Concern over rapid rise in COVID-19 cases in South Africa – The Associated Press

JOHANNESBURG (AP)

There is growing concern that South Africas hospitals may not be able to cope with the numbers of COVID-19 patients expected in the next two months.

Neighboring Zimbabwe imposed a dusk to dawn curfew, banned large public gatherings and reduced business operating hours to try to slow the spread of the disease.

The number of confirmed coronavirus cases in South Africa continues to surge, accounting for more than 50% of cases in Africa and making it the country with the fifth-highest number of cumulative reported infections in the world.

South Africa has 373,628 confirmed cases, including 5,173 deaths, according to figures released by the health minister.

The rapid rise of the rate of infections in the country has raised concerns about whether South Africas hospitals will be able to cope with the influx of COVID-19 patients when the peak of cases is expected between August and September.

Many hospitals in Gauteng province, South Africas virus epicenter that includes the largest city of Johannesburg and the capital Pretoria, are already feeling the pressure of increasing numbers of COVID-19 patients.

Health minister Zweli Mkhize warned earlier this month that the country did not have enough hospital beds equipped to treat the expected numbers of COVID-19 patients. He appealed to citizens to wear face masks, now mandatory in all public places, and to keep a distance from others.

We are extremely concerned that fatigue seems to have set in and South Africans are letting down their guard at a time when the spread of infection is surging, said Mkhize, in an address to the nation last week.

Zimbabwe has reported 1,713 cases, up from about 50 two months ago, and President Emmerson Mnangagwa on Tuesday evening announced a night curfew, banned political, religious and social gatherings, and reduced business operating hours in order to try to slow the spread of the virus.

Mnangagwa said the curtailing of freedoms we have always enjoyed, and had grown accustomed to was necessary, although some claim the banning of political gatherings is aimed at suppressing an anti-government protest planned for July 31.

The accelerating spread of COVID-19 in South Africa could be a precursor to what will happen in the rest of Africa, said World Health Organization executive director of emergencies, Dr. Mike Ryan.

I think this isnt just a wake-up call for South Africa, We need to take what is happening in Africa very seriously, said Ryan at the WHO weekly news conference in Geneva on Monday. Many of those countries exist in the midst of fragility and conflict, many of them need external help support.

___

AP journalist Farai Mutsaka in Harare, Zimbabwe, contributed to this report.

See the article here:

Concern over rapid rise in COVID-19 cases in South Africa - The Associated Press

Summer vacation plans stay the course in spite of Covid-19 spikes – CNN

(CNN) Not long ago, Lori Morell did something radical: She flew. On an airplane. All the way from her home in Grand Rapids, Michigan, to Reno, Nevada. It was time for her annual family vacation at the Mourelatos Lakeshore Resort in north Lake Tahoe, and she wasn't going to miss it.

"I'm going to live my life and nothing's going to stop it unless it's mandated," says Morell, 42, who works within the Department of Justice and has been spending summers in Lake Tahoe since she was a toddler.

Morell is not alone in her insistence on taking previously planned trips -- or spontaneously deciding to hit the road -- pandemic be damned.

Michelle Wild says her kids live for their annual summer road trip and that this year Covid caused some modifications but otherwise went off without a hitch.

Courtesy Michelle Wild

Different people are traveling in different ways. Some are driving. Others are renting RVs. Still others, like Morell, are hopping on planes.

And the question remains: why? Why are some people forging ahead with planned trips, despite the fact that the coronavirus is raging across the country?

No one reason

That's why Scott Gorenstein didn't cancel his family vacation to Lincolnville Center, Maine, where he's summered for over 50 years. "It is collectively our favorite thing to do and place to go," says Gorenstein, a media and talent executive with Sony Pictures Television, in New York. "It would be very disheartening to cancel and a blow to our psyche."

What's more, his 80-year-old mother, who lives in Philadelphia, hasn't gone anywhere since March. "She needs something to look forward to, and our annual trip is at the top of that list," he says.

For others, traveling is about ticking items off a bucket list, and they want to continue to do so. Alisha Brown, 46, and her husband, James, booked a two-week trip to Egypt with Osiris Tours for late October. "Our goal is to hit every continent," says Brown, an accountant in Houston.

Alisha Brown and her husband James booked a two-week trip to Egypt with Osiris Tours for late October in an effort to tick another box off the bucket list.

AFP/Getty Images

It's not that she doesn't worry about getting sick. She does. But she's been social distancing, wearing a mask and washing her hands diligently for the last few months.

"We've been doing everything we needed to be safe," she says. "But at some point we're like, 'we're going to have to live with this.' I have Purell wipes in my bag. I can wipe down things I feel uncomfortable with, like elevator buttons."

Since the only way to get to Egypt is by plane, Brown booked two seats on Emirates with extra legroom. She's also planned private tours on the ground. "The only place where we're with a number of people is on the four-day Nile cruise, but we have someone who meets us on the dock and takes us on our own tour," she says.

The family vacations

Some families are continuing with their trips because they don't want to disappoint their kids, which is how Michelle and Tom Wild of Buffalo, New York, feel. Four years ago, the couple bought a 31-foot RV so they and their two sons could explore the country.

Michelle and Tom Wild bought an RV a few years ago so they could take long road trips with their two boys.

Courtesy Michelle Wild

"My husband makes a big PowerPoint presentation before we go. We look online and at books and on apps to find the coolest things to visit in every state," says Wild, 38, assistant director of nursing at a hospital in Buffalo. "My kids live for this trip, more than anything else -- even Disney! I didn't want to take that away for them."

They saw some friends and family, but slept in the RV, which has a kitchen and bunk beds. "I wasn't nervous," says Wild.

The Wilds saw some friends and family, but slept in the RV, which has a kitchen and bunk beds.

Courtesy Michelle Wild

"The self-isolation really started to get to people, they were getting severe cabin fever (pun intended) in their own homes and started craving a change of scenery," says spokesperson Miguel DeJesus in an email. "We represent the next best and safest option: close to home, private and somewhat remote, no common areas, no interaction with staff, away from crowds, immersing in nature and the outdoors."

The great outdoors

In June, Sue and Matt Scaffidi went on a hiking trip with travel company Backroads.

Courtesy Sue and Matt Scaffidi

Sue Scaffidi, 50 and her husband, Matt, of Buffalo, returned from a June hiking trip with Backroads to the Blue Ridge Mountains, in North Carolina and the Great Smokey Mountains, in Tennessee. It was their fifth trip with the outfitter.

"This is our anniversary gift to each other," says Scaffidi, 50, who works in healthcare. "We'd been talking about where we want to go since November and booked the trip in early January. Then Covid hit and we were like, let's see what happens.'"

Although they had originally planned to fly, the couple decided to do the ten-and-a-half hour drive by car. Once they arrived at their hotel, she felt safe. Guides did temperature checks in the mornings, guests wore masks in the vans, and breakfast, lunch and snacks were laid out in advance, limiting physical contact.

The Scaffidis hiking trip took them to the Blue Ridge Mountains, in North Carolina and the Great Smokey Mountains, in Tennessee.

Courtesy Sue and Matt Scaffidi

"You're very self-contained, no one else is walking down your hallway and dinner is outside," she says.

Risks weighed

As for Morell, she, too, made sure she was going to be as safe as possible. She flew Delta, which is capping passengers and blocking middle seats through September 30. They hand out sanitizer; all customers and crew members are required to wear face coverings

She also spoke in advance with the owner of the resort, Alex Mourelatos, who told her about the safety precautions in place, which includes leaving a 'rest' day between room cleanings; not having housekeeping during guest's stay to limit person-to-person interaction; and leaving extra disinfectant in the rooms. While guests don't have to wear masks on property, they are asked to socially distance.

"I'm not worried," she says. "I pray that I don't get it, but I'm not going to live in fear. I'm not in a high-risk category and I'm going to social distance and wear my mask, but I'm also going to paddleboard. How much more socially distant can you get?"

Read more:

Summer vacation plans stay the course in spite of Covid-19 spikes - CNN

WHO concerned about COVID-19 impact on indigenous people in the Americas – UN News

More than 70,000 cases and over 2,000 deaths were reported among this population as of 6 July, according to the UN agency.

There have been at least six cases among the Nahua people, who live in the Peruvian Amazon, latest information has revealed.

WHO chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus explained that because indigenous people are among the worlds poorest and most vulnerable groups, they are especially at risk of contracting the disease.

Like other vulnerable groups, indigenous peoples face many challenges. This includes a lack of political representation, economic marginalization and lack of access to health, education and social services, he said, speaking from Geneva during the regular crisis update.

Indigenous peoples often have a high burden of poverty, unemployment, malnutrition and both communicable and non-communicable diseases, making them more vulnerable to COVID-19 and its severe outcomes.

WHOs Regional Office for the Americas recently published recommendations for preventing and responding to COVID-19 among indigenous peoples.

The agency also is working with the Coordinator of Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon River Basin, to step up the fight against the disease.

WHO also used the briefing to underline the importance of contact tracing to suppress COVID-19 transmission among indigenous communities and the population at large.

The process is essential as more countries begin to re-open after lifting lockdown measures.

One of the lessons from the recent Ebola outbreak in the eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo, which was declared over the last month, is that contact tracing can be done even in the most difficult circumstances, with security problems, Tedros told journalists.

Dr Ibrahima Soc Fall, WHO Assistant Director-General for Emergency Response, said contact tracing helps break further transmission of COVID-19, thus reducing its caseload and impact.

What we need to understand is that contact tracing is not an isolated practice. It is part of the best practices for epidemiology, he said, speaking in French.

WHO has welcomed promising news about a potential vaccine against COVID-19, as research into treatments in multiple countries, continues.

An experimental vaccine developed by Oxford University and the pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca, appears safe and triggers an immune response, according to a study published in the medical journal The Lancet.

It is good news, said Dr. Michael Ryan, Executive Director of WHOs Health Emergencies Programme, though he cautioned that the data is very new.

Dr. Ryan said the vaccine was given to 1,000 healthy adults aged 18 to 55 years. None appeared to suffer any serious adverse effects, other than chills, muscle aches and headaches, which were expected.

But again, there is a long way to go, he said. These are phase one studies. We now need to move into large-scale, real-world trials, but it is good to see more data and more products moving into this very important phase of vaccine discovery.

Dr. Ryan reported that 23 COVID-19 candidate vaccines are currently in clinical development.

See more here:

WHO concerned about COVID-19 impact on indigenous people in the Americas - UN News

Whistleblower Reality Winner has tested positive for COVID-19 in prison – The Verge

Former intelligence contractor and whistleblower Reality Winner has reportedly tested positive for COVID-19. Winners sister, Brittany Winner, tweeted her diagnosis earlier today. Winner is currently incarcerated in a federal medical prison in Fort Worth, Texas, where an outbreak has sickened hundreds of inmates and killed at least two.

Winner is seeking compassionate release during the coronavirus pandemic, citing underlying medical conditions. An early petition for release from her imprisonment at FMC Carswell was denied in April. Shortly afterward, Carswell reported its first coronavirus death: Andrea Circle Bear, who died after giving birth on a ventilator. The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reported last week that 130 people had contracted COVID-19 at the prison; the most recent Federal Bureau of Prisons statistics show over 500 cases. An appeal is currently pending.

Winners attorney, Joe Whitley, told Law.coms Daily Report that he hopes the court will take the outbreak into consideration. I hope the BOP is equipped to handle the geometric surge in cases, effectively at all their facilities, but I am concerned that may not be the case. According to Daily Report, Winners sister says she is currently asymptomatic, and one of her cellmates also tested positive.

Prisons have emerged as one of the most dangerous hotspots for Americas coronavirus outbreak. Attorney General William Barr has ordered prisons to prioritize releasing inmates to home confinement, but numerous reports have demonstrated confusion and delays in the process although some high-profile Trump associates, like Paul Manafort and Michael Cohen, have been released.

Winner, who previously worked for the National Security Agency, accepted a plea deal for espionage in 2018 after leaking a report on Russian election interference to The Intercept. She is currently scheduled for release in November 2021.

Follow this link:

Whistleblower Reality Winner has tested positive for COVID-19 in prison - The Verge

These five women were starting businesses in Lynn. Then COVID-19 hit, and the challenges multiplied – The Boston Globe

The other newbie owners echo her sentiments. Rachel Miller, who had been chef at the former Clio in Boston, opened Nightshade Noodle Bar last December in a tiny space in downtown Lynn, serving the Vietnamese and Asian-inspired dishes for which she had gained a pop-up following. Sommelier Sarah Marshall started Lucille Wine Shop in January, wagering that Lynn and surrounding communities were ready for her specialty wine and beer, plus tastings and classes. And Estefani Orellana Garcia and her mother, Fidelina Garcia, opened Estefanis, serving Central American and Mexican specialties on bustling Union Street, just a few weeks before the governor temporarily closed down indoor dining in Massachusetts.

The shock to hospitality businesses everywhere continues as restaurateurs assess whether offering takeout and opening dining rooms at reduced capacity makes financial sense, all while worrying about the health of customers and employees. These owners have the same concerns. Miller tells of crazy, long days after Nightshade Noodle pivoted in early spring to takeout and delivery and she reduced her staff to only a few people. The first two weeks were slow, but then rocked, and since then she figures she and her tiny staff sell just as much as before with half the staff. There is now a little patio with a pickup window, a rarity in the neighborhood, and takeout Wednesday through Sunday.

But, she adds, Ive definitely found a new sense of purpose. Miller, who was drawn to Lynn for its diversity, also found a deeper sense of community, donating a portion of profits in June to the North Shore Juneteenth Association and the NAGLY, the North Shore Alliance of GLBTQ Youth.

Mulfords Uncommon Feasts has become not just a takeout and delivery restaurant but a retail space for products from farmers who lost other restaurant accounts. She wanted to support them and offers their products on her takeout menus along with prepared foods. Ive completely shifted my perspective, she says. Catering and larger events are off the table, and in fact she cant see opening her airy dining room again in the near future because we cant do service the way we want. But artists in the Lydia Pinkham Building where the restaurant is located have presented online shows. The small patio is surrounded by the bustle of Western Avenue, she says, where trucks rumble by and children play in nearby spaces. It all feels fun and vibrant.

Estefani Orellana Garcia grew up in Lynn and is fiercely proud of that. After graduating from Bentley University and spending several years working in accounting and finance, she decided she hated the corporate world, and realized she wanted something more fulfilling.

With her mother, she opened Estefanis in the heart of the city, on the first floor of a residential building that her family owns. Their goal, she says, has always been to make their city better. The restaurant serves dishes of her Guatemalan and Salvadoran heritage, plus popular Mexican specialties, and its very much a family affair with her cousins husband as chef, her mother running the kitchen, and Orellana Garcia dealing with social media, customers, and everything else. Since reopening in early May, theyve been doing takeout and delivery, but the restaurant space is large so Orellana Garcia is considering trying indoor seating.

Marshall, of Lucille Wine Shop & Tasting Room, was able to stay open throughout the shutdowns, but found she also had to find new ways of doing business. It was almost like starting a second business, she says, as she added curbside pickup and home delivery, substituted in-store tastings with online events, and began to put her eclectic inventory online. The first couple of weeks were very stressful, Marshall, who was formerly sommelier for Oleana in Cambridge and Sarma in Somerville, says. But there were silver linings, she adds. I wasnt planning to do e-commerce for a year or so but now that shes got online ordering up and running, shes glad thats out of the way.

Now after months when every single week was a new animal, she is beginning to feel more confident that customers will gravitate to her very personal customer service and curated inventory. The neighborhood and her customers have been loyal and supportive, ordering cases of wine and joining in virtual tastings. More clients now are feeling more confident about coming into the store, and shes getting calls about private events (16 people or fewer) in the future.

The other women also found loyalty in customers. People deliberately shop with us weekly, Mulford of Uncommon Feasts says, adding that, surprisingly, shes even getting new customers. Its growing our connection to Lynn, she says.

The difficulties are real, too. Orellana Garcia says that when Estefanis reopened to offer takeout, there were shortages of supplies every week. One week it was trays, another week bags, another food compartment boxes. One week there were no containers anywhere, she says, and she had to figure out ways of getting supplies. Although she had waitressed in college and her mother had been a banquet waitress, the whole restaurant business was so new to them that she admits to Googling how to open a restaurant. Now shes getting comfortable with social media as Estefanis birria tacos, with slow-roasted beef and a Mexican favorite in Los Angeles, is taking off, attracting customers from as far away as Maine and New York.

One benefit, all the owners say, is a sense of women working together. When Orellana Garcia couldnt find supplies for takeout at Restaurant Depot, she said, Rachel [Miller of Nightshade] said she would share some. Mulford, Miller, and Marshall also talked of earlier collaborations with other women owners.

The owners have formed like a little club, says Miller. Its huge to have women-owned businesses.

For, as Marshall of Lucille Wine Shop says: If I can survive opening through a pandemic, I can do anything.

Alison Arnett can be reached at arnett.alison@gmail.com.

Read the original:

These five women were starting businesses in Lynn. Then COVID-19 hit, and the challenges multiplied - The Boston Globe

Facebook suspends anti-mask group for spreading COVID-19 misinformation – The Verge

Facebook has removed one of the largest anti-mask groups on its platform for violating its policies against spreading misinformation about COVID-19.

The About section of the public group Unmasking America! which had more than 9,600 members described it as here to spread the TRUTH about masks! It made several claims which have been widely debunked about masks obstructing oxygen flow and having a negative psychological impact. It is a psychological anchor for suppression, enslavement and cognitive obedience. When you wear a mask you are complicit in declaring all humans as dangerous, infectious and threats, the post stated.

It is one of dozens of such groups easily found in a search for unmasking on Facebook. Some of the groups are private, meaning a group admin has to approve new members before they can join. But the theme is the same: the groups oppose the public health intervention championed by medical experts. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends people wear masks in all public areas, which should limit the spread of the virus. These Facebook groups are for people who dont want to wear masks, and there are a lot of them.

Facebooks action came after an inquiry about the group from The Verge. We have clear policies against promoting harmful misinformation about COVID 19 and have removed this group while we review the others, Facebook spokesperson Dami Oyefeso said in an email.

According to Facebooks rules, if a group shares false news repeatedly, the platform will show the groups content lower in users News Feeds and stop suggesting people join the group to reduce its growth.

The Unmasking America group page included posts of photos from members wearing masks emblazoned with the Make America Great Again slogan or other references to President Trump, usually as a way of protesting mask requirements. Other posts described experiences dealing with stores that require masks, and many posters asked how to claim an exemption from mask rules.

An image of a Face Mask Exempt Card issued by the Freedom to Breathe Agency was linked to prominently; one poster advised others to print it, laminate it and use it. The number is legit. No such government agency exists and law enforcement officials have warned that such cards which use a version of the justice departments eagle logo do not carry the force of law, The New York Times reported.

Among the private groups are the Million Unmasked March group, which has more than 7,800 members. Parents are powerful! We are a group of moms, dads, grandparents, uncles, aunts, teachers, friends, nurses and anyone who is concerned with our children wearing masks to school in fall, the groups about section reads. We believe that our children wearing masks to school is physically and psychologically damaging. Join us in saying NO MORE MASKS! And the Unmasking Fear group, which has about 400 members, is promoting an August 1st event rallying against mandatory masks.

Medical experts, however, say there are very few medical reasons to preclude most people from wearing cloth face coverings when they go out in public. About two dozen states now have some kind of public mask requirement in place. Even President Trump, who has been largely resistant to wearing a mask in public, tweeted Monday that it was patriotic to wear a face mask when you cant socially distance.

Facebook has taken several steps to attempt to stem the flood of coronavirus misinformation on its platforms, with mixed results. A scathing report in April from human rights group Avaaz found 100 pieces of misinformation regarding the virus on Facebook were shared more than 1.7 million times and viewed about 117 million times. Facebook announced April 16th that it was adding a warning label when a person liked, commented, or reacted to a post with fake coronavirus information. Also in April, the company said it was removing pseudoscience from the list of categories advertisers could use to target potential customers to prevent potential abuse in ads.

In May, the company released a report describing its use of artificial intelligence along with human fact-checkers and moderators to enforce its community standards. According to the report, in April, Facebook put warning labels on 50 million pieces of content related to COVID-19, and since March 1st, has removed more than 2.5 million pieces of content related to mask sales, hand sanitizers, and COVID-19 test kits.

Continued here:

Facebook suspends anti-mask group for spreading COVID-19 misinformation - The Verge

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-17-2020 – 10 AM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

TheWest Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) reports as of 10:00 a.m., on July 17,2020, there have been 219,947 total confirmatory laboratory results receivedfor COVID-19, with 4,710 total cases and 100 deaths.

DHHR has confirmed the death of an 84-yearold male from Cabell County. We are deeply saddened by this news, a loss toboth the family and our state, said Bill J. Crouch, DHHR Cabinet Secretary.

In alignment with updated definitions fromthe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the dashboard includes probablecases which are individuals that have symptoms and either serologic (antibody)or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to a confirmed case) evidence of disease, but noconfirmatory test.

CASESPER COUNTY (Case confirmed by lab test/Probable case):Barbour (24/0), Berkeley (537/19), Boone(52/0), Braxton (5/0), Brooke (31/1), Cabell (205/7), Calhoun (4/0), Clay(15/0), Fayette (96/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant (21/1), Greenbrier (74/0),Hampshire (44/0), Hancock (50/3), Hardy (48/1), Harrison (134/1), Jackson(149/0), Jefferson (261/5), Kanawha (464/12), Lewis (24/1), Lincoln (15/0),Logan (41/0), Marion (122/3), Marshall (74/1), Mason (26/0), McDowell (12/0),Mercer (67/0), Mineral (69/2), Mingo (39/2), Monongalia (643/15), Monroe(14/1), Morgan (19/1), Nicholas (19/1), Ohio (174/0), Pendleton (18/1),Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (37/1), Preston (88/21), Putnam (96/1), Raleigh(89/3), Randolph (194/2), Ritchie (3/0), Roane (12/0), Summers (2/0), Taylor(26/1), Tucker (7/0), Tyler (10/0), Upshur (31/2), Wayne (141/2), Webster(2/0), Wetzel (39/0), Wirt (6/0), Wood (190/11), Wyoming (7/0).

As case surveillance continues at thelocal health department level, it may reveal that those tested in a certaincounty may not be a resident of that county, or even the state as an individualin question may have crossed the state border to be tested.

Pleasenote that delays may be experienced with the reporting of information from thelocal health department to DHHR.

Please visit thedashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more detailed information.

Read this article:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-17-2020 - 10 AM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

6 burning questions for Covid-19 vaccine developers headed to the House – STAT

Some drug companies say well have a coronavirus vaccine by the winter. Others say thats an irresponsible prediction. Some promise to forgo profits on a vaccine, but others believe theyre entitled to their monetary due.

Now, lawmakers can force the industry to get its story straight. On Tuesday, executives from five drug companies leading the vaccine race are due at a congressional hearing to talk about their progress in developing a product the entire world desperately needs. Representatives from AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Moderna, and Pfizer will appear in front of the House Energy and Commerce Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.

People weary of the constraints Covid-19 is placing on lives are pinning a lot of hopes on the promises those companies have made, particularly when it comes to when a vaccine might be ready. But there are still looming questions, from who will get a successful vaccine first to how much it might cost.

advertisement

Here are six burning questions the panel could pose.

Most of the manufacturers in the hunt for Covid-19 vaccines are making very bold promises about how quickly vaccines will be ready to be deployed and how rapidly theyll be able to produce their vaccines to the kind of scale needed to combat the pandemic. Many are promising tens, even hundreds of millions of doses by early 2021, and some even predict they can scale to the billion-dose range within the next calendar year.

advertisement

But in a recent interview with Harvard professor Tsedal Neeley, Merck CEO Ken Frazier warned that these predicted timelines are doing a grave disservice to the public.

For one thing, he said, vaccine development takes time. The fastest vaccine ever developed before now was the mumps vaccine, which took four years.

Cutting corners is a risky business, Frazier suggested: If youre going to use a vaccine in billions of people, you better know what that vaccine does.

Implied in the statement is the risk that any problems that might arise from use of the vaccines would throw fuel on the fire of the anti-vaccine movement, which is already sowing doubts about the safety of these fast-tracked Covid-19 vaccines.

Frazier also warned that giving people the sense a vaccine may be coming soon allows politicians to downplay other tools that can suppress spread of the disease, such as [wearing] the damn masks.

The most pressing question facing the drug industry is how soon it can come up with an effective vaccine. But right behind that is just how much itll cost. And the industry could answer now by committing to a price before a vaccine is approved.

The U.S. government has some leverage for such a demand. With the exception of Pfizer, each of the companies at the table has received substantial federal funding to support its vaccine development. Through the governments Operation Warp Speed project, taxpayers are on the line for more than $3 billion in research support, and the National Institutes of Health is picking up the tab for at least three massive vaccine studies.

So, what does the American public get in exchange? Some manufacturers have promised to sell their vaccines on a not-for-profit basis, at least for the extent of the pandemic. Others have not. Either way, its looking increasingly likely that the novel coronavirus will not simply vanish once the current crisis subsides, meaning there will demand for vaccines for years to come. If thats the case, will companies come to charge whatever the market will bear? Or are they willing to make pricing commitments now?

Since the start of the crisis, news about vaccine trials has made global headlines, moved markets, and seeped into politics. But the process of disseminating that data has been inconsistent. In May, Moderna put out a press release with vague positive language about its early-stage trial, frustrating experts who wanted more. Pfizer chose to upload its data to a preprint server, where scientific papers are posted without peer review, while AstraZeneca is holding out for publication in the Lancet.

A working vaccine is key to restoring anything resembling normalcy, and the public is desperate for information on the process. But without standardizing the current system, the public is left to parse press releases, rumors, and, worst of all, Twitter. Can the companies developing vaccines establish a system whereby the world gets clear, timely updates on their progress?

The second a coronavirus vaccine proves to be safe and effective, the entire world is going to be calling its manufacturer. The U.S. has already moved to secure millions of future doses, and the European Union is reportedly negotiating to do the same, but whats the plan for the world at large?

Scaling up manufacturing is a time-consuming process, meaning drug makers will be dealing with a constrained supply in the months following a vaccines approval. Beyond the wealthy nations that are already locking in bids, how can countries in the developing world ensure they get access?

That may seem like a question beyond the scope of a House hearing, but the U.S. has a public health interest in vaccines being widely available. With an economy deeply reliant on global trade and travel the U.S. will be at risk of another Covid-19 outbreak as long as the virus persists anywhere in the world.

Some manufacturers are suggesting that there may be enough data to warrant emergency use authorizations as soon as October. If that happens, vaccines destined for use in potentially billions of people will be deployed after mere months of human testing.

In the U.S., manufacturers are shielded from liability if a vaccine or drug developed in response to a health emergency causes injuries to people who receive it. That protection comes from the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act of 2005.

If that protection were not in place, would vaccine manufacturers be willing to roll out vaccines on such a slight evidence base? Will they make them available to countries that dont offer similar protection against liability?

The major manufacturers are all making vaccine at-risk, meaning they are already working to produce at commercial scale, even before they determine whether their vaccine candidate actually works. The goal is to have large amounts available for use as soon as the Food and Drug Administration green-lights a vaccine. If some candidates fail to clear the FDAs bar, that product will be destroyed.

But manufacturing vaccines is a notoriously unpredictable enterprise. During the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic, the start of mass vaccination was delayed by several months because the manufacturers had trouble scaling up production. The doses arrived as the fall wave of the pandemic was subsiding in the U.S. That happened with a vaccine that manufacturers had decades of experience producing. So it wouldnt be surprising if some of the companies have or will hit snags. In fact, it would probably be surprising if all the projects sailed through on the very ambitious timelines that have been laid out.

See the original post:

6 burning questions for Covid-19 vaccine developers headed to the House - STAT

Safe Pregnancy As COVID-19 Surges: What’s Best For Mom And Baby? – NPR

Pregnancy is a time of hope and dreams for most women and their families even during a pandemic. Still, their extra need to avoid catching the coronavirus has meant more isolation and sacrifices, too. Leo Patrizi/Getty Images hide caption

Pregnancy is a time of hope and dreams for most women and their families even during a pandemic. Still, their extra need to avoid catching the coronavirus has meant more isolation and sacrifices, too.

Carissa Helmer and her husband had been trying to get pregnant for five or six months by early April, when COVID-19 started to spike in the Washington, D.C., area where they live. Maybe, they mused, they should stop trying to conceive for a few months.

But then a pregnancy test came back positive.

"We were, like, 'Oh well I guess it's too late for that!' " Helmer says, laughing.

In some ways, she says, there are a few convenient aspects to being pregnant now starting with being able to work from home. Before the pandemic, she and her husband both commuted 90 minutes each way to their jobs in the city driving to the subway, then taking the train downtown. Because she's now working from home in her job in the subscriptions department at the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, Helmer is able to get more sleep and has been able to combat morning sickness with ginger ale and crackers. "On the Metro, you're not allowed to eat or drink at all," she says.

But other aspects of the pregnancy have been tougher than she expected. For one thing, she's had to go to all of her doctor's appointments by herself.

"It's completely understandable," Helmer says, "but I think that that's something ... we hadn't anticipated in a first pregnancy that my husband wouldn't be able to be in the room."

Carissa Helmer and her husband, Timothy, had been trying to get pregnant for months when COVID-19 first spiked in the Washington, D.C., area where they live. Helmer says she's found a few things convenient about being pregnant now: being able to work from home, getting more sleep, and not having to deal with morning sickness on the subway. Deborah Helmer hide caption

Then there's the delicacy required in making rules about visits from relatives.

"We've been trying to be really strict with them," Helmer says, advising extended family: " 'You know, it's really important that you're quarantining for 14 days before you come and visit us.' I think that's been a little hard to explain to some folks, just to tell them that I'm more at risk, and it's not anything against them."

Though she sounds relaxed, Helmer tells me that she's worried about getting the coronavirus.

"I'm terrified," she says. "My husband's still going to the grocery store, and that's pretty much the only place that he goes. And the only place that I go is the doctor's office."

Digging into the data about COVID-19 and pregnancy

How worried should expecting parents be about any extra risks the coronavirus might pose to the mom or developing fetus?

The answer and advice may continue to change, public health officials say, as the evidence rolls in. In June, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published a study showing pregnant women may be more likely to develop a severe case of COVID-19 than other women their age when they become infected with the virus. And just this week, physicians in France published a case study that strongly suggests a newborn caught the coronavirus before birth from his mother via the placenta.

"Where you can, you need to decrease your exposures. But that has to be practical," says Dr. Laura Riley, an OB-GYN at New York-Presbyterian Hospital who chairs the department of obstetrics and gynecology at Weill Cornell Medicine, and has been involved in devising pandemic guidelines for practitioners and patients on behalf of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Because this coronavirus is relatively new to humans, the evidence about the added risks it imposes on a pregnancy is scant. The June CDC analysis was partly reassuring, suggesting that women who get COVID-19 when pregnant are at no greater risk of dying from the virus than nonpregnant women their age, though they do seem to be at somewhat greater risk of developing a severe case of the illness.

The study reviewed more than 91,000 U.S. women of reproductive age who had a lab-confirmed coronavirus infection; of those, roughly 8,200 were pregnant at the time. Compared with other women of reproductive age who tested positive for the virus, pregnant women more often went into the intensive care unit and were more likely to need mechanical ventilation.

The data also showed that pregnant women who are Hispanic or Black may be at higher risk of infection than white pregnant women. (Black and Hispanic people in the U.S. have been found to be at greater risk of contracting the coronavirus and at higher risk of death from COVID-19.)

But there were limits to the CDC study that are worth noting, Riley says limits that may have made the added COVID-19 risk to pregnant women look bigger than it is.

First, pregnancy status was only known for 28% of the women of reproductive age who tested positive in the study. That means some infected women who went on to deliver perfectly healthy babies were likely not counted. And for those whose pregnancy status was known, data on race and ethnicity, symptoms, underlying conditions and outcomes were missing for a large proportion of cases. That, too, may have skewed their findings, the researchers who did the analysis say.

Then there's the matter of hospitalization rates for pregnant women. Many hospitals have implemented universal coronavirus screening for anyone admitted to a hospital's labor and delivery unit. What the evidence analyzed by the CDC doesn't reveal, Riley points out, is whether a pregnant woman was being hospitalized because of symptoms of COVID-19, or because she was going into labor.

"You can't tell from this data who came in because they were sick with COVID, and who came in because they were just going to deliver and were oh, by the way, COVID-positive," Riley says.

Plus, she says, it's hard to tell from the CDC data whether a pregnant woman was admitted to the ICU because her case of COVID-19 was severe, or because that particular hospital was only equipped to handle a pregnancy involving COVID-19 in an ICU.

There was one finding in the CDC data that does stand out to Riley as potentially worrisome: "It seemed pregnant women were more likely to need the mechanical ventilation, which suggests more severe disease."

Still, even there, she says, the number of coronavirus-positive pregnant women in the study who were sick enough to need a ventilator was quite small: 42 women out of 8,207 that's half of 1%.

Riley says her own OB-GYN practice includes many high-risk pregnancies including some older women, some who are pregnant with twins or triplets, and some who have underlying health conditions such as chronic hypertension or diabetes. So does this new data change what she tells her patients about pregnancy in the age of COVID-19?

Not really, she says.

"What it underscores, and what I tell my patients," Riley says, "is you just need to remain diligent in terms of all those things that we know work [to prevent infection with the virus]. We know social distancing works. We know that wearing a mask works. We know that washing your hands frequently works." Guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists also advise "limiting contact with other individuals as much as practicable" and urge patients to "maintain an adequate supply of preparedness resources including medications."

Where it can get harder for her patients, she says, is that, to keep the mother-to-be protected, partners and other members of the household need to take those same precautions. "That may not be so easy," Riley says, "but it's absolutely critical."

If pregnant women do have symptoms of COVID-19 or have been exposed to the coronavirus, they need to let their doctors know so they can be tested and receive appropriate care, Riley advises.

''Am I just going to be housebound the whole of pregnancy?''

Taking every precaution can mean staying close to home.

Kate Bernard lives in Austin, Texas, where she works at a music nonprofit and sings with her band KP and the Boom Boom. Originally from Yorkshire, England, she met her husband 10 years ago on a trip to Austin, and they married 2 1/2 months later.

Kate Bernard met her husband, David, a decade ago on a trip to Austin, Texas, and became pregnant in March. These days, she says, she's grateful to be able to do her work for a music nonprofit from home. Kate Bernard hide caption

Their world changed suddenly in mid-March: "The coronavirus lockdowns were just being announced that week that we got pregnant," she says.

The pandemic led to canceling the gigs the band had scheduled, and Bernard says she's not sure how she would have fared if she'd had to perform, considering her pregnancy-induced nausea and the Texas heat. These days, Bernard says, just 20 minutes outside in the heat makes her queasy, "and some of those gigs were outdoor gigs where you're playing for an hour, two hours."

To try to steer clear of the coronavirus, she's doing her nonprofit job from home. Bernard says she's grateful that's an option she has been able to work in bed whenever the sciatic pain in her back flares.

"I just can't imagine having to get dressed and get myself together" to go to the office, she says she figures she would have felt compelled to keep her pregnancy under wraps at work until the end of the first trimester.

Not that concealing it would have been easy in her small, open-plan office. "We've just got one bathroom, and they'd have heard the puking," she says, laughing. "They'd have known."

Bernard says her life has been a roller coaster since March, and the current surge of coronavirus cases in Texas only adds to her concern.

"We don't know when this is going to end, and it doesn't give you hope when the numbers are going up in the state that you live in," she says. "Am I just going to be housebound the whole of the pregnancy?"

Before the new CDC data came out last month, Bernard had been encouraging her husband to go places such as a downtown park or swimming at Austin's aquifer-fed Barton Springs Pool. And she had been hoping to swim in the pool at their apartment complex and engage in other activities that bring her joy. But now she feels like they'll both need to be more cautious, and the pools have closed in light of the pandemic. In addition to being pregnant, Bernard has asthma another risk factor that can make COVID-19 more severe.

"I like to make my own mind up about things," she says, adding that she and her husband both "try and think outside the box and live our life alternatively. But I just think it's just better to be safe than sorry at the moment."

Undeterred by COVID-19

So, do pregnant women really need to be housebound for nine months? Riley, the New York OB-GYN, says that would not be realistic.

For one thing, they need prenatal care. "Yes, we can do some prenatal care by telehealth, but we can't do it all that way. We can't assess your baby with you at home."

Plus, there are many other reasons to get out and move your body, she says: "Your mental well-being is not to be ignored." The need for fresh air or to take a walk are part of staying healthy, and going to work may be necessary financially, Riley says.

Dr. Carroll Medeiros is a professor at Brown University's Alpert Medical School and an OB-GYN at Southern New England Women's Health. She says many of her patients in Providence, R.I., don't have the luxury of working from home during the pandemic. Many are also Hispanic or African American.

Classified as essential workers, a number of her patients are still going in to do their jobs often at hospitals or nursing homes, she says or they live with an essential worker, and that, too, increases their risk of exposure to the virus.

Some of Medeiros' patients work in a factory where roughly 70 employees became infected with COVID-19.

"These people are mostly Black and brown," Medeiros says, "and it just shows the inequality. You have less of a chance of having a really good job in this country if you are Black and brown."

Many of her pregnant patients are worried about catching the virus, Medeiros says, but "it's hard for them to take off time when they feel like they are most at risk. You take off time you might lose your job."

Despite all the anxieties and the unknowns, Medeiros says she hasn't seen indications in her practice that people are avoiding pregnancy out of fear of the pandemic.

"They are very few and far between people who have told me, 'Oh, you know, we've changed our mind. We're not going to do it right now,' " Medeiros says. "People have come to have their intrauterine devices removed and to start trying. I don't think it's deterred anybody. But they have a lot of concerns about it."

''That hopefulness of having a child''

In Austin, Bernard anticipates that when her baby is due in December, the U.S. will still be grappling with the risks and effects of COVID-19.

And the current unrest over racial injustice and policing has added extra stress, Bernard says.

"I've just got to have hope for the new life," she says, "that bringing a baby in, we're going to teach it right from wrong. I think that's what I'll be holding on to that hopefulness of having a child. And rather than it being doom and gloom in the current times, having hope that the next generations will do a better job."

More here:

Safe Pregnancy As COVID-19 Surges: What's Best For Mom And Baby? - NPR

Golf legend Jack Nicklaus reveals he and his wife tested positive for Covid-19 in March – CNN

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Jack Nicklaus is arguably the greatest golfer the world has ever seen. His record 18 major titles and 19 runner-up spots have set an almost impossible target for the rest.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus was born in Ohio in January 1940 and took up golf at the age of 10. He won the US Amateur title in 1959 and 1961 and finished second behind Arnold Palmer in the 1960 US Open while still an amateur.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

He turned pro at the age of 21 in 1961 and won his first title in the paid ranks at the 1962 US Open, beating Palmer in an 18-hole play-off. So began one of golf's greatest rivalries as as this young upstart threatened to usurp the hero of Arnie's Army.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

In 1966 Nicklaus won his third Masters and then added a sixth major title at the British Open at Muirfield in Scotland. All by the age of 26.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Another British Open title came at St Andrews in 1970 at the age of 30 for Nicklaus' eighth major, taking him ahead of Palmer.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

By the summer of 1977 Nicklaus was on 14 majors but hadn't won one for two years. At the British Open at Turnberry he and reigning Masters champion Tom Watson were forced to take shelter from a storm on the third day before both shooting 65s to rocket clear of the field.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

In what became known as the Duel in the Sun, Nicklaus and Watson went head-to-head on a scintillating final day, but the younger Watson prevailed for his second Open and third major title.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus re-ignited his major charge with victory at the 1978 British Open back at St Andrews at the age of 38.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus and Watson fought plenty of battles against each other but they also came together as team-mates in the 1981 Ryder Cup at Walton Heath in England, winning all three of their matches together as the US won 18.5 - 9.5.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus was named captain for the 1983 Ryder Cup and led his side to a narrow victory against Europe at Palm Beach Gardens in Florida. It would be the final chapter in the US winning streak that had stretched back to 1959.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus bagged two more majors at the age of 40, but by 1986, aged 46, he hadn't won one for six years. A newspaper article ahead of the Masters said he was "done, washed up, through." Trailing leader Greg Norman by four going into the final day, Nicklaus summoned some old magic. A famous birdie putt on the 17th gave him the lead for the first time.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus' back-nine charge sparked roars the like of which Augusta hasn't heard since and his homeward 30 gave him a sixth Green Jacket and 18th major title.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus was again captain for the US Ryder Cup side at his Muirfield Village course in Ohio in 1987, but the Americans crashed to their first ever defeat on home soil.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Since Tiger Woods burst onto the scene with his first major title at the Masters in 1997 he has chased Nicklaus' major mark. But Woods has been stranded on 14 victories since 2008.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus was awarded the Congressional Gold medal in 2015 for his services to his sport and philanthropy.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Nicklaus' early career was characterized by his rivalry with Arnold Palmer (left) and Gary Player (right). Known as the "Big Three", the trio became honorary starters at the Masters.

Jack Nicklaus career in pictures

Palmer died on September 25, 2016 at the age of 87 and Nicklaus delivered a eulogy to his friend. "He was the king of our sport," Nicklaus said. "And he always will be."

See the article here:

Golf legend Jack Nicklaus reveals he and his wife tested positive for Covid-19 in March - CNN

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-17-2020 – 5 PM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

The West Virginia Department of Health andHuman Resources (DHHR)reports as of 5:00 p.m., on July 17, 2020, there have been 222,427 totalconfirmatorylaboratory results received for COVID-19, with 4,783 totalcases and 100 deaths.

Inalignment with updated definitions from the Centers for Disease Control andPrevention, the dashboard includes probable cases which are individuals that havesymptoms and either serologic (antibody) or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to aconfirmed case) evidence of disease, but no confirmatory test.

CASESPER COUNTY (Case confirmed by lab test/Probable case):Barbour (24/0), Berkeley (539/19), Boone(53/0), Braxton (6/0), Brooke (35/1), Cabell (207/7), Calhoun (4/0), Clay(15/0), Fayette (98/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant (21/1), Greenbrier (76/0),Hampshire (46/0), Hancock (51/3), Hardy (48/1), Harrison (133/1), Jackson(149/0), Jefferson (262/5), Kanawha (472/12), Lewis (24/1), Lincoln (19/0),Logan (42/0), Marion (124/3), Marshall (77/1), Mason (26/0), McDowell (12/0),Mercer (68/0), Mineral (69/2), Mingo (48/2), Monongalia (654/15), Monroe(14/1), Morgan (19/1), Nicholas (19/1), Ohio (173/0), Pendleton (18/1),Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (37/1), Preston (90/24), Putnam (99/1), Raleigh(92/3), Randolph (196/2), Ritchie (3/0), Roane (12/0), Summers (2/0), Taylor(26/1), Tucker (7/0), Tyler (10/0), Upshur (31/2), Wayne (144/2), Webster(2/0), Wetzel (40/0), Wirt (6/0), Wood (192/10), Wyoming (7/0).

Ascase surveillance continues at the local health department level, it may revealthat those tested in a certain county may not be a resident of that county, oreven the state as an individual in question may have crossed the state borderto be tested. Such is the case of Harrison and Ohiocounties in this report.

Please note that delays may be experiencedwith the reporting of information from the local health department to DHHR.

Please visit the dashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more detailed information.

Additional report:

To increaseCOVID-19 testing opportunities, the Governor's Office, the Herbert HendersonOffice of Minority Affairs, WV Department of Health and Human Resources, WVNational Guard, local health departments, and community partners today providedfree COVID-19 testing for residents in counties with high minority populationsand evidence of COVID-19 transmission.

Todays testing resulted in 914 individuals tested: 279 inBerkeley County; 416 in Jefferson County; and 219 in Mercer County. Please notethese are considered preliminary numbers.

Testingwill be held tomorrow in Berkeley, Jefferson and Monongalia counties in these locations.

See more here:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-17-2020 - 5 PM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

COVID-19: Up the nose and into the brain? See what a UC researcher found – The Cincinnati Enquirer

Dr. Ahmad Sedaghat looks into the nasal passage of a patient. Sedaghat is associate professor of otolaryngology and director of rhinology, allergy and anterior skull base surgery at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine.(Photo: Provided.)

You can't smell anything. Taste is botched. How depressing, right?

Well, yes, that is right. But the realquestion is, why do you feel depressed when you have COVID-19 with smell loss? The answer could be that the disease caused by the novel coronavirus might be attacking your brain.

New research led by Dr. Ahmad Sedaghat, an ear, nose, throat specialist and internationally recognized expert in rhinology at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, indicates that COVID-19 may not only be knocking out the sense of smell for somebut also using the olfactory tract as a way to get into the brain.

And once in the central nervous system, the illness might be causing the depression and anxiety that those with smell loss exhibit. No one will know that for sure until more research is done.

"It's our hypothesis," Sedaghat said lastweek.

The ideacame to him after he and his teamlooked at the results of a phone study in which people with the diseasewere asked about feelings of depression and anxiety.

The patients reporting psychological distress were those with smell inhibition and problems associated with it.

Labored breathing? Days of high fever? These life-threatening symptoms weren't linked with depression or anxiety.

"It is kind of absurd and ridiculous given how severe and how dire these symptoms are," said Sedaghat, associate professor of otolaryngology and director of rhinology, allergy and anterior skull base surgery at Unversity of CincinnatiCollege of Medicine.

[ We can't do work like this without our supporters.Please consider a subscription to Cincinnati.com. ]

"I would've guessed that the symptoms that would be most associated with depressed mood and anxiety would be severe, dire symptoms: shortness of breath, coughing, fever," Sedaghat said.

A car comes into a drive-through testing site outside UC Health on Burnet Avenue on March 27. The new coronavirus pandemic testing has increased dramatically in recent weeks in Ohio and Kentucky as more tests have become available.(Photo: Liz Dufour/The Enquirer)

He called the results of the research "shocking."

But then again, there's been previous evidence that other coronaviruses, such as the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) of the2003 outbreak,have the potential to infect the brain. Mouse studies showed the virus can enter the brain when inoculated intranasally.

Sedaghat, who works with European specialists in his field, was among researchers who'd studied the COVID-19 symptom of smell loss during the early weeks when the novel coronavirus was hitting the United States. Europe had been experiencing more cases at first and identified the possible symptom, which has become commonly known.

Sedaghat noted that people were experiencing smell loss early in the disease. That meant it could be used as a screening tool, he said, to identify them as possible COVID-19 sufferers who should stay distanced from other people. The symptom is now commonly considered an indicator of the disease.

The latest phone questionnaire that Sedaghat headed is available online at The Laryngoscope. Itlooked atcharacteristics and symptoms of 114 patients actively infected withCOVID-19 over six weeks at Kantonsspital Aarau in Aarau, Switzerland.

About47% of respondents reported at least several days of depressed mood per week, with 21% reporting depressed mood nearly every day. Nearly 45% reported mild anxiety and 10.5%, severe anxiety.

Sedaghat said his research isn't an end.

"This study raises more questions than produces answers," he said. But he added,"It gives insight into what is going on with the disease.

If you'd like us to ask a question of a COVID-19 doctor about what they're doing or not doing during the pandemic with their families, email our health reporter, Anne Saker, asaker@enquirer.com or Terry DeMio, tdemio@enquirer.com.

Read or Share this story: https://www.cincinnati.com/story/news/2020/07/19/covid-19-smell-loss-brain-attack-depression-anxiety-university-cincinnati-research/5451349002/

See the article here:

COVID-19: Up the nose and into the brain? See what a UC researcher found - The Cincinnati Enquirer

Germany’s Economy Will Triumph in the Post-Covid-19 World – The New York Times

Yet Germany is not dropping its commitment to balanced budgets. Since much of this spending will be drawn from savings, Germanys public debt is expected to rise, but only to 82 percent of G.D.P. a much lighter debt burden than that of the United States and other highly developed countries, which are spending far less on economic rescue packages.

Doubters say that Germany is now dangerously reliant on industrial exports, particularly to China, in a time of slowing global trade. Well aware of these vulnerabilities, Germany is pushing to modernize its leading exporters, the big car companies. Through regulation and public shaming, it is pressuring the carmakers to turn from the still highly profitable combustion engine to the electric cars of the future. Stuttgart, home to Porsche and Mercedes-Benz, has banned older diesel motors within city limits.

Germany is also making a big if somewhat belated push to become a more competitive tech power. It devotes as much to research and development as the United States does (around 3 percent of G.D.P.) and has a long-term plan to create an entrepreneurial ecosystem akin to Silicon Valley, in which venture capitalists fuel promising start-ups. Germanys technology industry is not without its setbacks, such as the recent and sudden collapse of the financial technology company Wirecard, which has raised questions about the vigilance of Germanys financial regulator. But many of the industrys first successes, copies of American online-shopping and food-delivery companies, are scaling up rapidly.

The German economic rescue plan includes $56 billion for start-ups that can digitize traditional industries, using artificial intelligence and other new technologies. Alongside France, Germany recently announced what its economics minister called a digital moonshot, which aims to create a European internet cloud to rival those of America and China.

Germany is an aging, conservative society, but critics who assume it is too slow to change have been proved wrong before. In the early 2000s, when Germany was dismissed as the proverbial sick man of Europe, it adopted labor market reforms that restored its status as the continents most stable economy. As the pandemic accelerates the pace of digitalization and de-globalization and drives up the worlds debts, Germany stands out for its relative lack of weakness to those challenges, and for a government prepared to handle them.

Ruchir Sharma is the chief global strategist at Morgan Stanley Investment Management, the author, most recently, of The Ten Rules of Successful Nations and a contributing Opinion writer. This essay reflects his opinions alone.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And heres our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Continued here:

Germany's Economy Will Triumph in the Post-Covid-19 World - The New York Times

Breast cancer care becomes troubling casualty of COVID-19 pandemic – ABC News

As many hospitals and doctor's offices limited patient appointments and surgeries during the coronavirus pandemic, a concerning side effect of the shutdown began to emerge. With fewer screening exams, patient visits and surgical procedures, breast cancer care took a frightening hit.

Regular breast cancer screenings save lives, but early in the pandemic, the American Cancer Society recommended that doctors postpone any routine breast cancer screenings or intervention to protect at-risk patients from potential exposures or illness.

"No one should go to a health care facility for routine cancer screening at this time," Dr. Richard Wender, chief cancer control officer for the ACS, said in a statement on April 29.

But delaying those appointments didn't just mean delaying regular breast exams. For some, it meant delaying preventative treatments, such as chemotherapy, designed to keep cancer from coming back. And as weeks turned into months, ACS eventually shifted its policy, encouraging women to talk to their doctor before potentially resuming their regular appointments.

The most recent statement, released on July 2, encouraged women to resume their usual screening mammograms, but suggested that some women can choose to wait for two years for their next screening mammogram based on their individual history and breast cancer risk factors.

Though the earlier advice has now changed, we don't know the effect these delays might have on breast cancer patients in the future.

Dr. Paulomi Shroff, a board-certified breast surgeon in Marietta, Georgia, has experienced the impact of the shutdown on her patients firsthand.

"Originally, an issue was that we couldn't get mammograms for about six weeks in Georgia," she said. Many other places around the country had even longer delays meaning that "women who had breast lumps would get pushed back in terms of getting them investigated."

In this July 31, 2012, file photo, a radiologist compares an image from earlier, 2-D technology mammogram to the new 3-D Digital Breast Tomosynthesis mammography.

Stopping mammograms did not just affect the women with breast lumps. Shroff said that it also affected women scheduling their yearly mammograms to screen for breast cancer.

"Really the problem with not having mammography in that time period is that women are skipping their mammograms," Shroff said. Because many women make a habit of getting their mammograms at a certain time of year, "if they were supposed to have their mammogram in May and didn't get it, they may just wait until next May," she added.

Altogether, the delays in mammograms could mean even more trouble for women down the road.

For patients diagnosed with breast cancer before the pandemic, the shutdown impacted their access to physicians, medications and surgeries. "A lot of different centers de-prioritized breast surgery," Shroff said.

This is a concern, she said, because by performing surgery "as early as possible, we are reducing the metastasis risk."

While patients waited for surgery, some who had certain types of cancer could be prescribed medications that would help keep their cancer from worsening.

Once elective surgeries were resumed, the pandemic had an impact on the decisions women made for having their breast cancers removed. In an effort to conserve hospital beds and to avoid overnight hospital stays, many patients and surgeons opted for less-invasive surgeries.

"In patients who might have otherwise wanted a mastectomy, if we could get away with a lumpectomy, we got away with a lumpectomy," Shroff said.

For those considering having a plastic surgeon reconstruct their breasts after having their breast cancers removed, Shroff said, "If they needed reconstruction we tried to do the minimum possible" to avoid an overnight hospital stay.

Even for patients without cancer, but with a high-risk change in their breast tissue called atypia, the pandemic caused problems. Shroff told ABC News that she had one patient with atypia who had to wait three months for surgery. By the time she had her surgery, it had progressed into cancer.

"I effectively sat on it without treatment for three months, which is not something I would have done in a non-COVID era," Shroff said.

In this May 6, 2010 file photo, a radiologist checks mammograms in Los Angeles.

Fortunately, multiple national societies are providing guidance to doctors making decisions about breast cancer care.

"Our society, along with four other societies ... wrote really literature-based guidelines about what to do with breast cancer patients during the pandemic," said Dr. Jill Dietz, president of the American Society of Breast Surgeons.

In addition to recommendations for virtual visits, streamlined in-person visits, masks, screening and preoperative testing, the guidelines prioritize patients' cancer care based on their individual risk of breast cancer progression or of serious illness should they contract COVID-19. Dietz said, "All of those factors are playing a role."

In terms of resuming mammograms, Dr. Lynn Baxter, director of breast imaging for Northside Radiology Associates at Northside Hospital in Atlanta, said that even though mammograms are back up and running at her facility, not everyone should be rushing to be seen.

"Let's say someone is older and has COPD -- if it's just a regular screening, it might be in the best interest of her health to wait. ... Let's say that same lady felt a lump, I would say, no, she really needs to come in and get that taken care of."

Most importantly, Baxter recommended that women "think about their individual risk and talk with their providers."

Along with these prioritization strategies, Shroff wants women across the country to know: "You don't need to be scared to go the doctor's in the pandemic, as long as you practice good personal hygiene, wear a mask, wash your hands. Don't not seek medical care because of this."

Stephanie E. Farber, M.D., is a plastic surgeon in Atlanta and is an ABC News Medical contributor.

Read the rest here:

Breast cancer care becomes troubling casualty of COVID-19 pandemic - ABC News

Only 209 new COVID-19 cases on Sunday in Oklahoma; 13 more in Garfield County – Enid News & Eagle

ENID, Okla. Oklahoma only saw 209 new COVID-19 cases on Sunday, but 15 of those were in Northwest Oklahoma counties, according to Oklahoma State Department of Health data.

There were no deaths reported Sunday by OSDH.

Eleven of the 13 Garfield County cases were in Enid, and two additional positive tests were confirmed in Kingfisher County by the OSDH. Other communities gaining a case in Northwest Oklahoma were Lahoma, Hennessey and Kingfisher.

Of the 25,265 cumulative COVID-19 cases, 5,348 are active, representing a single-day decrease of 71. There have been 19,466 Oklahomans who have recovered, according to OSDH, which definesrecovered as "not hospitalized or deceased and 14 days after onset/report."

State numbers

Increases in cases per age group reported Sunday were 81 in the 18-35 age group, 47 in the 36-49 age group, 38 in the 50-64 age group, 21 in the 65 and older age group, 16 in the 5-17 age group and six in the 0-4 age group.

Cumulative totals as of Sunday were 552 in the 0-4 age group, 1,953 in the 5-17 age group, 9,230 in the 18-35 age group, 5,524 in the 36-49 age group, 4,413 in the 50-64 age group and 3,593 in the 65 and older age group.

Of those testing positive, 12,942, or 51.23%, have been female, and 12,245 or 48.47%, have been male. There are 78 listed as "unknown" gender, according to OSDH data on Sunday.

Of the overall 451 deaths in the state, 360 or 79.82%, have been 65 and older; 69 or 15.30%, have been in the 50-64 age group; 14, or 3.10%, have been in the 36-49 age group; 7, or 1.55%, have been in the 18-35 age group; and one, or .22%, has been in the 5-17 age group. More men, 238, than women, 213, have succumbed to the virus, according to OSDH on Saturday. The average age of those who have died is 75.1.

Data shows deaths in 49 of Oklahoma's 77 counties, with 84 in Tulsa County; 77 in Oklahoma County; 40 in Cleveland County; 39 in Washington County; 19 each in Delaware and Wagoner counties; 14 in Muskogee County; 13 in McCurtain County; 11 in Caddo County; 10 in Rogers County; 9 each in Comanche, Creek, Kay and Osage counties; 7 each in Greer and Texas counties; 5 each in Grady, Mayes and Pottawatomie counties; 4 each in Adair, Canadian, McClain and Seminole counties; 3 each in Carter, Garvin, Jackson, Pawnee, Pittsburg and Sequoyah counties; 2 each in Cotton, Garfield, Lincoln, Ottawa, Payne and Pontotoc counties; and 1 each in Bryan, Cherokee, Choctaw, Hughes, Kiowa, Latimer, Leflore, Logan, Major, McIntosh, Noble, Nowata, Stephens and Tillman counties.

COVID-19 data released Sunday for Northwest Oklahoma counties shows Garfield with 173 cases, 114 recovered andtwo deaths,a woman in the 36-49 age groupin June and an86-year-old from Garfield Countyin April; Kingfisher with 62 cases, 43 recovered; Noble with 59 cases, 46 recovered and one death; Blaine with 23 cases, 17 recovered;Woodward with 18 cases, 14 recovered; Major with 16 cases, 13 recovered and one death, awoman in18-35 age groupin April; Woods with 12 cases, eight recovered;Grant with four cases, two recovered; and Alfalfa with one recovered case.

CumulativeCOVID-19 cases by city or townin Northwest Oklahoma include 159 in Enid (54 active); 25 in Kingfisher (eight active); 16 in Hennessey (five active); 15 each in Okarche (three active) and Woodward, (three active); 10 each in Alva (two active) and Watonga (two active); seven each in Cashion and Fairview (one active); six in Geary (one active); five in Ringwood (one active); four each in Dover (three active), Garber (one active), Lahoma (one active) and Longdale (two active); two each in Freedom (two active), Laverne (one active), Meno, Pond Creek (two active), Seiling and Waukomis (one active); and one each in Billings (one active), Canton (one active), Fort Supply, Hitchcock, Jet, Lamont, Medford, Mooreland and Okeene, according to data released by OSDH on Sunday. Residents living in areas with under 100 in population or those with unknown addresses may be recorded as "other."

In Enid, there have been 80 cases with 55 recovered, from the 73701 Zip Code, primarily the eastern half of the city, and 79 cases with 49 recovered from 73703, or the western half, according to OSDH data on Sunday. There also has been one recovered case in the 73705 Zip Code, which is listed as Vance Air Force Base athttps://www.unitedstateszipcodes.org/.

COVID-19 cases per county in Oklahoma as reported by the Oklahoma State Department of Health Sunday, July 19, 2020. SOURCE: OSDH

COVID-19 cases per city in Oklahoma as reported by the Oklahoma State Department of Health Sunday, July 19, 2020. SOURCE: OSDH

Nursing homes with resident- or staff-related COVID-19 cases have remained light in Northwest Oklahoma, according to OSDH reports, with eight in Enid three atThe Arbors, one of which was reported July 14 in the OSDH's Executive Report;two at The Commons in April; and one atGarland Road Nursing&Rehabilitation, which officials at the facility say subsequently tested negative.Golden Oaks Retirement Community verified July 3that a contract employee had tested positive for COVID-19 and on July 15 that another contract employee had tested positive, but the facility is not listed on the OSDH report.

Positive tests in long-term care facilities in the area include one each in Blaine, Woods and Woodward counties, five in Kingfisher County and five at Center of Love in Okarche in Canadian County. There have been two in Major County, including one staff member at Seiling Nursing Centerwho lived in Major County, tested positive and diedin April, according to OSDH data.

State Health Department officials areencouraging Oklahomans to get testedfor COVID-19, saying recently that due to adequate supplies, residents no longer need to exhibit symptoms or report exposure to someone with the virus to get in line for testing.

Free testing for COVID-19 is ongoing at the Garfield County and other state Health Departments. Testing is by appointment only for Blaine County, 521 W. 4th, Watonga, (580) 623-7977; Garfield County, 2501 S. Mercer, Enid, (580) 233-0650; Grant County, 115 N. Main, Medford, (580) 395-2906; Kingfisher County, 124 E. Sheridan, courthouse annex room #101, Kingfisher, (405) 375-3008; Major County, 501 E. Broadway, Fairview, (580) 227-3362; Noble County, 300 Fir St., Perry, (580) 336-2257; Woods County, 511 Barnes St., Alva, (580) 327-3192; and Woodward County, 1631 Texas Ave., Woodward, (580) 256-6416. For a full list of county drive-through testing, go tohttps://coronavirus.health.ok.gov/drive-thru-testing. Some health department also advise the public to check their Facebook pages for more information regarding testing.

Emergency warning signs for COVID-19 are trouble breathing, persistent pain or pressure in the chest, new confusion or inability to arouse, bluish lips or face, according to the CDC. More information can be found athttps://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/symptoms-testing/symptoms.html.

Those with symptoms of COVID-19 should call ahead to local emergency rooms. Those with minor symptoms should contact their regular physicians.

Resources and information on COVID-19 can be obtained by calling 211 or going tohttps://covidresources.ok.gov/.

BREAKING NEWSon the COVID-19 threat and its impact is available athttps://www.enidnews.com/virusand isfree for all readers. That includes information on closings and cancellations.

Get full-access breaking news via text alerts at https://enidnews.com/textalerts.

For more local, state, national and global COVID-19 pandemic news, go tohttps://enidnews.com/news/covid19.

All breaking news is fully accessible on theEnid News & Eaglewebsite.

Information also can be found athttps://coronavirus.health.ok.gov/andhttps://www.cdc.gov/.

We are making critical coverage of the coronavirus available for free. Please consider subscribing so we can continue to bring you the latest news and information on this developing story.

Excerpt from:

Only 209 new COVID-19 cases on Sunday in Oklahoma; 13 more in Garfield County - Enid News & Eagle

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-15-2020 – 5 PM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

TheWest Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR)reports as of 5:00 p.m., on July 15, 2020, there have been 217,786total confirmatorylaboratory results received for COVID-19, with 4,557 totalcases and 98 deaths.

DHHR has confirmed the death of a 77-yearold male from Wood County. Thepassing of this West Virginian is reported with great sadness and we extend oursympathies to his loved ones, said Bill J. Crouch, DHHR Cabinet Secretary.

In alignment with updated definitions fromthe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the dashboard includes probablecases which are individuals that have symptoms and either serologic (antibody)or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to a confirmed case) evidence of disease, but noconfirmatory test.

CASESPER COUNTY (Case confirmed by lab test/Probable case):Barbour(23/0), Berkeley (531/19), Boone (46/0), Braxton (5/0), Brooke (32/1), Cabell(197/7), Calhoun (4/0), Clay (13/0), Fayette (89/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant(20/1), Greenbrier (74/0), Hampshire (45/0), Hancock (47/3), Hardy (47/1),Harrison (131/0), Jackson (148/0), Jefferson (256/5), Kanawha (442/12), Lewis(23/1), Lincoln (12/0), Logan (41/0), Marion (116/3), Marshall (71/1), Mason(26/0), McDowell (12/0), Mercer (67/0), Mineral (68/2), Mingo (34/2),Monongalia (624/14), Monroe (14/1), Morgan (19/1), Nicholas (19/1), Ohio(158/0), Pendleton (17/1), Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (37/1), Preston (86/21),Putnam (93/1), Raleigh (83/3), Randolph (192/2), Ritchie (2/0), Roane (12/0),Summers (2/0), Taylor (22/1), Tucker (7/0), Tyler (10/0), Upshur (31/2), Wayne(136/1), Webster (1/0), Wetzel (38/0), Wirt (6/0), Wood (186/9), Wyoming (7/0).

As case surveillance continues at thelocal health department level, it may reveal that those tested in a certaincounty may not be a resident of that county, or even the state as an individualin question may have crossed the state border to be tested.

Pleasenote that delays may be experienced with the reporting of information from thelocal health department to DHHR.

Please visit thedashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more detailed information.

Excerpt from:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-15-2020 - 5 PM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

I Wont Return to the Classroom, and You Shouldnt Ask Me To – The New York Times

SEDRO-WOOLLEY, Wash. Every day when I walk into work as a public-school teacher, I am prepared to take a bullet to save a child. In the age of school shootings, thats what the job requires. But asking me to return to the classroom amid a pandemic and expose myself and my family to Covid-19 is like asking me to take that bullet home to my own family.

I wont do it, and you shouldnt want me to.

I became an educator after a career as a nurse. I teach medical science and introduction to nursing to 11th and 12th graders at a regional skills center that serves students from 22 different high schools in 13 different school districts.

My school district and school havent ruled out asking us return to in-person teaching in the fall. As careful and proactive as the administration has been when it comes to exploring plans to return to the classroom, nothing I have heard reassures me that I can safely teach in person.

More than 75 New York Department of Education employees have died of Covid-19. CDC guidelines say a return to traditional schooling with in-person classes would involve the highest risk for Covid-19 spread. But even in-person classes with students spaced apart and prevented from sharing materials are categorized as leading to more risk. The lowest risk for spread, according to the CDC, is virtual learning. I cant understand why we would choose more risk than is necessary.

Its impossible to hear about the way parties, day camps and church services have led to outbreaks this summer without worrying about what will happen if kids and adults gather in the fall. It scares me to think of how many more lives will be lost. It terrifies me that I could be among those who lose their lives.

I completely understand why parents and administrators want kids to return to school. When we first started online learning in March, it was miserable pointless, even. Eventually, we established parameters, and I figured out how to teach kids across the northwest corner of Washington State virtually. During summer school, Ive live-streamed my lectures into campgrounds, living rooms and bedrooms decorated with twinkly lights or festooned with posters. My virtual classroom includes pets and younger siblings.

Yes, it has been hard. Yesterday, as several really adorable teenage faces laughed through the computer screen at my use of a Tyrannosaurus Rex to explain the sympathetic nervous system and the feeling of impending doom it can cause, I thought, I miss them. I wished I was standing in my favorite place in the world, my classroom because, frankly, that T-Rex analogy is much better when accompanied by my dino walk.

But it amazes me how fast students adapted to remote learning. I teach a particularly hands-on class. This summer, Ive managed to teach them to type blood, to suture wounds and how the sensory system works. Ive taught them all about infection control and epidemiology they can not only tell you that you should wear a mask, but they can show you how to do it correctly. I used to put my hand over students hands to guide them through certain lessons. Now I use a GoPro camera. Its hard, but they are learning.

Most important, we students and teacher are safe.

If Im asked to return to the classroom as the pandemic rages, I will have to walk away. As deeply as I love teaching, I will not risk spreading this virus in a way that could hurt a child or a family member of a child. While children make up a small proportion of U.S. coronavirus cases and they are less likely to become seriously ill than adults, the virus might be linked to multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children. Plus, many of my students struggle with poverty or are from multigenerational households. I will not risk passing a virus to them that they might pass to their vulnerable loved ones. I wont do it.

It isnt fair to ask teachers to buy school supplies; we arent the government. But we do it anyway. It isnt fair to ask us to stop a bullet; we arent soldiers. But we go to work every day knowing that if theres a school shooting, well die protecting our students.

But this is where I draw the line: It isnt fair to ask me to be part of a massive, unnecessary science experiment. I am not a human research subject. I will not do it.

Rebecca Martinson is a teacher at Northwest Career & Technical Academy in Mount Vernon, Wash.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And heres our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

Read more here:

I Wont Return to the Classroom, and You Shouldnt Ask Me To - The New York Times

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-13-2020 – 6 PM – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

TheWest Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR)reports as of 6:00 p.m., on July 13, 2020, there have been 211,006total confirmatorylaboratory results received for COVID-19, with 4,313 totalcases and 97 deaths.

DHHR has confirmed the death of an 85-yearold female from Ohio County. Pleasejoin with me as we grieve the loss of another West Virginian, said DHHRCabinet Secretary Bill J. Crouch.

In alignment with updated definitions fromthe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the dashboard includes probablecases which are individuals that have symptoms and either serologic (antibody)or epidemiologic (e.g., a link to a confirmed case) evidence of disease, but noconfirmatory test.

CASESPER COUNTY (Case confirmed by lab test/Probable case):Barbour(20/0), Berkeley (518/19), Boone (34/0), Braxton (5/0), Brooke (27/1), Cabell(192/7), Calhoun (4/0), Clay (12/0), Fayette (84/0), Gilmer (13/0), Grant(21/1), Greenbrier (71/0), Hampshire (42/0), Hancock (41/3), Hardy (46/1),Harrison (122/0), Jackson (148/0), Jefferson (253/5), Kanawha (421/12), Lewis (21/1),Lincoln (9/0), Logan (39/0), Marion (106/3), Marshall (65/1), Mason (25/0),McDowell (8/0), Mercer (63/0), Mineral (66/2), Mingo (29/2), Monongalia(554/14), Monroe (14/1), Morgan (19/1), Nicholas (19/1), Ohio (147/0),Pendleton (15/1), Pleasants (4/1), Pocahontas (37/1), Preston (81/21), Putnam(90/1), Raleigh (80/3), Randolph (188/2), Ritchie (2/0), Roane (12/0), Summers(2/0), Taylor (22/1), Tucker (6/0), Tyler (10/0), Upshur (31/2), Wayne (127/1),Webster (1/0), Wetzel (37/0), Wirt (6/0), Wood (179/9), Wyoming (7/0).

As case surveillance continues at thelocal health department level, it may reveal that those tested in a certaincounty may not be a resident of that county, or even the state as an individualin question may have crossed the state border to be tested.Such is the case of Cabell, Lewis, Logan, Marion, Mingo, Nicholas, Ohio, andPreston counties in this report.

Please visit thedashboard at http://www.coronavirus.wv.gov for more detailed information.

Continue reading here:

COVID-19 Daily Update 7-13-2020 - 6 PM - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

Covid-19 data is a public good. The US government must start treating it like one. – MIT Technology Review

Earlier this week as a pandemic raged across the United States, residents were cut off from the only publicly available source of aggregated data on the nations intensive care and hospital bed capacity. When the Trump administration stripped the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of control over coronavirus data, it also took that information away from the public.

I run a nonpartisan project called covidexitstrategy.org, which tracks how well states are fighting this virus. Our team is made up of public health and crisis experts with previous experience in the Trump and Obama administrations. We grade states on such critical measures as disease spread, hospital load, and the robustness of their testing.

Why does this work matter? In a crisis, data informs good decision-making. Along with businesses, federal, state, and local public health officials and other agencies rely on us to help them decide which interventions to deploy and when workplaces and public spaces can safely reopen. Almost a million people have used our dashboards, with thousands coming back more than 200 times each.

To create our dashboards, we rely on multiple sources. One is the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN), run by the CDC. Prior to July 14, hospitals reported the utilization and availability of intensive care and inpatient beds to the NHSN. This information, updated three times a week, was the only publicly available source of aggregated state-level hospital capacity data in the US.

With 31 states currently reporting increases in the number of hospitalized covid-19 patients, these utilization rates show how well their health systems will handle the surge of cases.

Having this information in real time is essential; the administration said the CDCs system was insufficiently responsive and data collection needed to be streamlined.The US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) directed hospitals (pdf) to report their data to a new system called HHS Protect.

Unfortunately, by redirecting hospitals to a new system, it left everyone else in the dark. On July 14, the CDC removed the most recent data from its website. As we made our nightly update, we found it was missing. After significant public pressure, the existing maps and data are backbut the agency has added a disclaimer that the data will not be updated going forward.

This is unacceptable. This critical indicator was being shared multiple times a week, and now updates have been halted. US residents need a federal commitment that this data will continue to be refreshed and shared.

The public is being told that a lot of effort is going into the new system. An HHS spokesman told CNBC that the new database will deliver more powerful insights on the coronavirus. But the switch has rightly been criticized because this new data source is not yet available to the public. Our concerns are amplified by the fact that responsibility for the data has shifted from a known entity in the CDC to a new, as-yet-unnamed team within HHS.

I was part of the team that helped fix Healthcare.gov after the failed launch in 2013. One thing I learned was that the people who make their careers in the federal governmentand especially those working at the center of a crisisare almost universally well intentioned. They seek to do the right thing for the public they serve.

In the same spirit, and to build trust with the American people, this is an opportunity for HHS to make the same data its sharing with federal and state agencies available to the public. The system that HHS is using helps inform the vital work of the White House Coronavirus Task Force. From leaked documents, we know that reports for the task force are painstakingly detailed. They include county-level maps, indicators on testing robustness, and specific recommendations. All of this information belongs in the public domain.

This is also an opportunity for HHS to make this data machine readable and thereby more accessible to data scientists and data journalists. The Open Government Data Act, signed into law by President Trump, treats data as a strategic asset and makes it open by default. This act builds upon the Open Data Executive Order, which recognized that the data sets collected by the government are paid for by taxpayers and must be made available to them.

As a country, the United States has lagged behind in so many dimensions of response to this crisis, from the availability of PPE to testing to statewide mask orders. Its treatment of data has lagged as well. On March 7, as this crisis was unfolding, there was no national testing data. Alexis Madrigal, Jeff Hammerbacher, and a group of volunteers started the COVID Tracking Project to aggregate coronavirus information from all 50 state websites into a single Google spreadsheet. For two months, until the CDC began to share data through its own dashboard, this volunteer project was the sole national public source of information on cases and testing.

With more than 150 volunteers contributing to the effort, the COVID Tracking Project sets the bar for how to treat data as an asset. I serve on the advisory board and am awed by what this group has accomplished. With daily updates, an API, and multiple download formats, theyve made their data extraordinarily useful. Where the CDCs data is cited 30 times in Google Scholar and approximately 10,000 times in Google search results, the COVID Tracking Project data is cited 299 times in Google Scholar and roughly 2 million times in Google search results.

Sharing reliable data is one of the most economical and effective interventions the United States has to confront this pandemic. With the Coronavirus Task Force daily briefings a thing of the past, its more necessary than ever for all covid-related data to be shared with the public. The effort required to defeat the pandemic is not just a federal response. It is a federal, state, local, and community response. Everyone needs to work from the same trusted source of facts about the situation on the ground. Data is not a partisan affair or a bureaucratic preserve. It is a public trustand a public resource.

Ryan Panchadsaram is a cofounder of covidexitstrategy.org and United States Digital Response. He currently works at Kleiner Perkins and was formerly the deputy chief technology officer for the United States.

See the rest here:

Covid-19 data is a public good. The US government must start treating it like one. - MIT Technology Review

‘Carbon savings’ from Covid-19 lockdown halve within weeks – The Guardian

The UKs carbon emissions have begun to rebound following the easing of Covid-19 lockdown measures, causing the carbon savings triggered by the coronavirus to halve within weeks.

Greenhouse gas emissions from the energy and transport industries climbed last month as more people returned to work, raising demand for fossil fuels from record lows in April when strict lockdown measures were in place, according to new data.

An analysis by Sia Partners, seen by the Guardian, shows that the UKs carbon emissions fell by 36% in the first four weeks of the lockdown compared to the most recent official carbon emissions data collected in 2018.

But by June Britains total emissions savings had dwindled to a 16% drop as more cars returned to its roads and demand for energy began to rise.

Chlo Depigny, a senior manager at Sia Partners, said the data underlines the fragility of the UKs short-term carbon savings during the coronavirus, and the need for ambitious fundamental changes to the economy if the government hopes to meet its long-term carbon targets.

The data reveals that at the start of the lockdown Britain recorded a 90% collapse in carbon emissions from the aviation sector, a 60% fall in emissions from passenger vehicles and a 30% decline in emissions from Britains energy system.

In the last month the emissions savings from road use shrank from 60% to 30% of typical levels, and the decrease from the energy system contracted from 30% to 15%.

If lockdown measures are removed entirely by early October the total carbon savings from the coronavirus may erode to 10% below normal levels over the year as a whole, down 1 percentage point from the consulting firms previous full-year forecasts earlier this year.

In order to meet the UKs net zero target by 2050 the UK needs to cut 12 megatonnes of CO2 every year this is the equivalent of 3% of the emissions in 2018. So 10% is definitely a significant fall, she said.

However, from a climate point of view if this only occurs in 2020 and normal emissions return in 2021 then these savings will mean only a very small dent to emissions in the end. We saw this in the 2008 financial crisis; emissions very quickly returned to pre-crisis levels, she added.

One of the greatest threats to the UKs carbon savings this year is a surge in demand for road travel as more people opt to use passenger vehicles over public transport to avoid contact with the coronavirus.

This is one of the big uncertainties as we emerge from lockdown, said Depigny. If everyone is concerned about using public transport, and chooses to switch to using cars, then road emissions may well explode over the second half of the year, and could cause even a 10% emissions cut to disappear within a few months.

Another threat to carbon reductions in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak is the number of people who may continue to work from home during the winter months.

The report predicts that the carbon footprint of British homes is expected to be 6% higher than normal in 2020 based on the assumption that many people working from home will make a gradual return to office spaces from October. But a second lockdown during the colder months could mean far higher residential carbon emissions than currently forecast, Depigny said.

We have been lucky that lockdown has happened during warm summer months. If there was a second lockdown during the winter, homes would rely on gas-heating to keep their homes warm all day, which would produce far more emissions than during the summer. It would probably counter most of the savings from less commuting, she said.

Continued here:

'Carbon savings' from Covid-19 lockdown halve within weeks - The Guardian