‘Unbelievable’ Las Vegas car crash that killed baby haunts those investigating – Las Vegas Sun

Steve Marcus

Stuffed animals and flowers are shown at a makeshift memorial near the intersection of Rampart at Lake Mead boulevards Tuesday, July 14, 2020. One-year-old Royce Jones was killed in a traffic accident at the siteSunday.

By Ricardo Torres-Cortez (contact)

Thursday, July 16, 2020 | 2 a.m.

As night fell Tuesday, items that remained scattered around the heavily-damaged shopping center marquee near Rampart and Lake Mead boulevards illustrated the tragedy that ensued 48 hours before.

The punishing Las Vegas heat had wilted flowers and deflated Spider-Man balloons that swayed in the breeze at the impromptu memorial. Stuffed animals, still in good shape, surrounded them. A passerby with a trained eye might have seen charred brush, shattered glass, a broken wooden sign, and a bent exhaust pipe lying around.

Yellow lines painted by Metro Police investigators, veering from Rampart into the entrance of a shopping center, showed the turbulent path Lauren Loanna Prescias car took after it nicked another vehicle at 121 mph Sunday, subsequently smashing into the base of the marquee, which severed her car in two, instantly killing her 1-year-old son, Royce.

The posted speed limit on that road is 45 mph.

Prescia, 23, whom officers allege slurred her words and smelled of alcohol, walked away with minor injuries, according to her arrest report. Royce died strapped in his childs car seat in the back of his mothers unrecognizable 2020 Hyundai Sonata.

His father, Cameron Hubbard-Jones, was arrested Wednesday and booked into the Clark County Detention Center on a felony count of reckless driving causing the death of a juvenile.

Hubbard-Jones witnessed the crash from a separate vehicle, which had also accelerated to 100 mph in passing Prescias vehicle before the fatality.

In the womans arrest report, he told investigators that he was driving about 60 mph, noting Prescia must have been going 80 mph. They were on the phone, and he pleaded with her to slow down because their child was with her, he said.

Little is known about why they were speeding. The crash followed a custody exchange in which Prescia told Hubbard-Jones that she was going to beat him home.

It wasnt clear where they were heading.

Prescia told officers that she drank 24 ounces of an alcoholic seltzer beverage more than three hours before the crash, which occurred at 7:17 p.m. Shes out on a $50,000 bail, but is facing counts of DUI resulting in death, reckless driving and child abuse or neglect.

She is only allowed to go to work and medical appointments but isnt allowed to drive, court records show. She didnt have a listed attorney to speak on her behalf.

Had the motorist Prescia struck, who turned into her path on Rampart, made it to the lane she intended to turn into, she also would have likely died, Metro Sgt. Paul McCullough told the Sun Wednesday morning.

And had Prescia struck the marquee head-on, she couldve suffered her sons fate, McCullough said in calling her incredibly fortunate.

The boy didnt stand a chance of survival, McCullough added.

Driving drunk at 121 mph

McCullough arrived at the scene to find the car split in two.

The dynamics of the collision were disgusting, he said. Discovering that it was an infant child that was involved was quite upsetting, and it had an effect on everyone out there.

In his 23 years as a Las Vegas cop, he cant remember another victim who was that young.

The crash, the fourth fatality investigated by Metros traffic unit in seven days, remained under investigation. On Wednesday morning their priority was to track down dash-cam video that KLAS-TV had obtained and broadcast the previous night, which shows both vehicles speeding down the road before the crash. Hubbard-Jones Mercedes-Benz is seen driving ahead of Prescia.

McCullough, who described the crash as unbelievable, said investigators were still trying to determine the mechanics of it, such as seeing if Prescia applied the brakes.

Data from the car showed that Prescia had accelerated to maximum throttle five seconds prior to the crash, reaching 121 mph a couple seconds before, meaning she was traveling about 175 feet per second. After impact with the other vehicle, her car traveled more than 400 feet, spinning along the way, and hitting the marquee.

Hubbard-Jones said he saw Prescia walk away, while he tried to tend to his boy. The distraught father later told a second TV station he thought Royce was also OK, until he tried to lift his tiny head.

Bothered by the crash, McCullough laments many things, such as how apparently no one called 911 as the cars were speeding down Rampart, and how people with video went to the press instead of to police, or how these crashes keep happening.

Its so frustrating, he said, comparing their pleas to Las Vegas drivers to beating a dead horse.

We seem to have a portion of the community that just doesnt care. And whether it be drunk driving, reckless driving, racing, its just out of control, he added.

"Absolutely devastating"

Andrew Bennett, spokesman for Nevadas Office of Traffic Safety, became emotional when he saw the report early Monday. Any loss of life is devastating, especially when it involves such a young person ... someone who has so much life in front of them, he said.

He described it as absolutely devastating and selfish.

Bennett became a staunch advocate for public safety after his teenage sister was killed by a drunk driver more than a decade ago. He later found a career in that role.

Theres probably only a few times where Ive been moved by emotion, he said about reading about Royces death, even when hes read hundreds of traffic fatality reports. He equates it to the gut punch he felt when 8-year-old Levi Echenique died after an impaired driver hit his familys car as he was heading to school almost two years ago.

Bennett said Nevadas traffic safety office strives for accountability, responsibility and respect for life from drivers.

All three of those were clearly not demonstrated on Sunday evening. And, you know, this little boy was the one who was the victim and everybody else walked away, he said. Thats so unfair to him, its unfair to our community as a whole youll never know what this little boy could have accomplished in his life.

Bennett advised witnesses to reckless driving to immediately call 911 or *NHP (647) when on a highway.

Its Bennetts hope that public memorials like the one honoring Royce on Rampart arent again needed. Mourning an accident victim is painful. Its magnified when its a child.

Strangers are continuing to show up to the accident site to pay their respects. Some simply stare at the growing memorial.

A couple embraced after lighting candles, and another couple showed up to drop off a small stuffed bear and rose. Their kid was playing a soccer game nearby, and they just wanted to pay their respects to the child.

More:

'Unbelievable' Las Vegas car crash that killed baby haunts those investigating - Las Vegas Sun

NASA astronaut Stephanie Wilson on going to the moon, Mars and leading the next generation – Space.com

NASA astronaut Stephanie Wilson is ready and excited for the future of space exploration.

Earlier this year (before the COVID-19 pandemic) Space.com met up with NASA astronaut Stephanie Wilson, a veteran of three spaceflights who has logged more than 42 days in space, at the Cradle of Aviation Museum in Long Island, New York.

Wilson, who is one of 17 NASA astronauts eligible to become the first woman to step foot on the moon in 2024 as part of NASA's Artemis program, shared her thoughts on the future of space exploration and her advice for new explorers dreaming of joining the Artemis generation.

With regard to her lunar prospects, Wilson said, "I am of course excited to be included among the group and look forward to whoever the first woman is and the women who follow as part of the Artemis program to continue our studies of the moon, continue to descend down to the surface in a lander and hopefully to build a lunar base there on the moon and continue our journey from the Gateway orbiting laboratory."

The "Gateway," Wilson refers to the Lunar Orbital Platform-Gateway, a proposed NASA program that would orbit around the moon and allow astronauts to more easily travel back and forth from the lunar surface.

She added that the fact that Artemis explicitly includes women is "a wonderful testament to the progress that women have made" in human spaceflight since women were first allowed to apply to the astronaut corps in 1978.

Wilson elaborated, diving into the earlier days of her 24-year astronaut career and how life for women at NASA has changed over the years.

"I was very fortunate to have been able to study engineering and to find my way to NASA, to join the NASA astronaut class of 1996," Wilson said. "Over that period of my career, I have seen increased opportunities for women. We now have women working in the mission control center, working as flight directors."

As a role model for young people looking to grow up and become astronauts like her, Wilson shared a few pieces of advice.

For young women looking to follow in her footsteps, Wilson said, "there are many opportunities now for women in STEM [science, technology, engineering and math], so I encourage these young girls to study hard. If math and science is their interest then they can certainly find their way to NASA for a career," she said.

She added that astronaut hopefuls looking to go "the civilian route" (as opposed to astronauts who come from the military) have to have bachelor's degrees in STEM. "And as far as qualities or traits for the Artemis generation," she added, astronauts have to have what NASA calls "expeditionary skills."

"Very similar to the space station generation, we're looking for people that are adaptable, that are able to work well in a team," Wilson said. She added that astronauts have to be able to transition well between being leaders and followers and additionally "make good decisions quickly and efficiently in an emergency situation or in a situation where resources are limited." Astronauts have to be able "to lead themselves and their teams to a successful and safe outcome," she said.

So, why do people want to become astronauts? Why does our species want to explore the cosmos so badly?

According to Wilson, "being adventurous and being explorers is in our nature. It's in the history of how we've developed Earth and so that naturally continues to the space frontier."

"But," she added, "we also learn a great deal about ourselves, and we're able to bring that technology back to earth." She referenced all of the research that takes place on the International Space Station in fields including physical sciences, material sciences and medicine. Wilson added space-based research can greatly improve our lives as well as advance the technologies that we have here on Earth.

Email Chelsea Gohd at cgohd@space.com or follow her on Twitter @chelsea_gohd. Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

More here:

NASA astronaut Stephanie Wilson on going to the moon, Mars and leading the next generation - Space.com

The Journey Museum commemorates 50-year anniversary of Apollo 13 – Newscenter1.tv

RAPID CITY, S.D. Many people from young generations may know of Apollo 13 from the 1995 film, others may recall that eventful week in 1970.

To commemorate the mission and the future of space exploration, the Journey Museum held an in-person and online forum for the public.

That Apollo mission was meant to be the third moon landing mission and the seventh crewed mission in the Apollo program.

Things took a turn, when almost 56 hours into the flight, the crew was forced to abandon the mission when an oxygen tank exploded. While in some regards, the mission was a failure, the ingenuity of NASA brought the crew home, making it ultimately a success.

Now, 50 years later, NASA is planning on returning to the moon with the Artemis mission.

All of that is being done to do what we didnt do in the Apollo days, and that is set up a lunar base so that the astronauts can stay longer which is what theyll need to do when we send that very first human mission to another planet, and that planet will be Mars, says Tom Durkin, the Deputy Director for the South Dakota Space Grant Consortium.

With this mission, NASA plans to send astronauts back to the moon by 2024, with the very first female astronaut to set foot on the moon.

Space X also launched the crew Dragon capsule in May, making it the first time an American spacecraft sent American astronauts to the International Space Station in nine years.

Here is the original post:

The Journey Museum commemorates 50-year anniversary of Apollo 13 - Newscenter1.tv

Airbus US Space & Defense, Inc., announces a new direction for its business – Geospatial World

Airbus U.S. Space & Defense, Inc., today announced a new direction for the business, unveiling a new leadership team and signaling its intent to expand its presence in the U.S. space and intelligence markets.

Airbus U.S. Space & Defense Chief Executive Officer, Chris Emerson, formerly the President of Airbus Helicopters Inc., intends to build on the companys known reputation for military aircraft and helicopters. His organization will offer capabilities in low-cost satellite design and manufacturing, space exploration, geospatial intelligence, space-based sensors and equipment, secure communications and High Altitude Pseudo-Satellite technology.

Operating under a Special Security Agreement with the U.S. government, Airbus U.S. Space & Defense is approved to deliver on highly sensitive national security and defense requirements. The company is currently executing multiple contracts with U.S. government entities, including the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), and all of the service branches of the U.S. military.

Leveraging our decades of experience delivering Lakotas to the U.S. Army, we have reorganized our U.S. operations also to optimize our ability to support the growing U.S. space and intelligence markets, said Emerson. In addition to continuing our success with the Lakota program, we are building on the global Airbus portfolio of innovative technologies for the U.S., with reliability and commitment to our customers mission needs.

To meet these demands, Emerson has assembled an almost entirely new leadership team, including industry veterans and top picks from the U.S. Airbus executive community. These changes were prescient, coming at a time when the U.S. DoD is spearheading a transformation in national security space, and industry has been shifting to deliver the U.S. government vision.

The recent financing for OneWeb enables continued production of the OneWeb constellation in the high-volume, high-speed advanced satellite production facility operated by Airbus OneWeb Satellites in Florida, said Emerson. Airbus is thrilled to continue to leverage this low-cost capability in the U.S. to support the growing demand from U.S. customers for low-Earth orbit constellations.

We will position the new business to meet the growing demands of the U.S. space market, blending longstanding expertise in space systems and exploration with commercial investments and an entrepreneurial spirit.

Understanding the U.S. governments need for a resilient national security infrastructure, Emerson is also building up the companys U.S.-based geospatial intelligence capabilities. Airbus U.S. Space & Defense has readily-available, affordable, commercial imagery that can be delivered with the speed, precision and accuracy that the U.S. government requires.

Emerson has built a leadership team that he believes has customer service at the core. The new Board of Directors, Board of Advisors, and leadership team bring a diverse set of experiences,including strong backgrounds in the space, intelligence, defense and homeland security sectors.

Independent Directors:

Board of Advisors:

Parent company Airbus has been present in the U.S. for more than 50 years and currently supports over 275,000 jobs in more than 40 states. Airbus has contributed to over $48 billion in aircraft-related expenditures in the U.S. in the last three years and has over 450 suppliers and teammate relationships.

The rest is here:

Airbus US Space & Defense, Inc., announces a new direction for its business - Geospatial World

UK at forefront of space exploration with biomining experiment – Mirage News

BioAsteroid, a biomining experiment, uses a collection of 12 automatic culturing devices fitted with a layer of material on which the bacteria will be grown in the KUBIK ISS incubator for 3 weeks.

This experimental apparatus, which flew to space station in 2019, is a miniature bioreactor which allows the scientists to study how microbes grow in space and what effect microgravity has on their growth.

The University of Edinburgh and Kayser Space have collaborated on the project which is the first European experiment to be fast-tracked to the International Space Station through the Bioreactor Express programme.

Libby Jackson, Human Exploration Programme Manager at the UK Space Agency, said:

This is another exciting step forward in the commercialisation of research and business in space.

Enterprises such as Bioreactor Express allow anybody who wishes to carry out research or manufacture on the ISS the opportunity to do so. There is great potential for UK businesses and entrepreneurs to utilise the programme, which will help further reduce the costs of exploration and open the opportunities of space to a broader audience.

David Zolesi, Kayser Space Managing Director, added:

Executing the entire BioAsteroid project within one year, the UK has positioned itself at the forefront of two activities that will define the future of the commercial exploitation of space: asteroid mining and fast-track access to microgravity.

The experiment utilises Sphingomonas desiccabilis and Penicillium simplicissimum two microbes that, when placed in a liquid, feed from the rock surface, extracting ions. This causes the rock to break down and either form soils or release economically attractive elements in biomining.

Prof. Charles Cockell, University of Edinburgh, said:

By studying biofilm formation of these organisms on the asteroidal material in microgravity, BioAsteroid will investigate how space conditions ultimately affect microbe-mineral interactions, addressing questions on the biochemistry of the organisms, biofilm morphology and structure, fungal attachment and the ability of the microbes to break down rock, a key process for the future use of microorganisms in space exploration, including the mining of asteroids.

The Science Verification Test for BioAsteroid will take place later this month in Edinburgh, where the microbes will be grown for the first time on the actual flight culturing hardware. The experiment is scheduled to be launched to the ISS with SpaceX in October 2020.

The rest is here:

UK at forefront of space exploration with biomining experiment - Mirage News

The Streaming Wars Could Become a Battle of Tech Giants. Heres Why. – Barron’s

Text size

In 2020, media companies cant avoid streaming. Yet territorial battles mean that investors should expect ongoing conflict between platforms and programmers, says LightShed.

As cord-cutting accelerates, major media companies need to have direct-to-consumer (DTC) apps, analyst Richard Greenfield writes. But in many cases, theyve waited too long to do so, and now find that theyre pitted against far larger and more powerful tech companies.

That means that platforms including TV operating system and devices are facing off against apps, and this newly emerging battle is the single most important issue we are focused on in media today. For instance, while HBO Max launched in May, consumers still cant get it on Roku (ticker: ROKU) or Amazon.coms (AMZN) Fire TV platforms. Likewise, Peacockthe streaming division of Comcasts (CMCSA) NBCUniversal divisionis just days from its national launch, and will likely do so without Roku or Fire TV apps too.

The stakes couldnt be higher, argues Greenfield, as the company that has been able to claim the dominant operating system has historically reaped the lions share of the rewards, as Microsoft (MSFT) did with personal computing, and Apple (AAPL) and Alphabets (GOOGL) Google did with mobile computing. The failure of cable and satellite companies to adjust has left an opening, he argues, for some company to become the dominant global operating system for TVs globally.

If you control the TV OS platform, you can advantage your native apps relative to third-party competitors (think Roku Channel to Prime Video/Prime Music/IMDB.TV to Apple Music/Apple TV/Apple Arcade to YouTube/YouTube TV/Stadia) and leverage learnings from usage of competitive apps on the platform, he writes. You can also collect data and create an interdependent home ecosystem of products, enhanced by artificial intelligence. You quickly realize just how important it is to be a winner in the TV OS battle.

No wonder then, that big tech companies like Apple, Google, and Amazon are so eager to make their mark in the space, along with more media-focused rivals like Roku and Netflix (NFLX).

So who will win this prize? Its too early to tell, Greenfield says. Many times weve seen single-purpose companies win, which would point to contenders like Roku. However, much like cable TV, which bundled in broadband and phone to increase stickiness and reduce churn, we wonder if the ultimate TV OS winners will be large tech platforms that offer far more than streaming video. Time will tell, but this is a battle everyone should be watching keenly.

Write to Teresa Rivas at teresa.rivas@barrons.com

View post:

The Streaming Wars Could Become a Battle of Tech Giants. Heres Why. - Barron's

Chinese tech giants have tens of billions at stake in India – TechNode

As Chinese tech companies push abroad, India has been a land of opportunity. But rising tensions between the two countries are starting to raise questions about the future of Chinese tech in India.

In the past five years, firms including short-video giant Bytedance, e-commerce firm Alibaba, social media behemoth Tencent, and smartphone maker Xiaomi have participated in funding rounds for Indian startups totaling more than $12.3 billion, according to my analysis of public data. These investments have helped to scale Indian unicorns like Paytm, Snapdeal, Swiggy, and Ola.

Now, however, these Chinese companies could be caught in the crossfire of a geopolitical battle. On June 29, Indian officials banned 59 Chinese apps over national security concernsincluding apps made by companies that have been investing millions in the countrys startups.

Get instant access to all our premium content, archives, newsletters, and online community.

Get instant access to all our premium content, archives, newsletters, and online community.

More:

Chinese tech giants have tens of billions at stake in India - TechNode

American tech giants Google-Apple remove Palestine from world maps, replace with Israel – Daily Times

In a recent development, tech giant Google removed Palestine off its world map.

The latest stint has been followed even by Apple maps which marked the end of Israeli annexation of Palestine by completely removing the later country off the world map.

Google maps and Apple maps have officially removed Palestine from worldwide maps.Palestine is no longer a place according to google Ethnic cleansing, murder, land theft & corporate conspiracy, all is being done in the name of israel.#FreePalestine pic.twitter.com/wnwJtnn3Sv

Mohammad Abass (@imerabass) July 16, 2020

The change comes at the heels of Israel President Benjamin Netanyahu pledging to establish West Bank annexations. However, they have already triggered global criticism with many countries calling it human rights violation but the years-long Israel-Palestine conflict has only spiraled. Not losing any time to weaken the Palestinian Authority, Netanyahus coalition government have moved ahead with plans.

In 2016, Google clarified that the label Palestine had never been present on its mapping service, which instead includes labels for the West Bank and Gaza, as well as their respective outlines on the map.

There has never been a Palestine label on Google Maps, however, we discovered a bug that removed the labels for West Bank and Gaza Strip. Were working quickly to bring these labels back to the area, Google said in 2016.

Earlier, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson called for dialogue to resolve tensions over the proposed annexation by Israel of parts of the occupied Palestinian territories.

Meanwhile, 11 European foreign ministers have written to the EU to ask for possible actions that the bloc could take to prevent the proposed annexation.

Ministers from Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden and Finland asked EU Minister for Foreign Affairs Josep Borrell to set out the legal consequences of the move, following an initial request made at a meeting in May.

The letter suggested that doing so could help members deter annexation by laying out to Israel the consequences of such action.

Continued here:

American tech giants Google-Apple remove Palestine from world maps, replace with Israel - Daily Times

Kamala Harris blamed for EVERYTHING as Internet mocks news report ‘exposing’ her ties to tech giants – MEAWW

Friday, July 17, evening saw Twitter filled with tweets blaming Senator Kamala Harris for almost everything that ever happened in the world. In case you were wondering what brought on this weird trend, then we got you covered. The tweets were in response to a Huffington Post storyon how a series of e-mails revealed the proximity the senator shared with some big tech companies.

The report slammed Harris for treating the tech giants as allies rather than a threat to the security and freedom of the United States. The piece accused the senator of prioritizing the interests of tech giants over key policy-making issues. "As a senator, Harris has been mostly quiet on policy-making issues that carry implications for Facebook and Google. She sat out the debate on a 2018 sex trafficking bill once her signature issue only entering her name as a co-sponsor after it was clear the bill would pass by a wide margin," cited the story.

When Internet users stumbled upon the story and saw how it accused Harris of hobnobbing with tech giants like Facebook and Google, they were left feeling amused.So, in response to the Huffington Post story, several people took to their Twitter to blame Kamala for almost everything they could possibly think of, from blaming her for the split of Brad Pitt and Jennifer Aniston to letting Obama wear a tan suit. A user tweeted, "I can't believe Kamala Harris let Obama wear that tan suit. #huffpostHeadlines." Another user wrote, "Why didn't Kamala Harris stop me from marrying that guy in 2008? #huffpostHeadlines." "Why didn't Kamala Harris prosecute Big Red for assaulting Bird and dangling him out a window? #huffpostHeadlines," wondered another user.

"'Just In' Kamala Harris did indeed discover how the Pyramids were built, but she's selling the info to the highest bidder. So much for working 'For The Peoole'!! SMDH. #huffpostHeadlines," joked another user. "Kamala Harris could've prevented the death of Maya St Germain, but she chose to go out to dinner instead. #huffpostHeadlines," expressed a user.

"Why didnt Kamala Harris stop @HuffPostfrom letting @zachdcarter publish a hit piece that included ZERO on-the-record sources who criticized Harris' work as AG or bought into Carters opinion? #huffpostHeadlines She at least couldve made them label it as an opinion piece," wondered a user.

Read the original:

Kamala Harris blamed for EVERYTHING as Internet mocks news report 'exposing' her ties to tech giants - MEAWW

Wall Street delivered the ‘kind of pullback I’ve been waiting for,’ Jim Cramer says – CNBC

CNBC's Jim Cramer on Thursday advised that investors go hunting for companies that have strong fundamentals but whose stock prices are backtracking after Wall Street declined for the first time in multiple sessions.

"We needed a breather. The market can't go up every day without some sellers coming out of the woodwork," the "Mad Money" host said. "This is exactly, though, the kind of pullback I've been waiting for, so we have to use this moment to regroup and figure out the market's next move."

The market took a break from its upward climb as valuations on many stocks are nearing their limits, among other market-moving factors, he added.

"Review your portfolio. Understand that if you have a bunch of high-flying momentum stocks they're going to trade together and they're going to go down you might want to trim those positions, as we've been doing for my charitable trust," Cramer said.

The comments come after the Dow Jones dropped 135 points, or 0.50%, to 26,734.71 for the blue-chip index's first decline in four sessions and just the fourth down day this month. The S&P 500 slipped 0.34% to 3,215.57 and the Nasdaq Composite reversed 0.73% to 10,473.83.

The broad S&P index turned in its fourth decline in July and the tech-heavy Nasdaq declined for just the third time this month. The major averages are all up more or less 4% month to date.

Cramer offered viewers a playbook and handful of stocks he would keep an eye on to buy at attractive levels. While he did not contemplate how much further the market may decline, the host revealed what stocks he's keeping an eye on.

Those included Abbott Laboratories, PepsiCo, Morgan Stanleyand Johnson & Johnson. He also recommended tech giants of Facebook,Alphabet-subsidiary Google and Salesforce, all of who "have nothing to do with China and they're doing great."

In a speech earlier that day in Michigan, U.S. Attorney General William Barr chided Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, Apple, Cisco and Hollywood for their dealings with China, claiming the entities are "all too willing to collaborate with the Chinese Communist Party. All of the aforementioned tech names, minus Facebook, saw their shares slip in Thursday's session.

Cramer also put Amazon on his watch list.

"The stock's now down more than 10% from its highs, though it did find a slew of buyers late today coming in off its lowest levels," he said. "That's exactly what should happen."

Regardless of the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the ongoing pandemic, Cramer said opportunities exist to put more money to work in the market. The sell-off was shaped largely by profit-taking.

"Don't panic. Look for the stocks of high-quality companies that are going lower even though they deserve to go higher," he said. "And if that's too much work for you, you've got my blessing to gradually leg into a low-cost index fund on the way down."

Disclosure: Cramer's charitable trust owns shares of Facebook, Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Johnson & Johnson, Abbott Labs, Salesforce and PepsiCo.

Disclaimer

Questions for Cramer?Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC

Want to take a deep dive into Cramer's world? Hit him up!Mad Money Twitter - Jim Cramer Twitter - Facebook - Instagram

Questions, comments, suggestions for the "Mad Money" website? madcap@cnbc.com

Continue reading here:

Wall Street delivered the 'kind of pullback I've been waiting for,' Jim Cramer says - CNBC

How Huawei landed at the center of global tech tussle – Chicago Daily Herald

China's biggest tech firm, Huawei Technologies, has risen to global prominence as a leader in 5G, the much ballyhooed, next-generation wireless technology. It's also become a major target for the U.S., which has been trying to convince its allies to ban Huawei equipment from their national networks on spying concerns. In a major reversal, the U.K. decided in July to join the boycott, signaling fresh momentum for the American effort. Underlying the wrangling is the question of which country will take the lead in the nascent, "everything-connected" era, and who gets left behind.

U.S. government officials say Huawei is dangerous in part because it could use its growing share of the telecom equipment market to spy for the Chinese government. Already in 2012, a report by the U.S. House Intelligence Committee tagged Huawei and ZTE as potential security threats; the Federal Communications Commission designated them as such this year, a step toward driving them from the U.S. market. Concerns about Huawei drove the 2018 decision by President Donald Trump to block a hostile takeover bid from Broadcom, based at the time in Singapore, for the U.S. chipmaker Communal. The deal could have curtailed American investments in chip and wireless technologies and handed global leadership to Huawei. Such concerns have grown as carriers begin to spend billions of dollars on new 5G networks, which will collect data and enable services on an unparalleled scale.

In just over three decades it's grown from an electronics reseller into one of the world's biggest private companies, with leading positions in telecommunications gear, smartphones, cloud computing and cybersecurity, and substantial operations in Asia, Europe and Africa. Huawei generated 850 billion yuan ($122 billion) in sales in 2019 -- more than Boeing. It's plowed billions of dollars into 5G and broken into the top 10 recipients of U.S. patents last year. It has helped build 5G networks in more than 10 countries and expects to do the same in another 20 in 2020. U.S. sanctions spooked some Huawei customers and suppliers globally, while Chinese consumers and carriers rallied to its side.

The U.S. government -- like the Chinese and others -- is wary of employing foreign technology in vital communications for fear that manufacturers could install hidden "backdoors" for spies to access sensitive data, or that the companies themselves would hand it over to their home governments. U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo has said the U.S. might hold back intelligence-sharing with NATO allies if they use Huawei equipment, a threat met with some skepticism. The 5G networks are of particular concern because they will go beyond making smartphone downloads faster. They also will enable new technologies like self-driving cars and the Internet of Things. U.K.-based carrier Vodafone was said to have found and fixed backdoors on Huawei equipment used in its Italian business in 2011 and 2012. While it's hard to know if those vulnerabilities were nefarious or accidental, the revelation dealt a blow to Huawei's reputation.

Japan and Australia are among a handful of places that have joined the U.S. boycott. The U.K. will prohibit its telecom operators from buying Huawei equipment starting next year, and equipment currently installed must be removed by 2027. Countries such as India and Vietnam are considered unlikely to use Huawei. But the company has won 5G customers in Russia, the Middle East and Asia, including the Philippines and Thailand. Its equipment tends to be less expensive than alternatives from Nokia and Ericsson and is often higher quality. In Malaysia, the prime minister has said his country will use "as much as possible."

Norway decided against a ban, leaving the choice to individual companies; so far two have gone with Ericsson. Huawei lost two big contracts in Singapore this year but still has a foothold in the market. In the European Union, there are signs of a coordinated balancing act. German Chancellor Angela Merkel is grappling with a potential revolt by lawmakers who want to effectively ban Huawei equipment. China's ambassador to Germany threatened Berlin with retaliation if such a ban were adopted, citing the millions of vehicles German carmakers sell in China. Brazil has said it isn't excluding anyone from bidding.

The U.S. has moved to curb Huawei's ability to sell equipment in the U.S. and, more significantly, to buy parts from U.S. suppliers, by adding Huawei to a Commerce Department blacklist in 2019. Accusing the company of seeking to "undermine" those export controls, the department on May 15 imposed further restrictions on chipmakers using American gear in designing or producing semiconductors, meaning suppliers such as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing will have to cut off Huawei unless they get a waiver from Washington -- or potentially face penalties. The FCC prohibited the use of federal subsidies to buy equipment made by Huawei and ZTE and said it would consider requiring carriers now using the products to remove them.

7. What's going on in Canada?

In December 2018, at the request of the U.S., Canadian authorities arrested Huawei's chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, who's also the daughter of the company's founder, Ren Zhengfei. The U.S. is seeking her extradition as part of a criminal case alleging that she conspired to defraud banks into unwittingly clearing transactions linked to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions. Both Meng, who is also deputy chairwoman, and the company have denied wrongdoing. Canada is still deciding whether to allow Huawei to play a bigger role in developing 5G.

In 2003, Cisco Systems sued Huawei for allegedly infringing on its patents and illegally copying source code used in routers and switches. Huawei removed the contested code, manuals and command-line interfaces and the case was dropped. Motorola sued in 2010 for allegedly conspiring with former employees to steal trade secrets. That lawsuit was later settled. In 2017 a jury found Huawei liable for stealing robotic technology from T-Mobile, and on Jan. 28, 2019, the Justice Department indicted Huawei for theft of trade secrets related to that case. The same month Poland, a staunch U.S. ally, arrested a Huawei employee on suspicion of spying for the Chinese government. Huawei fired the employee and denied any involvement in his alleged actions.

That U.S. restrictions are not about cybersecurity but are really designed to safeguard American dominance of global tech. It has repeatedly denied that it helps Beijing spy on other governments or companies. But bracing for continued pressure, it outlined plans to shake up its management ranks as revenue growth slowed. The company, which says it's owned by Ren as well as its employees through a union, has in recent years begun releasing financial results, spent more on marketing and engaged with foreign media in an effort to boost transparency. Ren has become more outspoken as he fights to save his company. While he said he was proud of his military career and Communist Party membership, he rejected suggestions he was doing Beijing's bidding or that Huawei handed over customer information. In March 2019, Huawei went on the offensive, filing a lawsuit in federal court against a statute that blocks U.S. government agencies from using its equipment.

Yes. In October, the Trump administration placed eight other Chinese tech giants on its blacklist, accusing them of being implicated in human rights violations against minority Muslims in the country's Xinjiang region. They included Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology and Zhejiang Dahua Technology, which by some accounts control as much as a third of the global market for video surveillance; SenseTime Group, the world's most valuable artificial intelligence startup; and fellow AI giant Megvii Technology. ZTE almost collapsed after the U.S. Commerce Department banned it for three months in 2018 from buying American technology. The U.S. Justice Department has charged state-owned Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit, its Taiwanese partner and three individuals with conspiring to steal trade secrets from Micron Technology.

The rest is here:

How Huawei landed at the center of global tech tussle - Chicago Daily Herald

The Twitter Hacks Have to Stop – The Atlantic

Read: The staggering vulnerability of global elites

Internet communications platformssuch as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTubeare crucial in todays society. Theyre how we communicate with one another. Theyre how our elected leaders communicate with us. They are essential infrastructure. Yet they are run by for-profit companies with little government oversight. This is simply no longer sustainable. Twitter and companies like it are essential to our national dialogue, to our economy, and to our democracy. We need to start treating them that way, and that means both requiring them to do a better job on security and breaking them up.

In the Twitter case this week, the hackers tactics werent particularly sophisticated. We will almost certainly learn about security lapses at Twitter that enabled the hack, possibly including a SIM-swapping attack that targeted an employees cellular service provider, or maybe even a bribed insider. The FBI is investigating.

This kind of attack is known as a class break. Class breaks are endemic to computerized systems, and theyre not something that we as users can defend against with better personal security. It didnt matter whether individual accounts had a complicated and hard-to-remember password, or two-factor authentication. It didnt matter whether the accounts were normally accessed via a Mac or a PC. There was literally nothing any user could do to protect against it.

Class breaks are security vulnerabilities that break not just one system, but an entire class of systems. They might exploit a vulnerability in a particular operating system that allows an attacker to take remote control of every computer that runs on that systems software. Or a vulnerability in internet-enabled digital video recorders and webcams that allows an attacker to recruit those devices into a massive botnet. Or a single vulnerability in the Twitter network that allows an attacker to take over every account.

For Twitter users, this attack was a double whammy. Many people rely on Twitters authentication systems to know that someone who purports to be a certain celebrity, politician, or journalist is really that person. When those accounts were hijacked, trust in that system took a beating. And then, after the attack was discovered and Twitter temporarily shut down all verified accounts, the public lost a vital source of information.

Read: Why Twitter may be ruinous for the left

There are many security technologies companies like Twitter can implement to better protect themselves and their users; thats not the issue. The problem is economic, and fixing it requires doing two things. One is regulating these companies, and requiring them to spend more money on security. The second is reducing their monopoly power.

The security regulations for banks are complex and detailed. If a low-level banking employee were caught messing around with peoples accounts, or if she mistakenly gave her log-in credentials to someone else, the bank would be severely fined. Depending on the details of the incident, senior banking executives could be held personally liable. The threat of these actions helps keep our money safe. Yes, it costs banks money; sometimes it severely cuts into their profits. But the banks have no choice.

Go here to read the rest:

The Twitter Hacks Have to Stop - The Atlantic

Tech giants this country needs YOU! Do your moral duty and stop avoiding tax to help save our economy – The Sun

THE BRITISH economy is out of intensive care, but the return of the patient to full health is painfully slow.

This weeks official figures revealed that growth in May was just 1.8 per cent, much lower than most economists predicted.

12

The anaemic recovery adds to the pressure for further action from the Chancellor Rishi Sunak, who has already lavished a fortune on support programmes.

His recent mini-Budget added another 30billion of public money to the colossal 280billion he had previously promised to prevent economic meltdown.

Nothing on this scale has ever been seen in peace time and public finances have taken an unprecedented battering.

12

As Government borrowing soars and the national debt swells, there is a real threat that the Chancellor will have to put up taxes to restore some stability.

But it would be profoundly unfair if ordinary British citizens were now to be hammered, when too many wealthy companies, particularly the hi-tech giants, avoid their financial responsibilities to the rest of us.

12

Brimming with self-righteousness, these firms love to trumpet their social concern, their commitment to equality and their desire to protect the environment, but they are never so quick to pay their financial dues to our nation.

For all their fashionable eco prattle, they are keener on reducing their tax bills than carbon emissions.

The best way to fulfil all their trendy language about supporting communities and campaigning for fairness would be to pay more to the Treasury.

If they paid a proper amount in taxation, then there would not be such a fiscal crisis at present.

But that is precisely what these politically correct global corporations fail to do.

12

Only last week it was revealed that, through sophisticated accounting manoeuvres, Apple paid just 6.2million in tax last year in the UK, despite enjoying British sales of no less than 1.37billion.

If they paid a proper amount in taxation, then there would not be such a fiscal crisis at present.

Those sums are a profound insult to millions of hard-working taxpayers, including successful employees who have to hand over to the Government 40 per cent of anything that they earn above 50,000.

As Richard Palmer, the executive director of the group Tax Justice UK said, People are fed up of big companies like Apple using clever tricks to slash their tax bills.

Apple is hardly unique.

12

Its rival Microsoft reported in June that its UK revenues increased to 2.85billion in 2019, up from 2.1billion the previous year.

Yet Microsoft paid just 34million in UK taxes, marginally up from 28million in 2018.

The same story can be found at the mighty Google empire.

12

In April, the company reported UK revenues of 1.6billion for the year to June 2019, up by almost 200million on the previous year, yet its corporation tax payment to HM Revenue and Customs was a measly 44.3million, down from 65.6million a year earlier.

Indeed, Google dished out ten times more in bonuses - 441million than it paid in corporation tax.

This prompted Paul Monaghan of Fair Tax Mark to complain, Once again, it seems like Google are writing their own rules in the UK. Income tax is up but corporation tax charges are down.

The hi-tech tax avoiders like to justify their actions by claiming that they abide by British law.

But this is not a question of legal compliance.

12

No one is accusing them of breaking the law.

It is a question of moral duty.

At a time when the entire economy is struggling because of the fallout from Covid-19, they are acting disgracefully in making such a meagre contribution to the states depleted coffers.

Who do they think pays for the roads or the health service or the education system used by their staff?

No one is accusing them of breaking the law. It is a question of moral duty.

12

Just as insultingly, with many of these hi-tech giants such as Facebook, the social networking site, it is the public that provides the data on which their commercial success is built.

The most valuable product is the users information rather than anything created by the company.

Yet that reality does not appear to inspire any sense of obligation to the public.

12

And the tech corporations refusal to fulfil their moral duty makes a mockery of all their fine talk about their ethical values.

They pose as champions of compassion, but act like the most hard-hearted capitalists.

And the tech corporations refusal to fulfil their moral duty makes a mockery of all their fine talk about their ethical values.

That is certainly the spirt of Amazon, run by the worlds richest person, Jeff Bezos.

Last September, it was revealed that Amazon paid just 220million in direct taxes in the UK in the previous year, despite total revenues in this country of 10.9billion.

12

Similarly, Facebook in 2018 paid just 28million in corporation tax last year despite record British sales of 1.6billion and a rise in pre-tax profits of 50 per cent.

The hugely popular streaming service Netflix even received a 57,000 tax rebate from the Government in 2018, even though it made an estimated 700million from British subscribers.

HMRC has been far too weak in allowing the giants almost to dictate their own terms.

But the companies themselves have been ruthless in exploiting their own financial muscle, with sorry consequences for us all.

As Alex Cobham, the chief executive of the Tax Justice Network, puts it, When multi-national corporations abuse their responsibilities to society, they weaken the supports that our economies need to work well and create wealth.

For all the frequent talk of government crackdowns, the culture of avoidance remains deeply embedded.

12

One study in December 2018 asserted that a fifth of the biggest enterprises pay no corporation at all, highlighting the case of the oil company BP which made a 5.6billion profit the year before, yet received tax credits worth 134million.

In the same vein, the Standard Chartered Bank made a 1.8 billion profit, yet was handed a 12 million.

The Tax Justice Network argues that 35 to 90 billion in taxes goes uncollected every year, while 164 billion is spent on relief that is poorly targeted.

The selfish behaviour of the avoiders like Google and Amazon stands in stark contrast to the more ethical companies who have shown a real social conscience during the Coronavirus crisis.

With a sense of respect for the public purse, several firms have decided to pay back the furlough money they were given by the Treasury to protect the jobs of their employees.

12

Better trading performances than they expected meant that they did not need the cash, so they honourably returned it.

Among such companies are Ikea, Scottish Sea Farms, Games Workshop, the Spectator magazine, and the housebuilders Taylor Wimpey and Redrow.

With the same patriotic outlook, some employers have refused to accept the 1000 bonus offered by the Government as set out in Rishi Sunaks mini-Budget - for each furloughed staff member they take back.

Several firms have decided to pay back the furlough money they were given by the Treasury to protect the jobs of their employees... among such companies are Ikea, Scottish Sea Farms, Games Workshop, the Spectator magazine, and the housebuilders Taylor Wimpey and Redrow.

With enough cash coming in, they do not require another round of subsidies. Those doing the right thing include Barratt homes, the betting giant William Hill and retailers John Lewis and Primark.

That is exactly the approach that the hi-tech firms should demonstrate towards taxation.

Those doing the right thing include Barratt homes, the betting giant William Hill and retailers John Lewis and Primark.

CAN'T BEA SEENAndrew left out of pics as Beatrice wears dress loaned by Queen for wedding

PARK CHAOSMan slashed at Thorpe Park as two arrested on suspicion of attempted murder

Exclusive

BRIDE HIS TIMEPrince Andrew gives Beatrice away at socially-distanced royal wedding

AY CARAMBA!Sunseekers flock to beaches and parks as UK hotter than MEXICO

Exclusive

COVID MIRACLECovid patient hails medics who saved her life after 130 DAYS in hospital

ON YOUR BIKE'Lycra lout' shouts abuse at pregnant driver in shocking road rage dispute

They are fond of pushing all the politically correct buttons about social justice.

We stand in solidarity with the black community boasts Amazon, while Netflix trumpets its freedom and responsibility culture and Microsoft aims to drive progress on diversity and inclusion.

But those words would have more meaning if their authors were not depriving our Government of so much cash.

Read the original here:

Tech giants this country needs YOU! Do your moral duty and stop avoiding tax to help save our economy - The Sun

Apple expands coding partnership with Black schools as tech firms grapple with lack of diversity – USA TODAY

Apple is expanding its coding partnership with historically black colleges and universities as big tech firms faceincreased scrutiny surrounding diversity and inclusion.

The iPhone giantsaid Thursday that it's adding 10 more HBCUsto its year-old community education programmeant to create opportunities for people seeking to learn coding skills. The announcement comes a month after the company launched a racial equality initiative aimed at communities of color.

Under the expansion into more HBCUs, Apple will give an increasing number of people of color"the building blocks of coding," the company said in a press release. Coding is the infrastructure that makes digital technologies operate, andmore Black programmers put more Black people in the running forin-demand, high-paying jobs tech jobs.

Morehouse College in Georgia,Tougaloo College in Mississippi, Dillard University in Louisiana and Prairie View A&M University in Texas are among Apple's roster of partnership schools.

Apples Community Education Initiative extends to 12 HBCUs across the US.(Photo: Apple)

Of the 24 locations listed in Apple's Community Education initiative, 12 are HBCUs, which were generally established in the 1800s to serve the needs of the Black community toward the end ofslavery for the decades that followed.

'Keep this energy up': Black-owned businesses see surge of interest amid racism protests

'Things must change': Apple launches $100 million Racial Equity and Justice Initiative

Later in July, educators from 10 HBCUs will take part in a virtual academy to learn the building blocks of coding with Swift, Apples coding language.(Photo: Apple)

It's clear that tech giants, including Apple, have a diversity problem.

Many companies, including Facebook and Google, have faced increasing backlash over lackluster minority representation, especially at a time when many firms are declaring to be allies in the Black Lives Matter movement.

While Black people make up roughly 13% of the population, representation at tech firms is minuscule.

From 2013 to 2018, Facebook failed to meaningfully increase the number of employees from underrepresented groups in its U.S. workforce, aUSA TODAY analysis shows.The number of Black employees rose from 1% toroughly 3.7%.

In 2012 at Google, African Americansmade up roughly1.5% of U.S. employees. In 2018, the most recent figures available for Google parent company Alphabet, its workforce was 2.6%Black.

Last month, Apple CEO Tim Cook acknowledged that said his company "must do more" to fight racism and promote diversity.

In aletter on Apple's website, Cook vowed to bring more technology to underserved school systems and addressinclusion and diversity within its ranks.

"To create change, we have to reexamine our own views and actions in light of a pain that is deeply felt but too often ignored," Cook wrote. "Issues of human dignity will not abide standing on the sidelines. To the Black community we see you. You matter and your lives matter."

Follow Dalvin Brown on Twitter: @Dalvin_Brown.

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2020/07/16/apple-expands-hbcu-partnership-tech-grapples-lack-diversity/5449823002/

Read the rest here:

Apple expands coding partnership with Black schools as tech firms grapple with lack of diversity - USA TODAY

India’s Jio creates 5G tech in-house, teams with Google on affordable smartphone – FierceWireless

As major investments from tech giants stack up for Indias Jio Platforms, the chairman of parent Reliance Industries said a complete 5G solution created from scratch in-house by Jio can be ready for field deployments in 2021.

Speaking during Reliances Annual General Meeting on Wednesday, billionaire owner Mukesh Ambani laid out visions for its Jio Platforms unit, including plans to export 5G technologies to other telecom operators globally.

Jio Platforms is behind Indias largest mobile operator, which shook up the telecom market since entering the scene just four years ago now counting more than 388 million subscribers. Ambani said he sees a strong path for Jio to connect over 500 million mobile customers, more than a billion smart sensors and over 50 million homes and business in the next three years.

Like this story? Subscribe to FierceWireless!

The Wireless industry is an ever-changing world where big ideas come along daily. Our subscribers rely on FierceWireless as their must-read source for the latest news, analysis and data on this increasingly competitive marketplace. Sign up today to get wireless news and updates delivered to your inbox and read on the go.

With its 4G LTE-only network, Reliance Jio disrupted Indias telecom market that was largely 2G, offering very low pricing, broad coverage, and data. Some of Indias numerous operators at the time were forced to exit or decided to consolidate, leaving three major players Vodafone Idea, Bharti Airtel and Reliance Jio.

RELATED: Nokia scores major network deal with Indias Bharti Airtel

According to GSMAs Mobile Economy 2020 report (PDF), the resulting price war following Jios entry has meant India now has some of the cheapest mobile data pricing in the world, while 4G now accounts for almost 60% of total connections in the country.

Jio Platforms has secured billions in investments, including Google whichsaid yesterday it would put $4.5 billion into the company for a 7.7% share.Facebook is investing $5.7 billion for just under 10% in Jio Platforms.Other investors include Intel Capital, Qualcomm Ventures, private-equity firms Silver Lake, Vista Equity Partners, and General Atlantic, and Abu Dhabis two largest sovereign investment arms.

Ambani said the operators 4G and fiber network is already powered by several core software technologies and components developed by Jio engineers in India.

RELATED: Qualcomm invests $97M in Reliance Jio; Google commits $10B to India

This capability and know-how that Jio has developed positions Jio on the cutting edge of another exciting frontier 5G, Ambani said. The in-house 5G solution will enable us to launch a world-class 5G service in India using 100% home-grown technologies and solutions.

News of Jio developing end-to-end 5G technology to replace third-party vendors previously surfaced in March.

The 5G kit will be ready for trials as soon as 5G spectrum becomes available and ready for field deployments in 2021, Ambani added.

Jio can easily upgrade its 4G network to 5G, he told investors, citing the converged all-IP network architecture. And Jio has sights beyond India for its 5G tech.

Once Jios 5G solution is proven in India, Jio Platforms will be well positioned to be an exporter of 5G solutions to other telecom operators globally as a complete managed service, Ambani said.

Googles involvement with Jio also includes a commercial agreementto jointly develop an affordable 4G smartphone.

Part of Jios impact in connecting mobile users in India was the introduction of low-cost feature phone with 4G connectivity. The JioPhone launched in August of 2017 and sold over 100 million devices, costing less than $10.

In 2019, India surpassed the U.S. as the second-largest smartphone market globally with 158 million shipments and is still under penetrated relative to many markets, according to Counterpoint Research. By 2025 India will still be the second largest smartphone market with 1.04 billion users, only behind China, according to the GSMA.

Still, Ambani in his presentation saidthere are 350 million Indians who currently use a 2G feature phone that would want to upgrade to a conventional smartphone if it was affordable.

We believe we can design an entry-level 4G, or even a 5G, smartphone for a fraction of its current cost, Ambani said.

To that end, it's partnering with Google to build an Android-based smartphone operating system, designed with India in mind.

RELATED: Radisys supports Reliance Jio behind the scenes

Through this partnership we are confident that we can accelerate the national mission of putting a smart device in the hands of every Indian, he said, adding that existing 2G users shouldnt be deprived of the benefits that the digital and data revolution offer. Jio is determined to make India 2G-mukt.

Googles investment in Jio is the first part of a $10 billion Google for India Digitization Fund announced earlier this week. It aims to help accelerate Indias digital economy by making strategic investments in the country over the next 5-7 years.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai in a video appearance said getting technology into the hands of more people is a big part of our mission, and Google through its partnership with Jio Platforms sees a chance to have a greater impact than either entity could alone.

Pichai said he was excited the joint collaboration would focus on increasing access for hundreds of millions of Indians who dont currently own a smartphone, while simultaneously improving the mobile experience for all.

Read more here:

India's Jio creates 5G tech in-house, teams with Google on affordable smartphone - FierceWireless

G Suite’s new unified interface poses an existential threat to Zoom and Slack – Business Insider

Googleannounceda design overhaul for G Suite that will further integrate its enterprise productivity services including Gmail, Chat, Meet, and Docs. The new G Suite will beavailable to a select group of customers for preview starting this week, with a larger roll out slated for later in 2020.

Business Insider Intelligence

In essence, the redesign further blurs the lines between Google services: The Gmail app will also serve as a hub for Chat, Docs collaboration will be directly embedded in Chat rooms, and backend search will function across Chat and Gmail. Google claims these changes are intended to help G Suite users retain their focus by reducing the need to switch apps between tasks. The tech giant also noted more features are in development, such as supporting picture-in-picture video calls within Gmail and offering Meet functionality directly in Docs.

Deeper G Suite integrations pose an existential threat to Zoom and Slack, as enterprises will look to cut redundant software subscriptions.As we havenotedbefore, Google and Microsoft togetheraccountfor virtually the entire enterprise office suite market this gives the tech giants a considerable advantage over smaller competitors like Zoom and Slack, which only offer standalone enterprise communications platforms.

Google and Microsoft can exercise this advantage by promoting their less dominant services through their already dominant platforms. In concrete terms: If G Suite is suffused with Google Chat integrations available at no additional cost, it doesn't make sense for an enterprise to pay for both Slack and G Suite. And because there aren't viable competitors to Microsoft and Google in the enterprise office suite market, enterprises will choose to stay within their ecosystems, cutting the redundant services offered by Zoom and Slack.

Google will likely take a more gradual approach to rolling out the G Suite integrations due to concerns over both the user experience and antitrust regulation.For enterprises that use G Suite along with competing services like Slack or Zoom, the deeper integrations might come off as more invasive than useful, considering how much real estate they occupy within the revamped user interface. So even though Google could probably flip a switch and turn on every available integration at once, it risks alienating a significant number of customers by doing so. A more gradual approach could also help to avoid regulatory scrutiny.

In May, Slack CEO Stewart ButterfieldtoldThe Verge, "Microsoft is perhaps unhealthily preoccupied with killing us, and Teams is the vehicle to do that." Google is employing a similar strategy to grow market share in this domain, and as it faces antitrust scrutiny in both theUSandEurope, it may restrain its G Suite integration plan in an attempt to avoid attracting further regulatory attention.

Want to read more stories like this one? Here's how you can gain access:

Are you a current Insider Intelligence client? Log in here.

See the original post here:

G Suite's new unified interface poses an existential threat to Zoom and Slack - Business Insider

Is satire in political cartoons fully protected? Ask the lawyer – The Daily Breeze

Q: This is an election year. I saw a cartoon about Trump that was just plain offensive. Does anything go legally, its all OK?

-D.H., Hawthorne

A: Political speech is a right fundamentally defended by the First Amendment. Unless actual malice can be proven with regard to a depiction, the public figure or politician is fair game. An important case in this regard was decided in 1970 about former Los Angeles Mayor Sam Yorty. He sued the Los Angeles Times and its publisher for a caricature done by the well-known editorial cartoonist Paul Conrad, arguing it represented that Yorty was insane and should be placed in a straight jacket. In denying his claim for libel, the court held that opinions about the fitness of a person for public office are protected even though (the) view are those of a political adversary and are presented in rhetorical hyperbole. In addition, the court held the cartoon was not intended to be a literal depiction, and that reasonable readers would know.

Q: Can a tweet, or an online post, actually lead to a defamation claim?

-K.B., Long Beach

A: Defamation is a publication to a third person, which is not privileged (in other words, subject to some legal protection), that is false and damages a persons reputation. There are two kinds of defamation: Slander, which is oral, and libel, which is written. A post on twitter, or online generally, can rise to the level of defamation for the simple reason it may meet the definition. There is nothing about social media that is all that different from libeling someone in a letter (a writing) that is false and has been sent to one or more others.

This is a well-established procedure in California, which stands for Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation. The law is intended to prevent people from using the courts, and potential threats of a lawsuit, to intimidate those who are properly exercising their First Amendment rights. The way it works is if a person is sued, he or she makes a motion to strike the case because it involves speech on a matter of public concern. The plaintiff, or plaintiffs, then has the immediate burden of showing the court a probability he or she will prevail in the suit. This means, often very early on, having to show evidence that a favorable outcome for plaintiff is likely; if the plaintiff cannot do so, thats the end of that claim and the plaintiff may have to pay attorney fees to the other side.

Ron Sokol is a Manhattan Beach attorney with more than 35 years of experience. His column, which appears in print on Wednesdays, presents a summary of the law and should not be construed as legal advice. Email questions and comments to him at RonSEsq@aol.com.

See the rest here:

Is satire in political cartoons fully protected? Ask the lawyer - The Daily Breeze

Opinion: Blake Fontenay: Buts on the road to censorship – The Daily Camera

By Blake Fontenay

Bari Weiss, an opinion editor and writer at the New York Times, created a disturbance within the journalism world a few days ago when she tendered her resignation.

Weiss wasnt forced out because she had fabricated source material, libeled someone or committed some other unforgivable transgression. Instead, in her resignation letter, she said that she was quitting because she felt bullied and harassed by some of her Times colleagues for giving voice to moderate and conservative viewpoints within the newspapers predominantly liberal opinion pages.

I have to say that this story resonated with me on a deeply personal level. Not that Ive experienced that type of animosity from my colleagues here at the Daily Camera.

Most of them are still working from home as part of the newspapers efforts to limit the spread of the COVID-19 virus. Those I have met during my first few weeks on the job have been far too polite to tell me if they think Im running this newspapers opinion pages into the ground.

However, some readers are a different story. On an almost-daily basis, I hear from readers who have complaints about particular letters, editorials, cartoons or guest columns that have appeared on these pages.

Thats nothing new. I have worked at a lot of different newspapers over the course of my career and fielding complaints from readers goes with the territory.

I think healthy interaction between journalists and readers is one of the things that makes newspapers superior to other forms of news media. I mean really, when was the last time you called someone at a local TV or radio station to provide feedback on something you saw or heard there?

That said, Im seeing a pattern emerging that I find troubling, both as a journalist and an American. A great number of the complaints Ive received to date have come from people who believe certain pieces of commentary shouldnt have been published because the ideas expressed dont align with their own personal beliefs.

If you truly believe in the First Amendment and the freedom of expression, as I do, this line of thinking provides a path down a very dark road.

I go back to that famous quote we learned in elementary school, attributed to the French writer Voltaire but probably actually written by one of his biographers, which said: I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it. Thats the ideal on which our First Amendment was based.

I wonder, in our politically polarized society, how many people today could truthfully speak those words. If youre a supporter of President Donald Trump, would you really fight to the death to defend the free speech rights of one of the presidents critics?

Oh, but that argument cuts both ways. If you hate Trump and all that he stands for, are you still willing to fight to the death, or even a little bit to protect the views of the Make America Great Again crowd?

In my years as an opinion page editor and writer, I have yet to meet anyone willing to confess a desire to censor opposing points of view. Oh, no. Its never that.

The conversations usually start this way: Im all for hearing different opinions, but and what follows the but is a rationalization for why a particular piece of commentary was somehow beyond the pale and shouldnt have been published.

I agree that there are certain types of content that have no place in a general circulation newspaper. But the standard for excluding something has to be higher than this has the potential to offend someone. A lot higher.

If that were the standard, then there arent enough people writing about puppies and rainbows to fill our opinion pages each week.

Look, Im well aware that Boulder is predominantly a left-leaning community. The citys Wikipedia page even makes a light-hearted reference to the Peoples Republic of Boulder.

And thats absolutely fine with me. I wouldnt have agreed to take this job if I wasnt OK with that.

However, judging by some of the comments made to and about me on social media (where I think the term keyboard courage applies), some people apparently think my employment here at the Daily Camera is part of an evil plot to secretly transform Boulder into another Colorado Springs.

Right. And while Im working on that project, Ill also be trying to level off the Flatirons with a sandbox shovel.

For the record, I dont agree with every piece of content that appears on our opinion pages. You can be reasonably sure Im in agreement with the positions taken in our staff-written editorials, although even those represent not just my views, but the consensus of the editorial board.

The rest of the pages are an open forum where I strongly believe a variety of different viewpoints deserve a fair hearing. A former editor of mine used to refer to opinion pages as a garden of ideas. While I disagreed with him on nearly everything else, I think his views on that point were exactly right.

I think thats the right approach to take anywhere, but especially in a town like Boulder, with so many smart and well-educated people. This is, after all, a college town where a premium is placed on learning. And how can people truly learn without being exposed to ideas that fall outside of their personal belief systems?

I did my research on Boulder before I started work here. I know this is a place where tolerance and inclusion are highly valued. But tolerance and inclusion apply not only to peoples skin color or sexual orientation, but also to their ways of thinking.

I dont want to be in a position where Im asked to curate content to keep readers from being unduly influenced by potentially objectionable material. I have more faith in the critical thinking abilities of Boulderites than that. And I hope you have the same faith in your neighbors and yourselves.

Blake Fontenay is the opinion editor for the Daily Camera.

Read more:

Opinion: Blake Fontenay: Buts on the road to censorship - The Daily Camera

Japans $2.2 Trillion Cost Of Befriending Donald Trump – Forbes

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe listens to U.S. President Donald Trump during a bilateral meeting ... [+] on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Biarritz, south-west France on August 25, 2019, on the second day of the annual G7 Summit.

As political bets go, the one Japans Shinzo Abe made on Donald Trump in 2016 is proving to be a mistake of historic proportions.

No world leader was quicker in getting to Trump Tower in New York to congratulate the U.S. president-elect on a victory few saw coming. Nine days after Trumps shock win, there was Abe on Nov. 17, reassuring a fearful worldnot to worry, hed be a trustworthy leader.

From the start, Prime Minister Abes visit was a comedy of errors. Japanese diplomats are obsessive sticklers for protocol. Trumps people were slow to set a time or any choreography for his first post-election tte--ttewith a world leader. Japanese officialdom was livid that Trump brought his daughter Ivanka along.

The real error, though, was Abes effort to normalize a U.S. leader whos since taken a wrecking ball to the global economic order Abes team hoped to preserve 44 months ago. That order gives Japan a seat at the Group of Seven nations table not accorded to Beijing. And at a cost to Tokyo, so far, of more than $2.2 trillion and counting.

The amount referenced here is how much Abes government is having to spend to revive the economy. To be fair, Japan would be pumping stimulus into the economy even if Trumps White House hadnt so spectacularly botched its Covid-19 response. But the magnitude of the spending, about 40% of gross domestic product, is a direct result of Trumps failure and the global financial repercussions.

For a time, Tokyo-based pundits applauded Abes Trump wager. It seemed like a stroke of realpolitik genius. As Trump railed at China and threatened tariffs, pundits believed, Japan would be spared. Yet once Trump began slapping taxes on steel and aluminum, Japan did not score an exception. Trumps China tariffs, meantime, disrupted the supply chains on which Japan Inc. relies.

Trumps occasional Twitter attacks on a yen he views as too weak panicked Abes Ministry of Finance. Hes cozying up to North Koreas Kim Jong Un, ignoring Tokyos security interests, made for sleepless nights at Abes Ministry of Foreign Affairs. News that Trump cajoled Abe into nominating Trump for a Nobel Peace Prizehumiliated Japans diplomatic corps.

More recent news that Trump cozied up to Chinas Xi Jinping to help win reelection wont sit well with Abes fellow nationalists. An even worse discovery from John Boltons new book The Room Where It Happenedis that Trump tried to shake down Abe for an additional $8 billion annuallyfor hosting U.S. troops.

Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping attend a state dinner at the Great Hall of the People ... [+] in Beijing on November 9, 2017.

The former national security advisor detailed times when Trump would rail about Imperial Japans attack onPearl Harborand suggest Abes father was a failed kamikaze pilot. And how Trump dispatched Abe to negotiate with Iranin June 2019 as a lark.

But the real buyers remorse Japan is feeling concerns an economy losing altitude, and fast. In this sense, Trump has been costing Abe all along. The trade war sent powerful headwinds Japans way, steadily chipping away at its best recovery since the 1980s bubble economy imploded.

Granted, Abe made big mistakes of his own. One: not working harder since 2012 to implement big structural reforms to labor markets or Japan Inc.s patriarchal mindset. He failed to cut red tape, catalyze a startup boom or liberalize immigration in ways that wouldve positioned Japan to woo multinational companies tempted to flee Hong Kong as China clamps down on the city. Another: hiking sales taxes to 10% last October, a move that contributed to a 7.3% GDP contraction.

The real problem, though, is a U.S. veering off the rails. With coronavirus cases approaching 3.5 million, its clear Trumps White House has given up on fighting the pandemic. The economic fallout to come will reverberate around the globe, sapping growth in China, Japan, South Korea, Southeast Asia and beyond. So might any steps Trump takes to intensify his trade war between now and the Nov. 3 election to cheer his base.

If Trump cared about pal Abe or other allies, he would announce an immediate trade war ceasefire. Hed get on the phone with G7 and Group of 20 leaders to devise a collective assault on Covid-19and the global fallout on growth and incomes.

Japan is directly in harms way as a leader Abe vouched for hobbles the global economy. The trillions of dollars of stimulus Washington threw at Covid-19 is already wearing off. Even if Democratic rival Joe Biden defeats Trump 110 days from now, itll take time for his White House to repair thedamage done to growth and global economic relationships.

The answer for Abe is jumpstarting reforms to boost Japanese competitiveness, increase innovation and generate growth organically. Two decades after its economy imploded, Japan is becoming more and more reliant on zero interest rates and ginormous spending packages. Yet with approval ratings below 40%, Abe might not have the political capital to get much done.

Theres also a big question of what Trump might do between now and Nov. 3. As he seeks to cheer his base, might Trump slap new taxes on China? Will he make good on threats of 25% tariffs on cars and auto parts, savaging supply chains anew? Trump could weaken the dollar, further ruining Japan Inc.s year.

And have Japanese wondering what, oh what, their leader was thinking when he scurried to Trump Tower 1,337 days ago to do Trumps bidding. The bill for that blunder, $2.2 trillion and counting, will be one for the record books.

Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe speaks to reporters following a meeting with President-elect ... [+] Donald Trump November 17, 2016 in New York City.

Read more here:

Japans $2.2 Trillion Cost Of Befriending Donald Trump - Forbes

What Donald Trumps Access Hollywood Weekend Says About 2020 – The New York Times

People who know him cite this semi-magical thinking as a kind of political superpower, when harnessed effectively.

Dont underestimate his personal resiliency, Mr. Scaramucci said. He recalled the presidents advice to him once about news-cycle velocity: He said, Yeah, you get negative press. It lasts about a week. And then it blows over, and theyre onto something else, and nobody cares.

On this weekend, though, Trump advisers sensed that little would blow over on its own.

The idea of deploying Mr. Clintons accusers had filtered through the Trump orbit for months, discussed among Mr. Bannon and allies like Aaron Klein of Breitbart News the hard-right, Trump-supporting site that Mr. Bannon had run and long promoted by Roger J. Stone Jr., the informal Trump adviser and infamous Republican hell-raiser. (On Friday, Mr. Trump commuted Mr. Stones sentence on seven felony crimes after he had been convicted last year of obstructing a congressional investigation into the Trump 2016 campaign and possible ties to Russia.)

Just before Billy Bush weekend, as Mr. Bannon calls it (a nod to the Access Hollywood personality on tape with Mr. Trump), three of the Clinton accusers had been in Washington for interviews with Mr. Klein.

As Republican pleas for Mr. Trumps ouster multiplied, Mr. Bannon recognized an opportunity. He said he called Mr. Klein, now an adviser to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel, and asked how the Clinton material looked. The answer pleased him. New travel arrangements were made.

In the meantime, Mr. Trump sought temporary comfort in a familiar balm: applause.

By 5 p.m. on Saturday, supporters had clustered along Fifth Avenue, waving signs from the sidewalk. Mr. Trump descended to the marbled lobby, joined by his eldest son and his campaign manager, Kellyanne Conway, and stepped through the glass front door.

He pumped his right fist, to cheers. Fans reached out to graze his suit jacket.

A reporter asked if he would stay in the race. Hundred percent, Mr. Trump replied.

See the original post:

What Donald Trumps Access Hollywood Weekend Says About 2020 - The New York Times