Coronavirus disease 2019 – Wikipedia

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The first case was identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019. The disease has since spread worldwide, leading to an ongoing pandemic.

Symptoms of COVID-19 are variable, but often include fever, cough, fatigue, breathing difficulties, and loss of smell and taste. Symptoms begin one to fourteen days after exposure to the virus. Of those people who develop noticeable symptoms, most (81%) develop mild to moderate symptoms (up to mild pneumonia), while 14% develop severe symptoms (dyspnea, hypoxia, or more than 50% lung involvement on imaging), and 5% suffer critical symptoms (respiratory failure, shock, or multiorgan dysfunction).[6] At least a third of the people who are infected with the virus remain asymptomatic and do not develop noticeable symptoms at any point in time, but they still can spread the disease.[7][8] Some people continue to experience a range of effectsknown as long COVIDfor months after recovery, and damage to organs has been observed.[9] Multi-year studies are underway to further investigate the long-term effects of the disease.[9]

The virus that causes COVID-19 spreads mainly when an infected person is in close contact[a] with another person.[13][14] Small droplets and aerosols containing the virus can spread from an infected person's nose and mouth as they breathe, cough, sneeze, sing, or speak. Other people are infected if the virus gets into their mouth, nose or eyes. The virus may also spread via contaminated surfaces, although this is not thought to be the main route of transmission.[14] The exact route of transmission is rarely proven conclusively,[15] but infection mainly happens when people are near each other for long enough. People who are infected can transmit the virus to another person up to two days before they themselves show symptoms, as can people who do not experience symptoms. People remain infectious for up to ten days after the onset of symptoms in moderate cases and up to 20 days in severe cases.[16]Several testing methods have been developed to diagnose the disease. The standard diagnostic method is by detection of the virus' nucleic acid by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR), transcription-mediated amplification (TMA), or by loop-mediated isothermal amplification from a nasopharyngeal swab.

Preventive measures include physical or social distancing, quarantining, ventilation of indoor spaces, covering coughs and sneezes, hand washing, and keeping unwashed hands away from the face. The use of face masks or coverings has been recommended in public settings to minimise the risk of transmissions. Several vaccines have been developed and several countries have initiated mass vaccination campaigns.

Although work is underway to develop drugs that inhibit the virus, the primary treatment is currently symptomatic. Management involves the treatment of symptoms, supportive care, isolation, and experimental measures.

Symptoms of COVID-19 are variable, ranging from mild symptoms to severe illness.[17][18] Common symptoms include headache, loss of smell and taste, nasal congestion and rhinorrhea, cough, muscle pain, sore throat, fever, diarrhea, and breathing difficulties.[19] People with the same infection may have different symptoms, and their symptoms may change over time. In people without prior ears, nose, and throat disorders, loss of taste combined with loss of smell is associated with COVID-19.[20]

Most people (81%) develop mild to moderate symptoms (up to mild pneumonia), while 14% develop severe symptoms (dyspnea, hypoxia, or more than 50% lung involvement on imaging) and 5% of patients suffer critical symptoms (respiratory failure, shock, or multiorgan dysfunction).[21] At least a third of the people who are infected with the virus do not develop noticeable symptoms at any point in time.[22][23][24][25] These asymptomatic carriers tend not to get tested and can spread the disease.[25][26][27][28] Other infected people will develop symptoms later, called "pre-symptomatic", or have very mild symptoms and can also spread the virus.[29]

As is common with infections, there is a delay between the moment a person first becomes infected and the appearance of the first symptoms. The median delay for COVID-19 is four to five days.[30] Most symptomatic people experience symptoms within two to seven days after exposure, and almost all will experience at least one symptom within 12 days.[30][31]

COVID-19 is caused by infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus strain.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) spreads from person to person mainly through the respiratory route after an infected person coughs, sneezes, sings, talks or breathes.[33][34] A new infection occurs when virus-containing particles exhaled by an infected person, either respiratory droplets or aerosols, get into the mouth, nose, or eyes of other people who are in close contact with the infected person.[35] During human-to-human transmission, an average 1000 infectious SARS-CoV-2 virions are thought to initiate a new infection.[36][37]

The closer people interact, and the longer they interact, the more likely they are to transmit COVID-19. Closer distances can involve larger droplets (which fall to the ground) and aerosols, whereas longer distances only involve aerosols.[35] Larger droplets can also turn into aerosols (known as droplet nuclei) through evaporation.[38] The relative importance of the larger droplets and the aerosols is not clear as of November 2020; however, the virus is not known to spread between rooms over long distances such as through air ducts.[39] Airborne transmission is able to particularly occur indoors, in high risk locations[39] such as restaurants, choirs, gyms, nightclubs, offices, and religious venues, often when they are crowded or less ventilated.[38] It also occurs in healthcare settings, often when aerosol-generating medical procedures are performed on COVID-19 patients.[40]

Although it is considered possible there is no direct evidence of the virus being transmitted by skin to skin contact.[41] A person could get COVID-19 indirectly by touching a contaminated surface or object before touching their own mouth, nose, or eyes, though this is not thought to be the main way the virus spreads, and there is no direct evidence of this method either.[41] The virus is not known to spread through feces, urine, breast milk, food, wastewater, drinking water, or via animal disease vectors (although some animals can contract the virus from humans). It very rarely transmits from mother to baby during pregnancy.[41]

Social distancing and the wearing of cloth face masks, surgical masks, respirators, or other face coverings are controls for droplet transmission. Transmission may be decreased indoors with well maintained heating and ventilation systems to maintain good air circulation and increase the use of outdoor air.[42]

The number of people generally infected by one infected person varies.[41] Coronavirus_disease 2019 is more infectious than influenza, but less so than measles. It often spreads in clusters, where infections can be traced back to an index case or geographical location.[43] There is a major role of "super-spreading events", where many people are infected by one person.[41][44]

A person who is infected can transmit the virus to others up to two days before they themselves show symptoms, and even if symptoms never appear.[45] People remain infectious in moderate cases for 712 days, and up to two weeks in severe cases.[45] In October 2020, medical scientists reported evidence of reinfection in one person.[46][47]

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. It was first isolated from three people with pneumonia connected to the cluster of acute respiratory illness cases in Wuhan.[48] All structural features of the novel SARS-CoV-2 virus particle occur in related coronaviruses in nature.[49]

Outside the human body, the virus is destroyed by household soap, which bursts its protective bubble.[50]

SARS-CoV-2 is closely related to the original SARS-CoV.[51] It is thought to have an animal (zoonotic) origin. Genetic analysis has revealed that the coronavirus genetically clusters with the genus Betacoronavirus, in subgenus Sarbecovirus (lineage B) together with two bat-derived strains. It is 96% identical at the whole genome level to other bat coronavirus samples (BatCov RaTG13).[52][53] The structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2 include membrane glycoprotein (M), envelope protein (E), nucleocapsid protein (N), and the spike protein (S). The M protein of SARS-CoV-2 is about 98% similar to the M protein of bat SARS-CoV, maintains around 98% homology with pangolin SARS-CoV, and has 90% homology with the M protein of SARS-CoV; whereas, the similarity is only around 38% with the M protein of MERS-CoV.[54][55]

The many thousands of SARS-CoV-2 variants are grouped into clades.[56] Several different clade nomenclatures have been proposed. Nextstrain divides the variants into five clades (19A, 19B, 20A, 20B, and 20C), while GISAID divides them into seven (L, O, V, S, G, GH, and GR).[57]

Several notable variants of SARS-CoV-2 emerged in late 2020. Cluster 5 emerged among minks and mink farmers in Denmark. After strict quarantines and a mink euthanasia campaign, it is believed to have been eradicated. The Variant of Concern 202012/01 (VOC 202012/01) is believed to have emerged in the United Kingdom in September. The 501Y.V2 Variant, which has the same N501Y mutation, arose independently in South Africa.[58][59]

Three known variants of COVID-19 are currently spreading among global populations as of January 2021 including the UK Variant (referred to as B.1.1.7) first found in London and Kent, a variant discovered in South Africa (referred to as 1.351), and a variant discovered in Brazil (referred to as P.1).[60]

Using Whole Genome Sequencing, epidemiology and modelling suggest the new UK variant VUI 202012/01 (the first Variant Under Investigation in December 2020) transmits more easily than other strains.[61]

COVID-19 can affect the upper respiratory tract (sinuses, nose, and throat) and the lower respiratory tract (windpipe and lungs).[62] The lungs are the organs most affected by COVID-19 because the virus accesses host cells via the enzyme angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is most abundant in type II alveolar cells of the lungs.[63] The virus uses a special surface glycoprotein called a "spike" (peplomer) to connect to ACE2 and enter the host cell.[64] The density of ACE2 in each tissue correlates with the severity of the disease in that tissue and decreasing ACE2 activity might be protective,[65] though another view is that increasing ACE2 using angiotensin II receptor blocker medications could be protective.[66] As the alveolar disease progresses, respiratory failure might develop and death may follow.[67]

Whether SARS-CoV-2 is able to invade the nervous system remains unknown. The virus is not detected in the CNS of the majority of COVID-19 people with neurological issues. However, SARS-CoV-2 has been detected at low levels in the brains of those who have died from COVID-19, but these results need to be confirmed.[68] SARS-CoV-2 may cause respiratory failure through affecting the brain stem as other coronaviruses have been found to invade the CNS. While virus has been detected in cerebrospinal fluid of autopsies, the exact mechanism by which it invades the CNS remains unclear and may first involve invasion of peripheral nerves given the low levels of ACE2 in the brain.[69][70][71] The virus may also enter the bloodstream from the lungs and cross the blood-brain barrier to gain access to the CNS, possibly within an infected white blood cell.[68]

The virus also affects gastrointestinal organs as ACE2 is abundantly expressed in the glandular cells of gastric, duodenal and rectal epithelium[72] as well as endothelial cells and enterocytes of the small intestine.[73]

The virus can cause acute myocardial injury and chronic damage to the cardiovascular system.[74] An acute cardiac injury was found in 12% of infected people admitted to the hospital in Wuhan, China,[75] and is more frequent in severe disease.[76] Rates of cardiovascular symptoms are high, owing to the systemic inflammatory response and immune system disorders during disease progression, but acute myocardial injuries may also be related to ACE2 receptors in the heart.[74] ACE2 receptors are highly expressed in the heart and are involved in heart function.[74][77] A high incidence of thrombosis and venous thromboembolism have been found people transferred to intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 infections, and may be related to poor prognosis.[78] Blood vessel dysfunction and clot formation (as suggested by high D-dimer levels caused by blood clots) are thought to play a significant role in mortality, incidences of clots leading to pulmonary embolisms, and ischaemic events within the brain have been noted as complications leading to death in people infected with SARS-CoV-2. Infection appears to set off a chain of vasoconstrictive responses within the body, constriction of blood vessels within the pulmonary circulation has also been posited as a mechanism in which oxygenation decreases alongside the presentation of viral pneumonia.[79] Furthermore, microvascular blood vessel damage has been reported in a small number of tissue samples of the brains without detected SARS-CoV-2 and the olfactory bulbs from those who have died from COVID-19.[80][81][82]

Another common cause of death is complications related to the kidneys.[79] Early reports show that up to 30% of hospitalized patients both in China and in New York have experienced some injury to their kidneys, including some persons with no previous kidney problems.[83]

Autopsies of people who died of COVID-19 have found diffuse alveolar damage, and lymphocyte-containing inflammatory infiltrates within the lung.[84]

Although SARS-CoV-2 has a tropism for ACE2-expressing epithelial cells of the respiratory tract, people with severe COVID-19 have symptoms of systemic hyperinflammation. Clinical laboratory findings of elevated IL-2, IL-7, IL-6, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interferon- inducible protein 10 (IP-10), monocyte chemoattractant protein1 (MCP-1), macrophage inflammatory protein 1- (MIP-1), and tumour necrosis factor- (TNF-) indicative of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) suggest an underlying immunopathology.[75]

Additionally, people with COVID-19 and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have classical serum biomarkers of CRS, including elevated C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, and ferritin.[85]

Systemic inflammation results in vasodilation, allowing inflammatory lymphocytic and monocytic infiltration of the lung and the heart. In particular, pathogenic GM-CSF-secreting T-cells were shown to correlate with the recruitment of inflammatory IL-6-secreting monocytes and severe lung pathology in people with COVID-19 .[86] Lymphocytic infiltrates have also been reported at autopsy.[84]

Multiple viral and host factors affect the pathogenesis of the virus. The S-protein, otherwise known as the spike protein, is the viral component that attaches to the host receptor via the ACE2 receptors. It includes two subunits: S1 and S2. S1 determines the virus host range and cellular tropism via the receptor binding domain. S2 mediates the membrane fusion of the virus to its potential cell host via the H1 and HR2, which are heptad repeat regions. Studies have shown that S1 domain induced IgG and IgA antibody levels at a much higher capacity. It is the focus spike proteins expression that are involved in many effective COVID-19 vaccines.[87]

The M protein is the viral protein responsible for the transmembrane transport of nutrients. It is the cause of the bud release and the formation of the viral envelope.[88] The N and E protein are accessory proteins that interfere with the host's immune response.[88]

Human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (hACE2) is the host factor that SARS-COV2 virus targets causing COVID-19. Theoretically the usage of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and ACE inhibitors upregulating ACE2 expression might increase morbidity with COVID-19, though animal data suggest some potential protective effect of ARB. However no clinical studies have proven susceptibility or outcomes. Until further data is available, guidelines and recommendations for hypertensive patients remain.[89]

The virus' affect on ACE2 cell surfaces leads to leukocytic infiltration, increased blood vessel permeability, alveolar wall permeability, as well as decreased secretion of lung surfactants. These effects cause the majority of the respiratory symptoms. However, the aggravation of local inflammation causes a cytokine storm eventually leading to a systemic inflammatory response syndrome.[90]

The severity of the inflammation can be attributed to the severity of what is known as the cytokine storm.[91] Levels of interleukin 1B, interferon-gamma, interferon-inducible protein 10, and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 were all associated with COVID-19 disease severity. Treatment has been proposed to combat the cytokine storm as it remains to be one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in COVID-19 disease.[92]

A cytokine storm is due to an acute hyperinflammatory response that is responsible for clinical illness in an array of diseases but in COVID-19, it is related to worse prognosis and increased fatality. The storm causes the acute respiratory distress syndrome, blood clotting events such as strokes, myocardial infarction, encephalitis, acute kidney injury, and vasculitis. The production of IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, TNF-alpha, and interferon-gamma, all crucial components of normal immune responses, inadvertently become the causes of a cytokine storm. The cells of the central nervous system, the microglia, neurons, and astrocytes, are also be involved in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines affecting the nervous system, and effects of cytokine storms toward the CNS are not uncommon.[93]

COVID-19 can provisionally be diagnosed on the basis of symptoms and confirmed using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) or other nucleic acid testing of infected secretions.[94][95] Along with laboratory testing, chest CT scans may be helpful to diagnose COVID-19 in individuals with a high clinical suspicion of infection.[96] Detection of a past infection is possible with serological tests, which detect antibodies produced by the body in response to the infection.[94]

The standard methods of testing for presence of SARS-CoV-2 are nucleic acid tests,[94][97] which detects the presence of viral RNA fragments.[98] As these tests detect RNA but not infectious virus, its "ability to determine duration of infectivity of patients is limited."[99] The test is typically done on respiratory samples obtained by a nasopharyngeal swab; however, a nasal swab or sputum sample may also be used.[100][101] Results are generally available within hours.[94] The WHO has published several testing protocols for the disease.[102]

A number of laboratories and companies have developed serological tests, which detect antibodies produced by the body in response to infection. Several have been evaluated by Public Health England and approved for use in the UK.[103]

The University of Oxford's CEBM has pointed to mounting evidence[104][105] that "a good proportion of 'new' mild cases and people re-testing positives after quarantine or discharge from hospital are not infectious, but are simply clearing harmless virus particles which their immune system has efficiently dealt with" and have called for "an international effort to standardize and periodically calibrate testing"[106] On 7 September, the UK government issued "guidance for procedures to be implemented in laboratories to provide assurance of positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA results during periods of low prevalence, when there is a reduction in the predictive value of positive test results."[107]

Chest CT scans may be helpful to diagnose COVID-19 in individuals with a high clinical suspicion of infection but are not recommended for routine screening.[96][108] Bilateral multilobar ground-glass opacities with a peripheral, asymmetric, and posterior distribution are common in early infection.[96][109] Subpleural dominance, crazy paving (lobular septal thickening with variable alveolar filling), and consolidation may appear as the disease progresses.[96][110] Characteristic imaging features on chest radiographs and computed tomography (CT) of people who are symptomatic include asymmetric peripheral ground-glass opacities without pleural effusions.[111]

Many groups have created COVID-19 datasets that include imagery such as the Italian Radiological Society which has compiled an international online database of imaging findings for confirmed cases.[112] Due to overlap with other infections such as adenovirus, imaging without confirmation by rRT-PCR is of limited specificity in identifying COVID-19.[111] A large study in China compared chest CT results to PCR and demonstrated that though imaging is less specific for the infection, it is faster and more sensitive.[95]

In late 2019, the WHO assigned emergency ICD-10 disease codes U07.1 for deaths from lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and U07.2 for deaths from clinically or epidemiologically diagnosed COVID-19 without lab-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection.[113]

The main pathological findings at autopsy are:[84]

Preventive measures to reduce the chances of infection include staying at home, wearing a mask in public, avoiding crowded places, keeping distance from others, ventilating indoor spaces, washing hands with soap and water often and for at least 20 seconds, practising good respiratory hygiene, and avoiding touching the eyes, nose, or mouth with unwashed hands.[117][118]

Those diagnosed with COVID-19 or who believe they may be infected are advised by the CDC to stay home except to get medical care, call ahead before visiting a healthcare provider, wear a face mask before entering the healthcare provider's office and when in any room or vehicle with another person, cover coughs and sneezes with a tissue, regularly wash hands with soap and water and avoid sharing personal household items.[119][120]

The first COVID-19 vaccine was granted regulatory approval on 2 December by the UK medicines regulator MHRA.[121] It was evaluated for emergency use authorization (EUA) status by the US FDA, and in several other countries.[122] Initially, the US National Institutes of Health guidelines do not recommend any medication for prevention of COVID-19, before or after exposure to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, outside the setting of a clinical trial.[123][124] Without a vaccine, other prophylactic measures, or effective treatments, a key part of managing COVID-19 is trying to decrease and delay the epidemic peak, known as "flattening the curve".[125] This is done by slowing the infection rate to decrease the risk of health services being overwhelmed, allowing for better treatment of current cases, and delaying additional cases until effective treatments or a vaccine become available.[125][126]

A COVID19 vaccine is a vaccine intended to provide acquired immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2), the virus causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19). Prior to the COVID19 pandemic, work to develop a vaccine against coronavirus diseases like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) and Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) established knowledge about the structure and function of coronaviruses; this knowledge enabled accelerated development of various vaccine technologies during early 2020.[127]

As of February2021[update], 66 vaccine candidates are in clinical research, including 17 in Phase I trials, 23 in Phase III trials, 6 in Phase II trials, and 20 in Phase III trials.[128] Trials for four other candidates were terminated.[128] In Phase III trials, several COVID19 vaccines demonstrate efficacy as high as 95% in preventing symptomatic COVID19 infections. As of February2021[update], ten vaccines are authorized by at least one national regulatory authority for public use: two RNA vaccines (the PfizerBioNTech vaccine and the Moderna vaccine), three conventional inactivated vaccines (BBIBP-CorV, Covaxin, and CoronaVac), four viral vector vaccines (Sputnik V, the OxfordAstraZeneca vaccine, Convidicea, and the Johnson & Johnson vaccine), and one peptide vaccine (EpiVacCorona).[128]

Social distancing (also known as physical distancing) includes infection control actions intended to slow the spread of the disease by minimising close contact between individuals. Methods include quarantines; travel restrictions; and the closing of schools, workplaces, stadiums, theatres, or shopping centres. Individuals may apply social distancing methods by staying at home, limiting travel, avoiding crowded areas, using no-contact greetings, and physically distancing themselves from others.[134] Many governments are now mandating or recommending social distancing in regions affected by the outbreak.[135]

Outbreaks have occurred in prisons due to crowding and an inability to enforce adequate social distancing.[136][137] In the United States, the prisoner population is aging and many of them are at high risk for poor outcomes from COVID-19 due to high rates of coexisting heart and lung disease, and poor access to high-quality healthcare.[136]

Self-isolation at home has been recommended for those diagnosed with COVID-19 and those who suspect they have been infected. Health agencies have issued detailed instructions for proper self-isolation.[138] Many governments have mandated or recommended self-quarantine for entire populations. The strongest self-quarantine instructions have been issued to those in high-risk groups.[139] Those who may have been exposed to someone with COVID-19 and those who have recently travelled to a country or region with the widespread transmission have been advised to self-quarantine for 14 days from the time of last possible exposure.[citation needed]

The WHO and the US CDC recommend individuals wear non-medical face coverings in public settings where there is an increased risk of transmission and where social distancing measures are difficult to maintain.[140][141] This recommendation is meant to reduce the spread of the disease by asymptomatic and pre-symptomatic individuals and is complementary to established preventive measures such as social distancing.[141][142] Face coverings limit the volume and travel distance of expiratory droplets dispersed when talking, breathing, and coughing.[141][142] A face covering without vents or holes will also filter out particles containing the virus from inhaled and exhaled air, reducing the chances of infection.[143] But, if the mask include an exhalation valve, a wearer that is infected (maybe without having noticed that, and asymptomatic) would transmit the virus outwards through it, despite any certification they can have. So the masks with exhalation valve are not for the infected wearers, and are not reliable to stop the pandemic in a large scale. Many countries and local jurisdictions encourage or mandate the use of face masks or cloth face coverings by members of the public to limit the spread of the virus.[144]

Masks are also strongly recommended for those who may have been infected and those taking care of someone who may have the disease.[145] When not wearing a mask, the CDC recommends covering the mouth and nose with a tissue when coughing or sneezing and recommends using the inside of the elbow if no tissue is available. Proper hand hygiene after any cough or sneeze is encouraged. Healthcare professionals interacting directly with people who have COVID-19 are advised to use respirators at least as protective as NIOSH-certified N95 or equivalent, in addition to other personal protective equipment.[146]

Thorough hand hygiene after any cough or sneeze is required.[147] The WHO also recommends that individuals wash hands often with soap and water for at least 20 seconds, especially after going to the toilet or when hands are visibly dirty, before eating and after blowing one's nose.[148] The CDC recommends using an alcohol-based hand sanitiser with at least 60% alcohol, but only when soap and water are not readily available.[147] For areas where commercial hand sanitisers are not readily available, the WHO provides two formulations for local production. In these formulations, the antimicrobial activity arises from ethanol or isopropanol. Hydrogen peroxide is used to help eliminate bacterial spores in the alcohol; it is "not an active substance for hand antisepsis". Glycerol is added as a humectant.[149]

Coronaviruses on surfaces die "within hours to days" depending on the type of surface, and factors such as temperature and humidity. On non-porous surfaces such as glass, plastic and stainless steel, the virus remains infective for 37 days.[150] On paper and cardboard, SARS-CoV-2 dies within hours to a few days.[151] Coronaviruses die faster when exposed to sunlight and warm temperatures.[152] Various jurisdictions have their own versions of deep clean procedure.

Surfaces may be decontaminated with a number of solutions (within one minute of exposure to the disinfectant for a stainless steel surface), including 6271 percent ethanol, 50100 percent isopropanol, 0.1 percent sodium hypochlorite, 0.5 percent hydrogen peroxide, and 0.27.5 percent povidone-iodine. Other solutions, such as benzalkonium chloride and chlorhexidine gluconate, are less effective. Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation may also be used.[153] The CDC recommends that if a COVID-19 case is suspected or confirmed at a facility such as an office or day care, all areas such as offices, bathrooms, common areas, shared electronic equipment like tablets, touch screens, keyboards, remote controls, and ATM machines used by the ill persons should be disinfected.[154] A datasheet comprising the authorised substances to disinfection in the food industry (including suspension or surface tested, kind of surface, use dilution, disinfectant and inocuylum volumes) can be seen in the supplementary material of.[155]

Disinfection of surfaces is key to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2, but entails also some drawbacks. Given the current evidence that the contact with inactivated surfaces is not the main driver of Covid-19,[156] several works have started to demand more optimised disinfection procedures to avoid major problems such as the increase of antimicrobial resistance.[155][157]

The WHO recommends ventilation and air filtration in public spaces to help clear out infectious aerosols.[153][158][159]

The Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health recommends a healthy diet, being physically active, managing psychological stress, and getting enough sleep.[160]

While there is no evidence that vitamin D is an effective treatment for COVID-19, there is limited evidence that vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of severe COVID-19 symptoms.[161] This has led to recommendations for individuals with vitamin D deficiency to take vitamin D supplements as a way of mitigating the risk of COVID-19 and other health issues associated with a possible increase in deficiency due to social distancing.[162]

There is no specific, effective treatment or cure for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.[163][164] Thus, the cornerstone of management of COVID-19 is supportive care, which includes treatment to relieve symptoms, fluid therapy, oxygen support and prone positioning as needed, and medications or devices to support other affected vital organs.[165][166][167]

Most cases of COVID-19 are mild. In these, supportive care includes medication such as paracetamol or NSAIDs to relieve symptoms (fever, body aches, cough), proper intake of fluids, rest, and nasal breathing.[168][164][169][170] Good personal hygiene and a healthy diet are also recommended.[171] The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that those who suspect they are carrying the virus isolate themselves at home and wear a face mask.[172]

People with more severe cases may need treatment in hospital. In those with low oxygen levels, use of the glucocorticoid dexamethasone is strongly recommended, as it can reduce the risk of death.[173][174][175] Noninvasive ventilation and, ultimately, admission to an intensive care unit for mechanical ventilation may be required to support breathing.[176] Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used to address the issue of respiratory failure, but its benefits are still under consideration.[177][178]

The severity of COVID-19 varies. The disease may take a mild course with few or no symptoms, resembling other common upper respiratory diseases such as the common cold. In 3-4% of cases (7.4% for those over age 65) symptoms are severe enough to cause hospitalization.[183] Mild cases typically recover within two weeks, while those with severe or critical diseases may take three to six weeks to recover. Among those who have died, the time from symptom onset to death has ranged from two to eight weeks.[52] The Italian Istituto Superiore di Sanit reported that the median time between the onset of symptoms and death was twelve days, with seven being hospitalised. However, people transferred to an ICU had a median time of ten days between hospitalisation and death.[184] Prolonged prothrombin time and elevated C-reactive protein levels on admission to the hospital are associated with severe course of COVID-19 and with a transfer to ICU.[185][186]

Some early studies suggest 10% to 20% of people with COVID-19 will experience symptoms lasting longer than a month.[187][188] A majority of those who were admitted to hospital with severe disease report long-term problems including fatigue and shortness of breath.[189] On 30 October 2020 WHO chief Tedros Adhanom warned that "to a significant number of people, the COVID virus poses a range of serious long-term effects". He has described the vast spectrum of COVID-19 symptoms that fluctuate over time as "really concerning." They range from fatigue, a cough and shortness of breath, to inflammation and injury of major organs including the lungs and heart, and also neurological and psychologic effects. Symptoms often overlap and can affect any system in the body. Infected people have reported cyclical bouts of fatigue, headaches, months of complete exhaustion, mood swings, and other symptoms. Tedros has concluded that therefore herd immunity is "morally unconscionable and unfeasible".[190]

In terms of hospital readmissions about 9% of 106,000 individuals had to return for hospital treatment within 2 months of discharge. The average to readmit was 8 days since first hospital visit. There are several risk factors that have been identified as being a cause of multiple admissions to a hospital facility. Among these are advanced age (above 65 years of age) and presence of a chronic condition such as diabetes, COPD, heart failure or chronic kidney disease.[191][192]

According to scientific reviews smokers are more likely to require intensive care or die compared to non-smokers,[193][194] air pollution is similarly associated with risk factors,[194] and pre-existing heart and lung diseases[195] and also obesity contributes to an increased health risk of COVID-19.[194][196][197]

It is also assumed that those that are immunocompromised are at higher risk of getting severely sick from SARS-CoV-2.[198] One research that looked into the COVID-19 infections in hospitalized kidney transplant recipients found a mortality rate of 11%.[199]

Children make up a small proportion of reported cases, with about 1% of cases being under 10 years and 4% aged 1019 years.[45] They are likely to have milder symptoms and a lower chance of severe disease than adults. A European multinational study of hospitalized children published in The Lancet on 25 June 2020 found that about 8% of children admitted to a hospital needed intensive care. Four of those 582 children (0.7%) died, but the actual mortality rate could be "substantially lower" since milder cases that did not seek medical help were not included in the study.[200]

Genetics also plays an important role in the ability to fight off the disease. For instance, those that do not produce detectable type I interferons or produce auto-antibodies against these may get much sicker from COVID-19.[201][202] Genetic screening is able to detect interferon effector genes.[203]

Pregnant women may be at higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection based on data from other similar viruses, like SARS and MERS, but data for COVID-19 is lacking.[204][205]

Complications may include pneumonia, ARDS, multi-organ failure, septic shock, and death.[206]Cardiovascular complications may include heart failure, arrhythmias, heart inflammation, and blood clots.[207]

Approximately 2030% of people who present with COVID-19 have elevated liver enzymes reflecting liver injury.[124][208]

Neurologic manifestations include seizure, stroke, encephalitis, and GuillainBarr syndrome (which includes loss of motor functions).[209][210] Following the infection, children may develop paediatric multisystem inflammatory syndrome, which has symptoms similar to Kawasaki disease, which can be fatal.[211][212] In very rare cases, acute encephalopathy can occur, and it can be considered in those who have been diagnosed with COVID-19 and have an altered mental status.[213]

Some early studies[187][214] suggest between 1 in 5 and 1 in 10 people with COVID-19 will experience symptoms lasting longer than a month. A majority of those who were admitted to hospital with severe disease report long-term problems including fatigue and shortness of breath.[189]

By a variety of mechanisms, the lungs are the organs most affected in COVID-19.[215] The majority of CT scans performed show lung abnormalities in people tested after 28 days of illness.[216]People with advanced age, severe disease, prolonged ICU stays, or who smoke are more likely to have long lasting effects, including pulmonary fibrosis.[217] Overall, approximately one third of those investigated after 4 weeks will have findings of pulmonary fibrosis or reduced lung function as measured by DLCO, even in people who are asymptomatic, but with the suggestion of continuing improvement with the passing of more time.[215]

The immune response by humans to CoV-2 virus occurs as a combination of the cell-mediated immunity and antibody production,[218] just as with most other infections.[219] Since SARS-CoV-2 has been in the human population only since December 2019, it remains unknown if the immunity is long-lasting in people who recover from the disease.[220] The presence of neutralizing antibodies in blood strongly correlates with protection from infection, but the level of neutralizing antibody declines with time. Those with asymptomatic or mild disease had undetectable levels of neutralizing antibody two months after infection. In another study, the level of neutralizing antibody fell 4 fold 1 to 4 months after the onset of symptoms. However, the lack of antibody in the blood does not mean antibody will not be rapidly produced upon reexposure to SARS-CoV-2. Memory B cells specific for the spike and nucleocapsid proteins of SARS-CoV-2 last for at least 6 months after appearance of symptoms.[220] Nevertheless, 15 cases of reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 have been reported using stringent CDC criteria requiring identification of a different variant from the second infection. There are likely to be many more people who have been reinfected with the virus. Herd immunity will not eliminate the virus if reinfection is common.[220] Some other coronaviruses circulating in people are capable of reinfection after roughly a year.[221]

Several measures are commonly used to quantify mortality.[222] These numbers vary by region and over time and are influenced by the volume of testing, healthcare system quality, treatment options, time since the initial outbreak, and population characteristics such as age, sex, and overall health.[223] The mortality rate reflects the number of deaths within a specific demographic group divided by the population of that demographic group. Consequently, the mortality rate reflects the prevalence as well as the severity of the disease within a given population. Mortality rates are highly correlated to age, with relatively low rates for young people and relatively high rates among the elderly.[224][225][226]

The case fatality rate (CFR) reflects the number of deaths divided by the number of diagnosed cases within a given time interval. Based on Johns Hopkins University statistics, the global death-to-case ratio is 2.2% (2,451,695/110,709,173) as of 20 February 2021.[5] The number varies by region.[227][228] The CFR may not reflect the true severity of the disease, because some infected individuals remain asymptomatic or experience only mild symptoms, and hence such infections may not be included in official case reports. Moreover, the CFR may vary markedly over time and across locations due to the availability of live virus tests.

Total confirmed cases over time

Total confirmed cases of COVID-19 per million people[229]

Total confirmed deaths due to COVID-19 per million people[230]

A key metric in gauging the severity of COVID-19 is the infection fatality rate (IFR), also referred to as the infection fatality ratio or infection fatality risk.[231][232][233] This metric is calculated by dividing the total number of deaths from the disease by the total number of infected individuals; hence, in contrast to the CFR, the IFR incorporates asymptomatic and undiagnosed infections as well as reported cases.[234]

A recent (Dec 2020) systematic review and meta-analysis estimated that population IFR during the first wave of the pandemic was about 0.5% to 1% in many locations (including France, Netherlands, New Zealand, and Portugal), 1% to 2% in other locations (Australia, England, Lithuania, and Spain), and exceeded 2% in Italy.[235] That study also found that most of these differences in IFR reflected corresponding differences in the age composition of the population and age-specific infection rates; in particular, the metaregression estimate of IFR is very low for children and younger adults (e.g., 0.002% at age 10 and 0.01% at age 25) but increases progressively to 0.4% at age 55, 1.4% at age 65, 4.6% at age 75, and 15% at age 85.[235] These results were also highlighted in a December 2020 report issued by the WHO.[236]

At an early stage of the pandemic, the World Health Organization reported estimates of IFR between 0.3% and 1%.[237][238] On 2July, The WHO's chief scientist reported that the average IFR estimate presented at a two-day WHO expert forum was about 0.6%.[239][240] In August, the WHO found that studies incorporating data from broad serology testing in Europe showed IFR estimates converging at approximately 0.51%.[241] Firm lower limits of IFRs have been established in a number of locations such as New York City and Bergamo in Italy since the IFR cannot be less than the population fatality rate. As of 10July, in New York City, with a population of 8.4million, 23,377 individuals (18,758 confirmed and 4,619 probable) have died with COVID-19 (0.3% of the population).[242] Antibody testing in New York City suggested an IFR of ~0.9%,[243] and ~1.4%.[244] In Bergamo province, 0.6% of the population has died.[245] In September 2020 the U.S. Center for Disease Control & Prevention reported preliminary estimates of age-specific IFRs for public health planning purposes.[246]

Early reviews of epidemiologic data showed gendered impact of the pandemic and a higher mortality rate in men in China and Italy.[248][249][250] The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention reported the death rate was 2.8% for men and 1.7% for women.[251] Later reviews in June 2020 indicated that there is no significant difference in susceptibility or in CFR between genders.[252][253] One review acknowledges the different mortality rates in Chinese men, suggesting that it may be attributable to lifestyle choices such as smoking and drinking alcohol rather than genetic factors.[254] Sex-based immunological differences, lesser prevalence of smoking in women and men developing co-morbid conditions such as hypertension at a younger age than women could have contributed to the higher mortality in men.[255] In Europe, 57% of the infected people were men and 72% of those died with COVID-19 were men.[256] As of April 2020, the US government is not tracking sex-related data of COVID-19 infections.[257] Research has shown that viral illnesses like Ebola, HIV, influenza and SARS affect men and women differently.[257]

In the US, a greater proportion of deaths due to COVID-19 have occurred among African Americans and other minority groups.[258] Structural factors that prevent them from practicing social distancing include their concentration in crowded substandard housing and in "essential" occupations such as retail grocery workers, public transit employees, health-care workers and custodial staff. Greater prevalence of lacking health insurance and care and of underlying conditions such as diabetes, hypertension and heart disease also increase their risk of death.[259] Similar issues affect Native American and Latino communities.[258] According to a US health policy non-profit, 34% of American Indian and Alaska Native People (AIAN) non-elderly adults are at risk of serious illness compared to 21% of white non-elderly adults.[260] The source attributes it to disproportionately high rates of many health conditions that may put them at higher risk as well as living conditions like lack of access to clean water.[261] Leaders have called for efforts to research and address the disparities.[262] In the U.K., a greater proportion of deaths due to COVID-19 have occurred in those of a Black, Asian, and other ethnic minority background.[263][264][265] More severe impacts upon victims including the relative incidence of the necessity of hospitalization requirements, and vulnerability to the disease has been associated via DNA analysis to be expressed in genetic variants at chromosomal region 3, features that are associated with European Neanderthal heritage. That structure imposes greater risks that those affected will develop a more severe form of the disease.[266] The findings are from Professor Svante Pbo and researchers he leads at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and the Karolinska Institutet.[266] This admixture of modern human and Neanderthal genes is estimated to have occurred roughly between 50,000 and 60,000 years ago in Southern Europe.[266]

Most of those who die of COVID-19 have pre-existing (underlying) conditions, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease.[267] According to March data from the United States, 89% of those hospitalised had preexisting conditions.[268] The Italian Istituto Superiore di Sanit reported that out of 8.8% of deaths where medical charts were available, 96.1% of people had at least one comorbidity with the average person having 3.4 diseases.[184] According to this report the most common comorbidities are hypertension (66% of deaths), type 2 diabetes (29.8% of deaths), ischemic heart disease (27.6% of deaths), atrial fibrillation (23.1% of deaths) and chronic renal failure (20.2% of deaths).

Most critical respiratory comorbidities according to the CDC, are: moderate or severe asthma, pre-existing COPD, pulmonary fibrosis, cystic fibrosis.[269] Evidence stemming from meta-analysis of several smaller research papers also suggests that smoking can be associated with worse outcomes.[270][271] When someone with existing respiratory problems is infected with COVID-19, they might be at greater risk for severe symptoms.[272] COVID-19 also poses a greater risk to people who misuse opioids and methamphetamines, insofar as their drug use may have caused lung damage.[273]

In August 2020 the CDC issued a caution that tuberculosis infections could increase the risk of severe illness or death. The WHO recommended that people with respiratory symptoms be screened for both diseases, as testing positive for COVID-19 couldn't rule out co-infections. Some projections have estimated that reduced TB detection due to the pandemic could result in 6.3million additional TB cases and 1.4million TB related deaths by 2025.[274]

During the initial outbreak in Wuhan, China, the virus and disease were commonly referred to as "coronavirus" and "Wuhan coronavirus",[275][276][277] with the disease sometimes called "Wuhan pneumonia".[278][279] In the past, many diseases have been named after geographical locations, such as the Spanish flu,[280] Middle East Respiratory Syndrome, and Zika virus.[281]

In January 2020, the WHO recommended 2019-nCov[282] and 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease[283] as interim names for the virus and disease per 2015 guidance and international guidelines against using geographical locations (e.g. Wuhan, China), animal species, or groups of people in disease and virus names in part to prevent social stigma.[284][285][286]

The official names COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 were issued by the WHO on 11 February 2020.[287] Tedros Adhanom explained: CO for corona, VI for virus, Dfor disease and 19 for when the outbreak was first identified (31 December 2019).[288] The WHO additionally uses "the COVID-19 virus" and "the virus responsible for COVID-19" in public communications.[287]

The virus is thought to be natural and has an animal origin,[49] through spillover infection.[289] There are several theories about where the first case (the so-called patient zero) originated.[290] Phylogenetics estimates that SARS-CoV-2 arose in October or November 2019.[291][292][293] Evidence suggests that it descends from a coronavirus that infects wild bats and spread to humans through an intermediary wildlife host.[294]

The first known human infections were in Wuhan, Hubei, China. A study of the first 41 cases of confirmed COVID-19, published in January 2020 in The Lancet, reported the earliest date of onset of symptoms as 1December 2019.[295][296][297] Official publications from the WHO reported the earliest onset of symptoms as 8December 2019.[298] Human-to-human transmission was confirmed by the WHO and Chinese authorities by 20 January 2020.[299][300] According to official Chinese sources, these were mostly linked to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, which also sold live animals.[301] In May 2020, George Gao, the director of the CDC, said animal samples collected from the seafood market had tested negative for the virus, indicating that the market was the site of an early superspreading event, but it was not the site of the initial outbreak.[302] Traces of the virus have been found in wastewater that was collected from Milan and Turin, Italy, on 18 December 2019.[303]

By December 2019, the spread of infection was almost entirely driven by human-to-human transmission.[304][305] The number of coronavirus cases in Hubei gradually increased, reaching 60 by 20 December[306] and at least 266 by 31 December.[307] On 24 December, Wuhan Central Hospital sent a bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) sample from an unresolved clinical case to sequencing company Vision Medicals. On 27 and 28 December, Vision Medicals informed the Wuhan Central Hospital and the Chinese CDC of the results of the test, showing a new coronavirus.[308] A pneumonia cluster of unknown cause was observed on 26 December and treated by the doctor Zhang Jixian in Hubei Provincial Hospital, who informed the Wuhan Jianghan CDC on 27 December.[309] On 30 December, a test report addressed to Wuhan Central Hospital, from company CapitalBio Medlab, stated an erroneous positive result for SARS, causing a group of doctors at Wuhan Central Hospital to alert their colleagues and relevant hospital authorities of the result. That evening, the Wuhan Municipal Health Commission issued a notice to various medical institutions on "the treatment of pneumonia of unknown cause".[310] Eight of these doctors, including Li Wenliang (punished on 3January),[311] were later admonished by the police for spreading false rumours, and another, Ai Fen, was reprimanded by her superiors for raising the alarm.[312]

The Wuhan Municipal Health Commission made the first public announcement of a pneumonia outbreak of unknown cause on 31 December, confirming 27 cases[313][314][315]enough to trigger an investigation.[316]

During the early stages of the outbreak, the number of cases doubled approximately every seven and a half days.[317] In early and mid-January 2020, the virus spread to other Chinese provinces, helped by the Chinese New Year migration and Wuhan being a transport hub and major rail interchange.[52] On 20 January, China reported nearly 140 new cases in one day, including two people in Beijing and one in Shenzhen.[318] Later official data shows 6,174 people had already developed symptoms by then,[319] and more may have been infected.[320] A report in The Lancet on 24 January indicated human transmission, strongly recommended personal protective equipment for health workers, and said testing for the virus was essential due to its "pandemic potential".[75][321] On 30 January, the WHO declared the coronavirus a Public Health Emergency of International Concern.[320] By this time, the outbreak spread by a factor of 100 to 200 times.[322]

Originally posted here:

Coronavirus disease 2019 - Wikipedia

Prescott Valley, AZ Coronavirus Information – Safety Updates, News and Tips – The Weather Channel | Weather.com

Powered by Watson:

Our COVID Q&A with Watson is an AI-powered chatbot that addresses consumers' questions and concerns about COVID-19. It's built on the IBM Watson Ads Builder platform, which utilizes Watson Natural Language Understanding, and proprietary, natural- language-generation technology. The chatbot utilizes approved content from the CDC and WHO. Incidents information is provided by USAFacts.org.

To populate our Interactive Incidents Map, Watson AI looks for the latest and most up-to- date information. To understand and extract the information necessary to feed the maps, we use Watson Natural Language Understandingfor extracting insights from natural language text and Watson Discovery for extracting insights from PDFs, HTML, tables, images and more.COVID Impact Survey, conducted by NORC at the University of Chicago for the Data Foundation

See original here:

Prescott Valley, AZ Coronavirus Information - Safety Updates, News and Tips - The Weather Channel | Weather.com

COVID-19: Information for Veterinarians | Arizona Department of Agriculture

There is no evidence that animals can spread COVID-19 or that infection would be serious for them. The virus spreads primarily from person to person. The health and safety of employees should be the focus of every veterinary practice both companion animal and large animal.

Wash your hands frequently for at least 20 seconds with soap and warm water before eating, after using the bathroom, coughing or sneezing, and touching surfaces. Use an alcohol-based hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol if soap and water are not available and there is no visible dirt on your hands.

Frequently sanitize common areas with EPA registered antimicrobial products for use against COVID-19 that are safe to use in and around the animals and clinic.

Employees who are sick or show signs of respiratory illness should not work until they are symptom-free.

Work with other clinics to help cover workload as needed.

Veterinary services have been deemed essential functions under Healthcare and Public Health Operations in Arizona Governors Executive Order 2020-12.

In this context, the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) and the World Veterinary Association (WVA) advocate for the specific activities of Veterinary Services to be considered as essential businesses. Maintaining the activities that are crucial to public health.

Veterinarians are an integral part of the global health community. Beyond the activities linked to the health and welfare of animals, they have a key role in disease prevention and management, including those transmissible to humans, and to ensure food safety for the populations.

In the current situation, it is crucial that, amongst their numerous activities, they can sustain those necessary to ensure that:

Below are some links to various informationon how to keep you and your staff safe during these changing times.

With respect to regulatory issues, currently no state or country is waiving import requirements for animals. Please check with states of destination for requirements to move animals into those states from Arizona. In most cases, this will require an examination, +/- testing or vaccination and a CVI.

We encourage veterinarians to evaluate on a case-by-case basis the public health importance of companion animal rabies vaccination relative to the need to amend their business operations because of COVID-19. If a veterinarian determines that it is necessary to postpone an individual animals rabies vaccination appointment due to business operation interruption, then we recommend prioritizing administration of the rabies vaccination once normal veterinary business operations resume. Veterinarians are reminded that companion animals that have never received a rabies vaccination pose the most significant public health threat.

Follow this link:

COVID-19: Information for Veterinarians | Arizona Department of Agriculture

Board presented findings from first COVID-19 audit – Multnomah County

February 19, 2021

Focus areas included shelters, jails, adult care homes, and teleworking

Auditor Jennifer McGuirk presented the first in a series of reports on the Countys response to COVID-19 Thursday, Feb. 18, shedding light on County operations during the first year of the pandemic.

The Auditors Office surveyed more than 3,300 employees, held 70 interviews with County leaders and management, conducted site visits, and researched County, state and federal guidance. Focus areas included the Countys response in congregate settings and implementation of countywide guidance. The time period covered spanned from June 1, 2020 to Dec. 18, 2020.

Specifically we looked at conditions in shelters, jails, juvenile detention, and adult care homes, McGuirk said. People in these settings also tend to represent vulnerable communities in our county, including seniors, people who have disabilities, people who are experiencing houselessness, and people in adult or juvenile custody.

The report found that the County acted quickly in response to the significant challenges presented by the pandemic in accordance to public health guidance. The audit also found the County had to also ensure buildings are safe and ready for employees while reducing the risks associated with the high number of teleworkers.

This report provides us with an opportunity to reflect on our achievements and incorporate insights that will help us improve our ongoing efforts to address what may be the greatest challenge to the countys operations in its history, Chair Deborah Kafoury said.

Auditors reported almost 80 percent of surveyed staff agreed the County has taken appropriate action to reduce staff on site and installed sufficient signage promoting public health guidance.

The survey found generally good compliance with the Countys face covering policy, with 64 percent of respondents saying they always wear face coverings and 33 percent saying they sometimes wear them. Almost 80 percent agreed the County has taken appropriate action to reduce staff on site and installed sufficient signage promoting public health guidance.

Adherence to the face covering policy was lower among Sheriffs Office employees, with 42 percent of those surveyed saying they always wear face coverings. At Donald E. Long Juvenile Detention, that number was 50 percent.

Since Sheriffs Office employees work in jail facilities where people live together in close quarters, we want to see the mask wearing to be higher, said Nicole Dewees, a principal auditor. We found that there needed to be more mask wearing at detention facilities by people in custody and employees, particularly in light of recent outbreaks.

Sheriff Mike Reese and Erika Preuitt, who directs the Department of Community Justice, attended Thursdays meeting. In response to follow up questions from Commissioners Lori Stegmann and Jessica Vega Pederson, they affirmed that all staff, along with adults and youth in custody, are expected to wear face coverings. Failure to follow guidelines, they said, is subject to investigation and discipline.

I think early on we did have challenges with getting compliance with our face covering policy, which I take very seriously, Sheriff Reese said. Im certain that we have improved dramatically in our adherence to the guidelines and will continue to enforce my expectations that everyone wear a mask as appropriate and as per policy.

Its an expectation that our juvenile custody service specialists wear face coverings, Preuitt said. We, similarly to the Sheriffs Office, are going down progressive discipline if people are not wearing masks or not wearing their face coverings, also if theyre not following up with youth not wearing their face coverings.

The audit also examined the Countys response in other congregate settings, including shelters and adult care homes.

The Joint Office of Homeless Services successfully added additional shelter capacity to support physical distancing, along with clear safety guidance to providers, auditors found. Moving forward, they said, staffing and shelter supply challenges should be expected as the pandemic causes an increase in homelessness.

With about 600 adult care homes in Multnomah County, the report found the Countys Adult Care Home Program adjusted quickly to the pandemic. However, auditors also found the program could improve communication with adult care homes to ensure compliance with federal, state, and local health requirements for the safety of staff and residents.

The state has allowed us to do outside visits, so we encouraged outside visits for folks so their family can come and visit with them outside, said Irma Jimenez, who directs the Aging, Disability and Veterans Services Division. And just most recently, theres a little bit of flexibility for indoor visits, so another thing that were doing is providing that information to the providers when those restrictions get lifted or put in place, we make sure the providers know that.

In response to the pandemic, the County had to shift quickly to large numbers of employees teleworking to reduce workplace virus transmission. The audit also explored how the County can strengthen, clarify, and improve teleworking moving forward.

The Countys teleworking rules were originally designed as a mutual agreement when an employee is interested in teleworking under certain circumstances. The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed how the County can continue to serve people in productive, creative ways. It also exposed problems with accessing work equipment, technical difficulties, and access to human resources policies.

This pandemic gave us the opportunity in many places to see actually we can continue as agovernment functioning and in many places we can actually be even more productive, said Travis Graves, interim director of Department of County Assets and chief Human Resources Officer. So Im interested in looking to the future in terms of post-pandemic. What do we look like as an organization and what are the implications for that?

Commissioners thanked the Auditor for offering ways to improve the Countys response in congregate settings and facilities, while also honoring the employees who have worked in person throughout the pandemic.

This survey was about the employees going into work every single day who dont have the option of working from home like a lot of us are here, Commissioner Vega Pederson said, and doing their jobs and wearing masks for everyones safety and that is a lot that we ask of our employees. So Im really grateful for all the work that they do

Upon issuance of report, county Public Health officials should revise guidance on the public facing website for nonprofit shelter providers within county boundaries to improve clarity, in line with state requirements.

Joint Office of Homeless Services management should include clauses to follow Public Health guidelines in new contracts with shelter providers and in new amendments to contracts with shelter providers.

To be consistent with CDC guidelines, MCSO should begin exchanging the cloth masks of adults in custody on a daily basis if they are used upon issuance of this report.

With normal no-cost visiting options suspended because of COVID-19 precautions, MCSO should either expand the use of free-phone calls or modify lobby video visit operations to allow for safe use as soon as possible and no later than 90 days within issuance of this report.

Immediately upon the issuance of this report, we recommend that managers consistently enforce face covering policies with their staff.

The ACH Program should perform a review of all recent communication with each ACH and ensure that each ACH has received sufficient information and is aware of requirements and guidelines pertaining to the pandemic. A particular focus is needed in the areas of exposure, infection control, physical distancing and reporting. A review should be performed as soon as possible and no later than 30 days from issuance of this report. If contact is needed the contact should be made within at least 90 days from the issuance of this report.

As soon as possible, the OR OSHA COVID-19 temporary rule implementation committee should complete all new OSHA requirements:

Risk assessment, infection control plan, protocols for potential exposure, and employee training.

Note: management reports that substantial work toward this recommendation has been completed. This work occurred between the time the report was written and when it was issued. We acknowledge that work has been done, but we did not audit that work. We are leaving the recommendation in the report, so we can follow up on the recommendation thoroughly.

By March 2021, Central Human Resources should develop a method for employees to provide COVID-19 related feedback anonymously.

By March 2021, the Chair or her designee should provide employees with a point of contact for COVID-19 safety coordination.

Based on responses to our offices employee survey, it appears that applying policies is an ongoing challenge. Upon issuance of the report and periodically thereafter, the Chair or her designee should reiterate to managers and employees her expectations that safety policies and recommendations are followed, including the requirement that employees telework as much as possible.

Prior to adding in-person capacity at county locations, we recommend that FPM ensure that necessary building modifications, including the installation of partitions, and filter upgrades in HVAC systems have been completed.

Prior to adding in-person capacity at county locations, we recommend that FPM work with its janitorial contractors to ensure that each location has sufficient staffing capacity to ensure the enhanced cleaning recommended by the CDC.

We are told that the county is currently in the process of adding COVID-19 specific cleaning and disinfecting requirements into its contracts with janitorial providers. We recommend that FPM complete these contractual requirements prior to programs adding substantial in-person capacity at county locations.

By July 2021, department directors should provide county-owned computers to employees who frequently telework and should emphasize using county-owned computers for employees who occasionally telework. The county should also provide employees with any other equipment typically used by one person to telework effectively, such as computer mice, computer monitors, and headsets. These examples are meant to be descriptive, not exhaustive.

By February 2022, Central Human Resources should ensure the maintenance of telework information electronically, preferably in Workday to allow:

Accessibility to approved or denied telework agreements at the employee, supervisory, departmental and central levels.

Electronic approvals and updating for better efficiency.

Monitoring of teleworking performance and equity.

Documentation of specific details, such as computer ID numbers, of all county equipment used to telework.

To help ensure fairness among employees, by February 2022, Central Human Resources should indicate potential telework eligibility in county job descriptions.

Continued here:

Board presented findings from first COVID-19 audit - Multnomah County

COVID-19 Daily Update 2-19-2021 – West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

The West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) reports as of February 19, 2021, there have been 2,099,685 total confirmatory laboratory results received for COVID-19, with 129,055 total cases and 2,248 total deaths.

DHHR has confirmed the deaths of a 51-year old male from Jefferson County, an 89-year old female from Mercer County, a 76-year old male from Kanawha County, a 92-year old male from Fayette County, an 87-year old male from Jackson County, an 85-year old male from Berkeley County, a 63-year old male from Wood County, an 88-year old male from Wayne County, a 91-year old female from Mercer County, a 92-year old female from Mercer County, an 87-year old male from Jackson County, and a 54-year old female from Marion County.

It is with great sadness that we announce more lives lost to this pandemic, said Bill J. Crouch, DHHR Cabinet Secretary. Our sympathies and thoughts go out to these families, and we ask that all West Virginians do their part to prevent further spread of this virus.

CASES PER COUNTY: Barbour (1,163), Berkeley (9,532), Boone (1,538), Braxton (769), Brooke (1,983), Cabell (7,646), Calhoun (218), Clay (370), Doddridge (460), Fayette (2,587), Gilmer (699), Grant (1,044), Greenbrier (2,371), Hampshire (1,491), Hancock (2,565), Hardy (1,257), Harrison (4,788), Jackson (1,638), Jefferson (3,560), Kanawha (11,795), Lewis (1,012), Lincoln (1,198), Logan (2,643), Marion (3,601), Marshall (2,967), Mason (1,746), McDowell (1,334), Mercer (4,138), Mineral (2,567), Mingo (2,082), Monongalia (7,716), Monroe (930), Morgan (909), Nicholas (1,154), Ohio (3,567), Pendleton (617), Pleasants (794), Pocahontas (580), Preston (2,499), Putnam (4,116), Raleigh (4,561), Randolph (2,356), Ritchie (604), Roane (488), Summers (696), Taylor (1,072), Tucker (495), Tyler (607), Upshur (1,640), Wayne (2,576), Webster (289), Wetzel (1,062), Wirt (341), Wood (6,908), Wyoming (1,716).

Delays may be experienced with the reporting of information from the local health department to DHHR. As case surveillance continues at the local health department level, it may reveal that those tested in a certain county may not be a resident of that county, or even the state as an individual in question may have crossed the state border to be tested. Such is the case of Cabell and Marshall counties in this report.

Go here to see the original:

COVID-19 Daily Update 2-19-2021 - West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

APH Provides Update on COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination Sites – AustinTexas.gov

Austin, Texas All Austin Public Health (APH) COVID-19 testing and vaccination sites will remain closed Friday, Feb. 19 due to inclement weather. The sites have been closed since Saturday, Feb. 12 for the same reason.

APH staff have and continue to diligently monitor the vaccine to ensure it is safe and secure during the winter weather event.

We know these are challenging times as our staff, their families, and our entire community are grappling with issues caused by the weather, said APH Director Stephanie Hayden-Howard. We assure you that as soon as we can safely give the vaccine again, we will notify the public.

People with current vaccination appointments will receive a cancellation email or text.It is not known when vaccine operations will be able to resume. Anyone who receives a cancellation will be contacted by APH to reschedule. However, APH will not send out new appointments until we are confident that we can safely restart operations.

We greatly appreciate the communitys patience as we work through these unprecedented times, said Dr. Mark Escott, Interim Austin-Travis County Health Authority. While there may be several days between the time your appointment is canceled and your new appointment information is sent, it is important to remember that there is flexibility allowed between doses without losing effectiveness.

Dr. Escott reiterated: Your body works with the vaccine to make the first dose strongerover time. The second dose is a booster and a delay will not diminish its efficacy.

Both first and second doses are provided by appointment only. Pleasedo notshow up at the vaccine sites without an appointment as that will interfere with the vaccine operations.

Vaccine Sites:

Testing Sites:

As testing sites remain closed, continue to checkwww.austintexas.gov/covid-testinfofor updates.If you are experiencingsymptoms of COVID-19and are unable to get a test, continue to self-isolate for at least 10 days since symptom onset and at least 1 day following the resolution of fever and improvement of other symptoms.

COVID-19 Hotel Facility:

For additional COVID-19 information and updates, visitwww.AustinTexas.gov/COVID19.

Read more here:

APH Provides Update on COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination Sites - AustinTexas.gov

COVID-19 Deaths Near 500,000 In The US; Artists Discuss Future Memorials : Consider This from NPR – NPR

Chris Duncan, whose 75-year-old mother Constance died from COVID-19 on her birthday, photographs a COVID-19 Memorial Project installation of 20,000 American flags on the National Mall as the United States crosses the 200,000 lives lost in the COVID-19 pandemic on Sept. 22, 2020 in Washington, D.C. The U.S. will likely cross the mark of half a million lives lost to COVID-19 in the coming days. Win McNamee/Getty Images hide caption

Chris Duncan, whose 75-year-old mother Constance died from COVID-19 on her birthday, photographs a COVID-19 Memorial Project installation of 20,000 American flags on the National Mall as the United States crosses the 200,000 lives lost in the COVID-19 pandemic on Sept. 22, 2020 in Washington, D.C. The U.S. will likely cross the mark of half a million lives lost to COVID-19 in the coming days.

The U.S. death toll from COVID-19 is on track to pass a number next week that once seemed unthinkable: Half a million people in this country dead from the coronavirus.

And while the pandemic isn't over yet, and the death toll keeps climbing, artists in every medium have already been thinking about how our country will pay tribute to those we lost.

Poets, muralists, and architects all have visions of what a COVID-19 memorial could be. Many of these ideas are about more than just honoring those we've lost to the pandemic. Artists are also thinking about the conditions in society that brought us here.

Tracy K. Smith, a former U.S. poet laureate, has already written one poem honoring transit workers in New York who died of the disease. Smith says she wants to see a COVID-19 memorial that has a broader mission and invites people to bridge a divide.

Paul Farber runs Monument Lab, an organization that works with cities and states that want to build new monuments. He says he wants to see a COVID-19 monument that is collective experience and evolves over time. He also wants it to serve as a bridge to understanding.

Farber's list describes one of the most powerful memorials in recent American history: the AIDS quilt. Mike Smith, co-founder of that memorial, says that one focus of the AIDS quilt project that he would like to see in a COVID-19 memorial is inspiring communities to come together and not to isolate in processing and remembering those who died.

In participating regions, you'll also hear a local news segment that will help you make sense of what's going on in your community.

Email us at considerthis@npr.org.

This episode was produced by Lee Hale, Noah Caldwell and Jonaki Mehta. It was edited by Sami Yenigun with help from Sarah Handel, Courtney Dorning and Wynne Davis. Our executive producer is Cara Tallo.

See the rest here:

COVID-19 Deaths Near 500,000 In The US; Artists Discuss Future Memorials : Consider This from NPR - NPR

State COVID-19 dashboard changing to reflect total and positive tests – kwwl.com

(KWWL) -- Iowa's COVID-19 dashboard is updating to reflect total positive tests in the state, rather than individuals who have tested positive.

This change was discussed by Gov. Reynolds and IDPH Director Kelly Garcia during a press conference on Wednesday.

Reynolds mentioned that back in October she said that "continuing to report results for individuals would become more complicated and less valuable overtime as repeat testing became the norm."

According to Garcia, the shift from individual tests to total tests means that their positivity rate will align with total test results.

Previously on the homepage of coronavirus.iowa.gov, the state showed individuals tested and individuals who tested positive. Now, they will show the total tests the state has administered and the total number of tests that have come back positive. The difference in these numbers is caused by individuals getting tested more than once.

The number of positive tests is not the same as the number of positive cases. COVID-19 positive people may be getting tested multiple times. Rather than just reporting the new positive tests, we want to continue to report how many new individual people have tested positive.

To see recoveries for the state you must also scroll down to the bottom of the homepage and look at the "grand total" row of the summary chart.

The number of individuals positive will still be available on the website's "Positive Case Analysis" page. KWWL will continue to add the individuals positive from PCR and Antigen tests, to give the total number of individuals who have tested positive. We will subtract that number from the previous day to provide the number of new cases within the 24 hour period.

KWWL will continue to draw statewide numbers and those for Johnson and Dubuque counties from coronavirus.iowa.gov. We will still be using the Black Hawk County and Linn County dashboards to report those numbers respectively.

Follow this link:

State COVID-19 dashboard changing to reflect total and positive tests - kwwl.com

COVID-19 in Illinois updates: Heres whats happening Friday – Chicago Tribune

Illinois has surpassed 2 million COVID-19 vaccinations, public health officials reported Friday. The state reached a total of 2,060,706 doses after 83,673 vaccinations were administered Thursday.

Over the past seven days, the state averaged 59,460 vaccinations administered daily, down from a high of 66,320 on Feb. 14. Vaccinations have been affected this week by the severe winter weather, as the state had warned earlier in the week.

The citys CARES Act spending drew an angry rebuke from activists and aldermen who said the money could have instead provided badly needed housing, health care and business lifelines to struggling residents.

Also on Friday, state officials announced 2,219 new confirmed and probable cases of COVID-19 and 63 additional fatalities, bringing the total number of known infections in Illinois to 1,170,902 and the statewide death toll to 20,192 since the start of the pandemic.

Heres whats happening Friday with COVID-19 in the Chicago area and Illinois:

6:05 p.m.: Pritzkers tax plan: Closing corporate tax loopholes, or the best way to shoot yourself in the foot?

Gov. J.B. Pritzker wants to close $932 million of what he called corporate tax loopholes to help Illinois balance its budget after the fiscal ruins of COVID-19, but the controversial proposal comes as cities and states gear up to land relocating jobs and strengthen an economy battered by the pandemic.

Trade groups spoke out against Pritzkers plan after it wasannounced Wednesday, saying businesses are struggling even without new costs.

Real estate experts said Pritzkers proposal to phase out or eliminate some tax breaks could add a hurdle at an unprecedented moment, when swathes of corporations are rethinking their space needs.

Raising taxes during a pandemic is the best way to shoot yourself in the foot, when it comes to attracting jobs, said John H. Boyd, principal of The Boyd Co., a corporate site selection consulting firm. Its ill-timed and shortsighted.

5:50 p.m.: Far fewer COVID-19 deaths in Illinois nursing homes

In another promising sign Illinois is beating back the COVID-19 pandemic, cases and deaths at Illinois long-term care facilities have dropped to levels not seen since late summer, according to state data released Friday.

Following weeks of focused vaccination of long-term care residents and workers, the state reported 33 residents died from the virus over the past week. Thats the lowest reported tally since mid-August and exponentially lower than the 650 weekly deaths reported in early December.

Long-term care residents not only have seen a sizable drop in the number of deaths, they also now make up a far smaller share of those who are dying of COVID-19 each week going from roughly half or more of these deaths in Illinois to near 10 percent now.

Long-term care residents were among the first groups prioritized for vaccination, and advocates for seniors and industry officials credit the vaccines for reducing the viruss toll in long-term care facilities. But both groups cautioned that the pandemic remains far from over.

We still need to remember were in a crisis, even though were seeing positive trends, said Ryan Gruenenfelder, a director of advocacy and outreach for AARP Illinois.

In the past week the state recorded its 9,689th death of a long-term care resident, leaving the state just a few hundred shy of 10,000 deaths among nearly 75,000 cases.

5:40 p.m.: Younger Hispanic Kane County residents hit harder by COVID-19 deaths, new data shows

Younger Hispanic residents of Kane County have been hospitalized for COVID-19 and have died with the virus at disproportionately high rates, new health department data shows.

The data confirms what community advocates say they have long known: that Kane County has faced the same COVID-19 inequities that have played out across the country. But public information about the local communities most affected by COVID-19 deaths has been hard to come by.

The data also highlights the need to reach the countys Black and Hispanic communities with vaccines, Kane County Assistant Director of Community Health Michael Isaacson said, as small fractions of the countys doses to date have been administered to Black and Hispanic residents.

At the high level, these inequities show us that as a society we have a long way to go to get everybody better access to good health, Isaacson said. Specific to COVID, I think this data shows how important it is that we get vaccine to our Black and Latinx communities.

The information obtained by the Beacon-News shows vast divides in those who have died of COVID-19 when broken down by age.

In those under age 60, Hispanic residents made up about 68% of Kane County COVID-19 deaths through February 8 and about 64% of hospitalizations among younger residents for severe cases of the illness. That stands in contrast to the 32% of Kane Countys population that is Hispanic.

5:10 p.m.: Lightfoot joins mayors statewide in urging Illinois congressional delegation to back Bidens COVID-19 relief package

Illinois municipal groups and mayors, including Lori Lightfoot, have sent a letter to Illinois congressional delegation urging passage of President Joe Bidens COVID-19 relief plan and its $350 billion in direct aid to state and local governments nationally.

In a letter released Friday by the White House, the mayors and groups representing nearly 1,300 municipalities warned that without local recovery, there is no national economic recovery.

As mayors on the front line of the pandemic response, we have taken necessary steps to keep our communities safe and continue flattening the curve to save lives, the letter sent Thursday said. Undoubtedly, these steps have come with severe financial hardship. Not only have tax revenues been dropping drastically, but funding essential services critical to the health and safety of our residents has and continues to be challenged.

Of the $350 billion in direct relief to states and municipalities under the plan approved by the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, Illinois state government would receive $7.55 billion while municipalities in the state would get $5.7 billion. Of the municipal share, Chicago would get more than $1.8 billion.

While the letter was sent to all 18 members of Illinois House delegation and Democratic Sens. Dick Durbin and Tammy Duckworth, it was primarily aimed at the states five Republican congressmen: Reps. Adam Kinzinger of Channahon, Darin LaHood of Peoria, Rodney Davis of Taylorville, Mike Bost of Murphysboro and Mary Miller of Oakland. They have joined with other GOP members in opposing direct state and local pandemic relief funding.

2:13 p.m.: Suburbanites are getting COVID-19 vaccine appointments on Chicagos South and West sides. But should they?

Within the first couple days of vaccinating seniors and essential workers on the South Side of Chicago late last month, doctors at Howard Brown Health noticed something unusual: patients traveling from the North Side of the city to the clinics.

They werent the people that lived in the community, said Dr. Maya Green, Howard Browns regional medical director for the South and West sides. The fact is, the link (for appointments) was being communicated and shared faster on the North Side of Chicago, and not among Black and brown communities on the South and West sides of Chicago.

Its a scenario thats been playing out across the city in recent weeks since Illinois opened vaccinations to seniors and front-line essential workers Jan. 25. Many vaccine doses were sent to underserved parts of Chicago in an effort to make sure people in the communities hardest-hit by COVID-19 had access to shots. But with overall vaccines in short supply, people from outside those areas have been traveling to them to get vaccinated.

1:43 p.m.: Illinois surpasses 2 million COVID-19 vaccinations, but 7-day average down amid severe winter weather

The number of COVID-19 vaccinations administered in Illinois has surpassed 2 million, public health officials reported Friday.

The state reached a total of 2,060,706 doses after 83,673 vaccinations were administered Thursday. According to state records, that is the second-highest daily total, behind 95,375 doses on Feb. 11.

Over the past seven days, the state averaged 59,460 vaccinations administered daily, down from a high of 66,320 on Feb. 14. Vaccinations have been affected this week by the severe winter weather, as the state had warned earlier in the week.

The number of Illinois residents who have been fully vaccinated receiving both of the required two shots reached 507,862, or 3.99% of the total population. Over the past seven days, the state averaged 59,460 vaccines administered daily.

12:21 p.m.: Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot defends spending $281.5 million in federal COVID-19 relief money on police payroll, says criticism is just dumb

Mayor Lori Lightfoot defended Friday the citys decision to use $281.5 million in federal CARES Act money on Chicago police payroll costs, saying criticism from progressive aldermen and community groups on the issue is just dumb.

We saved taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars by saying yes to the federal government. Should we have said no? No, no, no federal government, well incur this expense, well put this burden entirely on city of Chicago taxpayers and you can take your money elsewhere? Lightfoot said. That would be foolish and of course we didnt do that.

The city took advantage of the federal CARES Act funding, which provided reimbursement money for COVID-19 related expenses, to avoid an even bigger deficit, Lightfoot said.

Criticism comes with the job of mayor but this ones just dumb, Lightfoot said.

The citys CARES Act spending drew an angry rebuke from activists and aldermen who said the money could have instead provided badly needed housing, health care and business lifelines to struggling residents.

12:13 p.m.: 2,219 new confirmed and probable COVID-19 cases and 63 additional deaths reported

Officials also reported 85,963 new tests in the last 24 hours. The seven-day statewide rolling positivity rate for cases as a share of total tests was 2.8% for the period ending Thursday.

10:13 a.m.: Chicago reports improvement in COVID-19 vaccine distribution efforts among citys Black and Latino population

The number of vaccines going to Black and Latino people in Chicago has gone up but the city still has work to do in closing the equity gap, according to newly released data.

The city has improved its vaccination record among minority groups since December, when Chicago began receiving doses for distribution. White people initially were receiving roughly 60% of doses per week, a figure thats dropped to about 40% in the past week as city officials pushed efforts to promote the vaccine in Black and Latino neighborhoods, city officials said.

Over the past month, we have doubled down on our efforts to not only drive vaccines into communities that need them most but ensure that our vaccination rates match the demographics of our city, Lightfoot said in a statement touting the citys efforts.

News of improving vaccination distribution efforts comes a week after state data showed that Black and Hispanic Illinoisans so far have been vaccinated at half the rate of white residents, confirming fears of inequity in COVID-19 vaccinations and spurring calls to action.

7:01 a.m.: Lightfoot, city officials to give vaccine update

Mayor Lori Lightfoot and Chicago health officials were scheduled to give an update on vaccine distribution in the city Friday morning.

Lightfoot and city Health Commissioner Dr. Allison Arwady were to join other city officials at Ombudsman Chicago South high school in Englewood.

The news conference comes as Chicago-area counties have struggled to reach even the states low vaccination rates. The city, Cook and DuPage counties reported that less than 10% of their populations had received their first dose, while Kane, Lake, McHenry and Will counties each had vaccinated 8% or less.

The announcement also comes as state officials have tried to ramp up vaccine distribution in areas throughout the state with lower vaccination rates, opening mass vaccination sites, including by opening three new mass vaccination sites in central and southern Illinois this week.

Stay up to date with the latest information on coronavirus with our breaking news alerts.

Here are some recent stories related to COVID-19:

Read this article:

COVID-19 in Illinois updates: Heres whats happening Friday - Chicago Tribune

Covid-19 Was Spreading in China Before First Confirmed Cases, Fresh Evidence Suggests – The Wall Street Journal

New evidence from China is affirming what epidemiologists have long suspected: The coronavirus likely began spreading unnoticed around the Wuhan area in November 2019, before it exploded in multiple different locations throughout the city in December.

Chinese authorities have identified 174 confirmed Covid-19 cases around the city from December 2019, said World Health Organization researchers, enough to suggest there were many more mild, asymptomatic or otherwise undetected cases than previously thought.

Many of the 174 cases had no known connection to the market that was initially considered the source of the outbreak, according to information gathered by WHO investigators during the four-week mission to China to examine the origins of the virus. Chinese authorities declined to give the WHO team raw data on these cases and potential earlier ones, team members said.

In examining 13 genetic sequences of the virus from December, Chinese authorities found similar sequences among those linked to the market, but slight differences in those of people without any link to it, according to the WHO investigators. The two sets likely began to diverge between mid-November and early December, but could possibly indicate infections as far back as September, said Marion Koopmans, a Dutch virologist on the WHO team.

This, and other evidence, suggest the coronavirus might have jumped to humans sometime during or shortly before the second half of November, she said, sickening too few people to attract attention until it led to an explosive outbreak in Wuhan. By December, the virus was spreading much more widely, both among people who had a link to the market, as well as others with no tie.

More here:

Covid-19 Was Spreading in China Before First Confirmed Cases, Fresh Evidence Suggests - The Wall Street Journal

Gov. Northam takes questions on COVID-19 issues including about when he thinks masks can come off – WAVY.com

HAMPTON, Va. (WAVY) On Friday, 10 On Your Side met with Gov. Ralph Northam while he was at Fort Monroe in Hampton.

10 On Your Sides Andy Fox asked Northam some of the pressing questions, including why it took so long to launch a statewide vaccination registration system, and why some health districts still dont have directors during a pandemic.

And finally, the question that many Americans are also wondering: When can the masks come off?

There are 10 healthdistricts in Virginiawhere the director isforcedto dodouble duty and manage multiple departments.That includes Dr.Demetria Lindsay,who isdistrict health director for Virginia Beach and Norfolk.

There are nine other directors just like Lindsay. Hampton and Newport News share a district health director, as do Portsmouth and the Western Tidewater Health District, which covers 1,500 square miles.

This pandemicis the likes we have never seen in decades,so we have been stretched thin, the governor said when 10 On Your Side inquired about the shortage of directors.

Some critics argue everything appears thin,from vaccinations to leadership at the top of some health districts.

We asked thegovernor why,during the worst global health crisis of our lifetime, do we have so many health districts without their own director? Does it look like we are not prepared?

Well,wevemade a lot ofmodifications. Wearein a very good place now compared to a year ago. We still have alot of work to do, Northam acknowledged.

And why donthealth districts,especially larger urbanones, havetheir own leadership?

The governor did not give a why when asked by 10 On Your Side.

10 On Your Side also pressed Northamabout therocky start to the statewide pre-registration vaccination website that crashed the morning it was launched. People in droves complained to WAVY.com.

As the site crashed, those residents also couldnt get their answers because Virginialaunched a help hotlinethe day after they launched the pre-registrationsite.

What about those issues?

We have had over300,000who havesuccessfully enrolled,and wehave transferred information from those who haveenrolledpreviouslythroughthehealthdepartmentinto the new system, Northam said.

So, is therelight at the end of the long, dark COVID-19 tunnel?

We havebeen at this a year. Numbersshowwe are moving in the right direction.Our positivity rates are going down, our number of vaccinations are going up, he said.

What about thisquestion: When does he think the masks can comeoff?

Hopefully, byearlyor mid-summer, we willhave folksvaccinatedand getto the herd immunity that we need to put COVID-19 in the rear-view mirror, he said.

But when will we be able to not wear masks anymore?

As theGovernor walkedaway to the next meeting, he declined to say.

Ill call you and let you know, Andy.In themeantime,keep it on.he told Andy Fox.

More here:

Gov. Northam takes questions on COVID-19 issues including about when he thinks masks can come off - WAVY.com

Tracking COVID-19 in Alaska: 210 new infections and no deaths reported Friday – Anchorage Daily News

We're making this important information available without a subscription as a public service. But we depend on reader support to do this work. Please consider supporting independent journalism in Alaska, at just $1.99 for the first month of your subscription.

Coronavirus cases in Alaska have been steadily declining over the last few months after a surge of infections in November and early December that strained hospital capacity.

Hospitalizations in Alaska are now less than a quarter of what they were during November and December. By Friday, there were 33 people with COVID-19 in hospitals throughout the state, including four on ventilators. Another patient was suspected of having the virus.

The COVID-19 vaccine reached Alaska in mid-December. By Friday, 137,124 people nearly 19% of Alaskas population had received at least their first vaccine shot, according to the states vaccine monitoring dashboard. Thats far above the national average of 12.4%. Among Alaskans age 16 and older, 24% had received at least one dose of vaccine by Friday. The Pfizer vaccine has been authorized for use for people ages 16 and older, and Modernas has been cleared for use by people 18 and older.

Health care workers and nursing home staff and residents were the first people prioritized to receive the vaccine. Alaskans older than 65 became eligible in early January, and the state further widened eligibility criteria last week to include educators, people 50 and older with a high-risk medical condition, front-line essential workers 50 and older and people living or working in congregate settings like shelters and prisons.

Those eligible to receive the vaccine can visit covidvax.alaska.gov or call 907-646-3322 to sign up and to confirm eligibility. The phone line is staffed 9 a.m.-6:30 p.m. on weekdays and 9 a.m.-4:30 p.m. on weekends.

Despite the lower case numbers, public health officials continue to encourage Alaskans to keep up with personal virus mitigation efforts like hand-washing, mask-wearing and social distancing. A highly contagious variant of the virus reached Alaska in December.

Of the 185 cases reported among Alaska residents on Friday, there were 59 in Anchorage plus one in Chugiak and five in Eagle River; two in Kenai; one in Soldotna; one in Kodiak; 18 in Fairbanks plus one in North Pole; one in Big Lake; 11 in Palmer; one in Sutton-Alpine; 38 in Wasilla; two in Utqiagvik; six in Juneau; 15 in Ketchikan; one in Petersburg; two in Sitka; one in Wrangell; one in Unalaska; and one in Dillingham.

Among communities with populations under 1,000 not named to protect privacy, there were three in the Copper River Census Area; one in the southern Kenai Peninsula Borough; three in the Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area; one in Yakutat plus Hoonah Angoon region; and nine in the Bethel Census Area;

Twenty-five cases were also identified among nonresidents: one in Anchorage, one in Fairbanks, one in Juneau, and 22 in Unalaska.

While people might get tested more than once, each case reported by the state health department represents only one person.

The states data doesnt specify whether people testing positive for COVID-19 have symptoms. More than half of the nations infections are transmitted from asymptomatic people, according to CDC estimates.

Of all the tests conducted over the last seven days, an average of 2.27% came back positive.

Read more here:

Tracking COVID-19 in Alaska: 210 new infections and no deaths reported Friday - Anchorage Daily News

Imposters posing as county officials reported to be spreading false COVID-19 info in Puna – KHON2

Posted: Feb 19, 2021 / 01:20 PM HST / Updated: Feb 19, 2021 / 01:26 PM HST

(AP Photo/Rogelio V. Solis)

HONOLULU (KHON2) Imposters claiming to be Hawaii County officials have recently been reported to be spreading false information about COVID-19 policies in the Puna area.

Get Hawaiis latest news sent to your inbox, click here to subscribe to News 2 You, a daily newsletter.

Hawaii County Mayor Mitch Roths office has received reports that claim two women were seen at multiple businesses in the Puna Kai Shopping Center telling employees and customers that face coverings are no longer necessary. The women also allegedly made false claims about social-distancing practices.

In one report, two imposters claimed to be from the Hawaii County Assembly of Health and Safety Commission. No such commission exists, the mayors office said in Fridays news release.

Its disheartening to think that there are folks out there who are trying to trick people into abandoning the practices that have allowed us to keep our [COVID-19] counts some of the lowest in the nation, said Roth. We have done a great job of keeping each other safe and caring for our community in these uncertain times, and I truly believe that we are close to the finish line. As those most vulnerable continue to receive their vaccinations and are deemed truly safe, we will begin to ease restrictions, but we arent there just yet.

On Feb. 12, Roth extended the state of emergency through April 12, which maintains all COVID-19 policies and procedures.

Hawaii County officials are currently investigating the situation. Anyone who has encountered similar activity is asked to call police at 808-935-3311.

Continue reading here:

Imposters posing as county officials reported to be spreading false COVID-19 info in Puna - KHON2

Houston Health Department to resume COVID-19 vaccinations following winter storm – City of Houston

Houston Health Department to resume COVID-19 vaccinations following winter storm

February 18, 2021

UPDATE (Feb. 18) - Houston Health Department-affiliated United Memorial Medical Center COVID-19 testing sites resume normal operations on Friday, February 19. Visit HoustonEmergency.org/covid19 for details.

HOUSTON- The Houston Health Department will resume COVID-19 vaccinations this weekend with 4,784 second dose appointments on Saturday and Sunday, February 20-21.

People who received their first dose from the department during the week of January 18-23 will be contacted Friday and Saturday to schedule appointments. People who do not hear from the department by Saturday afternoon should contact the COVID-19 call center at 832-393-4220.

The department will schedule additional second and first dose appointments next week.

Area Agency on Aging WaitlistThe Houston Health Departments COVID-19 vaccine waitlist remains open for people age 65 and older, people age 60 and older with chronic health conditions, and people with disabilities.

Those who qualify may call the departments Area Agency on Aging at 832-393-4301 to leave a voicemail with their name and phone number. Calls will be returned for screening and scheduling as supply is available. People only need to leave one message.

Testing SitesHouston Health Department-affiliated COVID-19 testing sites will remain closed Friday, February 19. An announcement about reopening will be provided Friday.

View post:

Houston Health Department to resume COVID-19 vaccinations following winter storm - City of Houston

Rural counties concerned over lack of COVID-19 vaccine supply for their residents – WGRZ.com

Some rural counties in Western New York have some of the lowest population percentages in terms of first dose vaccinations. Allegany County is last in the state.

BUFFALO, N.Y. Amid so many challenges with the vaccine rollout, a couple local counties are among the lowest in the state with getting residents vaccinated.

Some health officials believe where they're located has something to do with getting significantly fewer doses of COVID-19 vaccine.

According to New York State's Vaccine Tracker, Allegany County, has the lowest population percentage with at least one vaccine dose at 7.4 percent of the county's population.

"I don't think there's anything particularly different we're doing or not doing, we're involved in the same hub calls the western region is involved in," said Tyler Shaw, public health director in Allegany County, "As of right now, we have no additional first doses to go out the door."

Also low in that category: Orleans County at 7.9 percent. For some perspective, Erie County leads all WNY counties with nearly 13 percent of the population with at least one shot of vaccine.

"We understand the population divide and making sure allocations are based appropriately based on population, but ultimately we need increases in our local communities and not just Genesee and Orleans, but all the rural counties," said Paul Pettit, the public health director for Genesee and Orleans counties.

Pettit says vaccine allocation in both counties has been either cut or remained flat in recent weeks. This at a time, when the federal government and the state have been promising modest increases in supply.

"The challenges continue, we continue to hear about increased allocations from the state, we've been hearing that for weeks coming from the feds to the state, but that has not translated into increased local allocations for specifically rural counties," Pettit said.

Meantime, in Erie County, the county health department expects to see a modest increase from last week to this week.

"I guess the biggest thing, we just want to know is and we'd like to see is that that vaccine starting to come into the rural areas a little more readily and a little more parity with where that vaccine is going," Pettit said.

2 On Your Side asked the state health department and the governor's office about vaccine allocation to rural counties.

A spokesperson for the health department says this is all due to recent winter storms slowing down vaccine delivery.

Here's the full statement:

Nola Goodrich-Kresse, public information officer in Orleans County wrote in an email:"Based on the most recent data, Orleans County has received the third lowest allocation of vaccine in the Finger Lakes Region since it was initially distributed to date. There are also fewer healthcare providers in the county resulting in less eligible in the 1A prioritization groups early on. According to the 2020 County Health Rankings and Roadmaps, Orleans has a ratio of 13,660 patients to 1 provider. We have seen by the allocations to date that rural counties continue to receive less vaccine proportionally than larger urban counties. We're hopeful that as initial vaccination data is released, it will continue to show these disparities and lead towards increased allocations reaching our residents. Access to health care and transportation issues are very prevalent in the rural areas which limits the ability of our residents to reach current state run mass vaccination sites. Today, Genesee, Orleans and Wyoming Counties formally requested from the Governor a state run mass vaccination site at GCC to increase closer access and increased allocations of vaccine to our residents."

Assemblymember Steve Hawley writes in a statement:"The vaccination distribution to rural parts of the state has been concerning thus far, to say the least. While it's bad enough vaccine allocations have remained flat in recent weeks throughout rural areas of the state, here in Orleans County distribution has slowed since the amount of doses the county received was cut from 400 to 200 for the week of February 8th. We have reached out to the state Health Department regarding this shortage and, while they said they would look into it, we have not heard back. This shortage must be addressed immediately to stop the spread of COVID-19 through rural upstate New York and to save lives. Because we are all New Yorkers, no matter where we live."

State Senator Ed Rath issued a statement:"The Federal government has informed New York that nearly all COVID-19 vaccine doses allocated for Week 10 which were scheduled to be delivered between February 12th and February 21st are delayed due to the winter storms continuing to impact much of the country. Every dose that should have shipped on Monday was held back, and only a limited number of Pfizer vaccines left shipping facilities on Tuesday and Wednesday. This delay will undoubtedly pose a logistical challenge for New York but as we have shown over the last 350-plus days, we are New York Tough, and we are up to the challenge. The Department of Health is working closely with all providers, including local health departments, hospitals, pharmacies, and FQHCs to minimize the impact on their operations and reduce the number of appointments that must be rescheduled. The vaccine is the weapon that will win the war against COVID, and we will continue to work with our federal partners to expedite the delayed shipments and will keep New Yorkers updated over the coming days."

See the article here:

Rural counties concerned over lack of COVID-19 vaccine supply for their residents - WGRZ.com

NY Sues Amazon, Saying It Inadequately Protected Workers From Covid-19 – The New York Times

New Yorks attorney general, Letitia James, sued Amazon on Tuesday evening, arguing that the company provided inadequate safety protection for workers in New York City during the pandemic and retaliated against employees who raised concerns over the conditions.

The case focuses on two Amazon facilities: a large warehouse on Staten Island and a delivery depot in Queens. Ms. James argues that Amazon failed to properly clean its buildings, conducted inadequate contact tracing for known Covid-19 cases, and took swift retaliatory action to silence complaints from workers.

Amazons extreme profits and exponential growth rate came at the expense of the lives, health and safety of its frontline workers, Ms. James argued in the complaint, filed in New York Supreme Court.

Kelly Nantel, a spokeswoman for Amazon, said the company cared deeply about the health and safety of its workers.

We dont believe the attorney generals filing presents an accurate picture of Amazons industry-leading response to the pandemic, Ms. Nantel said.

Last week, Amazon preemptively sued Ms. James in federal court in an attempt to stop her from bringing the charges. The company argued that workplace safety was a matter of federal, not state, law.

Feb. 19, 2021, 7:57 p.m. ET

In its 64-page complaint last week, Amazon said its safety measures far exceed what is required under the law. It cited a surprise inspection by the New York City Sheriffs Office that found Amazon appeared to go above and beyond the current compliance requirements. The company also detailed other safety measures it had taken, including temperature checks and offering free Covid-19 testing on site.

New York, in its suit, said Amazon received written notification of at least 250 employees at the Staten Island warehouse who had Covid-19. In more than 90 of those cases, the infected employee had been at work in the previous week, yet Amazon did not close portions of the building to provide proper ventilation as the state required, the filing said.

Ms. James said that until at least late June, Amazon did not interview infected workers to determine their close contacts and instead relied on reviewing surveillance footage, which could take three days and did not cover the entire warehouse. The lack of interviews created a very time-consuming process which did not identify close contacts in a timely fashion, the complaint said.

She also argued that Amazon retaliated against Christian Smalls, a worker the company fired in the spring. Mr. Smalls had been raising safety concerns with managers and led a public protest in the parking lot of the Staten Island facility.

Amazon has said Mr. Smalls was fired for going to the work site for the protest even though he was on paid quarantine leave after he had been exposed to a colleague who had tested positive for the coronavirus.

Ms. Jamess filing said two Amazon human resources employees discussed Mr. Smallss situation in writing. The employees said they thought it was unfair to fire him because he did not enter the building and because Amazon had not told him that the companys quarantine policy prohibited him from being outside the facility.

Ms. James said that by firing Mr. Smalls and reprimanding another protest leader, Amazon sent a chilling message to others.

Amazon employees reasonably fear that if they make legitimate health and safety complaints about Amazons Covid-19 response, Amazon will retaliate against them as well, she argued.

The state said Amazon should change its policies, conduct training and undergo safety monitoring, and that it should pay lost wages and other damages to Mr. Smalls and offer him his job back.

See the article here:

NY Sues Amazon, Saying It Inadequately Protected Workers From Covid-19 - The New York Times

How the hybrid cloud is key to enterprise AI infrastructure strategies – Cloud Tech

The wheel, steam engine and the internet created revolutionary jumps in the way people work and play. Today, artificial intelligence is reshaping science, business and personal interactions with equal magnitude. In every industry, including agriculture, healthcare, customer service, finance, manufacturing, retail and more, companies are quickly adopting AI to ensure theyre not left behind during this tectonic shift.

AI workloads have unique requirements, including strategic planning to ensure data scientists and researchers work efficiently on delivering successful projects. For IT teams just starting out, its helpful to know that while AI workloads require accelerated infrastructure and software, many of the solutions IT is most familiar with are already AI-ready for integration into an innovative strategy for creating an AI Centre of Excellence.

Few resources are as readily available and easy to use as the cloud, and this easy access to infrastructure extends to AI workloads. With GPU-accelerated instances available from every cloud service provider, these resources are ideal for prototyping AI projects. They provide the scale needed when training new models. The cloud also can serve enterprises well as infrastructure for AI inference workloads, where AI models are deployed for things like computer vision, conversational AI, speech, language and translation, and recommendation systems.

The challenge here is that data governance and cloud costs can complicate AI adoption. Training models generally require processing large datasets, and as AI projects grow, hosting all the data on the cloud can result in unexpected costs. Additionally, when AI is deployed in applications, many apps require real-time responsiveness for automation or user experience, which can become a challenge when data makes a round trip from the cloud.

To overcome these hurdles, enterprises are building AI Centres of Excellence with on-prem systems for AI that connect with cloud-based AI computing for prototyping and scale. This involves planning for data gravity and putting computing closer to the source of data to ensure costs are balanced and resources are at the ready. It also helps enterprises start with small projects in the cloud that grow into the hybrid ecosystem when its time to deploy. All major cloud service providers offer hybrid accelerated computing solutions, making it easier to harness both on-prem and cloud-based compute resources as needed.

With this hybrid approach, enterprise data scientists always have the resources they need to stay as productive as possible whether theyre creating new models, training AI, or evaluating a deployed model to ensure its still accurate.

Its also important to consider the big picture when looking at the cost of accelerated computing in the hybrid cloud. On paper, high-performance instances may at first look costly, but they end up delivering significant cost savings. They enable large datasets to be processed much more quickly, which results in lower total costs. Most importantly, these instances provide faster time-to-market for products and services. In addition, software technology can help right-size accelerated computing resources to maximise efficiency on diverse AI training and inference workloads.

For AI use cases like conversational AI services, accelerated computing platforms train large, sophisticated networks in hours instead of weeks. When deployed as AI-powered services, these networks deliver immediate, natural-sounding replies to complex questions.

Central to every AI project is a software architecture built to deliver on enterprise AI objectives. Workloads for conversational AI, recommender systems, robotics automation and computer vision all depend on specialised software designed for these unique applications.

These software requirements can present the biggest challenges for AI teams getting started on new projects. To help companies hit the ground running on their AI Centres of Excellence, NVIDIA offers free software resources for developers and data scientists. The NVIDIA AI platform also offers a single architecture to develop and optimise the applications while offering the flexibility to run them anywhere.

For businesses, one size rarely fits all. The same is true for AI workloads. With a hybrid cloud strategy to augment an enterprise AI Centre of Excellence, IT teams can deliver AI acceleration thats both on demand and within budgets. By keeping AI software in mind and developing a strategy to keep pace with software innovation, enterprises will be ready to scale easily from the data centre, to the cloud, to the edge.

Interested in hearing industry leaders discuss subjects like this and sharing their experiences and use-cases? The Data Centre Congress, 4th March 2021 is a free virtual event exploring the world of data centres. Learn more here and book your free ticket:https://datacentrecongress.com/

Original post:

How the hybrid cloud is key to enterprise AI infrastructure strategies - Cloud Tech

Why companies are flocking to the cloud more than ever – Business Insider

The shift to cloud computing has been one of the most significant tech trends of the past few years. While it used to be the norm for companies to own and operate their own data centers, the amount of business software running on traditional servers is set to shrink to 32% of all enterprise applications by 2022, roughly half what it was in 2019.

Forrester senior analyst Tracy Woo put it bluntly:

"It's well understood using cloud is necessary to stay competitive," she told Insider. "The question most are weighing is when and should we be moving all of our workloads to the cloud?"

Moving to the cloud can create a host of benefits for companies, including slashed IT costs, more flexibility, increased efficiency, improved security, boosted performance, and the potential for innovation and developing new capabilities, according to Woo and other experts. And the pandemic has only accelerated this transition and digital transformation.

One of the first benefits that brought attention to the cloud, according to Canalys research analyst Blake Murray, was scalability, meaning the ability to increase or decrease resources to satisfy evolving demands. That remains a draw: For example, the NFL was able to lean on Amazon Web Services to live-stream its virtual draft last year, when it needed to use far more cloud capacity than typical.

Companies that embrace the cloud can additionally find "benefits in innovations" like artificial intelligence and machine learning use cases, according to Gartner research vice president Ed Anderson, as well as "operational efficiency and cost savings."

For example, American Airlines told Insider that uniting its backend system on cloud improved the customer experience, like giving people more control over rescheduled flights, while Capital One said that moving completely to the cloud allowed it to save money and increase the security of its products.

Case studies like that highlight why firms are anxious to make the leap to the cloud: A whopping 85% of enterprises will adopt a cloud-first principle by 2025, according to Gartner research VP Sid Nag, meaning that they'll be focusing on how to free up IT resources and deliver the most business value using the cloud.

The COVID-19 pandemic has also increased cloud adoption: Almost 70% of organizations using cloud services plan to increase their cloud spending in the wake of the pandemic according to a Gartner survey published in November.

"COVID and the shaky economy brought on a lot of focus to business priorities specifically accelerating to a more digital business that would enable a company to more readily respond to changing circumstances," said Woo. "It also forced companies to take a bigger focus on good business fundamentals in reducing costs in order to get through tough financial times."

Nag's report highlights three priorities firms have focused on: Preserving cash and optimizing IT costs, supporting and securing a remote workforce, and ensuring resiliency. "Investing in cloud became a convenient means to address all three of these needs," he wrote.

Cloud services also helped companies "keep their businesses viable and online and connected to their customers and partners," added Anderson, who co-authored a report about this shift.

Experts note that the trajectory of the pandemic, and the lingering effects thereafter, have informed their predictions for cloud adoption in 2021.

"I think that cloud services are maybe to steal the term like a 'new normal' for business," said Canalys' Blake Murray. "I think the growth will continue. There doesn't seem to be anything that would change minds, especially if the economy stabilizes more. I think people will pour more investment into digital transformation."

See the original post here:

Why companies are flocking to the cloud more than ever - Business Insider

The cloud without the wait: mobile edge computing and 5G – Verizon Communications

It all starts with the cloud

The cloud stores your data, all your pictures and your phone contacts, and it processes information that helps make your favorite apps work. Cloud computing can do several things at once, really well: It can compute, store data and work with the network, all in one location. Many cloud providers, for example, have storage facilities that do cloud computing in locations all over the world. When you take a photo with your phone and send it to Instagram, it goes to a cloud facilitypossibly several hops and four or five states awaywhere all the necessary computing takes place, and then it publishes to Instagram. Its a similar process for reading your morning email or listening to a podcast. For things like that, the centralized cloud works really well, and the latency is low enough that your experience is just fine.

But certain experiences require a lot of data to move very quickly to and from a device and the cloud. Thats where MEC comes in. It brings the cloud closer to you.

The edge refers to the part of Verizons network that is closest to you: Your device connects to the network at the edge. And edge computing means bringing the cloud to the edge of the network closest to your device.

So how do you make edge computing more mobile, and closer to the devices that need it?

MEC is an entire network architecture that brings computing power close to any device thats using it. Instead of data going back and forth to cloud servers four or five states away, its processed just miles or meters from the device. For this purpose, Verizon has installed cloud servers in its own access points across its networks.

See the original post:

The cloud without the wait: mobile edge computing and 5G - Verizon Communications

Cloud computing ‘sticker shock’ is on the rise, and containing it may be a new career path – ZDNet

As cloud adoption rises, so does cloud "sticker shock." That tremendous savings seen from the switch to up-front CapEx investments in information technology to subscription mode soon gets soured as the rising monthly bills come in for services nobody knows where and when they are being used.

If you feel your organization is behind the curve with automating even the most routine parts of cloud, and cloud spending is an unseen disaster waiting to happen, don't feel so bad -- even the most informed financial experts are still trying to figure these things out.

We're talking about those who are part of a rising new discipline called "FinOps" -- the practice of monitoring, measuring and mitigating the costs and value delivered from cloud. The perspectives of FinOps practitioners (yes, they are out there) provide a good look at understanding what lies ahead in cloud. Here, we see automation is still a struggle to fully attain, and cloud spending a big question mark.

These are the findings of the FinOps Foundation, a non-profit trade association focused on codifying and promoting cloud financial management best practices and standards, detailed in a recent survey of more than 800 FinOps practitioners from around the world with a collective $45 billion in annual cloud spend. "The dirty little secret of cloud spend is that the bill never really goes down," says J.R. Storment, executive director of the FinOps Foundation.

The results show massive adoption of public cloud spend, and the struggle to contain and optimize cloud spend. Nearly half of survey respondents (49%) had little or no automation of managing cloud spend. Of those with some automation, almost one-third automated notifications (31%) and tagging hygiene (29%.) Only 13% automated rightsizing and 9% spot use. This "indicates that companies are likely missing opportunities to optimize cloud spend," the survey's authors note.

Half of compute spend on public cloud was for on-demand, the highest-price service; and 49% for reserved, savings or committed use coverage, the next-costliest option. Only 13% was for spot use, the least expensive service, even though respondents identified 28% as being an "excellent" target for that option.

Getting engineers to act on cost optimization was cited by 40% of respondents as the biggest challenge, followed by dealing with shared costs (33%) and accurate forecasting spend (26%.)

The most oft-used tools used for managing cloud costs include AWS Cost Explorer, Cloudability (Apptio), CloudHealth (VMWare), Azure Cost Management, GCP Cost Tools, and Cloudcheckr. About half, 46%, use cloud native tooling as their primary technology, 43% use a 3rd party platform, and 11% use home grown tools or spreadsheets. At the same time, many FinOps practitioners still rely on data collection, collation, and analysis via spreadsheet. Almost all practitioners use a combination of tooling, while still relying on spreadsheets for some tasks -- with forecasting being the biggest Excel use.

The survey's authors project that significant growth is ahead for FinOps, the field of cloud financial management, as more companies accelerate their cloud plans, especially amid COVID-19, and struggle to contain and optimize cloud spend. The survey respondents predicted an over 40% growth in FinOps team size in the next 12 months.

For the most part, FinOps is a part-time pursuit, and organizations need to buy into supporting efforts to monitor and manage cloud costs. Some challenges cited by respondents in the survey include the following:

Go here to read the rest:

Cloud computing 'sticker shock' is on the rise, and containing it may be a new career path - ZDNet