What legalization would mean for wages, and the anatomy of a banda. – Monterey County Weekly

Dear Mexican: Im reading the redneck rhetoric in your most recent column, and I feel retarded to continually be surprised by the hate guised as nationalism that so easily flows from mouths of these degenerates. At least we don't have to worry about that nice stereotype like the Canadians.

Isn't it possible that no one wants to make taxpayers out of all of the illegals because this would entitle them to minimum wage? I agree that if you're going to enjoy the benefits of this country, you should maintain your culture, but also become a legal American citizen. But can we afford to actually pay full price for the labor foundation that we currently enjoy at such a discount?

-Dr. W

Dear Gabacho: Interesting punto! Gabachos dont want undocumented Mexicans to become American citizens because theyre Mexicans, and they really feel that once we become the majority, well rip out their hearts, wrap them in bacon, and serve them as a breakfast burrito.

And they also want us to remain perpetual peons, even if making us legal brings more money to the American economy. A 2013 paper by the Center for American Progress found that if undocumented immigrants were granted legal status and the possibility of citizenship that year, the United States' gross domestic product would grow by an additional $1.4 trillion cumulatively over the 10 years between 2013 and 2022.

Not only that, but analysts Robert Lynch and Patrick Oakford forecast the creation of 203,000 jobs per year in that time frame with amnesty. On the other hand, if said undocumenteds only got legal status in 2013 but weren't eligible for citizenship for a decade, the GDP would grow by a relatively modest $832 billion.

Thats more of an economic stimulus package than Trump could ever possibly conjure upbut since gabachos hate truth nowadays, the prospect of amnesty long ago went the way of the Paris climate accords.

I've been to a number of Mexican-sponsored events that include the typical banda, those bands with 40 members and every instrument known to man. My question is, why do those grupos bring such enormous speakers?

For a party taking place in a backyard or a room that fits no more than 50, theyll bring speakers large enough for a stadium. And since were on the subject of bandas, why do they have so many friggin people in them anyway?

-Split Eardrums, but Happy

Dear Gabacho: The more speakers any Mexican band use, the angrier gabachos will get. This isnt rocket science, pendejo.

Why is it that if you call anybody from Latin America thats not from Mexico a Mexican, they get mad? But everybody from Latin America calls any white person a gringo, no matter if they are Canadian, English, German, French, etc. It seems to me that Latin Americans want to be called by their country of origin but don't give a crap about a white person's country of origin. Would this be racism or prejudice?

-Gringo Greg

Dear Gabacho: Because a gringo is technically a white foreigner regardless of country. Besides, spare me: You gabachos call us illegals even if our families have lived in Aztln since your ancestors were dying of the Black Death.

Read more here:
What legalization would mean for wages, and the anatomy of a banda. - Monterey County Weekly

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Cast on Saving Lives for 13 Seasons and Counting – Variety


Variety
'Grey's Anatomy' Cast on Saving Lives for 13 Seasons and Counting
Variety
When the Grey's Anatomy cast visited PaleyFest at the Dolby Theatre to a packed house of 2,500 fans, the panel was an affectionate look at where the characters have been and where they might be headed in their thirteenth season on ABC. Fans got an ...
Ellen Pompeo reveals why she's stayed with 'Grey's Anatomy' for 12 yearsToday.com
Grey's Anatomy: Caterina Scorsone Is Just as Frustrated with Amelia as Fans AreTV Guide (blog)
Ellen Pompeo Explains Why She's Stayed On Grey's Anatomy All These YearsRefinery29
Access Hollywood -EW.com
all 41 news articles »

Read the rest here:
'Grey's Anatomy' Cast on Saving Lives for 13 Seasons and Counting - Variety

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ spinoff is everything that’s wrong with TV – New York Post

Does Shonda Rhimes think shes Dick Wolf?

Taking several pages from the Law & Order masterminds playbook, ABC announced Tuesday that Rhimes, the outrageously successful creator of Scandal and Greys Anatomy, will next executive-produce a Greys spinoff, also set in Seattle with firefighters, not love-starved doctors, as its focus.

Is this not a blatant rip-off of Wolfs Chicago franchise on NBC, which includes, so far, the fire and police departments, the hospital and the courthouse? What might ABC call this one? By George, I think Ive got it: Seattle Fire!

No one can interweave the jeopardy firefighters face in the line of duty with the drama in their personal lives quite like Shonda, and Greys signature Seattle setting is the perfect backdrop for this exciting spinoff, crowed ABC Entertainment President Channing Dungey in a statement announcing the newest addition to Rhimes empire.

Really? What has Wolf been doing since Chicago Fire kicked off his Windy City franchise in 2012?

Wolfs city of heroes franchise also includes Chicago P.D. launched in 2014, Chicago Med, which debuted a year later, and the 2017 entry, Chicago Justice. With the exception of the latter show, which has yet to be renewed for next season, they are dependable performers for NBC, averaging between 6 and 7 million total viewers. They also offer more proof that Wolf is the undisputed master of setting procedural shows in a specific city and, unlike Greys Anatomy (which is filmed in Los Angeles), shooting them there. His on-location Chicago series give viewers the gritty urban feel they learned to love on Wolfs groundbreaking, New York-set Law & Order franchise, whose sole survivor, SVU, has been renewed for an age-defying 19th season.

What does Rhimes and her Shondaland production company, which specializes in the kind of daytime-skewing melodrama where dominant females stomp their way through the corridors of power, have to offer here? Shes already launched one LA-set Greys spinoff, the middling Private Practice, which ran for six seasons. Do we need another? Rhimes is already on tap to executive-produce another legal series for ABC, the midseason entry For the People in 2018. And her most recent series, The Catch, was canceled after two lackluster seasons.

If it wasnt clear before, this latest Shondaland project seals it: ABC is in a rut programmingwise. After scheduling two doomed Scandal knockoffs last season (Conviction and Notorious), the network has decided to go back in time to find viewers. And so they announced a revival of American Idol, a series that has been off its competitors air just over a year, and then Roseanne, which ended 20 years ago. Whats next? The reboot of Burkes Law? Have Gun Will Travel with, let me think ... Zac Efron as Paladin?

Hollywood, I think we have a problem.

By contrast, another prolific producer, Ryan Murphy, has kept working (on cable, admittedly) by bucking formulas and branching out into different TV genres, and doing so in surprising, provocative and entertaining ways that command the attention of viewers and the respect of Hollywood, scooping up Emmys and other awards. In the past few years he has given us American Horror Story, The People v. O.J. Simpson and Feud: Bette and Joan, three distinct series that sent programmers scrambling to their conference rooms ... to copy him.

Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, but on TV, its a crutch.

Read more:
'Grey's Anatomy' spinoff is everything that's wrong with TV - New York Post

Anatomy of a Play: Inside Brandon Marshall’s versatility – Giants.com (blog)

Giants.com examines the versatily of Brandon Marshall with a freeze-frame look at some key plays:

The Giants signed Brandon Marshall to a contract on Wednesday afternoon, and he will add a dynamic to the receiving corps that is very different than the players already on the roster.

>> 5 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT BRANDON MARSHALL

Marshalls numbers were down last year (59 catches, 788 yards, 3 TD), but much of that can be attributed to the injuries he had to fight through and the struggles the Jets had at the quarterback position and on offense.

I watched nearly every catch he made last year, and he looks much more like the 2015 version of himself that had 109 catches for 1,502 yards and 14 touchdowns. Here are some examples, including some against two of the best cornerbacks in the league: Richard Sherman and Malcolm Butler

The Return of the Back Shoulder Catch Since the departure of Hakeem Nicks, the Giants have had trouble consistently completing back shoulder catches. Brandon Marshall should change that immediately. It is a huge weapon against press man-to-man coverage that could really help the Giants offense. With someone of Marshalls size, it is very difficult to stop when the timing is right between Eli Manning and Marshall.

Heres Richard Sherman with pretty good coverage and inside leverage on Marshall, but Ryan Fitzpatrick places the ball on Marshalls outside shoulder. He is able to adjust his body late to make the catch for the touchdown before Sherman can get his head around to locate the ball.

Then you have a similar play on star Patriots cornerback Malcolm Butler who is chasing Marshall. Fitzpatrick places the ball on his back shoulder to make the easy catch.

Back Shoulder/ Stop Fade Heres an example of a similar principle at work in the red zone. A play like this is why Marshall is such a big weapon in goal to go situations. Due to his size, corners have to play the corner fade, making the back shoulder or stop fade a potent weapon. He stops and turns on Butler and makes a play on the ball for the touchdown.

He Still Has Speed

Marshall turns 33 at the end of the month, but he still routinely shows the ability to challenge cornerbacks down the field. Here are two looks at a big play by Marshall to get down the field on Richard Sherman. The first picture shows how he shakes off Shermans press. He gets Shermans hands off him and then uses his left arms to get inside of the cornerback.

Then look at the separation he creates in the second picture for an eventual 41-yard gain on a 3rd and 8.

Route Running, Hands, and Footwork

This play is later in the same game that shows how Sherman has to respect Marshalls speed and opens up a comeback route on the sideline. The first picture shows Marshall coming to a stop while Sherman is still trying to turn his hips. Its a well-run route that Marshall has won against a great corner.

The second shot shows the separation. It also shows his arm extension to attack the ball to make a great catch. Also watch the trail behind his back leg as he drags his foot to make sure he gets both feet in bounds. Great fundamentals here.

The Spectacular

Brandon Marshall can put together all facets of his game to make spectacular grabs. This play against the Steelers by all right should be an interception. In this picture you see the poorly thrown ball in the cornerbacks hands with Marshall behind him reaching for it.

Marshall uses his length and strong hands to snatch the ball away from the defender for a touchdown. Its his size, hands, and ability to go up and get the ball all in one package.

Continued here:
Anatomy of a Play: Inside Brandon Marshall's versatility - Giants.com (blog)

The anatomy of Philip Hammond’s U-turn over National Insurance – iNews

It took the government just under a week to announce its dramatic U-turn over National Insurance rates.

How the policy the centrepiece of the Budget unravelled:

1.15, 8 March: Philip Hammond announces increase in National Insurance rates for around 2.5m self-employed people.

1.30: In a chaotic post-Budget briefing, Treasury aides deny the tax hike breached the Tory manifesto promise. Mr Hammonds spokeswoman argues that the policy had been fleshed out in a taxation Bill published two months after the election.

9 March: Newspaper headlines about the policy are universally damning.

Conservative backbench protests mount against the move. By the end of the day, 20 have been openly critical.

A Welsh Office minister, Guto Bebb, says the government should say sorry for the policy.

Theresa May, speaking in Brussels, insists the policy would make the tax system simpler, fairer and more progressive. But she promises to delay it until the autumn following further consultation.

10 March: Footage emerges of David Cameron apparently describing as stupid the decision to break the manifesto promise.

11 March: Ex-Chancellor Norman Lamont mocked by Mr Hammond in his Budget speech attacks the rookie error.

12 March: Sunday newspapers carry lurid accounts of recriminations between Downing Street and the Treasury over the NI decision.

14 March: Business minister Margot James lets slip that the policy is under review, saying the increase had simply been mooted.

Morning, 15 March: Theresa May and Philip Hammond meet in Downing Street and agree to abandon the planned rise.

11.32: Minister Rory Stewart defends the rise on BBC1s Daily Politics.

11.37: U-turn announced in letter from Mr Hammond to Tory MPs.

12.02: At the beginning of Prime Ministers Questions, Theresa May confirms that the planned increases have been scrapped.

Originally posted here:
The anatomy of Philip Hammond's U-turn over National Insurance - iNews

‘Grey’s Anatomy’: Jackson Confronting His Father Brings Japril ‘Healing’ & ‘Hope’ – Moviefone

Tonight, "Grey's Anatomy" Season 13 gives fans #JapriltheSequel. Season 13, Episode 16, "Who Is He (And What Is He to You)?" airs Thursday, March 16 on ABC, as another standalone episode for co-parent exes Jackson Avery (Jesse Williams) and April Kepner (Sarah Drew).

Sarah Drew already told Moviefone it's a "pivotal" episode. The promos revealed that Jackson has found his "long-lost deadbeat dad," and although that casting is still a secret until the episode airs, the daddy drama will play out over the episode.

"[April] realizes from the beginning that something's going on with [Jackson]. He's unusually cross with her even in terms of their working relationship," Sarah Drew told TVLine. "So when she discovers that [the reason] is his father, it kind of opens up a world for her of, 'Now everything makes sense' his attitude, his shortness, his shutting her out."

It gives April more patience with Jackson, and prompts her to do what it takes to get him to confront his father. Drew said she loves the way the scene plays out, because April tells Jackson he needs to talk to his father because he can't do his job right now and she needs him to do his job. "That's really tough, and I don't think it's completely honest," Drew said. "I think [she does it] totally out of love, but she's not going to let on that it is, because... that's exactly what he needs to hear in that moment. She's so firm and so strong. She's really being a rock for him."

Drew said "a great healing" comes out of the experience and it should give Japril fans "a lot of hope." So what more can you ask for than that?

We've already seen photos and synopses for the next two episodes after this one, so here are the details on "Till I Hear It From You" and here's more on Ellen Pompeo's directorial debut in "Be Still, My Soul."

"Grey's Anatomy" airs Thursdays at 8 p.m. on ABC.

Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

Original post:
'Grey's Anatomy': Jackson Confronting His Father Brings Japril 'Healing' & 'Hope' - Moviefone

ABC renews Grey’s Anatomy, Scandal, and How to Get Away With Murder – EW.com

Great news, TGIT fans: ABC has given early renewals to Greys Anatomy, Scandal, and How to Get Away With Murder.

The pickup news means Greys Anatomy will hit season 14, Scandal will make it to season 7, and How to Get Away With Murder will continue into season 4.

Greys Anatomy, Scandal, and How to Get Away With Murder continue to keep viewers on the edge of their seats and wanting more, says ABC Entertainment President Channing Dungey of the Shonda Rhimes-produced trio. Im thrilled to bring back these shows and the OMG moments that come with them.

This season, Scandal was delayed until midseason to accommodate Kerry Washingtons pregnancy, meaning TGIT was not part of the fall lineup new series Notorious aired in Scandals timeslot and didnt gain much traction. Dungy previously admitted to EW about being nervous over postponing Scandals return. Scandal is a big hit show for us and nobody likes to go into their first fall season as president of entertainment without one of the biggest guns in their arsenal, she said. But, obviously we were thrilled for Kerry and her family and thats all good news.

No decisions have been made in terms of Scandals episode count or whether it will be on in the fall or launch again in midseason Dungey previously said it was too early to tell whether shed repeat history and have another TGIT-less fall. I havent even had the opportunity yet to read the pilot scripts that are in development, so for me to posit what next falls going to look like is a little too early, she said.

RELATED: Hear more of the latest TV news from this week

Scandals absence also affected How to Get Away With Murder, which has been strong creatively, but not in the ratings. I think the lead-in certainly bears some responsibility, Dungey has said. Notorious did not perform as strongly as we would have hoped But if you look at How to Get Away With Murder over the seven-day period, we generally go up in triple-digit percentages, an average of 115 to 117 percent for the show. So that signals that people are still as engaged with it as before. I do think that the lack of TGIT pull-through did affect the number a little bit.

As for Greys Anatomy, Dungey seemed optimistic about the show continuing for many seasons to come, and possibly rivaling ERs tenure. Thatd be lovely, Dungey told EW. Ill take even more! Honestly, I think that the show is going to continue as long as Shonda and the gang have a creative passion for telling those stories. At the moment, it feels like were full steam ahead.

Greys Anatomy, Scandal,and How to Get Away with Murder air Thursdays at 8 p.m. ET, 9 p.m. ET and 10 p.m. ET, respectively, on ABC.

View original post here:
ABC renews Grey's Anatomy, Scandal, and How to Get Away With Murder - EW.com

Logan, Han Solo and the Anatomy of an Anti-Hero – CGMagazine

Hugh Jackman and James Mangolds Logan is about to make its debut in theaters, and with early reviews in, this sounds like the Wolverine stand-alone movie fans have been clamouring for. Wolverine is a beloved comic book character and has been taken to new heights with Jackmans performances spanning multiple X-Men and stand-alone movies.

But hes also an anti-hero, which makes his rise to fame that much more interesting. What is it about Wolverine, and anti-heroes in general, that make them so endearing? Investigating this question, there are specific qualities anti-heroes have that not only make them anti-heroes but also warms them up to the hearts of fans the world over.

Heres a look at the anatomy of an anti-hero as found in comic books, movies and television shows.

Most anti-heroes begin their heros journey on the peripheries of society. Starting with Wolverine, he begins Bryan Singers X-Men movie making a living fighting inside a steel cage in a seedy Alberta bar. Its only until he meets Rouge that he leaves that life as an outcast and moves toward a life a part of the collective, or in Logans case, as a card carrying member of the X-Men.

Keeping with films featuring Marvel Comics characters, virtually the entire main cast of James Gunns Guardians of the Galaxy are outcasts. Peter Quill, Starlord to his close friends, begins the film as a thief, stealing an ancient orb, one that lands a bounty on Quills head. Ensuing, Rocket Raccoon and Groot, two bounty hunters try capturing Quill, only to be thwarted by Gamora. The entire band of misfits are eventually arrested and sent to prison, where they run into their final member of the Guardians of the Galaxy, Drax. All five members of the Guardians of the Galaxy are outsiders, all living above or beneath the law, and all eventually being put behind bars until they band together to break out.

Stepping away from comics, Mad Max in George Millers The Road Warrior begins the movie as a lonely drifter, completely cut off from society. His life consists of scavenging old vehicles for a few litres of gas, and eating dog food from rusty cans. The successive movies, Mad Max: Beyond Thunderdome and the recent masterpiece Max Mad: Fury Road, find Max still roaming out in the wastelands, an outsider looking into a post-apocalyptic society.

Women are not immune to the outsider status either. In Netflixs Jessica Jones, our favourite leather jacket wearing anti-hero works as a private investigator, working outside the law. Her fledgling P.I. company, questionable business practices and foul mouth keep her on the periphery of New York society, never fully able to be a part of what society would deem successful.

The reluctant nature of many anti-heroes is another common quality. In The Road Warrior, Max wants nothing to do with the resistance fighting against the goalie mask wearing Humungous. He only wants gasoline for his car, and the bare essentials of survival. As events unfold, Max is reluctantly pulled into the fray, but its not out of the kindness of his heart.

Everyones favourite space smuggler in a galaxy far, far away falls into this category as well. When we first meet Han Solo in A New Hope, he is hired by Obi-Wan Kenobi for passage to Alderaan. After coming out of light speed, there is no Alderaan and the Millennium Falcon is tractor-beamed into the Death Star. When Solo finds out Princess Leia is also aboard, he wants nothing to do with her rescue. Its only through dollar signs that he decides to help. Nearing the films climax, Han leaves with his loot, not wanting anything to do with the Rebels attack on the Death Star. But fear not, reluctance only lasts so long with anti-heroes Han plays a major last second hand in giving Luke enough space to destroy the Death Star.

For many anti-heroes, there is a side to him or her that no one wants to be on. That side is vengeance. In George Millers first introduction to Max in Mad Max, he wasnt the drifter we know of him today. He is a loving family man. A police officer whose wife and child are run down by an Australian motorcycle gang. This pushes Max over the edge, and leads not only to Max turning to vengeance in that film, but in the film following. In The Road Warrior, Maxs dog is killed by Humongous gang this loss of family is once again the thing that pushes Max to murder and mayhem.

Running with the dog theme, Keanu Reeves in John Wick, turns into a vengeful killer, one that would make Charles Bronson jealous. Wicks car gets stolen and his dog is killed. The result is a vengeful body count done so well, a second instalment was made and is presently in theatres.

The Punishers entire existence is built on vengeance. First appearing in The Amazing Spiderman #129, the Punisher was a vigilante who readers fell head over heels for. Through the comic years, it was revealed that Frank Castles family were all murdered by the mob. As a result, this war veteran enacts his own brand brutal and systemic justice on New Yorks worst.

In last years smash hit film Deadpool, Wade Wilsons entire film existence is built upon vengeance when he is mutated and modified to have superhuman regenerative capabilities. Deadpool goes after the mastermind of his altered state and becomes one of the most beloved anti-heroes ever on screen through vulgarity, violence and of course, vengeance.

And we couldnt have a vengeance category without writing about V from V for Vendetta. Much like Deadpool, V was created by a bad experiment gone horribly wrong. The Guy Fawkes mask wearing V makes it his lifes mission to avenge what happened to him and put the power back in the hands of the British people by eliminating evil doers in government.

This is where audiences get to fully enjoy the dark nature of the anti-hero. One of Han Solos most loveable qualities is his irritability. Whether its a way of masking sexual tension between himself and Princess Leia, or his general disdain for droids (one distinct golden rod comes to mind), Han is at his best with his sarcastic and irritable sensibility.

Guardians of the Galaxy member Rocket Raccoon is beloved for more than being a furry, talking animal. His prickly personality makes him that more loveable. Hes irritable and doesnt suffer fools gladly. Hes constantly at-wits-end with Groot, and takes great joy in the misfortune of others. There is something endearing about an irritable anti-hero.

For the anti-hero to be redeemable in an audiences eyes, he or she must have something deeper they must have a heart of gold. When the chips are down, they need to put others before their own selfish needs. A great example of this is Han Solo. Throughout the original Star Wars Trilogy, Han lets us into the size of his heart. He comes back to help Luke destroy the Death Star in Episode IV. He opens his heart up enough to fall for a certain princess. He sacrifices his own self-preservation by joining the Rebellion.

Throughout his time on screen, Wolverine has had perhaps the biggest heart of all. Hes been protective of Rouge, and eventually for all of Professor Xaviers students. He fell for Jean. To save his mutant brethren, he went back in time to right wrongs in Days of Future Past. Logan protects his heart with his anger and resentment, but that just makes him that more irresistible.

Much of the anti-heros motivations are done out of love. Sure there is vengeance and anger, but the anti-hero also wants to right wrong wrongs that have hurt his or her heart. Deadpool fights to save the woman he loves, V terrorizes the British government to show the people they dont have to live in fear, and all the Guardians of the Galaxy decide to band together and do something good, keeping the orb away from Ronan and saving the people of Xandar.

In all, the anti-hero is a complex individual. And these complexities have allowed many of them to have a place in popular culture and in fans hearts the world over.

View original post here:
Logan, Han Solo and the Anatomy of an Anti-Hero - CGMagazine

Grey’s Anatomy Live Stream: Watch Season 13, Episode 15 Online Free – Streaming Observer News

Show/Episode: Greys Anatomy Season 13, Episode 15 Civil War

Date/Time: Tuesday, March 9 at 8 p.m. ET

Channel: ABC

Watch the Greys Anatomy Live Stream with: DIRECTV NOW (free 7-day trial), Sling TV (free 7-day trial)

Next Day, On Demand: Sling TV (free 7-day trial)

International Stream: Streaming options outside of the US

Civil War offers up a first-class case of hospital politics. April, Catherine, Jackson, and Richard all spend time on a difficult trauma case that is only made harder by in-hospital politics. Amelia comes to terms with how she feels about Owen. Meanwhile, Meredith ends up caught between Nathan and Alex because of a patient. If you cant wait to watch Greys Anatomy Season 13, Episode 15 online, you can learn how in the rest of this guide.

You can watch ABC online in a couple of different ways. The easiest way is by picking a live stream service. This means that youll be able to watch Greys Anatomy Civil War online when it airs on TV. There are two great, low-cost ways to watch Greys Anatomy Season 13, Episode 15 online and those are DIRECTV NOW and Sling TV. Even better, both options include free trials, so you can even watch Greys Anatomy online free! On-demand options are also available and will be discussed further in the article.

ABC is a channel offered in every DIRECTV NOW package. Package pricing starts at $35 each month and includes a minimum of 60 channels. ABC and other local channels are available in live stream in select cities or they are available on-demand nationwide. You also have FX, History, Food Network, USA, AMC, TNT, TBS, and Discovery. If you find you dont have enough channels you can choose a larger package or you can add channels like HBO for just a few dollars more each month.

DIRECTV NOW works on mobile and streaming devices and can be watched from almost anywhere with a WiFi connection. The DIRECTV NOW 7-day trial ensures that you can watch Greys Anatomy Season 13, Episode 15 online free! You can check out our DIRECTV NOW review if you want to learn more.

Like DIRECTV NOW, Sling TV also offers the ability to watch ABC online. The first thing you need to do is choose a package. The Sling TV Orange package only costs $20 a month and includes more than 25 channels. You will have access to TNT, AMC, A&E, ESPN, Disney, and many additional channels. From there, you need the Broadcast Extra package for an additional $5. This gives you access to ABC and select other channels. ABC is only available in live stream in select cities, but there is nationwide on-demand access, so youll be able to watch Greys no matter what! If youre interested in HBO that can be added to any package for $15/month.

Sling TV works on streaming and mobile devices from most locations. Perhaps the best news of all is that you can watch Greys Anatomy Season 13, Episode 15 online free with the Sling TV free 7-day trial! Our Sling TV review is available if you have any questions.

You can also watch Greys Anatomy S13, E15 online using on-demand services. Both Amazon Instant Video and Vudu are two of the most popular services. They both offer single episodes at $2 a piece and if you decide to order the season pass you can get them cheaper than that. Both services will allow you to watch online from a variety of streaming and mobile devices. You wont be able to watch the show in live stream, but each service does offer new episodes as soon as the day after they air on TV.

Still want to know how to watch Greys Anatomy Season 13, Episode 15 online? If so, any questions can be directed to our comment section. And if theres anything else youd like to know about Greys Anatomy streaming, our guide can fill you in!

Ashtyn Evans is a screenwriter and freelance writer from the Midwest. She owns nearly a thousand films on Amazon and holds streaming subscriptions to everything from HBO and Hulu to Showtime and Starz. Email her at ashtynevans@streamingobserver.com. Disclosure: Streaming Observer is supported by readers. Articles may contain referral links. For more information, see the disclosure at the bottom of the page.

Read more here:
Grey's Anatomy Live Stream: Watch Season 13, Episode 15 Online Free - Streaming Observer News

La La Land: anatomy of a backlash – Den of Geek UK

Reader, you should have seen the queue: it stretched all the way out of the cinema, down the street, round the corner and on for another half a kilometre or so. This was the line for La La Land at the London Film Festival late last year, and there was a definite hum of enthusiasm in the air.

Hype had already built around the musical since its first screening at the Venice Film Festival a couple of months earlier, and as a result, there were so many people desperate to see the movie at its first London screening that the cinema couldn't accommodate them all. Your humble writer managed to grab one of the last seats in the house - and again, the atmosphere was electric: the audience laughed in all the right places, and as the final credits rolled on Damien Chazelle's airy romance, a ripple of applause went up.

You've probably noted all the critical acclaim by now, and seen the La La Land poster covered in a sea of stars from all those gushing notices. Yet over the past few weeks, the tide has begun to turn against Chazelle's musical. Hadley Freeman wrote an amusing piece about the film's jazz-snob leading man, played by Ryan Gosling.

A more serious criticism argues that La La Land's racially insensitive in its casting, given that it's all about a white guy defending jazz - a form of music created by African Americans. Other commentators have suggested that co-star Emma Stone's character is something of a blank; still others have said that, really, Gosling and Stone's singing and dancing isn't up to much.

Those are only a very brief example of the criticisms levelled at La La Land over the past few weeks - for more a more detailed top-down view, these pieces at the Guardian and the Washington Post will give you just about everything you need. The deeper question, at least for us, relates to the nature of the backlash itself. How can a fairly harmless indie film go from acclaim to fairly comprehensive criticism so quickly?

Based on our years of watching and reviewing movies, here's a theory of how the backlash process works...

Like so many indie flicks, La La Land made its debut at a film festival. On paper, being a critic at a film festival sounds like the best gig in the world: you get to sit around watching movies all day and get paid for it.

The reality, however, is a bit more stressful than it initially sounds. First, you're spending eleven-or-so days watching dozens of films back-to-back. While you might be familiar with some of the movies on offer at any given festival, the whole point of these events is to get an early look at work from up-and-coming directors or filmmakers from more obscure parts of the globe.

This means you could be up bright and early to see an Italian drama for breakfast, before tucking into a Dutch thriller for elevenses, a Japanese horror at lunchtime, a French animation for your mid-afternoon snack, an American biopic for dinner, and so on. The last film might end somewhere around midnight, and then you have to trudge back to your hotel room, a stack of barely-legible notes clutched in your fist, and attempt to write reviews from them all - assuming you can even remember what happened in that film you saw at breakfast. It was Swiss, wasn't it? Yes, probably Swiss.

Now, we're not suggesting for one moment that you should throw a pity party for film critics. Rather, the above might help explain why, when a film comes along that's different or unexpected, weary critics will suddenly jump out of their skins. A musical as light and frothy as La La Land must have felt like a sunny antidote to some of the more brooding works on offer at last year's Venice film festival. As a comparison, Dutch director Martin Koolhoven's Brimstone (which was also in the main competition at Venice) is an exploration of how many horrible things Guy Pearce can do to men, women and livestock in two-and-a-half hours - a Supermarket Sweep of taboo-busting atrocities.

So the festival critics love your movie, and the first wave of reviews are full of five-star verdicts. As the film filters out to other festivals, more critics and cinema lovers are enticed into going to see it after that initial burst of acclaim, and the positive word-of-mouth continues. Gradually, however, the dissenting voices begin to surface: in December last year, for example, critic Daniel Kimmel argued that La La Land is "a film that tries too hard and is always showing how much it's straining." That same month, the National Post's critic Calum Marsh suggested that Chazelle's technique as a director did much to mask his shortcomings as a dramatist.

Within a few short weeks, the cracks have begun to show.

There are certain kinds of movie that awards bodies absolutely love. Movies that celebrate the triumph of the human spirit; movies that showcase the craft of acting. Most of all, Hollywood awards bodies love movies about Hollywood. Like silent-era love letter The Artist, the British Academy, the Golden Globes and the Screen Actors Guild have clutched La La Land to their bosoms. The movie broke records at the Globes; at the Oscars, its 14 nominations puts it alongside All About Eve and Titanic for the most nods given to a single contender.

For most indie filmmakers, awards recognition is a gift from the gods: with a potential audience of millions, even a nomination or two can mean a movie with an otherwise tiny marketing budget can get some much-needed exposure. In the case of a movie like The Artist or La La Land, however, there's the possibility that a sense of suspicion might set in among cinema-goers. Is La La Land really worth all those gold statues, or is this just another example of Oscar voters falling for the hype?

Despite all the gushing reviews from critics and the nominations from awards bodies, it's this stage that's the true turning point. A film's release exposes a movie to the broader public for the first time, obviously, but something else also happens at the same moment: columnists, bloggers, journalists and pundits start filing their opinion pieces.

On the surface, an opinion piece and a review might seem like the same thing - a review is, after all, one person's opinion, albeit backed up by their years of experience and knowledge in one particular field of interest. But reviews are invariably written early, often after one viewing and frequently before a film's release. They're an impression, a snapshot based on an initial screening. This is why movies can sometimes receive a critical drubbing on their theatrical release, and then a more positive reassessment sometime later.

As a quick example, consider Mark Kermode and his change of heart over Steven Spielberg's 2001 film, A.I.: Artificial Intelligence. When the movie first came out, Kermode gave it a negative review; 12 years later, he'd had time to reflect, revisit the movie, and came to the conclusion that he was wrong - so wrong that he even apologised to Spielberg for his initial verdict.

Articles and opinion pieces, unlike reviews, generally come after a period of rumination; writers have had a chance to think about a movie's themes, ideas and flaws. They may have rewatched it a couple of times, talked about it with friends, and come to the conclusion that some of the flaws are more fundamental problems on closer inspection.

This is why, at least in this writer's humble opinion, a movie as seemingly beloved as La La Land can suddenly seem so hated a few weeks later. Reviews are an expression of surprise, a reflection of an initial warm glow left behind by a first viewing; those later pieces are where a film's wider implications are picked apart in more forensic detail.

So if La La Land received a legion five-star reviews on one hand, and criticism for its insensitivity on the other, which is right? The answer, we'd argue, can be both. For a multitude of reasons, La La Land struck a chord with critics when it first emerged last year - and we were among the various outlets who expressed our affection for it. But
this isn't to say that La La Land is a perfect movie, or that the flaws found within it mean that it doesn't deserve the praise it's already received.

One of the positive things about our interconnected, online world is that we can read and hear opinions from critics in other countries and from different walks of life. Female writers, like Hadley Freeman, have pointed out the less likeable side of La La Land's central male character, Sebastian, and noted the somewhat flat depiction of its other lead, Mia - both things that may have passed some male cinema-goers by.

Similarly, jazz fans have pointed out flaws in its depiction of their favourite music genre; lovers of classic musicals have argued that La La Land isn't quite in the same league as the films it's quoting; MTV's Ira Madison III writes that, "If you're gonna make a film about an artist staying true to the roots of jazz against all odds [...] you'd think the artist would be black."

Criticisms like these are important; films are made by ordinary, flawed people who are products of their upbringing and their own worldview, so it follows that what they make is also flawed. Singling films out and holding them up for praise is important for the industry as a whole; without it, small films like La La Land, Blue Ruin, It Follows, Lion or Moonlight wouldn't get the word-of-mouth they need. But whether you call them backlashes or critical dissections, the more in-depth discussions of a film's ideas and meaning - whether intended or otherwise - are just as important.

See original here:
La La Land: anatomy of a backlash - Den of Geek UK

Inside the Linguistic Anatomy of the Perfect Trump Insult – New York Magazine

Ad will collapse in seconds CLOSE February 10, 2017 02/10/2017 12:10 p.m. By Drake Baer

Share

Donald Trump may hate his new job and be surprised to find hes not a dictator, but he is delivering on one campaign promise: innovation. At least in swearing.

The embattled new president is something of a muse for political obscenity. Consider the curious case of shit-gibbon, chronicled by linguist par excellence Ben Zimmer, in a new post at Strong Language, a sweary blog about swearing. The expletive exploded this week thanks to Pennsylvania state senator Daylin Leach. The public servant took umbrage when Trump joked of destroying the career of a Texas state senator who wanted to curb the police practice of asset forfeiture. Hey @realDonaldTrump I oppose civil asset forfeiture too! Leach tweeted. Why dont you try to destroy my career you fascist, loofa-faced, shit-gibbon! The response to the tweet has been beyond anything I could have imagined, the lawmaker said Thursday.

Though loofa-faced is a gem, the operative word here is shit-gibbon. Zimmer, doing the Lords work, traces the insults trajectory. Where could Leach have alighted upon such a life-affirming insult? Why, naturally, the land of curses: Scotland. As you may have recalled from the innocent days of last summer, the Donald mistakenly thought that Scotland had voted to leave the European Union when in fact the mass majority of Scots voted to remain. Just arrived in Scotland, he tweeted. Place is going wild over the vote. They took their country back, just like we will take America back. And oh, the insults started pouring in. History was made when Twitter user MetalOllie called Trump a tiny fingered, Cheeto-faced, ferret wearing shitgibbon. (Note: MetalOllie is not Scottish, he says, thought he WISHES he were [caps his]).

Shit-gibbon has a certain ring in the ear, a metrical urgency that Migos would be proud of. It belongs to an entire class of ritual Scottish insults (thats a real thing). Trump has a way of inspiring them, Zimmer notes; see also cockwomble, fucknugget, and jizztrumpet, to name but a few.

If the English major in you is tingling, thats because these insults all share a similar rhythm. As linguist/blogger Taylor Jones notes, these follow the formula of single-syllable expletive insult + trochee, or a two-syllable word where the first sound is stressed, like puffin or womble. (Due to their simplicity, perhaps, trochees make for great kids content, like turtle, power, and mighty, morphin, or ranger.) In poetry, this tressed-stressed-unstressed construction is called an antibacchius, Zimmer reports.

What makes the antibacchius such a fit for the anti-Trump? Why does the Orange One summon fucknugget and its peers? My guess is that, to follow up on Joness analysis, it has to do with the combination of high and low culture that the foot accommodates. Some variations are downright childish (fart person! poop human!) while others are Shakespearean (fart monger! piss weasel!). Its quite the match for a 70-year-old boy tyrant: fart basket, shit whistle, turd helmet, cock bucket. Feel free to invent your own, too.

Psychologists Think They Found the Purpose of Depression

Inside the Linguistic Anatomy of the Perfect Trump Insult

Your Dog Is Judging You for Being a Jerk

Scientists Finally Figured Out Why Whales Do Awesome Leaps Into the Air

Lonely Peoples Brains Work Differently

An MIT Scientist Claims That This Pill Is the Fountain of Youth

How Neuroscientists Explain the Mind-Clearing Magic of Running

So Apparently There Are 4 Kinds of Introversion

How Exercise Shapes You, Far Beyond the Gym

5 Leading Theories of What Dreams Actually Are

Most Popular Video On Science of Us

Not everything is terrible.

What happens when your distress keeps you from caring about anyone else.

A survey found that 29 percent of people said their productivity had tanked since the election.

They can tell when youre behaving badly toward other humans, and theyll react accordingly.

It starts with a state senator calling Trump a fascist, loofa-faced, shit-gibbon and only gets better.

The worst aspect of human nature is rearing its head at the moment, but a key idea from social psychology offers some solace.

A new study found a link between sign-language fluency and visual-processing skills.

Its like a therapeutic study hall.

Fitness can and should be convenient.

It can pull you out of the hustle of daily life and into meaning-making.

Its important to understand just how common it is to deal with a bout of anxiety, depression, or some other ailment.

If we want to bridge what today seems like an insurmountable chasm, we need to begin by rethinking our concept of belonging.

How the single-minded pursuit of success can backfire.

Unsurprisingly, Trump supporters were those most likely to dehumanize Muslims.

Which may be why it appears in every human culture.

A new book offers a nuanced take on compulsions.

Money, money, fun?

Psychology and philosophy explain why.

Researchers looked at four recent papers and found not one, not two, but 150 statistical errors. And that may just be the tip of the iceberg.

Maybe give the earbuds a break.

Social Account

or

Sign up with a social account:

Dont worry. We will never post to your social media account without your permission.

or create an account

Weve sent a registration confirmation email to .

Please follow the instructions in the email within 48 hours to complete your registration.

Forgot Your Password?

Enter your email address or username and well email instructions on how to reset your password.

This username or email is associated with a Facebook account.

Log in with your social account:

Check Your Inbox

Weve sent you an email with instructions on how to reset your password.

Choose a Username

Your username will appear next to your comments.

You already have an account registered under . You can link your Facebook account to your existing account.

Welcome! You are now a registered user of NYMag.com, TheCut.com, Vulture.com, ScienceOfUs.com and GrubStreet.com.

Want more? Subscribe to our daily newsletters.

Constant news updates on politics, business, media, and real estate.

Breaking news and analysis on all the latest TV, movies, music, books, theater, and art.

Get the latest fashion, beauty, and shopping news and recommendations.

We're sorry. You must confirm your registration within 48 hours of submitting your registration request. Please register again.

You are already registered. Please log in.

Reset Your Password

Enter a new password

Your password has been successfully changed.

Please log in.

Read more:
Inside the Linguistic Anatomy of the Perfect Trump Insult - New York Magazine

Greys Anatomy Recap: Mergers and Divisions – Vulture

Greys Anatomy

Save the Last Dance for Me

Season 16 Episode 13

Editors Rating 2 stars **

Photo: Ali Goldstein/ABC

Ah, midseason Greys Anatomy. Its that time of year where there are some moments of gripping drama, but mostly episodes are laying track for big things to come toward the end of the season. Were treading water again, and in Save the Last Dance for Me you could really feel it.

Take the AmeliaLink paternity debacle (YES WE HAVE TO). Amelia, in all her maturity and non-tumor-ness (wait, remember when Greys blamed all of Amelias irrational actions on her tumor? But then they removed it and shes basically the same? LOL, so cute), has taken to avoiding Link altogether while they wait for paternity results. Poor Link is just wandering around like a sad puppy waiting to find out if hes going to be a father or not as is his right, by the way and Amelia is acting like this is all about her. Yes, of course that tracks, but that doesnt make it fun to watch. She calls Link for a meeting in the plant room and pretty much tells him that he needs to figure out what hes going to do if the baby ends up being Owens right that very minute. You said you love me, is that true? she asks. This is such manipulative bullshit because hi, hello, he can love her and also be upset that this baby isnt his. Both things could be true, and where is a sister or two to come talk some sense into this lady when you need one? She especially needs a patented Meredith Grey speech about not being so Amelia about things by the end of the episode, because just as we think were going to get the paternity results, Amelia texts Link and tells him she hasnt even run the test yet. She cant. She needs time. What about our time, Amelia?!

Speaking of things we have a lack of interest in: the Grey Sloan Merger 2.0. Thats right, guys, Catherine went ahead and bought Pac-North, and it and its employees are being absorbed into Grey Sloan. Theyll be weeding out the extra staff by good ol fashioned interviews with Tom Koracick, the Chief of Chiefs. Once again, Tom is reveling in his power: Maggie gets her job back, but shes going to be working under Teddy; Owen is going to get his job back but gets strung along the entire day; and Richard is offered his job because Catherine demands it. No one is happy about any of this and Richard storms out, refusing to be a piece in Catherines chess game. Hed rather quit than let her win. But the people wont stand for that! And by people I mean Jackson, Bailey, and Meredith.

Jackson, Bailey, and Meredith grab Owen and Richard and go marching into the conference room to confront Koracick. Theyre the Board, ya see! Theyre not going to let Tom rule this hospital, ya see! Theyre a family and they do things a certain way, YA SEE! I mean this is all nice and fun, but its very confusing to keep track of who is on the Board and who isnt and also who really has power at Grey Sloan? This all seems convenient, but Tom goes along with it because he knows theyre right: If they all walk out on him, Catherine will not be happy. If he goes along with their plan, he can remain Chief of Chiefs in both title and salary, and that is enough for him to agree to making Maggie and Teddy co-Chiefs of Cardio, making Alex and Cormac co-Chiefs of Peds, and no longer running the hospital with a his way or no way mentality. For those who have been wondering how on earth wed get all our doctors under one hospital roof again, you have your answer!

Not all is lost, dear Greys friends. There is one storyline that has me intrigued: The unsolvable case of Suzanne. Remember Suzanne? DeLucas patient who started getting sicker after a routine appendectomy and they cant figure out why. Shes getting much worse, and although DeLuca has set up the war room Bailey requested, they still have no answers. DeLuca tricks a master diagnostician into coming to Grey Sloan by telling her The Meredith Grey has requested the consult, which is mean DeLuca repeatedly describes it as luring her to Grey Sloan and seems to think that makes it better and I really need someone to tell that child that is is only making it worse but ultimately a good decision.

Welcome Dr. Riley, Greys Anatomys first deaf doctor. She has no time for DeLucas nonsense, which is always delightful. After Maggie has to operate on Suzanne because of fluid building around her heart, Dr. Riley has an extremely risky plan: They need to take Suzanne off all of her medication antibiotics, steroids, everything so that they can see if maybe her medication is blocking out a clue to whats really going on. Obviously, taking a sick woman who just had heart surgery off all medication is not advisable, like, at all, but Rileys the best and this is her best recommendation. DeLuca turns to Maggie for her opinion, but Maggie, who may be back in the OR but is definitely much more detached than weve ever seen her, simply says Rileys idea is reckless and a catastrophic mistake. People should be watching out for Maggie.

Alas! There is no time! In the end, DeLuca offers Suzanne Rileys plan. Its risky shes definitely going to get sicker and be in pain while they try this but theyre all out of options. Its Suzannes sister Hadley who puts up the biggest fight. Riley wins her over with an emotional speech about her own sisters, how one is her best friend and so she understands what shes asking Hadley to do. She tells Hadley that Suzannes immune system is completely compromised and with the medication all gone, the disease will finally be able to talk to Riley. This is the best shot they have at saving Suzannes life. Suzanne and Hadley agree to move forward with Dr. Rileys plan. DeLucas moved by Rileys speech and when he starts to tell Riley about his own sister, she stops him shes an only child. She made it up to get Hadley on board. Dang, Dr. Riley. Thats cold but also Im impressed.

Well, I guess its time to talk about the Alex update: Jo confides in Amelia that Alex, still with his family, hasnt been taking her phone calls and told her hes going through something. Are they really going to have Alex just leave his wife and never return? We should reserve judgment until it plays itself out, but currently its all feeling a little too Izzie Stevens for me.

Is there really any hope for a reconciliation between Richard and Catherine at this point? Jackson seems to think so, well, until he sits down with Richard who compares Catherine to Godzilla stomping all over Tokyo. Im no expert, but that doesnt seem like a good sign for mending fences.

Wow, wow, wow. Is this the end of Schmitt and Nico? Nicos annoyed that Schmitt has basically moved into his place, just as Schmitt meets an older patient dying of cancer and her husband, who are the loves of each others lives. Former ballroom dancers, Schmitt helps Norman share one last dance with Irene in the hospital cafeteria. Its lovely. But it also makes Schmitt think about his relationship. He wants more than just great sex. He wants a real partner. It might not be Nico.

Meredith also has a big reaction to Norman and Irene dancing in the cafeteria: She realizes that back in the day, it wouldve been her organizing that dance. She wonders when she stopped being such a romantic, and what that says about her relationship with DeLuca. The two of them are sleeping together again, but she wonders what it means that when he sort-of-dumped her, she barely felt anything but annoyance. Is DeLuca out and Cormac in? Did Cristina Yang truly know best?

Wait. Are Bailey and Ben going to adopt 17-year-old foster kid Joey who came in from Station 19? Theyre totally going to adopt him.

Speaking of Station 19: Whats with all the crossover stuff? I watch both shows and even I find it all to be a little too much. Next week: Bear at
tack crossover! I mean, thats hilarious, but still.

Keep up with all the drama of your favorite shows!

Continue reading here:
Greys Anatomy Recap: Mergers and Divisions - Vulture

The Visible Body Blog

Well, here we are again in the final stretch of the year. Hard to believe 2016 is over, huh? Although I won't be sad to say goodbye to itCarrie Fisher, Debbie Reynolds, and George Michael, all in less than a week? 2016 had no chill.

Despite the fact that this year's Oscar In Memoriam segment is going to be 45 minutes long, 2016 also had its bright moments: it had some of the wackiest, most incredible happenings in the world of medicine.

Let's take a look at some of 2016's coolest medical stories:

Why not kick off with my favorite story from this year, which involved a woman undergoing surgery and waking up with an accent that wasn't the one she had when she went under. When I first read this back in June, I was skeptical. If anything, this woman had to be pulling a Madonna, right?

Wrong.

When she had surgery to correct her overbite, Lisa Alamia, a born-and-bred American, came out of it speaking with a completely different accenta British one. Well, sort of. She woke up with the incredibly rare condition known as Foreign Accent Syndrome. There are only 100 known cases of it, with most resulting from neurological damage or head trauma, although Alamia's scans and tests have all come back clear.

FAS occurs when the part of the brain that deals with the actual vocals of speech (cadence, melody, rhythm, etc.) is damaged, and speech is altered in terms of timing, intonation, and tongue placement so that is perceived as sounding foreign, resulting in a new "accent." It's important to note that Alamia isn't technically speaking with a British accent; the cadence of her speech has changed to sound like it (especially to Americans like me).

According to the University of Texas at Dallas, FAS has been documented in cases around the world, including accent changes from Japanese to Korean, British English to French, American-English to British English, and Spanish to Hungarian.

So while Lisa Alamia might not be firing up the tea kettle and having bangers and mash on the regular, her new "accent" is still super cool.

Way back toward the start of the year, a tiny Windows logo wannabe came out of Vanderbilt University in Tennessee and told the world we were approaching the day when dialysis would be a thing of the past.

Bill Gates is gonna sue someone. (Vanderbilt University)

Using silicon nanotech, Vanderbilt University Medical Centers Dr. William Fissell and his team have created a filter chip that will, with the help of living kidney cells, mimic the functionality of a healthy kidney. The promised result is that it'll be about the size of a natural kidney and will be powered by the body's own blood flow.

What's incredible about this little filter is the aforementioned kidney cells, which do things like nutrient reabsorption and getting rid of accumulated wastesomething that synthetic components aren't good at.

Wanna learn more about it? Check it out here:

It seems almost too good to be true. Chocolate is, after all, a sugar and high fat bomb that can cause obesity and tooth decay (or an allergic reaction in my case, womp womp), so how can it be possible that eating chocolate on the reg can yield such happy results? Well, it seems through more and more focused study that moderate consumption of the confectionparticularly dark chocolateis a good thing!

I've singled out dark chocolate because it has the highest cocoa content, which means it has the highest levels of antioxidantsflavonoids, which are molecules that can prevent some forms of cell damage.

Prof. Saverio Stranges of the University of Warwick Medical School, United Kingdom and the Department of Population Health at the Luxembourg Institute of Health (LIH) and his colleagues ran the Observation of Cardiovascular Risk in Luxembourg (ORISCAV-LUX) study, which took a look at the chocolate consumption of 1,153 people between the ages of 18 and 69. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether chocolate intake is associated with insulin resistance (where the body's cells do not effectively respond to insulin, raising the risk for type 2 diabetes and heart disease), as well as how chocolate consumption affected liver enzyme levels (a measure of liver function).

Of the participants, 81.8 percent consumed chocolate, with an average consumption of 24.8 grams daily. Compared with the participants who didn't eat chocolate, those who did had reduced insulin resistance and improved liver enzyme levels. And the more chocolate consumed, the stronger the effect.

The team published their results of their study in the British Journal of Nutrition.

So continue eating that chocolate, you chocoholics! But, you know, keep exercising and brushing your teeth too.

And right on the heels of the chocolate story...

I have to admit, I've never had a cavity in my life. I'm a freak when it comes to my teeth. My most prized possession in my bag isn't my wallet, but my giant thing of dental floss, which gets used at least 5 times a day. But while I might be super vigilant about my teeth, there are plenty of those who aren't. I had friends in grade school who practically lived at the dentist's.

But cavities may be fighting a losing battle with the advent of silver diamine fluoride, or SDF. This special liquid has been in use for decades in Japan but has only recently been introduced to the States. Used as a desensitizer for adults, studies have shown that it can halt the progression of cavities and even prevent them altogether!

SDF is a microbial liquid that is painlessly brushed onto the teeth in less than a minuteno drills, no mess.

While SDF has an amazing effect on cavities, the same can't be said for what it does to the aesthetic of a tooth, or a patient's wallet. SDF darkens the brownish decay on a tooth, which can be unsightly for some and not worth the risk. Not to mention that until more insurers hop on the bandwagon, it's an out-of-pocket expense. Relatively cheap one, though, clocking in at $25 per treatment.

So, if you're prone to cavities and want to ditch the drill, you've got options!

Okay, now we need to take this with some caution, as the findings haven't been published in a peer-reviewed journal yet, but Dr. Stanley Riddell, an immunotherapy researcher and oncologist at Seattle's Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, presented new adoptive T-cell strategies for cancer at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C. on February 14th.

One of the new strategies is a therapy that uses white T-cells as, well, attack dogs. White blood cells are extracted from terminally ill cancer patients and then genetically reprogrammed to target cancer cells. The souped-up cells are then reintroduced into a patients bloodstream, where they make it much harder for the cancer to spread and take hold.

Riddell and his colleagues have seen "sustained regression" in many relapsing and treatment-resistant cases of B-cell malignancies: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

In one trial, 94 percent of terminally ill lymphoblastic leukemia patients went into remission, while patients with similar blood cancers experienced response rates greater than 80 percent, with more than half going into remission.

In November of this year, Riddell received the American Cancer Society research professorship to continue his immunotherapy research.

Mosquitos are the absolute worstlike, why are they even here? All they do is suck your blood and kill over 750,000 people a year. That's not an exaggerated number, either. Mosquitos are the deadliest animals on the planet, with their bite transmitting countless diseases. Mosquito-borne Malaria alone kills 600,000 every year. If humans didn't taste so damn good to mosquitos, think of how many lives could be saved.

Well, we're working on it. And by "we" I mean "researchers at Johns Hopk
ins."

They posit that because mosquitos use a bunch of different senses (smell, temperature, and sight, among others) to detect their next human host, identifying a substance that makes the taste of humans "repulsive" to the Anopheles gambiae, or malaria mosquito, could stop the transmission of the disease.

What a jerk. (J. Gathany / Public Health Image Library)

"Our goal is to let the mosquitoes tell us what smells they find repulsive and use those to keep them from biting us," said Christopher Potter, Ph.D., assistant professor of neuroscience at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

The team isolated a special area of the mosquito brain to see where olfactory neurons went using a powerful genetic techniquenever before accomplished in mosquitoes, according to Potterto make certain neurons "glow" green. The green glowing label was designed to appear specifically in neurons that receive complex odors through proteins called odorant receptors (ORs), since OR neurons are known to help distinguish humans from other warm-blooded animals in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes, which carry the Zika virus.

Wed like to figure out what regions and neurons in the brain lead to this combined effect, said Potter. If we can identify them, perhaps we could also stop them from working.

And last but not least on our list is an interesting study out of Denmark that found pregnant women who took fish oil pills in the later stages of their pregnancies saw lower rates of Asthma in their children. The study randomly assigned 736 pregnant women at 24 weeks of gestation, and a total of 695 children were born and 95.5% completed the 3-year, double-blind follow-up period.

Among children whose mothers took fish-oil capsules, 16.9 percent had asthma by age 3, compared with 23.7 percent whose mothers were given placebos. The difference is a risk reduction of about 31 percent. Pretty significant, right?

Well, pump the breaks before any of you pregnant readers rush out to the nearest vitamin store.

The author of the study, Dr. Hans Bisgaard, professor of pediatrics at the University of Copenhagen and the head of research at the Copenhagen Prospective Studies on Asthma in Childhood, says he isn't ready to recommend that pregnant women routinely take fish oil. While the study found no adverse effects in the mothers or babies, the doses were super high: 2.4 grams per day15 to 20 times what most Americans consume from foods.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), asthma has more than doubled in developed countries in recent decades. More than six million children in the United States have it, as do more than 330 million children and adults worldwide.

Previous research had suggested that fish oil might help prevent asthma. Since inflammation in the airways and lungs plays a major role in asthma, and fatty acids in fish oil are thought to prevent inflammation, it seems like a no-brainer. We'll have to wait and see what further studies determine.

*****

From everyone at Visible Body, we hope you had a wonderful year with us, and we look forward to bringing you more anatomy goodness in 2017.

Happy New Year!

Read more here:
The Visible Body Blog

Pregnant ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Star Has Big, Feminist Dreams For Her … – Huffington Post

In an empowering Instagram post, Greys Anatomy star Camilla Luddington announced shes expecting a girl, whom she will raise to be a little warrior.

On Feb 3, Luddington posted a photo on Instagram that showed her holding a onesie with the words Tomb Raider in training on it. In her caption, she wrote she was so excited to share the news that she and her partner, Matthew Alan, will be welcoming a baby girl into their family. And Luddington already has big plans for her little one.

I want her to grow up knowing how strong women are, she wrote.

The actress wrote that she will teach her daughter to be kind and to be vocal about what she thinks is right.

[I want her to grow up] to be a little warrior who is not afraid to use her voice and stand up for what she believes is right, she wrote. To navigate through life with courage and kindness, and to be one of the girls who says, You CAN sit with us....

Luddington also posted a funny video of Greys Anatomy co-star Ellen Pompeo directing her in a maternity photo shoot inspired by the pics Beyonc released two days earlier when she announced she was expecting twins.

I mean this is amazing, Pompeo said. You are pregnant at the same time as Beyonc. When is that ever going to happen again, Camilla?

Heres to hoping Luddingtons little warrior will team up with Beyoncs newest members of the BeyHive for some playdates.

The HuffPost Parents newsletter offers a daily dose of personal stories, helpful advice and comedic takes on what its like to raise kids today.Sign up here.

Original post:
Pregnant 'Grey's Anatomy' Star Has Big, Feminist Dreams For Her ... - Huffington Post

Anatomy of a DUI: What happens when you get pulled over in Colorado? – Vail Daily News

A traveler being pulled over for driving under the influence is common in Summit County.

The Fifth Judicial District composed of Summit, Lake, Eagle and Clear Creek counties and nestled among a number of other trouble areas in northwest Colorado reports the second highest rate of DUIs per capita in the state.

The underlying causes of the areas problem are varied and inflated by tourists flocking to the county during high seasons in winter and summer along with a culture of heavy substance use among visitors and residents.

Punishments for getting behind the wheel while impaired can also be wide-ranging, including losing your drivers license, hefty fines and even significant jail time in more serious cases. But according to officials, many community members dont fully understand the potential consequences of a DUI offense or what to expect when they first see the flashing lights in their rearview mirror.

The idea of getting pulled over is never a fun prospect, and while sober drivers are more likely to leave the interaction with an officers business card than a ticket, anyone exhibiting clear signs of intoxication could be in for a long night.

The biggest thing is that we consider a totality of the circumstances, said Summit County Sheriffs Office Sgt. Mark Gafari, who allowed the Summit Daily News to participate in a ride-along earlier this month to get a first-hand look at how law enforcement agents patrol the area and what theyre looking for in regard to impaired drivers.

Alcohol can affect people very differently, Gafari said. It depends on if they ate, how much, are they used to drinking and a number of other factors. For us, it comes down to the driving actions and our personal observations. But we also have to remember that someone could be driving poorly because theyre lost, or they could be having a medical episode or something else. Our job is to go and have a polite conversation and check whats going on.

Getting pulled over

Gafari said impaired driving arrests are largely based around three factors. The first is called vehicle in motion observations, or the reason a traffic stop was initiated in the first place, such as a driver weaving on the roadway, driving at unusually slow or fast speeds, or exhibiting delayed or strange reactions like stopping at a green light, among other possible reasons.

The second factor is observations during the personal contact phase, in which an officer will try to determine if the abnormal driving behavior may be related to substance use, such as a strong smell of alcohol, slurred speech, trouble understanding an officers questions, slow reactions when handing over paperwork and more.

If an officer feels inebriation might be a contributor to the strange driving behavior, the driver will be asked to complete a standard field sobriety test three roadside maneuvers that have been scientifically validated to obtain indicators of impairment based on International Association of Chiefs of Police and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration standards.

The tests include looking for a horizontal gaze nystagmus (involuntary jerking of the eyes), a walk and turn, and one-leg stand.

We try to do all we can to consider everything that might be going on and give them a chance and have a conversation with them, Gafari said. Because there may be things I dont know, and its important for us to be human about it and explain the reason for the stop and why were doing what were doing.

But if I think you may be unsafe to operate a motor vehicle, I may want to check, and the voluntary roadside maneuver is the best way to do that. That totality including the driving behavior and our interaction will come together to determine if youre placed into custody for suspicion of DUI or not.

After an arrest

If the driver is taken into custody, theyll be asked to submit to their choice of a chemical blood or breath test under the states express consent law. In Colorado, and the rest of the nation, drivers give consent to be tested when theyre applying for their drivers license. If substances other than alcohol are suspected, the test has to be a blood test. Blood tests are performed by medical professionals, who typically take two samples to be sent to the Colorado Bureau of Investigation and an independent lab of the suspects choosing for analysis.

When you sign on the dotted line on the application for a drivers license, youre consenting, when reasonably requested, to give a blood or breath test, Fifth Judicial District Attorney Bruce Brown said. They cant just pull you over for speeding and ask for a test. They have to have a reasonable suspicion that you were driving under the influence.

Drivers can refuse to submit to a test, though that triggers an automatic yearlong suspension of their driving privileges by the Colorado Department of Revenue.

Beyond criminal charges, driving under the influence cases also can include a substantial administrative process at the Department of Revenues Division of Motor Vehicles. For example, if a breath or blood test returns a blood alcohol content of 0.08 or above the national threshold for DUI offenses the DMV automatically will revoke that individuals right to drive for nine to 24 months, depending on whether theyre a repeat offender.

A driver can have their driving privileges reinstated earlier in most cases, even as soon as one month or two months if they refused a blood or breath test though that typically involves agreeing to install an interlock device in their car, essentially a blow-and-go breathalyzer that prevents the car from starting if any alcohol is detected.

Its understandable people get lost in that quagmire because it seems like the court is the place to address this, said Summit County Judge Edward Casias, who handles a majority of the countys DUI cases. Thats purely an administrative process, and the court has nothing to do with it. I cant order the DMV to let someone drive.

After an arrest, offenders will typically be booked into the jail, fingerprinted, photographed, released on bond usually about $1,000 on a first offense and are either issued a summons to return to court or appear before a judge. After the first advisement, theres usually a period between hearings so the alleged offender can review their police reports, properly understand their charges, consult with an attorney and determine what path to take whether its pleading guilty, preparing a defense or providing new information to the District Attorneys Office.

Going to court

According to Brown, first-time DUI offenders frequently negotiate a settlement to a less severe charge of driving while ability impaired (DWAI), and a huge majority of offenders end up pleading guilty.

Over 90% of people who are charged with driving under the influence end up pleading guilty, Brown said. About 5% of those cases are dismissed or reduced to a charge less than a DWAI, and 5% or less would go to trial. Thats based on a nationwide statistical analysis, and weve done them here, and we are pretty consistent.

According to the 2019 Driving Under the Influence of Drugs and Alcohol report prepared by the Colorado Division of Criminal Justice, suspects were found guilty in more than 81% of DUI cases in 2017 statewide, and cases were dismissed in 9.7% of cases.

Driving under the influence charges are typically misdemeanor offenses, but can rise to the level of a felony for individuals with three prior convictions. By Colorado statute, the possible penalties for a DUI offense typically include five days to a year in jail (not mandatory), a $600 to $1,000 fine, 48-96 hours of useful public service, an alcohol evaluation, DUI classes and treatment, and the likely suspension of the drivers license along with court fees. Penalties for a DWAI are somewhat less severe, including a potential two to 180 days in jail, a $200 to $500 fine, 24-48 hours of useful public service, an alcohol evaluation, classes, court costs and eight points
off the drivers license.

Casias said individuals with aggravating factors in their cases, such as a high blood alcohol content, also could get supervised probation as part of their sentence, which requires an additional $600 supervision fee per year. Casias also noted that hell almost always include at least a small jail sentence for anyone who comes in with a blood alcoholcontent higher than 0.159.

Its more than twice the legal limit and over three times the limit for a DWAI, Casias said. That indicates the person definitely should have felt it and should have known they were too drunk to get behind the wheel. So theyre going to do a weekend in jail.

But offenders typically end up paying more than just fines, and the costs can add up. With court costs and required treatment classes alone not factoring in potential costs of an interlock device, attorney fees, rising insurance costs or any loss of wages a first-time DWAI offender will end up paying about $1,971, according to Casias. For a first-time DUI offender, the price tag goes up to about $2,560. These numbers assume the lowest level education and treatment course, which requires 21 weeks of treatment and 12 weeks of education courses at $35 a session.

Brown said drivers can receive some form of DUI charge even if their blood alcohol content doesnt reach the presumptive limits for a DUI (0.08) or DWAI (0.05), but said its fairly rare.

The punishments get more severe for reoffenders, though Brown said sentences for first-time offenders are designed to send a message and hopefully push that individual into making better decisions in the future or seeking out substance use treatment, if necessary.

If you go out and talk to your friends or co-workers, many people have suffered a DUI, Brown said. So the fact that someone is convicted doesnt become a moral judgment but an indicator that they might have a substance abuse problem. The primary purpose is to make sure that they get an opportunity to recognize the danger involved, to understand their relationship with alcohol and that they may have behavior that needs to be changed.

Attending classes

To that end, every offender is asked to complete an alcohol and drug education course or, in more severe cases, months of education courses and treatment programs.

For individuals in treatment, sessions are largely based around removing the shame around the offense, increasing awareness and responsibility, and better understanding the circumstances behind the offense.

I think its really important that people understand that this can happen to anybody, said Andrea Brown, a substance use counselor at Alpine Springs Counseling, who teaches courses out of Breckenridge. Ive had first responders, attorneys and everyone else. But this treatment is absolutely, though frustrating, essential. It can help people make better decisions and take the shame out of the equation. Its also important that people know theyll be treated respectfully when they come into one of our groups.

While the education groups are fairly structured, with an actual curriculum mandated by the state, Andrea Brown said counseling sessions are much more flexible allowing participants to push the conversation in the direction most useful to them, whether that means discussions around what is contributing to the areas problems, overcoming triggers or other topics.

According to Andrea Brown, the classes often pay dividends for participants.

Ive only seen a couple of instances where people have come back into the system, she said. That doesnt mean its perfect, but it does mean the average person has learned something, even if its just that they can download Uber. I think what were seeing is that its not just teaching them about sobriety. Were not here to make you feel bad about drinking but rather looking at where your drinking leads to poor decision making that resulted in getting in a car. Were looking at how we can have a more healthy awareness of how to care for ourselves and other people. I do think these groups help dramatically.

Excerpt from:
Anatomy of a DUI: What happens when you get pulled over in Colorado? - Vail Daily News

Grey’s Anatomy Season 16: Release Date, Cast, Plot And Other Major Details – The Digital Weekly

Hey, fans of Greys Anatomy, here is good news for you that Greys Anatomy is returning for two more seasons. In May, ABC stated that Shonda Rhimess classic medical drama is coming back for two more seasons, giving the lasting primetime medical drama in TV past time. Best of all: The wild world of Grey Sloan returns with season 16 September 26.

TheGreys Anatomy Season 16 opening is Thursday, September 26 at 8 pm ET/7 pm CT on ABC, with following episodes broadcasting on Thursdays on the system as part of their TGIT list.

The 16th Season is anticipated to have around 25 episodes, taking devotees to the middle time of May 2020. Episodes will be free to stream online on Hulu and the ABC website and app after broadcasting. The last 15 seasons are streaming on Netflix for those who desire to get their beloved epic episodes.

Here we are going to tell you the expected to cast to come back for Season 16, Meredith Grey would be playing by Ellen Pompeo, Alex Karev would perform by Justin Chambers, Miranda Bailey would be presenting by Chandra Wilson.

More cast including James Pickens Jr. would play as Richard Webber, Kevin McKidd as Owen Hunt, Kim Raver as Teddy Altman, Camilla Luddington as Jo Karev, Amelia Shepherd would play by Caterina Scorsone, Maggie Pierce would present by Kelly McCreary, Andrew DeLuca would paly by Giacomo Gianniotti.

We could see some great changes in the imminent season after the episodes of the last denouement which noticed Meredith, Richard, and Alex taking the fall for security deception. Season 16 chooses times from where it has concluded, Vernoff said, with the band still ignited and Jackson still wanting.

Merediths new character creates difficulties between her and DeLuca according to Vernoff, who stated: They have learned to operate the difficulties of a new relationship in the wake of Meredith having been shot and having broken the rule There are stressors on their very new relationship appearing from the consequences of those decisions previous season.

Further, the triple-firing will also have consequences for the rest of the crew of Grey Sloan. As Levi star Jake Borelli said that Its going to be difficult because a lot of the senior doctors have now dropped their works and he thought that its going to hit everybody in a strange direction. Thats where we choose. We started to understand how one resolution concerns all of these doctors individually.

He thought we were still getting how it changes Levi. Many of these people hes developing for the previous some of the years and he was sawed in a little unusual light maybe. So, were still concluding, but he thought it would be interesting.

Go here to see the original:
Grey's Anatomy Season 16: Release Date, Cast, Plot And Other Major Details - The Digital Weekly

‘Grey’s Anatomy’: Find out which doctor just left the show – USA TODAY

Jerrika Hinton took to Instagram to express just how grateful she is. USA TODAY

Spoiler alert! The following contains spoilers from Thursday's season finale ofGrey's Anatomy,"Ring of Fire."

Another doctor is leaving Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital.

In a bombastic finale to the show's 13th season, it was revealed that Dr. Stephanie Edwards (Jerrika Hinton) was alive after last week's cliffhanger, but also that she is leaving the hospital, and the show, after enduring burns during a traumatic night.

We'll miss you, Edwards!(Photo: Richard Cartwright, ABC)

Last week's episode found a rapist loose in the hospital, who first holds Edwards at knife-point, then sets a fire to attempt to escape the hospital and even takes a young girl hostage. Edwards is able to save the girl but suffers severe burns in the process. In the finale, confined to her hospital bed, Edwards tells her mentorDr. Richard Webber (James Pickens Jr.), "I quit."

And though Edwards will be missed, her method of exit is rare on a show known for its tragic deaths. In a goodbye note on her Instagram, Hinton noted how great it was that Edwards got to choose her own path.

"I am eternally thankful for five seasons of (Grey's Anatomy) and a graceful departure that underscores the courage it takes to choose yourself," Hinton wrote. "That Stephanie literally walks through fire to reach freedom her freedom inspires me. It also makes me curious: What does freedom look like for you, dear viewer? After all, its not only the heroics that make her brave, its her finally seeing (and seeking) a better path."

"You fans and viewers are some of the most devoted folks Ive ever met," she went on. "Thank you for your endless energy. Bosslady Shonda, Queen Debbie, and entire (Grey's Anatomy) cast and crew forever remain in my heart. The #Shondaland family is a mighty, winding forest. I look forward to seeing you all in another clearing."

See her whole note below.

Read or Share this story: https://usat.ly/2qB3lL4

The rest is here:
'Grey's Anatomy': Find out which doctor just left the show - USA TODAY

Anatomy of a murder: the brutal killing of Jason Corbett – Independent.ie

Molly Martens-Corbett and her father, Thomas Michael Martens, are now 72 hours into 20-year jail terms for the second-degree murder of Irish businessman Jason Corbett (39).

Their convictions were as much underpinned by what wasn't said in a North Carolina courthouse over the past four weeks as for what was revealed in evidence.

The father and daughter, if they contemplate the dramatic and emotion-charged events of last Wednesday morning in Courtroom C of the Davidson County courts complex in Lexington, will probably wonder precisely where the murder trial hinged?

When did the jury of nine women and three men swing towards a second-degree murder conviction rather than believing the story of self-defence? Was it the dramatic forensic evidence of blood spatter expert Dr Stuart James?

The Florida-based expert, one of the world's leading authorities on blood spatter analysis, effectively recreated the last moments of the Limerick father-of-two's life in the early hours of August 2, 2015 in the bedroom of his luxury home.

He determined that Mr Corbett may very well have suffered the first of at least 12 horrific blows to his head while in or by his bed.

He also determined that Mr Corbett's head was repeatedly struck in a descending motion - in other words as he fell to the ground.

Dr James also found, from blood impact spatters, that Mr Corbett was struck while on the ground - and with his wife and father-in-law standing over him.

"There were little bits of Jason all over her," Assistant District Attorney Alan Martin would tell the trial. "That puts her in the thick of it. It is rock solid evidence. That puts her there."

Pathology evidence indicated Mr Corbett then sustained between one and four blows to the skull when he was already dead.

Or perhaps the 33-year-old former Knoxville model and swim coach, and her father, a retired FBI agent and counter-intelligence operative, will consider the remarkable forensic work at the Panther Creek Court scene of Lt Frank Young. He preserved the clothing worn by the duo at the scene - and he compiled a video and photographic record of the property hailed as "truly excellent" by Dr James.

Thanks to his photographic record of the blood-soaked bedroom, hallway and bathroom, Dr James was able to do his work.

But in truth, the father and daughter are probably much more likely to focus on what wasn't said in Courtroom C over the three weeks of harrowing evidence in the case.

Jury foreman Tom Aamland revealed that the jury were intrigued by a number of obvious issues that weren't clarified - particularly by the Martens version of precisely what happened in the master bedroom that night.

Just like Irish jurors, an instinctive sense of curiosity, allied to a healthy common sense perception of something out of the ordinary, flooded through the North Carolina jury.

What was the young Tennessee woman doing with a heavy and unsightly concrete garden paving brick on her nightstand table that night?

"We all wondered what it was doing there," Mr Aamland said after the trial finished. No explanation was ever offered to the trial.

But there were other unanswered questions.

How on Earth could a 39-year-old, six-foot and 16-stone man grab his wife by the throat and then get engaged in a life-and-death tussle with a 67-year-old retiree and not leave a single mark on either of them?

Martens-Corbett's clothing wasn't torn, there were no marks on her neck and a delicate filigree bracelet on her wrist wasn't bent, damaged or scratched despite the ordeal she just claimed she had just gone through.

In that death struggle which ended with Mr Corbett sustaining head injuries so savage they were compared to those in a severe car crash or a fall from a great height, how could Martens recall almost every single blow struck with a metal Louisville Slugger baseball bat and yet not have a single recollection of his son-in-law being struck by a brick?

That was despite the fact the brick was not only soaked in the Limerick man's blood but was also embedded with his hair fragments and tissue.

When it was lifted by forensic experts from the bedroom floor, it left its outline in blood on the carpet. Martens similarly hadn't a single mark on him - and his clothing was likewise intact and not torn. The questions for the jury just kept mounting.

How did the powerful sedative Trazedone end up in Mr Corbett's system when the medication was prescribed for his wife just two days earlier?

But perhaps most intriguing of all for the jurors was the single most glaring omission from the accounts of both the father and daughter - where was Sharon Martens, their wife and mother, during the violent and prolonged confrontation?

Read More: Killer sought to take place of children's mother, at the ultimate cost

Martens said he was awoken from sleep in the basement bedroom by the sounds of a scream coming from upstairs.

Before the counter-intelligence operative and lawyer had even testified to that fact in court, he had given a pre-trial interview outlining precisely the same sequence of events to ABC's '20/20' programme, one of the top shows in the US.

It was almost as if, in anticipating a negative outcome to the North Carolina trial, the father and daughter were attempting to lay the groundwork for public sympathy for a subsequent appeal.

Back on August 2, at 3am, Mrs Martens apparently never awoke and stayed firmly in the basement bedroom.

This was despite the "life or death fight" that the former FBI agent said he got engaged in upstairs with his son-in-law.

This included shouting and blows to the head which left Mr Corbett's blood spattered all over three separate rooms.

Throughout it all, Mrs Martens apparently never budged from the basement bedroom.

After Mr Corbett was left in a bloody pulp on his own bedroom floor, the father and daughter never called out to Mrs Martens for help or support.

She never ventured upstairs to see what had happened and neither Martens nor Martens-Corbett called on the mother-of-four to immediately call 911.

When Davidson County police officers arrived at the scene and brought the two children, Jack and Sarah, down from their bedrooms, Mrs Martens was still in the bedroom and in total ignorance of the horror that had unfolded upstairs just metres away from her.

"It just makes no sense," Mr Martin said.

"It is like she vanished from the face of the Earth in Tom Martens's testimony."

Mr Aamland revealed that jurors were clearly taken by aspects of the prosecution case.

This ranged from the forensic evidence to the powerful closing arguments of Mr Martin and Assistant District Attorney Greg Brown.

In concise reference to evidence from paramedics and the 911 dispatcher, Mr Brown told the jury they contended the father and daughter beat Mr Corbett into a bloodied pulp on the bedroom floor and then cruelly left him to die.

They delayed calling 911 to ensure he was dead - and then engaged in a charade of "fake" cardiac pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) efforts while a 911 dispatcher listened on the line.

Despite having allegedly performed 600 chest pumps between them on Mr Corbett's blood-soaked chest, there was no blood found on the palms of either the father or daughter.

Mr Martin went even further.

He said the jury could infer whether there had been an attempt to drug Mr Corbett with a fresh mint Mojito on the evening of August 1? There had also been multiple calls - more than half a dozen - made by Martens-Corbett to her parents as they made the four-hour drive from Knoxville for the unexpected visit to the Corbett home.

In evidence, Martens said he could not recall the phone calls from his daughter.

Mr Aamland revealed that, having been asked to consider a verdict by Judge David Lee at 3.22pm on Tuesday, the jurors were already unanimously agreed that first night that Martens was guilty of second-degree murder.

The jur
ors had indicated, in a preliminary vote, they were split 10-2 on whether Martens-Corbett was guilty of second-degree murder.

However by 11am the following day, the two dissenting jurors had reviewed the evidence and changed their minds.

At 11.25am, Mr Aamland confirmed to Judge Lee and a shocked courtroom that unanimous verdicts had been reached.

Martens-Corbett began sobbing before either she or her father were taken into custody for 15 minutes before Judge Lee dealt with sentencing.

"I'm really sorry, Mom - I wish he'd just killed me," she wept.

Her father, after 40 years in law enforcement, remained calm and impassive, assisting bailiffs and sheriffs by holding his hands directly out behind him so he could be handcuffed.

Read More: Jason asleep as Molly attacked, jurors believed

In the public gallery there were tears of two different kinds.

On the right side of the court, the Corbett family, their friends and supporters wept in relief.

Throughout, the family's dignified and courageous approach to the case impressed all who witnessed it.

Across the aisle, members of the Martens family sobbed uncontrollably. Some were visibly devastated by the verdicts.

Mrs Martens wept and had to be comforted by her brother, Federal employee and Afghanistan Reconstruction Executive official Michael Earnest.

Her son sobbed so much he had to hold his head in his hands in a bid to regain his composure.

Mr Aamland admitted it was difficult for the jury, too.

Five jurors wept openly as the verdict was handed down and, minutes later, once again as the father and daughter received minimum 20-year prison sentences.

When they were brought back into the court, the father and daughter were a study in contrasts.

Martens was impassive but clearly worried as to the upset of his daughter and wife.

Martens-Corbett was physically shaking with emotion.

When her father declined the opportunity to address the court, she spoke briefly in an address that was almost incoherent due to sobs and wails.

"I did not murder my husband," she cried. "My father did not murder my husband.

"The incidents of August 2 happened as they happened on a somewhat regular basis.

"The only difference is my father was there," she sobbed.

Minutes later, the duo were led out of Courtroom C in a phalanx of armed Davidson County bailiffs and sheriffs.

Just over two hours later, they had changed from their clothing - a simple blue dress and a smart dark suit - into prison issue clothing.

Both wore handcuffs tied to waist chains as they walked to the waiting prison truck for transfer to high security prisons in Raleigh.

In Martens's case it was to Central Prison, where he was placed in special protective custody given his law enforcement background.

In Martens-Corbett's case, it was to the North Carolina Correctional Institute for Women.

She arrived with a recommendation from Judge Lee that she receive whatever psychological and psychiatric supports she might require.

Before their prison van left Lexington, their legal teams confirmed they intended to lodge challenges to the convictions with the North Carolina Court of Appeals.

Mr Earnest, visibly shocked by the verdict, briefly spoke to reporters outside the courthouse.

"I just want to say, in my opinion, in my personal life this is the most atrocious miscarriage of justice I have ever been a part of," he said.

Outside the Davidson Courts complex, on Salem Street, just metres from Lexington Post Office, the Corbett family issued a public statement of thanks to the jury, the District Attorney's Office and the Davidson County Sheriff's Department.

Jason's sister, Tracey Lynch, spoke as she was greeted by a bank of TV crews and photographers.

Before they had even left the court building, the family were planning flights back home to the greater Limerick area.

After four weeks in the searing heat of a North Carolina summer, the rain of Ireland was something everyone was looking forward to.

Mrs Lynch, flanked by her sister Marilyn, said their family's priority now was providing a safe, happy and positive future for two children who lost both parents to tragedies before they were 10 years old.

"We want to create a good future for Jason's two children who he loved so much," she said.

Minutes earlier, Assistant District Attorney Alan Martin had summed up the mood of all who attended the gruelling trial which came to dominate headlines on both sides of the Atlantic.

"There is no joy, there is no triumph, there is no pride. There is just grief, grief and more grief," he said.

Visit link:
Anatomy of a murder: the brutal killing of Jason Corbett - Independent.ie

Tua Tagovailoa dislocates hip: On the anatomy and recovery of his injury – FanSided

Everything was going as planned for Alabama and their star quarterback Tua Tagovailoa on Saturday. The Crimson Tide were thoroughly handling the Mississippi State Bulldogs when the unthinkable happened just prior to halftime.

Tagovailoa, pressured by two Bulldog defenders, was scampering out to his left when the injury occurred. Just after releasing the ball, the Alabama quarterback was hit from behind and landed forcefully on his right hip. Tagovailoa was carted off the field, visibly in pain, and was later flown to a local hospital via helicopter for further testing.

Aaron Suttles, who covers Alabama for The Athletic, reported after the game that Tagovailoas season is over secondary to a dislocated hip.

The hip, scientifically known as the femoroacetabular joint, is a very stable ball-and-socket joint and isnt dislocated easily. The stability of the hip joint is maintained by both soft tissue structures (four ligaments and one labrum) as well as its bony configuration; the four ligaments are the liofemoral ligament, ischiofemoral ligament, pubofemoral ligament, and ligamentum teres.

Approximately 90 percent of hip dislocations occur in a posterior (or backward) direction, much like Tagovailoa. It isnt uncommon for athletes to suffer concomitant posterior acetabular rim fractures when the hip is dislocated due to the femoral head being forcefully jammed against the structure; the acetabulum is the socket and the femoral head is the ball in ball-and-socket joint.

The main concern with hip dislocations involves the vasculature surrounding the femoral head. If the vasculature is damaged and unable to be stabilized the bone may, in essence, die, which is known as either avascular necrosis or osteonecrosis. This is the injury that multisport star Bo Jackson suffered in 1991 that forced him out of the NFL.

Supposing that the vasculature remains uncompromised or is able to be sufficiently addressed surgically, the rehabilitation process remains rather long and difficult. Surgery is usually completed as soon as possible if it is deemed necessary and the athlete is confined to crutches for a number of weeks.

In all, it takes a minimum of 2-3 months to recover from this injury.

This is obviously a debilitating injury for Tagovailoa as well as the Crimson Tide. Tagovailoa was in the running for the Heisman trophy and was thought of by many as being a potential top-five pick during the 2020 NFL Draft. How this injury impacts Tagovailoas draft status and career moving forward remains to be seen, but at this time, that is the least of his concerns.

Visit link:
Tua Tagovailoa dislocates hip: On the anatomy and recovery of his injury - FanSided

Grey’s Anatomy – BuddyTV (blog)

Nathan Riggs had us all swooning when he finally asked Meredith out on an official date on ABC's Grey's Anatomy. Of course in true Mer form, she told him she needed to think about it before she gave him an actual answer. She probably knows that once she goes down that route, that will take whatever it is they're doing to a completely new level. But I'm all for it! I figured she needed my help to figure out if Nathan is really right for her. So I wanted to give her a few reasons to consider why she should give him a real chance.

It's Beyond Time

I think we can all agree that it's time. It's been a couple of seasons since Shonda Rhimes made me and millions of others livid with Derek's tragic and shocking death. Meredith went through her dark phase, as any woman would. And Derek's passing is almost like a faint memory as the show has clearly moved on without him. Now, it's time for Meredith to be in a serious relationship. She definitely deserves to be happy after everything she has gone through.

Grey's Anatomy Prepares to Lose a Doctor>>> He Just Might Be the One Meredith has tried to date other guys after Derek and they obviously didn't work out in the long run. But things are clearly different with Nathan. I mean, look how far he's gotten already. Mer has tried to play hard to get on multiple occasions. Still, there is something about Nathan that puts her in a vulnerable spot. Avid viewers know that no one has the ability to do this, especially not a guy. While she even tries to be strong with Nathan, every girl needs someone they can let their guard down with, and Nathan has shown that he's strong enough to play that role. Besides, I'm just ready to see her let go and be in love already. He fits right in with her friends and most importantly, loves her children. The whole thing of being guarded is getting me to the point where I want to reach through the TV and yell, "Snap out of it!"

Their Chemistry Is Undeniable We wouldn't even be having this conversation if there wasn't an undisputable spark between Meredith and Nathan. After all, they hooked up in the parking lot of the hospital after suppressing their sexual tension with each other for way too long. And yes, there was the monkey wrench when Meredith's sister, Maggie, confessed her like for Nathan (without knowing about him and Mer.) But that seemed to come out of nowhere. Plus Maggie's connection with Nathan (or lack thereof) is nowhere near the one he has with Meredith.

He's Not Alex It looks like the writers are almost trying to add a little mystery of the future between Alex and Meredith and whether they'll ever be more than friends. But let's face it, they are perfect just the way they are. They are the only two left from the group of interns that started back in the first season so from death to birthdays, they have been through everything together. And I think it should stay that way. Alex should be the one that Meredith talks to about Nathan and Alex should be the one to give her guy advice about it. They shouldn't be going anywhere near the exit for the friend zone.

He's Basically Madly in Love with Her Nathan professed his feelings for Meredith on a recent episode of Grey's Anatomy. That took a lot for him to do because considering their back-and-forth, he had no idea how she would respond, not to mention her awkward new level of closeness with Alex. Still, he put himself out there. Plus, we have to agree with Maggie that Meredith is probably the only one who will understand Nathan in the way that he needs, considering they have both experienced tragic losses in their lives. I'm going to go out on a limb and say they just might be meant for one another!

Grey's Anatomy Recap: Will Nathan Win Meredith's Heart?>>> What do you think about Nathan asking Meredith out on an actual date? How do you feel about Meredith and Alex's friendship? Do you think Maggie is better for Nathan than Meredith?

Grey's Anatomy airs Thursdays on ABC at 9/8c. Want more news? Like our Grey's Anatomy Facebook page!

(Image courtesy of ABC)

See the article here:
Grey's Anatomy - BuddyTV (blog)