Bill Elliott Gives Clint Bowyer a Dose of His Own Medicine and Takes Hilarious Swipe at Former Driver’s Ability – Sportscasting

When NASCAR fans tune into a Fox broadcast, they know theyll get a couple of things from Clint Bowyer. First and most importantly, hell provide a drivers perspective of whats happening on the track. In his second season, hes also shown a propensity to take a lighthearted approach, joking around, which often includes taking shots at anyone and everyone.

On Sunday at Darlington, the tables were turned. Bowyer had a shot fired directly at him, and it surprisingly came from none other than Bill Elliott. It was a hilarious moment and just one of several reasons fans were suggesting the Hall of Famer should become a regular in the booth in the future.

Since Clint Bowyer joined the Fox NASCAR team at the start of the 2021 season, hes been more than willing to joke at the expense of others. Last year, his target was often his boothmate and former competitor, Jeff Gordon.

This year, with Gordons departure, the former Stewart-Haas Racing driver has had moving targets in the booth with Fox using a rotational lineup of guest analysts. Despite that change, Bowyer didnt take long to start firing shots, beginning with the season-opening race at Daytona and Tony Stewart.

After the network aired a segment with Stewart interviewing Kevin Harvick, in which both made fun of Bowyers attire, the live broadcast returned to the set where the 42-year-old took aim at his former boss.

You made fun of the way I dress. Have you seen some of your Halloween outfits over the years? I mean, my gosh, Bowyer said as the broadcast showed Stewart in one of his Halloween outfits when he dressed like Carmen Miranda, wearing a pink hat, pink skirt, and matching top, exposing his hairy stomach.

Look at that. What is that? Bowyer asked. Are you kidding me?

After Stewart explained it was a Halloween-winning costume from 2015, Bowyer finished off his attack.

Thats a Halloween nightmare, he said. How would you like to wake up with that babe, folks? Leah, look out!

On Sunday at Darlington, Fox provided a Hall of Fame lineup of guests analysts, including Richard Petty in Stage 1, Bobby Labonte in Stage 2, and Bill Elliott wrapping up the race. With 56 laps remaining and Elliott joining Bowyer and Mike Joy in the booth, Chase Briscoe got loose and drove the No. 14 car hard into the outside wall. Bowyer drove the SHR 14 car for the last four years of his career.

14 got off of pit road, but I think youre right, man. Smoked the wall, Bowyer said as the replay showed Briscoe earning one of many Darlington stripes delivered throughout the race. The 14 way too high, jumped the cushion, is what Im going to call that, and got into the wall.

Are you driving that thing today? Elliott hilariously asked.

No, Bowyer quickly retorted. Thats not funny, Bill.

Just checking. Okay, the Hall of Famer responded with his familiar drawl.

That cut deep, Bowyer said. My hero just cut me. I mean right in the back.

Elliotts humorous dig at Bowyer was one of several highlights of his time in the booth, which most agreed was not only a top guest analyst performance for the day, but one of the better ones for the entire season.

Bill Elliott is actually doing pretty good in the booth, Xfinity Series driver Ryan Vargas tweeted. Seems like hes genuinely having a good time and I love to see that.

Side note: Bill Elliott has been wildly good in the broadcast booth this stage. Very informative, wrote reporter Dustin Albino.

Bill Elliott is absolutely crushing it in the booth right now, wrote one fan. The man is as sharp and up to date with the sport as hes always been.

Those were just a few of the comments that were overwhelmingly positive. Based on that response, if Fox decides to go down the same route in 2023 with its coverage implementing a rotation of analysts, the network would be smart to bring on Elliott earlier in the season and for a couple of races. Theres no doubt hes going to already be on location watching his son, so might as well put him to work and, more importantly, watch him put Bowyer in his place.

Like Sportscasting on Facebook. Follow us on Twitter @sportscasting19 and subscribe to our YouTube channel.

RELATED: Chase Elliott Is a Star but Will Never Match His Dads Record Set at Talladega for Fastest Speed in NASCAR History

See the original post here:

Bill Elliott Gives Clint Bowyer a Dose of His Own Medicine and Takes Hilarious Swipe at Former Driver's Ability - Sportscasting

8 Reasons In The Heights Stumbled At The Box Office – Forbes

COREY HAWKINS, GREGORY DIAZ IV, ANTHONY RAMOSMELISSA BARRERA, STEPHANIE BEATRIZ, LESLIE GRACE, DAPHNE RUBIN-VEGA and DASCHA POLANCO in 'In the Heights'

In the Heights is exactly the kind of movie everyone claims to want but then ignores when Hollywood actually makes it.

We played ourselves. Warner Bros. had been trying to keep expectations in check for the last few months, knowing full-well thatIn the Heightswas being commercially overhyped and that the online fandom/anticipation was not being matched outside the film nerd bubble. Hence the nationwide free Mother's Day sneak preview and the deluge of free word-of-mouth screenings leading up to the film's domestic theatrical debut. Even while Warner Bros. sold the living hell out of this $55 million musical, they knew they weren't breaking through. At their best, Warner Bros.' marketing is the best in the business at turning non-franchise films into "got to see this in theatres" event movies. Think, offhand,Magic Mike, The Conjuring, Gravity, American Sniper,It, A Star Is BornandCrazy Rich Asians.Unfortunately, the magic didn't work this time.

In the Heightsplaced second this weekend just below the third Fri-Sun frame ofA Quiet Place part II, earning just $11.405 million. Rank and A Cinemascore grade aside, the gross is lower than the $14.1 million launch ofTom & Jerryearlier this year and the $13.3 million debut of Clint Eastwood'sJersey Boysin summer 2014. Even with the rave reviews and scorching online-specific buzz,In the Heightsis a prime example of "the beautiful lie." Simply put, the Internet has convinced us (if not necessarily Hollywood) that audiences want non-franchise, star-driven, high-quality and inclusive movie-movies in their local cinemas, even as they've spent the last five years ignoring such fare.In the Heightswas almost everything we say we wanted in theatrical movies. Yet it opened just a touch higher than (the admittedly quite good)Peter Rabbit 2.

So, what happened? Well, without further ado

1. No movie stars

UnlikeRide Along, Hustlersor the deluge of above-noted Warner Bros. hits,In the Heightslacked anything resembling mainstream star power. Anthony Ramos may deserve to be a star and might well have been one in a less IP-driven marketplace. Unfortunately, he's unknown to most of the audience. Jimmy Smits and Stephanie Beatriz have minor supporting roles, while Corey Hawkins is a regular inStraight Outta Compton, Kong: Skull Islandand Fox's24reboot without being a "butts in seats" name. Otherwise, it's primarily unknowns and young actors hopefully finding fortune and glory elsewhere. Melissa Barrera will be in the fifthScream,while Leslie Grace is better known as a musician than an actress. You didn't have a Constance Wu, an Ice Cube, a Jennifer Lopez, a Lady Gaga, a Sandra Bullock or a shirtless Channing Tatum.

2. The lack of a plot hamstrung the marketing.

The lack of stars and the comparatively niche source material put it at a disadvantage compared toLes MisrablesandHairspray. In addition, the general scarcity of plot (including cutting out much of the interpersonal conflict from the original play) made it harder to market in a raw "What is this movie about?" sense. Crude as this may be to say, the overriding marketing message was thatIn the Heightswas "Hispanic Americans: The Movie." There was little to offer those who didn't find specific value in such demographic representation or didn't need a 144-minute movie to remind them that "not a white guy" people are every bit as deserving of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The media coverage, emphasizing the film's demographic importance and preordained cultural value, almost made it seem like "good for you" homework rather than escapist entertainment.

3. It's a little-known play with no marquee characters or breakout songs.

Even with four Tony awards and a following among theater nerds,In the Heightsis a comparatively cult-level play in terms of general audience awareness. It was sold as, at best, a play you've never heard of from that guy you know fromHamilton.And when he hostedSaturday Night Livein late 2016, Lin-Manuel Miranda was self-aware enough to know that nobody in the audience knew who he was.It features no marquee characters and offers no marquee songs, the latter of which are going to be a problem if anyone is expectingGreatest Showman-like legs. Of course, that Hugh Jackman/Zac Efron/Zendaya musical was a once-in-a-generation occurrence ($184 million domestic from a $13.5 million Wed-Sun debut), the leggiest wide release sinceTitanic. It also wasn't available for free on HBO Max for the first 31 days.

4. Diversity only matters for movies audiences already want to see.

Here's a dirty, horrible secret: Audiences don't care that much about diversity. Yes, inclusivity can and should be an added value element in a film folks already want to see, like the newest MCU movie or the latestStar Warsstory. It is rarely an outright deterrent for getting audiences into the theater for a film they already want to see. But if the film isn't already on the "must-see" list, the demographic makeup of the cast makes almost no difference. It won't stopFurious 7orThe Force Awakensfrom being a smash, nor will it preventTerminator: Dark FateorBirds Of Preyfrom being a flop. Onscreen/offscreen inclusivity was a bonus and/or added-value element for already "got to see" mainstream rom-coms (Crazy Rich Asians), high-concept horror (Us),ensemble comedies (Girls Trip) and superhero movies (Black Panther).

5. Online interest didn't translate into general audience curiosity.

Moreover, online media/film conversation represents a small minority of the general population. So Twitter trends and online discourse can skew the narrative in a way that doesn't represent the mainstream. For example, the online left swore thatGreen Bookwas the root of all evil, but it won Best Picture and legged out to $322 million (the biggest-grossing Best Picture winner in almost a decade). The alt-right tried to convince you thatCaptain Marvelwas a disaster-in-the-waiting or that anyone gave a damn about "women-only" screenings ofWonder Woman. Cue $1.128 billion worldwide for the Brie Larson sci-fi flick and $821 million for the Gal Gadot World War I actioner. The online geek fandom convinced you/us thatScott Pilgrim Vs. the World,DreddandKick-Asswere destined for glory and that "real"Star Warsfans hatedThe Last Jedi.

6. General audiences are only too happy to stick to franchise flicks.

They also convince us that audiences want original, new-to-you, star-driven, inclusive and/or non-franchise studio programmers aimed at both adults and kids. But time and time again, we see the opposite at play. Fox released a slate of just such films in 2018, thinkThe Hate U Give, Bad Time at the El Royale, WidowsandLove Simon. Their only outright smashes that year wereDeadpool 2andBohemian Rhapsody(a "problematic" Freddie Mercury biopic that won several Oscars and earned $905 million worldwide). Then we wondered why Disney stripped Fox for spare parts. Audiences ignored those films (and the likes ofA Simple Favor) while flocking toHalloween, The GrinchandFantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald. We ignoreLucy in the SkyandUpgradebut flock toJokerandVenomand then complain aboutCruella.

7. General moviegoing has shifted to streaming.

Even if the HBO Max factor didn't bite too much into the film's debut (it's not like we were looking at a $35 million launch if it were theatrically exclusive), the casual "going to the movies just to see a movie" demographic has been decimated since 2016. Blame more affordable home theater technology and TV or streaming content that approximates 90% of what you'd get in theaters. The new normal is that audiences only go to the movies when there is specifically something they want to see in theaters.In the Heightsseems like precisely the kind of movie we all claim to want in theaters but then only watch it when it's "free" on Netflix or Hulu. I fear Covid hastened the theatrical demise of the non-franchise/non-event, old-school "movie-movie" in favor of superhero movies and nostalgic comfort food.

8. We're still in a pandemic.

In what may be a "one step forward, one step back" pattern we've seen this season, the soft opening forIn the Heightshas made everyone catch their breath after the blow-out win ofA Quiet Place part II. Likewise,Tom & Jerry(yay!) was followed byRaya and the Last Dragon(boo!), andWrath of Man(yay!) was followed bySpiral(boo!). Even with much of the country heading toward vaccination and the nation's theater's slowly reopening, there will still be some reluctance, especially/potentially among older audiences and communities of color, to go back to the movies. The mask mandates being perhaps prematurely revoked won't help. If you have any reluctance about going to theaters, well, a credit card and a high-speed internet connection get youIn the Heightsfor just $15.

Epilogue

The good thing about streaming is that every site wants as many customers as possible. They are currently in a relentless pursuit to fill every potential niche. I worry that the services will skew more "white guys" as they get more dominant, as we saw with Fox and UPN, but we aren't there yet. As I noted when Jon M. Chu'sCrazy Rich Asiansdebuted, the burden of proof was not on Asian American moviegoers to show that a big movie mainly starring Asian actors could play at the same level as their white peers. It was on the theatrical industry and theatrical studios to show that films likeCrazy Rich Asianscould still break out and make a more significant cultural and commercial impact in theaters than they might on Netflix.

The good news is that this soft opening, even if it legs out a little (legs likeMamma MiaandA Star Is Bornstill only gets it to $55-$60 million domestic), won't mean that the nextIn the Heightswon't get made. Jon M. Chu will still get credit for making a critically-acclaimed crowdpleaser that, had it opened sans Covid last summer, might have performed just a little bit better. Ironically, likeTenet, a movie that was supposed to be a "different kind of summer movie" amid the conventional franchise flicks, was held up as a seasonal savior and found to be comparatively wanting. The relative theatrical failure ofBooksmartdidn't stopUnpregnant, Plan BorBanana Split. But it just might debut on Amazon Prime and might be gone from the pop-culture consciousness in 72 hours.

More:

8 Reasons In The Heights Stumbled At The Box Office - Forbes

Box Office: In The Heights Disappoints With $5M Friday – Forbes

MELISSA BARRERA as Vanessa and ANTHONY RAMOS as Usnavi in 'IN THE HEIGHTS'

We tricked ourselves into convincing everyone that In the Heights was the next Mamma Mia, but really it may end up being the next Rent.

Well, this is the first real heartbreaker of the summer. Jon M. Chus acclaimed and buzzy In the Heights topped the box office last night with a frankly mediocre $5 million Friday. That includes previews on Thursday, and it points toward an over/under $15 million weekend launch. Warner Bros. has been playing down expectations, partially because they didnt want to be that defensive for a debut in line with Rent ($17.1 million over a Wed-Sun Thanksgiving launch in 2005) while the media (mea culpa, at least prior to Covid) was arguing for a $25-$35 million launch on par with Crazy Rich Asians. Warner sold the hell out of this one, and I dont look forward to folks blaming the marketing, which is the lazy excuse anytime a movie we think folks should have seen plays to empty auditoriums.

Barring incredible legs (which is still possible), the $55 million In the Heights could be another example of audiences acting in opposition to online media narratives. We say we want Widows, but audiences show up for Venom, Halloween and The Grinch. Film Twitter championed Birds of Prey, but audiences showed up for Joker. Film Twitter decried Peter Farrellys Green Book and Bryan Singers Bohemian Rhapsody, while both films from both problematic directors won multiple Oscars and grossed $322 million (the biggest-grossing Best Picture winner in a decade) and $905 million (the biggest-grossing straight drama ever) respectively. Meanwhile, during that 2019 Oscar season, Kevin Hart and Bryan Cranstons problematic The Upside earned $108 million domestic from a $20 million debut. Conversely, alt-right trolls didnt stop Captain Marvel from topping $1.128 billion, a lesson that came too late for Disneys Star Wars trilogy.

Diversity can be a big added-value element in a movie that audiences already want to see, or at least its very much not a deterrent when were talking about a splashy rom-com (Crazy Rich Asians), a buzzy horror flick (Get Out), an escapist fantasy ensemble road trip comedy (Girls Trip) or an MCU superhero flick (Black Panther). But its not much of a driver if audiences arent already interested in the movie in question. Film Twitter convinced themselves that In the Heights was The Force Awakens, but general audiences viewed it as Terminator: Dark Fate. In the Heights sold itself as a celebration of Hispanic-American culture but had little else to sell (no stars, no high concept, no IP, etc.) to those who those who didnt view such a noble sentiment as automatically worth seeing in theaters.

I havent mentioned the HBO Max factor yet. Godzilla Vs. Kong opened with $50 million over a Wed-Mon Easter debut despite being on HBO Max. The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It opened with $24 million last weekend (on par with Annabelle Comes Home and Curse of La Llorona) despite being on HBO Max. Even friggin Tom & Jerry opened with $14.1 million despite being on HBO Max. While the same-day streaming availability bit into the opening day/opening weekend numbers, that In the Heights earned $5 million yesterday seems to imply that the film wasnt pacing for a $10-$15 million opening day even in non-Covid/non-HBO Max times. Might the movie have opened higher had it opened last summer in a non-Covid timeline? Almost certainly so, but clearly we played ourselves in terms of how big.

There were hints. It didnt make the top ten in Fandangos most anticipated of summer poll. Warner Bros. knew the online excitement for the splashy musical melodrama wasnt being matched by general audiences, hence the deluge of free public screenings over the last month. We in the film nerd bubble knew about the project and were rooting for its success, but to general audiences, it was a musical based on a show theyd never heard of, starring actors theyd mostly never heard of, and with a full-throated marketing campaign hamstrung by the fact that the show isnt remotely plot-driven. The sheer emphasis (both in the press coverage and in the critical consensus) on demographic representation and cultural importance threatened to make the movie feel like homework. More importantly, online interest didnt translate to general audience interest.

This wasnt a well-liked television star (Constance Wu) starring in a conventional rom-com about a successful career woman discovering a big secret (that her boyfriend is incredibly wealthy) and dealing with a life-changing conflict (explicit disapproval from her potential mother-in-law). This wasnt a quartet of somewhat well-known (led by Queen Latifah and Jada Pinkett Smith) Black women going on an escapist vacation. This wasnt a trio of comic actors (led by Mila Kunis and Kristen Bell) living out a relatable fantasy of suburban mothers putting their own needs before their kids. Even with the Lin-Manuel Miranda factor, In the Heights may not be the best Crazy Rich Asians, Girls Trip or Bad Moms. It may end up being another case, like Kick-Ass, Scott Pilgrim Vs. the World and Dredd, where online anticipation overrepresents general audience interest.

Still, its not like there are a ton of splashy, culturally-specific modern-day musical melodramas playing in multiplexes this summer. With nothing huge (all due respect to The Hitmans Wifes Bodyguard) opening between now and June 25, Warner Bros. may try to sell the notion of a 14-day debut between In the Heights and F9. With rave reviews, an A from Cinemascore and a media clearly rooting for its success, I wouldnt be surprised to see initial legs on par with Puss in Boots (which disappointed with a $34 million debut in 2011 and then earned $33 million in weekend two). But if the film plays closer to Rent than The Greatest Showman, well, sometimes we online media types convince ourselves that a movie is bigger than it is. Sometimes audiences dont care about mother***ing snakes on a mother***ing plane.

Here is the original post:

Box Office: In The Heights Disappoints With $5M Friday - Forbes

Hundreds arrested in Capitol riot case, including at least 50 who have served in the military – RochesterFirst

WASHINGTON, D.C. (CBS) America watched as hordes of riotersbroke into the U.S. Capitolon January 6 crushing through windows, pressing up stairways, and sending lawmakers and law enforcement running for their lives. The flood of protesters who streamed into the Capitol that day left federal authorities with an equally immense task: finding and charging those responsible.

The Department of Justice said that as of Friday, approximately 465 defendants had been arrested in connection with the attack. The government also indicated in a Friday court filing they expect to charge at least 550 people total.

Prosecutors have called the case unprecedented in scale, and the government said in a March court filing that the Capitol attack is likely the most complex investigation ever prosecuted by the Department of Justice.

As law enforcement continues to round up alleged rioters, heres what CBS News has learned about those who were arrested:

Approximately 465 defendants have been arrested in connection with the riots, the Justice Department said Friday, and CBS News has reviewed court documents for 451 defendants cases that have been unsealed. Of those, at least 181 defendants were also indicted by grand juries.

More than 130 defendants have been charged with assaulting, resisting or impeding officers or employees, including more than 40 who were charged with using a deadly or dangerous weapon or causing serious bodily injury to an officer, the Department of Justice said.

In total, CBS News hasfoundthat more than 150 officers were injured in the attack, according to sources on Capitol Hill and the Capitol Police union, as well as testimony from Metropolitan Police Chief Chief Robert Contee.

At least 35 defendants have been charged withconspiracy, a charge that alleges defendants coordinated with others to commit an offense. They include four allegedThree Percenters, 16 Oath Keepers who were indicted together in a single conspiracy case and 15 members or affiliates of the Proud Boys, who were charged in four separate conspiracy cases.

Approximately 440 defendants were charged with entering or remaining in a restricted building or grounds. More than 40 were charged with entering the Capitol with a dangerous or deadly weapon, while around 25 were charged with theft of government property, the Department of Justice said.

More than 30 defendants have been charged with destruction of government property, and during proceedings forthreeof those defendants, the government has said their crimes amounted to terrorism an allegation that is not itself a charge but could influence prison sentences if they are found guilty.

At least 51 of those arrested are current or former military members. Of those,oneis an active duty service member, four are current part-time troops in the Army Reserve or National Guard, and 45 previously served in the military, according to attorney statements, military service records and court documents obtained by CBS News.

At least 22 have served in the U.S. Marines, 18 have served in the Army, two served in the Navy and two served in the Air Force. One defendant, Jeffrey McKellop, was a communications sergeant with the Army Special Forces, a group known colloquially as the Green Berets.

The Army Reserve shared the following statement with CBS News: The U.S. Army Reserve takes all allegations of Soldier or Army civilian involvement in extremist groups seriously and will address this issue in accordance with Army regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice to ensure due process. Extremist ideologies and activities directly oppose our values and beliefs and those who subscribe to extremism have no place in our ranks.

At least 11 of those arrested were either former police officers or were employed as law enforcement officers at the time of the riot, according to court documents and employment records. Prosecutors also charged at least onecurrentfirefighter and oneretiredfirefighter.

Of the six police officers employed at the time of the riot, at least four have since lost their jobs. An officer in North Cornwall Township, Pennsylvania, wassuspendedwithout pay after he was charged with, among other crimes, obstruction of law enforcement during civil disorder. Houston police officerTam Dinh Phamand Monmouth County correctional police officerMarissa Suarezboth resigned after they were arrested, and twoVirginia police officerswere fired after prosecutors charged them for their alleged conduct at the Capitol.

Prosecutors have arrested two former officers with the New York Police Department:Thomas Webster, who is accused of lunging at a Capitol police officer with a flagpole, and Sara Carpenter, whose arrest, an NYPD spokesperson said, was the culmination of the NYPDs close work with the FBI Joint Terrorism Taskforce.

Nicholes Lentz who the Florida Department of Law Enforcement said is a former officer in the North Miami Beach and Fort Pierce police departments was charged after posting videos from inside the Capitol. In a video, he said, Were not here to hurt any cops of course. I love my boys in blue, but this is overwhelming for them.

The FBI is stillseekingthe publics help to identify more than 250 people believed to have committed assaults on police officers or other violent acts on the Capitol grounds.

FBI Director Christopher Wray said in March that citizens from around the country had sent the FBI more than 270,000 digital media tips.

The government said it has issued a combined total of over 900 search warrants and the investigation has included more than 15,000 hours of surveillance and body-worn camera footage from multiple law enforcement agencies. The government has also gathered approximately 1,600 electronic devices, the results of hundreds of searches of electronic communication providers, over 80,000 reports and 93,000 attachments related to law enforcement interviews and other investigative steps, authorities said in a filing.

The alleged rioters come from at least 45 states outside of Washington, D.C. Among those arrested whose home states were known, the most were from Texas, with at least 45 Texans charged so far. Florida had at least 39 residents arrested while Pennsylvania and New York each had at least 37.

Authorities have connected at least 67 alleged rioters to extremist groups, including theProud Boys,Oath Keepers,Three Percenters, Texas Freedom Force and the conspiracy ideologyQAnon.

While those arrested in the January 6 mob were mostly men, at least 53 women have also been arrested for their alleged participation.

Among the 140 defendants whose ages are known, the average age is 41. The youngest-known alleged rioter is 18-year-old Bruno Joseph Cua, whom prosecutors accused of assaulting an officer after he posted online, President Trump is calling us to FIGHT!

The oldest is Gary Wickersham, who, according to his attorney, is an 80-year-old Army veteran. Authorities said Wickersham walked through the Capitol during the siege and later told authorities he believed he was authorized to enter because he pays his taxes.

The Senate released a report Tuesday identifying widespread security and intelligence failures that led to the deadly January 6 assault on the Capitol. In a rare bipartisan jointinterview, the Democrats and Republicans leading the investigation sat down with CBS News Kris Van Cleave for a candid conversation about what went wrong and allowed a mob to storm the U.S. Capitol.

On Friday, June 4, a judge rejected the governments request to ban Capitol riot defendant Anthime Gionet an alt-right internet provocateur known as Baked Alaska from posting videos online after they say he live-streamed himselfthreateninghis friend.

Former Vice President Mike Pencetolda crowd of Republican activists in New Hampshire on Thursday night that he doesnt know whether he and former President Trump will ever see eye-to-eye about the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

President Biden hasruled outcreating a presidential commission to investigate the January 6 assault on the Capitol because he believes Congress should be the one to investigate, according to White House press secretary Jen Psaki. A bill to create a bipartisan commission wasblocked by Republicansin the Senate.

Five months after the Capitol riot, at least 17 police officers remain out of work withinjuriessustained in the attack.

See the original post here:

Hundreds arrested in Capitol riot case, including at least 50 who have served in the military - RochesterFirst

Corrections: April 17, 2021 – The New York Times

NATIONAL

Because of an editing error, an article on Friday about New Yorkers whose houses were flooded with sewage in 2019 misstated the percentages of homeownership among New Yorkers of different ethnic and racial groups in 2018. The percentages given referred to homeownership within those communities, not to homeownership in the city over all. That year, 44 percent of Asian households and 43 percent of white households owned their homes, while the same was true for just 27 percent of Black households and 17 percent of Latino households.

An article on Friday about a noose being removed from the logo of Placerville, Calif., misstated the given name of the man who discovered flecks of gold in a streambed in early 1848, touching off the California gold rush. He was James Marshall, not John Marshall.

An article on Sunday about the professor Carl L. Hart referred incorrectly to his position at Columbia University. Jennifer Manly, a professor of neuropsychology, was the first tenured African-American science professor granted tenure at Columbia, not Professor Hart.

An article on Friday about a former alt-right YouTuber misstated the name of the group that the video producer Caolan Robertson runs. It is Future Freedom, not Future of Freedom.

An article on Friday about the acquisition of the basketball player Charli Collier by the Dallas Wings misstated the first Finnish player in the W.N.B.A. It is Taru Tuukkanen, not Awak Kuier.

An article on Page 15 this weekend about play reading groups describes incorrectly the type of work that donors to the Playwrights Realm could pay to act in. They could commission new plays or pay a smaller fee to act in a previously written play.

An article on Page 46 this weekend about Jo van Gogh-Bonger, Vincent van Goghs sister-in-law, misstates the surname of an artist. He is Richard Roland Holst, not Roland-Horst.

An article on Page 30 this weekend about the use of informants in terrorism-related cases misstates the filing date of a lawsuit about the constitutionality of Communications Management Units brought by several prisoners against the Justice Department. It was 2010, not 2011.

An article on Page 19 this weekend about drying your laundry in the sun misstates Joe Wachunass position at an electric-transportation advocacy group. He is a program manager, not a program director.

One of the covers for this weekends Culture issue misspells the surname of the singer featured with Elton John. She is Rina Sawayama, not Sawayawa.

A picture caption with an article on Page 56 this weekend about friends who create together misspells the surname of a model and journalist. They are Trey Gaskin, not Gaskins.

Errors are corrected during the press run whenever possible, so some errors noted here may not have appeared in all editions.

To contact the newsroom regarding correction requests, please email nytnews@nytimes.com. To share feedback, please visit nytimes.com/readerfeedback.

Comments on editorials may be emailed to letters@nytimes.com.

For newspaper delivery questions: 1-800-NYTIMES (1-800-698-4637) or email customercare@nytimes.com.

See the rest here:

Corrections: April 17, 2021 - The New York Times

Nebraska journalism professor investigates the lure of extremism – Nebraska Today

About five years ago, Nebraska journalism professor Joseph Weber became intrigued by news accounts of young Somali Americans in Minnesota accused in a plot to join ISIS.

I have had a longstanding interest in the idea that people join cults Why do they join them? What appeals to them that they would completely submerge their identities into a group? said Weber, an associate professor who holds the Jerry and Karla Huse endowed professorship.

Again the question arose for me: People all over the world at that point were joining ISIS. I couldnt understand why people would join a murderous, horrific cult, a death cult.

Weber previously authored Transcendental Meditation in America: How a New Age Movement Remade a Small Town in Iowa, which explored how followers of Maharishi Mahesh Yogi settled on a former college campus in Fairfield, Iowa. Before joining the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Weber worked 35 years in magazines and newspapers, including a 22-year stint for BusinessWeek in Dallas, Philadelphia, Toronto and Chicago. He also has taught journalism students in China and studied their attitudes on censorship and freedom of the press.

Webers curiosity about what was happening in Minneapolis grew to the point that he traveled there in May 2016 to attend the lengthy trial of three Somali-American men. That launched three years of research, including lengthy interviews with star witness Abdirahman Abdirashid Bashir, a 20-year-old diverted from the plot in the nick of time by his father and other relatives. Bashir became an FBI informant and avoided the harsh fates of some among a dozen who were once his friends: lengthy prison sentences or death in the Middle East.

As he traced the lure of extremism, Weber probed how the schools, courts, community organizations and others responded to ISIS recruitment. He looked at the role of the internet and researched how women and girls were persuaded to join in. He looked for patterns in a previous wave of Somali-American youth who were enticed to join Al-Shabab, the Somalia-based Islamic guerilla force.

Webers research, conducted independently and with support from his Huse professorship, resulted in a book, Divided Loyalties: Young Somali Americans and the Lure of Extremism, published in September by Michigan State University Press.

Following are Webers responses to some questions about his latest effort. They are edited for brevity and clarity.

While Divided Loyalties is a far cry from my business journalism, it is a logical extension of my first book, about the Transcendental Meditation community in Iowa. I have an enduring interest in Utopian (or dystopian) groups that fall outside the mainstream.

The TM community is a Utopian group whose members follow the teachings of a now-deceased guru, including outside-the-norm teachings that arguably categorize the group as a religious sect. Members built their lives within the group and surrendered a big part of their identities to it.

Similarly, the Somali-Americans who joined, tried to join or supported terrorist groups such as Al-Shabab and ISIS did so with a fervor that mixed nationalism and ethnic identity with religion. ISIS in particular is a death cult. Its members sometimes yield their lives to it.

The common denominator was my core question: why would someone leave their ordinary workaday lives to join what others regard as a cult, surrendering their individual identities to the group? Its an easier answer with a group pledged to peacefulness, such as the TM folks. Its a tougher answer with people who join a murderous group such as ISIS. Still, the question can be asked of recruits in both groups.

The connection is tangential though not too great a stretch.

In China, I explored the sentiments of journalism students who felt that journalists need to stand outside and take a critical look at another important group, the Chinese Communist Party. Similarly, I critically examined the TM movement and, of course, ISIS and Al-Shabab and like groups from the outside.

Journalists need to have critical distance when they report on religious groups, cults, political parties and the like. By looking at them dispassionately, we can help others understand them.

I dont believe the reportage on these cases fully explored the complex motives that drove so many Somali-Americans to seek to join ISIS and Al-Shabab, nor did it examine in detail the motives that pushed the informant (and others) away from that desire. I believe that society needs to understand both the pathologies that make such groups appealing to some people especially malleable young people as well as the best techniques for prying them loose from such pathologies (if possible). In addition to my interviews, I was able to draw on a deep well of academic material on these points where it seemed relevant.

I do credit many journalists for their superb work, which I cite at various points in the book. Good journalists deserved mention and, as a former occupant of the daily and weekly journalism trenches, I was obliged to acknowledge their coverage. Journalism is the first draft of history, as its often said, and the work of daily journalists can be put into perspective by authors of books, even when such authors are journalists themselves.

Sociologists, political scientists, judicial experts and psychologists all could tell pieces of this story. Indeed, I cite and quote people from such fields on issues of poverty, crime, alienation and other maladies that afflict parts of the Somali-American community. My contribution was to put such insights into a narrative with quotes from and accounts of individuals in a way that I hope is readable and accessible to non-experts. That is what journalists typically bring to the party in any of their work and what often differentiates it from academic studies and such.

Also, it is helpful to readers to apply a critical eye to the work of experts, especially when their findings contradict one another or seem incomplete.

Islamist terrorism has deep roots and its not going away, despite the destruction of the so-called Islamic State. Such foreign terrorism has been largely absent from the U.S. in recent times, but it continues to plague Africa and Europe, and is likely to return to us in time. So we need to understand what drives people mostly young people who havent found their way in American society into the ranks of terrorists. What are the recruitment techniques groups use? Why do they work? How can we thwart them?

The appeal of a group such as ISIS, moreover, in many ways is similar to the appeal of white supremacist groups in the U.S. and elsewhere. Both groups appeal to people who feel alienated from the mainstream, often to people whose personal identities are ill-formed and incomplete and who seek to develop their sense of self from a group that is likewise outside the norm. Both sorts of groups embrace violence and are driven by a sense of mission, no matter how misplaced. Many people involved in them see themselves as heroes battling for righteousness. They are often driven by religious fervor or nationalism. Their convictions can often be sincere and heartfelt, no matter how bizarre they seem to outsiders.

I believe policymakers can learn techniques for combatting the appeals from all sorts of cults. I hope the book contributes to that understanding.

Read more:

Nebraska journalism professor investigates the lure of extremism - Nebraska Today

Greenwich saw five hate crimes in 2020. Learn to be ‘allies against prejudice and bullying,’ advocates say. – CT Insider

GREENWICH Hate crimes and related incidents more than doubled in Greenwich from two in 2019 to five in 2020, according to data from the Anti-Defamation League.

The trend is roughly consistent with data statewide, which shows an increase from 65 events in Connecticut in 2019 to 128 in 2020.

Of the five reported incidents in Greenwich last year, three were anti-Semitic: swastikas and anti-Jewish slurs were written in a Jewish teachers classroom; a Zoom meeting was interrupted by intruders making vulgar remarks and sharing pornographic images; and New Order, a neo-Nazi group, distributed materials in town that contained swastikas and said Hitler was right.

Rabbi Mitchell Hurvitz of Temple Sholom in Greenwich said anti-Semitic hate was not a new concern for his temple. But in recent years, Hurvitz said he has seen people spreading hateful ideas become more emboldened, apparently because of national discourse.

I think that unfortunately, the climate within the nation has created an incubator to kind of let people who are at the extremes to do things and express things that arent appropriate, Hurvitz said. I dont know that our town has been immune to the national phenomenon.

He said the uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic also could have contributed to increased hostility in general.

I think that in times of challenge, fear takes root, Hurvitz said. And the exacerbation of extremes, demagoguery and words that incite ... all of that is challenging. And then the difficulties that COVID-19 brought and the economic challenges and all that extra turbulence definitely exacerbates the problems. We have to be more proactive.

Hurvitz said hate crimes have been increasingly part of the collective conscience, pointing to the 2017 Unite the Right Rally in Charlottesville, Va., which featured white supremacist groups and resulted in the death of a counter-protester, and the 2018 Pittsburgh synagogue shooting that left 11 dead in what has been called the deadliest attack on a Jewish community in American history.

The Jan. 6 siege on the Capitol reignited existing fears of increased anti-Semitic hate, Hurvitz said.

Some of the crazies that were marching out with anti-Semitic shirts and slogans put people at greater consternation, he said.

And though the other two Greenwich incidents chronicled by the ADL predated the Capitol siege, they were of a similar tone and tenor. Both involved the alt-right group Patriot Front, which in the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election distributed materials bearing slogans such as Reclaim America and America is not for sale.

Hurvitz said he has been impressed with the towns response in the wake of anti-Semitic or related incidents, both from clergy and town leaders. Greenwichs public and private schools have partnered with clergy and the ADL to spearhead educational initiatives on the dangers of anti-Semitism and white supremacy.

One example, Superintendent of Schools Toni Jones said, is the annual Names Day, which she said gives a voice to the targets of bullying and bias; building empathy in the perpetrators; and inspiring and empowering bystanders to become allies against prejudice and bullying.

Discrimination, racism and hateful acts have no place in our schools and in our communities, Jones said. Two components of our mission and vision very directly demonstrate the value we put on educating and preparing our students so that they can: Conduct themselves in an ethical and responsible manner and recognize and respect other cultural contexts and points of view. We build these capabilities in our students in hopes that they will perpetuate the good they see in the world, and recognize and act on what needs to be fixed.

justin.papp@scni.com; @justinjpapp1; 203-842-2586

Read the original here:

Greenwich saw five hate crimes in 2020. Learn to be 'allies against prejudice and bullying,' advocates say. - CT Insider

QAnon and the alt-right draw from the Nazi playbook – GoErie.com

Allison Siegelman| Erie Times-News

U.S. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has been responsible for circulating wacky QAnon conspiracy theories that have dark, satanic themes that are reminiscent of those believed in ancient times. She and those associated with alt-right and QAnon groups target the Jewish people in the same way the Nazi Party did: They spread stump rhetoric, written propaganda and images all weaving the fiction with horrifying false characterizations and conspiracies about how the country is being destroyed by people amongst us.

What is most concerning is that Holocaust revisionism and denial has been embraced by some in academics with an agenda. It is so extreme that the genocide of 6 million Jews (along with many other minorities) throughout Europe is being questioned, especially by the younger generations who did not live through World War II.

We are in times that leaveus with few of those who lived through the WWII period. The elders today are mostly those who were babies to toddlers at the time of the war. Soon, they, too, will be gone. History has recorded in video and text the wars atrocities as they occurred and retrospectives. These archives have been maintained in Holocaust museums in Israeland the U.S., along with the U.N., and many other government archives, museums and archival organizations.

Todays conspiracists who wish to diminish or discredit the history preserved through videos, publications and testimonials of the millions who lived through that time are attempting to erase the Holocaust, and for what purpose? It appears to be a radical political agendaor delusions from mental illness that are responsible.

The hatemongers are attracted to provincialism. They are willing to use any tactic to keep America from being a diverse democratized nation that today offers humans of all races, religions, ethnicities, genders and sexual persuasions freedom from persecution and oppression.

However, the U.S. has a jaded past that is filled with slavery, racism and segregation. It is no surprise that our nation birthed a movement in the late 1800s, known as eugenics, that led to the sterilization of over 64,000 disabled or impoverished (mostly of dark-skinned) Americans. Hitler and the Nazi Party subscribed to this ideology disguised at the time as science. The desire to propagate a superior race lead to the insanity of the 20th century Holocaust which is still recorded as the worst genocide in history it eliminated two-thirds (67%) of the worlds Jewish population, or 6 million Jews.

Genocide is the deliberate killing of a people with the intent of eliminating them from existence.

The Jewish people had endured many battles and oppression since their tribal identity was created by the father of monotheism (the belief in one God), Abraham. It was Hitlers Nazi fascism that targeted death to all Jews throughout the world not just to drive them out of a land. The Nazi Party was able to formulate conspiracy theories that relied on demonizing Jews bycirculating tales of Jews plotting to deceive and destroy the non-Jewish population. They played on arousing fear in a demographic group who were provincial, gullibleand eager to find a scapegoat for the ills of their nation.

Today, Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene and those like her are doing exactly the same thing. These extremists are looking to instill fear and anger in Americans who see anyone other than white and Christian as a threat to the U.S. They wrap their falsehoods with patriotism and glorify the quest to attack the Jews as if Jews are not trustworthy and upstanding citizens.

Ironically, those who participate in such defamation can be seen as the real enemy of a democratized nation. Those who remain indifferent or dismissive of the trend in radicalized American patriotism and the militia cells that we today call domestic terrorism are as much to blame for the threat to our nation.

If we are to survive as a democracy, we must put party politics aside and look to history for an understanding of what gave rise to democracy. George Santayanas iconic words spoken in 1905 could not be more relevant, Those who cannot remember the past are doomed to repeat it. It was in 1948 before the British House of Commons upon the end of WWII that Winston Churchill revised the quote as, Those who fail to learn from history are condemned to repeat it. I ask that we, as Americans, embrace the most basic tenet of democracy to avoid a horrific slide into fascism and worse: immorality.

Allison Siegelman of York Township is a member of Central PA American Israel Public Affairs.

See more here:

QAnon and the alt-right draw from the Nazi playbook - GoErie.com

How White nationalists evade the law and continue profiting off hate – Action News Now

Weeks before the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in 2017, a burly and bearded neo-Nazi told a CNN reporter on camera that "Jews are terrorists."

At the rally -- which turned deadly -- he participated with gusto, carrying a banner that, according to court documents, said, "Gas the kikes, race war now!" during a march past a synagogue.

But when Robert Warren Ray was indicted in June 2018 for using tear gas on counter-protesters at the event, police discovered he was nowhere to be found.

The fugitive, known in far-right circles as a prolific podcaster under a Bigfoot-themed avatar and the name "Azzmador," has vanished -- at least from real life.

However, Ray's podcast, which he calls The Krypto Report, later appeared on a new gaming livestreaming service that has become a haven for right-wing extremists who have been deplatformed from YouTube and other mainstream social media channels.

Called DLive, the live-streaming platform with a blockchain-based reward system allows users to accept cryptocurrency donations -- another perk for extremists barred from using services such as PayPal or GoFundMe, or who want to raise money internationally. Ray, a 54-year-old Texan, was a hit.

He quickly became one of the top 20 earners on DLive, according to an analysis by online extremism expert Megan Squire of Elon University in North Carolina, who studied the period from April 2020 -- the earliest data available -- through mid-January 2021.

It's not just the police who are searching for Ray. Since September 2019, he has been flouting court orders and missing appearances in a civil case that names him as one of 24 defendants accused of conspiring to plan, promote and carry out the violent events of Charlottesville.

"(Ray) has failed to communicate with Plaintiffs and the Court in any manner --even while continuing to participate on social media, post articles on the website of The Daily Stormer, and publish podcasts," said plaintiffs' attorneys in court documents filed in June.

As for the criminal case, which charges Ray with maliciously releasing gas, authorities have labeled him a fugitive since his 2018 indictment.

To be sure, Ray -- who mysteriously stopped podcasting from DLive a few months ago -- didn't get rich on DLive. But while he was ignoring court summonses for his alleged role in organizing Unite the Right, he earned $15,000 on the platform in just six months, according to Squire's analysis. He cashed most of it out, she said.

"The idea that he's wanted for all of this stuff, but then just gets to sit at home behind a microphone and make money on the side -- I thought that was just not good at all," Squire said.

Experts say the story of Ray and DLive underscores a reality about people who get chased into the shadows by lawsuits or deplatforming crusades: There will almost always be an entrepreneur who is willing to provide a venue for exiled promoters of hate.

"Where there is demand, eventually supply finds a way," said John Bambenek, a cyber security expert who tracks the cryptocurrency accounts of extremists.

Public scrutiny drives alt-right personalities deeper into the bowels of the internet, reducing their visibility.

And while their retreat to ever more obscure corners can make it more difficult to monitor the chatter, Michael Edison Hayden, a spokesman for the Southern Poverty Law Center, says the game of whack a mole is ultimately worthwhile.

"I have seen firsthand the degree to which figures who were...extremely successful in radicalizing large numbers of people, become extraordinarily marginalized, extraordinarily fast in so-called dark corners of the internet," he said.

There are few neo-Nazi figures who have been as widely deplatformed as Andrew Anglin, publisher of The Daily Stormer, one of the web's most notorious hate sites -- and where Ray gained prominence as a writer and podcaster. Anglin's Daily Stormer was dumped by Google and GoDaddy after Anglin in a post mocked the protester who was killed in Charlottesville as a "fat, childless 32-year-old slut."

This made it more difficult for laypeople to find his site, though it has managed to stay on the internet, partially through the work of an adroit webmaster. "There was just this ongoing battle of what (the webmaster) would do in order to keep Anglin's voice online," Hayden said.

Like Ray, Anglin is on the lam. He has evaded attorneys since the summer of 2019, when he lost a spate of lawsuits. In the biggest judgment against him, Anglin was ordered by a judge to pay $14 million to a Jewish woman in Montana who had endured anti-Semitic harassment and death threats from Anglin's "troll army" of supporters. (One voicemail said: "You are surprisingly easy to find on the Internet. And in real life.") Anglin, who did not respond to CNN's request for comment, has said in court documents that he isn't living in the country.

The woman, Tanya Gersh, recently told CNN that she has yet to receive a dime of the judgment and is appalled that people are profiting from hate.

"If knowing that doesn't disgust you, we have really, really been led astray in our country," she said.

Founded in 2017, DLive, which is owned by a 30-year-old Chinese national named Justin Sun, takes a 20% cut of its streamers' revenue, according to its website.

Although DLive initially allowed far-right figures -- including Ray -- it has purged several amid scrutiny in the wake of the deadly riot at the Capitol on January 6.

That day, Anthime "Tim" Gionet, better known as "Baked Alaska," used the service to live-stream his role in the incursion. In the video, he curses out a law-enforcement officer, sits on a couch and puts his feet on a table, and can be heard saying, "1776, baby," according to an FBI affidavit. Gionet was suspended from the site, as was Nick Fuentes -- part of a White nationalist group of young radicals called the Groypers -- who was also at the January 6 rally, though he says he did not enter the Capitol. Both had already been permanently jettisoned by YouTube and other social media outlets, though Fuentes remains on Twitter.

"DLive was appalled that a number of rioters in the U.S. Capitol attack abused the platform to live stream their actions," and when its moderators become aware of the live streams, they shut them down, the company said in a statement to CNN. "All payments to those involved in the attack have been frozen."

Ray's DLive account, too, has been suspended, a company spokesman said, although the action did not publicly appear on his page until a couple of days after CNN reached out to the company on February 5. The DLive spokesman said the decision to sanction his channel was unrelated to CNN's inquiry, and that the suspension amounts to a permanent ban.

In any case, Ray stopped posting to DLive about four months ago, around the time a judge in the Unite the Right case found him in contempt. He did not respond to CNN's requests for comment.

Gionet was arrested in Houston last month, but Fuentes and Ray have both since popped up elsewhere online.

Fuentes -- DLive's top earner, who took in about $114,000 in six months ending in January -- has been scrambling to keep his podcast streaming since DLive booted him. For a few weeks, he'd figured out a way to keep using YouTube, even though the platform had dropped him, largely by using intermediaries to embed a livestream from other YouTube channels on his own website.

Squire said she spent those weeks engaged in a game of cat and mouse with him, repeatedly finding the 22-year-old Illinois native and notifying the third parties, and YouTube, of Fuentes' actions.

The third parties have mostly acted swiftly and banned Fuentes' content, Squire said. And while YouTube didn't act on all of Squire's initial reporting, the company took action when CNN flagged it.

"We've terminated multiple channels surfaced by CNN for attempting to circumvent our policies," a YouTube spokesperson said last week. "Nicholas Fuentes' channel was terminated in February 2020 after repeatedly violating our policies on hate speech and, as is the case with all terminated accounts, he is now prohibited from operating a channel on YouTube. We will continue to take the necessary steps to enforce our policies."

Following YouTube's crackdown, Fuentes began experimenting with other blockchain based technologies that enable him to stream his nightly program without being deplatformed. His recent moves have left Squire frustrated. "I don't have an answer on how to do the take downs -- I just don't know," she said.

Ray, meanwhile, appears to have retreated to another obscure streaming site, called Trovo, which is so new it is still in beta mode.

In the chat section of what appeared to be Ray's new Azzmador page on Trovo, a follower said "we missed u Azz" on January 15.

Ray has yet to livestream any podcasts on Trovo. But in recent days -- after several months of silence -- a Telegram account bearing Azzmador's logo with a link to his DLive channel burst back onto the platform with a series of racist and anti-Semitic messages.

"Harriet Tubman and MLK are both fake historical figures who had Communist Jew handlers/promoters," read one February 7 message.

Some startups see the deplatforming of online firebrands as a recruitment opportunity.

"Hey @rooshv, so sorry to see you get censored!" a Canadian company called Entropy -- which targets YouTubers and other streamers seeking to avoid censorship -- tweeted at Daryush "Roosh" Valizadeh, an online personality in the so-called "manosphere," who has touted misogynistic ideas such as that women are intellectually inferior and that rape should be legal on private property. Valizadeh -- who authored an online post called "Why are Jews behind most modern evils?" -- had just been dumped by YouTube less than a week prior, on July 13. "We would be honored to support your streams," the tweet added.

In March 2019, Entropy's three young founders were interviewed by a podcaster about their new product, and excitedly touted their first big-name user, Jean-Franois Garipy, an alt-right YouTuber who frequently featured White nationalists on one of his shows.

"He was actually the first streamer to try us out," said co-founder Rachel Constantinidis. "He tried us out for a number of months, and we were able to really improve the stability of the platform based on his feedback."

In an email to CNN, Garipy denied a CBC news article's characterization of him as supporting "ideas of white superiority and white 'ethnostates,'" saying, "no proper context was provided by the journalist to understand the circumstances in which I discussed these subjects in the past."

Fuentes and Gionet did not respond to CNN's requests for comment, and Valizadeh declined an interview.

Just as far-right provocateurs are driven underground to more niche sites when they are booted from mainstream platforms, so, too, do they often gravitate towards cryptocurrency such as bitcoin when banished from using online payment services like PayPal and GoFundMe.

"Cryptocurrencies are indispensable to them at this point," said Squire.

Because many of them were early adopters -- and because bitcoin's volatile value has recently skyrocketed -- some are now sitting on vast sums.

Most successful in this realm has been Stefan Molyneux, a Canadian vlogger who has promoted ideas of non-White inferiority and has said, "I don't view humanity as a single species." Molyneux, dropped by PayPal in late 2019, starting taking bitcoin donations in 2013 and is holding onto a chunk of the cryptocurrency that amounted to more than $27 million as of Thursday morning, said Bambenek, the cyber security expert.

(Molyneux -- who is still on Facebook and Instagram -- has also been expelled from YouTube, and has since shown up on lesser-known platforms such as BitChute, DLive and Entropy, where his audience is considerably diminished. Molyneux told CNN in an email that he stopped covering politics last year, and is now writing about parenting. He declined to answer any questions about his finances.)

BitChute, Trovo and Entropy did not respond to CNN's requests for comment.

By publishing their wallet IDs online and urging followers to donate through cryptocurrency, extremists have -- perhaps unwittingly -- provided unprecedented insight into their financials. In an attempt to cut out the middleman and combat fraud, bitcoin transactions -- including sender and recipient identifiers -- are all recorded in a public ledger, available to anyone.

Individual donations to far-right personalities mostly appear to have been small, and Bambenek said they are shrinking on the whole.

One exception: Nick Fuentes received a single donation of 13.5 bitcoin, at the time worth about $250,000, in December from a person whom researchers believe was a computer programmer in France who apparently killed himself shortly afterward, according to a Yahoo News exclusive report.

Another notable cryptocurrency enthusiast is Anglin of The Daily Stormer who, in addition to owing Gersh of Montana $14 million, has another $4.1 million judgment against him for falsely branding comedian and CNN contributor Dean Obeidallah -- an American Muslim -- as a terrorist. He also owes money to Taylor Dumpson, who, after becoming the first Black female student body president at American University, endured a harassment campaign orchestrated by The Daily Stormer. That $725,000 judgment is against Anglin, the site and one of the site's followers.

Anglin, who claims on his website to be banned from PayPal, credit card processors and even his PO Box, has been directing his donations to bitcoin since 2014. Over the years, he received more than 200 bitcoin, but most appear to have been cashed out, according to Bambenek, who said Anglin is holding on to at least 10.1 bitcoin, worth more than $525,000 as of Thursday morning.

But Anglin's cryptocurrency holdings are becoming more difficult to monitor.

While Anglin was embroiled in the Gersh lawsuit, his website started advertising donations through a more obscure cryptocurrency called Monero, which -- contrary to crypto's ethos of transparency -- keeps transactions private.

Demonetizing and deplatforming aren't the only way to defang groups and individuals who espouse identity-based hate.

"You also need to sue them," said Amy Spitalnick, executive director of Integrity First for America, a nonprofit civil rights group.

Ray and Anglin are among a couple dozen defendants named in a lawsuit underwritten by Spitalnick's group on behalf of several activists who are Charlottesville victims. The two men are accused of being part of the leadership team that not only planned the Unite the Right rallies on August 11 and 12, 2017, but primed the pump for violence.

Four of the 10 plaintiffs in the civil rights lawsuit, which is scheduled to go to trial in October, were struck by the car driven by a neo-Nazi into a throng of counter-protesters, killing Heather Heyer, whose physical appearance Anglin would later disparage. Their injuries ranged from broken bones to concussions to torn ligaments. The other plaintiffs in the suit say they have suffered emotional distress either from physical injuries inflicted during the event or from psychological trauma and have missed work as a result.

In the days leading to the Unite the Right rally, much of the planning and coordination happened on The Daily Stormer, which -- with Anglin and Ray as principal authors -- began to take on a menacing tone, according to the suit.

On August 8, the suit says, Anglin and Ray said the purpose of the upcoming rally had shifted from being in support of a Confederate monument of Robert E. Lee, "which the Jew Mayor and his Negroid Deputy have marked for destruction" to "something much bigger...which will serve as a rallying point and battle cry for the rising Alt-Right movement."

"There is a craving to return to an age of violence," Anglin wrote, according to the suit. "We want a war."

The Daily Stormer advertised the rally with a poster depicting a figure taking a sledgehammer to the Jewish Star of David.

"Join Azzmador and The Daily Stormer to end Jewish influence in America," it said.

Prior to the event, the suit says, Ray and Anglin wrote on The Daily Stormer that "Stormers" were required to bring tiki torches and should also bring pepper spray, flag poles, flags and shields.

Anglin did not attend the rally in Charlottesville, but Ray did. During the march past the synagogue, the suit alleges, he yelled at a woman to "put on a fu**ing burka" and called her a "sharia whore."

The suit says he then proclaimed: "Hitler did nothing wrong."

Fast forward three-and-a-half years. By January, Ray's once-prolific podcast had been dark for several months. His fans began to notice. On a forum called GamerUprising, somebody started a thread on January 25 called "What happened to Azzmador????"

"He just disappeared and no one even seems to care," wrote the user, who goes by "Creepy-ass Cracker."

But there are signs that Ray plans a return to podcasting as Azzmador.

On February 3, a fan on his Trovo page asked when Azzmador would begin streaming.

He responded in a word: "soon."

See more here:

How White nationalists evade the law and continue profiting off hate - Action News Now

Deadly inspirations – What their chosen reading says about America’s far-right | United States – The Economist

PANDEMICS CAN have unexpected side-effects. One of them, according to a report last year by the New York Federal Reserve, may be a surge in support for extremist ideas. It observed how cities in Germany that suffered the most deaths from influenza by 1920 then voted in unusually large numbers for extreme-right parties, such as the Nazis, by the early 1930s. In the past year, too, according to studies in Britain and America, there has been a spurt in online searches for extremist content. Anger over lockdowns or loss of trust in government could be driving new interest.

Your browser does not support the

Enjoy more audio and podcasts on iOS or Android.

What texts might people be turning to? Researchers study literary habits of the far-right by monitoring reading lists traded on social media, texts promoted on podcasts or recited by enthusiasts as audiobooks on YouTube, output from right-fringe publishing houses and, most extreme, the diatribes that serve as manifestos of those who commit atrocities. Together they suggest several strands of hateful writing. Brian Hughes of American University in Washington, DC says that the sheer availability of online extremist ideology is, in part, responsible for the elevated rates of extremist mobilisation.

French writers have been strikingly influential, including those in the Nouvelle Droite movement. Alain de Benoist, an illiberal thinker, inspired members of Americas alt right such as Richard Spencer, a white supremacist. The works of a philosopher, Jean Renaud Gabriel Camus, also stand out. Ideas drawn from his book The Great Replacement (2011), are often repeated by those who say non-white immigration threatens Western countries. The book has been cited by mass shooters.

The work of another French writer, Jean Raspail, is championed by anti-immigrant activists in America. His dystopian novel from 1973, The Camp of the Saints, imagines the violent overrun of France by brown-skinned migrants. It is a weaponised retelling of an apocalyptic biblical parable, says Chelsea Stieber of Catholic University. The French understand it as literature, she says, whereas in America it gets to be this reality that could happen. Leading Republicans have promoted it, she points out, including Steve Bannon and Stephen Miller, both erstwhile close advisers of Donald Trump, as well as Steve King, a noxious ex-congressman from Iowa.

Apocalyptic writing is especially popular among a strand of the far-right known as accelerationists, meaning those who believe civilisation (or at least liberal democracy) will soon collapse. They hope the end can be hastened by violent acts or even civil war. In this vein an Italian fascist writer, Julius Evola, is also cited by Mr Bannon and Mr Spencer and lauded in far-right circles, along with his call for blowing everything up. He promoted an idea of heroic men who rise above history (Mussolini was a fan). Memes of him in his monocle are shared online by adoring followers.

Extremists turn to such writers because they justify using violence to clear the way for a supposed new golden age to begin. Others tell them how to achieve that. Siege, a book by James Mason of the American Nazi party, purports to be a guide to violent revolution. It had little impact when it was published in 1992, notes Graham Macklin of the Centre for Research on Extremism, in Oslo. But its rediscovery by neo-Nazis roughly five years ago has led to a surge of interest. PDFs of it are now shared widely online; the hashtag readSiege spreads periodically on social media. Now, its everywhere, he says.

The study of such writing matters, even if one researcher admits he feels like projectile vomiting while tackling some especially violent or cruel texts. Ideas can have deadly consequences, says Joanna Mendelson of the Anti-Defamation League. People are quoting and referencing books as a kind of reassurance that they are validated in their extremist views, she says. Many of the same ones reappear repeatedly among anti-Semitic and other extremist factions. A few, such as the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (an anti-Semitic conspiracy originating from Russia in 1903), or the racist, eugenics-based writing of Lothrop Stoddard in the 1920s, are repeatedly rediscovered or reinterpreted by new writers. What used to be called eugenics, for example, is today dressed up as race realism.

One book is still considered the bible of the far right. The Turner Diaries, a barely readable novel from the 1970s by William Pierce, another American Nazi, imagines an insurrection by a group called Order against a government that promotes egalitarian values and gun control. It has supposedly sold 500,000 copies. One avid reader was Timothy McVeigh, who bombed a federal building in Oklahoma City in 1995, killing 168 people. (He used a lorry full of fertiliser and explosives, a method depicted in the novel.) Others were inspired to form a real-world paramilitary group, also called the Order.

Jared Holt, who researches domestic extremism at the Atlantic Council in Washington, says such books are still powerful. Veteran members of groups pass them on to younger ones. They are used to build ties between adherents, to test new initiates and ease the anxiety of some by giving a sense of purpose to their lives. He notes, too, how younger readers are finding new writing. One rambling, self-published book called Bronze Age Mindset, for example, has won a cult following, reportedly including staffers at Mr Trumps White House. It draws on ideas from Nietzsche and tells readers to prepare for the military rule that will soon begin in America. For some readers such bilious writing is appealing. Finding out why is a first step towards confronting it.

This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline "Deadly inspirations"

See original here:

Deadly inspirations - What their chosen reading says about America's far-right | United States - The Economist

‘Patriots’ in America: how fighting for your country has taken on new meaning for Trump supporters – The Conversation UK

Despite Donald Trumps seeming lack of interest in the project, a number of his followers around the US have been flirting with the idea of forming a breakaway party of the right to challenge the Republican establishment. Most of these have names which use the word patriot.

In Florida, former Republican voters registered the American Patriot Party of the United States or TAPPUS, for short while at the end of January a spokesman for the former president denied reports he was planning to fundraise in cooperation with a group calling itself the MAGA Patriot Party National Committee.

Patriot was a word that surfaced repeatedly during the assault on the US Capitol in January, being repeatedly invoked to define the identities and motivations of those who invaded the nations legislative heart. Ivanka Trump herself praised the participants on Twitter as American Patriots though she deleted her tweet after being challenged by other Twitter users for her use of this word.

Patriot is a common enough word, but its modern use is often nebulous. A simple dictionary definition of a patriot is one who loves and supports his or her country. So you could call anyone who expressed their love for their country a patriot no matter where or when they lived. In the US context, though, until relatively recently the word has been used most frequently in relation to New England and especially Boston in the era of the American revolution.

Patriot has long been a convenient shorthand for those American colonists who supported or participated in the revolution, as distinct from the loyalists who hoped that the North American colonies would remain part of the British empire. New Englanders, particularly those who live in or around Boston, like to think that their city and region holds a special place in the history of the revolution, and thus of the United States. It was the home of leaders such as Paul Revere, Samuel Adams and John Hancock. It was also the site of the Stamp Act riots, the Boston Tea Party and the Battle of Bunker Hill.

The regions sole National Football League franchise is the New England Patriots, who are based in Bostons southern suburbs. The teams mascot, Pat Patriot, is depicted as a revolutionary-era soldier, wearing a Continental Army uniform and a tricorne hat. On the third Monday of April, Massachusetts, Maine and Connecticut celebrate the state holiday known as Patriots Day, in commemoration of the opening battles of the American revolution, which took place at Lexington, Concord, and Menotomy (now Arlington), Massachusetts.

The holiday is marked by re-enactments of these battles, and, more prominently, by the Boston Marathon. The 2016 film Patriots Day was so titled because its subject was the 2013 terrorist attack on the marathon.

What, then, is the connection between a regional tradition of remembrance of the revolution and the crowds of Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol Building? In 2016 a small but assertive group which called itself Patriot Prayer emerged, holding pro-Trump rallies in liberal west coast enclaves such as Portland, Oregon. But the term did not gain wide usage among white nationalists and other members of the alt-right until 2020, when it became a popular way for Trump supporters to describe themselves.

Kyle Rittenhouse, the Illinois teenager who shot three people at a Black Lives Matter protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin, was hailed by Trump supporters as a patriot. Since Novembers presidential election, the word has been employed repeatedly among those who believe that the Democrats stole Trumps victory.

Trump supporters travelling from Louisville, Kentucky for the rally on January 6 referred to their group as a patriot caravan. Meanwhile the husband of Ashli Babbit the air force veteran who was shot and killed by Capitol police during the invasion praised her as a great patriot to all who knew her.

On the far-right Breitbart website, someone commenting on a story quoting Donald Trump calling for a peaceful transfer of power attracted a large number of approvals when they left the following comment:

There will NEVER be reconciliation. We have irreconcilable differences, and the fight has just begun. We need to disown the RNC until they support the Patriot Party.

The word patriot has an obvious appeal. Its difficult to argue against a person or groups love of their country and their willingness to take action to defend it. Thats particularly significant when, in the case of the alt-right, it believes that its nations core values are threatened.

But we might view white nationalists embrace of the term as inspired less by American history than by the 2000 Hollywood film The Patriot, starring Mel Gibson himself one of Hollywoods most ardent conservatives. Gibsons character enters the War of Independence only reluctantly to protect one son and avenge the death of another. In other words, for unimpeachable motives.

But is it a stretch to apply this conception of the patriot to those who, like Babbit or the QAnon Shaman, stormed the Capitol because they believed that the Democrats had stolen the election? From the point of view of someone who believes the QAnon conspiracy theory that the Democratic Party elite were behind a vast paedophile ring threatening innocent children, perhaps this really did seem to be an act of patriotism.

Samuel Johnson famously claimed that patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel, but as is so often true the reality is undoubtedly far more complex.

Original post:

'Patriots' in America: how fighting for your country has taken on new meaning for Trump supporters - The Conversation UK

Tom Durkin: Stop the steal of our flag – The Union of Grass Valley

Wrapping yourself in an American flag does not make you a patriot any more than going to church makes you a Christian.

The people who stormed the Capitol Jan. 6 were not patriots, despite their chants of USA! USA!, weaponized American flags, and the blessings of a man who would be their king.

The true patriots at the Capitol Jan. 6, 2021, were the Capitol Police and the D.C. Metro Police. They defended the members of Congress against the murderous mob who, unchecked, might have lynched (they had a gallows) sitting members of the U.S. government, including the vice president.

The flag-waving mob consisted of revolutionaries, insurrectionists, seditionists, rebels, thugs, racists, extremists, criminals, sovereign citizens, rogue cops, war-trained veterans, domestic terrorists, conspirators. Not a patriot among them.

To be fair, many of the people in the riot just got caught up in the moment, mob mentality, mass hysteria. They probably thought they were in the right because they truly believed Donald Trump won the election.

After all, since last summer Trump had been telling his supporters the only way he could lose the election was if it were rigged. And when he actually did lose the election, he refused to accept the results and whipped his supporters into a seditious frenzy by claiming without any evidence whatsoever that the election was stolen from him.

Aided and abetted by journalistically bankrupt right-wing media and self-serving politicians, Trump still sustains The Big Lie that he won despite overwhelming evidence that he lost.

The Big Lie is a tactic chillingly articulated by one of the architects of the Holocaust, Josef Goebbels, who said: If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it.

I used to believe it could never happen here. I was wrong. It is happening here.

By grandiosely and mendaciously repeating the Big Lie that he won the election, Trump and his media sycophants have fooled and made fools of millions of credulous Americans.

Two hundred-and-still-counting rioters are facing federal charges ranging from misdemeanors to felonies to sedition. Fooled by Trump and the alt-right media. Foolish for taking selfies.

REALITY CHECK

Not only does Trump continue to promulgate the Big Lie, he has mesmerized millions of Americans into thinking theyre patriots. And these zombie patriots have appropriated the American flag as if only they were entitled to it.

Theres nothing patriotic about overthrowing our government.

And it is oxymoronic to use the American flag in support of insurrection.

All together now: I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands .

Theres a whole lot of cognitive dissonance going on here, some very pretzeled logic, alternate reality.

It is a fundamental law of the universe: The more you ignore reality, the more it will work against you. Just ask the folks in jail.

I like to think some Trump supporters were shocked back into the real world, ashamed of what happened Jan. 6 and beginning to realize what Trump and his echo chamber have played them.

U.S. democracy marched forward and certified the election of Biden and Harris despite the riot and Trumps histrionics.

They saw Trump impeached, again. This time for the high crime of inciting insurrection. They witnessed a lopsided trial where the House impeachment managers proved beyond doubt Trump was guilty, guilty, guilty.

Depressingly but not surprisingly, 43 Republican senators ignored the evidence Feb. 13 and voted to acquit. Perhaps they just want to ride Trumps insurrectionary gravy train to its dead end. Or maybe those faithless pols are afraid of their Trump-loving and some clearly violent constituents?

What was encouraging and surprising Feb. 13 was that seven Republican senators Burr, Cassidy, Collins, Murkowski, Romney, Sasse and Toomey broke ranks and voted to convict Trump. They risked political suicide by rejecting partisan politics and upholding their oaths to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

As Sen. Mitch McConnell so eloquently and hypocritically put it after he voted to acquit on an inane technicality, there was no question Trump was practically and morally responsible for inciting the Jan. 6 insurrection riot.

Real patriots vote their conscience. Real Republicans accept the results of elections. They suck it up if they dont like who got elected, just as the Democrats did in 2000, 2004 and 2016.

Real patriots dont betray their oath of office and vote even after the riot not to certify the free and fair election of Biden and Harris.

Eighteenth-century British pundit Samuel Johnson noted, Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel.

Former President Donald Trump is a lying, power-hungry scoundrel, and the people who blindly follow him are not patriots.

By their actions and rejection of reality, they have forfeited their right to call themselves patriots or to display the flag of the country they betrayed.

The election wasnt stolen, but the U.S. flag was.

Its our flag, and we want it back.

Tom Durkin is a freelance writer and photographer in Nevada City.

Go here to see the original:

Tom Durkin: Stop the steal of our flag - The Union of Grass Valley

Fox News tries to keep Trump fans satisfied, but at what cost? – Gazettextra

On Feb. 10, Fox News was in lockstep with other cable news channels and major broadcast networks in presenting more than four hours of the second impeachment trial of Donald Trump.

But at 5 p.m. Eastern, Fox News pulled away from the most graphic video evidence of violence during the insurrection by pro-Trump rioters at the Capitol on Jan. 6 and switched to its popular daily roundtable show "The Five."

Most of the panelists dismissed the Democratic impeachment managers' presentation, defended the former president and moved on to other topics including the viral Zoom cat lawyer video despite the historic nature of the events in Washington. Viewers who wanted Fox News journalists' take on the proceedings had to wait until anchor Bret Baier showed up at the top of the 6 p.m. hour.

The editorial judgment to cut away was met with derision on social media, where the conservative-leaning news network is often hammered by critics. On screen, Juan Williams, the lone liberal on "The Five," angrily chastised his co-hosts for ignoring the evidence presented.

What played out that day demonstrates the pressure Fox News is under, as the network faces growing scrutiny over its role in supporting Trump and his disinformation claims that many believe helped to fuel the deadly insurrection attempt in the Capitol.

The profit engine of Rupert Murdoch's Fox Corp. presents itself as a news network, but it's often defined by its opinion hosts, such as Sean Hannity, who pay fealty to Trump and the former president's devoted followers.

Those followers now have multiple options to feed their fix for right-wing opinions some of them far more extreme than what is delivered on Fox News. Satisfying those viewers while also reporting information that does not fit their worldview has become a challenge for an organization that faces vocal detractors on the political center and left, a potentially expensive lawsuit from one of Trump's baseless voter fraud targets and an increasingly outsize role in the parent company's financial performance.

"I have friends who don't watch Fox anymore because they see it as untethered from reality," said Richard Goodstein, a Washington attorney who has appeared on the channel as a liberal guest. "The question for Fox is balancing losing viewers like that to losing viewers who switch channels rather than watching someone like me who forcefully brings facts and opinions that they cannot tolerate."

Chris Stirewalt, the former political editor for Fox News, said in an op-ed column for the LA Times that he faced anger from the Trump multitudes after defending the network's election night call of the once reliably red Arizona for Joe Biden.

"When I defended the call for Biden in the Arizona election, I became a target of murderous rage from consumers who were furious at not having their views confirmed," he wrote.

Giving the benefit of the doubt and often full-throated support to a president whose lies led to an attempt to overturn an election in turn led to voting software maker Smartmatic's $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit against the network and three of its hosts.

The suit filed Feb. 4 alleges that Fox News and its hosts Maria Bartiromo, Lou Dobbs and Jeanine Pirro damaged Smartmatic's reputation and business by spreading Trump's conspiracy theories about the election being rigged to elect President Biden. (Fox News and the hosts have filed motions to dismiss the suit, saying the Trump's claims were newsworthy, even if they were false.)

A more immediate question hanging over Fox News is the same one the Republican party is grappling with: What is the next move for Trump? Just as Republican legislators fear Trump will support primary challengers back home if they take him to task, Fox News has to determine how to navigate his expected re-emergence following his acquittal in the second impeachment trial.

Joe Walsh, a former tea party movement congressman from Illinois and conservative radio host, said the right-wing audience remains enthralled with Trump.

"That's the only thing that's going to satiate the folks who turn on Fox," Walsh said. "Right now they are going on about big tech censorship and immigration. That's not going to be enough."

The challenges come as Fox News has emerged as the most significant piece of Fox Corp., which slimmed down after selling most of its entertainment assets to the Walt Disney Co. for $71 billion. During the current fiscal year, Fox News is expected to contribute 80% or more than $2 billion to Fox Corp.'s earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, an industry-wide measurement of profitability.

Fox News has been the most-watched cable news channel for 19 consecutive years, thanks to its effective positioning as a right-leaning alternative to other TV news outlets. As the rest of the traditional TV business declined in 2020, the channel's audience grew. Fox News became the most-watched network in all of cable TV, according to Nielsen.

The network expected an audience falloff once Trump lost the White House, as it had seen viewers tune out after Barack Obama, a Democrat, defeated his Republican opponents in 2008 and 2012.

But Trump remained the main story in the weeks after the 2020 election with his unfounded charges of voter fraud, leading to the insurrection at the Capitol by pro-Trump rioters that killed five people, followed by the second impeachment trial. Depressed Trump supporters tuned out of Fox News during coverage of those events, while the ratings for MSNBC and CNN surged as viewers who don't habitually watch cable news were tuning in.

Fox News has managed to ride out ratings fluctuations in the past, but it took longer this time. The network has ranked first in viewers since Biden's inauguration, although it still trails CNN in the 25 to 54 age group important to advertisers.

The dip was significant enough for Fox Corp. Chief Executive Lachlan Murdoch to calm the waters. On Feb. 9, Murdoch told financial analysts that the company extended the employment contract of Fox News Media Chief Executive Suzanne Scott and praised her performance.

Scott took over the operation in 2018 after it had been rocked by sexual harassment scandals and racial discrimination lawsuits related to the reign of the network's founding chief executive, Roger Ailes. After maintaining the network's ratings leadership for two years, she is now jiggering the network's lineup and will add at least two more hours of right-leaning opinion programs, which have always been the most reliable ratings performers.

Murdoch also tried to counter the notion that Fox News has veered too far to one end of the political spectrum.

"We don't need to go further right," Murdoch said. "We'll stick where we are, and we think that's exactly right and that's the best thing for the business and for our viewers."

Despite the younger Murdoch's assurances, there is a sense among some politicos and people inside Fox News that the network has already moved further right to stave off the insurgence of new outlets that are courting their audience. Even veterans of past Republican administrations, such as Matthew Dowd, who worked for George W. Bush, believe there has been a shift.

"We saw them as conservative and more likely to be more friendly than others, but we never saw them as like, 'Oh, let's do Fox because they're basically a propaganda arm,'" Dowd said. "You always thought of it as a conservative outlet, but it was rational conservative."

A Fox News insider not authorized to speak publicly on the matter said the conservative bent of the network is reflective of where the Republican Party has gone under Trump.

This past year, Fox News saw the rise of a pesky new rival in Newsmax, which kept up a steadfast defense of Trump's voter fraud claims through President Biden's inauguration. Last fall, the Boca Raton, Florida-based channel averaged as many as 1 million viewers at 7 p.m. Eastern on some days with host Greg Kelly, who on Trump's last day in office said, "I miss him already."

Newsmax's ratings have faded in recent weeks. Since the inauguration it has averaged 226,000 viewers compared with 2.5 million for Fox News.

The other right-wing Fox wannabe is the more strident San Diego-based One America News Network, which does not have enough distribution in cable and satellite homes to be measured by Nielsen.

But the new breed of conservative outlets know how to attract attention. After Fox News Media canceled Dobbs' Fox Business Network program where many of Trump's election fraud falsehoods were promoted OAN founder Robert Herring asked in a tweet for the host to give him a call. "We may have a position available for you in which you wouldn't be censored for speaking the truth!" Herring wrote.

Dobbs remains under contract to Fox News and still gets an annual salary in the seven figures.

Neither of the upstart channels has the financial resources or infrastructure to knock Fox News off its perch. Nevertheless, Fox News is entering an era where a multitude of new contenders will try to nibble away at the conservative audience it once had to itself.

"They've gone from having zero wing-nut competition to aggressive wing-nut competition," said Mike Murphy, a former Republican consultant and current political analyst for NBC News.

In addition to watching on cable, viewers can stream Newsmax and OAN without a pay TV subscription. There are also more digital conservative channels such as the First, which carries a nightly show from former Fox News host Bill O'Reilly, and Glenn Beck's Blaze Live. Both are available on free ad-supported streaming services such as Pluto.

Social media has provided new outlets for right-leaning voices as well. The Facebook page of Fox News contributor Dan Bongino, a former cop and Secret Service agent turned pugnacious Trump-defending pundit, has more monthly engagements than any major mainstream news organization on the platform.

Jon Klein, a digital media entrepreneur and former CNN president, said audience fragmentation is inevitable now that streaming has reached critical mass.

"Ten years ago conservative audiences were not that digitally savvy," Klein said. "The early adopters of digital media were younger, more liberal, educated, et cetera. None of this digital technology is a mystery anymore to the older white males who watch Fox News and certainly not a mystery to the alt-right young men they want."

Fox News does have an internal image problem resulting from the Arizona election call, which it stood by, despite an angry response from the Trump campaign and his supporters.

Stirewalt was fired from Fox News in a company restructuring on Jan. 19. Bill Sammon, the longtime executive in charge of the Washington bureau, which has long fought to remain independent from the network's opinion side, announced his retirement a day earlier.

Both moves were seen as responses to their roles on election night, leaving some of the journalists at the company stunned and concerned that the network is lessening its commitment to straight news.

Rupert Murdoch recently told The Washington Post that Stirewalt's exit was not related to the Arizona call. It was known among Fox News executives that Murdoch was not a fan of Stirewalt, who declined comment.

Even the perception that Fox News ousted journalists over reporting an election result that was ultimately accurate could damage one of the foundational constructs of the channel. The integrity of the Fox News polling unit and the precision accuracy of its election decision desk has helped define the divide between news and opinion.

But keeping the core conservative Fox News viewer happy is the company's primary goal. Rupert Murdoch's U.S. newspapers the Wall Street Journal and the New York Post have been highly critical of Trump's actions on their editorial pages since he lost the election. Any personal political convictions he has on the matter are not worth alienating fickle TV viewers who could ultimately have an impact on the company's balance sheet.

"They are not sentimental about their programming decisions," Klein said of the Murdochs. "They do what they need to do to get an audience."

(c)2021 the Los Angeles Times

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Continued here:

Fox News tries to keep Trump fans satisfied, but at what cost? - Gazettextra

POV: A New Age for Equal Access and the Deaf Community – BU Today

Recently, the White Houses new press secretary, Jen Psaki, announced that all White House press briefings will include an American Sign Language (ASL) interpreter. This announcement signals a new age for equal access and the deaf community, and is in stark contrast to the previous administrations disregard for the rights of deaf citizens to have access to communication from our government. The Biden administration has set a high bar for the rest of the country by recognizing that language is power, a giant leap forward to addressing the lack of access experienced by the deaf community in this country on a daily basis.

The deaf community, as a cultural and linguistic minority, fights for linguistic equality and access every day. Many assume that closed captions alone provide sufficient access, but this is not the case. ASL is the native language of many deaf people in the United States, and so direct access to information in ASL is critical.

Former President Donald Trump refused to provide an ASL interpreter during his entire tenure, forcing the National Association of the Deaf to sue the administration. A federal court judge ordered Trump to provide an interpreter, at minimum, to include access for hundreds of thousands of deaf people to briefings providing information on the COVID-19 pandemic, stating in his opinion: Captioning in English is not accessible for many deaf and hard of hearing people who use a different language, ASL. With their lives at risk due to the pandemic, it is important to provide the information in ASL so that deaf and hard of hearing people have access to this information.

Unfortunately, the Biden administrations first foray into this new age resulted in a brief gaffe when the first interpreter hired turned out to be a well-known alt-right activist. She appeared across social media touting MAGA propaganda and volunteered with a group called Right Side ASL (which changed its name to The Hands of Liberty after its previous page was flagged and blocked by Facebook), which spread misinformation regarding the outcome of the 2020 election. This interpreter was certified by the Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf (RID)the national organization responsible for establishing the standard of quality for interpreters. The RID code of conduct stipulates that individuals do not engage in an interpreting role when there is a real or perceived conflict of interest. In this case, the fact that this interpreter had volunteered to interpret for an organization that promoted misinformation constitutes a conflict of interest.

This misstep does not, and should not, take away from the intention of the Biden administration to provide access to all deaf Americans in their native language, ASL. And to their credit, they quickly remedied the issue by hiring Elsie Stecker, the founder of ASLIZED.org, who is not only a qualified ASL interpreter, but also a certified deaf interpreter (CDI). CDIs are certified through the RID and are themselves deaf or hard of hearing interpreters who have a thorough understanding of the deaf community and deaf culture, and have native or near-native sign language skills. They have obtained specialized training that provides them with additional proficiency to enhance communication in a way that nonnative signers are not able to produce.

This move to using a CDI highlights the power of access to the deaf community through the hands of a native deaf professional interpreter. In Massachusetts, Governor Charlie Baker has led the way with his commitment to equality for the deaf community by hiring a CDI for every one of his coronavirus briefings since the pandemic beganperhaps yet another example that the commonwealth of Massachusetts is not afraid to lead the way in doing what is right.

The more people who are educated about ASL and deaf culture, the stronger the impact on our society. This affects changes in laws and ultimately our access to information nationwide.

Here at BU, the Wheelock College of Education & Human Development Deaf Studies Program, with its ASL and deaf culture classes, is a stepping-stone to informing the greater society of language and access needs.

Having the White House acknowledge ASL and the deaf communitys needs is a milestone for our community. The new administration has set a high bar for others, and as members of the Deaf Studies and ASL programs at BU, where advocating for the deaf community is our mission, we applaud their actions. We see the new administrations step to include ASL as a positive sign of more change to come with regard to the rights and recognition of all members of our society.

POV is an opinion page that provides timely commentaries from students, faculty, and staff on a variety of issues: on-campus, local, state, national, or international. Anyone interested in submitting a piece, which should be about 700 words long, should contact John ORourke at orourkej@bu.edu.BU Today reserves the right to reject or edit submissions. The views expressed are solely those of the author and are not intended to represent the views of Boston University.

Link:

POV: A New Age for Equal Access and the Deaf Community - BU Today

Puncturing the Allure of Robert E. Lee, and Other Civil War-Era Histories – The New York Times

ROBERT E. LEE AND ME A Southerners Reckoning With the Myth of the Lost Cause By Ty Seidule291 pp. St. Martins. $27.99.

Long before the alt-right circled the statue of the Confederate general Robert E. Lee in Charlottesville in 2017, Seidule, a retired brigadier general and professor emeritus of military history at West Point, set out to understand why his academy continued to display a portrait of Lee, a graduate of the school who resigned his Army commission to fight against his country.

This investigation required that Seidule, a native Virginian and graduate of Washington and Lee University, examine his own reverence for Lee and the myth of the Lost Cause. The resulting book part autobiography, part history is a powerful and introspective look into white Americans continuing romance with the Confederacy, and the lasting damage that has done.

The chapters follow Seidules life, from his upbringing in Alexandria (which he later learned was a major slave-trading hub) and Monroe, Ga. (where a grisly 1946 quadruple lynching remains unsolved), to his Army career and years teaching at West Point. Along the way he explores Lost Cause ideology, which denies that slavery was the wars central motive; describes the pro-Confederate propaganda served to children in Southern schools in the 1960s and 70s; and illuminates the tortuous relationship between the U.S. Army and its greatest traitor.

The history of the Armys relationship to the Confederacy and Lee is fascinating, especially in light of current controversies over military bases named after Confederate commanders. After the Civil War, Seidule explains, West Point banished the Confederates from memory. The academys postwar motto, Duty, Honor, Country, was a rebuke to secession. Over the next century, however, Lee memorials began to appear. Seidule saw a pattern. Again and again, he says, progress toward integration and equal rights in the military was accompanied by Confederate memorialization.

The books epilogue sets out the reason for Lees treason: the protection of slavery. The evidence is clearly on Seidules side. It is long past time to break Lees grip on American Civil War memory. Seidule provides a blueprint for doing just that.

A SHOT IN THE MOONLIGHT How a Freed Slave and a Confederate Soldier Fought for Justice in the Jim Crow SouthBy Ben MontgomeryIllustrated. 285 pp. Little, Brown/Spark. $28.

The breathless title tells it all. The shot in the moonlight was fired by George Dinning, an emancipated slave, in defense of his home and family in Simpson County, Ky., in 1897. Dinnings target was a mob that had congregated at his home and accused him of theft; his shot killed a white farmer, the scion of a wealthy local family. Dinning was spirited away by a civic-minded sheriff determined to prevent a lynching. Denied that satisfaction, the mob burned Dinnings house to the ground.

Although Kentucky remained in the United States during the Civil War, it was rived politically and plagued by guerrilla violence long past 1865. By the turn of the century, the states white elite had grown impatient with mob violence, which marred its reputation and deterred investment. Kentuckys legislature passed an anti-lynching bill one month before Dinning stood trial for murder. Dinning could have been hanged, either by the mob or by the state. Instead, he was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to seven years in prison.

This sentence was too extreme for Gov. William Bradley, who pardoned Dinning, declaring that the fair name of Kentucky had been disgraced by mobs for too long. Noting that Dinnings conviction had been procured almost entirely on the evidence of his assailants, Bradley also affirmed Dinnings defense: that he had fired into the mob only after it had fired on him, and that he acted solely to protect his family.

Dinning, aided by his lawyer, Bennett Young a former Confederate soldier and humanitarian went on to sue members of the mob for the destruction of his home. They won a noteworthy victory in the Kentucky courts.

Montgomerys claim that a Black man in the South had sued his would-be lynchers and won is overstated. Its not clear that the men who congregated at Dinnings home intended to lynch him, and the lawsuit centered on the burned house, not on personal assault. Even so, its a good story, one that reveals the complicated history of the post-bellum South, a world that included brave freedmen, occasionally sympathetic white men and genuine commitment to law and order.

ECONOMY HALL The Hidden History of a Free Black Brotherhood By Fatima ShaikIllustrated. 525 pp. The Historic New Orleans Collection. $34.95.

Economy Hall is so inviting that the true depth of its scholarship is revealed only in its bibliography, which lists dozens of archival and other sources. Shaiks monumental book is anchored in 24 handwritten ledgers rescued from the trash by her father years ago. Her painstaking translation of the ledgers, and re-creation of the world that produced them, transports you to the orbit of the Socit dEconomie et dAssistance Mutuelle, a benevolent association and social club begun in 1836 by 15 French-speaking freemen of African descent in New Orleans. The book is simultaneously a history of the mens iconic meeting place, Economy Hall, and of the city they called home.

Alexis de Tocqueville, commenting on Americans propensity to form associations, called this art of joining the fundamental science of democracy. Shaik emphasizes the political activism of the New Orleans group. Whether refuting the claims of scientific racism, risking their lives for the right to vote or nurturing jazz and other forms of African-American culture, members of the Economie fought to participate in democratic life. Not all of their ventures achieved the desired outcome, as a coalition of New Orleans Black men that included a president of the Economie discovered in 1896, when the Supreme Court upheld Louisianas separate train car law in Plessy v. Ferguson.

After 1900, the Economie evolved from an elite to an inclusive society, Shaik writes. As segregation tightened across the South, the society was led by the son of a Black mother and a Jewish father and began to focus less on politics and more on culture, particularly jazz. Economie musicians shaped the new musical form, and Economy Hall became famous for its dance parties.

The book is organized around the life of Ludger Boguille, the groups long-serving secretary and a local leader of New Orleanss prosperous Creole community. A fierce advocate of Black suffrage, Boguille was nearly killed in 1866 when an armed mob led by police burst into a reconvened Louisiana constitutional convention. Boguille was also a teacher, who prescribed radical kindness for students and parents alike. The city of New Orleans is Boguilles co-star, and Shaiks rendition of her hometown is lyrical and mysterious and always captivating.

Follow this link:

Puncturing the Allure of Robert E. Lee, and Other Civil War-Era Histories - The New York Times

Majority of Proud Boys who disrupted peaceful Halifax protest still in uniform, despite new terrorist designation – The Telegram

The majority of the Proud Boys who dressed up in matching polo shirts and attempted to disrupt a peaceful protest in Halifax more than three years ago are still in the military, even though the federal government deemed the alt-right group a terrorist organization last week.

The five men four of them in the navy and one an army soldier attended a July 1, 2017 ceremony meant to honour Canada's missing and murdered Indigenous women near the statue of former governor Edward Cornwallis, infamous for his 1749 scalping proclamation aimed at Mi'kmaq people.

Of the five members involved in this incident, two have since released from the Forces, and three have completed required counselling and probation and have renounced their affiliation with the Proud Boys, Jessica Lamirande, who speaks for the Department of National Defence, said in an email responding to a question about whether the new terrorist designation means the men would be kicked out of the military.

These actions are absolutely not tolerated behaviour in the CAF. There are serious consequences for any CAF members who express intolerance while in or out of uniform.

Last week, Ottawa placed 13 new groups on its Criminal Code list of terrorist entities, including four ideologically motivated violent extremist groups:Atomwaffen Division, the Base, the Proud Boys and Russian Imperial Movement, according to a news release from Public Safety Canada.

Based on their actions, each group meets the legal threshold for listing as set out in the Criminal Code, which requires reasonable grounds to believe that an entity has knowingly participated in or facilitated a terrorist activity, or has knowingly acted on behalf of, at the direction of, or in association with such an entity.

The military is now reviewing how that will affect its policies, Lamirande said. The naming of specific groups as terrorist organizations provides an additional safeguard against the infiltration of (ideologically motivated violent extremist) organization members into the (Canadian Armed Forces and in partnership with the RCMP, facilitates the investigation of any CAF member suspected of supporting their activities.

People in Canadas military "are not permitted to be affiliated with or be part of any terrorist organizations, she said.

It should also be noted that prior to the announcement, it was already not permitted for (Canadian Armed Forces) members to participate in any activity, or be a member of any group or organization, that is connected with hate-related criminal activities, and/or promotes hatred, violence, discrimination, or harassment on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination as defined in the Canadian Human Rights Act.

These strong institutional core values, and a Code of Service Discipline that demands the highest standard of behaviour, were in place "long before these changes to the (ideologically motivated violent extremist) list, Lamirande said.

Members who cannot live up to those core values are dealt with through a range of administrative or disciplinary tools.

The military investigated the Proud Boys in Halifax and their unacceptable hateful conduct as soon as it heard about it and "undertook the appropriate corrective measures, Lamirande said.

The matter was deemed so serious even the country's top soldier at the time, Jonathan Vance, a retired general who was then chief of defence staff, was being kept in the loop, according to documents obtained under the Access to Information Act.

"Definitely inconsistent with our values," Vance wrote in an email to several senior sailors and soldiers.

"Will want, as a minimum, for them to be told (as soon as possible) that their actions are not acceptable and that they must stop."

Rebecca Thomas is a Mi'kmaq poet who participated in the peaceful ceremony the Proud Boys tried to disrupt on Canada Day in2017.

"There was an (Indigenous) woman who was cutting her braids off in mourning because of the legacy she'd experienced through residential schools, through being an Indigenous woman having lost some of her children," Thomas said.

The woman "was standing her ground against the Cornwallis statue," she said, noting the statue, which has since come down, represented a lot of that history.

As she was cutting off her braids, "these young, white dudes carrying the Red Ensign flag and chanting started coming into the park because they saw what was going on," Thomas said..

"Then you had a lot of non-Indigenous allies standing and blocking them. And there was a bit of a stare-down."

The men were trying to instigate trouble, saying things like, "It's a free country. We can walk through here. We're going to pay our respects to the founder of this great city," Thomas remembered.

The whole thing seemed unecessary, Thomas said. "They just wanted to be disruptive because they were told that they couldn't go through."

She questioned whether the men who took part have truly changed their ways.

"They can renounce it, but are their attitudes and behaviours still the same?" Thomas said. "They might not have an official membership card to the Proud Boys, for lack of a better word, but do they still kind of act in this kind of bravado, free country I can do whatver I want mentality? Because that's not any better."

Punishment is not necesarily the answer, said Thomas, who works as a student adviser at the Nova Scotia Community College.

"Consequence doesn't have to equate to punishment -- let's lose your livelihood," she said. "But consequence must mean something and I don't know what that something looks like."

Addressing the community they harmed is an important part of the justice process, Thomas said. "And I don't know if they've ever had to do that."

She wasn't surprised to learn last week that Canada has labelled the Proud Boys a terrorist organization, especially after they took part in storming the U.S. Capitol building in January. "A lot of folks will point to the United States and say, 'Look at all their problems that they have to deal with,' but then not recognizing that the Proud Boys were born in Canada. So I think, if anything, it is a moment for Canadians to look inward and say, 'This came from our country.' That we have issues; we can't just point to south of the border and say, 'Wow, it's so nice not to be like them.' Because ... we have our own issues, too."

We can't make laws retroactive, said Michel Drapeau, a retired colonel who practises military law in Ottawa.

"I think it's water under the bridge," he said of the Proud Boys who tried to disrupt the 2017 ceremony in Halifax.

But going forward, this should give people in uniform pause for thought before doing something similar, Drapeau said.

"Anybody who's got two cents worth of intelligence would understand, whether or not they're a member of the military or the public service or anything else," he said.

"The law is quite clear: If you're part of that, then you're commiting a crime just by your association or membership in it," Drapeau said. "You'd certainly be putting into peril your security classification. And if you do, you're not going to be able to hold a job within the military or within the public service."

That message "is loud and clear," he said.

Designating the Proud Boys a terrorist organization sends a "powerful signal that we're not going to put up with it, and if you do this then you're going to be paying a heavy penalty," Drapeau said.

RELATED:

Go here to read the rest:

Majority of Proud Boys who disrupted peaceful Halifax protest still in uniform, despite new terrorist designation - The Telegram

Anatomy of the pro-Trump mob: How the former president’s rhetoric galvanized a far-right coalition – ABC News

Nearly a month after a pro-Trump mob violently stormed the U.S. Capitol, a clearer picture is emerging of the individuals and groups involved as federal authorities arrest and charge people who allegedly participated in the riot.

Former President Donald Trumps supporters -- 74 million of whom voted to give him a second term in 2020 -- are diverse in background and ideology and come from all corners of the United States, and those who stormed the Capitol represent just a fraction.

But to some experts, the hundreds who took part in the Capitol siege represent some of the most fervent and radical adherents of the Make America Great Again movement and others caught up in the frenzy of the day. They say attempts to unite those extremist elements fell apart after Charlottesville but gained renewed momentum in 2020, with racial unrest, the pandemic and most recently the unfounded controversy over the election.

Pro-Trump protesters gather in front of the U.S. Capitol Building, Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C., before a mob stormed the Capitol, breaking windows and clashing with police officers, as congress gathered to certify the election of Joe Biden.

Cynthia Miller-Idriss, a sociology professor at American University who studies extremism and far-right movements, said that those who stormed the Capitol are a loose coalition of groups from across the far-right spectrum.

These were people who were radicalized and participated in an insurrection, its just that some did so in a very planned way, and I think others ended up being caught up spontaneously in mob rioting," Miller-Idriss said.

For the experts, the most prominent force that unified hard-right adherent, militias and other Trump supporters and whipped them up into a frenzy behind the idea that the election was stolen -- Trump himself.

And Trump, unlike past presidents, gave these disparate groups a national platform unlike any they'd had in modern American history with the instantaneous recognition and feedback of social media.

Trumps false claims about election fraud and his rhetoric post-election urging his supporters to fight back is at the heart of the former presidents Senate impeachment trial, which is set to begin next week. The House of Representatives voted to impeach Trump on Jan. 13 after House Democrats filed an article of impeachment, charging him with "incitement of insurrection."

ABC News reached out to the former presidents legal team but representatives declined to comment.

Larry Rosenthal, chair and lead researcher of the Berkeley Center for Right-Wing Studies, said that the mob was generally made up of two groups: right-wing populists, whom he described as part of Trumps most faithful rally-goers, and right-wing militia groups that represent two overlapping currents of the far-right movement: white nationalism and anti-government.

President Donald Trump is seen on a screen as his supporters cheer during a rally Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C. Trump supporters gathered in the nation's capital today to protest the ratification of President-elect Joe Biden's Electoral College victory over President Trump in the 2020 election.

Some of these ideologies and beliefs were on display in far-right insignia scattered among the crowd, which included symbols of the Confederacy, Nazism, white supremacy and anarchy.

And some of those arrested have documented their alleged involvement on social media and some have known ties to far-right groups, or are adherents of disproven conspiracy theories.

In addition to a diverse and loose coalition of groups involved, the members of the mob were also not racially and ethnically homogenous.

Although the majority of rioters at the Stop the Steal rally were white, the Trump mob was not a homogenous group of white nationalists," Cristina Beltrn, a professor at New York University who studies race, ethnicity and American politics, said.

Jacob Chansley and other supporters of President Donald Trump are confronted by U.S. Capitol Police officers outside the Senate Chamber inside the Capitol in Washington, Jan. 6, 2021.

In fact, one of the organizers of Stop the Steal is far-right activist and conspiracy theorist Ali Alexander, who identifies as Arab and Black. Blacks for Trump signs were spotted in the crowd and some Black and Latino participants are now wanted by the FBI for their alleged involvement in the siege.

In order to understand Trumps support, we must think in terms of multiracial whiteness, Beltrn writes in a Washington Post op-ed: Multiracial whiteness reflects an understanding of whiteness as a political color and not simply a racial identity a discriminatory worldview in which feelings of freedom and belonging are produced through the persecution and dehumanization of others.

The motivations of the mob

After weeks of hearing false claims from Trump and his allies that the election was stolen, thousands of the former president's most loyal followers disrupted the certification of the 2020 election results by breaching the U.S. Capitol and clashing with law enforcement in a violent siege that resulted in the death of five people.

Supporters listen as US President Donald Trump speaks on The Ellipse outside of the White House, Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

This insistence -- and not just Trumps, but other elected officials insistence on that narrative of disinformation and that false conspiracy about the election has played a huge role in mobilizing these people, Miller-Idriss said.

In fact, chants shouted by rioters and signs spotted in the crowd closely mirrored Trumps own words.

For instance, the rally was named Stop the Steal, a phrase the Trump appeared to revel in and tweeted repeatedly before his account was suspended; shortly after Trump urged supporters to march to the Capitol and fight like hell, rioters shouted fight for Trump as they violently breached law enforcement to enter the building; signs reading take back our country and Trump won the legal vote were spotted among rioters, reflecting language Trump has been using for weeks on Twitter as he repeated his false claims that the election was stolen from him.

Member of a pro-Trump mob exit the Capitol Building after teargas is dispersed inside, Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington, D.C.

And finally, after Trump continued to falsely claim that Vice President Mike Pence could refuse to ratify President Joe Biden's 2020 win -- but had declined to do so, chants of Hang Mike Pence were heard among rioters and images casting Pence as a traitor were scattered among the crowd.

(Trump) was continuing to propagate and circulate and disseminate this information about the election in ways that posed an existential threat to them and made them feel that their democracy has been stolen, Miller-Idriss said.

"People move from radicalization into mobilization, to really believing that they are not only empowered to act, but compelled to do so.

People shelter in the House gallery as protesters try to break into the House Chamber at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington.

The leader of the mob

According to Rosenthal, far-right groups that subscribe to white nationalist ideologies have always existed in the United States and since the second era of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s and 30s they have generally existed on the fringes of society, but Trump gave them a place in national politics.

Trump supporters gather outside the U.S. Capitol, Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington.

Suddenly, in 2015 at the level of presidential politics, somebody is talking their language, he added, pointing to Trump's anti-immigrant and racially charged rhetoric.

During his presidency, Trump frequently failed to condemn white supremacists and far-right groups espousing hateful and disproven conspiracy theories. He also often galvanized their causes.

The Stop the Steal movement energized some of the same elements of the far-right movement in the U.S. that shaped the August 2017 Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville when hundreds of so-called alt-right groups took to the streets to violently protest the removal of Confederate monuments.

The Unite the Right [movement] failed. It did not create such a unified militia and the groups that put it together started falling apart among themselves the alt-right kind of went into decline, but 2020 resurrected things, Rosenthal said.

This past year, anti-lockdown and anti-mask demonstrations amid the COVID-19 pandemic inflamed the anti-government right-wing militia groups, while the Black Lives Matter protests that erupted over the summer following the police killing of George Floyd activated the white nationalist side of the far-right movement, Rosenthal added.

Supporters of President Donald Trump gather in the rain for a rally at Freedom Plaza, Jan. 5, 2021, in Washington, D.C., the day before a mob of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol following a rally with Trump.

And Trump, who was outspoken on both issues, elevated these positions to the national stage, experts said.

As president, Trump repeatedly downplayed the pandemic, refused to implement a nationwide mask mandate, mostly refused to wear a mask himself and his administration frequently flouted federal safety guidelines meant to curb the crisis.

Meanwhile, during his 2020 campaign, Trump cast himself as the law and order candidate, slammed the Black Lives Matter movement, dismissed concerns surrounding systemic racism and police brutality and in a message to voters, he claimed that if he is not re-elected, crime and riots will overtake the suburbs.

President Donald Trump arrives to speak at a rally Wednesday, Jan. 6, 2021, in Washington D.C.

During his final weeks in office, the coalition of far-right groups again found a common cause around the baseless cause that the election had been stolen or rigged.

The white nationalist and anti-government currents compounded in "Stop the Steal," along with an important element of "fascist mobilizations," Rosenthal said: "A devotion to a singular leader who can command their attention.

ABC News' Alexander Mallin and John Santucci contributed to this report.

Read the rest here:

Anatomy of the pro-Trump mob: How the former president's rhetoric galvanized a far-right coalition - ABC News

COMMENTARY: We can condemn and combat extremism without loosening the definition of terrorism – Global News

If we were setting out to compile a list of groups that we condemn or disapprove of, a strong case could be made for the inclusion of the Proud Boys. But Canadas list of banned terrorist entities does not exist as a vehicle for expressing such sentiments and we should not be using it as such.

This past week, 13 additional groups were added to that list. Of those inclusions, 12 were relatively non-controversial. The inclusion of the Proud Boys, however, raises some legitimate questions and concerns.

Yes, the group holds radical political views and seem to have a thirst for violence (an alt-right fight club is how theyre described by one prominent anti-hate group), but the terrorism bar needs to be set higher than that. Politicizing this process seems both unwise and potentially counterproductive.

Story continues below advertisement

While a strong case exists for describing neo-Nazi groups like Atomwaffen Division and The Base as terrorist organizations, the Proud Boys were the only ones who were the subject of a motion in the House of Commons calling for such a designation (the NDP proposed the motion, which MPs passed unanimously).

Its encouraging that our elected representatives take a dim view of far-right organizations, but this is a highly unusual intrusion into what should otherwise be a sober and objective process. It should not be influenced by the prevailing political attitudes of the moment.

Loosening the definition of terrorism could set a troubling precedent, one that could be abused for political purposes.

The Proud Boys indeed appear to have been involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol Hill insurrection. The events of that day certainly crystalize the threat posed by far-right political extremism. Again, though, thats not an excuse for political interference in this process. If anything, the rushed inclusion of the Proud Boys could prove embarrassing for the government.

Story continues below advertisement

While some Proud Boys members have been charged in connection with the insurrection, none of those charges have been proven in court. Absent any convictions, the case for listing the Proud Boys becomes much weaker.

Trending Stories

This rationale exposes two additional problems for the decision. The fact that those involved in the insurrection are now facing serious charges demonstrates how criminal law provides a means to deal with this sort of political extremism.

Furthermore, it exposes the arbitrary nature of the decision. For example, there are members of the far-right group known as the Oath Keepers who have also been charged in connection with the insurrection. Yet we have not listed the Oath Keepers as a terrorist organization, even though a similar case could be made.

Or, for that matter, why havent we listed the Three Percenters? Or the Soldiers of Odin? Or the Order of Nine Angles? Or the Boogaloo Bois? Or QAnon?

Some of these groups are more dangerous than others. Some are more organized that others (some may be considered more movements than actual groups). There are lone wolf actors who may subscribe to some or all of the beliefs of these groups. There is unquestionably a security threat that exists here, but a narrow counter-terrorism approach will leave many gaps.

Story continues below advertisement

Listing a group as a banned terrorist entity can provide some useful tools in targeting its leadership or disrupting its fundraising, but that has limited applications. The motion voted on in Parliament is rather vague with regard to these nuances as well as the broader question of how we deal with political extremism. It involves law enforcement, obviously, but also a broader de-radicalization approach. Ironically enough, it also involves political leaders.

The word terrorist is obviously a pejorative term, and so much of the conversation around the Proud Boys seems more about who can use the strongest language to denounce them than any sort of meaningful conversation about what these groups and movements represent and how we can counter them.

Politicizing counter-terrorism efforts only serves to erode public confidence in those efforts, as does making arbitrary decisions about which groups make the list and which do not. All of this may outweigh whatever marginal upside results from the listing of the Proud Boys.

This list is not a magic bullet and we not should rely on the listing process as our means of dealing with political extremism. Parliamentarians are right to be worried about groups like the Proud Boys, but their proposed solution which has now been acted upon misses the mark in many ways.

Rob Breakenridge is host of Afternoons with Rob Breakenridge on Global News Radio 770 Calgary and a commentator for Global News.

2021 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.

Excerpt from:

COMMENTARY: We can condemn and combat extremism without loosening the definition of terrorism - Global News

Fake Accounts Examines the Alluring Trap of Our Online Personas – The New York Times

Like Emma, Oylers narrator teeters on the border between likable and loathsome and possesses enormous reserves of intellectual and libidinal energy in search of an outlet. Emma is handsome, clever and rich; Oylers narrator is also those things, albeit in somewhat lesser form. And perhaps most significantly, she too is fumbling, a little blindly, around the problem of her privilege, which she is aware of but not yet existentially troubled by.

In the wake of the election, she observes that for her cohort, the incoming administration would not affect them particularly sweepingly and that in fact, being a white woman living in Brooklyn began to feel, very briefly, less repugnant; the white women living in Brooklyn, in the end, were ultimately just annoying, point-missing and distracting, not the biggest problem.

A somewhat retrograde cynic, a toxic presence, the narrator armors herself in wit, continually hedging her position and thus her engagement with the political tumult around her. She hesitates to go to the Womens March not because I was ideologically opposed to the idea necessarily but because it seemed there would be a lot of pink, which in a feminist context signaled to me a lack of rigor. Later, she refers to her story as a typical searching bourgeois-white-person narrative.

But this cynicism blunts her ability to navigate the world, and her own emotions, with catastrophic results. Her friends tell her shes overcompensating for my despair with snark; I didnt have to be so clever all the time. What was the point of making jokes, she wonders, frustrated and teary. The narrator repeatedly gestures at the limitations of her irony, without necessarily being able to see beyond it.

That sense of entrapment of not knowing how to relate to the world is central to the novel. Oyler is such a funny writer that it can be easy to overlook the fact that the underlying tone of her book is extreme disquiet. Irony provides no protection from unease, but is itself a source of it. It becomes clear why the novel takes place in the days after the 2016 election. This period brought the rapid ascent of the alt-right, the proliferation of its language and symbols. Notably, that language was one of plausible deniability, hate expressed under the cover of irony.

At first glance, that particular form of toxic irony seems miles away from the lacerating humor and thrusting intellect of our narrator. But cynicism leaves her vulnerable to misapprehending the world and the people in it including her very online, conspiracy theorist boyfriend. The reader grasps much earlier than she does not only the final layer of Felixs betrayals, but also the grim possibility that she fell in love with Felix not despite his deceptions but because of them that there is an uncomfortable alliance between her lazy nihilism and his reactionary online persona.

How do we relate to irony and cynicism in this new age of the alt-right? Stylish, despairing and very funny, Fake Accounts doesnt necessarily provide an answer to this question. But it adroitly maps the dwindling gap between the individual and the world. However much time the narrator spends alone, in her head and online, she is formed by what is happening outside. Eventually, the realization hits: The entire time, the call has been coming from inside the house.

Here is the original post:

Fake Accounts Examines the Alluring Trap of Our Online Personas - The New York Times

The KOIN.com Top 10 protest stories of 2020 – KOIN.com

PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) In 2020, Americans were touched in large and small ways by civil upheaval sparked by the death of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police. The public demonstrations that followed swung between peaceful but insistent demands for change to all-out riots that sometimes turned deadly.

Portland became one of the biggest protest stages in the country. The city captured the attention of people around the world as demonstrations repeatedly drew thousands of participants and marches choked off major freeways. People of all ages, colors, ethnicities and beliefs united under the banner of ending police brutality and seeking racial justice.

But the peaceful demonstrations of the daylight hours often devolved into violent turmoil once night fell. Vandalism and looting drew the attention of the nations top leaders, leading to the deployment of federal law enforcement officers. Clouds of tear gas suffocated the streets of Portland for nights on end. Downtown buildings wore sheets of plywood like armor as agitated groups stalked through neighborhoods.

Portland, Oregon once one of the most desirable cities in the country was often unrecognizable.

The protests of 2020 have left an indelible mark on the soul of America. They have challenged deep-seated beliefs, shined a glaring light on injustice, ignited heated discussions across social media and they have set a fire for change in the hearts of strangers, friends, family members, artists, students and politicians.

One thing is certain: America is looking in the mirror and examining its reflection with new eyes.

Here are the top 10 most-read stories about the protests on KOIN.com during 2020:

By mid-June, protests sparked by the death of George Floyd had entered into a third week in Portland. Many who were joining rallies and marches did so while respecting the law. Others didnt.

Late on June 18 the eve of Juneteenth a small group met at NE Sandy Boulevard and NE 57th Avenue at the site of a large bronze statue of George Washington. Some wrapped the statues head in an American flag and lit it on fire. More people joined the group until there were enough people to successfully topple the statue. A KOIN 6 News crew found the statue of the countrys first president covered in graffiti. It wasnt the first public statue in the city to be defaced and it wouldnt be the last.

Oregon State Police troopers were federally deputized by U.S. Marshals in late summer. State police said they were working with the U.S. Attorneys Office to review arrests made by troopers assigned to Portland for potential prosecution.

But the decision, which was made in response to the growing unrest in Portland, meant a deputized OSP trooper could arrest someone for a federal crime and turn the case over to a federal prosecutor instead of a state prosecutor. Doing so would essentially override Multnomah County District Attorney Mike Shmidts policy of limited prosecution for certain charges related to the ongoing protests.

The story spoke to the larger undertone of confusion as federal and local authorities jostled for control over how to respond to the protests.

In mid-July, a video of Navy veteran Chris David being beaten by federal officers took social media by storm. Shot by Portland Tribune reporter Zane Sparling, the video showed David wearing shorts, a baseball cap and a backpack being struck repeatedly by officers in riot gear outside the federal courthouse building in downtown Portland as tear gas wafts through the air.

David needed surgery to repair his hand and needed months off from work to recover. He told KOIN 6 News in October his sense of activism has significantly changed. The things I want to be, to advocate for: police reform, criminal justice reform.

As the summer drew to a close, tensions began to rekindle in the lead-up to the presidential election. A rally held by the far-right group Proud Boys drew scores of supporters, Donald Trump flags and militarized body armor.

Simultaneous rallies supporting the Black Lives Matter movement were held relatively nearby but remained separated by a large police presence. Authorities said they arrested four people over the course of the day.

Aaron Jay Danielson, 39, was shot and killed near clashes between supporters of President Donald Trump and counterprotesters in late August during a Trump 2020 Cruise Rally.

KOIN 6 News crews witnessed two people yelling and having an altercation near SW 3rd and Alder. Someone sprayed mace and then someone pulled out a gun. The crews heard shots fired, then a wounded man, later identified as Danielson, was seen on the ground and the suspect took off running.

A federal task force tracked the suspected shooter 48-year-old Michael Reinoehl to Lacey, Washington. Reinoehl was killed as the task force attempted to arrest him.

Protesters overturned statues of former Presidents Theodore Roosevelt and Abraham Lincoln in Downtown Portland on Oct. 11, with organizers calling the event Indigenous Peoples Day of Rage.

The event that quickly unraveled from demonstration to destructive protest to riot was deemed by the Portland Police Bureau as one of the most damaging nights of demonstrations in five months of nightly unrest.

After 87 straight nights of protests on the streets of Portland, the co-president of the Downtown Development Group penned a letter to Mayor Ted Wheeler and the members of the Portland City Council. In it, he listed company after company departing the central district of Portland.

Greg Goodman said the companies included Daimler Chrysler, AirB&B, Banana Republic, Microsoft (who he said is permanently closing their retail store), Saucebox and Google. Their departure, he said in the letter, has nothing to do with the Black Lives Matter movement but does have most everything to do with the lawlessness you are endorsing downtown.

Scott Asphaug, theFirst Assistant US Attorney for Oregon, stood outside the Hatfield Federal Courthouse in July after police had declared an unlawful assembly the previous night. Inside the fence surrounding the courthouse were bags of feces, commercial-grade fireworks, CS cans used by officers, debris from garbage fires, bricks, glass bottles and fluid cans for Molotov cocktails. The courthouse itself was covered in graffiti.

This building is supposed to represent justice and its drowning out the voices that should matter, which are the voices of social and racial justice taking place in Portland, and instead were talking about riots, Asphaug said. So the people who are doing the rioting are drowning out the voices that really need to be heard and thats just heartbreaking.

Billy Williams, the US Attorney for Oregon, said leadership was needed to put an end to this ongoing violence.

Look around. Do you think its OK? Is there any justification on this? I hope not. Portland is losing its soul right now, he said.

Well-known right-wing protester and Proud Boys member Alan Swinney was arrested by Portland police on Sept. 30 after an indictment was issued on September 11. According to the district attorneys office, the indictment alleges Swinney fired a paintball gun at another person at a protest on August 15. That paintball shot caused physical harm to the individual. He is also accused of unlawfully using mace or a similar substance against another person and attempting to assault others on the same day.

The 50-year-old later pleaded not guilty to 12 total charges, including multiple for assault, unlawful use of a weapon, pointing a firearm at another person and unlawful use of mace.

On July 19, hours after rioters broke into the building that houses the Portland Police Association offices and set a fire, a passel of community leaders and activists begged for an end to the violence that had gripped the city for nearly two months.

Our community has had enough. Our business owners have had enough. Officers have had enough and Portland has had enough, said PPA President Daryl Turner at a press conference. This is no longer about George Floyd. This is no longer about racial equity about racial justice. This is no longer about reform or the evolution of policing. This is about violence, rioting, destruction, chaos, anarchy.

Follow KOIN 6 for the latest news and weather

Go here to see the original:

The KOIN.com Top 10 protest stories of 2020 - KOIN.com