Shockingly, Law School Named For Affirmative Action Opponent Bad At Race And Diversity – Above the Law

(Photo via Facedbook)

As law schools put together their responses to what has clearly become an historic juncture in the countrys long, ignominious history with race, its worth remembering that a law school at a public university went out of its way to rename itself after a guy who thought the Voting Rights Act was a perpetuation of racial entitlement and cited debunked theories about black people needing slower-track school from the bench. At a moment when most institutions are taking a hard look at their role in the wider landscape of racial injustice, its safe to say that ASSLaw is not.

ASSLaw, of course, is the George Mason University School of Law, which renamed itself the Antonin Scalia School of Law at the behest of a wealthy donor under admittedly shady circumstances without taking a second to consider the truly fitting acronym theyd bestowed upon themselves. They attempted to rebrand as the Antonin Scalia Law School, but by then wed all embraced the ASSLaw moniker.

And it seems that the school is content to follow their namesakes lead when it comes to race and diversity.

The school is a mere 2 percent black, an eye-popping number for a public school in Virginia. On a recent conference call discussing the issue, the Dean of Admissions cited the old canard of high academic standards as the reason why the school does not have more black students. Its a justification that would be news to UVA (5.7 percent), Georgetown (9.2 percent), and George Washington (7.8 percent), all demonstrably superior academic institutions that seem to have no problem finding black law students.

In fairness, part of the schools problem is the name itself. When the school made the shift to align itself ideologically with a jurist who spent his tenure pushing racist, sexist, and homophobic tropes onto the national stage we all knew it would create a self-selection diversity problem as minority students inched away from the barely top 50 program when so many alternatives exist. George Masons president, Angel Cabrera, defended the name change at the time with words that were either tragically ironic or nakedly cynical, We must ensure that George Mason University remains an example of diversity of thought, a place where multiple perspectives can be dissected, confronted, and debated for the benefit and progress of society at large. What he got was a school systematically erasing actual diversity. But more conservative professors whose scholarship might not land them work elsewhere get to call the school home and thats a kind of diversity, if a racist one.

But even if the name greatly diminished the pool of black applicants, the attempt to pin the lack of diversity on high academic standards hits at the core of the schools philosophical problem. Its not just that the school doesnt seem to care about diversity, its that they are quick to blame their own institutional shortcomings on black people themselves. As they see it, ASSLaw hasnt failed to recruit students the students failed to be good enough for ASSLaw. Its an exercise in victim blaming that guarantees the school will remain mired at the bottom of diversity rankings until it undergoes a fundamental mindset shift.

For the minority students still braving the ASSLaw ranks, the school isnt performing much better. With Eugene Volokh tossing around racial slurs and throwing tantrums when hes called out for it, you can imagine what a faculty built around Volokh Conspiracy bloggers can get up to. In response to complaints about both professors and students saying unconscionable stuff in class, the school formed a Classroom Dialogue Committee. That certainly sounds like a step in the right direction, but were hearing that many of the professors on the committee have complaints against them for inappropriate comments. Its like letting the inmates run the Ayn Rand School for Objectivist Studies.

And since ASSLaw is just Fosters Home For Right-Wing Troll Friends, the school that cant find any way to admit more black people did manage to bring in Ginni Thomass infamous aide Crystal Clanton who we last caught up with when she was texting co-workers that:

I HATE BLACK PEOPLE. Like fuck them all ... I hate blacks. End of story.

Despite this being a well-known incident that led to even Turning Point USA distancing themselves from her, ASSLaw admitted Clanton in another display of the schools deep commitment to promoting an inclusive atmosphere for professional education.

But Clanton has learned to like Clarence Thomas so I guess racism is solved.

At the end of the day, ASSLaw is now the conservative ideology factory that we thought it would be. But George Mason isnt a private school. A public school that cant muster a black student body of more than 2 percent in a state thats roughly 19 percent black is objectively failing at its mission to serve the people of Virginia.

There are definitely bigger issues in Virginia right now than law school administration, but thats no excuse for continued inaction. Someone in state government needs to step in and be the adult in the room because the stunted adolescence of libertarianism certainly isnt producing any leadership from within the school. This is the largest public research university in the state! And yet the law school seems more focused on providing a mill for conservative academics to publish hot takes than building the profession.

Fix it.

Joe Patriceis a senior editor at Above the Law and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Feel free toemail any tips, questions, or comments. Follow him onTwitterif youre interested in law, politics, and a healthy dose of college sports news. Joe also serves as a Managing Director at RPN Executive Search.

Read more from the original source:

Shockingly, Law School Named For Affirmative Action Opponent Bad At Race And Diversity - Above the Law

The Jio-FB tie-up: Will it subliminally influence and monolpolise Indian minds? – Economic Times

According to technology experts and social scientists, by 2024, a capitalistic conglomerate that straddle media, telecom, entertainment, digital data and e-commerce can easily control a majority of Indian minds.

The recently inked Jio-Facebook deal may have grand-stated objectives of helping Indias small businesses and individuals get new opportunities in the post-corona world, but possible un-stated ones are what consumers, partners, competitors, civil society and government should be wary of That of data privacy, for instance.

Does the new partnership nurture a secret ambition to directly control Indian minds, through digital India? It is laudable that Reliance has been able to become debt-free now but why would it bet big on e-commerce, a business that has not yet proven profitable to even Amazon for years?

With about 300 million users in Facebook, 400 million in WhatsApp and 390 million Jio subscribers, this new partnership probably will have direct access to about 650 million Indian minds as of now, assuming some inactive or duplicate users across the three. Add to that the indirect and direct control across several competing media houses and content, diversionary net neutrality, tech infrastructure, and political backing from more-than-willing policy makers, and we may see the power to monopolise not just industries, but more critically, our minds! Will the Googles decision to take a stake in Vodafone-Idea and also the planned Amazon-Airtel tie-up ward off this threat?

Reliance was always known to avoid competition in various ways including re-drawing of level-playing fields. Wherever they couldnt, as in its initial telecom foray and retail, they struggled. Its strength lies in influencing policy-making and executing very large-scale projects from refineries to optical fibre networks. Remember the controversy when a hitherto non-existent Jio University was conferred with a specially created University of Eminence status by the government, overlooking many great institutions, to let it bypass educational regulators like AICTE?

While it has put a sense of urgency in the Indian government for data sovereignty, the big question is whether Indians will trust their data with a company having maximising shareholder value at its core over, say, a Tata Group whose values aim for shared growth. Heres an opportunity for it to stand for maximising shared values and push for data privacy more than data sovereignty, but will it?

Meek noises that Facebook makes and the muted tokenism it exhibits every time there is a charge of fake content or privacy breach should be cause of extreme concern for the enlightened. To be harmless is not part of FBs ethos and it is just another pure play capitalist beholden only to its shareholders. In the Indian context, this high-handedness can be of immense advantage to the agenda-driven news creators of the ruling dispensation. This augurs well for these two partners and the government they support, but not for most other stakeholders.

That the Jio customers had let the camel into the tent was the butt of many social media jokes. Some former, perhaps disgruntled, Reliance suppliers crib about long-day ordeals with several rounds of negotiations across levels, with long gaps in between. Most employees work beyond 5 pm and stress-related health issues are likely. The company made a huge donation to PM CARES but unilaterally denied salaries to groups of employees in the Covid-19 crisis. Maximising shared value is not a part of its mission and it is great at tax avoidance. It is one of the top CSR taxpayers by statute but most of that is routed to in-house Trust (The government should not allow companies to route CSR funds to own Trusts which denies genuine NGOs like ours the much-needed funds, and stifle real developments on ground). Competitors talk of multiple levels of tactics to inconvenience them and squeeze their resources: From flooding high-cost but mediocre talent to lobbying policy makers/regulators (eg: IUC-interconnect usage charges abolition, data sovereignty). All these may be accusations by competitors but are critical events in our time-zero framework for predicting the future.

Monopolising informatics and digital communication will lead to monopolising minds, and if unregulated, could be the biggest fallout of this new venture. With media and content control, censoring and muting adverse content, development of new tech to know our thinking while we read a message, big data analytics and AI to know what we do at any point of time and predict our responses, and the ability to change minds with subliminal messaging, this behemoth can be a Frankenstein. We have already seen how quickly Indian minds can be diverted in the last few years. The stories that went viral for balcony clapping and diya lighting during lockdown are legends in the making! With a deeper knowledge of people than they themselves know, it is pretty easy to influence their minds.

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT), with its 70 million traders and 40,000 trade associations, has expressed its concerned about the use of consumer data. According to CAIT, Facebook has been known to violate domestic laws and the government should ensure that the data they already have should not be used for this new venture. They point out that it will be a total betrayal after having expressed reservations on this by the same government in the last term.

With data comes the power to create new products and services, and that is clearly an undue competitive advantage that will be created by this alliance, and it is surprising that the government shut an eye to this while granting FDI approval. The question is whether the government gives auto-approval for everything Reliance. How come the paranoia that was manifested in the case of suspect Chinese takeover of India was completely absent when it came to this FDI? Lets hope the government will show the same enthusiasm to speedily approve both Google and Amazon FDI proposals. Remember how the government treated Amazon founder in his last trip to India with big investment plans?

Without a strong civil society, a bold Fourth Estate, a determined opposition, impartial constitutional authorities, a sound justice system, and a coalition of competitors from related industries coming together, the threats of data privacy breach and net non-neutrality, and creation of monopolies will not be averted. Why are competitors, civil society and clean politicians not pushing for stringent data privacy laws and lobbying against cross-ownership in competing media houses that infringe on news neutrality?

Given the global forces that are at play, the business ecosystem will brave the turmoil to some extent but many competitors will fade away as we have seen in the telecom sector post Jio launch. The indicators are for a duopoly as we see in most developed economies in various sectors from telecom to healthcare and e-commerce. Smaller players will be marginalised to special niches.

We can postulate with reasonable accuracy that this covert take-over of the Indian minds will be eventually replicated in countless other realms: infrastructure, thriving public sector entities, entertainment, defence, etc. A willing government will always find subversive partners but they also will do well to remember that such a monopoly can make or break governments too. Ayn Rand couldnt have known todays conglomerates when she had written on how the soul of capitalism was dead, but it is the perfect opportunity for Reliance, as a leader, to prove her wrong by delighting not just its shareholders.

DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.

Read the original here:

The Jio-FB tie-up: Will it subliminally influence and monolpolise Indian minds? - Economic Times

When Tribal Journalists Try to "Cancel" Ayn Rand (Part 1) – New Ideal

Inaccurate, misrepresented, and even willfully distorted reporting on Ayn Rands ideas has been common in the media since she first gained public prominence. That fact came up in a conversation she had with the editor of The Ayn Rand Lexicon, a kind of mini encyclopedia of her philosophy, Objectivism. The editor, Harry Binswanger, relates that Rand became increasingly enthusiastic about the Lexicon project, in part because it could serve as a corrective and eliminate any excuse for the continual misrepresentation of her philosophy. Rand quipped to him, People will be able to look up BREAKFAST and see that I did not advocate eating babies for breakfast.

But articles that misrepresent, or outright distort, Rands ideas continually find their way into print. Rarely are they worth a response. Two recent articles about Rand one in Salon, the other in the New Republic are different. Its not because of what these articles say about her, but in how they say it.

Both articles raise worthwhile questions at least, nominally. One asks about the appeal of Rands ideas among young people; the other is on the relation between Rands moral ideal of selfishness and President Trump. Both articles, moreover, cite sources, name facts, and even include some actual reporting all in support of their highly unfavorable conclusions. Which is putting it mildly.

These essays are apt case studies of a tribalist mindset.

Whats remarkable about these essays is not that theyre sloppy, error-filled, slanted, or smears. They are. (And Ill indicate a few, though by no means all, of their errors and misrepresentations.) Rather: what marks these essays out is that they exemplify a pernicious mindset, a mindset thats wreaking havoc on our cultural-political life. Its a phenomenon wider than how people engage with Ayn Rand but when shes the subject, that mindset is often starkly apparent.

These essays are apt case studies of a tribalist mindset.

Before we go on, let me acknowledge a concern that some of you might have. Yes, I work for the Ayn Rand Institute; Im writing in a journal published by that Institute; and Im analyzing articles that portray Rand unfavorably. But my main point is not to vindicate Rand, nor to change your mind about her, nor to convince you that these critics are wrong in their assessment (though I believe thats the case).

What I want to show you regardless of what you may already think of Rand, if you have a view at all is that theres a fundamental problem with these articles, a problem that negates their credibility. Theyre not seeking to engage with facts, reach the truth, let alone convince any active-minded readers. Instead, they manipulate seemingly factual information for the sake of affirming and reinforcing a set of prejudices.

The Last of the Ayn Rand Acolytes, by Alexander Sammon, appeared in the New Republic, and it seemingly asks a worthwhile question. The piece contends that The romance of the [Objectivist] movement has lost a good deal of its cachet in an unequal, austerity-battered America particularly when it comes to pulling in the young recruits who were once the backbone of the Rand insurgency. All the kids these days are becoming socialists and communists. Citing a poll about young Americans who are fond of socialism, the writer then wonders if Rands hyper-capitalist philosophy is running out of juice?

There is a really interesting question here about Rands appeal, because it has far outlasted her lifetime and has gone global, reaching well beyond the United States. And its true that her writings resonate powerfully with young people. Why? What explains it? How much, if any, of it relates to her political views? Or her powerful dramatization in fiction of a new moral ideal? Does it vary by individual reader? These are among the questions my colleagues and I at ARI think a lot about. One observation Ive drawn is that these questions are deceptively simple. Answering them takes a lot of data and a serious engagement with the variety of ways that Rands work resonates with particular individuals.

READ ALSO: How to Resist the Pull of Todays Tribalistic Politics

But the article is remarkable for its lack of curiosity about its nominal question. The reporter logged a few days at the conference and interviewed a number of people. That on-the-ground reporting, however, was just an opportunity to gather some anecdotes and quotations to reinforce a preexisting view. Notice what the reporter takes as a sign that Objectivism has a serious youth problem, and the conferences organizers were quite aware of it. ARI, which runs the conference, offered a discount rate for those under 30, a talent show, and extracurricular activities like late night jams.

It would be exceedingly odd for an intellectual or political movement to be uninterested in connecting with young people.

What are these evidence of? Take the talent show. It might be probative, if it had been uniquely geared to young people. (No reason is given in the article to believe that.) Or, if it had been added to the program in a panicked reaction to some plummeting interest. (No again). The late-night jam session is an extracurricular event, meaning that attendees, not ARI, spontaneously organized it. That fact doesnt support the point the reporter is trying to establish and arguably, it might be counterevidence.

Finally, what conclusion can be drawn from the fact that people under 30 can register at a discount? One conclusion is that ARI is interested in attracting young people and making it easier, more affordable, for them to attend. But is that unique to the Objectivist movement? No. Student and youth discounts are everywhere (think: movie theaters, transportation). Moreover, it would be exceedingly odd for an intellectual or political movement to be uninterested in connecting with young people.

Thats why, for example, you find the same kind of discount offered by Netroots Nation, which, for more than a decade, has hosted the largest annual conference for progressives, drawing nearly 3,000 attendees from around the country and beyond. In 2019, if you were 18 or younger, you would have paid only $110 (discounted from the full rate of $375) to attend the conference. And thats quite apart from the hundreds of scholarships, covering full or partial costs, that Netroots offered. Is that proof, then, that the progressive movement in the U.S. has a serious youth problem?

Theres no way to reach a reasonable conclusion neither about ARIs conference, nor the Netroots event when this is what is offered as evidence.

What, then, is the actual purpose of the New Republics article? Some of the shoddy reporting provides a lead, because its not mere sloppiness. Its purposeful. Lets unpack just one paragraph, for which the relevant facts are publicly verifiable.

Sammon quotes ARIs chairman, Yaron Brook, saying that the Institutes first program focused on young people, and then writes:

True to that aim, ARI began donating 400,000 copies of Rands novels to advanced-placement high school programs each year. It also awarded big cash prizes for Rand-themed essay contests (in 2018 alone, ardent young Objectivists raked in a cool $130,000 for such broadsides).

In just these 44 words, there are four factual errors, which slant toward a purpose.

(1) The article implies that ARIs first program was giving away copies of Rands novels. In fact, the Institutes first major project, in 1985, was an essay contest on Rands novels. It was in 2002 fully seventeen years after ARI was founded that we piloted an initiative to supply teachers with free classroom sets of Rands novels. That project was born in response to requests from teachers themselves. So far, weve given away more than four million books. Teachers continue to ask for the books, and then tell us about how intellectually energized their students are after reading Rands novels.

READ ALSO: Church-State Separation: A Principle, Not a "Wall" (Part 2)

(3) Students who take part in our essay contests may agree or disagree with Rands view. Theres never been a requirement that they be ardent young Objectivists (meaning that they embrace Rands philosophy), either to take part or to win a prize. Which bring us to the next tendentious error.

(4) To imply that ARI awards prizes for Rand-themed broadsides is factually wrong. The questions we set for the essay contests are designed to prompt students to engage deeply with Rands novels, the plot, the motivations of characters, the books philosophic theme. Whats more, our judging criteria (published online) state that: Essays will be judged on whether the student is able to argue for and justify his or her view not on whether the Institute agrees with the view the student expresses. Take a look at the questions for 2020, and some of the winning essays, to form your own view.

Its a trivialization of Rands philosophy to take her appeal as exclusively about her advocacy of capitalism.

The thread running through these errors, and the article as a whole, is to push a distorted picture of Rand (and by extension, the Objectivist movement). There are three elements in that picture none of them true to the facts.

First, its a trivialization of Rands philosophy, so that her appeal is taken to be exclusively about her advocacy of capitalism and (in Sammons phrase) personal pocket-stuffing. Thats the subtext behind the errors Ive just noted, and many others. Its also evident in Sammons downplaying of the salient fact that the theme of our 2019 Objectivist conference was Rands theory of art.

Second, the movement around Rands ideas is portrayed as something of a quasi-religious, or cult-like, phenomenon of unthinking followers. Third, and this goes to a major purpose of the article, Rand is assumed to be the motive force behind the conservative or right-wing tribe.

This false picture comes out in numerous small touches throughout, but its the opening of the article thats particularly revealing. Sammon claims that the original Ayn Rand clubs in the 1960s were governed by eight rules, only two of which could be mentioned publicly: that Rand was the greatest human being ever, and Atlas Shrugged, the greatest human achievement ever. Then Sammon observes that at last summers Objectivist conference, everyone seemed to be in compliance. For evidence of that, he quotes a 26-year-old attendee. Sammon reports that she was once an avowed environmentalist, but after reading Atlas Shrugged, she has come to believe that the solution is to encourage development.

Put aside those eight rules for the moment (well come back to them), and consider his example of the former environmentalist. Lets assume that shes quoted accurately in the article. Whatever you think of environmental issues, or of Ayn Rand, this is nothing like a coherent argument. Ive met fans of Atlas Shrugged who believe environmental issues call for regulatory controls on development. You can hate Atlas Shrugged, or simply disagree with it, and still think that environmental problems call for more, not less, development and innovation. Thats basically the view Steven Pinker expresses in his book Enlightenment Now, and, whether hes read Rands novels or not, his views on key philosophic, moral and political issues are fundamentally at odds with Objectivism. We could keep going on and on with counterexamples.

Sammons claim cannot convince any active-minded reader. The non sequitur is pretty flagrant. What, then, is the articles opening trying to do? If you already hold a certain prejudice about Rand and about fans of her work, the article will trigger an emotional reaction. It will affirm and reinforce your prejudice. Put into words (politely), its something like: I always knew it theyre a bunch of unthinking worshipers of the dollar and rapacious industry.

READ ALSO: Wall Street Needs a Moral Defense against Warren, Sanders

Since that personal and professional rupture between them, Branden had an ongoing, publicly stated animus toward Rand and her ideas, and a vested interest in smearing her and vindicating himself. Theres a further problem, because his own memoir shows him to be a prolific liar, thus casting wholesale doubt over the books credibility. But if you did take it as credible, theres the fact that Sammon even manages to misreport that (dubious) source, regarding those rules in the source article. Brandens quoted words are implicit premises which his organization, the Nathaniel Branden Institute, transmitted to our students. Sammon takes this weird allegation from the grudge-bearing Branden and slants it further.

Sammons article is uninterested in convincing through facts and logic. Its advancing a particular slant, for the purpose of affirming certain prejudices.

But theres an even more significant problem here. Journalists are supposed to be not only critical of what they see, hear, and read, but also concerned with primary sources and first-hand evidence. A good place to look, then, is Rand herself, her published writing, her media appearances, her speeches. Though she was proud of Atlas Shrugged and possessed self-esteem, she would have strenuously repudiated those eight rules precisely because of their injunction to submit to authority. The through line of her writing and speaking is the supreme importance of thinking independently, putting nothing no authority above the judgment of your individual mind. To disregard this counterevidence, and pretend it doesnt exist, is malpractice.

Again: my point here is not to change your mind about Rand or her ideas, but to show that Sammons article is uninterested in convincing through facts and logic. Its advancing a particular slant, for the purpose of affirming certain prejudices.

Which bring us to the third element of the distorted picture of Rand and the movement around her ideas: the notion that Rand is the behind-the-scenes power of our cultures other major tribe, the conservative/right-leaning movement. This trope has been knocking around for years and surfaces in various articles. For those in the grips of this quasi-conspiracist trope, imagine how soothing it would be to hear that the Rand phenomenon is waning.

Has Rand influenced activists, intellectuals, politicians and others who define themselves as libertarian or Republican or conservative? Of course. But that influence is far from straightforward or uniform. For a start, Rand excoriated the conservative and libertarian movements of her own time; she saw those movements, in different ways, as intellectually bankrupt and subversive of freedom. Nor does Rand belong in the vague categories right wing or conservative, given her views. For instance, Objectivism rejects all forms of the supernatural, emphatically including religion; or consider her principled view on a womans moral right to abortion.

One more counterpoint to the trope is that Rands novels have been cited by Hollywood figures who view themselves as sympathetic, if not wholly supportive, of progressive causes. For instance, Angelina Jolie, Mayim Bialik, Emma Watson, among others, have said that Rands fiction had a strong impact on them. The point, then, is that Rands influence is multifaceted, it goes well beyond political issues, and it is unbounded by the conventional left-right framing.

READ ALSO: Theres Nothing Exploitative about the Gig Economy

Without appreciating these facts, its impossible to form a view of Rands cultural influence. To imagine that her philosophy underpins the mainline conservative movement is risible. Coming from opponents of her views, that notion is a prejudice.

The writer fashioned a narrative that will be emotionally soothing to the tribalist progressive reader and unconvincing to a critical reader.

Sammon seems dimly aware that the Rand-powers-the-right trope is problematic. But he is uncurious about why that is so. Instead, he mentions several politicians who claim to like Rand, but whose policies deviate from her ideal of laissez-faire capitalism. This is a fascinating phenomenon, and it should trigger dozens of questions for a journalist trying to understand Rands impact and appeal.

For example, if a professed admirer of Rands ideas enters politics but enacts policies at odds with Objectivism, does that mean hes betraying those ideas? Or, could it be evidence that his understanding of them was shallow or incomplete or non-existent? or that what resonated was not at all her political ideas, but perhaps the moral confidence of her heroes? or her depiction of productive achievement as heroic? More broadly, what does it look like for a radical, convention-challenging philosophy to influence an individual? Is it an overnight, all-or-nothing effect or is it subject to gradations, across what kind of time frame?

None of these threads (or many others I could name) is pursued in Sammons article. Theres no attempt to grapple with the actual nature and scale of Rands cultural impact. For Sammon, intent on portraying Rand and Objectivism in quasi-religious terms, there are just pilgrims and Quislings. By the close of Sammons article, theres no answer to the question that supposedly motivated it: Is Rands appeal with the young waning? At most, that question serves as a hook to make the article seem topical. Rather than address that issue, the writer fashioned a narrative that will be emotionally soothing to the tribalist progressive reader and unconvincing to a critical reader. Its message: Stop worrying, the Rand phenomenon and the hated conservative tribe it nourishes is done for.

End of Part 1.

SUPPORT ARI: If you value the ideas presented here, please become an ARI Member today.

Share this article:

Read more:

When Tribal Journalists Try to "Cancel" Ayn Rand (Part 1) - New Ideal

Meet Wikipedias Ayn Rand-loving founder and Wikimedia Foundations regime-change operative CEO – The Grayzone

This is part 2 in a series of investigative reports on the systemic problems with Wikipedia. Read part 1 here: Wikipedia formally censors The Grayzone as regime-change advocates monopolize editing

Internet encyclopedia giant Wikipedia has listed The Grayzone as a deprecated source, censoring the independent organization, alongside several other news websites, on an official blacklist of taboo media outlets.

The blacklisting is the result of a long-running campaign run by a coterie of regime-change activists who have effectively hijacked Wikipedia, scrubbing the site of information that runs counter to their sectarian agenda and editing their political adversaries out of existence.

At no point has this cabal of editors pointed to a pattern of errors or fabrications by The Grayzone. Instead, they have argued for its blacklisting on the grounds of the political views of its writers, a wholesale violation of Wikipedia guidelines that demand neutrality in editing.

As detailed in part one of this series, Wikipedia founders and the Wikimedia Foundation have done nothing to address the fundamental corruption of the internet encyclopedia they oversee by a gang of hyper-partisan censors.

That might be because the founder of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and the executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, veteran US regime-change operative Katherine Maher, share the interventionist and corporate agenda that disproportionately powerful, neoconservative-oriented editors advance under their watch.

Born from seemingly humble beginnings, the Wikimedia Foundation is today swimming in cash and invested in many of the powerful interests that benefit from its lax editorial policy.

The foundations largest donors include corporate tech giants Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Craigslist. With more than $145 million in assets in 2018, nearly $105 million in annual revenue, and a massive headquarters in San Francisco, Wikimedia has carved out a space for itself next to these Big Tech oligarchs in the Silicon Valley bubble.

It is also impossible to separate Wikipedia as a project from the ideology of its creator. When he co-founded the platform in 2001, Jimmy Jimbo Wales was a conservative libertarian and devoted disciple of right-wing fanatic Ayn Rand.

A former futures and options trader, Wales openly preached the gospel of Objectivism, Rands ultra-capitalist ideology that sees government and society itself as the root of all evil, heralding individual capitalists as gods.

Wales described his philosophy behind Wikipedia in specifically Randian terms. In a video clip from a 2008 interview, published by the Atlas Society, an organization dedicated to evangelizing on behalf of Objectivism, Wales explained that he was influenced by Howard Roark, the protagonist of Rands novel The Fountainhead.

Wikipedias structure was expressly meant to reflect the ideology of its libertarian tech entrepreneur founder, and Wales openly said as much.

At the same time, however, Wikipedia editors have upheld the diehard Objectivist Jimmy Wales, as the New York Times put it in 2008, as a benevolent dictator, constitutional monarch, digital evangelist and spiritual leader.

Wales has always balanced his libertarian inclinations with old-fashioned American patriotism. He was summoned before the US Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Operations in 2007 to further explain how Wikipedia and its related technologies could be of service to Uncle Sam.

Wales began his remarks stating, I am grateful to be here today to testify about the potential for the Wikipedia model of collaboration and information sharing which may be helpful to government operations and homeland security.

At a time when the United States has been increasingly criticized around the world, I believe that Wikipedia is an incredible carrier of traditional American values of generosity, hard work, and freedom of speech, Wales continued, implicitly referencing the George Bush administrations military occupation of Iraq.

The Wikipedia founder added, The US government has always been premised on responsiveness to citizens, and I think we all believe good government comes from broad, open public dialogue. I therefore also recommend that US agencies consider the use of wikis for public facing projects to gather information from citizens and to seek new ways of effectively collaborating with the public to generate solutions to the problem that citizens face.

In 2012, Wales married Kate Garvey, the former diary secretary of ex-British Prime Minister Tony Blair. Their wedding, according to the conservative UK Telegraph, was witnessed by guests from the world of politics and celebrity.

Wales status-quo-friendly politics have only grown more pronounced over the years. In 2018, for instance, he publicly cheered on Israels bombing of the besieged Gaza strip and portrayed Britains leftist former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn as an anti-Semite.

Jimmy Wales and the Wikimedia Foundation claim to have little power over the encyclopedia itself, but it is widely known that this is just PR. Wikimedia blew the lid off this myth in 2015 when it removed a community-elected member of its board of trustees, without explanation.

At the time of this scandal, the Wikimedia Foundations board of trustees included a former corporate executive at Google, Arnnon Geshuri, who was heavily scrutinized for shady hiring practices. Geshuri, who also worked at billionaire Elon Musks company Tesla, was eventually pressured to step down from the board.

But just a year later, Wikimedia appointed another corporate executive to its board of trustees, Gizmodo Media Group CEO Raju Narisetti.

The figure that deserves the most scrutiny at the Wikimedia Foundation, however, is its executive director Katherine Maher, who is closely linked to the US regime-change network.

Maher boasts an eyebrow-raising rsum that would impress the most ardent of cold warriors in Washington.

With a degree in Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies from New York University, Maher studied Arabic in Egypt and Syria, just a few years before the so-called Arab Spring uprising and subsequent Western proxy war to overthrow the Syrian government.

Maher then interned at the bank Goldman Sachs, as well as the Council on Foreign Relations and Eurasia Group, both elite foreign-policy institutions that are deeply embedded in the Western regime-change machine.

At the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), Maher says on her public LinkedIn profile that she worked in the US/Middle East Program, oversaw the CFR Corporate Program, and Identified appropriate potential clients, conducted outreach.

At the Eurasia Group, Maher focused on Syria and Lebanon. According to her bio, she Developed stability forecasting and scenario modeling, and market and political stability reports.

Maher moved on to a job at Londons HSBC bank which would go on to pay a whopping $1.9 billion fine after it was caught red-handed laundering money for drug traffickers and Saudi financiers of international jihadism. Her work at HSBC brought her to the UK, Germany, and Canada.

Next, Maher co-founded a little-known election monitoring project focused on Lebanons 2008 elections called Sharek961. To create this platform, Maher and her associates partnered with an influential technology non-profit organization, Meedan, which has received millions of dollars of funding from Western foundations, large corporations like IBM, and the permanent monarchy of Qatar.

Meedan also finances the regime-change lobbying website, Bellingcat, which is considering a reliable source on Wikipedia, while journalism outlets like The Grayzone are formally blacklisted.

Sharek961 was funded by the Technology for Transparency Network, a platform for regime-change operations bankrolled by billionaire Pierre Omidyars Omidyar Network and billionaire George Soros Open Society Foundations.

Maher subsequently moved over to a position as an innovation and communication officer at the United Nations Childrens Fund, UNICEF. There, she oversaw projects funded by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), an arm of the US State Department which finances regime-change operations and covert activities around the globe under the auspices of humanitarian goodwill.

Soon enough, Maher cut out the middleman and went to work as a program officer in information and communications technology at the National Democratic Institute (NDI), which was created and financed directly by the US government. The NDI is a central gear in the regime-change machine; it bankrolls coup and destabilization efforts across the planet in the guise of democracy promotion.

At the NDI, Maher served as a program officer for internet freedom projects, advancing Washingtons imperial soft power behind the front of boosting global internet access pursuing a strategy not unlike the one used to destabilize Cuba.

The Wikimedia Foundation CEO says on her LinkedIn profile that her work at the NDI included democracy and human rights support as well as designing technology programs for citizen engagement, open government, independent media, and civil society for transitional, conflict, and authoritarian countries, including internet freedom programming.

After a year at the NDI, she moved over to the World Bank, another notorious vehicle for Washingtons power projection.

At the World Bank, Maher oversaw the creation of the Open Development Technology Alliance (ODTA), an initiative that uses new technologies to impose more aggressive neoliberal economic policies on developing countries.

Mahers LinkedIn page notes that her work entailed designing and implementing open government and open data in developing and transitioning nations, especially in the Middle East and North Africa.

At the time of her employment at the World Bank, the Arab Spring protests were erupting.

In October 2012, in the early stages of the proxy war in Syria, Maher tweeted that she was planning a trip to Gaziantep, a Turkish city near the Syrian border that became the main hub for the Western-backed opposition. Gaziantep was at the time crawling with Syrian insurgents and foreign intelligence operatives plotting to topple the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

Just two months later, in December, she tweeted that was was on a flight to Libya. Just over a year before, a NATO regime-change war had destroyed the Libyan government, and foreign-backed insurgents had killed leader Muammar Qadhafi, unleashing a wave of violence and open-air slave markets.

Today, Libya has no unified central government and is still plagued by a grueling civil war. What Maher was doing in the war-torn country in 2012 is not clear.

Mahers repeated trips to the Middle East and North Africa right around the time of these uprisings and Western intervention campaigns raised eyebrows among local activists.

In 2016, when Maher was named executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, a prominent Tunisian activist named Slim Amamou spoke out, alleging that Katherine Maher is probably a CIA agent.

Amamou briefly served as secretary of state for sport and youth in Tunisias transitional government, before later resigning. He noted that Maher traveled to the country several times since the Arab Spring protests broke out in 2011, and he found it strange that her affiliations kept changing.

Maher replied angrily, seriously, Slim? Youve welcomed me in your home.

Amamou shot back, you gave me the impression that you were not who you claimed to be back then.

Maher denied the accusation. Im not any sort of agent, she said. You can dislike me, but please dont defame me.

Amamou responded, I dont dislike you. Im doing my duty of protecting the internet.

Amamou lamented that the Wikimedia foundation is changing.. and not in a good way.

Its sad, because rare are organisations that have this reach in developing world, he added.

In April 2017, in her new capacity as head of the Wikimedia Foundation, Katherine Maher participated in an event for the US State Department.

The talk was a Washington Foreign Press Center Briefing, entitled Wikipedia in a Post-fact World. It was published at the official State Department website.

Maher spoke about the libertarian philosophy behind Wikipedia, echoing the Ayn Randian ideology of founder Jimmy Wales.

When journalists asked how Wikipedia deals with highly charged topics, where some entities sometimes countries, sometimes various other entities are often engaged in conflict with each other, Maher repeatedly provided a non-answer, recycling vague platitudes about the Wikipedia community working together.

The Grayzone has clearly demonstrated how Wikipedia editors overwhelmingly side with Western governments in these editorial conflicts, echoing the perspectives of interventionists and censoring critical voices.

A few months later, in January 2018, Maher appeared on a panel with Michael Hayden, the former director of both the CIA and NSA, and a notorious hater of journalists, as well with a top Indian government official, K. VijayRaghavan.

The talk, entitled Lies Propaganda and Truth, was held by the organization behind the Nobel Prize.

The moderator of the discussion, Mattias Fyrenius, the CEO of the Nobel Prizes media arm, asked Maher: There is some kind of information war going on and maybe you can say that there is a war going on between the lies, and the propaganda, and the facts, and maybe truth do you agree?

Yes, Maher responded in agreement. She added her own question: What are the institutions, what is the obligation of institutions to actually think about what the future looks like, if we actually want to pass through this period with our integrity intact?

Hayden, the former US spy agency chief, then blamed the Russians for waging that information war. He referred to Moscow as the adversary, and claimed the Russian information bubble, information dominance machine, created so much confusion.

Maher laughed in approval, disputing nothing that Hayden said. In the same discussion, Maher also threw WikiLeaks (which is blacklisted on Wikipedia) under the bus, affirming, Not WikiLeaks, I want to be clear, were not the same organization. The former CIA director next to her chuckled.

Today, Maher is a member of the advisory board of the US governments technology regime-change arm the Open Technology Fund (OPT) a fact she proudly boasts on her LinkedIn profile.

The OPT was created in 2012 as a project of Radio Free Asia, an information warfare vehicle that the New York Times once described as a worldwide propaganda network built by the CIA.

Since disaffiliating from this CIA cutout in 2019, the OPT is now bankrolled by the US Agency for Global Media, the governments propaganda arm, formerly known as the Broadcasting Board of Governors.

Like Mahers former employer the National Democratic Institute, the OPT advances US imperial interests in the guise of promoting internet freedom and new technologies. It also provides large grants to opposition groups in foreign nations targeted by Washington for regime change.

While she serves today as the executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, Katherine Maher remains a fellow at the Truman National Security Project, a Washington, DC think tank that grooms former military and intelligence professionals for careers in Democratic Party politics.

The Truman Project website identifies Mahers expertise as international development.

As The Grayzones Max Blumenthal reported, the most prominent fellow of the Truman Project is Pete Buttigieg, the US Naval intelligence veteran who emerged as a presidential frontrunner in the Democratic primary earlier this year.

The extensive participation by the head of the Wikimedia Foundation in US government regime-change networks raises serious questions about the organizations commitment to neutrality.

Perhaps the unchecked problem of political bias and coordinated smear campaigns by a small coterie of Wikipedia editors is not a bug, but a deliberately conceived feature of the website.

Ben Norton is a journalist, writer, and filmmaker. He is the assistant editor of The Grayzone, and the producer of the Moderate Rebels podcast, which he co-hosts with editor Max Blumenthal. His website is BenNorton.comand he tweets at @BenjaminNorton.

Read the rest here:

Meet Wikipedias Ayn Rand-loving founder and Wikimedia Foundations regime-change operative CEO - The Grayzone

What Big Tech Wants Out of the Pandemic – The Atlantic

From the October 2018 issue: Yuval Noah Harari on why technology favors tyranny

Also in April, Google and Apple announced that they would suspend their rivalry to work with nations of the world to create a new alert system. They would reconfigure their mobile operating systems, incompatible by design, to notify users if they have stepped within the radius of a device held by a COVID19 patient.

The companies have failed to impress some public-health officials with their initial efforts, but their hastily designed program will likely improve with subsequent iterations. It could evolve to function like the official papers that Europeans are always fumbling to present to the authorities in grainy war movies. By documenting your history of social contact, your phone could be used to help demonstrate your fitness to return to the office or board a flight.

The shock of the virus has overwhelmed government at every level. In states facing an unmanageable deluge of unemployment claims, Amazon and Google have stepped in to revamp antique systems so that money can flow with less bureaucratic friction. When Nadella invoked the possibilities of a new alliance, he was alluding to the abrupt shift to telemedicine and virtual learning. Public health and education may be traditional functions of government, but Nadella suggested that his industry should share the burden: We at Microsoft view ourselves as digital first responders.

The blessings bestowed by the online economy in this strange time are indisputable, and we should be grateful for them. But thats not a reason to suspend skepticism of the tech industry as it attempts to make the most of the moment. In the years before the virus, critics began to prophesy that a handful of tech companies would soon grow more powerful than the government. Their scale and influence, and their ability to manipulate public opinion and shape markets, would permit them to reign unimpeded.

That warning, however dark, didnt quite capture the emerging strategy of these firmsa strategy that was in fact taking shape before the pandemic beganor the graver threat they pose. Rather than supplanting government, they have, in essence, sought to merge with it.

Tech executives didnt always yearn to work in league with government. During their years of wild growth and political immaturity, the tech companies sounded like teenagers encountering Ayn Rand for the first time. Like John Galt, the protagonist of Atlas Shrugged, they muttered about the evils of government and how it kept down great innovators. This view of the world smacked of self-interest. Companies such as Amazon, Google, and Facebook wanted to avoid the sorts of regulatory controls that constrained their older, more established competitors.

But if self-interest neatly aligned with idealism, the idealism was real. Googles cofounder Sergey Brin, a refugee from the former Soviet Union, warned about the moral costs of the companys foray into China. He styled himself a purist, and the companys experience in the country ultimately illustrated the logic of his stance: Despite abiding by the dictates of the regime, Google was breached by Chinese hackers, who attempted to steal its intellectual property and peer into the Gmail accounts of human-rights activists. In 2010, after four years of operating on the mainland, Google decamped to Hong Kong.

Read the rest here:

What Big Tech Wants Out of the Pandemic - The Atlantic

THE STROLLER: Digest these words and these flowers – Martinsville Bulletin

TODAYS WORD is the Latin root word arch. What does it mean, and what are some common English words that use it? Example: In Ayn Rand's engaging and powerful book "The Fountainhead," Howard Roark is an indivualistic young architect whose ideas and designs refuse to compromise with the staid conventions of the patriarchy.

TUESDAYS WORD was the Latin root word matri. It means mother. Some English words formed from it include matriarch, matrimony, matron. Example:Mrs. Stockton, the family matriarch, was firm and unyielding in her approach to discipline even of her adult children and grandchildren.

The Stroller is nearing the end of its daily look at words of Latin origin and soon will go back to miscellaneous words in the Word of the Day section. However, words and their origins are fascinating, and The Stroller eventually will find another theme. Please send in suggestions as to interesting Words of the Day, as well as potential themes. See contact information below.

These sprays of creamy white bell-shaped flowers, rising as tall as you do in height, above a plant with sharp, long, spiky leaves, are yucca, also called Beargrass or Adam's needle. The flower, in Spanish, is called izote.

The Stroller's best friend, whenever she sees yucca in bloom, recounts stories of how her mother used to cook it in Guatemala. Yucca is in bloom now, but The Stroller and best friend are in such a strong state of quarantine right now that there was no cooking together, so The Stroller cooked yucca flowers alone for breakfast. The verdict? Yum.

Here's how: Pick three or four cups worth of flowers. Remove the stamens (the little pointy things poking out in the center). Rinse the flowers, then boil them in salted water for 15 minutes.

In oil, saute half an onion, sliced, with two crushed cloves of garlic and half a chopped tomato or several halved cherry tomatoes. When they are tender, toss in the flower petals. Stir while cooking.

Variations of that include cooking sausage with the onions and/or adding in an egg or two with the petals.

Serve with a wedge of avocado and a dollop of sour cream and/or freshly made corn tortillas.

Fido's Finds and Kitty's Collectibles opens today in its new location: 119 E. Main St., Martinsville. It's at least twice the size as the original shop, a few doors down the same block from the original, bright and sunny.

The shop is in the old Rimmer's Jeweler's building, and shelves Rimmer's used to display china are used now by the SPCA-fundraising shop for the same purpose.

TUESDAYS TRIVIA ANSWER:Virginia's state flower is the dogwood.

TODAYS TRIVIA QUESTION:When it comes to state symbols, Virginia has an "official TV series." What is it?

The Stroller appreciates readers calling or emailing to share jokes, stories, comments, Words of the Day and trivia questions. Were at 276-638-8801 ext. 243 and stroller@martinsvillebulletin.com.

Follow this link:

THE STROLLER: Digest these words and these flowers - Martinsville Bulletin

From farmers to salad toppings: 26 weirdly niche dating web web sites. This updated tale had been initially published Feb. 8, 2012. Rebecca Ruiz…

From farmers to salad toppings: 26 weirdly niche dating web web sites. This updated tale had been initially published Feb. 8, 2012. Rebecca Ruiz contributed to the tale.

Ahoy, matey! You might "find very first mate" at SeaCaptainDate.com, a dating internet site that connects women and men whom share a love associated with the ocean.

After noting that "dating are a sea that is stormy" SeaCaptain.com CEO Bill Kay implores, "In the unforgiving ocean of love, why don't we be your lighthouse. "

Seeking Brits here is a website especially for individuals who are interested in men that are british DateBritishGuys.com.

Enter the Atlasphere those who love Ayn Rand love Ayn Rand -- therefore possibly it stands to reason why they are able to love each other also? TheAtlasphere.com is just a dating website that connects "admirers of 'The Fountainhead' and 'Atlas Shrugged. '"

Because the web site describes, "for all individuals, Ayn Rand's novels tend to be more than just 'a good browse'; they inspire us in order to become better peoples beings. "

Pounced! Pounced.org is really a personals web web site for furries -- that is, individuals attracted to "furry fandom. "

Perhaps Not certain what this means? Here is a description that is good the BBC News Magazine piece "that are the furries? ": "No standard meaning exists but generally speaking furries are individuals who have a fascination with anthropomorphic pets. They are pets which can be offered traits that are human like walking and chatting. They could be any such thing from cartoons figures like Bugs Bunny to video game personalities like Pokemon. The scene has its own art, https://hotrussianwomen.nets animation, comic publications and literary works. "

It is 4:20 someplace 420Dating.com, a totally free, personal site that is dating individuals who smoke cigarettes cannabis, gets the motto: "Why toke alone? "

Many people describe on their own inside their 420Dating.com pages as "laid back, " "kicked back" and "mellow"; some pages speak about attempting to find a someone special with|someone that is special who they might "burn just a little. "

Most mortals need not apply "Smart is sexy" at RightStuffDating.com, an site that is ultra-exclusive bills itself as "the Ivy League of dating. " To participate, a graduate or even a faculty user (evidence needed! ) from the choose band of "excellent" universities and universities.

Want to guess which schools appear on record? Harvard, Yale, Stanford, MIT -- yes. Greendale Community University -- no.

PURRfect for pet loversBefore you click PURRsonals.com in the office, turn your amount down! Otherwise, piano music will begin to play, and keeping a pet will enter from phase kept and keep placing strong emphasis that is verbal your message "purr. "

The stories and videos of their beloved family member as the lady holding the cat explains, "Cat lovers from all walks of life can celebrate the photos. If you're single, listed here is your opportunity to fulfill somebody who's PURRfect for your needs. "

What exactly is your favorite band? The people that began Tastebuds.fm are enthusiastic about that folks's music preferences say lots concerning the individuals on their own -- and about their compatibility that is potential with. This site that is dating you to definitely enter a couple of bands you love and start to become matched up with individuals across the nation who share your preferences and wish to satisfy someone.

A co-worker of mine whom heard of this website had this to express: "Where ended up being whenever I had been solitary? Did you know just how difficult it really is to locate appealing females who'll tolerate round-the-clock airings Stranglers and Killing Joke? "

Only a few. Bibliophiles can turn to Alikewise, which tries to match strangers centered on their flavor in literary works. Are you currently a nerd and proud from it? Geek 2 Geek pairs down special kindred spirits. Also Apple item fanatics will get real love on Cupidtino.

Lonely heart in the modern world, you will see a site devoted to the quest for the perfect types of love.

This updated tale ended up being initially published Feb. 8, 2012. Rebecca Ruiz contributed for this tale.

Continued here:

From farmers to salad toppings: 26 weirdly niche dating web web sites. This updated tale had been initially published Feb. 8, 2012. Rebecca Ruiz...

Journal Junction for May 11th – Martinsburg Journal

From Martinsburg:

I don't know Betty DeHaven, nor have I read Ayn Rand's "Fountainhead" but I found the former's letter to the editor in Saturday's Journal to be one of the best written and more intuitive and compelling arguments for individualism over collectivism I've ever read. The very positive impression the novel made on Ms. DeHaven suggests to me it should be required reading in every high school Social Studies class in the country.

From Charles Town:

As testing for CoVid becomes more widespread, and we are finding a greater number of people show positive but do not show symptoms, much less die from the disease, why are we not allowed to be responsible adults? Increase of positives is actually demonstrating lower mortality rate and much higher recovery rate. We need to be released from the bondage of imposed social isolationism. We are living in a Socialist paradise of a forced collapsed economy.

From Hedgesville:

6.6 million going to college students in West Virginia 100,000 for essential workers to split in each county. 40% raise to snap plus 300 debit card. Seniors and veterans... nothing except higher taxes.

From Gerrardstown:

Tues. I went to the County Clerk's office to return my primary ballot. It was scary. The only person, besides myself, wearing a mask was the officer at the door checking people in. Not one employee in that entire complex, that I saw, wore a mask. To quote Daffy Duck, "It's DisssPICable" that county employees servicing the public are not wearing masks. Wear a mask, protect others.

From Hedgesville:

Trump's valet who tested positive for Covid19 was part of a team that served his meals and soda. Yet, he claims he ".....had little personal contact with the valet..." Does someone bringing you meals not an up close and personal contact? Next Pence will claim no personal contact with his press secretary. Why does Trump attempt to distance himself from anyone who brings negative "vibes" on him?

From Charles Town:

Yipppy Yay! Michael Flynn gets off the hook in time to recruit the Russians for 2020 election. Just in time.....Bill Barr to the rescue again.

From Martinsburg:

Senator John Unger, who is a great person, says on the news that there is money in bank in WV for COVID-19, now get that governor in gear, and get that money out NOW for people, people need that money for research.

From Morgan County:

To Martinsburg;True, unemployment is very high, under this terrible pandemic created in China, not in the U.S., and certainly not by Trump. $5 trillion in debt, terrible. You think this stimulus money was plucked from a tree, really?

From Martinsburg:

It sure would be nice to lower Comcast bills because there is nothing to watch on tv.

From Martinsburg:

Lost keys on Tuesday, May 5th either on King Street by the Journal office or at Bob's carry out. One key has a plastic yellow house on it. "If found please call 304-676-2888" There is a reward for it.

From Berkeley County:

Trump is following his past practices of bankrupting everything he touches. Now America is set to follow his lead into trillions of dollars added to the national debt, as lost people, unemployment and the recovery costs will mount due to Trump's failure to mount a strong action plan to meet COVID-19 threat.

See the rest here:

Journal Junction for May 11th - Martinsburg Journal

Meaningful thoughts pass test of time – Bouldercityreview

I enjoy well said, meaningful sayings. Thoughts that are well-spoken, especially during a time of confusion, desperation and perhaps, situations that seem impossible, are often priceless.

I find it interesting that many of these offerings that are hundreds of years old are still sensible today. For example, as we contemplate the opening of our economic engine, stores, businesses, schools and churches the question of risk is put into the forefront of these decisions. Albert Einstein once said, A ship is always safe at shore but that is not what is was built for.

Think about it. Dont the majority of us have the common sense to make these decisions ourselves? Lets leave the dock with all of our safety equipment at hand and get down to business.

Abraham Lincoln proclaimed, We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts, not to overthrow the Constitution but to overthrow the men who would pervert the Constitution. Does this sound a little bit familiar as we learn more about the women and men that are working diligently to empower themselves?

Ayn Rand, author of Atlas Shrugged penned, When you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from those that produce nothing When you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors When you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws dont protect them against you When you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice You may know that your society is doomed. Is this beginning to open ones eyes a tiny bit?

D.H. Lawrence stated, Men fight for liberty and win it with hard knocks. Their children, brought up easy, let it slip away again, poor fools. And their grandchildren are once more slaves. Have we instilled the virtues of this country, our freedoms, our well-written Constitution to our children in our home and in their schools?

And lastly, lets not forget Thomas Jefferson, who wrote, The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.

These quotations were true the day they were said and are vastly true today. Just think about it.

G. Kevin Savord is currently a professional pilot and former small business owner. He can be reached at gksavord@gmail.com.

Go here to see the original:

Meaningful thoughts pass test of time - Bouldercityreview

To Take or Not to Take – New Ideal

The CARES Act has created a moral dilemma for those Americans who value freedom. The pandemic has cost them their jobs, their savings, their businesses. And they blame a significant part of this loss on the government. But because they oppose government handouts, they worry that accepting CARES money would be a breach of integrity.

At the Ayn Rand Institute, we are dedicated to philosophic principle. And because we are, we will take any relief money offered us. We will take it unapologetically, because the principle here is: justice.

To see why, focus on a fact that everyone seems determined not to know: government has no wealth of its own. Private philanthropists like Jeff Bezos and the Bill Gates Foundation can and do own wealth that they give in charity. But the government has no funds of its own. It can only redistribute the wealth of others. Government cannot provide help, it can only force others to provide it.

What the government would giveth, the government must first taketh away.

The $2.3 trillion in relief going to some people means $2.3 trillion ultimately drained from savings their own and the savings of others. The government doesnt run farms or factories. Its not a producer. Thus rather than being mesmerized by its shower of checks and paper dollars, consider the actual goods and services the government funds will be spent on.

Take eggs as the symbol. You can spend the newly created money to buy a dozen eggs, but the government is not adding to the egg supply, only to the supply of dollars. The government has no hens; but the Treasurys Bureau of Printing and Engraving does have printing presses. And the Fed has more sophisticated means of inflating the supply of money and credit. The effect of that new money created out of thin air entering the economy will be to put upward pressure on the price of eggs, and disrupt the price system that helps coordinate all business activity.

If ARI gets government relief money, it will be, for us, partial restitution for government-inflicted losses.

Austrian economics teaches that inflation enriches those who get the new money first at the expense of impoverishing those who get it later, after prices have been bid up. Inflation is not neutral: it benefits some by victimizing others.

For advocates of freedom, individual rights, and limited government to turn down these relief funds means choosing to play only the victims role in the governments bizarre game of loot and be looted. Embracing victimhood doesnt show integrity, only submissiveness. The times call not for timid deference but confident self-assertion.

It would be a terrible injustice for pro-capitalists to step aside and leave the funds to those indifferent or actively hostile to capitalism. It is anti-capitalist, statist polices that have turned this nature-made storm into a made-in-DC cataclysm.

Americas unpreparedness, the slowness of our response, and the byzantine maze of regulations now blocking the production and sale of new tests and new treatments are the tragic legacy of this nations century-long descent from capitalism into the entitlement-regulatory state.

As is well known, but seldom publicized, the growth of state power has enmeshed doctors, pharmaceutical companies, and biomedical firms in an ever-tightening web of regulations. Their every move is held suspect. Commercial test developers were prevented from getting early access to samples of the novel coronavirus, while the government bungled its own testing. Even when private hospitals want to add more hospital beds, they have to plead with government overlords for permission to do so.

And now weve seen what statism means for the general population: the placing of the entire nation under house arrest.

READ ALSO: Is It Moral to Accept Government Money During Covid-19?

You cant achieve the good of all by robbing everyone and then distributing the booty to some.

In this context, it would be morally wrong for pro-capitalists to humbly step aside and watch the new money go only to anti-capitalists. That would turn justice upside down.

Ayn Rand wrote an article arguing that it is proper to take government money from programs like Social Security and unemployment insurance on the condition that the recipient regards it as restitution and opposes all forms of welfare-statism. Those who support such government handouts, she added, have no right to them; those who oppose them have. If this sounds like a paradox, the fault lies in the moral contradictions of welfare statism, not in its victims.

She based her position on this trenchant analysis of statism:

Since there is no such thing as the right of some men to vote away the rights of others, and no such thing as the right of the government to seize the property of some men for the unearned benefit of othersthe advocates and supporters of the welfare state are morally guilty of robbing their opponents, and the fact that the robbery is legalized makes it morally worse, not better. The victims do not have to add self-inflicted martyrdom to the injury done to them by others; they do not have to let the looters profit doubly, by letting them distribute the money exclusively to the parasites who clamored for it. Whenever the welfare-state laws offer them some small restitution, the victims should take it.

The $2.3 trillion emergency stimulus will be paid for by extracting wealth from everyone, including the Ayn Rand Institute and its contributors, many of whom have already been damaged financially. Since raising taxes is not politically viable, the stimulus will be paid for by deficit financing a euphemism for raiding everyones savings.

If ARI gets government relief money, it will be, for us, partial restitution for government-inflicted losses.

Our contributors need to be sure that such payments wont function as bribes, weakening our dedication to laissez-faire capitalism and softening our denunciations of statism. But they need not worry. Our whole reason for being is to promote not just the political ideal of laissez-faire capitalism or the moral ideal of rational selfishness. Rather, our defining mission is to promote the entire, integrated, philosophic system that Ayn Rand created: Objectivism.

Whether or not ARI receives some restitution for damages suffered, that is not about to change.

SUPPORT ARI: If you value the ideas presented here, please become an ARI Member today.

Share this article:

Original post:

To Take or Not to Take - New Ideal

Analysis: What happened to Elon Musk? – WICZ

By Michael Ballaban and Peter Valdes-Dapena, CNN Business

Elon Musk truly entered the public consciousness just over a decade ago, when Tesla was a quirky upstart putting batteries in the chassis of a little Lotus sports car. Musk grew it into an electric powerhouse, building cars that he promised would one day drive themselves, with doors that swung upward much like the time machine from Back to the Future.

Musk deftly played the part of a new kind of CEO, one who made jokes on Twitter, engaged with fans, and even sought to re-define the very idea of what "fun" could be in a car. Then things began to change. Increasingly, the risks Musk has been taking are not with his own money, or even his own life, but with the money, careers, reputations and lives of others. And the boundaries that once held him back are caving under the pressure.

This week, the fun CEO from the past has become something different. What that is exactly may depend on your view of him and the current pandemic. Maybe he's a figure out of an Ayn Rand novel standing up against "sweeping, authoritarian and undemocratic restrictions on individual liberty" that are holding back business and the public, working for the greater good and ensuring that his workers can keep earning a living. Or maybe he's just another old-school executive (albeit one who's very attached to Twitter) demanding that he be allowed to send his non-unionized factory workers back to assemble cars at potential risk to their health and in violation of orders from the local health department in service of no greater purpose than his company's profits.

Musk's public persona today could not be more different from its beginnings. Once there was an entrepreneurial executive, helpfully cheering on popular cartoonists, urging on workers and mocking the established investors who doubted the company could survive.

Tesla and Musk promised big things that car companies had never done before, and when critics doubted those promises could ever be met, the company exceeded them. Musk promised an SUV that could go more than 300 miles on a charge and accelerate faster than a Porsche, seemingly impossible feats but soon enough, customers were driving them. Tesla cars could do the seemingly miraculous. They could be updated over the air in real time, even getting reminders to recharge when their electricity supply was threatened by wildfires. Tesla's market capitalization grew and grew in ways that looked just as miraculous.

Musk entertained notions of flights to Mars, and at the same time denied that it was his home planet. He behaved unlike any other car company CEO before him, and legions of adoring fans fell in line, giving his Twitter account a level of attention rivaling that of President Donald Trump. When Elon Musk tweets a vague hint about an upcoming product reveal or reports of potential planetary destruction, news outlets pick it up immediately. Even Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has asked Musk's advice on how to improve the service.

Ford's CEO, Jim Hackett, doesn't have a Twitter account.

Everything seemed great until it didn't.

In the summer of 2018, a boys' soccer team in Thailand became trapped in a cave that was quickly filling with water. As the 12 boys and their coach waited desperately for rescue, Musk stepped in to offer his services. His team could use much of the same capsule technology developed by Musk's rocket company, SpaceX, to build a submarine capsule to aid in the rescue, he said at the time.

But after one of the rescuers involved in the life-saving effort criticized the vessel, Musk lashed out, baselessly calling the rescuer a "pedo," which is often shorthand for "pedophile," but which Musk maintained merely meant "creepy."

It was the first time that Musk's apparent belief that he can do anything, that he knows better than the traditional experts, brought a wide public backlash down on him.

The rescuer sued Musk for defamation. Musk won, and the civil victory only seemed to embolden him and appeared to defuse the effect any criticism had had on him. Whereas Musk was once the rebellious leader of a scrappy upstart, he was now the wealthy tycoon who had crushed a lone emergency responder in court after publicly calling him, at best, "creepy."

Even before the lawsuit victory, however, Musk's Twitter account veered in another expensive direction. On August 7, 2018, Musk tweeted that he was taking Tesla private at a price of $420 per share, and that the funding for the deal was "secured." An announcement like that would send shockwaves through the business world however it was made. That it was tweeted out with such relative nonchalance was either the hallmark of an unconventional executive getting deals done or, perhaps, of something going off the rails.

It quickly emerged that the deal was far from done, and the would-be funding from Saudi Arabia never materialized. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission stepped in, saying that "in truth and in fact, Musk had not even discussed, much less confirmed, key deal terms, including price, with any potential funding source."

Surely this would be the straw that broke the back of Musk's Twitter feed. It's one thing to target a cave diver without Musk's own vast resources. It's entirely different to take on the regulators of the American federal government. Shareholders filed lawsuits alleging that he was intentionally manipulating Tesla's stock price.

The SEC wanted to prohibit Musk from acting as an officer or director of a publicly traded company, effectively demanding that he be removed from Tesla entirely.

But it didn't stick. Musk spent the next few weeks mocking the SEC from, of course, his Twitter account. After months of negotiations, the SEC agreed to a weakened settlement, the only significant result of which was that Tesla would appoint a new chairman, and Musk's tweets on some topics -- largely limited to the company's financial well-being and production numbers -- would now be reviewed by "an experienced securities lawyer."

It didn't seem to matter to investors. Tesla's share price soared ever-higher, soon totaling a market capitalization greater than the former "Big Three" of Ford, General Motors and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles combined.

Then the coronavirus pandemic began.

In a county that is one of the hardest hit by coronavirus in the area, Tesla workers are returning to the company's factory in Fremont, California. Despite an order from local health authorities prohibiting the manufacture and assembly of non-essential goods, the Tesla factory began churning out vehicles once more over the weekend.

Musk, as usual, took to Twitter, saying that if anyone was to be arrested for violating the order, it should be him.

The local health department capitulated, acceding to Musk's demands that the factory reopen next week, even though production has already re-started.

It is a situation that has been months in the making. Musk has long questioned the actual risk from the coronavirus. As early as January he tweeted that the coronavirus was no more dangerous than other common viruses despite expert opinions that it is, in fact, far more deadly.

By March, when there were just over 15,000 confirmed Covid-19 cases nationally he was tweeting that the U.S. would have "close to zero" new cases by the end of April.

"The coronavirus panic is dumb," he wrote.

Also in March, when Alameda County, California, where Tesla's headquarters and a manufacturing facility are located, put in place stay-at-home orders, Tesla delayed its shutdown for a week.

But by the end of April, the country was fast approaching the 1 million cases mark. By the time Musk forced his factory to reopen, more than 80,000 Americans had died.

On a recent conference call with investors Musk took time to rail against stay-at-home restrictions that, he said, were hampering his business, likening them to "forcibly imprisoning people in their homes."

In re-opening the factory, Musk and Tesla have said that steps are being taken to ensure workers' safety. County health officials have said they would be monitoring those efforts to ensure that workers are, as much as possible, protected from infection.

Musk and Tesla are not known for erring entirely on the side of caution even when it comes matters of safety. This is, after all, the company that provides Autopilot semi-autonomous driving software for its cars that comes with the warning that it is still in "beta test" mode. Musk and Tesla have insisted that the software is, on balance, safer than an unaided human driver when used as intended. Other automakers that offer such technology, though, have said that they would not ask driver to "beta test" the software on public roads.

Tesla's way is not to wait, though. While other automakers wait until lockdown orders have been lifted to even begin reopening their plants Tesla pushes ahead. For better or worse, that is what Tesla and Musk do. But now, with seemingly nothing in government or his company holding back Musk's impulses, the well-being and the lives of their workers rest on that decision.

And for better or worse, the barriers that are set up by society are dependent on the institutions that maintain them to ensure their strength. But those barriers were not designed to withstand an assault from an aggressive CEO backed by vast personal wealth, workers faced with a soaring unemployment rate, and a regulatory framework that crumbles when faced with a genuine, calamitous test. With an Elon Musk-sized hole smashed in those barriers, it's unclear that anything is holding Musk back.

Go here to read the rest:

Analysis: What happened to Elon Musk? - WICZ

A Philosophic Perspective on Infectious Disease Pandemics – New Ideal

The Covid-19 pandemic and the response to it at multiple levels of government have disrupted all of our lives.

Were just beginning to contemplate the challenge of reopening and rebuilding the economy in the face of ongoing viral spread. To do that, its critical to employ the right philosophical framework for thinking about these issues, so as not to be misled by false alternatives, wishful thinking, tribalistic finger-pointing and other forms of distorted thinking.

On Saturday, April 18, the Ayn Rand Institute held an online mini-conference, AynRandCon Live, to present a framework for thinking about the current crisis from the perspective of Ayn Rands philosophy, Objectivism.

The event featured:

All four sessions of the event are available on YouTube (below). If you value the ideas presented here and want to help spread them further, please become an ARI member today.

Download episodes on the ARI Live! podcast (Apple Podcasts, Stitcher).

SUPPORT ARI: If you value the ideas presented here, please become an ARI Member today.

Share this article:

Read the original post:

A Philosophic Perspective on Infectious Disease Pandemics - New Ideal

An Alternate View: Why Right-Wing Billionaires are Financing the Reopen Protests – Clare County Review

April 27, 2020

During the week of the April twelfth we saw an outbreak of right-wing extremists protesting numerous state governors executive mandates closing down businesses and stay at home orders to slow the spread of the COVID-19 virus to protect their citizens from contagion and their hospitals from being overwhelmed with very ill patients. These right-wing reopen protests began in Michigan but soon spread to Florida, North Carolina, Virginia, Minnesota, Idaho, Kentucky, and California and then boiled over into Colorado, Texas, Indiana, New Hampshire, Nevada, Maryland, Utah, and Wisconsin.

The protesters were chafing under the many weeks of shut down in their respective states whining that their freedoms were being infringed upon. The irony is that many of these folks are survivor types carrying weapons and boast of being able to survive for decades in well stocked shelters but now cannot go for a few weeks without their haircuts, bowling, or bars.Were these spontaneous, grass roots, people driven protests? Undoubtedly not. Wealthy donors like Michigans Betsy DeVos gave $500,000 to the Michigan Freedom Fund, co-host of the Michigan protest. The other host was the Michigan Conservative Coalition, founded by Matt Maddoch, a Republican member of the state house of representatives. These two host groups behind the Michigan operation gridlock on April 15 are both tied to the Republican Party and Donald Trump. These protests are as much rallies for Trumps reelection as they are about ending the states closure of business and stay-at-home orders. Two minutes after the FOX News coverage of the protests in Michigan, Virginia and Minnesota Trump tweeted his treasonous liberate to his supporters and protesters.

A decade ago they called themselves the Tea Party and before that the John Birch Society. But they are all the same right-wing extremist people supported by right-wing billionaires like Charles Koch.

Why are these right-wing extremist billionaires funding and promoting these less than grassroots movements to try and force prematurely the lifting of business closures and stay-at-home directives that would inevitable cause a resurgence of COVID-19 cases leading to the deaths of millions more? Such deaths would most heavily fall upon communities of color, poor whites, blacks, and Hispanics, and senior citizens. These people are the most expensive in our society from the point of view of billionaires and most likely to be on Medicare, Medicaid, SS Disability, and Social Security. Billionaires hate paying taxes especially to help people they see as moochers to use Ayn Rand libertarian language. So maybe they think if they can kill off enough of them they wont have to worry about their taxes going up to help keep Social Security and Medicare solvent, or to pay for programs that help the poor. Then they can keep more of their wealth.

Or is it a case that these billionaires who get much of their wealth from economic activity and when that is frozen, as in this national shut-down, their revenue stream stops. Take Charles Koch who is heavy into oil and in many brand name products. Oil is way down in price; in fact on April 20 the price of oil went negative causing Koch to experience a drop in revenues. So maybe the billionaires are seeking to force states to reopen prematurely, even though deaths from a resurged COVID-19 would increase, simply because they want to make money again and dont care how many would people die as a result.

I daresay both are reasons.

See original here:

An Alternate View: Why Right-Wing Billionaires are Financing the Reopen Protests - Clare County Review

Letters: Find a way to preserve public sector jobs, pay; Teachers need support; Vitamin D3 to help prevent disease – Honolulu Star-Advertiser

We oppose the governors 20% state employee pay cut (Gov. David Ige proposes 20% pay cuts for teachers, other Hawaii public employees, Star-Advertiser, Top News, April 15). Instead, policymakers should find every alternative to preserve public sector jobs and pay. Use special funds, rainy day funds, and emergency taxes on the very wealthy.

In this crisis, the private sector cannot pull us out of economic decline alone. Government and essential services keep the economy from hurting even worse. Not to mention, government officials at unemployment insurance offices are working harder than ever. Before COVID-19, the state already was unable to fill many positions due to low pay. One example is our teaching force: We are short about 1,000 qualified teachers. We should not cut pay of those we need to stay working.

While many are hurting, some are thriving. So why not temporarily tax the wealthiest who may profit during crisis?

Dont make the economic crisis worse.

John Bickel

President, Americans for Democratic Action Hawaii Chapter

To save money, reduce workers paid leave

There might be a way to preserve government employee wages instead of cutting it by 20%. Gov. David Ige wants to cuts wages by 20% because of the reduction in revenue.

Wages are only a part of an employees total compensation. If the budget requires a reduction in expenses paid to each employee, why not reduce their paid leave? If Ige eliminated paid sick leave (21 days), paid vacation leave (21 days), and paid holiday leave (13 days), that will amount to eliminating having to pay 55 days per employee per year. This eliminates about 20% of the total compensation paid to each employee.

Employees can maintain their wages but not have the benefits of being paid while not working. This can be a temporary solution until things return to normal. Wages, i.e., cash flow, are the lifeblood of economics. It should be preserved as much as possible.

Donald Fukumoto

Aiea

Teachers need support, now more than ever

Since March, parents in Hawaii and across the nation have realized a newfound respect for the role of teachers in our lives and in the development of our children.

Online instruction has been a challenge to which teachers have risen with creativity and compassion.

It is therefore mystifying that Gov. David Ige would choose this moment to suggest a 20% pay cut for teachers (Gov. David Ige proposes 20% pay cuts for teachers, other Hawaii public employees, Star-Advertiser, Top News, April 15).

It is hard enough to recruit and retain quality teachers. Too often we rely on their passion; but what must it do to their morale right now to casually suggest cutting their pay?

This is a moment when we need them focused on the children with enthusiasm and innovation, not worrying about making ends meet over the coming months. Lets either talk about pay increases for teachers or just leave teachers out of budget discussions for the time being.

Brad Dickey

Kaneohe

Health, not politics, the basis for lockdowns

When is it time to reopen our country, end the lockdown, return to our jobs, get together with friends?

Certain self-serving elements in our society President Donald Trumps MAGA supporters argue that the lockdowns are curtailing their rights and liberties, even though it is been demonstrably shown that in fact they are essential for public health, safety and saving lives. But this does not deter the Trump acolytes and ideologues, the Second Amendment gun-rights protesters, the Ayn Rand disciples and so on all folks who typically confuse liberties with privileges, rights with their own selfish agendas.

Meanwhile, our president unashamedly encourages them and in so doing, foments chaos, division and antipathy, rather than cooperation and healing, and thereby turning the COVID-19 pandemic into a culture war to serve his own political ends.

There will come a time to correctly and sanely open the country. To do so too soon will negate the gains we have made in fighting the virus and simply make matters much worse.

John Kitchen

Kailua-Kona

Hydroxychloroquine should not be misused

A few years ago, I was prescribed hydroxychloroquine, brand name Plaquenil, for an autoimmune condition doctors thought I had. At the beginning, I was told to wear long pants, long-sleeve tops and a hat because Plaquenil increased skin sensitivity to sunlight. After a few weeks on Plaquenil, I developed a very itchy rash and had to stop taking it. In the end, I didnt even have the condition.

I would not recommend anyone take this drug without a diagnosis of a condition for which it is currently approved. It has a lot of side effects and you might have something to lose.

Ann Beeson

Chinatown

Use wellness, vitamin D3 to help prevent disease

Hawaii is not getting the epidemic of the pandemic, proving Lucky you live Hawaii!

The obvious reason is the same reason why tourists flock to Hawaii: Our winter feels like summer to the tourists. We got sunshine power on a winters day, making natural vitamin D3 for you and me.

Medical science says that vitamin D3 will help prevent colds, flus and cancer.

The novel coronavirus is a terrible demon virus, but it is still a virus. Our immune system can identify and learn to kill this virus. We can learn how to enhance and support our immunity to resist and heal COVID-19.

Wellness works to reduce and prevent disease, not just flatten the curve. When we return to work, wellness will continue to help protect us and reduce the upcoming second wave of COVID-19.

Dr. Myron Berney, N.D.

Kaimuki

Use screening to allow tourists back into isles

Getting our tourists back is an imperative. We can bring them over by jet if the state, the airlines and airports cooperate by taking temperatures of the passengers before boarding and testing the travelers while they are waiting to board, while they are on the airplane or when they have arrived.

Those who have the antibodies and can provide a certificate (like the TB certificate we require for restaurant workers) can travel without the test. The governor mentioned that the Abbott Labs test takes 15-30 minutes to get results. With enough of these tests, we can make it feasible to start bringing in visitors.

On another matter, we need to limit the number of cars being allowed into our island the rental cars, and those from the military. Soldiers can bring in their cars for free and then they just leave them here. Its the cars, not the people, that ruin our little island.

Libby Tomar

Kailua

Let counties decide on exercise on beaches

As a resident of Kauai, Im proud of how proactive our mayor, Derek Kawakami, has been during the COVID-19 pandemic. He knows the island, and his concern and aloha for the people are tremendous.

Part of knowing the island is an awareness of the beaches. Most of ours dont have any safe places to walk along the coast. The only outdoor exercise I get is walking on the beach, and I find the statewide ban of exercise on the beach by Gov. David Ige to be too much, too late. That decision should be left to the mayors of individual islands.

Louise Pak

Kalaheo, Kauai

EXPRESS YOURSELF

The Honolulu Star-Advertiser welcomes all opinions. Want your voice to be heard? Submit a letter to the editor.

>> Write us: We welcome letters up to 150 words, and guest columns of 500-600 words. We reserve the right to edit for clarity and length. Include your name, address and daytime phone number.

>> Mail: Letters to the Editor, Honolulu Star-Advertiser 7 Waterfront Plaza, 500 Ala Moana, Suite 210 Honolulu, HI 96813

>> Contact: 529-4831 (phone), 529-4750 (fax), letters@staradvertiser.com, staradvertiser.com/editorial/submit-letter

See more here:

Letters: Find a way to preserve public sector jobs, pay; Teachers need support; Vitamin D3 to help prevent disease - Honolulu Star-Advertiser

The immigrant era – Meduza

In the past, Russian writers who achieved success in the United States have had little in common with each other. Ayn Rand, Vladimir Nabokov, Joseph Brodsky, Alexander Solzhenitsyn, Sergey Dovlatov each belongs to a separate era, and each has a distinctive biography. Since the turn of the 21st century, however, an entire generation of writers has appeared in the U.S. who all have Russian roots but rarely write in Russian. Almost all of these writers immigrated as children or adolescents in the 1980s and 1990s at the end of the third wave of Russian emigration, when large numbers of Jews were leaving the Soviet Union. By the mid-2000s, they had collectively become a notable phenomenon in American literature. Meduza asked journalist Svetlana Satchkova to profile a few of this literary generations most prominent members.

The Russian Debutantes Handbook, a novel by the then-unknown Gary Shteyngart, was published in the U.S. in 2002. Gary Igor Semyenovich, according to his passport was only seven years old in 1979 when he and his parents boarded a plane from Leningrad to Vienna, ending up in Queens a few months later. He was enrolled in a Jewish school, where he became the object of constant ridicule and bullying, and later in the Stuyvesant school for gifted children, where according to Shteyngart he was the most gifted student.At 19, he entered Oberlin College in Ohio, where, contrary to the wishes of his parents (who dreamed of having a lawyer in the family), he decided to become a writer.

In his debut novel, published when he was 30, Shteyngart essentially describes himself. The main character, Vladimir Girshkin, also moves as a child from Leningrad to New York. Like Gary, he is considered a failure by his family: He is unable to grow up and feels like a stranger everywhere. When Girshkin meets a mysterious old man associated with the Russian mafia, his life spirals into a whirlpool. Written in the black comedy genre, the novel won praise from critics and readers alike. Its success not only established Shteyngarts reputation, but also paved the way for publishing contracts for other writers with Russian roots who were trying to digest their own immigrant experiences. Shteyngart's second book, Absurdistan, about the son of a Russian oil magnate, was released in 2006. Next came Super Sad True Love Story, about a relationship between a Russian immigrant and an American of Korean descent.

For four years after that, Shteyngart worked on a memoir, published in 2014 under the title Little Failure.Self-deprecating humor became his hallmark. Shteyngart said he developed it as a student at the Jewish school so that he could laugh at himself before his classmates could. For 350 pages, he makes fun of his awkwardness and shyness, his lack of understanding of social norms, his inability to stand up to the father and mother who humiliated him even his teeth, which were crooked and scary-looking until he got dental veneers. Despite the author's comic gift, Little Failure is a very sad book Shteyngart dedicated it to his parents and his psychotherapist.

When Shteyngart recently met with readers at the Strand, a well-known New York City bookstore, it was standing room only.An audience of about 100 people hung onto every word from the writer, a short man with glasses and disheveled gray hair.He read an excerpt from his new novel, Lake Success (2018), then answered questions, peppering his comments with jokes, mostly at his own expense. For the first time, Shteyngart has written a novel in which there are no Russian immigrants. The main character is an American investment banker who runs away from family and work, gets on a Greyhound bus, and takes a long trip around the country. Like Shteyngarts previous novels, it is a satirical work in which he comments sarcastically on contemporary issues.

Shteyngart told the audience he spent many hours talking with top managers of hedge funds in their natural environment, including the bars where they get drunk after work to relieve stress.I realized that these peoples lives are completely empty, and wealth does not bring them joy. I also became privy to insider information. And I can give you this advice: For the sake of everything that is dear to you, do not put money in investment funds that promise high returns! Most of them are unprofitable: they lose billions, but people continue to trust them with their money, he said. In order to write knowledgeably about his protagonists road trip, Shteyngart traveled around the country for several months on Greyhound buses. His fellow travelers were people from all walks of life in American society, and the writer said he learned a lot about his country.Asked what he does besides work, he replied: I try to spend as much time as possible with my little son. In addition, I now can afford an expensive hobby: like my protagonist, I collect watches.

Money is not the only reason he accepts such offers, Shteyngart said. I get bored being cooped up, so Im glad to get out into the world. I used to write a lot for magazines, but now I go back and forth between New York and Los Angeles and Im studying the world of cinema. Its very interesting. Perhaps one of my next books will be about it.

Previously, Shteyngart traveled frequently to Russia to gather material for articles and promote his books, which were regularly translated into Russian. But his more recent works have not been translated into his native language.Moreover, when I was preparing to go to Moscow on an assignment for The New York Times, I wasnt allowed to board the plane, Shteyngart said. They said my journalists visa had incorrect dates. I jumped in a taxi and drove to the Russian consulate, but they told me they couldnt help and that I should contact the Foreign Ministry in Moscow. It may have been simple incompetence, but I had the feeling they didnt want to let me into the country. Perhaps this was not directed against me personally, but against the Times. I never found out, though I simply dont go to Russia anymore.

Lara Vapnyar moved to the U.S. in 1994 with her husband and her mother after graduating from Moscow State Pedagogical University with a major in Russian language and literature. My husband was a programmer and immediately found a job, she said. And I was sitting at home: first pregnant, then with a child. It was very hard and lonely and in order to cope somehow with the depression, I read in English and watched movies. I did not learn the spoken language; I had no one to communicate with. Perhaps that is why it is still difficult for me to speak the language, although I am fluent in it.

Vapnyar has dark wavy hair and a kind, slightly worried expression. She speaks quietly, carefully selecting her words. Her first job, she said, was in teaching: I helped teach English to old Russian people who needed to pass the citizenship exam. I myself knew it at only a very basic level, but it was enough for them. I earned, of course, just pennies.

Soon, one of Vapnyars friends suggested that she could study almost for free at the City University of New York and get a doctorate in literary criticism, so that she could really teach. Lara enrolled at the university and discovered that some of her professors there were famous writers: Andr Aciman (author of the novel Call Me by Your Name) and Louis Menand, who worked at The New Yorker.Vapnyar decided to show them the stories she had begun to write by that time. Back then, I did not understand what kind of magazine The New Yorker was. I knew, of course, that it was respected, but I couldnt imagine what publication there meant for a young author.

When a story of Laras appeared in The New Yorker, she immediately got an agent, and then a contract with a publisher. In 2003, a collection of her short stories, There Are Jews in My House, was published, and three years later, so was the novel Memoirs of the Muse. She never finished her studies. I had already passed all the exams for my doctorate, there were a lot of them, but I still had to write a dissertation, she said. That didnt happen, since I was already working on my books. In the end, they gave me an intermediate degree between a masters and a doctorate, called a Master of Philosophy.

The lights in the New York University classroom were turned off, and the hum of Broadway could be heard outside the windows. On a screen occupying almost an entire wall, Vapnyar showed her students a fragment of the television series Black Mirror. Emphasizing the techniques used by its creators, she explained the basics of storytelling: If you need the viewer to believe in a strange concept, introduce it gradually, furnishing as many specific and realistic details as possible. Making references to popular books and series, Vapnyar led a discussion about the effect that can be achieved by interchanging the structural elements of history. At the end of the lesson, she talked about the students final project: ideally, each student will use social networks to provoke a real response.Students shared their ideas: one was going to tell a story through a series of posts on Twitter, another through a story on Instagram.

Vapnyar also teaches writing to undergraduates at Columbia University. In October, her schedule became even busier as her sixth book, the novel Divide Me by Zero, was published, and she began promoting it. Her new novel bears no resemblance to what she wrote before, Vapnyar said. Previously, she invented characters and stories, drawing only some details from her own life. Divide Me by Zero, though, turned out to be almost completely autobiographical. It is about the illness and death of her mother, her divorce from her husband, and her romantic relationships with a university professor and an oligarch. In all my previous books, my daughter tried to find the details that came from my life, she said. This time, on the other hand, she had to search for what I had invented.

We all came out of Shteyngarts overcoat, Keith Gessen said, referring to himself and other American writers of Russian origin. Typically, that phrase is used to describe the influence of Nikolai Gogol on Russian-language literature its a high complement. For me, [Shteyngarts] first novel was a revelation. Before that, it seemed to me that migr culture could not be a literary subject. It was just my life, and I thought that it was of no interest to anyone," Gessen said.

Keith relatives still call him Kostya met me in his office at Columbia University, where he teaches journalism. The 12th-floor window of the building, named after Joseph Pulitzer, overlooks Manhattan; books and literary magazines in Russian and English were piled on shelves, on a table, on a coffee table, and even on the floor. Although Keith moved to the United States in 1981, when he was only six, he speaks Russian fluently with no accent. My dad is a programmer, and my mother was a literary critic, he said. Both my grandmothers worked in Moscow as translators and editors, and the fact that I became a writer is quite natural. Literary work in our family was held in high esteem.

Gessen began writing stories in grade school, and that was when he decided on his future profession. He went to Harvard to study history and literature: it seemed to him that before starting to compose, a writer should familiarize themselves with what had been written before and correlate it with historical context. After getting his bachelors degree, he went into journalism. He wrote for The Atlantic, Dissent, FEED, and The Nation. At age 26, he decided to enroll in a master's program in writing: "I realized that if I didnt do that, I wouldnt be able to start writing prose for real."

While studying at Syracuse University, Gessen wrote the first draft of his novel, All the Sad Young Literary Men, which was published in 2008. I found a publisher very quickly thanks, I think, to the fact that I had already made a name for myself, he said.Some former classmates and I had founded a literary magazine, n+1. We wanted to write prose and political criticism with a left-wing bias, but no one would publish us, so we decided to do it ourselves: We found a free room and raised $8,000 enough to print the first issue. The entire print run quickly sold out, and we did a second one. Soon, the magazine became successful. It still exists, although I no longer do editorial work there.

Gessen admitted he was disappointed with the reaction to his debut novel: despite warm reviews by Joyce Carol Oates and Jonathan Franzen, some critics called the book pretentious and boring. I was, lets say, offended, he said. He stopped writing prose and stuck with journalism. Soon, I had the chance to move to Moscow for a while: my grandmother developed dementia and had to be looked after. I happily agreed. Nothing was keeping me in America. In Moscow, I did translations and wrote for The New Yorker about Moscow traffic jams, about Ukraine, about the trials of Khodorkovsky and the people who were involved in the murder of Politkovskaya. And when I returned, I realized that it had been a very interesting time, and I slowly began to work on a new novel.

His incentive to complete the novel was the birth of his child. When my son Rafi was born in 2015, I had been working on the novel for six years, Gessen said. I didnt have a permanent job, and I really needed to sell the book and get an advance. I quickly put the first hundred pages together and got a contract with a publisher based on that. In 2018, the novel was released under the title A Terrible Country. It tells the story of a young American who comes to Moscow to look after his grandmother and gets involved with a group of political activists opposing the regime. Despite the books title, Gessen writes with love and humor about the country where he was born. This time, the reviews were positive.

Unfortunately, in the years since the release of my first book, public interest in fiction has declined, Gessen said. Now, people read more nonfiction. Keith is the younger brother of Masha Gessen, who has written 12 books of nonfiction and received many prestigious American awards, including the National Book Award for The Future Is History: How Totalitarianism Reclaimed Russia. Television shows have taken on the function of fiction, Keith Gessen said. When I myself come home in the evening, I dont pick up a book; I watch a TV show with my wife. And whos about to start reading novels in the Trump era? Everyone is analyzing and trying to understand what will happen to us.

Gessen isnt writing prose currently because his work as a professor takes a huge amount of time and because he has two young children. My wife manages to write a little more than me, he said. He is married to the American writer Emily Gould, who runs her own publishing imprint and online bookstore with fellow writer Ruth Curry.

Most likely, Gessen said, his next book will be a collection of essays, but he still hopes to write a novel someday that will become a bestseller. There is a powerful subculture of serious readers in America, he explained.These are people who read 30 or 40 books a year, but there are very few of them. All the other Americans read maybe one book a year. I want to write a novel not for the former group, but for the latter.

Ellen Litman asked to be called Lena. She apologized for taking so long to set a date for an interview and then completely forgetting about it because her life had devolved into chaos. "I caught a cold. You see, she coughed, I'm completely falling apart. I have two daughters, they are six and 10, now is the beginning of the school year, and Ive just filed for divorce.

Litman arrived in the U.S. as an adult in 1992 after finishing two years at the Moscow Institute of Electronic Machine Building.She graduated from the University of Pittsburgh and went to work as a programmer. From the age of 12, I wanted to become a writer, but it was immediately explained to me that this was unrealistic, she recounted. They said, Write for pleasure. And then my mom, whos a mathematician, handed me a programming book.

She told her story emotionally, as if sharing it with a friend rather than giving an interview. I worked for a company in Boston, I made good money, and thought all the time about starting to write prose. For a long time, I didnt dare: everything seemed to indicate that I would not succeed. After a couple of years, though, she started to take writing courses, and soon she applied for a masters program in writing at Syracuse University. Kostya Gessen was in my class. Imagine, out of six people in the program, there were two Russians! In the city of Syracuse, there is absolutely nothing to do, so in three years we all became very close; we practically became a family. One of our teachers was the famous George Saunders, who is not only a wonderful writer, but also a very kind, generous person.After graduation, Saunders helped her by introducing her to an agent who, in just two months, sold a collection of her short stories about Russian immigrants, The Last Chicken in America.

The book was published in 2007 and was successful. For a while, I traveled around the country to meet readers, Litman said.And then, pretty quickly, I found a new job that wasnt related to programming at all. For 12 years I have been teaching writing at the University of Connecticut, near where I live. I have wonderful colleagues and many friends. The place is very quiet, and Ive gotten used to that, although I have loved big cities all my life. I liked living in Boston, and I really wanted to live in New York but it didnt work out.

The book was published in 2014, when Litmans eldest daughter was four years old and her second daughter had just been born. For that reason, she was unable to travel and promote the book. Litman believes this was one of the reasons it did not sell well. However, she also was not happy with the story.I wanted to reproduce in detail the world in which I grew up Soviet life, Moscow to make it as lively and real as possible. That distracted me from what was happening with the characters.

Although Litman has never been back to Russia since her departure, she reads Russian literature and follows the news in her homeland: I am drawn to what is happening in Russia. This is a part of me that my parents dont understand. They get angry and ask, What do you have in common with that country? Why are you writing this? But I didnt want to leave Moscow it was their decision. So I was always interested in the question: How would my life have developed if I had stayed? And that parallel, imagined life exists somewhere.

Litman has conceived a new novel as a reflection on that subject. It will follow a group of friends, some of whom leave their native country and some of whom remain, as their relationship develops from the early 1990s to the present.

She admitted that she has practically no time to write: In the past few years, it has been very difficult. I was bearing the burden of my family on my own. I constantly had to look for part-time jobs. I hope that after a while, everything will settle down, and Ill be able to do what I love. "

As a teenager, he moved from Soviet Riga to Ohio. After attending the University of Michigan, he moved to New York, where he became a journalist. He wrote for New York magazine, Vogue, and Pitchfork Media, winning three National Magazine Awards.

In the early 2000s, Idov and his wife tried to bring a dream of theirs to life: they opened a small coffee shop. The business quickly went under, however, and in 2005, Idov wrote an article about it for Slate. Suddenly, it became a big hit, Idov said, and several literary agents immediately wanted to represent me. But the most important email in my life came from the late director Nora Ephron, who also liked the article. She said that it could make a charming book or movie and added that she would introduce me to her agent. Three days later, I became a client of the famed Amanda Urban. "

It turned out to be a book: the novel Ground Up, released in 2009. I forbade my agent and publisher from mentioning that English is not my native language, Idov said. I didnt want to be judged by less rigorous standards.For me, the highest compliment was that no one noticed. I established that benchmark for success because I had seen reviews in which the fact that a book was not written in the authors native language dominated the reviewers perspective, and everything else was viewed through that lens. Idov said he has never tried to pass himself off as an American in his everyday life on the contrary, he always preferred drawing contrasts between himself and the people he talked to. Still, at that moment, he said, it was important for him to find out if he could deceive the establishment.

The novel was not very successful in the U.S., perhaps because Idov did not take the opportunity to identify it with the increasingly popular "immigrant literature genre. But a year later, Ground Up came out in Russian, translated by the author and his wife and immediately became a bestseller in Russia. The Russian edition of GQ named Idov its writer of the year, and in 2012, he was invited to become the magazines chief editor. He and his family moved to Moscow.

Until she was 17, Anya Ulinich lived in Moscow and studied painting. In 1991, she and her family arrived in the U.S. on a tourist visa and stayed there. For a long time, we were just trying to survive, she said. We had neither legal status nor money, and our total vocabulary in English was about 20 words. In New York, with its large Russian-speaking community, things would most likely have been easier, but the Ulinich family ended up in Phoenix, Arizona.

The only person we knew in America was the mother of one of my school friends. She lived in Phoenix and invited us there. Arizona is an amazing place: no matter where you come from, theres culture shock. It's like being on Mars. The landscape, the weather, the ways the locals try to mask reality with green lawns in the middle of the desert, huge air-conditioned houses decorated with Christmas lanterns, cacti... At first, my life there was rather strange, and the things that happened to me that were almost as absurd as my Soviet experience.

Ulinich gives the impression of a very cheerful person. When she talks about the hardships she endured, it seems as though they werent hardships at all, just raw material for funny stories. The only work I could find without documents was cleaning houses for cash, she said. I was a spoiled girl from a family of intellectuals who grew up in a tiny apartment in Chertanovo, where they washed clothes in the bathtub. I didnt know how to clean. There was a whole army of Mexican women in my employer's house who cleaned much better than I did, but my employer made me something like her protg. I was a Jew from the USSR who didnt know anything about Judaism, so she took my religious education upon herself. Im an atheist, but I had to listen so they wouldnt fire me.

At 18, Ulinich married an American and, having received resident status, went to study art at the University of Arizona. She then transferred to the Art Institute of Chicago, moving there with her second husband. I wouldnt have gotten married so often if I understood the laws, she said. At the time, I thought that if I wasnt married to an American, they would take away my permanent residency.

The paintings she made during her studies were, she said, overloaded with narrative: I tried to convey everything that I thought and felt, all of my split identity. I used text as a visual element that started happening more and more often, and the pictures became more terrible, turning into a mishmash of words and allegorical images. These were stories disguised as paintings. In the end, I stopped doing that, and by the time I was in the masters program, I was just painting landscapes.

Still, the stories kept welling up inside. When Ulinich gave birth to a daughter and moved to Brooklyn in 2000, she sat down to write a novel. The apartment was too small to paint in, so when her husband came home from work, Ulinich left the child with him, grabbed a laptop, and went to the nearest coffee shop, where she worked on the text. I couldn't just be a mom, Ulinich explained.I had to create something. I couldnt set up canvases and paint at home, or in the caf. It seems I chose literature because the work was more compact.

When her second daughter was born, Ulinich did not stop writing. Her novel, Petropolis, is about Sasha Goldberg, a teenage girl from the Siberian town of Asbest-2 who comes to America through a bridesmaid service, leaves her husband, and decides to stay in the country by hook or by crook.

The novel was published in 2007 and received flattering reviews from critics as well as several awards. Seven years later, Ulinich published a graphic novel, Lena Finkles Magic Barrel. The book tells the tragicomic story of Lena, a writer and mother of two teenagers, who plunges into the world of online dating following a divorce. The title of the novel refers to Bernard Malamuds The Magic Keg, about a student named Leo Finkle who goes on a blind date.

Ulinich said she did not initially conceive her novel as a comic book. I had a crisis in my personal life, and writing prose wasnt working. But I was constantly drawing pictures on leaflets, writing notes on them and suddenly, I realized that this was the story. She admitted that she likes her second novel more than her first because its about problems that all adults face, regardless of their personal history. Unfortunately, it didnt sell very well: serious readers stay away from comics, and comic book lovers simply did not know about my book. It was released by an ordinary literary publishing house that doesnt have ties with specialty [comic book] stores.

Partly for this reason, the novel that Ulinich is writing now will be in a traditional format. Of course, I want my books to be read. But there is another, personal reason, she said. For several years now, she has been making a living with illustration and graphic design, so in her free time, she wants to work with text. She once taught writing but had to abandon that work: In New York, there are a lot of writers and a lot of competition for professorships. And I dont even have a writing degree.

During a panel discussion on Russian-American Writers: An Immigrant Narrative at New York Citys Tenement Museum, Irina Reyn joked that she should thank her parents for her literary career because they provided her with childhood trauma. She attended the same Jewish school as Gary Shteyngart which, according to his memoir, was a real nightmare. I just dont know what we would do without those injuries, she said. What would I write about then? But Reyn doesnt come off as a person who has problems: she smiles and laughs contagiously. Although she understands Russian, speaking her native language is difficult. When Lara Vapnyar and I meet, she speaks Russian to me, and I speak English to her, Reyn said.

She recalled her early childhood as completely idyllic: she liked living in Moscow and spending the summer with her grandparents in Ukraine. The family moved to the U.S. when she was only seven. Although she didnt know a word of English, she had to take a placement test for elementary school classes. I didnt understand what was written on the sheets, so I simply chose the first of all the answer options. Based on the number of points that I scored, I was assigned to the third grade, which was, of course, ridiculous, she said. Learning was hard, Reyn said no one helped her adapt or master the language.

As a child, she dreamed of becoming a detective, and then as a teenager, she began to watch films about women working in offices. Reyn envisioned the same future for herself. After college, she held a series of office jobs: She worked in public relations, in TV news, in a nonprofit organization helping refugees, in advertising, at a literary agency, and at a wedding magazine. She eventually got bored with each new job.

When I was an assistant editor at a publishing house, Reyn said, we released a collection of immigrant prose called Becoming American: Personal Essays by First Generation Immigrant Women. It was 1999, and the boss couldnt find a single Russian-American writer whose text we could include. She asked if I knew anyone suitable. Unexpectedly for myself, I said, Im a Russian-American writer! I had to quickly write an essay, and it was included in the collection. If not for that, who knows if I would have become a writer.

Soon, Reyn discovered that she liked writing fiction much more than essays because it created a distance that allowed her to speak much more freely about her concerns. Her debut novel, What Happened to Anna K., was released in 2008. She shifted the story of Anna Karenina to a modern setting: in her version, 37-year-old Anna lives in New York in a Russian-speaking community, meets a young writer, falls in love with him, and leaves her husband a successful businessman and son. Anna K.s story ends tragically, of course.

When I was writing the novel, Reyn said, I felt excitement, as if I were committing sabotage. It seemed to me that Tolstoy would not be happy if he found out that his heroine was made Jewish. This is precisely the strength of the immigrant experience: away from the homeland, you stop revering the authorities. I decided: Well, Tolstoy, so what? Big deal! The novel was enthusiastically received: critics said that the young writer had refreshed the plot of the classic without losing its emotional depth.

In Reyns second novel, The Imperial Wife, published in 2016, two story lines are developed in parallel. In one of them, a New York art dealer, Tanya, prepares to make the biggest sale of her career; in the other, an aristocrat from Germany is about to become the Russian queen. The second story takes place in the 18th century, and it quickly becomes clear that its subject is the future Catherine the Great.

Reyns third book, Mother Country, was released in the spring of 2019. It was inspired by a true story, she said. The main character, a Russian immigrant named Nadia, lives in Brighton Beach, works as a nanny and nurse, and is faced daily with petty humiliation. For several years, she has been trying to bring her adult daughter to the U.S from Ukraine, where the daughter was still living when war broke out there. Reyn wanted to explore the mother-daughter relationship in her novel, but it also turned out to be her most political work.

Reyn said that neither her second nor her third book received as much attention as her debut, but I dont see anything wrong with that. The main thing is that, for many years now, Ive had the opportunity to do what I love. Most writers of fiction are unable to make a living from it. I teach writing at the University of Pittsburgh, and its the best job you could imagine. In my case, writing and teaching have been able to come together and nourish one another.

When asked what her next novel would be about, Irina replied, I was recently asked, All your books have been about the immigrant experience, but youll write your fourth about something else, right? And I dont understand: is immigration not a deep enough topic to analyze all my life? What should I write about, the climate crisis? Philip Roth wrote about his penis for decades and nothing, no one, told him that it was time to stop.

Profiles by Svetlana Satchkova

Translation by Carol Matlack

Read the original:

The immigrant era - Meduza

Stars to fans on World Book Day: The more you read the more youll know – SocialNews.XYZ

Home Movies Movie News Stars to fans on World Book Day: The more you read the more youll know

Mumbai, April 23 (SocialNews.XYZ) On the occasion of World Book Day on Thursday, B-Towners took to social media to share with their fans which book they are currently reading.

Alia Bhatt's "new friend" is JK Rowling's "Harry Potter And The Philosopher'e Stone", which she is currently in reading. Sharing a picture of the book on Instagram, the actress wrote: "I've made a new friend. #worldbookday #currentlyreading."

Wishing her followers a Happy Book Day, Shraddha also shared a list of books that she says she already has completed reading during the lockdown so far: "The Ministry Of Utmost Happiness" by Arundhati Roy, "Conscious Collective" by Joseph Kauffman, "Homo Deus' by Yuval Noah Harari and "A New Earth" by Eckhart Tolle.

Not only that, the actress says she is is reading IC Robledo's "The Secret Principles Of Genius" which has been gifted by her "Chhichhore" co-star Sushant Singh Rajput. Thanking Sushant, Shraddha posted a photo of the book on Instagram.

"It's been really nice to catch up on some reading. Hope you guys are taking care of yourself," Shraddha also shared. Fans were quick to share their list of books with her. One of them mentioned "Mahabharata", and Shraddha showed her interest in it by saying: "I want to read." she said "The Fountainhead" by Russian-American author Ayn Rand is also one of the books that she would like to read someday.

Madhuri Dixit shared a photo of her bookshelf and revealed how books are her "source of inspiration". The actress tweeted: "For me books are something that not only teach us a lot, but at times they become our source of inspiration and a place to find solace in. Sometimes, they can even help you re-discover yourself! #WorldBookDay #worldbookday2020"

Telugu superstar Pawan Kalyan took to Twitter to share a list of his favourite books which include noted Bengali author Bibhutibhushan Bandyopadhyay's "Vanavasi" (original name "Aranyak"), Devarakonda Balagangadhara Tilak's "Amrutham kurisina rathri" and "Khraveludu" by Sishta Anjeneya Sasthri.

Esha Gupta is reading Ayn Rand's 1943 novel "The Fountainhead". Sharing a picture of the book on Instagram, the actress captioned: "The more that you read the more things you will know, the more that you learn, the more places you'll go- Dr.seuss #worldbookday"

Manav Kaul took to Instagram to share a video featuring the books written by him. The actor shared the names of his books and wrote: "Aapko kaunsi kitaab sabse zyada pasand hai? (Which book do you like the most?) #worldbookday#theektumharepeeche #premkabootar #tumharebaaremein #bahutdoorkitnadoorhotahai #anightinthehills @hind.yugm @westland_books"

Shruti Seth shared how her 5-year-old daughter Alina has turned into an avid reader. The actress tweeted: "Our greatest gift to Alina has been the joy of reading. We started reading to her when she was 6 months old. And she's been hooked ever since. Now that she's 5 she can read by herself and she reads to us. Superb ROI. #worldbookday2020"

Source: IANS

Gopi Adusumilli is a Programmer. He is the editor of SocialNews.XYZ and President of AGK Fire Inc.

He enjoys designing websites, developing mobile applications and publishing news articles on current events from various authenticated news sources.

When it comes to writing he likes to write about current world politics and Indian Movies. His future plans include developing SocialNews.XYZ into a News website that has no bias or judgment towards any.

He can be reached at gopi@socialnews.xyz

Like Loading...

Related

Read more:

Stars to fans on World Book Day: The more you read the more youll know - SocialNews.XYZ

The Fascist Bits of Onward – Houston Press

Let me start by saying that no film has ever pleasantly surprised me more than Onward did. The trailer underwhelmed me, but like a lot of you Im stuck at home with a bored child thanks to the coronavirus, so we watched it thanks to Disney+. It ended up being a heartwarming tale the first good brothers story from Disney I can recall since Fox and the Hound that perfectly balanced comedy and pathos. Its Ferris Buellers Day Off meets Weekend at Bernies meets Legend, and I cried like a baby at the ending. I like this film.

That said what the hell is up with the weird fascist undertones in Pixar?

Ive pointed this out before with The Incredibles. Pixar films have a very unnerving obsession with the concept that some people are inherently special, and that the democratization of ability is corrupting.

In Onward, magic is real, but it is hard to do. The film opens with an apprentice wizard giving up his staff to marvel at the simpler and user-friendly invention of electricity. Science becomes the norm, instead, thanks to it being available and apparently really easy.

This more or less leads to a fantasy version of Idiocracy. Majestic unicorns are now trash pandas. The formerly formidable manticore is an overworked restaurant manager. Dragons are indistinguishable from Pomeranians. Adventure lives on only in the minds of the nerds who play RPGs. Everyone has all their needs met, but there is nothing epic and no one is special. Theyre saying that last one is a bad thing.

Magic is not democratic in this universe. It isnt a meritocracy. The film makes it quite clear that younger brother Ian has something unique that enables him to wield the eldritch forces. He literally stumbles into greatness thanks to an inherited resource from his dad and some sort of ubermensch quality.

You know who cant use magic? His older brother, Barley. Think about how messed up that is for a second. For some reason, Barley does not have the proper gene for magic. Yet he is extremely well-versed in the theory of it. Throughout the film, it is his knowledge, acquired through years of study and preparation in spite of ridicule, that guide Ian through being able to become a wizard. Hes put more effort into magic than anyone we see in the film, the epitome of the bootstrap narrative, and yet he cant use it himself. That power is reserved for his brother, who is special for reasons we are never given.

This doesnt make Ian a bad character. He certainly earns every bit of progress he makes throughout the film. It does, however, speak about the films view of power. Barley can work as hard as he wants to, study as deep as he can, and he will never be more than the enabler of his brothers greatness because he isnt part of the wizard class. Science is a pitiable watering down of divine assignation of status, an entropic force that literally keeps residents of the world on the ground instead of in the air.

Like with The Incredibles, Onward is a movie fixated on the necessity of exceptional individuals to keep society from stagnating. It echoes Friedrich Nietzsche, who said Only the most intellectual of men have a right to beauty, to the beautiful. Only in them can goodness escape being weakness. Theres also an Ayn Rand quote that fits perfectly with its message if you replace words meaning intellect (which weve establish does not affect sorcery in Onward) with magic.

The man at the top of the intellectual pyramid contributes the most to all those below him, but gets nothing except his material payment, receiving no intellectual bonus from others to add to the value of his time. The man at the bottom who, left to himself, would starve in his hopeless ineptitude, contributes nothing to those above him, but receives the bonus of all of their brains.

The idea that fantasy races have become the Tolkien version of the humans from Wall-E thanks to the comforts provided by the advent of science is utterly incompatible with an idealized democratic society. Its a movie that worships people of ability, but only gives that ability to a select few with inherent disposition. At best they can wield magic weapons with brute force, like their mother Laurel, or serve as advisers, like Barley. Everything else is a perversion of the proper hierarchy that has made society weak and unworthy.

Whats required is a Chosen One who can make New Mushroomton great again with divine right. I dont think that its any coincidence that one of the things that gets destroyed in the final battle is a public school, a tool of the state that is not preparing the next generation for the glorious new magical future. Ian lectures on magic there in the epilogue.

Pixar films are amazing, and I love them dearly. What I dont understand is the weird hard-on that they use for their Heros Journeys. Its not enough for them to have exceptional protagonists. They must stand against anything that would flatten the hierarchy and prevent the right people from rising to the top, usually with an unhealthy fixation on past glory (The mid-century in Incredibles, days of yore in Onward). Whimsical and moving as these stories are, thats more than a little fascist. Everyone having light bulbs is not the reason dedicated individuals cant succeed and acting like it is just leaves people not of the exalted class in the dark.

Jef Rouner is a contributing writer who covers politics, pop culture, social justice, video games, and online behavior. He is often a professional annoyance to the ignorant and hurtful.

Read the original post:

The Fascist Bits of Onward - Houston Press

Letters to the Editor: April 24, 2020 – West Hawaii Today

Narrow minds need to be opened

When is it time to reopen our country? End the lockdown? Return to our jobs? Get together with friends?

Certain self-serving elements in our society President Donald Trumps MAGA supporters argue that the national lockdown is curtailing their rights and liberties, even though it is been demonstrably shown that, in fact, it is essential for public health, safety and saving lives. But this does not deter the Trump acolytes and ideologues, the 2nd Amendment gun nuts, the Ayn Rand disciples and so on, all folks who typically confuse liberties with privileges, and rights with their own selfish agendas.

Meanwhile, our president unashamedly encourages them and in so doing foments chaos, division and antipathy, rather than cooperation and healing, and thereby turning the COVID-19 pandemic into a culture war to serve his own political ends.

There will come a time to correctly and sanely open the country; to do so too soon will negate the gains we have made in fighting the virus and simply make matters much worse. The only thing that needs to be opened now are the dangerously narrow minds of those whose petty imagined grievances and misinformed beliefs would put all American society at ever greater risk.

John Kitchen

Kona

Getting back to normal

When our curve of coronavirus is minimal and stabilized as it is in Hawaii, especially on Big Island, its time to start relaxing mitigation efforts. Instead of loosening restrictions, I see government issuing further restrictions of our rights. Why?

Weve done a good job of containing the virus. Testing is used, contact tracing is effective and our hospitalizations are low. Its time to let folks go to their doctors for other medical needs, go outside to the beaches, etc., and open restaurants to outdoors/table spacing and retailers with limits. Sure we need to maintain some social distance, especially the elderly and those with medical issues and quarantine those who are sick, but lets focus on getting back to normal.

We have a window of opportunity now that tourism in lower in the summer to figure out how to safely bring them back. Let hotels open and lighten up on vacation rentals Maybe check temperatures at the airport. Tourists are the backbone of our economy, without them well continue to see longer lines at food shelves and more unemployment.

Weve basically shut down our borders but instead of complaining about the few that still come and putting up more barriers, lets figure out how to safely accommodate them. They are our livelihood after all.

Im actually in the higher risk group and supportive of the efforts to contain the virus in March but now were doing what we can and its time to move on. If not for us then for our children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren before we do anymore damage to our economy.

Joanne Johnson

Kailua-Kona

Mahalo, TMT

Although a small fraction of people in Hawaii do not support the TMT project, its extremely difficult, even for the protesters, to overlook this pleasant gesture by the folks at TMT.

The $100,000 donation to The Food Basket, Hawaii Islands food bank, was just what our community needed during this worldwide pandemic.

I must say, its a hell-of-a-lot more than what our state and county leaders have offered us.

Thank God, for the federal government too. Even our military who arent welcomed here in Hawaii by the protesters have been doing an exceptional job.

For those of you with your head still stuck in the sand. Are you now able to see the difference between transparency and goodwill vs. suspending the Sunshine Law that clearly encroaches on our civil liberties with clever and dishonest intent?

Mahalo nui loa to TMT, and to all the responders battling this pandemic war. Your selfless efforts do not and will not ever go unnoticed by many of us that greatly appreciate you.

Lisa Malakaua

Hilo

Letters policy

Letters to the editor should be 300 words or less and will be edited for style and grammar. Longer viewpoint guest columns may not exceed 800 words. Submit online at http://www.westhawaiitoday.com/?p=118321, via email to letters@westhawaiitoday.com or address them to:

Editor | West Hawaii Today

PO Box 789

Kailua-Kona HI 96745

View original post here:

Letters to the Editor: April 24, 2020 - West Hawaii Today

SIMPSONS short Playdate with Destiny heading to Disney+ – Comics Beat

The Simpsons short Playdate with Destiny will be available for streaming on Disney+ beginning Friday, April 10th. The Disney+ Twitter account announced the shorts streaming release with a handwritten letter from the Simpsons team.

The short, which stars Maggie Simpson, previously ran before PixarsOnward in theaters.But with movie theaters closed due to COVID-19, Disney moved up the streaming release date forOnward, which was made available on Disney+ last Friday, April 3rd.

Tomorrow, Playdate with Destiny will join the feature on Disney+, with the 2012 Simpsons short The Longest Daycare, being added to the streaming service later in the month. In The Longest Daycare, Maggie must survive a day at the Ayn Rand School for Tots (introduced in the classic season 4 Simpsonsepisode A Streetcar Named Marge).

If thats not enough Simpsons for you, there are a plethora of episodes available for your perusal right now: Disney+ currently has a whopping 30 (thatsthirty) seasons ofMatt Groenings seminal family sitcom. Thats over six hundred episodes, all ready to stream right now while you kill time waiting for Playdate with Destiny to be added tonight.

And dont forget one of the Simpson familys otherprevious outings on the big screen, 2007sThe Simpsons Movie, which includes a scene whereTom Hanks delivers a public service message in lieu of the United States government, which is forced to acknowledge that Hanks is a far more credible source of information than any Federal mouthpiece (huh, sounds familiar, for some reason).

If youre interested in streaming the thirty-first and current season ofThe Simpsons, it is currently available for streaming on Hulu, including the most recently aired episode, Highway to Well, which first aired on March 22nd. Also available for streaming on Hulu is Groenings other classic animated series,Futurama.

Related

See the original post here:

SIMPSONS short Playdate with Destiny heading to Disney+ - Comics Beat

Opinion: Alberta separation was always a bad idea, and COVID-19 has shown it’s never going to happen – The Globe and Mail

A crowd attends a Wexit Alberta rally in Calgary on Nov. 16, 2019.

Todd Korol/Reuters

Max Fawcett is a freelance writer and a former editor of Alberta Oil magazine and Vancouver magazine

In politics, timing is everything. And when it comes to Albertas burgeoning separatist movement, the timing of COVID-19 couldnt be much worse. It was just last October, in the wake of the federal Liberal governments re-election, that it appeared to be building some momentum. And while Alberta Premier Jason Kenney argued that he didnt share their ultimate objective, he did effectively legitimize many of their other priorities by striking the Fair Deal panel to assess their merits. Their final report was due last week, but any recommendations it contains are almost certainly moot.

Thats because the fallout from COVID-19 is serving as a powerful reminder of how much we depend on each other and how much well need to keep doing that as we emerge from its shadow. For most of us, this growing sense of social and national solidarity is a good thing.

Story continues below advertisement

But for Albertas separatist movement, its a major setback. Thats because, just as there are no atheists in foxholes, there wont be many people who believe theyre better off on their own after this pandemic finally passes. As Albertans stare at the possibility of an economic downturn thats reminiscent of the Great Depression, some of them are realizing they could use a little help from their friends even the ones they dont particularly like.

This is a nightmare for those who have been dreaming about an independent Alberta, one thats equal parts political revenge fantasy and Ayn Rand fan-fiction. Only once unshackled from the burdens of supporting the rest of the country and the ungrateful people in it who were holding them down, it suggests, will their province truly flourish.

The combination of their oil and gas resources and a determination to see them fully and unapologetically exploited would mean lower taxes, better services, more freedom and a long-overdue opportunity to watch the eastern bastards freeze in the metaphorical dark.

But that dream deliberately ignored the contributions that the federal government had made to their province and its oil and gas industry. It was the federal government that helped fund the oil sands in their earliest days and helped rescue them when a key American backer pulled out of the Syncrude consortium in 1973.

It was the federal government that implemented important tax changes in the 1990s that made the oil sands a far more attractive investment and helped kick off a decades-long building boom that disproportionately benefited Alberta. And it was the federal government that bought and is building the Trans Mountain Expansion Project, effectively doing for Alberta what the private sector couldnt or wouldnt.

The separatist dream of an independent Alberta also conveniently overlooks the fact that separating from Canada wouldnt mean separating from geography. British Columbia would still stand between Alberta and the Pacific Ocean, and the vast majority of its residents would want no part of a right-wing Libertarian petrostate, to say nothing of the many untreatied Indigenous communities who have made their feelings about Albertas favourite industry clear.

And as Assembly of First Nations National Chief Perry Bellegarde has said, the Indigenous communities that do have treaties with the federal government expect those to be respected. You have to be careful when you go down that road of Western alienation, Western exit, he told the CBC. We have inherent rights; we have treaty rights, and those are international agreements with the Crown.

Story continues below advertisement

I dont expect everyone who showed up at last falls pro-separation meetings to give up on their dream. There will always be a radical fringe of people who believe that Alberta would be better off if it separated from Canada, facts be damned, just as there will always be people who believe that the real source of climate change is the sun.

But I do hope that politicians such as Jason Kenney and Michelle Rempel, who have carefully nurtured the idea that Albertans are being mistreated by the federal government and used that feeling to advance their own political objectives and agendas, will stop trading in this fiction. Mr. Kenneys equalization referendum, for example, is a cynical effort to feed the sense of alienation rather than fix it. Now, more than ever, we need to be building bridges between different parts of the country, not trying to blow them up.

I also expect the federal government to rise to the occasion here, and use its financial clout to help the province that has done so much to help the rest of the country. For years, Alberta taxpayers made contributions to the federal treasury that werent matched by the transfers coming back, and the imbalance between the two fed the growing sense of alienation in places such as Calgary and Red Deer.

Now, its time for Ottawa to repay that debt. If it comes through with a sufficiently ambitious rescue package, it could even heal the divisions that have persisted between the two levels of government for so long and put an end to Albertas separatist movement in the process.

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney says Alberta will invest $1.1-billion and give loan guarantees to help Calgary-based TC Energy Corp. build its US$8-billion Keystone XL Pipeline project. The Canadian Press

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Read more:

Opinion: Alberta separation was always a bad idea, and COVID-19 has shown it's never going to happen - The Globe and Mail