Coaches weigh merits of Red Raider mascot – Cape Cod Times

Tim Grace grew up playing ice hockey for Barnstable High School. He took pride in every aspect of the program, from the players to the coaches to the games. Hes tried to instill that same passion in his players since he became the head coach in 2015, right down to the Red Raider nickname.

Red Raiders means a lot to me, Grace said. I played my high school career as a Red Raider and graduated a Red Raider.

Grace, his players and the rest of the Barnstable athletic community could find themselves playing under a new nickname when the 2020-21 school year gets underway. A petition spearheaded by current and former BHS students in late June requested a change to the nickname, which some consider offensive to Native Americans.

The Barnstable School Committee on Wednesday will discuss potentially dropping it.

There are some people that obviously are very nostalgic about the pride and years of competing under a certain mascot, Barnstable athletic director Scott Thomas said. But then, were also being sensitive to issues that are prevalent in our society today.

Should the committee vote for a change, it will find general, but not universal, support among the coaching staff. Every head coach from Barnstables last three competitive seasons (spring and fall 2019, winter 2019-20) was contacted, and the majority of respondents said it was time for a change.

I think these are concerns, not complaints, and are absolutely valid, said Tom Turco, Barnstables girls volleyball coach and the schools longest-tenured varsity head coach. The pride is in playing for and representing Barnstable. The same drive and desire of the Barnstable athletic community, to be the best possible athlete, coach and team, will not in any way change.

Grace said hed prefer to keep the nickname he grew up with, but if our name is, in fact, offending a group of people, then, yes, we should change our name. Several other coaches shared Graces reaction, that the nickname should be changed if it offends people.

Anytime theres a group of people that speak out, then theres definitely validity behind it, Barnstable football and girls basketball coach Ross Jatkola said.

A minority of coaches were firmly against the change.

Its time that we put aside our political correctness and get real about dealing with whats important to the majority of the student body and not a few that are offended, girls tennis head coach Lou Giglio said.

Changing nicknames might have big implications for the school, but perhaps not as much actual impact on players day-to-day lives. Grace said his teams helmets bear a Red Raiders sticker, but the uniform just says Barnstable.

We identify ourselves as the Red Raider baseball program, but on the field refer to ourselves as the Raiders, baseball coach Dave Fouracre said. If a mascot name is offensive to a race, a culture or a particular group of people, then it is my belief that it should be changed.

Multiple coaches said their teams rarely refer to themselves by the full nickname Red Raiders during practices or competitions. Jatkola said his football team sometimes calls its field Red Raider Beach, but he tends to simply use Raider in plays.

We haven't used Red Raider in a long time, field hockey coach Ashley Bishop said. Weve used Raiders or Barnstable or Stable for as many years as I've been coaching.

Turco said his volleyball uniforms also have Barnstable written on them, but no reference to the nickname. His preferred cheer is Lets go Red, but thats a reference to the school color, similar to the University of Michigans Go Blue.

When I think of red, I think of the actual color of the uniforms, Jatkola said. I dont think it was ever intentionally used (here) to describe a skin tone or anything like that. Its just been the color of the uniforms and the school colors.

The petition demanding the change, among other educational reforms, had over 1,700 signatures on change.org as of Thursday afternoon. It comes amid national conversations surrounding racism, cultural appropriation and minority representation.

The NFLs Washington franchise officially dropped its Redskins nickname earlier this month.

Thomas said he received occasional calls in previous years asking Barnstable to change its name, but nothing as organized as this.

Its definitely on everybodys mind, Thomas said. I definitely dont want to disrespect anyone.

Barnstables athletic department already has undergone several changes to its iconography over the years. The schools logo used to be a Native American face, but has since changed to a red letter B with attached feathers, though that face still appears on redraiderpride.com, the schools athletic archive.

The Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe has for years been against using Native American imagery or terminology for athletic teams. Cedric Cromwell, the tribes council chairman, signed a January 2019 letter to the Massachusetts Senate Committee on Ways and Means requesting legislation prohibiting Native American mascots and nicknames. The tribal council in 1995 unanimously voted to condemn such uses.

Itll be an adjustment, because well have to change logos and names, but if its an issue and its something that offends people, it should be changed, said Casey Proto, a rising senior and baseball player at Barnstable. Obviously, it can mean something thats derogatory.

Changing nicknames could also allow Barnstable to find a more unique mascot. Many other Massachusetts high schools have used the nickname Red Raider, including Lowell, Melrose and North Quincy.

Suggested new nicknames from coaches included Red Hawk and Pride. The red hawk would allow Barnstable to maintain the feathered B logo it currently uses, while Pride refers to the school slogan of Pride, honor, respect.

There is a red-tailed hawk that flies around campus all the time, boys tennis coach Mike Sarney said. We should have a nickname/mascot that everyone can be proud of.

More:

Coaches weigh merits of Red Raider mascot - Cape Cod Times

Temporary sign coming to Slaves Burying Ground in Orient – Suffolk Times

Oysterponds Historical Society will place a new sign at the site of a supposed slave burial ground on Narrow River Road in Orient. But they will not put back the sign that had previously been there for decades.

The societys Board of Trustees has decided to install a new sign, probably within the next two weeks, that will state what the society is doing to determine the actual history of the site, which decades of oral history have said is the burial ground of members of the Tuthill family and their servants.

We have a clear view not to put back the original sign, said Bob Hanlon, president of the societys board. We want to understand what this site is, and we will put up a temporary sign explaining what we are doing.

Last month, the society removed a marker that had been at the site since the early 1950s. It then formed a working group to research slavery and indentured servitude in Orient and East Marion. The removal met with sharp criticism from a number of Orient residents, many of them from so-called old families whose ancestors first settled in the area in the 1600s.

In a long Guest Spot column published by The Suffolk Times earlier this month, those residents said the sign should be returned to the site, saying the society erred in removing it without consulting the community. The tone of the column was that the old sign reflected accepted local history and should not have been tampered with.

The original marker said the ground around it was the burial spot for members of the Tuthill family and their servants, a benign euphemism for enslaved people who could be bought and sold. While criticized by some as a way to erase history, the society said in fact it wanted to dig deeper and try and determine who these individuals were and what became of them.

In an interview, Mr. Hanlon said that marker will not go back but a picture of the old sign will be part of the temporary new sign.

Mr. Hanlon said records will be thoroughly researched to determine exactly what is at the site. He said ground penetrating radar might be used to determine the number of graves there and whether there is truth to longstanding community rumors that the site might have been a traditional African burial ground.

Once we learn what we can, he said, then a new sign will go up. The old sign will remain in our collection The argument by some that we are destroying history, covering up history or caving in to [political correctness] is not so. We are simply looking to find out the truth. We are a historical society, not a political arm. Our job is history.

There were certainly slaves here in the 1600s. We are going about this with a totally open mind, and we will treat this ground with the respect it deserves, he added.

Some Orient residents who strongly opposed removing the old sign say the temporary one is a poor solution to the problem. In an email Tuesday, a spokesman for the group, Dick Leslie, said: This is the first we have heard of any specifics about the temporary sign. The Buildings and Grounds Committee of OHS has not been consulted on this. The majority of the new Working Group on this issue has not been consulted. This is not what transparency and community consultation looks like. Who at OHS drafted the language on the new sign? Has it been approved by the Board of Trustees ?

If the original sign was so offensive why would OHS erect a sign with a photo of the original? Is this a bizarre joke? Since this episode began almost two months ago the cemetery remains an unkempt mess. It is overgrown with brush and trees, the gate unrepaired and unpainted. OHS should concentrate on preserving the eight buildings under its jurisdiction and get out of the cemetery business.

View original post here:

Temporary sign coming to Slaves Burying Ground in Orient - Suffolk Times

Anarchy and annihilation are running amok – New Europe

Americans have buried George Floyd. Yet, the funeral did not end the ongoing protests, demonstrations, and riots. There have been casualties. The chaos has led to the destruction of local businesses, public administration buildings, and our cultural heritage.

It is time to reflect on what has been going on and to learn our lessons. We are dealing with a complex issue and our conclusions will be no different. It is not a black and white picture, no pun intended. Still, some are tempted to take shortcuts and deal with the cops in haste and to make an example out of them. Any decisions leading to defunding or even dismantling local the police forces may bring about anarchy.

The brutal truth is that Floyds case was not exceptional. Last year alone, 1,100 people died because of violence. Most of them were white and they were either beat up to death or shot dead. In addition, 150 police officers die in the United States each year. Therefore, the numbers do not give us clear-cut answers or a black and white picture. Any attempts of a deeper analysis of what happened or inquiries into Floyds past are met with hysterical knee-jerk reactions. There is no room for a rational discussion.

Are other places free of such problems though? Poland still remembers the death of Igor Stachowiak, who died in police custody. French streets have been taken over by violent clashes with yellow vests. A few years ago, we witnessed the brutality of the debates over the future of Catalonia. Every once in a while, German fascists, anti-fascists or alter-globalists awe us with their own street debates.

As a result, Europe is in no position to preach to the United States. Should anyone wish to insist on having the moral high ground, they should be reminded of Europes vast and long imperial and colonial past. I am writing these words in Brussels with a view of the statue of Leopold II, the Butcher of the Congo.

Another sad truth we must face is that we will never be entirely free of racist and xenophobic incidents. They have to be limited to a minimum and always be met with an adequate response from our societies and governments. What I mean by that, is a reaction that is suitable and balanced. What that entails is a peaceful demonstration and a due process of law. Hijacking protests by politically loaded issues is not justified. Unfortunately, all sorts of excluded, scandalised, offended, and dissatisfied groups that contest our social and international order tend to jump on the demonstration bandwagon.

Common thieves and criminals also blend into the crowd. The tendency to justify violence, theft and destruction of property by the liberal media is appalling. Racial tensions intertwine with economic issues. Recently, the latter has deepened due to the pandemic, and the US has been hit particularity hard. Problems of such high degree of complexity will not be solved overnight. Hastened administrative decisions only lead to more anarchy.

Unfortunately, one-size-fits-all type of solutions have been emerging for years. They have been driven by noble ideas of promoting tolerance and equal rights for everyone, including all minorities. Political correctness and affirmative action are among such policies.

The former was intended to rid the contemporary political discourse of hate speech, negative stereotypes, labelling, and shaming. It was to eradicate racist, xenophobic, sexist, and homophobic attitudes. Those were the goals. Instead, it led to the creation of doublespeak, which tends to be even more harmful due to its more sophisticated way of humiliating minorities.

I will spare you any examples. Just watch a couple of stand-up comedians on TV. In many cases, the newspeak is a mockery in itself and it simply boosts the popularity of the original term. In a complete frenzy, new phrases are being blacklisted, as they are supposedly related to slavery. Books, motion pictures, and monuments also fall victim to the self-righteous wave of censorship aimed to distort our collective memory.

Affirmative actions goal was to promote minorities access to education and social mobility by the application of quotas. What it led to were promotions that had no basis on merit. It is a common opinion in the United States that due to affirmative action a lot of people get promoted as soon as they can prove their heart is still beating. I was able to witness it first hand in the 1980s while I was a political immigrant from the progressive Eastern Bloc.

Unfortunately, privileges such as those based on a working-class or a peasant family background in Communist Poland do not lead to equality. So the question becomes how do we promote equality without granting minorities unfair privileges? Despite negative experiences with social engineering, the liberal left keeps marching on in that direction. Political correctness has also found its way into the world of science and art. Prestigious prizes tend to be granted based on PC criteria in order to appease discontent. Celebrity circles have been dominated by all sorts of minorities too.

This all leads to a distorted vision of history and reality. Try watching a contemporary TV series on Europes history and compare it to what you can learn from textbooks and from works of art. Do the scripts tell the stories the way they happened? Do actors looks and gestures portray the reality of the days past? Or are we being served a sort of virtual reality based on the wishes of todays social and ideological engineers?

The recent demons of extremism are bound to -and they do- inspire a pushback. In some cases, the recoil is soft in its nature and a moderate New York Times journalist will simply resign. In other cases, it is much more uncompromising. President Donald Trump has called certain liberal circles left-wing fascists and some politicians even go as far as to call for a military intervention in areas taken over by protesters.

To sum up, I would like to underline the fact that our civilisation was founded on the canons of Greek philosophy and democracy, the Roman legal and administrative system, and the Christian work ethic and family values. Our civilisation seeks compromise when dealing with complex problem-solving. The protests have been running amok and they increasingly resemble anarchy. As a result, our civilisation is facing attempts of annihilation.

In my opinion, it is our civilisation, rooted in Greek, Roman and Christian values that matters! It is our duty to defend it from the dictatorship of extreme minorities, who are fighting for unjustified privileges disguised as equality.

More:

Anarchy and annihilation are running amok - New Europe

Gapp tries to stand out in crowded GOP field – Kingsport Times News

By HANK HAYES

ROGERSVILLE Knoxville physician Josh Gapp is trying to stand out in a crowded 1st Congressional District Republican field that stands with President Trump and is pro-life.

We have a lot of great candidates and they are running on conservative principles, Gapp said during a stop at Hawkins County Republican headquarters.

I think Im probably further to the right. Theres a couple of key areas that matter to the people. One is this culture war thats been thrown at our feet. It stems from political correctness. That was the aha that got me out from underneath my microscope. The fabric of our country is being torn apart by political correctness. I am standing up to it. The other thing I think is important is Im an outsider. Ive never run for political office before. This is a project of passion for me.

Gapp addressed these questions:

If elected, what is your plan for the district?

Theres a couple key issues that we need to face. The key issues right now are this political correctness run amok. We cant have Black Lives Matter coming in and disrupting our communities. This COVID crisis, weve got to figure out a way to get the economy back up safe and secure for everybody. We cant afford as a country to have everything shut down. We need to get back open. President Trump was doing a wonderful job with the economy prior to this COVID. Weve got to get back to that.

How is the COVID crisis going to affect the Republican primary?

COVID is making it difficult to meet people in person. Weve done a lot of digital things. Weve done a lot of virtual events to make up for it. Were trying to talk to as many people as we can. I think theres enough motivation now that the vote wont be suppressed. I think its going to be a high turnout and people will go to the polls regardless of COVID.

Do you favor a second economic stimulus?

This is a tough one. It depends on what happens in the next couple of months.

If we shut down the economy again, then we absolutely need to do that. If we can keep the economy from fully shutting down, I think theres enough pent-up demand in the economy that we can let people get back to work and places open back up. The economy isnt shut down because of market forces. Its this exterior thing that is going on with COVID. The economy wants to jump. It wants to run.

Early voting has begun in the August GOP primary.

A Democrat hasnt been elected to the 1st Congressional District seat since the 19th century.

See more here:

Gapp tries to stand out in crowded GOP field - Kingsport Times News

Letters to the editor: July 29, 2020 | Letters To Editor – St. Louis Jewish Light

Funds urgentlyneeded for elections

For 125 years, National Council of Jewish Women-St. Louis has worked diligently to ensure nonpartisan voting rights for all, and the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted egregious deficiencies in Missouris voting system. While politicians of both parties argue about many things, democracy shouldnt be one of them. Experts estimate we need at least $4 billion to ensure that states can prepare for elections during the coronavirus. Without this necessary funding for election infrastructure, many voters will be disenfranchised and unable to vote.

Recently, Congress passed $400 million in election funding in the first stimulus bill, which is a start, but we have to go much further and pass the $3.6 billion that was allocated to ensure safe elections in the HEROES Act. Every voter needs safe and secure options to vote by mail, absentee, early and on election day. Missouri passed a law in June which will allow many more Missouri voters to vote absentee or by mail for the August and November elections. More funding is a necessity for hiring poll workers during COVID and implementing many other key reforms to ensure safe voting for all.

Its now up to the Senate to pass the additional $3.6 billion needed to be ready for our November elections. This funding is crucial for Missouri to have safe elections. NCJWSTL urges Sen. Roy Blunt, who is thechairman of the Senate Rules Committee, tomake this funding a priority. The people of Missouri should not have to choose between their health and their vote.

We urge everyone to contact Sen. Blunts office now to insist on fair and safe voting for all.

Andrea Powers Schankman and Debbie Gilula, NCJWSTL Voting Initiative Co-Chairs

COVID-19 and the start of the school year

Regarding the July 15 article, Doctor would greenlight day school opening this fall, with conditions. Stunned. I am stunned. With lives on the line, I think an actual list of conditions and in what context would be the only ethical way to convey the doctors opinion. While the question and answer format of the article is interesting, I am still trying to figure out the parameters that the article headline promises.

If I understand well what is being said.... Classrooms are no more dangerous than going to the grocery as well as looking to Australia and other countries where schools are in session...if they can do it, so can we.

Thats just not true. Our children have far more comorbidity issues than other countries that makes them far more susceptible to contracting COVID-19 (See CNBCs July 13 article, U.S. students are at higher risk from the coronavirus than kids in other countries, Dr. Scott Gottlieb says.)

For students and their families as well as school staff and their families to have the protection implied, each person and each scenario would have to be perfectly played out. There are so many moving parts that I submit, that the risk of infection and the spreading take just a handful of missteps.

Masks need to be worn and taken off perfectly. Hand hygiene, the same. Even if people do their best, they are human. We all are familiar with the two-second rule...or the five-second rule? If we can scoop up the piece of toast off the floor in under five seconds, its all good. No harm, no foul.

Now, imagine each parent, child and teacher applying their own five- second rule to life in school.

COVID-19 doesnt care about what anyone thinks. Unless we depend on science and not broad opinions from scientists, we will remain victims.

Lois Ockner,University City

Russian Americans in St. Louis: We dont want to be a silent majority

On July 11, a group of the Russian Americans in St. Louis got together to demonstrate their support for our police. These demonstrators, who gathered in front of the Olivette and Creve Coeur police departments, strongly oppose proposals to defund the police, and are aghast at the humiliation of police officers and the lawlessness that has ensued in our own and other American cities.

Many of us, who came to United States as the Jewish refugees 20, 30 or 40 years ago, watch with disbelief and horror at what is happening in todays America. The reality is that the grim past that the former Russians, Eastern Europeans, Chinese, Koreans and Cubans left behind for a better future for their families has become a reality right here and now. Unfortunately, the bloody and tragic history of those countries that became socialist and fell victims of Marxist-Leninist ideology, is not an antidote to those who organize lawless riots and what I would describe as a pogrom in a Jewish neighborhood of Los Angeles.

We know too well, that compliance (called political correctness) leads to silencing, censorship and disappearance of free speech.

With disbelief we observe that many Jewish communities around the country, as well as Jewish papers and mass media, keep silent at worst or are meek at best when it comes to addressing the anti-Semitic destruction organized in Los Angeles this May during Shavuot. Instead of strong support for their Orthodox brothers and sisters, they express alliance with the Black Lives Matter movement, which I believe is anti-Semitic and anti-Israel. It seems that the long and tragic Jewish history has not been learned.

We former Soviet Jews cannot be a silent minority watching this great country face catastrophe as Russia and many others have. We cannot be silent watching great American history being attacked and monuments being destroyed by mob action or mob hysteria. And we cannot be silent when the police officers that keep American streets safe are humiliated.

Wake up, all ye who believe that the events of the Old World will turn out differently in the United States.

Lena Fish,St. Louis

Response to editorial

Regarding the June 19 editorial, Defund, Defend, Define highlighting the number of cases of police brutality that have occurred across the nation in the past several months.First allow me to say how deplorable I find these miscarriages of justice to be.

Having said that, however, the thought of defunding police departments entirely, or in great measure, is certainly not the answer and is counterproductive.

I can unequivocally say that the overwhelming majority of police officers in our nation do an exceptional job to serve and protect, and are the epitome of honesty, integrity and decency, putting their lives on the line for the public every day.

Unfortunately, there are those officers who fail miserably to uphold the highest standard and quality of law enforcement. These men and women must be weeded out and punished to the fullest extent of the law when they dishonor their badge and commit egregious crimes, which has occurred too often recently.

Police training needs to be upgraded and policies enforced vigorously so that law enforcement is the very best it can be while protecting the rights of all citizens. We are a nation of laws and must never lose sight of that hallowed and never-ending principle.

GeneCarton,University City

A misguided and disturbing commentary

Even though Marty Rochester is a friend and a colleague, his July 15 commentary (Let us reason together to defeat the pandemic) was so misguided and disturbing that I felt obliged to reply.

Let me start with the COVID-19 pandemic. It should be clear to everyone now that there should be no debate between fighting the pandemic or restarting the economy. Without the pandemic under control, it is impossible to restart the economy. President Donald Trumps decision to prematurely open up the economy was solely based on his mistaken idea that this decision would benefit him politically. My guess is that this year more than 100,000 Americans will prematurely die due to that decision. May I encourage Rochester to look at the three pages of obituaries in the last edition of the Jewish Light; in normal times, there is usually less than a page.

More significantly, it is now apparent that virtually every decision Trump makes is solely based on his political benefit, even if it is not in our countrys interest. This includes his extortion of Ukraine, his request for political help from China, his withdrawal of troops from Syria, and his deal with the Taliban. How about his embrace of the Confederate Battle flag, the one that even the state of Mississippi has now decided to remove from its state flag? How about his racism and race baiting, when so many Americans are marching for racial justice? And Rochester finds that the Democratic Party more odious than Donald Trump? Unbelievable.

Bernard J. Feldman,Creve Coeur

Reader respondsto recent letter

I have to respond to the July 1 letter titled President deserves credit for Israel support. Look at President Donald Trumps history while in office. In a few short months he has made the United States a laughingstock in the eyes of the world.If he does anything for Israel, its solely to solidify his base. He is immoral and unjust when it comes to the plight of others. Trump is an unlearned racist who probably has never picked up a book to educate himself about Israels lengthy and complex history. Please dont be fooled.

MelodyBoime,Clayton

To submit letters to the editor, email letters@thejewishlight.com or use our online form at stljewishlight.com/letters.

More here:

Letters to the editor: July 29, 2020 | Letters To Editor - St. Louis Jewish Light

Letters to the editor: | Letters To Editor – St. Louis Jewish Light

Funds urgentlyneeded for elections

For 125 years, National Council of Jewish Women-St. Louis has worked diligently to ensure nonpartisan voting rights for all, and the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted egregious deficiencies in Missouris voting system. While politicians of both parties argue about many things, democracy shouldnt be one of them. Experts estimate we need at least $4 billion to ensure that states can prepare for elections during the coronavirus. Without this necessary funding for election infrastructure, many voters will be disenfranchised and unable to vote.

Recently, Congress passed $400 million in election funding in the first stimulus bill, which is a start, but we have to go much further and pass the $3.6 billion that was allocated to ensure safe elections in the HEROES Act. Every voter needs safe and secure options to vote by mail, absentee, early and on election day. Missouri passed a law in June which will allow many more Missouri voters to vote absentee or by mail for the August and November elections. More funding is a necessity for hiring poll workers during COVID and implementing many other key reforms to ensure safe voting for all.

Its now up to the Senate to pass the additional $3.6 billion needed to be ready for our November elections. This funding is crucial for Missouri to have safe elections. NCJWSTL urges Sen. Roy Blunt, who is thechairman of the Senate Rules Committee, tomake this funding a priority. The people of Missouri should not have to choose between their health and their vote.

We urge everyone to contact Sen. Blunts office now to insist on fair and safe voting for all.

Andrea Powers Schankman and Debbie Gilula, NCJWSTL Voting Initiative Co-Chairs

COVID-19 and the start of the school year

Regarding the July 15 article, Doctor would greenlight day school opening this fall, with conditions. Stunned. I am stunned. With lives on the line, I think an actual list of conditions and in what context would be the only ethical way to convey the doctors opinion. While the question and answer format of the article is interesting, I am still trying to figure out the parameters that the article headline promises.

If I understand well what is being said.... Classrooms are no more dangerous than going to the grocery as well as looking to Australia and other countries where schools are in session...if they can do it, so can we.

Thats just not true. Our children have far more comorbidity issues than other countries that makes them far more susceptible to contracting COVID-19 (See CNBCs July 13 article, U.S. students are at higher risk from the coronavirus than kids in other countries, Dr. Scott Gottlieb says.)

For students and their families as well as school staff and their families to have the protection implied, each person and each scenario would have to be perfectly played out. There are so many moving parts that I submit, that the risk of infection and the spreading take just a handful of missteps.

Masks need to be worn and taken off perfectly. Hand hygiene, the same. Even if people do their best, they are human. We all are familiar with the two-second rule...or the five-second rule? If we can scoop up the piece of toast off the floor in under five seconds, its all good. No harm, no foul.

Now, imagine each parent, child and teacher applying their own five- second rule to life in school.

COVID-19 doesnt care about what anyone thinks. Unless we depend on science and not broad opinions from scientists, we will remain victims.

Lois Ockner,University City

Russian Americans in St. Louis: We dont want to be a silent majority

On July 11, a group of the Russian Americans in St. Louis got together to demonstrate their support for our police. These demonstrators, who gathered in front of the Olivette and Creve Coeur police departments, strongly oppose proposals to defund the police, and are aghast at the humiliation of police officers and the lawlessness that has ensued in our own and other American cities.

Many of us, who came to United States as the Jewish refugees 20, 30 or 40 years ago, watch with disbelief and horror at what is happening in todays America. The reality is that the grim past that the former Russians, Eastern Europeans, Chinese, Koreans and Cubans left behind for a better future for their families has become a reality right here and now. Unfortunately, the bloody and tragic history of those countries that became socialist and fell victims of Marxist-Leninist ideology, is not an antidote to those who organize lawless riots and what I would describe as a pogrom in a Jewish neighborhood of Los Angeles.

We know too well, that compliance (called political correctness) leads to silencing, censorship and disappearance of free speech.

With disbelief we observe that many Jewish communities around the country, as well as Jewish papers and mass media, keep silent at worst or are meek at best when it comes to addressing the anti-Semitic destruction organized in Los Angeles this May during Shavuot. Instead of strong support for their Orthodox brothers and sisters, they express alliance with the Black Lives Matter movement, which I believe is anti-Semitic and anti-Israel. It seems that the long and tragic Jewish history has not been learned.

We former Soviet Jews cannot be a silent minority watching this great country face catastrophe as Russia and many others have. We cannot be silent watching great American history being attacked and monuments being destroyed by mob action or mob hysteria. And we cannot be silent when the police officers that keep American streets safe are humiliated.

Wake up, all ye who believe that the events of the Old World will turn out differently in the United States.

Lena Fish,St. Louis

Response to editorial

Regarding the June 19 editorial, Defund, Defend, Define highlighting the number of cases of police brutality that have occurred across the nation in the past several months.First allow me to say how deplorable I find these miscarriages of justice to be.

Having said that, however, the thought of defunding police departments entirely, or in great measure, is certainly not the answer and is counterproductive.

I can unequivocally say that the overwhelming majority of police officers in our nation do an exceptional job to serve and protect, and are the epitome of honesty, integrity and decency, putting their lives on the line for the public every day.

Unfortunately, there are those officers who fail miserably to uphold the highest standard and quality of law enforcement. These men and women must be weeded out and punished to the fullest extent of the law when they dishonor their badge and commit egregious crimes, which has occurred too often recently.

Police training needs to be upgraded and policies enforced vigorously so that law enforcement is the very best it can be while protecting the rights of all citizens. We are a nation of laws and must never lose sight of that hallowed and never-ending principle.

GeneCarton,University City

A misguided and disturbing commentary

Even though Marty Rochester is a friend and a colleague, his July 15 commentary (Let us reason together to defeat the pandemic) was so misguided and disturbing that I felt obliged to reply.

Let me start with the COVID-19 pandemic. It should be clear to everyone now that there should be no debate between fighting the pandemic or restarting the economy. Without the pandemic under control, it is impossible to restart the economy. President Donald Trumps decision to prematurely open up the economy was solely based on his mistaken idea that this decision would benefit him politically. My guess is that this year more than 100,000 Americans will prematurely die due to that decision. May I encourage Rochester to look at the three pages of obituaries in the last edition of the Jewish Light; in normal times, there is usually less than a page.

More significantly, it is now apparent that virtually every decision Trump makes is solely based on his political benefit, even if it is not in our countrys interest. This includes his extortion of Ukraine, his request for political help from China, his withdrawal of troops from Syria, and his deal with the Taliban. How about his embrace of the Confederate Battle flag, the one that even the state of Mississippi has now decided to remove from its state flag? How about his racism and race baiting, when so many Americans are marching for racial justice? And Rochester finds that the Democratic Party more odious than Donald Trump? Unbelievable.

Bernard J. Feldman,Creve Coeur

Reader respondsto recent letter

I have to respond to the July 1 letter titled President deserves credit for Israel support. Look at President Donald Trumps history while in office. In a few short months he has made the United States a laughingstock in the eyes of the world.If he does anything for Israel, its solely to solidify his base. He is immoral and unjust when it comes to the plight of others. Trump is an unlearned racist who probably has never picked up a book to educate himself about Israels lengthy and complex history. Please dont be fooled.

MelodyBoime,Clayton

To submit letters to the editor, email letters@thejewishlight.com or use our online form at stljewishlight.com/letters.

Excerpt from:

Letters to the editor: | Letters To Editor - St. Louis Jewish Light

UNPOPULAR OPINION: We all yes, all of us have implicit bias – newportri.com

As a community having these difficult conversations about race, there is a trend going on I want to name here today.

If there is a word or phrase people dont understand, instead of finding out what the word means, they immediately try to distance themselves from the word and shut down so the discussions and any steps toward progress end.

You know, kind of like when you say someone has a "racist" or "prejudiced" opinion, or that they are speaking from a place of "privilege." In my experience, if they are truly about making progress, an indicator is in their response to that accusation.

You will have some who say, "Yes, I have shown those beliefs and I am learning so that I can change them". There are others representing the majority that I have encountered who will take offense and shut down. They leave the room, dont return to the meetings, get very defensive and argue or stop talking all together. Can you all identify with this scenario?

Think back to a time when someone has said one of those words to a person, how do they usually react? I want to add that, to this day, I have NEVER seen a person who is racist, actually admit to being racist. So, lets see, I have brought up racist, privilege and prejudice are you feeling uncomfortable yet? If yes, please keep reading, stay with us.

One phrase I see being thrown around these days without people really knowing what it means is "implicit bias." Negative implicit bias can be harmful if gone unchecked, and even people with the best intentions have it.

Lets talk about it: Implicit bias refers to the attitudes or stereotypes that affect our understanding, actions, and decisions in an unconscious manner

According to the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity, implicit bias is defined as:

Residing deep in the subconscious, these biases are different from known biases individuals may choose to conceal for the purposes of social and/or political correctness. Rather, implicit biases are not accessible through introspection.

The implicit associations we harbor in our subconscious cause us to have feelings and attitudes about other people based on characteristics such as race, ethnicity, age, and appearance. These associations develop over the course of a lifetime beginning at a very early age through exposure to direct and indirect messages. In addition to early life experiences, the media and news programming are often-cited origins of implicit associations.

Here are some points from an informative website: https://www.aperianglobal.com/3-steps-address-unconscious-bias.

Understand that it is normal: We as human beings are hardwired to prefer others who resemble us or have similar features. What makes biases "bad" is a lack of awareness regarding how they influence our decisions and impact others.

Identify the biases and how they impact your work: After you identify and name your biases, notice how it affects who you invite to meetings, who you speak to easily and whose opinions influence your decisions?

Broaden your viewpoint and educate others: When identifying a negative bias you may have, make a conscious effort to learn more about that idea, individual, or group to understand how and why it makes you uncomfortable.

I challenge you all to learn more about implicit bias. Take an online quiz from "Project Implicit" by Harvard University. It is an eye-opener to those who feel they dont have implicit bias and see all people as equals. If you know you have bias, it helps to see which ones require attention to be changed to decrease biased behavior.

Change can be good.

Niko Merritt is the founding executive director of Sankofa Community Connection in Newport. Her column, Unpopular Opinion, appears bi-monthly on newportri.com and in The Daily News.

Read the rest here:

UNPOPULAR OPINION: We all yes, all of us have implicit bias - newportri.com

It should be everyone’s duty to join the National Trust – Telegraph.co.uk

I thought of my friend at the weekend, when we used our family membership to go camping in the glorious grounds of Polesden Lacey, and again today, when I received an email from the Trust informing me that due to what its director general says is its biggest crisis in living memory, it is to shed 1,200 jobs to help plug a 200 million funding gap after having had to close all of its houses, gardens, car parks, shops and cafes thanks to Covid-19.

There are no plans to mothball properties yet, although many remain shuttered: when we were there, the tall, elegant windows of Polesden Lacey remained darkened throughout; there was no opportunity to briefly escape the elements (and the children) to wander through cool, beeswax-smelling interiors; to be transported briefly back in time and marvel at the way people once lived.

Its pretty sobering stuff, even if youre no fan of some of the more right-on moves of recent years. Strip away the beanbags and the political correctness and at its heart, what the National Trust does is irreplaceably important. My friend was right we would all be the poorer without it.

And yet, while the job losses are undoubtedly tragic, could this slimming down turn out to, in the end, be to the good? 40 million of the Trusts savings are to be made in print marketing; 160 shops and 10 cafes are to close. Do we really need to be showered with more leaflets when we visit a heritage property, or be forced to exit through the gift shop, held to ransom over a box of fudge? Perhaps if the National Trust must tighten its belt, we could see a stripping away of all the extraneous fripperies, so we can concentrate on what is really glorious about what it does. For that, Ill keep paying my membership fee.

Farewell to another constant in my life: the noisy, comforting, swaying buffet car on an LNER train journey north. On every regular trip to my homeland, part of the ritual was choosing when, exactly, to make the endless, undulating journey up the length of the train (to take my handbag, or leave it to the fate of the gods?), usually only to find Id gone the wrong way and have to sway my way back again, all in pursuit of a bacon sandwich and a cuppa. The brief bit of core exercise broke up the monotony, but Im quite taken by the idea of being able to order food directly to my seat a small taste of how the other half live, without having to buy a first class ticket.

Read the original:

It should be everyone's duty to join the National Trust - Telegraph.co.uk

The Thing About France, S3E2: Thomas Chatterton Williams on Race, Philosophy, and COVID-19 – Frenchly

Learn more

The Thing About France, Season 3

Produced by the cultural services of the French Embassy. French Morning is a media partner of Season 3.

New episodes every other Tuesday, available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, SoundCloud, the website of The Thing About France, and French Morning.

Being first and foremost understood as American where the primary identity that I had in society wasnt a racialized one, it was nationalized actually, was liberating.

Advertisement

In this weeks episode of The Thing About France, the podcast by and for American Francophiles, guest Thomas Chatterton Williams got into a deep discussion with host Liesl Schillinger about black Francophilia, James Baldwin, and the impact of social media on expat life. Williams is an author and cultural critic whose notable works include the memoirs Losing My Cool: How a fathers love and 15,000 books beat hip-hop culture (2010), and Self-Portrait in Black and White (2019). An alum of Georgetown and NYU, the Newark, NJ native fell in love with France while on a summer study-abroad program in Tour, and now lives with his French wife and children in Paris.

Williams is an expert on the works of James Baldwin, and thinks about race professionally, so its not surprising that he had some interesting things to say about the American racial imaginary as a black man and an expat in the era of George Floyd.

Its interesting to watch these things from France, because France has a very different relation to political correctness, to identitarianism, to identity politics, he explains, mentioning Robin DiAngelos book White Fragility, which has only just been released in France this month. Im really interested to see how that is received. Because in many ways it challenges fundamental premises of the Republican ideal, that everyone is the same and that race is not something to be taken into account.

Regarding Baldwin, he discusses the notion of the expats responsibility to his or her home country. Though Baldwin eventually returned to America because of the draw of the Civil Rights movement, Williams feels that social media and online publications make it possible for him to take part in the transatlantic conversation no matter where he is.

But how exactly did a boy from New Jersey end up so far from home? Williams talks about his love of France, and how his father encouraged him to learn French as a child in the hopes of someday being able to experience the country and the culture. Paris symbolically holds a very special space in the black American imagination. Theres a strong expat tradition of writers like James Baldwin or jazz musicians like Sydney Bichet and others, even Miles Davis.

And dont think Coronavirus fatigue hasnt caught up with him, even in the small village in the Loire Atlantique where he and his family have been quarantining. This has been just such an extraordinary year full of so much, and on top of that youve got an election coming up thats extraordinarily important, and the whole world is watching, and it feels like were just exhausted. So my instinct in those situations is just to try to isolate, bring some good books, read, write as much as I can.

Sound advice. For those who would maybe prefer to listen than read right now, new episodes of The Thing About France will be available every other Tuesday. Stay tuned on Frenchly and French Morning for more.

The Thing About France, Season 3

Produced by the cultural services of the French Embassy. French Morning is a media partner of Season 3.

New episodes every other Tuesday, available on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, SoundCloud, the website of The Thing About France, and French Morning.

Continued here:

The Thing About France, S3E2: Thomas Chatterton Williams on Race, Philosophy, and COVID-19 - Frenchly

Welcome to Donald Trump’s terrordome: But even this may not save him – Salon

Donald Trump is a political arsonist. He has unleashed a firestorm across America. The kindling was always there. Trump chose to throw gasoline on it and set it afire.

Trump's political cult members and other followers are dancing in a circle around the flames. In the light and noise, they see and hear things which are not there. Like the troglodytes in Plato's allegory of the cave, they have lost the ability to discern truth from lies. All that matters is their proximity to Trump's fire.

Good Americans have encircled Trump's conflagration. They know the danger and power it possesses. They are also willing to be burned and suffer other injuries to save the country from its worst inclinations in the form of the fire devils that Trump commands.

Good Americans also know that fire can be used for both creation and destruction. As such, they are waiting for the right moment to seize the fire for their own purposes.

There are observers as well.Many are in the shadows cowed and afraid. Other watchers aresad and depressed and more than a little confused by what America in the Age of Trump has become.

Trump's blazingfire is the main attraction in the American terrordome, wherethe spectacle of Trump's threats, violence, lies, fear, intimidation, corruption, racism andcruelty unfold. Thisis the logic of reality TV made into a presidency and the resultingsurreal nightmare that has entrapped the American people in the Age of Trump.

The protagonists in Trump's spectacle are the "virtuous,""strong" and "heroic" Donald Trump and his"patriotic" and "law-abiding" (white) followers and of course the police and other enforcers of "law and order."

The villains are the various recurring bogeymen of the right-wing imagination, such as Latino "rapists" and "murderers," "invasions" and "caravans" of nonwhite people, Muslimsand any othergroup deemed to be despised. "Anti-fascists" and "Black Lives Matter" activists, who supposedly hate America. Black athletes who kneel in protest against police thuggery and other social injustices are "thugs" who should be kicked out of the country. The George Floyd protesters and anyone else who dares to disagree with the Trump regime are enemies of the state to be purged. "Anarchists," leftists, liberals and intellectualswith their "political correctness" are also to be disposed of.

Thisspectacle circulates across American society via Fox News and the larger right-wing propaganda disinformation machine. Unwittingly, those Americans with their "doomscrolling" a phrase that sounds like something from theH.P. Lovecraft mythos or the "Hellraiser" moviesand other Trump fixations are all part of the spectacle as well.

In total, Trump's terrordome is the theater of political terror and the "American carnage" he first promised in his 2016 inauguration speech. Trump hopes tousethe samethemes to win the 2020 election -- and then to stay in office for as long as he wants.

Trump's terrordome has a new attraction: his personal stormtroopers, a de facto Gestapo.

In a massive violation of the civil and human rights of the American people, Trump's secret policeareoperating in Portland, Oregon, grabbing protesters off the streets and disappearing them for interrogated. Trump's Gestapo is beating, gassing and shooting protesters with so-called non-lethalweapons, which in reality can cause grievous physical harm.

Trump has promised to unleash more than 50,000 of his personal enforcers in Democratic-led cities across the country. He will likely use these same enforcers to try to steal the 2020 election.

Trump's theater of terror in Portland (and soon elsewhere, perhaps) is following a script common to the authoritarian playbook where the leader creates a crisis, the people resistand then the threats and violence are amplified with the end goal being a "state of emergency" that"justifies" the authoritarian seizing even more power.

At the New York Times, former FBI director James Comeyaccurately summarizes Trump's Portland gambit:

What better way for Trump to demonstrate to his followers that he is "your president of law and order" than to deploy highly visible federal officers, and in a way that is sure to invite violent conflict, which, of course, demonstrates the need for a law-and-order president? And on it goes. The only thing damaged in the process will be the United States and the federal law enforcement agencies our country needs. Yet again, the craving of our president for reelection seems to override everything.

The Trump regime is so unrestrained that it actually uses the word "theater" to describe the Portland protests and the president's related instigationsand plots to remain in power.

As reported by the Washington Post, a Trump regime official said the president had chosen Portland as "a theater for his fight,"adding that"the White House had long wanted to amplify strife in cities, encouraging DHS officials to talk about arrests of violent criminals in sanctuary cities and repeatedly urging ICE to disclose more details of raids than some in the agency were comfortable doing. It was about getting viral online content."

Last Friday, Trump's White House press secretary,Kayleigh McEnany, presented the regime's own version of a Joseph Goebbels propaganda film in the form of a video purporting to show "riots" in Portland. This presentation was sotasteless that even Fox Newscut away from the White House press briefing.

Of course, there are no "riots" except for those instigated by Trump's enforcers and the right-wing extremists and other paramilitaries who have infiltrated what are largely peaceful gatherings.

McEnany's propaganda film is part of a larger and obvious strategy of terrifyingthe American people or at least Trump's base of older, white Fox News watchers, who he imagines as a"silent majority" into supporting the president's crackdown and re-electing him.

In Trump's terrordome these distorted images of anti-fascists, Black Lives Matter activists, mothers, veteransand other protesters are doing another type of political work as well

Violence by the Trump regime against dissenters is made legitimate. Moreover, violence by Trump's supporters against his perceivedenemies is encouraged and renderedvirtuous as well

In many ways, Donald Trump's terrordome spectacle is his version of the "Two Minutes Hate" as depicted in George Orwell's essential book "1984".

Writing at Bloomberg, legal scholar Cass Sunstein explains:

To see it, we have to step back a bit and consider one of George Orwell's most powerful creations: the Two Minutes Hate, directed against Emmanuel Goldstein, "the Enemy of the People" and opponent of Big Brother.

As Orwell depicts it in "1984," Big Brother focuses the public on Goldstein's misdeeds and the continuing threat he poses: "He was the commander of a vast shadowy army, an underground network of conspirators." As citizens see Goldstein's face on a screen, they break out into "uncontrollable exclamations of rage," followed by a "hideous ecstasy of fear and vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to torture, to smash faces in with a sledge-hammer."

Orwell's ominous words suggest that every human heart is vulnerable to that ecstasy. "The horrible thing about the Two Minutes Hate was not that one was obliged to act a part, but, on the contrary, that it was impossible to avoid joining in." (Think of what happens on contemporary social media.)

For Big Brother, the Two Minutes Hate is shrewd politics. It is a diversion from issues of policy, and from problems that people face in their ordinary lives. It focuses citizens' attention on a malevolent, even demonic force, who continues to threaten them.

Trump's terrordome and the power he has over many tens of millions of Americans (including bystanders) also recalls the description of Nazi Germany injournalist Milton Meyer's book "They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933-45":

The world you live in your nation, your people is not the world you were born in at all. The forms are all there, all untouched, all reassuring, the houses, the shops, the jobs, the mealtimes, the visits, the concerts, the cinema, the holidays. But the spirit, which you never noticed because you made the lifelong mistake of identifying it with the forms, is changed. Now you live in a world of hate and fear, and the people who hate and fear do not even know it themselves; when everyone is transformed, no one is transformed. Now you live in a system which rules without responsibility even to God. The system itself could not have intended this in the beginning, but in order to sustain itself it was compelled to go all the way.

Donald Trump is an authoritarian and a neo-fascist. Like others of that ilk, he is only able to destroy and not create. Nearly 150,000 Americans are dead from the coronavirus pandemic and Donald Trump's willfully negligent response. The country is teetering on the edge of a second Great Depression. Other existential threats, such as the global climate disaster, continue their march largely unabated.

Ultimately, the Trump regimeand its politics of terror and cruelty amplify the pain, suffering, fearand insecurityof the American people and by design do nothing to soothe and heal them.

Public opinion polls and other research showthat the American people are experiencing high levels of anxiety and other mental health challenges from the Age of Trump and his pandemic. Suicides have increased. The American people largely want a return to normalcy and consistency and not the chaos of the Trump regime. Life spans continue to decrease among many populations in America, include the "white workingclass". The American people know that the country is going in the wrong direction and the myth of American exceptionalism is collapsing.Patriotism is at the lowest levels in several decades.

The pain, sorrow, loss, and misery are the goal: Trump and his regime are illegitimate, and hope to use his terrordome spectacle to remain in power.

Because of a deep reluctance to state those plain facts, America's mainstream news media continues toignore thatthe country is in the grip of a fascistpolitics and authoritarian spectacle where normal politics and the folk theory of democracy with its "free and fair" elections, responsible political parties, politically engaged citizens, rule of law, and respect for the Constitution as well as existing political and social institutions no longer apply.

Those people who are fortunate to live outside of Trump's terrordome see something horrible in America.Once the leader of the world,the U.S. has lost its prestige and moral authority. Writing at the New York Times, Roger Cohen reflects on how America now looks from Germany, a country which was destroyed by fascism and then rebuilt as a leading democracy:

When paramilitary-style units have no identifying insignia, there is no transparency, no accountability and that means impunity. Democracy dies. Think of all this as setting the scene for Trump's own "state of emergency" if he does not like the November election result. Social media is combustible enough for a physical fire to be unnecessary.

The president says he wants to protect law-abiding citizens. In 1933, after the Reichstag burned, Hitler issued the "Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State" as his means to seize power.

German horror at Trump has many components. He's the fear-mongering showman wielding nationalism, racism and violence as if the 20th century held no lessons. He's the would-be destroyer of the multilateral institutions that brought European peace and made it possible for Germans to raise their bowed heads again. He is a fascist in the making.

At present, Joe Biden is leading Donald Trump inthe polls. There are many ways, legitimate and otherwise,that Donald Trump couldwin a second term, but many observersnowbelieve that he will be vanquished in historic fashion. Of course, that is no guarantee that Trump will peacefully leave office in January or that he may not find away to contest the outcome.

A Biden victory would show that the American people want a return to normal. But what does "normal" really look like when the status quo did so much tovomit out Trump's neo-fascist regime and allthe destruction and human misery it created?

To light the way forward to a better America will demandmuch more than going back to "normal" fromJoe Biden and from all of us.

Visit link:

Welcome to Donald Trump's terrordome: But even this may not save him - Salon

155 Years of Black Freedom – Columbia Business Times

Bringing awareness and a culture of inclusion to Columbia.

On June 19, 1865, Union Army General Gordon Granger arrived on the island of Galveston, Texas, with over 2,000 federal troops and announced a federal proclamation that declared all enslaved Black people free. This day became commonly known as Juneteenth, and would be celebrated to commemorate the liberation of the last enslaved Black people in America and the nascence of recognizing Black individuals as full human beings with hopes, fears, dreams, and most importantly, human rights.

Today, Juneteenth maintains the same spirit, but it has also taken on a new meaning.

Between March and May, the nation witnessed the murders of Breonna Taylor, Nina Pop, Tony McDade, and George Floyd, among many others, all at the hands of racism. Consequently, many Black individuals and allies rallied in the streets for the Black Lives Matter movement to protest the loss of these innocent lives, demand radical change in law enforcement systems, and initiate discourse on Black liberation and granting Black people authentic, unequivocal human rights.

Given this context, Juneteenth has taken on new meaning it has now morphed into a holiday that is not just a fte, but also a form of protest in defense of Black lives.

In Columbia, there were a number of events that celebrated Juneteenth and also educated the community on the history of the event and the general plight of Black people in the community. One of these events, CoMo Celebrates Juneteenth, was hosted at Karis Church.

The event was three parts. It began with a walk through Heritage Trail. This was followed by an in-person drive-through portion in Karis Churchs parking lot. The scene was vibrant, featuring people enjoying soul food made by local vendors. Families, with their enthusiastic children, contorted their bodies to the sound of Cupid Shuffle.

Thereafter, there were a series of speeches given by Adonica Coleman and Nikki McGruder, co-organizers of the event, and Mary Ratliff, president of Columbias NAACP chapter. All three speakers addressed the importance of celebrating Black liberation and harkening to voices in the community that are demanding change and demanding that Black lives to be acknowledged and respected. The drive-through segment ended with a recitation of Frederick Douglass famous speech, What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?

The final portion of the event was a series of online content and included an in-depth panel discussion with local pastors, moderated by Adonica, that discussed the history and meaning of Juneteenth.

The idea to host a major Juneteenth event began with CoMo Small Great Things, a book club of diverse women, and of which Adonica and Nikki are members. The book club dwells on literature about racial issues, so naturally, the conversation about Juneteenth and what the community could do to celebrate the event became a point of discussion.

We have a book club that has been meeting for three years . . . We were having a conversation about the latest book wed read, and one of the white ladies said, Why is the onus always on Black people in town to actually get things going? If were trying to seek racial reconciliation, we should be the ones doing the work, Adonica says. Thats when Juneteenth came up in the conversation, and they offered to take some of the responsibility of planning the event, offering to get more community members involved, including local churches.

While celebration was the central phenomenon, the event made it a priority to also educate the community and bring awareness to the context of Juneteenth.

Nikki says: I think its important to know that the group Im in has been having conversations around race for a long time. So, we wanted to make sure that we provided a celebratory aspect along with education.

She adds, We talked about the importance of working with our allies and wanted to make sure that it was a celebration where we could also show why it is important that those positioning themselves to be allies celebrate [Juneteenth] too.

Education was also a priority because, after taking stock of general sentiments regarding the holiday, organizers realized that the public especially the non-Black public doesnt know much about Juneteenth.

Adonica says: For Nikki and I, we didnt know about Juneteenth until we were fully-grown women, and were both Black women in our forties. So, we wanted to involve different people and have several voices and make the event interactive.

The process of planning CoMo Celebrates Juneteenth was not without its challenges. With the COVID-19 pandemic upending event planning, the organizing team had to adapt to the times and create an event that would celebrate and educate people about Juneteenth while keeping their health and safety a priority.

We submitted our plans to the health department and had consistent communication with them about what things to consider to make sure everyone was safe, Adonica says.

The team drew inspiration from Karis Churchs Easter service, which was a drive-through gathering that encouraged social distancing. In addition, there were also masks sold at the concessions table at the events entrance.

We talked about the importance of working with our allies and wanted to make sure that it was a celebration where we could also show why it is important that those positioning themselves to be allies celebrate [Juneteenth] too.

Reflecting on CoMo Celebrates Juneteenth, it is evident that the event was a success it was able to bring together Columbias community in solidarity, maintain health and safety regulations, and also give people invaluable knowledge about the importance of Juneteenth and advocacy for Black lives. As of June 19, 2020, Mayor Brian Treece proclaimed Juneteenth Celebration Day an officially recognized holiday in Columbia.

I think one of the greatest feats for that day was coming together to do the in-person aspect and keep it according to the plan that we put together for the health department. So people started off their day the right way, and then they were able to go to their respective places to enjoy the rest of the content virtually, Nikki says.

With regards to next year, the goal is to enlarge the Juneteenth celebrations by collaborating with more community entities, including the city council. The educational content will still harken to the history and relevance of Juneteenth, and it will extend to include the contributions and success of Black people within Columbia and the nation at large.

Original post:

155 Years of Black Freedom - Columbia Business Times

Voter guide: What you should know for the Aug. 11 primary elections in Wisconsin – Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

Buy Photo

Volunteer Anne DeLeo organizes ballots and documentation that goes with them for the April 7, 2020 election.(Photo: MIKE DE SISTI / MILWAUKEE JOURNAL SENTINEL)

The Aug. 11 partisan primaries will determine who of each party's candidates will be on the ballot in the Nov. 3general election andcome months after Wisconsin's contentious April 7elections, which were plagued by long lines and often a lack of social distancing.

A full statewidelist of the candidates on the primary ballot, including candidates for state Assembly and county district attorney, is available from the Wisconsin Elections Commission.

District 1:In the district once represented by former U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan, attorney and businessman Josh Pade of Kenosha is facing national security expert Roger Polack of Racine in the Democratic primary.

The winner will take on Republican incumbent Bryan Steil of Janesville in the general election.

The district encompasses Kenosha and Racine counties and portions of Rock, Walworth, Waukesha and Milwaukee counties.

READ MORE: 1st Congressional District primary: Pade, Polack hope to flip Paul Ryan's old district

District 3:Democratic incumbent Ron Kind of La Crosse, who has represented the district since 1997, is facing primary challenger Mark Neumann, a former physician from La Crosse.

Neumann is not the same Mark Neumann who served as the 1st District's representative in the 1990s.

Two political newcomers are running in the Republican primary in the hope of delivering the seat to the GOP in November: health care publicist Jessi Ebben of Eau Clare and former Navy SEAL Derrick Van Orden.

The western Wisconsin district stretches from Grant County in the far southwestern corner of Wisconsin north to the River Falls, Menomonie and Eau Claire areas. The district also includes parts of central Wisconsin, including Stevens Point.

READ MORE: 3rd Congressional District primary: Kind has challenge on left; GOP wants to flip district

District 4: Republicans Tim Rogers and businesswomanCindy Werner, both Milwaukee residents, are on the primary ballot, vying to take onDemocratic incumbent Gwen Moore in the district containing the city of Milwaukee.

Both Werner and Rogers previously ran in the 2018 Congressional primary. Moore defeated Rogers in the general election with about 75% of the vote.

District 5:Republican incumbent Jim Sensenbrenner announced in September that he would not be seeking reelection.

Navy veteran and businessman Tom Palzewicz of Brookfield is the only Democrat running to replace him.

But the Republican primary is contested between Scott Fitzgerald of Juneau, currently the majority leader in the Wisconsin state Senate, and Coast Guard Reserve commander and businessmanCliff DeTemple of Jackson.

The district includes Jefferson and Washington counties and parts of Dodge, Milwaukee, Walworthand Waukesha counties.

District 6:The three Democrats running in the primary, in the hope of unseating Republican incumbent Glenn Grothman ofGlenbeulah, arebusiness development executive MatthewBoor of Cleveland, IT consultant Michael Beardsley of Oshkosh, and lawyerJessica King of Oshkosh.

The district north of Milwaukee includes areas of Ozaukee, Milwaukee, Sheboygan, Manitowoc,Columbia, Fond du Lac, Dodge, Green Lake, Marquette, Waushara and Winnebago counties.

READ MORE: Meet the Democrats vying to challenge Glenn Grothman in the 6th Congressional District

A poll worker wears a sign asking voters to observe social distancing outside the Schuetze Recreation Center on April 7 in Waukesha, Wis.(Photo: Scott Ash/Now News Group)

In addition to other primary races throughout the state, the following legislative seats are holding partisan primaries in the Milwaukee area:

Senate District 6:Democratic incumbent LaTonya Johnson faces a challenge from Michelle Bryant, the chief of staff for state Sen. LenaTaylor.

The winner will face Republican candidate Alciro Deacon in the fall. The district covers parts of Milwaukee's north and west sides.

Senate District 28: Five Republicans are running to succeed incumbent Dave Craig, who is not running for reelection.The GOP challengers are leadership trainer Steve Bobowski, attorney Dan Griffin, Army veteran and businessman Jim Engstrand, businessman andformer La Crosse County Republican Party Chairman Julian Bradleyand attorney Marina Croft.

The Aug. 11 winner will face Democratic candidate and businessman Adam Murphy in the general election. The district includes parts of southern Waukesha and Milwaukee counties.

AssemblyDistrict 8:Both parties are running primaries to see who will vie to replace outgoing Democratic incumbent JoCasta Zamarripa on the near south side district.Zamarripa was elected to the Milwaukee Common Council in April.

In the Democratic primary, Milwaukee County Supervisor Sylvia Ortiz-Velez is running against community organizer Joanna Bautch. In the Republican race, Marine veteran and nonprofit founder Ruben Velez will face businessmanAngel Sanchez.

Assembly District 9:Democratic incumbent Marissa Cabarera is facingChristian Saldivar in the primary; the winner face Republican candidate and medical interpreter Veronica Diaz in the fall in the south side district.

Assembly District 11:Democratic incumbent Jason Fields, who was elected Milwaukee city comptroller in April, is not running for reelectionand there is a four-wayprimary to replace him. The candidates are community advocate Curtis Cook II, nonprofit member services coordinatorDora Drake, Glendale Ald. Tomika Vukovicand businessman Carl Gates. They are vying to face Republican candidate Orlando Owens in the general election. The district includes parts of northern Milwaukee County.

Assembly District 14: Republicans have a three-way primary to pick achallenger to Democratic incumbent Robyn Vining. The candidates arechurch outreach directorBonnie Lee, electrician Steven Sheveyand former special education teacher Linda Boucher.

The districtspans parts of Waukesha and Milwaukee countiesand includes Brookfield and Wauwatosa

READ MORE: Meet the candidates for the Republican primary for Wisconsin State Assembly District 14

READ MORE: A battleground district in a battleground state: How the Democrats aim to claim Scott Walker's home turf

Assembly District 17:Three Democrats teacher and veteran Mike Brox, Milwaukee County Supervisor Supreme Moore Omokundeand Democratic Party of Milwaukee County Chair Chris Walton are running in the primary to face Republican candidate Abbie Eisenbach. The seat, representing parts of Milwaukee's west sidewas held byDavid Crowley, who was elected Milwaukee County executive in April.

Assembly District 60:Republican incumbent Robert Brooks faces a primary challenge from health care consultant and former Cedarburg City Council member Chris Reimer. There are no Democrats on the ballot. The district includes parts of Ozaukee and Washington counties.

Assembly District 82:Republican incumbent Ken Skowronski faces a primary challenge from attorney Theodore Kafkas in the district covering parts of southwestern Milwaukee County including Greendale and Franklin.

The Democratic primary in the district pits recent Yale graduate Jacob Malinowski and businessman Paul McCreary.

In Milwaukee County, there is a contested Democratic primary for the office of Register of Deeds. Incumbent Israel Ramn faces a challenge from County Supervisor John Weishan Jr.

Registering to vote by mail or online in time for the primary ended on July 22, but it is still possible to register in person at the polls;to do so, you must bring a Wisconsin driver's license orstate IDor the last four digits of your Social Security numberas well as a document providing proof that you live in Wisconsin.

Wisconsinites who are already registered to votecan vote in person at their local polling place, at an early voting siteor by mail.

In-person early voting started on July 28 and ends Aug. 9.

To find your local polling place, visit myvote.wi.gov.Polls will be open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Aug. 11.

More than 785,000 voters have requested absentee ballots for the primary so far, and due to the pandemic, groups such as the bipartisan VoteSafeWI organization are trying to expand access to absentee voting. Anyone registered to vote can request an absentee ballot in person, by mailor online at myvote.wi.gov.

To request a ballot in person or by mail, visit or contact your municipal clerk; a directory of clerks is available at https://elections.wi.gov/clerks/directory.

If you are voting in person, you will need to bringa photo ID. Some of the accepted IDs include a driver's license from the Wisconsin Department of Transportation; an identification card from the DOT; a military ID card; a U.S. passport; an ID card from an indigenous tribe in Wisconsin; or a photo ID from a "Wisconsin accredited university or college that contains date of issuance, signature of studentand an expiration date no later than two years after date of issuance.Also, the university or college ID must be accompanied by a separate document that proves enrollment,according to the Wisconsin Elections Commission's ID website.

It is also possible to apply for a state photo ID through the Division of Motor Vehicles.

More details and forms of eligible ID can be found athttps://bringit.wi.gov/.

Our subscribers make this reporting possible. Please consider supporting local journalism by subscribing to the Journal Sentinel at jsonline.com/deal.

Read or Share this story: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/elections/2020/07/30/wisconsin-primary-what-know-august-11-elections/5518864002/

Excerpt from:

Voter guide: What you should know for the Aug. 11 primary elections in Wisconsin - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

LNP Scoreboard: Youth and recreational sports results from July 30 – LancasterOnline

Here is a listing of youth and recreational sports results reported to LNP on July 30.

Please note that because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the LNP sports department is not working in the newsroom. If you call in a score to 717-291-8666, you will only be able to leave a voice mail. We retrieve voice mails remotely each night; but if you do call, be sure to leave your name and phone number so we may contact you if there is a problem. Results may also be emailed to sports@lnpnews.com. They appear in the print edition of LNP as space permits each day. Also, because LNP has begun running on a new press as of July 27, print deadlines will be much earlier for the next several weeks during the shakedown process. The nightly cutoff for print will be between 8:30 and 9 p.m., depending on shifting deadlines.

14U

Section Two

Elizabethtown Black 11, Manheim Township Lightning 1

Dakota Petrosky went 2 for 3 with an RBI, and Brady Moran went 3 for 3 with an RBI.

Mountville Red Sox 16, Lititz VFW 9

Bowmansville Red Sox 14, Lampeter-Strasburg Blue 4

Section Three

Donegal Indians 15, Cocalico Eagles 1

Peighton Derr pitched a complete-game one-hitter for the win.

12U

Section One

Lampeter-StrasburgCardinals 5, Solanco Gold 3

Section Two

Cocalico White 6,Manheim Township Lightning 3

Mountville Phillies 15, Garden Spot Blue Sox 1

Section Three

Donegal Black 18, Hempfield 1

Manheim TownshipChargers 12, Manheim VFW 8

10U

Section One

Donegal Indians 10, Penn Manor 8

Section Two

Lancaster SALSA 15, Hempfield Red 2

Mountville Giants 14, Penn Manor White 6

14U

Section Two

Manheim Tigers 17,Lampeter-StrasburgBlue 4

10U

Section One

Mountville Cubs 9,Manheim Township Streaks 3

12U

Section Three

Mount Joy 18, Manheim VFW 17

At Lancaster Country Club

Friday, July 31

8 a.m. Austin Bortz, Zachary Lessley, Nathan Williams, Joseph McGinty (Boys Silver)

8:10 a.m. Isaiah Hansen, Ian Stefanchik, Jesse Shue, Jamesson Radwanski (Boys Silver)

8:20 a.m. Kayla Maletto, Elle Overly, Tristan Groff, Hannah Barrett (Girls Gold)

8:30 a.m. Tyler Swartz, Reagan Flynn, Luke Barbour (Boys Gold)

8:40 a.m. Grant Novinger, Brant Bomberger, Alex Williams, Brady Wiggins (Boys Gold)

8:50 a.m. Sawyer Marten, Brock Smith, Trey Rios, Matthew Wilson (Boys Gold)

9 a.m. Logan Wagner, Ben Wilson, Sean Cliff, Dante Billoni (Boys Gold)

9:10 a.m. Ben Feeman, Tyson Mitchell, Tanner Fackler, Simon Domencic (Boys Gold)

9:20 a.m. Colton Yenser, Evan Jozwiak, Michael Fioravante, Trevor Snyder (Boys Gold)

9:30 a.m. Garrett Engle, Derek McGlaughlin, Jonathan Glick, Connor Strine (Boys Gold)

Success! An email has been sent with a link to confirm list signup.

Error! There was an error processing your request.

Good Food Inc. 16, G.E. Richards 1

JUNIOR DOUBLES

Drew Jaquith, 226-212-277715

Aliza Shirk, 227-236-246709

Trevor Courtney, 210-270-207687

Robbie Jack, 192-207-280679

Morgan Kline, 226-177-213616

Bethany Jaquith, 192-215-197604

MENS GUEST DAY Better Ball of Partners, July 30.

Gross: First, Bob Ford and Alex Blickle, 68; second, Dave Knox and Andy Wallover, 69; third (tie), Dave Knox and Conor Gilbert, Shane Clayton and Pete Bulat, 70.

Net: First (tie), Hank Popplewell and Kevin Popplewell, Jody Shelby and Ed Kocher, Jim Fucci and Doug Layaw, Pahn Sisay and Paul Kamay, 61; fifth (tie), Jim Fucci and Ron Battaglia, Jim Fucci and Jake Daggett, 62.

PURPLE GANG STABLEFORD July 30. The team of Brian Eidemiller, Lee Tannehill and Mike Cohen won the front with +12, the back with + 7, and total with +19.

THURSDAY MORNING WOMENS LEAGUE July 20. FIrst, Becky Wilson, +9; second, Paula Levandowski, +7; third, Connie Archey, +6.

WEDNESDAY WOMENS LEAGUE Crier, July 29. First Gross: Billie Besser, 93. First Flight (Net): First, Fern Clemmer, 62; second, Donna Beck, 66) Second Flight (Net): First, Barb Landis, 70.

SENIOR LEAGUE July 30.

A Flight: First, Ron Hunt, 64; second, Mike ODay, 66; third (tie), Dan Miller, Karl Gochnauer, 68; fifth, Bob Kayden, 69.

B Flight: First (tie), Jack Janowicz, Dave Scott, 64; third (tie), Dennis Michael, Howard Pryor, 65; fifth, Jamie Roak, 67.

C Flight: First, Larry Booz, 62; second, Leon Brisson, 67; third, Don Denlinger, 68; fourth, Steve Brickner, 69; fifth (tie), Wayne Hoffman, Carl Smith, 71.

D Flight: First, Ed Rowlands, 64; second (tie), Carl Frey, Richard Drennen, Gene Wise, Bill Bitterman, 67.

E Flight: First, Frank Sahd, 62; second, Bill Arms, 63; third (tie), Ron Ross, Bill Renninger, 67; fifth, George Lower, 68.

Closest to the Pin: No. 6, Mike ODay, 8 feet, 2 inches; No. 17, Steve Parmer, 3 feet.

WOMENS NINE-HOLE LEAGUE Medal Play, July 30. Flight A: Linda Goodhart, 30. Flight B: Kristie Arment, 28. Flight C: Linda Wilson, 26. Flight D: Judy Gingerich, 36.

SENIOR LEAGUE Points System, July 30, 37 players. First: Mike MacKinnon and Dwight Evans, +21. Second: Carl Anderson, Herman Arters and Scott Herber, +20. Third: Greg Strunk and Jim Axe, +18. Fourth (tie), Ted Kuznier and Carl Sabal, Jeff Bohler and Joe Pieja, +13.

Greenies: No. 2, Joe Pieja; No. 8, Jere Stick; No. 11, Charlie Miles; No. 17, Ken Martin.

MONDAY SENIOR LEAGUE July 27.

A Flight (Handicap 17 and below): First, Frank Telenko Jr., 60; second (tie), Ed Binder, Guy Gillespie, Joe McDonough, 68; fifth (tie), Greg Smith, Keith Branum, 69; seventh, Jim Terry, 71.

B Flight (Handicap 18 and above): First, Pat Moran, 59; second, Gene Newcomer, 60; third, John Schnee, 65; fourth, Erick Kershner, 66.

Closest to the Pin: No. 12, Ed Binder.

WEDNESDAY SENIOR LEAGUE July 29.

A Flight (Handicap 17 and below): First, Tom Snyder, 65; second, Kevin Ahern, 66; third, Doug Bitner, 67; fourth (tie), Barry Mowrer, Ed Binder, Tom Shaub, 68.

B Flight (Handicap 18 and above): First (tie), Pat Moran, Phil Sinegar, 65; third (tie), Gene Newcomer, Robert Scharf, 66; fifth (tie), Carl King, Charlie Brecht, 67; seventh, Bob Culp, 68.

Closest to the Pin: No. 12, Keith Branum.

SHOT HIS AGE John Hershey, age 74, shot a round of 73 on July 30.

HOFFA TEAM MATCHES July 30. Front (plus-10) and total (plus-14): Roy Hoffa, Tom Perlaki, Dave Guiles and Ed Lilly. Back (plus-8): Irv Fox, Don Gehman, Jim Lloys and Dave Seibold.

SHOT HIS AGE Roy Hoffa, age 84, shot a round of 80 on July 30.

SHOT HIS AGE Irv Fox, age 77, shot a round of 74 on July 30.

SHOT HIS AGE Dave Seibold, age 77, shot a round of 77 on July 30.

SHOT HIS AGE Spence Henry, age 79, shot a round of 76 on July 30.

SHOT HIS AGE Jim Lloyd, age 89, shot a round of 89 on July 30.

WOMENS 18-HOLE LEAGUE Team Quota, July 29. First: Janice Leakway, Liz Martin, Ann Schein and Nancy Cummings, +11.

WEDNESDAY MENS LEAGUE Team Quota, July 29. First: Bob Stauffer, Mark Gast and Brian Cline, +3. Second (tie), Richard Frey, Roger Harvey Jr., Andrew Enck and Bob Rose; Blaise Holzbauer, Tom Holzbauer, Roger Harvey Sr. and Frank Dano, -2.

Subscribe today for only $2

' + submsgtxthtml + '

Get unlimited access to breaking news, ancestry archives, our daily E-newspaper, games and more.

Subscribe today for only $2

' + submsgtxthtml + '

Get unlimited access to breaking news, ancestry archives, our daily E-newspaper, games and more.

Subscribe today for only $2

' + submsgtxthtml + '

Get unlimited access to breaking news, ancestry archives, our daily E-newspaper, games and more.

Subscribe today for only $2

Continue reading here:

LNP Scoreboard: Youth and recreational sports results from July 30 - LancasterOnline

Fear of speech is replacing freedom of speech – The Boston Globe

Freedom of Speech, the famous Norman Rockwell painting that depicts a young man addressing a local gathering, was inspired by a real event. One evening in 1942, Rockwell attended the town meeting in Arlington, Vt., where he lived for many years. On the agenda was the construction of a new school. It was a popular proposal, supported by everyone in attendance except for one resident, who got up to express his dissenting view. He was evidently a blue-collar worker, whose battered jacket and stained fingernails set him apart from the other men in the audience, all dressed in white shirts and ties. In Rockwells scene, the man speaks his mind, unafraid to express a minority opinion and not intimidated by the status of those hes challenging. He has no reason not to speak plainly: His words are being attended to with respectful attention. His neighbors may disagree with him, but theyre willing to hear what he has to say.

What brings Rockwells painting to mind is a new national poll by the Cato Institute. The survey found that self-censorship has become extremely widespread in American society, with 62 percent of adults saying that, given the current political climate, they are afraid to honestly express their views.

These fears cross partisan lines, writes Emily Ekins, Catos director of polling. Majorities of Democrats (52 percent), independents (59 percent), and Republicans (77 percent) all agree they have political opinions they are afraid to share. The surveys 2,000 respondents sorted themselves ideologically as very liberal, liberal, moderate, conservative, or very conservative. In every category except very liberal, a majority of respondents feel pressured to keep their views to themselves. Roughly one-third of American adults 32 percent fear they could be fired or otherwise penalized at work if their political beliefs became known.

Freedom of speech has often been threatened in America, but the suppression of wrong opinions in the past has tended to come from the top down. It was the government that arrested editors for criticizing Woodrow Wilsons foreign policy, made it a crime to burn the flag, turned the dogs on civil rights marchers, and jailed communists under the Smith Act. Today, by contrast, dissent is rarely prosecuted. Thanks to the Supreme Courts First Amendment jurisprudence, freedom of expression has never been more strongly protected legally.

But culturally, the freedom to express unpopular views has never been more endangered.

On college campuses, in workplaces, in the media, there are ever-widening no-go zones of viewpoints and arguments that cannot be safely expressed. Voice an opinion that self-anointed social-justice warriors regard as heretical, and the consequences can be career-destroying. The dean of the nursing school at UMass-Lowell lost her job after writing in an email that everyones life matters. An art curator was accused of being a racist and forced to quit for saying that his museum would continue to collect white artists. The director of communications for Boeing apologized and resigned after an employee complained that 33 years ago he was opposed to women serving in combat.

Virtually everyone would agree that some views are indisputably beyond the pale. If there are supporters of slavery or advocates of genocide who feel inhibited from sharing their beliefs, no one much cares. But the range of opinions deemed unsayable by todays thought police extends well into the mainstream. And in many cases, the most enthusiastic suppressors of debate are students, journalists, artists, intellectuals those who in former times were the greatest champions of uninhibited speech and the greatest foes of ideological conformity.

It isnt only on the left that this totalitarian impulse to silence dissent exists. President Trump, always infuriated by criticism, has called for columnists who disparage him to be fired, hecklers at his rallies to be beaten up, and TV stations to lose their licenses if they run ads vilifying his handling of the pandemic calls routinely amplified on social media by tens of thousands of his followers. When a Babson College professor joked that Iran ought to bomb sites of beloved American cultural heritage like the Mall of America and the Kardashian residence, a right-wing website launched a campaign that got him fired.

The new Cato survey found that more than one in five Americans (22 percent) would support firing a business executive who donated money to Democrat Joe Bidens presidential campaign, while 31 percent would be OK with firing someone who gave money to Trumps reelection campaign. The urge to ostracize or penalize unwelcome views isnt restricted to just one end of the spectrum.

Americans right to free speech is shielded by the Constitution to a degree unmatched anywhere else. But our First Amendment guarantees will prove impotent if the habit of free speech is lost. For generations, Americans were raised to see debate as legitimate, desirable, and essential to democratic health. They quoted Voltaires (apocryphal) aphorism: I disapprove of what you say, but will defend to the death your right to say it. Editors, publishers, satirists, and civil libertarians took to heart the dictum of Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., who wrote that the principle of free thought is meant to enshrine not free thought for those who agree with us but freedom for the thought that we hate.

But that principle has been turned on its head. The thought that we hate is not tolerated but stifled. It is reviled as taboo, forbidden to be uttered. Anyone expressing it may be accused not just of giving offense, but of literally endangering those who disagree. And even if only some people lose their careers or reputations for saying something wrong, countless others get the chilling message.

And so dread settles in, writes journalist Emily Yoffe. Challenging books go untaught. Deep conversations are not had. Friendships are not formed. Classmates and colleagues eye each other with suspicion.

And 62 percent of Americans fear to express what they think.

The speaker in Norman Rockwells painting may have had something unpopular to say, but neither he nor his neighbors had any doubt that it was appropriate for him to say it. Now, such doubt is everywhere, and freedom of speech has never been more threatened.

Jeff Jacoby can be reached at jeff.jacoby@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @jeff_jacoby. To subscribe to Arguable, his weekly newsletter, visit bitly.com/Arguable.

Original post:

Fear of speech is replacing freedom of speech - The Boston Globe

"Freedom Festival" is planned this weekend – The Ellsworth American

ELLSWORTH Former State Senate candidate John Linnehan will host a Freedom Festival on Aug. 1 and 2 in the parking lot of the Maine Coast Mall behind Governors Restaurant.

This is the first one Ive ever done, said Linnehan. Im trying to make it a staycation vacation.

Linnehan, who is president of Linnehan Homes and has run Christian ministries in the area, was a conservative candidate in the July 14 Republican primary for Maine Senate District 7. He lost to fellow Republican Brian Langley of Ellsworth.

Linnehan said he is not selling tickets to this weekends event and will not be counting visitors. The state is still under orders to limit indoor gatherings to 50 people or less to prevent the spread of COVID-19. Seated outdoor events, such as concerts, may divide seating into up to four separate areas with up to 50 people each as long as the layout meets several criteria. Those include at least 14 feet of separation between sections, with physical barriers to prevent intermingling; separate restrooms, concessions and services for each section and enough space for 6 feet of separation between household groups.

Linnehan said that hes not sure how many people will be attending the festival but that he doesnt expect people to camp out but stay for an event and move on.

We will have masks available but Im not going to enforce it, he said. People are more than welcome to put it on. I believe its an individual choice.

The festival includes a Spin-tacular basketball show with the Crevier family, gospel singers and a salute to law enforcement. The festival will span two days, with the same agenda both days beginning at 1 p.m. and ending at 7 p.m.

We strongly believe in our biblical Christian values and our United States and Maine constitutional rights and freedoms, reads a statement on the Freedom Festival website. We believe that all citizens have their individual freedom of choice to wear a mask or not wear a mask. We will have masks available. Please respect all people attending whether you agree personally with their position on this issue or not.

Linnehan said that he wants everyone to respect everybodys individual constitutional rights, and that those who are uncomfortable with being in a large group are welcome to watch the event online or not attend.

Im very sorry the way this has been a divisive issue around the country, he said. Linnehan compared coronavirus with the flu and said he believes the risk from COVID-19 is very, very minimal. He said that the effects of lockdowns are worse.

Were meant to be social people. We hug people, we shake hands. Those things to me are being more effectively damaged.

Although respiratory diseases linked to the seasonal flu can be deadly, killing between 290,000 to 650,000 people every year according to the World Health Organization, COVID-19 has already surpassed that figure, killing at least 650,157 people worldwide since late December, according to Johns Hopkins University. That has been the case even with strict prevention and lockdown measures in place across the globe. Cases show no sign of abating in the United States.

The city did issue a mass gathering permit for the Freedom Festival, said Code Enforcement Officer Dwight Tilton, as it has done for other gatherings in recent weeks, including those associated with the Black Lives Matter movement.

This event differs from other rallies in recent weeks, said Tilton, because it is on private property.

The purpose of the permit is to have a diagram of the event area in case of a police or fire emergency, Tilton said in an email. The permit is not issued for the event but for the location.

The code enforcement officer would not be enforcing possible violations of the Governors executive order, which Tilton said would be the responsibility of the property owner and event coordinator.

Tilton said Police Chief Glenn Moshier did send letters reminding the property owner and event coordinator that they are required to follow the Governors executive order, and included copies of the order in the letter.

The American was unable to reach the owner of the Maine Coast Mall or state officials who would be tasked with enforcing the Governors executive order.

The rest is here:

"Freedom Festival" is planned this weekend - The Ellsworth American

Freedom worth fighting for right here in America – Times Union

There's a Far Side cartoon by Gary Larson that has always been a favorite. In it, two deer are standing in a field and they are chatting, as deer often do in Larson's cartoons. One of the deer has a black and white bull's-eye painted in the center of his chest. The other deer comments sympathetically, "Bummer of a birthmark, Hal."

Right now, Americans feel a little bit like Hal. We're getting used to the United States being challenged and accused by allies and enemies alike. We feel the danger that has accrued to our role in the world. We're reminded daily that our war is now about civilian targets. Shootings and bombings and police militarization are about civilian loss and injuries. It is civilians now people of color, young and old protesters who are in danger. We live in a military state and it crept up on us. We taught our kids, "If you ever feel scared, look for a policeman." And now none of us can safely say that.

This is where it gets hard to be an American liberal or conservative. We advocate for democracy in other countries, but we feel so aware of the personal danger that it's tempting to throw away what's important.

It's excruciating to watch a president and many leaders toss out our rights like a newcomer cleaning someone else's house. In the guise of security, what we look up online, or share on social media and even our medical records might not be private. We could end up running after a truck saying, "Whoa, those are my baseball cards and my civil liberties, and hey, that's the Bill of Rights, I'm not done with that yet."

People say they are willing to trade a few freedoms for safety, but do they mean that? I don't want to be blithe about the dangers. But can we keep for ourselves what we have fought for elsewhere: fair elections, freedom of speech, rule of law and an open political process? We can't paint a bull's-eye on our civil rights.

We also have to find ways to partner with the rest of the world. Years ago, Canada's then-prime minister, Pierre Trudeau, called the United States "the elephant next door." So, as the world's elephant, could we learn to move more gracefully? Or use our might for the common good?

I think about how, as a child, I learned about the United States from one of those wall-sized maps common in elementary classrooms, the ones that show each state as a different color. I remember the first time we went on a family vacation to another state and how disappointed I was that all that distinguished the next state was a sign saying, "Welcome to Ohio" but Ohio wasn't blue as my classroom map had shown it. Now, we are similarly challenged to accept that countries are permeable, and that we have to see the world as a whole.

In 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt described the four freedoms that he wished for our future: Freedom of speech and expression; Freedom for everyone to worship God his own way; Freedom from want; and Freedom from fear.

We've seen these freedoms depicted in Norman Rockwell paintings, which might make us think these were only for the American people, but that's not true. FDR called them a "human birthright," and the tagline on each painting was: for everyone, everywhere in the world.

That's the challenge. It's simple but not easy. But it's a birthmark worth wearing and fighting for abroad and at home.

Diane Cameron is a Capital Region writer. DianeOCameron@gmail.com.

Read more from the original source:

Freedom worth fighting for right here in America - Times Union

TCW’s Brexit Watch: Are we heading for a fake freedom? – The Conservative Woman

BREXIT Watchers received a nasty shock with the news that David Frost recently told senior Tory MPs that we will only get 60 per cent of what we want. Michel Barnier has continued with the intransigent EU demand for permanent rights over UK sovereign fishing grounds and insistence on the EU regulation of UK trade and state aid so as to prevent the UK gaining any economic advantage.

Could the UK be giving way on these demands? TheExpressreports that Cummings is fighting off Whitehall mandarins on state aid regulation, demanding UK freedomand also that the fisheries issue is to remain a matter of UK sovereignty, not a trading bargaining chip.Joe Barnes in theExpresshas also suggested that Frost is dropping several trade demands in the post-Brexit talks with Brussels in the hope of increasing the chances of a deal:

Boris Johnsons chief negotiator with the European Union hopes that asking for a less ambitious free-trade agreement will unlock the negotiations. David Frost has told EU counterpart Michel Barnier that the UK is willing to accept less favourable terms for manufacturers and professionals as part of the final agreement. The Taskforce Europe chief believes lowering the complexity of the pact, in areas such as rules of origin and mutual recognition of qualifications, would mean Brussels dropping its complaints about easy access to its single market.

That could possibly be good news as regards a clean Brexit, as long as the Germans and French are given the same treatment as the UK exporters.However Matthew Parris (always worth reading despite his belief we should stay in the EU) says in hisTimescolumnthat the UK is well on the way to becoming a trade colony and, like sheep, we are slowly but inexorably being herded into the truck.Following his colleague Bruno Waterfields briefing from Brussels, Parrisanticipates a trade deal will be done soon with the UK submitting to regulation as the price for tariff-free trade: the very bad deal that has always been feared by Brexiteers.

PM Johnson will, no doubt, praise the deal and pronounceit a victory but the truth is that it will amount to the UK beingallowedto check out legally, but agreeing not to,voluntarily a fake freedom, a Brino.

It is worth quoting from Parriss analysis as the article is behind a paywall. In his words:

Such an FTA would leave us still able to enjoy relatively frictionless trade with our formerEUpartners, so long as we essentially copy theEUs level playing field rules; but doing so voluntarily as a sovereign nation.Boris Johnsoncould burble more or less truthfully that we are no longer bound by Brusselss rules because we could always walk away (or diverge or regress) and take the consequences. Destiny, that sheepdog of our doings, knows already that since we realise which side our bread is buttered on, we shall not in fact diverge. But, hey, we could.

As he says, this is the puncturing of the Brexit dream of a clean break, that will be covered up by PM Johnsons burbling about a victory.He sets out the four ideas that he understands to be at the core of the case for Brexit:

The first was thatEUred tape was strangling the British economy (indeed, according to some, the British way of life). Straight bananas, threats to the British sausage, lawnmower-noise directives, that sort of stuff.

The second idea was that Europe would be so desperate to keep British trade that wed easily secure a frictionless trade agreement with theEU. We could deploy Project Fear against them. They would buckle.

The third was that we could keepEUimmigrants out.

The fourth was that there existed a world out there beyond theEU, waiting to do more business with us once wed untangled ourselves from European regulation and struck new, bilateral trade deals with other countries.

Parris thinks that some success has happened as regards the first point, but otherwise the failure of the UK to gain lots of trade deals with other nations has punctured the bid for freedom. He says:

But its the failure of the new global deals idea that has brought the whole project down. The deals are simply not there. America was the great hope, the linchpin of this hoped-for opening-up. You can forget Australia and New Zealand: antipodean trade was falling as a share of the total even before we entered theEU; their share now is tiny. The United States, though, is different: our second-biggest trading partner (15 per cent) after theEU(49 per cent). It has emerged this week that hopes of reaching any trade deal this year have all but vanished. The sticking points (food standards being notorious) are well known, and have not unstuck.

His view is that the Department of Trade has failed and that the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) lobby has managed to stall a quick deal with the USA, deploying its famous chlorine-washed chicken successfully as I discussed in my last post. This analysismight explain Frosts 60 per cent prediction, and is depressing. It is worth stressing that the farming issue remains contested and unclear. Whats more, it could be solved easily with big subsidies but as theFTtells us:The National Audit Office warned last year that Defra has not allowed enough time to fully develop the payments system.The dead hand of remainer Whitehall is impossible to escape.

Defence remains the one oven-ready deal, a pure gift to the EU, again disguised from the public and democratic accountability as I discussedhere.

On the SNPs war against Brexit, theTelegraphs Roger Bootlepoints out that the economic case for Scottish independence shrivels away after Brexit because it would be so disadvantageous.What is the point of trying to rejoin theEU for that is what would be entailed if that meant leaving the UKs single market, which is much more significant for Scotland than the bloc? he asks.

Finally, some good news. The UK has dodged an immense EU bullet of at least50billion that we would have had to pay to theEuropean Central BankCovid recovery fund. And poor Ireland is now on the hook to be a net contributor to the EU budget. The bloc is on its way to being a single dysfunctional state, ruled from Berlin. Leaving was surely a great decision, and remainers look more and more like fundamentalist swivel-eyed lunatics, as Matthew Parris and David Cameron used to call them.

- Advertisement -

Read more from the original source:

TCW's Brexit Watch: Are we heading for a fake freedom? - The Conservative Woman

The Hard Right is a Far Greater Threat to Freedom of Speech than ‘Cancel Culture’ – Byline Times

From his experience with the far-right, Caolan Robertson argues their reaction to that assault on commentator Owen Jones proves they are happy to silence opponents when it suits them

When Owen Jones was violently attacked outside a London pub last year by three football hooligans, one of whom karate kicked him in the back without warning, the response was disturbingly mixed. While many on the political left and the centre were justly horrified, there was a particularly disturbing and predictable response from much of the right.

On Telegram, the Russian app to which many far-right e-celebs have been exiled, comments and posts claiming Jones had it coming or outright denying the attack happened were rife. Even now on Twitter, responses to a BBC tweet linking an article about the attackers sentencing include users calling him a puff, claiming that he brought it upon himself and that he should have been hit harder.

James Healy, the man who led the attack was found to have been a member of a football hooligan firm and to have kept neo-nazi group Combat 18 memorabilia at home. While this attack was clearly politically motivated, its also worth noting that one of Combat 18s key tenets is Kill all Queers. Perhaps most concerning though, is not the actual violence from avowed neo-nazis, but rather the committed support for it from the much less radical sections of the right.

The right simply does not care about freedom of speech, or freedom of the press, or freedom of association or assembly or any other freedom that forms the basis of the Western democracy they profess to love so deeply.

On Telegram, the idols of the far-right such as Milo Yiannopoulos, Tommy Robinson and Gavin McInnes are vociferous in their insistence that free speech must be protected at all costs. But there is no clearer example of an attack on free speech than the brutal and frenzied attack on Jones simply for his advocating left-wing ideals.

So why are so many on the right, even the centre-right dismissing or even lauding what is essentially a shocking, appalling, affront to the very idea of free speech? Not since the murder of Jo Cox, a sitting MP, has such a blatant and frankly shameless act of political violence been met with such disregard from those who profess to nail their colours to the mast of Western Values.

News of Healy and his accomplices sentencing (two years and a suspended sentence of eight months respectively) comes at a time when the culture wars topic du jour is cancel culture. The timing could not be more pertinent. At this point, we must stop and ask ourselves which is the greater affront to freedom of speech and Western democratic ideals?

Certainly, the use of physical violence, of any kind, against a political opponent is a far greater threat to the ability of any person to speak freely than the possibility of losing a job, a book deal or some other professional commodity. We can debate whether cancel culture exists or not but all of its supposed impacts pale in comparison to actual violence. Yet the most outspoken advocates of free speech are not up in arms over this attack but at worst celebrated it and at best dismissed it completely.

Thus their hypocrisy is laid bare for all but themselves to see. This is because they patently do not care about freedom of speech or Western democracy. Milo Yiannopoulos, the right-wing provocateur who artificially inflated his book sales, posted on the right-wing app Parler as recently as this week, declaring he doesnt want to see less cancel culture but more of it, as long as it is those he disagrees with being cancelled.

Once upon a time, when I was much younger and vastly more stupid than I am now, I worked with Milo and this was very much his stance on politics. I also worked with Tommy Robinson and many other content creators on the online right and can assure you that this attitude is not limited to Yiannopoulos. As the outtake from 2018 below reveals, Robinsons latching onto the notion of free speech was very much opportunistic and insincere.

In @CaolanRob's upcoming piece on why the Far Right are a far greater threat than Cancel Culture to free speech, a previously unseen outtake from Yaxley Lennon in 2018, where he describes how he'll use the 'free speech' theme for his own ends. pic.twitter.com/iqic2k6KZ6

The trouble is that in recent years the line that separated the far right from the mainstream conservative movement is eroding fast.

Last year Prime Minister Boris Johnson appointed Chloe Westley as head of social media for Downing Street. Westley openly referred to the co-leader of Tommy Robinsons Pegida UK (a branch of a German alt-right ethnonationalist group) as a hero. Anne Marie Waters, the far-right activist in question, was caught on camera by ITV claiming the EU wanted to turn Europe into an Islamic State.

I even met with the CEO of Westminster Digital, a production company responsible for much of the Conservative Partys campaign content to discuss working on their content while I was working with Tommy Robinson and other hard-right ideologues.

One of the reasons I began working with these people was because I believed that freedom of speech was under attack, I heard the figures about Sadiq Khans online hate crime hub and the increasing number of arrests made over Twitter posts in 2016 and 2017. Like many, I had a knee jerk reaction to it, and this was part of the reason I drifted into hardcore right-wing politics.

One of the reasons I began to question my involvement was a violent attack on Muslim Youtuber Ali Dawah at the Day for Freedom rally in 2018. We had planned for the event to be the largest pro-free speech rally in recent memory and the lineup was a whos who of the online right at the time. The day before the event, Ali Dawah had been making a lot of noise on Twitter claiming that if the rally was really about free speech we would let him speak too.

What a coup it would be, we thought, if Ali Dawah, who had a history of online spats with Robinson would crop up on stage and speak. We thought we could prove the naysayers wrong, prove that it was ultimately all about the freedom of speech, about democracy and Western values of freedom.

It was agreed that he would be put on stage and the update was announced via Robinsons assistant on Twitter. The backlash was instant and Robinson publicly revoked the invite and denied any participation in making the decision, wasting no time in throwing his assistant under the bus.

Privately, however, Dawah was still slated to speak until the last minute when he had already arrived. A handful of supporters broke loose and violently confronted Dawah and his cameraman, assaulting him mid livestream in an attack that terrified me even then. My relationship with Robinson began to break down when that afternoon he reprimanded me, his assistant and my partner George Llewelyn-John for sharing tweets condemning the attack and appealing for witnesses to identify the men responsible.

At the Day for Freedom, Ali Dawah wasnt just literally cancelled but he was made the victim of all too common far-right violence, violence that is implicitly supported by people like Robinson and Yiannopolous.

But Ali Dawah and Owen Jones are far from the only victims, a labour activist in her 70s was attacked by right wing thugs and suffered cracked ribs as recently as November last year. In March that same year the DFLA, a loose union of football hooligan firms stormed into the Guardian offices demanding a letter they wrote be published and threatened to return in greater numbers if their demands werent met. There are countless examples of threats and actual violence from the far-right and yet none of the doxxing, assaults, threats or harassment are on the table for discussion when the right want to talk about cancel culture and its danger to freedom of speech.

It is time we all woke up. The right simply does not care about freedom of speech, or freedom of the press, or freedom of association or assembly or any other freedom that forms the basis of the Western democracy they profess to love so deeply. Nor do they care about democracy itself. They care only about winning, about spewing hate or perpetrating acts of violence with impunity.

If we are to stand any chance of slowing or reversing the tide of right-wing populism, if we are to protect freedom of speech and the right to dissenting opinions, we must stop meeting them where they are. We must stop taking their arguments at face value; false, disingenuous arguments meant only to subvert our democracy, to divert our attention while they conjure up something much worse.

We have to stop falling for it every time, arguing with them over a cancel culture that they dont even believe exists. It is all just a vehicle for them to achieve their reactionary goals, and while we are getting down in the mud with them from behind our computer screens, they are on the streets putting journalists in hospital and convincing a large proportion of the population that it didnt even happen.

I used to laugh about the idea of fascism in the UK. I used to joke about it because I thought it wasnt even a remote possibility.

How wrong how naive I was.

See original here:

The Hard Right is a Far Greater Threat to Freedom of Speech than 'Cancel Culture' - Byline Times

John Lewis: ‘Now it is your turn to let freedom ring’ | TheHill – The Hill

The late Rep. John LewisJohn LewisHouse approves amendments to rein in federal forces in cities Sanders calls for the end of the filibuster following Obama's remarks The Hill's Campaign Report: Trump faces pushback after suggesting election could be delayed MORE (D-Ga.) said in a posthumous op-ed that he had been inspired shortly before his death by nationwide demonstrations against systemic racism and police brutality sparked by the death of George Floyd in May.

In a piece publishedin The New York Times on the day of his funeral, the civil rights titan recounted his own fears after the lynching of Emmett Till in 1955 and his own path to the civil rights movement led by Martin Luther King Jr.

Lewis called on the next generation to carry on the mantle of civil rights and continue getting into good trouble, necessary trouble.

While my time here has now come to an end, I want you to know that in the last days and hours of my life you inspired me. You filled me with hope about the next chapter of the great American story when you used your power to make a difference in our society, Lewis wrote.

Though I may not be here with you, I urge you to answer the highest calling of your heart and stand up for what you truly believe. In my life I have done all I can to demonstrate that the way of peace, the way of love and nonviolence is the more excellent way, he added. Now it is your turn to let freedom ring.

Lewis wrote that he had to visit the site of demonstrations in Washington, D.C., in the newly established Black Lives Matter Plaza outside the White House in June to see the latest manifestation of the civil rights movement. Lewis was hospitalized the next day.

I just had to see and feel it for myself that, after many years of silent witness, the truth is still marching on, he wrote.

Lewis, who after a prominent role in the civil rights movement represented an Atlanta-area district in the House for more than 30 years, died on July 17 at the age of 80. He had been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in December.

Lewis was given the rare honor of lying in state at the U.S. Capitol two days earlier this week, and a funeral will be held for him Thursday at Atlantas Ebenezer Baptist Church, the site of Kings funeral in 1968. Former President Obama will be one of the attendees to deliver a eulogy.

Read more here:

John Lewis: 'Now it is your turn to let freedom ring' | TheHill - The Hill

On the internet, freedom for some never means freedom for all – The Spinoff

Kathy Errington introduces a conversation with Anjum Rahman on online harm, an extract from the upcoming BWB text Shouting Zeroes and Ones, edited by Andrew Chen.

Articulating what matters when we look to reduce online harm is becoming ever more important in a context where states are increasingly turning to regulation to address harms caused by social media platforms which grew too big, too fast while accepting too little responsibility.

Unfortunately, many of us have concluded that we cant trust social media companies to properly regulate themselves. They are, after all, largely reliant on a huge volume of user-generated content, and are often unwilling to make the necessary investment into human moderators to effectively review what or whom they give a platform to. Algorithms designed to ensure users stay on the platform can create dark echo chambers in which harmful content is continually reinforced, but social media companies have become reliant on this business model and are resistant to change.

Kathy Errington: You have said that in regard to freedom of expression, freedom for some takes away freedom from others. Can you expand on that?

Anjum Rahman: What we know about hate speech is when people are really aggressive with hate, particularly when language is threatening and abusive, it silences other people. Often with hate language, not only is it belittling the targeted group, it is spreading misinformation and ascribing false motives. The aim is to enhance the negativity of one group over another, thereby undermining the authority and validity of the speaker by associating them with a group or community delineated as evil.

The second dynamic is the sheer numbers. Those who are involved in hate will often attack groups that they perceive to have little ability to respond. In other words, the targets have little positional power within society, and they may already be viewed negatively by a significant number of people. So, the hater is in a position of feeling secure in being able to target that group safe in the knowledge that they have numbers on their side to overwhelm existing systems which attempt to provide balance.

For example, back in the day when letters to the editor were more of a thing than social media, I could write one letter trying to defend a position, and then have to deal with 20 to 30 letters in response. And the way it worked was that I only got 200 words, I only got to publish a letter once every 10 days or so, and therefore my ability to respond back, just with the sheer numbers, was so limited.

In the online world, an additional factor is the high number of bots and paid trolls, with a lot of resourcing going into campaigns targeting particular communities. As a person being targeted, when people are threatening you with rape, or death, or harm, when they are being really abusive in their language, and when they are spreading a lot of misinformation or one-sided information, when there are literally hundreds of accounts going at you, it restricts your freedom.

The response is to just shut down your social media accounts, to get offline, which means youve lost your freedom to speak. Weve seen it with celebrities, weve seen it with all sorts of people. The result is that the dominant groups freedoms are protected and advanced, while the marginalised groups lose their freedom. Theyre silent because they dont have the capacity to withstand the harassment and abuse, and they dont have the ability to respond to all those accounts. Countering the hate is not viable, so the response is to hunker down and to be silent, which is what the haters were wanting in the first place; they want to silence the voices of people they dont like.

That is a long answer to how freedom for some takes away the freedom of others. If you dont balance different types of freedoms from discrimination, from harm then youre actually only promoting the freedoms of dominant groups. Youre not promoting freedom for all people.

KE: How do we get regulation right? We seem caught in a conversation where any efforts to improve life online become immediately attacked for government overreach. And governments, even democratic ones, can respond in heavy-handed ways.

AR: I am not opposed to regulation, but we do need to be really careful. What we are hearing from an organisation in the United States is that, in their experience, regulation sought by marginalised groups can be used against them by a subsequent administration. Putting in regulation without also dealing with power and the way society is structured will not achieve anything. I think that we have to be really careful around legislation and we have to design the systems that administer those regulations knowing that, at some point, a hostile government will be enforcing them. What will protect marginalised groups in that situation? That has to be really seriously tested and factored into the way we regulate.

Another problem raised by civil society organisations overseas is that a lot of videos depicting violence which were taken down by YouTube were evidence of crimes by regimes, or evidence that could be used in court cases. So simply removing content has consequences that will be harmful to those that are suffering abuse. We need to think about how that content is archived. Who can have access to it? How can it be protected so that it can be accessed when its needed? All of this has to be factored into regulation, which is again to say, I do believe that we should have regulation. I think there are things we can do, but when it comes to implementation and enforcement, you really have to be careful.

Shouting Zeroes and Ones will be available at Unity Books from August 10.

David Hall, Curtis Barnes, Anjum Rahman, Kathy Errington, and Donna Cormack discuss the spread of disinformation, reducing online harm, and Mori data sovereignty as part of Techweek on Wednesday, July 29. Streaming details here.

The Bulletin is The Spinoffs acclaimed daily digest of New Zealands most important stories, delivered directly to your inbox each morning.

Here is the original post:

On the internet, freedom for some never means freedom for all - The Spinoff