therapy treatment for spinal cord injury by dr alok sharma, mumbai, india – Video


therapy treatment for spinal cord injury by dr alok sharma, mumbai, india
improvement seen in just 5 days after stem cell therapy treatment for spinal cord injury by dr alok sharma, mumbai, india. Stem Cell Therapy done date 7 Jan ...

By: Neurogen Brain and Spine Institute

Excerpt from:
therapy treatment for spinal cord injury by dr alok sharma, mumbai, india - Video

The American Physiological Society Launches APSselect

Contact Information

Available for logged-in reporters only

Newswise The editorial team carefully selects the top articles published each month across all ten APS research journals that highlight, promote, and rapidly disseminate the best original research. This collection provides: Outstanding scientific discoveries published by APS each month. Timely, convenient, and concise "one-stop shopping" mechanism to broadly transmit the most exceptional work. Easy access from the APS homepage http://www.the-aps.org.

APSselect is an ideal mechanism to enable a broader mission: to promote excellence of the physiological discipline to biomedical researchers said the Editor-in-Chief Joseph Metzger in the January 2014 issue of The Physiologist.

APSselect aims to serve as a virtual front porch of the American Physiological Societys scholarly home. The overarching goal of APSselect is to shine a bright light on the outstanding scientific discoveries published by the Society. APSselect will serve the APS membership and the physiology discipline with distinction and pride. APSselect can be accessed at http://www.apsselect.physiology.org.

Physiology is the study of how molecules, cells, tissues, and organs function in health and disease. Established in 1887, the American Physiological Society (APS) was the first US society in the biomedical sciences field. The APS represents more than 11,000 members worldwide and publishes 14 peer-reviewed journals with a global readership. http://www.the-aps.org

See the original post here:
The American Physiological Society Launches APSselect

The ethics of medical progress

A new method of producing stem cells is being described as a "game-changing" scientific breakthrough.

It is said that the research, carried out by scientists in Japan, could hail a new era of personalised medicine, offering hope to sufferers of diseases such as stroke, heart disease and spinal cord injuries.

The scientists bathed blood cells in a weak acidic solution for half an hour, which made the adult cells shrink and go back to their embryonic stem cell state. Using this process, a patient's own specially created stem cells could then be re-injected back into the body to help mend damaged organs.

The scientists in Japan used mice in this experiment but believe the approach may also work on human cells too.

The new method - much cheaper and faster than before - is being heralded as revolutionary, and could bring stem cell therapy a step closer, and all without the controversy linked to the use of human embryos.

But there is still research that some find ethically questionable.

On Inside Story: Is the controversy over using human embryos over? And how should ethics determine medical progress?

Presenter: Shiulie Ghosh

Guests:

Dusko Ilic, a reader in Stem Cell Science at King's College London School ofMedicine

Go here to read the rest:
The ethics of medical progress

Vitamin C and E supplements hampers endurance training

PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:

2-Feb-2014

Contact: Lucy Holmes LHolmes@physoc.org 44-020-726-95727 Wiley

Vitamin C and E supplements may blunt the improvement of muscular endurance by disrupting cellular adaptions in exercised muscles suggests a new study published today [3 February] in The Journal of Physiology.

As vitamin C and E supplements are widely used, understanding if they interfere with cellular and physiological adaptations to exercise is of interest to people exercising for health purposes as well as to athletes.

Dr Gran Paulsen, who led the study at the Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, explains:

"Our results show that vitamin C and E supplements blunted the endurance training-induced increase of mitochondrial proteins, which are needed to improve muscular endurance."

In the 11-week trial, 54 young, healthy men and women were randomly allocated to receive either 1000mg vitamin C and 235mg vitamin E (consistent with amounts found in shop supplements), or a placebo (a pill containing no active ingredients). Neither the subjects nor the investigators knew which participant received the vitamins or placebos.

The participants completed an endurance training programme, consisting of three to four sessions per week, of primarily running. Fitness tests, blood samples and muscle biopsies were taken before and after the intervention.

Whilst the supplements did not affect maximal oxygen uptake or the results of a 20 metre shuttle test, the results showed that markers for the production of new muscle mitochondria the power supply for cells increased only in the group without supplements.

See the article here:
Vitamin C and E supplements hampers endurance training

Running with genetic scissors: how a breakthrough technology works

News Release

Short DNA sequences known as PAM (shown in yellow) enable the bacterial enzyme Cas9 to identify and degrade foreign DNA, as well as induce site-specific genetic changes in animal and plant cells. The presence of PAM is also required to activate the Cas9 enzyme. (Illustration by KC Roeyer.)

A central question has been answered regarding a protein that plays an essential role in the bacterial immune system and is fast becoming a valuable tool for genetic engineering. A team of researchers with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and the University of California (UC) Berkeley have determined how the bacterial enzyme known as Cas9, guided by RNA, is able to identify and degrade foreign DNA during viral infections, as well as induce site-specific genetic changes in animal and plant cells. Through a combination of single-molecule imaging and bulk biochemical experiments, the research team has shown that the genome-editing ability of Cas9 is made possible by the presence of short DNA sequences known as PAM, for protospacer adjacent motif.

Our results reveal two major functions of the PAM that explain why it is so critical to the ability of Cas9 to target and cleave DNA sequences matching the guide RNA, says Jennifer Doudna, the biochemist who led this study. The presence of the PAM adjacent to target sites in foreign DNA and its absence from those targets in the host genome enables Cas9 to precisely discriminate between non-self DNA that must be degraded and self DNA that may be almost identical. The presence of the PAM is also required to activate the Cas9 enzyme.

With genetically engineered microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, playing an increasing role in the green chemistry production of valuable chemical products including therapeutic drugs, advanced biofuels and biodegradable plastics from renewables, Cas9 is emerging as an important genome-editing tool for practitioners of synthetic biology.

Understanding how Cas9 is able to locate specific 20-base-pair target sequences within genomes that are millions to billions of base pairs long may enable improvements to gene targeting and genome editing efforts in bacteria and other types of cells, says Doudna who holds joint appointments with Berkeley Labs Physical Biosciences Division and UC Berkeleys Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Department of Chemistry, and is also an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI).

Jennifer Doudna and Samuel Sternberg used a combination of single-molecule imaging and bulk biochemical experiments to show how the RNA-guided Cas9 enzyme is able to locate specific 20-base-pair target sequences within genomes that are millions to billions of base pairs long. (Photo by Roy Kaltschmdit)

Doudna is one of two corresponding authors of a paper describing this research in the journal Nature. The paper is titled DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. The other corresponding author is Eric Greene of Columbia University. Co-authoring this paper were Samuel Sternberg, Sy Redding and Martin Jinek.

Bacterial microbes face a never-ending onslaught from viruses and invasive snippets of nucleic acid known as plasmids. To survive, the microbes deploy an adaptive nucleic acid-based immune system that revolves around a genetic element known as CRISPR, which stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats. Through the combination of CRISPRs and RNA-guided endonucleases, such as Cas9, (Cas stands for CRISPR-associated), bacteria are able to utilize small customized crRNA molecules (for CRISPR RNA) to guide the targeting and degradation of matching DNA sequences in invading viruses and plasmids to prevent them from replicating. There are three distinct types of CRISPRCas immunity systems. Doudna and her research group have focused on the Type II system which relies exclusively upon RNA-programmed Cas9 to cleave double-stranded DNA at target sites.

What has been a major puzzle in the CRISPRCas field is how Cas9 and similar RNA-guided complexes locate and recognize matching DNA targets in the context of an entire genome, the classic needle in a haystack problem, says Samuel Sternberg, lead author of the Nature paper and a member of Doudnas research group. All of the scientists who are developing RNA-programmable Cas9 for genome engineering are relying on its ability to target unique 20-base-pair long sequences inside the cell. However, if Cas9 were to just blindly bind DNA at random sites across a genome until colliding with its target, the process would be incredibly time-consuming and probably too inefficient to be effective for bacterial immunity, or as a tool for genome engineers. Our study shows that Cas9 confines its search by first looking for PAM sequences. This accelerates the rate at which the target can be located, and minimizes the time spent interrogating non-target DNA sites.

Read more here:
Running with genetic scissors: how a breakthrough technology works

New Biotech Makes It Much Easier to Genetically Modify Monkeys

A new gene-editing technique could lead to more useful animal models of disease, and perhaps one day more effective gene therapy for humans

Genetically modified long-tailed macaques. Credit: Cell, Niu et al.

Like many babies, the wide-eyed twins are cute. The fact that they are macaque monkeys is almost beside the point. What is not beside the point, however, is their genetic heritage. These baby macaques are, as reported inCell, the first primates to have been genetically modified using an extremely precise gene-editing tool based on the so-called CRISPR/Cas system.

Conducted by researchers in China, the new study is significant because it paves the way for the custom development of laboratory monkeys with genetic profiles that are similar to those found in humans with certain medical disorders. Although mice and rats have long been the animals of choice when creating living models of human disease, they have not been very helpful for studying neurological conditions such as autism and Alzheimers disease; the differences between rodent and human brains are just too great.

To be sure, a few other genetically modified monkeys have been born over the past decade and a half, but the methods used to alter their DNA were not as efficient or as easy to use as the CRISPR/Cas technology. The amount of genome engineering in monkeys is pretty small, says George Church, a professor of genetics at Harvard Medical School.So yes, this [paper] is a pretty big deal.

CRISPR stands for clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and refers to what at first glance appear to be meaningless variations and repeats in the sequence of molecular letters (A, T, C and G) that make up DNA. These CRISPR patterns are found in many bacteria and most archaea (an ancient group of bacteria that is now considered to be different enough from other one-celled organisms to merit is own taxonomic kingdom, along with bacteria, protists, fungi, plants and animals).

First identified in bacteria in 1987, CRISPR elements started being widely used to create genetic engineering tools only in 2013. It took that long to figure out that the patterns actually served a purpose, determine out what that purpose washelping archaea and bacteria to recognize and defend themselves against virusesand then adapt that original function to a new goal.

Basically, biologists learned that certain proteins associated with the CRISPR system (dubbed, straightforwardly enough, CRISPR-associated, or Cas, proteins) act like scissors that cut any strands of DNA they come across. These cutting proteins, in turn, are guided to specific strands of DNA by complementary pieces of RNA (a sister molecule to DNA). The bacteria generate specific guide strands of RNA whenever they encounter a virus that is starting to hijack their cellular machinery. The guide-RNA complements the viral DNA, which is how the Cas proteins know where to cut. The bacteria then keep a copy of the viral DNA in their own genetic sequence between two CRISPR elements for future reference in case a similar virus tries to cause trouble later on.

In the past couple of years researchers have learned how to trick the Cas proteins into targeting and slicing through a sequence of DNA of their own choosing. By developing strands of RNA that precisely complement the part of the DNA molecule that they want to change, investigators can steer the Cas proteins to a predesignated spot and cut out enough genetic material to permanently disrupt the usual expression of the DNA molecule at that location.

In essence, scientists have turned a bacterial self-defense mechanism into an incredibly precise gene-editing tool. By some accounts CRISPR technology has been successfully tried out on 20 different kinds of higher organisms (meaning higher than bacteria) in just the past year or so.

See original here:
New Biotech Makes It Much Easier to Genetically Modify Monkeys

Ronald Crystal, M.D., receives Pioneer Award

PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:

31-Jan-2014

Contact: Vicki Cohn vcohn@liebertpub.com 914-740-2100 x2156 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc./Genetic Engineering News

New Rochelle, NY, January 31, 2014In recognition of his seminal work on adenoviral vectors, which accelerated the translation of gene therapy from the research laboratory to the clinic, Ronald G. Crystal, MD (Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York City), has received a Pioneer Award from Human Gene Therapy, a peer-reviewed journal from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers. Human Gene Therapy is commemorating its 25th anniversary by bestowing this honor on the leading 12 Pioneers in the field of cell and gene therapy selected by a blue ribbon committee* and publishing a Pioneer Perspective by each of the award recipients. The article by Dr. Crystal is available on the Human Gene Therapy website.

Currently it is standard practice to use a modified virus as a transport vehicle to deliver therapeutic genes to patients. But this concept was new, innovative, and technically challenging when Dr. Crystal began developing the molecular tools and methods in the late 1980s. In the Pioneer Perspective "Adenovirus: The First Effective In Vivo Gene Delivery Vector," Dr. Crystal provides historical insights on the many years of research and testing needed to design, optimize, manufacture, and evaluate the performance of adenoviral vectors. He describes the first in vivo studies, the first human studies, and the many current applications of this useful gene delivery system.

"Ron led the way in the clinical translation of adenoviral vectors in the very early days of gene therapy," says James M. Wilson, MD, PhD, Editor-in-Chief of Human Gene Therapy, and Director of the Gene Therapy Program, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

###

*The blue ribbon panel of leaders in cell and gene therapy, led by Chair Mary Collins, PhD, MRC Centre for Medical Molecular Virology, University College London, selected the Pioneer Award recipients. The Award Selection Committee selected scientists that had devoted much of their careers to cell and gene therapy research and had made a seminal contribution to the field--defined as a basic science or clinical advance that greatly influenced progress in translational research.

About the Journal

Human Gene Therapy, the official journal of the European Society of Gene and Cell Therapy, British Society for Gene and Cell Therapy, French Society of Cell and Gene Therapy, German Society of Gene Therapy, and five other gene therapy societies, is an authoritative peer-reviewed journal published monthly in print and online. Human Gene Therapy presents reports on the transfer and expression of genes in mammals, including humans. Related topics include improvements in vector development, delivery systems, and animal models, particularly in the areas of cancer, heart disease, viral disease, genetic disease, and neurological disease, as well as ethical, legal, and regulatory issues related to the gene transfer in humans. Its sister journals, Human Gene Therapy Methods, published bimonthly, focuses on the application of gene therapy to product testing and development, and Human Gene Therapy Clinical Development, published quarterly, features data relevant to the regulatory review and commercial development of cell and gene therapy products. Tables of content for all three publications and a free sample issue may be viewed on the Human Gene Therapy website.

Follow this link:
Ronald Crystal, M.D., receives Pioneer Award