TotalEnergies and partners to build offshore projects in South Korea – Power Technology

Energy companies TotalEnergies and Corio Generation have partnered with South Korean engineering firm SK ecoplant to develop the BadaEnergy offshore wind portfolio in South Korea.

Located offshore from Ulsan and South Jeolla province, the BadaEnergy portfolio features floating and fixed-bottom offshore wind farms with more than 2GW of combined capacity.

It includes Gray Whale, a 1.5GW floating offshore wind farm that is expected to become one of the worlds largest floating offshore facilities once completed.

Corio Generation Korea representative director Woojin Choi said: SK ecoplants broad experience and excellent capabilities in offshore development will serve as a great driving force for constructing offshore wind in South Korea, including one of the worlds largest floating offshore wind developments.

In order to support the countrys ambition to lead the way in offshore wind, we will have a dedicated focus on the localisation of capital, finance, and technology.

Using its offshore engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) knowledge, SK ecoplant will help its partners develop the projects through the planning, licensing, construction and operation phases.

In addition, the company will acquire a stake in the BadaEnergy portfolio subject to government approval.

To date, four of the portfolios five wind farm projects have secured electric business licenses (EBLs) from the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energys Electricity Regulatory Commission.

Most of the projects have secured exclusive development rights and the partners have set the first commercial operation date for 2027.

SK ecoplant CEO Kyung-il Park said: By jointly developing the offshore wind business with global energy companies, we have laid the foundation to become a major player in the market.

We have completed the overall value chain of the energy business by achieving rapid growth through intensive investments in the renewable energy sector such as offshore wind, solar, and fuel cells.

Read more here:

TotalEnergies and partners to build offshore projects in South Korea - Power Technology

2022 High Net Worth (HNW) Offshore Investment Report: Key Challenges Facing the Industry – ResearchAndMarkets.com – Business Wire

DUBLIN--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The "High Net Worth (HNW) Offshore Investment - Drivers and Motivations 2021" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering.

This report draws on the publisher's Global Wealth Managers Survey and Financial Services Consumer Survey to analyze the drivers behind offshore investments across the wealth pyramid. It examines and contrasts offshore investment preferences across multiple jurisdictions and wealth tiers, providing readers with an in-depth understanding of what is motivating investors to look to offshore booking centers. The report outlines key challenges facing the wealth management industry in 2022, taking into account the impact of inflation, the COVID-19 pandemic, and what this means for the offshore sector.

The offshore wealth management market has surged in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, rebounding sharply after the volatility of Q1 2020. New investors have been drawn to the formerly niche market, while the traditional core of the market - HNW investors - have upped their allocations. The pandemic has truly reshaped the offshore investor profile and their behaviors, with the role of Asia Pacific growing as a destination for non-resident investors mainly based in North America and Europe.

Scope

Reasons to Buy

Key Topics Covered:

1. Executive Summary

2. HNW Offshore Investors

2.1 The core HNW offshore segment is growing in most markets

2.2 Portfolio preferences of HNW offshore investors

3. Retail Offshore Investors

3.1 Retail offshore investors are mainly draw from developing market millennials

3.2 While many individuals have offshore accounts, few outside of the HNW client base are worth pursuing

4. Motivations and Drivers

4.1 COVID-19 encouraged more investors to offshore wealth to combat negative portfolio impacts onshore

4.2 HNW investors' business interests drive them to offshore

4.3 Retail investors are keen to offshore for better returns

5. Appendix

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/1g9yco

Source: GlobalData

Follow this link:

2022 High Net Worth (HNW) Offshore Investment Report: Key Challenges Facing the Industry - ResearchAndMarkets.com - Business Wire

Norwegian Companies Looking to Pair Ammonia Production Vessels with Offshore Wind Farms – Offshore WIND

Norways H2Carrier and Statkraft have entered into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding a study for the possible use of H2Carriers green ammonia floating production vessel, the P2XFloater, on certain offshore wind locations.

The P2XFloater will utilize renewable power to produce green hydrogen and green ammonia which in turn can be shipped to the international markets, the companies said.

H2Carrier recently received an Approval in Principle (AiP) from DNV for the use of the P2XFloater for near-shore production.

The purpose of this new study is to evaluate the use of the P2XFloater in a true offshore environment.

The P2XFloater is expected to contribute to improving the power flexibility of an offshore wind installation and make an offshore wind farm less dependent on grid and export cable facilities.

The study will assess the challenges of operating electrolyzers and an ammonia production process offshore with variable load handling.

Market demand for green ammonia is rapidly increasing due to the decarbonisation of the industrial and maritime sectors. The P2XFloater concept provide a low-cost, fast-track and flexible solution to produce green ammonia on an industrial scale and at a competitive price, said Mrten Lunde, CEO of H2Carrier AS.

H2Carrier will conduct the study together with the Norwegian engineering company KANFA who, together with its parent company, Technip Energies, has experience in the offshore production and installation industry.

We are very pleased to cooperate with Statkraft and KANFA to assess the impact of operating our P2XFloater in a true offshore environment. While we so far have focused on near shore operations, we are convinced that the P2XFloater will play an important role in the commercialisation of offshore wind resources, Lunde said.

Follow offshoreWIND.biz on:

Originally posted here:

Norwegian Companies Looking to Pair Ammonia Production Vessels with Offshore Wind Farms - Offshore WIND

Water injection pumps to help increase oil recovery offshore Guyana – WorldOil

Guyana has some of the world's biggest offshore discoveries made in years, with 10 billion barrels of recoverable oil and gas starting to come online since 2019. These offshore reserves are being extracted using floating production, storage and offloading (FPSO) vessels, which are connected to well-heads on the seabed. Sulzer has delivered 11 high pressure water injection pumps, and the latest order for five more HPcp pumps will support the largest FPSO in the Stabroek block.

Sulzers expert support for the FPSO arena is based on both innovative pump design and the flexibility to meet the customers requirements.

Sulzers expert support for the FPSO arena is based on both innovative pump design and the flexibility to meet the customers requirements. These are essential to cope with the often-extreme conditions of the oceans and the specifics of the operators production methodology and philosophy. Water injection as a method of increased oil recovery (IOR) is well known and time-proven in the upstream Oil & Gas market. Typically, high-pressure pumps are used to inject treated seawater or produced water into the aquifer formation to stimulate and drive oil to the production riser.

In this project, the engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) company will also lease and operate the FPSO for two years. Consequently, the efficiency and reliability of the major pumping equipment are very important. Sulzer has a long-standing partnership with the EPC, which appreciates the high-quality products that have been delivered for similar projects.

Steve Jackson - Head of Global FPSO Market for Sulzer, comments: Our expertise is widely recognized by this market where our pumps are renowned for delivering high-quality, robust products. The latest FPSO is designed to produce 250000 barrels of oil per day, with an associated gas treatment capacity of 450 million cubic feet per day and a water injection capacity of 300000 barrels per day. Operating in water around 1800 meters deep, the new vessel will have a storage capacity of around 2 million barrels of crude oil.

Read this article:

Water injection pumps to help increase oil recovery offshore Guyana - WorldOil

Can the controllers of crypto exchanges in offshore jurisdictions be held liable for the funds stolen by crypto fraudsters through those exchanges? -…

Courts in offshore jurisdictions have started to adopt the decisions of the English Courts when granting relief with respect to the dissipation and recovery of crypto-assets. One example is the recent decision in ChainSwap v Persons Unknown where the BVI court granted a freezing order over assets held by persons unknown in relation to a crypto fraud and follows similar decisions in the UK and other commonwealth countries where such relief is now commonly granted. Therefore, we consider the recent English decision in D'Aloia v Persons Unknown and Others [2022] EWHC 1723 (Ch) which highlights the possibility that the controllers and operators of a crypto exchange may be considered a trustee of misappropriated assets flowing through any crypto wallet that it maintains and that it would therefore have a duty to account to victims of the misappropriation for any unauthorized profits or gain made as trustee.

Background

The case concerns an application by Mr Fabrizio D'Aloia for interim injunctive relief and disclosure against a number of defendants, arising out of what he alleged to be the fraudulent misappropriation of cryptocurrency in the form of approximately 2.1 million USDT, and 230,000 USDC by persons unknown. Mr D'Aloia alleged he was induced, by way of fraudulent misrepresentation, to transfer USDT and USDC from his Coinbase and Crypto.com wallets to the operators of the "tda-finan" website, who were persons unknown. By using crypto investigation specialists, Mr D'Aloia confirmed that some 2.175 million of USDT and USDC was transferred to a number of private addresses and wallets operated by, or under the control of, various cryptocurrency exchanges. The decision importantly considers the satisfaction of the test for injunctive relief as it relates to crypto assets, including whether the English courts are the most appropriate forum for such an application with reference to the lex situs of the crypto assets in question and where the damage occurred.

Can an exchange can be responsible for the proceeds lost?

One of the most significant developments from the decision stems from the Court's ruling that there was a good arguable case that Mr D'Aloia has a claim not only against the fraudsters who stole his cryptocurrency, but also against the controller and operator of one of the exchanges which controlled the wallets through which it was possible to trace the crypto assets stolen from Mr D'Aloia. In doing so, it highlighted the possibility that an exchange with sufficient control over wallets that it maintains will be considered a trustee of misappropriated assets flowing through those wallets and in turn have a duty to account to victims of the misappropriation for any unauthorized profits or gain made as a result of its role as trustee. It remains to be seen whether Mr D'Aloia's claim in this regard will be successful at trial. Nonetheless, the fact that such a claim has been allowed to proceed is a significant decision not only in the England and Wales, but also offshore and specifically in the Cayman Islands and the BVI where such decisions are highly persuasive and likely to be followed.

Practical consequences

The decision in D'Aloia v Persons Unknown is significant as it demonstrates the possibility for victims of crypto fraud to have direct claims against the controllers and operators of crypto exchanges for equitable compensation where a constructive trust claim is made out. In circumstances where taking action against the fraudsters is ordinarily very difficult given the pseudonymous nature of crypto assets and the associated difficulty of identifying the fraudsters, victims of crypto-related fraud will now consider the availability of direct claims against crypto exchanges, as the known parties, where those exchanges have been notified that they are in possession of fraudulently misappropriated crypto-assets. Where crypto-assets are the subject of a potential dispute, a Court may make an order requiring that such assets be properly ring-fenced and not withdrawn. Crypto exchanges in the Cayman Islands and the BVI will need to consider best practice, including the level of control they exercise over wallets, and the procedures needed to mitigate against the risk of misappropriated funds being held in wallets maintained by the exchange.

For more information on this issue, or if you require advice such matters or any other Cayman Islands or BVI legal issues, please contact any of the primary contacts from the Dubai Insolvency and Dispute Resolution team listed below.

Read this article:

Can the controllers of crypto exchanges in offshore jurisdictions be held liable for the funds stolen by crypto fraudsters through those exchanges? -...

Dutch Coast Guard Responds to Product Tanker Fire Offshore – The Maritime Executive

Hafnia Tanzanite was disabled by an engine room fire off the coast of the Netherlands (Kustwacht Nederland photos)

PublishedSep 6, 2022 2:34 PM by The Maritime Executive

The Dutch Coast Guard responded to an engine room fire on a tanker offshore near Amsterdam on Monday morning. They are reporting that the fire was quickly brought under control and extinguished avoiding a serious incident and no individuals were harmed. There was no pollution but the vessel is disabled.

The 49,478 dwt product tanker Hafnia Tanzanite, registered in the Marshall Islands, was inbound from Malaysia with a cargo of bio-diesel fuel. The report of a fire aboard the tanker came to the Coast Guard command at 6:00 a.m. The vessel was approximately 40 nautical miles west of Scheveningen, with a major anchorage off the coast of the Netherlands, and has a crew of 20 aboard.

The Coast Guard alerted multiple units sending an aircraft to investigate along with a SAR helicopter and three lifeboats. They were preparing for the evacuation of the crew. In addition, they directed another rescue boat operating in the area to the tanker.

A specially trained fire crew with the Maritime Incident Group was airlifted to the vessel to assist with the firefight. Shortly after 7:00 a.m., they reported that they believed the fire had been extinguished through the use of the ships Halon system.

The MIG team later entered the engine room to confirm that the fire had been extinguished and to determine the extent of the damage. They reported that the fire began in the middle auxiliary engine of the six-year-old tanker.

So much damage has been caused to the engine room that the ship can no longer sail under its own power, the Coast Guard said in its follow-up statement to the incident. Two additional tugs were sent to the scene and the 600-foot tanker was taken to the anchorage, where it remains.

The Coast Guard is reporting that the vessel is disabled due to the extent of the damage. They are expecting that the ship will be towed to port by the owners for an additional survey and repairs.

Read more here:

Dutch Coast Guard Responds to Product Tanker Fire Offshore - The Maritime Executive

UMaine to host international offshore wind conference Sept. 1213 in Portland and virtually – UMaine News – University of Maine – University of Maine

The University of Maine Advanced Structures and Composites Center (ASCC) will welcome industry leaders from around the world for the American Floating Offshore Wind Technical Summit (AFloat) in the wake of President Joe Bidens attention on floating wind in the Gulf of Maine. The ASCC will host the 2022 AFloat Conference from Sept. 1213 at the Westin Harborview in Portland, Maine, with a virtual option for remote attendees.

AFloat will bring together developers, policymakers, financiers, academics and other stakeholders to discuss the future of floating offshore wind in the Gulf of Maine and globally.

The conference will address the Bureau of Ocean Energy Managements (BOEM) Request for Interest and a Request for Competitive Interest for offshore wind development in the Gulf of Maine, which were published Aug. 18, 2022.

U.S. Department of the Interior Secretary Deb Haaland said that the announcement represents one of the many milestones that this Administration has achieved to advance offshore wind development, create good-paying jobs and lower consumer energy costs while collaborating with our government partners.

The conference will feature presentations from University of Maine President Joan Ferrini-Mundy; Sens. Susan Collins and Angus King; and Gov. Janet Mills.

Other speakers and sessions at the conference include:

For information and to register, visit the AFloat 2022 conference website. Discounted rates are available for University of Maine students, researchers and employees looking to attend in person.

View original post here:

UMaine to host international offshore wind conference Sept. 1213 in Portland and virtually - UMaine News - University of Maine - University of Maine

A map of Newfoundland and Labrador’s tsunami of offshore oil plans – Canada’s National Observer

Deep under the choppy waters off Newfoundland and Labradors coast lies the key to the province's financial future: billions of barrels of oil it hopes will be extracted over the coming years.

That's how Newfoundland and Labrador is framing its latest push into offshore drilling, anchored by the recent federal approval of Bay du Nord. That project, if built, will become Canadas first deepwater oil site, emitting 30 million tonnes of carbon dioxide pollution annually. Now, Newfoundland and Labrador hopes to attract more projects like it, inviting the worlds oil majors to further explore the area off its coast and add more oil production to the economically struggling provinces balance sheet all part of a plan to double offshore oil production by the end of the decade.

From the perspective of the provincial government, Bay du Nord is the next step in what's going to be an even wider opening up of the offshore, said Angela Carter, a University of Waterloo politics professor based in Newfoundland and author of Fossilized: Environmental Policy in Canada's Petro-Provinces. This is about a commitment to expand the offshore to an unprecedented level.

Get daily news from Canada's National Observer

To understand the scope of this expansion, Canadas National Observer has mapped all oil exploration, production and significant discovery licences as well as areas where companies have been invited to bid on projects this year. It also shows where exploration wells have been drilled in the past.

View the full-screen version of this interactive map by Esri Canada

The map is interactive, so you can click on an area to find information about who owns each licence, financial information, and more. Using the legend, you can click on the layers, toggling them on or off to help navigate the map. Active oil production and significant discoveries are labelled. All information included on the map was provided by the Canada Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board (CNLOPB), a joint provincial-federal regulator that oversees the provinces offshore oil and gas industry.

Active production licences (in red) show sites that are currently extracting oil. In yellow are whats called significant discovery licences: parcels where companies have found notable oil reserves but aren't extracting, at least yet. Exploration licences (in blue) are parcels companies have been awarded the right to explore and come with commitments to spend a certain amount by a certain date. The black dots show where wells have been drilled to look for oil. In purple are the parcels the regulator has open for bidding but that are not yet owned by any company. The red star shows where Bay du Nord is located (although it's worth mentioning, its owner, Equinor, owns several nearby parcels it collectively refers to as the Bay du Nord project).

The map reveals clusters of investment activity. Around producing oilfields like Hibernia and Hebron (shown in red on the map) are other significant discoveries in a region called the Jeanne dArc Basin on the Grand Banks of Newfoundland an area historically important to the provinces fishing industry.

Bay du Nord (where the red star is) is farther to the northeast and represents a new play for oil in an area called the Flemish Pass. The map shows other significant discoveries in the Flemish Pass, called Mizzen, Harpoon and Baccalieu all majority-owned by Equinor. Those other discoveries helped Equinor decide to proceed with the Bay du Nord project because the company can redesign its plans to tap those other wells, adding hundreds of millions of barrels to the projects business case.

The regulators call for bids also shows plans to expand further into the Flemish Pass, as well as a whole new region to the islands southeast. The province says its oil and gas reserves span an area larger than the Gulf of Mexico.

Andrew Parsons, the province's minister of industry, energy and technology, was not made available for an interview before publication, but in 2020, he said the plan to boost production was supported by the fact the offshore is rich with oil reserves. Existing oilfields have about two billion barrels of oil left, but its estimated billions more exist.

The first step for Newfoundland and Labrador is to increase exploration because without more sites to drill, more oil cant be extracted. Exploration drilling is of highest importance to unlocking hydrocarbon potential, according to the province.

To do that, Newfoundland and Labrador launched its Offshore Exploration Initiative in 2020, a reimbursement program aimed at increasing the number of exploration wells drilled off the coast between 2021 and 2024. At the time, Parsons said it was important to incentivize near-term drilling or else the provinces competitiveness in the global market would be hit.

If Newfoundland and Labrador continues to develop its offshore oil industry, it will be significantly more challenging for Canada to reach its emission reduction targets, and further development will impose devastating consequences for marine ecosystems.

Newfoundland and Labrador has three organizations working to attract investment in its oil industry. They are the provinces Department of Industry, Energy and Technology, a Crown corporation called the Oil and Gas Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador and the provincial-federal regulator, the CNLOPB.

Together, these organizations study the offshore to find oil deposits and provide data to fossil fuel companies to attract exploration investment. Each year, the regulator opens up an area for investment and invites companies to bid on parcels ripe for exploration. It announced in May that 28 parcels spanning more than seven million hectares are up for grabs in the eastern region of Newfoundland, while 10 parcels covering 2.6 million hectares are available in the southeast area off the provinces coast. Together, thats an area nearly the size of New Brunswick. Bids are open until November and will be granted in early 2023, according to a press release from the board.

When the pandemic hit, major investments in offshore oil development were put on the backburner. Data shows that in 2019, three exploration licences were issued, compared to only one in 2020 and zero in 2021.

See the original post:

A map of Newfoundland and Labrador's tsunami of offshore oil plans - Canada's National Observer

Offshore Dedicated Development Team: Everything You Need to Know – London Post

With the software development industry continuing to grow, moving your development team offshore makes good business sense for many reasons. An offshore dedicated development team ensures that companies can deliver the highest quality software in the shortest time by reducing the burden of hiring and empowering skilled resources. With such a team, an organisation can simplify hiring, empower qualified staff, minimise development time, and improve time-to-market.

Unfortunately, According to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, out of the 7.8 billion people on the planet, only 27 million are software developers. That means there is one software developer for every 2,900 people worldwide. These numbers are alarming, given how much technology we depend on daily.

According to a report by the World Economic Forum on software developer shortages, we will need at least 18 million IT workers over the next decade. A global lack of software developers and tech talent isnt likely to subside anytime soon, causing damage to the tech industry and all sectors of the economy.

One reason the West cant find qualified candidates is that software development jobs are not particularly appealing to younger people in developed countries. It is no surprise that over half of the worlds software developers come from developing nations.

Consequently, companies are looking outside their local regions for talent. This necessity has contributed to the increase in offshoring.

You can build an offshore team alone but it is complicated as you have to deal with local legalities and navigate taxes etc., on your own. By teaming up with a partner on the ground, you benefit from dedicated, integrated developers without this extra hassle.

The right offshore partner can offer a great alternative to traditional outsourcing. They can solve your local skills shortage by building you a world-class, offshore dedicated development team, in a tech city like Bangalore or by setting up a remote team across India. Outsourcing involves working with people who divide their time between you and multiple clients, while offshoring delivers developers to work solely for you.

An offshore partner can handpick the best talent from the top 1% of engineers to build your team and help you access skills you couldnt find locally. They can build your team, set up operations on the ground, and support your operations, freeing you to focus on development and delivery. Say goodbye to lengthy and disruptive recruitment drives. With dedicated developers, creating a software development team has never been easier.

Offshoring provides simple scaling solutions, improves employee engagement, managed operations, and improves communication because it ensures that your developers are an integral part of your team. Offshore partners set you up with a dedicated team, and the partner handles all the heavy lifting. Also, Indias development industry speaks English, making communication more straightforward.

You can scale your development capacity without spending excessive time on hiring as the sourcing and initial testing phases are taken care of. In contrast to outsourcing, where engineers juggle multiple clients and projects, your teams developers are your companys full-time employees. Offshoring focuses on achieving long-term goals and aligning developers with your companys mission.

Traditionally, outsourcing was just about finding unattainable prices at home. The benefits of offshoring are also associated with lower costs, but it is more about finding the right talent to meet your business needs. You can grow with a dedicated team of highly talented developers from tech hubs like Bangalore. It does not mean, however, that outsourcing is not a suitable option. Its okay if youre looking to build an app that requires minimal maintenance. But, if the application is the core of your customer offering, a dedicated team would be a much better idea.

Offshoring your software development means you wont have to invest in additional IT infrastructure or devote more time than necessary to recruitment and hiring locally.

You can also access knowledgeable software engineers with extensive experience developing software applications of international standards and quality. If you have a dedicated team thats fully aligned with your vision and mission, you can rest assured that they can work around the clock to ensure a quality product. As a result, you can ensure your product reaches the market sooner.

You can focus on your core business strategy with offshore software development instead of managing complex and time-consuming software development processes. Your company can concentrate on core practices. Using this approach, companies of all sizes can access the same skilled labour force, reducing costs and time spent on software development.

When hiring an offshore dedicated development team builder, it is vital to consider three actionable strategies:

A companys case studies are an excellent indicator of their work, success, and the type of clients they deal with regularly.

Speak with the businesss senior management about its ethos, temperament, and attitude. Learn if your partner has a recruitment process based on their requirements to help procure the right skills and cultural fit. Find out how this partnership will benefit your existing company. Theyll be able to provide answers if theyre real.

Communicating effectively with a partner located a long distance away is essential. Have you experienced fast and polite responses to your emails and calls during early conversations? Are you confident in the companys ability to meet your requirements? Is the company asking the right questions? If there is not much to evaluate at the beginning of your cooperation, you should still look for anything that raises red flags.

Software development offshore makes good financial and business sense. When you plan correctly and understand the risks involved, you can carefully define your project, select the best offshore development partner, and use best practices to keep work transparent, communication easy, and project coordination seamless.

The process of hiring skilled developers in-house is a time-consuming one that is expensive in terms of time, effort, and overhead. You should build an offshore dedicated development team, with a partner on the ground, when you need to fill talent gaps in your team or if your in-house development team lacks skills and experience required by the business. The right developers can help organisations take advantage of the latest technologies and help you innovate and excel.

Here is the original post:

Offshore Dedicated Development Team: Everything You Need to Know - London Post

Glendronach gas tie-in west of Shetland close to sanction – Offshore magazine

Offshore staff

LONDON TotalEnergies E&P UK and its partners should sanction the Glendronach gas development west of Shetland by year-end 2022.

According to Kistos, which farmed into the surrounding Greater Laggan Area (GLA) earlier this year, Glendronach should be onstream and producing through the GLA offshore pipeline system before the end of 2024.

The partners also plan an exploration well on the 638-cf Benriach prospect, which is close to the producing infrastructure.

As for Kistos E&P operations in the Dutch North Sea, the company has decided to continue exporting gas from Q10-A (Kistos 60%) via the P15-D platform, after considering various rerouting options. This should limit the future capex and the associated risk of interruptions to production that would have arisen.

Preparations are underway for a new work program to slow Q10-As production decline, with negotiations progressing for a rig to start work in first-quarter 2023. The schedule will include installation of velocity strings in the A-06 and A-05 wells, a sidetrack of the A-01 well into the Slochteren Formation and simulation of the Zechstein clastic formation in the A-04 well.

Estimated gross cost is about 30 million (US$29.7 million).

The Concept Assess phase has concluded for the Orion oil development, with three options under review. Two of these would make use of the Q10-A platform, while the third would involve installation of a new, minimal facilities Bridge Linked Platform alongside.

Orions oil is located directly above the Q10-A gas field in the Vlieland sandstone formation, a proven play in the area, although this reservoir has low porosity and permeability. However, it also contains natural fractures that could enhance productivity, as demonstrated by an appraisal well last summer that flow tested 3,200 bbl/d from an 825-m horizontal section.

As for the Q11-B appraisal well, which was suspended in February, Kistos is considering development options, in light of current gas prices.

The Dutch authorities have rejected the companys application for an extension of its operated M10a and M11 licenses north of the Wadden Islands beyond June 30, 2022. Kistos has lodged an appeal and will submit the full details of its reasons for doing so by the deadline of Sept. 14, accompanied by a draft field development plan. It expects the appeal to be heard before the end of the year.

09.07.2022

Read more here:

Glendronach gas tie-in west of Shetland close to sanction - Offshore magazine

Copenhagen Energy Submits Third 3 GW Offshore Wind Proposal in Australia – Offshore WIND

Danish renewable energy company Copenhagen Energy has submitted a third offshore wind project proposal in Australia to the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water for initial assessment under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

After filing two proposals earlier this year for 3 GW offshore wind farms in Western Australia, one in the waters between Mandurah and Bunbury and one offshore Kalbarri, the company has now revealed details for a project of the same size planned for an area 10 to 44 kilometres offshore between Lancelin and Two Rocks Two Rocks.

The third project, called Samphire Offshore Wind Farm, will comprise up to 200 turbines and six substation platforms in Commonwealth waters delivering 3 GW of renewable electricity, enough to power three million homes and businesses, for up to 50 years, according to the developer.

Subsea export cables through State waters will connect the wind farm to a transfer station on land at a site between 60 to 120 kilometres north of Perth.

Same as with the two previously announced projects, Copenhagen Energy said its modelling indicated that for every 1 GW of power, the Samphire Offshore Wind Farm will create 14,500 direct and indirect jobs during construction, and 200 jobs during operation.

The project can power around 3 million homes with clean electricity and is expected to offset up to 6 million tonnes of CO2 a year.

Subject to approvals, the company aims to start construction of the Samphire offshore wind farm in 2029.

The release of our Samphire proposal is just the start of a long process that will involve comprehensive studies to understand the environmental, economic, and social impacts of our project, said Copenhagen Energy Chief Executive Officer Jasmin Bejdic.

As with our other projects, we are talking to a range of local, State and Federal government agencies and local community, tourism, and fishing groups about our project and how we can develop it successfully.

Last month, Copenhagen Energy released details of its Midwest Offshore Wind Farm, some five months after introducing its first project in Western Australia, LeeuwinOffshore Wind Farm.

The developer has one more project planned for the Australian State, Velella Offshore Wind Farm, for which it will also file a proposal to the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water.

The fourth project is also planned to have an installed capacity of 3 GW, bringing Copenhagen Energys development portfolio in Western Australia to a total of 12 GW.

Follow offshoreWIND.biz on:

Go here to see the original:

Copenhagen Energy Submits Third 3 GW Offshore Wind Proposal in Australia - Offshore WIND

The Philippines makes its first move towards offshore wind – Energy Monitor

The Philippines is exploring the feasibility of installing up to 3GW of offshore wind by 2040, announced Aboitiz Power Corporation, one of the countrys main power distributors, on 18 August 2022.

The study, which is funded by the US Trade and Development Agency, is expected to conclude by mid-2023, the company said. It will work on the project in partnership with Climate Capital Management and the think tank RMI.

Currently, the Philippines has no installed offshore wind capacity. The World Bank estimates there is more than 178GW of technical offshore wind potential in the country.

In April 2022, the Philippines Department of Energy and the World Bank launched the Philippines Offshore Wind Roadmap, which presents research-based targets for building a robust offshore wind presence for the nation.

The road map identifies 3GW of offshore wind potential by 2040, which is 3% of the countrys electricity supply. In a high-growth scenario, the authors estimate the potential for 21GW of offshore wind, or 21% of electricity supply.

With rising energy demand and renewable energy targets to meet, the feasibility study aims to supplement the governments low-carbon vision.

It is our goal to contribute to our countrys energy transition journey by exploring more zero-emissions indigenous energy sources, said Emmanuel V Rubio, president and CEO of Aboitiz Power, at the launch of the study. This offshore wind feasibility study is a step in the right direction as we further diversify our extensive renewable energy portfolio to achieve our goal.

See the rest here:

The Philippines makes its first move towards offshore wind - Energy Monitor

South African court bans offshore oil and gas exploration by Shell – The Guardian

A South African court has upheld a ban imposed on the energy giant Shell from using seismic waves to explore for oil and gas off the Indian Ocean coast.

The judgment delivered in Makhanda on Thursday marks a monumental victory for environmentalists concerned about the impact the exploration would have on whales and other marine life.

The 2014 decision granting the right for the exploration of oil and gas in the Transkei and Algoa exploration areas is reviewed and set aside, the high court ruled in the southern city.

Civil rights organisations and civilians celebrated outside the courthouse following the verdict, according to local media.

A Shell spokesperson said the company respect[s] the courts decision and would review the judgment to determine our next steps. Shell did not say if it would appeal against the judgment or not. We remain committed to South Africa and our role in the just energy transition, he said.

Last December the same court had issued an interim order prohibiting the firm from going ahead with its plans.

Green Connection, one of the environmental and human rights organisations that filed the case against Shell, said that civil society, traditional communities and small-scale [fishermen] have once again been vindicated by the courts.

The petroleum firm was set to collect 3D seismic data over more than 6,000 sq km (2,300 sq miles) of ocean off South Africas Wild Coast - a 300km (185-mile) stretch of rich waters housing exquisite marine life and natural reserves.

Campaigners argued the research would have sent extremely loud shock waves every 10 seconds, 24 hours a day for five months, potentially harming marine species and disrupting their routines.

South Africas energy ministry had backed the scheme, and criticised those who opposed it as thwarting investment in the countrys development.

Continue reading here:

South African court bans offshore oil and gas exploration by Shell - The Guardian

Incredible farmhouse with access to unspoilt beach for sale on beautiful Scots island – Daily Record

A stunning farm property with sea views and access to a beautiful unspoilt beach on one of Scotland's most picturesque islands has just gone up for sale. The farm of Backaskaill is found on the island of Sanday, the largest of Orkneys outer islands, in what's been described as a "dream location".

The sale features a "tastefully restored" three-bedroom farmhouse and converted two-bedroom cottage (with a conservatory) that can be found close to a spectacular sweeping sandy bay with spectacular views out to the North Sea.

Placed on the market for offers in the region of 1,350,000, the main building is currently being used as a popular luxury 5* holiday let, meaning there is the option to continue it as a successful business.

Orkney-based estate agent K Allan Properties, who are taking care of the sale, said: "The farmhouse provides a magnificent, luxury family home with the additional benefit of letting income potential. It has been tastefully restored and decorated to a very high standard with double-glazing throughout, in keeping with its character and heritage, by a professional interior designer."

They added that the farm building comes with two additional large rooms that are currently unused, and undergoing conversion into a cinema room and playroom but could easily become two further bedrooms.

As well as both the main building and the cottage, which currently links internally to the farmhouse but can be separated by internal doors on both sides, the property also comes with a number of outbuildings, formerly used by the farm.

Sanday is well known its stunning coastal scenery, long sandy beaches, abundant wildlife and peaceful lifestyle attract new residents and holidaymakers. It is increasingly popular with tourists and boasts a thriving economy.

The island benefits from high-quality shops, primary/secondary school, hotels, medical practice and a dynamic social community scene.

The B-listed farmhouse and steading built in the 19th century incorporates a former mill and character coach house tower.

You can view the full property here.

Don't miss the top culture and heritage stories from around Scotland. Sign up to our twice weekly Scotland Now newsletter here.

Read more:

Hiker wakes up to 'biblical' cloud inversion while camping at the top of Ben Lomond

Luxury wedding venue Myres Castle up for sale for 3.5million

Scots city named amongst the 'ugliest' in the UK

Photographer shocked to capture stunning photos of rare Golden Pheasant at Loch Ness

The medieval Scots village currently used as an Outlander filming location

See more here:

Incredible farmhouse with access to unspoilt beach for sale on beautiful Scots island - Daily Record

Satanists Keep Dominating Headlines: What Do They Believe? Do They Really Worship the Devil? An Explainer – Faithwire

On the heels of a Pennsylvania school district allowing The Satanic Temple, a Satanist group, to host a back-to-school event, theres likely a superabundance of questions surrounding what this particular organization believes and about Satanism more generally.

Do adherents believe in Satan? Do they actually worship the devil? What does it all mean?

With stories like this increasingly popping up in the headlines, theres some understandable confusion, particularly when it comes to Satanists core beliefs and practices.

Listen to the latest episode of CBNs Quick Start podcast

First and foremost, lets start with the baseline definition of Satanism.

Merriam-Webster offers two denotative meanings. The first is innate wickedness and the second is the obsession with or affinity for evil.

Of course, these definitions dont fully explain Satanism in the modern era, as it has become a more complex enigma one with an atheistic and secularist flair.

Before we break down the distinctions, we must recognize a core reality: evil is real. The Bible speaks explicitly about Satan and the presence of evil, with stories of possession and healing present throughout the entirety of the biblical narrative.

That said, not everyone who calls himself or herself a Satanist actually believes in the devils existence, as strange as that might seem.

Listen to an explainer on Satanism:

As stated, there are a lot of contemporary headlines about Satanists creating after-school clubs among other antics. One of the groups sometimes associated with these stories is The Satanic Temple.

The organizations website contains images one might associate with Satanism, but upon digging into The Satanic Temples core tenets, it becomes clear adherents are essentially atheistic.

In the organizations FAQ section, the question: Do you worship Satan? is presented. Heres the organizations response:

No, nor do we believe in the existence of Satan or the supernatural. The Satanic Temple believes that religion can, and should, be divorced from superstition. As such, we do not promote a belief in a personal Satan. To embrace the name Satan is to embrace rational inquiry removed from supernaturalism and archaic tradition-based superstitions. Satanists should actively work to hone critical thinking and exercise reasonable agnosticism in all things. Our beliefs must be malleable to the best current scientific understandings of the material world never the reverse.

So, The Satanic Temple doesnt believe in Satan as a real-life being (the Bible, of course, affirms his existence and role in our world). The organization goes on to say it believes undue suffering is bad and sees blasphemy as a legitimate expression of personal independence from counter-productive traditional norms, among other core views.

All that aside, there are some rites members might choose to perform. These are not required rituals, and nothing is prescribed by the organization. Some of the associated activities include a so-called Black Mass, which celebrates blasphemy and an unbaptism ceremony. The latter is an act meant to undo baptisms that might have been conducted on individuals as children.

Additionally, some perform defiance and destruction rituals, with the first involving the destruction of items that have caused pain and the latter offering a challenge to the status quo. Again, not every member participates and these are at-will activities.

We could go into further detail, but to summarize: The Satanic Temple and other organizations like it fall under a category some call rationalistic Satanism or atheistic Satanism. Rather than actual worship of Satan, they might examine or aspire to his attributes but generally believe hes not real.

This is, of course, a radical departure from those who practice another form of the religious system: theistic Satanism. Well discuss theistic Satanism in a bit but lets first look at the modern roots of contemporary Satanism.

Modern Satanism is generally seen as having origins in the 1960s, though Satan is obviously a historical and theological figure with roots throughout Scripture and, as Genesis tells us, the devil was even present in the Garden of Eden.

The Church of Satan, founded in 1966 by Anton S. LaVey, tends to be seen as the beginning of the modern Satanist movement. For context: The Satanic Temple didnt emerge until decades later in 2013, despite now being the most frequently mentioned Satanist organization.

LaVey, a former carnival worker, also authored The Satanic Bible in 1969, which was seen as laying out beliefs and church rituals. While, like The Satanic Temple, LaVey and his followers didnt worship Satan as a live being, they saw him as a symbol of humanistic values, according to Britannica.

The encyclopedia noted, though, that LaVey purportedly incorporated occultic practices and rituals into his teachings, though it seems that, if true, this was quite limited.

Splintering began to unfold as early as the 1970s, with new groups forming and different ideas branching off of LaVeys ideology. According to Bitter Winter, there was a big split in 1975 between the rationalists and the occultists. This latter group within LaVeys camp was persuaded that Satan really existed as a sentient being.

Today, these differences, among others, persist, despite the most widely known groups seeing Satan as a mere metaphor.

Despite similarities, The Satanic Temple details some of its issues with LaVeyan thought, including an alleged fetishization of authoritarianism. But beyond that, there seems to be some disagreement over the inclusion of purported supernatural elements. Heres a bit more from The Satanic Temples FAQ:

While LaVeyan Satanism is atheistic in that it rejects the notion that Satan is a conscious entity, it nevertheless adheres to supernaturalism. [The Satanic Temple] does not forward supernatural theories of the universe and finds little value in LaVeyan edicts such as those that instruct one to acknowledge the power of magic if you have employed it successfully to obtain your desires. If you deny the power of magic after having called upon it with success, you will lose all you have obtained. (From the Eleven Satanic Rules of the Earth, Anton LaVey)

Other groups appear to have an amalgamation of beliefs borrowed from both rational and theistic forms of Satanism. Bitter Winter covered a man named Michael Ford who is allegedly associated with a number of organizations, including Greater Church of Lucifer, Church of Adversarial Light, and Order of Phosphorus.

On the surface, Fords Satanism is a variation of LaVeys, Bitter winter wrote. However his organizations are also part of Luciferian witchcraft, a galaxy of small groups that try to keep together Wicca and Satanism claiming that the god of the witches was in fact Lucifer.

Now that some of the atheistic and mixed Satanist elements and history have been explored, lets look at the theistic realm, which is a bit more complicated.

Theistic Satanists are more in line with what many Christians might traditionally know about the Satanic belief system, though there are vast differences even within this ideological tent.

Despite divergent ideals, there are some common threads: those who adhere to theistic Satanism believe the devil is real and they revere him.

Theistic Satanists believe Satan is one of a group of supra-personal dark forces capable of having some control or influence over human beings, and who venerate, worship, or align with him, the Gospel Coalition noted. A prime example is the Order of Nine [Angles], an occult group created in the 1960s in the UK, whose members strive to become one with Satan and other dark forces and seek to create new, more highly evolved individuals.'

The BBC reported that the Order of Nine Angles, a group allegedly associated, to some degree, with neo-Nazis. Adherents purportedly date the calendar to Adolf Hitlers birth and hold theologically Satanist views. Some of this information is tough to come by, though, and its unclear how the group is run or how many people are members.

Members are purported to infiltrate churches and organizations to try and harm them from within, and allegedly want to push back on Judeo-Christian culture, offering a cruel mixture of Social Darwinism, Satanism, and Fascism, the BBC reported.

Its a bit confounding, and the details are murky, but the focus on evil is purportedly seen as a way to open up and harness supernatural evil.

Theres also Luciferianism, a belief system that venerates Lucifer as a liberator. It can combine elements of both rational and theistic Satanism, though skews toward the latter.

There are other groups and associated theories as well, but for the sake of time we will hold back on exploring each of those. The central premise of theological Satanism is a worship of Satan and an overt entertaining of evil.

The broader group of theistic Satanists is reportedly quite small in number globally, though its tough to know for certain how many people worship Satan in this way.

History.com calls todays Satanism largely nontheistic, though CBNs Faithwire has covered real-life stories of individuals who have worshipped the devil and have later come to faith.

For instance, ex-Satanist Brian Cole explained on The Playing With Fire Podcast that, as a little boy, he didnt feel like he belonged anywhere.

He ended up spending more than three decades embroiled in the occult and now shares his incredible story of leaving Satanism behind, finding freedom in Christ and spreading the Gospel to others:

Historically, Satanic cults have existed in North America and Europe as far back as the 17th century, though it is tough to go back further than that due to a lack of documentation, Britannica noted.

Regardless of the type of Satanism one adheres to, there are some tragic realities one must understand. At its core, an embrace of Satanism is a rejection of Jesus and true faith. As GotQuestions.org noted, The basic commonality in all the branches of Satanism is a promotion of self.

Even without the overt belief in God and the devil, the persona and attributes of Satan are heralded and held up as a standard of sorts.

Whether Satanists believe in him or not is irrelevant to Satan, GotQuestions.org added. The end result is the same their souls are in bondage to him.

There are certainly other schools of thought, though getting caught in the mess and mix of information isnt the point. The Bible tells us the devil is the father of lies and that he is bent on confusing, killing, and destroying. Any dabbling in this arena is spiritually dangerous.

As John 8:44 (NIV) reads: You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your fathers desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.

***As the number of voices facing big-tech censorship continues to grow, please sign up forFaithwiresdaily newsletterand download theCBN News app, developed by our parent company, to stay up-to-date with the latest news from a distinctly Christian perspective.***

View post:

Satanists Keep Dominating Headlines: What Do They Believe? Do They Really Worship the Devil? An Explainer - Faithwire

Two-thirds of independents say they don’t want Trump to run for president – NPR

Former President Donald Trump arrives on stage at a rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., on Sept. 3. According to a new poll, 67% of independents do not want Trump to run again, while just 28% said they do. Mary Altaffer/AP hide caption

Former President Donald Trump arrives on stage at a rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pa., on Sept. 3. According to a new poll, 67% of independents do not want Trump to run again, while just 28% said they do.

Former President Donald Trump continues to heavily suggest he will run for president in 2024, but a new poll out from NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist shows voters in the middle overwhelmingly don't want him to give it another go.

Sixty-seven percent of independents said they do not want Trump to run again, while just 28% said they do. In 2020, Trump lost independents and lost the election. In 2016, Trump fared better with the group, but throughout his presidency and afterward he suffered with them and has never regained them.

"I think we need someone who can start uniting the country," said survey participant Mike Helms, 68, of Lincolnton, N.C., an independent who voted for Trump in 2020. "I don't think him or [President] Biden can unite this country."

Trump has continued to be heavily unpopular outside of his base, raising questions about the strength of a Trump 2024 candidacy. People who live in large cities and suburban women continue to be two of the groups most opposed to Trump, while white evangelical Christians, whites without college degrees and those in rural areas are most supportive.

"I definitely don't want him to run, because he will split the Republican Party and give the vote to the Democrats," said Greg Cox, 54, of New Haven, Mo., another independent who voted for Trump in 2020.

Overall, 61% of survey respondents said they don't want Trump to run again, largely unchanged from just after the 2020 election that Trump lost. A lot has transpired since then, and it shows just how locked in Americans' views are of Trump.

In fact, when respondents were asked if they would want Trump to run again, even if he is charged with a crime, the percentage saying no only increased marginally to 65%. That's within the margin of error.

Republicans looked like they were starting to pull away from Trump, but since the FBI searched Mar-a-Lago, his Florida home, for classified materials, they have reconsolidated around him.

When it comes to the FBI search, a plurality (44%) of respondents said they think Trump did something illegal. Another 17% think he did something unethical, but not illegal. Nearly 30% maintain he did nothing wrong, including 63% of Republicans.

Two-thirds of Republicans said they want Trump to run again, and a whopping 61% of them said they still want him to run even if he's charged with a crime.

Trump is using the FBI search as a rallying cry, calling it an "egregious abuse of the law." That's despite the FBI obtaining a legal search warrant. The Justice Department has said that it began investigating after a referral from the National Archives about classified material being mixed in with other material it received from Trump.

The FBI said it had evidence that Trump's team did not turn over all the documents it was asked for and the search bore that out. An inventory of the search of Trump's home found dozens of boxes of documents, including some marked with the highest, most sensitive classifications.

On Monday, Trump was granted the right to a "special master" to separate out materials that have attorney-client privilege and even potentially material that could be argued to have "executive privilege," even though Trump is no longer president.

"We're going to take back America," Trump said at a rally in Wilkes-Barre, Pa. Saturday, where he lambasted the FBI search. "And in 2024, most importantly, we are going to take back our magnificent White House."

But Trump's base alone proved not to be enough in 2020, and likely wouldn't be in 2024, either.

Biden has also struggled with independents, who have largely disapproved of the job he has done so far, so they will be a major question mark and potentially hold the key to a 2024 presidential election, if it is a Biden-Trump rematch.

Helms, for example, said he would vote for Trump over Biden if Trump does run again, but not happily.

Cox said he would "absolutely not" vote for Trump again if there's a next time around, but he emphatically said he is not open to voting for Biden, either.

"Maybe I'd vote Libertarian," Cox said.

Methodology

The survey of 1,236 adults was conducted Aug. 29 through Sept. 1. It has a margin of error of +/- 4.1 percentage points, meaning results could be 4 points higher or lower than what is shown. There are 1,151 registered voters surveyed with a margin of error of +/- 4.3 percentage points.

Read the original here:

Two-thirds of independents say they don't want Trump to run for president - NPR

Trump investigation: Where do things stand and what happens next? – Al Jazeera English

Washington, DC A United States judges decision to temporarily halt the governments review of documents seized from Donald Trumps home until they are vetted by an objective third party has sparked bewilderment among legal experts.

Judge Aileen Cannon on Monday ordered the appointment of a so-called special master to assess the documents collected by the FBI at the former presidents Mar-a-Lago estate last month for content that falls under attorney-client or executive privilege.

While many legal experts argue the ruling is unwarranted, they say it will only slow the Justice Departments probe into Trumps possible mishandling of classified materials not stop it.

Here, Al Jazeera looks at where things stand in the investigation and what the recent ruling means for the case:

A special master is typically someone with legal and/or technical expertise who can assist a judge in certain aspects of a case. In criminal cases, a special master is occasionally appointed as a neutral arbiter when privilege issues arise.

Trumps team had requested a special master to vet the documents as part of an ongoing lawsuit against the Justice Department over its investigation of the former president.

Certain information, including communication between suspects and their lawyers, is considered privileged, meaning the government cannot see it.

In the Trump case, the special master will assess the files taken from Mar-a-Lago for anything related to attorney-client privilege, as well as executive privilege.

Executive privilege is a legal concept that protects certain communication within the executive branch from going public, explained Michael Meltsner, a law professor at Northeastern University in Boston.

Under US law, when the president speaks to somebody and asks their advice, that is a privilege that can protect the conversation from [being divulged], Meltsner said. Its not in the Constitution. Its been created by the courts. But its never been to my knowledge applied to a former president.

In this situation, the special master needs to have a high-security clearance to handle secret documents and legal training to understand executive privilege.

Court documents show the US authorities retrieved dozens of classified government documents, some marked top secret, from Trumps home despite him leaving the White House in early 2021.

Numerous lawyers, professors and former prosecutors have criticised Judge Cannon, who was appointed by Trump shortly before he left office, for an order they say has no legal basis.

Meltsner, a veteran civil rights advocate who recently published a novel about the Civil Rights era titled Mosaic, told Al Jazeera that courts rarely interfere with criminal investigations, which he said makes Cannons decision to halt the document review unusual.

She is leaning over backwards to treat Trump the way nobody else has been treated, Meltsner said. In US law and practice, we dont interfere lightly with a criminal investigation. A criminal investigation by its very nature has to be private.

He added that court interference in criminal probes risks compromising vulnerable witnesses and making documents that could be used by defendants public. The Justice Department earlier said it had identified and avoided materials that could be considered privileged.

Cannon has ordered lawyers for the government and for Trump to submit a list of nominees for the post of special master by Friday.

The Justice Department can still appeal her order to a higher court, a potential move that Meltsner said would likely succeed but also carries risks.

The opinion by this judge is totally inconsistent with the law. It would not surprise me if an appellate court if it ever gets the issue would reverse her very quickly, he said.

But appeals may take time, appeals may distract, and appeals may even find similar Trump-appointed judges in the Court of Appeals. And if the Court of Appeals rules against Trump, then theyll go to the Supreme Court, and who knows what happens there.

While the judge has temporarily blocked the Justice Department from reviewing the documents taken from Mar-a-Lago, investigators can still interview witnesses and pursue other leads in the criminal probe.

Meltsner described Cannons orders as a speed bump in the investigation.

The government can still indict people, he said. Nothing this judge can or has done can stop the government from doing so if they want to. But thats another tactical decision that the government will have to make down the road.

Only the US Justice Department and likely Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has said he personally approved the August 8 search at Mar-a-Lago can answer that.

On the basis of the public record, it would certainly seem reasonable to charge Trump and/or his people with various offences regarding taking these documents and keeping these documents and refusing to return these documents, Meltsner said.

Whether they will do so or not is another matter. You can say that the elephant in the room is whether the prosecutors will think about the politics of this.

To press charges, the Justice Department would have to present its accusations to a grand jury to approve a formal indictment.

Trump and his Republican allies have rallied against the investigation and dismissed it without evidence as a political witch hunt. The former president has suggested that he is interested in another run for the White House in 2024, but he has not announced his candidacy.

Garland was appointed by President Joe Biden, but the White House says it does not interfere in Justice Department-led investigations.

View original post here:

Trump investigation: Where do things stand and what happens next? - Al Jazeera English

Melania Trump to divorce former US president Donald Trump? Latest …

Former US president Donald Trump celebrated his 75th birthday on Monday and the event was a low-key affair. Trump marked his 75th birthday with a dinner at the Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey.

Donald Trump Jr, the son of former US president, took to his Instagram account to share some photos of the birthday party. The guests included Donald Jr.s girlfriend Kimberly Guilfoyle, former NFL star Herschel Walker, Indiana congressman Jim Banks and Colorado congresswoman Lauren Boebert.

The most notable absentee was Donald Trump's wife and former First Lady, Melania Trump.

Ex-wife Ivana Trump once said in an interview that "Donald hates his birthdays", and a source also told People magazine that Melania "keeps her own schedule and leads her own life" away from her husband.

The absence of Melania has once again sparked the divorce rumors between the couple but writer Kristyn Burtt said that it is wrong to say that Melania has decided to part ways with Donald Trump.

She said: "She did that at the start of his administration when she and son Barron remained in New York City so he could finish out the school year before they moved to Washington, D.C. The couple has very different hobbies and seems to prefer their independent activities, but no one should read too much into her absence. This shouldnt be seen as a sign that there is trouble in their marriage."

Notably, the only family members who were present during Donald Trump's 75th birthday celebration were Donald Jr. and his girlfriend. Daughter Ivanka Trump was also not present at the event.

Read more here:

Melania Trump to divorce former US president Donald Trump? Latest ...

Trump Reportedly Had Information About a Foreign Governments Nuclear Secrets at Mar-a-Lago, and Yeah, Thats Exactly as Bad as It Sounds – Vanity Fair

Question: Is there any legitimate, not-suspicious reason that a former president of the United States would take information about a foreign countrys nuclear capabilities from the White House with him when he left, stash it in his home, and refuse to give it back despite being asked to do so on numerous occasions?

Answer: No, there isnt! Not a single one! Which is why it is incredibly damning to learn that Donald Trump, whose entire life has been a series of incredibly damning moments for which he should probably do hard time, allegedly did just that.

Yes, on Monday night, The Washington Post reported that a document describing a foreign governments military defenses, including its nuclear capabilities was among the materials seized from Mar-a-Lago during the FBIs August 8 search. If youre wondering if its possible that such a document could simply include low-level, not closely guarded details about another countrys nukes, and this whole thing isnt actually as bad as it sounds, we regret to inform you that is not the case. (In fact, its probably even a bigger deal than any of us can currently comprehend.) According to The Post, some of the documents uncovered during last months search detail top-secret U.S. operations so closely guarded that many senior national security officials are kept in the dark about them and only the president, some members of his Cabinet or anear-Cabinet-level official could authorize other government officials to know details of these special-access programs. For that reason, such records, per The Post, are kept under lock and key, almost always in a secure compartmented information facility, with a designated control officer to keep careful tabs on their location.

As in: not at a for-profit country club that anyone willing to pony up the initiation fee, or their guest, or a rando off the street asking to use the pool can walk through. Its also why, when the National Archives removed 15 boxes of documents this past January and the FBI came back for more in June, theyd hoped that was everythingparticularly in light of the fact that a lawyer for Trump had signed a written statement claiming all classified material had been returned to its rightful owner, i.e., the U.S. government.

In a statement, Christopher Kise, an attorney for the ex-president, did not address the fact that Trump had stashed information about a foreign powers nuclear capabilities at Mar-a-Lago, or that he held on to it despite a subpoena from a grand jury demanding the return of all documents or writings in the custody or control of Donald J. Trump and/or the Office of Donald J. Trump bearing classification markings, including Top Secret, and the lesser categories of Secret and Confidential. Instead, he selectively decried the leaks about the case, saying they continue with no respect for the process nor any regard for the real truth, claiming the damage to public confidence in the integrity of the system simply cannot be underestimated.

On Monday, a Trump-appointed judge, Aileen Cannon, granted the ex-presidents request for a special master to conduct a third-party review of the documents seized from Mar-a-Lago. In a move condemned in the harshest terms by basically anyone with a law degreeincluding former Trump attorney general Bill BarrCannon also blocked prosecutors from continuing to use the documents in their criminal investigation until the review is complete.

Back in November 2020, after Trump lost the presidential election, current and former government officials sounded the alarm on the possibility he would reveal valuable, classified information to further his own interests. John Fitzpatrick, a former intelligence officer and expert on the systems used to protect state secrets, told The Washington Post that the sort of information Trump was liable to have picked up on during his time in office includedwait for itspecial military capabilities, details about cyberweapons and espionage, the kinds of satellites the United States uses and the parameters of any covert actions that, as president, only Trump had the power to authorize. Assessing the possibility that he might do something untoward with that intelligence, David Priess, a former CIA officer, told the outlet, Anyone who is disgruntled, dissatisfied or aggrieved is a risk of disclosing classified information, whether as a current or former officeholder. Trump certainly fits that profile.

Original post:

Trump Reportedly Had Information About a Foreign Governments Nuclear Secrets at Mar-a-Lago, and Yeah, Thats Exactly as Bad as It Sounds - Vanity Fair

Trump Told White House Team He Needed to Protect Russiagate Documents – Rolling Stone

In his final days in the White House, Donald Trump told top advisers he needed to preserve certain Russia-related documents to keep his enemies from destroying them.

The documents related to the federal investigation into Russian election meddling and alleged collusion with Trumps campaign. At the end of his presidency, Trump and his team pushed to declassify these so-called Russiagate documents, believing they would expose a Deep State plot against him.

According to a person with direct knowledge of the situation and another source briefed on the matter, Trump told several people working in and outside the White House that he was concerned Joe Bidens incoming administration or the Deep State would supposedly shred, bury, or destroy the evidence that Trump was somehow wronged.

Trumps concern about preserving the Russia-related material is newly relevant after an FBI search turned up a trove of government documents at the former presidents Mar-a-Lago residence.

Since the search, Trump has refused to say which classified government papers and top-secret documents he had at Mar-a-Lago and what was the FBI had seized. (Trump considers the documents mine and has directed his lawyers to make that widely-panned argument in court.) The feds have publicly released little about the search and its results. Its unclear if any of the materials in Trumps document trove are related to Russia or the election interference investigation. A Trump spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment.

But both Trump and his former Director of National Intelligence have hinted that Russia-related documents could be among the materials the FBI sought. I think they thought it was something to do with the Russia, Russia, Russia hoax, Trump said during a Sept. 1 radio interview. They were afraid that things were in there part of their scam material.

Former DNI John Ratcliffe told CBS days earlier that, while he had no knowledge of what was in the records, It wouldnt surprise me if there were records related to [Russia] there.

A month before the 2020 election, Ratcliffe declassified intelligence detailing how the U.S. had obtained information about Russian intelligence analysis on Hillary Clintons campaign. The intelligence community, Ratcliffe wrote, couldnt determine whether the information contained exaggeration of fabrication. Both CIA director Gina Haspel and NSA chief Paul Nakasone reportedly opposed the declassification on the grounds that it could reveal how American spies had obtained the information. Indeed, a variety of other officials familiar with the internal debate felt such declassifications could out sensitive sources.

That document was from a pretty sensitive place that you would know where it was from if you were in Russia, one former intelligence official tells Rolling Stone about the material released by Ratcliffe. There were enough clues in there that the Russians couldve figured it out.

Other intelligence officials expressed concern that Ratcliffe would reveal even more information potentially damaging to U.S. intelligence sources. We were worried theyd try to counter the bipartisan Senate Intelligence committee endorsement of the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment by selectively declassing intel that the House Intelligence minority had cobbled together to counter the narrative that Russia preferred Trump, another former intelligence official says.

The 2017 assessment concluded that Russian president Vladimir Putin had meddled in the 2016 election because he wanted Trump to win a conclusion Putin himself half admitted to during his 2018 summit with the former president in Finland. But Republicans on the House Intelligence committee, led by Devin Nunes, repeatedly disputed that conclusion, even as their Republican counterparts on the Senate Intelligence committee accepted it.

The intelligence communitys resistance to Trumps efforts to declassify sensitive material related to Russia and the election specifically a classified report by Nunes disputing the 2017 assessment reportedly led Trump to consider firing CIA director Gina Haspel in November 2020 as he moved trusted allies into sensitive intelligence positions, CNN reported at the time.

Trump never fired Haspel, and the House Intelligence committees classified report wasnt released publicly. But both Trump and Meadows worked up until Biden took the oath of office to declassify information they viewed as beneficial to Trumps narrative of Deep State persecution.

In a memo to the acting attorney general and intelligence officials sent the day before Trump left office, he claimed the Justice Department had sent him a binder of materials on the FBIs so-called Crossfire Hurricane investigation in late December 2020. The department sent Trump that information, he claimed, so I could determine to what extent materials in the binder should be released in unclassified form.

The materials included transcripts of intercepts made by the FBI of Trump aides, a declassified copy of the final FISA warrant approved by an intelligence court, and the tasking orders and debriefings of the two main confidential human sources, Christopher Steele and Stefan Halper, according to John Solomon, Trumps representative to the National Archives.

Trump White House Chief of staff Mark Meadows later wrote in his memoir that he personally went through every page of the documents to make sure the declassified portions didnt disclose sources and methods and described his frustration by what he considered push back from the Department of Justice and FBI.Meadows and Trump worked to release the material up until minutes before Bidens inauguration. Trump sent a memo on Jan. 19 accepting the FBIs redactions and ordering declassification. Meadows sent a followup memo on Bidens inauguration day. The material was never released publicly. But in a series of podcast interviews recorded before the FBI search, former Nunes and Trump official Kash Patel shed some light on the administrations broader plans. He claimed Trump had asked him to help retrieve and publish so-called Russiagate material the White House counsels office had sent to the National Archives in the last days of the administration.

Read the rest here:

Trump Told White House Team He Needed to Protect Russiagate Documents - Rolling Stone