1. Atheism

Category Archives: Atheism

Atheism: Irrational and Absurd (Part 3) | Brian Schwertley – Video

Posted on by


Atheism: Irrational and Absurd (Part 3) | Brian Schwertley
Brian Schwertley gives a Biblical refutation of atheism, while debunking the New Atheists like Dan Barker, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris. This video is part of the #39;Atheism:...

By: Theology, Philosophy and Science

See original here:

Atheism: Irrational and Absurd (Part 3) | Brian Schwertley - Video

How One Man Made Himself Into an Aboriginal God With Wikipedia

Posted on by

In Chapter 10 of his 2012 book Atheism and the Case Against Christ, Matthew S. McCormick provides a list of "gods and religions in history that have fallen out of favor." Between the Chinese deities Jade Emperor and Ji Gong on this list sits Jar'Edo Wens, an exotic-looking nonsense phrase some Australian guy added to Wikipedia seven years prior.

The blog Wikipediocracy recounts the genesis of a wholly fictional Aboriginal deity, created by an anonymous Australian pranksterpresumably named Jared Owens, get it?who published a Wikipedia article for Jar'Edo Wens and added an entry about the god to the site's page on Australian Aboriginal mythology in 2005. Thanks to Wikipedia's immense and often indiscriminate ability to disseminate facts and factoids alike, Jar'Edo has spread its gospel of humility and learning to the furthest reaches of the internet in the years since then.

The brief Jar'Edo article read:

In Australian Aboriginal mythology, Jar'Edo Wens is a god of earthly knowledge and physical might, created by Altjira to oversee that the people did not get too big-headed, associated with victory and intelligence.

(A person working from the same anonymous IP address also attempted to add a god called "Yohrmum" to the list, in case there's any doubt that Jar'Edo was a work of fiction.)

According to Wikipediocracy, Jare'Edo Wens is the longest-running hoax in Wikipedia history; its article sat on the site for nine years before it was recognized as fiction in November 2014 and finally deleted earlier this month. But by then, the internet had already accepted Jar'Edo as real.

In addition to Atheism and the Case Against Christ author McCormicka professor of philosophy at Sacramento StateJar'Edo managed to dupe the editors of several non-English Wikipedias, many of which still list him alongside legitimate Aboriginal gods. (Here's Jar'Edo on the Russian, Polish, French, and Turkish sites.) Wikipediocracy also notes a 2013 sci-fi novel called The Captain's Propensity: The Andromeda Incident II with a character named Jar'Edo Wens, though "whether that's a coincidence, a knowing wink, or an attempt to reuse the name of a genuine Aboriginal mythological figure for dramatic purpose is an open question."

It doesn't stop there: Jar'Edo also turns up in online dictionaries, spammy-looking sites about religion, rhetorically-challenged debates in the comments sections of news articles, Yahoo! Answers threads, and, of course, vaguely "spiritual" Tumblrs.

See the article here:

How One Man Made Himself Into an Aboriginal God With Wikipedia

Atheism Unleashed presents.. Inspirational Christopher Hitchens – Video

Posted on by


Atheism Unleashed presents.. Inspirational Christopher Hitchens
Christopher Hitchens. What #39;s not to like? The straight talking, no nonsense, say it like it is legend. Here #39;s a video showing a more inspirational speech from the greatly missed Mr Hitchens.

By: Atheism Unleashed

View original post here:

Atheism Unleashed presents.. Inspirational Christopher Hitchens - Video

Atheism: Irrational and Absurd (Part 1) | Brian Schwertley – Video

Posted on by


Atheism: Irrational and Absurd (Part 1) | Brian Schwertley
Brian Schwertley gives a Biblical refutation of atheism, while debunking the New Atheists like Dan Barker, Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens and Sam Harris. This video is part of the #39;Atheism:...

By: Theology, Philosophy and Science

Continued here:

Atheism: Irrational and Absurd (Part 1) | Brian Schwertley - Video

Half Audio – Jay on W.L. Craig, Atheism, Transcendental Arguments – Video

Posted on by


Half Audio - Jay on W.L. Craig, Atheism, Transcendental Arguments
I had numerous requests for more theology, mathematics and metaphysics, so here you go. In this latest audio, I talk over William Lane #39;s talk over a Ted Talk. I thought it illustrative of both...

By: Jay D

Continue reading here:

Half Audio - Jay on W.L. Craig, Atheism, Transcendental Arguments - Video

Muslim Gunned down while admiring snow | Islam on the New Atheism – Video

Posted on by


Muslim Gunned down while admiring snow | Islam on the New Atheism
Another Muslim Is Killed in America. Anyone Care? After surviving years of war in Iraq, Ahmed al-Jumaili was gunned down after less than a month in Dallas. You are dead. We are going to...

By: TheDeenShowTV

Here is the original post:

Muslim Gunned down while admiring snow | Islam on the New Atheism - Video

Atheism in Hinduism – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Posted on by

Atheism (Sanskrit: , nir-vara-vda, lit. "statement of no Lord", "doctrine of godlessness") or disbelief in God or gods has been a historically propounded viewpoint in many of the orthodox and heterodox streams of Hindu philosophies.[1] Generally, atheism is valid in Hinduism, but some schools view the path of an atheist to be difficult to follow in matters of spirituality.[2]

Hinduism is a religion, but also a philosophy.[3]Klaus Klostermaier, a prominent scholar of Hinduism, says that Hinduism is more than myth, ritual, doctrine, as it affects other aspects of existence such as economics, politics, and law.[4] Among the various schools of Hindu philosophy, Mimamsa, and Samkhya while not rejecting Brahman, typically rejects a personal God, creator God, or a God with attributes. While Samkhya rejected the idea of an eternal, self-caused, creator God, Mimamsa argued that the Vedas could not have been authored by a deity.

Hindu atheists accept Hinduism more as a "way of life" than a religion. They are unlike other Hindus in their religious outlook, but they share the same cultural and moral values.[5]

The Sanskrit term stika ("pious, orthodox") refers to the systems of thought which admit the validity of the Vedas.[6] Sanskrit asti means "there is", and stika (per Pini 4.2.60) derives from the verb, meaning "one who says 'asti'". Technically, in Hindu philosophy the term stika refers only to acceptance of authority of Vedas, not belief in the existence of God.[7] However, though not accepted universally, stika is sometimes translated as "theist" and Nstika as "atheist", assuming the rejection of Vedas to be synonymous to the rejection of God.[8] In Indian philosophy, three schools of thought are commonly referred to as nastika for rejecting the doctrine of Vedas: Jainism, Buddhism and Crvka. In this usage, nastika refers to the non-belief of Vedas rather than non-belief of God.[6] However, all these schools also rejected a notion of a creationist god and so the word nastika became strongly associated with them.

The Rig Veda, the oldest of the Vedas, deals with a lot of skepticism when dealing with the fundamental question of a creator God and the creation of the universe. It does not, at many instances, categorically accept the existence of a creator God. Nasadiya Sukta (Creation Hymn) in the tenth chapter of the Rig Veda states:[9][10]

Whence was it produced? Whence is this creation? The gods came afterwards, with the creation of this universe.

The Brihadaranyaka, Isha, Mundaka (in which Brahman is everything and "no-thing") and especially Chandogya Upanishads have also been interpreted as atheistic because of their stress on the subjective self.[11]

Mimamsa was a realistic, pluralistic school of philosophy which was concerned with the exegesis of the Vedas.[12] The core text of the school was the Purva Mimamsa Sutras of Jaimini (c. 200 BCE200 CE). Mimamsa philosophers believed that the revelation of the Vedas was sacred, authorless (apaurusheyatva) and infallible, and that it was essential to preserve the sanctity of the Vedic ritual to maintain dharma (cosmic order).[13][14]:5253 As a consequence of the belief in sanctity of the ritual, Mimamsas rejected the notion of God in any form.[12] Later commentators of the Mimamsa sutras such as Prabhkara (c. 7th century CE) advanced arguments against idea of God.[15][16] The early Mimamsa not only did not accept God but said that human action itself was enough to create the necessary circumstances for the enjoyment of its fruits.[17]

Samkhya is an atheistic[18] and strongly dualistic[19][20] orthodox (Astika) school of Indian philosophy. The earliest surviving authoritative text on classical Samkhya philosophy is the Samkhyakarika (c. 350450 CE) of Ivaraka.[14]:63 The Samkhyakarika accepts the notion of higher selves or perfected beings but rejects the notion of God.[21]

Crvka, a materialistic and atheistic school of Indian philosophy, had developed a systematic philosophy by 6th century CE. Crvkas rejected metaphysical concepts like reincarnation, afterlife, extracorporeal soul, efficacy of religious rites, other world (heaven and hell), fate, and accumulation of merit or demerit through the performance of certain actions. Crvkas also refused to ascribe supernatural causes to describe natural phenomena. Crvka philosophy appears to have died out some time after 1200 CE.[22]

Read the original post:

Atheism in Hinduism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


  1. Atheism