theres no lack of motivation: Plenty of cryptocurrency analysts say its possible ethers price could jump as demand increases for tokens to stake. Ethers price has tripled this year to about $390. Such returns far exceed bitcoins 56% gain on the year.

Story continues

Financial incentive to buy and hold both increases the security of the network, and could lead to dramatic price appreciation, said Connor Abendschien, an analyst at the research firm Digital Assets Data.

BTC: Price: $11,509 (BPI) | 24-Hr High: $11,521 | 24-Hr Low: $11,045

Trend:Bitcoin is showing signs of life with a near 3% rise to over $11,500 on Wednesday after a lackluster day yesterday.

The bulls will be hoping to maintain a foothold above $11,400, having failed to keep gains above that level in the previous two trading days. If successful, stronger buying interest may emerge, pushing prices to the psychological hurdle of $12,000 last put to test on July 27.

However, if the market fails to absorb selling pressure above $10,400, a re-test of the daily chart support at around $10,900 may be seen.

A continued bullish scenario looks likely with gold, an inflation-hedge, rallying to record highs above $2,000 and the U.S. dollar losing ground across the board. Both bitcoin and gold have recently moved in tandem, with Goldman Sachs warning that the greenback could lose its global reserve status.

The overall bias will stay bullish as long as prices are held above the former hurdle-turned-support at $10,500 (February high).

The rest is here:

First Mover: Ethereums Transition to Staking Could Push More Traders to Use Derivatives - Yahoo Finance

BNB Investors Remain Bullish on the Pending Binance IEO Announcement – Ethereum World News

In brief:

Back in mid-July, CZ Tweeted that the Binance Launchpad team was reviewed a list of promising crypto projects in hopes of selecting one as the next IEO on the platform. The last time the Binance Launchpad hosted a crowdfunding event was in April. As a result, Binance Coin (BNB) investors have been waiting paitently for an announcement from the team providing details of the next one.

Since the initial announcement by CZ, Binance Coin investors have expressed their optimism with respect to the upcoming IEO. Furthermore, some have taken to social media to remind the Binance team of their promise to announce the details of the next crowdfunding event on the platform as can be seen in the following Tweet.

Additionally, speculation is high that the next Binance Launchpad IEO will be a DeFi project

The excitement and anticipation of a new Binance Launchpad IEO has positively affected the value of Binance Coin (BNB) in the crypto markets. When CZ made the announcement that an IEO was in the pipeline, Binance Coin (BNB) was valued at $17. A quick glance at the BNB/USDT chart reveals that Binance Coin has since broken the $19 and $21 resistance level with the digital asset now consolidating at the $22 price level.

With the details of the Binance IEO yet to be announced, the value of Binance Coin (BNB) could continue on its upward trajectory. If the general crypto-market environment is maintained, BNB could possibly break other resistance levels such as $23, $24.5, $26.2 or even the February peak of $27.3.

As with all analyses of Binance Coin (BNB), traders and investors are advised to have an eye out for any sudden Bitcoin price movements that might affect their trading positions. Furthermore, stop losses and low leverage are advised to protect trading capital from sudden volatility.

See the rest here:

BNB Investors Remain Bullish on the Pending Binance IEO Announcement - Ethereum World News

Ethereum Price Hits $392 And Confirms Monthly Uptrend Not Seen Since 2017 – CryptoTicker.io

Ethereum had a massive breakout today above a long-term resistance level at $366 on Binance and $363 on Bitfinex. This breakout confirms a monthly uptrend for the Ethereum price, something not seen since 2017. Of course, the month has just started and Ethereums price still needs to close above this resistance level at the end of the month, however, its a crucial first step to reach the all-time high again.

ETH is obviously overextended now but FOMO is definitely playing a big role in keeping the bullish momentum alive. Ideally, the bulls would like to see Ethereums price breaking $400 before a healthy consolidation. They would also love to see a clear monthly close above $360 and absolutely confirm that monthly uptrend.

Looking at the monthly chart, we can observe basically no resistance levels to the all-time high above $1,400. ETH price might encounter a slight resistance point at $838, established in May 2018.

So, the monthly chart is not showing a lot of resistance, what about the weekly chart? The next resistance level seems to be located at $515,28, quite far from the current Ethereum price at $387. Bulls will also encounter some resistance at $838 as we mentioned before and then $979 before the all-time high.

Of course, psychological levels are important, especially $1,000 but shouldnt be a problem for the bulls considering the current momentum. The weekly chart has an overextended RSI, something that also hasnt happened since December 2017 when Ethereum crashed down to $83, months later.

The most important positive factor for Ethereums price is the increasing bull volume on the weekly chart after smashing all the important resistance levels. While the overall trading volume is still on the low end, it is increasing which is a positive sign for the bulls.

Perhaps the most significant metric is the huge increase in market dominance by Ethereum. On January 2020, Ethereum had a 7.3% market dominance and has now peaked at 12.22%, a massive surge compared to Bitcoin which lost 7 points.

We know the price of Ethereum is eventually going to see a pullback. However, its really hard to predict since FOMO is continuously pushing the price of Ethereum up. The daily chart is again extremely bullish and showing an increase in trading volume again. The RSI remains massively overextended at 90 points but a similar overextension was seen in February 2020.

If Ethereum starts consolidating, the nearest support level is located at $327,53, the 12-EMA, and then $293,38, the 26-EMA. There is also a $306 low formed on July 28. Considering how fast Ethereum went up, there are not many support levels below but EMAs should be enough for the bulls.

Buyers could also form another daily bull flag and consolidate only down to $360 before another leg up to convincingly close above $360 and confirm that monthly uptrend.

In order to support and motivate the CryptoTicker team, especially in times of Corona, to continue to deliver good content, we would like to ask you to donate a small amount. Independent journalism can only survive if we stick together as a society. Thank you

Instant Crypto Credit Lines from only 5.9% APR. Earn up to 8% interest per year on your Stablecoins, USD, EUR & GBP. $100 million custodial insurance.

Ad

This post may contain promotional links that help us fund the site. When you click on the links, we receive a commission - but the prices do not change for you! 🙂

Disclaimer: The authors of this website may have invested in crypto currencies themselves. They are not financial advisors and only express their opinions. Anyone considering investing in crypto currencies should be well informed about these high-risk assets.

Trading with financial products, especially with CFDs involves a high level of risk and is therefore not suitable for security-conscious investors.CFDs are complex instruments and carry a high risk of losing money quickly through leverage. Be aware that most private Investors lose money, if they decide to trade CFDs. Any type of trading and speculation in financial products that can produce an unusually high return is also associated with increased risk to lose money. Note that past gains are no guarantee of positive results in the future.

Posted By

Ethereum just managed to briefly climb above $360, hitting $360,52 on Binance before a slight rejection towards $357. Currently, Ethereum

Today we are going to be talking about 5 major cryptocurrencies that already have a high market capitalization, yet still

The cryptocurrency market is running as if to meet the moon. Almost all the coins are performing well. The Bitcoin

Link:

Ethereum Price Hits $392 And Confirms Monthly Uptrend Not Seen Since 2017 - CryptoTicker.io

Ethereum and Reddit: The 5-day challenge and solutions – Somag News

Four possible applications could answer Reddits challenge to protocol developers on Ethereum. Until the deadline, which ended on July 31, a large number of proposals were observed by them.

Although most of the developers of applications on the Ethereum network did not present viable solutions, there are others that seem to be quite attractive. Some of them meet expectations and may be approved.

Reddits challenge to Ethereum users and developers is to provide an answer or solution to various network problems. Some are proposed to handle 100,000 specific claims, 25,000 subscriptions, 75,000 one-off point burns and 100,000 transfers.

The difficulty of this Reddit challenge to the Ethereum community increases with the short time they put in for a solution. Despite this, there are some proposals that seem to bring solutions.

Aztec is the first of the platforms to present possible solutions. To do this, they propose the implementation of a private Zk-Rollup package. This consists of, for example, the transactions that Reddit needs, are made through the Ethereum Blockchain network.

The weak point of this would be that the Gas charged for each movement would be higher than the cost of the transactions that are generally made of ETH.

Building transactions can take, in the longest case, up to 40 seconds. These require up to 3 minutes to be fully completed. The project promises an effort to improve interactions.

Another proposal for Reddits challenge to the Ethereum community comes from the OMG protocol, formerly OmiseGo. This consists of the use of plasma side chains to solve scalability problems.

It should be noted that Plasma has a functionality similar to Bitcoins Lightning Network. Both consist of improving the scalability of the Blockchain network. In the case of Plasma, it has existed since 2017 as a proposal of the founder of this network Vitalik Buterin together with Joseph Poon.

The functionality of this proposal of the Ethereum OMG protocol to Reddits challenge, is to create parallel chains of plasma. To do this, the application creates a Chrome extension, which can be adapted to the Reddit interface.

For its part, the Skale protocol proposes a decentralized cloud computing platform. It is a high performance proposal which is primarily designated by cloud computing.

Skale assures that, responding to Reddits challenge to the Ethereum network, involves providing attractive solutions. One of them is to eliminate transaction fees. In this way, the operation would be similar to what exists on the Amazon platform.

To do this, Reddit should create its own platform on the Skale Blockchain network and reimplement its Community Points logic. For the company it could have a cost between $ 350 and $ 44,000 USD. All this, they explain, depending on the size of the chain.

View post:

Ethereum and Reddit: The 5-day challenge and solutions - Somag News

Here is the Best Time of Day to Save on Ethereum Gas Prices – Cryptonews

Source: Adobe/bogdandimages

The Ethereum (ETH) blockchain doesn't sleep, but people do - and this means that the time of day can be used to one's advantage to pay lower transaction fees.

"In order to save on gas prices, the best time is to submit our transaction is the early weekend morning Singapore time and the worst time is on Thursdays at around 8 PM [12 PM UTC] , Singapore time," according to Marco Marchioro, chief scientist at blockchain startup DEXTF.

Marchioro noted that there are more transactions during the Asian daytime, meaning that one can save on gas prices if they wait for the very early morning in Asia. The author particularly mentioned Singapore as "one of the most vibrant places for companies in the DeFi space."

Therefore, on average, the best time to save on fees is to submit transactions between 2 AM (18:00 UTC) and 8 AM (12 AM UTC) Singapore time. Furthermore, "the worst time during the week for gas prices is observed on Thursdays at UTC noon, or 8 PM in Singapore."

The report stated that there is a positive average surplus during the weekdays, while the gas-price surplus stays negative for most of the weekend, with small positive peaks at 14:00 and 15:00 UTC on both days. "This means that in order to save on gas, on average, it is better to wait for the weekend to submit transactions to the Ethereum blockchain."

"With the growing presence of sleepless and unfaltering bots, and the fast evolution of artificial intelligence, we expect to observe in the years to come less and less hourly or weekly periodicity on transactions in all blockchains," DEXTF's Marchioro said.

Meanwhile, crypto entrepreneur George Harrap added that "Crypto's rise has been dependent on Asia since the beginning of Mtgox in Japan."

____

Learn more:Coinbase Blames Performance Issues on Ethereum Fee SpikeMedian Ethereum Fee Up Almost 1,300% Since April, Bitcoin Fees Jump Too

Read the rest here:

Here is the Best Time of Day to Save on Ethereum Gas Prices - Cryptonews

Ethereum Turns 5 But ETH Price Vs. Bitcoin Never Recovered Since 2018 – Cointelegraph

Ethereum is five years old and Ether (ETH) has surprised investors with a trip above $300 but compared to Bitcoin (BTC), the biggest altcoin is underperforming.

As data from on-chain monitoring resource Skew confirms, ETH/USD as a percentage of BTC/USD remains far below its all-time highs.

As of Ethereums birthday, Ethers share stood at 3.1% of the BTC price. At its peak in January 2018, the figure was 11%.

Since the altcoin boom over two years ago, Ether has failed to reclaim much of its lost ground as Bitcoin took over the broader cryptocurrency market cap.

As developers pushed ahead with Ethereums transformation to Ethereum 2.0, only recently has ETH/USD begun rewarding patient bagholders.

The past week alone has seen price gains of 45%, beating Bitcoins performance as previous resistance at $285 fell away. At press time, ETH/USD traded at $325, fuelled by the DeFi token phenomenon and associated trading boom.

Just tested former resistance as support to the sat, popular analyst Scott Melker confirmed on Tuesday.

Ether price as a percentage of Bitcoin price 3-year chart. Source: Skew

Nonetheless, not everyone was convinced.

ETH/BTC stops dumping for a change and ETH maxis go full blown manic, Blockstream developer Grubles wrote on Twitter on Sunday.

Just recently ETH/BTC was at Coinbase-listing levels from nearly 5 years ago.

Meanwhile, the past weeks have seen significant changes in realized correlation between the two cryptocurrencies, with the 1-month measure showing particular divergence from the norm.

ETH/BTC realized correlation comparison. Source: Skew

Cointelegraph has published a dedicated retrospective to celebrate Ethereums fifth anniversary, taking a look at the projects ups and downs since 2015.

Tomorrow, dont miss our upcoming conference Cointelegraph Crypto Traders Live. More than 30 star speakers including Raoul Pal, John Bollinger, Mike Novogratz, DataDash and Jon Najarian will gather on July 30th to discuss the challenges of crypto trading. Join the show for over 9 hours of crypto trading content!

Read the rest here:

Ethereum Turns 5 But ETH Price Vs. Bitcoin Never Recovered Since 2018 - Cointelegraph

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis August 3rd, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

EOS

EOS slid by 10.93% on Sunday. Reversing a 6.71% gain from Saturday, EOS ended the week up by 8.23% to $2.9409.

It was a choppy start to the day. EOS rose to an early morning intraday high $3.4852 before hitting reverse.

EOS broke through the first major resistance level at $3.4029 before tumbling to an early morning intraday low $2.4884.

The sell-off saw EOS slide through the days major support levels before briefly revisiting $3.0 levels.

EOS moved back through the third major support level at $2.7121 and the second major support level at $2.9748.

It was a bearish 2nd half of the day, however. EOS fell back through the second major support level to end the day in the deep red.

At the time of writing, EOS was up by 0.75% to $2.9631. A mixed start to the day saw EOS fall to an early morning low $2.9022 before rising to a high $2.9631.

EOS left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

EOS would need to move through the $2.9715 pivot level to support a run at the first major resistance level at $3.4546.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for EOS to break back through to $3.40 levels.

Barring another extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level would likely cap any upside.

Failure to move through the $2.9715 pivot would bring the first major support level at $2.4578 into play.

Barring an extended sell-off, EOS should steer well clear of the second major support level at $1.9747.

First Major Support Level: $2.4578

Pivot Level: $2.9715

First Major Resistance Level: $3.4546

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $6.62

38% FIB Retracement Level: $9.76

62% FIB Retracement Level: $14.82

Ethereum fell by 3.92% on Sunday. Partially reversing an 11.69% rally from Saturday, Ethereum ended the week up by 19.52% to $371.21.

Tracking the broader market, Ethereum rallied to an early morning intraday high $415.00 before hitting reverse.

Ethereum broke through the first major resistance level at $406.35 before tumbling to an early morning intraday low $325.75.

The selloff saw Ethereum fall through the first major support level at $356.1 before finding support.

More significantly, Ethereum also fell through the 38.2% FIB of $367 before the partial recovery.

Ethereum moved back through to $389 levels before falling back to end the day at sub-$380.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was up by 1.00% to $375.93. A mixed start to the day saw Ethereum fall to an early morning low $366.34 before rising to a high $376.63.

While leaving the major support and resistance levels untested, Ethereum found support at the 38.2% FIB of $367 early on.

Story continues

Ethereum would need to avoid a fall through the $371 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $416.22.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ethereum to break out form Saturdays high $415.00.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level should cap any upside.

A fall through the $371 pivot would bring the first major support level at $326.97 into play.

Barring another extended sell-off, however, Ethereum should steer well clear of the second major support level at $281.74.

First Major Support Level: $326.97

Pivot Level: $371

First Major Resistance Level: $416.22

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP fell by 1.25% on Sunday. Following a 12.06% rally on Saturday, Ripples XRP ended the week up by 33.50% to $0.28764.

A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP rise to an early morning intraday high $0.3262 before hitting reverse.

Ripples XRP broke through the first major resistance level at $0.3071 and the second major resistance level at $0.3233.

The reversal saw Ripples XRP slide through the first major support level at $0.2653 to an intraday low $0.24158.

Steering clear of sub-$0.24 support levels, Ripples XRP revisited $0.30 levels before falling back into the red.

In spite of the bearish day, Ripples XRP moved back through the first major support level to limit the loss.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was up by 2.95% to $0.29612. A mixed start to the day saw Ripples XRP fall to an early morning low $0.28383 before rising to a high $0.29661.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Ripples XRP will need to avoid a fall through the $0.2851 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.3287.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ripples XRP to break out from Saturdays high $0.3262.

Barring another broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level should cap any upside.

In the event of a breakout, Ripples XRP could make a run at the second major resistance level at $0.0.3698.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $0.2851 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.2441 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, Ripples XRP should avoid sub-$0.24 levels, however.

First Major Support Level: $0.24441

Pivot Level: $0.2851

First Major Resistance Level: $0.3287

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.3638

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.4800

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.6678

Please let us know what you think in the comments below.

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

View post:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis August 3rd, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

A Birthday Look: 5 Years of Ethereum Network Updates, Delays and Changes – Cointelegraph

Five years ago to the month, a massive crypto project launched, forever changing the landscape of the crypto and blockchain space. Since its 2015 opening day in July, Ethereum has undergone a number of planned changes. The projects recent move into proof-of-stake, or PoS, has faced a number of delays.

On July 28, 2015, Ethereum unveiled details showing an expected launch for Frontier, the networks inaugural framework, between July 29 and July 30. The project started up on July 30, as planned.

By February of the next year, Ethereum had become a major player in the blockchain and crypto industry, with its Ether (ETH) asset holding the spot as the second most valuable crypto asset on the market.

Ethereum had four mains stops along its development journey: Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis and Serenity.

Ethereum publicized a planned move into its second phase, Homestead, on Feb. 29, 2016, expected to launch on March 14. Homestead arrived on the network on March 14, as expected, according to a blog post from Consensys.

With 2017 came talk of a move toward Metropolis, a hard fork expected to hit the network in the latter days of September of that year, as per August 2017 Cointelegraph reporting. Later reporting showed hard forks Byzantium and Constantinople as the anticipated outcome of the event. By September, the event looked paced for an on-time release.

According to Cointelegraph reporting in November 2019, Byzantium came on Oct. 16, 2017, while Constantinople arrived on Feb. 28, 2019. Istanbul followed on Dec. 7, 2019.

The fourth phase, Serenity, also known as Ethereum 2.0, or ETH 2.0, still remains in the works the result of a lengthy string of delays. The team touted a January 2020 launch date, although, by July, the industry still awaits the network alteration. A move that ushers in PoS, Ethereum 2.0s completed test network reportedly opens on Aug. 4.

Contemplating Ethereums journey through the years in a recent July interview, co-founder Vitalik Buterin told the host of the Hashing It Out podcast that he and the Ethereum team underestimated the length of time the update would take.

Excerpt from:

A Birthday Look: 5 Years of Ethereum Network Updates, Delays and Changes - Cointelegraph

Ethereums Adoption Rate After 5 Years Far Exceeds Bitcoins – Cointelegraph

One key metric suggests that Ethereum (ETH) has enjoyed a much faster rate of adoption and growth in the first five years of existence than Bitcoin (BTC).

Comparing the total number of addresses after n days for both Bitcoin and Ethereum. Source: Cointelegraph, Glassnode, Etherscan.

We compared the total number of addresses created in the first five years on both major blockchain networks. While the number of addresses could be a good gauge of the rate adoption, it may not be perfect for various reasons. One reason is that the accounting systems in the two networks are different.

Total number of addresses in the first five years of existence Ethereum versus Bitcoin. Source: Cointelegraph, Glassnode, Etherscan.

In the first 600 days, the growth rate for both networks is quite similar. By mid-2017, however, Ethereums curve became much steeper. The most obvious explanation is the ICO boom. The creation of thousands of ERC20 tokens and their subsequent distribution and trading led to a much greater rate of Ethereum address creation.

Another advantage that Ethereum had from the beginning is that it was standing on the shoulders of Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies; whereas Bitcoin was the worlds first decentralized electronic currency. Bitcoins adoption was slow and gradual. The slope of its curve never had an uplift similar to the ICO boom.

In another five years, a similar comparison will hopefully still remain relevant.

Go here to read the rest:

Ethereums Adoption Rate After 5 Years Far Exceeds Bitcoins - Cointelegraph

Why DeFi on Ethereum Is Like Algorithmic Trading in the 90s – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Mona El Isa would never go back to traditional finance.

The former Goldman Sachs vice president developed the Melon protocol, a vehicle for creating Ethereum-based hedge funds without having to spend the tens of thousands of dollars it would take to launch a fund in traditional markets.

Managers who are used to a fund custodian and fund administrator are starting to experiment with automating technology, El Isa said.

El Isa admits that not many founders in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space have her background in traditional capital markets. In the traditional world, DeFi resembles what algorithmic trading was in the 1990s, said Tarun Chitra, CEO of Gauntlet Network, a business that does stress-tests on blockchain networks and DeFi platforms.

A lot of money was made on random equities on electronic exchanges, Chitra said of the Clinton-era innovation. They were people who were more technical than financial.

Now Ethereums surging DeFi sector could force a similar migration.

Chitra said some traders are beginning to move away from over-the-counter (OTC) desks in favor of emerging DeFi platforms like automated market maker (AMM) Curve and lending protocol Compound. Why bother with an OTC middleman?

Still, while proprietary traders have taken an interest in DeFi, few hedge funds and banks have entertained it, he said.

But builders whove come from equities to DeFi see a lot of opportunity for growth.

New interest

For example, in the Melon protocols first year there were almost no users and only $250,000 on the platform, El Isa said. After Melons user interface was updated last February, the platforms total assets increased to $1.2 million. Now the number of funds on Melon has tripled in the last four months, although many of them are experimental, El Isa added. Around two dozen of the funds on the platform are real funds.

The biggest success story on our platform is now half of the whole [assets under management], El Isa said, referring to a closed fund that only lets in whitelisted investors. Hes got $625,000 on his network.

For traditional funds, operation costs are normally less than $100,000 for the first year and $75,000 for every year after that, she added. On Melon, the setup cost is currently $100 for the first year and around $1,000 to $2,000 per year in gas prices after that (the cost was around a fourth of those estimates last year, before gas prices started to spike).

As funds build longer track records, El Isa hopes Melon will become more attractive to investors. The track records are not long enough to make that attractive for people yet, she said. I think in a few months people will be like, Wow, this fund has consistently been outperforming ether.

Even if El Isa ends up moving from building protocols to launching another fund, she said shes determined to do so in DeFi. Melon protocol is now decentralized and El Isa has launched Avantgarde Financial, a company that plays the lead developer role for Melon. El Isa was formerly the CEO of Melonport AG.

Less scary

Barney Mannerings, CEO of Vega Protocol, which aims to allow users to spin up a market for derivatives anywhere in the world, said that while DeFi is still in an experimental phase, he sees a great deal of interest from the large investment banks the ones he used to advise while at Capco and Accenture.

Instead of creating a new derivative over the course of a year, Vega will allow users to submit market proposals and deploy them over the course of a few hours.

In keeping with Ethereums ethos, the protocol was designed to cut out the middlemen: In this instance, the commercial bank or broker that consumers pay to trade and the investment bankers those middlemen pay to trade for the consumer.

I was always thinking about the traders that I knew in London and New York and the products that they used in the real economy, Mannerings said.

In addition to building out Vega, Mannerings said he hopes large countries like the United States develop more crypto integrations to the traditional economy.

If I want to hedge my U.S. dollar risk on Vega and I can do it for a fifth of the cost, thats great, but I also need to make sure that I can get U.S. dollars into an appropriate stablecoin and take that position easily, he said. We have to chip away at that risk and make it less and less scary.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Visit link:

Why DeFi on Ethereum Is Like Algorithmic Trading in the 90s - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

Ethereums First ICO Blazes Trail To A World Without Bosses – Forbes

Augur co-founders Jeremy Gardner (second-from left) and Joey Krug (second from right) gather with ... [+] their founding team.

If it werent for horses, Joey Krug might not have ever gotten into ethereum. Growing up in the small farming town of Knoxville, Illinois, he and his younger brother used to ride their bikes through fields of corn and soybeans looking for trouble. One day, when he was about 9 years old, Krug came across the farm of a local school teacher, who raised and rode horses. He instantly fell in love with the powerful creatures, and pedaled home as fast as he could to ask his parents for one.

Perhaps not realizing the entrepreneurial spirit already growing in their son, they offered him a deal. They said, No, but if you go there and you muck stalls every day for a year, we'll get you a horse, he says. I think they assumed there was no way I was going to do that. But I did. I went there every day, mucked stalls, brushed the horses. And so they finally got me this pink horse, a quarter horse named Shimmer.

When not riding horses, the young boy excelled on his familys computer, figuring out ways to hack it so it would turn on in the wrong order and get stuck trying to permanently boot up the CD-ROM. By the time he enrolled in an eighth-grade beginners computer course, it took him only 15 minutes to do 45 minutes worth of work. Instead of going home, the 12-year-old Krug deposited $20 of birthday money into an off-shore book, and placed a bet.

Not only did the bet win him $20, jump-starting more sophisticated models tracking race distance, jockey and track conditions in a spreadsheet, but it merged his love of horses with computers. Now 26, Krug is the co-chief investment officer at Pantera Capital and a cofounder of Augur, an open-source no-limits betting platform built on the ethereum blockchain that lets anyone build any kind of betting market, without a bookie.

Today, Krug and a team of open-source developers scattered around the world launched Version 2 of that platform, which amounts to a significant leap forward in the world of decentralized applications that function similar to the internet but without the need for trusted third parties. If successful, the profound upgrades could be used to more than just place horse-bets without a bookie; they could mark a turning point in the next generation of the internet.

When you think about centralized power, it kind of always corrupts, says Krug, 26, who might in other circumstances have the CEO title, if not for the unusual nature of the project he cofounded. Somehow, somebody takes too much power, and they do something they shouldn't. And if you think about regular businesses, too, they have the same incentive, to make as much money as possible. And so Auger is very different. It's sort of like public infrastructure.

Augur co-creator Joey Krug on Shimmer, the Palomino horse his parents got him after mucking horse ... [+] stalls for a year.

Born in July 1995, Krug grew up surrounded by farms, but his family werent farmers. His mom was a physicians assistant, and his dad an ER doctor. During his freshman year of college, he discovered bitcoin on Overclock.net, a forum dedicated to expanding computer processing power. Shortly thereafter, Krug read retired Congressman Ron Pauls The Case For Gold and was struck by how irresponsible bureaucracy had led to a U.S. debt of more than $10 trillion at the time.

After hearing further stories from his parents about how another bureaucracy, around the U.S. healthcare system, had deprived them of the joy they once felt helping others, Krug briefly enrolled in Pomona College, based in Claremont, California, with a double focus on computer science and pre-med, hoping he could streamline the process. Fate would have it, though, that hed get permanently derailed by blockchain. Still, his goal of fixing broken bureaucracy never wavered.

After founding a bitcoin club at school, Krug built a bitcoin point-of-sale app and went door to door to try to convince local Claremont businesses to accept the cryptocurrency. Unable to find customers, he moved to San Francisco in search of another way forward. At around this time a team of researchers at Princeton published an influential paper on creating decentralized prediction markets, or distributed autonomous organizations (DAOs), where betting is used as an incentive to create valuable data about the future. Unlike brash predictions carelessly made around the internet without repercussions, these predictions would have monetary repercussions, but no bookies, or any other middlemen to oversee them.

It's interesting from a wide range of aspects, says Krug, reminiscing about the paper, which also influenced ethereum inventor Vitalik Buterin, now 26. All the way from my horse-betting days to a real world informational standpoint, you can get data about the real world that you wouldn't necessarily have without it.

Initially, Krug joined forces with college friend Jeremy Gardner, now 28, and Jack Peterson, now 37, to build their own implementation of a project that had been circling around the cryptocurrency community, called TruthCoin, that used a modified version of the bitcoin blockchain to incentivize making accurate predictions. Buterin caught wind of the project and approached Krug, explaining that he was in the final stages of launching ethereum, a blockchain similar to bitcoin, but with a computer language that would make it much easier to write more elaborate instructions, called smart contracts, to directly connect bettors to each other.

To pay for all this, over a 45-day period in the fall of 2015, Augur ran the first-ever initial coin offering (ICO), in which tokens were issued on the ethereum blockchain. The privately-held Forecast Foundation, based in Estonia, sold or distributed 11,000 REP tokens to be used on Augur, 80% of which went to the crowd, or people interested in participating in the prediction market, 16% of which went to the Augur founding team, including Buterin, and 4% of which went to support the foundation itself. A total of about $5.2 million was raised for the development of the platform by selling more than one million ether tokens and 12,000 bitcoins used to pay for the tokens. At the current rates those tokens would be worth nearly a half-billion dollars.

But this was the very earliest days of what would come to be known as the ICO craze. Not only were the terms of the ICO more generous than many later capital raises using blockchain, but the founders objective was more philosophically aligned with the principles of decentralization inherent in blockchain. Just two years later an Augur competitor, Gnosis, raised more than twice what Augur did ($12 million) by selling a fraction of the tokens (5% instead of 80%), in a mere 15 minutes. That left the Gnosis team with 95% percent of the tokens, then valued at nearly $300 million, making them independently wealthy with little more than a white paper describing their idea. Between then and October 2018 more than $20 billion was raised in ICOs according to news site Coindesks tracker, before the bubble burst amid regulatory uncertainty around whether or not these tokens qualified as securities.

While REP tokens are able to accumulate and lose value, similar to securities, and are currently worth $20.90 each, for a total liquid market value of $230 million, according to data site Messari, they are unlike securities in that they are crucial for the proper functioning of the prediction market, giving them the unofficial status of utility tokens. So-called reporters in the Augur ecosystem are required to stake their REP (short for reputation) tokens while they are helping determine the outcome of an event. If the reporter reports in consensus with others, they receivea small portion of the protocols fees and their REP remains intact. A reporter can dispute the system 21 times, with their required stake doubling each time, before a fork, or copy, of Augur is automatically created and essentially two different versions of the truth exist.

Ultimately truth is going to be a public consensus that ends up being determined in the long run by which world does it appear that people want to live? says Forecast Foundation operations director Tom Kyser. And presumably that world is going to be the one that the general public and consensus believes accurately reflects reality.

In the early days of the build, a team of independent and paid coders from around the world worked largely under the management of Augur co-founder Jack Peterson, a biophysicist with a Ph.D from the University of California. After initially laying much of the groundwork for the code, Krug was selected to be a Peter Thiel fellow in June 2016 and the following year joined as the co-chief investor at cryptocurrency and blockchain investor Pantera Capital, which has approximately $500 million in assets under management.

The month after Krug joined Pantera, on July 9, 2018, the first version of Augur was launched, a very slow, expensive, difficult to use version, according to Krug. But one that showed that a gambling platform without bookies was possible, and that any kind of market could be built on it. At that point, nobody had any idea whether this would actually work at all, he says. A lot of these were untested ideas. In version one, dedicated users would have to wait between six hours and 12 hours just to download the app, and could then create markets, determine potential outcomes and make bets denominated in the highly volatile, and increasingly valuable ethereum cryptocurrency.

In total 2,895 markets were created on version one generating volume of 69,662 ether, or roughly $15 million to $20 million depending on the price of ether over the two year period, according to the Forecast Foundation, which helps oversee development. 2,609 unique visitors made more than 15,000 transactions. 650 reporters staked 1,385,843 REP tokens for fees resulting in 5,758 REP in disputes. To give an idea of how much thats worth, on the early platforms busiest day, $2.5 million worth of assets were locked in active bets at the same time.To give an idea of how much is at stake here, the global online betting industry alone, dominated by middlemen that connect bettors, including FanDuel and Draft Kings, generated $53 billion revenue last year, according to Grand View Research, and is on track to have a compound annual growth rate of 11.5% from 2020 to 2027.

One of the more prolific applications built on version one was Guesser, a venture-backed outfit based largely in Madrid that uses election forecasting models developed by the same market research firm employed by Marco Rubio in his 2016 Presidential campaign, Optimus Analytics, to let users bet on anything from how many times U.S. President Donald Trump mentions China in a speech, to whether or not hell be re-elected later this year. Today in politics, people rely a lot on public polling as a source of data for how a betting market might behave, says Guesser CEO, Jose Garay, 24. We provide them with a data engine with orders of magnitude more data points than you can get from simply public polling. And this allows you to set a very straight forward probability, a very solid price, on each outcome.

The problem was, ethers fluctuating price meant that if a market didnt fulfill for months down the road (imagine placing a bet on who wins the U.S. Presidential election today) users could accurately predict the future, but still lose money if their staked funds decreased in value. In addition, with the price of ethereum increasing from about $1.00 when Augur concluded its ICO to $316 today, many ether owners have been hesitant to trade it, resulting in low liquidity. If Augur version two has to crack one problem, or one challenge says Garay, It's bringing liquidity in big volumes.

While Jack Peterson was largely responsible for managing the somewhat autonomous team of developers working on version one, Krug worked overtime in addition to his job at Pantera Capital to help bring version two over the finish line. As of today, Pantera hasnt invested in any startups building on Augur, choosing rather to let the firms raise their own seed capital, then look to the best of those firms for a possible Series A investment, says Krug. We'd like to invest in whoever we think is doing the best.

Among the notable changes in version two, Augur now has a scam filter that moves likely-fraudulent markets to an area on the site not immediately accessible to new users, and is integrated with a number of distributed applications (dapps) that also dont rely on trusted third parties. For example, it is integrated with the 0x open source software that enables free peer-to-peer bets instead of the fee that was previously charged. Instead of betting ether, users bet DAI, a stablecoin pegged to the U.S, dollar, powered by another dapp called MakerDAO, that provides a free, open-source programming interface for anyone who wants to accept the token. Instead of relying on a trusted third-party to convert a users funds from ether or another cryptocurrency to DAI, Augur is now also integrated with Uniswap, another dapp to automatically provide liquidity on ethereum. Think of it as a DAO of dapps, among the first of a new kind of companies without bosses. Everything is sort of interweaved together to broadcast data in an automated fashion, says Krug.

Screen capture of Augur, v2's account summary page.

In a lot of ways, the launch of version two of Augur is a return to an earlier, more idealisticperhaps more naivetime when blockchain innovators might get rich, but thats not what they set out to do, according to Buterin. In addition to encouraging Krug and the founding Augur team to switch from building on a fork of bitcoin to ethereum, Buterin provided technical insight into how to simplify Augur game theory in a way that more efficiently incentivized truth-telling, and in-turn owns an undisclosed amount of REP.

At the beginning, it was much less certain that crypto could have worked as a thing at all. And so the teams that were going in were generally teams that have believed in the vision that we're really doing this collective project for the public good, says Buterin. Obviously you have to fund developments, but we're definitely not going to be greedy about it. And I think what happened over time, and as the model got validated, it started to be definitely this kind of change in mindset where just the fact that it seemed like a clear profit opportunity made it something closer to a kind of regular startup thing.

Now, thats not to say the Augur developers are philanthropists. While Krug and the Forecast Foundation team declined to share how much of the original ICO capital they still hold, they explained that the idea isnt to ever turn the foundation into a profit-generating entity. Rather, the goal is for the organization to follow a similar path as Melonport, a DAO for hedge fund infrastructure, and slowly dissolve once the code on which anyone else can build is complete. At that time, and that time alone, Krug says he might start looking for profit.

Someday the foundation will run out of money and basically, kind of disappear and this becomes an ongoing community developed open source software project, he says, At which point, we could maybe create a for-profit entity on top that does actually try to aggressively make money.

Read more:

Ethereums First ICO Blazes Trail To A World Without Bosses - Forbes

Proof-of-Stake Chains Team Up to Prove DeFi Is Bigger Than Ethereum – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Liquidity mining is coming to proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchains.

Anchor, the new decentralized finance (DeFi) platform from Terra, Cosmos, Web3 Foundation and Solana, is being designed to launch with a governance-token reward. Version 1 is going live in October, according to a Terra co-founder.

Anchor is a two-pronged platform for PoS token holders. The system offers savings accounts and a lending platform the bread and butter that made DeFi on Ethereum a multibillion-dollar enterprise.

Weve been looking at ways in order to earn passive income on our users, for unused balances in unused assets, Do Kwon, a co-founder of Terra and the startup built atop it, Chai, told CoinDesk in a phone call. Terra is a two-token stablecoin protocol that has risen to prominence in Korea as a payments provider known for saving users money.

As Kwon explained, Alipay rapidly gained market share by promising users a better savings rate if they held cash in their mobile app. Kwon believes his team can craft a DeFi system that can produce a predictable rate of return that performs considerably better than bank savings.

Further, if the trends so far hold, adding a liquidity mining element should bolster those returns.

The new governance token is likely to be named Anchor, like the platform, Kwon said. It will distribute over the course of five years and there will be no pre-mine for Anchors creators.

While its launching with a small set of PoS tokens, Kwon said Anchor hopes to make it very easy for other projects to join by meeting a set of technical standards. We really imagine this closer to the Rosetta standard that Coinbase published, Kwon said.

How Anchor will work

One of the general trends of DeFi is can you give consumers something that looks like a savings account, that is a yield-paying crypto asset, Zaki Manian, founder of Iqlusion and a leader in the Cosmos ecosystem, told CoinDesk in a phone call.

The first thing that has to be understood about DeFi is this: When someone deposits a token somewhere to earn yield, what they get back is a token. Users dont have an account like in Web2; they have a wallet. Depositors get a digital note in their wallet after making a deposit, and they can as easily give that to someone else as hold onto it.

Staking works the same way. PoS protocols require their validators (which function like bitcoin miners) to post a stake to do the computational work that blockchains require. Validators ante up to win block rewards, and their stake is at risk if they misbehave.

Staking is DeFi, Solana CEO Anatoly Yakovenko told CoinDesk in a phone call. Composability between chains is fairly easy to build between proof-of-stake networks.

Spreading the wealth

One fear PoS leaders have had is that a few big operations would dominate all the networks. The most obvious threat: major centralized exchanges. They can give traders convenience and staking returns, which is tough to beat.

If there isnt a decentralized alternative to this, proof-of-stake is not a viable idea. This is the frontier, Manian said.

This new token represents a future claim to yield. So, for example, if a Cosmos investor deposited 100 ATOM onto a staking platform advertising a 5% annual yield, they would get a token back for their deposit. If they traded that token in at the end of a year, they would get back 105 ATOM. Anchor calls these tokens that represent stakes bTokens.

Much like Compound or MakerDAO, Anchor will let PoS holders deposit bTokens as an asset on Anchor. These will serve as collateral for stablecoin loans (initially, these are likely to be primarily stablecoins created with Terra).

On the consumer side, users will be able to make stablecoin deposits in Terra and earn a predictable return.

We now have means to turn Anchor into a turnkey asset for passive income, Kwon said.

Manian concurred. Im interested in this because A.) DeFi and B.) the potential for what seems like a wider consumer product, he said.

Terra update

The Korea-based stablecoin project was first announced with a $32 million investment led by Binance in August 2018.

In October, Terra reported $54 million of payments through its Chai wallet app.

Terra has risen to be tied for fourth place as a payments platform in Korea, Kwon said. No small feat.

For users, Chai is able to provide users with discounts funded by new token emissions, which get minted whenever demand starts to push the price above its target.

Chai has already brokered a partnership for access to the Mongolian market. Kwon said travel restrictions under COVID-19 have dramatically slowed the teams ability to access other markets, although Taiwan is the next step.

Its another small country, but it has a lot of e-commerce activity, and Terra was created with e-commerce in mind.

While Chai hasnt shown up in the U.S. yet, Kwon is working on a partnership now that would enable U.S. customers to put funds into Anchor using fiat, over regulated payment rails. Further, its expansion to Solana reflects a larger strategy to expand Terras footprint.

We are building bridges to all the layer ones that dont currently have stablecoins, Kwon said.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Read more:

Proof-of-Stake Chains Team Up to Prove DeFi Is Bigger Than Ethereum - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

605 Days Later: How ArCoins Got the SEC Go-Ahead as an Ethereum-Traded Treasurys Fund – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Convincing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that the Ethereum blockchain is an acceptable medium to store regulated investment funds was no easy task for Mason Borda of Tokensoft.

The CEO of this Bay Area tokenization firm spent over two years crusading for a peer-to-peer tradable fund. Borda developed compliance-appeasing token standards, hired regulatory veterans to lead his transfer agent subsidiaries and even moved Tokensoft into the same San Francisco high-rise as the SECs West Coast enforcement wing (albeit on a different floor).

The effort paid off earlier this month: In early July, the SEC granted a notice of effectiveness to ArCoin, a cryptographically-traded U.S. Treasury Fund pursued by digital asset manager Arca Labs and designed by Tokensoft. Its the first Ethereum blockchain-native investment fund registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (a so-called 40 Act Fund).

ArCoins registration marks a shift in the regulators tolerance for public blockchain investment vehicles, Borda said. He and Arca CEO Rayne Steinberg both said ArCoins could light the way for future offerings with similarly decentralized structures.

But regulatory filings capture just how hard-fought first that victory was.

Long road

Arca signaled its earliest interest in offering a U.S Treasury Fund in an SEC filing from November 2018. Over the next 605 days, it filed volleys of prospectus amendments as nearly 10 different evolutions of what would eventually become ArCoins repeatedly hit a regulatory wall.

Steinberg said there was no guarantee his firms costly regulatory campaign would ultimately prevail.

Tokensoft signed on as Arcas tokenization specialist in July 2019, Borda told CoinDesk. Even then, a full year passed before ArCoin finally cleared that regulatory wall.

This took a lot of backchanneling with the SEC, Borda said.

10 floors apart

Borda said one benefit of running a compliance-focused tokenization firm from his high-rise in San Franciscos Financial District is that SEC regulators asking questions about his proposals are just an elevator ride away.

There was a case where I received a call the night before to do a presentation in the morning because the Crypto Czar was in town, Borda said, explaining office proximity (Tokensoft is on floor 38, the SEC is on floor 28) made meetings a lot more accessible.

That can be handy when meeting topics are as potentially contentious and fraught as the marriage of public blockchains and regulated investment vehicles. The SEC has been reticent to approve crypto-tied proposals before, perhaps most visibly in its ongoing denial of a bitcoin ETF.

The particulars behind one crypto projects failure before the SEC and anothers success are not interchangeable. For example, ArCoins do not represent an investment in the Ethereum blockchain, only a product (U.S. Treasurys) whose vehicle is traded on that blockchain.

But Borda said a major obstacle in pushing through a tokenized 40 Act Fund were regulators misconceptions of how crypto markets function.

There were a lot of preconceived notions just based on how the crypto space operates that we had to overcome: that these tokens are freely tradable, that theres no way to control them, Borda said.

He said regulators thought these securities worked like bitcoin. He made clear to CoinDesk that they dont.

The SEC declined a request for comment.

Restricted transfers

Borda said Tokensoft and Arca had to prove ArCoins blockchain backend was far more restrictive, regulatable and, well, permissioned than the permissionless Ethereum mainchain this funds smart contract lives atop. Ethereum is the leading smart contract platform in the world.

Unlike the vast majority of Ethereum tokens (and also completely dissimilar to bitcoin and most every other crypto asset), ArCoins cannot just jump around from wallet to wallet, Borda said.

Two critical functions are executed before a transfer prevents ArCoins from flying freely between wallets: detectTransferRestriction and messageForTransferRestriction. They comprise the core of the ERC-1404 standard, a whitelist-focused derivation of the ubiquitous ERC-20 token standard.

Tokensoft spearheaded development of the open-source ERC-1404 with the express purpose of creating a token standard that could pass regulators muster. Its outcome, unveiled in September 2018, restricts token activity like peer-to-peer transfers and trading during lock-up periods, among other concerns.

Though these caveats seemingly run counter to the permissionless, borderless and stateless ideals of some corners of Crypto Twitter, Borda said theyre essential for working inside regulators demands and even workable within the idealists framework.

It is possible to build a token on a public blockchain and have it follow the most aggressive standards in the world, he said.

ArCoins accomplishes this by checking intended recipients against a whitelist maintained by the funds transfer agent, Tokensoft subsidiary DTAC LLC, at the start of any transfer. Only investors who have passed AML and KYC protocols (and whose wallet addresses therefore appear on the whitelist) will receive their ArCoin.

Non-whitelisted addresses receive nothing Borda said the transfer simply wont go through.

The cool thing about having this on a blockchain is you can now prevent unauthorized transfers, the smart contract will just reject it, Borda said.

Appealing to Arca

Arca CEO Steinberg said his firm tapped Tokensoft only after considering at least eight different tokenization tech providers.

Steinberg said the only thing clear to Arca, a digital assets investment management firm, was that it didnt want to build that solution in-house. Though Steinberg admitted Arca could have programmatically restricted smart contract transfers without ERC-1404, he said thats kind of reinventing the wheel that already exists for something like this.

Specialists are most likely going to do that better and come up with novel solutions like a standard than you will in building it yourself, he said.

Steinberg sees this as a key value of utilizing standards like ERC-1404. His firm has now demonstrated that the SEC is comfortable granting effectiveness to a 40 Act investment vehicle that runs on ERC-1404.

ArCoins proving the concept may make what Steinberg described as the expensive, expansive and time-consuming procedure of bringing any investment product (and especially blockchain-based ones) past the SEC a little bit easier.

He noted that getting any product on the regulated market is never a sure thing, and recalled how the vast majority of people he spoke to after ArCoins green-light were shocked that the historically reticent SEC had allowed ArCoins to register.

The goal of Arca is to become a multiproduct asset manager with multiple different wrappers like this, he said.

Future groundwork

Borda chalked Tokensoft and Arcas success in registering ArCoins to a confluence of compliance and structural factors one major one was his tapping former SEC and CFTC regulator Alex Levine to head the legal team for Tokensofts affiliate transfer agent DTAC LLC.

Borda is even more bullish about ERC-1404 and the future of token-based securities in the 40 Act Fund mode, especially its potential appeal to regulators, who could use the built-in transfer restrictions of smart contracts to their benefit: They wont ever have to worry about unapproved transfers or bearer instruments falling into the wrong hands.

Companies could also catch that upside, he said:

This should prove to the companies out there that there is a path to have better compliance.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Read more here:

605 Days Later: How ArCoins Got the SEC Go-Ahead as an Ethereum-Traded Treasurys Fund - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

How the EEA Made Ethereum Palatable to Big Business – CoinDesk – CoinDesk

Ethereum has attracted the attention of large companies for almost as long as it has been around. But it wasnt until early 2017 that a formal business-focused consortium came into being: the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (EEA).

The EEA created a concerted effort to get large corporates and tech providers on the same page when implementing private (or permissioned) versions of Ethereum technology. Thereafter, the EEA became a kind of standards organization for blockchain business, with one eye on a future state when the public blockchain might morph together with private implementations.

After all, company intranets gradually became part of the internet, or so blockchain believers will tell you.

Back in February 2017 when the EEA launched, Julio Faura, who was head of blockchain at Banco Santander at the time, volunteered to become EEA founding chairman, a position he held until July 2018.

A few of us just got together to try to make the technology a little bit more suitable for enterprise uses, recalls Faura, now the CEO of blockchain-based payments company Adhara. We were all doing our own rudimentary attempts to use the technology. But it wasnt conceived for enterprise use rather for trustless and public use and was very far from being ready.

Along came Quorum

Megabank JPMorgan Chase had released its open-source Ethereum-based blockchain client, Quorum, towards the end of 2016. The banks privacy-centric take on Ethereum became a powerful driver for enterprise adoption, said Faura.

Quorum came along and it was a blessing, he said, because it made doing permissioned networks with a consensus algorithm much easier. Suddenly performance started to go up. I remember configuring networks myself with thousands of transactions per second, so it was very exciting.

No matter what enterprise platforms look like in 15 years, there will be pieces that evolved from industry coopetition conversations that never would have happened otherwise.

JPMorgan was one of the founding members of the EEA, a group of 30 or so companies that included Microsoft, Santander, ConsenSys, CME Group and Intel (a further 86 members were announced a couple of months later at CoinDesks 2017 Consensus event).

The EEA inspired huge organizations to think about solving long-bemoaned data coordination challenges in new ways, said Amber Baldet, CEO of Ethereum-based startup Clovyr. No matter what enterprise platforms look like in 15 years, there will be pieces that evolved from industry coopetition conversations that never would have happened otherwise.

Baldet, who led the team at JPM that built Quorum, said that while theres still a long way to go, enterprises are building more creative systems for decentralized data sharing than ever before.

The EEA will continue to shape core technologies that move tons of records (and crypto assets) and most consumers will continue to know nothing about any of it and that is success, she said.

After the early blockchain hype, which saw almost every decent-sized bank either joining a consortium or announcing a proof-of-concept, the enterprise distributed ledger technology (DLT) space seems to have fallen into what Gartner calls the trough of disillusionment. Call it an inevitable phase in the lifecycle of new and potentially transformative technologies.

If you ask the banks and enterprise teams involved in blockchain work whats happening, most will tell you its simply been a case of keeping their heads down and building. Behind the scenes, the EEA has been working hard on standards work, said Yorke E. Rhodes III, a program manager on Microsoft Azures blockchain team.

There has been a tremendous amount of specification work going on, said Rhodes. We are building on a foundation of not only five years of Ethereum, but three-plus years with an enterprise focus. Its a good spot. The things that needed to happen are really happening.

Freedom of choice

A crucial characteristic of the enterprise Ethereum ecosystem is choice, said Adharas Faura.

Its very important whatever technology ends up being used is not controlled by a single software vendor, because that creates a huge strategic risk, Faura said.

The choice of enterprise Ethereum clients widened considerably last year with the release of Hyperledger Besu, a high-profile cross-pollination between the two ecosystems, built by ConsenSys engineers, and designed from the ground up to incorporate the Ethereum mainnet.

Ethereums community was really keen to see this platform used, not just by anarchists and radicals and people who wanted to take down the banks, but by the banks themselves.

A hat-tip must go to the then-EEA lead Ron Resnick, who worked tirelessly to broker a deal between Ethereum and Hyperledger, added Faura.

In fact, a bridge between Ethereum and Hyperledger had been a long time coming. Before he became the executive director of Hyperledger, Brian Behlendorf recalls meeting Ethereum chief scientist Vitalik Buterin.

Behlendorf, a leading figure in the open-source software movement, said Ethereum and its growing community reminded him of the culture of the Apache Software Foundation and its friendly approach to corporate use cases.

I remember being fascinated by the idea of decentralization at the heart of architecture, and something much more interesting than just a cryptocurrency play, said Behlendorf. This was a programmatic network for building decentralized applications, and its community was really keen to see this platform used, not just by anarchists and radicals and people who wanted to take down the banks, but by the banks themselves.

For his part, current EEA Executive Director Daniel C. Burnett said there is a ton of stuff to be excited about, flagging up ConsenSys engineer John Wolperts Baseline Protocol as an interesting enterprise project in 2020.

More generally, Burnett pointed to the stability of Ethereum and the end of the frontier mindset of previous years.

In the past couple of years, things are beginning to settle a bit, Burnett said. Its certainly not boring, but were a little less of the Wild West.

The leader in blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests in cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

Go here to see the original:

How the EEA Made Ethereum Palatable to Big Business - CoinDesk - CoinDesk

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis July 29th, 2020 – Yahoo Finance

EOS

EOS rallied by 5.06% on Tuesday. Following on from a 5.07% gain on Monday, EOS ended the day at $3.0048.

It was another mixed start to the day. EOS rose to an early morning high $2.9204 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $2.9785, EOS slid to a late morning intraday low $2.7830.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $2.6879, EOS rallied to a late intraday high $3.0799.

EOS broke through the first major resistance level at $2.9785 before easing back.

At the time of writing, EOS was up by 0.30% to $3.0137. A bullish start to the day saw EOS rise from an early morning low $3.0040 to a high $3.0191.

EOS left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

EOS would need to avoid a fall through the $2.9559 pivot level to support a run at the first major resistance level at $3.1288.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for EOS to break out from Tuesdays high $3.0799.

Barring another extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level at $3.1288 would likely cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $2.9559 pivot would bring the first major support level at $2.8319 into play.

Barring an extended sell-off, EOS should steer well clear of sub-$2.80 levels. The first major support level at $2.8319 should limit any downside.

First Major Support Level: $2.8319

Pivot Level: $2.9559

First Major Resistance Level: $3.1288

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $6.62

38% FIB Retracement Level: $9.76

62% FIB Retracement Level: $14.82

Ethereum fell by 1.49% on Tuesday. Partially reversing a 3.47% gain from Monday, Ethereum ended the day at $317.59.

A bullish start saw Ethereum rise to an early morning intraday high $327.34 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $333.93, Ethereum fell to a late morning intraday low $306.29.

The pullback saw Ethereum fall through the first major support level at $310.97 before moving back to $323 levels.

A bearish end to the day, however, left Ethereum at sub-$320 levels and in the red.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was up by 0.54% to $319.29. A bullish start to the day saw Ethereum rise from an early morning low $317.52 to a high $319.50.

Ethereum left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Story continues

Ethereum would need to avoid a fall through the $317 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $327.86.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ethereum to break out from Tuesdays high $327.34.

Barring an extended crypto rally, the first major resistance level and Tuesdays high should cap any upside.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $317 pivot would bring the first major support level at $306.81 into play.

Barring an extended sell-off, however, Ethereum should steer clear of sub-$300 levels. The first major support level should limit any downside.

First Major Support Level: $306.81

Pivot Level: $317

First Major Resistance Level: $327.86

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $257

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $367

62% FIB Retracement Level: $543

Ripples XRP rose by 2.67% on Tuesday. Following on from a 4.33% rally on Monday, Ripples XRP ended the day at $0.23070.

It was a mixed start to the day, with Ripples XRP rising to an early morning high $0.22698 before hitting reverse.

Falling short of the first major resistance level at $0.2333, Ripples XRP slid to a late morning intraday low $0.21773.

Steering clear of the first major support level at $0.2127, Ripples XRP rallied to a late intraday high $0.23499.

Ripples XRP broke back through the first major resistance level at $0.2333 before sliding back to sub-$0.23 levels.

Finding late support, however, Ripples XRP wrapped up the day at $0.23 levels for the 1st time since March.

At the time of writing, Ripples XRP was up by 0.87% to $0.23271. A bullish start to the day saw Ripples XRP rise from an early morning low $0.23085 to a high $0.23271.

Ripples XRP left the major support and resistance levels untested early on.

Ripples XRP will need to avoid a fall through the $0.2287 pivot to support a run at the first major resistance level at $0.2379.

Support from the broader market would be needed, however, for Ripples XRP to break out from Tuesdays high $0.23499.

Barring a broad-based crypto rally, the first major resistance level should cap any upside.

In the event of a breakout, Ripples XRP should test the second major resistance level at $0.2451 before any pullback.

Failure to avoid a fall through the $0.2278 pivot would bring the first major support level at $0.2206 into play.

Barring an extended crypto sell-off, Ripples XRP should avoid sub-$0.22 levels and the second major support level at $0.2105.

First Major Support Level: $0.2206

Pivot Level: $0.2278

First Major Resistance Level: $0.2379

23.6% FIB Retracement Level: $0.3638

38.2% FIB Retracement Level: $0.4800

62% FIB Retracement Level: $0.6678

Please let us know what you think in the comments below.

Thanks, Bob

This article was originally posted on FX Empire

View original post here:

EOS, Ethereum and Ripples XRP Daily Tech Analysis July 29th, 2020 - Yahoo Finance

Coin Race: Top Winners/Losers of July; Ethereum Up the Most, Bitcoin Least – Cryptonews

Source: Adobe/Kalyakan

The crypto market seems to have acquired a habit of surprising us near the end of a month - albeit not always positively. July, however, ended up very much positively.

July has seen a mini crypto revival, one may say. After weeks of unusual lack of movement, or better said - volatility, which we are all used to seeing from many digital assets, the market swiftly moved upwards. It might've been true that it was 'resting,' preparing for a fast bull coming its way, as very few coins finished the month in the red.

Just as the month neared its end, bitcoin (BTC) moved upwards from the USD 9,000 level it had seemed stuck at, and first jumped to USD 10,000, followed by USD 11,000. The first days of August, saw the coin hit the USD 12,000 level shortly, then crashing in minutes.

Altcoins weren't left behind either. Ethereum (ETH) surpassed the USD 300 mark and is standing near the USD 400 one, currently separated by some USD 15 from it. As a matter of fact, ETH appreciated the most among the top 10 coins by market capitalization in July.

Additionally, ETH - which celebrated its fifth aniversary on July 30 - was one up on bitcoin. Namely, its price grew in July more than double that of bitcoin's. This trend continues with the yearly, quarterly, and weekly numbers as well.

Furthermore, XRP, cardano (ADA), and bitcoin SV (BSV) all appreciated more than 50% during July.

The rest of the coins on the top 10 list also had a productive July, all appreciating between 30% and 50% - except bitcoin. The world's most popular coin appreciated the least over the course of the past month.

Among the top 50 coins by market capitalization, elrond (ERD) is leading the top 10 winners by more than double the increase of the second-placed aave (LEND), which was one of the winners in June as well. The two have appreciated more than 200% and 100%, respectively.

Both also had news to share in July. Elrond Network announced it's live on mainet, with decentralized app Maiar as the first to launch on it, also adding that they will transform their economic model. Meanwhile, Aave announced its tokenomics upgrade proposal, genesis governance, and governance token, with LEND's migration to AAVE.

Three top 10 coins found themselves among the most appreciating coins. Generally, the coins on the list went up between 50% and 80%, with the 10th-placed cosmos (ATOM)'s price increasing by 52%.

Chainlink (LINK) is also among these coins, going up nearly 65%. It had a turbulent July, with a controversial campaign against it run by a secretive company called Zeus Capital.

The past month has been so good to the market, that there are only two coins on the losers list to speak of this time around, compared to quite a few of them back in June.

Not taking stablecoins into account, the two coins whose prices have decreased are hedgetrade (HEDGE) and ampleforth (AMPL). The former dropped more than 3% and the latter more than 54%.

Ampleforth received more attention in the Cryptoverse after it had rallied to become the best-performing coin among the top 50 cryptoassets by market capitalization in mid-July, while at the same time seeing extreme volatility both to the upside and downside.

Band protocol (BAND) sits at the top of the green list in July among the top 100 coins, having appreciated nearly 270%. It's followed by elrond, as well as advanced internet blocks (AIB) - all of which went up more than 100%. Another four coins increased by more than 100%.

Nine coins in the top 100 dropped in July. This includes the mentioned AMPL, which is at the top here as well. The midas touch gold (TMTG) is in the second place, followed by verge (XVG) and quant (QNT) - all of which recorded double-digit drops. The remaining coins' prices decreased less than 4%.

View original post here:

Coin Race: Top Winners/Losers of July; Ethereum Up the Most, Bitcoin Least - Cryptonews

Ethereum vs Ripple: which one should be in your portfolio in 2020? – Capital.com

A brief summary of Ripple and Ethereum

Despite all the turmoil and uncertainty in the global financial markets, cryptocurrencies are currently experiencing somewhat of a bull run. While new projects attract most of the attention, Ethereum, Ripple and Bitcoin continue to dominate the market cap rankings.

In this Ripple vs Ethereum guide, we compare two of the most significant crypto projects and check out whether they belong in your investment portfolio. However, before we dive in, here's a quick summary of the projects.

Ripple is an open-source protocol that supports real-time cross-border transactions. It was created by Ripple Labs in 2012 and aims to modernise the world of payments, exchange rates and replace the SWIFT network. XRP is the native token of the platform and acts as a medium of exchange, representing the transfer of value on the network.

Ethereum is best known for its smart contracts functionality. In brief, it's a distributed computer that allows developers to build applications on top of the Ethereum blockchain. Ether or ETH is the native token used to pay for transactions and other interactions with the protocol.

When looking at Ripple vs Ethereum, investors should remember that they are entirely different projects, designed to address different markets and solve different problems. Same applies to ETH vs XRP tokens.

Technology and utility aside, there are apparent ideological differences behind the two projects. Ripple Labs is a for-profit technology company that invented and continues to develop the Ripple protocol. It owns a majority of the XRP tokens and has commercial interests, including a potential IPO. Ethereum, on the other hand, is a decentralised network supported by the Ethereum Foundation, a Swiss non-profit organisation.

So, is Ethereum better than Ripple? Lets look at the main differences to find out.

Ethereum blockchain currently uses Proof of Work (PoW) consensus mechanism to validate transactions. In PoW consensus, miners compete with each other to solve complex mathematical puzzles and are rewarded with ETH. Anyone can mine ETH, which contributes to the decentralisation of the Ethereum blockchain.

Ripple network uses a unique distributed consensus mechanism. A network of trusted "transaction validators", mostly banks that use Ripple technology, decide which transactions are valid and authentic. Network participants can select which nodes they trust. However, they are encouraged to adopt Unique Node Lists (UNLs) maintained by Ripple Labs. Because of this, the Ripple network is often viewed as centralised in the crypto community.

There's currently almost 12m ETH and new coins are created as a reward for miners who maintain the network. There's no hard cap on the total amount of ETH that can be issued. The system is decentralised and no central authority controls the issuance of ETH.

XRP, on the other hand, is pre-mined with a total supply of 100bn tokens. However, only 45bn are currently in circulation. The rest are held in escrow and released to Ripple Labs at a rate of 1bn per month. The company can choose if they want to put XRP back into escrow, sell it on the market or sell directly to financial institutions that use Ripple technology. For Ripple Labs, selling XRP is part of the business model and a way to maintain profitability ahead of the potential IPO.

At the moment, the Ethereum network can, at its best, process roughly 15 transactions per second. The transaction fees on the network have been climbing recently due to the emergence of stable coins and decentralised finance (DeFi) projects. The average transaction fee on Ethereum is currently around $1.50, up from $0.10 in April 2020.

Ripple network can process a transaction in four seconds and can handle 1,500 transactions per second, according to the company. The standard transaction fee on the Ripple network is 0.00001 XRP per transaction, which gets burned, creating a deflationary mechanism.

Truth be told, early investors in both cryptocurrencies have done exceptionally well. ETH went from trading below $10 at the beginning of 2017 to an all-time high of above $1,400 in January 2018. Similarly, XRP was trading below $0.01 in March 2017 and after going on an impressive run, reached $3.40 in January 2018.

Simple and intuitive platform

Since January 2018, however, ETH is down over 75 per cent while XRP is down more than 90 per cent. Regardless, it is worth noting that more recently, since the March 2020 lows, ETH rallied over 200 per cent going from $100 to just over $300. XRP lagged during the same period, only appreciating by about 35 per cent.

In the latest news, the Ethereum community continues to focus on scalability solutions and the transition to Proof of Stake (PoS) consensus. The initial phase, or Phase 0, has been delayed multiple times but is still expected in 2020. The team will release the last testnet on August 4, at the earliest, with the mainnet launch expected to follow later in the year. It's near impossible to discuss Ethereum without mentioning the impressive growth in DeFi. There's currently more than 4m ETH locked in various DeFi platforms, contributing to the demand for ETH.

Ripple is well known for its extensive list of partnerships with financial institutions around the world. From that perspective, it is set to benefit from the recent decision by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to allow banks that are licensed in the US to offer crypto custody services. In other news, Santander, one of the large retail banks working with Ripple, has recently expanded available regions for its international payments app. The app is a borderless blockchain payment tool, built alongside Ripple, that aims to make transactions cheaper, faster and more transparent.

On a less positive note, Ripple continues to battle a string of class-action lawsuits claiming it violated securities laws in the US. The lawsuits allege that XRP is a security and was not registered with relevant authorities when it was marketed and sold in the US.

So now that we know what both projects are about and the main differences between them, which one is a better investment in 2020, ETH or XRP?

The usual disclaimer here, no one knows which token will perform better in the future, so it is always crucial to do your own research. What we can do, however, is consider whether the Ethereum or Ripple network has better prospects.

On that front, Ethereum has a brighter future. Most decentralised applications are currently built on the Ethereum blockchain. DeFi projects are an easy example of Ethereum's utility. Over the long-term, there are many other areas, like energy, where Ethereum's smart contract functionality could make a big difference. And while the future is bright, Ethereum does need to execute on its PoS roadmap as well as other scaling solutions.

For XRP, the source of fundamental demand for the token is unclear. Many retail investors abandoned XRP after the 2017 bull run. Institutional investors are also not too keen. The Grayscale XRP trust, for instance, had $6.6m in AUM in June 2018, compared to just $2.7m at the end of June 2020. An additional supply of 1bn new XRP every month is likely to limit any sustained price upside. The pending lawsuits also present a substantial risk. If the SEC designates XRP as a security, its utility as a medium of exchange will disappear.

Undoubtedly, ETH, XRP and other cryptocurrencies present attractive investment opportunities. Their volatility also makes them great assets for traders and speculators.

For those who prefer to take advantage of that growing volatility, without holding the underlying coins, contracts for difference (CFDs) might be a way to go. CFDs allow investors to take long and short positions as well as trade on margin. CFDs could be used to hedge existing exposures or for speculation.

You can trade cryptocurrencies CFDs with Capital.com and take advantage of our AI-powered trading platform. A quick note of caution, because CFD trading involves the usage of leverage, both gains and losses are magnified.

Find out how to trade crypto CFDs by reading our comprehensive guide.

Ready to get started?

Download Capital.com

Read the original post:

Ethereum vs Ripple: which one should be in your portfolio in 2020? - Capital.com