Greys Anatomy season 16 episode 11 preview: The father of Amelias baby is – Culturess

After years of facing hardship and heartbreak on Greys Anatomy(and before that,Private Practice), Amelia finally found hope in the form of a surprise pregnancy.

Even though fans hoped the situation would progress without complications its hard not to love Link, after all if youve watchedGreys for a while, you know smooth sailing always takes a back seat to drama.

So far, Amelias pregnancy seems to be going smoothly unless you count the fact that Link might not be the father. Even worse still, Owen might hold that title instead.

The good news is, Amelia doesnt seem to have any desire to drag this drama out the same way she thankfully didnt wait to tell Link about the baby in the first place. In this weeks upcoming episode, it appears shes actually going to speak up.

At least, thats what the brief preview leads us to believe. Watch it below:

She doesnt say he definitely isnt the father because at this point, even she isnt sure. She says he might not be. Which technically means he still could be. Which means the entire fandoms worries and subtle threats to quit the show if Owen turns out to be the father are going exactly according to the showrunners plan.

There is still a chance Link really is the father after all, and this is just a curveball thats supposed to add more romantic drama to the season.

Will the episode even the season end up with Teddy and Owen getting their happily ever after, while Amelia and Link commit to each other for good for real? Maybe not.Greys never keeps even fan-favorite couples truly happy for long.

But there are still months worth of episodes to finish out what may or may not be the final season. Anything could happen. A major pregnancy complication could arise. Something could happen to Link. Owen could completely fail as a partner (again). Teddy could cheat on Owen with Tom (fingers crossed this doesnt happen, but it could).

One things for sure (judging by YouTube comments alone): Fans do not want Owen to be the father. The Owen/Teddy/Amelia love triangle (is it a love square if you include Tom?) isnt juicy and exciting anymore. Its gone on a little too long. Which means this is the season it might finally resolve, in some way or another, for good.

Creating drama inside and outside the show in this regard is hardly accidental, of course. They could have easily kept Amelia and Link on their own happy-parents-to-be island for the rest of the season without this hiccup. But anything for the drama, right?

Judging by the fight Owen and Teddy are probably about to have, its likely safe to assume there arent going to be many happy couples left by the time this weeks episode airs its final moments.

Excerpt from:
Greys Anatomy season 16 episode 11 preview: The father of Amelias baby is - Culturess

Golfer’s Diary: The anatomy of a birdie | News, Sports, Jobs – Evening Observer

According to my extensive research, 99 percent of people who golf are terrible at the sport. I include myself in that number, of course.

Given those most definitely accurate and indisputable numbers, it should come as no surprise that birdies are a rare occurrence. Heres where Id make a joke about a bird watcher seeing a rare bird, but lets be honest, I dont know any rare birds and no one would actually get it.

I carded eight birdies (or better) this past season. I kept track of them and I remember each of them like they just happened. Thats how much fun it is to sink the ball in fewer strokes than par allows for. For reference: birdie is one less than par; eagle is two under; and technically albatross is the term for three under par, but good luck ever getting one of those.

To make birdie, you either need to be incredibly good or very fortunate. Its usually one dynamic shot that makes it all possible. Lets take a look at my eight circled numbers (birdies are circled once on the scorecard while eagles are circled twice) in 2019 and how I got there. Theyre in chronological order, as if that matters.

1) Cassadaga Country Club, No. 7 This is a majestic hole. Standing above the trees way up on the tee box, a golfer has an incredible view of Cassadaga Lake and the surrounding area. Looking towards the green, way down the hill, theres a pond some 200 yards away (needing some 225-250 to clear it). In one of my first (it may have been my first) round of the year, I tattooed my drive not just over the pond, but actually onto the green. It wasnt terribly close to the pin, so a two-putt for birdie was exactly what I was trying to do.

2) Shorewood Country Club, No. 9 Par 5s are easily my most birdied holes in my golf career because theres a little more margin for error. This one is a long ways to the green with a slight dogleg. My drive was nothing special. In fact, I was off the green to the right a little bit. My second shot was a bomb, but I pulled it left into the trees about pin height. I had a pair of trees making something like uprights, to use a football analogy, between me and the green. I decided to basically just close my eyes and go for it. The end result was my ball splitting those trees and stopping about five feet from the pin for an easy tap-in (and incredibly fortunate) birdie.

3) Silver Lake Country Club, No. 4 This is the only par 3 on the list, though I certainly gave myself many more chances on various par 3s this year. This one was not just almost a hole-in-one, rolling within inches of the cup on the way by, but it was in a huge tournament and almost won me a new car! It was a long par 3 and I struck my 3-hybrid about as well as I can hit that club.

4) CCC, No. 5 Eagle alert! This came during one of my weeks as a sub in a league at CCC. I had never actually driven the green on this short, but very uphill par 4. That said, after smoking my tee shot and making the drive up to the green, we found my ball maybe five feet from the pin. Tap-in eagles dont happen everyday, but this one even gave me skins for the day, so that was a nice bonus.

5) CCC, No. 4 Thats right, yet another birdie at CCC. This one was a bit of a redemption hole for me. The round before this one, I drove the green and had a painful three-putt for par. My drive rolled onto the green briefly, but ended up off to the right. An easy chip and putt for birdie made up for that first one a little bit, at least.

6) Rosebrook Golf Course, No. 15 This is another long par 5 with a dangerous treeline along the entire right side of the fairway. Not only did I smash my drive, but I annihilated my approach shot and actually ended up past the green. It may be the furthest Ive ever hit a 5-iron. That said, I still had my work cut out for me. But a decent chip preceded a dropped put and there was my birdie. Just like they draw it up.

7) Pinehurst Golf Club, No. 5 If you would have told me Id birdie this hole after where my drive went, Id have called you a liar. I sliced the daylights out of the drive and was almost on No. 8s green. Not only did I have a lovely grove of trees between myself and the green, but I had a nasty downhill lie, making it very unlikely Id get the height needed to clear the trees. Since its on this list, you can probably guess what happened. I hit one of my shots of the year and landed the ball in the shadow of the flagstick before burying the putt. Incredible.

8) Pinehurst Golf Club, No. 1 This is a par 5, but was actually very similar to the above entry at Pinehurst. My yanked my drive left into No. 2s fairway. Not only that, but there was a giant tree directly where I wanted to hit my ball. Sometimes it pays to be stubborn because I lasered my ball through the tree without making so much as a rustle. Some 250 yards later and my ball was on the fringe of the green. If I hit that same shot 100 times, theres no way I duplicate this shot. A chip and a putt for par had me off to a wonderful start to a round.

There are eight birdies with extremely different ways of getting there. Great drives. Terrible drives. Lucky shots. Awesome shots. The only way I didnt get a birdie this year was with a hole-out or chip-in.

Does anyone else track their birdies? Maybe youre part of the 1 percent that gets them too regularly to make them a special occasion. Did you have any extra memorable ones this year. Please shoot me an email with your stories.

Until next week, golf is great. Go get some.

Stefan Gestwicki is an OBSERVER contributing writer. Comments on this article can be sent to golfersdiary@gmail.com

Special to the OBSERVERBRADFORD, PA Despite having five players score in double digits, the Fredonia State ...

Read the original post:
Golfer's Diary: The anatomy of a birdie | News, Sports, Jobs - Evening Observer

PHOTOS: Anatomy of a wave – WJLA

by World Entertainment News Network

Incredible images have revealed the anatomy of a wave after one brave photographer risked life and limb to slip under the waves and capture them from behind as they broke. (Don Hurzeler/mediadrumworld.com/WENN)

Incredible images have revealed the anatomy of a wave after one brave photographer risked life and limb to slip under the waves and capture them from behind as they broke.

The stunning underwater shots show violent vortices venting from the collapsing tube of a breaking wave, and the backside of a breaking wave, which can either look like a mirror or act as a window when the wave is very thin.

Other amazing pictures show the more traditional view of a breaking wave as the camera points down the tube while surfers and swimmers are pictured trying to ride or avoid the waves.

The spectacular snaps were taken at Kua Bay, Hawaii by author and photographer Don Hurzeler, 70, from Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, who explained just how dangerous this type of photography can be.

I've been run over by surfers on boards, swept by currents onto the rocks, said Hurzeler.

Ive had run-ins with large sharks, had the camera and housing bounce off the sand so hard it broke everything, hurt my back repeatedly by being pounded into the sand and had to stop taking photos to rescue visitors to our island who had ventured out into the wrong spot at the wrong time.

Ive nearly bit through my tongue, broke ribs, toes, fingers, have been in surf so large I did not think I would ever make it back to the beach and have stepped on spiny sea urchins, sharp coral, sharp rocks and jellyfish, he added.

I have been run into by sizable turtles who got caught up in a wave - those shells turn out to be quite sharp when they run into you - and scared out of my mind by a 600-pound endangered monk seal that swam right under me just before sunup the other day. Other than that, no problems.

To take the photos Hurzeler swims out with his camera in one hand and swims in place, or stands if in shallow water, as a wave approaches.

He tries to duck down and slip under the oncoming wave. If hes not successful he gets dragged over the top of the wave, slammed into the sand or coral and then dragged underwater like a "rag doll in a spin cycle of a washer."

Shooting photos of the backside or underneath of a breaking wave allows me to share a sight that few people get to see directly, he said.

I feel that the images range from beautiful textures, shapes and colors to otherworldly captures.

The shot of a wave breaking is familiar to virtually everyone. An underwater shot of several vortices venting from the collapsing tube of a breaking wave is of a process most people never even knew exists.

And the shots of the underwater backside of the tube as it is breaking can range from nearly a mirror to a colorful textured cylinder.

Read more:
PHOTOS: Anatomy of a wave - WJLA

14 Hopes For ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Season 14 – Wetpaint

12. More standalone episodes

Yes, we love seeing all the docs every week, but the standalone episodes of Season 13 the ones focusing on just a few docs, at most were some of the most interesting installments.

Yes, yes, weve seen it all plane crashes, ferry crashes, earthquakes, mass shootings. Just accept the fact that Shondaland Seattle is the most catastrophe-ridden place on the planet and the fact that the disaster episodes are some of the most thrilling, memorable episodes.

We dont need these tragedies to kill off any surgeons R.I.P. Lexie and Mark. The mortal danger itself is captivating enough.

Yes, yes, weve seen it all plane crashes, ferry crashes, earthquakes, mass shootings. Just accept the fact that Shondaland Seattle is the most catastrophe-ridden place on the planet and the fact that the disaster episodes are some of the most thrilling, memorable episodes.

We dont need these tragedies to kill off any surgeons R.I.P. Lexie and Mark. The mortal danger itself is captivating enough.

Weve long since accepted that Greys Anatomy will outlive us all, and the show has proven its staying power. Season 13 held the shows quality and popularity steady, and were sure Season 14 will, too.

Plus, a 15th season puts it one season away from beating ER as the longest-running primetime medical drama in America. #goals

Weve long since accepted that Greys Anatomy will outlive us all, and the show has proven its staying power. Season 13 held the shows quality and popularity steady, and were sure Season 14 will, too.

Plus, a 15th season puts it one season away from beating ER as the longest-running primetime medical drama in America. #goals

Shonda Rhimes and her cabal of writers will soon be getting back to work to plot out Greys Anatomy Season 14 if they havent already and as fans of the show since 2005, we have high hopes for the drama to come.

In fact, weve written down those hopes to not-so-humbly submit them for consideration.

Check out the photo gallery here to see why we want Maggie and Jackson to hook up, why we want another disaster to strike Seattle, and other probably-controversial desires for Season 14.

Greys Anatomy returns for Season 14 this fall.

See more here:
14 Hopes For 'Grey's Anatomy' Season 14 - Wetpaint

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Season 13, Episode 22 Spoilers: Leave It Inside … – EconoTimes

Greys Anatomy Season 13, Episode 22 Spoilers: Leave It Inside Alex Faces Another Possible Dismissal, Jail Time After Operating Without Consent

Greys Anatomy season 13s episode 22, titled Leave It Inside, will follow Alex as he faces another possible dismissal from the hospital as well as jail time after he operates on a young patient without parental consent.

The synopsis for Leave It Inside posted on TV Guide reads, April (Sarah Drew) and Andrew (Giacomo Gianniotti) consult with a fiery patient who has a giant, inoperable heart tumor. Meanwhile, Alex (Justin Chambers) and Eliza (guest star Marika Dominczyk) are at odds over the treatment of a young patient; and Stephanie (Jerrika Hinton) and Ben (Jason George) make decisions that could affect their careers.

The upcoming episode will be another challenging one for Dr. Alex Karev as he faces a possible dismissal from Grey Sloan Memorial Hospital over his latest decision. It was revealed in the promo that Alex will operate on a young boy despite his parents not giving parental consent.

Alex is set to clash with Eliza on the treatment of the young boy. It seems that Alex believes that only surgery can help the patient. Alex insisted that the boy took the train by himself to ask the doctors help.

The promo shows the parents being told that their son needs surgery. However, the mother replies, We dont believe in that sort of intervention. Of course, Alex and his colleagues are shocked at their decision.

In the end, Alex will risk his career by taking the case in his own hands despite the ethical consequences. The final scene in the promo shows the angry father screaming at Alex, You had no right to touch him!

Alex successfully dodged a previous assault case with Andrew that would have landed him in jail. He was also offered his old job back at Grey Sloan. However, it remains unclear whether he can avoid being charged a second time around.

Meanwhile, the upcoming episode will also feature big changes for Stephanie and Ben. According to Cartermatt, it seems that Stephanie will be ready to move on with her career and may leave Grey Sloan for better opportunities ahead.

Actress Jerrika Hinton, who took on the role of Dr. Stephanie Edwards since 2012, will not be returning as series regular for season 14. According to TVLine, Hinton has signed on to new television series and may return on Greys Anatomy but only on a guest-star basis.

Greys Anatomy season 13s episode 22, titled Leave It Inside, is scheduled to air on ABC on May 4, 2017. It was directed by Zetna Fuentes and written by Elisabeth R. Finch. It will be followed by episode 14, titled "True Colors, scheduled to be released on May 11 and directed by Kevin McKidd.

Human Life Could Be Extended Indefinitely, Study Suggests

Goosebumps, tears and tenderness: what it means to be moved

Are over-the-counter painkillers a waste of money?

Does an anomaly in the Earth's magnetic field portend a coming pole reversal?

Immunotherapy: Training the body to fight cancer

Do vegetarians live longer? Probably, but not because they're vegetarian

Could a contraceptive app be as good as the pill?

Some scientific explanations for alien abduction that aren't so out of this world

Society actually does want policies that benefit future generations

Six cosmic catastrophes that could wipe out life on Earth

Big Pharma Starts Using Cannabis For Making Drugs In Earnest

Do you need to worry if your baby has a flat head?

Read this article:
'Grey's Anatomy' Season 13, Episode 22 Spoilers: Leave It Inside ... - EconoTimes

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Finale Has ‘Big News’ for Meredith & Riggs, and … – Moviefone

The "Grey's Anatomy" Season 13 finale should bring major updates on at least two relationship fronts, in addition to major events at the hospital itself.

"Grey's" hasn't given us much on Alex Karev (Justin Chambers) and Jo Wilson (Camilla Luddington) in a while, but that will soon change. The synopsis for the May 18 season finale mentions Alex making a "hard choice" in his relationship with Jo. In the same episode, we'll see Meredith Grey (Ellen Pompeo) share some "big news" with Nathan Riggs (Martin Henderson), bringing their relationship to "a turning point."

(!) She's not pregnant again, is she?

The finale is Episode 24 and, at this point, Episode 22 has yet to air. Here are the titles and synopses for the final three episodes of the season:

"Leave It Inside," Episode 22 (May 4) "April and Andrew consult with a fiery patient who has a giant, inoperable heart tumor. Meanwhile, Alex and Eliza are at odds over the treatment of a young patient, and Stephanie and Ben make decisions that could affect their careers."

"True Colors," Episode 23 (May 11) "The doctors of Grey Sloan encounter a difficult case involving a dangerous patient. Meanwhile, Owen receives life-changing news that pushes Amelia to step up to support him, and Alex attends a medical conference after making a shocking discovery."

"Ring of Fire," Episode 24 (May 18) "The doctors' lives are at risk after a dangerous patient escapes the hospital room. Alex must make a hard choice in his relationship with Jo while Meredith has some big news for Nathan that brings things to a turning point."

So Alex will make a "shocking discovery" in the episode before the finale's hard choice about Jo. Don't forget that Matthew Morrison was seen with Justin Chambers when they were filming Episode 23 -- both wearing suits -- and Morrison is still being eyed as Jo's abusive estranged husband. There's a good chance Morrison's character, Dr. Paul Stadler, plays into Alex's hard choice about Jo. And, yeah, he's probably at this same conference.

The Season 13 finale sounds pretty intense, beyond whatever happens on the relationship fronts. A dangerous patient on the loose is bad, and may be part of the "shocking" event Kelly McCreary (Maggie) talked about.

"Grey's Anatomy" airs Thursdays at 8 p.m. on ABC.

Want more stuff like this? Like us on Facebook.

Read more:
'Grey's Anatomy' Finale Has 'Big News' for Meredith & Riggs, and ... - Moviefone

Anatomy of a Price Gouging Case – JD Supra (press release)

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):

hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide

Go here to read the rest:
Anatomy of a Price Gouging Case - JD Supra (press release)

Anatomy of a fake scandal, ginned up by right-wing media and Trump – Washington Post (blog)

President Trump started off this morning as he often does, by settling in to watch the festival of nincompoopery that is Fox & Friends. On the show, he saw something that he believes vindicates the bizarre and false charge he made that Barack Obama was tapping his phones during the presidential campaign.

Ill try to sort through the substance of all this. But I also want to make a broader argument about how Trumps support system inside his government but especially in the conservative media and on Fox, which is where he apparently gets most of his intelligence information is playing to his worst instincts, harming him politically, and making his presidency even more dangerous.

Todays antics all started with a report on Fox & Friends in which correspondent Adam Housley reported that a high-ranking Obama administration official had requested the unmasking of the names of Trump officials who were caught up in surveillance of foreign targets. Ordinarily, when a U.S. person shows up in such surveillance say, talking to a Russian ambassador whose communications are being monitored that persons identity is blacked out in reports on the surveillance. While Housley did not identify the Obama administration official, he did say that Trump associates were being picked up by this surveillance for a year before Trump took office.

Then we get this report from Eli Lake, identifying former national security adviser Susan Rice as the Obama official who requested the unmasking. Id like to highlight this passage:

Rices requests to unmask the names of Trump transition officials does not vindicate Trumps own tweets from March 4 in which he accused Obama of illegally tapping Trump Tower. There remains no evidence to support that claim.

But Rices multiple requests to learn the identities of Trump officials discussed in intelligence reports during the transition period does highlight a longstanding concern for civil liberties advocates about U.S. surveillance programs. The standard for senior officials to learn the names of U.S. persons incidentally collected is that it must have some foreign intelligence value, a standard that can apply to almost anything. This suggests Rices unmasking requests were likely within the law.

Id say that if members of the Trump team were in communication with foreign actors who were under surveillance, that damn sure has foreign intelligence value, and its not too surprising that the national security adviser would want to know about it. Were talking about associates of a presidential candidate communicating with representatives of a foreign power.

Lets back up for a moment and go through the series of events here to get some context. Heres what has happened, with the caveat that some of the information is sketchy:

1. On March 4, President Trump sends out a series of tweets claiming that Barack Obama tapped his phones, apparently because of an article Trump saw on Breitbart. In subsequent days, the FBI director, the NSA director, the former director of national intelligence and everyone in any position to know make clear that not only didnt Obama tap Trumps phones, the president has no power to order phone-tapping.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer has been repeatedly defending President Trump's unproven claims that former president Barack Obama ordered a wiretap on him in 2016. (Bastien Inzaurralde/The Washington Post)

2.Because Trump never backs down from even the most ridiculous lie, his employees and allies are now required defend his claim. So spokesperson Sean Spicer argues that because in a different tweet Trump put the words wire tapping in quotes, that means he was referring to a whole host of surveillance types and not his phones being tapped, despite the fact that he said President Obama was tapping my phones. Trump himself will later pick up this argument.

3.Two White House officials, Ezra Cohen-Watnick and Michael Ellis, locate intelligence reports that include Trump officials in communication with Russians under surveillance by American intelligence agencies. The White House says they came across those reports in the ordinary course of business and were not actually looking for something that would back up Trumps claim; you can decide how plausible you find that. In any case, they then call Rep. Devin Nunes, the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, to the White House so he can view the information. Nunes then holds a news conference announcing the find and briefs Trump on what Trumps own staff has told him.

All of this was designed to allow Trump to say that he was right all along that he was being targeted by Obama, which of course he does.

4. Im skipping over some smaller developments and plenty of details. But today, we have the following series of events: Trump officials leak that Rice requested the unmasking of the identities of Trump associates who were in communication with foreigners under surveillance; those reporters publish their stories; then the president himself calls attention to them on his Twitter feed:

This particular PR maneuver is not unprecedented, but the point is this: Whats obviously of most importance to the president of the United States isnt the fact that his associates were in contact with people from Russia (or other countries) who were of sufficient interest to U.S. intelligence that they would be under surveillance, but whether or not each new detail that emerges does or does not support his idiotic tweets.

And this is why I argue that Fox and some of Trumps allies are only helping him hurt himself. Much of the time, having a supportive amen chorus has great political utility, because it helps buck up your base and disseminate the arguments youre making. But its one thing when those arguments are things like We should cut taxes or Obamacare is a disaster. Its something else when theyre trying desperately to claim that every stupid thing Trump ever said is actually true.

In this case, clinging to the idea that the Obama administration unfairly monitored the Trump campaign only encourages further investigation of what could turn out to be one of the biggest scandals in American political history. Nuness buffoonish efforts on Trumps behalf havent helped him at all. Quite the contrary, theyve made his committee utterly irrelevant and increased pressure on the Senate Intelligence Committee to conduct a thorough and objective review. Nunes has zero credibility, and so he can no longer be an asset to the White House.

But when Trump tunes in to Fox & Friends every morning, he learns that hes right about everything. He doesnt need to listen to his intelligence briefers or anyone else who might tell him something he doesnt want to hear. He can keep telling tall tales and pursuing his petty grievances. He never does anything wrong and never has to change. I shudder to think how that dynamic will play out when this administration faces its first foreign policy crisis, with untold numbers of lives at stake.

Visit link:
Anatomy of a fake scandal, ginned up by right-wing media and Trump - Washington Post (blog)

Chapter 2: Anatomy of the Eye – TimRoot.com

Before discussing conditions affecting the eye, we need to review some basic eye anatomy. Anatomy can be painful for some (personally, I hated anatomy in medical school) so Im going to keep this simple. Let us start from the outside and work our way toward the back of the eye.

The eyelids protect and help lubricate the eyes. The eyelid skin itself is very thin, containing no subcutaneous fat, and is supported by a tarsal plate. This tarsal plate is a fibrous layer that gives the lids shape, strength, and a place for muscles to attach.

Underneath and within the tarsal plate lie meibomian glands. These glands secrete oil into the tear film that keeps the tears from evaporating too quickly. Meibomian glands may become inflamed and swell into a granulomatous chalazion that needs to be excised. Dont confuse a chalazion with a stye. A stye is a pimple-like infection of a sebaceous gland or eyelash follicle, similar to a pimple, and is superficial to the tarsal plate. Styes are painful, while chalazions are not.

Eyelid Movement Two muscles are responsible for eyelid movement. The orbicularis oculi closes the eyelids and is innervated by cranial nerve 7. Patients with a facial nerve paralyses, such as after Bells Palsy, cant close their eye and the eye may need to be patched (or sutured closed) to protect the cornea. The levator palpebrae opens the eye and is innervated by CN3. Oculomotor nerve palsy is the major cause of ptosis (drooping of the eye). In fact, a common surgical treatment for ptosis involves shortening the levator tendon to open up the eye.

CN 3 opens the eye like a pillar CN 7 closes like a fish-hook

The conjunctiva is a mucus membrane that covers the front of the eyeball. When you examine the white part of a patients eyes, youre actually looking through the semi-transparent conjunctiva to the white sclera of the eyeball underneath. The conjunctiva starts at the edge of the cornea (this location is called the limbus). It then flows back behind the eye, loops forward, and forms the inside surface of the eyelids. The continuity of this conjunctiva is important, as it keeps objects like eyelashes and your contact lens from sliding back behind your eyeball. The conjunctiva is also lax enough to allow your eyes to freely move. When people get conjunctivitis, or pink eye, this is the tissue layer affected.

There is a thickened fold of conjunctiva called the semilunar fold that is located at the medial canthus it is a homolog of the nictitating membrane seen on sharks.

Tear Production and Drainage The majority of tears are produced by accessory tear glands located within the eyelid and conjunctiva. The lacrimal gland itself is really only responsible for reflexive tearing. Tears flow down the front of the eye and drain out small pores, called lacrimal punctum, which arise on the medial lids. These puncta are small, but can be seen with the naked eye. After entering the puncta, tears flow down the lacrimal tubing and eventually drain into the nose at the inferior turbinate. This explains why you get a runny nose when you cry. In 2-5% of newborns, the drainage valve within the nose isnt patent at birth, leading to excessive tearing. Fortunately, this often resolves on its own, but sometimes we need to force open the pathway with a metal probe.

Lid Lacerations Most lacerations through the eyelid can be easily reaproximated and repaired. However, if a laceration occurs in the nasal quadrant of the lid you have to worry about compromising the canalicular tear-drainage pathway. Canalicular lacerations require cannulation with a silicone tube to maintain patency until the tissue has healed.

Warning: Drug absorption through the nasal mucosa can be profound as this is a direct route to the circulatory system and entirely skips liver metabolism. Eyedrops meant for local effect, such as beta-blockers, can have impressive systemic side effects when absorbed through the nose. Patients can decrease nasal drainage by squeezing the medial canthus after putting in eyedrops. They should also close their eyes for a few minutes afterwards because blinking acts as a tear pumping mechanism.

The eyeball is an amazing structure. It is only one inch in diameter, roughly the size of a ping-pong ball, and is a direct extension of the brain. The optic nerve is the only nerve in the body that we can actually see (using our ophthalmoscope) in vivo.

The outer wall of the eye is called the sclera. The sclera is white, fibrous, composed of collagen, and is actually continuous with the clear cornea anteriorly. In fact, you can think of the cornea as an extension of the sclera as they look similar under the microscope. The cornea is clear, however, because it is relatively dehydrated. At the back of the eye, the sclera forms the optic sheath encircling the optic nerve.

The eyeball is divided into three chambers, not two as you might expect. The anterior chamber lies between the cornea and the iris, the posterior chamber between the iris and the lens, and the vitreous chamber extends from the lens back to the retina.

The eye is also filled with two different fluids. Vitreous humor fills the back vitreous chamber. It is a gel-suspension with a consistency similar to Jell-O. With age and certain degenerative conditions, areas of the vitreous can liquefy. When this occurs, the vitreous can fall in upon itself usually a harmless event called a PVD (posterior vitreous detachment). However, this normally benign vitreous detachment can sometimes tug on the retina and create small retinal tears.

Aqueous humor fills the anterior and posterior chambers. This is a watery solution with a high nutrient component that supports the avascular cornea and lens. Aqueous is continuously produced in the posterior chamber, flowing forward through the pupil into the anterior chamber, where it drains back into the venous circulation via the Canal of Schlemm. Well discuss the aqueous pathway in detail in the glaucoma chapter.

The cornea is the clear front surface of the eye. The cornea-air interface actually provides the majority of the eyes refractive power. The cornea is avascular and gets its nutrition from tears on the outside, aqueous fluid on the inside, and from blood vessels located at the periphery.

On cross section, the cornea contains five distinct layers. The outside surface layer is composed of epithelial cells that are easily abraded. Though epithelial injuries are painful, this layer heals quickly and typically does not scar. Under this lies Bowmans layer and then the stroma. The corneal stroma makes up 90% of the corneal thickness, and if the stroma is damaged this can lead to scar formation. The next layer is Descemets membrane, which is really the basal lamina of the endothelium, the final inner layer.

The inner endothelium is only one cell layer thick and works as a pump to keep the cornea dehydrated. If the endothelium becomes damaged (during surgery or by degenerative diseases) aqueous fluid can flow unhindered into the stroma and cloud up the cornea with edema. Endothelial cell count is very important as these cells dont regenerate when destroyed the surviving endothelial cells just get bigger and spread out. If the cell count gets too low, the endothelial pump cant keep up and the cornea swells with water, possibly necessitating a corneal transplant to regain vision.

Decemets membrane is deep, while Bowmans layer is high up in the belfry. A belfry is a room, usually high up in a tower, where bells are hung.

The angle formed by the inner cornea and the root of the iris is particularly important in ophthalmology. Here you find the trabecular meshwork with its underlying Schlemms Canal. This is where aqueous is drained, and blockage of this pathway/angle will become important as we discuss glaucoma.

The iris, ciliary body, and the choroid plexus are all continuous with each other and are collectively called the uvea. This is an important term, as many people can pres
ent with painful uveitis spontaneously or in associated with rheumatologic diseases.

The iris is the colored part of the eye and its primary function is to control the amount of light hitting the retina. Sympathetic stimulation of the pupil leads to pupil dilation and parasympathetic stimulation leads to constriction. In other words, if you see a bear in the woods, your sympathetics kick in, and your eyes dilate so you can see as much as possible as you run away. Ill be using this mnemonic/metaphor many times throughout this book to help you remember this concept.

The inner iris flows back and becomes the ciliary body. The ciliary body has two functions: it secretes aqueous fluid and it controls the shape of the lens. The ciliary body contains sphincter muscles that change the lens shape by relaxing the zonular fibers that tether to the lens capsule.

The choroid is a bed of blood vessels that lie right under the retina. The choroid supplies nutrition to the outer one-third of the retina which includes the rod and cone photoreceptors. Retinal detachments can separate the retina from the nutritious choroid, which is disastrous for the photoreceptors as they quickly die without this nourishment.

FUN FACT: An ostrichs eye is larger than its brain.

The lens sits behind the iris. The lens is unique in that it doesnt have any innervation or vascularization. It gets its nourishment entirely from nutrients floating in the aqueous fluid. The lens also has the highest protein concentration of any tissue in the body (65% water, 35% protein).

The lens has three layers in a configuration similar to a peanut M&M. The outer layer is called the capsule. The capsule is thin with a consistency of saran wrap and holds the rest of the lens in place. The middle layer is called the cortex, while the central layer is the hard nucleus. Cataracts are described by where they occur such as nuclear cataracts, cortical cataracts, and subcapsular cataracts. With cataract surgery the outer capsule is left behind and the artificial lens is placed inside this suporting bag.

The capsule is held in place by suspensory ligaments called zonules that insert around the periphery and connect to the muscular ciliary body. Contraction of the ciliary muscle causes the zonule ligaments to relax (think about that for a minute), allowing the lens to become rounder and increase its refracting power for close-up reading.

In children the lens is soft but with age the lens hardens and becomes less pliable. After age 40 the lens starts having difficulty rounding out and people have problems focusing on near objects. This process is called presbyopia. Almost everyone over 50 needs reading glasses because of this hardening of the lens.

The retina is the sensory portion of the eye and contains layers of photoreceptors, nerves, and supporting cells. Histologically, many cell layers can be seen, but they are not worth memorizing at this point. The important ones include the photoreceptor layer, which is located further out (towards the periphery), and the ganglion nerve layer which lies most inward (toward the vitreous). For light to reach the photoreceptor it has to pass through many layers. After light reaches the photoreceptors the visual signal propagates back up to the ganglion nerves. These ganglion nerves, in turn, course along the surface of the retina toward the optic disk and form the optic nerve running to the brain.

The macula is the pigmented area of the retina that is responsible for central vision. Within the central macula lies the fovea, which is a small pit that is involved with extreme central vision. The fovea is very thin and derives its nutrition entirely from the underlying choroid, making it susceptible to injury during retinal detachments.

The optic disk is the entry and exit point of the eye. The central retinal artery and vein pass through here, along with the the ganglion nerves that form the optic nerve. A physiologic divot or cup can be found here that will become important when we talk about glaucoma.

Seven different bones form the orbital walls: dont be intimidated by this complexity, however, as these bones are not that confusing when you break them down. For example, the roof of the orbit is a continuation of the frontal bone, the zygomatic bone forms the strong lateral wall, while the maxillary bone creates the orbital floor. This makes sense, and you could probably guess these bones from the surrounding anatomy.

The medial wall is a little more complex, however, but is mainly formed by the lacrimal bone (the lacrimal sac drains tears through this bone into the nose) and the ethmoid bone. The thinnest area in the orbit is a part of the ethmoid bone called the lamina papyracea. Sinus infections can erode through this paper-thin wall into the orbital cavity and create a dangerous orbital cellulites.

Despite the fragility of the medial wall, it is well buttressed by surrounding bones, such that its the orbital floor that breaks most often during blunt trauma. The maxillary bone fractures downward and the orbital contents can herniate down into the underlying maxillary sinus. This is called a blowout fracture and can present with enopthalmia (a sunken-in eyeball) and problems with eye-movements from entrapment of the inferior rectus muscle. Well discuss blow-out fractures in more detail in the trauma chapter.

The back of the orbit is formed by the greater wing of the sphenoid bone, with the lesser wing surrounding the optic canal. Theres also a little palatine bone back there in the middle, but dont worry about that one!

The orbital apex is the entry point for all the nerves and vessels supplying the orbit. The superior orbital fissure lies between the wings of the sphenoid bones, through which many vessels and nerves pass into the orbit.

The Annulus of Zinn, a muscular band that serves as the insertion point for most of the ocular muscles, rests on top of the superior orbital fissure. The four rectus muscles attach to the annulus and the optic nerve passes right through the middle.

Four rectus muscles control each eye. These muscles insert at the sclera, behind the limbus, and each pull the eye in the direction of their attachment.

The superior, medial, and inferior rectus muscles are all controlled by the oculomotor nerve (III). The lateral rectus, however, is controlled by the abducens (VI) nerve, which makes sense as the lateral rectus abducts the eye.

The remaining two eye muscles are the superior and inferior oblique muscles. The superior oblique also originates in the posterior orbit, but courses nasally until it reaches the trochlea (or pulley) before inserting onto the eye. The inferior oblique originates from the orbital floor and inserts behind the globe near the macula. Because of these posterior insertions, the oblique muscles are primarily responsible for intorsion and extorsion (rotation of the eye sideways), though they also contribute some vertical gaze action.

Confused, yet? Dont kill yourself learning the action of the oblique muscles or nerve innervation as well discuss these topics in greater detail in the neurology chapter.

Summary: There is much more anatomy we could cover, but lets hold off for now and discuss more detailed anatomy in future chapters as they become relevant.

1. Why dont objects like contact lens and eyelashes get stuck behind the eye? Because the conjunctiva covering the front of the eye loops forward and covers the inside of the eyelids as well.

2. How many chambers are there in the eyeball? Three, actually. The anterior chamber sits in front of the iris, the posterior chamber between the iris and the lens, and the vitreous chamber lies behind the lens filling most of the eye.

3. Name each of the numbered bones. Which bone is thinnest? Which is most likely to fracture after blunt injury? Which is most likely to erode from sinus infections?

The bones are: (1)Sphenoid (2)Zygomatic (3)Ma
xilla (4)Lacrimal (5)Ethmoid (6)Frontal. The ethmoid is the thinnest bone and most likely to perforate from an eroding sinus infection (this happens mostly in kids). The maxillary floor is most likely to fracture from blunt injury.

3. What is the uvea? What eye structures compose it? The uvea comprises the iris, ciliary body, and the choroid. They are all connected to each other and are histologically similar. Patients can present with a painful uveitis, an inflammation of the uvea, often secondary to rheumatological/inflammatory conditions like sarcoidosis.

4. Where does the retina get its nutrition supply? The inner 2/3rds of the retina (inner implies toward the center of the eyeball) gets its nutrition from the retinal vessels. The outer 1/3 (which includes the photoreceptors) is nourished by the underlying choroid plexus. A retinal detachment, which separates the retina from the choroid, is particularly dangerous for the photoreceptors. This is especially true for detachments involving the macula as the thin macula gets its blood supply primarily from the underlying choroid.

5. When the ciliary body contracts, how does the lens change shape (does it get rounder or flatter)? The ciliary body is a round, spincter-like muscle, so when it contracts the zonules actually relax, allowing the lens to relax and become rounder. With age, the lens hardens and has a hard time relaxing, no matter how hard the ciliary muscle contracts. This aging process is called presbyopia.

6. Which extraocular muscle doesnt originate at the orbital apex? Unlike the other muscles, the inferior oblique originates from the orbital floor before inserting on the back of the globe near the macula.

7. Which full-thickness eyelid laceration is more dangerous medial or lateral lacerations? Why? You worry about the canalicular tear-drainage system involvement with medial lacerations. You want to repair this system as soon as possible, to avoid chronic epiphora.

8. How many layers are there in the cornea? Can you name them?There are five: the superficial Epithelium, Bowmans layer, Stroma, Decemets membrane, and the inner Endothelium.

9. How does the water content of the cornea differ from the rest of the eye? The cornea is relatively dehydrated, which helps with clarity. If water gets into the cornea, via a disrupted endothelium or a high pressure gradient from acute glaucoma, the cornea turns hazy and white.

10. A pseudophakic (i.e. implanted lens) patient is found to have excellent far vision, but reading is terrible. Whats going on? As we get older, our natural lenses harden and do not change shape very well making it hard to accommodate and see near objects. This phenomenon is called presbyopia and is a normal finding in people over 40 years of age. A prosthetic lens is not able to change shape at all, so all patients (including small children) with implanted plastic lenses require reading glasses to read.

Read more here:
Chapter 2: Anatomy of the Eye - TimRoot.com

Anatomy of a Goal: Justin Meram’s Breakaway – Massive Report

Welcome to the Anatomy of a Goal, where each week we dissect one goal (or near goal) from Columbus Crew SCs previous match.

For Week Five of the 2017 MLS Season, we take a look at Justin Merams 13th minute breakaway goal that put Crew SC up 1-0 as part of the 2-0 win over Orlando City on Saturday.

Heres a look at the finish from the Crew SC winger.

Through the first 12 minutes of the match, the Crew SC players were still trying to find their footing. Orlando employed a high press that forced Columbus goalkeeper Zack Steffen to make some difficult plays out of the back.

Merams game-winning goal starts with a Crew SC press. Above, you can see City center-back Jose Aja in position to receive a pass from goalkeeper Joe Bendik. As the pass approaches, Federico Higuain and Ola Kamara begin to press, cutting off Ajas safety valve to his goalkeeper and his movement down the field.

After dispossessing Aja, Higuain plays a pass to midfielder Wil Trapp. Here, you can see that Trapp has three options: Either Meram streaking down the left side of the field between Aja and Antonio Nocerino, Ola Kamara in an offside position near Jonathan Spector or Ethan Finlay wide rigth.

In this still shot, you can see that Finlay probably would have been the best option. Spector has yet to notice the Crew SC winger, and Trapp has a simple passing angle right into the path of Finlay.

However, Trapp opts to play the ball to an offside Ola Kamara. OCSC right back Will Johnson is able to intercept this pass and plays a simple ball to Aja.

Pay attention to the positioning of Meram and Johnson in the image above. Meram had just made a run down the left side of the pitch and Johnson had moved into the middle of the field to dispossess Trapp. The Orlando City right back may notice that Meram is unmarked, but he does not move towards the winger and instead turns back toward the Black & Gold half.

Here, Orlando striker Carlos Rivas receives a ball from Aja, and streaks down the middle of the pitch. Notice Artur running right behind Rivas.

Artur makes an incredible hustle play to get to the side of Rivas and make a clean, dispossessing tackle.

With the ball at his feet, Arturs eyes are locked downfield where he can see Kamara standing unmarked (and probably offside) between Spector and Johnson.

Here is where this goal really starts. Meram stayed in a wide left position, but Johnson (hidden under the Audi goal logo) is occupied by the streaking Kamara. You can just see that Johnsons back is turned to Meram.

As Arturs ball beats the Orlando backline, Johnson is still staring right at the Crew SC striker, insisting that Kamara is offside (he probably was). Meanwhile, Johnson has no idea that Meram started his run onside and is running unmarked at a full sprint.

Meram and Kamara are both in position to receive Arturs lofted ball. Johnson, in the magnified circle, is still upset that the linesman hasnt raised an offside flag and totally switched off from the play, walking back toward his defensive end. Spector is also calling for the offside flag, but also in a race to get between the ball and the goal. The Crew SC striker, maybe knowing that he was offside, cuts his run short so that Meram can take possession.

The Columbus winger, now in possession of the ball, has two options: He can either head right, toward the middle of the goal, to have more space to beat the Orlando goalkeeper or stay on his left foot and avoid the onrushing defender. Spectors defensive run is angled toward the middle of the goal, trying to force Meram onto his weaker (left) foot and provide Bendik with a better angle to make a save.

Spectors smart defensive play should not be overlooked. Running from the midfield, the City center back likely knows that Meram plays as an inverted winger and loves to start left but cut back to his right for a shot. Shielding Merams right foot, Spector cuts off the his path to goal, forcing Meram into a more difficult angle with his left foot in the best position to shoot.

Now, Meram must decide whether he will take a shot with his left foot or attempt to cut back on Spector and hit the Meram Meat Hook with his right foot.

Heavily shielding Merams right side, Spector makes Merams decision for him, and the Crew SC winger fires a left footed shot to the back post.

And Crew SC take a 1-0 lead.

Findings:

1. The start of this goal gives us a quick look at the Crew SC high press in action. The press lead directly to Trapp having the ball at his feet, in a position to put someone in on goal. While Trapp was unable spring Finlay or Kamara, this chance shows how effective a high press can be for Crew SC.

2. Johnson totally switched off during this play. Distracted by Kamaras (potentially) offside run, Johnson doesnt notice Meram running toward goal onside and unmarked.

3. Just like last week, Crew SC score another goal on a long pass following a breakaway. Artur played a perfectly weighted ball over the Orlando City backline to spring Meram.

4. Eschewing his traditional Meram Meat Hook, the winger hit a near perfect ball past Bendik. Spector made an incredible defensive play, taking away the Meat Hook and getting a slight deflection on Merams left-footed-shot.

View original post here:
Anatomy of a Goal: Justin Meram's Breakaway - Massive Report

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Star Kelly McCreary Discusses Filming Maggie’s … – BuddyTV (blog)

Ellen Pompeo may have made her directorial debut on Grey's Anatomy last week but it was Kelly McCreary's Maggie who took center stage in "Be Still, My Soul." The emotional hour focused on a desperate Maggie putting her mother Diane (LaTanya Richardson Jackson) on an aggressive experimental treatment in attempt to save her from inflammatory breast cancer and firing Meredith (Pompeo) as her mother's surgeon in the process. Unfortunately, Diane passed away after complications from the clinical trial. Grey's Anatomy Recap: Is Maggie Able to Save Her Mother?>>>

According to McCreary, who went through a range of emotions in the episode, she struggled with her character's tough situation. She also had to put herself in Maggie's shoes as she prepared for the inevitable tragedy.

"To prepare, I did a lot of reading about IBC and the treatments, just the way that Maggie goes through trying to find out about what other patients had experienced," she continued. "In other words, I did research in the same way that Maggie did as she was trying to figure out how to treat her mother."

Despite the devastating loss that will surely have an immense impact on Maggie's life moving forward, McCreary takes some comfort in knowing that Maggie was able to make peace with her mother before she died.

McCreary also believes that Maggie will stay true to her character even while suffering the loss of her mom. "That's who Maggie is at her core," McCreary says of Maggie's optimism. "I don't think that this is going to change that. But I do think she's going to take to heart all of that lovely advice that her mom gave her in her final moments, when she told Maggie to just live life more fully and give herself permission to be a little messy."

"Are we going to see Maggie go dark? I don't know what the future holds, but Maggie will grieve in the way that seems, from the outside, to be relatively healthy. The thing about grief is that we think of it in stages, or we've been told that it's stages, but those stages go in cycles. So when she gets to anger, or returns to anger or denial, maybe some dark stuff will come up then," she explained.

Obviously Maggie will have to lean on Meredith at this very difficult time and hopefully what they have or have gone through will be stronger than the outcome of the whole Nathan situation.

"Maggie's mom has died now. So, the question of whether Meredith should have told her becomes less about the fact that they are together and Maggie wants him. It's less about the fact that Meredith took something that Maggie wanted, and more about ... something else. ... It's not about Meredith taking the boy Maggie had a crush on. Maggie has experienced something that makes that sort of trivial at this point. I don't want to give too much away about that storyline, because it is one of the major questions left to be answered this season," she told TV Guide.

"I think that it will definitely bring her closer to Meredith -- and Amelia, too, with the loss of her father. Even though the circumstances are completely different, they share something that they didn't share before, and it'll bring a new level of understanding and closeness, I think, to those relationships," she added.

(Image courtesy of ABC)

Read more here:
'Grey's Anatomy' Star Kelly McCreary Discusses Filming Maggie's ... - BuddyTV (blog)

Should Meredith & Carina Be Worried About DeLuca on ‘Grey’s Anatomy’? (VIDEO) – TVInsider

DeLuca (Giacomo Gianniotti) is determined to figure out what's wrong with his patient, Suzanne (Sarah Rafferty), but his sister Carina (Stefania Spampinato) is worried about him.

As seen in TV Insider's exclusive sneak peek of Thursday'sGrey's Anatomy, she's thinking about the family's history, specifically her father's. (You'll recall that she was the one who noticed signs that their father is bipolar.)

"I came to Seattle because Andrew is now the same age as our father was when his symptoms started," Carina explains to Meredith (Ellen Pompeo). And it's not just his behavior when it comes to trying to treat Suzanne."Failing to understand or properly consider the consequences of your actions is a sign of mania," Carina continues.

Watch the clip above to see the examples she lists and Meredith's reaction.

(ABC/Gilles Mingasson)

In "A Diagnosis," DeLuca is irritated when Meredith takes over with Suzanne. Plus, Jackson (Jesse Williams), Owen (Kevin McKidd), and Jo (Camilla Luddington) work on a couple injured in a bear attack, and Levi (Jake Borelli) is hurt when Nico (Alex Landi) doesn't want him to meet his parents.

Grey's Anatomy, Thursdays, 9/8c, ABC

Excerpt from:
Should Meredith & Carina Be Worried About DeLuca on 'Grey's Anatomy'? (VIDEO) - TVInsider

TV Ratings Thursday: ‘Grey’s Anatomy’ holds, ‘Young Sheldon’ improves – TV by the Numbers

Broadcast primetime live + same-day ratings for Thursday, November 14, 2019

Note: FOXs live NFL broadcast may result in greater adjustments than usual for the network in the finals later today.

The numbers for Thursday:

Thursdays primetime ratings winners stayed the same week-to-week.

ABCs Greys Anatomy remained the nights highest-rated scripted show, with the same 1.3 rating in adults 18-49 that it scored a week ago. A Million Little Things followed it with a 0.8 rating for the second week in a row, while How to Get Away with Murder (0.5) ticked up one-tenth from its last episode.

CBS Young Sheldon once again raked in the largest audience (8.98 million viewers) of any of the nights scripted shows, and rose from its previous 1.1 to a season high 1.2 rating. Mom similarly hit a new season high in the 18-49 demo, after ticking up from a 0.8 to a 0.9. The Unicorn (0.7) and Carols Second Act (0.6), however, both slipped a tenth from their most recent outings, and Evil held steady with another 0.5 in the 10 p.m. hour.

On NBC, Superstore (0.7) and The Good Place (0.6) both stayed even week-to-week. Law & Order: SVU (0.7) managed to climb up a tick, but the same could not be said for Perfect Harmony (0.4) or Will & Grace (0.4), both of which fell one-tenth from their episodes last week.

Elsewhere, the CWs Supernatural maintained its previous 0.3 rating, and Legacies (0.3) ticked up a tenth. Meanwhile, FOXs broadcast of the Thursday Night Football game between Pittsburgh and Cleveland topped the night with a 3.3 rating and 11.65 million viewers. Pending updates, that puts the game notably up from the 2.6 preliminary rating and 9.42 million viewer audience that last weeks TNF game scored.

Network averages:

Definitions:

Rating: Estimated percentage of the universe of TV households (or other specified group) tuned to a program in the average minute. Ratings are expressed as a percent.Fast Affiliate Ratings: These first national ratings are available at approximately 11 a.m. ETthe day after telecast. The figures may include stations that did not air the entire network feed, as well as local news breaks or cutaways for local coverage or other programming. Fast Affiliate ratings are not as useful for live programs and are likely to differ significantly from the final results, because the data reflect normal broadcast feed patterns.Share (of Audience):The percent of households (or persons) using television who are tuned to a specific program, station or network in a specific area at a specific time.Time Shifted Viewing:Program ratings for national sources are produced in three streams of data Live, Live +Same-Day and Live +7 Day. Time-shifted figures account for incremental viewing that takes place with DVRs. Live+SD includes viewing during the same broadcast day as the original telecast, with a cut-off of 3 a.m. local time when meters transmit daily viewing to Nielsen for processing. Live +7 ratings include viewing that takes place during the 7 days following a telecast.

Source: The Nielsen Company.

Like Loading...

Read more here:
TV Ratings Thursday: 'Grey's Anatomy' holds, 'Young Sheldon' improves - TV by the Numbers

Missing Leonardo link: writer discovers that Da Vinci’s anatomy drawings were owned by Charles II – Art Newspaper

The incomparable Leonardo volume (around 1590) that provided the exciting proof of provenance Courtesy of Royal Collection Trust

Were the wonderful Leonardo drawings at Windsor once owned by Charles II? Scholars have been intrigued by the idea, but there has been no proof. Their earliest documentation in the Royal Collection dates from 1690, when Constantijn Huygens Jr, secretary to William III, spent a morning leafing through the bound album. So, when I stumbled on a report in an English publication of 1680, it was not so much eureka! as gotcha!. Here, unmistakably, was an eyewitness account of Leonardos drawings being in Charles IIs Whitehall Cabinet.

The testimony came from a blue-chip sourceWalter Charleton (1619-1707), physician-in-ordinary to Charles I and Charles II. Prominent in his own day, he is now eclipsed by more famous friends, John Evelyn, Anthony Wood and Margaret Cavendish. In March 1679, as Harveian Orator of the Royal College of Physicians, Charleton gave the inaugural lectures in the new anatomy theatre. These were published in 1680 as Enquiries Into Human Nature: in VI. Anatomic Praelections in the New Theatre of the Royal Colledge of Physicians in London. The opening words of the sixth lecture, Of motion voluntary, are startling:

For Painting, I recommend to them the incomparable Lionardo da Vinci, della Pittura: not only because he was eminently skilld in all parts of Anatomy, as appears by the accurate Figures that illustrate and adorn Vesaliuss noble Volume De Corporis humani fabrica, all of which were drawn and cut by Da Vincis own hands; and the original Draughts of which are yet extant in a large Manuscript of his in Folio, in the Italian language (but written from the right hand to the left) carefully preservd in HisMajesties Cabinet at White-Hall, where I have had the good fortune sometimes to contemplate them: but alsobecause in his Treatise Della Pittura just now mentiond, he seems to me to have describd the figures, motions, forces and symmetry of the limbs, their Articulations and Muscles, in various postures, more clearly than any Writer I have hitherto read.

Charletons intimate contact with the Leoni-Leonardo album is palpable, and felicitous; we could scarcely conjure a more fitting 17th-century English reader. Discussing Leonardos writings on animal and human musculature, he cites a passage in the editio princeps (Paris, 1651) of the artists Trattato della pittura. To identify a text that confirms Charles IIs ownership of the album during the 1670s connects Leonardos anatomydrawings and the treatise on painting, and situates them in the frontline of 17th-century scientific theory, was, for a Leonardo nerd like me, equivalent to finding the missing evolutionary link. The new discovery holds out the promise of further eureka moments among the papers of Charletons networks, and a glimmer of hope that we may yet ascertain how Leonardos celebrated drawings entered the Royal Collection.

Margaret Dalivalles discovery is discussed in more detail in Leonardos Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts, published on 17 October by Oxford University Press. She teaches at the Centre for Medieval and Renaissance Studies, Oxford

See more here:
Missing Leonardo link: writer discovers that Da Vinci's anatomy drawings were owned by Charles II - Art Newspaper

Anatomy of a Nightwing/Batgirl Cover – Talking to Meghan Hetrick About Her Crimes Of Passion – Bleeding Cool News

Im a big fan of comics illustrator Meghan Hetrick and I support her work on Patreon. I got the chance to talk to her about her upcoming Cover Alpha Comics variant cover for DC Comics Valentines Day-timed Crimes Of Passion anthology, a cover featuring Barbara Gordon and Dick Grayson coincidentally tunning alongside the news that a certain proposal is back in continuity. You can see work in progress images below.

Bleeding Cool: We see three mockup ideas for this cover (below). The standard approach is to present your favourite idea, the one you can live with and a third one that is so wrong that it persuades the client to choose one of the others. But invariably its the third one that gets chosen, psychically, as if they somehow know. Can you relate to that, and how did it apply to this cover?

Meghan Hetrick: So, while I know that is the norm, I dont ever submit any cover ideas (or commissions in general) that I wouldnt be happy working on. I spend a lot of time with these things, and its a miserable experience working on something you dont want to work on.

Also, my approach for this cover was different. I did Sweet, Sensual, and Sexy basically, I worked my way up the mood meter. Its my first time working with Cover Alpha, and also my first time working DC in years (for cover work), so I wasnt sure exactly where the lines were in regards to what was acceptable.

Bleeding Cool: Dick Grayson and Barbara Gordon is a pairing that has been a) popular with certain fans and b) a pairing often denied them. How much does the denial fuel that desire, do you think, and are DC superhero comics just an exercise in literary BDSM?

I think that the idea of you want what you cant have is fairly universal, and if youre a smart marketer, you know how to play that. Ethical? Likely not. But marketing isnt usually all too concerned about ethics.

As for the second half of the question, being that Im not part of the BDSM community, I dont feel like Im the best person to answer that in any sort of meaningful way. I do think that comics as a whole, not just DC, owe a lot to the BDSM and kink community, in many more positive ways than not.

Bleeding Cool: Batgirl was only introduced as a love interest for Dick Grayson as a reaction to gay panic in comics and especially the Batman comics after the publication of Seduction Of The Innocent by Dr. Frederick Wertham, which condemned Batman and Robin as lovers. Should Dick/Barbara fans, in a weird way, be grateful to Wertham?

This is a very, very loaded question, and a concept that while I am familiar with it, Im woefully out of practice on (my senior thesis was actually about Seduction of the Innocent, but that was almost 20 years ago now). I do believe that anyone who is even remotely interested in how media and culture can collide, the backlash surrounding it, and the implications and fallout of said backlash (the pendulum swing), really owes it to themselves to pick up a copy of Seduction of the Innocent, read it, and form their own opinion.

Just get an e-reader version of it though, because an actual copy is stupid expensive.

Bleeding Cool: When do you know when to stop? Looking at your process for this cover, layers over layers over layers, is there an end game that says this is where the cover ends or is it always this is where the deadline says it must end? How much further could you go? And is there anything you lose from your initial sketches in the process to where you end up?

So, what Im guessing youre referring to (because Im not sure what files youre mentioning), are the WIP saves I did throughout the process. Its actually not a lot of layers there, just a whole lot of different stages of rendering, haha. As to the meat of your question though, its a combination of both this is where the cover ends and this is where the deadline says it ends. My rule of thumb is that if I get to a point where anything else I add just kinda doesnt serve a purpose, then its done. There are always, ALWAYS tweaks that can be made, which can eat up a *huge* amount of time, but that falls into the category of getting precious with a piece, which is a defining trait of folks just starting to draw. I think when you get to the fuck it, Im done stage, while satisfying your clients needs, and can just live with cashing that check, thats when you can probably start calling yourself a Pro, hahah.

With this piece, like I said, there are spots where I could tweak, but they dont really add anything else to it. I wanted a softly lit, human touch on this one, especially with as much as was done digitally, so leaving those mistakes in there actually gives it a bit of life, and makes it not look so clinical. I do feel that sometimes a lot of the energy of a piece can be lost in inks, if you try and just make everything too perfect. Art made by human hands needs to have imperfections, IMO.

Bleeding Cool: You talked on your Patreon about moving from drawing interior comic book pages to just covers and illustrations and gallery shows- more in the career mode of Frank Frazetta or Gerald Brom. What steps are you making in that direction, and what other more contemporary creators can you see following a similar path?

I love telling stories, so Ill always have a love for interior work, Im just not sure if Im a good fit for superheroes, or the mainstream publication format. As Im getting older, Im realizing I have a much more European approach to my ideas and art in general, which is both a good and bad thing, haha.

As for the steps Im taking, Im currently teaching myself how to oil paint, and Im having a fucking blast doing so. They dont lend themselves too well to the monthly format with comics thats so common here in the US, just because of the nature of the medium they take FOREVER to dry, and when I get, on average, about a week to turn a cover around, that doesnt work all that splendidly, LOL. My current slate of commissioned paintings consists of a huge range of licensed properties, and its fun to take characters that are typically seen as essentially throwaway art, and render them in a manner that folks dont really expect to see nowadays. Comics *are* art, and one of the hardest to actually get a handle on. I would love to do my best to elevate the artform. Im not sure if Im necessarily the right person for the job, but dammit, Im going to try. I also have my own projects and characters Ill be fiddling around with, especially once I get more comfortable with the medium, and these will be what I use to start pushing my way towards gallery work.

As for contemporary creators, I can rattle off a few (and I will), but Im not entirely certain theyd be interested. Three folks already doing it are Joe Jusko (of course), Scott Hampton, and Esad Ribic. All three have been major, major influences on me, too. You also have the old guard of Heavy Metal and 2000 AD artists, who dont get anywhere near enough recognition. Folks Id love to see dip their toes into that realm are Cary Nord, Fiona Staples, Becky Cloonan. Mahmoud Asrar has also been painting lately as well, and its gorgeous. Simple truth is that there are more creators I can see following that similar path than I could feasibly name, but its breaking that barrier and getting accepted as real artists, while were still alive, and not 100+ years after were dead (see: all the Brandywine School artists).

Bleeding Cool: How much do you try and create in a vacuum and how much fan reaction do you allow to filter into your work? Can reader reaction to your images that may have not been intended ever taint them for you? Or can you be detatched from it?

At the risk of kicking the internet hornets nest, anymore, I think the only way you can maintain some semblance of sanity as a creator is to disregard almost all comments regarding your work (not ignore, disregard). Now, if you see a pattern emerging with the same thing being said repeatedly, at that point maaaaybe you should investigate into whats being said, and see if it has any merit. So, I do tend to create
quite a bit in a vacuum, with very little fan reaction having influence on my work. I will absolutely listen to constructive criticism though the key word there being constructive. If someone just spouts off this sucks or the equivalent thereof, without any reasoning behind it besides that it doesnt fit their personal taste, well, opinions are like assholes and whatnot.

That being said, fan support is awesome, and I wouldnt be where I am today without fans whove supported my art over the years. I think one of the hardest things about being a creator is finding that balance between being true to yourself, and what you want to do, since that creates the best art, and not giving into the trends for a quick buck if you can. Its the internet, theres a fandom and a market for everything, you just need to find your people. My breaks (because there were two) into comics came not from me riding trends, but just by being myself, and thats something Ive done my best to try and stay true to.

And, because it hasnt come up in the questions here, I just wanted to take a second and thank Cover Alpha and DC for the opportunity to work on this cover. All parties involved have been awesome to work with, and it made this a truly fun experience especially revisiting two characters I love drawing, haha. Also, thank you for the thoughtful questions, and your support.

Read the original here:
Anatomy of a Nightwing/Batgirl Cover - Talking to Meghan Hetrick About Her Crimes Of Passion - Bleeding Cool News

‘Grey’s Anatomy’ Season 14 Will Be ‘Funnier,’ ‘Lighter’ – Moviefone

"Grey's Anatomy" has been breaking our hearts and causing us to go through a million tissues for 13 seasons, but Season 14 has a new prescription: fun.

Actor Giacomo Gianniotti, who plays Andrew DeLuca, says the new season is "funnier, it's sexier, it's lighter."

"We're going to have fun this season," he told TV Line.

As he explained, the sho has "been dreary for a long time." Yeah, between McDreamy's death and Lexie's death and Mark Sloan's death it's a wonder that anyone is still alive in Seattle.

"There's just been a lot of separation and loss, so we want to show the characters having some fun," Gianniotti said. "Also, a lot of the men are single now, so we're going to explore what that dynamic is like."

Ooh, there hasn't been a good bromance since Derek and Mark!

"Grey's Anatomy" Season 14 premieres Sept. 28 at 8 p.m. on ABC.

Link:
'Grey's Anatomy' Season 14 Will Be 'Funnier,' 'Lighter' - Moviefone

Grey’s Anatomy Season 15 Episode 13 Recap: Owen and Amelia …

Now PlayingGrey's Anatomy Worst Couples Ranked (Seasons 1-14)

Grey's Anatomy's most tumultuous couple is on the rocks again. With Betty Britney (Peyton Kennedy) missing again and her parents in town looking to take Leo for themselves, Owen's (Kevin McKidd) inner rage emerged and Amelia (Caterina Scorsone) was right in the crosshairs.

Here's the thing, Owen and Amelia have never been the best-suited couple. They got together pretty soon after the love of Owen's life, Cristina (Sandra Oh), left for Sweden, which had everyone labeling it as a rebound. Then they got married and got into a huge fight about children because Amelia had PTSD from her first pregnancy. Instead of dealing with it, Amelia locked herself in a hotel for a few weeks, driving Owen to demand a divorce. Then it turned out that Amelia had a tumor growing in her brain for years and it was allegedly responsible for all of her crazy behavior. Things have been pretty smooth since the tumor was removed, but Amelia and Owen's core differences are coming up now.

It's not that Amelia doesn't understand Owen's desire for a family she gets it. The problem is that Amelia always saw Britney/Betty as a core part of that family situation and Thursday's episode made it clear that Owen did not. Of course Owen is upset that Leo might be taken away from him, but that doesn't give him the right to blame Amelia for being unable to help him keep the kid. It also doesn't give him the right to judge her for having the same bond with Betty/Britney that he has with Britney's son.

At the end of the day, Owen and Amelia don't know how to have these differences and fights in a healthy manner; they always have to hit rock bottom before finding their way back together, and that's not an ideal type of relationship to raise a child in.

Even if there is potential for them to come back from this, it is made more complicated by Teddy's (Kim Raver) pregnancy and her feelings for Owen. Teddy may be trying to swear that she and Owen are just friends, but we all know that if Owen said he was down to give it a try, she would dump Koracick (Gregg Germann) in a heartbeat.

After years of pining, it seems inevitable that Grey's will have to give Teddy and Owen their due. Is this latest Britney/Betty drama going to be the thing that finally drives Owen to Teddy? We have a few more steps to get there, but rest assured that Amelia and Owen's latest fight doesn't say anything good for the future of their relationship. Prepare for the implosion.

Grey's Anatomy airs Thursdays at 8/7c on ABC.

Read the original here:
Grey's Anatomy Season 15 Episode 13 Recap: Owen and Amelia ...

Anatomy of a Goal: Ola Kamara’s New England Golazo – Massive … – Massive Report

Welcome to the Anatomy of a Goal, where each week we dissect one goal (or near goal) from Columbus Crew SCs previous match.

For match 13 of the 2017 MLS Season, we take a look at Ola Kamaras 20th minute half volley that put Crew SC up 1-0 as part of the 2-1 loss to the New England Revolution on Sunday.

Here is a look at the finish from the Crew SC striker.

The Black & Gold had a fast start to Sundays match against New England, using a high press to disrupt the Revolution and getting the fullbacks involved in the attack. On defense, Columbus employed the typically rigid banks of four, as you can just see breaking up in the image below.

On first glance, Olas goal looks like the result of two moments of brilliance: an incredible pass by midfielder Wil Trapp and an incredible strike by the Crew SC striker. However, this goal provides us with an opportunity to dissect how the Black & Gold can successfully pass out of a high press.

In the image above, and the next few images, I have placed a triangle around the three Crew SC players involved in passing out of a press. The passing triangle is one of the quintessential techniques taught and employed by every coach at almost every level of the game. The concept teaches players to quickly pass and move in space, in order to work out of a congested area. In practice, this drill typically employs one or two more offensive players than defensive players, and is often called a rondo. The focus of a rondo, and a passing triangle, is to move the ball around the defensive players until one of the offensive players sees an opportunity to move into a new space, opening up an attack or another triangle.

Above, Crew SC left back Waylon Francis wins an errant New England pass, heading the ball toward teammate and winger Justin Meram. Trapp forms the third point of the triangle. In the middle is New England attacker Femi Hollinger-Janzen. Revs right back Andrew Farrell stays just outside this triangle, perhaps wary of giving Meram the space to move into the New England attacking end.

Meram, barely bothered by Farrell, makes a quick pass to Trapp. Femi, still in the middle of the rondo, is forced to defend all three Columbys players as Farrell opts to protect his defensive end rather than get involved in the triangle.

As Femi over commits to the Trapp-Meram combination, the central midfielder makes a quick pass back to Francis. Trapp will then have to make a decision to move based off of Femis positioning. If Femi moves back to cover Francis, the New England attacker will then leave space for Trapp to run into, breaking up the triangle and opening up an attacking lane. If Femi stays centrally, Trapp and Francis will have a new passing triangle with center-back Jonathan Mensah.

As Femi heads directly toward Francis, Farrell focuses his attention on Meram. Femis decision to defend Francis opens the field for Trapp, who immediately makes a run into the now open space ahead of him. As the ball arrives, Francis must decide if he will pass the ball back to Trapp in an attacking position, or if he will make a pass to the defended Meram.

Francis hits an excellent pass into space to Trapp, giving the Crew SC captain the opportunity to view his surroundings before receiving the pass. As the ball travels, you can see Trapp looking directly at teammate Federico Higuain, who is marked by the just off-screen Xavier Kouassi.

Less than a half-second later, Trapp shifts his gaze from Higuain to the rest of the pitch, where he likely sees Crew SC striker Ola Kamara defended by only one player downfield. Notice the time in this image and the previous image. Trapp is able to identify multiple passing options in the less than one second before he receives the pass from Francis.

Seeing Higuain covered by Kouassi, Trapp decides to move up the field. As Trapp drives forward, Kouassi leaves Higuain. Trapp now has three options: a deep pass to Kamara, continue his dribble and force Kouassi to defend him or Higuain or a quick pass to his playmaker.

Trapp decides to continue his dribble and Kouassi engages the Crew SC captain. As Kouassi closes in on Trapp, the Columbus midfielder now has two options: a deep pass to Kamara or a slotted ball to Higuain. A pass to Higuain is obviously the safe choice, but Trapp is one of the best long-pass deliverers in MLS.

Trapp opts for the home-run pass to Kamara, and his ball is inch-perfect.

The above video shows just how perfect this Trapp pass was. With minimal effort, Trapp sends the ball about to Kamara, who is about 60 yards away. The ball drops directly between Kamara and New England center-back Antonio Delamea, right at the feet of the Crew SC striker.

Kamara, aware of Trapps ability to deliver a perfect long pass, sees the ball arrive and must quickly decide whether to take a touch or to let the ball bounce in front of him. Delamea is the last defender between Kamara and the goal.

The Crew SC striker lets the ball take one bounce, and is faced with another decision. Kamara can either hit the ball on a half-volleyed shot from a difficult angle or he can take a touch on the ball and attempt to beat Delamea on the dribble.

As with Trapp, Kamara opts for the home-run option, and fires an outside-the-foot shot from around 20 yards out. Because Kamara uses the outside of his boot, the ball rotates clockwise, curving back in toward the goal...

...and into the back of the net for the Crew SC goal of the season thus far.

This shot has to be seen in video to appreciate how difficult it actually is to make this shot, and Kamara makes it look almost effortless.

Findings:

Continue reading here:
Anatomy of a Goal: Ola Kamara's New England Golazo - Massive ... - Massive Report