Pundits heralded Donald Trump for his new ‘tone’. That didn’t end well … – The Guardian

That didnt last long. It never does.

A week after Donald Trump was hailed by some media figures for a change of tone in his coronavirus briefings, the US president on Tuesday praised a doctor who believes in alien DNA and demon semen, grumbled about his low approval ratings and abruptly walked out when challenged by a female reporter.

Its presidential, Jim, but not as we know it.

It has become a familiar pattern. Trumps outrage machine has numbed the media so that shocking statements are normalized to the point that they no longer register as news. Its therefore actually more newsworthy when he says something vaguely similar to what a President Jeb Bush or President Marco Rubio might have said.

In other words, Trump touts junk science or Trump accuses Obama of spying is no longer new and unexpected, but more likely to be met with a shrug. But Trump embraces science or Trump shows compassion would fit the definition of genuinely surprising and headline-making.

The consequence of this brings to mind former president George W Bushs phrase the soft bigotry of low expectations. Any hint of Trump struggling for redemption is lauded out of proportion. Clinging to an optimistic view of human nature, some media commentators need to believe its true.

When he won the presidential election in 2016, there was endless talk of a pivot to presidential that never came. When he delivered his first speech to a joint session of Congress in January 2017 and honored the widow of a Navy Seal, the CNN pundit Van Jones declared: He became president of the United States in that moment, period.

The Daily Show with Trevor Noah recently compiled seven clips from late March and early April in which the MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski spoke of a dramatic shift in tone and others noted a somber tone or similar.

Trump was only speaking as any world leader might be expected to speak. But because it went against his expected type, it was worth remarking on. Soon, however, he reverted to his more familiar style, lambasting reporters especially women of color pushing hydroxychloroquine despite the evidence and going down in flames with idle speculation about injecting disinfectant.

So as Noah pointed out, last weeks pivot was deja vu all over again. In his first coronavirus briefing since April, Trump warned that it will probably unfortunately get worse before it gets better and endorsed wearing masks. It was hardly a The only thing we have to fear is fear itself moment but, when the bar is as low as bleach injections, Trump was rewarded.

Matt Mackowiak, a Republican strategist, tweeted: Trumps press conference today marks a change in tone and a more disciplined and realistic approach. It will be a good message for the public and he will benefit from it politically. Welcome news.

Yet even at that briefing, Trump took the time to bestow his best wishes upon the British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell charged with being part of Jeffrey Epsteins sex trafficking ring. If any other president had done so, a firestorm would have raged for days. With number 45, it was merely another here today, gone tomorrow controversy.

And as the Associated Press noted, The change in tone lasted a day by Tuesday, the Republican president had returned to lashing out on Twitter at his Democratic critics.

Indeed, it was soon enough the same old Trump, culminating in his retweet on Monday of a video in which a group of lab coat-wearing doctors pushed false and misleading claims about Covid-19, then his defense on Tuesday of one of the doctors who rejects the need for face masks and promotes hydroxychloroquine, as well as claims that alien DNA is used in medical treatments and some gynecological problems are caused by people dreaming about having sex with demons.

This assault on presidential tone is not trivial. It is a key characteristic of the consoler-in-chief role of the American president in times of crisis and tragedy. Some say Bill Clinton became presidential only after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. But with Trump, the repeated media narrative of him pivoting to more presidential behavior is a triumph of hope over experience.

Jennifer Rubin, a Washington Post columnist, wrote on Tuesday: The medias fetish with tone seems to tell us more about the media than Trump. It is part of the mainstream medias collective determination to avoid spelling out how irrational and impulsive he actually is.

The media engages in gaslighting by disingenuously presenting Trump as a rational president, Rubin added. The medias acknowledgment of the frightening reality we have lived with for four years will come, I suspect, only after Trump leaves office.

Go here to see the original:

Pundits heralded Donald Trump for his new 'tone'. That didn't end well ... - The Guardian

Sorry, Donald Trump: The 2020 presidential election is on – CNN

In Washington, DC, fears of a new war ran deep. At one particularly anxious meeting, a young staffer noticed that Secretary of State George Marshall remained cool and collected. "Mr. Secretary," he asked, "how in the world can you remain so calm during this appalling crisis?" Marshall, who was the US Army's Chief of Staff during World War II, replied bluntly, "I've seen worse."

Like George Marshall, we as a nation have seen worse, both epidemiologically and economically. Voting -- the central, unifying act of functioning democracy -- went forward in troublesome decades past.

It's insulting to the American public to even suggest that this sacred constitutional right should be undermined by an authoritarian President tanking in the national polls to Joe Biden.

From the earliest days of the republic, regular elections and orderly transfer of power have been signatures of American democracy. That we were able to achieve both so early is a testament to the wisdom of the Founders, but even they disagreed over the limits of executive authority.

In 1797, that worry faced its first test as President John Adams contemplated a second term in the midst of escalating tensions with France. Jefferson, Adams' vice president, feared that escalation could distract the nation from the "pivot of free and frequent elections." If war came, he wrote, no one could foresee "into what port it will drive us."

Luckily, Adams maintained the peace. The 1800 election proceeded as scheduled. And for more than 150 years after, Americans brooked no possibility of postponing our quadrennial presidential rite, despite war, panic and pestilence.

Public opinion was split, with most New England states refusing to send militiamen to the cause and later formulating a plan to secede from the Union. With the nation divided and under attack, Madison might easily have considered postponing that year's election.

Instead, he won a second term, kept the union together and negotiated an end to hostilities.

Across the country, intemperate voices argued, as one commentator put it, "that politics should be completely adjourned during the building of the defense program; that opponents of the party in power should sit down and shut up; that, in fact, the presidential election should be postponed until the danger to this country is over."

"For more than three centuries," Roosevelt continued, "we Americans have been building on this continent a free society, a society in which the promise of the human spirit may find fulfillment. . . . It is this that we must continue to build -- this that we must continue to defend. It is the task of our generation, yours and mine. But we build and defend not for our generation alone. We defend the foundations laid down by our fathers. We build a life for generations yet unborn. We defend and we build a way of life, not for America alone, but for all mankind."

Like Lincoln, Roosevelt understood his duty to the Founders' great experiment.

In the postwar era, the United States continued to be the symbol of rock-solid democracy. Candidates could come and go, but faith in what seemed like the natural cycle of our elections was near absolute.

Fast forward to 2004. As the first post-9/11 presidential election loomed, Newsweek reported that members of George W. Bush's administration wanted to usurp Congress's power to set presidential election dates, citing the need for quick decision making were terrorists to strike immediately before the election.

One Texas voter quoted in the Odessa American got right to the point: "We expect this kind of talk from tinpot dictators or Third-World banana republics desperate to hold onto power," he said, "not from the current administration of the world's oldest constitutional republic."

So the next time Trump tweets or suggest that the 2020 election might be postponed, patriotic lawmakers should shut him down hard. Ballots will be cast.

Our country has seen worse and always had the fortitude and democratic idealism to carry on. November 3 is the gold-stamped day. The race for the White House has begun.

See the rest here:

Sorry, Donald Trump: The 2020 presidential election is on - CNN

Trump wants second stimulus checks to be more than $1,200. Experts question whether that’s the right relief – CNBC

U.S. President Donald Trump delivers a speech during a tour of the Double Eagle Energy Oil Rig in Midland, Texas, July 29, 2020.

Carlos Barria | Reuters

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are in agreement on sending a second batch of $1,200 stimulus checks to millions of Americans.

And now President Donald Trump is upping the ante, calling for the government to cut checks for more than that $1,200 figure.

"I'd like to see it be very high because I love the people," Trump saidWednesday. "I want the people to get it."

The president did not elaborate on how much higher he wanted the checks to be.

More from Personal Finance:$600 unemployment boost almost over. For some, aid will fall by 93%Americans more worried about Social Security amid pandemicA third of small-business owners tapped personal funds to stay afloat

Trump's comments come after Senate Republicans introduced the HEALS Act earlier this week, their targeted $1 trillion plan for shoring up the U.S. economy. House Democrats in May passed their own bill, the HEROES Act, which would cost about $3 trillion.

Both parties are now working to come to a consensus on issues where they are divided, particularly unemployment insurance. The extra $600 per week in federal unemployment benefits expires this month. Lawmakers are at odds over how much extra help they want to provide to jobless Americans going forward.

That would include up to $1,200 for individuals or $2,400 per married couple, plus $500 for dependents, according to the Republicans' HEALS Act. This time, however, the definition of dependents would be expanded to include adults. Last time, those payments were limited to children under age 17.

Both sides of the aisle apparently have come closer to an agreement on the second stimulus checks. Both bills call for sending up to $1,200 to individuals under similar terms to the first checks in their legislative proposals.

But a group of Republican senators on Thursday unveiled a new proposal calling for $1,000 stimulus checks for both adults and children with valid Social Security numbers. A family of four would stand to receive $4,000.

The government appropriated a total of approximately $300 billion toward the CARES Act stimulus checks. So far, the government has deployed about $260 billion of that money, the Treasury Department has said.

"If you increase the value of the checks, it would certainly increase the total cost," said Adam Michel, senior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. "If you're still going to stick to a $1 trillion target, you would have to reduce things elsewhere."

The payments may not provide the intended boost to the American economy because many people aren't spending because they're afraid to leave their houses amid the coronavirus pandemic, not necessarily because they don't have the resources, he said.

"This idea that these checks have been termed stimulus checks doesn't mean that they're actually stimulative in any way," Michel said.

Chuck Marr, senior director of federal tax policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonpartisan think tank, said he thinks Trump's comments are "perplexing" in light of the proposals from both Democrats and Republicans.

Other forms of financial aid should come first, Marr said, including expanded unemployment benefits for people without jobs, eviction protections for those in danger of losing their homes and nutrition assistance for those with limited access to food.

"These are all very targeted, very important proposals that need to be in there first," Marr said.

Stimulus payments would be helpful, he said, though they are somewhat broader in terms of whom they would help.

Visit link:

Trump wants second stimulus checks to be more than $1,200. Experts question whether that's the right relief - CNBC

It’s time to take Trump seriously, figuratively, and literally – Business Insider – Business Insider

Hello, everyone! Welcome to the new edition of Insider Today. Please sign up here.

"Democracy is not a state. It is an act, and each generation must do its part to help build what we called the Beloved Community, a nation and world society at peace with itself," the late John Lewis. He left the New York Times a posthumous essay to be published the day of his funeral.

Andy Kiersz/Business Insider Sourc: US Bureau of Economic Analysis

GDP plunged at an annualized rate of 33% in the second quarter, by far a record drop. The pandemic lockdowns caused the economy to shrink about 10% in the quarter. Meanwhile, weekly unemployment claims increased again to 1.43 million, the 19th week in a row with more than 1 million claims.

President Trump suggested postponing the presidential election, which he cannot do. Trailing badly in the polls, Trump tweeted falsely that mail-in voting could make the election "FRAUDULENT." Only Congress could change the date of the presidential election, and only a constitutional amendment could change Inauguration Day.

Former GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain has died at 74, apparently of COVID. He had been hospitalized for weeks, and had contracted the virus shortly after attending President Trump's Tulsa rally. A former restaurateur, Cain briefly led the GOP field in 2011. Trump considered him for the Fed board in 2019, but didn't nominate him after widespread opposition.

It's time to take Trump seriously, figuratively, and literally

This morning President Trump tweeted about delaying the election due to the pandemic.

Twitter

In April Trump's rival, Vice President Joe Biden, predicted the President might try to delay the election if his poll numbers looked bad, and they look hideous.

Twitter

Remember that this is a pandemic that spun out of control largely because of a lack of federal response. Trump only put on a mask himself a few weeks ago. The White House could create the conditions for safe elections by competently handling this crisis, but it won't. That's why we're here.

Trump works by gut instinct, and he has never let his ignorance of how the US government works or the limits of presidential power stop him from trampling on the rights of others. (See: His multiple attempts at passing a travel ban on Muslim countries.) The fact that he can't change the date of the election won't stop him from knocking on every door, or trying to open any window he can, into victory.

We already have evidence that Trump will stop at nothing to improve his chances for reelection. Two weeks ago he tried to get Republicans to defund coronavirus testing in Congress' upcoming pandemic relief bill to make infection numbers look better for him.

If you think someone who is willing to do that won't try to hinder the democratic process, I have a gold-plated, Trump-branded bridge to sell you. And I don't just mean Trump will try messing with vote counts, I mean he will be messing with our faith in the outcome of this election and the process of democracy itself. That's the bare minimum of what he will do.

It is in this man's inherent nature to use all of his power unfortunately, the power of the presidency for his own power's sake. That is exactly how Henry Wallace, Vice President of this country from 1941 to 1945, described American fascists.

"A fascist is one whose lust for money or power is combined with such an intensity of intolerance toward those of other races, parties, classes, religions, cultures, regions or nations as to make him ruthless in his use of deceit or violence to attain his ends. The supreme god of a fascist, to which his ends are directed, may be money or power; may be a race or a class; may be a military, clique or an economic group; or may be a culture, religion, or a political party."

Be vigilant. Take Donald Trump seriously, literally, figuratively. He is a desperate demagogue limited only by what we the people will abide. Linette Lopez

If you're enjoying this story,sign up now for the Insider Today newsletterto receive more of these insights from Henry Blodget and David Plotz.

Mandel Ngan/Pool via AP Now we know what Jeff Bezos' worried face looks like

Four masters of Silicon Valley the CEOs of Apple, Google, Amazon and Facebook testified before Congress to answer for their anti-competitive behavior yesterday, and in stark contrast to previous hearings they were visibly shaken by the questions they were asked.

As I put in my column, we got to see Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos' worried face.

Some highlights in case all you caught were the clips of Republicans screaming about being silenced (there was some of that, but there was more productive questioning):

All in all, the CEOs seemed caught off guard. They expected this hearing to be more of the same from Washington a series of uninformed questions from geriatric senators who barely read email. It was not that. Catch the whole column here. LL

FILE PHOTO: View of the Exxon Mobil refinery in Baytown, Texas Reuters

Exxon is reclassifying employees as poor performers in order to hide layoffs as performance-based job cuts. Internal documents and 19 insiders reveal that the company is pushing managers to downgrade employees in order to force them out for performance reasons. In April, Exxon required managers to put at least 8% of employees in the poor performer category, up from a previous minimum of 3%.

There was some fraud, but not a ton of it, in the PPP program. The SBA watchdog has found about $300 million in potentially dubious small business loans, out of more than $500 billion issued.

Inside the sarsen circle at Stonehenge. James Davies/English Heritage

Scientists have finally figured out where the huge stones at Stonehenge came from. The 80 "sarsens," which weigh 25 tons each, were brought from about 15 miles away, and probably all at the same time.

10 signs your relationship will or won't work, based on a study of 11,000 couples. Some are obvious: Do you fight a lot? Is your sex life good? Others are less so: Do you appreciate your partner?

Parents, teachers, and lawmakers are all debating whether or not schools should open their doors this fall for in-person instruction. We joined Insider Audio'sCharlie Hermanfor a discussion about what it will take to get students back in their seats amidst a pandemic, and what's at stake if they don't return.Click here to listen to the full conversation. HB & DP

Rachel Askinasi/Insider

She tried making scrambled eggs 10 different ways: Insider's Rachel Askinasi changed the level of heat, added different liquids, and compared results. Milk made them watery, cream made them fluffy.

Claudia Conway returned to Twitter. She criticized her mom's boss, Donald Trump, and joked that AOC should adopt her.

The best and worst things about living in a camper van. Pluses: the great views, the nature, the lack of schedule. Minuses: No showers, no WiFi, never getting to stay in the same place for more than a couple nights.

*The most popular stories on Insider today.

Read more from the original source:

It's time to take Trump seriously, figuratively, and literally - Business Insider - Business Insider

When it comes to honoring John Lewis, Donald Trump was no hypocrite – Olean Times Herald

CHICAGO (TNS) We should thank Donald Trump for skipping Congressman John Lewis farewell ceremony.

While his absence from the memorial in the Capitol rotunda on Monday was glaring, Trump did us all a favor by leaving town. To pay respects to a man for whom he showed so little regard in life would be disingenuous.

Trump might be a liar, but at least he is no hypocrite.

Unlike Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Trump did not stand over Lewis casket as he lay in state and quote the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. He did not try, as Republican Sens. Marco Rubio and Dan Sullivan did, to pretend like he had a good relationship with Lewis by tweeting photos posing with Rep. Elijah Cummings, the Black congressman who died in October.

When it came to honoring the civil rights icon, Trump was perhaps more honest that he ever has been. He did not attempt to represent himself as anything other than what he is the antithesis of Lewis.

We should be truthful as well. No one wanted Trump there and he knew it.

So lets stop ranting about how he disrespected Lewis legacy by tweeting two generic sentences offering condolences to the family. No one is shocked that Trump had more to say about the passing of TV host Regis Philbin than the man who helped change the course of America.

The president would have been expected to say a few words at the event, attended by a small bipartisan group of Washington politicians and dignitaries. But anything he said would have been a lie.

As soon as he stepped away from the podium, we would have blasted him the way we did McConnell for acting as though he supported Lewis political positions. It was sickening to hear McConnell repeat Kings words, The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward justice, though he is actively blocking a bipartisan bill to restore voter protections the U.S. Supreme Court removed from the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The landmark bill came about as a result of the lifes work of King, Lewis and other civil rights champions.

There is no reason to believe that Trump would even sign the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act into law. He is convinced that millions of fraudulent voters are on the rolls. He supports strict voter ID requirements and less access to mail-in ballots, making it harder for minorities to vote.

Trump had nothing to gain politically by acting as though the loss of a congressional Democrat mattered to him. By no means does it suggest that he felt no sympathy for the 80-year-old congressman, who died from pancreatic cancer, and his family. It just shows that for Trump, politics transcends death.

This is the latest example of Trumps dangerous race-based reelection strategy putting him in a precarious position. Even if he had wanted to visit the Capitol over the two days Lewis body lay in state, he could not.

It is no secret that white nationalists have infiltrated Trumps base. Such a display of honor toward a man who devoted his life to fighting racism would not bode well with that part of Trumps constituency. If he has any chance of being reelected in November, he needs racists to turn out in force.

Shortly after Trumps election, Lewis said he believed that Trump could learn something by participating in his annual march across the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, Alabama. But he would not invite him.

Anything Trump said about Lewis beyond those two short sentences he tweeted would have been fabricated. It would have been worse than saying nothing.

Consider what happened Tuesday when Attorney General William Barr paid tribute to Lewis in his opening statement to the House Judiciary Committee.

He called Lewis an indomitable champion of civil rights and the rule of law and then went on to defend Trumps deployment of federal officers into cities to bring law and order.

Lewis likened the use of troops on protesters to the fire hoses used on civil rights protesters in the 1960s.

Rep. Cedric Richmond, former chairman of the Congressional Black Caucus, called Barr out by pointing to the fact that neither Barr nor his two predecessors brought any African Americans in top staff positions with them.

That, sir, is systematic racism. That is exactly what John Lewis spent his life fighting, he said.

And so I would just suggest that actions speak louder than words, and you really should keep the name of the honorable John Lewis out of the Department of Justices mouth.

The same goes for Trump.

(Dahleen Glanton is a columnist for the Chicago Tribune.)

2020 Chicago Tribune

Visit the Chicago Tribune at http://www.chicagotribune.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Here is the original post:

When it comes to honoring John Lewis, Donald Trump was no hypocrite - Olean Times Herald

Donald Trump Is the Best Ever President in the History of the Cosmos – The New York Times

To hear more audio stories from publishers like The New York Times, download Audm for iPhone or Android.

Its no longer interesting, or particularly newsworthy, to point out that Donald Trump lies. It stopped being interesting a long time ago. He lied en route to the presidency. He lied about the crowd at his inauguration. His speech itself was one big lie. And the falsehoods only metastasized from there.

Why? Weve covered that, too, most recently in all the chatter about Too Much and Never Enough, by Mary Trump, who is not only his niece but also a clinical psychologist. He lies because he grew up among liars. He lies because hyperbole and hooey buoy his fragile ego. He lies because he is practiced at it, is habituated to it and never seems to pay much of a price for it.

What intrigues me is that last part: the impunity. I want to understand how he has gotten away with all of the lying, because Im desperate to know whether hell continue to.

Thats the question at the heart of his re-election bid, because his strategy isnt really law and order or racism or a demonization of liberals as monument-phobic wackadoodles or a diminution of Joe Biden as a doddering wreck. All of those gambits are there, but they spring from and burble back to a larger, overarching scheme. His strategy is fiction. His strategy is lies.

Can he sell enough Americans on the make-believe that he really cares about the quality of life in cities and is dispatching federal officers as a constructive measure rather than a provocative one, in a flash of empathy versus a fit of vanity? He gave himself away a few days ago when he punctuated a mention of the wonderful people of Chicago with the needless notation that its a city I know very well. Everything Trump says is self-referential, and everything he does is self-reverential.

Can he feed voters the fantasy that his actions in the infancy of this pandemic saved lives and that our countrys world-leading death toll and un-flattened curve are more figment than fact or at least more fluke than indictment? Can he convincingly don the mask of a longtime evangelist for masks?

His recent interview with Chris Wallace of Fox News was a trial run of this and wow. Up was down. Black was white. A superficial check of his cognitive coherence was a profound spelunking of his cerebral glory.

He claimed that Joe Biden had pledged to defund no, abolish the police, when Biden had done nothing of the kind. He boasted that Americas management of this pandemic made us the envy of the world, when in fact were so densely diseased that were barred from entering most of Europe. Oh, and hes cruising toward four more years: All of those pollsters who predict otherwise are incompetent fabulists. (Talk about projection.)

Then there are the Trump campaigns ads, which are Veep-grade caricatures of the usual fakery, not to mention paragons of incompetence in their own regard. One that appeared on Facebook in early July said, WE WILL PROTECT THIS just like that, in URGENT CAPITAL LETTERS beneath a picture of a statue of Jesus. But Trump wont be protecting that statue, because, as eagle-eyed observers noticed, it was the Christ the Redeemer monument that looms over Rio de Janeiro.

Another Facebook ad a few weeks later comprised two side-by-side pictures. Under an image of Trump were the words Public Safety. Under a separate image, of a police officer crumpled on the ground amid protesters, were Chaos & Violence.

Scary! But, again, foreign. The scene wasnt Portland or Minneapolis or Washington or Chicago circa 2020, although that was the obvious suggestion. The picture, it turns out, was taken in Ukraine. Six years ago. For a more complete and very funny deconstruction of its infelicity, read Jonathan Lasts riff in The Bulwark.

The Trump campaigns television commercials, meanwhile, have painted a dystopia of rampant criminality in Democratic-controlled metropolises where the police no longer function or exist. One shows an elderly woman being attacked by a burglar as she listens to a 911 recording that tells her to leave a message.

If this is Trumps tenor in July, just imagine October. By the time hes done, Willie Horton will look like Peter Pan.

Its beyond ludicrous. But is it too much? I once would have answered an emphatic yes. Now I just dont know.

Every presidents election illuminates the moment in which it occurs, and Trumps told us something important and terrifying about our relationship with the truth. He relied like no candidate before him on a new infrastructure of misinformation and disinformation, tweeting toward Bethlehem while his allies made Mark Zuckerberg their stooge. If youre peddling fiction, Twitter and Facebook are the right bazaars.

But theyre hardly the only ones. The web (how aptly named) has fostered the proliferation of news sites with partisan and micro-partisan agendas. They amount to flourishing ecosystems for alternate realities. Many Americans believe that Trump is an underappreciated martyr because they marinate in selective, manipulated and outright fraudulent factoids. And Trump and his minions have really figured out how to slather on the marinade.

When Robert Mueller released the conclusions of his investigation into the Trump campaigns ties to Russia, everyone focused on its second section, about Trump, when the first was at least as important. It documented the extent and ingenuity of Russias attempts to pervert the election. But even many of the people who paid it heed missed the point, which wasnt Russias nefariousness. It was the processs corruptibility. It was the power of lies in a world gone digital.

As for the power of a liar, well, thats what Trump is testing. He got away with lies in his business career because he chose professional avenues paved with deception and crowded with con men. Plus he had and still has a special talent for treating drivel as gospel, as long as its tumbling from his lips. Thats the great advantage of the truly amoral: Theyre liberated from any tug of conscience, so theres no suspicious hesitancy in their words, no revelatory panic in their eyes. Damn the verities and full steam ahead.

He got away with lies in 2016 because of social media, because show business and politics had finally fused to the point where one was indistinguishable from the other, and because many Americans had grown so skeptical of traditional candidates that an utterly untraditional one seemed more trustworthy on some level. Trump was the diet that hadnt yet failed them. They were ready to believe.

But to believe now is to ignore the receipts. About 150,000 Americans have died from Covid-19. Tens of millions have tumbled into financial ruin or are on the precipice of it. Racial tensions are at a palpable boil. And Trump keeps having to double back to correct his predictions and retrace his missteps. Charlotte, Jacksonville, Charlotte: Ive lost track of where the Republicans are convening next month and of whos on board, though I remain primed for Trumps remarks. He alone can fictionalize it.

From now until Nov. 3, Trump will take the grand inventions that attend any presidential candidates campaign to a newly grandiose level, signaled by his insistence a few days ago that hed done more for Black Americans than anybody with the possible exception of Abraham Lincoln. I love that possible. Trump, Lincoln: Its a jump ball, really.

So while this election is indeed a contest between two men with two visions, its also something else. Its the tallest tale Trump has ever scaled, the greatest story ever told. Its a referendum on the reaches of his persuasion. Its a judgment of the depths of Americans gullibility.

Have we cut the cord to reality? Then Trump has a chance. And America hasnt a prayer.

I invite you to sign up for my free weekly email newsletter. You can follow me on Twitter (@FrankBruni).

Listen to The Argument podcast every Thursday morning, with Ross Douthat, Michelle Goldberg and me.

View original post here:

Donald Trump Is the Best Ever President in the History of the Cosmos - The New York Times

Alex Jones and Donald Trump: How the Candidate Echoed the Conspiracy Theorist on the Campaign Trail – FRONTLINE

As 2015 drew to a close, then-candidate Donald Trump made an appearance that was unprecedented in the history of modern presidential campaigns.

It was on InfoWars, the hard-right outlet run by extremist conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, a trafficker in false information who had exploited national tragedies from 9/11 to Newtown. And it was brokered by Trumps longtime associate Roger Stone, a frequent InfoWars guest, in a bid to win over Jones millions of viewers.

Yourreputationisamazing.Iwill not let youdown,Trump told Jones, whofor years had been pushing a message that elites and globalists are part of a secret conspiracy that controls the world.You willbe very veryimpressed,Ihope.

A new FRONTLINE documentary traces how the alliance between Jones and Trump, facilitated by Stone, would help to bring conspiracy theorist thought into the political mainstream ushering in the current era, in which misinformation about the coronavirus pandemic has spread like the virus itself.

That documentary,United States of Conspiracy, includes a striking sequence that illustrates how Trump adopted Jonesclaims voicing thempublicly in a way that shocked even InfoWars staffers ashe ran for the highest office in the land.

I mean, sometimes it was, like, verbatim like, really Trump, really? Youre taking his word for it? former InfoWars staffer Rob Jacobson says.

Embedded at the top of this story, the sequence juxtaposes clips of Jones sharing false and conspiratorial claims about then-President Barack Obama, Senator Ted Cruz and Hillary Clinton with Trump making strikingly similar claims at rallies and in interviews.

The presidential candidates echoing of Jones on the campaign trail was a significant development in the mainstreaming of conspiracy theorist thought. And it stunned author Jon Ronson, a renowned expert on extremism who has been following Jones for 20 years.

The big shock was Alex having the ear of a president-to-be, Ronson says in the excerpt. Of all the people Ive interviewed over 35 years, I can think of a lot of people I would rather have the presidency than Alex Jones. Its a bit of a shame that one of the most spiraling people Ive ever met is the one who is influencing Trump.

For the full story, watchUnited States of Conspiracy, which is now available to stream in full online and on-demand. From veteran FRONTLINE filmmaker Michael Kirk and his team, the documentary reveals how conspiracy theories have come to play an outsize role in American politics and what that means for American democracy as the coronavirus pandemic continues, the country reckons with racism, and the 2020 election looms.

Conspiracism has become a recognized and accepted way of exercising political power.It creates a polarization in the population thats much deeper than partisan polarization its a polarization about what it means to know something, Nancy Rosenblum, co-author ofA Lot of People Are Saying, says in the film.I think its likely to spread across the political spectrum. And whether it returns to the fringes or not I think will depend on whether people in office can resist using it.

Stream the full United States of Conspiracy documentary below, on the PBS Video App or on YouTube.

This story was updated to include an embed of the full documentary, and the fact that it is now streaming online and on-demand.

Link:

Alex Jones and Donald Trump: How the Candidate Echoed the Conspiracy Theorist on the Campaign Trail - FRONTLINE

Nevada sheriff mends ties with library over diversity statement – Las Vegas Sun

By Ricardo Torres-Cortez (contact)

Wednesday, July 29, 2020 | 6:45 p.m.

Scott Sonner / AP

Douglas County Sheriff Dan Coverley is shown during a news conference in Reno on Monday, Jan. 28, 2019.

The Douglas County Public Library in Northern Nevada and the Sheriffs Office are back on good terms following an apparent threat earlier this week that suggested law enforcement would not respond to the library over its support of the Black Lives Matter movement, according to a joint statement published today.

After Douglas County Sheriff Dan Coverley walked back his comments and clarified that his deputies would continue responding to calls for service at the library Tuesday, he and library Director Amy Dodson talked.

Sheriff Coverley and I had a very candid conversation about the statement and we both expressed our opinions regarding the intent of our exchanged correspondence, Dodson wrote in the statement published on the sheriffs website today. We agreed that we both support the people of Douglas County and this may have been an unfortunate circumstance of misunderstanding. The library respects and supports the work of the Douglas County Sheriffs Office and appreciates everything they do to keep our community safe.

I am passionate about and proud of the work the Sheriffs Office does for all members of this community, Coverley wrote. This has been a difficult time to be a law enforcement professional and can be disheartening when we perceive that our office may be under attack. My response was rooted in my belief that these issues need to be openly discussed in a way that values diversity and law enforcement.

Coverleys frustration came Monday in response to a diversity statement the library intended to propose at a board meeting Tuesday, which was ultimately postponed.

Citing support for Black Lives Matter, the four-paragraph statement denounced all acts of violence, racism, and disregard for human rights ... We resolutely assert and believe that all forms of racism, hatred, inequality and injustice dont belong in our society.

A growing number of libraries across the country have put out similar messages following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis police custody in late May.

In its statement, the Douglas County library said it was going to add its name to a list of more than 170 public libraries in signing the Urban Libraries Council statement on race and social equality.

Learning about its intention to support Black Lives Matter, Coverley put out a letter Monday denouncing the movement and the proposed diversity statement, which he saw as an obvious lack of support or trust with the Douglas County Sheriffs Office, adding, please do not feel the need to call 911 for help.

Most of the verbiage in Coverleys letter was copied from a letter by a group of state attorneys to U.S. senatorial and congressional leaders, the Nevada Independent reported.

The Black Lives Matter movement is not monolithic and doesnt have an official chapter in Nevada. Douglas County, with a population of about 47,000, is 89% white, according to the 2010 Census.

On Tuesday, he said his letter was more a public comment rather than a directive, vowing that his department would continue providing service to the library impartially.

The board meeting in which the statement was to be discussed will be rescheduled.

Read this article:

Nevada sheriff mends ties with library over diversity statement - Las Vegas Sun

Jon Gruden welcomed to Las Vegas with Raiders-themed Shelby GT500 – Las Vegas Review-Journal

If you see someone driving around Las Vegas in a Raiders-themed Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 that looks like Jon Gruden, theres no need for a double take.

Southern Nevada Ford Dealers delivered to Gruden on Monday a 2020 edition of the souped-up muscle car, decked out in a silver-and-black paint job with Raiders painted on top of the rear spoiler and the teams famous pirate logo included on the ends.

Giving the already impressive vehicle an even more unique touch, it came with a Raiders Nevada specialty license plate embossed with JTWYN, a nod to late owner Al Davis memorable motto Just win, baby.

The Southern Nevada Ford Dealers couldnt be more proud to welcome Coach Gruden, to Las Vegas, said Steve Olliges, owner of Team Ford and member of the Southern Nevada Ford Dealers, who are a founding sponsor of Allegiant Stadium. We hope he enjoys driving the Mustang and we look forward to seeing him lead the Las Vegas Raiders to many victories this season and for many years to come.

The Shelby GT500 features a 5.2-liter V-8 engine, boasting a top speed of 186 mph powered by 745 horsepower.

Thats the Henry Ruggs III horsepower right there, Gruden said in a statement, comparing the car to the speedy rookie receiver.

Although nothing tops winning a Lombardi Trophy in the NFL, Gruden had high praise for the vehicle.

(Its the) best thing I will ever own, next to my Super Bowl trophy, Gruden said.

Contact Mick Akers at makers@reviewjournal.com or 702-387-2920. Follow @mickakers on Twitter.

See the rest here:

Jon Gruden welcomed to Las Vegas with Raiders-themed Shelby GT500 - Las Vegas Review-Journal

The news item "SPECIAL REPORT: Janez Jana’s Newest Investment Scared the Government and Big Banks" is an online scam – Gov.si

The news report, which was published on a fraudulent website and is making the rounds on social media, is an online scam. There are statements on the website that were not made or written by Prime Minister Janez Jana and were falsely attributed to him, moreover, the photos were published without authorisation from the authors.

The fraudulent website with the fake news. We ask internet users to be cautious and not to fall prey to the above-mentioned online scam. | Author Ukom

As the website in question is based on fake news and uses fake statements of the Prime Minister and his photos to redirect users to other websites offering services for cryptocurrency trading, we want to alert users not to be fooled by such online scams.

Regarding the above-mentioned website, the Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Slovenia submitted a request to the Slovenian National Cyber Security Incident Response Centre SI-CERT to remove the post. SI-CERT asked the service provider hosting the website to remove or block access to the website, with the decision regarding the removal of the website being in the hands of the hosting service provider.

We also notified the response centre for addressing incidents concerning the information systems of the state administration and its bodies SIGOV-CERT about the online scam, while we filed a charge against an unidentified offender due to misuse of personal information.

The Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Slovenia would like to take this opportunity to specifically ask internet users not to fall prey to this online scam.

Link:

The news item "SPECIAL REPORT: Janez Jana's Newest Investment Scared the Government and Big Banks" is an online scam - Gov.si

Propaganda, fake news and disinformation on the internet could destroy us Susan Dalgety – The Scotsman

NewsOpinionColumnistsThe internet is a wonder of the modern world, but it is being used to spread dangerous conspiracy theories and undermine democracy, writes Susan Dalgety

Friday, 24th July 2020, 4:45 pm

Since lockdown, my life has moved online. My ancient iPhone 6, second-hand when I bought it, is by my side 24 hours a day. (Top tip: always buy refurbished tech, works just as well as the new models and costs far less).

I fall asleep to the sounds of American liberal news channel MSNBC and wake in the middle of the night to listen to Rachel Maddow, patron saint of progressives everywhere. I scroll through Twitter before I get up. I read my newspapers online while eating breakfast, and yes, I subscribe to the Scotsman you should too. What work I do, now that my Malawi projects are on hold because of the pandemic, I carry out online. Zoom meetings, Facetime chats, hours of endless Google searches, some of them useful.

I shop for everything on my phone, from my lockdown workwear leggings to supplies for our new coronavirus tradition, Saturday cocktails. Todays is an Espresso Martini. I stay in touch with friends and family, close by and across the world. It is as easy to have a weekend catch-up with Martha in New Yorks East Village as it is to DM my sister in Dumfries.

And throughout the day I get updates from Malawi about the relentless rise of the virus there. Malawi, with one of the smallest economies in the world, also has most expensive data, at 21.50 for 1GB of data. The cheapest bundle here costs, literally, pennies. But despite the cost, around 40 per cent of the 18 million population has a mobile phone.

Digital life now our real life

Even my 80-something mother, who resisted the lure of the internet until recently, has her smartphone and iPad sitting by her landline. (Top tip: always buy your mother a new piece of tech for a landmark birthday, refurbished wont cut it on special occasions).

Our four grandchildren are, of course, digital natives, born into a world where life happens on YouTube and WhatsApp is their playground.

The advent of lockdown saw schools retreat on to Microsoft Teams. Across Scotland teachers dropped dense PowerPoint decks once a week and parents struggled to coach their kids through them, before giving up and letting little Jack or Olivia watch Netflix.

Our digital life is now our real life. What started as a grand experiment in August 1991, when Tim Berners-Lee loaded the first ever website onto the new-fangled internet, is now as essential to humanity as water and sanitation.

In 2016, a report from the Human Rights Council of the United Nations General Assembly even declared access to the internet a basic human right.

The internet is one of the most powerful instruments of the 21st century for increasing transparency in the conduct of the powerful, access to information, and for facilitating active citizen participation in building democratic societies, the UN said.

It is also one of the most powerful instruments for interfering in democracies, as a report published by Westminsters Intelligence and Security Committee earlier this week shows.

The report said the UK was clearly a target for disinformation campaigns around its elections, and that there was credible open source commentary suggesting influence campaigns from the Russians during the Scottish independence referendum in 2014.

In other words, Putin and his online army may well have flooded Facebook and other social media platforms with fake news to encourage the break-up of the UK. Just as they did in the 2016 presidential elections, which led to the inauguration of Donald J Trump as leader of the free world.

And just as they most likely did during the Brexit campaign. Only it seems the Conservative government couldnt be bothered to investigate that breach of democracy. For fear of what they might expose perhaps?

Fans of Cold War spy novels will not be surprised that Putins Russia interferes in American and British elections. After all, psy ops (psychological warfare) was the main weapon used by the USA and Soviet Russia in their 30-year battle for supremacy.

Vaccine conspiracy theories

America and Nato may have won that war, but Putin is making great advances in this new battlefield.

America is now pitied across the world as the coronavirus burns its way through 50 states, while its President fiddles (allegedly) his tax returns. Britain leaving the EU will damage our economy and weaken our global influence, and Scotland leaving the UK would further diminish Britains standing.

It is not just Alex Salmond, Russia Today TV presenter and former First Minister, who would cheer the break-up of the UK. Vladimir Putin would also raise a glass of ice-cold vodka to toast the new world order.

The speed and global reach of the internet has also fuelled the dystopian debate that insists humans born male can become female, simply by wishing they had a cervix.

It has allowed a cancel culture which sees women, even those as famous as JK Rowling, ostracised for daring to question this new gender orthodoxy. And social media is the seed bed for nonsensical conspiracy theories about vaccines some planted, surprise, surprise, by Putins digital troops.

A third may not use Covid vaccine

Microsoft founder and global philanthropist, Bill Gates, had to go on the record this week to debunk a theory that he is supporting the development of a coronavirus vaccine because he wants to use it to implant tracking devices in the worlds population. You may well laugh, but a recent Yahoo News/YouGov poll found that 28 per cent of US adults believe this nonsense, and here in the UK, a third of people say they are unsure or definitely would not use a coronavirus vaccine.

And it is largely people who prefer social media to TV news who hold such extreme views.

I am no epidemiologist though I do have a PhD in Googling but even I understand that if not enough people take up the vaccine once its found, we will not achieve herd immunity. Life will not get back to normal.

We need to get the truth out there, Bill Gates said during his interview on CBS News on Wednesday.

And the truth is that the internet is one of the worlds greatest ever inventions, up there with the wheel and vaccines.

Social media is one of the wonders of the world, allowing a child in central Malawi to connect instantly with their friend in Orkney. But the network that has transformed the world into a global village also has the potential to destroy us. Now let me check Twitter to see what Trump has been up to today.

A message from the Editor:

Thank you for reading this article on our website. While I have your attention, I also have an important request to make of you.

With the coronavirus lockdown having a major impact on many of our advertisers - and consequently the revenue we receive - we are more reliant than ever on you taking out a digital subscription.

Subscribe to scotsman.com and enjoy unlimited access to Scottish news and information online and on our app. With a digital subscription, you can read more than 5 articles, see fewer ads, enjoy faster load times, and get access to exclusive newsletters and content. Visit http://www.scotsman.com/subscriptions now to sign up.

Our journalism costs money and we rely on advertising, print and digital revenues to help to support them. By supporting us, we are able to support you in providing trusted, fact-checked content for this website.

Read the rest here:

Propaganda, fake news and disinformation on the internet could destroy us Susan Dalgety - The Scotsman

Massive Growth in Human Genetics Market Breaking new grounds and touch new level in Upcoming Year by QIAGEN, Agilent Technologies, Thermo Fisher…

Human Genetics Market report focused on the comprehensive analysis of current and future prospects of the Human Genetics industry. This report is a consolidation of primary and secondary research, which provides market size, share, dynamics, and forecast for various segments and sub-segments considering the macro and micro environmental factors. An in-depth analysis of past trends, future trends, demographics, technological advancements, and regulatory requirements for the Human Genetics market has been done in order to calculate the growth rates for each segment and sub-segments.

Human Genetics Market is growing at a High CAGR during the forecast period 2020-2026. The increasing interest of the individuals in this industry is that the major reason for the expansion of this market.

Get Sample Copy (Including FULL TOC, Graphs and Tables) of this report:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/sample?reportId=261272

Note In order to provide more accurate market forecast, all our reports will be updated before delivery by considering the impact of COVID-19.

Top Key Players Profiled in this Report are:

QIAGEN, Agilent Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Illumina, Promega, LabCorp, GE

Various factors are responsible for the markets growth trajectory, which are studied at length in the report. In addition, the report lists down the restraints that are posing threat to the global Human Genetics market. It also gauges the bargaining power of suppliers and buyers, threat from new entrants and product substitute, and the degree of competition prevailing in the market. The influence of the latest government guidelines is also analyzed in detail in the report. It studies the Human Genetics markets trajectory between forecast periods.

Key Questions Answered in this Report:

Hurry Up! Get 20% Discount on this Report @:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/discount?reportId=261272

The report summarized the high revenue that has been generated across locations like, North America, Japan, Europe, Asia, and India along with the facts and figures of Human Genetics market. It focuses on the major points, which are necessary to make positive impacts on the market policies, international transactions, speculation, and supply demand in the global market.

Reasons for buying this report:

Table of Contents

Global Human Genetics Market Research Report 2020 2026

Chapter 1 Human Genetics Market Overview

Chapter 2 Global Economic Impact on Industry

Chapter 3 Global Market Competition by Manufacturers

Chapter 4 Global Production, Revenue (Value) by Region

Chapter 5 Global Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Regions

Chapter 6 Global Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type

Chapter 7 Global Market Analysis by Application

Chapter 8 Manufacturing Cost Analysis

Chapter 9 Industrial Chain, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream Buyers

Chapter 10 Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors/Traders

Chapter 11 Market Effect Factors Analysis

Chapter 12 Global Human Genetics Market Forecast

Buy Exclusive Report @:

https://www.a2zmarketresearch.com/buy?reportId=261272

If you have any special requirements, please let us know and we will offer you the report as you want.

Read the rest here:

Massive Growth in Human Genetics Market Breaking new grounds and touch new level in Upcoming Year by QIAGEN, Agilent Technologies, Thermo Fisher...

Centre for Commercialization of Cancer Immunotherapy and Regenerative Medicine and the Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine Partner to Boost…

TORONTO & MONTREAL--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Regenerative medicine (RM) has the potential to transform healthcare by developing curative therapies for diseases such as heart failure or vision loss. By repairing damaged tissues and organs, this will not only improve patients lives but create economic impact in a market forecasted to reach $5.6B USD by 2025.

Several Canadian-made cell therapies will take a major step closer to the clinic thanks to a new collaboration between the Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine (OIRM) and the Centre for Commercialization of Cancer Immunotherapy and Regenerative Medicine (C3i).

Each organization will leverage their unique resources and expertise to help Canadian research teams overcome common but significant hurdles in the RM translational process, from clinical trials through to therapeutic application.

C3i is a funded Centre of Excellence in Commercialization and Research of the federal governments Networks of Centres of Excellence program. It accelerates the development of cancer immunotherapies and cellular-based therapies by providing one-stop-shop services in the chain of product development through to commercialization, as well as supporting Canadian-based companies working in this space.

OIRM is a comprehensive clinical translation ecosystem in Ontario focused on translating promising RM research from the lab to the clinic. Unfortunately, OIRMs core provincial funding was not renewed, compromising multiple world-class translational research programs at pivotal points in clinical development.

Our partnership with C3i is truly a win-win for both organizations, for RM research in Ontario and Canada, and for the health of Canadians, says Dr. Duncan Stewart, President and Scientific Director, OIRM. With C3is deep commercialization resources and manufacturing expertise, OIRM will be able to shift our translational pipeline into high gear. In turn, OIRM will help C3i achieve lateral growth in the RM field on par with their impact to date in the field of cancer immunotherapy.

The CEO of C3i, Mr. Benoit Deschamps, says: We believe that the C3i-OIRM partnership truly expands the one-stop-shop model in supporting cell and gene therapies for Canadian technologies.

In addition to supporting commercialization and manufacturing activities, OIRM and C3i will launch a joint Industry and Investor Program that will include pitch days technology scouting calls tailored to the interested organization as well as opportunities to work alongside researchers to develop strategic solutions needed to advance technologies through the pipeline.

The C3i-OIRM partnership will be guided via a joint steering committee. The OIRM administrative centre and a satellite office for C3i will share space in Torontos MaRS Discovery District.

As part of its Canadian mandate, C3i is excited to expand the Ontario-Quebec corridor and support innovation, ensuring that Canadian technology in cell and gene therapy space can flourish and remain accessible to Canadians, said Mr. Deschamps.

Go here to see the original:

Centre for Commercialization of Cancer Immunotherapy and Regenerative Medicine and the Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine Partner to Boost...

Literature Review of Surgical Treatment in Idiopathic Full-Thickness M | OPTH – Dove Medical Press

Mantapond Ittarat,1,2 Thanapong Somkijrungroj,2,3 Sunee Chansangpetch,2,4 Pear Pongsachareonnont2,3

1Surin Hospital and Surin Medical Education Center, Department of Ophthalmology, Suranaree University of Technology, Surin, Thailand; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand; 3Vitreoretinal Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; 4Glaucoma Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

Correspondence: Pear Pongsachareonnont Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine 1873 Rama IV Road, Patumwan, Bangkok 10330, ThailandTel +66-2256-4142Fax +66-2-252-8290Email pear.p@chulahospital.org

Purpose: To summarize current surgical techniques for treating primary macular holes (MHs).Methods: We reviewed publications detailing surgical approaches to primary MHs, briefly described their protocols, and outlined their results.Results: Currently, the technique for primary MH repair is pars plana vitrectomy, removing the posterior cortical vitreous, stripping the epiretinal membranes, and ending with intraocular gas tamponade. The evident benefit of peeling off the internal limiting membrane (ILM) was clearly shown for MHs at stages 2 to 4 by achieving an anatomical closure rate of > 90%, even in large MH up to 650 m. Newer MH surgical techniques include modification of ILM flap techniques, placing an autologous scaffolding of tissue within the hole, and cell therapy has shown to increase the closure rate of large and chronic macular holes, resulting in modest functional improvement in complicated MHs.Conclusion: Since the turn of the century, the success rate of modern macular surgery has increased, even for large and chronic MHs. There seems to be no limit to novel concepts in MH surgery, which range from anatomical closure to those proposing natural restoration of visual function via stem cell therapy.

Keywords: macular hole, macular hole surgery, stem cell therapy, internal limiting membrane peeling

This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License.By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

See the rest here:

Literature Review of Surgical Treatment in Idiopathic Full-Thickness M | OPTH - Dove Medical Press

Five developments in oncology targets – Drug Target Review

Drug Target Review explores some of the newest oncologic drug targets, including those for glioblastoma, lung cancer and breast cancer.

According to new research published inDevelopmental Cell, the PRC1 protein is an essential component in cell division. Acting as a viscous glue, the protein creates resistance as cells pull chromatids to either end of the single dividing cell.

The team explains that this process controls the speed that DNA is separated into daughter cells, suggesting that the over-abundance of PRC1 characteristic observed in many cancer types (including prostate, ovarian and breast cancers) may be causing the cells to divide unevenly, resulting in chromosomal abnormalities and driving cancer growth and mutation.

PRC1 produces a viscous frictional force, a drag that increases with speed, said Scott Forth, an Assistant Professor of Biological Sciences and member of the Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in the US. The friction it produces is similar to that of water if you try to move your hand through water slowly, you move easily, but if you push your hand fast, the water pushes back hard.

The team explained that correct cellular division relies on physical forces produced by motor proteins and microtubules, essentially ripping pairs of chromatids apart so a single cell of the cellular DNA ends up in each daughter cell. The mitotic spindle is an element of cellular machinery that uses mechanical forces push, pull and resistance to complete the task.

We think the force PRC1 produces is integrating and dampening out cellular motions as the DNA is separated so that ultimately, you get the correct rate of chromosome segregation, Forth said. However, if this process goes awry due to too much or too little PRC1, it can cause uncontrollable cancer growth.

Researchers have found that expansion stress can drive breast tumours to become highly aggressive in their growth, invasion and metastasis.

Expansion stress is a condition often seen in solid cancer tumours when, as they grow, biomechanical forces in the tumour microenvironment cause compression within the tumour, tension at its periphery and altered interstitial fluid flow.

The interdisciplinary team from the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB), US, also suggested that the biomechanical forces may modulate the immune response through cancer cell-immune cell crosstalk.

To explore how these biomechanical forces may be impacting breast cancer growth, the researchers created a tissue-engineered, three-dimensional (3D) breast cancer mimetic system that recapitulates the in vivo growth of breast cancer cells. It includes tumour-associated fibroblasts, endothelial cells and immune cells, within a physiologically relevant extracellular matrix.

According to the team, the biomechanical forces significantly altered the proteome of breast cancer cells and enhanced exosome production. These tumour cell-secreted exosomes are one of the intercellular mediators of signalling in the tumour microenvironment and are now considered key regulators of tumour progression.

In the study, the exosomes promoted aggressive tumour cell growth, induced immune suppression and altered immune cell polarisation in the tumour microenvironment. Furthermore, the researchers recently engineered an oscillatory compression device for real-time application of biomechanical force on orthotopic mammary tumours in mice, which allowed them to observe exosome-mediated immunosuppression and aggressive tumour growth.

The researchers concluded that their study suggests that exposure to mechanical strain promotes invasive and pro-tumourigenic phenotypes of breast cancer cells. They also added that mechanical strain also impacted the growth and proliferation of cancer cells, altered exosome production and induced immunosuppression in the tumour microenvironment.

The paper was published in Laboratory Investigation.

Researchers studying lung cancers revealed that the cancers observed in non-smokers are distinctly different to those in smokers, with different genetic underpinnings dependent on age, and lifestyle. They suggest that some patient populations may respond to targeted treatments better than others.

The study, conducted in Taiwan, was co-led by scientists at The Institute of Cancer Research.

According to the scientists, around 10-15 percent of lung cancers in the UK occur in people who have never smoked, but in East Asia this proportion is much higher, especially among women.

The study, published in Cell, details the analyses of tumour samples from 103 lung cancer patients from Taiwan, the majority of which were non-smokers. The researchers conducted a detailed analysis of genetic changes, gene activation, protein activity and cellular switches in lung cancer to develop a comprehensive picture of the biology of lung cancers in non-smokers.

Looking at the genetics and the related proteins produced by cancer cells in the tumour samples, the team found that some early-stage lung tumours in non-smokers were biologically similar to more advanced disease in smokers.

Tumours in females typically had a defect in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene, whereas in men the most common mutations were in the KRAS (Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue) and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) genes. The team suggested this could cause the two sexes to respond differently to treatments.

The study also identified a pattern of genetic changes involving the APOBEC (apolipoprotein B mRNA editing catalytic polypeptide-like)gene family in 75 percent of tumours in female patients under the age of 60 and 100 percent of with no mutation in the EGFR gene.

APOBEC proteins play an important role in the function of the immune system but can be hijacked by cancers to speed up their evolution, which can expedite the development of drug resistance. According to the team, patients without EGFR defects tend to respond better to immunotherapy and suggest that testing for APOBEC could help identify women more likely to respond.

Finally, the team identified 65 proteins that were overactive in the tumours that could be targeted by existing drug candidates.

While the new study included patients treated in Taiwan, the researchers believe that many of their findings could be applicable to UK patients. They will be validating their findings in larger studies and beyond Asia.

Dr Jyoti Choudhary, Team Leader in Functional Proteomics at ICR, UK, said: We carried out the most comprehensive study ever conducted into the biology of lung cancers in an East-Asian population with a high proportion of non-smokers and found that their disease is molecularly diverse and distinct from what we classically see in smokers.

We observed distinct patterns of genetic faults in non-smokers and between women and men, which suggest that a woman who has never smoked, for example, is likely to respond differently to treatment than a male smoker.

Dr Emily Armstrong, Research Information Manager at Cancer Research UK, said: In order to beat cancer, we need to understand all the ways it can develop Understanding the difference between lung cancers in smokers and non-smokers could be vital for providing patients with the most appropriate treatment.

Scientists have identified a population of cells within glioblastomas from which all other cancerous cells within the tumour arise. They suggested that targeting these glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) could be a potent future treatment option.

Tumour heterogeneity, or the genetic variation of tumour cells, is one reason why brain cancers can be resistant to treatments. After a treatment, resistant cells remain and subsequently repopulate the tumour.

In a new study, researchers identified a cancer cell hierarchy, indicating that each cell originates from a single cancer cell type, coined glioblastoma stem cells by the team. They suggested that targeting these cells with drug interventions could therefore slow cancer growth.

The team began by sequencing the RNA from 55,000 glioblastoma cells and 20,000 normal brain cells. They identified five main cancer cell types within each tumour and found that these are similar to cell types found within the human brain.

One cell type described was a progenitor GSC, a cell type from which all other glioblastoma cells would develop. They further showed that there was a cellular hierarchical organisation to the cancer that originates from progenitor GSCs.

According to the team, GSCs divided at a faster rate than the mature cancer cells. In fact, they made up most of the dividing cells within the tumour, despite making up a relatively small proportion of the cells within the whole tumour. These rapidly dividing cells are the earliest detectable cancer cells in the hierarchy, suggesting they are a promising target for therapy.

The researchers identified that molecular vulnerabilities of the progenitor GSCs and targeted them in experiments. They found that progenitor GSC survival and proliferation decreased as a result of these interventions and that in pre-clinical disease models, this reduced tumour growth and increased survival of the animals.

Our work has gone a long way to resolve the complexity of glioblastoma heterogeneity and provides a new framework to reconsider the nature of glioblastoma, explained research leader, Dr Kevin Petrecca, a neurosurgeon and brain cancer researcher at The Neuro (Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital) of McGill University, part of the McGill University Health Centre in Canada. As part of this work, our study also shows, in contrast to decades long dogma, that glioblastoma stem cells are the most rapidly dividing cancer cells in the tumour, and we identified new ways to target these cells. There is still much work to be done. Understanding how these cancer cells interact with the cancer microenvironment is not well understood in this disease, but this study serves as a good starting point to begin to understand how glioblastoma originates and evolves prior to treatments.

This study was published in Nature Communications.

Scientists have identified AVIL as an oncogene responsible for glioblastoma, the deadliest brain tumour. According to the researchers, the discovery offers a promising new treatment target for this cancer, as this gene is vital to the survival of glioblastoma cancer cells.

Glioblastoma is one of the most deadly cancers. Unfortunately, there is no effective treatment option for the disease, said researcher Dr Hui Li, of the University of Virginia School of Medicine and the UVA Cancer Centers Department of Pathology, both US. The novel oncogene we discovered promises to be an Achilles heel of glioblastoma, with its specific targeting potentially an effective approach for the treatment of the disease.

In this study, Li and colleagues identified AVIL, a gene that is typically involved in cells maintaining their size and shape, as an oncogene that can cause cancer cells to form and spread.

In their experiments, blocking AVIL destroyed glioblastoma cells within mice, but had no effect on healthy tissue. The team concluded that therapies targeting this gene are likely to be highly effective and selective.

AVIL is overexpressed in 100 percent of glioblastoma cells and clinical samples, and is expressed at even higher levels in so-called glioblastoma stem cells, but hardly expressed in normal cells and tissues, said Li. Silencing the gene wiped out glioblastoma cells in culture and prevented animal xenografts, while having no effect on normal control cells. Clinically, high AVIL expression correlates with worse patient outcomes. These findings and classic transformation assays proved AVIL being a bona fide oncogene.

The researchers said that the AVIL gene plays a critical role in glioblastoma development and survival. Li added that the strategy they used to identify this oncogene, studying a structural variant identified in a paediatric cancer, could be used to identify other genes driving other adult cancers.

The paper was published in Nature Communications.

Link:

Five developments in oncology targets - Drug Target Review

How Neurotechnology Market Will Dominate In Coming Years? Report Covering Products, Financial Information, Developments, Swot Analysis And Strategies…

Up Market Research (UMR) has published a latest market research report on Global Neurotechnology Market. The global report is prepared in collaboration with the leading industry experts and dedicated research analyst team to provide an enterprise with in-depth market insights and help them to take crucial business decisions. This report covers current market trends, opportunities, challenges, and detailed competitive analysis of the industry players in the market.

The published report explains about the current supply and demand scenario and presents the future outlook of the market in a detailed manner. Up Market Research (UMR) has applied a robust market research methodology to bestow the new entrants and emerging players with 360 wide-view analysis on the latest advancements and their impacts on the market. It has congregated massive amount of data on the key segments of the market in an easy to understand format. The research report has laid out the numbers and figures in a comprehensive manner with the help of graphical and pictorial representation which embodies more clarity on the market.

You can buy this complete report @ https://www.upmarketresearch.com/buy/neurotechnology-market

Report Covers Impacts of COVID-19 to the market.

The on-going pandemic has overhauled various facets of the market. This research report provides the financial impacts and market disturbance on the Neurotechnology market. It also includes analysis on the potential lucrative opportunities and challenges in the foreseeable future. Up Market Research (UMR) has interviewed various delegates of the industry and got involved in the primary and secondary research to confer the clients with information and strategies to fight against the market challenges amidst and after COVID-19 pandemic.

Market Segmentation:

Few of the companies that are covered in the report.

General ElectricSiemens HealthcareKoninklijke PhilipsToshiba MedicalShimadzuHitachi MedicalElektaTristan TechnologiesAllengers MedicalNatus MedicalMagstim

Note: Additional companies can be included in the list upon the request.

By Product Type:

Imaging ModalitiesNeurostimulationCranial Surface MeasurementNeurological ImplantsOthers

By Applications:

HospitalsClinicsDiagnostic CentersAmbulatory Surgical Centers

By Geographical Location:Asia Pacific: China, Japan, India, and Rest of Asia PacificEurope: Germany, the UK, France, and Rest of EuropeNorth America: The US, Mexico, and CanadaLatin America: Brazil and Rest of Latin AmericaMiddle East & Africa: GCC Countries and Rest of Middle East & Africa

Exclusive Free Sample Report @ https://www.upmarketresearch.com/home/requested_sample/18826

The research report provides a detailed analysis of the prominent player in the market, products, applications, and regional analysis which also include impacts of government policies in the market. Moreover, you can sign up for the yearly updates on the Neurotechnology market.

7 Reasons for Buying Neurotechnology Market Report

If you have any query regarding the report, ask our experts: @ https://www.upmarketresearch.com/home/enquiry_before_buying/18826

Below is the TOC of the report:

About Up Market Research (UMR)

Up Market Research (UMR) has an extensive experience in the creation of tailored market research reports in several industry verticals. We cover in-depth market analysis which include producing creative business strategies for the new entrants and the emerging players of the market. We take care that our every report goes through intensive primary, secondary research, interviews, and consumer surveys. Our company provide market threat analysis, market opportunity analysis, and deep insights on the current and market scenario.

To provide the utmost quality of report, we invest in analysts that holds stellar experience in business domain and has excellent analytical and communication skills. Our dedicated team goes through quarterly training which helps them to acknowledge the latest industry practices and to serve the clients with foremost consumer experience.

Contact Info UpMarketResearchName Alex MathewsEmail [emailprotected]Website https://www.upmarketresearch.comAddress 500 East E Street, Ontario, CA 91764, United States.

More:

How Neurotechnology Market Will Dominate In Coming Years? Report Covering Products, Financial Information, Developments, Swot Analysis And Strategies...

MOBILE BIOMETRICS MARKET TRENDS, TECHNOLOGY AND FORECAST | BY TOP COMPANIES APPLE INC.; IDEMIA; NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; NEC CORPORATION – Market…

Details about the market drivers and market restraints included in thisMOBILE BIOMETRICSreport helps understand whether the demand of the products in ICT industry will rise or get lower. Qualitative and transparent research studies are performed devotedly to offer you the excellent market research report for your niche. The report is accomplished with transparent research studies and is generated by a team work of experts in their own domain. The market studies, insights and analysis carried out in this MOBILE BIOMETRICS market research report keeps marketplace clearly into the focus which helps achieve business goal.

Download Mobile Biometrics Research Report in PDF Brochure@ (Note: Kindly use your business/corporate email id to get priority):https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/request-a-sample/?dbmr=global-mobile-biometrics-market

Global mobile biometrics market is expected to register a healthy CAGR of 27.29% in the forecast period of 2019-2026. The report contains data from the base year of 2018 and the historic year of 2017.

Research strategies and tools used of Mobile Biometrics Market:

This Mobile Biometrics market research report helps the readers to know about the overall market scenario, strategy to further decide on this market project. It utilizes SWOT analysis, Porters Five Forces Analysis and PEST analysis.

Details Key Players of Mobile Biometrics Market -:

The report incorporates key player profiles along with the information of the strategies they are adopting to remain ahead in the competition.

List of few players are-:Apple Inc.; IDEMIA; Nuance Communications, Inc.; NEC Corporation; Precise Biometrics AB; Gemalto NV; BIO-key: FUJITSU; ImageWare Systems, Inc.; BioEnable Technologies Pvt. Ltd; Applied Recognition, Inc.; Cognitec Systems GmbH; Fulcrum Biometrics, LLC; Neurotechnology; M2SYS Technology Kernell Inc.; VoicePIN.com Sp. z o.o.; Verint VoiceVault Voice Authentication; Aware, Inc.; Mobbeel; Veridium Ltd.; Fingerprint Cards; ValidSoft; Egis Technology Inc.; Shenzhen Goodix Technology Co., Ltd.; Synaptics Incorporated and Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. among others.

Drivers & Restraints of Mobile Biometrics Market-:

Market Drivers:

Significant rise in demand for electronic verification solutions; this factor is expected to boost the growth of the market

Market Restraints:

Requirement of additional components and software integration for the successful deployment of this technology is also expected to restrict the growth of the market

Several market drivers, market restraints, along with opportunities and challenges are taken into consideration under market overview which gives valuable insights to businesses for taking right actions. Businesses can surely rely upon this first-class market report to accomplish an utter success.

Breakdown of Mobile Biometrics Market-:

The Mobile Biometrics market report performs segmentation which is done on the basis of type, end-user, and manufacturers and applications to fully and deeply research and reveal market profile and prospects.

Global Mobile Biometrics Market By Component (Hardware, Software), Authentication Mode (Single-Factor Authentication, Multi-Factor Authentication), Application (Access Control, Mobile Banking/Payment, Authentication, Others), Industry (Consumer Electronics, Healthcare, Finance & Banking, Travel & Immigration, Government/Law Enforcement & Forensic, Military & Defense, Others)

Regional Insights-

Regional analysis helps the market players to take an exhaustive assessment of the Mobile Biometrics market region wise so that it becomes easy for them to distinguish and investigate the developing pattern and hidden opportunities all over the world.

Regional Coverage of the Market

South America

North America

Middle east and Africa

Asia and Pacific region

Europe

Table of Contents Major Key Points

Part 01: Mobile Biometrics Market OverviewPart 02: Manufacturers ProfilesPart 03: Global Mobile Biometrics Market Competition, by PlayersPart 04: Global Mobile Biometrics Market Size by RegionsPart 05: North America Mobile Biometrics Revenue by CountriesPart 06: Europe Mobile Biometrics Revenue by CountriesPart 07: Asia-Pacific Mobile Biometrics Revenue by CountriesPart 08: South America Mobile Biometrics Revenue by CountriesPart 09: Middle East and Africa Revenue Mobile Biometrics by Countries

Continued.

New Business Strategies, Challenges & Policies are mentioned in Table of Content, Request Detailed[emailprotected]https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/toc/?dbmr=global-mobile-biometrics-market

Report synopsis

To analyze the market size of the market and infer the key trends from it.

Industry Chain Suppliers of Mobile Biometrics market with Contact Information

Historical, current and projected market size in terms of volume and value

In-depth market segmentation

Comprehensive quantitative analysis of the industry is provided for the period of 2018-2025 to assist stakeholders to capitalize on the prevailing market opportunities.

Buy[emailprotected]https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/checkout/buy/enterprise/global-mobile-biometrics-market

Yes, Report can be customized to meet the clients requirements. Please connect with us ([emailprotected]), we will ensure that you get a report that suits your needs.

About Data Bridge Market Research:

An absolute way to forecast what future holds is to comprehend the trend today!Data Bridge set forth itself as an unconventional and neoteric Market research and consulting firm with unparalleled level of resilience and integrated approaches. We are determined to unearth the best market opportunities and foster efficient information for your business to thrive in the market.

Contact:

US: +1 888 387 2818

UK: +44 208 089 1725

Hong Kong: +852 8192 7475

[emailprotected]

Continue reading here:

MOBILE BIOMETRICS MARKET TRENDS, TECHNOLOGY AND FORECAST | BY TOP COMPANIES APPLE INC.; IDEMIA; NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.; NEC CORPORATION - Market...

You get 2 choices for president. That’s it. – Action News Now

There's been a lot of news, but I want to focus today on an argument made by Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan that I think is worth exploring for its complete and total wrongness.

Hogan is a pretty remarkable politician -- a Republican popular in a blue state, he has not been afraid to call out the Trump administration.

He's got a new book out about his fight with cancer and in it he describes Trump administration Cabinet members (he doesn't say which ones) suggesting he should run against President Donald Trump this year. He considered it but didn't, ultimately.

Who does he support for president? But what I want to address here is how Hogan is treating the question of whether he'll support Trump this fall. He's done variations of this in a few interviews, including with CNN's Jake Tapper on Sunday.

TAPPER: You didn't vote for President Trump in 2016. You have consistently criticized his approach to governing. A few days ago, you told "The Dispatch" podcast you probably will not endorse him before the election. Who do you think is a better person to lead the US through this very difficult time, Joe Biden or Donald Trump?

HOGAN: Well, I think I'm just going to let the American people make that decision. The election is 100 days away. I think early voting starts in 60 days or less. So we're getting very close for the American people to make that decision. I think, quite frankly, a lot of people, like me, are frustrated with the divisiveness and dysfunction on both sides and don't feel like we have two great choices.

That idea is true. A lot of Democrats who supported other people in their primaries probably aren't too excited about Joe Biden. And a lot of Americans are probably concerned that Democrats are moving too far to the left even as they're frightened by Trump.

But Hogan went a bit further in an interview with the conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt:

"I mean, there's, there are other choices. I didn't make that choice between Hillary and Donald Trump the first time. I did a write-in for my dad, who I had a lot of respect for and who we could probably touch on with your Nixon background there. But, you know, it's, it's not a black or white decision."

Technically speaking, he's correct. You can write someone in or pick one of the other presidential candidates who will likely appear on your ballot. The Green Party has Howie Hawkins. The Libertarians have Jo Jorgensen. Neither of them are going to be president.

But he's also totally wrong. And this is where Hogan veers into politician-speak silliness. Your 2020 vote is entirely a black-and-white decision.

If you support Trump, he needs your help. A series of CNN battleground state polls out this weekend show the President trailing in three states he won in 2016, including Florida, which no successful Republican presidential candidate has lost in 96 years. Since Calvin Coolidge.

If you don't support Trump, you'd better vote that way. Because he's on the ballot and despite those polls, you might end up with four more years of him.

That's about as binary a decision as it's possible to have. Barring unforeseen calamity, either Donald Trump or Joe Biden will take the oath of office on January 20 at noon. It will not be Larry Hogan's father, who died in 1975.

The subtext of Hogan, a Republican, not vocally supporting Trump is that he opposes Trump but he doesn't want to turn off all the Republicans who do. Hogan has this luxury since he's the governor of a state that will almost certainly cast its electoral votes for Biden. And he'll be reminding everyone of that if he runs for president in 2024!

But the effect of Hogan's words is the idea that it doesn't matter which candidate wins and that another option is worth considering. The time for other options, in the electoral system that's grown up around us, was during primary season.

There are plenty of people arguing the US electoral system needs changes. Those aren't going to happen before November 3.

R or D for 150 years. It is a fact of American life that the two parties have held a death grip on the White House since the Civil War. And they'll keep it unless or until the entire system is changed.

The parties have beaten back Populists, Progressives, Socialists, Dixiecrats and Independents. They've humbled Teddy Roosevelt, Eugene Debs, Strom Thurmond, George Wallace and Ross Perot. Would-be moderate independent Howard Schultz's campaign never even formally launched this year.

The last non-major-party electoral votes were a very long time ago. Despite offering frustrating options, the major parties have only gotten more dominant. Nobody but a Republican or a Democrat has gotten any electoral votes at all in more than 50 years, since Wallace, promising to keep segregation, won five Southern states in 1968.

Change agents run in party primaries. The power the parties hold over the US system is why Bernie Sanders, who isn't a Democrat, ran as a Democrat two times. It's why Ron Paul ran as a Republican twice. It's why Trump, who hasn't always been a Republican, ran as a Republican in 2016. Recall that he dabbled with a Reform Party run in 2000 only to realize there was no path to victory.

In November, until the country changes the system, it's R or D at the presidential level.

A bad year for a protest vote. Presidential candidates try to sell every presidential election as the most important one ever, but this certainly carries some real-time importance.

Set aside the more political divisions of Trump's presidency:

Focusing only on his stewardship of the country in the midst of pandemic:

Americans have seen, under Trump and during the pandemic, that who sits in the Oval Office actually does have a bearing on daily life. And for that reason, in 2020, there are no other choices.

See the original post:

You get 2 choices for president. That's it. - Action News Now

Coronavirus, Brexit and climate change threaten food security for millions in the UK – Sky News

A Minister for Food Security is urgently needed to deal with the threat posed by COVID-19, Brexit and climate change, according to a cross-party group of MPs.

Millions of people have struggled to access food as a result of the coronavirus pandemic, with the number of food bank users doubling during lockdown.

The Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee warns that food insecurity is "likely to get worse before it gets better" because of risks including a second wave of coronavirus cases, as well as potential disruption and delays to the food supply system as a result of a "disorderly Brexit".

The committee analysed the government's response to the disruption to food supplies caused by COVID-19.

Although committee chair Neil Parish said the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs response was "commendable" once the pandemic hit, the report questions why the government appeared unprepared for disruptions - such as supermarket shortages due to increased demand - which other countries had experienced when they went into lockdown before the UK.

Increased buying was not a result of "panic", according to the committee, but "a reasonable and predictable response to the expectation that more meals would need to be eaten at home".

Mr Parish said despite the easing of lockdown "problems with food security are far from over".

He added: "Food banks and other food redistribution organisations have reacted heroically to a shocking spike in demand for food aid, but this problem is likely to get worse before it gets better.

"It is therefore essential that the government appoints a new minister for food security who will stop this issue falling between the cracks.

"The government's actions to lock down the country and close businesses were necessary, but they had huge impacts on the food sector and on food security."

:: Listen to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

The report also highlighted issues with the voucher scheme for free school meals. Initially the vouchers could be used at supermarkets like Waitrose and M&S but not at Aldi or Lidl, which the report said was "out of touch with the reality of where families were likely to shop".

Around 4.9 million adults and 1.7 million children are currently facing food insecurity in the UK, according to the committee, which the UN defines as a lack of physical and economic access to sufficient and nutritious food.

The cross-party group is asking the government to consult on whether a 'right to food' should be put in legislation.

A government spokesperson said: "[we have] invested record levels of funding to help people get the food they need.

"Our COVID-19 task force has also brought together expertise across government to tackle the extraordinary circumstances of this pandemic and ensure those most vulnerable in our society are protected."

View original post here:

Coronavirus, Brexit and climate change threaten food security for millions in the UK - Sky News

Brexiteer exposes heavy restraints the EU had over the UK – ‘EU rules come crashing down!’ – Daily Express

Former Labour MP Frank Field argued European Union rules on free movement resulted in carers' wages being kept low in the UK. While speaking to Brexit Watch with Jonathan Saxty, the Brexiteer insisted it was important the UK was free to correct the negative effects the EU had on Britain. Mr Field also called for mass reform to the care sector after Brexit at the end of the year.

Mr Field said: "We will not ever be able to do justice for carers in this country until we have left the European Union and we can control our borders.

"For decades now it has been obvious that Britain is an ageing population.

"Therefore, other things being equal, we would have seen a very significant rise in the wages of carers as demand went up.

"This increase in demand was totally neutered by being part of the European Union with the free movement of labour.

DON'T MISS:Report to Remainer Sadiq Khan - Brexit BIGGER risk than coronavirus

"This meant that people just came into this country and filled those vacancies at current wage rates rather than pushing them higher."

Mr Field argued the importance of reforming the care industry and its importance in post-coronavirus Britain.

He said: "What I very much hope for the Government's reform is they integrate the NHS and social care and that we commit ourselves to a higher minimum wage for the sector of care.

"We would move away from having a single national minimum wage to having wages pushed up further in certain areas, like with caring.

"This is so we can reward people better and we will be able to do so because of the higher minimum wage rates for that sector will not be attracting people from the EU under the free movement rules.

"The simple reason being those rules come crashing down as well.

"We will be in a position for the very first time to start delivering seriously a proper wage for those carers that look after so many of us at the end of our lives.

"Leaving the European Union at the end of the year allows us from January 1 onwards to have a proper wage policy.

READ MORE:

Guy Verhofstadts cynical plot to see Brexit Britain suffer exposed[ANALYSIS]EU has NO future! Verhofstadt triggers backlash[INSIGHT]Brexit LIVE: EU breaks silence with scathing attack on UK[LIVE BLOG]

"We will be able to increase real salaries for care workers as of January next year."

Brexit trade deal talks between the UK and EU have so far proven unsuccessful.

Michel Barnier last week claimed that a deal was looking less likely as he admitted to not making much progress with the UK.

However, UK Brexit negotiator David Frost claimed that a deal could be reached by the end of the year if the EU realised the UK would not sacrifice its sovereignty for a trade deal.

Visit link:

Brexiteer exposes heavy restraints the EU had over the UK - 'EU rules come crashing down!' - Daily Express