Can blockchain restore trust to the fund management and audit industries? – Accountancy Age

Blockchain could provide a solution to restore trust in the fund management and audit industries, according to Nish Kotecha, Chairman and Co-founder of Finboot, and Bryan Foss, Independent Director and Visiting Professor at Bristol Business School.

Kotecha and Foss cite fund manager Neil Woodfords Equity Income Fund as a perfect example of how blockchain could have prevented such a scandal.

Not too long ago, Neil Woodford was still regularly being heralded as a superstar manager and the Oracle of Oxford. How different the story is today, they said.

Ultimately, the Equity Income Fund did not do what it said it would, and Woodford ran it unchecked. If investors had been fully aware of the investments being made into unlisted and illiquid stocks, would they have kept their money in?

There can be no doubt that its in the best interest of investors that information is readily available to enable timely decisions to be taken. Dissemination of such information should not be left to the whim of the fund manager who relies on investor trust.

Ultimately, trust requires transparency to validate integrity. Adopting technologies such as blockchain into the reporting and audit framework of a public fund could provide a fresh approach so that investors can avoid being caught in a Woodford-like situation.

For instance, an investor-facing blockchain could be programmed to release updates on a funds portfolio at regular intervals without further approvals from the fund manager. The constant release of data in a predefined format would provide evidence of the funds status, forcing the fund manager to operate within the automated reporting schedules and ensure that the funds share price is a fair reflection of its valuation, they said.

Similarly, Kotecha and Foss argue that a blockchain solution could have prevented and detected fraud like in the Patisserie Valerie scandal earlier this year.

Had blockchain been used to underpin the accounting framework of the company, its likely the thousands of false entries that were discovered as fraudulent would never have been approved by the distributed ledger technology.

The time-stamped links of blocks could reveal alterations or tampering to the recorded transactions, as well as providing an immediate insight into the performance of the company at any given time, they added.

But how far away is a genuine blockchain solution from becoming a reality? On this Kotecha and Foss are more cautious.

While many may suggest that this type of solution is available, few are able to provide an enterprise grade solution that can provide ease of use, integration and scalability within a private blockchain environment. Finboots blockchain middleware and application suite can provide this today through proof of concept projects that can be operationalised rapidly as the basis for long term incremental developments.

Technology has often been mooted as a potential route out of the audit crisis in the UK, but Kotecha and Foss stopped short of saying it negated the need for reform altogether.

Audit reform is necessary to tackle the increasingly sophisticated financial environments in which we now find ourselves. However, technology can be part of the answer. The FRC Labs and accounting firms are evaluating ways in which technology can be used to reduce audit risks and improve transparency and verification capability. Blockchain, for example, can be used to improve trust in the process while also reducing time and money for a full audit procedure. Technology should be a partner to audit reform, they said.

Kotecha and Foss believed that perhaps most importantly, blockchain would provide a secure immutable and auditable solution to both sectors.

Once the data is uploaded onto a blockchain, it is immutable and auditable. Improving the quality of the source data is an important factor to ensure that accurate data is uploaded and this can be achieved through a variety of mechanisms, such as direct data feeds from the point of capture (e.g. from completed stock exchange trades, etc). Overlaying a programme of random periodic audits will then dramatically reduce the time and cost for a full audit procedure while improving confidence and trust in the process, hopefully making such events like Woodford an anomaly.

More validated, immutable information will generate trust in the fund management market and audit industry as a whole. The choice between investing in public market funds and private market funds should be left to the investor, and public fund managers should be prevented from changing their reporting framework because it suits them. Likewise, listed companies should adhere to a fully transparent corporate reporting process that is not susceptible to distortion. In both cases, there is a clear argument for an automated blockchain that can act as a single source of truth for the benefit of investors, on whose trust the share price of listed entities partially depends, they concluded.

See more here:

Can blockchain restore trust to the fund management and audit industries? - Accountancy Age

Blockchain voting is vulnerable to hackers, software glitches and bad ID photos among other problems – The Conversation US

A developing technology called blockchain has gotten attention from election officials, startups and even Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang as a potential way to boost voter turnout and public trust in election results.

I study blockchain technology and its potential use in fighting fraud, strengthening cybersecurity and securing voting.

I see promising signs that blockchain-based voting could make it more convenient for people to vote, thereby boosting voter turnout. And blockchain systems can be effective at strengthening the security of devices, networks and critical systems like electricity grids, as well as protecting personal privacy.

The few small-scale tests run so far have identified problems and vulnerabilities in the digital systems and government administrative procedures that must be resolved before blockchain-based voting can be considered safe and trustworthy. Therefore I dont see clear evidence that it can prevent, or even detect, election fraud.

There are a few steps in a blockchain-based voting system, which uses technology to mirror the process of in-person voting.

First, the system needs to verify a voters identity often by having the user upload a photo of a government-issued ID and then a photo or video self-portrait. The system confirms the IDs validity, and facial recognition software makes sure the person in the self-portrait is the person on the ID. Then the user is authenticated as eligible to cast a vote.

Only at that point does blockchain technology actually enter the process. The system gives each authenticated voter a digital token that represents the persons vote and a list of the digital addresses to which he or she can send that token. Each address indicates a vote for a particular candidate or an answer to a ballot question.

The tokens dont indicate who cast them, so votes remain anonymous. When a voter sends a token, a record of that act is stored simultaneously on several different computers, making it much harder for hackers to alter the vote records. After casting the ballot by sending the token, the user receives a unique code that they can use to look at the anonymized online vote tally to confirm their vote was counted as they intended.

Early results show that blockchain systems may increase voter turnout, though its not yet clear why. Many of the tests have been for informal ballots, like student government groups and community projects.

However, several election officials in the U.S. have held small-scale trials of blockchain voting, allowing members of the military who are stationed overseas to vote electronically, rather than by mail.

In the November 2018 congressional elections, West Virginia allowed 144 voters living overseas to cast ballots from 31 different countries using an app developed by a private company called Voatz, which is involved in many of these trials.

Another 200 voters overseas expressed interest in using the system, but their home counties in West Virginia werent set up to do so. Based on the results, West Virginia says it plans to continue and expand the trial in the 2020 presidential election.

Denver, Colorado, had 119 voters who were overseas use a Voatz system to cast their ballots in municipal primary elections in May. In the citys June runoff election, 112 voters did so online through a blockchain system. In August, 24 voters cast their ballots from overseas using a Voatz app in a Utah County, Utah, election.

The most recent and largest use of a blockchain-based voting system was in the city council election in Moscow, Russia, on Sept. 8. Because of concerns that the system was not set up securely, only three of the citys 20 electoral precincts allowed voters to use a blockchain-based mobile voting app to cast their ballot from anywhere with an internet connection.

Again, the evidence showed a boost in voter turnout: The citys overall turnout rate was around 17% of registered voters. That includes a 90% turnout among the voters who had registered to use the system.

However, technological complications barred some people from voting, which led at least one losing candidate to object that he would have won if everything had worked properly. Thats the sort of problem that is most worrying for people who hope using mathematical principles and computerized encryption will help the public have trust in election outcomes.

There are several obstacles in the way of blockchain ever becoming useful for large-scale, legally binding voting.

One is that most people have little understanding of how blockchain systems work. Another, equally vital, is that even experts dont have a way to identify every possible irregularity in online voting. Voting on paper, by contrast, is well studied and easily verified and audited.

One crucial aspect of a blockchain voting system is the method by which the computer system verifies voters identities. When a verified voter establishes an account on the system, that process creates a digital key that identifies them securely when casting a ballot. A more complex key is harder to hack, but also takes more computing resources to verify. It will be important to find a way to protect the integrity of the voting process, without exhausting government budgets buying advanced computing power. The computational power required may make blockchain systems inefficient for voting on a nationwide scale or even statewide, in populous states like California and Texas.

The Moscow election system, for instance, initially assigned keys that were too easily hacked. That opened the possibility of voter impersonation, which is bad enough. But that weakness also violated the principle of a secret ballot by letting outsiders know how each person voted.

Other problems with digital voting systems are separate from the underlying technologies. In some cases, government-issued IDs used to verify voters identities are many years old.

Even when dealing with current images, facial recognition systems, including the one used by Voatz, have high error rates, especially for non-white voters. In addition, hackers may try to trick the system.

The phone or computer a voter uses to cast a ballot may not be secure, either and its not safe to assume that the computer networks they communicate over, and the servers the data is stored on, are safe from manipulation or even random errors.

Proprietary voting apps like Voatz offer the public no way to know whether voters choices are accurately recorded, nor whether these apps truthfully deliver their ballots encrypted copy to be counted by election officials.

Voatz has claimed that its system has been audited by third parties, but has made few details of that process or its findings available to the public. West Virginia officials who hired Voatz have also refused to reveal information about how its security was evaluated.

The company has said it would not release that information because it had a nondisclosure agreement with the auditors, and for fear its proprietary system design might be discovered by competitors.

Its possible that blockchain-based voting could boost voter participation rates, but theres no evidence yet that it is better at preventing election fraud. With plenty of potential trouble spots outside the system itself, and little public transparency within it, I have to conclude that blockchain voting is not yet safe or ready for service.

Read this article:

Blockchain voting is vulnerable to hackers, software glitches and bad ID photos among other problems - The Conversation US

Blockchain Technology is Disrupting the Startup Ecosystem – Times of India

Since the introduction of the first practical implementation of blockchain over ten years ago, the technology has found a myriad of use-cases in a wide variety of industries, including fintech, healthcare, digital identity, Internet of Things (IoT), and logistics. Many of these industries have already been marching towards digitisation of their internal processes for the past few years, making blockchain integration only more advantageous due to its increased security and reliability benefits.

Even besides the fact that blockchains cannot be easily hacked or compromised, the technology offers a great deal of other benefits ranging from decentralisation to duplication. The latter is extremely important for companies that require stored data to be available at all times and for an indefinite period.

The Blockchain Age: Why it is important

Traditional data centres can be wiped out by bad weather conditions, intermittent connectivity issues, and even political turbulence in a given region. In stark contrast, blockchains have multiple computers - thousands or even millions - store a copy of the ledger at all times. Unlike traditional databases that can be modified or written to by a lone rogue or malicious individual, blockchain requires the consensus of a majority for any changes to be finalised. As a result, security breaches in a well-implemented blockchain network are practically unheard of.

In Deloittes Global Blockchain Survey, 53% of respondents said that blockchain technology has become a critical priority for their organisations in 2019. When it comes to blockchain adoption, many companies are now following in the footsteps of behemoths such as IBM and Microsoft that have invested large sums of money and resources into their respective blockchain endeavours. While IBM has partnered with shipping giant, Maersk, to build a blockchain-based supply chain platform, Microsoft is aiming to become a driving force in the enterprise sector by offering Blockchain as a Service (BaaS) solutions through its Azure cloud brand.

Blockchain Investment Is on the Rise

Given the sheer potential of blockchain, it is not surprising that a number of new startups are attempting to find unique use-cases for the technology outside of the traditional finance ecosystem. This is perhaps best exemplified by the fact that venture capital investment in blockchain startups increased by 280% in 2018, according to research group, Diar. While 2017 saw startups in the distributed ledger space raise around $1 billion, the total for 2018 ended up being closer to $4 billion.

The average size of VC deals is on the rise as well, with Diar estimating the median VC investment in a blockchain startup to be around $2.5 million as of 2018. While many cryptocurrency companies chose to raise funds via Initial Coin Offerings (ICO) or public token sales in 2017, startups focused on use-cases outside finance continue to favour the traditional venture capital fundraising route. Furthermore, the vast majority of tokens sold and distributed in 2017 lost a considerable amount of valuation over the past two years, leading to financial struggles at many ICO-funded startups.

Finally, blockchain companies are starting to favour VC investment once again because of the increased credibility that comes with a veteran firm or investor.

Insights on Blockchain Startups

As a result of the above factors, traditional investors and deal advisory teams at various companies are now actively scouting for potential unicorns in the blockchain industry. However, given that the technology and associated startups are rapidly evolving due to their relative immaturity, identifying key growth factors and obtaining actionable insights on blockchain companies can be an extremely challenging and time consuming task. To meet this growing demand for high quality data on the global blockchain ecosystem, Oddup offers a real-time startup tracking platform that allows investors, M&A teams, and others to obtain due diligence insights quickly and efficiently.

As consumer and enterprise interest in distributed ledger technology continues to grow, its likely only a matter of time before the number of blockchain startups matches that of other cutting edge technologies like artificial intelligence and IoT.

Disclaimer: Content Produced by Oddup

See the rest here:

Blockchain Technology is Disrupting the Startup Ecosystem - Times of India

Is blockchain the answer for sustainability in the cocoa sector? – ConfectioneryNews.com

Companies regularly make sustainability claims about their supply chains, from ethical and organic to deforestation- and child labor-free. These claims were traditionally supported by audits and certifications, which only validate a sample of suppliers, but new legislation requires accountability for the full end-to-end supply chain. With companies sourcing from thousands of suppliers and new technology that enables end-to-end traceability, audits and certification are no longer best practice: its time for comprehensive supply chain due diligence. Thats where supply chain transparency comes in, writes Leonardo Bonanni, in a blog on his company website sourcemap.com.

Bonanni, Sourcemaps founder and CEO, expanded on the due diligence approach during a breakout session on blockchain technology at the WCF Partnership Meeting in Berlin, which looked at how traceability tools could help the cocoa sector in eradicating child labor, deforestation and poverty in its supply chain.

Arguably, deforestation is at the forefront of supply chain issues in the coca sector. He told the audience that only in the past two years has it been possible to trace every small transaction in the certified supply chain, and a lot of the credit should go to the Cocoa & Forests Initiative for its role in mapping farms.

He said that, although mobile technology is needed on the farms and $40 android phones will do the job, the process of digitizing is still a struggle in cocoa-growing communities because the data is either still on paper or it doesn't exist at all.

We're trying to get that data that doesn't exist into the cloud through whatever means necessary, he said.

We know that a lot of the data is actually still on ledgers and needs to just be put into spreadsheets and uploaded to the cloud.

As his work with Sourcemap continues, he said that when you start to crunch more data and cross-reference, you realize there's a lot of farms that are not performing (or producing) cocoa at all.

They must be doing something else for someone else - and then there are a whole bunch of farms that are over performing in a way that doesn't really make sense right now.

As a report this week in The Washington Post reveals, there remains glaring gaps in the audits covering hundreds of thousands of cocoa farms of which Utz is responsible for, casting doubt on the claims by major chocolate companies that the monitoring efforts are eliminating those abuses.

In five years time, digital blockchain technology could become standard for carrying out supply chain audits. Many consumers willingly pay more for chocolate made from certified cocoa, and most of the large companies have pledged to certify most or all of their supply, The Washington Post writes.

Bonanni said companies like Sourcemap are there to help nudge the cocoa sector in that direction, technology has made the price of traceability go significantly lower and is no longer an excuse.

For now, Bonanni concedes that there is a mishmash of data sources, which probably goes someway to explaining the problems at Utz, and the system still depends on field data collection for offline traceability to obtain an accurate picture of a farmers output.

Maintaining an ongoing supply chain discovery, benchmarking and verification process is the only way to manage the risk of deforestation, he said, for example.

Impending customs compliance issues in the US and EU around child labor have made it necessary for all players in the cocoa supply chain to adopt a due diligence approach if they wish to stay within in the law. Transparency is the crucible of blockchain technology, because dodgy data will be uncovered, where ever it is in the supply chain.

The session was moderated by Nadia Hewett from the World Economic Forum, which has published extensive white papers on blockchain, one of which comes with this introduction:

Since data can be made visible to all participants who have been authorized to view it and in general, cannot be altered by a single entity customers can have confidence that data has not been tampered with along the way. On top of this, time-stamping can provide a single source of truth on the products history, from the harvesting of the materials to the shelving in a store. Knowing the full journey of a product comes with several benefits, including improved product safety, a reduction in fraud, and an increased accuracy in forecasting and collaborative planning within the industry.

Paul Chang, global leader for Blockchain in the Distribution & Industrial Markets at IBM, said he has been working in supply chain transformation for 15 years with the company, mainly with retail giants such as Walmart and Carrefour. But he has also developed transparency solutions for the coffee sector, linking consumers with growers directly and allowing them to see via an app not only where their coffee comes from, but contribute directly through a digital wallet to the running of the farm.

He said that in the network era we now live in, technology is multi-directional, instantaneous and from one to many, rather than one-to-one. He also called on companies to work together, and cited Walmart sharing its own platform with major competitors for the good of the industry.

At the end of the day its all about trust, the audience was told, and the cocoa industry should work together, drop the competitiveness in adopting new forms of technology and initiatives - only then will it clean up its supply chain once and for all.

Link:

Is blockchain the answer for sustainability in the cocoa sector? - ConfectioneryNews.com

Energy Blockchain Applications Expected to Experience a 67% CAGR – Transmission & Distribution World

A recent report fromNavigant Researchoffers an overview of the developing market for energy blockchain applications, providing global forecasts for energy blockchain revenue through 2028.

According to the report, Energy Blockchain Applications Overview, energy blockchain applications are expected to generate US$19 billion in cumulative revenue over the next decade, reaching an annual market size of US$7.7 billion in 2028, at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 66.9%.

The report further explores the blockchain market by region and segment, with examples of key use cases in each market. It describes the components of blockchain architecture, and looks intothe competitive landscape and key challenges that must be addressed before blockchain can be widely adopted in the energy sector.

Early growth of energy blockchain applications is expected to be concentrated in regions with competitive market structures and low barriers to market entry in Europe, Asia Pacific, and parts of the United States. Europe and North America are projected to be the leading markets for most of the forecast, but a rapid growth rate of 83.3% in Asia Pacific propels the region to the front in 2027.

Energy and power sector stakeholders are experimenting with blockchain technology along the energy value chain. This extends from supply chain transparency to asset financing, proof of origin for power generation, electric vehicle (EV) charging and grid integration, and transactive energy. Although a few energy blockchain products have been commercialized, most remain in the early stages of testing and business model development.

As the grid system becomes increasingly digital, distributed, and decentralized, new information technologies are needed to support interactions and transactions between grid participants, said Johnathon de Villier, research analyst at Navigant Research. Blockchain is one of the several distributed ledger technologies that could serve as a framework for these emerging markets by providing a mathematical basis for information management and coordination across participants in a network and minimizing the role of intermediaries while reducing transaction costs and friction.

An executive summary of the report is available fordownload here.

Read more from the original source:

Energy Blockchain Applications Expected to Experience a 67% CAGR - Transmission & Distribution World

Japanese Messaging App LINE Positioning Itself As Leader In Blockchain and Crypto Space – Forbes

(Photo credit should read MARTIN BUREAU/AFP/Getty Images)

Enterprise blockchain and cryptocurrency adoption has been peeking in 2019 with news constantly filtering through of major Western powers such as IBM, Microsoft, Amazon, and other tech companies exploring space.

Advancements such as Facebook looking to create its own cryptocurrency, and JPMorgan and Wells Fargo also piloting their cross-border payments, have been heralded as revolutionary. However, there are other companies out of the western media that are doing far more to position themselves as leaders in the ever-growing space of blockchain and cryptocurrency.

One company that has been pushing the limits in recent times is Japans leading messaging app LINE. Not only was it one of the first publicly traded companies to launch a proprietary blockchain mainnet with its own cryptocurrency, it recently opened the doors on its exchange BITMAX.

The latter move by LINE was especially important as the app, which boasts 81 million users, has achieved the full backing of the Japanese Financial Services Agency, the watchdog that has cracked down on exchanges in the country following the hacks of Mt. Gox and Coincheck.

LINE have moved fast with their own blockchain, token, and now exchange, but this is all part of their ongoing plans to be well placed for the next technological fintech wave that will include both cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.

Looking ahead

Brian Lee - Manager of Global Corporate Affairs, LVC Corporation - has said that both blockchain and cryptocurrency require substantial time and financial investment if the messaging app is to be well positioned in the coming decade or so.

Regarding fintech, including cryptocurrency, we recognize that a substantial investment over several years is necessary, Lee told The Daily Chain. We need to be fast in order to be a leader within this field, with early investment the key to innovation and success. Once we are established, we anticipate that fintech services like cryptocurrency will provide stable revenues for a long time to come.

Regarding blockchain specifically, we regard blockchain as a disruptive technology that enables users and services to exchange value and enhance transparency between one another, with cryptocurrency a kind of investing business for the future that utilizes blockchain-based systems.

Applying this kind of new technology into the fintech area, we can actualize innovation in various ways. For example, using blockchain technology, we can analyze user behavior patterns. We can use data to enhance our credit service by further developing our LINE Score offering. We can also apply this blockchain framework to provide incentive to users who contribute to the development of services.

I followed up with Lee to understand LINEs move within the nascent space and to understand how they see the integration of cryptocurrencies and blockchain.

It will take several years for banks, securities, and other conventional financial services to work together with blockchain, which is why right now we are focusing on the blockchain business and other financial services. When the technology advances further we imagine the possibility of a crossover between conventional financial services and blockchain technology, Lee told me.

Being regulatory sure

One big important aspect of the launch from LINE has been their intention to be fully regulated, especially in light of Japans intense pressure on exchanges. Of course, being a well established enterprise there was never any doubt as to the company seeking full regulatory clarity, and this was expressed in the quick turn around from the approval to the launch.

We maintain regular communication with the FSA in order to ensure that we comply with all the necessary rules and regulations, Lee added. As an operator in the online space, LINE places the utmost importance in reaching the highest standards to ensure that user trust, privacy, and security is protected.

With specific reference to cryptocurrency, we collaborate with BitGo Inc., which provides the highest international standard of wallet services, to deliver the most robust and secure service to our users. We also leverage a wealth of internal expertise, particularly in the field of encryption, in order to ensure secure provision of our wallet service.

On the course for more

With Lee explaining that LINE is committed to working in the blockchain and cryptocurrency space for the foreseeable future, it is interesting to plot its journey, and to speculate where it is going next.

With a mainnet blockchain, cryptocurrency and exchange, the foundations are laid for LINE to be a true driving enterprise force in the ecosystem, but they are not quite ready to explain what is next in the pipeline.

With the launch of BITMAX, our current aim is to provide a secure service to users. We forecast that cryptocurrency will form a linchpin of future infrastructure, and intend to continue developing our crypto-related services placing the utmost importance on security. Any announcements regarding LINK coin, or other crypto services and products, will be made at the appropriate time, Lee concluded.

More:

Japanese Messaging App LINE Positioning Itself As Leader In Blockchain and Crypto Space - Forbes

Could Blockchain Help the Cannabis Industry? Were About to Find Out – Observer

A Uruguayan cannabis company has announced it will track marijuana sales via blockchain. But is it really necessary? RAUL ARBOLEDA/AFP/GettyImages

Blockchain at times can feel like a very large, very inchoate Rube Goldberg machine. The security advantages of decentralization and encryption for sensitive data are obvious, but why employ a peer-to-peer distributed ledger to record simple or mundane tasks unlikely to be targets of hackers or other malfeasance? Because its coolor because its cool and it works, in the case of the blockchain-based tracking solution soon to be employed by Montevideo-based cannabis company Uruguay Can.

Blockchain has many fans in the drug policy reform world for the very simple reason that, until quite recently, blockchain was a viable technique to mask drug transactions from authorities. (It was not for the cool factor that Bitcoin was Silk Roads coin of the realm.) Blockchain may yet be the bedrock on which solutions to the American cannabis industrys banking woes are built (though its more likely that big centralized banks will start taking cannabis business accounts first).

SEE ALSO: Whats Wrong With Genetically Modified Marijuana?

In the meantime, blockchains value as a tracking tool will be tested by Aeternity, which announced on September 25 that it would be creating a blockchain-based supply chain management platform for Uruguay Can, which producers both medical and recreational cannabis.

In a press release, the company said blockchain would allow the registration and tracking of cannabis strains from the seed to the final product which ensures consumer safety while complying with regulations, according to AeternityCEO Pablo Coirolo.

In theory, using blockchain to track a cannabis plants progression from seedling to cured and saleable product would make it more difficult for a bad actor to inject bad product into the supply chain, and more difficult for anyone to fudge the decentralized ledger. Thus, the end users should be more assured of the validity of the data they are receiving about the cannabis theyre consuming, particularly if they are using a device thats on the blockchainthey are also the holder of that data, not an institution or third party.

The ability to trace the source and the way cannabis is produced is beneficial for both the cannabis and pharmaceutical industry as well as its consumers and end users, who should feel more secure about the product that they are consuming, Uruguay Can CEO Eduardo Blasina said in a press release.

OK, but why do this? Is it necessary, or is this just an SEO-friendly solution in search of a problem? From whom, exactly, must this data be kept safe and secure, and why isnt the governmentwhich has been inspecting and assuring food and drug safetyup to the task?

In the United States, several states mandate cannabis companies to track the progress of their supply chain from seed to sale to ensure that cannabis grown under legal protections doesnt end up on the underground market. This doesnt really work all that wellthe black market in the United States is still colossalbut whether thats because regulations are too strict and legal cannabis too expensive, or because its an impossible and unwieldy task using the wrong technology depends on who you ask and is a query outside the power of this brief item to answer.

Blockchain might do this task better, but decentralizing the data chain wouldnt necessarily preclude unscrupulous operators from declaring a batch of product bad and destroyed when its really being sold off-marketthats a job for regulators. And there has yet to be evidence of a bad cannabis company altering data to put out bad productthey just put it out.

Theres also the open question of why this is necessary for such a tiny cannabis market. Uruguay is a country about half the population of Los Angeles. Uruguay is important in the marijuana world because it became the first country in the world in 2013 to legalize recreational cannabis for adultswho can buy cannabis at licensed pharmaciesbut the market remains extremely small. Small enough to track on Google Sheets, or whatever solution a mid-sized American company is employing.

The country boasts fewer than 40,000 customers. Only about 3,000 kilograms of flower have been consumed since sales began, according to official figures, although there is a nascent export market: Uruguayan companies have begun exporting medical cannabis flower to other countries. Up to 100 kilograms a month may eventually be shipped overseas from the South American nation, as Marijuana Business Daily reported.

But again, if quality and security need to be established or verified by official government inspectors anyway, and theyre not using blockchain, what is the utility of putting such data on a decentralized ledger?

See the article here:

Could Blockchain Help the Cannabis Industry? Were About to Find Out - Observer

Overstock.com Hones In On Blockchain Identity With Medici Ventures And Evernym Partnership – Forbes

(AP Photo/Douglas C. Pizac)

Overstock.com, one of the original Bitcoin-believer companies, has had a long and storied history in its evolution with blockchain technology. The company, and it's blockchain subsidiary Medici Ventures, are in an interesting point of flux at the moment with former CEO Patrick Byrne stepping down and president of Medici Ventures, Jonathan Johnson, taking over.

While Byrne was the face of Overstock's Bitcoin fascination, Johnson has been at the coal face of getting the company heavilyinvested in blockchain business. Medici Ventures has been incubating a family of companies which it labels as a Keiretsu a Japanese term describing companies with interlocking interests.

Now, adding to that, and honing in one of its six key areas of focus - identity - Medici Ventures has participated in Evernym's recent Simple Agreement for Future Equity (SAFE), which entitles Medici Ventures to convert its interest in the SAFE to preferred stock in Evernym's future, priced round of equity financing.

Medici allocated $2 million to help the company continue to bring blockchain-based identity products into production, with Johnson explaining that this signals a growing intent by the company to invest into blockchain identity as a critical area of focus.

Focusing on Identity

The business model seen by Overstock and its expansion into Medici Ventures has been a noteworthy one as it is quite unique. The separation of Overstock and Medici, and then the further breakdown into the Keiretsu companies is something that has not been seen from high-level enterprises.

Looking deeper into it, Johnson spoke with me about Medici Venture's short to mid-term ambitions and how this latest move has them upping the ante on blockchain identity - something seen as potentially revolutionary.

"We have two main initiatives for both the short and mid-term focus of Medici Ventures," explained Johnson. First, supporting the companies that are in the Medici Ventures family. This includes support with software development, management, recruiting, public relations, and fundraising as requested by the leadership at those companies."

"We believe we have found the best in breed in each of our six areas of focus (Identity, Land Titling, Banking & Currency, Capital Markets, Supply Chain, Voting) with Evernym squarely filling out the Identity focus.

"Our second initiative is to build out our Government as a Service offering, which ties the service providers in each of our focuses together to offer a full menu for governments to choose where they would like to increase efficiency, reduce redundancy, and provide transparency in their services."

The breakdown of Overstock, and Medici Ventures', blockchain involvement by Johnson, appears to be expanding rapidly even under the new management. Even back in 2018, there was signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Rwanda Land Management and Use Authority and the Rwanda Information Society Authority. The MoU will be aimed at implementing the company's blockchain-based land management technology to the context of Rwanda.

Linking identity to governments

Johnson goes on to show how these two sides of Medici Ventures coin are interlinked with blockchain identity often spoken about in the same breath as voting, governmental initiatives, and citizen registration and identity.

"One of Medici Ventures' areas of focus is in the identity space," added Johnson. "Identity is core to the other services we plan to integrate in a Government as a Service product built on the technology stack for civilization."

"Evernym is bridging the gap between the traditional siloed approach to identity and true self-sovereign identity. We have finally found the last piece of our tech stack puzzle. Evernym's approach to identity is aligned with Medici Ventures' vision of bringing individuals trust through technology."

"Medici Ventures and its companies are focused on bringing blockchain-based products into production to democratize capital, eliminate middlemen, and re-humanize commerce."

"Medici Ventures has been focusing in the identity space for quite some time, so this is a continuation of the direction we plotted for Medici Ventures from the beginning. Everything finally fell into place for Medici Ventures and Evernym to come together," the new Overstock.com CEO also added.

A driving force

Because of Overstock's history within the Bitcoin and then blockchain space, it is a company - an enterprise - that has a lot more experience than others in implementing and growing the blockchain ecosystem.

The success and expansion of Medici Ventures have been visible in the last few years and is relatively unique and pioneering in its approach. If it will be the leader in years to come is yet to be seen, but in this experimental phase of the technology, Medici is doing a lot in several different sectors to find the killer application of blockchain.

See the original post here:

Overstock.com Hones In On Blockchain Identity With Medici Ventures And Evernym Partnership - Forbes

How Blockchain Is Affecting The Marketing And Advertising Industry – Forbes

If youve been a CMO for the past five years, you remember those times when entrepreneurs looked at blockchain through hype-filled eyes. Some regarded it as an opportunity to make big bucks, while others were scared of the Wild West label that the media put on crypto markets due to their free regulation.

Ultimately, this kind of hype has largely died down. Yes, the global blockchain technology market is expected to climb to over $23.3 billion by 2023 (paywall), but I believe this is because businesses are shifting their gaze toward completely different purposes: redefining advertising and marketing processes, management, accounting and communications with users. In 2019, almost no one I know confuses blockchain with bitcoin, and this is the first and foremost of blockchain's accomplishments with which we should begin.

When we look at global service industries, advertising stands out: Digital ad spending worldwide could reach a total of $427.26 billion by 2022. Still, it is an area affected by fraud and insufficient transparency. From that standpoint, we have yet to gain great efficiency.

Blockchain Startups In Advertising: Now And Then

Advertising fraud can take a severe toll on advertising income, to the tune of an estimated $6.5 billion in losses in 2017. But in 2017, some of the first blockchain-based advertising projects were also getting press and seemed promising for resolving issues of fraud.

Stage two, the year 2018, proved the great potential and willingness of companies to invest more money into blockchain projects. That's when Toyota managed to raise its site visits by 21% (paywall) with help from a blockchain analytics company. AB InBev also ran blockchain-enabled ad campaigns for several beer companies in 2018. Around the same time, Google Trends illustrated a peak in searches for "blockchain advertising."

The outcome of this is tremendous growth; by 2019, research from Never Stop Marketing (via VentureBeat) showed that the number of blockchain marketing companies multiplied to a total of 290. In 2017, the landscape featured only 22 companies. Altogether, these projects belong to various areas in which marketing could benefit from further innovation, including social media, data, e-commerce and programmatic advertising.

Big names like Unilever, Kelloggs and Kimberly-Clark joined a consortium for ad-buying blockchain solutions last year in order to eliminate middlemen and enable buyers to audit advertising spending. Additionally, MetaX mergedads.txt (a register of authorized sellers) with Ethereum in order to make media-buying transparent on an inventory level. Recently, startups like Lucidity have worked to create "advertising supply chain transparency which should reduce fraud and minimize reconciliation discrepancies."

How Blockchain Can Reshape Advertising

Lets recall why AdTech reached out to blockchain in the very beginning. Digital advertising is based on an open system fueled by Internet connections. This openness creates immense media-trading opportunities, but it also creates gaps and a lack of transparency in the media supply chain. These challenges make the entire ecosystem vulnerable to fraud. With no source of consistent information and no centralized marketplace, digital advertising lacks a common data source that could identify and prevent fraud.

Blockchain creates a distributed database that can serve as a single source of truth about ad impression for both demand and supply partners. Think of it as of huge database that constitutes all data related to advertising. All related kinds of actions and information are automatically recorded on the distributed ledger. Within the chain, demand and supply partners can detect questionable activities and delete the wrongdoer. It is exactly the event-level transparency basis for which we all strive, and this is what we as entrepreneurs and marketing leaders should use to redefine our business relationships in the long-term.

What It Means For CMOs

By creating tools that enforce trust along the advertising chain, CMOs can restore dollars back to the working media side. By adding a blockchain ledger to their systems, CMOs can ensure better accountability for all internal processes, not only those related to media-buying. For example, your team can use event-level data and cryptographic transaction verification to create a new safety layer and secure automatic information processing when breaches occur.

You can also use the blockchain to track and help customers understand how your business handles their data and tracks their activities. This way, they can trust you and feel at ease with your business practices.

Overcoming Challenges

When obstacles associated with a regulatory framework are left in the past, CMOs face a new kind of challenge -- learning how to combine profitability and privacy. So far, its largely been a one-way street. Websites collect user data and sell it to advertisers, who then use it for the purposes of advertising personalization.

Entrepreneurs, startups, publishers and advertisers should direct their efforts toward rewarding user attention in exchange for their data usage, which is especially important in regard to the General Data Protection Regulation.

Like every great work, it won't be easy. Advertising entities will need to redefine their approach to hiring and the day-to-day workflow if they incorporate blockchain into their advertising approach. For this, they will have to attract specialists in both advertising and blockchain and partner up with publishers who understand the significance of fair play for every participant of the advertising process, including users.

Will this all be embodied in the next wave of user-rewarding startups, or should we expect existing advertising companies to reform from the inside? In either case, I expect that it won't be a matter of function but rather of form in which changes will arrive, and only the future will show which one will be taking root in digital advertising.

Link:

How Blockchain Is Affecting The Marketing And Advertising Industry - Forbes

Will Facebook’s Libra Overtake Bitcoin Cryptocurrency And The Ethereum Blockchain? How Will It Work? – Forbes

Trust is the fundamental element in business transactions. It is what keeps economies and societies functioning. Throughout history, we have managed to build complex institutions from legislative, judicial, law enforcement to banks and various financial institutions to enable trust in commercial transactions. We also invented tools such as fiat money, bonds, stocks and contracts to guarantee the successful execution of business transactions.

And then came Bitcoin and its blockchain technology that allowed two parties to exchange value with trust without legislative institutions, fiat money, banks or contracts. It is, simply, a revolutionary technology. This is probably why blockchain was hyped as the next generation of the internet that will create the programmable economy.

(Full disclosure: I own bitcoins and have a small investment in Facebook.)

Despite the many successful implementations of blockchain, it has not been as transformational and didnt generate the much-hyped benefits.

One reason is that blockchains are implemented as disconnected solutions with no foundational protocols such as TCP/IP, HTTP and HTML that created the internet revolution. Additionally, no single blockchain network emerged as the dominant one that would offer a multitude of business services to produce the desired transformational benefits.

Enter Facebooks Libra cryptocurrency and blockchain.

On June 18th, Facebook announced the Libra blockchain and cryptocurrency, which raised many questions: What is Libra and how will it work? Is it a cryptocurrency? Is it a blockchain? Will it overtake Bitcoin and Ethereum? Will consumers trust it? What is its potential? Whats in it for Facebook? And will Libra become the unifying and transformational blockchain that everyone was hoping for?

The Libra whitepaper holds some answers to the above questions, including how it will be governed. Libra will be launched by the Libra Association, which is an independent, nonprofit membership organization, headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland. Libra will be governed and controlled by this association and will be independent of Facebook. It is currently composed of 28 organizations.

The key difference between Libra and Bitcoin is the permissionless versus permissioned blockchain. Simply put, a permissionless blockchain implies that anyone with the right hardware infrastructure can apply the mining protocols and participate in validating transactions and in becoming a validating node on the Bitcoin network. Currently, Bitcoin has over 9,500 nodes, which enabled it to withstand the test of time and produce an immutable, distributed and secure ledger.

In contrast, Libra is going to be a permissioned blockchain that is centralized where its consensus mechanism, software and governance are controlled by Libra Association members who are the only ones permitted to validate transactions. At launch, the Libra blockchain will have 100 permissioned organizations. Visa, Mastercard, Uber, Vodafone and Spotify are among the founding companies of the Libra Association.

So, is Libra a cryptocurrency with a blockchain like bitcoin?

Well, Libra applies many of the same building blocks and concepts as Bitcoin. It uses a blockchain, cryptography, digital wallets, anonymous accounts, smart contracts and the gas concept with a new programming language called "Move." This makes Libra more like Ethereum than Bitcoin.

Libra will be implemented as a stable cryptocurrency by pegging it to a basket of low volatility assets such as the dollar, euro, yen and bonds, and through creating the Libra Reserve. This reserve allows the 100-node consortium to mint and destroy Libras as needed and based on demand. So, when customers buy Libra coins using dollars, those dollars are put into the reserve that is then invested in low volatility assets. This fund concept is missing from Bitcoin and Ethereum, which leads to their price swings and speculations and makes Libra a powerful contender to Bitcoin, Ethereum and other cryptos.

Libra is also being architected with some advantages over traditional cryptocurrencies. It will consume far less electricity than Bitcoin and is touted to have a higher throughput of 1,000 transactions per second (TPS) compared to bitcoins seven TPS and Ethereums 15 TPS.

It also promises to make sending money across the globe as easy as texting and will have very low fees compared to close to 5% of the transaction value of international wire transfers.

Furthermore, Libra has the potential of helping many of the 1.7 billion unbanked to enter the global financial system. It could trigger a wave of innovation in financial services as much as the internet did for online services. These are some remarkably important advantages for Libra that could possibly offer the transformation that has been expected from blockchain and cryptocurrencies.

With Facebooks 2.4 billion users across the globe, Libra has the potential of transcending governments and central banks and possibly becoming an international digital currency. If Facebooks users adopt Libra to shop, transfer money and transact, it could make Facebook one of the most powerful financial institutions in the world. That would herald a consumer revolution but could also make financial systems less stable and reduce governments economic sovereignty, writes The Economist.

Its clear that Facebooks Libra has legs but also some serious challenges. Aside from the technological challenges of delivering the Libra network with the advertised throughput, security and smart contracts, there are questions on whether a 100-node blockchain network can be immune to global outages and to denial of service attacks.

In addition, how will a 100-node permissioned blockchain move into a permissionless one within the planned five years, and maintain the promised 1,000 TPSs? Will consumers accept it as a slower alternative to credit card processing that is at some 1,700 TPS? Finally, it is not clear when Libra will be available and how will it be rolled out.

But, more importantly, Facebook needs the blessing of governments across the globe and the trust of its customers. These are two enormous obstacles that Facebook would need to overcome. It is by this fundamental trust from governments and from consumers that would define the future of Libra and possibly of Facebook. So, can Facebook address these two trust problems and use Libra to solve its own low level of trust from consumers and governments?

More:

Will Facebook's Libra Overtake Bitcoin Cryptocurrency And The Ethereum Blockchain? How Will It Work? - Forbes

Exploring cryptocurrency and blockchain in Iceland – Penn: Office of University Communications

Imagine a hairdryer running on high, continuously, for 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The energy it drainsabout 40 kilowatts per hourequals what one extremely powerful specialized computer uses to mine cryptocurrency. A single six-building data center outside a small town in northern Iceland houses nearly 30,000 of these machines.

That town of about 900 people, called Blndus, uses about 1,500 kilowatts of energy per hour, on average. The data center uses 32,000, says Zane Griffin Talley Cooper, a doctoral student in Penns Annenberg School for Communication. That data center also has its own dedicated connection to the nearby hydroelectric power plant, which itself is growing in anticipation of industrial expansion into northern Iceland.

On its face, Iceland seems an ideal setting for the fast-growing cryptocurrency industry. The country uses 100% renewable energy thats relatively cheap to access. Its climate acts as a natural coolant for continuously running machines that heat up quickly. And to date, the political environment there has mostly welcomed this industry.

But despite those facts, Cooper has questions, not about what cryptocurrency is or does, but about what it requires. How does it work on the ground? he asks. What must be in place for cryptocurrency to happen in a given setting and what about the people involved in building and maintaining the system?

A multimodal exhibit Cooper created with Annenberg technologist Kyle Cassidy and doctoral student Katie Gressitt-Diaz of Rutgers aims to answer some of these questions through a virtual reality (VR) documentary film, a photo series, and conceptual sound work. It also brings people face to face with a fully operational cryptocurrency mining machine, called an application-specific integrated circuit or ASIC. The intent of the exhibit, on display in the Annenberg Forum through May 2020, is to convey an ethnographic exploration of cryptocurrency and blockchain in Iceland and to spur thinking and conversation about their energy use.

Without understanding the nuts and bolts of cryptocurrency, the subject can seem, well, cryptic. Part of the confusion, according to Cooper, is the word mining attached to it. Its not something that already exists that you find, he says. Rather, its a sort of transaction-verification process and subsequent reward for that authentication, in the form of a finite number of untraceable electronic coins.

Cassidy likens it to a ledger book. All of the people who are mining cryptocurrency, theyre watching that ledger and making sure no fraudulent entries are put in. At intervals decided by each currencys creatorand there are thousands of cryptocurrenciesa coin is generated and given to one of those people as a reward. A verified transaction then typically gets added to a block, which joins other blocks to form a chain known as the blockchain. The blockchain is the history of all transactions on that particular network, ever, Cooper explains. And, in theory, it cant be erased.

The verification process itself is complicated. It requires generating a very particular number that, when added to the data already in the block, produces just the right number of zeros in a row, something impossible for humans to solve. That means the more computing power, the better. When Bitcoin, the first cryptocurrency, came on the scene in 2009, nearly anyone could verify transactions on a regular old laptop. But as more coins started to circulate, meaning more puzzles to solve, that soon wasnt enough computing power.

People moved to desktops, then to graphics cards, stringing them together, Cooper says. Then that wasnt enough, so companies started creating whats essentially a motherboard built for a single purpose, to mine Bitcoin. It used to be that you could make a profit with just one, but all of a sudden, four wasnt enough. You had to get seven, 10. Then you had mining pools, where people would link a bunch of machines together in the hopes of getting pieces of a coin. These mining pools grew, and then large data centers started being built, first in China, then in other placeslike Iceland.

For the past year, Cooper has been thinking about cryptocurrency in Iceland within the broader context of his research, which focuses on how our digital world depends heavily on what he describes as regimes of resource extraction and energy production. In fall 2018, he started contemplating a trip to experience and document how Icelands natural resources move from the earth to the ASICs, and who is involved in that process. He asked Cassidy to come take pictures and enlisted Gressitt-Diaz, who studies sonic representation in media at Rutgers, to construct conceptual sound pieces, do field recording, and design an audio mix for the documentary.

In 2019, the trio visited Iceland twice, once in March, a second time in July. They met with blockchain and cryptocurrency industry insiders, environmental activists, two members of the Icelandic parliament, and several people in the energy industry. They toured a geothermal energy facility and a data center.

They learned a great deal. Being in these spaces is so wild because you can hear what they sound like. It doesnt jive with the images portrayed on Instagram, says Gressitt-Diaz. Youre hearing traffic, the sound of drones flying overhead. There are all of these sounds, of tourists chattering, machine sounds, the hum of powerlines, what I refer to as dirty noises that are there and real and part of the sonic identity of Iceland. But they dont come across when youre looking at idyllic images of Iceland on Instagram.

Technology is everywhere, too. Gressitt-Diaz recalls experiencing this even on a deserted road on a relatively empty part of the island.

We pulled over at one point on top of this hill, she says. There was a wide-open space where you could look out onto this vista, land as far as the eye can see. There was nothing around except power lines, and they were really loud, this technology connecting people on the island to power, to electricity. Even in this spot in the middle of nowhere, you could hear the presence of people and their machines.

From that time in Iceland came the exhibit now on display in the Annenberg Forum, Alchemical Infrastructures: Making Blockchain in Iceland. Coopers part is a 40-minute, two-part VR documentary film that visitors experience with Google Cardboard viewers, a 360-degree ethnographic examination of cryptocurrency landscapes in Iceland. The film blends multiple environments into single spaces in an attempt to show how different infrastructures and ecologies mix and depend on each other in complex ways.

You have Icelands active geology, which is the foundation of all of this. If Iceland wasnt at the intersection of two tectonic plates, then geothermal energy wouldnt be so prominent there, Cooper says. You have the energy industry, which is involved in tapping into that geothermal energy. Then you have the blockchain companies, which have set up real estate and are negotiating with the energy companies. Plus, you have the environmental angle.

With this film, he adds, Im trying to allow people to feel the geography of it all.

Cryptocurrency mining machines are so loud that the single Antminer S7 on display must be submerged in mineral oil. As the top recording showcases, the sound is still noticeablethough much quieter than the 30,000 machines that run continuously outside an Icelandic town called Blndus, heard in the bottom recording.

Cassidys portion consists of 10 portraits. Theres one of someone who survived a volcanic eruption and another of a powerplant manager, plus photos of cryptocurrency managers and an environmental activist, among others. I wanted to make my part of the story about these individuals, the faces of these people who are part of this along the way, he says. That made it real for me.

With her soundscape, called Icelandland, Gressitt-Diaz says she wanted to showcase just how entangled technology and nature, the environment and people are. I hope people will come away from the piece understanding how the use of technology in Iceland has a profound and sometime irreversible effect on nature, she says. If we continue to allow big industry to take advantage of that great energy resource, nature will continue to suffer until its too late.

The final component of the show is a fully functional ASIC, specifically a Bitmain Antminer S7thats actively mining Auroracoin, the unofficial national cryptocurrency of Iceland. The machine is so loud when turned on that it must be submerged in mineral oil to stay cool and be suitable for a public space. Etienne Jacquot, an Annenberg IT support specialist, was the lead engineer responsible for setting up the Antminer and connecting it to the network. He maintains the energy and revenue displays at the exhibit and manages the digital Auroracoin wallet.

The ASIC will run continuously during the course of the exhibition, costing roughly $2 a day in electricity. In just about a month, it earned 123 Auroracoins which, at current exchange rates, comes in at about $3.16.

But Cooper and the others are much more interested in energy consumed than coins earned. Because if the process to put on the exhibit taught them anything, its that blockchain and cryptocurrency can succeed, but often at great cost to the environment, even in a place that runs on 100% renewable energy. When the S9 version of the Antminer was released, for example, S7s suddenly became too slow, making them mostly obsolete and likely destined for a landfill.

This exhibit is intended to open peoples minds to what this system looks like. Its the beginning of something, not the end product, Cooper says. I dont know if we should or shouldnt build a world out of blockchainI think it has a lot of promisebut we need to account for all of these negotiations between the environment, energy infrastructure, and social and political infrastructure. Then maybe some good can come of it.

Homepage photo: Through his two-part 40-minute virtual reality film, Cooper is aiming to convey an ethnographic exploration of cryptocurrency and blockchain in Iceland and to spur thinking and conversation about their energy use. (Photo: Kyle Cassidy)

View original post here:

Exploring cryptocurrency and blockchain in Iceland - Penn: Office of University Communications

Blockchain At The United Nations Leading Solutions To The Global Crisis – Forbes

UN SDG Poster 2019

The 73rd United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) convened this week in New York and was dominated by the climate crisis with Grete Thunberg, the "16-year-old poster child" for the climate crisis movement, delivering a passionately blistering speech on how the political and business establishments have stolen her dreams by not appropriately responding to the crisis.

Last years UNGA was dominated by the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and how blockchain and related technologies could help expedite the achievement of the goals. This year, thanks to the burning platform created by Thunberg and the Global Climate Strike where an estimated 1.4 million children stayed away from school to protest, and greater developments in blockchain technologies, SDGs and the blockchain which last year seemed slightly uncomfortable bedfellows were unquestionably united.

Dr. Jane Thomason commented: It is early days, but in the social benevolence and impact space, the application of blockchain for remittances, financial inclusion, green bonds and new forms of financing are receiving increasing prominence in global discussions at 2019 UNGA."

Thomason is the ceo of Fintech Worldwide and is a global thought leader in social impact with a pedigree in public policy. I have the privilege of crossing paths with Thomason at big global events and brain trusts where industry meets government meets academia meets digital / fintech meets impact investing. She is in my global superhero community of people who help connect the dots between these intersecting silos. She also knows her way around UNGA both on and off-piste.

Blockchain has significant relevance for climate change and The Sustainable Digital Finance Alliance (SDFA) along with HSBC Center of Sustainable Finance launched the report: BLOCKCHAIN Gateway for Sustainability Linked Bond". The report outlines how the blockchain, AI and the IOT can reduce administrative reporting requirements and move the green and sustainable bond market from $167.3 billion, two percent of the overall bond market in 2018, and help to access capital to meet the annual funding deficit of the SDGs.

"With 130 banks representing more than$47 trillion in assets and one-third of the global industry signing the United Nations' Principles for Responsible Banking on Sunday, the role of green digital finance will be central to meet the goals of the U.N.'s Paris Agreement on Climate Change, as well as its Sustainable Development Goals," says Katherine Foster, the chief intelligence officer of the SDFA.

The report is a strong signal from the market that sustainable bonds, enabled by blockchain, are ready to take off. In contrast to last year's UNGA, I was moderating panels with bankers and corporate financiers who didn't have this on their radars with most pointing to the World Bank Commonwealth Bank of Australia as the first ever blockchain bond, and indicating a "wait and see" approach.

Another important use case for refugees was profiled. Among the digital finance pioneers for humanitarian settings is the World Food Program (WFP) flagship initiative Building Blocks: Blockchain for Zero Hunger was showcased at multiple events. WFP is using digital cash vouchers powered by the blockchain to ensure that food aid is getting to where its needed in Jordan, Kenya and Somalia.

Richard Byworth, the ceo of Diginex, blockchain financial services and technology company, and a big proponent of the power of using blockchainto create an impact, said: The progress we are making in this area is outstanding, as well as working with a number of global NGOs and intergovernmental organizations, we are rapidly seeing interest from corporates that are starting to understand the efficacyof good. One example of this is oureMintool, launched last year to help migrant workers from being exploited, which is now being rolled out across Thailand.

The Women Political Leaders (WPL) Global Forum, the Blockchain Charity Foundation (BCF), and the Finance Centre for South-South Cooperation, hosted Blockchain for Social Good: Utilizing Blockchain to Aid Economic Development focusing on the possibilities for blockchain to be a strong driver for inclusive growth. WPL pursues this topic in the belief that women politicians have an opportunity to play an important role in understanding and driving the crucial role of blockchain for future social and economic development. Jorge Chediek, Envoy of the United Nations Secretary-General and Director of the UN Office for South-South Cooperation, pointed out that blockchain technology could act as a game changer, having a massive impact on economic development to build a better world.

Promising partnerships were formed, with BCF and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) recognizing the importance of blockchain technology to construct a better society and, during this event, announced their partnership to support the work of blockchain for social good. BCF will contribute one million dollars to UNDP.

On the SDG financing theme, another side event explored Cryptocurrencies & Blockchains A New Boost For SDG-Financing? hosted by The Leading Group on Innovative Financing for Development, represented by Georgia, France and Germany. The event explored the potential of blockchain to stimulate new private sector investment but warned of the tax and regulatory issues, or rather lack of in the sector.

I moderated a global financial services regulator panel at UNGA last year where in broad terms, regulators were supportive of crypto, digital assets and blockchain as investment vehicles for achieving SGDs, however, they were concerned about the marketing of such products to retail consumers, and the "provenance" of the investment products demonstrating they actually achieved SDG goal targets. This is a serious area that needs further monitoring and development.

No Blockchain event is complete without a good hackathon!On September the 21st and 22nd a hackathon at the NYC Blockchain Center was convened by the Global Blockchain Business Council (GBBC) and Blockchain for Social Impact Coalition (BSIC). Developers and entrepreneurs worked over the weekend to solve three challenges framed by three of the UNs SDGs: Goal 6: Clean Water & Sanitation, Goal 10: Reduced Inequalities and Goal 11, Sustainable Cities & Communities. Teams came up with innovative new ways to address the SDGs. It is always inspiring to see the commitment of blockchain developers to use technology to build a better world.

Sandra Ro, ceo of GBBC commented, Against the backdrop of the UNGA 2019, we are thrilled to have partnered with leading blockchain companies, enterprise, and institutions to host the Scaling Impact for the UN SDGs Hackathon. The solutions that have emerged from this hackathon will no doubt advance the conversation around the United Nations 2030 Agenda for sustainable development and move the dial on employing blockchain technology to advance our shared vision of a better, more sustainable and equitable future for all.

The international and blockchain ecosystem communities are increasingly looking at how to use this technology to work towards achieving the SDGs. The UN recently published a white paper entitled The future is decentralized Blockchains, distributed ledgers, and the future of sustainable development. An increasing number of startups, non-governmental organizations, cryptocurrency philanthropy funds, and organizations including Global Goals, the Pineapple Fund, Impact Coin, SDG Coin, Moeda, Dapact , Gainforest, SolarCoin and Unicef are all working on applications for blockchain technologies to move the dial to achieve the SDGs.

Thomason adds, An increasing number of blockchain events at and around the UNGA this year focused on demonstrating how blockchain is continuing to contribute to the SDGs by offering up some excellent use cases.

What a difference a year makes! The pace and maturity of blockchain technology use cases to expedite the achievement of the SDGs displayed at UNGA 2019 is breathtaking. Lets hope it continues at this pace to help effectively respond to the global crisis humanity is facing.

Read the original here:

Blockchain At The United Nations Leading Solutions To The Global Crisis - Forbes

U Wyoming Spurs Blockchain Development with Hackathon ‘Stampede’ – Campus Technology

Coding

For the second year, the University of Wyoming has hosted a multi-challenge hackathon focused on blockchain. The "Blockchain Stampede," part of the university's College of Engineering and Applied Science WyoHackathon, is intended to help highlight the state's commitment to blockchain technology.

During the 2018-2019 legislative session, the state passed 13 separate blockchain bills, covering property rights, banking services, authorized custodians for digital assets and setup of "sandboxes" for financial innovators. Shortly after, state officials reported that 200 new companies had registered in Wyoming with names indicating their involvement in blockchain technology. Various blockchain courses have been introduced at the university, and its money-raising foundation is among the first to accept donations in bitcoin.

At the end of last year, a blockchain developed at the university was used to track the first shipment of beef that was proven to be free range and "fairly farmed." That trial shipment, demonstrated by BeefChain, a Wyoming-based company, was a joint effort of U Wyoming's Department of Computer Science and the colleges of Agriculture and Business. The beef was raised at Murraymere Farms in Powell, WY, then placed in tagged cases with RFID labels and shipped to a "five-star dining establishment" in Taipei, Taiwan. The labels included a digital identifier that enabled the cases of beef to be tracked along the complete supply chain, from plant processing, export, import and into the kitchen at the restaurant.

The latest blockchain event brought together tech companies, blockchain developers and lawmakers to the campus for meetings, planning sessions and coding competitions. The WyoHackathon competition included 13 challenges, which promised $184,000 in prizes. As an example, one challenge offered $15,000 to the best solutions for promoting interoperability "between exchanges, blockchains, wallets, cryptocurrencies, infrastructure and traditional fiat financial systems." A $30,000 challenge wooed developers to come up with a "simple and interactive game" to explain "Green," a blockchain technology that helps people pay for their power. And a third, sponsored by Sandcastle Foundation, was a regional qualifier that would allow the winners to head to Dubai in 2020 for a World's Fair event.

According to local reporting, the institution's Board of Trustees has asked the state to provide $2 million to support "the university's fledgling blockchain programs." That funding would cover the hiring of four blockchain professors: two in computer science, a third in finance and a fourth in agricultural economics.

About the Author

Dian Schaffhauser is a senior contributing editor for 1105 Media's education publications THE Journal and Campus Technology. She can be reached at dian@dischaffhauser.com or on Twitter @schaffhauser.

Read more from the original source:

U Wyoming Spurs Blockchain Development with Hackathon 'Stampede' - Campus Technology

How the blockchain is inspiring organizational design – Quartz

In August, the Business Roundtable CEO lobbying groupled by JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and with members including Amazons Jeff Bezosredefined the purpose of a corporation and essentially rejected Milton Friedmans long dominant theory about shareholder supremacy. It was a historic moment that challenges popular teachings in MBA programs across the country and the business practices we see in corporations today.

That same week, a few hundred developers gathered in Berlin to discuss the future of DAOs, a relatively new organizational model that decentralizes power and decision-making among all stakeholders. The two gatherings, though philosophically divergent in many ways, were united in their core thesis that the classic corporate model is due for an upgrade.

This is, of course, a popular topic among organizational designers. Aaron Dignan, founder of design firm The Ready, opens his 2019 book Brave New Work with an image of an early 20th-century organizational chart, which looks exactly like the pyramid-shaped org charts of today. If I showed you a house, a car, a dress, or a phone from 1910 and asked you whether it was modern or antique, youd have a pretty good idea because almost everything has changed, he writes. But not management.

The traditionally hierarchical model, with a concentration of power at the top, has persisted since the Industrial Revolution, when assembly-line work was in its infancy and Taylorism was the scientific management practice of the day. As we enter the next industrial revolution, we are operating in a far more complex global economy. Somehow, amid a period of relentless innovation, including the internet, mobile computing, autonomous vehicles, artificial intelligence, and rockets to space that can land themselves, Dignan notes, the way we come together as human beings to solve problems and invent our future has stayed remarkably constant.

Rigid hierarchies prone to bureaucratic gridlock have unique vulnerabilities now, whereas dynamic entities that can react quickly to black swan events have compelling advantages. Furthermore, as routine tasks are automated, humans will be freed to take on and create more creative rolesif organizations will allow it. A lot hinges on our ability to organize in new ways, including our collective wellbeing. Charity: Water founder Scott Harrison put it this way: Eliminate bureaucracy, and awaken the humanity within.

So what does the next evolution of the organization look like? How do companies harness a greater intelligence through design, and in the process cultivate human flourishing?

Former McKinsey consultant Frederic Laloux was compelled to find answers to these questions after a decade of exploring the interiors of some of the worlds most influential companies as a coach and advisor. He determined there must be a better way to design companies in the 21st century.

I just couldnt work with these big organizations anymore, he told the New York Times. They felt too soulless and unhealthy to me, too trapped in a rat race of just trying to eke out more profits.

So he left his job and began researching organizations that are operating at the next stage of consciousness. Laloux discovered a number of successful companies that fit this description, ranging in size from a few hundred to several thousand employees. In 2014, he published his findings in an internationally bestselling book, Reinventing Organizations: A Guide to Creating Organizations Inspired by the Next Stage of Human Consciousness. His thesis, that there is an evolutionary process behind the way we organize ourselves, draws from developmental psychology and philosopher Ken Wilbers mapping of the stages of human consciousness.

This next stage involves taming our ego and searching for more authentic, more wholesome ways of being, Laloux wrote. If the past is any guide to the future, then as we grow into the next stage of consciousness, we will also develop a corresponding organizational model. He doesnt downplay the significant work it takes to get there: Cognitively, psychologically, and morally, moving onto a new stage is a massive feat.

The companies he identified as already operating within this new paradigm include French metal manufacturer FAVI; Buurtzorg, a healthcare network in the Netherlands; and iconic US apparel company Patagonia. His book provides all the details on his research methods and findings, but in short, a dominant shared trait among these progressive organizations is a decentralized hierarchy that facilitates self-organization. Trust is baked into the system; employees are given significant agency. Juxtaposed against the standard model, which is low on trust, this is revolutionary.

While decentralizing decision-making and power is not enough to ensure that companies operate at this next level of consciousness, its a critical piece. As companies evaluate how to design their workforces during this next industrial revolution, its worth exploring the lessons and data emerging from DAOs (decentralized autonomous organizations), which anchor near one end of the centralization decentralization spectrum.

DAOs famously emerged out of the 2008 financial crisis as the system design for cryptocurrency economies. Authentic DAOs are built on blockchain technology. Members can exchange value in a direct peer-to-peer manner through smart contracts, which are pre-programmed with an entitys rules and bylaws. Decision-making is distributed among stakeholders, and the organization is essentially leaderless. DAOs have so far been effective for a number of cryptocurrency networksmost notably Bitcoin, which has a market capitalization in the range of $200 billion, rivaling that of some of the worlds largest companies. As with any new technology, DAOs are in the very early stages of development.

The 2016 hack of The DAOa smart contract on the ethereum blockchain which raised $150 million and lost about a third of its assetsrevealed critical vulnerabilities, proving these systems are not immune from rogue behavior, even though they are designed to promote and protect rational actors. But the popularity of The DAO also signaled real interest in this emergent organizational structure.

There are a number of communities that are designed to support the creation of DAOs, including Aragon, Colony, and DAOStack. These organizations provide tools like dispute-resolution frameworks that aid in the scaling of decentralized networks. DAOs arent limited to a physical location and they allow anyone in the world to create value, says Aragon co-founder Luis Cuende.

Among the biggest opportunities and challenges for DAOs is the process of developing new governance protocols. DAOs ask all of their participants to exercise true agency and self-sovereignty, behaviors that are not necessarily intuitive (and not always rewarded) in traditional corporate environments. Additionally, as citizens weve become numb to the idea of a participatory-type of system, Stratis Karad, a business developer at DAOStack, said on the State of the DAO panel discussion on the Emerge podcast. If we give [this muscle] enough rest and good stimuli then this muscle will wake up again.

In short, DAOs require adopting entirely new ways of thinking. Being decentralized is not for the faint of heart! Ceri Power, who handles people operations at ethereum blockchain messaging startup Status, wrote in a Medium post. It takes a lot of belief in the core values of autonomy, privacy, personal liberty, and open source.

Entrepreneur Tom Thomison, who co-founded HolacracyOne, a consultancy that provides a framework for self-organization, says that decentralized entities require a new social contractone that is quite different from the social parenting construct embraced by todays corporation. Dont expect as individuals to get these needs met through the organization, he says. With his next startup, Encode, Thomison is developing new legal infrastructure in jurisdictions around the world that can support the next evolution of the organization.

At the end of the day, no matter where you stand on the centralization decentralization spectrum, organizations experience long-term success or failure due to the strength of incentive alignment among all stakeholdersemployees, leaders, customers, suppliers, society at large. The Business Roundtable took an important step by formally acknowledging this.

We are only in the early stages of this next evolution in consciousness, which begins with greater self-awareness and exploration. How it manifests at scale remains to be seen, but thanks to a number of pioneering leaders and organizations, we have some clues as to whats ahead.

See the original post here:

How the blockchain is inspiring organizational design - Quartz

US Homeland Security grants blockchain credentialing contract to Danube Tech – Ledger Insights

The Science and Technology Directorate (S&T) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has awarded a $143,478 contract to digital identity firm Danube Tech for credentialing. The Austrian firm has been tasked with developing blockchain security technology for the DHS to secure associated services such as customs and immigration.

The DHS incorporates U.S. Customs and Border Protection, the Transportation Security Administration, and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. The current system employs paper-based documentation for issuance, validation and verification of licenses and certificates from these federal bodies. This legacy system is susceptible to errors and does not facilitate data exchange between departments.

Meanwhile, the funding was provided under S&Ts Silicon Valley Innovation Program (SVIP) solicitation for Preventing Forgery & Counterfeiting of Certificates and Licenses. SVIP works with private players to advance solutions for homeland security.

Danube Tech received the award for its Universal Issuer and Verifier project. In the first phase of the contract, Danube Tech will integrate interoperability support for credentialing data formats, existing blockchains and standardized and open application programming interfaces.

Danube Tech is building core interoperability infrastructure for issuers and verifiers, said Anil John, SVIP Technical Director. Interoperability between blockchains is enabled by using emerging World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) standards to globally resolve and find information where it exists on a particular blockchain.

Digital identity has been marred with security issues. The primary concern is that data silos are attractive to hackers and the organizations that hold this centralized data have repeatedly failed to protect it.

Decentralization reduces the amount of siloed data. It often enables users to keep far more information themselves. Trusted authorities such as a passport issuer can attest that this person is who they say they are, without sharing the passport details. Hence, this also addresses the second issue, privacy.

Credentialing is one of the popular blockchain applications for digital identity. Thats in part because businesses are a more accessible and eager target to adopt decentralized identity.

The current W3C specification for Decentralized Identifiers (DiDs) was edited by representatives of three companies, including Danube Tech. The other two organizations were Evernym (which started the Sovrin Network) and Digital Bazaar.

Danube Tech and Digital Bazaar act as stewards on the Sovrin Network, which enables users to control their personal data. Recently Sovrin started supporting the issuance of credentials. Numerous big corporate names are Sovrin stewards (operate nodes) including the likes of Cisco and IBM.

And last week, Digital Bazaar announced it is collaborating with standards organization GS1 US on a blockchain-based identity project. Digital Bazaar has also worked on a proof of concept with the U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

The DHS had earlier acknowledged that it was working with its divisions to introduce blockchain in government programs. Last month, the U.S. Commercial Customs Operations Advisory Committee said that the U.S. government was working on blockchain projects for international trade.

View post:

US Homeland Security grants blockchain credentialing contract to Danube Tech - Ledger Insights

Mark Cuban bullish on blockchain, but would take bananas over bitcoin – The Block Crypto

Quick Take

In a Q&A video segment with WIRED magazine, Dallas Mavericks owner and billionaire investor Mark Cuban answered a question regarding the opportunity for cryptocurrencies and ICOs.

Cuban started off saying that crypto, particularly Bitcoin is only worth what somebody will pay for it.

Cuban then compared bitcoins with collectibles such as baseball cards, art, and comic books, stating that Theres no real intrinsic value, you cant eat a baseball card or shouldnt eat a baseball card; your artwork might look good on the wall but not much you can do with it. Bitcoin, theres even less you can do with it. At least I can look at my baseball cardI can look at artwork.

Cuban also expressed his doubt for the mainstream adoption of cryptocurrencies due to its complexity, saying Cryptois so complicated for 99% of the population. Do you put it in a device? Do you print it out? How do you keep it from being hacked? Whos going to host it for you? Its just so difficult that its only worth what somebody will pay for it.

During the segment, Cuban also compared bitcoin to gold. So I say its like gold. Gold is a religion. Now, people who are really into gold, theyll tell you that theres a bad depression and things go to hell in a handbasket, if you own gold then youll be okay. No, you wont! You carry around a gold bar someones gonna hit your ass, knock you out and steal your gold bar and its gonna happen again and again and again. Id rather have bananas, I can eat bananas. Crypto, not so much.

Cuban, however, did conclude on a more positive note, citing the blockchain as something he can make a great argument for, and conceding that cryptocurrencies can be used as a store of value. Theres a lot of applications, and theyll be usedbut you can create a blockchain on your own without using all the available cryptocurrencies, he said. Its not that Im against cryptocurrencies. You just have to be very careful. At best theyre a store of value.

The Block reached out to Cuban directly to clarify his perspective. In an email, Cuban said I probably shouldnt have said bananas, since they go bad, adding that the WIRED segment was supposed to be a humorous piece.

Cuban also added that the rest of the point was solid. [Cryptocurrencies are] a store of value, not a currency, fiat or otherwise and that If you can get enough people buying it the value will go up. And vice versa.

In August, the Dallas Mavericks announced that they were going to start accepting bitcoin as payment.

Read the original post:

Mark Cuban bullish on blockchain, but would take bananas over bitcoin - The Block Crypto

Energy Industry Blockchain Landscape – The National Law Review

Monday, September 30, 2019

At the recent Blockchain in Energy conference hosted by Greentech Media (GTM), the theme was entirely clear: the perception of blockchain in the energy industry has matured from proclaiming blockchain a disruptive panacea that would completely vault a heavily regulated industry into the transactive grid of the future to placing blockchain as a tool in the firmament of the technology stack for the currently transitioning grid. In the words of Scott Clavenna, GTMs Chariman, ICOs were the worst thing that ever happened to blockchain. Said differently, the massive publicity surrounding the value increase of cryptocurrencies and the attendant utilization of blockchains such as Ethereum for raising funds created a wave of hype that promised the future energy grid now and obscured a critical analysis of the role the technology could play.

From 2016 to 2018, blockchain energy companies raised $324 million, a good portion of which came through ICOs premised solely on white papers. Industry experts saw use cases for blockchain in every facet of the energy sector, and the road to the transactive grid seemed clear-cut even if the details of the on-ramp still needed to be clarified. Blockchain appeared to be on the cusp of disrupting the energy industry. The allure of disruptive technology evoked dreams of success found most famously in startups in Silicon Valley, stoking the appetite for blockchain.

This fervor proved unsustainable. The landscape today is not tinged with the same effervescent confidence that the future is right around the corner. Instead, the reality of attempting to transform a heavily regulated industry with fixed returns and little appetite for risky innovation solely for innovations sake has created a smaller but hardier ecosystem of companies seeking to solve the myriad complex problems of an energy grid morphing from the traditional hub-and-spoke model to, in the words of the conference attendees, the flexible grid. To succeed, an impetus to deploy blockchain solutions is necessary for these companies. Despite the excitement surrounding blockchain when it first entered the energy industry, that impetus has not come as quickly or as widespread as many initially thought that it would.

Much of the current innovation with blockchain in energy is occurring in Europe. With a stronger emphasis on renewable energy resources, a greater penetration of vehicle electricification and the accompanying effects on the grid, regulators have allowed distribution system operators to experiment with blockchain-based solutions. American regulators have not, as of yet, granted American utilities the same latitude to experiment. Without an objective and clearly identifiable need, like that in Europe, it should come as no surprise that experimentation with blockchain solutions in American utilities runs into roadblocks that have little to do with the underlying technology.

The nature of a heavily regulated monopoly, like the American utility system, is that major policy decisions intersect between technical, strategic and legal concerns. Blockchain projects fall under the umbrella of a major policy decision and thus the experiment to prove that something can be done often runs into the question of whether it should be done. The steady transition to distributed energy resources (DERs) has inverted the traditional thinking about the energy grid. In the past, a utility would forecast load and manage generation. With renewable energy resources taking a larger role in the DER stack, utilities find themselves attempting to forecast generation (will the sun shine? will the wind blow?) and manage load. New problems require new solutions and the technical features of blockchain satisfy many of the criteria established to ease the transitioning grid.

It remains clear that blockchain projects can and should be deployed to ease this transition. However, will the aha moment for blockchain adoption come from a disruptive startup or from within the established industry? The story for the disruptive startup is well established in high tech culture, even if it has not caught on with the same fire in the energy industry. Part of the fervor for ICOs can be attributed to the desire for disruption. We now see that the disruption that early startups hoped to create has not, as of yet, borne fruit. More curious is the possibility for change from within an established player in the industry.

A blockchain solution is a necessarily technical solution to complex technical problems. One panel consisting of primarily representatives of utilities explained that the unique internal dynamics of heavily regulated monopolies are an additional impediment to this technical solution. A proponent of a blockchain solution must first choose a proof-of concept that will have a great chance for success, persuade the appropriate stakeholders that the risk of failure is worth the benefit of success and then must actually succeed. Having successfully proven the technical solution, that proponent must then argue for widespread adoption and scaling of the technical solution while ensuring that any regulatory or other non-technical concerns are satisfied. This process is patently fatiguing and clearly shows the need for an internal champion of blockchain technology, ideally one in a position with strategic responsibility and the technical chops to understand the intricacies of the problem and the solution.

An internal champion should be planning for the flexible grid now rather than waiting until it is forced to act. Navigating the energy industry is entirely different from the environments in which disruptive technologies have traditionally thrived. There is little room for error; no matter what, the lights must stay on. For a company to implement a blockchain project successfully, it must consider regulatory barriers, privacy implications, and complexities associated with digital securities among various other obstacles.

1994-2019 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.

Go here to see the original:

Energy Industry Blockchain Landscape - The National Law Review

BurstIQ raises $5.5M to bring blockchain to the healthcare space – VatorNews

The company has been profitable for the last 18 months and will use the new funding to scale

Blockchain gets a lot of hype, mostly because of the cryptocurrency market, but its a technology that can be used in an endless number of spaces. The real opportunity it represents is the trust and transparency it provides; to have data that is secure and cannot be tampered with or altered. In no other space are those qualities more important than healthcare, where data is literally life or death, and, yet, blockchain has not become as large a part of the healthcare space as you might expect.

That is where BurstIQ comes in; it provides a secure, HIPAA-compliant blockchain platform for the healthtech space, allowing its tocustomers use the platform for interoperability, granular consent, data marketplaces, analytics, IoT connectivity and personalized medicine.

We started out with the basic premise that precision medicine and all the data created by it, coupled with next generation IoT and machine intelligence, is going to truly transform the healthcare engagement model to where health becomes an every day, all the time experience, Frank Ricotta, CEO of BurstIQ, told me in an interview.

What was missing was an open and secure data platform that pulls all this data together and allows a person to truly own and control their health profile. When you look at the current environment, health data is locked in silos. We wanted to build the pathways that unlock that data and allow it to be accessible to the healthcare ecosystem but do it in a person-centric way. From working with my medical professionals, to managing my chronic conditions, to participating in medical research, and, of course, my health and fitness, we want each person to sit at the center of their own health, not the periphery of it."

The BurstIQ platform allows health businesses toprovide consumers with more control over their data, as well as the need to increase accessibility of that data for all the stakeholders who participate in the health ecosystem.The company positions its platform as a B2B blockchain enablement platform for large enterprises, digital health solution providers, life science and pharma companies, and government agencies, allowing these organizations to connect with each other and exchange data, while allowing individuals to manage how their own data is used and accessed across that ecosystem.

On Tuesday, the Denver-based company announced that it raised a $5.5 million Series A round of funding from Elsewhere Partners. BurstIQ had previously raised $425,000 in venture funding, making this its first major institutional funding round.

BurstIQ sees Elsewhere as more than an investor, Ricotta made clear to me; they see them as a key partner going forward.

Anytime a company brings in a major investor at a pivotal growth point, that investor becomes a critical partner. Because we were revenue and cash-flow positive, we had the flexibility to be patient and hold out for the right partner. We were looking for a firm that would add value to the business in terms of the relationships they can bring forward to help us accelerate and grow our market presence. The Elsewhere team understands both blockchain and healthcare in a way that is rare in venture capital, he said.

Investors who are comfortable with healthcare may not be comfortable with some of the technical aspects of our platform, like the blockchain piece. And if theyre comfortable with the blockchain side of life, healthcare is a foreign domain. Whoever we partnered with had to be able to bridge both. Elsewhere has the talent and the relationships to do that."

Founded in 2015, BurstIQ builds health profiles of people, places and things by connecting data from all the disparate sources of that data. The platform then provides the mechanisms for those people, places and things to interact with each other, share and collaborate.

We can handle any source of data and make it simple to access while putting each person in control of their own data, Ricotta said.

The platform is used by hospitals and large healthcare systems, large enterprises, startups and government agencies. The company gained early traction by partnering with large enterprises such as Empiric Health, Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) and Colorado Regional Health Information Organization (CORHIO).

Empiric Health, a company that is dedicated to eliminating unnecessary surgical costs, is the companys cornerstone use case," Ricotta said; the two entered into a partnership in 2017. Empiric is able to identify 20 to 25 percent cost savings within surgical workflow.

Our stack enabled them to get to market faster by providing a plug-and-play HIPAA compliant data management layer and development frameworks. In addition, the platform allows them to execute advanced predictive modeling across datasets and customers while maintaining full regulatory compliance, said Ricotta.

Unlike other startups in the space, including Guardtime and Hyperledger, which has a health initiative, and large, established players like IBM, Microsoft, Google, all of which have their own blockchain initiatives within the healthcare sector, what separates BurstIQ is its focus on building a broad-based platform and an interconnectivity network, rather than bringing single-sector applications to market, said Ricotta.

The BurstIQ platform lets you do things that you wouldnt otherwise be able to do within current application development environments. We provide an interconnectivity framework to allows for the exchange data across applications and allows for people to manage their data, he told me.

The company, which has been cash-flow positive and profitable for the past 18 months, is going to use the new funding to scale the company; that means, in part, expanding the number of employees from the low teens to the mid-30s in the next year, though the exact number will partially depend on how some of its partnerships come together in that time.

We process billions of transactions through the platform, so we know the base platform works. Now its time to scale it. We are at that tipping point where the company will significantly accelerate its growth over the next year. To support that growth, we are going to grow the business development team and our community team, building communities and ecosystems on the global network, said Ricotta.

While Ricotta admits that blockchain is often used as a buzzword in the tech world, he considers it a good buzzword, as Blockchain opens the possibility of entirely new health economies new products and services and monetization opportunities that have never been possible before. It gets people thinking differently, and it creates an opening for innovation.

The true innovation of blockchain is not the ledger. Its the whole trust establishment. Can I trust that piece of data? Can I trust the person who is on the other end of this transaction? Thats pretty key, he said, explaining that the ability to trust the source and authenticity of data is critical in healthcare, where life-and-death decisions depend on whether the right data is accessible at the right time, and whether that data is trustworthy or not," he said.

According to Ricotta, giving people access to their records so they can take them from doctor to doctor is necessary, but its not enough; the true disruption occurs with the ability to make that data actionable for the person, for their provider, and for the ecosystem of researchers, B2B services, AI tools, decision support systems and consumer products that all contribute to delivering on the promise of truly person-centric care.

We are moving health towards a true access-based economy, where I have 24/7 access to care as well as access to tools and capabilities that allow me to make smarter choices and access personalized services. In health, everybody talks about person-centric care, but blockchain is the critical piece that truly allows us to achieve person-centric, holistic health.

For BurstIQ, success going forward isnt just a numbers game,Ricotta explained. Success for the company means being the most trusted health data platform in the world, and it means being the platform that allows health companies to finally achieve the promise of person-centric healthcare and empowers people with the tools and insights to live their healthiest, best life.

Originally posted here:

BurstIQ raises $5.5M to bring blockchain to the healthcare space - VatorNews

Blockchains Next Frontier: Saving the Planet (and Possibly Pandas, Too) – Observer

Obtaining funding for social and environmental projects has historically relied on a one-way and opaque system. Paul Zinken/picture alliance via Getty Images

Despite the boom and bust cycle of Bitcoin and its extensive family of cryptocurrencies, there is a general consensus among the tech and business community that blockchain is a real innovation bound to underpin the future of the digital world. The nascent technology is already seeing application in such areas as e-commerce, publishing and database management.And now, its eyeing a next-level mission: to save the planet.

This week, amid the climate change-themed United Nations General Assembly conference series in New York City, Brooklyn-based blockchain software company ConsenSys, led by Ethereum co-founder Joseph Lubin, unveiled a partnership with the World Wide Fund (WWF) for Natures Panda Labs (an incubating program for sustainability projectsnot just panda projects) called Impactio, a blockchain-powered platform tasked with connecting entrepreneurs, investors and subject-matter experts on social and environmental projects.

SEE ALSO: HeresWhat You Really Need to Know About Blockchain

Historically, obtaining funding for sustainability-related projects through nonprofits like WWF relies on a one-way and opaque system, where project leaders submit grant applications and keep their fingers crossed for a response from interested funders. Impactio seeks to make this process more efficient and transparent by bringing various stakeholders on to one platform and creating a feedback loop where participants can peer-review projects through a digital token-based voting process. The same tokens can also be donated by curators to chosen projects as seed funds.

There are a whole bunch of people who have great ideas, a whole bunch of people who want to invest in projects, and a whole bunch of subject-matter experts scattered all around the world. You need a trustworthy platform to serve as sort of a magnet for all these different actors, ConsenSys CEO Lubin explained to Observer. Its almost like a game, but a game with real stakes. You bring in people with expertise who want to stake their reputation and even to benefit financially.

The curation and voting mechanism is supported by a set of smart contracts, while every activity on the platform is recorded on the blockchain ledger to prevent unauthorized editing and hacking.

We face a $2.5 trillion funding gap to achieve the SDGs (sustainable development goals) by 2030. We know that this isnt necessarily due to a lack of capital or a lack of solutions. What is lacking is a robust mechanism for linking these private dollars to viable, large scale, SDG-advancing projects, Kavita Prakash-Mani, director of WWF Global Conservation, said in a statement.

Impactio was born in 2017 out of a collaboration between ConsenSys staff in Sydney, Australia and the WWF Australia team with an initial goal to incentivize people into participating in wildlife preservation in Australia, said Robert Greenfield, co-founder of ConsenSys Social Impact. But the project later evolved into one focused on reducing the operational cost of finding such projects.

During a seven-week pilot program from July 1 to August 21, Impactio attracted over 100 participants who approved 17 social and environmental projects through its token-based curation process.

Read more:

Blockchains Next Frontier: Saving the Planet (and Possibly Pandas, Too) - Observer

Stellar Development Foundation proposes to disable inflation mechanism from its protocol – The Block Crypto

The Stellar Development Foundation (SDF), the non-profit organization that supports thedevelopment of the Stellar blockchain network, has proposed to disable the inflation mechanism from its protocol.

The foundation announced the proposal Monday, saying that it is a good idea as inflation is not benefiting projects building on the Stellar network. In the networks inflation mechanism, new lumens (XLM) tokens are added to the network at the rate of 1% each year. Each week, the protocol distributes these tokens to any account that gets over 0.05% of the votes from other accounts in the network that hold a balance of at least 100 XLM.

A few Stellar ecosystem projects receive enough votes to qualify for inflation, but the good people who vote for those projects are essentially opting out of inflation pools. Theyre choosing to make a donation, the foundation said.

It stressed that it is just a proposal and that Stellar validators will have to vote on it. The foundation has already disabled the inflation mechanism in its version 12 of the Stellar core network and asked validators to decide if they would accept the release. But it "encourages" validators to vote to accept it.

Continue reading here:

Stellar Development Foundation proposes to disable inflation mechanism from its protocol - The Block Crypto