Edmunds puts Tesla’s range to the test – Chattanooga Times Free Press

Edmunds' test team recently published the results of its real-world range testing for electric vehicles. Notably, every Tesla the team tested in 2020 came up short of matching the EPA's range estimate. Almost all other EVs Edmunds tested met or exceeded those estimates.

That result, as you can likely guess, ruffled some feathers at Tesla headquarters.

A CHALLENGE FROM TESLA

The lackluster results prompted the automaker to reach out to the Edmunds test team. Tesla's engineers disputed our figures and argued that by stopping our EV range tests at zero indicated miles, rather than pressing on until the battery died, we were underestimating their vehicles' true range.

Tesla said its vehicles have a safety buffer that ensures drivers can keep going even when the indicated range displayed zero miles. And when you factored in this buffer, Tesla argued, it would allow their vehicles to match the EPA range estimates, which are typically measured when the battery is fully depleted.

It was a challenge we at Edmunds were up for, so we rented a 7.5-mile-long closed-course oval at an unaffiliated automaker's proving ground in California's Mojave Desert. This facility allowed us to safely drive five EVs until their battery power completely ran out. Tesla provided a Model 3 Long Range for us to test. We also brought along the Edmunds-owned Model 3 Standard Range Plus and Model Y Performance used in our original range testing, plus two non-Teslas for comparison purposes: a Ford Mustang Mach-E and an Volkswagen ID.4. These were also provided by their manufacturers.

THE TEST

Most in-car range meters factor in your recent driving habits when forecasting the remaining range. Edmunds' editors needed to drive the vehicles in the same manner to normalize the range meters and provide a level playing field.

At the test track, we drove the five EVs at a common highway speed of 65 mph, with the automatic climate control set to 72 degrees, audio off, no accessories plugged in, and with drivers rotating in one-hour shifts, until the batteries were depleted. Once each vehicle's range estimate indicated zero miles, we measured how far it could go before coming to a complete stop.

Miles Traveled Past Zero

Ford Mustang Mach-E Extended Range: 7.3 miles

Tesla Model Y Performance: 12.6 miles

Volkswagen ID.4: 12.9 miles

Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus: 17.6 miles

Tesla Model 3 Long Range: 25.9 miles

Notice how the buffer can vary even within the same brand. The Model 3 Long Range went twice as far as the Model Y. What's more, there was no indication how far you could keep going since all vehicles simply read zero miles remaining. For all we knew, the cars could stop at any moment.

BOLSTERING OUR RESULTS

We also ran a control test on the Edmunds' EV range route with the Model 3 Long Range and Model Y Performance, driving them to the end of their battery life on public roads. The Model Y traveled 11 miles past zero and the Model 3 went an extra 17.5 miles; both were less than the buffers we experienced at the test track.

We asked Tesla about this discrepancy in the reserve range. The automaker said that the buffer was based on a combination of near-past conditions and instantaneous conditions, essentially the weather and terrain variation, which was why "the buffer cannot be defined exactly to a number every time."

TAKEAWAYS FOR THE EV SHOPPER

Some Teslas would be capable of meeting their EPA estimates in Edmunds' real-world range test if we included their reserve battery range, or the distance we traveled running beyond the point of zero indicated miles left.

But even in this scenario, there would be requirements such as driving conservatively in a temperate climate and using Tesla's maximum battery charge, even though Tesla recommends this for long-distance trips only.

The majority of Teslas we've tested so far four of the six do not meet their EPA estimates even allowing for a safety buffer. Furthermore, almost every other EV Edmunds has tested met or exceeded EPA estimates without the need to include their safety buffers.

Potential Tesla shoppers should know that to use the full range as advertised, they need to feel comfortable going past the zero indicated mile mark. This is not only risky, but it also requires the owner to deeply discharge the battery, which isn't recommended for the long-term health of the battery.

EDMUNDS SAYS: Edmunds' EV range test isn't meant to be the definitive word on a vehicle's range but rather a real-world complement to the laboratory-based EPA testing. We'll continue to test to an indicated zero because we'd never advise customers to rely on the unpredictable buffer range.

_______

This story was provided to The Associated Press by the automotive websiteEdmunds. Ronald Montoya is a senior consumer advice editor at Edmunds.

RELATED LINKS:

Testing Tesla'sRange Anxiety.

Why electric vehicleranges varyfrom EPA estimate.

EdmundsBest Electric Carsof 2021 and 2022.

Electric CarRange and Consumption.

Read more from the original source:

Edmunds puts Tesla's range to the test - Chattanooga Times Free Press

Is Now The Time To Buy Stock In Tesla, Netflix, Alibaba, Ford Or Facebook? – Yahoo Finance

One of the most common questions traders have about stocks is Why Is It Moving?

Thats why Benzinga created the Why Is It Moving, or WIIM, feature in Benzinga Pro. WIIMs are a one-sentence description as to why that stock is moving.

Here are the latest news and updates for Tesla, Netflix, Alibaba, Ford and Facebook.

Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) delivered 184,800 vehicles in the first quarter, handily beating the 168,000 expected by analysts. Estimates ranged from 145,000 to 188,000 deliveries, according to CNBC... Read More

Netflix Inc (NASDAQ: NFLX) shares were trading higher Thursday after Piper Sandler initiated coverage on the stock with an Overweight rating and announced a $605 price target.

Here are the analyst rating updates on Netflix since the beginning of March:

Date

Research Firm

Action

Current

PT

4/01/21

Piper Sandler

Initiates Coverage On

Overweight

605.0

3/23/21

Argus Research

Upgrades

Buy

650.0

3/15/21

Benchmark

Maintains

Sell

472.0

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. (NYSE: BABA) shares were trending Thursday. The stock looks to be nearing a support level and to test it soon. Alibaba also looks to be forming what technical traders call a descending triangle pattern... Read More

On CNBC's "The Exchange," Jerry Castellini discussed his playbook moving forward. Castellini, the president and chief investment officer of Castleark, was asked about Ford Motor Company, which is up 38% this year.

"You could buy Tesla today," Castellini said, "but you could also buy Ford at a tenth of its valuation, even up 38%, and participate in the electric vehicle phenomenon.... Read More

The U.S. Supreme Court sided with Facebook, Inc. (NADSAQ: FB) in a case that accused the social media giant of violating a federal anti-robocall law.

The lawsuit was filed by Montana resident Noah Duguid in California federal court in 2015. Duguid charged Facebook with sending him... Read More

Story continues

Photo by freestocks on Unsplash.

See more from Benzinga

2021 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Continued here:

Is Now The Time To Buy Stock In Tesla, Netflix, Alibaba, Ford Or Facebook? - Yahoo Finance

BMW’s new i4 is set to take on Tesla with 523 hp and a 300-mile range – MarketWatch

With its new i4 electric car, BMW BMW, +0.23% is hoping to take a bite out of Teslas TSLA, -0.93% market dominance.

The i4 is a 4-door, 5-seat car that is similar in size to BMWs 3 Series, albeit with a profile more akin to the fastback 4 Series Gran Coupe. Unlike the 4 Series, though, the i4 is electric. BMW says its electric motors churn out up to 530 horsepower, and the automaker estimates a 300-mile electric range when the Environmental Protection Agency rates the car.

BMW says the car will scoot to 60 mph in around four seconds, though an M Performance version presumably boasting more power and sharper handling will follow.

We dont know what the i4 will cost when it arrives in the U.S. for the 2022 model year, but its safe to assume that BMW has the $37,490 Tesla Model 3 in its sights. Still, the i4 Gran Coupes 300-mile range doesnt quite match the 353-mile range of the current Tesla Model 3 Long Range (which starts at $46,490).

Still, the i4 does bring some new tricks to the party. For one, the cars Apple AAPL, +0.70% CarPlay compatibility will be able to calculate a route (using Apple Maps, of course) based on the cars available range, as well as any charging stations along the way. Additionally, those with iPhones can use their devices as a key fob to enter and start the i4. And you thought replacing a lost BMW key would be expensive.

See: Whats it like to drive the 2021 Maserati Ghibli?

BMW isnt quite done with gasoline engines which is good news for enthusiasts pining for a few more years or wringing out the German automakers legendary turbocharged powertrains. The automaker is aiming to convert half of its lineup to electric power by 2025, though it hasnt released a target date for going fully electric.

This story originally ran onAutotrader.com.

View original post here:

BMW's new i4 is set to take on Tesla with 523 hp and a 300-mile range - MarketWatch

U.S. safety agency says it will gather information on Tesla-truck crash in New Jersey – Reuters

FILE PHOTO: A Tesla logo on a Model S is photographed inside of a Tesla dealership in New York, U.S., April 29, 2016. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson/File Photo

(Reuters) -The U.S. auto safety agency said on Monday that it will collect information about an accident in which a Tesla vehicle crashed into a tractor-trailer in New Jersey.

The Tesla driver, a 44-year-old, said he had his cruise control on when he momentarily lost focus on the roadway and drove his car under the trailer on Monday morning, according to a statement from the South Brunswick Township Police Department.

The impact was so severe it shredded the roof off the passengers side of the vehicle.

The Tesla was destroyed in the crash, but the driver received minor injuries.

NHTSA is aware of the Tesla crash on March 29 in New Jersey. We have contacted Tesla and local law enforcement regarding this crash and will act accordingly when we have more information, a representative of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said in a statement to Reuters.

Tesla did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comments.

The NHTSA said earlier this month that it had opened 27 investigations into crashes of Tesla vehicles, 23 of which remain active, and at least three of the crashes occurred in recent weeks.

Reporting by David Shepardson in WASHINGTON, Writing by Hyunjoo Jin; Editing by Himani Sarkar

Link:

U.S. safety agency says it will gather information on Tesla-truck crash in New Jersey - Reuters

Tesla’s EPA Driving Ranges Didn’t Hold Up to Testing. It Tried Again and Still Fell Short – The Drive

Back in February, Edmunds published data that it gathered from testing the driving range of 17 EVs currently for sale and compared its findings to their official U.S. Environmental Protection Agency figures. The Porsche Taycan did incredibly well, surpassing its predicted range by over 100 miles, but as it's to be expected, not every car fared as well. Specifically, every single Teslasix models were testedactually fell short of their EPA estimates.

According to the publication, that aggrieved some engineers at Tesla, of course, who reached out to Edmunds staffto say that its test procedure was all wrong: In a Tesla, the claimed driving range apparently doesn't end at zero miles remaining, but when the car actually drains its "safety buffer" and comes to a complete stop.

In a nutshell, even when using the safety buffer, in controlled conditions, four of the six Tesla cars Edmundstested for range did not hit their EPA mileage. Two didbut in the real world, you're not actually meant to use that safety buffer, both because it's bad for your battery and because it's, well, out of range. You don't have any idea how much further you can drive once the remaining range drops below zero, so while that buffer might be a life-saver in an emergency, it's really not something that folks should count on using or abusing on a daily basis. Plus, as I said, it actually harms the batteryso why would Tesla insist on counting this buffer as part of the EPA-estimated driving range?

There are some factors that affect battery capacity and range, like cold weather or uphill driving, for example. Edmunds claims to have controlled these variables by performing these tests at a temperate, flat track. On the other hand, you can argue that running at a consistent 65 mph, as it didnot the world's most thrilling track dayrobs the cars of potential regeneration under braking and lift-and-coast, plus it doesn't actually reflect real-world driving. So, Tesla, there's your get-out-of-jail card.

The original test where the Teslas fell short wasn't that dramatic; the 2021 Model 3 Long Range and the 2020 Model S Performance only came in eight miles below their EPA estimates. That difference may have felt amplified because pretty much every otherEV was delivering figures in excess of the EPA numbers, but it's not a giant gap that can probably be explained through environmental conditions and driving styles. Both those cars eventually went on to meet their EPA estimates when using the sub-zero mileage format recommended by Tesla, although as noted above - this isn't actually meant to be drivable range.

For the other Teslas tested, however, things didn't go as "well." The 2018 Model 3 Performance was off by 54 milesthis might not look that notable on a couple-year-old modelbut when the testing is performed in such friendly conditions that the 2020 Mini Cooper SE, with an EPA range of 110 miles, is exceeding that by 40 miles, then it just doesn't paint a pretty picture for the Tesla cars.

Edmunds then decided to retest the cars under the conditions Tesla told them to, charging the cars to 100 percent and then running until they came to a complete stop. The staff used a 2021 Mustang Mach-E and a 2020 Volkswagen ID.4 as sort of controls or "lead cars" along with three recent Tesla: the 2020 Model Y Performance, the 2020 Model 3 Standard Range Plus, and the 2021 Model 3 Long Range. Of those, the 2021 Model 3 Long Range went a massive 25.9 miles after it had hit zero remaining mileage, the 2020 Model 3 went 17.6, and the 2020 Model Y 12.9 miles. That's further than either the Mach-E, which traveled 7.3 miles after zero, or the ID.4, which squeezed another 12.6 miles after zero. This wasn't a huge deal for the Ford or the VW, as both had previously exceeded their EPA mileage under the test conditions by 34 and 37 miles respectively.

The 2021 Model 3 Long Range only met its EPA estimate using the extra mileage below zero, but more damningly, the other two didn't. The 2020 Model 3 Standard Range Plus had originally fallen 18 miles short of its EPA estimate, but then stopped at 0.4 miles off its target by driving past the zero mark. The 2020 Model Y Performance had fallen 28 miles short in the first test, and it was still 15.1 miles off target after fully draining the battery.

Will this push away prospective Tesla customers? Probably not. Tesla still offers some of the best driving ranges on any EV, after all. It's also still the leader in overall EV performance. It's just an odd situation, especially because you really shouldn't be cycling your battery to empty unless you have to. EV batteries, like all lithium-ion cells, stay healthiest if you keep them somewhere between 20 and 80 percent charged.

Tesla told Edmunds that the disparity was caused by its software being ultra-conservative about mileage estimates, with the safety buffer overestimated to get people home. But when every other car is, under the same conditions, exceeding their EPA estimate, it's at least a weird quirk that's landed Tesla on the wrong side of the numbers.

Got a story with mileage? Mail me at hazel@thedrive.com

View post:

Tesla's EPA Driving Ranges Didn't Hold Up to Testing. It Tried Again and Still Fell Short - The Drive

Analyst Expects Tesla, GM To See EV Tax Credits Restored With Biden Kicking Off US ‘Green Tidal Wave’ – Yahoo Finance

TipRanks

Working the stock market is a data game. Getting the best information, in a timely way, and knowing how to use it, are keys to success. So, here are some numbers to think about. According to industry market research, artificial intelligence companies and products are on the verge of explosive growth. The AI market was valued at $9.5 billion in 2018, over $27 billion in 2019, and is projected to exceed $250 billion in 2027. AI refers to the use of data to simulate human intelligence processes including learning, reasoning and self-correction by machines. AI is making its way into almost every industry. Data collection and collation, automation systems from factories to self-driving cars, even online shopping site they all benefit from AI applications. And this has not been ignored by Wall Street. Analysts say that plenty of compelling investments can be found within this space. With this in mind, weve opened up TipRanks database to find two AI stocks that have gotten the seal of approval from 5-star analysts, stock pros rated among the top 3% of their peers. Lets find out why they recommend these two AI plays. Veritone, Inc. (VERI) The first AI stock we're looking at is Veritone, a software company whose flagship product, an AI-powered operating system called aiWARE, allows the user to coordinate machine learning models and integrate disparate data sources including audio and visual into actionable intelligence results. The system boasts an open architecture, and has been applied in the entertainment, government, legal, and media sectors. At the beginning of March, Veritone released its 4Q20 earnings, showing record quarterly revenue at $16.8 million a year-over-year gain of 35%. The increase was driven by yoy sales gains in aiWARE SaaS, which was up 53%, and Advertising, which was up 50%. However, Veritone stock saw a 49% fall from the peak value it hit in February. Investors liked the strong financials, but there is some worry about the companys future guidance. Management is predicting a non-GAAP net loss in the range of $3.9 million to $4.4 million in 1Q21, and while that represents a 38% improvement at the mid-point from 1Q20, investors do want to see a profit. Roth Capital's 5-star analyst Darren Aftahi, however, thinks this new, lower stock price could offer new investors an opportunity to get into VERI on the cheap. Aftahi sees this stock as a well-positioned AI growth story. VERI put up better 4Q results, but more importantly, accelerating topline growth in both AI SaaS and Advertising (both over 50%). If our assumption about its Content and Licensing business returning to 2019 levels (with modest growth) is correct in 2021, it implies its 2021 guide (which was much better by the way) for advertising and AI SaaS is north of 40% growth (~30% for Advertising and ~low 60%s for AI). Most importantly, its AI SaaS line was guided to 60-65% growth, showing a doubling of growth y/y, Aftahi noted. In line with his comments, Aftahi rates the stock a Buy, and his $50 price target implies growth of 104% in the year ahead. (To watch Aftahis track record, click here) All in all, with a share price of $24.53 and a consensus average price target of $38.75, VERI shares offer investors a chance for 58% share growth this year. The analyst consensus rating, a Moderate Buy, is based on 3 Buy reviews and 1 Sell. (See VERI stock analysis on TipRanks) Verint Systems (VRNT) Verint stock has appreciated 107% over the last 12 months, with a large part of that gain coming in a 31% jump at the beginning of February. That jump came in reaction to the companys split into two entities Cognyte, the spin-off, took on the parents intelligence and cyber operations, while Verint continued as a pure-play, AI-powered customer engagement service. The company uses its combination of market experience and AI and analytic products to enable customers to optimize their automation, knowledge, and workforce. Verints fiscal year 2021 ended on January 31, the day before the split, and the company reported its Q4 and full year results at the end of March. Those results beat expectations for the quarter, with $349 million in total revenue a 3% year-over-year gain. For the full year, however, the $1.27 billion in revenue was a shade below the $1.3 billion reported in the previous year. The Q4 data bodes for the Verint in its pure-play customer engagement incarnation, as those AI cloud sectors grew more than 30% year-over-year in that quarter. Calling Verint a "unique AI engagement company," Oppenheimer's 5-star analyst Timothy Horan sees the new Verint in a strong position to move forward. VRNT reported solid 4Q21 earnings and is now a pure play customer engagement AI company following its split. VRNT is successfully executing its transition to a SaaS/ Cloud model. New perpetual license bookings (PLE) was up 15% this quarter. The transition away from licensed sales is difficult but largely behind it as revenue growth should accelerate from this quarter onward. Cloud demand has seen a healthy 50/50 split between existing and new customers. Getting to the bottom line, Horan adds, It exited the year with strong momentum in cloud and bookings. We think it can continue to sign large cloud deals across contact center and other verticals. These are upbeat comments, and Horan backs them with an Outperform (i.e., Buy) rating, and a $60 price target indicating room for ~32% growth in the next 12 months. (To watch Horans track record, click here) Overall, there is broad agreement on Wall Street that Verint is a stock to Buy, as shown by the unanimous Strong Buy analyst consensus rating. This is based on 6 recent positive reviews. The shares have an average price target of $59.33, suggesting ~30% upside potential from the current trading price of $45.50. (See VRNT stock analysis on TipRanks) To find good ideas for AI stocks trading at attractive valuations, visit TipRanks Best Stocks to Buy, a newly launched tool that unites all of TipRanks equity insights. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the featured analysts. The content is intended to be used for informational purposes only. It is very important to do your own analysis before making any investment.

Read the rest here:

Analyst Expects Tesla, GM To See EV Tax Credits Restored With Biden Kicking Off US 'Green Tidal Wave' - Yahoo Finance

Tesla "Supercharger" station may be coming to the Santa Maria Town Center mall – KSBY San Luis Obispo News

After more than a year of negotiations between the City of Santa Maria and Tesla, a 5-year deal has been proposed to bring 32 charging stations to the city's Town Center mall.

"We are really thrilled that we can be part of this, said Mark van de Kamp, the City of Santa Marias public information officer.

There are a few electric vehicle charging stations around the city currently, including at Lowe's and the Santa Maria Health Care Center, but to find a Tesla Supercharger open to the public, you would have to drive a little farther, like to the Pismo Beach outlets or the Madonna Inn.

Tesla owner and Santa Maria resident Justin Boileau is happy to hear there could soon be some closer to home.

"That would be very exciting, it would be very convenient. Right now, I have to drive north to Pismo and often the parking lot is very congested and it's hard to actually get a slot in, Boileau said.

The charging station will include 20 "Level-3" chargers, also called superchargers, for Tesla drivers only.

There will also be 12 "Level-2" chargers for any other electric vehicle, free of charge.

"If it is approved and built, it will benefit both Tesla drivers and drivers of other electric vehicles will be able to charge and it will also benefit our downtown because they can park their vehicles and go shop at the local area, van de Kamp said.

That's something nearby candy shop owner Sheila Guge is looking forward to.

"Of course, after COVID we are all trying to recover so more traffic is better for everybody, Guge said.

As part of the deal, Tesla has agreed to pay the City of Santa Maria a $20,000 yearly rental fee with a 3% increase after five years - money the city says can be used to fund other city programs.

The station would take up 38 parking spaces with six being used for the station's transformers.

Tesla has also agreed to pay the fees for construction and maintenance.

"It looks like we have come to a pretty good arrangement and this will be in a location that is adjacent to Highway 101 and Main Street being Highway 166 it will be really convenient for people who are here in town or who are visiting, van de Kamp said.

The Santa Maria City Council is set to meet next Tuesday to vote on this proposal.

An exact date for when construction will begin, if the city decides to move forward, has not yet been determined.

City officials say it will more than likely begin this year.

Visit link:

Tesla "Supercharger" station may be coming to the Santa Maria Town Center mall - KSBY San Luis Obispo News

Chinese Astronauts Prepare To Assemble Space Station in Orbit

China's space station is preparing for the first crewed missions to launch and assemble its next space station, Tiangong-3.

Gearing Up

As China prepares to launch the modules of its next space station into orbit, the astronauts who will help assemble it in space are completing rigorous training.

China plans to launch several individual space station modules in the coming months, Space.com reports, and human crews will follow to help with assembly. China plans to get the components and modules of its Tiangong-3 space station into orbit over the course of 11 launches, so the crewmembers will have their work cut out for them as they piece it together — a dazzling test of China’s growing space prowess.

Familiar Face

So far, there’s no timeline available for the individual missions, but astronauts will follow the space station’s modules into orbit inside the Shcnzhou capsule, launched from China’s new Long March 2F rockets.

So far, the crewmembers’ identities have been kept under wraps. But Space.com spotted astronaut Wang Yaping, the second Chinese woman to go to space, in a recent video report by the state-owned Xinhua News Agency that showed some of the training astronauts are undergoing — suggesting she may have made the cut.

China’s space agency revealed a new roster of astronauts in October, but even the people on that list will need to complete the ongoing training before they’re actually selected for a given mission.

Practice Run

Part of the rigorous training program includes putting on a spacesuit and plunging underwater to work inside a full-scale replica of the space station, according to Space.com.

The crewmembers will need to be able to perform risky spacewalks that last up to six hours while they assemble Tiangong-3, according to footage released by the Chinese government, so the ongoing training is designed to put them through the paces as much as possible while they’re still here on Earth and the stakes are much lower.

READ MORE: With 1st space station launch this spring, Chinese astronauts are training for flight [Space.com]

More on China’s space program: Congress Bars NASA From Working With China. That’s Likely a Mistake.

The post Chinese Astronauts Prepare To Assemble Space Station in Orbit appeared first on Futurism.

Go here to read the rest:
Chinese Astronauts Prepare To Assemble Space Station in Orbit

Something Else Killed Three Times as Many People As COVID This Year

The death count as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic has been astronomical — but there may be an even bigger threat facing humanity today.

Air Raid

The death count as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic has been astronomical — but there may be an even bigger threat facing humanity that often goes unnoticed: air pollution, as Guardian columnist Rebecca Solnit argues in a recent opinion piece for the newspaper.

She points to one recent study that found that air pollution caused by the use of fossil fuels results in the deaths of around 8.7 million people worldwide each year, with 62 percent of deaths occurring in China and India — meaning it kills roughly three times annually as many people as the COVID-19 pandemic did last year.

Pollution Killer

Solnit argues that while the death toll of COVID-19 has been brought to the forefront of every discussion, the same can’t be said about air pollution and climate change.

“We have learned to ignore other forms of death and destruction, by which I mean we have normalized them as a kind of moral background noise,” Solnit argues.

“What if we treated those 8.7 million annual deaths from air pollution as an emergency and a crisis,” she writes, “and recognized that respiratory impact from particulates is only a small part of the devastating impact of burning fossil fuels?”

Impact Assessment

Solnit suggests we could use the same amount of funds made available to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic and use them to fight climate change.

“In response to the pandemic, we in the US have spent trillions of dollars and changed how we live and work,” she argues. “We need the will to do the same for the climate crisis.”

It’s certainly not an argument to look away as thousands succumb to the deadly coronavirus every day. More than 2.8 million people have died from the virus, according to the New York Times tracker, since the start of the pandemic.

But our mobilizing efforts prove that we have the resources to make a dent in much bigger problems facing humanity today — like climate change.

READ MORE: There’s another pandemic under our noses, and it kills 8.7m people a year [The Guardian]

More on air pollution: This $350 Breathing Mask Is Cashing in on Climate Change

The post Something Else Killed Three Times as Many People As COVID This Year appeared first on Futurism.

Read more from the original source:
Something Else Killed Three Times as Many People As COVID This Year

Pieces of Alien Planet Buried Inside Earth Are “Millions of Times Larger Than Mount Everest”

The gigantic blobs buried within the Earth's mantle, thought to be fragments of the ancient protoplanet Theia, are unfathomably huge.

Left Behind

Roughly 4.5 billion years ago, an ancient protoplanet called Theia likely crashed into the Earth, sending shrapnel and debris into space and ultimately forming the Moon.

But the crash also likely left pieces of Theia buried beneath the Earth in the form of two incredibly huge blobs of rock and metal, according to research by Arizona State University scientists. Now, in a new interview with Insider, the lead scientist behind that research has clarified their utterly unfathomable scale.

Those ancient, buried fragments are “millions of times larger than Mount Everest in terms of volume,” Arizona State researcher Qian Yuan told the site.

Dream Summit

The gargantuan masses are 621 miles tall and two to three times as wide, according to Yuan’s research, scheduled to be published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters. And the rock isn’t just sitting there — scientists have previously been able to study the blobs after their contents oozed up and out of Samoan and Icelandic volcanoes, according to Insider.

Studying that lava, according to Insider, is part of what led scientists to believe that the blobs are drastically different from the surrounding mantle, lending evidence to the idea they came from somewhere other than Earth.

Nearby Shrapnel

If these underground blobs really are pieces of Theia, it would mean that Earth had a shockingly violent past. But it would also help explain where the Moon came from.

A “hit-and-run” theory of the Earth-Theia collision, Yuan told Insider, would say that the two planets glanced off each other and the pieces they flung into space eventually formed the Moon. Scientists have previously suggested there are pieces of Theia under the lunar surface, but the Moon’s composition is highly similar to Earth. Given that and the incredible size of the blobs that got buried, it seems most of the ancient planet’s surviving remains got stuck here instead.

READ MORE: Earth contains buried chunks of an alien world that are ‘millions of times larger than Mount Everest,’ research suggests [Insider]

More on Theia: There Appears to be a Huge Chunk of an Ancient Planet Buried Inside Earth

The post Pieces of Alien Planet Buried Inside Earth Are “Millions of Times Larger Than Mount Everest” appeared first on Futurism.

See more here:
Pieces of Alien Planet Buried Inside Earth Are “Millions of Times Larger Than Mount Everest”

Professor Says We Could Already Build a Floating Space Elevator

Scientists argue that entirely space-based space elevators could greatly enhance our ability to send payloads into orbit.

The concept of a space elevator, a consistently popular topic in works of science fiction, has been around since at least the late 19th century.

The basic idea is to allow us to reach space by using a cable that’s tethered to the Earth on one end and to a counterweight, orbiting the Earth, on the other.

But rather than having one end cemented in the Earth, scientists are now arguing that a more recently developed iteration of the space elevator design could be built much sooner. The design involves having both ends of the tether float entirely in space, making transportation of payloads from one orbit to the other much easier.

And, as George Zhu, professor of mechanical engineering at York University, tells The Academic Times, the concept isn’t nearly as far fetched as we might think.

“Technical-wise, it’s kind of ready,” Zhu told the outlet. “It just has small engineering [adjustments], and there’s no fundamental difficulty to do that.”

In his paper, published in the journal Acta Astronautica last month,  Zhu argues that a “partial space elevator” that sends payloads from a lower to a higher Earth orbit is already mechanically feasible today.

In short, the idea is to send payloads to the lower reaches of space via rockets, attach them to the lower end of the tether, and have them be zipped up to the further reaches of Earth’s orbit via the elevator.

Such an elevator could use two, instead of one, cable tethers to keep the elevator stable.

That’s mainly to stop the Earth’s rotational force, the Coriolis effect, moving the cable back and forth, a phenomenon referred to by Zhu as “libration.”

“Our idea is, when we put two tethers together, one cargo will be moving up and the other cargo will be moving down, so the forces will cancel each other,” Zhu told The Academic Times.

Since “both ends are floating in space,” according to Zhu, “the tension within the tether is limited. Current material can support that tension.”

As a result of the significant fuel savings involved in only sending a rocket to the lower reaches of space, today’s rockets could send up to ten times more payload by weight into space, according to the researcher.

There are several downsides to the approach, however. Zhu did admit to The Academic Times that a kilometers-long tether would make it very difficult for existing objects in Earth’s orbit to avoid debris.

For instance, the International Space Station routinely has to fire its thrusters to avoid oncoming bits of space junk. If it were tied to an extremely long tether, as Zhang suggests, such maneuvers would be near impossible.

While such a space elevator doesn’t quite solve the issue of having to spend massive amounts of fuel to get off the ground and escape the Earth’s powerful gravitational pull, it could still cut the required journey short significantly, saving plenty of fuel in the process — an intriguing possibility.

READ MORE: Far from science fiction, space elevators may be nearing deployment [The Academic Times]

More on space elevators: These Researchers Want to Run a Cable From the Earth to the Moon

The post Professor Says We Could Already Build a Floating Space Elevator appeared first on Futurism.

The rest is here:
Professor Says We Could Already Build a Floating Space Elevator

People Are Experiencing a “Contact High” at Vaccination Centers

Getting a COVID-19 vaccine can be exhilarating. Not only from the personal security, but also the experience of a public health program actually working.

There’s something exhilarating about getting a COVID-19 vaccine injected into your arm.

The past year and change has been a disaster, especially in the United States: Over 500,000 of our friends, family members, loved ones, and neighbors have died, and the government’s response illuminated and exacerbated the structural inequalities that are deeply entrenched in American society.

But for many — soon to be many more as more states plan to open vaccination appointments to the general public — getting that jab gives a glimpse of the light at the end of the tunnel. It’s a sign that, after months and months of lockdown blurring together, you’re a lot more likely to make it out.

And also, after the horror stories we endured regarding missing, faulty, or insufficient tests, the act of getting a vaccine might leave you walking away in awe over a public health initiative that actually runs smoothly.

“After I got the shot, I left Javits Center in such a good mood,” NBC News reporter Ben Collins tweeted Thursday. “I realize now I had some sort of contact high from experiencing something communal and in public that worked, and did exactly what they said it was going to do. Haven’t seen anything like that in years, literally.”

“Literally I volunteer at a vaccine pod every Saturday with [the] Chicago dept of public health [because] of this feeling !!!!” tweeted Sruti Ramadugu, a Strategic Initiatives Advisor at the Sheryl Sandberg & Dave Goldberg Family Foundation.

When I got my first shot, I walked into a clinic, filled out a form, and got a free injection. There’s no doubt in my mind that my experience was easier than many others — especially given some areas’ horrible vaccine rollouts and the lack of national coordination early on — and there’s an undeniable privilege in being able to hide indoors until it was time to get jabbed.

But still, the experience was remarkably straightforward and felt like it took less time than planning out which masks and face shield I’d wear. The simplicity felt unreal, and I get what Collins is talking about: I jumped in the air and clicked my heels like a cartoon character (holding the champagne I’d impulse bought) when I got outside.

“I realized how relentlessly let down I am by basic stuff here,” Collins tweeted. “Nothing ever works, everything is always a pain in the ass, but I make do. It is shocking when you walk into a place then leave and there was no trap or trick. Borderline euphoric.”

The post People Are Experiencing a “Contact High” at Vaccination Centers appeared first on Futurism.

See the article here:
People Are Experiencing a “Contact High” at Vaccination Centers

NASA Says There Are Still Easter Eggs on Its Mars Rover That Nobody Has Discovered

NASA has been teasing that there are two yet-undiscovered Easter eggs on its Perseverance Rover. Anyone who wants to find them has until Easter to try.

I Spy

NASA has been hinting that it hid two more Easter eggs on the Perseverance rover it’s currently steering around the surface of Mars — and that nobody has spotted them yet.

The space agency posted a few clues on Twitter, urging followers to investigate and uncover them before a big, on-theme Easter reveal this upcoming Sunday. NASA says that both hidden surprises can be seen in Perseverance’s collection of raw images. But because there are over 16,500 of those online, you may also need the hints that NASA has been dropping on Twitter throughout the week.

Past Reveals

NASA has a long history of hiding messages on its rovers as a sort of inside joke. Some of the secret messages on Perseverance have already come to light. For instance, the rover’s landing parachute had “DARE MIGHTY THINGS,” a phrase borrowed from a famous Theodore Roosevelt speech, encoded in binary on it.

Perseverance also has a “family photo” of previous Mars rovers on its exterior.

Tick Tock

For those who want to uncover the last two Easter eggs in time, NASA posted a couple extra hints.

“Hint on Easter egg #1: every vehicle has one. Hint on Easter egg #2: it’s in our nature,” NASA tweeted on Wednesday. On Friday, NASA followed up to mention that the second one is “‘wheely’ tricky to spot,” so, you know, do with that what you will.

Happy hunting!

More on Perseverance: All The Easter Eggs NASA Engineers Left on the Mars Rover

The post NASA Says There Are Still Easter Eggs on Its Mars Rover That Nobody Has Discovered appeared first on Futurism.

Read this article:
NASA Says There Are Still Easter Eggs on Its Mars Rover That Nobody Has Discovered

Amazon Admits It Was Fibbing About the Pee Thing

Deaths, injuries, and suicide attempts have landed Amazon on a list of the country’s most dangerous employers according to a new report from The Guardian.

Sorry Not Sorry

Amazon has issued a rare public apology related to its whole creating-a-harmful-and-oppressive-work-environment-that-forces-employees-to-urinate-in-bottles problem — but it wasn’t aimed at its workers.

After the tech company was caught lying to Rep. Mark Pocan and denying that Amazon workers don’t pee in bottles because of how oppressive working conditions are, they admitted that they weren’t “accurate” about their claims, according to The Verge

“This was an own-goal, we’re unhappy about it, and we owe an apology to Representative Pocan,” the statement posted on the Amazon blog read. It then went on to explain that they did not take into account their drivers who have been known to urinate in water bottles, while also continuing to lie about how employees at their fulfillment centers haven’t had that experience. 

You can check out the full apology on the Amazon blog

Piss-Poor PR 

The statement was released on Friday April 2 — more than a week after it posted this tweet in reply to a tweet from Pocan criticizing the company’s abusive management tactics. 

1/2 You don’t really believe the peeing in bottles thing, do you? If that were true, nobody would work for us. The truth is that we have over a million incredible employees around the world who are proud of what they do, and have great wages and health care from day one.

— Amazon News (@amazonnews) March 25, 2021

The tweet was quickly ratio’d to hell and inundated with replies asserting that Amazon’s employees were, in fact, peeing in water bottles due to bad work conditions.

I was the person who found the pee in the bottle. Trust me, it happened. https://t.co/U76UlDRWSO

— James Bloodworth (@J_Bloodworth) March 25, 2021

Peeing at Amazon – or not being able to – is an actual thing. Here's what workers told me. https://t.co/D0lp4pdQ5D https://t.co/eqFiS8WZbG pic.twitter.com/RVLOYezGvE

— Will Evans (@willCIR) March 25, 2021

Delete Your Account

Amazon is actually having a bit of a moment when it comes to Twitter spats defending their onerous management practices as well as decrying union organizing efforts. They’ve even taken to social media to pick fights with the likes of Sen. Bernie Sanders and Sen. Elizabeth Warren who have been largely critical of the company.

There’s a big difference between talk and action. @SenSanders has been a powerful politician in Vermont for 30 years and their min wage is still $11.75. Amazon’s is $15, plus great health care from day one. Sanders would rather talk in Alabama than act in Vermont.

— Amazon News (@amazonnews) March 26, 2021

In a few instances, sock puppet Twitter accounts have appeared posting anti-union tweets under the guise of being Amazon employees. Among them included an account whose profile picture was actually one of the guys from Dude Perfect. 

Amazon didn’t even really try with this one lol pic.twitter.com/Q9dyTzKqns

— Tim Sullivan ? (@timjsully) March 29, 2021

This is a part of a trend that’s been occurring for a few years now of bizarrely-obvious fake Twitter accounts championing Amazon. For a multi-billion dollar company, they sure do have some of the crappiest social media strategies (and also workplace practices). 

READ MORE: Amazon apologizes for lying about pee — and attempts to shift the blame [The Verge]

More on Amazon: Those Obviously-Fake Amazon Warehouse Workers are Still Tweeting

The post Amazon Admits It Was Fibbing About the Pee Thing appeared first on Futurism.

Link:
Amazon Admits It Was Fibbing About the Pee Thing

NASA Tests Propulsion System for Lunar Space Station

NASA recently ran a ground test for the propulsion system on their Gateway lunar orbiter. It'll allow the future space station to explore the Moon.

Power and Propulsion

NASA has recently tested a propulsion system for its future lunar space station.

The agency conducted the ground test of a subsystem for their Power and Propulsion Element (PPE), according to a NASA press release. The PPE will allow NASA’s Gateway, an outpost to orbit the Moon, to maneuver above the lunar surface. 

Check out a video of the ground test below (complete with cheesy 90s house music):

Exciting First Steps

The test was for a six-kilowatt solar electric propulsion subsystem. NASA plans to combine several of these thrusters to create the PPE’s 50-kilowatt electric propulsion system. When completed, it’ll be the most “powerful electric propulsion spacecraft ever flown,” according to the press release.

“This is an exciting first step toward proving the PPE’s propulsion system will meet Gateway’s requirements,” said Power and Propulsion Element manager at NASA’s Glenn Research Center Mike Barret in the press release. “These thrusters will be critical in delivering the first elements of Gateway to lunar orbit and will help us create a dynamic exploration platform over Gateway’s 15-year lifespan.”

Gateway to the Moon

Gateway is a part of NASA’s Artemis program to land the first woman (along with yet another man) on the Moon by 2024. The agency hopes that the orbiting lunar outpost will provide support for “sustainable, long-term human and robotic exploration,” according to the press release. 

To create Gateway, NASA is partnering with SpaceX to launch the portion of the outpost where astronauts will live. Once that happens, the first crewed mission for the Artemis program will launch in 2023 — with a touchdown on the lunar surface slated the next year. 

READ MORE: We’re Fired Up! Gateway’s Propulsion System Passes First Test [NASA]

More on Artemis: NASA Releases Beautiful New Renders of Lunar Gateway Space Station

The post NASA Tests Propulsion System for Lunar Space Station appeared first on Futurism.

Read the original here:
NASA Tests Propulsion System for Lunar Space Station

Mars Lander Detects Mysterious “Marsquakes”

Insightful Observation

NASA has recently observed two strong quakes on Mars — but still aren’t clear on their origins.

The agency’s InSight lander detected the magnitude 3.3 and 3.1 rumblings on March 7 and 18 (respectively) in a region on Mars called Cerberus Fossae, according to a NASA press release.  The lander has previously detected two other powerful “Marsquakes”  in the same region measuring at magnitude 3.6 and 3.5.

Though InSight has recorded more than 500 quakes, the four detected in Cerberus Fossae offer the clearest signals to observe the interior of the planet. 

Earth-Like Quakes

Researchers believe these four quakes indicate that the region is active with seismic activity.

“Over the course of the mission, we’ve seen two different types of marsquakes: one that is more ‘Moon-like’ and the other, more ‘Earth-like,’” said Taichi Kawamura of France’s Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris in the press release. According to NASA, Earth-like quakes have waves that travel through a planet. Moon-like quakes, on the other hand, are scattered. 

“Interestingly,” Kawamura said, “all four of these larger quakes, which come from Cerberus Fossae, are ‘Earth-like.’”

Marsquake Weather

Scientists say that the InSight lander benefitted from the right weather conditions on the Martian surface when it detected the quakes. That’s because the seismometer they’re using is sensitive enough that wind and cold weather can affect its detection. 

“It’s wonderful to once again observe marsquakes after a long period of recording wind noise,” said John Clinton, the leader for InSight’s Marsquake Service at ETH Zurich said in the press release. “One Martian year on, we are now much faster at characterizing seismic activity on the Red Planet.”

Researchers still don’t know the exact origins of the rumblings since the planet doesn’t have tectonic plates like Earth. Some theories include frozen groundwater creating pressure on the Martian surface much in the same way fracking does. 

READ MORE: NASA’s InSight Detects Two Sizable Quakes on Mars [NASA]

More on Marsquakes: NASA’s Insight Mars Lander Just Recorded Its First Ever Marsquake

The post Mars Lander Detects Mysterious “Marsquakes” appeared first on Futurism.

Originally posted here:
Mars Lander Detects Mysterious “Marsquakes”

Giant Octopus Attacks Australian Geologist

A giant octopus attacked a 34-year-old geologist in Dunsborough, Australia on March 18 — and video of their confrontation has gone viral.

Well-Armed Confrontation

Most vacation souvenirs come in the form of cheap, plastic tchotchkes bought at gift shops — but sometimes they come in the form of scars from giant octopus attacks.

That was the case with an Australian man who was attacked by a giant octopus while on vacation with his family in March. 

Lance Karlson, a 34-year-old geologist from Perth, was vacationing with his wife and daughter on a beach in Dunsborough, Australia on March 18 when he spotted a giant octopus in shallow waters, according to The New York Times. He decided to approach the creature with his 2-year-old daughter in one hand and a phone to record the encounter in the other. 

Here’s what happened:

The Angriest Octopus

Karlson and his daughter made it away unscathed from that particular interaction. However, when the geologist decided to do some snorkeling later, he was attacked by what he described as “the angriest octopus” to the NYT. 

As he swam out into the ocean, he spotted a pile of crab shells stacked on the ocean floor — a common way for octopi to conceal their hiding spots. He told the NYT that an octopus then lashed out at him twice, striking him on his neck, back, and arms. 

His injuries consisted of visible red marks on his neck, back, and arms. He also felt a stinging sensation where he was struck, and his wife later poured soda down his back to alleviate the pain.

“The stinging sensation went away almost instantly,” Karlson said to the NYT. 

Judit Pungor, an octopus researcher at the University of Oregon, told the NYT that octopus don’t have venom in their tentacles that would be “alleviated by pouring something acidic over it.” She believes that Karlson might have been coincidentally attacked by a jellyfish.

But it wouldn’t be too surprising if he was attacked by an octopus. After all, they’ve been known to punch fish out of spite.

Octopuses punch fishes. YES. OCTOPUSES. PUNCH. FISHES!!

Our new paper is out on @ESAEcology, showing that octos express this behavior during collaborative hunting with other fishes. This was probably the most fun I had writing a paper. Ever! (small ?)https://t.co/Vwg9BoaSUo pic.twitter.com/PIYuVXpM9t

— Eduardo Sampaio (@OctoEduardo) December 18, 2020

Beautiful Creatures

After posting the video to his Instagram, it quickly went viral. Now, Karlson fears that people will get the wrong idea about octopuses saying that folks should “give some love to these beautiful creatures and not treat them with disdain.”

Peter Ulric Tse, a professor of cognitive neuroscience at Dartmouth College who has studied octopus behavior, believes that the creature in the viral video wasn’t trying to harm Karlson.

“My guess is that the octopus here is sending a warning meaning ‘back off,’” he told the NYT. “Octopuses will lunge or shoot an arm out when they feel a fish, another octopus or a human is in their space. I think this is often pre-emptive aggression, meant to signal ‘don’t mess with me,’ rather than aggression seriously meant to harm the ‘invader.’”

So instead of having a Jaws-esque backlash against our favorite eight-tentacled vertebrate, we should appreciate them from afar — and maybe avoid bothering them for the ‘gram.

READ MORE: ‘The Angriest Octopus’ Lashes at a Tourist on an Australian Beach [NYT]

More on octopi: Scientists Say That “Spiteful” Octopuses Punch Fish When They’re Angry  

The post Giant Octopus Attacks Australian Geologist appeared first on Futurism.

Continue reading here:
Giant Octopus Attacks Australian Geologist

Paleontologists Discover Dinosaur With Super Hearing

The One Who Causes Fear

Paleontologists have discovered a new dinosaur species in Patagonia that likely had superior hearing abilities over its fellow dinosaurs.  

Researchers in Argentina dubbed the new species “Llukalkan aliocranianus,” according to a press release from the paleontologists. Llukalkan comes from the Mapuche word for “the one who causes fear,” while aliocranianus is Latin for “unusual skull.”

Aside from its very metal name, the dinosaur is also notable for its uniquely-shaped head, which researchers say gave it more sharpened hearing abilities.

“A peculiarity of this dinosaur is that it has cavities in the ear area that other abelisaurids did not have, which could have given this species different auditory capacities, possibly a greater hearing range,” said Federico Gianechini, a paleontologist at the National University of San Luis, Argentina, in paper published in Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. “This, together with its keen sense of smell, would have given great capabilities as a predator to this species.”

Here’s a closer look at that unusually-shaped skull:

Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology

A Top Predator

The dinosaur looked a lot like a T-Rex, with a large head and short stubby arms. It was also just as fierce — if not fiercer. 

According to the press release, the Llukalkan was “likely among the top predators” in the region during the Late Cretaceous period. It measured up to five meters long, and had sharp teeth, big claws, and a strong bite — not to mention straight up super hearing abilities. 

So yeah. If they ever end up mixing frog genes with dinosaur DNA a la Jurassic Park, let’s all hope they take a pass on “the one who causes fear.”

READ MORE: New Dinosaur Discovered in Patagonia, Dubbed ‘One Who Causes Fear’ [IGN]

More on dinosaurs: Scientists Find Smoking Gun Evidence in Dinosaur-Killing Asteroid Case

The post Paleontologists Discover Dinosaur With Super Hearing appeared first on Futurism.

See the original post here:
Paleontologists Discover Dinosaur With Super Hearing

Famed Physicist: Soon-To-Launch Telescope Likely to Discover Alien Life

During a Reddit AMA, science communicator and theoretical physicist Michio Kaku said he expects we'll discover the theory of everything by the year 2100.

Making Contact

String theorist and science populariser Michio Kaku believes that the James Webb Space Telescope will find life on other planets — but he doesn’t think it’s a good idea to reach out to any potential aliens. 

The professor of theoretical physics at City College, New York spoke to The Guardian about his trepidations in an interview about his upcoming book “The God Equation.” He says he believes that we are on track to discover alien life within a century.

“Soon we’ll have the [Webb] telescope up in orbit and we’ll have thousands of planets to look at,” Kaku said to The Guardian, “and that’s why I think the chances are quite high that we may make contact with an alien civilization.”

When Montezuma Met Cortés

However, the string theorist and best-selling author doesn’t believe that we should be so quick to reach out to other lifeforms even if we did find them.

“There are some colleagues of mine that believe we should reach out to them. I think that’s a terrible idea,” he said to The Guardian. “We all know what happened to Montezuma when he met Cortés in Mexico so many hundreds of years ago. Now, personally, I think that aliens out there would be friendly but we can’t gamble on it. So I think we will make contact but we should do it very carefully.”

He doesn’t make it clear who is Montezuma and who is Cortés between the aliens and humanity — and, frankly, we’re not sure what’s scarier. 

READ MORE: String theorist Michio Kaku: ‘Reaching out to aliens is a terrible idea [The Guardian]

More on aliens: Elon Musk Has an Interesting Argument Against UFOs

The post Famed Physicist: Soon-To-Launch Telescope Likely to Discover Alien Life appeared first on Futurism.

Read more from the original source:
Famed Physicist: Soon-To-Launch Telescope Likely to Discover Alien Life

Perseverance Drops Off Ingenuity Helicopter On Martian Surface

The Final Drop

The Ingenuity helicopter has been dropped off on the surface of Mars by the Perseverance rover. 

NASA’s Jet Propulsion Lab announced on Twitter that Ingenuity has successfully touched down on the Martian surface on Saturday, according to CNET. It was the culmination of nearly a week of deployment procedures — not to mention 293 million miles and about seven months of travel from Earth to Mars on the belly of the Perseverance rover.

#MarsHelicopter touchdown confirmed! Its 293 million mile (471 million km) journey aboard @NASAPersevere ended with the final drop of 4 inches (10 cm) from the rover's belly to the surface of Mars today. Next milestone? Survive the night. https://t.co/TNCdXWcKWE pic.twitter.com/XaBiSNebua

— NASA JPL (@NASAJPL) April 4, 2021

The tweet included a great shot of Ingenuity standing on its four legs on the rocky landscape where it will take off later this month:

NASA/JPL

Survive the Night

Now Ingenuity has to brave through its first night “alone” on Mars. 

Until it was dropped off, the helicopter relied on the Perseverance rover to keep its battery charged, and also used the rover’s thermostat-controlled heater to keep warm, according to NASA. Now that it’s disconnected, it’ll have to contend with Martian nights that can get as cold as -130 degrees Fahrenheit. 

Luckily, Ingenuity has its own heater to keep warm along with a solar panel to charge its battery — but it’ll still be a nerve-wracking waiting game for NASA engineers. “The Ingenuity team will be anxiously waiting to hear from the helicopter the next day,” said Bob Balaram, chief engineer for the Mars Helicopter Project at JPL, in a status update.

Next Up: Taking Flight (Kind Of)

If all goes well (knock on wood), the Ingenuity team will continue to check on the helicopter’s temperature and battery performance over the next few days. After that, it’ll begin preliminary flight procedures.

“If it all looks good, then it’s onto the next steps: unlocking the rotor blades, and testing out all the motors and sensors,” Balaram said in the status update.  

The flight is scheduled for April 11, according to a tweet from JPL. As with all things space exploration related, though, that’s subject to change at any moment. Once it does happen, it’ll mark the first ever controlled flight through another planet’s air space. 

READ MORE: NASA Perseverance rover drops Ingenuity helicopter off on Mars surface [CNET

More on Ingenuity: NASA Hid a Small Piece of the Wright Brothers’ Airplane in Its Mars Helicopter

The post Perseverance Drops Off Ingenuity Helicopter On Martian Surface appeared first on Futurism.

Read the original here:
Perseverance Drops Off Ingenuity Helicopter On Martian Surface