Brexit warning: UK and EU deal on ‘collision course for failure’ – could go down to wire – Daily Express

Britain and the European Union are continuing talks in a desperate attempt to strike a post-Brexit trade deal before the end of the transition period on December 31. The UK officially left the bloc on January 31, with trade talks beginning in Brussels two months later, led by Boris Johnson's chief negotiator David Frost and Brussels counterpart Michel Barnier. Face-to-face talks were put on hold due to the coronavirus crisis sweeping through the continent, but resumed last month in Brussels, followed by further meetings in London at 10 Downing Street last week.

But both sides have lamented the lack of progress made in negotiations to this point, continuing to insist "significant differences" remain between them.

The UK and EU teams have attacked each other over demands made in a future trade deal, with elements such as fisheries, a level playing field and access from the City of London to EU financial markets acting as major stumbling blocks.

Mr Johnson wants a deal completed over the coming weeks but Angela Merkel - whose country Germany took over presidency of the European Council on July 1 - said talks could stretch into the autumn and has warned EU nations to prepare for a no deal scenario.

Denis Macshane, a former Europe Minister in the UK, believes the two sides may have to wait until "the last moment" before any deal is agreed.

The former British Cabinet minister told The Parliament Magazine: The only talks that matter consist of the private conversation going on between the left and right sides of Boris Johnson's head.

Does he want to risk a major crisis of 50km queues at Dover or Calais, the City of London being shut out of its most profitable markets, threats to data exchange on criminals and all thousand and one relations the UK has taken for granted for half a century as a functioning member of first the EEC now the EU?

He added: How intense is the pressure from Tory MPs and elderly grass roots party activists who believe as an article of faith that any links with Europe other than on exclusively English terms are unacceptable.

Michel Barnier is sending out all sorts of compromise signals on fisheries and the European Court of Justice not applying to UK domestic law. But so far there has been no equal reciprocity by Johnson.

READ MORE:EUs Brexit strategy unveiled: How bloc insider picked apart tactics

I suspect if a deal does happen it will happen in a rush at the last moment with lots more to be done in the coming years. But no-one knows.

The British Prime Minister looks shattered and at times rambling and confused as he has not fully recovered from his COVID-19 near-death experience. I doubt if he knows himself.

He remains a journalist more than a Government leader and like all journalists will only focus once a deadline is imminent.

Roger Liddle, a Labour Party member of the House of Lords who also served as special adviser on European affairs to former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair from 1997-2004, warned the UK and EU "are on collision course for failure".

DON'T MISSEU arrogance laid:Whybloc's Galileo blunder 'plays into China hands'[COMMENT]Junckers Brexit trapdoor: Secret way for UK to rejoin bloc[INSIGHT]Brexit: Blair savaged over plea for 12 month delay to avoid no deal[POLL]

Mr Liddle, who is also art of the UK-based think tank the Policy Network, argued in a paper: The negotiations on Britains future relationship with the EU are on a collision course for failure. To avoid this will require mutual give and take.

"Principally, the British government needs to climb down from its self-imagined pedestal of Brexit triumph."

He also warned the UK faces huge economic risks in piling on top of the grave COVID-19 emergency with the negative impacts of no deal, or a very bare bones trade deal, which is probably where we are heading.

The latest warnings come as the European commission has been asked to draw up a "needs assessment" in case of a no deal Brexit at the end of the transition period.

European Council President Charles Michel said the aim of this is to ensure member states, regions and specific sectors, such as fisheries and agriculture, dont suffer unforeseen consequences.

Mr Michel, who recently unveiled plans for a 5billion Brexit Reserve to mitigate against the impact Brexit, wants the Commission to formally plan for a no deal scenario.

The European Council President added the Commission will therefore need to prepare a needs assessment, so that we are able to support those countries, regions and sectors that will be most affected by Brexit.

See the rest here:

Brexit warning: UK and EU deal on 'collision course for failure' - could go down to wire - Daily Express

Brits more concerned about financial hit of COVID-19 than Brexit – Yahoo Finance UK

People are more concerned about the impact of COVID-19 on their finances than they are about Brexit, a survey suggests.

When it comes to the two major challenges the UK faces the handling of the coronavirus pandemic and Brexit two thirds (65%) think the pandemic is more concerning for their personal finances, while just a fifth (21%) believe Brexit is the bigger threat, Nationwide Building Society found.

The findings were published as part of Nationwides savings index which was compiled from a survey of more than 11,000 people across Britain in May.

The research found that, despite many households now living on reduced incomes, nearly two fifths (37%) of people had put more into a savings account than they would usually, rising to 45% of 18 to 34-year-olds.

READ MORE:

Only one in six (16%) people said they had saved less since lockdown started on 23 March.

And more than a third (36%) wish they had saved more before the pandemic struck.

Research from website Moneyfacts found last week that the choice of savings accounts on the market has fallen to the lowest levels since at least 2007. To compound savers woes, average savings rates for many types of account are now sitting at record lows.

However, it is still important to have a rainy day savings pot which savers can turn to in financial emergencies.

Nationwide Building Societys research was carried out as part of its PayDay SaveDay campaign, which encourages people to save the day they get paid to build a financial buffer.

READ MORE:

Although many have saved more, almost one in six people have had to dip into their savings as a direct result of COVID-19, jumping to more than a quarter of people who are unemployed.

With many people facing uncertainties over their employment prospects and finances, Nationwides index also points towards people preferring not to touch their savings at all, if possible.

According to Nationwides own customer data, nine in 10 of the societys members did not withdraw any money from their savings accounts between January and May.

Tom Riley, Nationwides director of banking and savings, said: Theres no doubt that the impacts of COVID-19 have been felt across the savings market.

He continued: Whether this is the start of a new savings culture remains to be seen, although the pandemic has certainly made us look at the need for a financial buffer for a range of reasons.

Interestingly, a large portion have changed their savings habits as a direct result of the pandemic, so we may well see a shift in the nations savings culture over the coming months as new savings routines begin to stick.

See the rest here:

Brits more concerned about financial hit of COVID-19 than Brexit - Yahoo Finance UK

The pound has been volatile when Brexit is at the fore, is now the time to ‘hedge’ your investments? – Telegraph.co.uk

Adrian Lowcock of Willis Owen, a rival firm, warned that currencies could be volatile and might be a bigger determinant of a portfolios performance than the companies it invested in.

If sterling appreciates on news of a Brexit deal, hedged funds will come into play. However, the trading costs in such funds can be higher and eat into any gains, so the currency movement must be large enough to make it worthwhile.

Sam Dickens of IG, the trading firm, said he expected Britain and the EU to hash out a deal before the end of the year. However, Mr Lowcock warned that predicting currency movements was notoriously difficult and that most fund managers avoided making suchcalls.

There are other factors to consider as well. Although Brexit is a big issue at home, it does not have much impact on other currencies.

The American presidential election in November, for example, is likely to be a much larger factor for the dollar.

Mr Dickens added that investors could change their mind on the pound over factors other than Brexit. Recently, the British currency has risen as investors have started to take on more risk, moving away from safe havens such as the dollar and the yen.

If the stock market rally fails to be sustained, the pound could come under pressure again, he said.

Read the original here:

The pound has been volatile when Brexit is at the fore, is now the time to 'hedge' your investments? - Telegraph.co.uk

Sam Smith ‘romantically linked to Brexit campaign volunteer Shahmir Sanni’ – Mirror Online

Sam Smith is rumoured to be dating a former Brexit campaign worker named Shahmir Sanni who made headlines after becoming a whistleblower from within the Vote Leave campaign.

The 28-year-old chart topping star is said to be in the fledgling stage of a blossoming romance with the political campaigner despite being at opposite ends of the political spectrum.

Sam has been a champion of equal rights and a poster person for the gender non conforming community after coming out as non-binary in March last year.

While Eurosceptic political activist Shahmir, 26, worked for the Vote Leave campaign during the 2016 EU referendum.

The Mail on Sunday claims the duo are becoming an unlikely couple, have been out for a string of dates, and were spotted enjoying drinks together at a Soho bar earlier this month.

A friend of the singer whispered to the publication: They are having a great time.

No one thought Sam would strike up such a friendship with a Brexiteer, but they just clicked.

They move in the same circle of friends, have been on dates together, and have also been seen kissing.

A spokesperson for the star has dismissed the rumours of a romance and claimed news of Sam dating Shahmir is "false".

Shahmir made headlines two years ago when he became a whistleblower accusing Vote Leave of misspending campaign money and declaring the referendum was won illegally.

His personal life was dragged into the spotlight after his former boyfriend Stephen Parkinson, who had been Prime Minister Theresa May s political secretary, outed him to the press.

Sam has been linked to a number of his profile men over the years most recently linked to 13 Reasons Why actor Brandon Flynn.

Sam and Brandon split last year, but The Lonely Hour star has previously been linked to TOWIE star Charlie King and model Jonathon Ziezel over the years.

Meanwhile, the singer is said to be gearing up to release their third studio album but the planed 2020 release has been paused amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

Read more here:

Sam Smith 'romantically linked to Brexit campaign volunteer Shahmir Sanni' - Mirror Online

Brexit civil war: How Chancellor was ‘finished’ after 30billion ‘tax and axe’ threat – Daily Express

Rishi Sunak is the most popular Chancellor since Gordon Brown was in charge at No 11 in the early Noughties, a new poll suggests. Just after revealing his 30billion rescue package, the Chancellor's current rating reached heights not seen since New Labour 15 years ago. Five times as many people approve than disapprove of the measures announced in Mr Sunaks statement this week, with 59 percent now thinking he is doing a good job as Chancellor.

It makes him very easily the most well-liked politician to hold the role since Mr Brown in the run up to the 2005 election, when his approval rating peaked at 67 percent.

The British public largely welcomed six of the key policies announced on Wednesday, with a staggering 80 percent backing the VAT cut in the hospitality sector and the minimum wage apprenticeship scheme for 16 to 24 year-olds.

Mr Sunaks poll ratings throughout the coronavirus crisis also suggest he is the most popular politician in the country.

As many wonder whether he will be the next Prime Minister, unearthed reports shed light on the time George Osborne was leading the Treasury.

According to a throwback report by the Daily Express, just before the 2016 EU referendum, Mr Osborne announced he was planning to impose punishing tax hikes and spending cuts if voters decided to quit the EU.

However, the former Chancellor's plans were met with fury with several Tory MPs saying his credibility had been destroyed.

Sixty-five Tory MPs signed a joint statement opposing Mr Osbornes plans for a Brexit emergency Budget of extreme austerity measures, effectively killing any prospect of getting such a package through the Commons.

The statement said: If he were to proceed with these proposals, the Chancellors position would become untenable.

Privately, senior Tories called for Mr Osborne to be removed from the Treasury following the EU referendum, whatever the result, because of his scaremongering.

One senior Tory said: Osborne is finished. He cannot deliver another Budget. His credibility is destroyed.

JUST IN:How China's accession to WTO had 'crippling effects' on organisation

Another one added: The Chancellors reputation has been hugely damaged.

And in a BBC Question Time special, Cabinet minister Michael Gove refused to say whether he wanted Mr Obsorne to stay as Chancellor after the vote.

Asked if he would back Mr Osbornes planned Brexit Budget, Mr Gove said: No.

When asked if he thought Mr Osborne should keep his job he avoided the question and refused to lend support.

Mr Osborne stood shoulder to shoulder with former Labour Chancellor Lord Alistair Darling to sound the alarm about potential economic impact from Brexit.

Speaking at a Hitachi train plant in Ashford, Kent, they claimed a Brexit-triggered slump could have left a 30billion hole in public finances that could have only been filled by tax rises and spending cuts.

Mr Osborne said: A vote to leave would hurt businesses, hurt investment and cost jobs. There would be difficult decisions decisions that begin next Friday.

There would have to be an emergency Budget to fill a 30billion black hole.

DON'T MISS:UK civil servants paid 20million to do NOTHING unmasked[REVEALED]How Poland threatened EU chaos with CRUCIAL referendum[INSIGHT]Trade expert reveals why FTA between UK and EU is in sight[EXCLUSIVE]

Today we are setting out the difficult decisions we would have to take.

Under his plans, the basic rate of income tax would have risen from 20p to 22p, the middle income rate by 3p to 43p and inheritance tax would have soared.

Tory MPs warned the proposals would scrap a string of manifesto pledges including vows not to raise income tax or cut NHS spending.

Ex-ministers Liam Fox, Iain Duncan Smith, Cheryl Gillan and John Redwood signed the statement condemning a Brexit Budget.

It said: We find it incredible the Chancellor could seriously be threatening to renege on so many pledges.

If the Chancellor is serious we cannot possibly allow this to go ahead.

Mr Duncan Smith added: Of all the things the Remain camp has done, this is probably the most bizarre and the most ridiculous. Its shocking behaviour, more irresponsible than Ive seen from any Chancellor at any time.

"He appears to be talking the economy down in the hope that it will panic everybody, panic the markets and force people to vote Remain because theyll be so scared.

Mr Osborne resigned from the Government after the Brexit referendum, hours after the departure of David Cameron as Prime Minister.

The rest is here:

Brexit civil war: How Chancellor was 'finished' after 30billion 'tax and axe' threat - Daily Express

SNP Brexit stance is far from incoherent – The Guardian

Where is the incoherence in the Scottish nationalist position that demands regulatory independence from London, while mourning the fact that regulation is no longer dictated in Brussels (Editorial, 15 July)? The SNP sides with the majority of the Scottish population in wanting to remain in the EU. Participating as a member state of the EU on the basis of shared values is categorically different from being steamrollered by a Tory government increasingly wedded to a specifically English nationalist agenda. Anne McLaren Liverpool

I still wear my fathers old Crombie coat (Letters, 15 July). When I once asked him how old it was, he said: It is older than you. Im now 65. Not only is it older than me, it feels heavier than me. Barry Norman Drighlington, Leeds

I feel quite angry with the man who found a fortune in a charity shop (Experience, 10 July). I wonder what the volunteers from the now closed shop think of his small anonymous donation after the book he picked up for 50p raised 16,000 at auction. Geraldine Halsey Hitchin, Hertfordshire

Your advertisement supplement from the UK government about UK holiday destinations (16 July) tells us that Sutherland and Caithness are as remote as the UK gets. Remote from where? Paul Brownsey Glasgow

What about Domocracy as a descriptor for this shambolic government (Letters, 14 July)? Julian Roberts Ilkley, West Yorkshire

Read more from the original source:

SNP Brexit stance is far from incoherent - The Guardian

OGUK urges government to be ‘mindful’ of impact from new Brexit customs costs – News for the Oil and Gas Sector – Energy Voice

Oil and Gas UK (OGUK) has urged the UK Government to be mindful of any additional costs to the sector as it plans new Brexit customs charges.

Last week the UK Government published a border control plan, including 705m in new measures to prepare the country for leaving the customs union at the end of the year.

The move, with full controls in place at all ports from January 1st, means the number of required customs declarations is going to increase by around 245million, according to the British Chambers of Commerce.

Each declaration is expected to cost around 32, according to several newspaper reports.

OGUK said it is looking into the impact on the sector, which is already under severe pressure due to the downturn and Covid-19.

Supply chain director Matt Abraham said: OGUK is working with our members and the UK Government to understand the implications of this for our industry.

Our most recent survey of members underlines the concern over uncertainty on transitional arrangements.

At a time when our industry remains under severe pressure from the operational impact of Covid-19 and low oil and gas prices, we continue to urge government to be mindful of any costs which could limit our ability to meet UK energy needs, support jobs and enable a transition towards a lower carbon future.

The industry exports almost 12bn of goods and services annually, according to OGUKs website.

Many parts of the energy sector had managed to grapple with changes related to Brexit in the run up to the start of the year, however the pandemic has brought severe financial strain to many, along with widespread job cuts.

The Scottish Government recently argued for an extension to the transition period, which would help provide stability for the industry.

Cabinet secretary Michael Gove made the announcement last week, along with publication of a 206-page border operating model.

An estimated 50,000 additional customs agents are needed to handle the additional requirement.

Russell Borthwick, chief executive of the Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, pointed to the UK chambers network for businesses seeking support.

He said: With full border controls in place at all ports from January 1st next year, regardless of any deals agreed with EU nations this will mean an estimated 200 million more customs declarations needing to be made annually at a cost of 7bn.

So, it is vital that firms who import from and export to the EU prioritise the appointment of customs intermediaries to advise on the next steps.

With the government stating an additional 50,000 customs agents are needed to handle the additional requirements, there is currently insufficient capacity in this sector to meet the required demand.

In order to avoid costly delays and enable trade to continue unhindered, businesses need to take action now to secure these services and the UK Chambers of Commerce network is well placed to assist.

Link:

OGUK urges government to be 'mindful' of impact from new Brexit customs costs - News for the Oil and Gas Sector - Energy Voice

Covid-19 and Brexit: The Impact on Industry, Jobs and Skills – FE News

Further Education News

The FE News Channel gives you the latest education news and updates on emerging education strategies and the#FutureofEducation and the #FutureofWork.

Providing trustworthy and positive Further Education news and views since 2003, we are a digital news channel with a mixture of written word articles, podcasts and videos. Our specialisation is providing you with a mixture of the latest education news, our stance is always positive, sector building and sharing different perspectives and views from thought leaders, to provide you with a think tank of new ideas and solutions to bring the education sector together and come up with new innovative solutions and ideas.

FE News publish exclusive peer to peer thought leadership articles from our feature writers, as well as user generated content across our network of over 3000 Newsrooms, offering multiple sources of the latest education news across the Education and Employability sectors.

FE News also broadcast live events, podcasts with leading experts and thought leaders, webinars, video interviews and Further Education news bulletins so you receive the latest developments inSkills Newsand across the Apprenticeship, Further Education and Employability sectors.

Every week FE News has over 200 articles and new pieces of content per week. We are a news channel providing the latest Further Education News, giving insight from multiple sources on the latest education policy developments, latest strategies, through to our thought leaders who provide blue sky thinking strategy, best practice and innovation to help look into the future developments for education and the future of work.

In May 2020, FE News had over 120,000 unique visitors according to Google Analytics and over 200 new pieces of news content every week, from thought leadership articles, to the latest education news via written word, podcasts, video to press releases from across the sector.

We thought it would be helpful to explain how we tier our latest education news content and how you can get involved and understand how you can read the latest daily Further Education news and how we structure our FE Week of content:

Our main features are exclusive and are thought leadership articles and blue sky thinking with experts writing peer to peer news articles about the future of education and the future of work. The focus is solution led thought leadership, sharing best practice, innovation and emerging strategy. These are often articles about the future of education and the future of work, they often then create future education news articles. We limit our main features to a maximum of 20 per week, as they are often about new concepts and new thought processes. Our main features are also exclusive articles responding to the latest education news, maybe an insight from an expert into a policy announcement or response to an education think tank report or a white paper.

FE Voices was originally set up as a section on FE News to give a voice back to the sector. As we now have over 3,000 newsrooms and contributors, FE Voices are usually thought leadership articles, they dont necessarily have to be exclusive, but usually are, they are slightly shorter than Main Features. FE Voices can include more mixed media with the Further Education News articles, such as embedded podcasts and videos. Our sector response articles asking for different comments and opinions to education policy announcements or responding to a report of white paper are usually held in the FE Voices section. If we have a live podcast in an evening or a radio show such as SkillsWorldLive radio show, the next morning we place the FE podcast recording in the FE Voices section.

In sector news we have a blend of content from Press Releases, education resources, reports, education research, white papers from a range of contributors. We have a lot of positive education news articles from colleges, awarding organisations and Apprenticeship Training Providers, press releases from DfE to Think Tanks giving the overview of a report, through to helpful resources to help you with delivering education strategies to your learners and students.

We have a range of education podcasts on FE News, from hour long full production FE podcasts such as SkillsWorldLive in conjunction with the Federation of Awarding Bodies, to weekly podcasts from experts and thought leaders, providing advice and guidance to leaders. FE News also record podcasts at conferences and events, giving you one on one podcasts with education and skills experts on the latest strategies and developments.

We have over 150 education podcasts on FE News, ranging from EdTech podcasts with experts discussing Education 4.0 and how technology is complimenting and transforming education, to podcasts with experts discussing education research, the future of work, how to develop skills systems for jobs of the future to interviews with the Apprenticeship and Skills Minister.

We record our own exclusive FE News podcasts, work in conjunction with sector partners such as FAB to create weekly podcasts and daily education podcasts, through to working with sector leaders creating exclusive education news podcasts.

FE News have over 700 FE Video interviews and have been recording education video interviews with experts for over 12 years. These are usually vox pop video interviews with experts across education and work, discussing blue sky thinking ideas and views about the future of education and work.

FE News has a free events calendar to check out the latest conferences, webinars and events to keep up to date with the latest education news and strategies.

The FE Newsroom is home to your content if you are a FE News contributor. It also help the audience develop relationship with either you as an individual or your organisation as they can click through and box set consume all of your previous thought leadership articles, latest education news press releases, videos and education podcasts.

Do you want to contribute, share your ideas or vision or share a press release?

If you want to write a thought leadership article, share your ideas and vision for the future of education or the future of work, write a press release sharing the latest education news or contribute to a podcast, first of all you need to set up a FE Newsroom login (which is free): once the team have approved your newsroom (all content, newsrooms are all approved by a member of the FE News team- no robots are used in this process!), you can then start adding content (again all articles, videos and podcasts are all approved by the FE News editorial team before they go live on FE News). As all newsrooms and content are approved by the FE News team, there will be a slight delay on the team being able to review and approve content.

RSS Feed Selection Page

Read more here:

Covid-19 and Brexit: The Impact on Industry, Jobs and Skills - FE News

Japans $2.2 Trillion Cost Of Befriending Donald Trump – Forbes

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe listens to U.S. President Donald Trump during a bilateral meeting ... [+] on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Biarritz, south-west France on August 25, 2019, on the second day of the annual G7 Summit.

As political bets go, the one Japans Shinzo Abe made on Donald Trump in 2016 is proving to be a mistake of historic proportions.

No world leader was quicker in getting to Trump Tower in New York to congratulate the U.S. president-elect on a victory few saw coming. Nine days after Trumps shock win, there was Abe on Nov. 17, reassuring a fearful worldnot to worry, hed be a trustworthy leader.

From the start, Prime Minister Abes visit was a comedy of errors. Japanese diplomats are obsessive sticklers for protocol. Trumps people were slow to set a time or any choreography for his first post-election tte--ttewith a world leader. Japanese officialdom was livid that Trump brought his daughter Ivanka along.

The real error, though, was Abes effort to normalize a U.S. leader whos since taken a wrecking ball to the global economic order Abes team hoped to preserve 44 months ago. That order gives Japan a seat at the Group of Seven nations table not accorded to Beijing. And at a cost to Tokyo, so far, of more than $2.2 trillion and counting.

The amount referenced here is how much Abes government is having to spend to revive the economy. To be fair, Japan would be pumping stimulus into the economy even if Trumps White House hadnt so spectacularly botched its Covid-19 response. But the magnitude of the spending, about 40% of gross domestic product, is a direct result of Trumps failure and the global financial repercussions.

For a time, Tokyo-based pundits applauded Abes Trump wager. It seemed like a stroke of realpolitik genius. As Trump railed at China and threatened tariffs, pundits believed, Japan would be spared. Yet once Trump began slapping taxes on steel and aluminum, Japan did not score an exception. Trumps China tariffs, meantime, disrupted the supply chains on which Japan Inc. relies.

Trumps occasional Twitter attacks on a yen he views as too weak panicked Abes Ministry of Finance. Hes cozying up to North Koreas Kim Jong Un, ignoring Tokyos security interests, made for sleepless nights at Abes Ministry of Foreign Affairs. News that Trump cajoled Abe into nominating Trump for a Nobel Peace Prizehumiliated Japans diplomatic corps.

More recent news that Trump cozied up to Chinas Xi Jinping to help win reelection wont sit well with Abes fellow nationalists. An even worse discovery from John Boltons new book The Room Where It Happenedis that Trump tried to shake down Abe for an additional $8 billion annuallyfor hosting U.S. troops.

Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping attend a state dinner at the Great Hall of the People ... [+] in Beijing on November 9, 2017.

The former national security advisor detailed times when Trump would rail about Imperial Japans attack onPearl Harborand suggest Abes father was a failed kamikaze pilot. And how Trump dispatched Abe to negotiate with Iranin June 2019 as a lark.

But the real buyers remorse Japan is feeling concerns an economy losing altitude, and fast. In this sense, Trump has been costing Abe all along. The trade war sent powerful headwinds Japans way, steadily chipping away at its best recovery since the 1980s bubble economy imploded.

Granted, Abe made big mistakes of his own. One: not working harder since 2012 to implement big structural reforms to labor markets or Japan Inc.s patriarchal mindset. He failed to cut red tape, catalyze a startup boom or liberalize immigration in ways that wouldve positioned Japan to woo multinational companies tempted to flee Hong Kong as China clamps down on the city. Another: hiking sales taxes to 10% last October, a move that contributed to a 7.3% GDP contraction.

The real problem, though, is a U.S. veering off the rails. With coronavirus cases approaching 3.5 million, its clear Trumps White House has given up on fighting the pandemic. The economic fallout to come will reverberate around the globe, sapping growth in China, Japan, South Korea, Southeast Asia and beyond. So might any steps Trump takes to intensify his trade war between now and the Nov. 3 election to cheer his base.

If Trump cared about pal Abe or other allies, he would announce an immediate trade war ceasefire. Hed get on the phone with G7 and Group of 20 leaders to devise a collective assault on Covid-19and the global fallout on growth and incomes.

Japan is directly in harms way as a leader Abe vouched for hobbles the global economy. The trillions of dollars of stimulus Washington threw at Covid-19 is already wearing off. Even if Democratic rival Joe Biden defeats Trump 110 days from now, itll take time for his White House to repair thedamage done to growth and global economic relationships.

The answer for Abe is jumpstarting reforms to boost Japanese competitiveness, increase innovation and generate growth organically. Two decades after its economy imploded, Japan is becoming more and more reliant on zero interest rates and ginormous spending packages. Yet with approval ratings below 40%, Abe might not have the political capital to get much done.

Theres also a big question of what Trump might do between now and Nov. 3. As he seeks to cheer his base, might Trump slap new taxes on China? Will he make good on threats of 25% tariffs on cars and auto parts, savaging supply chains anew? Trump could weaken the dollar, further ruining Japan Inc.s year.

And have Japanese wondering what, oh what, their leader was thinking when he scurried to Trump Tower 1,337 days ago to do Trumps bidding. The bill for that blunder, $2.2 trillion and counting, will be one for the record books.

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe speaks to reporters following a meeting with President-elect ... [+] Donald Trump November 17, 2016 in New York City.

Read more here:

Japans $2.2 Trillion Cost Of Befriending Donald Trump - Forbes

What Donald Trumps Access Hollywood Weekend Says About 2020 – The New York Times

People who know him cite this semi-magical thinking as a kind of political superpower, when harnessed effectively.

Dont underestimate his personal resiliency, Mr. Scaramucci said. He recalled the presidents advice to him once about news-cycle velocity: He said, Yeah, you get negative press. It lasts about a week. And then it blows over, and theyre onto something else, and nobody cares.

On this weekend, though, Trump advisers sensed that little would blow over on its own.

The idea of deploying Mr. Clintons accusers had filtered through the Trump orbit for months, discussed among Mr. Bannon and allies like Aaron Klein of Breitbart News the hard-right, Trump-supporting site that Mr. Bannon had run and long promoted by Roger J. Stone Jr., the informal Trump adviser and infamous Republican hell-raiser. (On Friday, Mr. Trump commuted Mr. Stones sentence on seven felony crimes after he had been convicted last year of obstructing a congressional investigation into the Trump 2016 campaign and possible ties to Russia.)

Just before Billy Bush weekend, as Mr. Bannon calls it (a nod to the Access Hollywood personality on tape with Mr. Trump), three of the Clinton accusers had been in Washington for interviews with Mr. Klein.

As Republican pleas for Mr. Trumps ouster multiplied, Mr. Bannon recognized an opportunity. He said he called Mr. Klein, now an adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, and asked how the Clinton material looked. The answer pleased him. New travel arrangements were made.

In the meantime, Mr. Trump sought temporary comfort in a familiar balm: applause.

By 5 p.m. on Saturday, supporters had clustered along Fifth Avenue, waving signs from the sidewalk. Mr. Trump descended to the marbled lobby, joined by his eldest son and his campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, and stepped through the glass front door.

He pumped his right fist, to cheers. Fans reached out to graze his suit jacket.

A reporter asked if he would stay in the race. Hundred percent, Mr. Trump replied.

See the original post:

What Donald Trumps Access Hollywood Weekend Says About 2020 - The New York Times

Donald Trump ends the career of his former chief ideologue, Jeff Sessions – The Economist

Jul 18th 2020

THOUGH A FAN of Confederate monuments, Donald Trump could not have taken down Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, a living memorial to the rebel South and the presidents first attorney-general, more ruthlessly. This week the Republican veteran named after two Confederate heroes (Jefferson Davis and General P.G.T. Beauregard) suffered his first electoral defeat, in a primary for the Alabama Senate seat he occupied for 20 years. When he last defended it, in 2014, Mr Sessions won an uncontested race with 97% of the vote. But against a Trump-backed rivala former college-football coach and political debutant, Tommy Tuberville, who seemed unsure of most issueshe was trounced.

Even after so many illustrations of the presidents grip on Republican voters, it was astonishing to see Mr Sessionss career-long claim on Alabaman affections blown away in this fashion. It was equally remarkable, even after so many displays of Mr Trumps vindictiveness, to see him end his former aides career so cruelly. No Republican played a bigger part in Mr Trumps rise than Mr Sessions. No one did more to try to make Trumpism meaningful.

He was not only the first congressman to endorse Mr Trump (apart from two Republican House members, who have since been jailed for unrelated crimes). He was also the first to take him seriouslyas he signalled by donning a MAGA cap and appearing with Mr Trump at a rally in Mobile in August 2015. Though Mr Trump had recently supplanted Jeb Bush to lead the primary field, most elected Republicans still considered his presidential bid absurd. Mr Sessionss decision to stand with him, before 30,000 roaring Alabamans, and praise him for the work youve put in on the immigration issue was a striking corrective. No one could accuse Mr Sessions of being unconservative, the charge Mr Bush was levelling at Mr Trump. Indeed, his racially accented populism had latterly moved from the margins of his party to the mainstream.

He saw America not as an idea, as most Republican leaders professed to, but as a place of communities and traditions besieged by immigrants, criminals and a liberal elite unleashed by the first black president. He demanded tough border restrictions and policing, deregulation and religious-liberty guarantees. The Tea Party movement, a nativist campaign masquerading as an anti-government one, had embraced this agenda and Mr Sessions personally. A like-minded nationalist, Steve Bannon, even urged him to run for presidentnotwithstanding his low stature, thick accent and air of twinkling eccentricity. By identifying Mr Trump as a more charismatic populist, whose professed beliefs were close enough to his own, Mr Sessions made him seem not only more acceptable to his Republican colleagues, but comprehensible.

He played a similar role as attorney-general. In a cabinet of competent technocrats, such as John Kelly, and populist nincompoops like Ryan Zinke, Mr Sessions was a rare competent populist. Even more than Mr Bannon or Stephen Millerwho had gone from Mr Sessionss office to the presidentshe drove the administrations strict border policies. (On the trail in Alabama, he derisively mimicked those who had objected to his separating migrant children from their parents: Noooo, this is a poor child!) He also dismantled an effort to make the police more accountable. He launched a religious liberty task force. And as he did so the president tried to destroy him by a thousand cuts.

Mr Trump dealt the first (because he has no respect for eccentric ideologues) in Mobile, where he joshed that Mr Sessions was like 20 years old. But it was after Mr Sessions recused himself from his departments investigation into Russias effort to get Mr Trump elected that he let loose. That was 22 days after Mr Sessions was confirmed by the Senate. For his remaining 20 months in the job, Mr Trump mocked and insulted him, on Twitter and in private, including allegedly as a dumb southerner and mentally retarded. No matter how often he was assured that Mr Sessions had had no choice but to recuse himself (because of his own Russia ties), Mr Trump considered his failure to fix the Russia investigation a sign of weakness and disloyalty. And the fact that Mr Sessions not only put up with this onslaught but continued beavering away at the presidents agenda only seemed to make him angrier. A similar dynamic was apparent in the closing stage of this weeks primary contest: the more Mr Sessions claimed to have delivered Trumpist policies, the more the president denounced him.

If Mr Sessions were a slightly more sympathetic figure, his downfall would be tragic. Instead it mainly points to Mr Trumps abandonment of much of the populist platform he was ostensibly elected on. While he persists with protectionisman important exceptionhe has not restored manufacturing jobs, built infrastructure including a border wall, or changed Americas immigration regime in any way that a Democratic administration could not change back. He has no heavy-hitters working on those issues. Mr Miller, a writer of dystopian speeches, is the last Bannonite standing. Mr Sessionss latest successor, William Barr, though not opposed to tough policing and border policies, spends more of his time protecting the president and his criminal cronies, in precisely the way Mr Sessions refused to.

A few prominent conservative populists are still struggling to make Trumpism mean something more than presidential whimled by the Fox News presenter Tucker Carlson and a handful of senators, including Josh Hawley and Marco Rubio. But none, for obvious reasons, is eager to enter the administration, which makes them much less influential than Mr Sessions and Mr Bannon were. The result, less than four months from the election, is that Mr Trump appears to have no policy agenda of any kind for a second term. Trumpism, as Mr Sessions must now suspect, as he slopes back to his church and grandchildren, appears to mean little more than Mr Trump. Actually, he must have suspected that all along.

Dig deeper:Sign up and listen to Checks and Balance, our weekly newsletter and podcast on American politics, and explore our presidential election forecast

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "A family separation"

See more here:

Donald Trump ends the career of his former chief ideologue, Jeff Sessions - The Economist

‘They Realize the Bully Is Just Kind of an Empty Suit’ – POLITICO – POLITICO

Sensing, correctly, that the balance of power between him and these owners had shifted in his favor, an emboldened Trump only escalated his Kaepernick rhetoric the first fall he was president.

In September at a rally in Alabama, he levied a new strain of assault. Wouldnt you love to see one of these NFL owners, when somebody disrespects our flag, to say, Get that son of a bitch off the field right nowouthes fired ? he roared. The crowd responded with a crescendo of cheers. Hes fired!

Lockhart called Goodell early the following morning to talk about what to do. Hours later, Goodell issued a lukewarm statement labeling Trumps comments divisive. It wasnt close to enough; this was only the beginning. The next day, Trump took to Twitter to call for a boycotta president, and a Republican to boot, employing a highly atypical tactic of interfering with private enterprise.

The NFL owners wanted no part of thiseven if, as a league source said to ESPN, they were all pissed at the president. Even Robert Kraft, the owner of the Patriots, who considers Trump a wonderful friend, said he was deeply disappointed by the tone of his comments in Alabama. The owners of the Lions, the Dolphins, the Falcons, the Giants, the Rams and the Bills, too, made similar public censures. Jones of the Cowboys kneeled with players on his team before the playing of the national anthem, and Stephen Ross of the Dolphins locked arms with hisat first. The owners, though, quickly became alarmed at how rapidly fans outrage was eroding many of the leagues key business metrics, ESPN reported, and public polling showed the net favorability of the NFL dipping because of the protestsin particular among Trump voters. This, said an owner, could kill football and end our business.

Kaepernick, meanwhile, remained conspicuously unsigned.

We already know in a situation where Colin Kaepernick couldve actually helped some NFL teams he wasnt re-signed, and one of the reasons for thatno questionwas Donald Trump placing this social pressure, this cultural pressure, on the league.

Dave Zirin

The following spring, the NFL stiffened its anthem policy: Players could stay in the locker rooms during the national anthem; if they were out on the field in the view of the fans, however, they needed to stand and show respect. Teams with players that didnt faced fines. NFL, read the POLITICO headline, caves to Trump.

Trump, Tim Miller, the political director of Republican Voters Against Trump, told me, demonstrated that he wielded enormous influence over the owners around the Kaepernick controversy.

We already know in a situation where Colin Kaepernick couldve actually helped some NFL teams he wasnt re-signed, Dave Zirin, the sports editor of The Nation, told me, and one of the reasons for thatno questionwas Donald Trump placing this social pressure, this cultural pressure, on the league.

He could make life miserable for them, Geragos, Kaepernicks attorney, told me. And he did. The league, Lockhart added, was well aware that a tweet might be coming at any time.

This is a very winning, strong issue for me, Trump told the Cowboys Jones in a phone call, according to Jones deposition in Kaepernicks lawsuit that accused the league of colluding to nix his career. Tell everybody, Trump told Jones, meaning all the other owners, you cant win this one. This one lifts me.

It doesnt matter this time what Donald Trump says

Now, though, the NFL could help sink him.

Trump wants the NFL, the institution besides the start of school that tells the country its fall, to play its games as slatedneeds it, national sports columnist Dan Wetzel told meto foster any semblance of normalcy for citizens addled with anxiety, and perhaps to provide some vague collective psychic boost during the run-up to Election Day, with as ever a certain portion of voters making their choices based on how they feel more than what they might or might not know. In April, less than a month after the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of the novel coronavirus a pandemic, the president said he thought the NFL season should start on time. A few weeks ago, when Anthony Fauci sounded notes of skepticism about the leagues ability to play games safely, Trump lashed back. Tony Fauci, he tweeted, has nothing to do with NFL Football. He retweeted himself some 8 hours later.

Original post:

'They Realize the Bully Is Just Kind of an Empty Suit' - POLITICO - POLITICO

Donald Trumps Efforts to Distort the Census Have Started Back Up – Slate

President Donald Trump makes a statement on the census with Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross and Attorney General William Barr in the Rose Garden of the White House on July 11, 2019.Alex Wong/Getty Images

A year after the Supreme Court struck down the Trump administrations attempt to add a citizenship question to the census form, the integrity of the 2020 census is once again under threat. And once again, the stakes are highest for communities of color. On Friday, Politico reported that President Donald Trump was planning to reup his push to exclude undocumented immigrants from the count. Such a move this late in the count would be unprecedented; it would also fundamentally alter apportionment and likely depress the response rates of immigrants who have not yet filled out their forms. This change would be consistent with the Trump administrations long and unsuccessful bid to add a citizenship question as well as with recent apparent attempts to politicize census operations more broadly.

At the end of last month, the White House and the Commerce Department placed two new political appointees at the Census Bureau, renewing fears that the Trump administration was again seeking to interfere with the census, a sprawling operation whose results will shape the distribution of political power and federal funds for the next decade. One of the roles went to Adam Korzeniewski, a Marine Corps veteran who consulted for the unsuccessful congressional campaign of Joseph Saladino, a controversial YouTube prankster who once wore a swastika to a Trump rally and claimed in one of his videos that the Black community is very violent towards Trump and his supporters. The other position went to Nathaniel T. Cogley, a radio commentator and assistant professor at Tarleton State University in Texas, who will be the deputy director for policythe highest post a political appointee has held at the bureau for decades (besides the director, who is also a political appointee).

Neither Cogleys nor Korzeniewskis job descriptions have been made publicthe roles did not even exist prior to the announcementand neither man has sustained experience with census operations. Adding political appointees in the middle of the count is virtually unprecedented, not to mention doing so right at the start of what is sure to be one of the most difficult in-person counting operations in the bureaus history. The American Statistical Association decried the news as creating the perceptionif not realityof improper political influence. The inspector general has asked the bureau to provide additional information about the positions, and Democratic lawmakers recently accused the Trump administration of failing to explain why political appointees are running what should be an ideologically neutral count of the people in our country.

In addition to undermining the reputation of an agency that prides itself on nonpartisanship, political meddling poses a serious risk to the accuracy of the census. If the White House pressures the bureau to curtail efforts to reach nonresponsive households, as some career bureaucrats fear, it will be historically undercounted communitiespeople of color, the poor, the homelesswho will suffer most. This is especially so amid a pandemic that has already upended the bureaus door-knocking operation, which is designed to count people who do not respond on their own.

As of mid-July, only 62.1 percent of households nationally had responded to the census. If the remainder are to be counted, Census Bureau employees will need to visit nonresponding households in person, a process that is starting now on a phased basis and will continue through the fall. This non-response follow-up is especially critical for counting historically undercounted groups, who tend to respond to the census on their own at lower rates than do the general population.

Already, the response rate in some predominantly Black communities is far lower than the national average. In Jefferson County, Mississippi, home to a population that is more than 80 percent Black, the self-response rate is just 42.2 percent; in Hancock County, Georgia, which has a population that is nearly three-quarters Black, the self-response rate is a staggeringly low 24.8 percent. Even with a full door-knocking operation, the 2010 Census had a net undercount of Black citizens and residents by 2.1 percent and Latinos by 1.5 percent, missing the equivalent of two congressional districts. (The net undercount measures the share of people missed less the share of people counted multiple times or otherwise erroneously.) Before the pandemic hit, the 2020 census was already at risk of an even worse net undercount given low levels of trust in government and the Trump administrations botched attempt to add a citizenship question to the census form. If the Trump administration does decide to exclude undocumented immigrants from the count, that could skew the data even further.

The new political appointees could further undermine the census if they propose cutting back on the door-knocking operation, such as by limiting the number of times door knockers can try to contact unresponsive households. (Currently, door knockers can make up to six attempts to visit a home.) While working in a previous role as a senior adviser in the Commerce Department, Cogley reportedly questioned some of the bureaus methodologies, including those used to reach historically hard-to-count communities. Any last-minute changes to census operations would be highly disruptive. Even before Cogleys appointment, it was not clear whether the bureau would be able to conduct door-knocking safely, although all field workers will be required to wear masks (a policy announced only last week) and the bureau will also distribute hand sanitizer and gloves. The recent surge in COVID-19 caseloads across the country makes their job even more difficult.

The new appointees could also pressure the Census Bureau to cut costs by increasing the use of administrative records, rather than in-person visits, to count the population. Despite the concerns of some activists and experts, the Census Bureau was already planning to rely on such recordswhich include federal tax returns, Medicare enrollment information, and 2010 census datato fill in data for households they fail to reach in person. Using administrative records for this purpose was already risky, given that such records typically underrepresent communities of color. Relying more heavily on these records would be a mistake.

Now is the time for the bureau to fortify its operations, not shortchange them. The bureau should make sure it has enough staff to count homeless people, for example, an effort that will not begin until late September, just a month before the census ends. The bureau should also continue to spend money on advertising and outreach, which has been the primary way of spreading awareness about the census, especially among undercounted populations who tend to be less familiar with the questionnaire.

After the counting period is over, the Census Bureau typically reviews the data for accuracy, to try to ensure that no one is missed or counted more than once. The pandemic makes this stage more important than ever, given the risk of double-counting people who have moved during the counting periodcollege students living away from home, in particular, who tend to be disproportionately higher-income and white.

An accurate count benefits everybody, but it is especially important for Black citizens and residents and other racial minorities. Since the very first census, in 1790, Black people have never been counted equally: the text of the Constitution mandated that enslaved persons count as merely three-fifths of a free person. Even now, people of color continue to be omitted from census data. The current census could yield a particularly severe undercount in light of COVID-19, which has sickened racial minorities at disproportionately high rates and reduced opportunities for in-person outreach.

As the nation grapples with the effects of systemic racism, the census may appear dry and technocratic compared to debates about police brutality or Confederate statues. But failing to fully count communities of color will have deep repercussions, depriving Black and Latino communities of their share of political representation and federal funding for the next 10 years.

Census data provides the basis for determining which states will gain and lose seats in the House of Representatives, and states rely on census data for redistricting and often to allocate seats in state legislatures. The federal government, meanwhile, uses census data to distribute more than $1 trillion per year in funding to programs that cover everything from education to roads to Medicare. Prince Georges County, Maryland, a majority Black county, estimates that an undercount would result in a loss of $18,250 per person over the course of a decade.

The census should be above politics, and its data above reproach. To ensure this remains the case, the bureau should make Cogleys and Korzeniewskis job descriptions public and disclose any operational changes it is seriously considering. Everyone has a right to be counted. Amid COVID-19 and a national reckoning over race, the stakes have rarely been higher.

Readers like you make our work possible. Help us continue to provide the reporting, commentary, and criticism you wont find anywhere else.

Read the original post:

Donald Trumps Efforts to Distort the Census Have Started Back Up - Slate

Donald Trump has battled to block my film’s release for years. Now he has failed – The Guardian

Here in Britain we like to think our journalism is free from control by those with power and money. Sadly thats not always the case. I have spent years trying to release a film about Donald Trump and have witnessed the corrosive power his money has over freedom of expression both in the UK and the US.

In 2016, when the Mail Online reported on a 92-year-old Scotswoman taking on Trump, readers were appalled to learn Molly Forbes had to collect water from a nearby stream in a bucket because, she claims, Trumps construction workers had cut off her supply. The article was accompanied by a disturbing picture of an exhausted Molly, taken from my new documentary Youve Been Trumped Too, which was due to be released ahead of the US election. But shortly after its publication, the article vanished, along with another like it in the Sun.

Next, our films American cinema release was cancelled and a US TV network pulled the plug on screening it. This was after Trump International had issued a legal threat to anyone who showed the film or repeated Mollys allegation about her water supply. The threats were enough to undermine our films release.

The Guardians Peter Bradshaw wrote of Youve Been Trumped Too: There could hardly be a more relevant or urgent film than this. But to understand why the film was seen mainly by critics and not more widely by the general public, you have to understand that Trump and I have history.

Rewind to before he was US president: in 2010, after a phone call from Donald Trump Jrs team, Aberdeenshires police arrested me and my colleague and threw us in jail. This was after we first learned Mr Trumps workers had cut off the water supply of Molly, then aged 86, while building his luxury golf course. Footage of my arrest and the Forbes familys desperate plight appeared in my earlier film Youve Been Trumped, which was ultimately broadcast on BBC2 in 2012 despite Donald Trump and his lawyers attempts to block it on the grounds of defamation.

In 2016 and more than half a decade after her water was cut off, Molly was still without a reliable supply. Other residents who opposed Trumps golf course found huge Mexico border-style walls surrounding their homes. After returning from the Republican convention in 2016, Mollys son Michael found that the water was still not working properly and fixed it himself. Ahead of the US elections in November that year we ran a successful Kickstarter campaign to fund Youve Been Trumped Too, in order to inform voters about the person running for president.

While editing the film, we were simultaneously working to secure a form of liability insurance (called errors and omissions in the film industry), which all distributors and broadcasters require, and which gives protection from legal action from the rich and powerful. Normally this is a routine matter, costing about 2,000, and two sets of lawyers had given the film a clean bill of health. However, with Trump the focus of our film, the quotes we received were astronomical. There was no time to run another crowdfunding campaign. We had just sent the film off for review and I was heading to New York for the world premiere.

On learning of Trumps legal threats and the absence of E&O, our US distributor (widely seen as a supporter of independent film) got cold feet and abruptly cancelled our US release. The company asked us to remove its logo from the start of our film. Even the leftwing American news network Now This scrapped plans for a primetime preview screening. We were left with one theatre in New York and a festival premiere at IDFA in Amsterdam. Although we streamed the film on Facebook for free it reached only a fraction of the available audience. Our US publicist said they could no longer work on the film.

The day before Trumps election victory, Mail Online published a correction to their original story about Forbes (who Trump says reminds him of his mother) which said: Trump International Golf Links has assured us the headline and related article are incorrect in various respects. The Sun issued a similar statement, in which Trump International denied that the initial disruption was deliberate or that their contractors carried out further work in 2014 and 2015. Neither myself nor the Forbes family were approached for comment.

With further legal help we have now been able to secure E&O insurance at a standard price. And although Trump has in the past taken to Twitter to threaten me with legal action, it is time to stand firm. The British distributor Journeyman Pictures agrees. The company has a proven track record of distributing powerful and controversial factual content and will be releasing Youve Been Trumped Too worldwide next month. It may be nearly half a decade late, but it is reassuring to know that freedom of speech in Britain has, in certain quarters, won the day.

Follow this link:

Donald Trump has battled to block my film's release for years. Now he has failed - The Guardian

Donald Trump Is Living Proof of Osama bin Ladens Success – The Nation

Donald Trump visits Aston, PA on September 22, 2016. (Evan El-Amin / Shutterstock)

EDITORS NOTE: This article originally appeared at TomDispatch.com. To stay on top of important articles like these, sign up to receive the latest updates from TomDispatch.

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Its July 2020 and Im about to turn 76, which, as far as Im concerned, officially makes me an old man. So put up with my aging, wandering brain here, since (I swear) I wasnt going to start this piece with Donald J. Trump, no matter his latest wild claims or bizarre statements, increasingly white nationalist and pro-Confederate positions (right down to the saving of the rebel Stars and Bars), not to speak of the Covid-19 slaughter of Americans hes helped facilitate. But then I read about his demand for a National Garden of American Heroes, described as a vast outdoor park that will feature the statues of the greatest Americans to ever live and, honestly, though this piece is officially about something else, I just cant help myself. I had to start there.Ad Policy

Yes, everyone undoubtedly understands why Gen. George Patton (a Trump obsession) is to be in that garden, not to speakgiven the presidents reelection politicsof evangelist Billy Graham, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, and former president Ronald Reagan. Still, my guess is that most of you wont have the faintest idea why Davy Crockett is included. Im talking about the frontiersman and Indian killer who died at the Alamo. Given my age, though, I get Trump on this one and it gave me a rare laugh in a distinctly grim moment. Thats why I cant resist explaining it, even though I guarantee you that the real subject of this piece is Osama bin Ladens revenge.

After all, The Donald and I grew up in the 1950s in different parts of the same bustling city, New York. We both had TVs, just then flooding into homes nationwide, and I guarantee you that we both were riveted by the same hit show, TVs first miniseries, Walt Disneys Davy Crockett, King of the Wild Frontier, starring the actor Fess Parker. Its pop theme song swept the country. (Born on a mountain top in Tennessee, greenest state in the land of the free Kilt him a bar when he was only three Davy, Davy Crockett, king of the wild frontier.) The show also launched a kids craze for coonskin caps. (Who among us didnt have, or at least yearn, for one?) So how could a statue of Fess Parker not be in the Garden of American Heroes?

And since Donald Trump is himself the essence of a bad novel (though hes also become our reality), I just wonder: What about the Lone Ranger and Tonto, especially since there are no plans for Native Americans in his garden-to-be? They were a crew obviously put on Earth to be wiped out by white colonists, cowboys, and the cavalry in the kinds of Westerns both of us trooped to local movie theaters to see back then.

Or how about Hopalong Cassidy (Hoppy!), that other TV cowboy hero of our childhood? Doesnt he deserve to ride in that garden next to another Trump military fixation, Gen. Douglas MacArthur? After all, I know that Hoppy was real and this is how: When I was seven or eight, my father had a friend who worked for Path News and I rode in front of the tripod of his camera on the roof of that companys station wagon in a Macys Day Parade in my hometown. (I still have the photos.) Somewhere along the route, Hoppy himselfI kid you not!rode by on his white horse Topper and, since I was atop that station wagon and we were at about the same height, he shook my hand!

And heres what makes Cassidy especially appropriate for The Donalds garden landscape: In the 1950s, he was the only cowboy hero who dressed all in black right up to his hat (normally, a sign of the bad guy) and, in the process, created a kids craze for black shirts (his version of a coonskin cap), breaking its past association with either Italian fascism or mourning and bringing it back into the culture big time. Tell me honestly, then, dont you think a garden of heroes in the age of Trump should have a few black shirts and an increasingly Mussolini-ish look to it?

So Donald Trump and I both lived through the same TV world in our childhoods and youth. We also lived through 9/11, still in the same city, although unlike him, I wasnt practically a first responder at the site of those two downed towers, nor did I see all the Muslims celebrating across the river in Jersey City (as he claimed he did). Still, of one thing Im convinced: Donald Trump is Osama bin Ladens revenge.Current Issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

Of course, that was all so long ago. The new century had barely begun. I was only 57 and The Donald 55 when those two hijacked planes suddenly slammed into the twin towers of the World Trade Center in our hometown, a third one plunged into the Pentagon in Washington, and a fourth (probably heading for the White House or the Capitol) crashed into a field in Pennsylvania after its passengers fought back. Ever since, all you have to do is write 9/11 and everyone knows (or thinks they know) what it stands for. But on 9/11, there was, of course, no 9/11.

It was a breathtakingly unexpected event (although, to be fair, the CIA had previously briefed President George W. Bush on Osama bin Ladens desire to hijack commercial planes for possible terror operations oh, and there was that FBI agent in Phoenix who urged headquarters to investigate Middle Eastern men enrolled in American flight schools). Still, the downing of those towers and part of the headquarters of the singularly victorious military of the ultimate superpower of the Cold War, the one already being called indispensable and exceptional in 2001, was beyond shocking.

Admittedly, theres history to be remembered here. After all, it wasnt actually that military or that Pentagon that downed the Soviet Union. In fact, when the American military fought the Soviets in major proxy wars on a planet where nuclear catastrophe was always just around the corner, it found itself remarkably stalemated in Korea and dismally on the losing side in Vietnam.

No, if you want to give credit where its due, offer it to the CIA and Washingtons Saudi allies, who invested staggering effort from 1979 to 1989 in funding, supporting, and training the Talibans predecessors, groups of Afghan Islamic extremists, to take down the Red Army in their country. Supporting them as well (though, as far as is known, probably not actually funded by the United States) was a rich young Saudi militant named, believe it or not, Osama bin Laden who, before that war even ended, had founded a group called the Base or Al Qaeda, and would, in 1996, declare war on the United States. Oh yes, and though its seldom mentioned now, when charges are flying fast and furious about the possible recent Russian funding of Taliban militants to kill at most a few Americans in Afghanistan, in those years the United States poured billions of dollars into well, not to put it too subtly, empowering Islamic extremists to kill the soldiers of that other superpower by the thousands in yes, Afghanistan. Hows that for shocking?

If you like this article, please give today to help fund The Nations work.

In 1989, the defeated Red Army finally limped home from what the Soviet Unions leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, had taken to calling the bleeding wound. Only two years later, his country imploded and the United States was left alone, officially victorious, on Planet Earth (despite future fantasies of a horrific axis of evil to be faced), the first country in endless centuries of imperial rivalry to find itself so.

And what exactly did that triumphantly indispensable, exceptional superpower do but, a decade later, get dive-bombed by 19just 19!largely Saudi hijackers in the service of tiny Al Qaeda and that wizard of terror Osama bin Laden, whose urge was then to provoke Washington into a genuine war in the Muslim world and so create yet more Islamic extremists. And did he succeed? You betand in a fashion even he undoubtedly hadnt conceived of in his wildest dreams. Think of 9/11, in fact, as the greatest example of shock and awe in this century.

Heres a feeling I still remember from the weeks after the 9/11 attacks when I saw where the administration of President George W. Bush was heading toward the invasion of Afghanistan and then, God save us, Iraq; when I watched our mainstream media narrow its focus to this country as the most victimized yet dominating and exceptional place on Earth and Osama bin Laden as the ultimate evil on this planet; when I watched the never-ending memorial ceremonies begin and what soon came to be called the war on terror be launched with up to 60 (count em: 60!) countries in its gunsights, even if I didnt yet know that, on 9/11 in the damaged Pentagon, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had turned to an aide and said, Go Massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not, with a future invasion of Saddam Husseins Iraq clearly in mind, though the Iraqi autocrat had no relation whatsoever to Al Qaeda (something you wouldnt have known from the top officials in that administration in those years)when, in short (though I didnt yet think of it that way), I watched my own country become a bleeding wound that has never stopped flowing and, in Donald Trumps Covid-19 moment, has turned into an American Garden of Blood.

Back in late September 2001, despite having been deeply involved decades earlier in the nightmare of the Vietnam War (and opposition to it), I could already sense war coming, and it occurred to me that this was going to be the worst period I had ever experienced. Now that were in Donald Trumps America, with hundreds of Americans dying daily of a disease that a reasonably responsible president and administration could have brought under control, the 3,000 deaths of 9/11 are beginning to look like a drop in the casualty bucket. (By the beginning of April 2020, Covid-19 deaths in New York City alone had already surpassed those of 9/11 by 1,000.)

And I wasnt wrong in that hunch about this being the worst period, was I? Mind you, it was just a gut feeling then, no moreeven though it would soon enough lead, almost inexorably, to the creation of my website, TomDispatch, and its focus on what turned out to be Americas never-ending wars of this century.

Lets get one thing straight, though. If, at that moment, you had told me that this country was going to launch a series of forever wars across what would turn out to be a significant part of the planet and fight them hopelessly for almost two decades or that, the more success proved absent in those same years, the more one administration after another would pour taxpayer dollars into the US military, the 17 intelligence agencies, and the rest of the national security state; that whats still known, with no accuracy whatsoever, as the defense budget would years ago have become larger than those of the next seven best-funded military powers on the planet combined and, by 2020, the next 10, and would still be rising; that domestic investment, from infrastructure to pandemic preparedness, would be starved for money in those same years, and that just about no one would protest any of this in the halls of Congress or the streets of America, I would have thought you a madmanor rather, the worlds best writer of dystopian fiction.

If you had told me that, in those very years, of the two great powers of this century, China and the United Statesone rising, the other ever more clearly fallingthe latter would lose approximately 7,000 military personnel (and at least another 8,000 military contractors) and many more wounded, not to speak of those who came home with PTSD or, under the pressure of repeated deployments to the sorriest of conflicts, committed suicide, while the former, as The New York Times reported recently in the wake of a bloody (but not weaponized) clash on Chinas disputed Himalayan border with India, would have lost next to none, I wouldnt have believed you. (In four decades, as the Times wrote, the Peoples Liberation Army had lost just three soldiers to fighting abroadtroops who were killed in United Nations peacekeeping operations in Mali and South Sudan in 2016.)

If you had told me that, facing a devastating virus, the leader of one would largely suppress itadmittedly using the most authoritarian of methodswhile, in his search for reelection, the leader of the other, officially still the greatest power on the planet, would ignore it, open the economy, churches, schools, and institutions of every sort and watch it run wild without a plan in sight; if you had told me that fewer than 5,000 people would die in the first of those countries and more than 134,000 (and still counting) in the other, leaving the American dead of 9/11 and the bloody wars of this century in the shade, and that it was all only getting worse, I wouldnt have believed you. Not for a second.

And if, above all, you had told me that, deep into those years of bleeding abroad and increasingly at home, a near majority of Americans would vote to (as I wrote during election campaign 2016) send a suicide bomber into the White House, I would have told you that, though Osama bin Laden had been killed by SEAL Team Six in Pakistan and buried in the briny deep in 2011, Donald Trump was his living revenge, and that bin Laden had won twiceonce thanks to those ludicrous, murderous forever wars across much of the Muslim world, and the second time thanks to the pandemic from hell and the president from the same place.

Get unlimited access: $9.50 for six months.

Imagine if, in 1991 when the Soviet Union imploded, I had told you that in 2020, not quite three decades distant, an American passport would be, more or less literally, a document for a trip to nowhere. Talk about a bleeding, or even hemorrhaging, wound! In the years to come, I think it will be ever more obvious that Donald Trump was, in fact, proof of Osama bin Ladens success, of the fact that 9/11 and those 19 hijackers were all that was needed to produce the world of his dreams and the wounds that went with it.

And if, by the way, you wondered why I wrote this piece with the longest sentences I could possibly create, the answer is simple enough: two decades into the 21st century, I think it should be obvious that Americans have been given an exceptionally, perhaps even indispensably long sentence without parole on a planet already heating to the boiling point, 94,000,000 miles from the sun.

No, this truly wont be the American century, but I doubt it will be the Chinese one either. By the time this crew is done, it may be nobodys century. Thanks a heap, Osama! This is your bleeding wound, too.

Link:

Donald Trump Is Living Proof of Osama bin Ladens Success - The Nation

The unmasking of Donald Trump – Maclean’s

In 1997, Mark Singer, a staff writer atNew Yorker magazine specializing in profiles, was tasked with what many today would chalk up as a literary suicide mission: Follow Donald Trump and find out what makes him tick.

At the time, Trump was, at least according to his own accounts, at the top of his real estate mogul game, which is likely why he agreed to the profile in the first place. A few years earlier it likely would never have happened: the Trump Organization was on the verge of collapse, mired in debt and facing bankruptcy.

By 1997, it had not only survived, but Trump was doing better (which in his mind can only mean richer) than ever. Hed re-financed his failing hotels and casinos division with a successful public offering, netting himself $7 million in 1996 in salary and bonuses (even while the value of the shares was tanking).

Singer, not known to shy away from challenges, embarked on weeks of research, shadowing Trump in what ultimately reads like an otherworldly jaunt through the crass Wonderland that is Trumpworld, complete with mobsters, Hollywood stars and shady businesspeople.

At the centre of the story, of course, is the shadiest of them all, Donald Trump who, among other pulp fiction character traits, Singer describes as the hyperbole addict who prevaricates for fun and profit and the perpetual seventeen-year-old who lives in a zero-sum world of winners and total losers, loyal friends and complete scumbags. Trump, Singer concludes, is a fellow both slippery and nave, artfully calculating and recklessly heedless of consequences.

READ MORE: What Americans dont know should worry us

Somewhere in that riot of egos, one must assume, was the real Trump, though Singer conceded in the end that he had failed in his mission to find him. He did claim, however, to have unearthed something even more astonishing and rare: an existence unmolested by the rumblings of a soul.

In some ways, Singers profile aligns neatly with the Trump weve all come to know as the American president. His penchant for exaggeration and outright lies, his visceral loathing for journalists who write stories he doesnt likethis is just Trump, and he hasnt changed, even after a quarter of a century.

But in other ways, something has changed. The artfully calculating Trump of 1997 has gone missing, replaced by a clumsy, sometimes pitiful novice who cant seem to formulate any cohesive strategy. Singers slippery Trump, the man who has dodged bankruptcy and the IRS for decades, who has shifted his political position so often that his politics resembles a mosaic cobbled together by a 4-year old, is now noticeably stickier, more ranting Republican of the deep south Confederate variety than the slick Wall Street free marketer he pretends to be.

As a businessman, even as incompetent as he was, Trump had been able to maintain the illusion of invincibility. The masks never came off. Even when it seemed like he was on the verge of being outed as a shyster, he stayed in character, forever the bigwig blessed with a golden touch. But as president, the opposite has happened: he has been steadily unmasked.

Is it a function of increased scrutiny? Despite his enablersAttorney General Bill Barr and Republican members of Congress who continue to throw up smoke screens to protect a man they see as their best chance to reverse the tide of liberalism they believe is threatening to destroy AmericaTrump cant completely avoid the oversight that comes with being president, particularly with a Democratic-controlled House of Representatives. Or maybe its just plain old age. Trumps lifestyle, his eating habits, lack of exercise and any meaningful intellectual stimulation is a perfect recipe for cognitive decline.

Whatever it might be, what were seeing now is not the same fit and agile Trump who is pictured in the 1997 New Yorker profile. Were seeing past that glittery veneer at an angry man-child, the inevitable outcome of an upbringing poisoned by privilege and racism. The more he fails against the pandemic, against Americas racial reckoning, against the pollsthe more desperate he appears to become, and the more transparent.

The fact is, Trump has always been a racist. Weve seen glimpses of it over the years, for instance in the early 1970s when the U.S. Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Trump, his father and the property management company they co-owned for allegedly discriminating against prospective Black and Latin American tenants. It was not the first time the Trumps had been called out on their racial bias and, unsurprisingly, they not only denied the charges but countersued, enlisting Roy Cohn, Senator Joseph McCarthys infamous legal attack dog during the anti-Communist purges in 1954. After the presiding judge rejected the countersuit and ruled that there was enough evidence to proceed on the charges of discrimination the Trumps decided to settle.

Somehow, that history has been largely buried, though David Cay Johnston, an investigative journalist who has covered Trump and his business dealings since the 1970s, re-hashed it in his 2016 book, The Making of Donald Trump. Over the years of his presidency, major news outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post have also dug deep into Trumps history and uncovered piles of past wrongdoings.

Johnston, however, with some justification, still blames the media for failing to properly report on Trump in 2016, ultimately helping him win the White House.

Donald Trump knows that so long as he never corrects himself or acknowledges error, journalists will quote what he says, Johnston told me recently. Thats why George Lakoff, the cognitive research professor at UC Berkeley argues journalists who cover Trump should use what he calls a truth sandwich. Instead of quoting Trump and then taking it apart, you should say: Were about to tell you something Donald Trump said that is depending on the appropriate worddubious or a flat out lie, etc. Then you quote him and after that, you take it apart. That way, people are psychologically set up to understand that what youre hearing is not revealed truth.

Indeed, journalists themselves now admit they dropped the ball in dealing with the deluge of misinformation that poured out of Trump during the 2016 presidential campaign. This time around, they seem better prepared, challenging Trump whenever he makes himself available to the media.

Typically, Trump has responded by making himself less available. His most recent appearance, a press conference on July 14 where he was supposed to announce additional sanctions against China, devolved into an hour-long incoherent rant on everything from Joe Bidens alleged lack of mental acuity to a redux of his 2016 claim that killer immigrants are crossing into the U.S. from Mexico. He answered questions for all of six minutes before abruptly walking off the stage.

Increasingly, a cornered Trump is turning to those people most like him, a segment of the American population lashing out at the prospect of losing its privileged position, of having to compete on an equal footing with immigrants and people of colour, with homosexuals, queers and the gender fluid. The dream for most of usa world where the colour of your skin or the clothes you wear has nothing to do with your life prospectsis a nightmare for them.

Whats frightening is that this is still such a large segment of American societysomewhere around one-third of voters. But despite its size, its not going to be enough to hand Trump a victory in November, and it seems to be dwindling. The latest Gallup poll reinforces what we suspected all along: In the 2016 election, Trump relied on a sizeable cohort of voters who, after the 2009 financial crisis, had lost faith in the American political system. They were tired of politiciansBarack Obama includedwho promised to revive the American Dream but then, in times of crisis, went on to dole out sweetheart deals to corporations and their CEOs.

For a wide range of regional and idiosyncratic reasons, those people, including some Obama voters, decided to give an outsider like Trump a shot. Now that Trump has been unmasked, these same people are fleeing Trumps dystopia in droves. In every demographicgender, age, race, education or regionthe percentage change in support for the U.S. president from January to July is negative. Trump has alienated nearly everyone who can be alienated.

Instead of shifting tactics, Trump has decided to double down on those core supporters, the people he himself most identifies with. As a businessman, he was able to dissemble his way out of most tight spots. But as a politician, Trump is quickly discovering that theatrics can only take him so far. With all of the hustling stripped away, whats left is a hollow ideologue grasping for approval from those who see the world the way he does.

Finally, we are seeing the real Donald Trump, and it is a sad, frightening, unhinged image indeed.

Excerpt from:

The unmasking of Donald Trump - Maclean's

Trump sours on online learning that his administration evangelized – POLITICO

In events and media appearances over the past several weeks, the White House and administration officials have repeatedly insisted that the nations schools and colleges must physically reopen classes and that online instruction, fully or partially, isnt an appropriate alternative. Theyve threatened to use federal funding as a lever to prod schools into physically reopening.

The Trump administration has been clear that its concerned that schools remaining closed would be a drag on the economic recovery that the president is banking on ahead of the November election. "If we don't reopen the schools that would be a setback to a true economic recovery, Larry Kudlow, Trumps top economic adviser said this week.

Trump blasted Los Angeles school officials earlier this week for a terrible decision to keep the nations second-largest school district online-only when classes start in several weeks. Many other large school districts across the country are also defying Trumps demands to physically reopen.

Its not a matter of if schools should reopen, its simply a matter of how, DeVos has repeated several times in recent weeks as shes become a main spokesperson for the Trump administrations push to reopen schools. Schools, she has said, must fully open and they must be fully operational.

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos listens as Vice President Mike Pence speaks at a roundtable discussion in Tiger Stadium on the LSU campus. | AP Photo/Gerald Herbert

But the Trump administrations focus on in-person instruction in traditional school buildings is a stark change for DeVos, who has long been an ardent proponent of virtual schools and individualized digital learning options for students.

As secretary of Education, she has also taken action to promote online instruction in both K-12 schools and higher education, steering money and grants toward digital learning options and scaling back federal regulations in order to promote distance education.

DeVos last year traveled the country on a Rethink Education tour in which she repeatedly called for education leaders to question longtime assumptions about what K-12 and higher education looks like which she noted hasn't changed much in several centuries.

It's past time to ask some of the questions that often get labeled as non-negotiable or just don't get asked at all, DeVos said during a 2018 speech. Among them: Why do students have to go to a school building in the first place?

DeVos also touted high-quality virtual charter schools as valuable option during her confirmation process. She and her husband previously were investors in K12 Inc., one of the nations largest virtual school companies.

Kevin Chavous, the longtime Democratic education reformer who previously served on the board of DeVos school choice advocacy organization, the American Federation for Children, is now a top executive at K12.

The administration has generally been supportive of parent choice, Chavous said, but he acknowledged that message feels more scrambled when you try to truncate the choice options into an either/or decision between fully online and brick-and-mortar options.

School districts can find a way to open by finding fully online options in a thought-out way or blended options depending on the status of the virus in their jurisdiction, he said. We should really be tailoring our approach in a solutions way instead of having some political conversation.

Emergency online or remote learning as its been administered by some school districts isnt the same as online schools administered by people who know what theyre doing, he said.

Chavous said K12 Inc. has seen unprecedented interest from school districts and parents since the start of the pandemic, adding that the company is looking to hire 1,300 new teachers.

John Bailey, who served as a White House domestic policy adviser to President George W. Bush, said there is a puzzling disconnect between Trumps criticism of schools opting for online education and his Education Departments previous celebration of local choices.

I cant make sense of it because it just shows an utterly dysfunctional federal government, said Bailey, who is also a visiting fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He said the Trump administrations criticism of online education in recent days has been a distraction for schools that have just several weeks left to plan for the fall.

As coronavirus cases soar in many parts of the country, Bailey said he expected that most schools will adopt some type of mix of online and in-person instruction this fall.

Everyone knows online learning was not great for a lot of teachers and students and in the spring, he said. The focus now needs to be on how we provide the best hybrid learning and online learning not debating, Should the school be open five days a week or not?

As an example, Bailey said, a major problem this spring was how little time teachers and students interacted through online platforms. He cited Census data showing that virtual instruction in American households averaged just a handful of hours each week. We should be incentivizing more instructional time, not reopening schools, he said.

In higher education, too, DeVos has spent most of her time in office seeking to advance online education as an innovative way to bring college costs down.

DeVos new proposed regulation on online learning in higher education which was unveiled in the midst of the pandemic but had been in the works for more than a year before would make it easier for online colleges to access federal student aid.

Its pretty clear that the rhetoric were hearing right now is entirely politically motivated because of how inconsistent it is with what the administration has been doing, said Clare McCann, deputy director for federal higher education policy at New America.

McCann, who also worked at the Obama Education Department, has been critical of the Trump administrations deregulatory approach to online learning as have other critics and consumer advocacy groups, who argue that there are too few federal guardrails for quality in the programs.

Those critics see irony in Trumps sudden criticism on the quality of distance learning as hes rushing to reopen schools. Theres no doubt that online education is really hard to do right, McCann said. At the same time, quality has not a big concern from this administration when it comes to online education.

Beyond seeking to change regulations, DeVos also threw a lifeline to one of the nations most prominent online schools, Western Governors University, in rejecting an inspector generals finding that the school ran afoul of federal law governing how much and how frequently instructors and students must interact to qualify for student aid. The final online regulations DeVos finalized also eases that requirement of regular and substantive interaction between instructors and students going forward.

In March, the Education Department also used emergency powers to loosen the rules for how accreditors could approve online learning in higher education telling colleges they didnt necessarily need to adopt elaborate online learning platforms to win approval.

During a discussion about reopening schools at Louisiana State University this week, DeVos struck a more careful tone on the role of the online learning that Trump has slammed as inadequate.

While distance learning works well for some kids, it doesnt work well for others, DeVos said during a roundtable discussion with Vice President Mike Pence. Thats why Ive always believed that education needs to meet the needs of students, not the other way around.

Angela Morabito, a department spokesperson, emphasized that DeVos wants schools to be fully reopened in the fall but acknowledges that there may be some exceptions to the rule depending on the local health situation.

DeVos is focused on getting schools to provide a full academic year of learning that respects each students unique circumstances, she said. All hybrid plans are not created equal.

Read this article:

Trump sours on online learning that his administration evangelized - POLITICO

Threat of a Trump without rallies triggers fears across GOP – POLITICO

The nursing home industry has been pushing for looser regulations for years. And they got what they wanted at the start of the pandemic. But now, advocates say lax standards are fueling the virus' spread.

One senior administration official said the lack of recognition some of Trumps top aides have paid to coronavirus has done irreversible damage to his reelection campaign. Internal divisions over how much focus Trump should lend to the virus have plagued the White House in recent weeks. Chief of staff Mark Meadows and senior adviser Jared Kushner have both pushed the president to focus on communicating a strong second-term agenda, including measures he would take to help bring the U.S. economy roaring back to life, while others have encouraged him to focus on combating the virus itself given its widespread impact on most peoples lives.

If you solve the virus problem, almost everything else will solve itself, said the senior administration official.

Instead of attending meetings with health officials alongside Vice President Mike Pence, the president has been eager to resume a demanding campaign schedule that mirrors his approach in 2016. When Trump has weighed in on the viral pandemic, it has been tangential: Last week, he hosted a White House event to discuss the reopening of schools this fall. But he has consistently attributed the rising number of cases in southwestern states to increased testing capabilities, even as other administration officials acknowledge that testing alone cannot statistically account for surges in most areas.

In an interview with CBS on Tuesday, Trump said Covid-19 testing in the U.S. has been working too well.

Were finding thousands and thousands of cases, he told the network.

Campaign staffers who scrambled to get the president back in front of the large audiences he craves were so shaken by the Tulsa episode they waited until the eleventh hour to call off his New Hampshire rally for fear of upsetting him, according to the two people close to the campaign. Staffers who were already on the ground in Portsmouth, N.H., a riverfront city situated in a county Trump handily won in 2016, were caught off guard last Friday when their colleagues alerted them of the change. One campaign volunteer, who questioned the reasoning at the time, noted that intense humidity was the only weather-related issue on the ground and suggested that Parscale postponed the event until the campaign could guarantee larger crowds.

A spokesperson for the Trump campaign said the rally was expected to be rescheduled in the next one or two weeks, and disputed claims that it was postponed for any reason other than the forecast. The same spokesperson on Tuesday said there was nothing to announce about when the rally might be rescheduled.

President Trump and his campaign are continuing to stay engaged with both in-person and digital events, said Erin Perrine, director of press communications for the campaign. Just this week, we hit over 1 billion video views since April across all our social media platforms. Last week, President Trump hosted a roundtable in Miami, Vice President Pence had a hugely successful bus tour in Pennsylvania and Women for Trump just finished up a bus tour in Wisconsin.

New Hampshire is one of several states Trump lost in 2016 that his campaign is now eyeing to make up for potential losses elsewhere in November. His first-place finish in the states 2016 primary, followed by a narrow loss to Democrat Hillary Clinton in the general election, revealed the surprising strength of Trumps populist brand in a state known for its independent and late-breaking voters. Inside his campaign and among his supporters, Trumps Portsmouth rally was seen as a chance to restart his reelection campaign in a state that boasts a sizable population of enthusiastic MAGA fans.

President Trumps affinity to New Hampshire is because it all started here for him, and he has a loyal following here, said Corky Messner, a Trump-endorsed Republican running to unseat Democratic Sen. Jeanne Shaheen. The four electoral votes in New Hampshire could potentially be very important.

Stephanie Murray contributed to this report.

Here is the original post:

Threat of a Trump without rallies triggers fears across GOP - POLITICO

Trump says the European Union was ‘formed in order to take advantage of the United States’ – Business Insider – Business Insider

President Donald Trump on Tuesday claimed the European Union was formed to take advantage of the US and argued that the US's European allies had "never treated us well."

His comments came during a long campaign-style speech covering a series of unrelated topics in the White House's Rose Garden.

The event had been billed as an announcement of new actions on China, but Trump instead spoke for roughly an hour about military spending, illegal immigration, and his friendship with Mexico's president while launching attacks on Joe Biden.

When he turned to talk about Europe, he said: "Don't forget we're in competition with China, and with many other countries throughout the world. We're in tremendous economic competition, including Europe, which has never treated us well."

"The European Union was formed in order to take advantage of the United States," he said. "Formed to take advantage of the United States. I know that. They know I know that, but other presidents had no idea."

The earliest iteration of what is now called the European Union was formed in 1950, in the aftermath of World War II, when Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands formed the European Coal and Steel Community.

The organization was intended to promote trade links as well as foster political cooperation to put an end to the bloody European conflicts that had characterized the first half of the 20th century.

Trump has often criticized multilateral institutions such as the 27-member EU, which he's accused of seeking to undermine the US by operating as a single trading bloc.

In 2018, he identified the EU, a major US ally, as one of the country's biggest foes. "Well, I think we have a lot of foes," he told CBS News. "I think the European Union is a foe, what they do to us in trade. Now, you wouldn't think of the European Union, but they're a foe."

Read this article:

Trump says the European Union was 'formed in order to take advantage of the United States' - Business Insider - Business Insider

Donald Trump Is America’s Abusive Dad – The Daily Beast

Legendary filmmaker Judd Apatow really liked Donald Trumpwhen he was on TV.

I watched [The Apprentice] all the time because I found it so hilarious that all of his opinions were so wrong and everyone he would fire was always for the wrong reason. It was so terrible and crazy that it was fun to watch, Apatow says on the latest episode of The New Abnormal.

These days, Apatow isnt laughing. When you're in show business, you meet people like Trump, you meet people who literally don't exist in the same dimension as you; they're just gone. And that's what he's like. He's like Cosby in a way, these people who are completely deluded and they've been famous and all of their wishes are attended tothey lose complete touch with reality, Apatow adds, calling Trump the abusive parent to the country.

Then! Washington Post media editor Margaret Sullivan weighs in on the Bari Weiss controversy. If Bari was truly bullied at work, then that's very regrettable and I'm sorry to hear that, but she was not forced to resign. I guess you could say cancelled herself, says Sullivan, author of the new book Ghosting the News.

Plus! How many minutes will Trumps new campaign manager last? WTF is up with the Trumps and Goya beans? How did Molly possibly survive an entire day without Twitter?! And how is the Apatow family holding up during quarantine?

For the first month or two, it's like, Oh my God, we're getting all this like special family time. But now heading into month five, they're like, I gotta get the fuck outta here, Apatow says. Even my cats are like, When are you going to get out of here? I have a life without you here.

Read the rest here:

Donald Trump Is America's Abusive Dad - The Daily Beast