7 Immunity Foods to Eat If You Get COVID-19 to Help Fight It Off – The Beet

If you are one of the over 1 millionpeople to get Covid in the US today, there are foods you can eat to help your body withstand the virus and even get through it sooner, so long as you also take care of yourself by sleeping and drinking fluids as you would do for the common cold or a sore throat.

Hopefully, you have mild symptoms, that resemble nothing more than a cold, due to the fact that you arevaccinated and boosted. But no matter what your immunization status, there are ways to help your immune system fight off a case of COVID just as it needs to battle the flu or even the common cold since all these viruses trigger the body's immune defense. If you eat immune-boosting foods and take care of yourself, you may even experience fewer severe symptoms and get through your COVID case that much faster.

For what to eat to strengthen your immune system against COVID (either before or after you get it) we spoke with an immunologist and specialist, Dr. Robert Lahita, Professor of Medicine at Hackensack Meridian School of Medicinewho has been affiliated with Weill Cornell and other venerable hospitals.He isthe author ofImmunity Strong, which tells readers how to kick up their immune systems to live longer, healthier lives. Dr. Bob (as he requests to be called) has some very practical and actionable advice for what to do if you get COVID and pretty much every other virus or infection out there.

"Your immune system is like the police department in a big city and that city is your body, and it has to watch out for crimes big and small and do its job to keep everything and everyone safe and sound," Dr. Bob told The Beet.In more scientific terms, the driver of the immune system, the dispatch that signals to the body that everything is quiet, or to sound the alarms, is your gut and the microbiome living within it.

The billions of tiny organisms found in the gut are not bad for you but co-exist in a way that acts as the body's first line of defense, so when you eat a diet rich in probiotics (like fruits and vegetables) and prebiotics (like fermented foods and drinks such as kombucha) it is a greatway to give your microbiome all the energy it needsto create a healthy immune system that can head off any infection.

Here are the best vitamins and minerals to help boost your immunity, but first, Dr. Bob says, he highly recommends that youtake a multivitamin every day to fill in the gaps

"Iwould not have always recommended this, but at the point, we are now at with COVID and our poor diets, I think it's wise," he says. "Withnine out of 10 Americans not eating the recommended five servings of fruits and vegetables a day or not even getting three if they're lucky it may be time tobring back the multivitamin."

Of course, it's better to get your nutrients naturally, from diet, but at this point, thestandard American diet is not providing what the immune system needs to function properly, Dr. Bob warns us. The most important vitamins and minerals we should be eating more of, that we are not getting from the diet, are Vitamin C, Vitamin D, and zinc. "These are immune co-factors that help strengthen your immune system and help fortify it. Zinc, he says, is too often overlooked.

"I strongly recommend everyone take a multivitamin every day. I have a dispenser and I take it every day," says Dr. Bob. "Multis have been 'poo-poo'd' or dismissed. I remember doing a magazine article years ago when this was the case. Everyone thought that only children needed a multi."

But today most Americans don't get all the nutrients they need from their diet. Only 10 percent of Americans get the recommended 5 servings of fruits and vegetables a day. In fact, you're lucky if you get three, says Dr. Bob. "And there are specific immunity drivers that are essential now in the days of Covidd, such as Vitamin C, D, A, and E that you need to supplement. Iron and zinc are especially hard to get enough of if you are plant-based," explains Dr. Bob. "So instead of worrying about it, just supplement."

Raw Organic Ruby Red Grapefruits

Your daily intake should be well over 500 and up to 1000 milligrams a day is healthy, says Dr. Bob. The easiest way to get it is from citrus fruits like oranges. "I eat a clementine in the morning and one at dinner time," he says since they have about 35 mg each. "And I get vitamin C in the multivitamin I take each morning. We know from research thata vitamin C dose of over 500 milligrams a day can help combat the common cold and guess what? The omicron is related to the common cold."

Eat citrus fruits like an orange in the morning m (51 mg of vitamin C), or drink lemon water when you wake up (a lemon has 30 mg of vitamin C on average). Grapefruit is also high in vitamin C (38 mg for half a grapefruit) but Dr. Bob adds: "Make sure your medications are compatible since grapefruit can accelerate drug elimination or it can potentiate blood thinners if you are taking those."

Vitamin D is essential for immunity and most people only get a fraction of what they need, especially in the winter months when we are not exposed to as much sunlight as the rest of the year. Dr. Bob says you can either frontload your D vitamin for the week and take one large dose once a week, or you can take it daily and make sure to take it with calcium so your body absorbs what you need.

"You need 50,000 units a week or 500 a day with calcium," he says. "I advise every patient to get a Vitamin D testfrom their doctor since during the winter our D levels drop. So chances are you are deficient and don't know it. And for women oranyone with autoimmune diseases, who I see a lot in my practice, they are often short on D. So just assume you need to take vitamin D.

But don't overdose with vitamin D. You only need an average of 500 mg a day, and some people who have taken five times that amount or more on a daily basis have had adverse side effects, such as kidney stones.As for taking it once a week, yes, your body can sustain that big amount once a week. Add it to juice, so it gets absorbed without disturbing your digestion."

Buddha bowl with pan roasted tofu, avocado, sweet potato, rice, vegetables and mixed seeds

Zinc is one of the key elements that you should take for general immunity, and studies have shown that it can help reduce the symptoms of COVID-19. How? zinc helps the body build the lymphocytes that your body needs to send out the immune cells into the body to kill off invaders of all kinds, and even shorten a common cold. "Zinc iscrucial for normal development and function of cells mediating nonspecific immunitysuch as neutrophils and natural killer cells," according to one study.

Zinc is also helpful in metabolism function. The Mayo Clinic website states: "Evidence suggests that if zinc lozenges or syrup is taken within 24 hours after cold symptoms start, the supplement can help shorten the length of colds." Women need 8 mg daily and men 11 mg.

The best foods for zincinclude tofu, hem, lentils, oatmeal, pumpkin seeds, quinoa, shiitake mushrooms, black beans, green peas, and cashews.

Dr. Bob says it's easier to take zinc than to get it in diet, so he keeps zinc lozenges on his desk and pops one a day. In fact, they are so popular that as he reached for one his supply was out. "I keep them right here on my desk but the nurses take them. They work! You can get them at the supermarket."

Studies show thatVitamin A is crucial for promoting healthy growth and development of cells and protecting the epithelial tissue that surrounds all your organs and that infections or viruses have to pass through to attack any parts of the body. It is also essential to creating healthy mucus which lines the nose and helps capture invading airborne agents that you might inhale. "Vitamin A is also known as ananti-inflammation vitaminbecause of its critical role in enhancing immune function," studies have found.

"I take vitamin E for my skin and immune support," Dr. Bob adds. Vitamin E is a potent antioxidant in the human bodythat also helps the immune system fight infections. One way it does this, studies show, is that Itwidens blood vessels and this helps to keep clots from forming in them.

"It's hard to get all the vitamin E you need fromyour diet, so do take a supplement. I take 200 units of E every day." Vitamin E, which is found in nuts, oil, and other foods, has anti-aging benefitsand can prevent inflammation,lower the risk of heart disease and somecancers, studies have found.

Avocado toast on a plate with ingredients around it on stone counter.

Iron is essential to the immune response in the body, studies have shown. "The role of iron in immunity is necessary forimmune cells proliferation and maturation, particularly lymphocytes, associated with the generation of a specific response to infection," according to one study.

"Most people think iron only comes from animal products but in fact, watercress is high in iron," says Dr. Bob. So are spinach and arugula. Beans are rich sources of iron, as are pumpkin seeds and quinoa. Eat white mushrooms, lentils, potatoes, tofu among other high iron foods. It's actually easy to get enough iron on a plant-based diet.

"Manyvegetables and most legumes contain iron," says Dr. Bob. Men need 8 mg a day while women need over double that amount, or 18 mg a day.

The best way to get all these every day is simply to take a multivitamin, says Dr. Bob.

And Dr. Bob adds: "We need to think about the microbiome, the billions of bacteria that live in the but as well as the lungs, around the hear, in every part of our bodies, which should not be thought of as bad but rather as co-existing with us to help keep the body running smoothly. You need probiotics and prebiotics, in the form of fiber-filled foods or fermented drinks like kombucha, to feed these organisms and let them signal tothe immune system that everything is a-okay."

The easiest way to support your microbiome is by eating high-fiber foods such as fruits and vegetables and drinkingFermented juices. Kombucha. WheatGrass, and other fermented foods.

How diet plays into the strength of our immune system overall

So what else can you do if your aim is to avoid Covid, or get better once you've tested positive for the virus? Diet only plays one role, but the rest of it is fairly common sense, says Dr. Bob.

Get sleep. It's important to get enough sleep and to manage stress and exercise every day. Even if that is the elliptical or the bicycle or just walking every day.

Exercise daily. Get on the elliptical or the bicycle every day, or swim or take a walk. You need to move every single day to show your immune system that you are healthy and able. This motion not only makes your heart healthier but also every other cell in your body.

Prioritize relationships.Intimacyboosts immunity. So having a strong relationship is also important in boosting the immune system and the endocrine system and works hand in hand with what I call the biological soul and that is the immune system.

Manage stress. The brain is integrated into this as well. That's where de-stressing comes in.

The brain is the central control center and if you are dealing with stress hormones it makes everything else worse. Do yoga, meditate or take whatever joys and nourish that part of your life. If we can strengthen our immune system we can fight off COVID and any other infection.

Know your family history. As we get older our immune system gets senescence.So depending on your genetics, your immunity either gets weaker or stays healthy depending on both your personal DNA and how you take care of your immunity. Of course, staying healthy in other areas is vital since nothing stresses your immunity like co-morbidities.

These are all things your immune system and your body has to protect against, so control the things you can, like diet and lifestyle choices, Dr. Bob advises. Help take care of your immune system and it will help take care of you back.

Animmune specialist says that in order to strengthen your immunity against COVID and other viruses, take a multivitamin. It's the easiest way to make sure you are getting all the nutrients such as Vitamins C, D, A, and E plus zinc and iron, right now.

Read more:
7 Immunity Foods to Eat If You Get COVID-19 to Help Fight It Off - The Beet

Aaron Rodgers Loves Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged and We’re Not Shocked – Esquire

Namaste. First off, welcome to the new year that is 2022. Secondly, let's discuss the consciousness of man, the innate benefits of capitalism, and the turmoil that can result from extreme governmental oversight as it applies to small- and medium-sized businesses. Not of interest to you? Oh, perhaps you haven't read Ayn Rand's Atlas Shruggednoted favorite novel of Aaron Rodgers and every 17-year-old libertarian interested in majoring in fuh-nance.

How do we know this? During Monday Night Football, Peyton and Eli Manning had Rodgers on for a segment and couldn't resist asking him what he was reading from the bookshelf behind him on camera. Earnestly, Rodgers points to the collection and says, "A lot of French poetry," before pointing to the other side and saying, "Got Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand over here." Then, he adds that he also has a football helmet on the shelf, signed by both Manning brothers, leading me to believe that Rodgers reads that regularly, too.

While I'm intrigued by the idea of Rodgers kicking back with a tall glass of room temperature kombucha, reading the works of de la Fontaine and Hugo, the part that caught the attention of the internet is, of course, the Ayn Rand of it all. Rand's best-known work, Atlas Shrugged is often referenced as a favorite in libertarian and conservative circles, so when our guy proudly pointed to the nearly 1,200 page work as a highlight of his library, people took notice.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

For most of us, Atlas Shrugged was the summer reading assignment we skimmed a third of before resorting to SparkNotes. You didn't need to read it, reallyBlake, that guy from your junior year literature class who has big thoughts on the free market, wasn't going to let you get a word in edgewise during class discussion anyway. And that's because Atlas Shrugged is the Bible for people who might describe themselves as, simultaneously, "cerebral" and "free-thinker." It represents an ideology that values the individual and his own decisions, or, as my friend Zack used to say, it's a "real douche-nozzle's guide to the world."

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This content is imported from Twitter. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This all aligns pretty nicely with the headline-making course that Rodgers has been on for the past six months. After claiming to be "immunized" in August, Rodgers tested positive for Covid-19 this fall and further explained that he's not actually vaccinated in the, you know, actually vaccinated way, but that he's taken alternative treatments like ivermectin, which is an anti-parasite medication often used on horses. Looking back, Rodgers's explanation on The Pat McAfee Show should have tipped us off on what was to come:

His worldview gels perfectly with two facts seared into my mind for eternity: Rodgers' finace Shailene Woodley absorbs vitamin D through her vagina and sometimes eats clay. I don't fault Rodgers for loving Ayn Rand; I fault myself for not assuming Ayn Rand was an inspiration in this tall lug of a man's life from the jump. Now, I simply want to know what else is on the book shelf. Eat This, Not That? Three unopened paperback copies of Animal Farm? A VHS copy The Scarlet Letter where Demi Moore takes baths? Open my mind, Aaron Rodgers. Save me from myself by recommending Chicken Soup for the Sports Fan's Soul.

The Packers are set to play the Detroit Lions this Sunday at 1pm. Aaron Rodgers is set to play himself again at some point in the near future.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

Read the original post:

Aaron Rodgers Loves Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged and We're Not Shocked - Esquire

Boris Johnson and the woeful and costly Tory war on woke – The Japan Times

Coronavirus cases are once again exploding in the United Kingdom. Yet Prime Minister Boris Johnsons Conservative government, dominated by extremist ideologues who value their notion of individual freedom above the public good, is again unwilling to impose necessary measures a reluctance that has already cost innumerable lives in previous COVID-19 waves.

Last month, about a hundred Tory Members of Parliament voted against a very modest government plan that mandates the wearing of masks and vaccine certificates in some places. As hospitals fill up again with COVID-19 patients, they talk about an ancient British tradition of liberty. Were not a papers please society, Tory MP Marcus Fysh claimed, This is not Nazi Germany.

Given such anti-government rhetoric, you might not guess that Johnson, who has been dogged by reports he was partying at his official residence during a general lockdown last year, and has often appeared maskless in public spaces, matches Donald Trump in his disdain for public health regulations.

Or that the British media, overwhelmingly right wing, provides the background chorus for freedom from COVID-19 restrictions. In fact, it led the Tory celebrations of Freedom Day in July this year.

The celebrations were as foolish as they were premature. These days, the world watches again in appalled fascination as omicron spreads fast, and rowdy invocations of personal responsibility and individual choice delay preventive moves in the United Kingdom and, by extension, everywhere else.

Public-spiritedness is by no means alien to Britain; its present-day embodiment, the National Health Service, was widely applauded during the early weeks of the pandemic. Tory fanboys of Winston Churchill like to invoke his lonely defiance of Nazi Germany as they insist on their right to remain maskless. But there is no record of Tory freedom-lovers keeping their lights on at night during the blackout enforced by Churchills government in 1940.

Contemporary Tory libertarianism derives from the American ideologue Ayn Rand more than any ancient British tradition of liberty. And the present-day contempt for collective welfare is largely a legacy of the revolution launched by Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s. Thatcher notoriously doubted the existence of society; Reagan claimed that the nine most terrifying words are Im from the government, and Im here to help.

The strange thing is that the battles launched by Reaganites and Thatcherites against tax rates, protectionist industry and labor union privilege were won a long time ago. Libertarians in the United States even managed to discredit major government involvement in health care.

So, what makes Anglo-American individualists so dangerously inflexible, even self-destructively fanatical, today?

Two recent events have spoiled the show for them. First, the rise of China, which proved again after the previous successes of Japan and the East Asian countries that government intervention is crucial to national success in education and health care as well as industrial growth and technological innovation.

The other, arguably more unnerving event, which has occurred right at home, is the increasing assertiveness of historically silent, often disenfranchised peoples: women, non-white immigrant populations, and sexual minorities.

During two centuries of Western expansion and hegemony, a minority of white men enjoyed a relative freedom to do and say whatever they wanted without much regard for the rights and sensitivities of others. Unsurprisingly, many of them loathe the demand from previously voiceless peoples that old attitudes ranging from the narcissistic to the selfish and cruel be re-examined and, preferably, abandoned. The demand is frequently and unfairly derided as woke.

Those still clinging to political power and cultural capital would rather stoke conflict and polarization than admit that their societies are irrevocably diverse, and ought to acknowledge the dignity of people who were once systematically degraded by the gender and racial hierarchies erected by white men.

They naturally fear and loathe scholarship that underlines long-established facts: that the unique wealth and power of a male minority in the West was built on slavery and imperialism rather than any innate superiority, and that the white mans burden was actually carried by black, brown and yellow men.

Instead, faced with the smallest challenges to their moral and intellectual authority, many historically advantaged males have chosen to double down, accusing activists and intellectuals of promoting cancel culture and historical revisionism.

Johnsons government has prosecuted its war on woke with remarkable zeal and clinical efficiency throughout the pandemic. Indeed, rightwingers talking of freedom are shriller than ever before in Europe and America. Their battle against COVID-19 restrictions has become part of their larger, and very desperate, war against political correctness an existential struggle, no less, something as urgent as the existential struggle of many today against severe illness and premature death caused by COVID-19.

The consequences for the rest of us are incalculable. While freedom-loving Tories make their last stand, the mounting evidence from elsewhere is that coordinated action by governments and solidarity among citizens are what will contain the pandemic.

Indeed, the lesson from the U.K. epicenter of delta and now omicron, and home to a dysfunctional government and failed ideology is profoundly ominous: That in societies deliberately divided by culture wars, trust and confidence in an unscrupulous ruling class will inevitably run low, and the pandemic is what will enjoy true freedom.

Pankaj Mishra is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. His books include Age of Anger: A History of the Present, From the Ruins of Empire: The Intellectuals Who Remade Asia, and Temptations of the West: How to Be Modern in India, Pakistan, Tibet and Beyond.

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

PHOTO GALLERY (CLICK TO ENLARGE)

Go here to read the rest:

Boris Johnson and the woeful and costly Tory war on woke - The Japan Times

Has the Great Barrington Declaration been vindicated? – UnHerd

Has the Left finally woken up to the devastating costs of implementing lockdowns? In its first edition of 2022, the Observer carried a surprisingly balanced interview with Professor Mark Woolhouse, a member of Sage whose new book The Year the World Went Mad argues that long lockdowns promoted more harm than good and failed to protect the vulnerable. Its favourable reception appears to herald a new direction in the critique of Covid measures and policies on the Left; for the first time, the question of what really represented the collective good in the Covid debate has been put on the table by a mainstream left-liberal publication.

This is certainly a new departure. As we have previously noted on UnHerd, the Left has strongly supported restrictive measures in the fight against the pandemic.

It argued that these restrictions, which clearly infringe on individual freedoms and rights, were nonetheless justified in the name of the collective good and the collective right to life. This allowed them to pre-empt any criticism of the new Covid consensus: if youre against any of these measures, youre against the collective interest. And so thinkers like us, who have always criticised neoliberal individualism and argued in favour of progressive state intervention, suddenly found ourselves accused of being libertarians or outright Right-wingers, just for taking a critical stance of governments response to the pandemic.

Indeed, it would appear that for many on the Left today, anything can be justified in the name of the collective good. Its easy to see why Right-wing critics view this uncritical invoking of collective benefits as proof of the Lefts inclination towards authoritarian or Stalinist control. While such caricatural definitions are easy to laugh off, as leftists we cant deny that there is something disturbing about the lack of critical commentary from the Left on how to reconcile the need for collective action with the importance of individual rights and freedoms in the response to Covid.

After all, the Left has historically championed civil rights and freedoms in society which are associated with individual liberties: the right to protest, the right to work, the right to sexual independence and freedom. Expanding the freedoms of men and women while emphasising that this can only be achieved through collective action has always been a central tenet of leftist, even socialist-democratic, ideology. So clearly something more complex than default authoritarianism is at work in the juxtaposition of the current Covid crisis and the Lefts broad response towards civil and individual liberties.

Part of it has to do, we believe, with the Lefts criticism of the rise of desocialised individualism. The growing emphasis in economic and political thought on personal autonomy and the individuals responsibility for their own fate, which has accompanied the rolling back of welfarism, has radicalised the ideological construction of the individual. We can see this in the renewed popularity of a figure such as Ayn Rand, with her message of enlightened egoism as the basis of civilised life. However, criticising modern individualism is one thing; laughing off the very idea that individual rights and freedoms matter is another, as is arguing that anything goes in the pursuit of saving lives and the collective good.

All of which has meant that, until the Observers interview with Mark Woolhouse, there has been painfully little critical analysis from the mainstream Left as to whether the raft of restrictive Covid measures we have seen over the past two years have indeed served the collective good or saved lives for that matter. By definition, for something to be considered in the collective interest of a society, it has to be in the interest of at least a significant majority of its members. However, its hard to see how lockdowns (and other subsequent measures) meet this criterion.

Their psychological, social and economic impact might have been justified from a collective-interest and life-saving standpoint if Covid represented an equal threat to all citizens. Yet soon into the pandemic, it became clear that Covid-19 was almost exclusively a threat to the elderly (60+): in the last quarter of 2020, the mean age of those dying both with and of Covid-19 in the UK was 82.4, while by early 2020 the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) the risk of actually dying if you catch Covid in people under 60 was already known to be exceptionally low: 0.5 per cent or less. A paper written late in 2020 for the WHO by professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University, one of the worlds foremost epidemiologists, then estimated that the IFR for those under 70 was even lower: 0.05%. As Woolhouse points out in his interview people over 75 are an astonishing 10,000 times more at risk than those who are under 15.

Moreover, given the impacts on other aspects of medical care, the preservation (or prolonging) of life of the elderly was certainly being achieved at the expense of the life expectancies of younger sectors of the population to say nothing of the catastrophic impacts in the Global South. This has indeed been confirmed by evidence which shows that excess deaths in younger age groups rose sharply in 2021, with very little of this attributable to Covid mortality.

If anything, Covid restrictions should have been framed in terms of solidarity: as measures which implied the overwhelming majority of the collective, which risked little or nothing from Covid, paying a price, and a heavy one at that, in order to protect, in theory at least, a minority (in Western countries people aged 60 or older represent on average around 25% of the population). Acknowledging this from the start would have avoided much loss of trust in public institutions down the road, and would have allowed for a rational discussion around important questions of intergenerational equity, proportionality and the balancing of rights and interests.

A possible counter-argument is that avoiding healthcare systems being overrun with Covid patients, regardless of their age, was in the interests of everyone. This might be true from a purely theoretical standpoint. However, both arguments hinge on the assumption that lockdowns were actually useful in reducing hospitalisations and deaths. But theres hardly any evidence that this has been the case.

In early 2021, John Ioannidis published a paper claiming that there was no practical difference in epidemiological terms between countries that had locked down and those that hadnt. Several other studies have appeared since then that confirm Ioannidiss initial findings: see, for example, here, here and here.Indeed, some of the countries that locked down the hardest are also those with the highest mortality figures and excess death rate. Peru is an obvious example, while Swedens excess mortality is below the European average for 2020.

Meanwhile in the US, the end of 2021 confirmed the reality that lockdown strategies had little or no impact on Covid mortality. The two neighbouring states of Michigan and Wisconsin followed very different Covid policies, with Michigan favouring severe restrictions while Wisconsin lifted them much earlier; yet at the start of this month, Michigans Covid mortality rate was far higher than Wisconsins, at 2,906 deaths per million compared to 1,919 per million in Wisconsin. Another stark example comes from comparing two other neighbouring states: North and South Dakota. South Dakota infamously imposed no Covid restrictions, while there were mask mandates in North Dakota during the second wave in Winter 2020/2021: yet as of January 1st 2022, the two states death rates are very similar, at 2,810 per million (South Dakota) and 2,640 (North Dakota).

Another case that is less talked about is that of Italy. Over the course of the past two years, Italy has implemented some of the strictest and longest lockdowns in the world (indeed, it is the country that invented the concept of national lockdown), topping every other Western country in terms of average stringency of anti-Covid measures. Yet Italy is also one of the countries with the highest mortality rate per capita well above the United Kingdom, Spain, France, Germany, Sweden and several other countries that adopted much less restrictive measures. And theres evidence that this isnt despite the lockdowns but, most likely, because of them.

As Piero Stanig and Gianmarco Daniele, two professors at Bocconi University, explain in their book Fallimento lockdown (Lockdown Failure), the worst possible thing you can do when dealing with a highly infectious disease that spreads almost exclusively indoors and targets the elderly is to lock old people up inside their homes with other family members, and ban citizens from spending time in arguably the safest place of all: outdoors. In other words, even from the narrow perspective of saving lives, not only were lockdowns not in the collective interest of society, they werent even in the interest of those whose lives were actually at risk.

Such an outcome was easily predictable. Indeed, the WHOs 2019 report on pandemic preparedness states that the quarantine of exposed individuals let alone of the entire population is not recommended because there is no obvious rationale for this measure.

The grotesquery of the global responses becomes even more apparent when we take into account the fact that while governments went out of their way to keep healthy people locked in, chasing runners down solitary beaches or checking shopping trolleys to make sure people were only buying essentials, they all but abandoned those most vulnerable: nursing home residents. According to a recent Collateral Global study, Covid deaths in nursing homes amount on average to a staggering 40% of all Covid deaths in Western countries, despite representing less than 1% of the population. In some countries (Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, the UK and the US), more than 5% of all care home residents were killed.

In view of this, it seems obvious that the focused protection approach championed by the Great Barrington Declaration (GBD) based on allow[ing] those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk was the right course of action. It would have avoided inflicting needless pain on workers, women and children through repeated lockdowns, while arguably saving countless lives, by focusing first and foremost on the elderly and especially on nursing homes.

Naturally, the way in which this worked would have been very different in different settings. While in richer countries the resources and infrastructure were certainly available to direct policy in this way, in poorer countries with high Covid mortality and weak healthcare systems such as Latin America, India and South Africa the capacity of governments to offer focused protection was limited. Nevertheless, funds could have been used for this purpose, rather than to fund schemes such as contact tracing, which the WHO had specifically disbarred in all circumstances as a pandemic response in its aforementioned 2019 report.

Instead, countries such as Argentina, Colombia, Peru and South Africa have faced the catastrophe of both severe Covid restrictions and high Covid mortality. What has followed is the destruction of the livelihoods and access to food of tens of millions of citizens; a recent report showed that after almost two years, Covid restrictions have completely shattered the worlds informal economies, with 40% of domestic workers, street vendors and waste pickers still earning less than 75% of their pre-Covid earnings.

And yet as we enter 2022, our openness to reassessing the paths not taken remains constrained. Not only has there been no acknowledgment of the missed opportunity of focused protection at the institutional level and no apology to the authors of the statement, victims of a vicious smearing campaign but even now the GBD is dismissed by academics and epidemiologists such as Woolhouse, even though the focused protection policy he advocates is drawn from it.

Meanwhile, throughout the past year, governments have actually upped the ante, coming up with even more invasive, oppressive and discriminatory measures all in the name of public health and the collective interest. Yet surely the past two years have revealed the dangers of assuming that a collective response to the pandemic requires lockdown measures. Many other collective responses such as focused protection and the GBDs suggestions of free deliveries of groceries to the elderly and vulnerable, and frequent rapid testing of care home staff and visitors would likely have been more effective.

It is time for the Left to look reality in the face and take stock of the fact that the prevailing Covid response of most Western governments has been an abysmal failure on all fronts not least that of saving lives. An alternative approach is desperately needed. Fortunately, and tragically, its been hiding in plain sight all this time.

Go here to read the rest:

Has the Great Barrington Declaration been vindicated? - UnHerd

Advice: Im a woman of color often overlooked at work until people realize I outrank them – The Boston Globe

Anonymous / Cambridge

People who do this are caught out and ashamed. You saw their bum, not the other way around, so whos embarrassed and scrambling? Not you, Anonymous. Slow your roll here, do deep breaths or count to 10. Let that awkward silence be your voice, telling them that yep, you saw that, and it was indeed a transgression. Then proceed with the business you were there to conduct. Graciously, from the power-up position you now hold, like a queen extending mercy. This time.

Dont derail your intended agenda for the jabroni in the moment; you can decide afterward if you should do anything else. If said jabroni is in your company, youve uncovered a risk factor and skill deficit, so do whatever is appropriate with that information. Its unwise to make assumptions in the workplace, and career suicide not to behave with universal courtesy. If a person mistakes a manager for a receptionist, that shouldnt require a radical change in behavior, because everyone deserves respect no matter where their job falls on the company org chart.

Enough about them, lets talk about you. Do you have friends who are women of color, or even a good online forum, to decompress with? You know youre not the only one who experiences these things, but thats different from feeling that youre not alone. And to account for the psychological toll that nonsense like this takes on you, honor it as labor. Factor it in when making decisions like what projects and teams you want to be on, and how much money you will ask for, and how you prioritize your well-being.

And now to your last, heartbreaking question. Try this: Answer it seriously. You obviously, empirically, fit into categories besides your job title (woman, person of color, Bostonian . . . you get the idea). Write down 20. Sleep on it and then see which self-descriptions matter to you, which hold some key relationship or value. I find this a helpful way to remember were worth so much more than how some people see us.

Look at a baby. Unless youre a Charles Dickens villain or an Ayn Rand heroine, you dont see a larval worker whose only worth lies in its potential for labor. You wish that baby a future of love, beauty, good health, and good times, along with meaningful work. We want and deserve those things for ourselves, too.

Miss Conduct is Robin Abrahams, a writer with a PhD in psychology.

Read more:

Advice: Im a woman of color often overlooked at work until people realize I outrank them - The Boston Globe

Russia digs in on Ukraine never joining NATO, on a day of talks with the U.S. – NPR

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman (left) and Russian deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov (right) pose for pictures as they attend security talks on soaring tensions over Ukraine, at the U.S. permanent Mission, in Geneva on Jan. 10. Denis Balibouse /POOL/AFP via Getty Images hide caption

U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman (left) and Russian deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov (right) pose for pictures as they attend security talks on soaring tensions over Ukraine, at the U.S. permanent Mission, in Geneva on Jan. 10.

The idea that Ukraine, Russia's neighbor, might someday join NATO "is one of the areas where we have the greatest difference of views with the U.S.," Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Monday, after an hours-long discussion with his U.S. counterpart, Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman.

Sherman and Ryabkov posed together at the start of the session, convened as an effort to ease tensions aroused by Russia's positioning of some 100,000 troops along its border with Ukraine. But they both said the discussions achieved no breakthroughs and after the talks were over, Sherman and Ryabkov each held separate briefings with the media rather than appear together.

"We had a frank and forthright discussion over the course of nearly eight hours," Sherman told reporters who were on a conference call.

"For us, it's absolutely mandatory to make sure that Ukraine never, never, ever becomes a member of NATO," Ryabkov said at a news conference after the day-long meeting in Geneva, Switzerland.

But Sherman said NATO's open-door policy is one of the alliance's key strengths, and she said the U.S. "will not allow anyone" to slam that door shut. She also said the U.S. won't allow Russia to dictate how it cooperates with other sovereign states.

"We will not make decisions about Ukraine without Ukraine" being involved, Sherman said, adding that the same goes for the European Union. "As we say to our allies and partners: Nothing about you, without you," Sherman said.

Of the Russian side, Ryabkov said the country is "fed up" with what he called loose talk and half promises.

"We do not trust the other side," he stated. "We need ironclad, waterproof, bulletproof, legally binding guarantees not assurances, not safeguards guarantees with all the words" spelling out with certainty that Ukraine shall never become a member of NATO. He also said Russia has no plans to attack Ukraine.

"It's a matter of Russia's national security," he said.

Sherman reiterated Secretary of State Antony Blinken's statement, that Russia has a choice to make between de-escalating or facing deterrents, such as sanctions.

"It's really a very stark choice and one that I suspect only Mr. Putin, President Putin, can decide," Sherman said. "And we certainly urged Russia to de-escalate, to create an environment that was conducive to the diplomatic track. But we will see."

Russia does not see a nation's ability to join a military alliance as an absolute, Ryabkov said, adding that in his country's view, that freedom should be both limited and qualified.

"The situation now is so dangerous," the Russian diplomat said, as he urged a speedy resolution to the issue.

Sherman said the U.S. is open to meeting again soon. She also said the U.S. raised "preliminary ideas" about a range of issues from the placement of some missile systems in Europe to a plan to set reciprocal limits on the scope of military exercises, and to ensure transparency about those exercises.

See the original post here:

Russia digs in on Ukraine never joining NATO, on a day of talks with the U.S. - NPR

US ‘Unequivocal’ to Russia on Right of Ukraine, Others, to Join NATO – Defense One

Washington will take no action to prevent Ukraine from entering the NATO alliance, despite Russias urging, the United States confirmed to Russia on Monday. Its the latest sign that the tense standoff between the U.S. and its allies and Russia will continue to drag on.

In December, Russia issued a list of demands to be met before it would consider removing the 100,000-plus troops on the Ukraine border who stand poised for a potential expansion of Russias nearly 8-year-old war on Ukraine. One of those demands was barring Ukraine from joining the NATO alliance.

Some Western observers have suggested that the United States give in to the request. That might stave off the looming conflict and save Ukraine, Lyle J. Goldstein, the director of Asia Engagement at Defense Priorities, wrote in Defense One in December.

But on Monday, during a conversation between U.S. and Russian diplomats, the United States reiterated that barring Ukraine from joining NATO is a non-starter for discussion.

We were unequivocalWe do not agree that any country should have a veto over any other country when it comes to being part of the NATO alliance. NATO has its own process, for inclusion, U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Wendy Sherman told reporters.

Ukraine has long said that it intends to eventually join the NATO alliance, and in 2008, during its Bucharest Summit, NATO officials said that both Ukraine and Georgia could eventually become members if they chose. They havent wavered from that stance since.

Ukraine has a number of exercises with the United States, such as Rapid Trident. The two countries have also conducted joint operations in Afghanistan.

In June 2020, NATO officially upgraded Ukraines status to an enhanced opportunities partner, which officially put Ukraine on the shortlist for NATO membership, along withAustralia, Finland, Georgia, Jordan, and Sweden.But that does not mean an invitation is inevitable.

In November 2020, Alyona Getmanchuk, director of the Ukraine-based New Europe Center, said Ukraine could go to the next step of becoming a NATO member, receiving the NATO membership action plan, or MAP, as early as 2023.

But a European security expert who asked to remain anonymous said Monday they highly doubt that would happen.

All decisions at NATO are made at consensus, so the North Atlantic Council would have to agree to grant Ukraine a MAP, which literally one country could stop from happening, the expert said.

Sherman and her Russian counterpart also discussed the placement of missiles in Europe. The demise of the IMF Treaty in 2019broadens the type of missiles either the United States or Russia could stage in Europe.The U.S. has placed an Aegis Ashore radar unit in Romania and plans to base a similar one in Poland this year.

While the subject did come up, Sherman said, This was not a negotiation that we were putting ideas on the table and a long way to go. But of course there are ongoing concerns about intermediate range missiles.

View original post here:

US 'Unequivocal' to Russia on Right of Ukraine, Others, to Join NATO - Defense One

Defusing the crisis in Europe: A better idea Ukraine than NATO membership | TheHill – The Hill

This week, American officials are expected to hold a series of meetings with other NATO states and Russia to discuss the security crisis in Europe. With Russia deploying some 100,000 troops near Ukraines borders plenty to cause lots of mischief and conduct limited land grabs, even if not enough to seize the country the issue is acute. If things get out of hand, we quickly could find ourselves at our most dangerous moment in world politics since the Cold War ended.

Russia demands that, to defuse the crisis, the United States and the North Atlantic Treaty Organizations other 29 members must promise not to include Ukraine or other former Soviet republics such as Georgia in the alliance in the future. Russia also insists that we promise not to station weapons in existing NATO member states in Eastern Europe, such as Poland and the Baltic states, that have joined the alliance since the Cold War ended.

NATO cannot give in to Russian bullying or allow Russia a sphere of influence over its formerly subjugated neighbors. So any deal on Russian President Vladimir PutinVladimir Vladimirovich PutinUS looks to ward off Ukraine conflict in talks with Russia Overnight Defense & National Security US, Russia have face-to-face sit down House GOP members introduce legislation targeting Russia over Ukraine MOREs proposed terms would be unacceptable.

But we need to change the conversation at its fundamental level and develop new concepts for European security. Ukraine and Georgia should not be in NATO even if Moscow should not be allowed to decide that for them.

At present, we arguably have created the worst of all worlds. At its 2008 summit, NATO promised eventual membership to Ukraine and Georgia, but it did so without offering any specificity as to when or how that might happen. For now, these countries, as well as other Eastern European neutral states, get no military protection from NATO members. Knowing of our eventual interest in bringing these nations into an alliance that he sees as adversarial, Putin has every incentive to keep them weak and unstable so they will not become eligible for NATO membership. That fact, plus Russias desire to dominate its neighbors, are at the root of this crisis, and also help explain why Russia has destabilized both Georgia and Ukraine over the past 14 years.

It is time that Western nations begin to envision a new security architecture for those neutral countries in Eastern Europe today. The conversation should begin within NATO, and then include those countries themselves before we actually negotiate any arrangement with Moscow. But the conversation can begin at a more philosophical and general level with Russia, too, in the meetings this week.

The core concept for future security in Eastern Europe would be one of permanent neutrality for former Soviet republics that are not now in NATO Ukraine and Moldova and Belarus, as well as Georgia and Armenia and Azerbaijan.

The new security architecture would require that Russia, like NATO, commit to help uphold the security of Ukraine, Georgia and other states in the region. Russia would have to withdraw its troops from those countries in a verifiable manner (though the Crimea issue would have to be finessed, since Moscow almost certainly will not give that strategic peninsula on the Black Sea back to Ukraine, after giving it to Ukraine in the 1950s and then grabbing it back with its little green men in 2014).

After that has occurred, corresponding sanctions imposed on Russia because of its aggressions against neighbors would be lifted, though snapback provisions would remain in case Russia subsequently violated its promises to keep its hands off those fully sovereign and independent nations.

The neutral countries would retain their rights to participate in multilateral security operations on a scale comparable to what has been the case in the past, even those operations that might be led by NATO. They could think of themselves and describe themselves as Western states (or anything else, for that matter). They would have complete sovereignty and self-determination in every sense of the word; someday, if invited, they could join the European Union. But they would not be American allies in any formal sense; we would not promise to defend them as if they were U.S. territory, which is ultimately what it means to be a part of NATO.

Ukraine and Georgia are wonderful, but faraway, countries that are hard to defend and much less central to American security than to Russias sense of its place in the world and, yes, to its sense of its own security. The fact that a strongman such as Putin is the one making demands about them, and doing so in unreasonable terms, does not mean we should ignore Russias concerns.

These countries should not be in NATO at least, not until the entire European security order has been transformed in such a way that NATO membership would mean something entirely different than it does today. We are overdue for a serious discussion about security orders for Eastern Europe and that conversation should begin now.

Michael O'Hanlon is a senior fellow and director of research in the foreign policy studies program at the Brookings Institution, where he holds the Philip H. Knight Chair in Defense and Strategy. He is the author of the 2017 book, Beyond NATO: A New Security Architecture for Eastern Europe. Follow him on Twitter @MichaelEOHanlon.

View post:

Defusing the crisis in Europe: A better idea Ukraine than NATO membership | TheHill - The Hill

Norway swaps in its F-35s for NATO quick-reaction mission in the High North – DefenseNews.com

WASHINGTON Norway has designated its F-35 aircraft for a NATO quick-reaction alert mission in the High North, ending a 42-year run of the countrys F-16s for that job, the government announced Jan. 6.

The Lockheed Martin-made jets are held at Evenes Air Base in northern Norway, with at least three ready to scramble within 15 minutes and examine potential airspace violations of Norway and, by extension, NATO. The fifth-generation aircraft have previously accompanied F-16s on such missions in anticipation of the formal takeover on Thursday.

The change in aircraft types further embeds the F-35 jet into the fabric of alliance patrol missions in Europe, just as Lockheed recently recorded initial wins in its sales campaigns for Finland and Switzerland.

Norways F-16 have operated the quick-reaction mission from Bod Air Base for four decades, according to a defense ministry statement. The new location of Evenes puts the missions center of gravity about 100 miles further north.

The Norwegian military is expanding the base to also house P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft, putting key aerial and naval surveillance assets into an area that has seen an uptick in Russian military exercises.

Norway expects to have its fleet of 52 F-35s fully operational by 2025, according to the defense ministry. Aside from a handful of scramble-ready planes at Evenes, the fleets home base is rland, located in the south-central part of the country.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Defense Department continues to use F-16 aircraft in the Baltics, another hotspot for NATO air patrols along the border with Russia. American jets arrived in Poland earlier this month, joining Polish and Belgian F-16s to prepare for that mission, according to a Jan. 6 alliance statement.

Sebastian Sprenger is associate editor for Europe at Defense News, reporting on the state of the defense market in the region, and on U.S.-Europe cooperation and multi-national investments in defense and global security. Previously he served as managing editor for Defense News.

See original here:

Norway swaps in its F-35s for NATO quick-reaction mission in the High North - DefenseNews.com

First NATO Military Chiefs of Defence Meeting of 2022 to be held virtually (revised) – NATO HQ

NATOs highest Military Authority, the Military Committee, will meet virtually on 12-13 January 2022, in Brussels, Belgium. Admiral Rob Bauer, Chair of the Military Committee, will preside over the sessions, which will be attended by the Allied Chiefs of Defence. They will be supported by General Tod Wolters (Supreme Allied Commander Europe, SACEUR) and General Philippe Lavigne (Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, SACT).

The two-day meeting of the NATO Military Committee in Chiefs of Defence Session (MCCS) will enable the Chiefs of Defence to meet and discuss issues of strategic importance to the Alliance. The first day will be dedicated to Military Strategic thinking, with discussions on NATOs Warfighting Capstone Concept, the future work strands associated with its implementation as well as the progress on the Concept for the Deterrence and Defence of the Euro-Atlantic Area. The last session of the day will focus on military inputs to the new Strategic Concept.

The NATO Secretary General will open the second day of the bi-annual meeting by providing on overview of the current political context to the 30 Chiefs of Defence. This will be followed by a 360 degree update on the current security situation and a discussion on NATOs ongoing Deterrence and Defence Posture. The Chiefs of Defence will then meet with their Georgian and Ukrainian counterparts, respectively, to discuss the security situation in their Nations as well as the ongoing progress with defence-related reforms.

Media Opportunity

Thursday 13 Jan 2022

18:00 Virtual Press Conference with the Chair of the NATO Military Committee, Admiral Rob Bauer

NATO will facilitate remote interaction during the press conference. To declare your interest in asking a question to the Chair of the NATO Military Committee, journalists must register via Eventbrite no later than 16:00 (Brussels time) on Tuesday 11 January 2022, at the following link: registration for virtual press conference. Registered journalists will be contacted separately with technical details.

The press conference will be streamed live on the NATO website and the livefeed will be provided to Eurovision.

The video will be available for free download from the NATO Multimedia Portal after the event.

Imagery

Following each event, photos, video and audio files will be made available on the NATO IMS webpage http://www.nato.int/ims, as well as on the Military Committee in Chiefs of Defence session (MCCS) event page. Please click here to access the event page.

Social Media

We will post the latest information and photos from the MCCS on our official Twitter account: @NATO_PASCAD. The Chair of the NATO Military Committee will be using his own account @CMC_NATO.

Please use the hashtags #NATOCHoDs and #NATOMC when tweeting about the NATO Military Committee.

Media Enquiries:

Ms Eleonora Russell, Public Affairs and Strategic Communications Advisor to the NATO Military Committee and the NATO International Military Staff.

E-Mail: russell.eleonora@hq.nato.int

Lt Col Goetz Haffke, Deputy Public Affairs and Strategic Communications Advisor to the NATO Military Committee and the NATO International Military Staff.

Tel: + 32 490 58 06 47E-Mail: haffke.goetz@hq.nato.int

For more background information about the NATO Military Committee click here.

See more here:

First NATO Military Chiefs of Defence Meeting of 2022 to be held virtually (revised) - NATO HQ

CoinGeek Weekly Livestream: A special edition from the CES Day 1 in Las Vegas – CoinGeek

Aftera very successful 2021, Kurt Wuckert Jr. kicked off the new year with a special edition of theCoinGeek Weekly Livestreamfrom Las Vegas, Nevada. Kurt is leading a contingent of BSV blockchain companies that have attended and are exhibiting at the biggest consumer electronics event in the world. He talked about the event, how the BSV booth is faring and who would win in a Brazilian jiu-jitsu showdown between him and Roger Ver.

The Consumer Electronics Show (CES), held annually at the Las Vegas Convention Center, kicked off on January 5 and will run for three days. Theeventattracts the crme de la crme from augmented and virtual realities, the Internet of Things, smart homes, smartphones, computing, self-driving cars, and other consumer electronics. This year, itdrewabout 2,200 exhibitors, and the BSV ecosystem was well represented.

As Kurt revealed on the livestream, the BSV contingent congregated in its own booth on the first day of CES, showcasing their products and discussing why BSV is above Ethereum, BTC, and others such projects.

As a co-host of the booth, Kurt spent the first day interacting with several dozen people, answering questions about theBitcoin Civil War, explaining why not everyone needs to run a node, and much more.

And then we go through the white paper, and I quiz them at the end. Its really good, he quipped.

Kurt revealed that the BSV booth, which featured entities including Bitcoin Association, VXPASS, CoinGeek, Ayre Ventures, Omniscape, Haste Arcade, and Built By Gamers, had attracted a lot of traction at the event. Its been super busy, he stated, with many tech enthusiasts being massively interested in how they can build a metaverse that sources and recordsall data on-chainin real-time and at very low fees. The likes ofEthereumdont have the capacity to offer this, despite being the network that most people are exposed to initially.

Apart from explaining the massive power of BSV, the startups also got to show off the capabilities of their apps and platforms. Among the most popular wasOmniscape, the XR platform built on BSV blockchain by Transmira. At a time when the metaverse is the biggest buzzword in tech, Omniscape is showing the world that BSV is the only logical choice to host the metaverse.

Transmira founder and CEORobert Rice showed a crowd of awestruck people how Omniscape allows users to digitally drop NFTs in real space and using digital avatars.

Aside from the events at CES, Kurt answered questions related to everything else happening in the space, as he always does. They includedthe efforts by the Ira Kleiman lawyersto force a retrial in the case they lost horribly to Dr. Craig Wright. Kurt believes that a retrial is next to impossible.

However, the efforts by the lawyers will go a long way in vindicating Dr. Wright and his victory over Ira, especially since anti-BSV people had tried to spin the trial to look like it ended in an Ira victory. Winners dont appeal, said Kurt.

Kurt also addressed theSuperAsset token protocoldeveloped by Attila Aros and what it does better than other protocols. A big fan of Attila, Kurt admitted not being quite well-versed with the protocol. Still, he believes that the rise of varying protocols is a testament to the rapid growth of tokenization on the BSV blockchain.

And as he had had to do with many people who visited the BSV booth at CES, Kurt delved into the decentralization myth withBTC. While the number of people who run nodes is big, the core decisions are still made by a few insiders. Most node operators just upgrade their software as instructed, in what is a de facto tyranny of ambiguity. Despite being a global project, BTC has five GitHub maintainers. They wield a lot of power over the community, including what improvement proposals will move forward to get voted on.

Thats not how Bitcoin is governed. Bitcoinis supposed to be governedby proof of work. Its not in BTC and in my opinion, what makes Bitcoin decentralized is that nodes can join and leave the network as they please, they can sync right up with the chain, they can attempt to mine blocks, they can govern the chain with proof of workbut none of that happens in BTC, he explained.

Kurt concluded the livestream with a unique audience question who would win in a Brazilian jiu-jitsu battle between him andRoger Ver. Roger has been in the Bitcoin community for several years and was among those who previously championed increasing the Bitcoin block size. However, he got derailed with BCH and didnt want to fully implement Satoshis vision of unbounded block sizes.

Roger is a big guy, has a brown belt in jiu-jitsu, and has been involved in the martial arts and combat discipline for decades. Despite this, Kurt is confident that he would get the better of Roger.

Id bet on me. Im pretty big and Im good at jiu-jitsu, Kurt noted.

Stay tuned for more footage and insight from CES on special editions of CoinGeek Weekly Livestream on the second and third days of the event. On day 2, Kurt will hold the livestream from the venue, including showing Robert Rices presentation, where he will be debuting really first of its kind cool stuff.

Watch: CoinGeek Weekly Livestream episode with Transmiras CEO Robert Rice

New to Bitcoin? Check out CoinGeeksBitcoin for Beginnerssection, the ultimate resource guide to learn more about Bitcoinas originally envisioned by Satoshi Nakamotoand blockchain.

Read this article:

CoinGeek Weekly Livestream: A special edition from the CES Day 1 in Las Vegas - CoinGeek

Mass adoption, regulation, other key trends: What’s in store for DeFi in 2022? – CNBCTV18

The financial ecosystem has seen a major transformation since the advent of blockchain technology, and particularly bitcoin. Blockchain technology has enabled businesses to transition from centrally governed systems to more democratic and decentralised systems.

The year 2021 was an exciting one for the decentralised finance (DeFi) space with the total value locked (TVL) in DeFI applications skyrocketing from $22 billion on January 1, 2021, to $220 billion by the end of the year. TLV is the total of all assets deposited in the DeFi protocols that are earning interest, new coins, or other such rewards. The broader crypto market also grew, pulling the DeFi market up along the way.

So what does 2022 look like for DeFi? Experts believe DeFi and decentralised platforms, like Decentralised Exchanges (DEXs) and Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs), will make significant strides this year as they are the underlying infrastructure of Web 3.0, the third version of the internet. Here are the key trends they predict in 2022:

Mass adoption:

The current macroeconomic situation has unlocked new avenues in the world of crypto for the masses -- novices and seasoned traders alike. Traditional physical systems are quickly being replaced by decentralised systems requiring minimum human intervention. But will there be mass adoption?

As Ahmed Al-Balaghi of Biconomy pointed out to Cointelegraph: More scaling solutions will become essential to the mass adoption of DeFi products and services."

Al-Balaghi said while most DeFi applications go live on multiple chains, making them cheaper to use, it adds more complexities for those who are trying to learn and understand how they work.

"To start the second phase of DeFi mass adoption, we need solutions that simplify onboarding and use DApps that are spread across different chains and scaling solutions," he said.

Another expert Alex Tapscott of Ninepoint Digital Assets Group highighted that in just one year, the DeFi industrys market capitalisation has ballooned 30 times to $150 billion. The next decade, he said, will see a billion people, many of them unbanked, get onboarded to financial markets for the first time ever via DeFi applications.

Regulatory action: one of the impedances to institutions is the lack of clarity on regulation and compliance. As various countries brainstorm how to tackle this issue effectively, 2022 is expected by many to be the year when we finalise the rules.

Co-founder of Swarm Markets, Timo Lehes, believes regulation will be imperative in 2022 as those bearing fiduciary duties will not be able to access DeFi through unregulated channels.

Across DeFi, Anti-Money Laundering (AML) solutions and wallets with inbuilt KYC and cross border rules checks will help to increase institutional exposure in the year ahead, said Rachid Ajaja, CEO and Co-Founder of AllianceBlock, in a conversation with CryptoNews. AllianceBlocks Cross-Border Regulatory Compliance Rules Engine allows traditional institutions to access opportunities in DeFi in a compliant way through pre-trade international checks, he added.

CDO of DappRadar, Dragos Dunica, believes despite the regulatory challenges that DeFi is about to be faced with, the sector is well poised to remain unthwarted and continue growing. Governments may even launch their own DeFi platforms and initiatives.

Interoperability of NFTs, DEXs, GameFi, and Liquidity Mining:Once regulatory hurdles are cleared, experts believe the sector will be able to offer increasingly innovative product services to investors. NFTs are expected to top that list.

The NFT craze is gathering steam and we could see the best of it in 2022 in spaces beyond in-game collectibles, artworks, and sports memorabilia. It is expected to grow over 1,000% in 2022 alone, per a Forbes prediction.

In the blockchain-based gaming industry, Axie Infinity has cemented its name among the biggest success stories of 2021. From 38,000 active users in April 2021, the game saw a massive influx touching 2.7 million users in mid-November. This is expected to give a massive boost to GameFi (in-game finance), and DeFi platforms will inevitably be a part of this development.

Liquidity Mining and Yield Farming are two more areas where experts see vast potential. DEXs require a liquidity pool for their smooth functioning, which is crucial in maintaining healthy solvency. The current debacle faced by liquidity providers is the loss caused by the change in crypto prices as they constantly fluctuate. (Also called impermanent loss).

The rise of DeFi platforms has also boosted the concept of stablecoins in the Indian crypto circles. As Nischal Shetty of WazirX pointed out in a Fortune India article, more Indians are thronging the stablecoin market and most DeFi companies have tied up with Indian cooperatives to offer peer-to-peer services and are planning to open more branches and even ATMs.

"...interoperability could also be a game-changer in DeFi. Interoperability could just improve the overall user experience in DeFi, providing a way for users to easily transact between chains and choose the one that suits them most," Ankitt Gaur of EasyFi Network told Cointelegraph.

However, most experts agreed that how DeFi grows in the near future will largely depend on the user experience and the simplification of the onboarding process.

Most of the world has never used a DeFi product. It is up to the entrepreneurs and businesses to build the software tools that make DeFi easy, safe, and useful enough for more people to want to get involved, Roger Ver of Bitcoin.com told Cointelegraph.

Excerpt from:

Mass adoption, regulation, other key trends: What's in store for DeFi in 2022? - CNBCTV18

How radar works: The technology made famous by war – Livescience.com

Radar was among the most important technical breakthroughs of the Second World War. The technology helped Britain and its allies emerge victorious during the Battle of Britain, the air war fought over UK skies in 1940, according to Imperial War Museums (IWM).

Radar which stands for Radio Detection and Ranging is a detection system that uses radio waves to locate objects. It is still widely used today, but as technology has advanced they now often harness microwaves, according to the Earth Observing Laboratory. These are at the higher frequency end of the radio spectrum and provide more accurate readings.

Related: What is electromagnetic radiation?

Although this literal trial by fire made radar a household name, the technology behind it started life much earlier and centred around the study of electromagnetic (EM) waves.

EM radiation is a form of energy that is everywhere and can take on lots of different forms, such as radio waves, microwaves, X-rays, gamma rays and ultraviolet (sunlight). EM waves also form the basis of how mobile phones and wireless computer networks function.

And back in 1885, it was Scottish physicist James Clerk Maxwell who came up with the idea that perhaps radio waves could be reflected by metal objects, just like light waves could.

A few years later, German physicist Heinrich Hertz set out to prove it. In an experiment he conducted in 1888, he discovered that they were indeed reflected back. As the first person to apply the theories of Maxwell, the unit of frequency of an EM wave was named a hertz after him, Live Science previously reported. In 1904 a patent was issued to a German engineer called Christian Hlsmeyer for what was termed an obstacle detector and ship navigation device. Not a catchy name, but nevertheless a type of early radar system had been born.

Despite that, it was not until the 1930s that there was a need for the technology, mainly due to the invention of long-range military bombers, which prompted countries to invest in a system that could detect their approach and provide early warning, according to Encyclopaedia Britannica.

All of the major world powers at the time continued research, but it was the USA and UK that were able to refine the technology. Scottish physicist Sir Robert Watson-Watt, known as the father of radar, took the science that had gone before and created the workable system that formed the basis of modern radar , according to the Royal Society.

A typical system has four main components, these are:

Transmitter: The source of the radio pulse.

Antenna: Needed to send the pulse out into the ether and receive it when it is reflected back.

Switch: This tells the antenna when to transmit or receive the pulses.

Receiver: Required to detect and turn the pulses, which come back into a visual format to be read by an operator.

The process of directing artificial radio waves towards objects is called illumination. Although radio waves are invisible to the human eye as well as optical cameras. According to NASA, they are sent out at approximately 300,000,000 metres per second the speed of light.

Some of the reflected radio waves (echoes) are directed back toward the radar where they are received and amplified, with the data being interpreted by skilled operators with the help of computers, according to the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. Once returned, they provide information such as range and bearing.

Radio waves are cheap to generate, can pass through snow, mist and fog and are safe, unlike gamma and X rays.

Radar can be used to detect ships, planes and satellites, or closer to home radar speed guns are used by the police to calculate how fast cars are going, with any that are going too fast in line for a speeding ticket, according to Encyclopaedia Britannica. Meteorologists also use radar to map and track weather systems around the world.

During the Battle of Britain, radar enabled the RAF to detect incoming German aircraft using radio waves, according to the RAF Museum website.

From radar towers dotted around the South and East of the country, the system would send these waves out, which would keep travelling until they hit something, like an incoming plane, and be bounced back to be picked up by the receiver. By calculating how long it had taken the waves to return, skilled operators could figure out the altitude, range and bearing of the incoming enemy planes, according to the RAF.

By doing so, it gave the RAF enough time to scramble its own planes to meet the incoming threat. Being in the right place at the right time helped the UK win the battle and landing a killer blow to the invasion plans of the Third Reich, according to a radar operators account, published by the BBC.

Without doubt, one of the biggest advances in post-war radar technology was Doppler radar, according to Encyclopaedia Britannica. With a need to defend against bombers now gone, the new motivation to refine the technology was using it to track the weather.

While ordinary radar can figure out range and location, Doppler can tell us information about an objects speed too. It works on the principle of the Doppler Effect, the idea that waves produced by an object will be squeezed closer together if it is moving towards you, or will spread out if it is moving away.

This is used for tracking weather systems which are constantly on the move, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

They can gather a huge amount of information too so modern Doppler radars depend on increasing processing power.Doppler radar is also what you would find in a police speed gun too!

You can observe and track the precipitation detected by NOAAs radar technology live using the interactive radar viewer webpage.

Do you want to know more about how radar technology is transforming transport safety? Hear from an expert panel at the Future of the Car Summit 2020 in this video by NXP.

"Robert Alexander Watson-Watt. 13 April 1892 -- 5 December 1973". Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society (1975). https://www.jstor.org/stable/769695

"Grand Challenges in Radar Signal Processing". Radar Signal Processing (2021). https://www.frontiersin.org

"Doppler Radar Probing of the Clear Atmosphere". Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (1978). https://journals.ametsoc.org

Continue reading here:

How radar works: The technology made famous by war - Livescience.com

Hayward Strengthens its Position in Pool Technology with Recent Acquisitions – Yahoo Finance

Water Works Technologies Group, LLC Water Feature and LED Lighting BusinessSmartPower Proprietary, Communication and LED Lighting Control TechnologySmartValve IP Rich Valve/Fluid Control Technology for SmartPad Installation

BERKELEY HEIGHTS, N.J., January 10, 2022--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: HAYW) ("Hayward"), global designer, manufacturer and marketer of a broad portfolio of pool equipment and technology, today announced the acquisition of Water Works Technologies Group, LLC ("Water Works"), a manufacturer of water features including water bowls and sheer waterfalls with LED lighting options.

This acquisition follows the recent acquisitions of two internet of things (IoT) technology businesses, SmartPower and SmartValve. Together, these acquisitions further extend Haywards leading position in smart, IoT-enabled technologies designed to bring greater control and ambiance to the pool while simplifying ease of use and cost of ownership.

Water Works manufactures a variety of water bowls in both resin and glass in an assortment of colors and finishes as well as Sheer Waterfalls. These high-end water features all have color illumination through LED lighting options which allow Smart app coordination with other pool, spa or landscape lighting colors and shows.

SmartPower is a breakthrough LED Lighting controller leveraging a proprietary communication protocol which makes installing and control of multiple lighting zones in the pool, spa, water features or landscape simple to configure and use. Custom lighting effects and shows are easy to program, coordinating multiple water features with the pool, spa, and even landscape lights to effortlessly transform the entire backyard. The technology also presents a compelling financial benefit. This unique product architecture delivers all the control with less than 50% of the cost of using currently available technology. SmartPower is the solution for standalone cloud-based control for any new or existing pool or as part of the OmniLogic ecosystem, Haywards leading pool and spa automation platform.

Story continues

SmartValve is an active fluid management system for intelligent control of multiple, advanced water features in addition to delivering increased hydraulic energy efficiency for pool/spa design. SmartValve will operate autonomously as the central water distribution system with cloud-based control of other pool equipment via local control or app. As with SmartPower, the SmartValve technology will seamlessly integrate with the OmniLogic ecosystem. SmartValve will dramatically simplify equipment pad installation with a simple manifold design significantly lowering the amount of labor and equipment cost for the installer and the pool owner.

"These three businesses complement each other and further extend Haywards leading Smart technology solutions to increase the ambiance of the pool, spa and backyard. They are perfect examples of harnessing new technology to deliver sustainable, energy-efficient solutions to our space," said Kevin Holleran, CEO of Hayward. "SmartPower and SmartValve are both easy to use and less costly to install, a real win-win for both the homeowner and trade professional. With OmniLogic and the coupling of our new line of innovative water features from Water Works, Hayward is leading the way with products transforming the pool and backyard environment. We are really excited to introduce these game-changing new product platforms to our consumers and trade partners."

About Hayward Holdings, Inc.

Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) is a leading global designer and manufacturer of pool equipment and technology all key to the SmartPad conversion strategy designed to provide a superior outdoor living experience. Hayward offers a full line of innovative, energy-efficient and sustainable residential and commercial pool equipment, including a complete line of advanced pumps, filters, heaters, automatic pool cleaners, LED lighting, internet of things (IoT) enabled controls, alternate sanitizers and water features.

This release contains forward-looking statements and information relating to the Company that are based on the beliefs of management as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to management. When used in this release, words such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "intend," "potential," "continue," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "plan," "target," "predict," "project," "seek" and similar expressions as they relate to us are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements reflect managements current views with respect to future events, are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict. Further, certain forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions as to future events that may not prove to be accurate. Actual results or events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and expectations disclosed in forward-looking statements. Hayward has based these forward-looking statements largely on managements current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that management believes may affect Haywards business, financial condition and results of operations. Important factors that could affect Haywards future results and could cause those results or other outcomes to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include the following: our ability to execute on our growth strategies and expansion opportunities; our ability to maintain favorable relationships with suppliers and manage disruptions to our global supply chain and the availability of raw materials; our relationships with and the performance of distributors, builders, buying groups, retailers and servicers who sell our products to pool owners; competition from national and global companies, as well as lower cost manufacturers; impacts on our business from the sensitivity of our business to seasonality and unfavorable economic and business conditions; our ability to identify emerging technological and other trends in our target end markets; our ability to develop, manufacture and effectively and profitably market and sell our new planned and future products; failure of markets to accept new product introductions and enhancements; the ability to successfully identify, finance, complete and integrate acquisitions; our ability to attract and retain senior management and other qualified personnel; regulatory changes and developments affecting our current and future products; volatility in currency exchange rates; our ability to service our existing indebtedness and obtain additional capital to finance operations and our growth opportunities; impacts on our business from political, regulatory, economic, trade, and other risks associated with operating foreign businesses; our ability to establish and maintain intellectual property protection for our products, as well as our ability to operate our business without infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating the intellectual property rights of others; the impact of material cost and other inflation; the impact of changes in laws, regulations and administrative policy, including those that limit US tax benefits or impact trade agreements and tariffs; the outcome of litigation and governmental proceedings; impacts on our business from the COVID-19 pandemic; and other risks and uncertainties set forth under "Risk Factors" in the prospectus for Haywards initial public offering and in Haywards subsequent SEC filings.

The forward-looking statements in this presentation represent managements views as of the date of this release. Unless required by United States federal securities laws, Hayward neither intends nor assumes any obligation to update these forward-looking statements for any reason after the date of this presentation to conform these statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220107005542/en/

Contacts

Media Relations: Tanya McNabbtmcnabb@hayward.com

Investor Relations: Hayward Investor Relations908-288-9706investor.relations@hayward.com

The rest is here:

Hayward Strengthens its Position in Pool Technology with Recent Acquisitions - Yahoo Finance

Professor Says Technology for Driverless F1 Is Closer Than You Think – Autoweek

PATRICK T. FALLONGetty Images

Prof. Markus Lienkamp of the Technical University of Munich today is celebrating another winning weekend for an autonomous race car championed by TUM in the Indy Autonomous Challenge at Las Vegas Motor Speedway.

The technical advances between Round 1 of the Indy Autonomous Challenge at Indianapolis Motor Speedway in October and this past week's second round was striking. The competition at Indianapolis, originally promoted as an event that promised wheel-to-wheel racing, instead proved to be an event where cars hit the track one at at time in time trials format of competition.

Las Vegas, on the other hand, featured true wheel-to-wheel racingeven if it was a modest two cars on the track at at time.

TUM won both events.

So, where is this all going? Lienkamp predicted that the pace of development of the autonomous race car technology could result in, gulp, an autonomous Formula 1 car on track as soon as 2025.

This content is imported from YouTube. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

To take the discussion one step further, could F1 cars one day race without drivers in the cockpit? Well, there is something to be said of racing where crashes would not injure or even kill drivers.

The autonomous race cars in the Indy Autonomous Challenge are modified Indy Lights race cars built by Dallara and powered by a 2.0-liter, turbocharged 388 bhp Honda (K20C) engine. Each cockpit inlcudes three radars, six cameras, computers and sensors. The weight the electronics closely matches the weight of a human driver. So changes to the suspension configuration was minimal.

Lienkamp tackled the possibility of driverless F1, among other autonomous vehicle topics, in a Q&A released to the media by TUM this morning.

"That's both a technical and emotional discussion which affects the spectators more than anything else," said Lienkamp said when asked about the possibility of driverless F1. "Fans always like to bond with particular driver personalities and identify with them in competition. When I see the constantly growing enthusiasm for esports, I think at some point we'll see both.

"In technical terms of course we always have to ask when it will be realistic to actually replace the driver. After our experience in Indianapolis, we believe this could be possible by 2025. We can even imagine sending one of our autonomous cars to a real Formula 1 race to compete against human professionals."

Lienkamp added that while the human driver at the Formula 1 level still has the upper hand on artificial intelligence, the gap is closing.

John Rettie

"In its present form, our software has already reached the level of an amateur driver," Lienkamp said. "When we talk about professional-class races, experience shows we're about half a second behind. So it will probably take a couple more years before our autonomous vehicles are able to beat racing pros. You can compare it to a chess game against the computer: In the beginning the AI was only able to beat hobby players. It took quite a while before it was possible to beat the chess world champion. But it's definitely possible."

As far-fetched as a true autonomous Formula 1 seems, the professor said that it some ways the technology for the race track is further advanced than that of autonomous street cars.

"The race track doesn't have traffic laws or points of reference like marked lanes, traffic lights or traffic signs," Lienkamp said. "Ultimately we're dealing with 'unpredictable' objects, in our case the other race cars. We have to detect them and make predictions about where they'll move, and that all at speeds of over 250 km/h.

"We're able to do this because our software doesn't concentrate on strictly complying with traffic regulations, as is the case with other vendors. Instead, our software calculates the probable locations of the other objects which it then uses to calculate the optimum solution for our own movements."

John Rettie

So, how does that work?

"Our approach uses conventional sensor technologies with lasers, cameras and radar," he said. "The software knows the race course and detects the other vehicles. That means it can predict the most probable trajectory, i.e. what location on the course the other vehicle will move to at what point in time, and can then plan its own movements accordingly. Here the computing speed of the software plays an important role. That's decisive when it comes to safely executing aggressive maneuvers and reacting spontaneously to critical situations."

The speed at which the software is advancing comes in part from the fact that teams from all over the world are involved.

"The fact that we made the software generally available as open source code and thus let other teams work on it was enormously helpful as well," he said. "That speeds up the development process so that soon the number of people around the world who will be able to work on our code will surpass the development capacities of all the automobile manufacturers put together.

"Ultimately, though, the software and the car are only as good as the teams behind them. I have an extraordinarily good team whose members worked very hard and well beyond the call of their normal everyday duties to make this success happen. 15 doctoral candidates moved this entire project ahead over the course of four years, and four team leaders made sure the teams succeeded in the individual phases."

This content is imported from {embed-name}. You may be able to find the same content in another format, or you may be able to find more information, at their web site.

This content is created and maintained by a third party, and imported onto this page to help users provide their email addresses. You may be able to find more information about this and similar content at piano.io

View post:

Professor Says Technology for Driverless F1 Is Closer Than You Think - Autoweek

Connectivity and assistive technology can equalize opportunity for people with disabilities – Kitsap Daily News

By Cathy Bisaillon, President & CEO, Easterseals Washington

The Internet and assistive technology have the incredible power to level the playing field for people with disabilities. To advance digital equity means to provide vital connections to friends, family, and support networks; in a nutshell to combat social isolation and barriers to achievement through technology and education.

As a leader for Easterseals Washington who works and lives on the Kitsap Peninsula, Ive worked hard throughout my career to champion and advance accessibility and technology education for people with disabilities in the area, and throughout the state.

With its tagline All Abilities, Limitless Possibilities Easterseals Washington prioritizes the use of technology, including connectivity and training, throughout all its service lines. Access to the internet and its many applications is key to helping everyone we serve establish and reach their individual goals. One in four Americans has a disability, whether apparent or invisible to others, and everyone should be able to chart their own course regardless of ability.

26 years ago, I started my career with Easterseals Washington as a direct service provider to help people with disabilities get jobs, and through their achievements, improve their lives. That incredibly rewarding work has fueled me every day to lead our organization with our participants potential in mind. Ive watched the internet, devices, and software rapidly evolve and enable our job seekers, students, and program participants to create their own video rsums, apply for jobs online, access spoken language through communication devices, and reconnect with family members across the world via email and social media.

While strides have been made to bring digital equity to people with disabilities, there is still substantial work to be done. According to Pew Research, a quarter of people with disabilities say they never go online, and more than half say they do not have a home broadband subscription (American Association of People with Disabilities).

As part of our dedication to providing technology access to people of all abilities in Kitsap County, Easterseals Washington recently partnered with Comcast to open a Lift Zone Lab: Community Learning Space at our Gateway Adult Services facility in Bremerton. It will facilitate digital literacy training for adults with disabilities including sensory, physical, intellectual, and disabilities due to aging. The sky is the limit, with expected outcomes to include monumental gains in participants communication, memory, job development, community access, overall independence, computer literacy, motor skills, and so much more.

The Lift Zone Lab is furnished with a variety of technology and assistive devices to tailor the digital experience for each individual. For example, a person with autism will work with virtual reality to overcome anxieties associated with public interaction; and clients with mobility challenges will build independence by learning to operate Smart Home devices, and by accessing them with adaptive equipment.

The Labs assistive technology inventory includes:

The Lift Zone Lab project achieves an objective in Easterseals Washingtons current Strategic Plan by forming key partnerships that increase equity for people with disabilities in every aspect of life. We envision activation of similar labs around the state in the near future.

I often say that we need to do away with the do-for in disability services. Assistive technology, internet access, and funding for training empowers people with disabilities to do things that they never imagined. It allows us, as service providers, to know that we have done more than provide care we have provided inspiration, challenge, and change.

Connectivity and accessible technology will continue to become more important for people of all abilities. Our mission is to stay on top of the best tools and techniques so that people with disabilities can stay on top of achieving their dreams.

Please visit the News page of our website for more information on the Lift Zone Lab: Digital Community Learning Space and Gateway Adult Services in Bremerton: https://www.easterseals.com/washington/who-we-are/news/new-digital-community.html

Visit link:

Connectivity and assistive technology can equalize opportunity for people with disabilities - Kitsap Daily News

Ropes & Gray Strengthens IP and Technology Transactions Team with New Partner and Counsel – PRNewswire

NEW YORK and SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 10, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Global law firm Ropes & Gray today announced that its industry-leading intellectual property and technology transactions practices are expanding again with the arrival of two leading lawyers: Edward H. Sadtler as partner in New York and Emily M. Karlberg (Lieberman) as counsel in San Francisco.

"Dealmaking shows no signs of slowing in 2022. Market-leading IP advisers like Edward and Emily are integral to help our clients understand and execute the complexities of the red hot tech market. Each has a strong, technical background and deep market knowledge that benefit our clients in their most challenging and complex tech deals. We are excited to welcome them to the firm," said David Djaha, managing partner.

Edward joins Ropes & Gray's 500-lawyer New York office as a partner in its intellectual property transactions and technology, media and telecommunications industry group. Ropes & Gray's global team is renowned for providing first-rate counsel to groundbreaking technology companies, and their investors, on transactional, regulatory, litigation and investigative matters.

With more than 20 years of experience representing leading technology companies and private equity firms, Edward has become an indispensable advisor for clients faced with complex legal challenges.

Edward has counseled clients on IP and technology aspects of M&A transactions and private equity investments, including many cross-border deals and matters involving unique transaction structures. He also serves as lead counsel on a wide range of strategic transactions, including, licensing and collaboration matters involving IP and technology in a wide range of industries. These industries include financial services, software, fintech, consumer brands, hospitality, media, energy, communications and health care.

In addition, Edward has guided fund managers and private equity firms on legal issues related to data strategies that include monetization of data, as well as cybersecurity and privacy issues. His experience also extends to providing IP advice in financings, securitizations, public offerings and restructurings.

Emily, who will be based in San Francisco, also has established a reputation for handling sophisticated transactions. Her practice is focused on IP and carve-out aspects of mergers and acquisitions, including complex business divisions, spin-offs, and joint ventures. In addition to conducting IP diligence, Emily also advises on licensing arrangements, services agreements, and other commercial agreements, both within the context of mergers and acquisitions and on a stand-alone basis.

Emily has also counseled emerging growth clients in IP and technology matters arising from entity formation, corporate partnerships and other strategic and complex transactions. She is a Certified Information Privacy Professional, and conducts privacy diligence in addition to IP diligence on transactions.

"Edward and Emily are leading technology lawyers joining a sophisticated team," said Ed Black, co-head of Ropes & Gray's global technology, media and telecommunications practice.

Black continued: "In 2021, Ropes & Gray guided complex and record-breaking technology transactions, including McAfee Corp.'s $14 billion sale, and the $40 billion SPAC merger and IPO of Southeast Asian super-app Grab. Edward and Emily are a perfect fit for the complex work we're doing in the field of global tech."

"Tech dealmaking is on a tear right now. To meet that demand, Ropes & Gray is further strengthening its deal teams. Edward and Emily are a perfect complement to our practice. They understand the most complex technology, M&A and IP matters," said Megan Baca co-head of Ropes & Gray's global IP transactions practice.

Said Melissa Rones, co-head of Ropes & Gray's IP transactions practice: "At a time when more and more corporate deals involve matters related to IP, which is where Edward and Emily specialize, we are very pleased that they have decided to join our team."

Edward said: "I'm excited to be a part of the continued growth of the firm's renowned IP and technology practice and feel privileged to be joining this remarkable team of attorneys. The deep industry experience across the firm's practice groups offers clients access to one of the best platforms for handling matters where IP and technology are critical."

"It's an exciting time to join Ropes & Gray, especially with the firm's announcement that it is adding a third California office," Emily said. "This is a premier firm serving leading clients in IP and M&A, and I am proud to be part of the team."

Ropes & Gray has announced the firm will open its 12th office, and third in California, in 2022, and that private equity partner Brandon Howald, based in Los Angeles, has joined the firm.

About Ropes & Gray's Technology, Media & Telecommunications PracticeRopes & Gray's technology, media & telecommunications group consists of a multi-disciplinary team of attorneys with years of experience handling matters in the areas of technology transactions, M&A, data privacy and cybersecurity, intellectual property, finance, fintech, capital markets, antitrust, regulatory and tax. The firm advises TMT clients across the full gamut of subsectors including automotive and aeronautical, consumer technology, energy technology, fintech, AI, big data, gaming, hardware, semiconductors, software, internet and e-commerce, digital health and telecommunications.The award-winning TMT practice is regularly ranked among the world's leading practices by high-profile publications such asU.S. News & World Report,Legal 500 andChambers USA.

About Ropes & Gray Ropes & Gray is a preeminent global law firm with approximately 1,600 lawyers and legal professionals serving clients in major centers of business, finance, technology and government. The firm has offices in New York, Boston, Washington, D.C., Chicago, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, Los Angeles, London, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Tokyo and Seoul, and has consistently been recognized for its leading practices in many areas, including private equity, M&A, finance, asset management, real estate, tax, antitrust, life sciences, health care, intellectual property, litigation and enforcement, data, and business restructuring.

Website | LinkedIn | Twitter | Videos | Podcasts

Our privacy policy can be viewed here.

Media Contact: Eric GoldmanSenior Public Relations SpecialistOffice: +1-212-596-9089Cell: +1-917-224-9861[emailprotected]

SOURCE Ropes & Gray

Continued here:

Ropes & Gray Strengthens IP and Technology Transactions Team with New Partner and Counsel - PRNewswire

Plain Talk: An unsexy technology that could lead to some sexy outcomes for government – INFORUM

MINOT, N.D. I make a living writing and talking about politics, and I divide the topics I cover up into two categories.

First, there's the sexy stuff. The hot-button stuff. Topics that immediately stir up interest from the audience. It's the stuff we spend most of our time talking about. How big should the government be, and how much should it cost us? Stuff like that.

Then there's the unsexy stuff. Like blockchain.

What is blockchain? North Dakota Chief Information Officer Shawn Riley knows. He's an advocate for it. He tried to explain it to this humble political wonk on this episode of Plain Talk, and what he said makes a lot of sense.

Blockchain is a way of recording transactions in a way that's simultaneously secure and transparent. He believes it could be used in everything from recording title histories for property to tracking mineral rights and, yes, even voting.

Nerd stuff, I know, but the impact could be very sexy in terms of that thing we all care about, which is how much government is costing us.

Riley estimates that North Dakota has something like $1.2 billion in what he calls "tech debt," which is to say investments in dated technology that needs to be upgraded. There's no holding back the rapid advance of technology, but Riley argues that if we implement blockchain for the information our government is built around - all the little transactions and data the state records and keeps - upgrading that technology could be a lot cheaper in the future.

If we could make our interactions with the government more efficient, and more secure, while simultaneously holding down the cost of the government gathering and keeping all that data, isn't that a win for everyone?

See the original post here:

Plain Talk: An unsexy technology that could lead to some sexy outcomes for government - INFORUM

Commerce Department Reports on Fiscal 2020 Technology Transfers – Executive Gov

The Department of Commerce (DOC) has produced a report about how its agencies ran technology transfer activities in fiscal year 2020, including projects related to space weather and air quality.

The Annual Report on Technology Transfer: Approach, Plans, Fiscal Year 2020 Activities and Achievements summarizes how the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Telecommunications and Information Administration and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration handled technology transfers, NIST said Thursday.

For example, NOAA created a technique that uses machine learning to search for space weather content among large amounts of satellite-gathered data. The weather forecasting agency also worked with NASA to study how wildfires across the U.S. affect air quality.

The agencies performed this work under the Fire Influence on Regional and Global Environments and Air Quality or FIREX-AQ program, whose resulting data now supports NOAAs forecasting models for smoke and air quality.

This report is integral to understanding and analyzing the tech transfer activities of the agencies, and it provides a great reference point for DOCs overall role in tech transfer, said Mojdeh Bahar, associate director for innovation and industry services at NIST.

Continue reading here:

Commerce Department Reports on Fiscal 2020 Technology Transfers - Executive Gov

2023 BMW 7 Series going heavy on technology and output – Autoblog

The next-generation BMW 7 Series is expected to enter production later this year before rolling out to global markets around early 2023. Based on reports and spy shots, seems we can expect a lot more revolution than evolution from Munich's flagship luxury sedan. BMW Blog has run through the intel on the various powertrains to be offered, saying that the top slot among the ICE-powered trims will belong to the M750e xDrive PHEV. Tuned by the M division, its powertrain reportedly combines the B58 3.0-liter inline-six with an electric motor for roughly 560 total horsepower pushed to all four wheels. M will also tune the handling dynamics, and based on camouflaged prototypes, the bodywork will wear M cues including, perhaps, quad trapezoid taillpipes. A version that may be called the 745 xDrive will utilize the same powertrain without the M badging and finessing, likely coming in around 480 hp.

Sticking with the ICE half of the family, BMW Blog's sources allege the base model will be a 735i with about 270 horsepower, the only rear-driver among the range. Above that comes a gas-powered 740i xDrive with about 370 hp, both using the same B58 3.0-liter inline-six. BMW is said to be retiring the current N63 4.4-liter twin-turbo V8 for the S68 V8. In the new 750i, that V8 could produce around 535 horsepower, and will be even more powerful as a hybrid in the top trim of the XM crossover.

The i7 will be motivated by electrons only, and supposedly will count i740, i750, and i7 M60 trims ranging from 480 to around 650 horsepower.

Design-wise, the G70/G71 sedans are going to borrow tech and features from the spearheads in BMW's electrification push, the iX, i4, and XM. Outside, anticipate split headlights from the Concept XM flanking a large kidney grille with a new slat treatment and illumination options. On the sides, doors with flush handles will gain the pushbutton open and close functions most identified with Rolls-Royce, in back, the license plate holder will move from the trunk to the bumper for the first time in 7 Series history. Inside, there will be BMWs new infotainment system displayed on a huge, curved screen, Natural Interaction gesture control from the iX, the Motorway Assistant driving tech, and an even better Bowers & Wilkins sound system.

See original here:

2023 BMW 7 Series going heavy on technology and output - Autoblog