Origami millirobots bring health care closer to precision drug delivery – Nanowerk

Jun 15, 2022(Nanowerk News) If youve ever swallowed the same round tablet in hopes of curing everything from stomach cramps to headaches, you already know that medicines arent always designed to treat precise pain points.While over-the-counter pills have cured many ailments for decades, biomedical researchers have only recently begun exploring ways to improve targeted drug delivery when treating more complicated medical conditions, like cardiovascular disease or cancer.A promising innovation within this burgeoning area of biomedicine is the millirobot. These fingertip-sized robots are poised to become medicines future lifesavers to crawl, spin, and swim to enter narrow spaces on their mission to investigate inner workings or dispense medicines.Origami millirobot with spinning-enabled propulsion. (Image: Zhao Lab)Leading research in this field, Stanford University mechanical engineer Renee Zhaois working on many millirobot designs at once including a magnetic crawling robot, which was recently seen worming its way through a stomach on the cover of Science Advances. Powered by magnetic fields which allow for continuous motion and can be instantly applied to generate torque and change the way the robots move her robots can self-select different locomotive states and overcome obstacles in the body. Just by shifting the strength and orientation of the magnetic field, Zhaos team can send the robot sailing across the body at distances in a single leap that are 10 times the robots length.A key aspect of her research, the magnetic actuation also provides untethered control for non-invasive operation and separates the control unit from the device to allow for miniaturization. Zhao said their most recent robot, featured in Nature Communications ("Spinning-enabled wireless amphibious origami millirobot"), is the most robust and multifunctional untethered robot we have ever developed.This new spinning-enabled wireless amphibious origami millirobot is as multifunctional as its name implies. Its an elegantly conceived single unit thats able to speedily travel over an organs slick, uneven surfaces and swim through body fluids, propelling itself wirelessly while transporting liquid medicines. Unlike pills swallowed or liquids injected, this robot withholds medicine until it reaches the target, and then releases a high-concentration drug, said Zhao, who is an assistant professor of mechanical engineering. That is how our robot achieves targeted drug delivery.Reshaping drug deliveryWhats groundbreaking about this particular amphibious robot, according to Zhao, is that it goes beyond the designs of most origami-based robots, which only utilize origamis foldability to control how a robot morphs and moves.On top of looking at how folding could enable the robot to perform certain actions imagine an accordion fold that squeezes out medicine Zhaos team also considered how the dimensions of each folds exact shape influenced the robots rigid motion when it was not folded. As a result, the robots unfolded form inherently lends itself to propulsion through the environment. Such broad-minded considerations allowed the researchers to get more use out of the materials without adding bulk and in Zhaos world, the more functionality achieved from a single structure within the robots design, the less invasive the medical procedure is.Another unique aspect of the design of the robot is the combination of certain geometrical features. A longitudinal hole into the robots center and lateral slits angled up the sides reduced water resistance and helped the robot swim better. This design induces a negative pressure in the robot for fast swimming and meanwhile provides suction for cargo pickup and transportation, Zhao said. We take full advantage of the geometric features of this small robot and explore that single structure for different applications and for different functions.Based on conversations with Stanford Department of Medicine experts, the Zhao Lab is considering how to improve upon current treatments and procedures by building new technologies. If this work goes Zhaos way, her robots wont just provide a handy way to effectively dispense medicine but could also be used to carry instruments or cameras into the body, changing how doctors examine patients. The team is also working on using ultrasound imaging to track where robots go, eliminating any need to cut open organs.The smaller, simpler, the betterWhile we wont see millirobots like Zhaos in real health care settings until more is known about optimal design and imaging best practices, the labs first-of-its-kind swimmer highlighted in Nature Communications is among their robots that are furthest along. Its currently in the trial stages that come before any live animal testing that proceeds human clinical trials.In the meantime, Zhaos team continues combining a variety of novel smart materials and structures into unique designs that ultimately form new biomedical devices. She also plans to continue scaling down her robots to further biomedical research at the microscale.As an engineer, Zhao strives to develop the simplest structures with the most functionality. Her amphibious robot exemplifies that mission, as it inspired her team to more fully consider geometric features not yet commonly prioritized by other origami robot researchers. We started looking at how all these work in parallel, Zhao said. This is a very unique point of this work, and it also has broad potential application in the biomedical field.

Read the original here:
Origami millirobots bring health care closer to precision drug delivery - Nanowerk

New Amrita Hospital is all set to open in Faridabad in August this year; 2,400-bed facility will become Indias biggest private hospital – The…

Amrita Hospitals announced on Thursday that its new 2,400-bed campus will soon be open to the public in Faridabad in August this year. During the press conference on Thursday, hospital management announced that the new Amrita Hospital is spread across 133 acres of land in Faridabad and it will be the biggest private sector hospital in India.

This would be the second large-scale Amrita Hospital in India after the iconic 1,200-bed Amrita Hospital in Kochi, Kerala, which was established 25 years ago by the Mata Amritanandamayi Math.

The new hospital is located at Sector 88, Faridabad and it will have a total built-up area of 1 crore sq. ft., including a 14-floor-high tower that will encompass the key medical facilities and patient areas. During the press conference, Swami Nijamritananda Puri, Head, Mata Amritanandamayi Math, Delhi announced that the 81 specialties at the hospital will include eight centers of excellence, such as oncology, cardiac sciences, neurosciences, gastro-sciences, renal sciences, bone diseases and trauma, transplants, and mother and child.

The hospital will become operational in stages, with 500 beds opening in August this year. In two years, this number will rise to 750 beds, and further to 1,000 beds in five years. When fully operational, the hospital will have a staff of 10,000 people, including over 800 doctors.

On how the new hospital has incorporated the aspects of pandemic-induced demands, Dr. Sanjeev K Singh, Medical Director, Amrita Hospital, Faridabad told Financial Express.com: We have learned a lot from the pandemic. The construction of the hospital began 5-6 years ago and the learnings from the pandemic also got incorporated along the way. For example, any patient who comes in an emergency gets facilitated in a 40-bed setup. In that set-up, we have a decontaminated area in which anyone who needs to shower will be sent there. We have four negative pressure rooms and if we have any suspected cases of covid or covid-like diseases we can send them to concerned specialists. The mechanism of shifting is also planned and implemented. In all critical care units, there are positive pressure isolation rooms.

The massive facility will also include 534 critical care beds which is the highest in India, the hospital management claims. The hospital campus will also include 64 modular operation theaters, most advanced imaging services, fully automated robotic laboratory, high-precision radiation oncology, most updated nuclear medicine, and state-of-the-art 9 cardiac and interventional cath lab for clinical services. Cutting-edge medical research will be a strong thrust area, with a dedicated research block spread across a 7-floor building totaling 3 lakh sq. ft with exclusive Grade A to D GMP lab with focus on identifying newer diagnostic markers, AI, ML, Bioinformatics etc.

Dr. Singh also told Financial Express.com that they want to integrate all aspects of medical science and bridge the gap between clinicians and scientists.

In Kochi, we have established tissue engineering, a nano-medicine-based cardiac stent, bone growth, and lots more. What we are looking at Faridabad campus is developing something new in stem-cell therapies. We want to create techniques like creating human cells on our own in our GMP labs as generally, we rely on international counterparts for such procedures. Recently, we conducted research in which we found that we can use patient pluripetin stem cells in tumours and it will destroy them. For us, oncology is the big thrust area but other areas will be a focus too. The intent of our research facility will be to make the high-end expensive equipment and treatments cost-effective for the common man. We want to integrate medicine, engineering, biotechnology, and other segments altogether, Dr. Singh told Financial Express.com.

Dr. Singh also said that they have already been awarded the Advanced ICMR Clinical Trial Unit and this will enable them to conduct their trials in the new facility.

Mata Amritanandamayi has allocated a certain amount of seed money to initiate research. On the basis of submitted proposals, things will materialise and start, he added.

Dr. Singh also told Financial Express.com that the new hospital will also be empaneled. There is a process of 3-6 months and then after medical facilities will be available under all panels like ECHS, CGHS and other TPAs, he added.

During the press conference, Dr Singh also informed that the hospital will be among the very few facilities in the country to conduct hand transplants, a specialty pioneered by Amrita Hospital in Kochi. We will also do transplants of liver, kidney, trachea, vocal cords, intestine, heart, lung, pancreas, skin, bone, face and bone marrow, he said.

Training of medical students and doctors will be a strong focus area. The hospital will have state-of-the-art robotics, haptic, surgical-medical simulation centre spread across 4 floors and 1.5 lakh sq. ft area, the biggest such learning & development facility for doctors in the country. The facility will also host a medical college and the countrys biggest allied health sciences campus, he stated.

Moreover, the management also informed that ultra-modern Amrita Hospital at Faridabad would be one of Indias largest green-building healthcare projects with a low carbon footprint. It is an end-to-end paperless facility, with zero waste discharge.

There is also a helipad on the campus for swift transport of patients and a 498-room guest house where attendants accompanying the patients can stay, they said.

Read the rest here:
New Amrita Hospital is all set to open in Faridabad in August this year; 2,400-bed facility will become Indias biggest private hospital - The...

India’s GM Crops Regulation Should Be Based on a Gene’s Effects, Not Its Source The Wire Science – The Wire Science

Representative photos of cotton and brinjal: Wikimedia Commons, CC BY

India has a long and dubious record of regulating genetically altered crops for agriculture. While the nation began at the same time as many other countries with the same ambitious goals to deploy new genetic engineering tools to address agricultural vulnerabilities it has fallen behind. Only one crop, modified with molecular techniques pest-resistant cotton has been approved by regulators.

In an attempt to expand farmers access to genetically engineered crops, in March of this year, the Indian government exempted crops with certain kinds of genetic modifications introduced by genome editing (also known as gene editing) from the cumbersome and time-consuming regulations previously imposed on the commercialisation of all crops genetically modified with molecular techniques.

Specifically (and as explained in more detail below), the new policy exempts crops with simple tweaks to genes that are already natural to the plant but that have not had any foreign DNA added. This approach may be expedient but it is not scientifically sound.

Bt cotton and Bt brinjal

Genetically modified cotton came first to India because of its economic importance and environmental externalities. Specifically, Bt cotton was the first product in the country modified with modern molecular genetic techniques. However, it sparked fierce political debate instigated by internationally visible but misguided activists.

Bt is shorthand for Bacillus thuringiensis, a bacterium found mainly in the soil that produces proteins toxic to some insects, especially the cotton bollworm. The genes that express these proteins were introduced by recombinant DNA technology a.k.a. gene splicing into the genome of various crop plants to protect them from pests.

Bt cotton soon became ensnared in spurious societal battles around neo-colonialism, the purported evils of Monsanto, organic agriculture and farmers suicides. It was officially regulated and socially stigmatised as a GMO, short for genetically modified organism. After 10 years, it remains Indias only approved genetically engineered crop.

The Indian versions of insect-resistant Bt-cotton proved highly successful in controlling the bollworm that had ravaged cotton crops. They contained only one transgene, or a gene introduced from an unrelated organism, for one trait and for only a single species of bollworm. Yet, because of the presence of this single newly introduced gene, this first successful application of molecular genetic engineering in Indian agriculture was subjected to a long and costly development process.

Herbicide tolerance as a weed-control trait also proved popular, although it was never approved and therefore its cultivation was, and is, illegal.

At the same time, farmers demand in underground markets moved the transgenic frontier forward in a poorly regulated and awkward way. Farmers vote with their ploughs, and many officials lack the knowledge and/or the incentives to contest illegal plantings.

Also read: Does India Need Transgenic Mustard?

The biggest flaw in Indias cumbersome and poorly understood regulatory system emerged vividly with the introduction of a second genetically engineered crop candidate: Bt brinjal1, a staple of some of the worlds poorest rural populations.

Brinjal in India is attacked by a boring insect larva (Leucinodes orbonalis) that is susceptible to the same protein as the cotton bollworm. But as with cotton, there is no naturally occurring gene in the brinjal family tree that conventional breeding could utilise. This is why researchers introduced the Bt gene into a brinjal variety, thus rendering it a transgenic organism.

Brinjal is not extensively traded internationally but is very important for small farmers income and both local and national consumption. There is also no environmentally acceptable, effective alternative for farmers to use as insecticides against brinjal pests.

Field trials of the transgenic brinjal cultivars were extremely promising, even compared to the successes of Bt cotton. The fact that the transgene and the cultivars were both indigenous also suggested that the variety would be nationally acceptable in a way that Bt cotton couldnt be.

The Genetic Engineering Approval Committee of India approved Bt brinjal but it was vetoed in 2010 by the then-environment-minister, Jairam Ramesh. It has since been stuck in regulatory limbo in India. During this time, India donated the genetic event EE12 to Bangladesh and the Philippines.

After EE1 was introduced into Bangladeshi varieties of eggplant and tested, the government approved them and they have been extremely successful. Interestingly, some of the altered brinjal has spread to India, and is found growing happily in India but on an unknown scale and unapproved by bureaucrats.

Regulatory discrimination

Both Bt cotton and Bt brinjal in India tell the same story: that advances for farmers unavailable through conventional, pre-molecular plant-breeding techniques have proved useful not panaceas but incrementally beneficial, trait by trait, with more in the pipeline. However, the regulatory system is slow, unscientific, inconsistent and obstructionist. Its concerns often reflect more urban politics and the blandishments of activists than farmers interests.

Nonetheless, there is hope that the most recent advances in the seamless continuum of genetic modification of plants represented by genome editing will fare better. These techniques allow genetic material to be added, removed or altered at specific locations in the genome.

The best known of these techniques is CRISPR-Cas9. This system is faster, cheaper, more precise and more efficient than earlier genome editing methods. It is also more democratic, by being less dependent on the political heft and huge resources of the multinational plant science corporations. Innovation is thus often centred in universities and individual research teams.

This said, if genome editing is to live up its potential, its regulation will need to be scientifically defensible and risk-based.

This is why the UK has reconsidered its highly prohibitive stance on molecular genetic engineering. Even the generally anti-genetic engineering EU is discussing a revised legal framework that incorporates genome editing. Consistent with this global trend, in March 2022, India announced that it would exempt certain categories of genome-edited crops from regulatory oversight.

As part of this, it has categorised genome-edited alterations as SDN-1, SDN-2 and SDN-3 (SDN stands for site-directed nuclease3). Variants made using SDN-1 and SDN-2 involve simply tweaking particular traits that already exist in a genome whereas SDN-3 involves the insertion of genes from external, or foreign, sources. So making brinjal resistant to insect predators by introducing genes from B. thuringiensis would put it in the SDN-3 category.

India has announced that SDN-1 and SDN-2 will be regulated as non-genetically engineered organisms, as there are no distinguishable sequence changes made between them and those resulting from conventional crop breeding. SDN-3, however, which involves the incorporation of a foreign DNA sequence, will continue to be heavily regulated.

This approach to regulation is unscientific and short-sighted. It has no demonstrated connection to enhanced risk. Instead, the SDN categories are based simply on considerations of how close to nature the new constructions are. Bt cotton, which was introduced to India over 20 years ago and has transformed Indias economy, will be classified as an SDN-3 crop as will Bt brinjal. So as such, the latter looks set to remain stuck in the regulatory quagmire it has been in since the beginning of its development.

There is no scientific rationale for a regulatory policy that distinguishes SDN-3 crops from SDN-1 and -2 crops. The difference between these categories is determined by the presence or absence of a foreign
gene, but the term foreign has many connotations, none of which is meaningful for regulation in the current context.

Through advances in genome sequencing, we now know that foreign genes i.e. genes that originated in an unrelated organism are present in many crop plants. They may be thought of as natural GMOs. From sweet potato to several species of grass, genes from unrelated organisms have found their way into the most unexpected places.

Also read: The Strange Case of Indias First Public-Sector Bt Cotton Variety

Failed tests

What matters from a risk and therefore regulatory perspective is not the source of a gene but its function and its effect on phenotype4. A construct that results from the addition of a foreign gene via molecular techniques should not be held to a different standard or subjected to a more stringent regulatory regime unless the modification could in some way increase risk.

Baseless regulatory discrimination against transgenic i.e. SDN-3 crops means that some new varieties that could drastically improve the fortunes of resource-poor people and environmentally vulnerable places will, for practical purposes, remain proscribed and unavailable except through the stealth practices of farmers.

The regulatory policies of the governments of India, the EU and many other countries fail this test of scientific logic. The regulation of molecular genetic engineering has been based more on political considerations than on sound science, and as such cripples progress.

Flawed regulation is not the only problem related to genetically engineered crops in India. Another is the chronic lack of transparency about agricultural technology generally and genetic engineering in particular. Data that supports government policies and specific regulatory decisions have been consistently and conspicuously lacking from government sources. That stokes public suspicion about incompetence or even corruption.

That is unfortunate and puzzling, because there is plenty of evidence they could cite. We have more than 20 years of data on commercialised genetically engineered crops worldwide. It is very clear that they are as safe as, or in some cases safer than, crops from other breeding methods. Put another way, there is no evidence that the use of molecular genetic engineering techniques confers unique or incremental risks.

The European Academies Science Advisory Council said in 2013, There is no valid evidence that [genetically engineered] crops have greater adverse impact on health and the environment than any other technology used in plant breeding. Even the WHO a component of the notoriously risk-averse UN agrees: it said in a 2014 report that

[genetically engineered] foods currently available on the international market have passed safety assessments and are not likely to present risks for human health. In addition, no effects on human health have been shown as a result of the consumption of such foods by the general population in the countries where they have been approved.

Literally hundreds of other analyses by governmental and professional groups have echoed these findings.

Genome editing is both a continuation of plant modifications humans have depended on for millennia and a promising new frontier. Nevertheless, striking a balance between too little and much caution is not difficult, given the great precision and predictability of newer molecular techniques. Science shows the way, and politicians and regulators everywhere should follow it.

Henry I. Miller is a physician and molecular biologist and a senior fellow at the Pacific Research Institute. He was the founding director of the FDAs Office of Biotechnology and a consulting professor at Stanford Universitys Institute for International Studies. Kathleen L. Hefferon teaches microbiology at Cornell University. Ronald Herring is emeritus professor of government and International Professor of agriculture and rural development at Cornell University.

Continue reading here:
India's GM Crops Regulation Should Be Based on a Gene's Effects, Not Its Source The Wire Science - The Wire Science

Should University Agricultural Research Scientists Partner With Industry? – Genetic Literacy Project

Paul Vincelli, extension professor and Provosts Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Kentucky| March 7, 2017

HIGHLIGHTS:

Biases, conflicts of interest come from many sources, including associations with industry, advocacy groups, other non-profits Industry funding of studies on GE crops does not appear to be important bias source Personal experience suggests corporations receptive to negative results, as they improve products, limit liability Limited resources for much agricultural research without industry support Dubious shill accusations against biotech scientists discourage public engagement, depress discourse

Agricultural scientists who interact with the public often feel under enormous scrutiny. One of the most common concerns is that professional ties with industryespecially obtaining funding from industrycompromise scientific credibility. This concern is particularly acute in the area of genetically engineered crops (GE crops, commonly known as GMOs).

Research into genetically engineered crops is not my specialtymy work is focused on plant pathologyand I have never solicited nor received private-sector funding on this issue. Over my career, my industry interactions have dealt with non-GMO products for plant disease control. My interest in GE crops arises from their potential to address genuine human needs and to reduce the environmental footprint of agriculture. And I am concerned that a dark shadow has been cast over many independent scientists because of their collaborative efforts with various stakeholders, including companies.

Biases From Many Sources

Across multiple disciplines, industry-funded projects may be more likely to report positive outcomes, or less likely to report negative outcomes [1-4]. However, industry funding is not always associated with biased outcomes [5, 6]. Furthermore, many sources of funding NGOs, non-profits, other civil and governmental organizationsmay engender conflicts of interest (COIs) and biases that influence reported research. Powerful biases may arise for non-monetary reasons [7] in both researchers and in non-researcherspossibly including you and me.

Regarding GE crops, I am aware of three journal articles on the topic of industry funding and bias. In the first [8], the authors found no evidence of bias due to financial COIs (studies sponsored by an industry source that may benefit from the outcome), but they did document bias associated with professional COIs (where at least one author was affiliated with a company that could benefit from the study outcome). In that study, among the 70 studies examined (see their Table 2), 61% had either a financial or a professional COI. Among the much larger sample size (698 studies) examined by Sanchez [9], the majority had no COI, and only one quarter had COIs related to author affiliation and/or declared funding source.

A recent study by Guillemaud et al [10] had similar findings: among 579 studies with definitive COI information (see their Figure 3), the majority did not report a COI. However, among those with COIs, there was a higher probability of reported outcomes favorable to the GE crop industry. In addition to these journal articles, another independent analysis [11] suggested that industry funding did not bias study outcomes for GE crops, but these data have not been analyzed statistically nor published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Thus, while evidence to date shows that the majority of studies on GE crops are not influenced by COIs, some fraction is so influenced. Therefore, there is value in remaining alert to the possibility of bias and in continuing to practice full disclosure. I believe it is important to remain alert to COIs and biases of all sortsnot only those associated with corporate influences, but also those of NGOs or other civil organizations that may have explicit or implicit agendas.

Some people simply do not trust corporations. This is understandable, given the indefensible behavior of some in business, such as the tobacco industry, the chemical industry, Exxon, and Volkswagen [12-15]. Consequently, some members of the public perfunctorily dismiss commercial-sector scientists who may have solid scientific skills and high personal integrity. I personally must admit to a measure of distrust of corporations, which may even express itself occasionally as an anti-industry bias. But I also believe it is unwise to categorically reject all industry-funded data, solely on the basis of their provenance. In fact, I would label such an attitude a bias itself. Thoughtful, evidence-based analysis must always trump bias and ideologyand does, for a good scientist.

Why do researchers accept industry funding? Public-sector and private-sector scientists may share common interests. Industry scientists and I share a common interest in knowing what works in the field and what doesnt. Consequently, industry sources provide funding for field tests of their products for plant disease control. Furthermore, public funding for science in the USA is insufficient to support even a fraction of the worthy research projects. Inadequate funding can quickly and thoroughly undercut a career in science at any stage. Since researchers are hired to do research on important topics and not to whine about the difficult state of public funding, some will welcome funding from commercial sources, if it allows them to continue to do research they believe is intellectually compelling, important to society, or both. Also, industry scientists may have knowledge, skills, and facilities that we public scientists may not.

My Funding Choices: Scientific Rigor Coupled With Personal Integrity

Discussing my own practices should provide an idea of how many scientists work. Roughly half of my funding over the years has been from industry, primarily to support product testing for plant disease control. I have commonly tested synthetic fungicides, but I have also tested natural products of various sorts. In fact, commercial pesticide manufacturers can fairly accuse me of an anti-pesticide bias. I say this because I have tended to favor testing products that might be perceived as more consistent with sustainability (biocontrol products, for example) than applications of synthetic chemicals, often requesting limited, or no, funding for such tests. Besides industry funding, I have received federal funds for research and outreach on detection and management of plant diseases.

I publish all efficacy trials in Plant Disease Management Reports. We commonly publish data showing inadequate efficacy or phytotoxicity, and I never consider funding sources when the report is drafted. In fact, the reports are drafted by the Senior Research Analyst who conducts the field work, and he doesnt know who provided funding nor for what amount. Thus, our testing program does not suffer from publication bias. This approach is not exceptional [16, 17].

I accept no personal giftsmonetary or materialfrom private-sector sources.

I have no hesitation about challenging multinational corporations. For example, I provided a degree of national leadership in challenging a major pesticide manufacturer over certain uses of a commercial crop fungicide. I was one of the lead authors of a letter to the US Environmental Protection Agency raising questions about the paucity of public data to support plant health claims. I gave a similar talk in a major scientific conference, the 2009 American Phytopathological Society meeting.

Several factors may help me and other scientists to offset natural human tendencies towards bias:

A common concern is that providing funding buys access to researchers. This may sometimes be the case, but for me, this criticism doesnt fit. I am an Extension Specialist everybody has access to me and my expertise. I dont recall a single instance in my entire career when I failed to return a phone call or email from anyone. In fact, it is a federal requirement that Extension programming be grounded in engagement with diverse stake- holdersincluding,
but certainly not limited to, industry [18].

What Happens When Data Fall Short Of Company Expectations?

We regularly see poor product performance in our experiments. In a memorable instance, we observed visible injury to a creeping bentgrass putting green from a particular formulation of the widely used fungicide, chlorothalonil. On the day of application, the turfgrass was suffering exceptionally severe drought stress, due to an irrigation equipment failure, which probably was a predisposing factor.

I notified the company of my observations, which is my standard practice if a product provides unexpectedly poor performance or unexpected phytotoxicity. This is not to provide the company the opportunity to help me see the error of my ways. Rather, this is simply good scientific practice. I want industry scientists to collect their own samples, so that they may better understand the poor results obtained; and to offer hypotheses or insights that may account for the unexpected results, as they often know things about their product and its performance that I do not.

In the case of the turfgrass injury caused by chlorothalonil, a company representative and I visited the experiment together and shared observations. I listened to the representatives hypotheses and shared my own. After the meeting and additional lab work, I reported my findings in various outlets. In my research program, unfavorable results get reported no differently than favorable results.

I must state emphatically that, in my 34 years of product testing for plant disease control, I cannot recall a single instance where a company representative attempted to pressure me to report favorable results. Company representatives do not like to receive bad news, but in my experience, almost every company representative I have interacted with has been professional enough to recognize the importance of discovering the limitations of their products sooner rather than later. The consequences of introducing an inadequate product can be catastrophic for a corporation.

Corporate Funding for Outreach

What about private-sector funding for outreach? To my knowledge, such funds are never provided with a quid pro quo that the scientist will make particular claims about a companys products. To the contrary, private-sector representatives take note of speakers whose scientific understanding is consistent with their own. They may approach those speakers to discuss possible support for outreach, but without specifying the content of such presentations. Although I refuse industry funding for all aspects of GE crops, I do not suspect undue industry influence when funds are provided for travel expenses or supplies of invited speakers. Even honoraria or stipends for speaking engagements dont particularly concern me. This is true for such funding across the full spectrum of possible funding sources, ranging from advocacy groups for organic agriculture to multinational pesticide manufacturers. I want to see the scientific methods and data, no matter who did the study.

Who Should Pay For Research?

Should publicly funded professors even do product testing? Yes: there is a public interest in independent assessments of how products perform. The more public data on performance, the better.

If you agree that third-party testing is desirable, the question arises, Who pays for it? I believe that, usually, the manufacturer is responsible, not the taxpayer. Of course, this raises concern about funding bias. If a researcher wishes to avoid funding bias, can they tap into other sources? Not in my discipline. Pools of public funding for product testing are essentially non-existent.

What about studies of possible impacts of products to the environment? Who should pay for that? Again, in my opinion, such costs fall to the manufacturer, although in some cases, there is a compelling public interest that justifies the use of public funds for product testing.

Final thoughts: Does industry-researcher cooperation undermine the credibility of scientific research?

For me, the answer is, No. We should be cognizant of possible biases and COIs due to source of fundingwhether the source is industry, NGOs, advocacy organizations, or other sources. Disclosure is critical [7, 19]. However, industry scientists are often excellent scientists who take pride in their work, no differently than any industry critic. Yes, we should exercise a degree of caution when reviewing industry-funded research, but the same holds for research funded by advocacy organizations, since each has an agenda. Personally, in all cases, I will not reject either source out of hand; I will judge the work based on its scientific merit.

Sometimes the bias against industry-funded research on GE becomes hurtful, especially in the social media. Witnessing dedicated public servants being unfairly attacked as industry shills is demoralizing to public scientists, and it has the unintended consequence of discouraging public engagement by scientists who already have very busy professional and personal lives. Such unfounded charges are not only divisive and unproductive: they are unkind and can be abusive. (Sadly, unkind behavior can be found in all sides of the GMO debate.)

My freedom from industry funding on all aspects of GE protects me from similar accusations. Yet it doesnt surprise good scientists that, after years of studying the scientific literature, I independently arrived at an understanding very similar to that presented in the re- port of the National Academy of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM) published earlier this year [20]. This isnt because industry has somehow influenced me or the members of the NASEM review committee. It is because there is a substantial body of credible science supporting the conclusions presented in the NASEM report. In reviewing the body of peer-reviewed scientific literature on GE crops, one is likely to arrive at similar conclusions. I had an identical experience with the scientific consensus on climate change [21].

Ultimately, with enough careful study of evidence from credible sources, fidelity to good scientific practice, and a degree of humility, it is hard not to arrive at findings rather similar to those of journal-published experts of a scientific discipline. They actually do know something about their subject after all.

Paul Vincelli is an Extension Professor and Provosts Distinguished Service Professor at the University of Kentucky. Over the 26 at UK, he has developed specializations in management of diseases of corn, forages, and turfgrasses, molecular diagnostics, and international agriculture. He also has provided Extension programming on climate change and on genetic engineering of crops. He currently is UKs Coordinator for the USDAs Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education program, and he serves as Councilor-At-Large for the American Phytopathological Society.

The Genetic Literacy Project is a 501(c)(3) non profit dedicated to helping the public, journalists, policy makers and scientists better communicate the advances and ethical and technological challenges ushered in by the biotechnology and genetics revolution, addressing both human genetics and food and farming. We are one of two websites overseen by the Science Literacy Project; our sister site, the Epigenetics Literacy Project, addresses the challenges surrounding emerging data-rich technologies.

Acknowledgements

Thanks are expressed to John R. Hartman and Jon Entine, for reviewing earlier drafts of the manuscript.

Disclosure Statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest in the topic of GE crops. Detailed disclosure documents may be found here. The author donated the full amount of his monetary honorarium for writing this article to Human Rights Watch.

Literature Cited

1. Bes-Rastrollo, M., Schulze, M. B., Ruiz-Canela, M. and Martinez-Gonzalez, M. A., Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: A systematic review o
f systematic reviews. PLoS Medicine, 2013, Vol. 10, p. e1001578, DOI: 10.1371/ journal.pmed.1001578. Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001578

2. Lesser, L. I., Ebbeling, C. B., Goozner, M., Wypij, D. and Ludwig, D. S., Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS Medicine, 2007, Vol. 4, p. e5, DOI: 10.1371/journal. pmed.0040005. Available from: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0040005

3. Vera-Badillo, F. E., Shapiro, R., Ocana, A., Amir, E. and Tannock, I. F., Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer. Ann Oncol, 2013, Vol. 24, p. 1238-44, DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds636. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23303339

4. Landefeld, C. S., Commercial support and bias in pharmaceutical research. Am J Med, 2004, Vol. 117, p. 876-8, DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.10.001. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15589496

5. Barden, J., Derry, S., McQuay, H. J. and Moore, R. A., Bias from industry trial funding? A framework, a suggested approach, and a negative result. Pain, 2006, Vol. 121, p. 207-18, DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.12.011. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16495012

6. Kaplan, R. M. and Irvin, V. L., Likelihood of null effects of large NHLBI clinical trials has increased over time. PLoS One, 2015, Vol. 10, p. e0132382, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132382. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26244868

7. Young, S. N., Bias in the research literature and conflict of interest: an issue for publishers, editors, reviewers and authors, and it is not just about the money. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience, 2009, Vol. 34, p. 412-417. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2783432/

8. Diels, J., Cunha, M., Manaia, C., Sabugosa-Madeira, B. and Silva, M., Association of financial or professional conflict of interest to research outcomes on health risks or nutritional assessment studies of genetically modified products. Food Policy, 2011, Vol. 36, p. 197-203, DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.11.016. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919210001302

9. Sanchez, M. A., Conflict of interests and evidence base for GM crops food/feed safety research. Nat Biotechnol, 2015, Vol. 33, p. 135-7, DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3133. Available from:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25658276

10. Guillemaud, T., Lombaert, E. and Bourguet, D., Conflicts of interest in GM Bt crop efficacy and durability studies. PLoS One, 2016, Vol. 11, p. e0167777, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167777. Available from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27977705

11. Brazeau, M., GM Food is Safe According to Independent Studies, in Cosmos. 2014. Available from: https://cosmosmagazine.com/biology/gm-food-safe-according-independent-studies.

12. Gates, G., Ewing, J., Russell, K. and Watkins, D. Explaining Volkswagens Emissions Scandal. New York Times. 19 Jul 2016. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/business/international/vw-diesel-emissions-scandal-explained.html.

13. Markowitz, G. and Rosner, D., Deceit and Denial: The Deadly Politics of Industrial Pollution, With a New Epilogue. 2013, California/Milbank Books on Health and the Public. 446 pp. pp, ISBN 9780520275829.

14. Ingram, D. Judge Orders Tobacco Companies to Admit Deception. Reuters News Agency. 27 Nov 2012. Available from: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-tobacco-idUSBRE8AQ18A20121128.

15. Banerjee, N., Lisa Song, L. and Hasemyer, D., Exxons Own Research Confirmed Fossil Fuels Role in Global Warming Decades Ago. 2015 16 Sep 2015 [Accessed 18 Aug 2016]; Available from: https://insideclimatenews.org/content/Exxon-The-Road-Not-Taken.

16. Lipsky, P. E., Bias, conflict of interest and publishing. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 2009, Vol. 5, p. 175-176, DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2009.52. Available from: http://www.nature.com/nrrheum/journal/v5/n4/full/nrrheum.2009.52.html

17. Kniss, A., I Am Biased and So Are You: Thoughts on Funding and Influence in Science. 2016 [Accessed 18 Aug 2016]; Available from: http://weedcontrolfreaks.com/2015/08/i-am-biased-and-so-are-you-thoughts-on-funding-and-influence-in-science/.

18. Kelsey, K. D. and Mariger, S. C., A case study of stakeholder needs for Extension education Journal of Extension, 2002, Vol. 40, 2RIB2. Available from: http://www.joe.org/joe/2002april/rb2.php

19. Lewandowsky, S. and Bishop, D., Dont let transparency damage science. Nature, 2016, Vol. 529, p. 459-461. Available from: http://www.nature.com/news/research-integrity-don-t-let-transparency-damage-science-1.19219

20. National Academies Press. Genetically Engineered Crops: Experiences and Prospects. 2016, ISBN 978-0-309-43738-7. Washington DC. 420 pp. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/23395Accessed18May2016.

21. Vincelli, P., Scientific consensus as a foundation for Extension programming. Journal of Extension, 2015, Vol. 53, 1COM2. Available from: http://www.joe.org/joe/2015february/comm2.php

The rest is here:
Should University Agricultural Research Scientists Partner With Industry? - Genetic Literacy Project

Tenaya Therapeutics Launches Operations of New Genetic Medicines Manufacturing Center to Support the Development of Potentially First-In-Class…

Facility to Provide Clinical Supply of Lead Gene Therapy Programs TN-201 and TN-401 for Planned First-in-Human Studies

94,000 sq. ft. Modular Facility has Initial Production Capacity at the 1000L Scale

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, Calif., June 16, 2022--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Tenaya Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: TNYA), a biotechnology company with a mission to discover, develop and deliver curative therapies that address the underlying causes of heart disease, today announced that it has completed the build-out and operational launch of its Genetic Medicines Manufacturing Center in Union City, California. Tenaya is advancing a pipeline of therapeutic candidates, including several adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene therapies, for the potential treatment of both rare and prevalent forms of heart disease.

This press release features multimedia. View the full release here: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220616005336/en/

Tenayas Genetic Medicines Manufacturing Center located in Union City, CA (Photo: Business Wire)

"Tenaya made an early, strategic commitment to internalize several core capabilities to optimize the safety, efficacy, and supply of our product candidates on behalf of patients. With todays announcement we have made a big leap forward on that commitment by establishing end-to-end in-house manufacturing capabilities for our pipeline of AAV-based gene therapies," said Faraz Ali, Chief Executive Officer of Tenaya. "The operational launch of Tenayas Genetic Medicines Manufacturing Center represents an important milestone as we prepare to advance our robust pipeline of potentially first-in-class cardiovascular therapies into initial clinical studies."

Tenayas Genetic Medicines Manufacturing Center is designed to meet regulatory requirements for production of AAV gene therapies from discovery through commercialization under Current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) standards. Initial production efforts will support first-in-human studies of Tenayas lead gene therapy, TN-201. TN-201 is being developed for the treatment of genetic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) due to MYBPC3 gene mutations. Tenaya plans to submit an Investigational New Drug (IND) application for TN-201 to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the second half of this year. The facility will also support cGMP production for TN-401, Tenayas gene therapy program being developed for the treatment of genetic arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) due to PKP2 gene mutations, for which the company plans to submit an IND to the FDA in 2023.

Story continues

"The investment in our own world-class manufacturing facility provides Tenaya with greater control over product attributes, quality, production timelines and costs, which we believe will ultimately translate into better treatments for patients," said Kee-Hong Kim, Ph.D., Chief Technology Officer of Tenaya Therapeutics. "Tenayas Genetic Medicines Manufacturing Center complements our established internal genetic engineering and drug discovery capabilities and is designed to meet our near- and long-term needs such that we can readily scale and expand as our pipeline matures and evolves."

Tenaya completed customization of approximately half of the 94,000 square foot facility to incorporate manufacturing suites and labs, office space and storage. Utilizing a modular design, the state-of-the-art facility is now fully operational with initial capacity to produce AAV-based gene therapies at the 1000L scale, utilizing Tenayas proprietary baculovirus-based production platform and suspension Sf9 cell culture system. The excess space and modular design of the Genetic Medicines Manufacturing Center is intended to provide Tenaya with considerable flexibility to expand manufacturing capacity by increasing both the number and the scale of bioreactors to meet future clinical and commercial production needs.

The Union City location, approximately 30 miles from Tenayas South San Francisco headquarters, is expected to enable the seamless transition of Tenayas science from early research through commercial manufacturing. The selection of this location is intended to foster a culture of close collaboration across teams at all stages of developing and testing novel AAV capsids, de-risk the translation from research to process development and create opportunities for improvements in production processes. The Genetic Medicines Manufacturing Center is staffed by a growing in-house team with expertise in all aspects of gene therapy manufacture, including process development, analytical development, quality assurance and quality control.

About Tenaya Therapeutics

Tenaya Therapeutics is a biotechnology company committed to a bold mission: to discover, develop and deliver curative therapies that address the underlying drivers of heart disease. Founded by leading cardiovascular scientists from Gladstone Institutes and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Tenaya is developing therapies for rare genetic cardiovascular disorders, as well as for more prevalent heart conditions, through three distinct but interrelated product platforms: Gene Therapy, Cellular Regeneration and Precision Medicine. For more information, visit http://www.tenayatherapeutics.com.

Forward Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements in this press release that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements. Words such as "potential," "will," "plans," "believe," "expected," and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding the therapeutic potential of Tenayas pipeline of therapeutic candidates; Tenayas plan to use the cGMP manufacturing facility for the production of TN-201 and TN-401; Tenayas belief that its cGMP manufacturing facility will enable seamless transition from early research through commercial manufacturing and translate into better treatments for patients; the expected timing for submission of IND applications for TN-201 and TN-401; and statements by Tenayas chief executive officer and chief technology officer. The forward-looking statements contained herein are based upon Tenayas current expectations and involve assumptions that may never materialize or may prove to be incorrect. These forward-looking statements are neither promises nor guarantees and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to: risks associated with the process of discovering, developing and commercializing drugs that are safe and effective for use as human therapeutics and operating as an early stage company; Tenayas ability to successfully manufacture product candidates in a timely and sufficient manner that is compliant with regulatory requirements; Tenayas ability to develop, initiate or complete preclinical studies and clinical trials, and obtain approvals, for any of its product candidates; the timing, progress and results of preclinical studies for TN-201, TN-401 and Tenayas other programs; Tenayas ability to raise any additional funding it will need to continue to pursue its business and product development plans; negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on Tenayas manufacturing and operations, including preclinical studies and planned clinical trials; the timing, scope and likelihood of regulatory filings and approvals; the potential for any clinical trial results to differ from preclinical, interim, preliminary, topline or expected results; Tenayas manufacturing, commercialization and marketing capabilities and strategy; the loss of key scientific or management personnel; competition in the industry in which Tenaya operates; Tenayas reliance on third parties; Tenayas ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for its product candidates; general economic and market conditions; and other risks. Information regardi
ng the foregoing and additional risks may be found in the section entitled "Risk Factors" in documents that Tenaya files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this press release, and Tenaya assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

View source version on businesswire.com: https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20220616005336/en/

Contacts

Investors Michelle CorralVice President, Investor Relationship and Corporate CommunicationsTenaya TherapeuticsIR@tenayathera.com

Media Wendy RyanTen Bridge CommunicationsWendy@tenbridgecommunications.com

Read more here:
Tenaya Therapeutics Launches Operations of New Genetic Medicines Manufacturing Center to Support the Development of Potentially First-In-Class...

Why a $30 million CryptoPunks auction fell apart at the last minute – The Verge

In the Sothebys salesroom one evening in late February, fluorescent lights beamed down on the assembled crowd. A sea of spectators is not unusual for Sothebys the 278-year-old auction house typically hosts more than 600 sales per year but this sale was different. It was the auction houses first-ever evening sale dedicated solely to NFTs.

Sothebys described the event, titled Punk it!, as a truly historic sale for an undeniably historic NFT project. It consisted of a single lot 104 CryptoPunks sold as an all-or-nothing bundle. Sothebys estimated the bundle would go for $2030 million, on par with sales of paintings by David Hockney or Jean-Michel Basquiat.

To drum up interest, the auction house had thrown a series of events aimed at attracting prospective punk-buyers. There was a pre-auction dinner for VIP Punk holders and an afterparty with DJ Seedphrase, known for the enormous CryptoPunk headpiece he wears while playing sets. The campaign worked: the crowd on the day of the auction included Nicole Muniz, the CEO of Yuga Labs, as well as NFT influencer Andrew Wang and Nifty Gateway co-founders Duncan and Griffin Cock Foster.

Eli Tan, a writer at crypto news outlet CoinDesk, remembers a party atmosphere. The actual sale seemed like kind of a secondary thing, he explains.

Then, things got weird. The indicated start time of the sale, 7PM, came and went. Five minutes passed, then 20. Finally, a voice on the intercom announced that the lot had been withdrawn. Gasps could be heard in the salesroom. After weeks of preparation, the sale was canceled and no one was sure why.

Sothebys says the lot was pulled after discussions with the seller, but theres been little other explanation including whether the decision came from the auction house or the seller. Artnet reported that Sothebys pulled the lot due to lack of interest, while the seller tweeted simply that they had decided to hodl.

Its not uncommon for lots to be pulled ahead of sales, although its typically the result of legal concerns or fear of a flop, as The New York Times noted after the failed auction. But for anyone dealing with auction houses or NFTs, it was hard not to speculate on the mysterious no-show. Kenny Schachter, art world provocateur and NFT collector who attended the sale, believes the seller pulled the lot after being informed by the auction house that it was unlikely to sell for the low estimate. Schachter even heard rumors of a legitimate and significant offer that the seller declined in advance of the failed auction one that cleared $10 million but still fell short of the lower end of the estimate.

It should have been a high point for CryptoPunks as a collection. Just a few months earlier, BAYC had sold a bundle of 101 tokens for $24 million, and CryptoPunks fans were primed for a similar victory. Instead, punk-holders left the auction feeling burned and for good reason. They were pretty devastated, Tan says. They were showing me their Punks and they were like, this is the end, probably.

They werent the only ones watching. Less than three weeks after the auction, Yuga Labs would acquire CryptoPunks, effectively ending the projects run as an independent NFT juggernaut. Tan suspects the Yuga Labs team, including CEO Muniz, could have been at the sale to scope out the Punks market.

But despite the risks, theres a real value to putting NFTs up for auction and the anonymous seller seems to have come away from the auction just fine. A few weeks after the sale, it was reported that the seller took out an $8 million loan against the Punks with the help of NFTfi and MetaStreet.

Stephen Young, co-founder of NFTfi, a platform that allows NFT collectors to use their NFTs as collateral on loans, explains that selling at a traditional auction house is a way to give a collection an institutional stamp of approval a precursor to this kind of loan. According to Young, if an NFT from a collection has sold once at Sothebys or Christies, its enough to inflate the price and legitimize the entire collection.

Thats the only reason they do it, Young said of NFT collectors selling at the big houses. You pay the 20% that gives you that [stamp of approval], but its made all of your other CryptoPunks worth 20 percent more, so its more than worth it.

Before Christies $69 million sale of Beeples opus put NFTs on the mainstream art worlds radar in March 2021, Sothebys and Christies were known, at least to those outside the art world, as places to buy expensive rare objects from the collections of the well-off (and often, the recently deceased). Now, the auction houses are selling NFTs of Pepe The Frog with the same pomp and circumstance.

But it didnt happen overnight. Both Sothebys and Christies have been forced to modernize to keep up with an increasingly young and international collector base. Both houses have expanded into selling sneakers and pop culture memorabilia. In the process, theyve elevated Nike SBs and T. rex skeletons into rarified cultural artifacts. It follows that the houses foray into crypto may look like an attempt to elevate NFTs to the status of Monet and Rembrandt, but its actually much simpler: Theres a market.

They would like a chunk of [the NFT] market, of course, says Schachter. They would like a chunk of selling dirty underwear, if there was a market for it. They dont care.

According to Tim Schneider, art business editor at Artnet News who has covered NFTs since before the CryptoKitties days, businesses like Christies and Sothebys have an interest in converting anyone with cash to spend into a power bidder.

Some corners of the crypto world clearly have cash to spend, and NFT sales last year allegedly brought in significant amounts of new bidders (according to Sothebys end-of-year report in 2021, about 80 percent of NFT bidders were new to the auction house). A high-level official at the auction house confirmed that part of their long-term goal is to make it easier for crypto-native collectors to transact, as well as establish NFTs as a new collecting category for the traditional art world.

And in brief flashes, it seems like Sothebys strategy may be working: Crypto billionaire Justin Sun spent more than $100 million on art last fall, including $78 million on a record-breaking Giacometti sculpture at Sothebys but that may be one of the only examples weve seen so far, at least publicly, where a crypto bro has shown a noted interest in fine art.

For all of the lip service being paid to the notion of cross-collecting and people who started off in NFTs getting interested in other traditional artworks, Schneider explains, were not seeing a tremendous amount of organic integration between NFTs and the art establishment. After we spoke, Schneider reported in Artnet that Sothebys has pulled back on the crypto-art-crossover: The auction house notably did not accept cryptocurrency as a payment for any lots during their most recent slate of evening sales, as they had done in 2021.

As embarrassing as the failed auction was in the short term, Schachter still thinks Sothebys and the other houses got back more than they put in. The auction houses are not going to weep, he says. One deal goes down, and then they just move on to the next.

See original here:

Why a $30 million CryptoPunks auction fell apart at the last minute - The Verge

Nanorobotics – Wikipedia

"Nanobots" redirects here. For the They Might Be Giants album, see Nanobots (album).

Emerging technology field

Nanoid robotics, or for short, nanorobotics or nanobotics, is an emerging technology field creating machines or robots whose components are at or near the scale of a nanometer (109 meters).[1][2][3] More specifically, nanorobotics (as opposed to microrobotics) refers to the nanotechnology engineering discipline of designing and building nanorobots with devices ranging in size from 0.1 to 10 micrometres and constructed of nanoscale or molecular components.[4][5] The terms nanobot, nanoid, nanite, nanomachine and nanomite have also been used to describe such devices currently under research and development.[6][7]

Nanomachines are largely in the research and development phase,[8] but some primitive molecular machines and nanomotors have been tested. An example is a sensor having a switch approximately 1.5 nanometers across, able to count specific molecules in the chemical sample. The first useful applications of nanomachines may be in nanomedicine. For example,[9] biological machines could be used to identify and destroy cancer cells.[10][11] Another potential application is the detection of toxic chemicals, and the measurement of their concentrations, in the environment. Rice University has demonstrated a single-molecule car developed by a chemical process and including Buckminsterfullerenes (buckyballs) for wheels. It is actuated by controlling the environmental temperature and by positioning a scanning tunneling microscope tip.

Another definition[whose?] is a robot that allows precise interactions with nanoscale objects, or can manipulate with nanoscale resolution. Such devices are more related to microscopy or scanning probe microscopy, instead of the description of nanorobots as molecular machines. Using the microscopy definition, even a large apparatus such as an atomic force microscope can be considered a nanorobotic instrument when configured to perform nanomanipulation. For this viewpoint, macroscale robots or microrobots that can move with nanoscale precision can also be considered nanorobots.

According to Richard Feynman, it was his former graduate student and collaborator Albert Hibbs who originally suggested to him (circa 1959) the idea of a medical use for Feynman's theoretical micro-machines (see biological machine). Hibbs suggested that certain repair machines might one day be reduced in size to the point that it would, in theory, be possible to (as Feynman put it) "swallow the surgeon". The idea was incorporated into Feynman's 1959 essay There's Plenty of Room at the Bottom.[12]

Since nano-robots would be microscopic in size, it would probably be necessary[according to whom?] for very large numbers of them to work together to perform microscopic and macroscopic tasks. These nano-robot swarms, both those unable to replicate (as in utility fog) and those able to replicate unconstrained in the natural environment (as in grey goo and synthetic biology), are found in many science fiction stories, such as the Borg nano-probes in Star Trek and The Outer Limits episode "The New Breed".Some proponents of nano-robotics, in reaction to the grey goo scenarios that they earlier helped to propagate, hold the view that nano-robots able to replicate outside of a restricted factory environment do not form a necessary part of a purported productive nanotechnology, and that the process of self-replication, were it ever to be developed, could be made inherently safe. They further assert that their current plans for developing and using molecular manufacturing do not in fact include free-foraging replicators.[13][14]

A detailed theoretical discussion of nanorobotics, including specific design issues such as sensing, power communication, navigation, manipulation, locomotion, and onboard computation, has been presented in the medical context of nanomedicine by Robert Freitas.[15][16] Some of these discussions[which?] remain at the level of unbuildable generality and do not approach the level of detailed engineering.

A document with a proposal on nanobiotech development using open design technology methods, as in open-source hardware and open-source software, has been addressed to the United Nations General Assembly.[17] According to the document sent to the United Nations, in the same way that open source has in recent years accelerated the development of computer systems, a similar approach should benefit the society at large and accelerate nanorobotics development. The use of nanobiotechnology should be established as a human heritage for the coming generations, and developed as an open technology based on ethical practices for peaceful purposes. Open technology is stated as a fundamental key for such an aim.

In the same ways that technology research and development drove the space race and nuclear arms race, a race for nanorobots is occurring.[18][19][20][21][22] There is plenty of ground allowing nanorobots to be included among the emerging technologies.[23] Some of the reasons are that large corporations, such as General Electric, Hewlett-Packard, Synopsys, Northrop Grumman and Siemens have been recently working in the development and research of nanorobots;[24][25][26][27][28] surgeons are getting involved and starting to propose ways to apply nanorobots for common medical procedures;[29] universities and research institutes were granted funds by government agencies exceeding $2 billion towards research developing nanodevices for medicine;[30][31] bankers are also strategically investing with the intent to acquire beforehand rights and royalties on future nanorobots commercialisation.[32] Some aspects of nanorobot litigation and related issues linked to monopoly have already arisen.[33][34][35] A large number of patents has been granted recently on nanorobots, done mostly for patent agents, companies specialized solely on building patent portfolios, and lawyers. After a long series of patents and eventually litigations, see for example the invention of radio, or the war of currents, emerging fields of technology tend to become a monopoly, which normally is dominated by large corporations.[36]

Manufacturing nanomachines assembled from molecular components is a very challenging task. Because of the level of difficulty, many engineers and scientists continue working cooperatively across multidisciplinary approaches to achieve breakthroughs in this new area of development. Thus, it is quite understandable the importance of the following distinct techniques currently applied towards manufacturing nanorobots:

The joint use of nanoelectronics, photolithography, and new biomaterials provides a possible approach to manufacturing nanorobots for common medical uses, such as surgical instrumentation, diagnosis, and drug delivery.[37][38][39] This method for manufacturing on nanotechnology scale is in use in the electronics industry since 2008.[40] So, practical nanorobots should be integrated as nanoelectronics devices, which will allow tele-operation and advanced capabilities for medical instrumentation.[41][42]

A nucleic acid robot (nubot) is an organic molecular machine at the nanoscale.[43] DNA structure can provide means to assemble 2D and 3D nanomechanical devices. DNA based machines can be activated using small molecules, proteins and other molecules of DNA.[44][45][46] Biological circuit gates based on DNA materials have been engineered as molecular machines to allow in-vitro drug delivery for targeted health problems.[47] Such material based systems would work most closely to smart biomaterial drug system delivery,[48] while not allowing precise in vivo teleoperation of such engineered prototypes.

Several reports have demonstrated the attachment of synthetic molecular motors to surfaces.[49][50] These primitive nanomachines have been shown to undergo machine-like motions when confined to the surface of a macroscopic material. The surface anchored motors could potentially be used to move and position nanoscale materials on a surface in the manner of a conveyor belt.

Nanofactory Collaboration,[51] founded by Robert Freitas and Ralph Merkle in 2000 and involving 23 researchers from 10 organizations and 4 countries, focuses on developing a practical research agenda[52] specifically aimed at developing positionally-controlled diamond mechanosynthesis and a diamondoid nanofactory that would have the capability of building diamondoid medical nanorobots.

The emerging field of bio-hybrid systems combines biological and synthetic structural elements for biomedical or robotic applications. The constituting elements of bio-nanoelectromechanical systems (BioNEMS) are of nanoscale size, for example DNA, proteins or nanostructured mechanical parts. Thiol-ene e-beams resist allow the direct writing of nanoscale features, followed by the functionalization of the natively reactive resist surface with biomolecules.[53] Other approaches use a biodegradable material attached to magnetic particles that allow them to be guided around the body.[54]

This approach proposes the use of biological microorganisms, like the bacterium Escherichia coli[55] and Salmonella typhimurium.[56]Thus the model uses a flagellum for propulsion purposes. Electromagnetic fields normally control the motion of this kind of biological integrated device.[57]Chemists at the University of Nebraska have created a humidity gauge by fusing a bacterium to a silicon computer chip.[58]

Retroviruses can be retrained to attach to cells and replace DNA. They go through a process called reverse transcription to deliver genetic packaging in a vector.[59] Usually, these devices are Pol Gag genes of the virus for the Capsid and Delivery system. This process is called retroviral gene therapy, having the ability to re-engineer cellular DNA by usage of viral vectors.[60] This approach has appeared in the form of retroviral, adenoviral, and lentiviral gene delivery systems.[61][62] These gene therapy vectors have been used in cats to send genes into the genetically modified organism (GMO), causing it to display the trait.[63]

3D printing is the process by which a three-dimensional structure is built through the various processes of additive manufacturing. Nanoscale 3D printing involves many of the same process, incorporated at a much smaller scale. To print a structure in the 5-400m scale, the precision of the 3D printing machine needs to be improved greatly. A two-step process of 3D printing, using a 3D printing and laser etched plates method was incorporated as an improvement technique.[64] To be more precise at a nanoscale, the 3D printing process uses a laser etching machine, which etches the details needed for the segments of nanorobots into each plate. The plate is then transferred to the 3D printer, which fills the etched regions with the desired nanoparticle. The 3D printing process is repeated until the nanorobot is built from the bottom up. This 3D printing process has many benefits. First, it increases the overall accuracy of the printing process.[citation needed] Second, it has the potential to create functional segments of a nanorobot.[64] The 3D printer uses a liquid resin, which is hardened at precisely the correct spots by a focused laser beam. The focal point of the laser beam is guided through the resin by movable mirrors and leaves behind a hardened line of solid polymer, just a few hundred nanometers wide. This fine resolution enables the creation of intricately structured sculptures as tiny as a grain of sand. This process takes place by using photoactive resins, which are hardened by the laser at an extremely small scale to create the structure. This process is quick by nanoscale 3D printing standards. Ultra-small features can be made with the 3D micro-fabrication technique used in multiphoton photopolymerisation. This approach uses a focused laser to trace the desired 3D object into a block of gel. Due to the nonlinear nature of photo excitation, the gel is cured to a solid only in the places where the laser was focused while the remaining gel is then washed away. Feature sizes of under 100nm are easily produced, as well as complex structures with moving and interlocked parts.[65]

There are number of challenges and problems that should be addressed when designing and building nanoscale machines with movable parts. The most obvious one is the need of developing very fine tools and manipulation techniques capable of assembling individual nanostructures with high precision into operational device. Less evident challenge is related to peculiarities of adhesion and friction on nanoscale. It is impossible to take existing design of macroscopic device with movable parts and just reduce it to the nanoscale. Such approach will not work due to high surface energy of nanostructures, which means that all contacting parts will stick together following the energy minimization principle. The adhesion and static friction between parts can easily exceed the strength of materials, so the parts will break before they start to move relative to each other. This leads to the need to design movable structures with minimal contact area [[66]].

Potential uses for nanorobotics in medicine include early diagnosis and targeted drug-delivery for cancer,[67][68][69] biomedical instrumentation,[70] surgery,[71][72] pharmacokinetics,[10] monitoring of diabetes,[73][74][75] and health care.

In such plans, future medical nanotechnology is expected to employ nanorobots injected into the patient to perform work at a cellular level. Such nanorobots intended for use in medicine should be non-replicating, as replication would needlessly increase device complexity, reduce reliability, and interfere with the medical mission.

Nanotechnology provides a wide range of new technologies for developing customized means to optimize the delivery of pharmaceutical drugs. Today, harmful side effects of treatments such as chemotherapy are commonly a result of drug delivery methods that don't pinpoint their intended target cells accurately.[76] Researchers at Harvard and MIT, however, have been able to attach special RNA strands, measuring nearly 10nm in diameter, to nanoparticles, filling them with a chemotherapy drug. These RNA strands are attracted to cancer cells. When the nanoparticle encounters a cancer cell, it adheres to it, and releases the drug into the cancer cell.[77] This directed method of drug delivery has great potential for treating cancer patients while avoiding negative effects (commonly associated with improper drug delivery).[76][78] The first demonstration of nanomotors operating in living organisms was carried out in 2014 at University of California, San Diego.[79] MRI-guided nanocapsules are one potential precursor to nanorobots.[80]

Another useful application of nanorobots is assisting in the repair of tissue cells alongside white blood cells.[81] Recruiting inflammatory cells or white blood cells (which include neutrophil granulocytes, lymphocytes, monocytes, and mast cells) to the affected area is the first response of tissues to injury.[82] Because of their small size, nanorobots could attach themselves to the surface of recruited white cells, to squeeze their way out through the walls of blood vessels and arrive at the injury site, where they can assist in the tissue repair process. Certain substances could possibly be used to accelerate the recovery.

The science behind this mechanism is quite complex. Passage of cells across the blood endothelium, a process known as transmigration, is a mechanism involving engagement of cell surface receptors to adhesion molecules, active force exertion and dilation of the vessel walls and physical deformation of the migrating cells. By attaching themselves to migrating inflammatory cells, the robots can in effect "hitch a ride" across the blood vessels, bypassing the need for a complex transmigration mechanism of their own.[81]

As of 2016[update], in the United States, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates nanotechnology on the basis of size.[83]

Nanocomposite particles that are controlled remotely by an electromagnetic field was also developed.[84] This series of nanorobots that are now enlisted in the Guinness World Records,[84] can be used to interact with the biological cells.[85] Scientists suggest that this technology can be used for the treatment of cancer.[86]

The Nanites are characters on the TV show Mystery Science Theater 3000. They're self-replicating, bio-engineered organisms that work on the ship and reside in the SOL's computer systems. They made their first appearance in Season 8.Nanites are used in a number of episodes in the Netflix series "Travelers". They be programmed and injected into injured people to perform repairs. First appearance in season 1

Nanites also feature in the Rise of Iron 2016 expansion for Destiny in which SIVA, a self-replicating nanotechnology is used as a weapon.

Nanites (referred to more often as Nanomachines) are often referenced in Konami's "Metal Gear" series being used to enhance and regulate abilities and body functions.

In the Star Trek franchise TV shows nanites play an important plot device. Starting with "Evolution" in the third season of The Next Generation, Borg Nanoprobes perform the function of maintaining the Borg cybernetic systems, as well as repairing damage to the organic parts of a Borg. They generate new technology inside a Borg when needed, as well as protecting them from many forms of disease.

Nanites play a role in the video game Deus Ex, being the basis of the nano-augmentation technology which gives augmented people superhuman abilities.

Nanites are also mentioned in the Arc of a Scythe book series by Neal Shusterman and are used to heal all nonfatal injuries, regulate bodily functions, and considerably lessen pain.

Nanites are also an integral part of the Stargate SG1 and Stargate Atlantis, where grey goo scenarios are portrayed.

See original here:

Nanorobotics - Wikipedia

In-depth Research on Nanotechnology in Medical Market Forecast Estimation & Approach 2022-2028 | Amgen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer,, and more…

The Nanotechnology in Medical market report provides a detailed analysis of global market size, regional and country-level market size, segmentation market growth, market share, competitive Landscape, sales analysis, the impact of domestic and global market players like Amgen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer,, etc., value chain optimization, trade regulations, recent developments, opportunities analysis, strategic market growth analysis, product launches, area marketplace expanding, and technological innovations.

The Key Areas That Have Been Focused in the Report:

Get Exclusive Sample of Report on Nanotechnology in Medical market @ https://www.affluencemarketreports.com/industry-analysis/request-sample/2382524/

Nanotechnology in Medical Market Segmentation:

Nanotechnology in Medical market is split by Type and by Application. For the period 2016-2028, the growth among segments provides accurate calculations and forecasts for sales by Type and by Application in terms of volume and value. This analysis can help you expand your business by targeting qualified niche markets.

Nanotechnology in Medical Market Report based on Product Type:

Nanotechnology in Medical Market Report based on Applications:

The key market players for global Nanotechnology in Medical market are listed below:

Get Extra Discount on Nanotechnology in Medical Market Report, If your Company is Listed in Above Key Players List @ https://www.affluencemarketreports.com/industry-analysis/request-discount/2382524/

Promising Regions & Countries Mentioned in Nanotechnology in Medical Market Report:

TABLE OF CONTENTS INCLUDE

Consumption Forecast, Market Opportunities & Challenges, Risks and Influences Factors Analysis, Market Size by Application, Market Size by Manufacturers, Market Size by Type, Nanotechnology in Medical Consumption by Regions, Nanotechnology in Medical Production by Regions, Production Forecasts, Value Chain and Sales Channels Analysis, Key Findings in the Global Nanotechnology in Medical Study, Manufacturers Profiles

Report Customization: Clients can request for customization of report as per their need for additional data.

CONTACT FOR ADDITIONAL CUSTOMIZATION @ https://www.affluencemarketreports.com/industry-analysis/request-inquiry/2382524/

Impact of COVID-19 on Nanotechnology in Medical Market

The report also contains the effect of the ongoing worldwide pandemic, i.e., COVID-19, on the Nanotechnology in Medical Market and what the future holds for it. It offers an analysis of the impacts of the epidemic on the international Market. The epidemic has immediately interrupted the requirement and supply series. The Nanotechnology in Medical Market report also assesses the economic effect on firms and monetary markets. Futuristic Reports has accumulated advice from several delegates of this business and has engaged from the secondary and primary research to extend the customers with strategies and data to combat industry struggles throughout and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

For More Details on Impact of COVID-19 on Nanotechnology in Medical Market https://www.affluencemarketreports.com/industry-analysis/covid19-request/2382524/

Frequently Asked Questions

About Affluence:

Affluence Market Reports is the next generation of all your research needs with a strong grapple on the worldwide market for industries, organizations, and governments. Our aim is to deliver exemplary reports that meet the definite needs of clients, which offers an adequate business technique, planning, and competitive landscape for new and existing industries that will develop your business needs.

We provide a premium in-depth statistical approach, a 360-degree market view that includes detailed segmentation, key trends, strategic recommendations, growth figures, Cost Analysis, new progress, evolving technologies, and forecasts by authentic agencies.

For more Details Contact Us:

Affluence Market Reports

Contact Person: Mr. Rohit

Phone Number:

U.S: +1-(424) 256-1722

U.K.: +44 1158 88 1333

Email: [emailprotected]

Website: http://www.affluencemarketreports.com

The rest is here:

In-depth Research on Nanotechnology in Medical Market Forecast Estimation & Approach 2022-2028 | Amgen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer,, and more...

Global Nanomedicine Market To Be Driven By Increased Government Backing And Funding, As Well As The Growing Demand For Specific Therapies In The…

The new report by Expert Market Research titled, GlobalNanomedicine MarketReport and Forecast 2022-2027, gives an in-depth analysis of the global nanomedicine market, assessing the market based on its segments like product type, Application, Nanomolecule Type and major regions. The report tracks the latest trends in the industry and studies their impact on the overall market. It also assesses the market dynamics, covering the key demand and price indicators, along with analysing the market based on the SWOT and Porters Five Forces models.

Request a free sample copy in PDF or view the report[emailprotected]https://bityl.co/CUiU

The key highlights of the report include:

Market Overview (2017-2027)

The rising usage of nanomaterials such as nanocapsules and nanotubes in drug delivery systems can be linked to the rise in demand for nanomedicines. The rise in cancer and cardiovascular disease occurrences has boosted the need for nanomedicines, resulting in increased public and private investment in nanomedicine research and breakthroughs in biodegradable nanoparticles. The cost-effectiveness of these medicines, as well as their lack of adverse effects, are important drivers of the nanomedicine industrys expansion.

The North American nanomedicine sector is predicted to be one of the main markets for nanomedicine in the forecast period of 2022-2027, thanks to significant government investment on nanomedicine research in the United States. The regions growth is attributed to the greater availability of patented nanomedicine items. Nanomedicine is easily available in this region, in addition to a well-developed healthcare infrastructure and a high prevalence of cancer, which has assisted market expansion.The Asia Pacific regions huge senior population is experiencing high rates of cancer and cardiovascular illness, which is likely to drive the regions nanomedicine industry. The regional market for nanomedicine is predicted to be one of the fastest expanding. Increased research funds to combat life-threatening diseases are likely to boost market expansion in Asia Pacific, with nations like China and Japan leading the way.

Industry Definition and Major Segments

Nanomedicine is a branch of nanotechnology that focuses on diagnosing, treating, monitoring, and controlling biological systems. By modifying materials at the nanoscale, it increases drug delivery. As a result, nanomedicine has helped in the treatment of a wide range of diseases.

Nanomedicine is still in its infancy, with a slew of new products in the works. Nanobiotix has discovered 230 nanomedicine items that are either labelled or in the testing phase. Out of the 230 products, 49 are now on the market, and 122 are in various stages of clinical testing, including Phase II and Phase III trials.

Explore the full report with the table of[emailprotected]https://bityl.co/CUiR

By application, the market is categorised into:

Based on product type, the market can be segmented into:

Based on nanomolecule type, the industry is categorised into:

The major regional markets of nanomedicine are:

Market Trends

Nanotechnology is now making great development in the identification and treatment of chronic diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and other disorders in the healthcare industry, which is one of the most important areas where nanotechnology has made substantial success. As healthcare corporations focus on transdermal insulin administration and the industrys attention shifts toward transdermal medicine delivery, businesses investigating patch technology have attracted considerable funding. Furthermore, in order to limit the danger of adverse effects, the personalised medicine delivery strategy is being heavily emphasised. This approach delivers reachability with greater efficacy and less degradation by bypassing the bodys defense mechanisms. In the next years, such technical advancements and investments are projected to propel the industry forward.

Key Market Players

The major players in the market are Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Nanospectra Biosciences, Inc., Ablynx N.V., AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Celgene Corporation and Others.

About Us:

Expert Market Research is a leading business intelligence firm, providing custom and syndicated market reports along with consultancy services for our clients. We serve a wide client base ranging from Fortune 1000 companies to small and medium enterprises. Our reports cover over 100 industries across established and emerging markets researched by our skilled analysts who track the latest economic, demographic, trade and market data globally.

At Expert Market Research, we tailor our approach according to our clients needs and preferences, providing them with valuable, actionable and up-to-date insights into the market, thus, helping them realize their optimum growth potential. We offer market intelligence across a range of industry verticals which include Pharmaceuticals, Food and Beverage, Technology, Retail, Chemical and Materials, Energy and Mining, Packaging and Agriculture.

Media Contact

Company Name: Claight CorporationContact Person: Louis Wane, Corporate Sales Specialist U.S.A.Email:[emailprotected]Toll Free Number:+1-415-325-5166 | +44-702-402-5790Address: 30 North Gould Street, Sheridan, WY 82801, USAWebsite:https://www.expertmarketresearch.com

Read More:

United States Basmati Rice Market:https://heraldkeeper.com/industry/united-states-basmati-rice-market-to-be-driven-by-increasing-consumer-demand-for-basmati-rice-and-the-rising-awareness-about-the-nutritional-benefits-provided-by-parboiled-rice-in-the-forecast-period-2015363.html

United States Led Lighting Market:https://heraldkeeper.com/industry/united-states-led-lighting-market-to-be-driven-by-rising-consumer-awareness-in-the-forecast-period-of-2021-2026-2015178.html

Europe Flavoured Milk Market:https://heraldkeeper.com/industry/europe-flavoured-milk-market-to-be-driven-by-clinical-and-functional-advantages-in-the-forecast-period-of-2021-2026-2015177.html

Airless Tyres Market:https://heraldkeeper.com/industry/global-airless-tyres-market-to-be-driven-at-a-cagr-of-5-in-the-forecast-period-of-2021-2026-2015059.html

Oilfield Services Market:https://heraldkeeper.com/market/global-oilfield-services-market-to-be-driven-at-a-cagr-of-3-5-in-the-forecast-period-of-2021-2026-2014982.html

*We at Expert Market Research always thrive to give you the latest information. The numbers in the article are only indicative and may be different from the actual report.

Read more from the original source:

Global Nanomedicine Market To Be Driven By Increased Government Backing And Funding, As Well As The Growing Demand For Specific Therapies In The...

Nanotechnology is poised to shape the future of healthcare – ETHealthWorld

by Srinivas Iyengar

One of the most awaited technologies on the verge of moving out of laboratories and set to enter commercial production is nanotechnology. There is so much buzz about nanotechnology that industries, from cosmetics, healthcare, and automobiles to aerospace, expect big disruptions due to nanotech. In the race for nano supremacy, I see healthcare as the most exciting space with a variety of use cases that can have a profound impact on humankind. In fact, nanotechnology is the most radical and wide-reaching emerging technology, and healthcare is its most urgent application.Before we delve deeper into the application of nanotechnology in healthcare, let us take a closer look at nanotechnology, its use cases, and its market share. This will give us a clearer perspective and some critical insights into this emerging technology.

Nanotech is a multidisciplinary field of research that deals with the restructuring and manipulation of matters that are of the size of 1 to 100 nanometers, i.e., at the molecular level. The word nano means dwarf in Greek and nanotechnology is the science of the extremely small!

The space where nanotechnology meets healthcare is called nanomedicine. Industry experts estimate the nanomedicine market share to grow up to $260Bn in 2025 from $141Bn in 2020.

While nanostructures occur naturally in soil, dust, oceans, plants, and animals, scientists today are building nano materials with newly manipulated attributes or engineered properties. This holds massive potential and opens new doors in drug delivery systems, body scans, gene therapy, identifying cancer cells, and health monitoring.

All thanks to the great scientist Richard Feynman who seeded the concept of nanotechnology in 1959. He was also regarded as one of the best safecrackers in the world! You can read a book written by him, Surely You're Joking, Mr. Feynman!.The lexicon of nanotechnology

Nanometer (m): A nanometer is a unit of measurement which is 1 billionth of a meter. The smallest things around us are measured in nanometers. To illustrate, a DNA molecule is about 2.5 m wide compared to a red blood cell which is about 7 m.

Nanoparticles (Nanodots/Quantum dots): These are small particles that range anywhere between 1 to 100 Nm. We all know well that the smaller the material, the surface area to volume ratio increases. This ensures that nanoparticles have distinct optical, physical, and chemical properties and produce quantum effects.

Nanotubes: These are tubes with atom-thick walls and a tube-like structure mainly made of carbon materials. Nanotubes are a few nanometers wide, and their length can be up to a few millimeters. What makes them more attractive in the healthcare arena is that they are non-toxic and, therefore, safe to use.

Nanorobotics: Nanorobotics is the process of building robots at the nanoscale and such robots are called nanobots. They are typically nanoelectromechanical systems that can be programmed to carry out specific tasks.

The most promising use-cases of nanotechnology in healthcare

Industry experts believe that nanotechnology will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of healthcare. Lets take a look at some of its most compelling use cases that are already show promising results

Targeted Drug Delivery System: In todays conventional drug delivery mechanism, did you know that when you take a medicine for a headache, it possibly goes through your entire body, including the head, to give you relief? This also means that the drug delivery mechanism is inefficient, slow, requires more drug consumption than needed, and may impact non-targeted organs. Nanotechnology can carry drugs to specific cells and release them when it reaches the targeted organ or area. This can be highly instrumental, for instance, in curtailing the side effects of chemotherapy.

Diagnosis: A biomarker, in general, is a measurement, substance, or chemical in the body which indicates a disease or a condition. It is seen that nanotechnology can bridge the gap between measurable biomarkers representing the physiology of a biological process and clinical outcomes. Nanoparticles injected into humans can detect these biomarkers with extremely high efficacy as compared to scanning the human body from the outside, thereby reducing the chances of drug failure/rejection.

Medical Imaging: Nanoparticles/Quantum dots are so small that their surface area to volume ratio is relatively high, thus producing excellent contrast and fluoresce. In generic terms, a nanoparticle is more like a glow-in-the-dark thing, and its ability to reflect light will help us in biological labeling at the molecular level. Nanoparticles in medical devices and drug therapy can give us much better diagnosis results and treatments with a higher success rate.

Wound Treatment: One of the major pain points of wound healing is contamination with microorganisms. Silver nanoparticles have antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties that provide better wound healing efficacy with less bacterial resistance. They can be used as scaffolds for skin regeneration. Nanofibrous materials can also be used as delivery systems for drugs, proteins, growth factors, and other molecules. This will help us in targeted drug delivery with minimal and effective drug usage.

Needless to say, there exists great scope for advancements in nanotechnology that hold the potential to revolutionize and reinvent healthcare systems despite existing hurdles. Nanomedicine, nano pharmacology, nanoimaging, and targeted drug delivery systems will make the diagnosis and prevention of diseases, and care delivery more efficient and patient-centric.

Srinivas Iyengar, VP & Head of Healthcare and Life Sciences, Happiest Minds.

(DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are solely of the author and ETHealthworld does not necessarily subscribe to it. ETHealthworld.com shall not be responsible for any damage caused to any person / organisation directly or indirectly)

Continue reading here:

Nanotechnology is poised to shape the future of healthcare - ETHealthWorld

Retraction for the article In vitro and in vivo protein release and an | IJN – Dove Medical Press

Shan F, Liu Y, Jiang H, Tong F. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:76137625.

The Editor and Publisher of International Journal of Nanomedicine wish to retract the published article. Concerns were raised regarding the alleged manipulation of the in vitro transfection images shown in Figure 4C and the duplication of histopathological images shown in Figure 5A.

The authors responded to our queries and explained the fluorescent images collected for Figure 4C had mistakenly been superimposed on top of each other and the duplication of images in Figure 5Ab and 5Ac had occurred inadvertently during the figure preparation. The authors also provided original data for the figures in question. However, the authors explanation and the provided data was not satisfactory, and the Editor requested for the article to be retracted. The authors were notified of this decision.

We have been informed in our decision-making by our policy on publishing ethics and integrity and the COPE guidelines on retractions.

The retracted article will remain online to maintain the scholarly record, but it will be digitally watermarked on each page as Retracted.

This retraction relates to this paper

This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

See the rest here:

Retraction for the article In vitro and in vivo protein release and an | IJN - Dove Medical Press

Clinical Trial Management System Market Size to Expand Significantly by the End of 2027 – Digital Journal

Theglobal clinical trial management system marketis expected to rise due to the augmented use of these systems, increased R&D investment by life science and clinical research organizations, and the rapid expansion of healthcare IT sector. A clinical trial management system refers to a software programme utilized in the management of clinical studies. The system keeps track of the reporting, executing, and planning duties, as well as the deadlines and contact information of participants. In addition to that, the features of a clinical trial management system (CTMS) come with the ability to oversee linked clinical trials by therapeutic area based on a set of particular clinical activities and the ability to track site monitoring.

Request Sample of Report https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=S&rep_id=544

An increase in the number of new deadly illnesses has resulted in a tremendous need for vaccines and medicines. To satisfy the need, it requires clinical trials to demonstrate medicines and vaccines meet the specific requirements. The number of clinical trials that are conducted is increasing because of rising demand and the need to meet it, which is likely to boost the adoption of clinical trial management systems and spur development of the global clinical trial management system market. Demand for these systems has risen to new heights as a result of technological advancements.

Some prominent players that are operating in the global clinical trial management system market are DataTRAK International Inc., Parexel International Corporation, Bio-Optronics, Inc., Dassault Systmes SE, MedNet GmbH, and International Business Machines Corporation.

Request for Covid-19 Impact Analysis https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=covid19&rep_id=544

During the forecast period, from 2019 to 2027, the global clinical trials management system market is likely to be driven by escalating demand for novel medicines and increased research and development activities. The global clinical trials management system market was worth around US$ 1.4 Bn in 2018, and is expected to grow at a 10.5% CAGR over the forecast period, from 2019 to 2027.

Rising Demand for Drug Development to Drive the Market in North America

The global clinical trial management systems market was led by North America, with the US coming up as one of the leading contributors in the regional market. Various factors such as increased spending on research and development activities and rising demand for development of drugs are likely to assist in the growth of regional market. Increased financing for clinical research, along with an increase in the number of clinical trials and studies, and expected to support market growth in the years to come.

Pharmaceutical firms R&D expenses have also grown in recent years, thanks to a greater emphasis on therapeutic areas, complicated compounds, and regulating markets. Pharmaceutical businesses in the US spend more energy, time, and money on research and development than other industries. The biopharmaceutical sector, for example, spent an estimated US$ 102 Bn on research and development activities in 2018, according to the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.

Enquiry Before Buying https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/sample/sample.php?flag=EB&rep_id=544

Due to the surge in research and clinical trials in the North Americaregion, thedemand for these systems is projected to rise, thereby assisting in the expansion of the market in the region throughout the forecast period, from 2019 to 2027.

Rise in Financing from Various Government Bodies to Support Demand in the Market

Medical research is receiving impetus by increased government financing and investments from biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. In the forthcoming years, this trend is expected to enhance growth of the global clinical trials management system market. CTMS systems are continually advancing in terms of technology. Lack of experienced experts is forcing pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to engage in staff training programmes to familiarize people with various elements of complex solutions, particularly in developing nations. Furthermore, because of their capacity to combine a broad spectrum of applications, the prices of these systems are considerable. As a result, the high cost of CTMS is expected to deter small- and medium-sized businesses from adopting it.

However, the the global clinical trials management system market is expected to grow as the number of clinical studies increases. Furthermore, there is a significant demand for analysis of clinical trial results and effective data management. All of these elements are expected to contribute towards the expansion of the market in the years to come.

Rising government funding and investments by biotechnology and pharmaceutical are promoting medical research activities. This factor is anticipated to boost the market growth over the forecast period. The CTMS solutions are rapidly undergoing technological advancements. Lack of skilled professionals, especially in developing countries, is pushing pharmaceutical and biotechnological firms to invest in staff training programs to make them familiar with various aspects of sophisticated solutions. Furthermore, costs of these systems are high owing to their ability to integrate a wide range of capabilities. Thus, small- and medium-sized companies anticipate high cost associated with CTMS to hinder adoption.

However, increasing number of clinical trials is anticipated to boost the growth of the market for CTMS. Furthermore, the demand for efficient data management and analysis of clinical trial outcomes is also high. All these factors are projected to contribute to market growth.

The information provided in the review has been extracted from a TMR report titled Clinical Trial Management System Market (Mode of Delivery On-premise, Web-based, and Cloud-based; Component- Software, Hardware, and Services; Type Enterprise-based and Site-based; End use Pharmaceutical Industries, Contract Research Organizations, and Health Care Providers) Global Industry Analysis, Size, Share, Growth, Trends, and Forecast 2019 2027.

More Trending Reports by Transparency Market Research:

Nanomedicine Market: Nanomedicine, a branch of nanotechnology, is used in the diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and control of biological systems. Nanomedicine improves medicine delivery by manipulating materials on a nanoscale. Hence, nanomedicine has aided in the treatment of various diseases. It is still in a nascent stage, with several products in the pipeline.

Albumin (as Excipient) Market: According to the report, the globalalbumin (as excipient) marketwas valued at US$891.7Mn in 2020 and is projected to expand at a CAGR of6.2%from 2021 to 2028. Albumin is a water-soluble globular protein produced in the liver. It accounts for 50% of blood plasma proteins. These play a vital role in regulating blood volume and act as transporters for molecules such as hormones, bile salts, and ions.

About Us

Transparency Market Research is a global market intelligence company, providing global business information reports and services. Our exclusive blend of quantitative forecasting and trends analysis provides forward-looking insight for thousands of decision makers. Our experienced team of Analysts, Researchers, and Consultants, use proprietary data sources and various tools and techniques to gather, and analyze information.

Our data repository is continuously updated and revised by a team of research experts, so that it always reflects the latest trends and information. With a broad research and analysis capability, Transparency Market Research employs rigorous primary and secondary research techniques in developing distinctive data sets and research material for business reports.

Contact Us

Rohit Bhisey

Transparency Market Research Inc.

CORPORATE HEADQUARTER DOWNTOWN,

1000 N. West Street,

Suite 1200, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 USA

Tel: +1-518-618-1030

USA Canada Toll Free: 866-552-3453

Email: [emailprotected]

Website: https://www.transparencymarketresearch.com/

Visit link:

Clinical Trial Management System Market Size to Expand Significantly by the End of 2027 - Digital Journal

World Brain Tumour Day 2022: The biggest regrets of neurosurgeons who treat brain cancer cancer patients – Times Now

Dr Venugopal G Consultant Neurosurgeon Yashoda hospitals Hyderabad

The diagnosis of a brain tumour can be devastating for the patient and the family. A brain tumour is a mass or growth of abnormal cells in your brain. Many different types of brain tumours exist. Some brain tumours are noncancerous (benign), and some brain tumours are cancerous (malignant).

Doctors who treat brain tumours or brain cancer patients have some learnings to share. We asked Dr Venugopal G, Consultant Neurosurgeon, Yashoda Hospitals in Hyderabad - whether during the tests and treatment of brain tumour patients they ever felt helpless, wished the patient had done a certain thing to be healed sooner etc.

Renowned Neurosurgeon Dr Venugopal G said, "My biggest regret is knowing the poor prognosis of a brain tumour and yet need to operate the patient when they can only survive for a couple of years or less and family or relatives spending around 8-10 lakhs (work up, surgery, radiation and chemotherapy).In some cases, there is no light at the end of the tunnel! Literally, we have a flash of these once we look at the MRI scan revealing an ugly tumour such as the GBM!"

The doctor knows!

Get treated from the best equipped:

Dr Venugopal G says, "Our hospital (Yashoda Hospitals in Hyderabad) is equipped with all the latest gadgets in all three departments (Neurosurgery, Oncology and Radiotherapy) which work like a well-oiled machine while handling a patient. Where neurosurgery is concerned, we have 3T MRI and CT for evaluation of the tumour and we can as well do an fMRI to look for the eloquent area damage, followed by the well equipped modular operation theatre which has an advanced Pentero microscope, CUSA, high-speed drill, Neuro Navigation, intraoperative 3T MRI, IONM ( Intra Operative Neuro Monitoring), Endoscopes. Paragon An expert neurosurgeon's skill is amplified by these peerless types of equipment."

Is a brain tumour always terminal/fatal?

Dr Venugopal says, no. "Research is going on things are getting better for some of the tumours. Thanks to the molecular biologists and new technologies in the surgeon's armamentarium. For low-grade gliomas, meningiomas, and pituitary adenomas which usually come under grades I and II things are very reassuring compared to a decade ago.

"Some of the tumours like GBM, and metastatic brain tumours are still lethal but even in these types, some breakthroughs are coming albeit at clinical trial levels only. Nanomedicine surely is the only hope for this kind of tumours. These tumour cells multiply at a rapid pace and will be resistant to some of the available chemo drugs and radiotherapy too. Research in all the fields (surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy) will bring a panacea for patients with these lethal tumours.

The date, significance, importance, history and theme of World Brain Tumour Day:

The World Brain Tumour Day is observed on June 8 every year to spread awareness about brain tumours and educate people about them. The non-profit organisation, Deutsche Hirntumorhilfe e.V or German Brain Tumour Association, observed the first World Brain Tumour Day on June 8, 2000.

Disclaimer: Tips and suggestions mentioned in the article are for general information purposes only and should not be construed as professional medical advice. Always consult your doctor or a dietician before starting any fitness programme or making any changes to your diet.

Read more here:

World Brain Tumour Day 2022: The biggest regrets of neurosurgeons who treat brain cancer cancer patients - Times Now

Nikolas Badminton | Futurist Speaker | Futurist Keynotes | Futurist.com

Glen Hiemstra is the founder andFuturist Emeritusof Futurist.com.

Glen is dedicated to disseminating information about the future to assist individuals, organizations, and industries in effective strategic planning. An internationally respected expert on future trends, long-range planning and creating the preferred future, Glen has advised professional, business, and governmental organizations for three decades and has served as a technical advisor for futuristic television programs. Audience members for Glens keynote speeches and clients for his long-range planning say things like, Once you hear Glen Hiemstra speak, the future will never look the same.

A writer as well as a speaker and consultant, Glen is the author of Millennial City: How a New Generation Can Save the Future,Turning the Future into Revenue: What Businesses and Individuals Need to Know to Shape Their Future. Previously he co-authoredStrategic Leadership: Achieving Your Preferred Future.

Glen has worked with many leading companies, government agencies and organizations across a wide variety of domains. These include Microsoft, The Home Depot, Boeing, Adobe, Ernst & Young, PaineWebber, ShareBuilder, Ambrosetti (Italy), Club of Amsterdam, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Pacific Ocean Division, Northern Telecom, REI, Weyerhaeuser, Hewlett Packard, Novo Nordisk, U.S./Mexico JWC, APAX Partners, Costa Rica Hotel Association, Atlanta 2060, Tulsa 2025, Idaho Transportation 2030, Michigan DOT 2030, Federal Highway Administration Advanced Research, Eddie Bauer, Procter & Gamble, ACE Hardware, IHOP, John Deere, Weitz Construction, Lexis Nexus, Land O Lakes, GHD Engineering (Australia), SONAE (Portugal), and others.

As a recognized expert in preferred future planning, Glen is a popular keynote speaker who can zero in on emerging trends in economics, demographics, energy, the environment, Internet and communications, science, technology, housing, and transportation. Glen goes beyond simple trend analysis to discuss the opportunities that we all have to shape the preferred future. In his consulting, Glen utilizes tools such as environmental scanning, scenario development, whole systems perspectives, paradigm shifts, and analysis of organizational culture for managing change to assist enterprises to achieve high performance.

A skilled communicator, Glen also offers a variety of informational resources for those interested in exploring the future. Each month visitors from 120 nations come to Futurist.com and the blog for provocative snapshots of emerging ideas, trends, and technologies.

As a media technical advisor Glen has worked on several television productions, including with Steven Bochco Productions (creator of Hill Street Blues and NYPD Blue), among others. He has oft beencited in publicationssuch as The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, US News & World Report, Newsweek, The Futurist, USA Today, Business Week, the Economist, Puget Sound Business Journal, and the Los Angeles Times.

In a first career, Glen was an award-winning educator; he also served as a Visiting Scholar at the Human Interface Technology Lab at the University of Washington, which worked on virtual and augmented reality technology.

Glen was educated at Whitworth College, the University of Oregon, and the University of Washington. He lives in Seattle, Washington.

Contact us to discuss your event.

Read the original post:

Nikolas Badminton | Futurist Speaker | Futurist Keynotes | Futurist.com

10 of the Worlds Most Groundbreaking Futurists – HowStuffWorks

In 1900, Smithsonian Institution curator John Elfreth Watkins wrote an article for The Ladies' Home Journal, entitled "What May Happen in the Next Hundred Years," filled with predictions that many of his readers probably scoffed at as ridiculously improbable. Indeed, Watkins was pretty far off about some things. He predicted, for example, that the letters 'C,' 'X' and 'Q' would vanish from the alphabet, streets would be relocated underground, and farms would grow strawberries as large as apples. But what's more impressive is the extent to which Watkins' vision of the future actually has come to pass -- wireless phone networks on which a person in New York could talk to another in China, live TV images being transmitted around the globe, MRI machines, aerial warfare, and high-speed trains traveling between cities at 150 miles per hour. Watkins even predicted the food trucks that have become a fad in cities throughout America [source: Watkins].

Today's futurists -- who aim to forecast trends, inventions and events that will appear in the decades ahead -- would love to be that prescient. But unlike Watkins, who mostly seems to have relied upon his own imagination and wishful thinking, modern forecasters have developed more sophisticated methods for divining what may lie ahead. As Timothy Mack, president of the World Future Society, explains on the organization's Web site, futurists systematically scan the news media and published results of scientific studies, and conduct carefully structured surveys called "Delphi polls" in which they probe the minds of experts in various fields. Many also now create computer simulations and even conduct role-playing games in an effort to foresee what events and trends might result from certain changes, such as worsening environmental problems, the development of new energy sources or changes in the tax system [source: Mack].

Futurists -- whose work often is underwritten by companies and governments trying to prepare for future problems or gain a competitive edge from foresight -- also know that their predictions actually may shape the world ahead. "The main purpose of studying the future is to look at what may happen if present trends continue, decide if this is desirable, and, if not, work to change it," Mack explains [source: Mack].

Here are 10 futurists who've greatly influenced modern society with their predictions of what may lie ahead.

Read the rest here:

10 of the Worlds Most Groundbreaking Futurists - HowStuffWorks

Five benefits of hiring a chief futurist officer

As leaders, we can all be better about being more prepared for the future, but its something Ive seen many struggle with. Its much easier to analyze the data from today and know what strategies need to occur within the next one to three years. But what about five years from now? How about 10 years? If you find yourself struggling to clearly see what the pathway is for your company to move ahead, differentiate, and be better prepared for trying times, a CFOchief futurist officercan help.

In my opinion, the pandemic will not be the last great accelerator. The rapid adoption of new technology and ever-shifting underlying cultures within the workforce will create future hurdles that can be overcome if you are willing to do the deep thinking or have someone on your leadership team that can think ahead and spot an area you want to either work toward or avoid.

What a certified futurist does is study the patterns from a historical perspective, identify innovations and cultural movements from today, and perform ethnographic research to hear the anecdotal stories around the topic of study. A futurist is then able to translate that data into forecasts that lead to innovative insights and strategies that can help make companies more future prepared and better able to outperform their competitors.

Here are five benefits of hiring a chief futurist officer.

1. BETTER STRATEGIC PLANNING

Futurism is the step needed before strategic planning. A chief futurist officer can guide you to better and more far-reaching, innovative ideas than just solving the problems of today. By working with your chief futurist officer, you can instill new innovative ideas into your strategic plan to be better prepared for the future.

2. DIFFERENTIATION

When I ask most leaders if they want to differentiate themselves in the market in the next five years, almost everyone raises their hand. When I then ask them if they know how to do it, only about half of their hands remain in the air. A chief futurist officer can be your guiding light. With their study of your market, they can identify opportunities for innovations that can scale and be assimilated into your practice, as well as analyze how your competitors might shift over the next decade too.

3. DAILY FORESIGHT

One of the main responsibilities of a chief futurist officer is to scan the horizon for what is happening now in order to know what will come next. This is a daily activity they need to perform themselves and then instill in the company so that it becomes a common and shared practice. This prepares your entire company to be on the lookout for changes that could cause opportunities or weaknesses in the future of the company.

4. STAKEHOLDER INSIGHTS

The two biggest questions I get from leaders center around What do my future clients want? and How can I attract and retain better talent? Working in concert with your human capital resource manager, your chief futurist officer will be able to identify the right people who will not only have culture fit today but culture adaptability for tomorrow. With this same lens, they can analyze what the needs of your clients are today and 10 years from now to help you understand how your product and offerings can pivot.

5. CULTURE ANALYSIS AND TALENT ATTRACTION

The biggest opportunity is to use a chief futurist officer to understand the divide between your perceived culture and the actual lived culture of your workplace and then forecast what a truly successful culture could be. As talent looks for new jobs, culture and experience are likely high on their lists. If you can state what your culture will be in the next 10 years and all the opportunities between now and then, that can serve as a great attractor for the talent you want to hire and retain.

Looking ahead is hard. Your brain is geared to think about your future self as a stranger, but with futurism and a chief futurist officer, they can turn that uncertainty into innovative strategic planning to follow and act on.

Certified FuturistMark Bryan, Director of Innovation & Research at M+A Architects, creates data-driven solutions & future-driven forecasts

See the original post here:

Five benefits of hiring a chief futurist officer

Visionary Futurist Neal Stephenson and Crypto Pioneer Peter Vessenes Announce Lamina1, the Layer-1 Blockchain for the Open Metaverse – Business Wire

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--For the Metaverse to achieve its promise, it requires a base-level blockchain protocol equal to the technical, economic, and philosophical origins of the Metaverse idea itself an open and expansive virtual universe. To fulfill that promise, cryptocurrency pioneer Peter Vessenes and renowned futurist Neal Stephenson are announcing Lamina1, a new Layer-1 blockchain technology designed for the Metaverse with Web3 principles in mind.

Co-founders Vessenes and Stephenson serve as Lamina1s chief executive officer and chairman, respectively. Later this year, the company will launch a testnet and a subsequent betanet. Beyond 2022, the co-founders plan to seed a new immersive environment inspired by Stephenson's million-selling novel Snow Crash, building infrastructure and releasing tools to support the work of third-party creators who want to build Open Metaverse experiences at scale.

Lessons Learned from Web 2.0

As titans of the technology industry implement their vision of the Metaverse - a sector projected to grow to $1T in the coming decade - Lamina1 is working to ensure it does not repeat the missteps of the past by continuing to perpetuate existing structures of centralized ownership and inequality.

Lamina1 proposes an alternative a more modern and integrated Web3 community and ecosystem as the first building block for a truly Open Metaverse. The provably carbon negative Lamina1 chain will offer high transaction volume and an economic design with new incentive mechanisms to help create thriving, vibrant economies for creators and entrepreneurs.

Lamina1 Co-founders Bridge Visionary Science Fiction to Imminent Metaverse Reality

The concept of the Metaverse, an immersive version of the internet was first brought to life in 1992 with the publication of Snow Crash. Now, 30 years later, Stephenson is for the first time founding a company to create the digital world he envisioned.

The 30th anniversary of Snow Crash, and recent interest in actually building the Metaverse, has got me thinking about how to do it in a way thats true to the original concept, said Stephenson. That means creative ferment rooted in a strong base layer of open source tech that provides key services to creators while making sure that they get paid. The purpose of Lamina1 is to provide that, using the best and most up-to-date ideas from the industry. Well build first-and second-party experiences just to make sure it all works. But well know weve succeeded when Lamina1 is adopted by third-party creators.

This vision will be brought to life by the considerable engineering and business acumen of Lamina1s co-founder, Peter Vessenes. Vessenes is known in the cryptocurrency industry for a series of firsts, namely launching the first VC-backed Bitcoin company (2011) and forming the Bitcoin Foundation (2012) - today a blueprint for the way the now $1T+ blockchain industry engages communities and manages and creates cryptocurrencies.

Lamina1s Founding Team Brings Together Experts in Virtual Worlds

Joining the Lamina1 team is Metaverse pioneer Tony Parisi, former head of AR/VR at Unity. He was also an early leader in Web3D and virtual reality, the inventor of VRML (the original standard for 3D graphics on the web) and co-creator of glTF, the open file format that today powers millions of 3D objects. Rounding out the Lamina1 leadership team is advisor Rony Abovitz, founder of Sun and Thunder, Magic Leap, and MAKO Surgical.

I am incredibly excited about Lamina1, said Abovitz. When Neal and Peter told me what they wanted to do (and if I would join their quest), it felt right and good. Neal brings wisdom, empathy, creativity, and a moral framework to his work- attributes deeply needed in creating a good future and a Metaverse that works for humanity. There is no one better to lead the way to build a more Open Metaverse. It is also the right time in human history for there to be a connection between the decentralized open innovations we see in the crypto world and Neal's innate vision and deep insights. I also loved the meshing of Peters genius in crypto with Neals visionary imagination.

I dont know how to describe this other than a true meeting of the minds, said Vessenes. "As an active investor and cryptographer, I have a list of the technology, economic and social innovations I'd like to see in a Layer-1 chain, so being able to team up with Neal and his personality, wisdom, and vision was compelling enough that it brought me out of retirement, so to speak. Seeing some of the earliest Bitcoin and Ethereum investors in the world back the project personally feels like a super special moment for all of us. I can think of no better way to honor Snow Crash's 30th anniversary than by co-founding Lamina1 with Neal.

Initial Investors in Lamina1 include Rony Abovitz, Geoff Entress, Jeremy Giffon, Bing Gordon, James Haft, Reid Hoffman, David Johnston, Joseph Lubin, Patrick Murck, Matthew Roszak, Tihan Seale, Peter Vessenes and Wu Ying.

Lamina1 will be formally introduced at Consensus 2022 presented by CoinDesk. For more information, visit lamina1.com.

About Lamina1

The brainchild of Neal Stephenson (Chairman), who first conceptualized the Metaverse in his 1992 million-selling book Snow Crash, and Peter Vessenes (CEO), a foundational leader from the early days of Bitcoin, Lamina1 is a Layer-1 blockchain purpose-built to empower the Open Metaverse. Lamina1s chain technology, cryptographic model and extensive intellectual property partnerships (to be announced throughout 2022) will establish it as the preferred destination for this generations most creative minds those who are crafting the digital societies of the future. It is the first provably carbon-negative blockchain in the world.

See the original post:

Visionary Futurist Neal Stephenson and Crypto Pioneer Peter Vessenes Announce Lamina1, the Layer-1 Blockchain for the Open Metaverse - Business Wire

Futurist predicts Covid and what’s coming in a decade – Fast Company

In January 2020, when the coronavirus started making headlines around the world, Jane McGonigals inbox was flooded with emails from Silicon Valley execs, government officials, and nonprofit leaders. They all had the same question: Jane, didnt you run a simulation of a respiratory pandemic?

Yes, she had. All the way back in 2010.

McGonigal is a game designer. She builds simulations that help players imagine the unimaginable. And in 2010, she invited nearly 20,000 people to immerse themselves in a future world besieged by a global pandemic. How would you change your habits? she asked. What social interactions would you avoid? Can you work from home?

A decade later, when COVID-19 went from nascent threat to full-blown crisis, McGonigal started hearing from folks who had participated in the simulation. Im not freaking out, one of them said with relief. I already worked through the panic and anxiety when we imagined it 10 years ago.

According to the latest research in psychology and neuroscience, we can all learn to make the shift from panic to poise by training our brains to think about the unthinkable. But what does that training look like? In her new book,Imaginableand on todays episode of The Next Big Idea podcastMcGonigal shares evidence-based techniques you can use to see the future coming. Listen to the full episode below, or read a few key highlights. And follow host Rufus Griscom on LinkedInfor behind-the-scenes looks into the show.

Rufus Griscom:Your path from studying and designing video games to working as a futuristsome would see that as counterintuitive. I think you see this as a logical progression. Why does that sequencing make sense?

Jane McGonigal: What first really fascinated me about the gaming community was this trend that I was observing in gamers: They were developing real skills, real abilities, collective intelligence, and collective imagination that they wanted to apply in a bigger contextmaybe help solve some real-world challenges.

This was back in 2001 when I was starting my PhD work. And I thought, This is amazing! It would be really good for humanity if we could channel these new skills that are coming out of online gaming into real-world problem-solving. But at that time, there were not a lot of games to play that actually connected this community with real-world challenges.

After studying it for six years, writing my dissertation on this topic, I rolled right into, Im going to be the one to make games that help gamers apply those strengths to real-world contexts. And the context that I wound up working in was trying to anticipate hard-to-predict futures, or apply that collective imagination to seeing future scenarios from massively many points of viewthe same way that we see a game worldso that we might discover the outlier risks or unexpected opportunities. And thats what Ive been doing for 15 years now.

This mission to take our interest in gaming and collective imagining exercises and use them to help us better understand possible future outcomesyou and your team have been engaged in this for a while, and you have an astoundingly impressive track record at anticipating possible future outcomes. Can you share some of the details of what you all have done?

2020 was a really strange year to be a future forecaster, in that I had an experience of living through a very difficult future that we had been forecasting for a decade or more. My work at the Institute for the Future involved creating these social simulations way back in 2008, 2010, where we were inviting thousands of people to spend weeks in a private social network. It would look like Twitter, Facebook, or Discord, but everything being posted and shared was about a hypothetical future.

Futurists love to look 10 years ahead because that gives us enough mental distance to think creatively. And if were imagining problems that might not happen for 10 years, it gives us enough time to prepare for them or prevent them. So we were looking at the years 2019 and 2020; and back then, our simulation centered around, How would we survive and adapt to a respiratory pandemic that started in China that was also complicated by cascading crises?One of the things that I specialize in is figuring out how different crises and disruptions intersect. So were not just looking at it from a public health perspective or an epidemiology perspective. We were also thinking about how we would survive and adapt when we have the supply-chain disruptions, when there is misinformation and conspiracy theories about the pandemic being spread on social media, when there are historic wildfires and extreme heat waves due to climate change. And thats just what we lived through in 2020.

What made me sort of crazy for a little while, and made me want to write the bookImaginable, is that there was this incredible proliferation of news stories and headlines using the word unimaginable to describe the pandemic and its consequences. But itwasntunimaginable. We just didnt have a critical mass of people imagining it. We had 20,000 people in one of our simulations, and 8,000 in another. My goal is to have 20millionI think that would really help us prepare for the future.

McGonigal:When we give ourselves these long, luxurious deadlines, we feel time rich. And when we feel time rich, we think, I have all this time! I can do what I want. I can do what matters to me.

When we have urgent deadlines or too many tasks on our to-do list for today, we feel time poor, time deprivedand then we just dont use our time because even though we still have the same amount of time, it feels scarce.

Another thing that researchers have found is that when we imagine 10 years out, we tend to think about things that are more relevant to our most important valuesthe kinds of goals that would help us live a life that we would consider really authentic, really true to our dreams or what we find meaningful and purposeful.

I give people this challenge. Its not, Where would you like to be in 10 years or what would you like to be different? The challenge is to try to vividly imagine waking up on a specific day. So, pick a day of the week; is it a Monday? Is it a Saturday? A Sunday? You imagine yourself waking up, and you try to picture every detail. Where are you? Are you in the same room that you woke up in today, or is it a different room? Where is it? Is there somebody with you? Is it a person? Is it a pet? Is it a different person or pet than you might wake up with today? And then imagine what mood you are in. What mood would you like to wake up in? What would put you in that mood? What might be on your calendar for that day that would put you in that mood?

And then I tell people, Go put it on your calendar. If youve just imagined yourself doing this amazing thing that makes you feel a certain way, go ahead and open up your Google or Apple calendarthey do go 10, 20, 30, 40 years in the futureand put it on your calendar. Even better, invite somebody. Invite a loved one.

It can spark some really interesting conversations about our real hopes and dreams. What is it going to take to get there? Because weve given ourselves 10 years, it allows us to dream bigger and also enjoy that sense of time spaciousness to really make some changes or explore possibilities that we would dismiss as impossible today.

Griscom:Are there any other future scenarios that you think our listeners should consider?

Things to pay attention to: government-mandated internet shutdowns is a huge future force that is spreading globally. If youre not aware of this phenomenon and not potentially prepared to live through weeks or months of the government turning off the internet, thats something to think about.

Another one is climate migration. Weve got to be willing to think about the risks where we live. Are we in a climate-secure, climate-resilient place that will probably be welcoming others who are migrating out of climate-unsafe regions? If so, we should be prepared to see a higher density of living, to be welcoming to people who have been forcibly displaced. Are we emotionally ready for that? Are we economically ready for that? Also think about our pathways to move if we need to. That is something that every serious futurist that I know is thinking aboutpathways of human movement within countries, and across borders. How can we support people economically, socially, mentally, psychologically? How can we make a home? Thats a problem space that warrants so much imagination and innovation and creativity. If I could get all of the smartest minds on the planet to work on something, it would be thinking about movement. That is the biggest future scenario that would benefit from our imagination, and also our innovation.

This article originally appeared in Next Big Idea Club magazine and is reprinted with permission.

Here is the original post:

Futurist predicts Covid and what's coming in a decade - Fast Company

Heres what Teslas futuristic diner with drive-in theater and Supercharger could look like – Electrek

Teslas futuristic diner with drive-in theater and Supercharger station is finally becoming a reality, and we get a look at what could look like thanks to renders based on the construction plans.

This project has been in the work for a long time.

In 2018,Elon Musk said that Tesla plans to openan old school drive-in, roller skates & rock restaurant at one of the new Tesla Supercharger locations in Los Angeles. It was yet another, Is he joking? kind of Elon Musk idea, but he apparently wasnt kidding.

A few months later,Tesla actually applied for building permits for a restaurant and Supercharger station at a location in Santa Monica. However, the project has since stalled, apparently due to local regulations. Nevertheless, Tesla still moved forward with a Supercharger at the location, but it had to move the diner project to Hollywood earlier this year.

Last month, Tesla filed the construction plans with the city giving us the first look at what the automaker intends to build.

We learned from the plans that it will be a semi-circular two-story diner with 29 Supercharger stalls and two movie theater screens, but everything is from architectural plans.

Ed Howard, an expert in architectural models, built renders based on those plans to give us a better idea of what the Tesla diner could look like:

Obviously he took some liberties for things that werent in the plans, like the name of the diner, Milliways, the restaurant at the end of the universe from Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy.

But for the most part, thats what the building and layout should look like:

It looks like the right mix of retro-looking, which was the original plan, and a more futuristic design, which was the new plan once it got moved to Hollywood. The renders are accurate down to the bamboo walls that are going to separate the Tesla diners lot from the rest of the block.

We dont have a solid timeline on when Tesla plans to open the diner, and it is going to be dependent on permit approvals, but things are moving forward.

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Subscribe to Electrek on YouTube for exclusive videos and subscribe to the podcast.

More here:

Heres what Teslas futuristic diner with drive-in theater and Supercharger could look like - Electrek

An Exhibition Unearths Rare Production Drawings from the Futuristic Neo Tokyo of the Anime Classic ‘Akira’ – Colossal

AnimationHistoryIllustration #anime#architecture#drawing#film#science fiction

Akira, cut #1, Final production background detail, Toshiharu Mizutani, poster color on paper, 93 x 53 centimeters. All photos from AKIRA (Movie), based on the graphic novel AKIRA by Katsuhiro Otomo. First published by Young Magazine, Kodansha Ltd. MASH ROOM / AKIRA COMMITTEE, shared with permission

Katsuhiro Otomos 1988 sci-fi classic Akira has had an unparalleled influence on anime and film, and an exhibition at the Tchoban Foundation in Berlin showcases the original drawings that brought its futuristic cyberpunk setting to life. Akira The Architecture of Neo Tokyo features 59 production backdrops, layouts, concepts, and image boards, many of which have never been shown publicly. The collection includes now-iconic works by art director Toshiharu Mizutani and collaborators Katsufumi Hariu, Norihiro Hiraki, Shinji Kimura, Satoshi Kuroda, Hiromasa Ogura, Hiroshi no, Hajime Soga, Tsutomu Uchida, and Takashi Watabe.

Otomo first released the dystopian story as a manga series in 1982 before turning it into the highly influential action film a few years later. The narrative follows characters Shtar Kaneda, the telekinetic Tetsuo Shim, and their friends, who navigate the imagined Japanese metropolis of Neo Tokyo with its neon streetlights, crumbling infrastructure, and unrelenting post-apocalyptic vibe.

Ahead of the exhibition, curator Stefan Riekeles also released the book Anime Architecture: Imagined Worlds and Endless Megacities. The volume contains fantastic scenes from various animated classics including Ghost in the Shell and Metropolis. You can see Akira The Architecture of Neo Tokyo through September 4, and according to Its Nice That, the show might travel to London next.

Akira, pattern no. 182, final production background, Toshiharu Mizutani, poster color on paper, 55 x 42 centimeters

Akira, pattern no. 2211, final production background, Hiroshi Ohno, poster color on paper, 50 x 36 centimeters

Akira, pattern no. 2204, picture board, Toshiharu Mizutani, poster color on paper, 25 x 35 centimeters

Akira, pattern no. 700, final production background Toshiharu Mizutani, poster color on paper, 26 x 37 centimeters

Akira, pattern no. 214, final production background, Toshiharu Mizutani, poster color on paper, 25.5 x 37 centimeters

Do stories and artists like this matter to you? Become a Colossal Member today and support independent arts publishing for as little as $5 per month. You'll connect with a community of like-minded readers who are passionate about contemporary art, read articles and newsletters ad-free, sustain our interview series, get discounts and early access to our limited-edition print releases, and much more. Join now!

More:

An Exhibition Unearths Rare Production Drawings from the Futuristic Neo Tokyo of the Anime Classic 'Akira' - Colossal