How Donald Trump’s vanity may have doomed his reelection bid – CNN

"I'm going to Walter Reed to see some of our great soldiers who have been injured," said Trump on Thursday. "Badly injured. And also see some of our Covid workers, people who have such a great job. And I expect to be wearing a mask when I go into Walter Reed. You're in a hospital so I think it's a very appropriate thing."

"Trump -- who has stubbornly refused to wear a mask in public, ridiculed those who have and done little to encourage his supporters to embrace the common sense public health measure -- has said he will wear a mask during a visit to Walter Reed National Medical Center on Saturday.

"He is also expected to be photographed wearing it, a photo opportunity that some of the President's aides practically begged him to agree to and hope will encourage skeptical Trump supporters to do the same."

It might be too late -- from both a public health perspective and a political one.

"Sometimes, American politics is complicated. Right now, it's extremely simple: the public has reached a harshly negative judgment of the president's handling of the most important issue facing the country, and the issue is so paramount that there's little room to wiggle out of it."

What's remarkable about where Trump finds himself now is that it's almost entirely due to his own personal vanity.

"Cloth face coverings are recommended as a simple barrier to help prevent respiratory droplets from traveling into the air and onto other people when the person wearing the cloth face covering coughs, sneezes, talks, or raises their voice. This is called source control. This recommendation is based on what we know about the role respiratory droplets play in the spread of the virus that causes COVID-19, paired with emerging evidence from clinical and laboratory studies that shows cloth face coverings reduce the spray of droplets when worn over the nose and mouth. COVID-19 spreads mainly among people who are in close contact with one another (within about 6 feet), so the use of cloth face coverings is particularly important in settings where people are close to each other or where social distancing is difficult to maintain."

Given that, why hasn't Trump been wearing a mask? Because he thinks it makes him look weak and/or bad. Not kidding.

What, exactly, do you make of that Trump quote other than that he isn't going to wear a mask because of vanity?

"Wearing a face mask as I greet presidents, prime ministers, dictators, kings, queens -- I just don't see it," he said. Why not? Because, based on the science, what an American president would be saying by wearing a mask when meeting with foreign leaders is that he is following best practices to keep himself -- and those around him -- safe.

But of course, that's now how Trump sees mask-wearing. He sees it as a sign of weakness or lack of masculinity.

"He makes a speech and he walks onto the stage wearing this massive mask ... and then he takes it off, he likes to have it hang off usually the left ear. I think it makes him feel good, frankly. He's got the largest mask I think I've ever seen. It covers up a big proportion of his face. And I think he feels he looks good that way."

So, yeah. Because he thinks that masks make him (and people generally) look bad or not manly or tough or something, Trump has resisted wearing one in public for months on end. Which has had a deeply deleterious effect on public health and his own political prospects.

View post:

How Donald Trump's vanity may have doomed his reelection bid - CNN

Trump team launches a sweeping loyalty test to shore up its defenses – POLITICO

Last year, POLITICO reported that a top Trump administration health official was using tax dollars to hire GOP consultants to boost her image. Now, an inspector general report confirms the story.

White House officials have said the interviews are a necessary exercise to determine who would be willing to serve in a second term if President Donald Trump is reelected. But officials summoned for the interviews say the exercise is distracting from numerous policy priorities, like working to fight the pandemic, revitalizing the economy or overhauling regulation, and instead reflect the White Houses conviction that a deep state is working to undermine the president.

Its an exercise in ferreting out people who are perceived as not Trump enough, said one person briefed on the meetings.

If theyre spending time trying to hunt down leakers, thats time theyre taking away from advancing an agenda, said a former senior administration official whos spoken with officials undergoing the interviews. And thats irresponsible.

The interview process, along with White House chief of staff Mark Meadows ongoing hunt for leakers, shows how the White House less than four months before the presidential election remains consumed by loyalty and optics despite urgent policy problems such as a raging coronavirus pandemic, nationwide worries about reopening schools and historically high unemployment. This weeks White House drama over Anthony Fauci, the nations top infectious-disease doctor, highlighted the persistent internal concern about whether government officials are in line with Trumps preferred policy approaches such as the presidents desire to downplay the latest coronavirus surges.

The reinterviewing exercise is being led by Johnny McEntee, a 30-year-old who's been a Trump aide since the 2016 campaign and was installed earlier this year as chief of the White House personnel office and is responsible for filling thousands or jobs across the federal agencies.

The interviews can take the form of general questions, such as an appointees career goals, but can also veer into territory meant to test a persons perceived loyalty, like asking for the appointee's thoughts on the U.S. relationship with China or probing questions about why an appointee was chosen for his or her current job. Interviewers have also asked people to give examples of ways they are supporting the administration.

It just seems like you could be a rocket scientist, but all they care about is whether you are MAGA, said one senior administration official familiar with the interview process. It is fair to do something to prepare to fill jobs in a second term, but right now, it is hard to know what the metrics are with this personnel office for being successful. There is no set criteria for what makes a good political appointee.

McEntee, a former body man for Trump, did not respond to a request for comment. A White House official who defended the process said its part of the personnel offices preparations for a second term, including gauging the officials postelection plans.

The head of the presidential personnel office under President Barack Obama called the interviews unusual. I could definitely see that kind of questioning being uncomfortable and creating unease among political appointees, said Rudy Mehrbani, who also vetted appointees while in the White House counsels office under Obama. If you are working in one subject area like Peace Corps or USAID, that does not mean you are signing on to the administrations position on funding for reproductive rights.

Political appointees at the Defense Department, including a top layer of officials undersecretaries are going through reinterviews with the White House personnel office this month, according to a current Defense official and two former officials. During the interviews, the representatives from the personnel office are forcing senior leaders to answer questions about their loyalty to the president with an eye toward keeping their jobs in a second Trump term, the people said.

Pentagon spokesman Jonathan Hoffman countered that the interviews with the White House personnel office were set up by the Defense department so that our political appointees could discuss second-term opportunities at the department and throughout the administration.

In other areas of the government, the personnel tests come at a moment when Trump appointees are already struggling to manage portfolios that have ballooned during the pandemic. For instance, HHS staff have now spent more than five months juggling the round-the-clock response to the coronavirus while handling other ongoing policy goals, like the presidents focus on securing lower drug prices before the election a balancing act that officials described as exhausting even before facing de facto loyalty tests.

Five political appointees in disparate roles across HHS said theyd either scheduled their meetings with the personnel office or were awaiting an appointment.

The interviews also have exposed some Trump appointees to unexpected risks: Labor Department officials were forced to quarantine after meeting with a White House personnel staffer who later tested positive for the novel coronavirus, Bloomberg Law first reported.

You would think they would want to shore up the bench in response to the pandemic or start getting ready to fill expected gaps because people get sick or they leave, Mehrbani added. In the run up to a transition, historically, there is lots of turnover. Those are the things the personnel office should be tending to.

For Trumps true believers, the interviews are viewed as a mandatory part of working in the Trump administration.

If were going to extend this amount of capital on you, and push for you, they should ask more questions. Im glad theyre doing it finally, one White House official said. The fact that PPO is finally considering whether people are aligned with the president its long overdue.

Lara Seligman contributed to this report.

More here:

Trump team launches a sweeping loyalty test to shore up its defenses - POLITICO

The Trump-O-Meter: Where President Donald Trump’s campaign promises stand in the summer of 2020 – PolitiFact

Donald Trumps campaign promise to build a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border was vintage Trump: controversial, huge, symbolic. But he also meant a real wall.

"I would build a great wall, and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me, and I'll build them very inexpensively," Trump said when he launched his campaign for the White House. "I will build a great, great wall on our southern border. And I will have Mexico pay for that wall."

Trumps passionate supporters loved when he made that promise in 2015 and applaud that hes talked about the wall through the three and half years of his presidency. If they judge him on changing the conversation in Washington on immigration, the president definitely achieved that.

RELATED:Browse 102 campaign promises individually rated on the Trump-O-Meter

But Trumps election didnt result in an actual wall being built. Trump couldnt get Congress to pass legislation that would have addressed costs or logistics of an actual wall. Mexicos leaders rejected Trumps rhetorical demands to pay for it. And its unclear that the Trump administration has the ability, money or time to complete such a complex project.

The Trump administration was able to reinforce and rebuild about 200 miles of fencing and barriers some of it existing before he took office. Trump has repeatedly referred to these efforts as building a wall along the 2,000 mile border. But this most repeated of his campaign promises is largely unfulfilled. Compared with before Trump took office, the numbers of people apprehended crossing the U.S. Mexican border were down in 2017 and 2018, then increased dramatically in 2019 as families in Central America fled crime and other instability. Crossings are down this year, most likely due to the coronavirus pandemic.

As Trump reaches the fourth anniversary of being nominated as the GOPs candidate for president, PolitiFact offers an account of the progress on 102promises he made in the 2016 campaign. Our Trump-O-Meter promise tracker finds that roughly 49% of Trumps promises can be described as either broken or not achieved.

Among Trumps Broken Promises were to establish the right to carry a concealed weapon in all 50 states; invest $550 billion in infrastructure; repeal Obamacare, and end birthright citizenship.

Trumps unfulfilled campaign promises are broken most often because he would have needed to change laws to achieve his goals but was unable to get action through Congress. (PolitiFact rates campaign promises based on outcomes, not intentions or effort.)

Our tracking project which we have done for 11 years including the promises of President Barack Obama and more than two dozen governors and mayors shows Trump kept roughly 24% of his promises. Typically he achieved progress when he could act on his own without Congress or the promise didnt require complex administrative action. As promised, he took no salary for his presidency. He began the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris climate agreement. He rolled back regulations. He refused to say "Happy Holidays" instead of "Merry Christmas."

His most substantial kept promise: cutting taxes. When Republicans controlled both chambers of Congress in 2017, they passed a wide-ranging bill that lowered taxes for many people and businesses. Trumps promises on taxes were ambitious, and he didnt get everything he wanted in the tax law. But he got enough to earn ratings of Compromise on his tax promises to eliminate the marriage penalty (it was reduced but not eliminated), lower the business tax rate to 15% (it was lowered to 21%), eliminate the estate tax (also reduced but not eliminated) and cut taxes for "everyone."

With roughly five months left in Trumps term, PolitiFact has rated Trumps remaining promises Compromise (about 20%) or Stalled (5%). At a similar point in 2012, Obamas promises were rated Promise Broken at 16%, Promise Kept at 37%, Compromise at 14%, and the rest Stalled (10%) or In the Works (22%).

How much will Trumps policy success or failure matter as voters go to the polls? The coronavirus pandemic has changed the political equation for answering that question. The coronavirus pandemic arrived unexpectedly in the final year of Trumps first term. It is a wild card in assessing his record, given its most direct impact on the day-to-day lives of Americans.

Nevertheless, Trump had three years to achieve his campaign promises before the pandemic. He may yet move more legislation through Congress to address that and other issues. PolitiFact will be updating promise ratings as circumstances warrant. Prior to the Trump-O-Meter, PolitiFact tracked former President Barack Obamas campaign promises for eight years on The Obameter. Obamas final tally was 24% of his promises rated Promise Broken; 48% promises rated Promise Kept, while another 28% of his promises were part of a Compromise.

How Trump achieved progress or fell short

Trump scored legislative victories with the passage of his tax bill, an increase in defense spending, and, with the backing of many Democrats, a criminal justice overhaul.

Trump has also managed to win confirmation of judges at an unusually fast clip, thanks to strong support from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. Trump signed massive spending bills and coronavirus relief packages, which had bipartisan support.

He has not succeeded in his promise to repeal and replace Obamacare, even when his party controlled both chambers of Congress. The Trump administration has not forwarded a repeatedly promised infrastructure bill to Congress. And, even before the enormous outlays required by the pandemic, his promise to cut domestic spending did not happen.

Much like his predecessor,Trump faced obstacles in working with Congress due to intense partisan polarization. But experts suggested he has fueled those very partisan fires that inhibit his own agenda.

"We have not had a president so distant from the legislative process as Trump since at least the 1920s," said Steven S. Smith, a political scientist at Washington University in St. Louis.

Trump tended to punch back against even modest deviations from his position. "He has mean-tweeted virtually every congressional leader at some point," said Gregory Koger, a University of Miami political scientist.

Like Obama, Trump has made stronger use of his executive powers, which dont require the agreement of Congress. Trump has been able to make progress on his environmental agenda by rolling back the actions of his predecessor through executive orders and regulations, rather than winning legislative votes.

"But as for regulatory changes and executive orders, what one president can do, the next president can undo," said John J. Pitney, Jr., a Claremont McKenna College political scientist and author of "Is Congress Broken?"

This means that if Joe Biden wins the 2020 presidential election, he would be able to overturn many of Trumps policies on immigration, the environment, and climate change, among other issues.

Any president has the tools to put their mark on foreign policy, and Trump has done so. Some of his biggest foreign policy promises were kept: pulling out of the Iran nuclear agreement, leaving the Paris climate accord, quitting the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal, renegotiating the North American Free-Trade Agreement, providing strong backing for Israel including moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem, and curtailing the Obama-era thaw with Cuba.

RELATED:Our only agenda is to publish the truth so you can be an informed participant in democracy. Donate today.

Some of these moves will be hard to reverse, while others could be changed by a Democratic administration.

Some say the biggest impact from Trumps approach may be intangible. "The area that may be irreversible is American leadership in the world," Pitney said. "We have made our allies wary of American leadership during the Trump administration, and they are not likely to again accede to a U.S. leadership role that makes them vulnerable."

Then again, Trump had promised during his campaign to adopt an America First approach. He said he would build the wall on the U.S.-Mexico border, he demanded that U.S. allies pay us for more for their defense, he pledged to impose tariffs on trading partners, and he said he would keep out Muslims and immigration from terrorism-prone countries.

History may question the wisdom of these policies, but Trumps rhetoric during the 2016 campaign gave clear signs that the rest of the world would find fault with some American policies on his watch. Dissatisfaction abroad with U.S. leadership under Trump suggests he has kept that promise.

PolitiFact reporter Miriam Valverde contributed to this report.

RELATED:Read more Trump-O-Meter reports on all 102 of President Donald Trump's 2016campaign promises.

View post:

The Trump-O-Meter: Where President Donald Trump's campaign promises stand in the summer of 2020 - PolitiFact

Sheer incompetence! Donald Trump Jr. shreds his father or at least thats how it appears in this viral clip – MarketWatch

Ben Meiselas, the lawyer who represented Colin Kaepernick in his case against the NFL, and his two brothers have a knack for delivering viral attack ads aimed at the Trump White House.

Last month, they posted an edited version of Ivanka Trumps commencement speech, which was cancelled by a university in Kansas. They followed up with a video focusing on GOP lawmakers who have dodged questions relating to some of Trumps more controversial tweets and actions.

Now theyre out with another, which has already racked up more than 4 million views overnight:

As you can see, the clip flips Donald Trump Jr.s attacks on Joe Biden Gross negligence! and sheer incompetence around and lobs them at the president. This guy is the epitome of the swamp, he said. The entire family have enriched themselves.

The Meiselas brothers, who run the MeidasTouch.com website, reserved some of their harshest criticisms for a statement that accompanied the video.

Trump children, propped up in this regime by the bizarre and shameless nepotism seen in banana republic dictatorships, represent the blend of incompetence, entitlement, and cringeworthy hypocrisy thats propelled America into disaster were now in under Trump, they wrote.

The #ByeDonJr hashtag blew up over night, as the Twitter haters ate up the clip:

See the original post here:

Sheer incompetence! Donald Trump Jr. shreds his father or at least thats how it appears in this viral clip - MarketWatch

Anthony Fauci Is a Better Economist Than Donald Trump or Jared Kushner – The New Yorker

Back on April 29th, Jared Kushner, Donald Trumps son-in-law and senior adviser, gave an interview to Fox News in which he dismissed concerns that the coronavirus pandemic would have a lasting negative impact on the American economy. I always find that we see the leading indicators, and often the media sees the lagging indicators, Kushner said. I think youll see by June a lot of the country should be back to normal, and the hope is that by July the countrys really rocking again.

Kushners statements neatly encapsulated the Trump Administrations economic theory of COVID-19: it would be a sharp but short shock. As states, particularly some that are governed by Republicans, rushed to reopen their economies in May and June, economic activity did rebound. The Labor Departments jobs report for June, which was released on July 2nd, showed that employers added 4.8 million jobs, and the official unemployment rate fell from 13.3 per cent to 11.1 per cent. Trump hailed this as spectacular news. But now it looks as though the employment survey, which was carried out in the second week of June, may well have marked an inflection point for the economy rather than a breakout.

As last month proceeded, the rate of new infections picked up in a number of states, including Arizona, California, Florida, and Texas. Americans took notice and changed their behavior. Some real-time indicators of discretionary consumer spending, including restaurant reservations and credit-card activity, took a dip. Given the threat that the virus presents in confined spaces, it could be argued that the restaurant and bar businesses are special cases. However, there is also evidence from other industries, such as retail and transportation, that the initial hit from the virus may be turning into a long-lasting one.

Last week, the clothing company Brooks Brothers filed for bankruptcy, and United Airlines warned that it may furlough nearly half of its U.S. employees in Octobersome thirty-six thousand people. On Thursday, the Labor Department reported that, during the previous week, another 2.3 million Americans had filed for state or federal unemployment benefits. We are beginning to see the impact of the recession spreading to companies that were not directly impacted by the virus, Andrew Challenger, a senior vice-president at the firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, which monitors hiring and firing closely, told Reuters. At the same time, companies that attempted to reopen but were only able to attract a fraction of their pre-COVID customers are closing down again.

In an online appearance with the National Press Club on Monday, Robert Kaplan, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, said that the surge in infections and hospitalizations was having a chilling effect on the economy. Citing high-frequency data that his institution monitors, as well as conversations with businesspeople, Kaplan said, Unfortunately, with this resurgence of disease, it is muting that rebound. It is muting that growth. Other analysts agree. Economists at the investment bank Jefferies & Co. said on Monday that their index of economic activity suggests the recovery is running out of steam.... Most components of our index are now below their mid/late June peaks.

In his remarks, Kaplan emphasized the connection between faster economic growth and following public-safety protocols. He appealed to all Americans to wear masks and social-distance. If we dont do these things, it will be more likely that we have to slow the rate of reopening, he said. In some places, that is already happening. On Monday, Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, ordered restaurants, bars, wineries, movie theatres, museums, and zoos to close their indoor operations statewide. In a number of counties where the virus is spreading the fastest, including Los Angeles, Orange, and Riverside, Newsom added additional businesses to the list, including gyms, hair salons, and nonessential offices.

Other states, including Arizona and Texas, have taken some more modest steps to roll back or slow the pace of reopening. What is lacking, and has been lacking all along, is effective national leadership which recognizes that repairing the economy and extinguishing the virusor knocking it down to a very low levelare complementary policies rather than contradictory ones. From China to South Korea to Ireland, other governments have exhibited this type of leadership and resolve. We have a President who reportedly hasnt attended a meeting of his coronavirus task force for more than a month, and who donned a mask in public for the first time on Saturdaynearly five months after the first U.S. case of the virus was confirmed.

On Monday, a number of media outlets reported that the Trump White House is trying to discredit Anthony Faucithe best-known member of the task forcewho has expressed concerns over reopening the economy as the number of cases surges. Appearing on NBCs Meet the Press on Sunday, Admiral Brett Giroir, another member of the task force, said that Fauci looks at it from a very narrow public-health point of view. That may be true; Fauci doesnt pretend to be an economist. And yet, by emphasizing the need to arrest the renewed spread of the virus, he is dispensing advice that jibes with what Kaplan and other economic policymakers, including Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, have been saying. (The path forward for the economy is extraordinarily uncertain and will depend in large part on our success in containing the virus, Powell told Congress a couple of weeks ago.)

Even as the United States is reporting record numbers of new cases, Trump seems unable or unwilling to accept reality. Until the start of this month, the daily death toll for the country as a whole had been falling, largely due to dramatic declines in New York, New Jersey, and other states in the Northeast, which endured lengthy lockdowns and moved cautiously to reopen. Over the past week, though, the national mortality trend line has ticked up a bit, a Washington Post graphic shows. And, on Friday, Deborah Birx, the cordinator of the White House task force, publicly acknowledged that a rise in the over-all number of deaths is expected as the disease continues to spread in some of our large metro areas where comorbidities exist, the Times reported.

Ultimately, this is a human tragedy. To protect the lives of vulnerable Americans, and also to protect the economy, Trump and Kushner should listen to Fauci rather than try to trash him.

Here is the original post:

Anthony Fauci Is a Better Economist Than Donald Trump or Jared Kushner - The New Yorker

The Jolt: Jockeying for position ahead of Donald Trump’s visit to Atlanta – Atlanta Journal Constitution

Lake was a notable Georgia GOP voice of opposition to Trump during the 2016 campaign and shortly after. Ahead of Trump's arrival, Loeffler's campaign pointed to a2017 comment from Lake acknowledging that he didn't vote for the president and suggesting that Trump might leave office before his first term was up. Said Loeffler spokesman Stephen Lawson:

"Doug Collins hiring a Never Trumper to lead his campaign affirms how he really feels about our president. Congressman Collins is a career politician who only backed President Trump after his choice candidate was crushed in the primary. His entire campaign is built on lies, and his record as a fake conservative and total fraud is finally being exposed."

The reply from Collins campaign spokesman Dan McLagan:

"Attacking staff is sad. It's also silly since Kelly herself was a Mitt Romney never Trumper and her top strategists have been attacking the President for years. Kelly, Inc. sounds frightened and weak. Like mewling little kittens."

At the same time, the Collins campaign also riposted this morning with news that Loeffler's newly hired legislative director in Washington, Wesley Coopersmith, has an anti-Trump history: "Friends don't let friends vote for con-artists"...here's looking at you Florida #nevertrump," he posted in March 2016.

Loeffler also released thisgauzy digital video welcoming Trump back to Georgia, which he carried by five percentage points in 2016. "He continues to fight for all Americans. He's the only person that can do it again. Joe Biden has no clue what's at stake in this election," Loeffler says.

Meanwhile, Democrat Jon Ossoff, the nominee to challenge Republican incumbent David Perdue in Georgias other U.S. Senate race, welcomed Trump to town in a different way.

Ossoff took aim at the White House'snew policy for hospitals to report coronavirus data directly to the federal government -- and bypass the Atlanta-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Ossoff assailed Trumps decision to ignore, undermine and smear the CDC and called for the White House to guarantee the public uncensored access to the data. Said Ossoff:

"The accuracy, credibility, and transparency of COVID-19 data is essential to our national public health effort. Today's move raises grave concerns that the Administration is placing this information under political control, whereby its credibility will be in doubt, and it could be manipulated to serve partisan ends.

***

Republican congressional candidates Karen Handel (Sixth District) and Rich McCormick (Seventh District) will also be on hand when Trump steps out of Air Force One, we're told.

But GOP congressional candidates still enmeshed in north Georgia runoffs have apparently been left off the invitation list.

In the Ninth District, thats state Rep. Matt Gurtler and firearms retailer Andrew Clyde. In the 14th, construction executive Marjorie Taylor Greene faces neurosurgeon John Cowan.

The decision has at least one advantage: Greene has achieved some renown for her endorsement of QAnon conspiracy theories and racist comments. Having her in the same camera frame with President Trump might be inconvenient.

***

In decades past, when a president is both unpopular and a member of one's own party, there has been a temptation for state leaders to be suddenly called out of town when a presidential visit is announced. But that was then.

In today's polarized climate, there is little upside for a Republican who wants to distance himself or herself from Trump. In fact, refusing the president can be dangerous.

Consider the case of former U.S. attorney general Jeff Sessions hopes for a senatorial comeback were dashed Tuesday by former Auburn University football coach Tommy Tuberville -- and President Trump.

Tuberville had Trumps backing in the Republican primary runoff to take on Alabama Democratic Sen. Doug Jones. During the Alabama campaign,Trump repeatedly criticized Sessions for recusing himself from an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election.

***

The Trump event will be containedwithin the Hartsfield-Jackson universe, so the impact on Atlanta traffic should be minimal.

***

We told you on Tuesday that the Trump Administration had eliminated the Atlanta-based US Center for Disease Control and Prevention as a first recipient and compiler of coronavirus data from hospitals across the nation.More this morning from The New York Times:

The new instructions were posted recently in a little-noticed document on the Department of Health and Human Services website. From now on, the department not the C.D.C. will collect daily reports about the patients that each hospital is treating, the number of available beds and ventilators, and other information vital to tracking the pandemic.

Officials say the change will streamline data gathering and assist the White House coronavirus task force in allocating scarce supplies like personal protective gear and remdesivir, the first drug shown to be effective against the virus. But the Health and Human Services database that will receive new information is not open to the public, which could affect the work of scores of researchers, modelers and health officials who rely on C.D.C. data to make projections and crucial decisions.

But don't expect Trump to address the coronavirus or the sidelining of the CDC this afternoon. Instead, the president is expected to announce a new federal ruleto speed up the environmental review process for proposed highways, gas pipelines and other major infrastructure. Critics are describing the move as a dismantling of a 50-year-old environmental protection law.

***

ProPublica reports that sincePresident Trump took office, the Comptroller of the Currency has quietly shelved at least six investigations into discrimination and redlining by major banking institutions -- including Atlanta-based Cadence Bank:

Flagstar Bank, a leading lender in Michigan, wrongly charged Black homeowners more through a network of mortgage lending affiliates, OCC officials concluded in 2017. That same year, agency examiners found that Colorado Federal Bank, an online lender, was doing the same to female borrowers.

Another inquiry by OCC officials concluded that Chicago-based MB Financial, a lender acquired by Fifth Third Bank last year, charged Latinos too much on mortgage loans. Cadence Bank, a lender in several Southern states, was turning away minority borrowers in Houston, according to an OCC investigation. Fulton Bank, a lender based in Pennsylvania, had been discriminating against minorities in parts of Richmond, Virginia, and its home state, regulators concluded.

***

National Archives employees working at home during the pandemic have used this time to improvepublic access to black history documents, including records of Martin Luther King Jr. and U.S. Rep. John Lewis.

More than 5,000 documents and photos have been tagged with descriptive keywords to make them more searchable online, the federal agency said. Now that additional records have been identified, archivists are beginning the process of transcribing them.

The trove of documents connected to Lewis includes congressional speeches and resolutions, pictures and even FBI reports of his activity during the Civil Rights Movement.

***

An endorsement of President Donald Trump by state Rep Vernon Jones was rewarded with a trip to the White House on Monday.

Jones, a Democrat who lives in either Lithonia or Atlanta depending on who you ask, was asked to join a roundtable with Trump and other guests "positively affected by law enforcement." The goal of the discussion was to counteract public debate about police brutality and reforms.

Among the other invitees was Jo Etta Northcutt, whose family credits an off-duty officer with saving her grandson from an attempted kidnapping at a Florida hotel. Northcutt said she lives in Atlanta and currently feels less safe -- withcrime on the upswing and protests occurring in the streets.

Jones's remarks centered on his time as DeKalb County CEO, and he spoke about tending to the families of police officers who died in the line of duty. He said most officers are acting honorably and "we have to stand with them."

***

Fulton County's elections office is once again accepting absentee ballot requests submitted by email, the AJC'sMark Niesse and Ben Brasch report.

The county's reversal came quickly after complaints that its refusal to process emailed ballot requests would reduce voting access and violate Georgia voting laws.

Fulton, the most populous county in the state, initially rejected emailed absentee ballot requests following struggles to manage a flood of applications before the June 9 primary election. Many voters in Fulton said they never received their absentee ballots, forcing them to wait in line for hours to vote in person during the coronavirus pandemic.

Voters who emailed absentee ballot requests Monday and part of Tuesday received a response from Fulton asking them to instead send paper applications by mail.

The county on Tuesday restarted processing absentee ballot requests for the Aug. 11 runoff, with some limits meant to avoid problems that surfaced before the primary. Only one absentee ballot application may be attached to each email. Absentee ballot applications submitted by email must be less than 5 megabytes in size, legible and in pdf or jpg file format.

More:

The Jolt: Jockeying for position ahead of Donald Trump's visit to Atlanta - Atlanta Journal Constitution

Singapore Researchers Look to Intel Neuromorphic Computing to Help Enable Robots That Feel – Global Banking And Finance Review

Whats New: Today, two researchers from the National University of Singapore (NUS), who are members of the Intel Neuromorphic Research Community (INRC), presented new findings demonstrating the promise of event-based vision and touch sensing in combination with Intels neuromorphic processing for robotics. The work highlights how bringing a sense of touch to robotics can significantly improve capabilities and functionality compared to todays visual-only systems and how neuromorphic processors can outperform traditional architectures in processing such sensory data.

This research from National University of Singapore provides a compelling glimpse to the future of robotics where information is both sensed and processed in an event-driven manner combining multiple modalities. The work adds to a growing body of results showing that neuromorphic computing can deliver significant gains in latency and power consumption once the entire system is re-engineered in an event-based paradigm spanning sensors, data formats, algorithms, and hardware architecture. Mike Davies, director of Intels Neuromorphic Computing Lab

Why It Matters: The human sense of touch is sensitive enough to feel the difference between surfaces that differ by just a single layer of molecules, yet most of todays robots operate solely on visual processing. Researchers at NUS hope to change this using their recently developed artificial skin, which according to their research can detect touch more than 1,000 times faster than the human sensory nervous system and identify the shape, texture and hardness of objects 10 times faster than the blink of an eye.

Enabling a human-like sense of touch in robotics could significantly improve current functionality and even lead to new use cases. For example, robotic arms fitted with artificial skin could easily adapt to changes in goods manufactured in a factory, using tactile sensing to identify and grip unfamiliar objects with the right amount of pressure to prevent slipping. The ability to feel and better perceive surroundings could also allow for closer and safer human-robotic interaction, such as in caregiving professions, or bring us closer to automating surgical tasks by giving surgical robots the sense of touch that they lack today.

While the creation of artificial skin is one step in bringing this vision to life, it also requires a chip that can draw accurate conclusions based on the skins sensory data in real time, while operating at a power level efficient enough to be deployed directly inside the robot. Making an ultra-fast artificial skin sensor solves about half the puzzle of making robots smarter, said assistant professor Benjamin Tee from the NUS Department of Materials Science and Engineering and NUS Institute for Health Innovation & Technology. They also need an artificial brain that can ultimately achieve perception and learning as another critical piece in the puzzle. Our unique demonstration of an AI skin system with neuromorphic chips such as the Intel Loihi provides a major step forward towards power-efficiency and scalability.

About the Research: To break new ground in robotic perception, the NUS team began exploring the potential of neuromorphic technology to process sensory data from the artificial skin using Intels Loihi neuromorphic research chip. In their initial experiment, the researchers used a robotic hand fitted with the artificial skin to read Braille, passing the tactile data to Loihi through the cloud to convert the micro bumps felt by the hand into a semantic meaning. Loihi achieved over 92 percent accuracy in classifying the Braille letters, while using 20 times less power than a standard Von Neumann processor.

Building on this work, the NUS team further improved robotic perception capabilities by combining both vision and touch data in a spiking neural network. To do so, they tasked a robot to classify various opaque containers holding differing amounts of liquid using sensory inputs from the artificial skin and an event-based camera. Researchers used the same tactile and vision sensors to test the ability of the perception system to identify rotational slip, which is important for stable grasping.

Once this sensory data was captured, the team sent it to both a GPU and Intels Loihi neuromorphic research chip to compare processing capabilities. The results, which were presented at Robotics: Science and Systems this week, show that combining event-based vision and touch using a spiking neural network enabled 10 percent greater accuracy in object classification compared to a vision-only system. Moreover, they demonstrated the promise for neuromorphic technology to power such robotic devices, with Loihi processing the sensory data 21 percent faster than a top-performing GPU, while using 45 times less power.

Were excited by these results. They show that a neuromorphic system is a promising piece of the puzzle for combining multiple sensors to improve robot perception. Its a step toward building power-efficient and trustworthy robots that can respond quickly and appropriately in unexpected situations, said assistant professor Harold Soh from the Department of Computer Science at the NUS School of Computing.

About the Intel Neuromorphic Research Community: The Intel Neuromorphic Research Community is an ecosystem of academic groups, government labs, research institutions, and companies around the world working with Intel to further neuromorphic computing and develop innovative AI applications. Researchers interested in participating in the INRC and developing for Loihi can visit the Intel Neuromorphic Research Community website. A list of current members can also be found at the site.

More Context: Neuromorphic Computing (Press Kit) | Intel Labs (Press Kit) | How Neuromorphic Computing Uses the Human Brain as a Model (Video) | Exceptional sense of touch for robots and prosthetics (National University of Singapore) | New breakthrough by NUS researchers gives robots intelligent sensing abilities to carry out complex tasks (National University of Singapore)

About Intel

Intel (Nasdaq: INTC) is an industry leader, creating world-changing technology that enables global progress and enriches lives. Inspired by Moores Law, we continuously work to advance the design and manufacturing of semiconductors to help address our customers greatest challenges. By embedding intelligence in the cloud, network, edge and every kind of computing device, we unleash the potential of data to transform business and society for the better. To learn more about Intels innovations, go to newsroom.intel.com and intel.com.

Intel Corporation. Intel, the Intel logo and other Intel marks are trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries. Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.

Alexa Korkos

415-706-5783

[emailprotected]

Read the original post:

Singapore Researchers Look to Intel Neuromorphic Computing to Help Enable Robots That Feel - Global Banking And Finance Review

FP2: Verstappen heads Bottas and Perez at the Red Bull Ring as Ricciardo crashes – Formula 1 RSS UK

2019 Austrian Grand Prix winner Max Verstappen set the pace in Free Practice 2 for the 2020 Styrian Grand Prix at the Red Bull Ring, heading a session that saw a red flag early on after Daniel Ricciardo had a big impact with the barriers at Turn 9.

Having had two decent efforts deleted for track limit infringements, Red Bulls Verstappen eventually posted a lap of 1m 03.660s around seven-tenths shy of last weeks pole lap at the same track and 0.043s up on the Mercedes of Valtteri Bottas.

READ MORE: Formula 1 adds Mugello and Sochi to revised 2020 F1 race calendar

Behind Verstappen and Bottas, the Racing Points confirmed their pace at the sharp end of the field, FP1 leader Sergio Perez 0.217s behind Verstappen in third, three-tenths up on team mate Lance Stroll in fourth.

Carlos Sainz was the fastest McLaren in P5, ahead of the second Mercedes of Lewis Hamilton in P6, with the six-time champion looking less comfortable than his team mate around the 2.7-mile track, as he ended up nearly seventh-tenths adrift of Bottas. Alex Albon recovered from a spin at Turn 3 to go P7, and complained about a snappy Red Bull RB16 which then led to another spin into the gravel going though the Turn 7-8 chicane with 15 minutes of the session to go.

Lando Norris put the second McLaren P8, but will be compromised on Sunday after he was handed a three-place grid penalty for a yellow flag infraction during FP1 while the updates to Charles Leclercs Ferrari SF1000 couldnt get him within a second of Verstappens session-heading time, as he took P9.

Renaults Esteban Ocon rounded out the top 10 but his team mate Daniel Ricciardo missed the majority of the session, after losing the rear end of his R.S.20 on the exit of Turn 9 and barrelling into the wall on the outside of the track.

PADDOCK PASS: Previewing this weekend's Styrian Grand Prix at the Red Bull Ring

Ricciardo was able to limp out of the car, before being cleared by the doctors after a visit to the medical centre. His car was looking less happy, though, with visible damage to the front and rear wings and what looks to be a long evening ahead for the Renault mechanics.

FP2 Highlights: 2020 Styrian Grand Prix

With bad weather forecast for Saturday and Sunday morning, there is a chance that if no running is possible then, the FP2 times could set the grid for the race, something that was all-too obvious to Pierre Gasly, after he was sent out to provide a tow to his AlphaTauri team mate Daniil Kvyat. Im not giving a ****ing tow to Dany, Gasly yelled, before adding: If this is quali, we didnt maximise it.

Lower down the grid, Williams George Russell was P15 in his first session of the weekend having given up his FW43 to Jack Aitken this morning ahead of the second Ferrari of Sebastian Vettel, who had a faster lap deleted, while the two Haas cars continued to struggle for pace, Kevin Magnussen and Romain Grosjean ending up P18 and P19.

The next on track running will be FP3 on Saturday, followed by qualifying. Can Bottas make it two poles in a row? Or can Verstappen challenge for top spot on the grid? Follow all the action live on F1.com tomorrow to find out...

Read more:

FP2: Verstappen heads Bottas and Perez at the Red Bull Ring as Ricciardo crashes - Formula 1 RSS UK

Hair loss treatment: The popular drink that could help stimulate hair growth – Express

Hair loss isn't a necessary evil of ageing. There are things that can help restore your luscious mane. One drink has even been shown to stimulate hair growth.

A laboratory experiment found that one substance found in a popular drink helped to block the effects of dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in male hair follicles.

Medical News Today states that the male sex hormone, DHT, plays a role in male pattern hair loss.

The androgen hormone is believed to be a major factor for hair loss at the temples and the crown of the head.

The study found that caffeine found in coffee helped block the effects of DHT in male hair follicles.

Caffeine also stimulated the hair follicles, resulting in longer and wider hair roots.

And it prolonged the anagen duration in the hair growth cycle, explained below.

To understand how hair loss happens, it's helpful to know the three stages of hair growth: anagen, catagen, and telogen.

READ MORE:High blood pressure: This type of berry could reduce your risk of cardiovascular disease

Anagen is the growth phase the longer it lasts, the longer the hair grows. The catagen stage typically lasts two weeks, and it's where the hair follicles renew themselves.

Telogen is the resting phase, where hair follicles remain dormant for up to four months.

Then the cycle continues. Bear in mind that each strand of hair will go through this cycle individually.

And when the anagen phase begins again, the existing hair is pushed out of the pore by the new growth and naturally sheds.

DON'T MISS

Male pattern baldness occurs when the hair follicles slowly become miniaturised, the anagen phase is reduced and the telogen phase increases.

Over time, the anagen phase becomes so short that the new hairs don't even peek through the surface of the skin.

Moreover, as the follicles become smaller, the shaft of the hair becomes thinner with each cycle of growth.

Coffee hair care

For those noticing their locks don't grow as long as they used to, or the hair is seemingly thinner, this is the coffee hair care treatment for you.

You'll need three things: two to four cups of brewed, completely cool coffee, a spray or applicator bottle and a plastic shower cap.

Pour the cooled, brewed coffee in the applicator bottle, then wash and condition your hair as normal.

While the hair is still wet, liberally spray the hair with the coffee, then massage the coffee into your hair and scalp for a few minutes.

Massaging the head and scalp encourages blood (with its oxygen and nutrients) to replenish the hair follicles.

Apply the shower cap, and leave the coffee to sit on your hair and scalp for about 20 minutes.

After 20 minutes, rinse the coffee from your hair using lukewarm water and pat your hair dry.

Bear in mind that coffee stains the colour of the hair, so it's a good fix for grey hairs.

However, it may not be the best option for light blond or red heads. It would be much better suited for dark blond, brown and black hair.

Read the original here:

Hair loss treatment: The popular drink that could help stimulate hair growth - Express

Trump heads to Georgia as ‘lights are flashing red’ in state he won easily in 2016 – Analysis – The Independent

Donald Trump heads to Georgia on Wednesday for the ninth time, but the first as the underdog in the 2020 presidential race.

The president won the state by 5 percentage points in 2016, but several polls taken since late June show him in a dead heat with former Vice President Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee.

The swing in the Peach State is part of a broader trend in some states Mr Trump won rather easily last time. Each shows a 5-point to 10-point swing away from the president. That means his campaign already is spending money in places it did not expect, and Mr Trump will need to visit those places plenty before Election Day -- likely taking him away from the six or seven expected swing states his campaign initially targeted.

Sharing the full story, not just the headlines

Where his 2016 campaign was a start-up, his re-election bid is turning into something of a reclamation project.

"The trip tells you that the triple whammy of virus, the slowed-down economy and the social unrest has really taken a toll. ... It's more of an official visit this time, but there's the president and his team would have to be completely unrealistic to not think Georgia is in play right now," said one Republican strategist.

The tables turned in Georgia on the president sharply since the coronavirus outbreak began.

An University of Georgia survey completed on March 2 put him up 8 percentage points over Mr Biden, just as the former VP was solidifying himself as the presumptive Democratic nominee. But two polls, conducted by Public Policy Polling and Fox News, from late June gave Mr Biden a 2-point and 4-point lead there, respectively.

"There's no question all the lights are flashing red, at this moment at least, for the Trump campaign," said Bill Galston, a former Clinton White House aide now with the Brookings Institution. "Biden is doing well in places that six months ago, people thought he might not have a chance."

The president is headed to Atlanta ostensibly to announce the easing of regulations that his administration contends will clear the way for infrastructure projects in the Peach State. In so doing, he will be touting his second-term agenda for overhauling the country's infrastructure -- something on which he ran four years ago, only to fail to reach anything close to a deal with just about anyone, Republican or Democrat, on Capitol Hill.

A list of polls show nearly two-thirds of all Americans want Washington to cut a massive check for new roads, bridges, tunnels, airports and other things. The issue also is popular among older voters, a voting bloc Mr Trump won four years ago but has steadily lost during his term.

'All politics, all the time'

"From Trump's perspective, the most important group is seniors," the GOP strategist said. "There is a reason why Joe Biden is doing well with seniors: they don't see him as being as toxic as Hillary Clinton. They're not afraid of him like with her."

Still, White House aides are dismissing the notion that the trip should be viewed like a campaign stop on the taxpayer dime. And experts say they have a point about Atlanta, where he will tour and speak at a UPS facility.

For one, the Georgia capital also is widely considered the capital of the South. It is a major player in the financial, energy, tourism and automotive sectors.

"I can think of three or four other reasons than re-election that might take any president to Georgia," Mr Galston said. "But with this president, it is all politics, all the time. Although the president is not indifferent to GOP candidates he likes, he cares more about his own prospects."

Also on the ballot in November are the states two US senators, a rarity. GOP Senator David Perdue has been a Trump ally since the president was a candidate and fellow-Republican Senator Kelly Loeffler has been a reliable vote since taking office this year. (Ms Loeffler is expected to travel to Atlanta on Air Force One and Mr Perdue is slated to be by the president's side after meeting him there.)

'Greatly exaggerated'

Though the mere visit suggests Mr Trump now anticipates a fight to keep the Peach State red, the Republican strategist and Mr Galston caution against ruling him out.

"His political demise has been greatly exaggerated," the strategist said. "Biden's in a good place, but Trump can still win this thing."

One way he helped salvage some Republican-held House seats in the 2018 midterm cycle was by holding raucous campaign rallies in those areas. But the coronavirus pandemic has forced the president and his campaign team to re-think those events after a subpar turnout recently in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

The Atlanta trip will start to form an answer to whether a daytime official visit about a complicated matter like nixing infrastructure project regulations can provide the same boost as one of his wild rallies.

"The electoral landscape is looking more perilous for the president with each passing week. We saw his rallies give GOP House candidates a boost in the 2018 midterms. Now he needs to do that for himself," said Patrick Murphy, polling director at Monmouth University. "I expect we will see him in a lot of states he won handily four years ago. But it's not clear how impactful non-rally trips can be."

Read more:

Trump heads to Georgia as 'lights are flashing red' in state he won easily in 2016 - Analysis - The Independent

Offshore fishing producing the goods Bundaberg Now – Bundaberg Now

Bundaberg offshore

Lately, offshore fishing from Bundaberg and 1770 has been awesome! Plenty of trophy-sized coral trout and red emperor has been caught. Using pilchards and live baits will get you into some tasty trout, and big flesh baits will get you some red emperor action. Remember to fish the tide change, as that one hour on the tide change can definitely change your day. There has also been plenty of pelagics offshore. Even a few small marlin have been caught on most of the popular fishing grounds off Bundaberg.Bundaberg inshore

The inshore reefs have been producing some cracking grunter and grassy sweetlip. Most of these fish are being caught early in the mornings and late afternoons. There has been also some nice sized squid around. The shallows off Elliott Heads seems to be the hottest spot for these.

The mouth of the Burnett River has been alive with plenty of schoolie mackerel and tuna over the past week. Trolling hardbody lures and fast-retrieving metal slugs around the bait will get you into some action. Stick with around 60lb leader while chasing the schoolies. Stay away from the wire and your catch rate will increase crazily. There has also been some cracking bream being caught and most of them are being caught on small soft plastics and small vibes. Also, dont forget to drop the crab pots in the new moon tides will get those crabs moving.

Both the Baffle and the Kolan systems have been producing some ripper flathead and whiting. The flathead have been loving slow-rolled paddle-tail soft plastic over super-shallow sandbars. Pumping yabbies at low tide and fishing the incoming afternoon tide will get you into a nice feed of whiting. Again, dont forget to throw the crab pots in. The three metre tides will get them moving.

Lake Monduran is still fishing well considering how cool this weather is. Quite a few barra have been caught, measuring up into the 90cm range and they are tanks! The shallow windblown points have been where all the barra action has been. The new Samaki Redic lures have been getting the bite for most anglers.

The Queensland seasonal closure for snapper and pearl perch came into effect from 12.01 am on the 15th July and will run until 11.59 pm on 15th of August. During this time the snapper and pearl perch will be no-take species to protect the fish during spawning and to help rebuild stocks. More information can be found on the Department of Agriculture and Fisheries website.

Till next timeKeep it realMitch Beyer

Tackle World Bundaberg

Previous fishing reports: Solid fishing around the region with more to come

See the original post:

Offshore fishing producing the goods Bundaberg Now - Bundaberg Now

State library announces the 2020 Kansas Notable Books – GREAT BEND TRIBUNE – Great Bend Tribune

TOPEKA State Librarian Eric Norris announced the 15th annual selection of Kansas Notable Books. The 15 books feature quality titles with wide public appeal, written either by a Kansan, set in Kansas, or about a Kansas related topic.

I am proud to present the 2020 Kansas Notable Book list. This years list covers a wide swath of our cultural and natural history, said Eric Norris, State Librarian. The rich array of works on this years list examine petroglyphs across the prairie and go on fantastical high seas adventures with pirates; explore the careers of academics, athletes, and aviators; and consider the importance of family from the viewpoint of a young Exoduster in the 1880s and as a world traveler in a present day small western Kansas town. This years list will both educate and entertain. I encourage every Kansan to contact their local public library and celebrate the artists and artistry of Kansas.

A committee of librarians, academics, and historians nominated titles from a list of eligible books, and state librarian Eric Norris selected the final list. In 2006, the first Kansas Notable Books list was announced. Since then more than 200 books have been recognized for their contribution to Kansas literary heritage.

Kansas Notable Books is a project of the Kansas Center for the Book. The Kansas Center for the Book is a program at the State Library of Kansas and the state affiliate of the Library of Congress Center for the Book. The Kansas Center for the Book exists to highlight the states literary heritage and foster an interest in books, reading, and libraries.

For more information about Kansas Notable Books, visit https://kslib.info/2020KNB, call 785-296-3296, or email infodesk@ks.gov.

2020 Kansas Notable Books

Birds, Bones, and Beetles: The Improbable Career and Remarkable Legacy of University of Kansas Naturalist Charles D. Bunkerby Charles H. Warner (Lawrence) University Press of Kansas

A Constellation of Rosesby Miranda Asebedo (Manhattan) HarperTeen

Crumbled! (The Misadventures of Nobbin Swill)by Lisa Harkrader (Tonganoxie) Yellow Jacket

Follow Me Down to Nicodemus Townby A. LaFaye (Glen Carbon IL), illustrations by Nicole Tadgell (Oxford MA) Albert Whitman & Company

Headwinds: A Memoirby Edna Bell-Pearson (Overland Park) Meadowlark

The Healers Daughter: A Novelby Charlotte Hinger (Hoxie) Five Star Publishing

How to Be a Family: The Year I Dragged My Kids Around the World to Find a New Way to Be Togetherby Dan Kois (Arlington VA) Little, Brown and Company

Journey to a Promised Land: A Story of the Exodusters(I Am America) by Allison Lassieur (Schenectady NY) Jolly Fish Press

Kansas City Chiefs Legends: The Greatest Coaches, Players and Front Office Execs in Chiefs Historyby Jeff Deters (Lawrence) Deters Publications

A Perfect Silhouetteby Judith Miller (Overland Park) Bethany House Publishers

Petroglyphs of the Kansas Smoky Hillsby Rex C. Buchanan (Lawrence), Burke W. Griggs (Lawrence), Joshua L. Svaty (Ellsworth) University Press of Kansas

The Reckless Oath We Made: A Novelby Bryn Greenwood (Lawrence) G.P. Putnams Sons

Steel Tide: A Seafire Novelby Natalie C. Parker (Lawrence) Razorbill

The Topeka School: A Novelby Ben Lerner (Brooklyn NY) Farrar, Straus and Giroux

What Color Is Night?by Grant Snider (Wichita) Chronicle Books

Excerpt from:

State library announces the 2020 Kansas Notable Books - GREAT BEND TRIBUNE - Great Bend Tribune

This cute lil’ underwater drone just spent 4 years ~ vibing ~ in the Atlantic – The Next Web

Credit: Teledyne Marine - Edited

When it comes to autonomous vehicles, theres a lot of focus on American electric vehicle manufacturer Tesla at the moment. But I want you to cast your net a little wider, and divert your attention to the high seas for just a moment.

Out in the Atlantic Oceans choppy waters, anautonomous underwater drone has just completed a circumnavigationcompletely unaided by humans. The Slocum G2 Glider, named Silbo, took over four years, 1,273 days to be exact, to complete its journey.

[Read: Theres yet another proposal for an EV charger emoji]

It undertook the journey in four legs. In 2016, after having receiving modifications to its energy bay and thruster, Slibo set sail from Cape Cod, Massachusetts with Ireland in its sights. It covered the 6,557 km journey in 330 days.

From here Silbo then went to the Canary Islands covering 3,695 km in 178 days, which was a bit of a homecoming for the AUV. The Canaries were Silbos original destination during its maiden voyage back in 2011, after it set off for the first time from its home in Iceland, where it wasmanufactured by Teledyne Marine, an autonomous underwater vehicle maker.

From the Canary Islands, Silbo flew 6,256 km across the Atlantic Ocean again heading to St. Thomas on the US Virgin Islands. The unit was recovered by local university students and Teledyne technicians that replaced its batteries and set it out for its final leg in under 24 hours.

After St. Thomas, Silbo headed on a 6,236 km trip back to Marthas Vineyard, an island off the coast of Massachusetts, which took 348 days. In total, the underwater autonomous glider covered 22,744 km.

Throughout its journey, various scientists from around the globe interacted with Silbo and used the data it was gathering for a variety of applications.

Over the course of its four-year voyage, Silbo mostly collected weather data about hurricanes, storms, and ocean conditions, taking more than 5,000 data readings that helped with metalogical forecasting. Its also helped researchers better understand the demands of long distance unmanned underwater explorations.

Despite the long period of time spent at sea, Silbo only required the occasional battery change and cleaning, and suffered one scratch to its hull that needed repair.

Ill be honest, I dont know much about autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV), but Silbo has certainly sparked my curiosity. One thing is for sure, the AUV community seems pretty stoked about it.

An Epic mission! A technological achievement, a global team building achievement, with data impact on hurricanes and others. A 4-year mission for the record books. Congrats to all involved! said Scott Glenn, Board of Governors Professor Rutgers University.

Read next: Facebook gears up to take on TikTok with Instagram Reels' worldwide launch

Do you want to get the sassiest daily tech newsletter every day, in your inbox, for FREE? Of course you do: sign up for Big Spam here.

Read the original post:

This cute lil' underwater drone just spent 4 years ~ vibing ~ in the Atlantic - The Next Web

Exclusive: U.S. turns screws on maritime industry to cut off Venezuela’s oil – Reuters

LONDON/WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Several companies that certify vessels are seaworthy and ship insurers have withdrawn services to tankers involved in the Venezuelan oil trade as the United States targets the maritime industry to tighten sanctions on the Latin American country.

FILE PHOTO: An oil tanker is seen in the sea outside the Puerto La Cruz oil refinery in Puerto La Cruz, Venezuela July 19, 2018. Picture taken July 19, 2018. REUTERS/Alexandra Ulmer/File Photo

U.S. sanctions have driven Venezuelas oil exports to their lowest levels in nearly 80 years, starving President Nicolas Maduros socialist government of its main source of revenue and leaving authorities short of cash for essential imports such as food and medicine.

The sanctions are part of U.S. efforts to weaken Maduros grip on power after Washington and other Western democracies accused him of rigging a 2018 re-election vote. Despite the countrys economic collapse, Maduro has held on and frustrated the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump.

Maduros government says the United States is trying to seize Venezuelas oil and calls the U.S. measures illegal persecution that heap suffering on the Venezuelan people.

Washington has honed in on the maritime industry in recent months in efforts to better enforce sanctions on the oil trade and isolate Caracas, Washingtons special envoy on Venezuela Elliott Abrams told Reuters.

What you will see is most shipowners and insurance and captains are simply going to turn away from Venezuela, Abrams told Reuters in an interview.

Its just not worth the hassle or the risk for them.

The United States is pressuring shipping companies, insurers, certifiers and flag states that register vessels, he said.

Ship classification societies, which certify safety and environmental standards for vessels, are feeling the heat for the first time.

The United States is pressuring classifiers to establish whether vessels have violated sanctions regulations and to withdraw certification if so as a way to tighten sanctions further, a U.S. official told Reuters, speaking on condition of anonymity.

Without certification, a vessel and its cargo become uninsured. Ship owners would also be in breach of commercial contracts which require certificates to be maintained. In addition, port authorities can refuse entry or detain a ship.

London-headquartered Lloyds Register (LR), one of the worlds leading ship classifiers, said it had withdrawn services from eight tankers that were involved in trade with Venezuela.

In accordance with our programme for complying with sanctions laws, where we become aware of vessels operating in breach of relevant sanctions laws, LR classification has been withdrawn, a Lloyds Register spokeswoman said.

Abrams said the pressure on the maritime industry was working.

We have had a number of shippers that come to us and say, We just had our insurance company withdraw the insurance, and the ship is on the high seas and weve got to get to port. Could you give us a license for one week?, Abrams said.

In June, the United States designated six shipping companies - two of them based in Greece - and six tankers they owned for participating in proscribed Venezuelan trade.

Another leading ship classifier, Hamburg-headquartered DNV GL Maritime, said it had suspended services for three of those vessels in June.

The company resumed services when the United States removed those vessels from the list of sanctioned entities after the shipping companies that own and operate the vessels agreed to cease trade with Venezuela.

The United States has threatened sanctions on any company involved in the oil trade with Venezuela, and that has had a chilling effect even on trade permitted under sanctions.

Some oil companies are refusing to charter vessels that have called at Venezuelan ports in the past year, even if the voyage was exempt from sanctions.

The shipping sector has been at the receiving end of U.S. action on Venezuela and it has caused much uncertainty as no one knows who will be next, one shipping industry source said.

Insurers are also in a bind. They have been conservative in their interpretation of U.S. sanctions to avoid any potential violations, said Mike Salthouse, chairman of the sanctions sub-committee with the International Group association. The group represents companies that insure about 90% of the worlds commercial shipping.

If there is ambiguity as to what is lawful and what is unlawful it makes it almost impossible for an insurer to say whether someone has cover or not, he said.

Even after ships and companies are removed from the sanctions list, they may face difficulties, Salthouse said.

The stigma associated with a designation may last some time, he said.

Oil majors, for example, may review relationships with companies that own or manage vessels that the United States had designated and then removed to avoid any possible problems with other vessels, he said.

Venezuela is on the list of high risk areas set by officials from Londons insurance market.

If a vessel sails to Venezuela they have to notify the underwriter and it may be that the underwriter will not be able to cover them, said Neil Roberts, head of marine underwriting at Lloyds Market Association, which represents the interests of all underwriting businesses in Londons Lloyds market.

The industry faces the direct and real threat of having its trade stopped by a watchful U.S. administration because of an inadvertent infringement, he said.

This risk alone is enough to fuel the multiplication of compliance checks.

Some of the biggest global flag registries including Panama and Liberia are also looking more closely at ships that were involved in Venezuela trading as they come under U.S. pressure to withdraw registration for ships violating sanctions.

Maritime lawyers in Panama said its registry is fining vessels that do not comply with the U.S. maritime guidance issued in May. The registry is mostly de-flagging vessels targeted by multilateral sanctions rather than unilateral U.S. sanctions, the lawyers said.

Officials at Liberias registry did not respond to requests for comment.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross, a former investor in shipping, helped craft the strategy targeting the maritime sector, sources said.

A Commerce Department spokesperson acknowledged Ross had worked with other government agencies to determine how to best hold accountable those who are evading U.S. sanctions on Venezuela.

Abrams vowed to keep up the pressure.

There are people who dont cooperate ... Well go after the ship, the ship owner, the ship captain.

Additional reporting by Marianna Parraga in Mexico City and Elida Moreno in Panama City; Editing by Simon Webb and Daniel Wallis

The rest is here:

Exclusive: U.S. turns screws on maritime industry to cut off Venezuela's oil - Reuters

Submarine Cables in the Law of Naval Warfare – Lawfare

No technology is as profoundly important to the global economy as the internet, which is dependent on the security of a vast network of some 750,000 miles of seabed cables that criss-cross the oceans depths. The interdependence of global submarine communication systems means that a break in one cable can have cascading effects on internet access to distant states. While the rules to protect this critical infrastructure in peacetime should be refurbished, the need to further develop the rules to secure this global infrastructure during periods of armed conflict is perhaps even more compelling. Although several peacetime treaties protect submarine cables from disruption and criminal acts, albeit weakly, the rules that apply during naval war are even more antiquated. Because the law of naval warfare is principally based on custom and state practice rather than treaties, there is considerable uncertainty over how submarine cables would fare in conflict at sea.

The internet facilitates $10 trillion in international financial transactions daily; submarine cables are the backbone of this distributed, global infrastructure. The critical importance of cables underscores the debate within Western states over the prudence of working with the Chinese communications conglomerate Huawei Marine. Russia and China both view submarine cables as strategic assets and could either tap them or sever them in any future conflict. Russias surface ship Yantar, for example, is monitored by Western naval forces since it is outfitted with cable-cutting gear and deep-sea submersibles.

The principal treaty governing submarine cables, adopted in 1884, sets forth an enlightened and balanced approach that is still followed today. The treaty is supplemented by the 1958 Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf and the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). While Article 2 of the 1884 treaty criminalizes the breaking or injury of submarine cables done intentionally or through culpable negligence that results in disruption of telecommunication services, Article 4 requires cable owners and operators to indemnify each other for damaged cables and, under Article 7, pay for lost anchors and fishing nets sacrificed in order to avoid cutting a cable.

The 1958 convention recognizes that coastal states have sovereign rights over the resources of the seabed. These rights inhere to the coastal state, regardless of its ability to occupy the seabed, access the resources or exercise control over the area. This recognition of coastal state rights codified the U.S. claim in the 1945 Truman Proclamation, which had crystallized into customary international law. Article 4 of that treaty ensures that coastal states may not impede the laying or maintenance of submarine cables or pipelines on their continental shelves. Laying submarine cables is a high seas freedom, and Article 2(4) of the treaty recognizes that all states have a right to do so, while exercising reasonable regard for other statessuch as the coastal state. The act of laying submarine cables is also a high seas right under the peacetime rules reflected in Article 112 of UNCLOS. States are required to adopt necessary laws and regulations to address willful or culpably negligent damage to cables in accordance with Article 113. Articles 114 and 115 of UNCLOS reflect the long-standing regime of liability and indemnity and are derived from the 1884 treaty. Even in peacetime, as set forth by the rules reflected in UNCLOS, the submarine cable system is fragile. The International Cable Protection Committeean industry group that represents 97 percent of submarine cableshas reported coastal state delays and exorbitant costs, such as those imposed by India and Indonesia, that hinder undersea cable repairs on their continental shelves. China has a lax record of enforcement against its fishing vessels that cut submarine cables.

While Article 10 of the 1884 treaty specifies that warships and other government vessels have a right to verify the nationality of a merchant vessel if it is suspected of having broken a submarine cable, this provision is a departure from the concept of exclusive flag state jurisdiction over ships, as embodied in Article 92 of UNCLOS. Still, it is also possible to suggest that Article 10 persists even now by virtue of Article 30 of the 1958 convention, which states that prior agreements already in force shall continue. Thus, the rule that states may approach and visit merchant vessels to investigate cut or damaged cables may still apply to states party to the 1884 convention and the 1958 convention, or perhaps more broadly under customary international law.

While these peacetime instruments are rather dated and would benefit from new agreements to increase penalties for tampering and other criminal acts that disrupt their operation, the rules that apply during armed conflict are perhaps even more uncertain. The 1907 Hague Regulations forbid seizure or destruction of submarine cables connecting an occupied territory to a neutral territory, except in the case of absolute necessity. Furthermore, cut cables must be restored and compensation paid once the conflict is over. Not only does this exception practically negate the rule, but the regulations themselves apply only to war on landoccupied land at thatand are silent on destruction of cables in the open sea. State practice is clear, however, that cables connecting two points in enemy territory (or two enemy states) may be cut. (See p. 95 of volume 50 of International Law Studies, of the Stockton Center for International Law at the U.S. Naval War College.)

Article 15 of the 1884 treaty states that the rules on submarine cables do not affect the liberty of action of belligerent states during armed conflict. This is amplified in Rule 37 in the influential San Remo Manual on the Law Applicable to Conflict at Sea, which states that parties to a conflict shall take care to avoid damaging submarine cables and pipelines laid on the seabed that serve neutral states. Article 54 of the 1913 Oxford Manual of the Laws of Naval War prohibits cutting cables in neutral waters connecting neutral states with an enemy state. Such cables may be cut on the high seas only if the belligerent state doing so is conducting an effective blockade of the enemy state. Yet, even the Oxford Manual cautions that seizure or destruction of a submarine cable may not be done unless there is an absolute necessity. This rule applies without discrimination as to nationality of the owner of the cable, whether a natural person or corporate entity. Recently, the 2020 Oslo Manual on Select Topics on the Law of Armed Conflict recognized in Rule 67 that states that have laid submarine cables or pipelines, or whose nationals have done so, are entitled to take protective measures to prevent or terminate harmful interference of them.

It is unclear, however, the extent to which the rules set forth in the Oxford, San Remo and Oslo manuals, weak as they are, reflect the understanding of states. In short, the content of the law is murky. Further, the willingness of states to acknowledge even the rather circumspect restraints from customary law on their conduct during armed conflict at sea is doubtful. And while legal practitioners and scholars might devise some clarity, such as through the ongoing revision process of the San Remo Manual, the challenge of more crisply defining rights and duties of states concerning submarine cables is daunting. In the meantime, states may expect that adversaries plans to disrupt international submarine cables during naval warfare are limited only by their national laws and their imagination.

Read more:

Submarine Cables in the Law of Naval Warfare - Lawfare

The Wyvill family who were "an enemy of slavery" and the admiral who took the fight to end it to the high seas – The Northern Echo

OUR recent series on slavery shows how, even though the North-East is not associated with the trade, its tentacles and its riches reached into our communities.

But the trade also had its opponents, like the Wyvill family of Constable Burton, near Bedale, in North Yorkshire.

The Reverend Christopher Wyvill was nominally in charge of the parish of Black Notley in Essex but he very shrewdly married his cousin, Elizabeth, who was more than 20 years older than him but was the heir to the family hall.

When her father, Sir Marmaduke, died in 1774, he inherited Constable Burton Hall and an income comfortable enough for him to be able to give up his parish.

However, he was desperately keen to see improvements in Britain and in 1779 formed the Yorkshire Association, a group of hundreds of independent members of the gentry which lobbied for economic and Parliamentary reform. Among the many reforming causes to which he gave his support was William Wilberforces crusade to end slavery.

On his death in 1822, his eldest son, also Marmaduke, inherited Constable Burton.

He was the MP for York from 1820 to 1830 and he, too, sided with Wilberforce, declaring himself an enemy of slavery. In 1829, he presented a petition to Parliament signed by hundreds of people in York demanding freedom for slaves.

Admiral Christopher Wyvill, who crusaded against slavery on the east coast of Africa. Picture courtesy of Charles Wyvill

The reverends second son was Admiral Christopher Wyvill who in the 1840s commanded HMS Cleopatra. He took the battle against slavery to the high seas.

He was stationed off the Cape of Good Hope, patrolling the east coast of Africa, where Portuguese traders still harvested slaves in Mozambique and sold them to the plantations of the Americas.

The admiral would chase after the slavers. Some he would capture and liberate hundreds of captives; others, though, would flee from him and in their desperation to escape would run aground. The crew would get away but the human cargo beneath the battened hatches might not be so lucky.

HMS Vestal, the sister ship of HMS Cleopatra which was commanded in the 1840s by Admiral Christopher Wyvill on an anti-slavery crusade

Then the admiral took the fight onland.

The Portuguese, like the Lascelles family of Northallerton MPs whose story we told last week, would pen the Africans in a makeshift prison until there was a ship to sail them off to slavery.

The admiral would destroy these slave factories the permanently moored prison ships pioneered by Henry Lascelles MP or he would land and burn the barracoons the stockades where the captives were incarcerated.

At the end of a long naval career, the admiral retired to The Grange, which is opposite Bedale sports ground, where he died in 1863 aged 71.

See the article here:

The Wyvill family who were "an enemy of slavery" and the admiral who took the fight to end it to the high seas - The Northern Echo

Crew kidnappings on the rise off West Africa – defenceWeb

The International Maritime Bureau (IMB) has warned that violent attacks against ships and their crews have increased this year, with the Gulf of Guinea becoming increasingly dangerous for commercial shipping as it accounts for 90% of maritime kidnappings worldwide.

The Bureau on 15 July said that so far this year, 77 seafarers have been taken hostage or kidnapped for ransom since January, according to its latest piracy report.

Violence against crews is a growing risk in a workforce already under immense pressure, said IMB Director Michael Howlett. In the Gulf of Guinea, attackers armed with knives and guns now target crews on every type of vessel. Everyones vulnerable.

So far this year, 49 crew have been kidnapped for ransom in the Gulf of Guinea and held captive on land for up to six weeks. Rates are accelerating, with 32 crew kidnapped in the past three months alone. And incidents are happening further out to sea: two-thirds of the vessels were attacked on the high seas from around 20 to 130 nautical miles off the Gulf of Guinea coastline, the IMB said.

We need to change the risk-to-reward ratio for pirates operating within the Gulf of Guinea. Without an appropriate and proportionate deterrent, pirates and robbers will get more ruthless and more ambitious, increasing the risk to seafarers, said Howlett.

In one recent case commended by the IMB, the Nigerian Navy responded promptly to a distress call from a fishing vessel boarded and hijacked by armed assailants in Ivory Coast waters. As a result the crew were saved and the ship was prevented from being used as a possible mother vessel to carry out further attacks.

In another incident, a product tanker was attacked while underway around 127 nautical miles off Bayelsa, Nigeria. Eight armed pirates kidnapped ten crew as well as stealing cash, personal valuables, and ships property. The IMBs Piracy Reporting Centre contacted regional and international authorities, and a Nigerian Navy Security Vessel was dispatched. A nearby sister vessel helped the four remaining crewmembers to sail the tanker to a safe port. The kidnapped crew were released three weeks later.

Overall, the IMB said global ship hijackings are at their lowest since 1993. In total, IMBs Piracy Reporting Centre recorded 98 incidents of piracy and armed robbery in the first half of 2020, up from 78 in the second quarter of 2019.

Somalia was for many years the epicentre of maritime piracy, but this year no incidents were reported off Somalia. Vessels are urged to continue implementing Best Management Principles (BMP5) recommended practices while transiting these waters. The Somali pirates still maintain the capability for carrying out attacks, the IMB cautioned.

Visit link:

Crew kidnappings on the rise off West Africa - defenceWeb

Is it the End of the Road for India in the Enrica Lexie Incident? – The Wire

The award of the ad-hoc arbitral tribunal constituted under Annex VII of the United Nations Convention on the Law of Sea (UNCLOS), only the operative portions of which were publicly released last week, appears to have brought to an end, an eight year long tussle between New Delhi and Rome on the exercise of criminal jurisdiction over two Italian marines accused of manslaughter.

As many would remember, on February 15, 2012, two Italian marines Sgt. Massimiliano Latorre and Sgt. Salvatore Girone, deployed on board an oil tanker MV Enrica Lexieflying the Italian flag en route from Sri Lanka to Egypt, at roughly 20.5 nautical miles off the Indian coast, opened fire, killing two Indian fisherman on board an Indian vessel St. Antonyafter claiming to have mistaken them for pirates.

Soon after the incident, the Indian Coast Guard intercepted the Italian ship and directed it to shore.

The marines were then arrested and charged with murder by the Indian authorities. The Italian government, which claimed to have started its own criminal investigations, strongly contested Indias exercise of criminal jurisdiction over the marines and in any case argued that the marines, having been officially deployed with an anti-piracy mandate, enjoyed sovereign immunity.

Also read: Enrica Lexie: Did India Lose Case Against Italy Because of Lapses By its Own Supreme Court?

The incident and the detention of the marines greatly soured the relationship between Italy and India, with the former deciding to initiate arbitration proceedings under Annex VII of the UNCLOS.

Lotus 2.0?

The incident itself bore strong resemblance with another infamous high seas incident decades earlier that was the subject of a decision rendered by the permanent court of international justice (PCIJ). In the SS Lotus case, following a collision between a French steamer and a Turkish vessel on high seas, resulting in the death of eight Turkish nationals, France objected to Turkeys attempt to criminally prosecute the captain of the French steamer for his role in the collision.

The SS Lotus. Photo: http://www.alchetron.com

The PCIJ, equating the Turkish vessel to Turkish territory, held that under customary international law Turkey was entitled to assert jurisdiction over the persons responsible for the collisions since its effects have taken place on Turkish territory.

The decision thus laid down the foundation for the principle of objective territoriality. Many saw the decision as relevant to the Enrica Lexie incident, with Italy taking the place of France and India that of Turkey. However, there were some notable differences.

First, the Enrica Lexie incident did not take place on the high seas; rather it took place in an area beyond Indias territorial sea called the contiguous zone, where India exercises limited sovereign rights.

Second, the basis of the decision in SS Lotus was overruled through treaty law, specifically Article 97 of the UNCLOS which provided that in the event of a collision or any other incident of navigation on the high seas, involving penal responsibility of any person in the service of the ship, only the flag state or state of which the person is a national would be entitled to assert penal jurisdiction.

Third, the captain of the French vessel SS Lotus was not an agent of the French state. In contrast, the two marines were members of the Italian armed forces specifically deployed as per Italian law framed pursuant to anti-piracy resolutions passed by the United Nations Security Council.

Each of these differences appears to have ultimately proved critical to the outcome of the case. The Tribunal dismissed the reliance placed by Italy on Article 97 of the UNCLOS to argue that only Italy as the flag state was entitled to assert jurisdiction over the marines, presumably since the incident did not take place on the high seas and/or did not involve collision or other incident of navigation but rather shooting across vessels.

The Tribunal also found that by firing upon St. Antony, Italy effectively, interfered with an Indian vessels freedom of navigation under Articles 87 and 90 of the UNCLOS, and was entitled to pay compensation to India in connection with the loss of life, physical harm and material damage to the Indian vessel St. Antony and its crew.

Also read: Enrica Lexie: In Setback for India, Tribunal Says Countrys Courts Cant Try Italian Marines

Finally, although under the tribunals award India could exercise concurrent jurisdiction over the marines, as per the tribunal it was precluded from doing so on account of the immunity enjoyed by the marines as sovereigns state officials exercising sovereign functions, presumably under the rules of customary international law.

On immunity

It is this last part of the award finding that the marines are entitled to sovereign immunity that has proved particularly controversial. Under customary international law, as also reflected in the commentary to the Draft Articles on Jurisdictional Immunities of States and Their property, states (including its organs) and its property, subject to limited exceptions, enjoy immunity from the jurisdiction of the courts of another state.

One significant exception recognised in international law to such jurisdictional immunity, is with regard to the commercial activities of the state and over their commercial assets It is equally well accepted that the armed forces of a state, as an organ of the state, enjoy such jurisdictional immunity, for acts committed in their official functions. This underlying idea of sovereign immunity is also reflected in Articles 95 and 96 of the UNCLOS, which provide that warshipsand ships owned or operated by the state on governmental non-commercial service, enjoy complete immunity from the jurisdiction of any state other then the flag state.

Also read:India, Italy Spar Over Marines Issue Again as Ad-hoc Tribunal Reviews Enrica Lexie Case

However in the Enrica Lexie incident although the marines were indisputably members of Italian armed forces, they had been deputed on board a private Italian oil tanker, with an anti-piracy mandate. Thus according to India, Italy by deploying its armed forces on a private charter was acting in its commercial capacity, and the positions of the marines were equivalent to that of private armed security on board a vessel. However it is important to remember that, and as stressed by the Italians, the marines had been deployed under an Italian law framed pursuant to certain UN Security Council resolutions and had to adhere to rules of command, engagement, etc.

The majority of the tribunal appears to have found favour with the Italian position, whereas the dissenting members appear to have accepted that the Italian state (or its organs) was carrying on commercial activity.

Accordingly the majority of the tribunal, after taking note of the commitment made by Italy during the arbitral proceedings to resume criminal investigation against the marines for the incident, directed India to take steps to cease its exercise of criminal jurisdiction over the marines.

The road ahead

Naturally, as a result of losing jurisdiction over the marines, the award has not been met with much enthusiasm in India, especially in the state of Kerala where the deceased fishermen hailed from.

Enrica Lexie. Photo: Wikipedia/CC BY 3.0

However contrary to the expectations expressed in some quarters, the award of the tribunal at Hague is final and not subject to appeal in terms of Article 11 of Annexure VII to the UNCLOS read with the agreed rules of procedure. As an international law abiding nation, the Indian government has correctly decided to abide by the ruling of the tribunal and its application to the Supreme Court should be viewed in this context.

Having said that, the Indian governments role in this matter is far from over. Although the legal phase of the matter is over, the Indian government should continue to exercise diplomatic pressure on Italy, to ensure that the marines are subjected to a fair trial in Italy for their roles in the incident.

The government must also ensure that the compensation to be agreed with Italy, in terms of the directions of the tribunal, accurately reflects the material and moral loss caused to St. Antony and its crew. In the event no agreement on compensation is reached diplomatically between New Delhi and Rome, expect another round before the arbitral tribunal.

Jay Manoj Sanklecha is a lawyer specialising in international law. Views are personal.

Follow this link:

Is it the End of the Road for India in the Enrica Lexie Incident? - The Wire

Is it time to add ‘the great’ to St. John Paul II? – Greenville Daily Reflector

As he began his 1979 pilgrimage through Poland, Pope John Paul II preached a soaring sermon that was fiercely Catholic, yet full of affection for his homeland.

For Communist leaders, the fact that the former Archbishop of Krakow linked faith to national pride was pure heresy. The pope joyfully claimed divine authority to challenge atheism and the governments efforts to reshape Polish culture.

Man cannot be fully understood without Christ, John Paul II told 290,000 people at a Mass in Warsaws Victory Square. He cannot understand who he is, nor what his true dignity is, nor what his vocation is, nor what his final end is. ... Christ cannot be kept out of the history of man in any part of the globe, at any longitude or latitude of geography.

That was bad enough. Then he added: It is therefore impossible without Christ to understand the history of the Polish nation. ... If we reject this key to understanding our nation, we lay ourselves open to a substantial misunderstanding. We no longer understand ourselves.

This was the stuff of sainthood, and John Paul II received that title soon after his 26-year pontificate ended. But the global impact of that 1979 sermon is a perfect example of why many Catholics believe its time to attach another title to his name the great.

The informal title the great is not one that is formally granted by the church, explained historian Matthew Bunson, author of The Pope Encyclopedia: An A to Z of the Holy See.

Every saint who is also a pope is not hailed as the great, but the popes who have been called the great are all saints. ... When you hear that title, you are dealing with both the love of the faithful for this saint and the judgment of history.

When he was chosen to succeed John Paul II, Pope Benedict XVIs first words to the crowd in St. Peters Square were, After the great pope ...

Discussions of attaching the great to this saints title were jumpstarted by a recent letter from Benedict XVI that marked the centenary of the birth, in the Polish town of Wadowice, of the man who would become John Paul II.

The word saint indicates Gods sphere, and the word great, the human dimension, wrote Benedict. The term great is harder to define, he added, and in the course of the almost 2,000-year-long history of the papacy, the title the great has been maintained only for two popes: Leo I (440-461) and Gregory I (590-604). In the case of both, the word great has a political connotation, but precisely because something of the mystery of God himself becomes visible through their political success.

Just look at the dramatic life of John Paul II, Bunson said. You start with his underground work against the Nazis, then all the ways that he stood up to Communism during the Cold War. Finally, there are his encyclicals opposing the existential threat of postmodernism what he called the culture of death to the value of the human person.

Let us leave open the question of whether the epithet the great will prevail or not, noted Benedict XVI.. It is true that Gods power and goodness have become visible to all of us in John Paul II. In a time when the Church is again suffering from the oppression of evil, he is for us a sign of hope and confidence.

Read more from the original source:

Is it time to add 'the great' to St. John Paul II? - Greenville Daily Reflector

Reasonable Liberal Up for Adoption – Lynchburg News and Advance

Another, #TrumpIsNotWell, taunts Trump as shaky, weak and babbling. Why isnt the press covering Trumps secretive midnight run to Walter Read Medical Center? the ad asks, addressing the Trump base with a clever (though inaccurate) hit on the media.

Mourning in America portrays a heartland of empty factories, dilapidated homes and broken people. Under the leadership of Donald Trump, our country is weaker and sicker and poorer, the voiceover says in sorrow. Americans are asking, If we have another four years like this, will there even be an America?

The Lincoln Project managers were sure to have the ad aired on Tucker Carlsons Fox News program.

In Betrayed, an angry ex-Navy Seal rails against Trumps nonresponse to reports of Russians paying the Taliban to kill American soldiers. Any commander in chief with a spine would be stomping the living s out of some Russians right now, Dr. Dan Barkuff says. He calls Trump a coward and draft dodger, and Barkuff adds in passing, Im a pro-life, gun-owning combat veteran.

The brains behind these videos, Wilson and Lincoln Project colleagues George Conway, Steve Schmidt, John Weaver and others, are on my side. They remind people they used to campaign against there are patriotic Republicans who still put their country above party.

I dream these never-Trump Republicans become not a third party but one of the two parties a replacement for the shabby Trump cult now called the Republican Party. They might even change their name to the Lincoln Party.

See the rest here:

Reasonable Liberal Up for Adoption - Lynchburg News and Advance