Planting Justices Prison Abolition Work Starts at the …

The same thoughts keep running through his mind. That guy sitting in his cell wondering if hes going to outlive his sentence, all the amends he made or wants to makewill he get to see that through? Will he get to be like me and the numerous other people who are formerly incarcerated and are doing great things in the community right now? I think about them and that my voice has to be in advocacy for them.

B

eyond the urgency of the San Quentin COVID outbreak, Lockhearts day-to-day work at Planting Justice is about the longterm project of prison abolition, which means working with people to build healthier communities. The definition of that is manifold. It means helping formerly incarcerated people get on their feet through green jobs at Planting Justice, awakening them to a new sense of purpose by building raised flower beds for clients and tending to plants at the organizations nursery and farm. It means teaching about sustainability and food justice in public school classrooms, juvenile detention centers, jails and prisons. It means helping people who live in food deserts start urban gardens. It means handing out free kale smoothies at Castlemont High School during a time when many are going hungry because of the pandemic-induced recession.

If we go in and teach these people how to grow their own food and how to be sustainablethe Black Panther Party got it right, Lockheart says. With no food and no options, [people are] gonna go get it how they can. And unfortunately, thats crime. And crime equals prison. We wanna abolish the prisons, we wanna abolish all these systems, but we first have to plant the seeds of love, trust and sustainability.

Lockheart and his fellow reentry coordinator Diane Williams sow those seeds by helping their colleagues get acclimated to life outside of prison, sometimes in ways people whove never been incarcerated may take for granted. Planting Justice gives former residents, as formerly incarcerated people are called there, clothing and food stipends; Lockheart and Williams help them navigate bureaucratic tasks such as reinstating a drivers license after a DUI. They offer emotional support too. Meditation circles are as much a part of the workday as pulling weeds and watering strawberries and squashes.

Really its believing in them and whatever they bring to the table thats positive, encourage that, says Williams, who brings 40 years of social work and substance-abuse counseling experience to Planting Justice. So much stuff that happened to us as a little kids, we keep recycling it as adults until we process it and move on. So were just helping each other move on here.

P

lanting Justice takes a big-picture view of how access to healthy and environmentally conscious practices can help address some of the wounds of systemic racism and mass incarceration. Another one of the organizations projects zooms out even further, addressing the ways the unjust systems that marginalize Black and Indigenous communities began with colonialism.

The organization collaborated with the Sogorea Te Land Trust to give two acres of land back to people of the Ohlone community of Northern California. The Ohlone people arent a federally recognized tribe, nor do they have a land base. Now, two acres of the Rolling River Nursery are an Ohlone cultural heritage site and a space for ceremony.

Williams, who is part of the Native American community and helped organize the partnership, says that Ohlone ideas of land as sacred inform Planting Justices work. Its a love, she says. You cant tell people, Youve got to love this land because its supporting you. No. Its something you have to develop for people whove been separated from the land.

Understanding the history of colonization is the deeper work, echoes Planting Justice media director Ashley Yates. When you control the land, you control the people, you control the resources. And when were talking about BIPOC communities, you understand theres also a disconnect thats intentional because our spirituality and our communities are vested in the earth. We are an earth-reverent people. So when you disconnect people from that, you disconnect people from their power.

See original here:

Planting Justices Prison Abolition Work Starts at the ...

Portland Activist Calls for ‘Abolition’ of the United States

On Friday, before the fiftieth night of violent antifa riots, a protester who identified herself as an Afro-Indigenous non-binary local organizer declared that she is advocating for the abolition of the United States as we know it. This brief declaration arguably encapsulates the destructive spirit of antifa and the impetus behind the violent riots that have ravaged the streets of Portland.

My name isLilithSinclair, Im an Afro-Indigenous non-binary local organizer here in Portland, organizing for the abolition of not just the militarized police state but also the United States as we know it, Sinclair declares in a brief video that went viral on Twitter. She also called Portland stolen land, proceeding to give Native Americans a land acknowledgment. By the way, she also identifies herself as a sex worker, i.e. a prostitute.

By Afro-Indigenous, Sinclair likely means she has black and Native American ancestors. By non-binary, she insists that she does not fall into the binary understanding of biological sex as male or female. In an interview with thePortland Mercury last month, Sinclair argued that Americans have to deconstruct the colonized thought that white oppressors supposedly foisted upon racial minorities.

Weve been working to heal these intergenerational wounds of colonization and genocide for generations. But theres still a lot of work to undo the harm of colonized thought that has been pushed onto Black and indigenous communities, Sinclair told the newspaper. Thats in regards to Christianity, and in regards to all of these different types of oppressive systems that have introduced and enforced the gender binary on communities that did not ascribe to that way of thinking, including indigenous communities both Native American and across Africa.

She spoke about coming out as non-binary, saying it involved unlearning the harm through colonization that Ive been introduced to, but also about making space for our elders who have been fighting the fight for a long time, to try to teach them to see past the colonization path as well. My gender journey took being surrounded by a lot of other Black trans and nonbinary revolutionaries who really helped me unlearn cultural expectations, and the forced performed femininity thats expected in sex work.

Sinclairs call to abolish the United States as we know it is not just a fluke of one speech she gave in Portland. Last month, she told theMercury, I work on abolitionist principles because I know the United States was founded on genocide. I know that there is clearly no respect for the sanctity of human life. She argued that Americas involvement in foreign countries is not leadershipits imperialism and neocolonialism dressed up in a way to make people forget the genocide.

She concluded by celebrating the Stonewall Riots in 1969, now celebrated in June (designated Pride month) as the beginning of the LGBT movement. I think its apt that we are looking at a global uprising against oppressive structures during the month where we celebrate the anniversary of another uprisinganother movement to not just ask for but to demand our rights, she said.

Sinclair believes that white oppression is so ingrained in the minds and attitudes of supposedly oppressed people that they have to unlearn the colonized thought of Christianity and the gender binary which is rooted in the scientific binary of biological sex. She seems to believe that certain cultural expectations rooted in the genocide upon which America was founded have brainwashed her and she needs to unlearn basic truths like the fact that people are male or female.

This comes from Marxist critical theory, which analyzes the world in terms of power and oppression. The evils perpetrated against both black slaves and Native Americans supposedly sully the entire American project, which must be uprooted in order for people to be truly free.

This is nonsense. While black people and Native Americans struggle with various pathologies, American society has taken great strides to level the playing field and ensure equal opportunities. The system is not perfect, but it is not rooted in preserving slavery and genocide.

Yet Sinclair believes this because so many powerful institutions teach it. Just last month, the SmithsoniansNational Museum of African American History and Culture (NMAAHC) released a horrifying Marxist lesson on whiteness that deconstructed various aspects of American and Western culture, including capitalism, science, the nuclear family, and Christianity, as nefarious relics of white supremacy. The lesson also claims that a work ethic, delayed gratification, being polite, and getting to meetings on time are aspects of the whiteness culture that must be deconstructed and rejected.

To call this throwing the baby out with the bathwater would be an understatement. In fact, nefarious teachings like this actually encourage black people to reject basic standards of hard work, delayed gratification, politeness, and timeliness that are essential for getting ahead in a free-market society or almost any society, for that matter.

This experiment in Marxist critical theory also emerges inThe New York Timess 1619 Project, which claims that Americas true founding came in 1619 with the arrival of the first slaves, rather than in 1776 with the Declaration of Independence. According to this theory, every aspect of American society must be examined and uprooted in the interest of racial justice.

When vandals toppled a statue of George Washington in Portland, they spray-painted 1619 on the statue. When Claremonts Charles Kesler wrote inThe New York Post Call them the 1619 riots, the projects founder, Nikole Hannah-Jones, responded (in a since-deleted tweet) that it would be an honor to claim responsibility for the destructive riots and the defamation of American Founding Fathers like George Washington.

In a November 9, 1995 op-ed, the 1619 Project founder condemned Christopher Columbus as no different from Adolf Hitler and demonized the white race as the true savages and bloodsuckers. She went on to describe white Americas dream as colored Americas nightmare. Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) expressed a similar sentiment when she called for the dismantling of Americas economy and political system, in order to root out supposed racist oppression.

Yet the 1619 riots have arguably oppressed black people far more than the U.S. supposedly does. The riots have destroyedblack lives, black livelihoods, and black monuments. At least 22 Americans have died in the riots, most of them black.Retired police chief David Dorn was killed by looters breaking into his pawnshop in St. Louis. Chris Beaty was shot while helping two women who were being mugged in Indianapolis. Antonio Mays Jr., a 16-year-old boy, was shot and killed outside the Capitol Hill Occupied Protest (CHOP) in Seattle. Secoriea Taylor an 8-year-old girl! was fatally shot as her mother attempted to park a car near a group of protesters close to the Wendys where Rayshard Brooks had been killed by police.

Lilith Sinclair likely has the best of intentions for her advocacy thats what makes it so tragic. Indeed, she told theMercury that she cares a great deal about providing essential goods and services to help her community.

Yet this advocacy for the abolition of the United States, her rejection of colonized thought, and her goal to expunge the genocide of Americas founding are truly dangerous. She has brainwashed herself and she is fighting to destroy a country that has brought an unprecedented degree of freedom and prosperity to its citizens and to the world.

After the rally that Lilith Sinclair addressed, rioters launched fireworks and other incendiary devices near the Portland Police Bureau as others walked the streets with katanas. The next day, antifa rioters set fire to the police union and again attacked the federal courthouse and Justice Center. Portland is a war zone, thanks in large part to this noxious critical theory.

Tyler ONeil is the author ofMaking Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center. Follow him on Twitter at@Tyler2ONeil.

Read more:

Portland Activist Calls for 'Abolition' of the United States

How will Brexit impact recruitment? – Lexology

As Brexit resurfaces in the news, we look at how it will impact recruitment practices, from the government's proposed new points-based immigration system for EU and non-EU nationals to attracting and developing talent.

Points-based immigration

As things stand, free movement of people between the UK and the rest of the EU will end on 31 December 2020. Individuals who are resident in the UK on or before then based on EU free movement rules can apply to the EU Settlement Scheme if they wish to continue to lawfully live and work in the UK. Employers would be wise to carry out staff audits to identify who may be impacted.

From 1 January 2021, a new immigration system will apply that will cover both EU and non-EU nationals meaning EU nationals arriving in the UK after this date will need a visa to live and work in the UK. Those who have been granted status under the Settlement Scheme will continue to be governed by the rules of that scheme.

Under the proposed new points-based immigration system for both EU and non-EU nationals, some eligibility criteria will be mandatory but other characteristics would be tradeable so that an applicant could offset certain strengths against certain weaknesses to meet the overall points threshold. As part of these proposals, the controversial resident labour market test would be abolished meaning that mandatory advertising to the resident UK workforce would no longer be legally required.

Sponsorship

The need for a sponsor job offer will add time and as yet unspecified expense to existing recruitment processes. However, there are a number of aspects under the proposed new scheme that would actually make sponsorship of non-EU/EEA/Swiss nationals easier.

The abolition of the resident labour market test would allow for broader and more innovative advertising, rather than the current prescribed locations and format. The minimum skill level of sponsored workers will also drop, as will the general minimum salary threshold, increasing the pool of non-EU workers that can theoretically be sponsored. The government has also proposed to remove the cap on the number of visas that can be issued under the current system.

There is an important exception to the rule, in that a proposed global talent visa category will allow the most highly skilled workers without a job offer primarily with a background in STEM subjects to come to the UK. Other non-sponsorship routes are also being considered.

Competing for UK-based talent

The proposed changes to the immigration system have the potential to make already competitive recruitment processes that much harder for individuals especially for senior posts. Employers may have to rethink the way they attract talent in order to stand out from the crowd.

Given the current economic situation and anticipated downturn, employers would be wise to focus on what they can offer prospective employees other than pure salary especially as salaries could decrease in relative terms. Many employees will gauge employers by the benefits they offer.

Employers who promote work-life balance through flexible working for example are likely to be attractive to job seekers, especially following the change in working patterns for many people as a result of Covid-19. Similarly, being able to evidence a positive culture that makes employees feel valued and supported is likely to have a significant impact on employee retention levels.

Developing existing talent

The new immigration system will arguably make it easier for employers to employ non-UK nationals in more senior or highly skilled roles. As such, employers will likely be more concerned with how they fill perceived staffing gaps for so-called low skilled roles.

The government has urged employers to develop their own UK-based staff and look to the economically inactive to fill the gaps created once their access to low-skilled EU labour is cut off. Employers could consider if their current recruitment processes act as a barrier to talent and look to widen their existing recruitment criteria and target demographics if this is the case. Many employers have already recognised that there are untapped resources out there, for example women who have left work to raise children and who may now be looking to return to a work environment.

Low skilled or entry level roles that do not require particular skills could be used as training and development opportunities to improve staff retention. Likewise, apprenticeship schemes or graduate programmes could benefit younger workers who can learn the skills they need on the job.

While additional investment in training will incur further cost, this may be more palatable than the costly and often time consuming process of recruiting skilled workers from overseas.

Future trends

In the longer term, automating certain jobs or roles, such as repetitive manufacturing processes may help employers to deal with challenging recruitment conditions and increase productivity. However, it should be approached on a case by case basis, as certain roles will not be suitable for machines alone and will always require an element of human involvement.

The current economic downturn is likely to mean less people are looking to move jobs, but employers should work to better understand what drives their existing workforce and how to keep them engaged. Salary is not always the determining factor management, targets, workload and culture may be just as important. Employee surveys and informal feedback opportunities are relatively low cost, low effort ways of facilitating this and signposting where employers could do better in managing staff turnover.

Right to work checks are an obvious but often overlooked consideration. UK employers are required to conduct right to work checks on all prospective employees. They must retain clear records of workers' rights to work in the UK in either prescribed electronic form or hard copy, for the duration of the employment and for a period of two years afterwards. The way EU/EEA/Swiss nationals prove their right to work in the UK will undoubtedly change when the new immigration system is implemented in 2021, and new guidance on right to work checks is expected before then.

View original post here:

How will Brexit impact recruitment? - Lexology

Assembly Recognizies Abolition Commemoration Day and Juneteenth – The Lansing Star Online – Lansing Star

"African American history has too often been overlooked, whitewashed and relegated to the confines of a single month," Heastie said. "I am proud to serve in this incredibly diverse legislative body, and one that continues to work to represent the diversity of our people and our history. I am also proud that today I can tell Association for the Study of African American Life and History New York State Director Bessie Jackson, a constituent of mine who for years has advocated for the recognition of Abolition Day, that her hard work has finally paid off."

Legislation passed today would establish Abolition Commemoration Day, which would be observed on the second Monday in July. This commemorates the Abolition Act, which passed the New York State Legislature on March 31, 1817 and abolished slavery effective July 4, 1827. Abolition Commemoration Day, not only marks the end of slavery in New York, but also honors the bravery and sacrifices of abolitionists (A.10831, Pretlow).

"Slavery was not an institution confined to the south New York had its own long history with its cruelty and horrors. Our state also has a legacy of abolitionists like Frederick Douglass and Harriet Tubman and countless others," Pretlow said. "By recognizing Abolition Commemoration Day, we remember and shed light on both sides of Black and African American history, and New York State's history, including the parts that are too often glossed over."

"Freedom was never given, it was fought for. Today marks the creation of a new holiday Abolition Commemoration Day to recognize the end of slavery in New York State and a start to teaching our full uncompromised history. New York was one of the largest slave-holding states in this country and we are convinced that a civilized state should do no less than spend at least one day a year in atonement for its participation in the horror, fear and trauma that sustained slavery for more than 200 years. We are proud to have led this fight and stand with the entire state legislature to recognize the sacrifices of African Americans and other abolitionists in their fight for freedom," said Bessie M. Jackson, NYS Director of the Association for the Study of African American Life and History.

Also passed was legislation that would recognize Juneteenth as a public holiday in New York State. Juneteenth, June 19th, marks the day Union General Gordon Granger and federal troops arrived in Galveston, Texas, taking control of the state and enforcing the Emancipation Proclamation. Today, Juneteenth commemorates Black and African American freedom and achievements, while encouraging continuous self-development and respect for all cultures (A.10628, Hyndman).

"It is long past time that we commemorate and honor important dates in Black history," Hyndman said. "Juneteenth must be recognized across the country as a public holiday, and I am proud that, working with my colleagues, we are able to mark a piece of Black liberation on the calendar and in our cultural consciousness here in New York State. The hope is that this day is celebrated far and wide."

v16i30

View original post here:

Assembly Recognizies Abolition Commemoration Day and Juneteenth - The Lansing Star Online - Lansing Star

Philly Landlord Tenant Officer married to eviction court judge – WHYY

The story of Shuters ascendancy to Landlord and Tenant Officer is the latest chapter in a nearly 50-year-old failure to reform Philadelphias eviction process.

A unique feature in Pennsylvania, the citys current Landlord and Tenant Office dates back to 1970 and was initially introduced as a civil reform to the citys ancient constabulary system. That 17th-century system of appointing men to handle tax collection and court service had, by the 20th century, lost many traditional powers due to government reorganization. By the 1960s, people elected to constable positions in Philadelphia functioned primarily as politically connected bounty hunters, charged with enforcing court eviction orders for profit often by any means necessary.

During that decade, the constabulary system became a lightning rod for criticism over graft and lack of oversight. Renters routinely reported being harassed out of their homes or evicted without cause. The men doing the evictions held constable sales or distress sales to recoup their costs and time, auctioning off furniture or clothing belonging to displaced tenants.

A 1965 state attorney generals inquest into the system recommended abolishing the positions and transferring their duties wholesale to the city Sheriffs Office.

[Philadelphias] constables are engaging in practices designed to terrify the average citizen, the report reads, describing many constables as glorified bill collectors operating under official marque.

Sam Stretton, a longtime ethics lawyer in Philadelphia, said he recalled now-deceased U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter making a case for dismantling the constabulary system as a central plank of his campaigns for Philadelphia District Attorney in the 1960s.

It was the wild west out there, he said, of the constables. It was bribes and everything else.

Outcry and a court injunction followed an episode in 1969 in which a constable sought to auction the furniture of a North Philadelphia family that put rental payments in escrow after the inspectors deemed their landlords property unfit for human habitation. In a subsequent lawsuit, filed by legal aid group Community Legal Services, federal courts ruled these sales unconstitutional, ordering the abolition of Philadelphias constabulary offices and the judicial appointment of theoretically more formalized Landlord and Tenant officers.

But the ensuing reform soon became a source of controversy itself. And the new system quickly came to resemble the old.

One of the first Landlord and Tenant officers, Edward A. Green, was sued by Community Legal Services for attempting in 1970 to shake down tenants for travel costs and service fees on top of what he was legally allowed to collect. Al Sacks, another Landlord and Tenant officer himself a former constable was also sued by the legal nonprofit in 1986 for allegedly bilking tenants into paying bogus legal fees.

The legislative reformsput the Landlord and Tenant Officers in Philadelphia in the same position as the constables were prior to those reforms, lamented plaintiffs in the suit against Green.

By the late 1980s, the position came under the aegis of the law firm of Robert H. Messerman. This attorney was appointed by Marisa Shuters father, former President Judge Silberstein, who presided over Municipal Court from 1986 to 1999. Messerman would hold this appointment for nearly 30 years.

Reached by phone in July, the attorney said he could recall few details of the offices operations. But records show Messerman subcontracted much of the eviction work to surrogates. A so-called deputy landlord-tenant officer that was shot and killed in a 1990s dispute with a West Philadelphia tenant was later revealed to be a contract worker paid by Messerman, according to an Inquirer report. A later lawsuit filed against Messermans office indicated that work was also sometimes subbed out to a local process service firm called B&R Services for Professionals, Inc.

Meanwhile, Silbersteins daughter, Marisa Shuter, graduated from Temple Universitys Beasley School of Law in 1993 and soon went to work in the family trade administering the citys court system. After a stint as an associate in the real estate department at Blank Rome, she began her career in the court system. While her father served as Municipal Courts president judge, the court hired her as a law clerk around 1996. She later joined Messermans office in 2006, serving as a staff attorney and office manager, according to First Judicial District spokesperson Marty ORourke.

When Messerman eventually retired from his post as Landlord and Tenant Officer, Marisa Shuter was appointed by then-President Judge Marsha Neifield Williams to replace him in January 2017.

Today, she runs the office much as Messerman did, relying on independent contractors to do the heavy lifting of writ service. ORourke said all these people are formally deputized, but court rules do not require them to be trained or certified law enforcement.

The court does not require the Landlord-Tenant Officer or the Deputy Landlord-Tenant Officers to meet any specific law enforcement credentials, ORourke said.

Marisa Shuter said, in practice, many did have a background in police work or had served as suburban magisterial constables. She reiterated that she requires deputies to have a license to carry a firearm, own a vehicle and that all received significant job training.

I personally explain all of the laws to them and the process from start to finish, she wrote. They ride along with an experienced deputy for a period of time before being assigned to handle evictions on their own so that they can learn the job.

Michael Williams, a Philadelphia housing attorney, said the distinction between these deputies and actual law enforcement was often vague.

Sometimes tenants will call them the sheriff, but thats wrong, Williams said. Theyre from the landlord-tenant office. Sometimes, they will still refer to themselves as constables.

Some, like ethics lawyer Sam Stretton, said the courts shouldnt be empowering private entities with little duty to disclose information to the public to force residents from their homes.

This office is held out as part of the government when, in fact, its a private law firm, he said. Theres still no standards. They could just get some monster, and say hes just the toughest guy I found.

See the rest here:

Philly Landlord Tenant Officer married to eviction court judge - WHYY

Decolonizing the Curriculum: The Black Lives Matter Approach to History – The College Post

Somewhere in the fireworks and star-spangled attire of every Fourth of July lies an all-too-familiar historical script. Americans never tire of tales in which their freedom-loving forefathers took a stand against British tyranny and asserted their right to independence.

But the window dressing has invited more scrutiny than usual in 2020. In a curious adaptation of the traditional story, protesters threw Christopher Columbus into a Baltimore harbor this year. So much for the Boston Tea Party.

Between 15 million and 26 million Americans are estimated to have participated in Black Lives Matter protests since late May. This makes BLM the largest movement in the nations history and marks a sea change in racial attitudes. Most Americans, regardless of skin color, now agree that racial and ethnic discrimination in their country is a big problem.

Racism, however, is not confined to Americas borders or history. As a result, BLM has not just drawn support from around the world. Recent protests have prompted other countries, like the United Kingdom, to confront their own checkered legacies on race.

This takes us to the heart of the British capital, where University College London (UCL) is working to change the way it teaches history and thinks about its own past.

In 2018, the Royal Historical Society published a landmark report documenting significant and disproportionate levels of discrimination, bias and harassment towards Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) history students and researchers. Led by UCLs own Margot Finn, the RHS concluded that BME historians feel unwelcome and underrepresented in their field. This stems in part from a pervasive unwillingness to grapple with the uncomfortable aspects of white, Eurocentric curricula.

The reluctance to reevaluate traditional teaching methods contrasts with what British universities say they are willing to do in the name of racial justice. When surveyed this year, 84 universities declared a general commitment to making their curricula more diverse, international or inclusive. Only 24 were actually committed to decolonising their curricula.

According to Meera Sabaratnam, Senior Lecturer in International Relations at the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, decolonization can mean several things. It rests, however, upon a willingness to challenge our shared assumptions about how the world is.

Universities can do this, for example, by providing greater representation of non-Western thinkers: Is it acceptable if writings and teachings about international regions or global affairs are done almost exclusively by writers from or based within the West?

But while representation is important, it is only one piece of the puzzle. Decolonising a curriculum requires scrutiny of what universities prioritize learning about, the models that they use to learn it, and the classroom culture that is created as a result.

All of these things contribute to an attainment gap in degree results between BME and white students that persists even at universities that pride themselves on diversity.

Decolonization is a difficult and comprehensive process, but it is what the RHS report concluded is necessary to redress systemic inequities in the field of history. Universities must not only include and draw attention to the work of BME historians, though that too is important.

Universities must make race and ethnicity essential topics of discussion while dissecting white histories and Eurocentric approaches.

Joe Cozens, a British historian at UCL, explained to The College Post what that might look like.

Diversifying the writers and central themes of British history, Cozens said, is how we facilitate more meaningful discussions on race and ethnicity than traditional curricula would permit.

I encourage my students to engage with the likes of C.L.R. James, Ron Ramdin, and Paul Gilroy, he said, and recently I have added Shirin Hirschs In the Shadow of Enoch Powell and Priya Gopals Insurgent Empire to my reading lists. All are celebrated BME colonial and postcolonial historians.

I have also integrated the themes of race, ethnicity, and migration into the broader story of social and political change in the long nineteenth century, referring to the period between 1789 and 1914.

Asked about how the role of his classroom in todays social climate, Cozens turned to a familiar topic.

I encourage students to think deeply and critically about the purpose of policing in the past and to consider what police reform in the future might look like. These issues seem all the more vital in the context of the Black Lives Matter movement.

Department Head Eleanor Robson elaborated on how historians at UCL are tackling Britains whitewashed past from several angles.

Were the only History Department in the country that offers a programme of truly global history from antiquity to modernity, and are world leaders in the history of slavery and abolition, empire and post-colonialism, Robson told The College Post.

Our flagship Centre for the Legacies of British Slave-Ownership has been dominating the national news in recent weeks, she added as an example.

The Centre is known for tracing the beneficiaries of Britains Slave Compensation Act of 1837, which compensated slave owners for the abolition of slavery. Insurance market Lloyds of London and Greene King, the largest pub chain in the country, recently apologized and pledged charity donations to minority communities after some of their founding members were revealed to have been compensated by the law.

While the department has ramped up its reassessment of policies and teaching methods since the RHS report was released in 2018, it started doing so long before. In fact, Robson said, UCL historians have been working to decolonize their curricula since before the Black Lives Matter movement began in 2013.

Still, another challenge for reform-oriented educators is to diversify what it means to study BME history in the first place. According to the RHS report, there is a seemingly relentless focus on enslavement, abolition and exploitation.

This is especially important to keep in mind as calls to reform British history education extend beyond universities. In the wake of recent protests, The Black Curriculum, an education reform group, has seen a surge in support for their nationwide campaign to make teaching black history mandatory in secondary schools.

"When I was at school, as a Black British girl, I couldnt see myself in the history books; none of my ancestors were there and our stories werent toldhow important can my culture be if it wasnt even taught in schools?" @GraziaUK #TBH365https://t.co/5SVUkzE11w

The Black Curriculum (@CurriculumBlack) July 20, 2020

It is also something to keep in mind as UCLs history department expands opportunities to study Native American, Caribbean, East Asian, and African history this year. This also includes a new postgraduate program in Black British History at Goldsmiths, University of London.

Departmental culture has also become an area of scrutiny. According to the RHS report, demeaning comments and stereotypes inhibit the success of BME scholars and further contribute to the attainment gap.

As a result, all students and Teaching Assistants will undergo inclusivity training this year as part of an initiative from the departments Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion Committee, which Robson chairs.

The department will also provide a new support network for BME staff and students amid complaints of inappropriate comments and behavior. The network, however, has declined to give details about how it will operate and how students can get involved.

After two years of implementing the recommendations of the RHS report, the department will soon audit its progress. But while not complacent, Robson said it has certainly moved in the right direction.

And considering that decolonizing a curriculum is not something that happens overnight, as Lecturer Sabaratnam wrote, such steps alone are laudable. The history departments recent reforms reflect a sensitivity to increasingly vocal demands for systemic change.

Supporting the now-global cause of racial justice manifests itself in many ways. In this case, the UCL history department is doing so by scrutinizing its traditional teachings and addressing inattention to its own underrepresented BME scholars.

See the original post here:

Decolonizing the Curriculum: The Black Lives Matter Approach to History - The College Post

Director Clement Virgo on the renewed resonance of ‘The Book of Negroes’ – The Chronicle Journal

TORONTO - When Clement Virgo saw the video of a white police officer pressing his knee on a Black man's neck, he recognized the image immediately.

The visual horror of George Floyd's death is seared into our collective consciousness, the Canadian director says, because it's symbolic of a hateful, ongoing history.

"That's not the first time that image has occurred," said Virgo. "It's happened since slavery all the way through today, where voices of individuals were suppressed with a knee on the neck."

Virgo predicts that past and present racist violence will shape the way viewers see his 2015 miniseries, "The Book of Negroes," when it returns to CBC for a three-part encore broadcast from Sunday to Tuesday.

Based on Canadian author Lawrence Hill's acclaimed novel, the six-episode epic follows Aminata Diallo, played by Aunjanue Ellis, from her abduction from her West African village as a child, through her lifelong struggle to escape enslavement in the U.S. and return home.

Revisiting the show, Virgo said he was struck by the modern parallels to our current reckoning with systemic racism.

"We're in a climate now where the dominant conversation is around how do we reconcile our history, and how do we move forward in the future," said Virgo, 54.

"What is the most equitable way to recognize that history and to acknowledge that there has been suffering and that there has been pain?"

Before reading "The Book of Negroes," the Toronto-based filmmaker said he had to overcome his own resistance to the idea of telling a so-called "slave story."

But at the urging of jazz singer Molly Johnson, he decided to give the book a shot. In it, he found a female-led adventure, a love story and an unknown history that echoed his own.

Raised in Jamaica amid the political violence of the 1970s, Virgo's family immigrated to Canada when he was 11. He said he related to Aminata's emotional journey of being uprooted from home, and striving to find her place in a new world.

Virgo said he initially planned to adapt "The Book of Negroes" as a film, but despite the 2007 novel being an international hit, he struggled to find financing.

CBC was first to come on board, he said, and partnered with American channel Black Entertainment Television to develop the script into a miniseries.

Big-name actors such as Cuba Gooding Jr. and Louis Gossett Jr. signed on to star in the project. The shoot proved to be as sprawling as its source material, filming on locations from South Africa to Nova Scotia.

As a director, Virgo said he had to be mindful about how to depict the brutal violence of slavery in a way that honoured its painful history without veering into traumatization, particularly given that he was working with Canadian child actress Shailyn Pierre-Dixon for the first episode.

"I don't want to present a catalogue of horrors to the audience, but I want them to psychologically and emotionally feel and identify and recognize the injustice," he said.

"It's not so much about seeing the violence ... but feeling that pain."

While it was a long road to wrapping production, Virgo said when his mother saw the series, she reminded him why it was all worth it.

"She said, 'That's why I immigrated to Canada, so you could make this series,'" Virgo recalled.

"It was one of the most satisfying experiences of my life."

"The Book of Negroes" draws its title from a real historical record of 3,000 Black refugees, many of them former slaves, who were resettled in Nova Scotia after siding with the British during the American Revolutionary War.

Virgo said he'd like to see more of Canada's Black history shown onscreen.

Working across the border, Virgo said there's a stronger sense that stories of Black struggle and survival are part of U.S. identity. Here, he said, entertainment executives pay lip service to increasing diversity, but often treat projects led by people of colour as "charity work."

"(Black) history is not a separate history. It's integral and integrated into the fabric of Canada," he said.

"I'm hoping that in Canada, it becomes a part of our ecosystem. That it's not just an afterthought."

The first instalment of the "The Book of Negroes" airs on CBC on Sunday. It'll be preceded by a one-hour TV special, "Being Black in Canada," featuring interviews with Virgo, Hill and some of the show's stars.

The broadcast is part of CBC's special programming in honour of Emancipation Day on Aug. 1, the anniversary of the abolition of slavery across the British Empire.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2020.

Read more:

Director Clement Virgo on the renewed resonance of 'The Book of Negroes' - The Chronicle Journal

Clement Virgo revisits ‘The Book of Negroes’ – The Flamborough Review

Raised in Jamaica amid the political violence of the 1970s, Virgo's family immigrated to Canada when he was 11. He said he related to Aminata's emotional journey of being uprooted from home, and striving to find her place in a new world.

Virgo said he initially planned to adapt "The Book of Negroes" as a film, but despite the 2007 novel being an international hit, he struggled to find financing.

CBC was first to come on board, he said, and partnered with American channel Black Entertainment Television to develop the script into a miniseries.

Big-name actors such as Cuba Gooding Jr. and Louis Gossett Jr. signed on to star in the project. The shoot proved to be as sprawling as its source material, filming on locations from South Africa to Nova Scotia.

As a director, Virgo said he had to be mindful about how to depict the brutal violence of slavery in a way that honoured its painful history without veering into traumatization, particularly given that he was working with Canadian child actress Shailyn Pierre-Dixon for the first episode.

"I don't want to present a catalogue of horrors to the audience, but I want them to psychologically and emotionally feel and identify and recognize the injustice," he said.

"It's not so much about seeing the violence ... but feeling that pain."

While it was a long road to wrapping production, Virgo said when his mother saw the series, she reminded him why it was all worth it.

"She said, 'That's why I immigrated to Canada, so you could make this series,'" Virgo recalled.

"It was one of the most satisfying experiences of my life."

"The Book of Negroes" draws its title from a real historical record of 3,000 Black refugees, many of them former slaves, who were resettled in Nova Scotia after siding with the British during the American Revolutionary War.

Virgo said he'd like to see more of Canada's Black history shown onscreen.

Working across the border, Virgo said there's a stronger sense that stories of Black struggle and survival are part of U.S. identity. Here, he said, entertainment executives pay lip service to increasing diversity, but often treat projects led by people of colour as "charity work."

"(Black) history is not a separate history. It's integral and integrated into the fabric of Canada," he said.

"I'm hoping that in Canada, it becomes a part of our ecosystem. That it's not just an afterthought."

The first instalment of the "The Book of Negroes" airs on CBC on Sunday. It'll be preceded by a one-hour TV special, "Being Black in Canada," featuring interviews with Virgo, Hill and some of the show's stars.

The broadcast is part of CBC's special programming in honour of Emancipation Day on Aug. 1, the anniversary of the abolition of slavery across the British Empire.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 24, 2020.

By Adina Bresge, The Canadian Press

Excerpt from:

Clement Virgo revisits 'The Book of Negroes' - The Flamborough Review

Radical roundup: 10 stories that got buried this week – Left Foot Forward

Left Foot Forward's roundup of the progressive news you might have missed.

In no particular orderPS: Got a story tip? Email us:[emailprotected]

10. The UK Government must abandon plans to introduce an effective veto over the Scottish Parliament, the Scottish Greens have said.

Hidden in its White Paper on the UK internal market, the UK Government proposes to impose sweeping new laws to reserve the right to veto any devolved decision which threatens their free market fundamentalism, or isnt in the interest of big business. This could be applied retrospectively.

Although Conservative politicians have previously claimed that various devolved policies are safe, the White Paper proposes that a uniform approach is key to our ability to remain a competitive economy, which presents a serious threat to devolved commitments on environmental protections, food standards and public ownership.

Scottish Green co-leader Patrick Harvie has written to Business Secretary Alok Sharma demanding that these plans go back to the drawing board, with a commitment to protect the Scottish Parliaments democratic authority. Commenting, Patrick Harvie said: Close cooperation between governments is essential, but these proposals arent merely a power grab, they call into question the very notion of devolution itself.

9. The Lib Dems responded to the news the Government has dropped plans for a Constitution, Democracy and Rights Commission.

Liberal Democrat Spokesperson on Political Reform, Wendy Chamberlain, said:Given the widespread fears that this Commission was going to be used as a vehicle for Boris Johnson to attack the judiciary and slash checks and balances on his own powers, the fact it has been dropped is extremely welcome.

If this Government is serious about reviewing the workings of our democracy, then they should be committing to a fully transparent and independent process.

Ministers must be prepared to put the real issues on the table. Issues like whether the First Past the Post voting system is fit for purpose, and why we continue to unfairly disenfranchise 1.5million 16 and 17 year olds.

8. Firefighters have agreed to continue aiding the coronavirus response, warning that the virus threat remains serious and despite the governments easing of lockdown restrictions.

The Fire Brigades Union (FBU) has assured the public that firefighters arent going to abandon their communities now, as preparations for a second wave of COVID-19 infections commence.

An agreement reached on 26 March has allowed firefighters to drive ambulances, deliver vital supplies to the elderly and vulnerable, and move the bodies of the deceased.

Since then, a number of further activities have been agreed, including assembling personal protective equipment (PPE) and training care home staff in infection, prevention and control.

The FBU, fire chiefs, and fire service employers have agreed to extend the work until 30 September, six months longer than planned, with the possibility for further renewal. The initial agreement was for two months, but was extended in early June.

7. Campaigners have warned that time is running out for a Brexit deal.

Best for Britain CEO Naomi Smith said:Despite the hunger shown by the EU for a wide-reaching deal in these negotiations, the UK government seem to have much smaller ambitions.

Time is now runningout. We need to see the UK government negotiating in good faith soon or citizens across Europe and in Britain will lose out.

It is certainly the case that some forms of Brexit are better than others. A comprehensive trade deal would minimise the impact on business and employment. No deal, or a bare bones deal, would be a disaster for Britain in our current position.

6. Over 200,000 people have signed a We Own It petition calling for the House of Lords to protect the NHS from trade deals by amending the Trade Bill.

The petition comes after the House of Commons voted against amendments to the Trade Bill on Monday that would have stopped the NHS from being included in trade deals. The House of Commons also voted against an amendment from Conservative MP Jonathan Djanogly which would have given MPs the power to accept or reject trade deals negotiated by the government.

According to campaigners, the Trade Bill as currently worded would pose a range of dangers for the health service, opening up the NHS to being charged more for drugs, enshrine the rights of American healthcare companies to access our NHS in international treaties and lock in privatisation that would be incredibly difficult for a future government to reverse.

5. Outsourced cleaners at Ark Globe Academy have won a stunning victory this week, after it was announced that they would receive the London Living Wage, full pay sick pay in parity with directly employed Ark staff. Workers also won the immediate implementation of an enhanced Risk Assessment process from the 1st of September.

The announcement, made by the cleaners trade union, United Voices of the World (UVW), comes after a campaign which also demanded the immediate abolition of gender disparity in pay, trade union recognition, and an end to outsourcing at the academy. The union threatened strike action if its demands were not met.

The dispute began after workers staged a spontaneous walkout on the 4th and 5th of June in response to what their union has described as months of unlawful wage deductions and fears over a lack of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) or a meaningful Risk Assessment having been carried out. The outsourced cleaning firm Ridge Crest came under fire after a regional manager was recorded telling a strike leader that she could: Pick you up some masks from the office and drop them into youand it means everybody goes back and gets rid of the union and that I just wanna shut the union down. LFF covered the leaked recordings here.

4. A cross-party group of MPs have warned that there is a real risk that the worst effects of Covid-19 could fall on those who are least able to afford it in Wales, a nation whose economy was already vulnerable to economic shocks before the pandemic.

In their interim report on the Welsh economy and Covid-19 the Welsh Affairs Committee describes the impact that the virus has had to date on businesses and people throughout Wales. It also details support provided by both the UK and Welsh Governments, and focuses attention on some of the sectors at particular risk during the crisis.

Before the crisis Wales was ranked second to last in a list of 12 UK nations and regions for Gross Disposable Household Income and had a poverty rate of 23%. The nation also has the second highest levels of employment in sectors most exposed to the headwinds caused by virus countermeasures, namely retail, food and drink, and arts and leisure. There is a perfect storm for a post-Covid rise in poverty, the Welsh Affairs Committee said.

3. A major public consultation to get a wide range of views on the prospect of an Irish border poll has been launched by a working group established by UCLs Constitution Unit.

Citizens and civil society groups from across Northern Ireland are being invited to share their hopes, concerns and thoughts on the format and conduct of any future referendum on the question of Northern Irelands constitutional status.

A referendum on Irish unification is envisaged in certain circumstances by the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement. The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland is obliged to call such a vote if a majority for a united Ireland appears likely.

Recent developments may have increased the chances that this condition could be met in the coming years. Yet no detailed public thinking has been done on what form the vote could take.

2. The SNP has said the Dominic Cummings scandal continues to erode public trust in the Tory government after Englands Chief Nursing Officer confirmed she was dropped from a coronavirus briefing after raising concerns about the senior Tory advisers rule-breaking.

Asked about lockdown rules and the actions of Dominic Cummings at the Public Accounts Committee, Ruth May confirmed she was dropped from the briefing and said I believe the rules were clear and they were there for everyones safety. They applied to us all.

Commenting, SNP Westminster Deputy Leader Kirsten Oswald MP said: The Dominic Cummings scandal continues to erode public trust in the Tory government after Boris Johnson refused to take any action against his rule-breaking senior adviser.

This latest revelation, that the Chief Nursing Officer was dropped from a public health briefing, after expressing legitimate concerns that the rules must apply to us all, shows just how far the Tories are willing to go to cover-up concerns and avoid taking any responsibility for their actions.

1. Housing campaigners Generation Rent have called on the Government to urgently explain how new rules replacing the eviction ban will protect renters affected by coronavirus.

The housing campaign group has written to Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick MP and Justice Secretary Robert Buckland QC MP with a list of questions the Government must answer to give clarity to renters under threat of eviction. The Government is allowing evictions to restart from 23 August with new civil procedure rules.

The new rules are inadequate, Generation Rent say. It is unclear how they will work in practice and will provide any protection for renters struggling to pay their rent due to covid-19.

The Government needs to urgently explain how the new rules will deliver on their pledge that no renter who has lost income due to coronavirus will be forced out of their home, the group said in a statement.

Josiah Mortimer is co-editor of Left Foot Forward. Follow him onTwitter.

As youre here, we have something to ask you. What we do here to deliver real news is more important than ever. But theres a problem: we need readers like you to chip in to help us survive. We deliver progressive, independent media, that challenges the rights hateful rhetoric. Together we can find the stories that get lost.

Were not bankrolled by billionaire donors, but rely on readers chipping in whatever they can afford to protect our independence. What we do isnt free, and we run on a shoestring. Can you help by chipping in as little as 1 a week to help us survive? Whatever you can donate, were so grateful - and we will ensure your money goes as far as possible to deliver hard-hitting news.

More:

Radical roundup: 10 stories that got buried this week - Left Foot Forward

BLM activist Brittany Battle: Theres no way in hell Im gonna let them intimidate me. – Triad City Beat

Featured photo: Activist Brittany Battle speaks at a Black Lives Matter rally. (photo by Michaela Ratliff)

Brittany Battles parents still laugh about the time she led a walk-out in her eighth grade class.

I felt like my teacher was being unjust, so I inspired my classmates to walk out of this mans class, Battle says in an interview.

She has had an eye towards social justice for as long as she can remember, aligning herself with Black Lives Matter Winston-Salem shortly after moving there last year. Her involvement with the activist group recently drew her to John Nevilles case.

I cant breathe, inmate John Neville repeatedly told Forsyth County detention officers as they placed him in a prone restraint. He would later die from a brain injury caused by the restraint. Many people were outraged that the Dec. 4, 2019 death was not made public until July 8, 2020, when Forsyth County District Attorney Jim ONeill announced five detention officers and a nurse were being charged with involuntary manslaughter for the death of Neville in a press conference.

Black Lives Matter Winston-Salem called an emergency meeting and then gathered outside of the Forsyth County Law Enforcement Detention Center that same day to protest the lack of timely communication to the public and the case of police brutality. The crowd of protesters erupted into cries of, Let them go! as five protesters were arrested for leaving the sidewalk and walking into the street. Battle was one of them.

She expressed that law enforcement held positive attitudes during the local protests for the deaths of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, saying that they rode bikes alongside them and blocked off streets for their safety.

Oh, those are bad cops in Louisville, those are bad cops in Minneapolis, she predicted the police said then. But when we start talking about bad cops in Winston-Salem and Forsyth county, the light is shone in their own house. They didnt like that.

They came out there with zip ties, she recalls. They came out there with an LRAD, which is a long-range acoustic device. Its frequently used against protesters. It can make them deaf or hard of hearing. Its supposed to be inconspicuous because people think its a speaker. They admitted it was an LRAD in the paperwork of one of my comrades who was arrested. They said they warned us via LRAD not to be in the street..

And yet, Battle remained fearless.

Theres no way in hell Im gonna let them intimidate me, she says.

Battle felt her arrest was intentional, saying police targeted those they recognized from being organizers of protests in the city. The drive to continue fighting even harder for social justice after her arrest wasnt the only thing she left the protest with. She now flaunts a black splint on her right wrist as a result of the recent arrest as she waits for her follow up appointment with an orthopedic surgeon to examine the extent of her injury.

After I got released, I went to the ER first for the wrist injury they did to me, she said, and then I went right to an organizing meeting after that. There was no stopping.

In addition to being involved with Black Lives Matter Winston-Salem, Battle is also involved with the Triad Abolition Project, a newly-formed grassroots collective of people interested in sharing ideas and resources about abolishing the carceral system, as well as educating others about the meaning of abolition. The Triad Abolition Project, in partnership with the Unity Coalition, another newly formed group in Winston-Salem with similar objectives, organized Occupy the Block Winston-Salem, an ongoing peaceful resistance in Bailey Park which started on July 15. The group intends to hold a protest every day until the four main demands of the Triad Abolition Project are met which include: responding to all questions posed by the Triad Abolition Project and the Unity Coalition, banning the use of prone restraint on any civilian, incarcerated or not, sick or not, notifying the public of any death involving an officer or deputy immediately, and dismissing all charges against protestors from July 8th and 9th arrests.

An activist on the streets and in the classroom, Battle is an assistant professor in the Department of Sociology at Wake Forest University. She earned her masters in African-American studies from Temple University in 2012, and her PhD in Sociology from Rutgers University New Brunswick in 2019. She finds it difficult to balance her time between teaching and fighting racial injustice as her activism tends to infiltrate her classroom.

In spring I taught a class, Social Justice in the Social Sciences, she said. We talked about how social justice shows up in social theories, social research methods, and actual activist movements.I teach from a Black feminist perspective. I create syllabi that highlights the voices of Black women and Black queer folks.

She says she values elevating the voices of minorities as she was also a member of the NAACP and the Black Student Union during her undergraduate years.

Outside of activism and teaching, she can be found creating keepsake baby quilts for her friends who are new moms. She also loves to sew and create jewelry. When social-justice work gets to be overwhelming, she escapes to what she calls her happy place the beach. She also values relaxation exercises like meditation and sage burning to stay grounded, activities she incorporated into Occupy the Block.

We have people who will be coming out to lead a yoga session, she says. Every evening we have a vigil. Were out here burning sage and incense and stuff so were really taking the spiritual part of it seriously as well because this is a lot to be out here twelve hours a day. Weve gotta make sure people are taking care of themselves spiritually, mentally, and emotionally.

Battle is okay with the fact that her ultimate vision abolishing the carceral state will likely not happen in her lifetime, but that doesnt mean her efforts towards it will stop.

My real motivation is that my freedom and liberation is tied up in everybody elses, she says. If there are some of us out there that arent free, none of us are. Thats what inspires me to keep doing this type of work.

Learn more about the Triad Abolition Project by visiting their website at triadabolitionproject.org.

Go here to see the original:

BLM activist Brittany Battle: Theres no way in hell Im gonna let them intimidate me. - Triad City Beat

Open letter on anti-racism to the Princeton School of Architecture – The Daily Princetonian

Gabe Lipkowitz / The Daily Princetonian

Following weeks of civil unrest demanding justice and reflecting on 401 years of anti-Black racism and violence across the nation, the graduate students past and present of the Princeton School of Architecture (PSoA) have discussed how best to support our Black peers. In the words of Kimberly Dowdell, President of the National Organization of Minority Architects (NOMA): We must all leverage our positions of privilege to help our most vulnerable citizens, neighbors and colleagues strive for life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If we are to truly resist anti-Black racism in the architecture discipline, we must first recognize and address the ongoing anti-Black racism and inequality within our own PSoA community. We must not ignore the daily realities and traumas of our Black students, faculty, and staff. Our support cannot simply be a statement of detached sentiment or a pledge to do better. Those of us who are white and non-Black POC students, faculty, staff, and administration must stand with our Black colleagues and unequivocally condemn and resist the violence that affects them. We must examine the ways in which we actively marginalize Black voices. We must commit to taking concrete steps to build an anti-racist institution where Black students and colleagues, as vital members of our academic community, can thrive. Black lives matter.

As we consider how to confront racism in our own community, we must remind ourselves that Princeton University has reproduced and protected forms of anti-Black racism since it was founded in 1746. Thanks to the work of Princeton students and faculty such as the Black Justice League and the Princeton & Slavery Project, which has carefully studied the University's support for the institution of chattel slavery, it is now widely known that Princeton presidents, faculty, and students all used enslaved labor while they pursued scholarship in the 19th century. We must recognize that this is not some distant history, but a legacy that continues with us into the present. In a particularly glaring example, the University continued until recently to honor the legacy of Woodrow Wilson, who promoted white supremacy in the United States and around the world, and enforced segregation at Princeton well into the 20th century. We must see and acknowledge the ongoing efforts around us to undo this legacy, including the campaign that successfully removed Wilsons name from the School of Public and International Affairs and which aims to critically transform its curriculum. If we are sincere in our efforts to address racism on this campus, we must raise up and support existing voices particularly those of our Black neighbors and colleagues who have already called for systemic change.

In response to demands for change from their students and alumni, the administrations of Columbia GSAPP, Harvard GSD, Pratt SoA, and Yale SoA have all issued public statements detailing commitments that their schools will make to address anti-Black racism. We join students of other architecture schools, colleagues from the Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, and the PSoA A.B. program (forthcoming) in voicing demands for racial justice. As members of the Princeton SoA graduate student community, past and present, we hope that the faculty and administration of the PSoA will join us in the building of an anti-racist institution, beginning with active resistance to racial violence in the Princeton community and its surroundings. We demand that the PSoA take immediate action on the following:

1. Divest from the Police

After the egregious murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Tony McDade, Dion Johnson, and countless others at the hands of the police, it is not enough to express concern. We believe that the PSoA must use its institutional power to demand that the University end any relationship it has with the Princeton Police Department (PPD) and the New Jersey State Police (NJSP). The PSoA must recognize that the police brutality being protested across the country exists in our very own community. In 2016, African American studies professor Imani Perry was handcuffed to a table by two white officers over parking violations. Despite comprising only 5 percent of the towns population, in 2018, Black people comprised 15.4 percent of motorists pulled over by PPD, and half of use-of-force incidents.In June of last year, Princeton's Department of Public Safety supported Bill A-4553 of the N.J. General Assembly, which granted police officers working at private universities qualified civil immunity and protection from repercussions in civil court. The way forward is clear. We recognize the Black leaders across the country who have said unequivocally, Reform is not enough. We acknowledge demands made by Yale Black Students for Disarmament as well as those on our own campus, including faculty and alumni and Students for Prison Education and Reform, who have called for the abolition of the carceral state and its extensions in our universities. We must follow the footsteps of Minneapolis, Denver, Seattle, Oakland, and other public schools in actively rejecting police violence.

We demand that the PSoA:

2. Recruit Black Students, Faculty, and Speakers

In the statement Hearing the Call for Structural Change, Dean of the School of Architecture Mnica Ponce de Len stated that data drives diversity. Lets be clear: while data may be necessary, it is only a small first step, and does not constitute structural change in itself. Yes, the PSoA needs to actively recruit Black students and faculty. But simply increasing numbers is inadequate and ultimately self-defeating if not accompanied by the transformative change we outline in this letter. The lack of Black voices at every level of the PSoA has reinforced inequality and helped to ensure that white faculty define the center of contemporary architecture at Princeton and beyond. Black students are consistently underrepresented in the A.B., M.Arch, and Ph.D. programs. While we recognize that the PSoA has begun to address anti-Black racism through faculty hires and lecture programming, we ask that the school continue to do more to elevate the voices of Black architects and scholars in the school and the discipline.

We demand that the PSoA:

3. Provide Financial and Administrative Support for Black Students

Support for Black students must take place at all levels of teaching and mentorship: it should not be taken for granted that students in an overwhelming minority will naturally feel comfortable in an institution structured upon racist ideals. Black and non-Black POC students alike need dedicated staff and mentors whom they can turn to for advice, to discuss opportunities, and to address issues of discrimination. This need is especially, though not exclusively, visible in relation to student evaluation within the school. Currently, in the M.Arch and Ph.D. programs, there is a lack of transparency in evaluation, grading, and structures of advancement. In both cases, this lack of transparency results in unequal expectations, opportunities, and work loads between students. As long as protocols for grading and advancement are not clearly delineated, room for discrimination remains. In order to restore opportunities for BIPOC students and repair trust within the school, new financial and structural commitments must be made.

We demand that the PSoA:

4. Center Black Voices in the Curriculum

Addressing race in the curriculum should not be limited to seminars about BIPOC histories, or studios that engage with BIPOC experiences. Rather, we must recognize that whiteness is also racial, and that subsequently allstudios and seminars, even when addressing predominantly white communities and authors, must be attuned to issues of race. We must not continue making whiteness the invisible norm. This also means that Black and non-Black POC points of view cannot be cordoned off in one week of a syllabus as a topic. Rather, their points of view on weekly topics should be pervasive throughout. We must also recognize that the Black intellectual tradition aligns with the goals of History and Theory requirements in architecture and should be engaged with as such. In sum, we must recognize that issues of race are not topical, but rather foundational fundamental prerequisites in our understanding of the world.

We demand that the PSoA:

5. Dismantle White Supremacy in Studio

As in the curriculum as a whole, the school must make visible how whiteness operates as an invisible norm in the vast majority of existing studio pedagogy. Architecture lags behind other disciplines in the critical examination of its own methods and the subject positions of its practitioners. A view common to architectural education is the assumption that historical, social, and political contexts can be apprehended after a brief site visit or week-long trip. This method encourages extractive, rather than collaborative, design practices and forms of knowledge production that make expertise seem one-sided. Frequently, this creates a power imbalance, often racialized, between a student-designer and their prospective client. These practices are destructive, and reinforce political and economic processes that extract wealth from BIPOC communities in New Jersey and elsewhere around the world. Studio instructors must actively interrogate their ethical commitment and accountability to the communities that they seek to engage with.

We demand that the PSoA:

6. Ban Inequitable Labor Practices

The use of unpaid and poorly compensated student work is a barrier to career advancement for economically disadvantaged students and therefore disproportionately affects Black and non-Black POC students. Working in the private offices of faculty members provides students with a foundation for future professional advancement, garnering them long-term professional support and helping them to build their resume. Unpaid and low-paying internships have been shown to exclude BIPOC students to a greater degree than their peers, due both to their higher levels of indebtedness and the high opportunity costs of unpaid positions.

We demand that the PSoA:

7. Implement Anti-Racism Training

The PSoAshistoric lack of action on racial awareness has obligated BIPOCstudents to not only manage the challenges of architecture school, but also to expend time and energy in processing and confronting racist behavior. BIPOC students cannot be expected to take on the additional labor of educating their peers and professors about race. Instead, the school must assume responsibility for offering anti-racism training starting in the 202021 school year. Studies have shown that diversity and anti-bias training are ineffective when treated as one-off, isolated initiatives. If not coupled with structures of accountability and provided with ongoing institutional support, training can produce racist outcomes. To be effective, training in the PSoA must be undertaken in concert with other initiatives for addressing racism in the school and, wherever possible, be sustained over time.

We demand that the PSoA:

8. Build Campus and Community Alliances

The PSoA should work to strengthen existing student and faculty-initiated alliances with African American Studies, African Studies, the Carl A. Fields Center, and with scholars and institutions beyond Princeton. Strategic alliances should be part of the daily fabric of learning in the PSoA, reflected in distribution requirements and studio offerings. Although partnerships with outside programs, foundations, and departments are important in bringing Black (as well as non-Black POC) voices into the school, extramural efforts should also not replace the PSoAs own efforts in actively countering racism.

We demand that the PSoA:

9. Ensure Accountability and Transparency

In order to uphold any long-term commitment to racial justice, the PSoA administration must provide students and faculty with a list of actionable items along with an implementation timeline, the metrics used to gauge progress, and the methods with which to monitor the schools accountability.

We demand that the PSoA:

This letter has made many demands of the PSoA. At the same time, we, the PSoA student community, recognize our failure in uplifting our BIPOC peers and must hold ourselves accountable for inaction. For too long, students have remained silent when faced with a syllabus of white men or a traveling studio that reproduces racist, colonial dynamics. Many have not shown up to events that feature Black speakers, conferences on Black topics, and classes on Black history. In the recent past, numerous students have tried to start conversations about race and inequity but were ignored by their faculty, peers, or the school administration. It is impossible for the PSoA to pursue racial justice unless all members of the school community acknowledge their responsibility in such an effort. We recognize that while we are being shaped by a racist institution, we as students must actively resist its racist ideals. We, the undersigned students and alumni, pledge to actively confront racism in our discipline and in our worldviews.

In closing, let us remember the words of civil rights leader Whitney M. Young Jr., who in 1968 told the architects at the AIA National Convention in Portland: You are not a profession that has distinguished itself by your social and civic contributions to the cause of civil rights, and I am sure this does not come to you as any shock You are most distinguished by your thunderous silence. We are humbled by the fact that more than five decades have passed since we first heard his indictment, yet there remains so much work to be done. We, as a community, must not be silent once again. Let us move forward with his words as a reminder of how our discipline has contributed to and sustained white supremacy. This letter is only one small effort in the continuing struggle to dismantle anti-Black racism struggles that were happening both within and outside of Princeton long before this moment, and that will continue far into the future. We must not allow this to become a single moment in time, but rather an urgent reminder that we must struggle, actively and on a daily basis, to reject this legacy.

Sincerely,

The undersigned graduate students and alumni of the Princeton School of Architecture.

[Follow this link to sign this letter: https://bit.ly/3hYV0Jn%5D

Current Students (84)

Tairan An, Ph.D.

Zulaikha Ayub, Ph.D.

Fiorella Barreto, M.Arch I 21

Maeliosa Barstow, M.Arch I 21

Carrie Bly, Ph.D.

Barrington Calvert, M.Arch I 23

Landon Carpenter, M.Arch I 21

Gregory Cartelli, Ph.D.

Lluis Alexandre Casanovas Blanco, Ph.D.

Cole Cataneo, M.Arch I 21

Carson Chan, Ph.D.

Martn Cobas, Ph.D.

Jonah Coe-Scharff, M.Arch I 21

Eleanor Collin, M.Arch I 22

Evan Crawford, M.Arch I 22

Melinda Denn, M.Arch I 22

Megan Eardley, Ph.D.

Michael Faciejew, Ph.D.

Kaitlin Faherty, M.Arch II 21

Helen Fialkowski, M.Arch I 21

Clemens Finkelstein, Ph.D.

Chase Galis, M.Arch I 21

Curt Gambetta, Ph.D.

Henry Gomory, Ph.D.

Victor Guan, A.B. Arch 21

Bernardo Guerra, M.Arch I 23

Larissa Guimares, M.Arch I 21

Daniel Hall, M.Arch II 22

Jonathan Hanna, M.Arch I 22

Jane Ilyasova, M.Arch I 21

Zaid Kashef Alghata, M.Arch II 21

Anna Kerr, M.Arch I 22

Evangelos Kotsioris, Ph.D.

Ivan L. Munuera, Ph.D.

Ingrid Lao, Ph.D.

Grace Lee, M.Arch I 22

Simon Lesina-Debiasi, M.Arch I 21

Reese Lewis, M.Arch I 22

Piao Liu, M.Arch II 21

Christopher Loofs, M.Arch I 23

Tiantian Lou, M.Arch II 21

Elena MBouroukounda, M.Arch I 21

Austin Madrigale, M.Arch I 22

Matthew Maldonado, M.Arch I 21

Anoushka Mariwala, A.B. Arch 21

Jacob McCarthy, M.Arch I 21

Elis Mendoza, Ph.D.

Ruta Misiunas, M.Arch I 21

Jacqueline Mix, M.Arch I 22

Christina Moushoul, M.Arch I 22

Luis Fernando Muoz, M.Arch I 21

Christopher Myefski, M.Arch I 21

MaryKate Neff, A.B. Arch 21

Jessica Ngan, Ph.D.

Victoria Oeye, Ph.D.

Emmanuel Osorno, M.Arch II 21

Megan Pai, A.B. Arch 22

Chitra Parikh, A.B. Arch 21

Rafael Pastrana, Ph.D.

Bart-Jan Polman, Ph.D.

Juan Pablo Ponce de Leon, M.Arch I 21

Clelia Pozzi, Ph.D.

Lisa Ramsburg, M.Arch I 22

See the original post here:

Open letter on anti-racism to the Princeton School of Architecture - The Daily Princetonian

Black Women Have Consistently Been Trailblazers for Social Change. Why Are They So Often Relegated to the Margins? – TIME

When someone says no one cares about Black women and girls, I tend to reply, we all we got. Its a slight correction to a sentiment thats understandable. There is, after all, ample evidence that much of the world does not have much concern for the well-being of Black women, girls and femmes, but to say that no one cares fails to acknowledge those who do, those who work to protect and support them. As Christina Sharpe, the inimitable author of In The Wake: On Blackness and Being, reminded me a few weeks ago: Black women, girls and femmes have always looked out for each other.

In the past, I admit, I too asserted without qualification that no one cares about us, overlooking historical and contemporary examples of Black women and femmes showing up for and centering the plight of Black women, girls and femmes. Even as a Black feminist, I participated in the racist and sexist practice of erasing Black womens labor. I said no one cared because I was angry that far too few people beyond other Black women and femmes care about our victimization or the energy we expend struggling against injustice.

Today the undervaluing of the labor and commitment of those of us who do care and show up for Black girls, women and femmes looms large. Black women and femmes keep developing radical ideas about social transformation, wrestling with the ways anti-Blackness manifests in areas such as the criminal justice system, health care, news media and popular culture, and tirelessly amplifying the experiences of Black women, girls and femmes. But even as our ideas are coopted, our victimization remains on the margins.

Our limited visibility as prominent architects of the burgeoning 2020 uprising and as victims of racial injustice feels all too familiar and has left me with disconcerting questions: What will it take for folks to not use our ideas and strategies without crediting us or centering injustices against us? Should Black women, girls and femmes give up on expecting anyone other than us to care? Is solidarity even a meaningful goal if folks continuously fail to cite our labor and center our marginalization?

The problem we endure is one of constant erasure. For example, the origins of anti-rape activism in the U.S., although largely attributed to feminist activists in the 1970s, date back more than 150 years. In 1866, a group of African-American women testified before Congress about being gang-raped by white men during the Memphis Riot. Despite compelling testimony, the perpetrators were not punished. After this pioneering moment in anti-rape activism, African-American women such as Fannie Barrier Williams and Ida B. Wells founded and participated in campaigns to end sexual violence against Black women and girls. Black women in the late 19th century laid the groundwork for future generations of anti-rape activists. In the 1970s, which many consider the third peak in anti-rape activism, the strategies and aims of Black womens anti-rape activism became part of a broader movement that included the creation of rape crisis centers and college campus activism.

Many of the trailblazing African-American women who documented, analyzed and fought against sexual violence, however, became mere footnotes in the historical record of the enduring struggle to end sexual violence. This made it easier for folks in 2017 to overlook Tarana Burke, who founded the #MeToo movement in 2006, and to not identify Aishah Shahidah Simmons NO! The Rape Documentary as a germinal film about contemporary sexual violence. It was also unsurprising that the stories of primarily famous white women took centerstage in national debates. Black womens work anchors anti-rape activism, and yet sexual violence against Black women, girls and femmes remains under-addressed within the mainstream anti-rape movement.

Protesters gather for the Black Women Matter "Say Her Name" march in Richmond, Va., on July 3, 2020.

Eze AmosGetty Images

History appears to be repeating itself as calls to #DefundThePolice intensify. This part of the current racial justice movement owes a tremendous debt to the grassroots organizing and scholarship of Black feminists and other feminists of color over the past few decades. From Marsha P. Johnson, Sylvia Rivera and the Street Transvestite Action Revolutionaries who knew they could not look to police or prisons to address violence against queer and trans people to Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Angela Davis and others forming Critical Resistance as a grassroots organization striving to dismantle the prison-industrial complex, the demand to abolish policing and prisons is hardly new. Davis argued in her 2003 book, Are Prisons Obsolete?, thatthe most difficult and urgent challenge today is that of creatively exploring new terrains of justice, where the prison no longer serves as our major anchor. Defunding the police is a means by which abolition becomes possible.

While more folks are now engaging the work of Black women like Davis, Gilmore and other Black feminist abolitionists on policing and prison abolition, some people are missing key Black feminist sensibilities that undergird demands to radically transform the criminal justice system. Systems of policing currently allow people, from police officers to intimate partners, to harm Black women, girls and femmes with no accountability. The move to divest from policing and prisons demands an understanding of interlocking systems of power in which Black women, girls and femmes are disproportionately vulnerable to violence and to being overpoliced.

The call to defund and ultimately abolish police is predicated upon examining the conditions in which harm thrives. It also compels us to care about, prevent and address harm outside of a punitive context through investment in areas like education, health, housing and employment, areas in which Black women, femmes and girls combat notable bias, disparities and inequities.

To re-center the lives and labor of Black women, girls and femmes in the current debate about #DefundThePolice isnt merely about recognition; its about ensuring that we dont render them as no one. In 2014, Black women created #SayHerName to push people to acknowledge that Black men are not the only ones killed by police at a disproportionate rate. While there were massive protests after the killings of Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown and Eric Garner, we did not see similar public outrage over Rekia Boyd, Tanisha Anderson or other Black women, girls and femmes who died at the hands of police. Although Black women are routinely killed, raped and beaten by the police, their experiences are rarely foregrounded in popular understandings of police brutality, said Kimberl Crenshaw, who authored and published the #SayHerName report with Andrea Ritchie, and the African American Policy Forum in 2015. Yet, inclusion of black womens experiences in social movements, media narratives, and policy demands around policing and police brutality is critical to effectively combating racialized state violence for black communities and other communities of color.

A demonstrator marches on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C., on June 6, 2020.

Tom WilliamsCQ-Roll Call, Inc./Getty Images

Today these deaths still dont get the nearly the attention or mobilization our male counterparts do. It took George Floyds death for people outside of Louisville to march for justice for Breonna Taylor, who was killed by police two months earlier. And beyond Black trans and non-binary people and a few non-trans allies, I suspect few people even know about the killing of Brayla Stone, a 17-year-old Black trans girl whose body was found in June, or the five other Black trans women who were killed between June 25 and July 3.

I dont know how to convince people to care about the lives of Black women, femmes and girls like Taylor and Stone, but I do know that theyre not no one and neither are the Black women and femmes pushing fighting for them.

For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.

Contact us at editors@time.com.

Visit link:

Black Women Have Consistently Been Trailblazers for Social Change. Why Are They So Often Relegated to the Margins? - TIME

After George Floyd, Who Will Police Minneapolis? | by Krithika Varagur – The New York Review of Books

Kerem Yucel/AFP via Getty ImagesMinneapolis Police Chief Medaria Arradondo, accompanied by an MPD sergeant, taking a knee as the remains of George Floyd are driven to a memorial service in his honor, Minneapolis, Minnesota, June 4, 2020

Minneapolis, MinnesotaTo begin, two tales of Twin Cities police.

First, Donn Landrum. The fifty-three-year-old served three foreign tours in the Navy, discharged right before the Gulf War. Thanks to his military experience, he quickly found work in private security after that. Landrum, who is black, grew up in Chicagoand still wears a Bulls jerseybut has lived in Minneapolis since 1987. While working, he eventually went back to school and obtained a bachelors degree so that he could enroll in the citys police academy, which he did in 2008.

He quit within six weeks. The disparities in how they treated black people were just too big, he told me. It was my deep feeling that it couldnt be changed.

He returned to the private sector, working for various security firms over the years. One of his colleagues in 2017 was George Floyd. A really nice guy, he recalled. Never started anything. Landrum attended Floyds funeral last month.

Second, Clarence Castile. He is the uncle of Philando, who was infamously murdered by police in 2016 in Falcon Heights, a suburb of St. Paul. The sixty-year-old works as a landscaper, but at the time of his nephews death, he was well on his way to his certification as a reserve police officer in St. Paul. He went ahead and completed it, and took up a volunteer post that requires a hundred hours of service per year, usually to assist in tasks like traffic control for public events. Today, Castile wears the same blue uniform as regular cops, but does not carry a firearm.

I had a moment of reflection when that happened, for sure, when I didnt think I could go through with it, he told me. We saw seven bullets get emptied into his [Philandos] body. I was so angry; I hated cops. But it wasnt all cops who killed my nephew I had friends from high school who became cops and they cried with me, in their uniforms, he went on. My family doesnt hate cops. If we turn angry and stay angry, all it would do is fuel other peoples anger.

Those two accounts go to the heart of a raging debate in Minneapolis over whether to reform or abolish the citys police department in the wake of the protests over George Floyds murder that have shaken the nation, and the world beyond. When nine members of the City Council stood together in a park on Sunday June 7, a fortnight after Floyds killing, and announced their intent to disband the department, it seemed like an astonishing victory for the popular uprising. The council members stated simply that The Minneapolis Police Department cannot be reformed and will never be accountable for its actions. Even after the heat of that moment, every single member of the council voted on June 27 to advance a proposal to create a new department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention, to be led by someone with non-law enforcement experience.

To the generation of activists shaped by Black Lives Matter, this sequence of events seems to offer an unprecedented chance to completely redefine policing, and they are pinning their hopes on the charter amendment, in spite of state-level gridlock on other police reforms. But to other activist groups that have been through previous cycles of campaigning, setbacks, and disillusionment, the potential for such dramatic change appears dimmer.

We are definitely moving in the right direction, said Kandace Montgomery, a queer black organizer who in 2018 co-founded the group Reclaim the Block, a leading voice on the abolitionist side. What were focused on now is that people get an opportunity to vote for an amendment to the city charter addressing the abolition of the police department, and getting it on the ballot in November, she said. The deadline for adding new items to the ballot before this years election day is August 21. Under consideration is the very existence of a city police department, as well as the required minimum number of police for the citys population (currently set at 730 officers).

Reclaim the Block activists have helped pro-abolition councilmembers formulate language for this amendment, a dialogue that Montgomery said would have been impossible until very recently. Engagement was very minimal before Floyds murder, she said. Having people out on the streets every day has been key to getting them to pay attention. If were not pressuring them, they are going to lose focus. Just last year, she noted, the council authorized an $8 million increase to the police departments budget. Even this amendment is subject first to revision by a fifteen-person volunteer commission, and second, to a vote in the council on whether that wording gets put up for referendum in November. And even if that passes, it would still have to go to the mayor for his approval (though the council could override his veto).

One reason for the abolitionist camps confidence is that it is articulating positions that have gestated for several years. A landmark report by regional activists called MPD150 presented a well-researched practical pathway for the dismantling of the Minneapolis Police Department back in 2017. And the grassroots groups Reclaim the Block and the Black Visions Collective have heavily foregrounded abolition, in addition to demanding specific budget cuts to the police, most recently calling for a $45 million decrease.

Its basically been six years of political development on the police abolition front, said Philip V. McHarris, a scholar and organizer. People have had the opportunity to learn, build, and grow with one another in the context of a broader movement since the Ferguson era, he said. The movement became an ideological incubator. As an organizer in New York, he recalls discussing cop-free zones in Chicago as an alternative to policing, typifying the real sharing of ideas that took place in this period across state lines.

In the early response to the movement, he noted, under the Obama administration, the focus was on technocratic solutions like body cameras. But todays renewed calls for abolition and structural change draw on deeper intellectual roots, like the work of Angela Davis, Ruth Wilson Gilmore, Mariame Kaba, and Alex Vitale. More recently, the Movement for Black Lives, the umbrella activist organization that arose in 2014, also developed the policy ideas of investing in social services and divesting from policing that informs abolitionist demands today.

Still, even in its newly robust form, abolition does not draw a universal consensus among campaigners in Minneapolis, some of whom remain committed reformists. Michelle Gross, who leads the nonprofit Communities United Against Police Brutality, has called the charter amendment totally flawed and has criticized the process behind the proposal as rushed.

Her organization was chastened by events two years ago, when the City Council failed to act on popular, more modest demands to reform the police department after a black man named Thurman Blevins was fatally shot by a cop in 2018 and no one was charged. The City Council floated a proposal for it to oversee the police instead of the mayor, but it didnt get off the ground. Grosss group complains that the city authorities seemed to learn nothing from that experience.

Then, just nine months before Floyds murder, a coalition including CUAPB issued fourteen proposed changes to the contract between the police department and the city. Their proposals were fairly wonkysuch as calling for officers to be penalized for bad behavior through a new disciplinary matrix of measuresand the major priorities were far from radical, including items such as capping officers work hours to limit fatigue and making mental health screenings mandatory. In March, the coalition revealed that its members had been shut out of City Council discussions, an exclusion that only intensified as the pandemic and lockdown took hold.

Acknowledging such setbacks, Sheila Nezhad, another Reclaim the Block organizer, admitted during a recent webinar that if the council stalled past the August deadline, activists would have to gear up for at least another year of pressure. For its part, CUAPB argues that its more modest slate of reforms could usefully be adopted as interim measures, whether or not the charter amendment moves forward.

While the council famously had a veto-proof majority of nine when it announced its commitment to dismantle the police, Mayor Jacob Frey has dismissed proposals to rewrite the charter and rejected the concept of defunding the police in general. But a recent national poll fromThe Washington Post found that 69 percent of respondents believed that Floyds killing represents a broader problem in law enforcement, as opposed to 43 percent who did so in 2014 after the Ferguson protests. Frey may be swimming against the tide of public opinion.

*

The Minneapolis Police Department dates back to 1867. By the 1920s, when the city was still about 99 percent white, the force was shot through with Ku Klux Klan members and sympathizers. In June 1922, officers made several high-profile arrests of black men for disorderly conduct, which provoked the citys small black community to protest, and for the local chapter of the NAACP to meet with the Mayor. Its major demand: increasing the number of black people on the force.

A century later, that refrainWe need more cops who look like uswas one I heard today all over the Twin Cities, and notably from many different black men, including John Thompson, the friend of Philando Castile who is now running for state office in a House district of St. Paul; Deputy Police Chief Art Knight; and community activist Jamar Nelson, who helps lead a group called A Mothers Love that cooperates with the police department over community patrols. Its true that the demographics of the citys police force is still not representative. In 2015, 22 percent of the Minneapolis police force and 17 percent of the one in St. Paul was nonwhite, compared to 40 percent and 46 percent nonwhite presence in their respective populations.

The Minneapolis Police Departments recently appointed chief, Medaria Arradondo, is the first black person to hold the office; Art Knight is a deputy chief serving under him. In 2007, Arradondo and four others sued their own department, alleging that black officers were disciplined more harshly and frequently than their white counterparts for comparable misconduct; the suit was settled out of court. In their complaint, the black officers said that some of them had received hate mail signed KKK.

Ive been a policeman for twenty-eight years, but my first perspective of the world is being black, said Knight. Originally from Chicago, he is an avowed fan of Barack Obamas initiativesfollowing Trayvon Martins murder and has been credited with introducing to the Minneapolis police several typical post-Ferguson reforms such as body cameras and implicit bias training. Today, he remains a committed incrementalist, though he is obliged to admit that the training he has championed is not a panacea: The frustrating thing about Derek Chauvin [the cop who killed Floyd]and I was even his supervisor for six months, though I dont remember much, because he was unremarkable, honestlywas that he did go through all these trainings. And it still didnt make a difference.

We have a joke in policing, that cops hate two things: change and the way things are, he told me. When Knight joined the force in 1992, shortly after the Rodney King riots in LA, he was one of only two black officers in the whole department. So from my perspective, the changes since then have been substantial. We certainly never talked about something like bias when I was in training. He has fired a gun twice in his career, neither occasion resulting in a fatality.

His number one priority when he was appointed as deputy chief in 2017 was improving the forces diversity, which he labeled atrocious. But diversity doesnt come for free, he said; one of the main means to recruit nonwhite officers is a cadet program for people who didnt major in law enforcement in college (which is a requirement for the MPD). Knight estimated that it costs about $250,000 a year in total, which has made the department reluctant to keep funding it.

A more representative police force seems like a good idea, but would more black cops actually result in fewer police-involved killings? In the influential 2017 monograph The End of Policing, Alex Vitale surveys the literature and concludes that There is now a large body of evidence measuring whether the race of individual officers affects their use of force. Most studies show no effect. Despite modest increases in the nonwhite police numbers since Knight started his career there, the Minneapolis force still heavily over-polices black people, who are about nine times more likely than white people to be arrested for low-level offenses like trespassing, disorderly conduct, and loitering, according to an ACLU report from 2015.

If abolition becomes the order of the day, it will doubtless make all these efforts at internal reform look quaint, if not feeble. But whether abolitionist or reformist, all efforts to overhaul the MPD face one formidable foe: the extremely strong police union, led by the pugnacious Bob Kroll, a lieutenant who has described the Floyd protests as a terrorist movement. If the police department is not dismantled, the union will be the main roadblock to reform. Pete Gamades, an organizer with the group MPLS for a Better Contract, argues that changes to the contract are possible. Pay, he said, has been used successfully for leverage against police unions in cities like Austin. Off-duty work can be very lucrative for police, so its in their best interest to agree to work fewer hours. But, he also acknowledged, We look at this as an addition to, not an alternative to, the charter debate.

Prospects for using this leverage, though, look limited. The union negotiates directly with the mayor, not the City Council, and had already, before the pandemic, moved its current contract talks to a mediation stage, which prevents further public involvement. Since Floyds death, Police Chief Arradondo has pulled out of negotiations altogetherindicating that he does not see the contract as a vehicle for change.

*

In face of this stop-start nature of institutional change, some in Minneapolis are taking the job of public safety into their own hands. Powderhorn Park, in south-central Minneapolis, is a leafy, residential neighborhood just a few blocks from Cup Foods, where Floyd was murdered. In early June, the park itself became the site of pop-up settlements in camping tents of unhoused people, who now number over eight hundred. These started on June 9, when about two hundred homeless people whod occupied the Sheraton Hotel in the aftermath of the Floyd protests were evicted. Because of this and the parks proximity to the site of Floyds murder, anti-police sentiment runs high in Powderhorn.

This is essentially a no-go zone for the police, said Jack Nobles, a middle-aged white man who usually works as a set designer. He has become one of dozens of volunteers who have been staffing these camps around the clock to provide food and water, medic tents, showers, even weekly laundry.

Dennis Barrow, who is now in his fourth month without formal housing, is one of the day one encampment residents, and does double-duty as a community security guard. We know whos who, he said, we police our own community. He wore a whistle around his neck on a lanyard that said SMILE. We dont use firearms at all, he said. The key thing is de-escalation. To him, this means conversations, direct engagement, and being a familiar face. The Powderhorn Park security team, which numbers about a dozen, report to an exacting commander named Dee, who wears a white durag and has a habit of picking up garbage behind the other residents. There is a noise curfew starting at 10 PM, and community meetings every evening at 7 PM.

But the informal settlements experiment has had its challenges. At least three sexual assaults have been reported there, and gun violence is on the rise, too. When I visited one morning this month, Nobles said there had been a spike in meth use when people got their unemployment checks. Im a former addict, so I can tell, he said. We officially take a harm reduction approach here and provide clean needles, have people trained to administer Narcan [a nasal spray that can treat opioid overdoses], and so onbut we dont, as a rule, ever want to call 911 about an overdose because that will end up on the police scanners.

In the immediate aftermath of Floyds murder, when the neighborhood was a hot zone for violent riots, local residents started to organize their own community patrol, too. Danielle Enblom, a dancer who has been living in an apartment near the park since March, became a leader of the neighborhood watch program in May. We had one big meeting in the park where almost a thousand people attended, she told me, and we discussed how to keep ourselves safe in the absence of policingor even from the police. Her group now counts 120 active members who communicate on a mobile group chat and maintain a neighborhood watch in a four-to-five block radius. The initial impetus for security waned somewhat after the most violent phase of the protests, but the unhoused encampment in the park filled its place, to an extent. Like many of her neighbors, Enblom was happy to support the sanctuary movement there, but there are a lot of fears and concerns, which is understandable, she said. Look, the neighborhood is not going to be as safe and secure as it once felt.

Already, it seems as though time may be running out for the Powderhorn sanctuary, and the utopian window into a different world, where goods and services were freely circulated within a city to its most vulnerable, may be closing. Signs at the park now broadcast limited resources and a new volunteer model, and there is a de facto moratorium on new tents; volunteers have been peeling off because of perceived security risks and armed robberies during daylight hours. The ones who have stuck it out, with the idea that community-led safety should not be given up even under such circumstances, are grittier, and employ guerrilla tactics.

Nomad, the alias of a twenty-four-year-old volunteer with an ad hoc security group called Bikwakoon (an Ojibwe word for a bundle of arrows), is one of them. He says he hasnt slept much since Memorial Day, spending all night, after his shifts as a line cook, zipping to high-risk neighborhoods on his motorbike, with a bandana tied around his face. Theres no strict protocol, and we dont use firearms, but our MO is really just to deescalate situations verbally and get people help without calling the police, he said, of Bikwakoons approach. Their approximately twenty-five members coordinate through the Signal messaging app and deploy to wherever theyre needed, from about 10 PM to 4 AM each night.

Last week, they were patrolling at Little Earth, an affordable housing complex home to many Native Americans, when they encountered a teenaged girl who had overdosed with opioids and started foaming at the mouth. Nomad helped rouse her to consciousness and called an ambulance, waiting with her family until they came, and politely refusing police intervention. On Friday night, another volunteer who goes by the name No Face conveyed a young woman who had been sexually harassed at Powderhorn to another, smaller encampment in his white cargo van. A central assertion of the police abolitionists is that many of the things people call 911 for could be answered by people without guns: mental health professionals, social workers, domestic violence advocates, and other responders, per the MPD150 report.

For the time being, these community-led policing initiatives have proliferated, often taking over from the MPD effective responsibility for public safety in their localities. Another group along these lines, formed in the wake of the Floyd uprising, are the Freedom Riders, an armed group of about fifty volunteers originally assembled by the Minneapolis NAACP to protect black-owned businesses during the riots. Yet another group, led by black female organizer Alicia Smith, known as the Minnesota Safe Streets Coalition is based in the Corcoran neighborhood and in Little Earth, an all-night patrol organized by Native American residents call themselves the protectors.

But how sustainable in the long run is it for autonomous, volunteer groups to provide community policinggiven the strenuous, high-stakes, all-night demand for security in the face of real social problems? I think were pushing for our elected officials to step up and show up and come to the table with solutions with us at this point, said Enblom, who volunteers occasionally at the Powderhorn sanctuary beyond coordinating her neighborhood watch. It shouldnt be the job of unpaid neighborhood volunteers to make it work.

Meanwhile, three of the councilmembers who support defunding the police had received a barrage of threats, and, for most of the month of June, the City had to assign them a private security detail, rather than MPD officers. The cost, it was revealed this week, was over $150,000.

This article is thesecondin a three-part series supported by the Economic Hardship Reporting Project.

Here is the original post:

After George Floyd, Who Will Police Minneapolis? | by Krithika Varagur - The New York Review of Books

The Occupation at City Hall – Dissent

The occupation sought to challenge the priorities of a city government that would choose to cut funding for guidance counselors, park workers, teachers, and other social services while continuing to spend billions on cops.

The apparition of New York City Council Speaker Corey Johnsons face on a projector screen, surrounded by hundreds of protesters, was one of the most uncannyyet definingimages of Occupy City Hall. After weeks of unrest, the city council faced its first substantial political test: a vote on the 2021 budget. For the protesters who had spent the week camping outside City Hall, Johnsons budget didnt do enough to reduce spending on the NYPD. Cheers, applause, and boos filled the middle plaza as council members, at bizarre camera angles characteristic of Zoom meetings, explained their votes deep into the night.

As occupiers watched the screen, others manned the barricades along the perimeter of the park, facing down police in riot gear who threatened to break into the encampment. At various points the boundaries of the space expanded as nearby blocks were annexed. A young man wearing a camouflage jacket and an American flag bandana as a mask later told me about having been arrested as a teenager and making the dreadful walk down Police Plaza Path. Dancing on that same walkway brought a sense of joy.

The occupation, which began on June 23 and was cleared out by police in the early hours of this morning, was established with one central demand: for the city council to vote to cut the NYPD budget by at least $1 billion. In New York City, taxpayers hand over about $11 billion to the police each yearmaking it one of the most lavishly funded departments per capita in the United States. Local frustration about the oversized presence of the NYPD isnt new. But the national movement that sprung up in the wake of George Floyds murder by a police officer in Minneapolis brought renewed energy and confidence to activists who argued that cities should reconsider how much they spend on policing. On June 26 the Minneapolis City Council had unanimously agreed to scrap their police and replace it with a Department of Community Safety and Violence Prevention. Activists around the country hoped to see more action along these lines. Through the month of June, in New York and across the country, protesters holding Defund the Police signs were kettled, tear gassed, and beaten up. In the face of nonviolent dissent, the polices only response was more violence.

Why do our students lack textbooks when the NYPD has submarine drones? one sign at the occupation asked. Why are our crucial programs and community services always the first on the chopping block? The occupation sought to challenge the priorities of a city government that would choose to cut funding for guidance counselors, park workers, teachers, and other social services while continuing to spend billions on cops. It began seven days before the scheduled vote on an austerity budget, which had to make up for a $9 billion shortfall in revenue due to the slowdown of the economy during the coronavirus pandemic. In its timing and focus on the vote, the occupation had a practical orientation. The activists who gathered around the screen for hours to watch council members speak showed deep investment in the politics of the immediately possible.

They were ultimately disappointed with the outcome of the vote. While the city government claimed a cut approaching $1 billion, activists said it was a sleight of hand. Instead of real cuts, the budget shifted money from the NYPD to other departments where it would still be spent on policing, and used calculations of an expected decrease in overtime claims with no mechanism to enforce it (the citys Independent Budget Office estimates that the force will exceed the overtime cap by $400 million). The council members apparent capitulation to the duplicity of Mayor Bill de Blasios budget drew much ire, and protesters vowed that the occupation would be the beginning, not the end, of their fight to defund the police. This fight could also be a defining moment for the council itself: as journalist Ross Barkan has noted, thirty-five of the fifty-one city council seats are term-limited and an organized push in 2021 by the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) or other groups could bring in a new wave of council members more attuned to their demands.

For a week the occupation also served as a dynamic site of debate among people eager to examine or live out the more radical politics of the moment, inspired by Black Lives Matter, the largest movement in this countrys history. The conversations I had and the interactions I observed in the camp suggested an ambitious political horizon. The camp was named Abolition Park, and the vision of a future without police or prisons mingled and, at times, clashed with the goal of reducing the NYPDs budget. The abolitionist current was manifest on various levelsfrom fiery disputes between activists to approaches to dealing with interpersonal harm within the space. As they camped out to draw attention to the upcoming vote, organizers sought to model, however imperfectly, the world they hoped to eventually build: one that wouldnt be free from conflict, but would be free from violence.

The occupation began when local activist group VOCAL-NY, Black Youth Project 100, and the Afrosocialists and Socialists of Color caucus of the DSA, all of whom fall under the Communities United for Police Reform umbrella, organized a march that ended with the establishment of the camp. Members from these groups coordinated the provision of food and supplies, recruited volunteers, and wrote community agreements for the space. Wearing a black Defund the Police face mask, Jawanza Williams of VOCAL-NY told me that, amid the nationwide spectacle of police violence, political education and teach-ins could challenge dominant ideas about the necessity of policing and introduce new people to abolitionist ideas. We have to be able to imagine new futures, he said. And we cannot use the frameworks that exist to imagine our future. We have to redefine some words. We have to redefine safety.

When I first arrived at Abolition Park on Friday, June 26, the occupation had been in place for three days. A green and white Don Panchito truck was giving away free tacos. In front of the fence guarding City Hall were tables for writing letters to representatives (QR codes took you directly to pages to contact a city council member or de Blasio, or to register to vote) and an ever-expanding library. Across from those tables was the medic camp and, further in, an island of people sitting on lawn chairs, mats, blankets, yoga mats, and tarps. Loud cheers erupted when a group of cyclists, on their own march against police brutality, coasted past. Motorists honked in support. Drivers in a trash truck received one of the loudest cheers of the night. Protesters yelled, within police earshot, These are the real essential workers. Around the edges I could hear the brush strokes of people making art on the floor. A shrine to Breonna Taylor, the twenty-six-year-old woman killed by the police in Louisville in March, was decorated with lit candles and flowers. Another monument featured a grid of fifteen people killed by the NYPDincluding Kimani Gray, Ramarley Graham, and Shantel Daviswith golden halos and rose petals scattered around. The whole encampment was a giant cenotaph for Black people killed by police.

This is the first time in my life living through a true revolutionary movement, Rudy Martinez, a graduate student of Colombian descent who was reading Roberto Bolaos The Savage Detectives under the canopy of trees, told me. Martinez wore round eyeglasses, an ankh necklace, and had a Sontag-like streak of white in his shoulder length hair. It had been hard for him to stay home and sleep or focus on anything else with all that had been happening across the country. He had been impressed by the seventeen-year-olds he kept running into and was excited to see teenagers do in one night what theorists have been theorizing for decades on end.

Some of the teenagers returned from their Maghrib prayers. One, a Moroccan-American with a black and white Palestinian keffiyeh wrapped around his head, was a baby when 9/11 happened. He was alarmed to realize that Black communities had been undergoing the harassment that Arab and Muslim-American ones had undergone in the last two decadesbut for hundreds of years. He could either be home playing video games or be here standing in solidarity, he said. On the inside of an old pizza box next to a tree, the demands of the Arab Diaspora were listed: the closing of NYPD offices or operations in countries in the Middle East and the redistribution of the money to Black working-class communities.

Isidore Barney, a seventeen-year-old in a tie-dye Black Lives Matter T-shirt who was overseeing a table of supplies, had arrived on the second day after seeing a call for volunteers on the @justiceforgeorgenyc Instagram page, which has been sharing information about planned protests and marches in the city. Before the summer break, she had been in school in Iceland, where she was making Black Lives Matter posters to hang up around Reykjavik and educate white Icelanders (especially boomers who arent active on social media) on racial injustice, especially microaggressions.

Building on a moment in which protests and marches have led to the radicalization of a young, multiracial cohort, the occupation included frequent political education workshops and teach-ins. Some were planned with the involvement of organizers and announced ahead of time at the camp and on Instagram. Others came together whenever, whereverall it took was enough demand and a teacher. A significant proportion were focused on abolitionist politics. A reading group met to discuss chapters of Ruth Wilson Gilmores Golden Gulag, a landmark study of mass incarceration in California. Other workshops taught participants about the fight to support public higher education or the importance of voting in all elections and not just the presidential ones. There were also de-escalation trainings to provide practical tools for when conversations got heatedas they often did.

Perhaps the most instructive educational moments were spontaneous principled struggle sessions that began when individuals called out problems or disagreements in the hope of holding others accountable. One such session occurred around 9.30 p.m. on the Friday I arrived. There had been a comedy show, in line with the organizers belief that joy is a form of resistance. At the Peoples Assemblywhere a majority of people circled around the main plaza lit by streetlights to listen to a speakernumerous people voiced their frustrations. I didnt sign up for Coachella, one said about the celebratory nature of the space. Another said comedy felt inappropriate when there are people still dying. Others argued about the quiet hours from 1 a.m. to 7 a.m., I didnt come here to sleep . . . the cops are being paid to babysit, a protester said. An organizer responded that there was not one leader, and things were up for discussion. But the crowd seemed to revel in the rebellions, and many cheered as the critiques kept coming.

Some of the issues raised highlighted the racial dynamics at the camp. One protester lamented that she felt like several groups of white people on the margins were not engaging with the programming. (A different protester later told me that he thought these privileged individuals were a tactical asset to the camp as any police incursions and violence against them would trigger more backlash than if it were directed at the Black protesters.) Another recurring critique challenged the lead organizers affiliations with the nonprofit world; there were heated discussions about whether or not nonprofit and grassroots are opposing constructions, and the ways that funding affected activism. Some people just wanted more energy and action; various groups sought to mobilize people to take over the nearby bridges, or streets, sometimes against the wishes of lead organizers who thought fewer bodies in the camp endangered it.

Among Black protesters, there were also wonderful debates that exhibited how various strains of Black liberationist thought, ranging from pan-African to Black nationalist, are being rearranged to meet a new historical moment. Other arguments devolved when the speaker chose to wield their identity to foreclose critique. These exchanges were also instructive: the dead-ends served as a live action political education on why its important to understand intersectionality as the prioritizing of politics that benefits the most oppressed among us, rather than a tool for individuals who want to deflect disagreement.

An ethos of community accountability and restorative justice informed behavior and expectations. At every turn, individuals worked to identify harm in what was being said, and to interrupt it, or address it later, without resorting to vengeance, violence, or other carceral habits. In this way, the camp sought to align the personal and political, even if it wasnt always easy to meet that goal. As people at the camp strove to abolish the cop within their minds (as one activist put it to me), they encountered barriers, psychic as well as political. One such moment of introspection for me was seeing a post shared by the @abolitionplaza Instagram that squared the apparent contradiction of calling for the arrests of the police officers who killed Breonna Taylor while espousing abolitionist politics. Grieving families have FULL permission to call for justice how they see fit . . . the post read. But we do need to do the work to examine what justice looks like free of vengeance.

From the outset, the occupation had been criticized by some for being reformist, and for not making a big enough ask after having mobilized so many people. (A teach-in at the camp by the Racial Justice Working Group of NYC-DSA argued for a 50 percent budget cut, for instance.) VOCAL-NY, one of the lead organizations behind the encampment had been accused by some of not being abolitionist enough. If you believe that Black Lives Matter, then you need to make sure that Black people are protected, Jawanza Williams told me, pointing to VOCALs decades of work on homelessness, the AIDS epidemic, mass incarceration, and the drug war. Who is most affected by all those issues is Black people. He explained that their membership (which consists of people directly affected by these issues) held a variety of perspectives. His work was to make sure that they are offered up other alternatives to think about the world and to be able to imagine Black futures that do not have prisons and that center the dignity and the humanity of people. He was open to principled critiques and thought that after this action, the organization would have a chance for reflection. Reforms, he said, are only antithetical to abolition if they expand the carceral state. He defended the occupation as an abolitionist action, since it reduces the power of the NYPD.

Defunding the police is not as radical as it is being made to seem, and the demands are eminently reasonable, said the historian and New Yorker staff writer Jelani Cobb in a recent talk about the protests. Governments shouldnt be looking to create great policing in underprivileged communities. The first people to say the police do too much are the police, Cobb said. If politicians had hired a consultant who advocated that police stick to core competenciesstopping violent crimethey would get a fat check and big round of applause. What policymakers have an issue with is who is making the argument to defund.

During the budget vote, some of explanations offered by council members appeared to validate Cobbs observation. In a statement explaining their stance in support of the budget, the councils Black, Latino, and Asian Caucus acknowledged that our city faces unique fiscal challenges that demand painful choices and shared sacrifice, pointing to the challenge of narrowing a $9 billion deficit despite $7 billion in lost revenue. They dismissed the defund the police call as an oversimplification of our centuries-long struggle on matters of race. To defund frames that struggle as an issue of economics, which is but part of a larger context that also includes changes to social structures, priorities, and culture.

Had the budget not been passed that night, there was a risk that the state would take over the task and enact cuts at its whim. And the final budget partially wrested back money for things like summer youth employment programs and counselors for schools in low-income communities. Still, even if they were acting with genuine concern for their constituents, many council members chose to oversimplify the matter. Leader Laurie Cumbo commented that the occupation felt like a colonization and incorrectly stated that it was not being led by Black activists. If you really cared about this, wed see you at NYCHA [New York City Housing Authority], at homeless shelters, she said. Work under the existing leadership of the communities that are already there. VOCAL-NY responded on Twitter that the organization had run a homeless drop-in space for more than a decade close to Cumbos office. Speaker Johnson also described listening to African-American council members as his north star, in the deliberations over the police budget.

It was bizarre to witness this tactic of using Blackness (or proximity to Blackness) to support the budget in lieu of critical engagement with the substance of policies that harm Black people. The call to defund the police was being framed as an extraneous demand, and yet at its center was the desire of Black and brown New Yorkers (and more than half of all New Yorkers, according to a recent poll) to see reallocation of money from a violent police force to services they count on. The politicians rejection of the legitimacy of the protesters was a local version of a dynamic weve seen on the national stage. As the scholar and writer Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor noted about the Congressional Black Caucus earlier in June, we can no longer assume that shared identity means a shared commitment to the strategies necessary to improve the lives of a vast majority of Black people. Class tensions among African-Americans have produced new fault lines that the romance of racial solidarity simply cannot overcome.

Part of the point of recent protests, I believed, was to stop treating Black people, or any people, as a monolith. We dont have to agree, but at least we faced each other in the park, Nelini Stamp, an organizer of the occupation, told me as we talked about her experience being challenged by other activists at the camp and, later, by the council members. Even if it was painful in the park, what happened was more principled than how some city council members decided to view protests over the last few weeks. The fundamental difference, she felt, was the dismissal of the hundreds of thousands of people who had, in the streets and over emails and calls, tried to engage with their elected leaders. The majority of council members voted to pass a budget that not only failed to actually cut $1 billion from the NYPD budget, but also included the Mayors plan to increase the police budget by $42 million by issuing New Yorkers more tickets.

As the budget passed, I thought of Lou, a Cameroonian immigrant who had been brutally beaten and arrested within minutes of joining his first protest and was held just across the street at 1 Police Plaza. The night before the vote he wondered how so many people have been bystanders for so long; how political leaders in New York could say Black Lives Matter when the killer of Eric Garner walked free; what it must do to a person psychologically to see another human being terrorized for so long, and do nothing about it. He is not fully himself anymore. A human being when you see another human being oppressed or killed or mistreateda real human being stands up and stops it.

Lous comments reminded me of a session during the Peoples Assembly when the gathered group sang ancestors watching / I know they watching / ancestors watching I know I know, as individuals yelled out the names of their ancestors, biological and ideological: Marsha P. Johnson! Sylvia Rivera! Bayard Rustin! Fannie Lou Hamer! Malcolm X! The names came faster and faster, drowning out the chirps of a green parrot, the patter of feet, faint voices on a megaphone, the melodious conversations and laughter from the margins of the camp, the hum of cars on the highway nearby, the groans of the subway below, and the helicopter hovering above. The ancestors arent the only ones watching anymore. The police have ended the occupation in the park, but with upcoming elections, council members and politicians are on notice.

Anakwa Dwamena is a contributing editor for Africa Is a Country, and on the editorial staff of the New Yorker magazine.

Read more here:

The Occupation at City Hall - Dissent

We need and deserve far more than ‘fair pay’ – Morning Star Online

OUR public-sector unionsUnison, GMB and Unite have been pressing for a fair payrise for council staff.

Their arguments are irrefutable. Not only on the grounds of pure justice: public-sector wages have been in lockdown for years as part of the Tory and Lib Dems failing strategy to reduce public expenditure. Last year a measly 2 per cent was won, but the outstanding case for a substantial rise remains unanswered.

The case for a pay rise rests also on the grounds of commonsense. The unions point out that the net cost of a pay rise for council and care staff, many of whom are very low-paid, is lower than the headline cost because it would increase the Treasury tax take, raise national-insurance contribution, reduce spending on tax credits and employment subsidies and boost local economies.

The true cost, the unions argued, is under 800 million.

Employers in both private and public sectors know full well that most of their costs power, raw materials etc are fixed. The biggest variable cost is wages, and thus whenever employers are under pressure from market forces or government policies to cut costs it is what our US cousins call compensation that suffers.

The term compensation suggests that the employee is compensated for the time they spend at the beck and call of the employer.A much better way of looking at pay is to think of it as that part of the value of our labour that the boss doesnt take as profit.

Except for the special case of privatised public services where we, the taxpayers, subsidise the profits of the contractors, public services are not there to make a profit but to maintain the stability and good order of our collective lives and deliver the services that make modern living approximate to a civilised existence.

Pay levels in the bigger market for labour power in the rest of the economy are a measure of how far public-sector pay has fallen behind, so it is easy to see how unions alight on the idea that a pay rise would be fair.

This is especially true in an economy where women earn much less than men. Class is the organising factor, where men from professional and managerial backgrounds earn 21 per cent more than working-class women in the same professions while black and ethnic-minority professionals generally earn less than white colleagues in similar roles.

A useful article in the Morning Stars Full Marx series pointed out that the biggest disparities in pay are with the hierarchy of pay grades between upper managerial and so-called routine occupations where this is regarded as normal, justified on the need to provide incentives the implication being that care jobs bring their own rewards.

This factor is especially important in local government where the full social and human value of the lowest-paid jobs as revealed in the pandemic is not reflected in pay levels.

Our local-government unions and the workers they represent deserve every support in the campaign, not only for themselves but because raising the average level of pay in this massive sector raises the level for everyone else.

In our futures there does lie the essential prerequisite for a solution to this seemingly never-ending struggle. This is when the working class receives the full value of its collective labour.

Instead of the conservative motto: A fair days wage for a fair days work, argued Karl Marx in Wage Price and Profit, trade unions ought to inscribe on their banner the revolutionary watchword: Abolition of the wages system!

Original post:

We need and deserve far more than 'fair pay' - Morning Star Online

It’s a tough job market, so this college grad is hoping to land an internship anything to get some experience – CNBC

CNBC's "College Voices 2020" is a series written by CNBC summer interns from universities across the country about coming of age, launching new careers and job hunting during a global pandemic. They're finding their voices during a time of great social change and hope for a better future. As part of the series, each student chose a recent college graduate to profile to provide an up-close and personal look at who the class of 2020 is, what issues they're facing as they try to find a job in these extraordinary times and how they're tackling them. Here is the story of Jordan Levy, a graduate of Rutgers University.

The coronavirus pandemic has created a stir of events for everyone across the world these last couple of months. The unemployment rate has skyrocketed, many businesses are temporarily closed,more than100,000 people have died, and the fear of what will happen in the coming months lingers on.That makes it all the more difficult for the Class of 2020 to find a job in the worst job market since the Great Depression.

Jordan Levy, a recent graduate of Rutgers University with a B.A. in journalism/media studies and music, has already felt this impact. As an African-American, he has taken this pandemic, the events of George Floyd's death, and the economy, to heart. He haslived through the 2008 recession, the 2010 BP Oil Spill, a mass amount of unarmed black men being killed, and now the coronavirus. All at the age of 22 years old.

I took some time to sit down with Levy, whowasa good friend of mine growing up, to talk about these issues and histhoughts about thefutureamidthe chaos.

Levy explainshow he has been working a lot in the sun at his new jobwithapackage-delivery service. He twirls his face mask in his fingersas he describesthe lack of social distancing going on in the warehouses, and the lack of enforcement to wear masks. I take this information in as I ponder his professional career in this coronavirus life we are all living.

Jordan Levy in a subway station on the way to his former internship.

Source: Jasmine Cunningham

Levy had an internship at a magazine earlier in the year that was before the coronavirus pandemic hit. Around the beginning of March, they told him they would have "fewer weeks" in the office. Then those fewer weeks turned into a couple of days, and those days turned into the internship being shut down completely. It was clear in his voice that he was upset. This wasn't the launching pad to his career that Levy had hoped.

None of this was as he or any of the Class of 2020 had hoped. Levy graduated in May from home via a computer screen instead of a stadium filled with tassels and regalia. It was a pre-recorded ceremony, with the graduates' names scrolling past the screen like the end credits of a movie. Except, there wasn't that same gratifying feeling you get at the end of a movie when the credits roll.

Newly graduated but feeling unsettled that this was how the launch of his adult life was happening, Levy took a lot more time to read, but found it hard to write new material. As a journalist, his life revolves around writing, yet being cooped up inside for such a long period of time with no inspiration from the outside world made putting pen to paper (or rather, fingers to keyboard) a tough task. Furthermore, his tone became a bit more dismal when he brought up how "freelance budgets are drying up," making picking up even part-time work in journalism tough right now.

I brought up the issues of George Floyd, expecting his demeanor to be that of anger and frustration, but found him calm and relaxed. The death of George Floyd, after a Minneapolis cop kneeled on his neck for over 8 minutes, was upsetting but the protests and social upheaval that resulted were "long overdue."

"There is more progress on police reform happening in the past few weeks than in the last few years," Levy said.

More From Invest in You:It's a tough outlook for graduates in the Class of 2020Many college graduates are relying on unemployment to pay the billsPerseverance is key for my generation to succeed and create change in the world

Rubbing his hands together, he brings up the chants for the abolition of police and prisons a notion that "a lot of people have never heard before," which sounds scary and confusing at first thought. Levy explains that the calls for abolition will more than most likely not be met. But what could happen and what people want is "the substantial decrease in the political power of the police, more than anything else." That includes the unions, the supporters of unions, etc. I ask him what he believes is the right course to go, being that both of us will inhabit this world as the next generation. He says abolition of the police but then chuckles, noting that such a decision feels like it would be in the same lane as communism, a word and philosophy hit with such taboo that it started the Cold War between the U.S. and Russia.

I ask him what his plans are post-graduation and if he's worried about money.

Levy says he's stopped looking for entry-level jobs because a lot of seasoned journalists have lost their jobs from this virus and if they can't find a job, then his chances are even less likely. Instead, he says he'll pursue finding an internship just to get some experience in his field. Based on his past experience with an internship, he feels like it's better "to have something rather than nothing."

As for money concerns, it helps that he isn't a big spender, "which is a natural gift," he says. Plus, with the pandemic, no one is making a lot of plans to go anywhere which makes saving money even easier than usual.

So, what does he think about the economy?

Levy says he does not believe a Biden or Trump presidency will do much to change the economy in an effective manner.

What he hopes for is that the government will help people get through this and be more responsive to the cries and demands of its citizens. He'd like to see a more progressive approach for how money is distributed in America things like defunding the police, putting more money into mental health institutions, increasing the minimum wage and taxing not only the rich, but corporations more. He sees the need for less corporate power in politics as a whole.

As I get up to lead him out, we fist pump and say our goodbyes. He places his face mask back on a visual metaphor for how much more needs to be done in order to get things right. The course of real change is met by being in discomfort, not being complacent.

SIGN UP: Money 101 is an 8-week learning course to financial freedom, delivered weekly to your inbox.

CHECK OUT:How I became a millionaire in my 30s and retired early by learning to invest during the 2008 recession viaGrow with Acorns+CNBC.

Disclosure: NBCUniversal and Comcast Ventures are investors inAcorns.

Read more:

It's a tough job market, so this college grad is hoping to land an internship anything to get some experience - CNBC

In the Age of Abolition, Many Reforms Constitute Incarceration by Another Name – Truthout

As millions of people ponder a future without police and prisons, and as authorities try to dream up ways of derailing the momentum of popular insurrection, Maya Schenwar and Victoria Laws new book, Prison By Any Other Name: The Harmful Consequences of Popular Reforms, provides a guide to staying on the path to transformation. In the book, Schenwar (Truthouts editor-in-chief) and Law (an investigative reporter who has been covering prison issues for Truthout and other outlets for years) balance two critical needs. First, they alert us to reformist policy tricks and rebranding that authorities will use to keep reproducing oppression on a mass scale. Second, they help us shape our imagining of a different society to view abolition not like a monumental goal we have no hope of ever reaching, but something we practice every day. In this interview, Schenwar and Law discuss how they came to write the book, why reform movements can often co-opt the push for abolition, and why working toward abolition is not simply a distant vision but something we must practice every day.

James Kilgore: How did you come to write this book and why do you think it is relevant at this moment?

Victoria Law: We started writing this book in 2015. We could never have predicted this moment of demands to defund the police, increasing calls for abolition and people wanting to know what a world without police (and prisons) might look like. But here we are and our book examines the pitfalls of popularly proposed reforms that come up repeatedly as alternatives to mass incarceration. These alternatives fail to recognize that policing and imprisonment are built on bedrocks of white supremacy, colonialism and patriarchy. They also ignore the underlying causes of why people commit harm (or engage in acts that are criminalized). Instead, these alternatives pose seemingly more humane measures than locking people in physical buildings, called jails, prisons or immigrant detention centers. But theyre still forms of coercive control. One wrong step like going to the store without permission could mean incarceration. We challenge these reforms and highlight how people are creating new ways to address and prevent violence and harm. Like everyone, I have engaged in and been personally impacted by violence and harm. Punitive policies do nothing to prevent or address harm, nor help people heal from harm.

Never miss the news and analysis you care about.

Maya Schenwar: Yes Vikki and I were both wary of how sinister new forms of confinement and policing and surveillance were gaining traction in the name of reform.

Part of this wariness emerged from witnessing my sister go back and forth between jails, prisons and other forms of confinement for 15 years, mainly due to her addiction to heroin. When she wasnt in jail or prison when she was free she wasnt actually free. She was bound to an electronic monitor, under harsh probation restrictions, or confined in a mandated drug treatment facility she couldnt leave. This took a toll on her. She would always say her main desire was to be entirely free from institutions, but it felt impossible. None of these alternatives did anything to help her move beyond addiction; study after study has shown us that in general, you cannot mandate people into lasting recovery.

Meanwhile, Id been researching incarceration and editing stories about prisons for many years for Truthout. When I started writing about prisons in 2005, few people wanted to read about that issue. By 2015, there was so much energy fueling the prison reform train. And there was a massive and long-overdue national focus on police violence, anti-Blackness and racial injustice, in the midst of the Black Lives Matter movement and related struggles.

Although there was momentum behind shrinking the system among grassroots activists and powerful organizing happening, politicians were putting energy into reforms that would not change the carceral system at all. We saw a need for a book that would address the limits of and the harm caused by many popular reforms that were being accepted as improvements.

What do you mean by your title: Prison By Any Other Name?

Schenwar: Our title shows how the common reforms we describe are often new forms of imprisonment. Electronic monitoring is a good example; its basically a form of house arrest, as you note in your work, James, terming it e-carceration. We also write a lot about the use of psychiatric hospitals and locked-down drug treatment centers as places to put people as alternatives to prison. These reforms are popular, including among many liberals, because they seem kinder and gentler but they still involve keeping people whove been criminalized out of the larger society. They dont challenge the process of deeming people criminal, a label which is overwhelmingly applied to Black and Indigenous people and other people of color, trans people, disabled people, drug users and other marginalized groups.

These things are not the same as prison: Most people would rather be confined and surveilled in their home than behind bars. But the only options should not be a bad cage or a worse cage. We need to imagine a society with no cages at all.

Can you talk about one or two of the most memorable or surprising encounters you had with people you interviewed in researching this work?

Law: One of my early and most memorable interviews was with Elliott Fukui. Starting from the age of 12, Elliott had been placed in involuntary psychiatric confinement 20 times in seven years. He described how psychiatric confinement, which is often seen as something helpful or protective for those who are experiencing suicidal ideation or mental health crises, actually mimic the punitive structures of imprisonment including solitary confinement, physical violence, lack of human contact, and failures to acknowledge the role of systemic racism and oppressions or underlying traumas leading to mental health issues.

By the time I interviewed Elliott, he was in his thirties, had built a strong support system and developed a safety plan among his friends and community to support him when he was verging on crisis. Hes now an organizer who gives trainings about disability justice training which includes both examining the political history behind the ideas of madness and confinement and building a wellness and safety support system so that a person (and their loved ones) can avoid being entangled in a system that might end with involuntarily confinement, under medication or other controls. His experience challenges the idea that people who are most impacted must look to outside experts to determine what is best for them and instead can create their own paths to safety and wellness.

Schenwar: Patricia, a mother of five, wrote me about being confined to an electronic monitor. Shed been charged with burglary for entering the home of a friend, with whom she had an open-door policy, to retrieve her own medicine. When she got in touch, she had been on house arrest with a monitor for two years. Shed expected to be done in six months. Her sentence dragged on and on largely because she could not pay the weekly fees of $115 to be on the monitor. She cut corners. Her family went a winter without heat, their car was repossessed, they stopped going to the doctor, but still fell behind. Meanwhile, the restrictions of house arrest meant she couldnt even take her children to the park. Her case worker told her that her sentence would continue until she caught up on fees. Meanwhile, she was charged for every week that her sentence was extended.

Here she was, trapped in her home due to poverty. In our first conversation she had told me, If I had just done time, I wouldve been done by now. My whole family is on house arrest and my kids cant understand why.

Stories like Patricias made us want to show how these alternatives that are assumed to be better than prison are still harsh, punitive, oppressive, harmful, and that if we support them, were supporting deep harm inflicted upon human beings, families and communities.

Many actors in these new forms of incarceration pose as guardians of social welfare and protectors of the poor. Can you talk a little about who these people are, how they function and why they pose a danger to an agenda of transformation?

Schenwar: So many people are being deputized as police. Teachers are enlisted to call in the police about a whole range of discipline problems, fueling the school-to-prison pipeline. Doctors, nurses, social workers, child care providers and many others are mandated reporters to Child Protective Services. In 18 states, everyone is a mandated reporter, meaning were all being called upon to police our neighbors parenting. Psychiatrists perpetuate institutions of coercive control in the name of mental health. Case workers serve as gatekeepers to social services and ultimately police their clients. Some policing practices involve recruiting community members to serve as the eyes and ears of the police, surveilling their neighbors and calling the police whenever they sense danger a determination often grounded in racism, classism, transphobia and ableism.

People didnt get into these professions to be police, but its what theyve become. Its not just people with badges and guns. What makes it so insidious is the way in which its supposed to be enforced by all of us. Thats why Vikki and I and other abolitionists are calling for an end to policing, not just the official police.

Obviously, you both think deeply about how racial oppression is intertwined both historically and in these processes of reform. Many people are familiar with the disproportionate incarceration of Black people, but have you found new dimensions to racial oppression in these reforms that you write about?

Law: Racism, colonialism and white supremacy show up in all the popularly proposed alternatives. For instance, we examine the child welfare system, which some have dubbed the New Jane Crow because of how it targets Black women and women of color. People often think this is designed to help parents and children. In reality, the system surveils, controls and punishes. Mariame Kaba calls it the child kidnapping system. A parent doesnt have to be accused of abuse or violence to become entangled in the child welfare system; child welfare intervenes because a family is living in poverty and someone calls in a complaint not having heat in their building or letting their children go to the nearby playground while theyre at work. Many of these types of complaints and the systems reaction draw on cultural assumptions about Black women as mothers vestiges from the times of slavery when slave owners justified breaking apart families and selling children by telling themselves that Black women did not love and care for their children. When we were writing this book, a series of events occurred where people called child welfare on Black mothers because their children were left asleep in a car. At the same time, white parents were writing about raising free-range children, where they allowed their 7-year-old children to roam the city, including taking the subway, without any parental or adult supervision. Public reaction to free-range parenting was mixed, but the child welfare system did not become involved. In the cases of Black mothers who could not afford daycare, children were taken away and placed in foster care.

Schenwar: By the time theyre 18, the majority of Black children have experienced a child protective services investigation. As the child welfare system increasingly targeted Black and Indigenous families in the 1960s and 1970s, it became more punitive. And punitive meant tearing children from their families.

Racial oppression is pervasive in the helping institutions we discuss in our book. Many people love the idea of mandating mental health treatment instead of prison, but these treatments are coercive and inherently oppressive if theyre mandated by a court. Black people are three to five times as likely as white people to be handed a schizophrenia diagnosis one of the serious categories is most likely to result in court-mandated treatment. In the 1960s and 70s, some doctors called schizophrenia protest psychosis and insisted on strong sedatives to address it: trying to literally suppress peoples drive to participate in Black liberation movements. In the late 19th century, some Southern towns labeled Black residents insane by census-takers. Throughout history weve seen how these labels increase peoples vulnerability to measures like sterilization and institutionalization.

We cant separate this countrys systems of care from its explicitly punitive institutions, pretending the former are free of racial oppression.

You obviously place a heavy emphasis on gender analysis. In what ways do you think the gender dynamics of reform are different than what happens when mass incarceration is done with steel and concrete cages?

Law: There are both similarities and differences. For instance, when a father goes to prison, he often has a female partner or family member to take care of his children. Women, on the other hand, are more likely to be primary or sole caregivers to their children. Incarceration removes a mother from that role, making it more likely that her children will land in foster care and be legally terminated from her custody. In 1997, Congress passed (and Clinton signed into law) the Adoption and Safe Families ACT (ASFA), which mandates that, if a child has been in foster care for 15 of the past 22 months, the state needs to begin proceedings to terminate parental rights.

Popular alternatives to incarceration, such as mandatory drug treatment or involuntary psychiatric confinement, might have the same effect. If a mother (or other caregiver) has no one to care for her children while she is confined Somewhere Else, she risks having her children placed in the foster care system. In response, in New York State, advocates, including formerly incarcerated women, fought for the ASFA Expanded Discretion Act to allow judges to pause ASFAs timeline for parents in prison and those whose children are in foster care while they are in residential drug treatment.

Can you describe how you became abolitionists and why it is particularly useful today during the mass uprising?

Law: We live in a society [obsessed with] punishment and punitive policies. This hasnt stopped violence and harm from happening. If it did, we should be living in one of the safest eras in human history.

We need to recognize that, everyone in this world (who is older than a baby or toddler) has both engaged in harm and been impacted by harm. Mass incarceration and the popular alternatives to mass incarceration do not address the underlying reasons behind why harm and violence happen. They dont challenge or change structural conditions (such as racism, misogyny or poverty) or individual reasoning and behavior.

Were in a momentous time when increasing numbers of people are recognizing police do not keep us safe and are often purveyors of violence. Locking up people (mostly Black, Brown and other marginalized people) has not kept us safe, either. We need to put more resources into structures that have proven to meet peoples basic needs and to keep us safe. These include affordable housing, access to medical and mental health care, food, living-waged employment (if not a universal basic income).

When we interviewed Ruth Wilson Gilmore, she encouraged us to think about abolition not as an aspirational adventure but as already-accumulated encounters, awarenesses and activities. She pointed out that organizing for workers rights is a step toward abolition; organizing for environmental justice is a step toward abolition; anything that gets us closer toward meeting peoples actual needs and transforming conditions that are likely to produce harm is a step toward abolition. This helps us view abolition not like a monumental goal we have no hope of ever reaching, but something we practice every day.

Schenwar: Getting to abolition was a journey. My first real, deep personal interactions with the system involved a friend who was incarcerated prior to his deportation, my sisters incarceration in juvenile jail and friends who were incarcerated for acts of civil disobedience. In all of these cases, I could tell myself, Ok, we could get rid of juvenile jail and stop incarcerating people for immigration and end the drug war and free political prisoners, but wed still need prisons to address real problems. Of course, incarceration doesnt solve problems, it entrenches and deepens problems, but this is the mindset thats pervasive in our society, that we somehow need prisons.

Several things pushed me fully toward abolition. One was reading and re-reading Angela Davis, Ruth Wilson Gilmore and Beth Richies work, as well as my mentor Kathy Kellys writings from prison. They encourage us to think beyond incarceration. My friend and pen pal, Lacino Hamilton, who remains in prison in Michigan after more than 20 years inside, has also been one of my primary mentors. Lacino has a deep analysis of how the systems groundings in anti-Blackness and capitalism translate to how everyday life unfolds in prison that you cant just take those things away from prison; but must uproot those groundings. And witnessing the brutality of my sisters repeated incarcerations, and how they never addressed any of her issues but made them worse, caused me to question the entire system more deeply.

It is very significant that calls to abolish police and prisons are now infusing mainstream public discourse. This call to uproot the entire system is being emphasized again and again. Even if some people do not immediately agree, the fact they are even hearing abolition is a thing, that policing is a manifestation of white supremacy and capitalism and should be vanquished is significant. It plants a seed.

Police, prisons and the alternative prisons we describe in our book grew out of a foundation of oppression, and they continue to reproduce oppression on a mass scale. Once someone fully comprehends that, its hard to argue that these institutions have any place in the life-affirming and liberatory society we want to live in.

This interview has been lightly edited for clarity.

Read the rest here:

In the Age of Abolition, Many Reforms Constitute Incarceration by Another Name - Truthout

OP-ED: Its time to rethink how we deal with crime – SaltWire Network

HALIFAX, N.S.

In recent weeks, calls to defund police agencies have grown throughout the U.S. and Canada as disturbing images of police brutality against African-Americans and Indigenous people continue to receive high-profile attention.

The term defund is an ambiguously provocative moniker. Even if it is taken literally, there is little chance that any resulting policies will lead to the abandonment of big-city police agencies or the discarding of traditional law enforcement approaches to crime. Indeed, most of the immediate reforms contemplated in such cities as New York, Los Angeles and Toronto in recent weeks entail only a modicum of budget cuts to their police agencies.

To be sure, some advocate for the abolition of police forces, in part because of the historical and systemic racism that persists in policing and law enforcement cultures, policies, and programs.

Calls to defund branches of the criminal justice system (CJS) are not limited to police; a prison abolition movement has grown in North America and Europe as critics demand a wholesale move away from state-imposed institutionalization and punishment and toward community-based corrections, rehabilitation, and social reintegration. Solitary confinement has become a lightning rod for prison abolitionists who cite research and high-profile cases exposing how its use constitutes a human rights violation.

Calls to defund and abolish the police and the broader carceral structure of criminal justice are the result of an increased understanding of the inherent limitations, misuses, and injustices of the CJS that put the sanctity of the entire system beyond even the most meaningful reforms. The traditional cops, courts, and corrections approach is insufficient to unilaterally control, prevent, or deter acts that threaten public safety; the CJS is unable to cope with the actual quantity of crime, fails to identify most criminal offenders and bring them to justice, fails to rehabilitate offenders, and fails to address the underlying factors that contribute to crime and criminality.

There is scant theoretical justification for the traditional CJS approach to controlling crime. Deterrence theory which assumes that crime results from a rational calculation of the costs and benefits of criminal activity and therefore potential offenders can be swayed from such behaviour through the threat of punishment rests on the false premise that altering criminal penalties will alter behaviour. In fact, research and statistics generally conclude that increasing the severity of penalties has only a negligible effect on crime and recidivism, especially among serious and chronic offenders (although this body of knowledge did little to influence the Harper Governments tough-on-crime agenda).

Critics of the CJS also point to its enormous costs, the high rate of incarceration generally and of nonviolent offenders specifically, and the negative impact that a criminal record and incarceration can have on people.

Perhaps the most damning critique of the CJS is that it is fraught with systemic injustices perpetrated against the innocent, victims, those from lower socio-economic backgrounds, and those with mental illnesses. The most frequent injustices of the CJS in North America are committed against people of African or Indigenous heritage, who are arrested, punished, incarcerated, abused, and killed by the system at a rate far greater than Caucasian offenders. The criminal justice system in Nova Scotia has long been plagued by racism, the latest evidence of which is documented in a 2019 report on racial profiling by Halifax-area police showing that black people were carded at a rate six times higher than that of white people.

Another fundamental criticism of the CJS is that it is almost entirely reactive when addressing crime and disorder issues and, as a result, only addresses the symptoms of much deeper social problems. What makes this particularly troubling is that police and the CJS have increasingly become the main state institution in dealing with a broad range of social problems that have nothing to do with crime, such as family breakdown, mental health illnesses, homelessness, poverty, inequality, and racism.

The intrinsic faults and unfairness of the CJS underscore the importance of the defund and abolition movements. It should be noted, however, that many activists and intellectuals behind the calls for defunding are not endorsing the abolition of law enforcement agencies necessarily; instead, they are arguing that funding and other resources be shifted to policies, programs, agencies, and institutions that can more effectively and fundamentally address the root causes of crime and other social problems while avoiding the abuses and injustices wrought by the CJS.

For years, criminologists such as myself have called for a massive shift in resources away from the CJS towards crime prevention and, more specifically, problem-solving solutions that emphasize social and community development. This alternative approach is inherently proactive in that it focuses on the social (root) causes of criminality by strengthening such institutions as the family, housing, schools, health care, social welfare systems, and local communities and economies.

Central to this philosophy is the belief that many social problems currently being dealt with through the CJS should be treated as public health issues and addressed accordingly. A proactive, preventative, public health approach to crime and violence emphasizes such alternatives to policing, law enforcement and the CJS as social workers (to work with troubled families), outreach workers (for at-risk youth and homeless populations), conflict mediators (to prevent violence), community-based psychiatric nurses (to deal with mental health emergencies), supervised group homes (for those with complex needs), restorative justice (as an alternative to courts), as well as addictions treatment centres and safe injection sites.

The American criminologist Peter Greenwood distinguishes between the ultimate goals of the CJS and that of social problem-solving crime prevention. He asserts that the main role of the CJS in helping to produce a civil and orderly society is the control of individuals and groups. In contrast, crime prevention through social and community development is ultimately geared toward the improved functioning of the individual and society.

While disagreements may exist over the definition and extent of defunding, there is a growing need to fundamentally re-think how we deal with crime in society. At the very least, less emphasis should be placed on the use of policing, law enforcement, and the broader CJS as the front-line institutions in dealing with social problems. Concomitantly, resources need to be shifted towards those policies, programs, organizations, and institutions that truly address the root causes of crime through proactive, community development, social welfare, and public health interventions, especially ones that serve those who are most marginalized and discriminated against in our society.

Stephen Schneider, a resident of Wolfville, is a professor with St. Marys Universitys Department of Criminology.

Read the original:

OP-ED: Its time to rethink how we deal with crime - SaltWire Network

Not Another NHS Reorganisation? – Medscape

In his State of the Union address in 1962 President John F Kennedy declared 'The time to repair the roof is when the sun is shining'.

It would seem reasonable to infer from this that it would be a really bad time to fix the roof during a huge typhoon, or perhaps during an unprecedented global pandemic if we were to be thinking about this in terms of the NHS.

The NHS is a huge, complicated organisation and has shown itself to be remarkably resilient for dealing with the first acute phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. I think most commentators would praise how the NHS has coped with this, showing great flexibility, including being able to rapidly bring on-line huge increases in critical care capacity to ensure that this precious commodity was not overwhelmed by demand. There are rightly held concerns regarding the delays - which are becoming more evident - affecting cancer diagnosis and treatment and other elective waiting lists.

The complexity of the NHS and the trends of demand - particularly as the UK is dealing with an increasingly elderly population with multiple medical conditions - means that NHS planning needs to be considered over the medium to long-term. Unfortunately, it seems that our political leaders rarely think of such timescales and usually only consider actions over the terms of a parliament and their chances of re-election.

Over the years the NHS has gone through multiple, and considerable, reorganisations, from the establishment of NHS foundation trusts under Tony Blair's government in The NHS Plan in 2000 - which gave much more autonomy to high performing hospitals - to the more recent and lamented Andrew Lansley reforms in the Health and Social Care Act 2012. Lansley's act was opposed by the BMA as it was felt that it would increase the amount of private provision within the NHS - this has proved unfounded. But it did result in massive organisational changes. Primary Care Trusts (PCTs) and Strategic Health Authorities (SHAs) were abolished and their 60-80 billion worth of commissioning was transferred to GP-led clinical commissioning groups. These changes were hugely costly, with projected redundancy costs of 1 billion for around 21,000 PCT and SHA staff, many of whom received large redundancy payments only to be re-employed in almost identical roles for the new groups.

Prior to the introduction of Lansley's reforms warnings were given that the abolition of SHAs - which were responsible for improving regional services and for co-ordinating responses to challenges posed - and the disruption to the speciality of public health with diminished funding, would disrupt our ability to respond to an emergency or epidemic situation. It is unfortunate to consider that if the COVID-19 pandemic had occurred 10 years earlier, the local authorities would have been in a much better position to cope and to mobilise far more quickly than happened this year, when the contact tracing was abandoned in early March.

As the death toll mounts in the UK, with the official overall number at more than 45,000, many feel that the Government should have done better in its response. It seems unable to acknowledge any mistakes and continues to make claims of 'world beating/leading' initiatives including a 'game-changing app' for track and trace that was abandoned at an apparent cost of more than 11 million, for 6 weeks work. The manual track and trace system, despite great fanfare and claims of great success, appears to be failing to contact approximately 1 in 5 confirmed COVID cases, and of those contacted around 70% of their close contacts were identified and asked to self-isolate. Although freely admitting limited knowledge about the epidemiology, the large percentage not being identified leaves me concerned about our ability to identify and limit any further local outbreaks.

Unfortunately, one area we appear to have been 'world leading' during this pandemic is with the number of health and social care workers that have sadly lost their lives. The UK, with at least 540 deaths, is second only to Russia (545).

With this background it is concerning to learn that the Prime Minister is planning a radical reorganisation of the NHS, and the thought of the incumbent government and its ministers gaining more direct control of the NHS does not fill me with any confidence following their continued apparent mismanagement of the current crisis. It is claimed that there is ministerial frustration with the role played by some agencies during the pandemic, particularly Public Health England (PHE), and with the independence of Simon Stevens, the Health Service's chief executive.

Any further major reorganisations will undoubtedly come at significant cost and would seem wasteful in the current climate of stretched NHS budgets. These will likely worsen rather than improve once the full economic cost of the COVID pandemic becomes clear and the Government's spending spree needs to be repaid. The cynics may suggest that this apparent desire to reform the NHS is merely one of the opening gambits for the inevitable 'blame game' that seems certain to follow, and highlighting problems within the NHS would help absolve or deflect blame from government.

The Lansley reforms that introduced competition between health care providers possibly had no place in a national health service, and many organisations are already working in closer partnerships at local levels to ensure that resources can be used more efficiently, for example, centralisation of acute stroke services, rather than each hospital delivering this 24/7.

The NHS is far from perfect, but it has shown incredible adaptability and resilience in its response to this unprecedented crisis. The last thing the NHS needs at this time is the distraction of another huge reorganisation which would possibly be motivated for short-term political gains rather than necessarily for the long-term future of the NHS. It is worth stating that some of the initiatives that were enforced by the pandemic need to be explored further and possibly maintained, for example, increased use of telephone and video consultations, and perhaps the introduction of A&E by appointment.

I'd even go as far to suggest that given the opportunity to make a sensible long-term plan, with appropriate funding and with limited political interference (I know this is unlikely to happen), the NHS could, indeed, get back to being 'world beating'.

Original post:

Not Another NHS Reorganisation? - Medscape

Race-based disadvantage denialism is a head-on assault on the transformation project – Daily Maverick

Former minister of trade and industry Rob Davies. (Photo: EPA / Nic Bothma)

The reinvigoration of the Black Lives Matter campaign in the aftermath of the murder of George Floyd has underscored the extent to which racism and race-based disadvantage has persisted in the United States more than 150 years after the abolition of slavery and more than 50 years after the passage of civil rights legislation.

A growing number of people around the world are now recognising the necessity for further steps to be taken in many countries to eliminate structural racism as an integral part of promoting greater inclusivity and social justice.

Yet, in South Africa, we still have people who want to argue that because we have had universal suffrage for just 26 years, the effects of hundreds of years of discrimination and institutionalised racism have disappeared and any remaining disadvantage must be due to individual circumstances.

One such denialist is Paul Janisch (Business Maverick, 22/7/2020). For some years, Janisch has run a blog dedicated to demonising any measure aimed at promoting broad-based black economic empowerment (BBBEE). His stock in trade has involved highly personalised attacks, including developing an infantile nickname for myself: Bolshie Bob. Wednesdays piece was yet another example of his red-baiting anti-transformation rants.

For the record, when I was appointed minister of trade and industry in 2009, the 2003 Black Empowerment Act was already in force. The Codes of Good Practice developed in terms of it had the merit of establishing a system to measure and compare various BEE initiatives then underway.

The act also sought to promote and encourage empowerment by setting this as a factor to be taken into account by public authorities when awarding incentives or other benefits. Research presented at the BBBEE Advisory Council, however, indicated that despite this legislation:

The overall result was that what passed for BEE was all too often a share deal in which some black persons received a minority stake in some established company unmatched by any real managerial or leadership control. Companies involved in such deals, again all too often, presented themselves as empowered for the purposes of obtaining some or other benefit from the government.

The 2013 BBBEE Amendment Act was an attempt to steer BEE in a better and more productive direction. It established a statutory offence of fronting and set up a BBBEE Commission to investigate and deal with cases of fronting. Revised codes required delivery, at a sub-minimum level, on such elements as skills development and supplier development elements which we judged could help promote a greater level of more effective empowerment of black people either in empowering companies themselves or in their supply chains.

What cannot be allowed to pass unchallenged, though, are attempts by denialists like Janisch to generalise issues arising in this particular case into a head-on assault on the transformation project as a whole. What he thinks of me is immaterial and a matter of complete indifference to me personally.

The 2013 Amendment Act also sought to facilitate the inclusion of small black-owned enterprises into supply chains by proscribing any requirement on them to obtain costly BEE verification certificates.

Verification agencies were not statutory bodies and their assessments were not required for official purposes. They had sprung up in the years after the 2003 act, and their verification certificates were widely demanded by larger companies seeking to earn points for themselves in dealings with suppliers. Apart from removing costly private sector red tape from SMMEs, the 2013 act also required the development of a regulatory framework for verification agencies a task that, alas, still has to be completed.

Significantly, the 2013 Amendment Bill was supported in the National Assembly by the DA, under its then parliamentary leader, Lindiwe Mazibuko that is until she was overruled by her leader and sent to Harvard. Other initiatives we undertook included the Black Industrialist programme, where incentives were provided to black-owned businesses involved in manufacturing. I would maintain that the vast majority of beneficiaries were quality enterprises of the sort we definitely need to see more of.

Have these measures eliminated fronting? Absolutely not. But, I would argue, we are much better equipped to tackle what is, after all, a form of fraud by having established the commission. By the time I left office, the commission had dealt with several cases of fronting to good effect. Does still more need to be done to develop a more productive and genuinely broad-based BEE? Absolutely, and I am sure this is something the current authorities are seized with.

The issue that Janisch seized on arose from an attempt to simplify and render less costly efforts by public entities to facilitate BBBEE. Instead of requiring development finance institutions or operators of public infrastructure to have to obtain verification certificates, a process was developed to accord them BBBEE facilitator status. A high court has now ruled that there were procedural flaws in the case of Telkom, which it also ruled was not entitled to such status as it is not a fully state-owned entity. The current authorities will have to determine the way forward on that particular issue.

What cannot be allowed to pass unchallenged, though, are attempts by denialists like Janisch to generalise issues arising in this particular case into a head-on assault on the transformation project as a whole. What he thinks of me is immaterial and a matter of complete indifference to me personally.

But, in the world after Covid-19, which is also the world increasingly recognising the imperative to work to eliminate structural racialised inequality and poverty, the common task required of all South Africans must surely be to find new and better ways to ensure that such issues are addressed in ways that result in more inclusive outcomes. BM/DM

Rob Davies is a retired former Minister of Trade and Industry.

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or if you are already an Insider.

Read the original here:

Race-based disadvantage denialism is a head-on assault on the transformation project - Daily Maverick