Tucker Carlson Should’ve Been Fired Years Ago – New York Magazine

Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Tucker Carlsons abrupt departure from Fox News has left millions of Americans asking one of the hosts favorite questions: What is going on?

Media reporters are currently chasing down the reasons for Carlsons absence, which was described by the network as a mutual agreement to part ways, even though he was under the impression he was going to host his show on Monday night. But with the landscape of conservative media shaken by the announcement, a look back at Carlsons career reveals a number of comments that would have gotten him fired or at least gotten him axed at a different network that cared about things like not promoting white nationalists. Below are some of the greatest worst hits of the networks most popular ex-host.

Carlson was co-hosting Fox & Friends Weekend in July 2013 when the network was discussing the killing of Trayvon Martin. After Geraldo Rivera called in to say that if you dress like a thug, people are going to treat you like a thug, Carlson declined to comment directly on the shooting of the Black 17-year-old but had something to say about two prominent civil-rights activists pushing for justice. I am positive that people like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton do not deserve to be called civil-rights leaders, Carlson said. They are not. They are hustlers and pimps who make a living off inflaming racial tensions. They know nothing about this.

A decade of conversation about race in America didnt appear to have much impact on Carlson. In April, after Tennessee lawmaker Justin Pearson was removed from the state legislature for demonstrating for gun reform, Carlson played two videos of Pearson speaking one from his time at Bowdoin College and another on the statehouse floor. After claiming Pearson only got into Bowdoin because he is Black, Carlson said that Pearson sounded like a crypto white kid in the first video. In the more recent clip of Pearson, he suggested the lawmaker was mimicking civil rights leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. because of the cadence of his speech. Carlson failed to note that Pearsons father was a pastor. He then suggested that Pearson sounded like a sharecropper compared to other civil-rights figures like Malcolm X.

Carlson was famous for xenophobia on his show, but one of the foulest comments he made condemning immigration came in December 2018, when he described how he thought migrants crossing the southern border affected the country:

We have a moral obligation to admit the worlds poor, they tell us, even if it makes our own country poorer and dirtier and more divided. Immigration is a form of atonement.

Carlson faced some advertising blowback for the comment, with 11 advertisers including Pacific Life and IHOP pulling their spots from his show. But it wasnt enough to make him reevaluate his opinion. A year later, he did not push back when a guest said that immigrants make New York City dirty.

Remember Bubba the Love Sponge the Florida radio host whose sex tape with Hulk Hogans wife took down Gawker? His conversations put Carlson in hot water, too, when Media Matters for America published clips of Carlson calling into his radio show between 2006 and 2011 saying some pretty horrific things. Iraq was a place filled semi-literate primitive monkeys where they did not know how to use utensils. He said everybody knows that Barack Obama would never have been elected to national office if he were white. He described white women with jungle fever as mudsharks.

On his show, Carlson has suggested that powerful women, like Vice-President Kamala Harris, have dated their way into their positions and claimed that women in the upper ranks of the armed forces have made a mockery of the U.S. military. But these on-air comments pale in comparison to the Bubba the Love Sponge recordings released the same week as the racist jokes above. During the same period between 2006 and 2011, Carlson called women extremely primitive. He called Britney Spears and Paris Hilton the biggest white whores in America. He said he felt sorry for Justice Elena Kagan because he feels sorry in general for unattractive women. He said that rape-shield laws should be banned. He imagined a scenario in which girls at his daughters girls-only boarding school were having sex with each other and said, If it werent my daughter, I would love that scenario.

For the past five years, Carlson has been airing segments on the racist conspiracy known as great-replacement theory the idea that an elite cabal (often Jewish) is pushing to increase immigration from nonwhite countries, which will ultimately result in a civilizational shift in majority-white nations like the United States when white people are no longer the dominant plurality. In one monologue from April 2021, he mentioned the idea by name:

I know that the left and all the little gatekeepers on Twitter become literally hysterical if you use the term replacement, if you suggest that the Democratic Party is trying to replace the current electorate the voters now casting ballots with new people, more obedient voters from the Third World. But they become hysterical because thats what happening, actually. Lets just say it. Thats true.

Carlson, who has called white nationalism a hoax, has repeated the idea hundreds of times, according to one count. And white nationalists have been thrilled that Carlson has been doing their work for them. In 2019, a leaked chat from the supremacist group Identity Evropa had messages saying Tuck was our guy, who has done more for our people than most of us could ever hope to. The same year, Derek Black, a man who renounced his prominent neo-Nazi family, said they used to sit around watching Carlson on replay because they feel that he is making the white nationalist talking points better than they have. Carlsons mention of the theory cooled off for a few months last year after a racist shooter cited it in his manifesto for killing ten people in a Buffalo supermarket. But a few months later, he was back on it, calling the great replacement an election strategy by Democrats, not a conspiracy theory.

As the COVID vaccine rollout gained momentum among the general public in spring 2021, Carlson aired a segment falsely claiming that more than 3,000 people had died after getting the shot. The actual number is almost certainly much higher than that, Carlson said, citing an open-source database compiledby anti-vaxx conspiracists. Perhaps vastly higher.

Carlson was way off: An extremely small number of people who received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine died from a rare blood-clotting syndrome. Hundreds of millions of Americans have been fully vaccinated.

Daily news about the politics, business, and technology shaping our world.

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice and to receive email correspondence from us.

View original post here:

Tucker Carlson Should've Been Fired Years Ago - New York Magazine

Soldier with white nationalist ties pleads guilty to gun charges – ArmyTimes.com

A Fort Bragg soldier who allegedly sought to physically remove as many racial minorities from eastern North Carolina by whatever means need be pleaded guilty Tuesday to illegal possession of an unregistered short barrel rifle, the Justice Department announced Wednesday.

Noah Edwin Anthony, 23, was apprehended on March 3 after gate security personnel performing random vehicle inspections discovered a loaded 9mm Glock Like ghost gun a weapon with no serial number in the vehicles center console.

Military Police called to the scene when Anthony failed to furnish paperwork for the weapon searched the vehicle and found two extended magazines, ammunition, Nazi type patches and an American flag with a Swastika in place of the blue field and stars, according to the release.

The discovery prompted a subsequent search of Anthonys barracks room, where authorities found a 3D-printed FGC-9 rifle without a serial number, magazines for various firearms, a lower receiver, a trove of white supremacist paraphernalia and electronics that contained evidence of Anthonys self-titled operation to target minorities.

Personnel from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives determined the unserialized FGC-9 to be in violation of the National Firearms Act, which, beyond serial number legalities, mandates rifle barrels be no shorter than 16 inches.

Anthony, meanwhile, is the second Fort Bragg soldier to be investigated in recent months for ties to white nationalism. In August, Killian Mackeithan Ryan, a fire support specialist, was arrested and booted from the Army for serious misconduct after investigators discovered he was using numerous Instagram accounts associated with racially motivated extremism, according to court records.

In one particular Instagram post, Ryan claimed to have joined the military for combat experience so Im more proficient in killing Black people, investigators said.

Army Times request for comment from Fort Bragg has not been returned as of publication, though in an earlier statement provided to North Carolina news outlet WRAL a spokesperson at the installation said the service does not tolerate extremist ideologies, racism or hate.

We are a values-based organization and put the safety of our Paratroopers first, the spokesperson from the 82nd Airborne Division told WRAL. Any actions that detract from the good order and discipline of our unit are addressed in a swift and prudent manner.

Personnel from the FBI, Army Criminal Investigation Division and ATF are continuing to investigate the case.

Anthony is expected to be sentenced later this year. He faces up to 10 years in prison.

Jon Simkins is a writer and editor for Military Times, and a USMC veteran.

Original post:

Soldier with white nationalist ties pleads guilty to gun charges - ArmyTimes.com

Fox News Could Be Just as Racist Without Tucker Carlson – New York Magazine

Until his abrupt dismissal Monday morning, Tucker Carlson was Americas most racist news host. He was also the most popular anchor on all of cable television. For that reason, among others, Carlsons departure may not mark the end of Fox News foray into unabashed white nationalism.

Virtually all Fox News commentators speak to red Americas amygdala, cultivating fear and resentment of low-income Black communities, non-white immigrants, and rootless, godless liberal elites. But most try to maintain some distance between their demagogy and that found on neo-Nazi message boards, if only to retain the sponsorship of image-conscious advertisers.

Carlson did not. During his six years helming Fox News 8 p.m. hour, the host all but used Stormfront as an assignment editor. While other Fox News hosts demonized non-white criminals, Carlson described tens of millions of U.S. citizens as enemies of the people.

In April 2021, Carlson mocked Joe Biden for calling the January 6 insurrection the worst attack on democracy since the Civil War, countering that the Immigration Act of 1965 was a bigger affront to political liberty in the U.S.: That law completely changed the composition of Americas voter rolls, purely to benefit the Democratic Party. That seems like kind of an assault on democracy, a permanent one. Thus, by Carlsons logic, every American who secured access to this country as a result of Congresss repeal on racial quotas for immigration in 1965 is a de facto foot soldier in the Democratic Partys plot to permanently disenfranchise our nations longtime residents.

Variations on this theme were a staple of Carlsons commentary. In another diatribe against the 1965 immigration law last year, the host endorsed the great replacement conspiracy theory by name. That white-nationalist narrative holds that rootless cosmopolitan elites are deliberately replacing Americas white majority with multiethnic immigrants who will be easier for them to control. You cant just replace the electorate because you didnt like the last election outcomes, Carlson declared. That would be the definition of undermining democracy, changing the voters. But when it happens in this country, there is mandatory media-enforced silence and in fact, if you notice its happening, its your fault. (In reality, the authors of the 1965 Immigration Act did not expect the law to change the demographic composition of the nation nearly as much as it did and, as Ron DeSantiss recent landslide reelection in a state that is only about 50 percent non-Hispanic white showed, non-white immigrants are not actually automata programmed by George Soros.)

Perhaps, the most distinctive feature of Carlsons demagogy was his amplification of marginal stories that had previously captured the attention of virtually no one in the United States beyond white supremacists. South African land reform is not a subject that speaks to the typical Fox News viewer. In 2018, however, American racists eager to see confirmation of their prophecies of impending white genocide took keen interest in reforms enabling the South African government to expropriate landowners property without compensation. Specifically, white nationalists glommed onto a narrative propagated by far-right Afrikaners that Black mobs were murdering white farmers in South Africa in large numbers while their government worked to seize land from their surviving kin.

Its not hard to see the appeal of this story for white nationalists. Unlike in the United States, where fodder for white grievance is so limited that racially inclusive Cheerios commercials qualify as an affront, South Africas white population is a genuinely politically disempowered minority group (even as it continues to wield disproportionate economic power in the country). Place pogroms against white farmers against this backdrop, and you have Richard Spencers nightmares made real.

Or rather, you would have that, if such pogroms had actually existed at any substantial scale. In reality, murders on South African farms had been declining for decades and murder rates in white rural parts of South Africa remained far lower than in predominantly Black townships. Discrete anti-white hate crimes surely occurred. But white farmers remained unusually safe relative to the South African population as a whole. And the governments land reforms would have implicated Black and white South Africans alike.

But this did not stop Tucker Carlson from broadcasting white nationalists preferred version of events. At other points in his tenure, Carlson saw fit to portray gypsy refugees as filthy, unassimilable public defecators, or lambast Macys for selling hijabs.

Carlson might disavow the idea that his program promoted white nationalism. But white nationalists begged to differ.

All this led many Fox News employees to raise internal complaints about Carlsons program, and many big-name advertisers to pull their spots from the channels 8 p.m. hour.

Given the exceptional severity of Carlsons racism and its seemingly adverse implications for Foxs ad business, it is natural to assume that the hosts departure will render Americas most-watched cable news channel slightly less of a cancer on the body politic. We dont yet know why Fox fired Carlson. During last Fridays broadcast, the host appeared to have no inkling that the show would be his last. Its conceivable that his dismissal represents an editorial decision to pivot away from his brand of content. Regardless, it is certainly possible (perhaps, even probable) that Carlsons replacement will traffic in a subtler form of white grievance. But that is far from a certainty.

After all, Carlsons on-air persona was not born of any longtime, deep-seated ideological attachment to white-nationalist ideology. Before Carlson became a right-wing populist critic of cosmopolitan corporations, woke capitalism, and free markets, he was a laissez-faire-loving libertarian. Further, as messages unveiled by the Dominion Voting Systems defamation lawsuit make clear, Carlsons televised pronouncements dont necessarily reflect his current beliefs. Even as Carlson comported himself as one of Donald Trumps most fervent cheerleaders, he told others privately that he hated the president passionately.

In truth, Carlsons incendiary content did not reflect his own idiosyncratic beliefs so much as his audiences revealed preferences. As the New York Times reported last year, the driving force behind Carslons far-right turn was minute-by-minutes ratings, data that tracks the size of a shows audience at 60-second intervals. Determined to avoid a reprise of his previous failures to retain a large audience at CNN and MSNBC, Carlson became one of his networks most avid consumers of minute-by-minutes. And when the host carefully studied which subjects actually held his audiences attention, it became clear that stories activating a perception of racialized threat did the trick. As one former Fox employee told the Times in 2022, He is going to double down on the white nationalism because the minute-by-minutes show that the audience eats it up.

To the extent that any personal quality informed the exceptional racism of Carlsons program, it seems to have been nihilistic ruthlessness. No sense of decency prevented Carlson from declaring white supremacy nonexistent days after a white-nationalist terrorist mass-murdered Hispanic Americans in El Paso, nor from stoking fears of a migrant invasion right after similar ideas inspired a neo-Nazi to shoot up a synagogue in Pittsburgh. If amorality enabled Carlson to fish in such waters, though, it was economic rationality that drew him there. When the host used George Floyds killing as an opportunity to assail the Black Lives Matter movement in terms that made Black colleagues uncomfortable, he posted the highest quarterly ratings of any cable-news show in history.

True, Carlsons approach cost him advertisers. But it did not cost his employer advertising revenue. As big brands fled, Fox filled the consequent gaps with spots for other Fox programming (thereby funneling Tuckers massive audience to other shows that such brands would patronize) and charged premium rates to the advertisers that remained. Trading respectability for maximum eyeballs proved lucrative. From 2018 through 2022, Tucker Carlson Tonight brought in more annual ad dollars than any other Fox show.

Further, as the Times reported last year, Carlsons strategy reflected an emerging editorial consensus at Fox News commanding heights. Fox Corporation CEO Lachlan Murdoch reportedly has even more sympathy for far-right politics than his father, Rupert. Meanwhile, Fox News vice-president Tom Lowell championed a Moneyball approach to programming: allowing the wisdom of the crowds (as discerned through minute-by-minute ratings) to determine editorial decisions. Combine an ideological openness to white revanchism with data demonstrating its efficacy for maximizing engagement, and you get Foxs recent rightward drift, in which its primetime propagandizing has suffused more and more of its ostensibly neutral daytime content.

Of course, just because there are economic incentives to emulate Carlson does not mean his successor will do so. Plenty of Fox News existing hosts have chosen to refrain from directly promulgating white-nationalist conspiracy theories, even as Carlson rode them to ratings supremacy. Nevertheless, the fact that Carlsons editorial line reflected a data-driven assessment of which subjects will keep Americas (disproportionately old and white) news viewers from changing channels should temper optimism for Foxs future. Tucker Carlson has left Americas most-watched news network. But its audiences appetite for White Nationalism Lite remains.

Daily news about the politics, business, and technology shaping our world.

By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice and to receive email correspondence from us.

Go here to read the rest:

Fox News Could Be Just as Racist Without Tucker Carlson - New York Magazine

Fox finally boots Tucker Carlson – IrishCentral

So Tucker Carlson has finally bit the dust after years of spewing pro-fascist sentiments in which he encouraged white nationalism and supported fascist leaders.

His message has suddenly stopped resonating with his embattled employer, Fox News, which terminated his contract on Monday morning, finally signaling that theyve had enough of their home-grown fascist superstar no surprise there as Fox got whacked last week with a bill for $787 million, payable to Dominion Voting Systems, for smearing the company as supposedly complicit in 2020 election fraud.

There is a history of Tucker Carlsons in American media. It should be no surprise that another member of that evil tribe has risen, crashed, and burned in a pretty stunning fashion.

The closest comparison to him is Father Charles Coughlin, who in his heyday in the 1930s had 30 million listeners a week tuning in for his weekly pro-Nazi rant.

Coughlin was enormously powerful, so much so that his own church was terrified of dealing with him as the powers-that-be knew he had millions of followers who had the capacity to seriously damage the stature of the Catholic Church.

Coughlin was a demagogue who explained away the Nazi atrocities of the 1930s, saying, for instance, Kristallnacht happened because the Germans had been attacked. He was a dangerous, evil character who would have prospered enormously if Hitler had won.

But the goodwill of the American people towards Coughlin faded over time. As the Nazi atrocities unfolded, and amidst the revelation that Coughlin was being paid by the German Nazi party to broadcast his hate, his popularity soon plunged.

It is incredible to think now that Coughlin was a guest at the White House where he met with FDR and other leading American political figures who were seeking to blunt his extremism but did not want to face him head-on.

They initially failed in their effort and Coughlin went on to become the face of American Nazism. He even had his own version of the Proud Boys, a group he called the Christian Front whose members regularly attacked Jews and synagogues.

At his height, Coughlin signed a lucrative contract with CBS to expand his radio show which gave a massive boost to his listenership. With the Catholic Church refusing to step in, showing a moral cowardice that was all too evident in their dealings with Coughlin, it was left to FDR to take the vital step.

He announced that Coughlin was being barred from the airwaves and could no longer broadcast his extremist views. Unlike Germany, Coughlin never built a movement capable of sustaining an armed insurrection and he soon faded from history.

But now comes Carlson with his own brand of hatred for everything not white, his continued attacks from the far right on immigrants, and his support for the January 6 insurrectionists.

But now, even Fox News has had enough, and we were treated to the extraordinary spectacle of Carlson being booted out without even knowing his fate on Monday. And not a moment too soon.

Foxs house is far from clean, and there are a few more hosts who need to be shown the door and probably will be Judge Jeanine, anyone?

No doubt Carlson will eventually resurface and double down on his hate, and it will be fascinating to see what becomes of Fox News, purveyors of so much misinformation which theyll be paying more for in the days ahead as other defamation lawsuits work their way to the forefront.

So good riddance to Tucker Carlson. To most Americans, he wont be missed.

*This column first appeared in the April 26 edition of the weekly Irish Voice newspaper, sister publication to IrishCentral.

Here is the original post:

Fox finally boots Tucker Carlson - IrishCentral

Severe immigration policies intensify as Title 42 nears its end – Source New Mexico

Title 42, a measure that prevents migrants from getting asylum in the U.S. due to COVID, is expected to end next month as the country lifts its national public health emergency.

Meanwhile, federal immigration agencies are ramping up severe immigration policies ahead of the policy ending on May 11.

Federal authorities expelled more than 235,000 asylum seekers in the first three months of 2023 under Title 42, according to government data. Since the start of Title 42 in March 2020, the U.S. has removed over 2.8 million asylum seekers.

That includes families, children and people traveling alone.

The premise of Title 42 was to increase COVID precautions. Health officials said that policy actually lacks public health reasoning.

Title 42 is a federal code that allows the federal government to expel migrants who have come from a country with a communicable disease. Ending the policy means the U.S. has to process migrants under typical immigration laws, allowing them again to seek asylum instead of deportation.

Sophia Genovese is an attorney at the New Mexico Immigrant Law Center. She said its likely a rush of asylum seekers will come to the U.S. when the policy lifts.

While its a good thing that Title 42 is ending, she said, there are still overly strict immigration policies in place.

In January, with the end of Title 42 in mind, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security announced a string of new, strict border enforcement measures. One measure proposes rapidly kicking migrants out of the U.S. known as expedited removal who arent eligible for Title 42 under Title 8 instead.

Under Title 8, if asylum officers determine that migrants dont have a credible fear back in their home country or migrants dont ask for asylum, the federal government can remove them from the country. Genovese said this is a big issue.

Were wasting a lot of money on expulsions and deportations, instead of being rational and recognizing that migration is normal, she said.

Genovese said there are expedited removal violations at the Torrance County Detention Center, one of three immigrant detention centers in New Mexico. It has a history of violating federal standards. Migrants have also repeatedly reported inhumane conditions, and one Brazilian asylum seeker being held at Torrance died by suicide last year.

Federal officials hold credible fear interviews to ensure that migrants have a reason to be afraid of returning to their home country. Genovese said some interviews at Torrance have been violating due process rights, with officers asking few questions in interviews, only asking yes-or-no questions when questions are supposed to be open-ended and speeding through interviews.

She said shes working with a migrant from Ecuador who speaks Kichwa and was forced to proceed with an interview in Spanish, despite not even speaking that language.

Genovese said the U.S. deportation exodus only creates a larger mess than what is necessary in the end.

No amount of border policies are going to limit migration, she said. What this causes instead is chaos, and it feels intentional.

Genovese pointed out that providing accessible services to migrants, such as legal help, is less costly than detaining them.

They are invested in the process, and simply need access to information and services to meaningfully participate in that process, she said.

Genovese said the New Mexico Immigrant Law Center wants to see alternatives to detention, like Immigrant Customs and Enforcement check-ins and community-based models of assistance.

People want to comply with court orders. They want to comply with the law, she said. People are here because they generally fear returning to their home countries, and they want whats best for them and their familys safety.

Immigration is ultimately up to the federal government. Genovese said the state government cant interfere with the enforcement of these policies.

However, New Mexico could show solidarity for migrants, she said, and employ strategies like welcoming centers. She brought up Portland, where an immigration welcome center provides access to legal services, food programs and language education.

How powerful would that be, if perhaps the City of Albuquerque did that, or other cities within the state supported by the state government are able to establish these welcoming centers, she said. So that people have the tools that they need to get through their asylum process.

One New Mexico representative is asking for the New Mexico National Guard to be sent to the southern border to help stem the flow of illegal activity.

Rep. Jenifer Jones (R-Deming) sent a letter to Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham last week referencing a conversation the two had during the Legislature about potential federal funds to send the New Mexico National Guard to the border. Jones said state funds could be used if theres no federal assistance.

Maddie Hayden, spokesperson for the governors office, said via email that the New Mexico National Guard is ready to assist with non-enforcement related work at the southern border, at the request of the federal government.

Congress ultimately bears responsibility for finding a solution on federal immigration policy, she wrote, but until Republicans recognize that border security and humanitarian aid are not mutually exclusive, this fundamentally federal issue will continue to fester without a solution in sight.

Hayden said Lujan Grisham agrees with Jones that public safety is paramount, including at the southern border. She added that the governor is committed to dedicating whatever resources are needed to keep New Mexicans safe.

New Mexico Senate allows immigration detention to continue

In the letter, Jones said the flow of illegal activity will likely increase when Title 42 lifts, worsening a crisis of illegal drugs coming across the southern border and the threat of human trafficking.

Genovese said Democrats cant fall victim to messages like the one from Jones and try to appease white nationalism.

Its fear-mongering by Republicans, predominantly, about the immigrants, the asylum seekers, the migrants, failures to recognize humanity in our neighbors, she said. Its completely racist and xenophobic.

She said Biden also shouldnt try to appease these Republicans. His administration has expelled more people under Title 42 than the Trump administration that enacted it, according to the government statistics. Genovese said too often, Democrats like Biden try to placate Republicans by showing force around the southern border.

Its caused a tremendous amount of chaos and more harm, she said.

Bidens stance on Title 42 has swayed over the years, with the administration often denouncing inhumane immigration policies while still keeping them in effect.

Congressional members pointed out Bidens mixed messages in January. They sent a letter to Biden arguing against the expansion of Title 42. New Mexicos U.S. Sen. Ben Ray Lujn and Rep. Teresa Leger Fernndez signed that letter along with 75 other officials.

The Biden administration as well as immigration advocacy centers have failed to end Title 42 numerous times.

As a result of that and Title 8 being in effect, Genovese said there have been and still are thousands upon thousands of migrants and asylum seekers waiting in Mexico. Many are often in very dangerous situations, she added.

When asylum seekers rush into the U.S. when Title 42 lifts, she said, U.S. Customs and Border Patrol wont have the capacity to hold everyone, meaning some will get through undetected and officials will just have to allow others through.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

SUBSCRIBE

Read the rest here:

Severe immigration policies intensify as Title 42 nears its end - Source New Mexico

President Biden Announces Key Appointments to Boards and … – The White House

WASHINGTON Today, President Biden announced his intent to appoint the following individuals to the Presidential Advisory Commission on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans:

Presidential Advisory Commission on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans

The Presidential Advisory Commission on Advancing Educational Equity, Excellence, and Economic Opportunity for Black Americans aids in developing, implementing, and coordinating educational programs and initiatives for agencies such as the Department of Education. Specifically, the Commission provides advice to the President through the Secretary of Education on matters pertaining to educational equity and economic opportunity for the Black community. The Commission primarily focuses on: 1) promoting career pathways for Black students through programs such as internships, apprenticeships and work-based learning initiatives, 2) increasing public awareness of the educational disparities Black Americans face and providing solutions to these problems, and 3) establishing local and national relationships with public, private, philanthropic, and nonprofit stakeholders to advance the mission of equity, excellence, and economic opportunity for Black Americans.

Malcolm Kenyatta, Chair

Representative Malcolm Kenyatta is a third-generation North Philadelphia native, thought leader, and legislator, currently serving in the Pennsylvania General Assembly. He earned his Bachelor of Arts in Public Communications with a minor in Political Science from Temple University and his Master of Science in Strategic and Digital Communications from Drexel University. Kenyatta also completed the Harvard Kennedy Schools Executives in State and Local Government Program. Kenyatta was chosen for multiple prestigious fellowships and international delegations, including the Bertelsmann Leadership Fellow in the Digital Economy, the bipartisan Hunt/Kean Leadership Fellow in Education, and the American Jewish Committee Project Interchange.

Kenyatta is a barrier-breaking public figure, becoming the first openly LGBTQ+ Person of Color and one of the youngest members elected to the PA General Assembly in 2018. In 2022, he became the first openly LGBTQ+ Person of Color to run for the U.S. Senate in American history. Kenyatta has been a vocal proponent of protecting workers rights, enacting common-sense gun safety policies, and rooting out government corruption and waste. He has multiple legislative leadership roles, serving as a Member of the State Government Committee with oversight on state agencies and elections, Chair of the Subcommittee on Campaign Finance and Elections, Chair of Automation and Technology in the Committee on Commerce, and Member of the Finance Committee. Since his election, he has served on Governor Tom Wolfs Suicide Prevention Task Force and has been a member of the Philadelphia Delegation leadership team.

Kenyatta lives in North Philadelphia with his husband Dr. Matthew Kenyatta and their dog Cleo.

Lezli Baskerville, Member

Attorney Lezli Baskerville, an Honors graduate of Howard University School of Law and a constitutional justice lawyer, is a Howard University School of Law Lifetime Achiever. She is an Honors graduate of Douglass College at Rutgers University and a Douglass Society inductee, which she received in recognition of her work on improving the quality of life for vulnerable populations. Baskerville is the CEO of the National Association for Equal Opportunity in Higher Education, the membership and advocacy association of richly diverse HBCUs and PBIs. Baskerville, a Harvard University Advanced Leadership Fellow, served in the Education Group/Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law on the NAACP Legislative Counsel, as a National Black Leadership Roundtable Chief, as a DC Administrative Appeals Judge, and as a senior executive staff for members and committees of Congress. Baskerville has directed 34 political campaigns, designed and directed public policy campaigns, and wrote articles in or edited 40 public policy documents credited with shaping public opinion on state, national, and global policy.

Baskerville is a Founding Investor and Member of the Board of ECRID, the first Black-Founded and controlled publicly traded credit bureau and lending corporation that offers a fix to FICO and credit access to a broader and more diverse applicant pool. Baskerville has been by the Higher Education Leadership Foundation as Woman of the Year, by STEMConnector as one of 100 Women Leaders in STEM, by Diverse Issues in Higher as one of 25Women Making a Difference, by AOL Black Voices as one of the Nations Top 10 Black Women in Higher Education, and by Ebony Magazine for six consecutive years as one of Americas Top 100 Most Influential Association Leaders. Baskerville is acknowledged in The History Makers as a distinguished lawmaker.

Marla Blunt-Carter, Member

Marla Blunt-Carter is an Associate Professor of Professional Practice at Rutgers University School of Social Work in New Brunswick, New Jersey. As a recipient of multiple teaching awards, she instructs graduate-level courses on social policy, community organizing, advocacy, and political social work. Blunt-Carter holds a Bachelor of Arts in Political Science from the University of Delaware and a Master of Social Work from Rutgers University. Blunt-Carter combines social work practice approaches and her extensive background in political and public policy work to provide a unique perspective to her teaching.

Blunt-Carters professional experience includes serving as Projects Manager and Director of Constituent Services for then-U.S. Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr., Delaware State Director for the 2008 Obama-Biden Presidential Campaign, and Senior Agency Liaison in the Office of Presidential Correspondence for the Obama-Biden Administration. Blunt-Carter has also held positions as Senior Advisor and Communications Director for Delawares Insurance Commissioner and Director of Community Planning and Policy Development for the Delaware HIV Consortium.

In 2015, Blunt-Carter became the Senior Advisor and Political Strategist for Lisa Blunt Rochester, who became the first woman and Person of Color to represent Delaware in the U.S. House of Representatives. She continues to provide consultation to the Congresswoman and also provides assistance to other local officials in Delaware. Blunt-Carters exceptional ability to merge her experience in political and public policy with social work gives her a distinctive perspective, making her an outstanding educator and mentor to her students.

Stacy Brown-Philpot, Member

Stacy Brown-Philpot is Founder & Managing Partner at Cherryrock Capital, an early-stage venture firm focused on investing in Black and Latinx entrepreneurs. She is the former CEO of TaskRabbit, the leading task management network, which she led from a fast-growing startup into a global business, and eventually to its successful acquisition by the IKEA Group. Prior to that, Brown-Philpot spent over a decade with Google and Google Ventures where she lent strategic expertise, led global operations for key Google flagship products, and served as Head of Online Sales and Operations for Google India. Brown-Philpot also brings a background in finance from her experience at PricewaterhouseCoopers and Goldman Sachs.

Brown-Philpot is a founding member of SoftBanks $100mm Opportunity Fund, established to invest in Black and Latinx entrepreneurs. She is on the Board of Directors for HP Inc., Nordstrom, Noom, StockX, Joy, Black Girls Code, and The Urban Institute. She was named a 2016 Henry Crown Fellow with the Aspen Institute and has been ranked by Business Insider as one of the 46 Most Important Blacks in Technology. Originally from Detroit, where she developed a deep and abiding love for all things Motown, Brown-Philpot now resides in the San Francisco Bay Area with her husband and two daughters. She holds a Bachelor of Science in Economics from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania and a Master of Business Administration from the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University.

Vilicia Cade, Member

Vilicia Cade, an accomplished educational leader, scholar, author, and social justice advocate, is the first Black female CEO and Superintendent of the Capital School District in Dover, Delaware. Cade is the only Black female Superintendent in the state, and she brings over three decades of improving outcomes for vulnerable children and adults to her current role. Her portfolio of public-private partnerships validates her track record in improving the quality of life and economic opportunities for her students. Cade is known for her inspired and innovative approaches to bolstering community, faith-based, and business partnerships interrupting the school-to-prison pipeline. Notably, she was a key administrator of the Brooklyn High Schools New Visions reform project, Co-Creator of the College Readiness Scholars Institute at the University of Delaware, and is credited for launching numerous parent empowerment programs.

Cade enthusiastically embraces her personal journey as a former ward of the State of New York, described in her debut bestseller If Not For Love. Her story resonates with many Black Americans illuminating the gaps in our child welfare system. Her childhood has established a firm foundation for resilience proving why empowering the disenfranchised is quintessential. Cade has served on boards such as Northeast Ohio Boys & Girls Club and United Way of Delaware. Cade earned her bachelors degree, three masters degrees, and doctorate from New York University. In 2020, she received the prestigious Zeta Phi Beta Sorority Inc. Education Advocate Centennial Dove Award. A radio personality on the Stellar Awarded WNZN in Lorain, Ohio, she uses urban inspiration to connect the significance of service, educational equity, and economic development.

Vincent Dorien Evans, Member

Vincent Evans serves as Executive Director of the Congressional Black Caucus. He oversees the legislative policy agenda, manages the external and political affairs of the Caucus, and provides strategic leadership for the Caucus 58 Members of Congress. Prior to this role, Evans served as the Deputy Director of the Office of Public Engagement and Intergovernmental Affairs for Vice President Kamala Harris at the White House where he was responsible for creating and coordinating direct dialogue between the Biden-Harris administration and the diverse American public. He worked at the local, state, and national levels to ensure community leaders, diverse perspectives, and new voices all had the opportunity to inform the work of the President and Vice President. Evans served as Political Director to then-Senator Kamala Harris on the Biden-Harris Campaign during the general election and the campaigns Southern Political Director during the primary season. Prior to this, he served on the senior staff of U.S. Representative Al Lawson of Florida, with a portfolio that focused on state and local issues.

Before his role in the Congress, Evans worked as the Aide to Tallahassee City Commissioner Curtis Richardson after running Richards successful campaign. His experience includes working at a government relations firm focused on state legislative matters in the Florida Senate Democratic Caucus for Democratic Leader Nan Rich and later at a cabinet-level state agency. He managed or served in leadership roles on the campaigns of the two most recent Florida Democratic gubernatorial nominees and several local, state, and congressional races in Florida. In 2022, Evans was named a Young Black Changemaker by NextGen America, the Nations largest youth voter organization. Born and raised in Florida, Evans attended Florida A&M University.

Michael Anthony Holmes, Member

Michael A. Holmes currently serves as President and CEO of MD and Partners, a consulting firm that focuses on strategic community planning and program development, and Executive Director of the Black Community Provider Network, a collaboration of Community Based Organizations in Illinois. Holmes is the former Executive Director of the Illinois African American Family Commission. He has served as an administrator for more than 20 years in both the City of Chicago and State of Illinois. Holmes has also served as former Vice President of Operations for Westside Holistic Services and Statewide Quality Assurance Administrator for six regions in the State of Illinois. Over the last 15 years, Holmes has been actively involved in working with the State of Illinois General Assembly as Deputy and Associate Director of two State agencies. Holmes worked specifically with the Illinois Legislative Black Caucus to monitor and identify policies and legislation that affect the African American communities in the State of Illinois. As Executive Director of the Illinois African American Family Commission, Holmes developed the role of liaison to the Governors office and the States administration for the purpose of recommending State services and resources to communities.

Holmes is actively engaged in civic and community activities. He is currently a member of the Youth and Child Development Committee for Congressman Danny Davis of the 7th Congressional District, Chairman of the Country Club Hills Police and Fire Commission, former Chairman of the Country Club Hills Umbrella Project, and former Member of the Illinois Department of Human Services Child Care Advisory Council. Holmes has also served as Coach and League Coordinator for CHA Midnight Basketball, Coordinator of Chicago Housing Authority Biddy Basketball, Volunteer for Chicago Inner City Games, former Member of the child watch African American Family Commission, former Member of the Illinois Department of Human Services Statewide Advisory Committee, former Commissioner at the Country Club Hills Park District, Founding Member of the Department of Children and Family Services African American Advisory Council, and Member of the Statewide Foster Parent Recruitment and Retention Steering Committee.

As a Seaman in the United States Navy, Holmes completed his basic training at the Great Lakes Naval Base and completed eighteen months of military service at the Naval War College, an international military leadership training institute. As a result of his service at the College, Holmes became a computer operator, which enabled him to develop war strategy. He received an associates degree from Kennedy King Jr College and bachelors degree and masters degree in Inner City Studies from Northeastern Illinois University. Holmes has been married to his wife for 40 years and they have raised four sons in the Chicago land area.

Fedrick C. Ingram, Member

Fedrick C. Ingram is Secretary-Treasurer of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), serving 1.7 million members. Ingram is the immediate former President of the 140,000-member Florida Education Association. He served as Vice President of the AFTs Executive Council from 2014 to 2020 before getting elected as the AFTs Secretary-Treasurer. Ingram grew up in inner-city Miami where he attended public schools. Pursuing his love of music, he attended Bethune-Cookman University on a scholarship and became the first member of his family to earn a postsecondary degree in music education. In 2006, he was named the Francisco R. Walker Miami-Dade County Teacher of the Year. He was also a finalist for the state of Florida Teacher of the Year Award in 2006. In addition to his bachelors degree from Bethune-Cookman, Ingram earned a masters degree in educational leadership from Barry University and holds an honorary doctorate of Humane Letters from Florida Memorial University for a lifetime of work in education.

Lonnie L. Johnson, Member

Lonnie L. Johnson retired from Exxon Mobil Corporation in 2019 as Senior Counsel, Downstream Commercial Litigation. Prior to serving in that position, Lonnie served as Senior Director, Federal Relations at Exxon Mobil Corporation in Washington, DC. Lonnie received his J.D, with distinction, from The University of Iowa College of Law, where he served on the Iowa Law Review and was a member of the Phi Delta Phi Legal Fraternity. Johnson earned his Bachelor of Science from the University of Nebraska at Omaha. Johnson currently serves on the Board of the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation and on the Tugaloo College Research Board. Johnson also serves on the Board of Silence the Shame, an organization dedicated to removing the stigma associated with mental illness and getting people the help they need. Johnson is a former member of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Advisory Board and the Board of the National Democratic Club. He served on the Board of Council for Legal Education Opportunities for more than 10 years. Johnson is married to Eartha Jean Johnson and they have three children, Teiva Johnson Bell (Criminal District Court Judge, Harris County Texas), Tiera Johnson Williams (Prosecutor, Family Violence Cases, Harris County Texas), and Antuan Johnson (Criminal Defense Attorney, Houston Texas).

Chad Dion Lassiter, Member

Chad Dion Lassiter is a national expert in the field of American Race Relations. Lassiter has worked on race, peace, and poverty-related issues in the United States, Africa, Canada, Haiti, Israel, and Norway. Lassiter is the current Executive Director of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission where he has developed and launched a No Hate in Our State Townhall to address the surge of White Nationalism in Pennsylvania, a Social Justice Lecture Series providing an outlet for communities to discuss imperative issues, and serves as a Racial Reduction Response team for those communities impacted by hatred. Lassiter has also developed programs such as the Global Social Justice Initiative, Black and Jewish Beloved Community Dialogue, and the College Race Dialogue Initiative.

Lassiter received his masters degree from the University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Social Work, where he was the A. Phillip Randolph Award winner in 2001 and was the recipient of the prestigious Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Involvement Award in 2008.

Lassiter is the Co-Founder and current President of The Black Men at Penn School of Social Work, Inc., an organization within the School of Social Policy and Practice at the University of Pennsylvania, the first Ivy League Black male group of social workers. In 2019, he was inducted into the School of Social Policy and Practice Alumni Hall of Fame. Lassiter was recently chosen as the National Association of Social Workers Pennsylvania Chapters Social Worker of the Year for 2021 and was recognized by the Philadelphia Tribune as The Most Influential African American Leader from 2010-2022.

Adena Williams Loston, Member

Dr. Adena Williams Loston possesses over 40 years of professional leadership experience including spearheading a national agenda for education, engaging communities in addressing economic development issues, providing organizational and institutional leadership towards workforce readiness and academic preparation. She has served as the 14th President of St. Philips College, the Nations Historically Black College and Hispanic Serving Institution, since 2007 with responsibilities for 13,000 students including four early college high schools, programs at three military base sites and dual credit and P-TECH programs. Through her strategic leadership and management oversight in 2018, St. Philips College received the Governors Award for Performance Excellence and the national Malcolm Baldrige Award as one of the Alamo Colleges. She has instituted the Planning Budget and Assessment Cycle, Resource Allocation Process, Presidents Academy, Department Chair Academy, Good to Great Strategic Planning Process, and three Centers of Excellence. Loston also provides oversight for $400 Million in new and renovated facilities construction.

Loston previously served as the Chief Education Office for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration in Washington DC, President of San Jacinto College South, and held administrative positions at Santa Monica College and the El Paso County Community College District. She has also served as an associate professor at George State University and instructor at Arkansas State University. Loston was a three-term appointee to the HBCU Capital Financing Committee. She graduated Alcorn State University with a bachelors degree in 1973 and received her M.Ed. and Ph.D. degrees from Bowling Green State University in 1974 and 1979.

William Billy Mitchell, Member

Representative William Billy Mitchell, a former public-school teacher, was previously elected to the City Council of the historic Stone Mountain in 1995. His colleagues then unanimously selected him to serve as Vice Mayor. Appointed Chair of the Finance Committee, he led the City to outstanding financial status, as reported by independent auditors. Among the ordinances he was most proud to author, Representative Mitchell granted the City the authority to erect the Freedom Bell in the middle of its downtown, commemorating Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.s call in his immortal I Have a Dream speech to let freedom ring, from Stone Mountain of Georgia!

A depended upon leader in the Georgia General Assembly, Mitchell has authored legislation signed into law every term he has served. His Caucus in the State Legislature selected him to receive their highest honor, the Legislator of the Year award, after only his second term. Mitchell earned his Bachelor of Science degree from Rutgers University in New Brunswick, New Jersey, his Masters of Arts degree from the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, and his Juris Doctor degree from Atlanta Law School. Mitchell has also been bestowed a Doctorate degree from the Trinity United School of Ambassadors. Elected by his colleagues, he currently serves as Chair of the Georgia House of Representatives Democratic Caucus. He was also elected by his nationwide peers to serve as President of the National Black Caucus of State Legislators (NBCSL) and now serves as President of the NBCSL Foundation. NBCSL members represent seventy million Americans, and former members of NBCSL include 40% of the current Congressional Black Caucus and the 44th U.S. President. Mitchell was also elected to serve on the Executive Committee of the National Conference of State Legislators, which is the worlds largest legislative organization serving legislators and legislative staff in all of Americas 50 states and territories.

Clarence A. Nesbitt, Jr., Member

Clarence A. Nesbitt is the Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary of THINK450, the business, innovation, and partnership engine of the National Basketball Players Association (NBPA). In this role, Nesbitt serves as the principal legal advisor across THINK450s business units, working to propel the organizations next stage of growth by amplifying the value of the collective players rights, expanding commercial opportunities, and securing innovative deals in the business of basketball among other responsibilities. Prior to this role, Nesbitt has served as the NBPAs General Counsel where he led the legal and government affairs functions of the union, negotiated modifications to the collective bargaining agreement associated with the coronavirus pandemic, and led the successful voluntary recognition campaign to unionize the NBA G League players (the NextGen Basketball Players Association).

Nesbitt attended Florida A&M University, where he received a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration and a Masters Degree in Business Administration. Nesbitt went on to Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, DC for his Juris Doctor degree. Nesbitt currently serves on the Board of Trustees for the Central Park Conservancy and the Black Entertainment & Sports Lawyers Association.

Denise L. Pease, Member

Denise L. Pease has committed her dynamic career as a senior government executive to developing impactful and sustainable policies that improve the lives of people, particularly those living in low- and moderate-income communities, by providing greater access and opportunities. Her talent for identifying problems and finding viable solutions has gained her the respect of national and international government, business, and community leaders. Pease served as the Northeast and Caribbean Regional Administrator at the General Services Administration in the Obama-Biden Administration. Through her leadership, the region succeeded in increasing minority business participation, returning the federal government to the World Trade Center site, and reconstructing federal government facilities and services after Hurricane Sandy. She has also served as the New York State Deputy Superintendent of Banks and the New York City Assistant Comptroller for Commercial Banking. In both positions, she created and implemented policy initiatives that increased banking services to the un-banked and under-banked communities.

Denise is a disability advocate, having developed and advocated on behalf of those with epilepsy and as a breast cancer survivor. Denise earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Columbia Universitys School of General Studies. She has furthered her pursuit to develop innovative sustainable solutions to the economic disparity found in many communities through the completion of advanced studies at internationally renowned educational institution including Executive Management training at the European Institute of Business Administration (INSEAD) Paris Strategic Management of Financial Structures Programme. She has received numerous awards and recognition for her accomplishments including serving as a National Urban Fellow at the Bernard Baruch School of Public Administration and as a Charles H. Revson Fellow on the Future of New York at Columbia University.

Denise devotes her time to working with organizations to ensure that future generations have lives of endless possibilities, including her work with UN Women, the Disability Council of the DNC, the Greater Queens Chapter of the Links, Inc., and serving as a Life Member of NAACP and Heritage Member of the Claude B. Govan Chapter of Tuskegee Airmen, Inc.

Rebecca Becky Pringle, Member

National Education Association (NEA) President Becky Pringle is a fierce social justice warrior, defender of educator rights, unrelenting advocate for all students and communities of color, and valued and respected voice in the education arena.

A middle school science teacher with more than three decades of classroom experience, Pringle is singularly focused on uniting the members of the largest labor union with the Nation, and using that collective power to transform public education into a racially and socially just and equitable system that is designed to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

Pringles passion for students and educators, combined with her first-hand classroom experience, equip her to lead the movement to reclaim public education as a common good. Before assuming NEAs top post in 2020, Pringle served as NEA Vice President and before that as NEA Secretary-Treasurer. She directed NEAs work to combat institutional racism and spotlight systemic patterns of racism and educational injustice that impact students. Under Pringles guidance, NEA works to widen access and opportunity by demanding changes to policies, programs, and practices. The Associations goal is to ensure the systemic, fair treatment of people of all races so that equitable opportunities and outcomes are within reach for every student. This is why Pringle is a staunch advocate for students who have disabilities, identify as LGBTQ+, are immigrants, or English Language Learners.

Pringle is a passionate Philadelphia Eagles fan, loves anything purple, and is the Best Nana B ever for two special someones.

Marisa J. Richmond, Member

Marisa J. Richmond teaches history and womens and gender studies at Middle Tennessee State University. She previously taught at Tennessee State University, Vanderbilt University, and Nashville State Community College. She is the current President of the Tennessee Federation of Democratic Women, and a Co-Chair of the Transgender Advisory Committee of the Democratic National Committee. Locally, she is a member of the Metro Historical Commission, having previously served as a member, and Past Chair, of the Metro Human Relations Commission. She also served on the Mayors Council on the Status of Women and the Davidson County General Sessions Court Judicial Equity Collective. Previously, she served many years as the President and Lobbyist for the Tennessee Transgender Political Coalition.

Richmond is a prolific author and speaker on transgender rights, and has served on many boards at the local, state, and national levels. She has been recognized for her work with many awards. Richmond has three degrees, all in U.S. History. Her Bachelor of Arts is from Harvard University, her Master of Arts from the University of California, Berkeley, and her Ph.D. from George Washington University.

Bernice G. Scott, Member

Bernice G. Scott is a resident of Hopkins, South Carolina. She has 20 years of experience serving as a member of Richland County Council in South Carolina, including a tenure as Chairwoman. She has 15 years of experience working in county and state government, including service in Governor Jim Hodges administration. She is the founder of the nationally recognized grassroots political advocacy group, The Reckoning Crew. Since retiring from county government, she has been volunteering with the Tri-City Visionaries, Inc. to help senior citizens in rural and disadvantaged areas repair and secure their homes. She is the mother of two children, five grandchildren, and four great-grandchildren.

Richard Mouse Smith, Member

Richard Mouse Smith is a lifelong Delawarean his family has been in Delaware since the 1860s. Smith is the President of Delawares NAACP Coalition of Branches and he has been in the NAACP since 1959. He was a union president for eight years and worked at the Port of Wilmington for 42 years. Over the years, he has worked with seven Wilmington mayors and six Delaware governors. Smith helped establish the Delaware Rainbow Coalition with Jesse Jackson, which was part of the coalition to desegregate schools. Education has been integral in his life, and it is one of his main priorities for his community.

He has been friends with President Biden for over 50 years. The people and leadership of the City of Wilmington and State of Delaware made him who is today.

Joe Tate, Member

Representative Joe Tate is serving his third term and now represents Michigans 10th State House District, a diverse community that covers Detroits lower east side and the communities of the Village of Grosse Pointe Shores, Grosse Pointe Woods, Grosse Pointe Farms, Grosse Pointe City, and Grosse Pointe Park. Tate is Michigans first Black Speaker of the House, now holding the gavel and setting House priorities in a legislative term in which Democrats have the majority for the first time in over a decade. His policy priorities include uplifting Michigan families, protecting the rights of all people, ensuring workers are valued, and investing in a world-class education system, a strong infrastructure, and a thriving economy.

Tate decided to run for office as a part of his deep and lifelong commitment to public service. The value of service was taught to him by his parentsa teacher in the Detroit public school system and a Detroit firefighter. As a teenager, Tate earned a scholarship to play football at Michigan State University before joining the National Football League (NFL). After the NFL, he went on to serve in the U.S. Marine Corps, deploying twice to Afghanistan during Operation Enduring Freedom. After an honorable discharge from the Marine Corps, he earned both an MBA and a masters in environmental policy and planning from the University of Michigan. Before joining the Legislature, Tate helped small businesses grow their capacity as a program manager for the Detroit Economic Growth Corp.

Kenny D. Thompson, Jr., Member

Kenny Thompson, Jr. is the Chief Public Affairs Officer at Vail Resorts (NYSE: MTN) overseeing government relations, community relations, communications, sustainability, and the Companys social responsibility platform, EpicPromise. Vail Resorts is the leading global mountain resort operator with 41 resorts in 15 states and four countriesincluding some of the worlds most iconic destinations as well as travel-centric retail and hospitality businesses.

Prior to joining Vail Resorts, Thompson served as the Vice President of External Affairs, North America at PepsiCo. While at PepsiCo, he developed PepsiCos strategy for targeting, investing, cultivating, and maintaining partnerships with external stakeholders to support PepsiCos broader business goals. Before joining PepsiCo in 2013, Thompson held several positions in the Obama-Biden Administration, including Director of Message Events for then-Vice President Joe Biden, Senior Advisor to United States Trade Representative Ron Kirk, and Special Assistant and Advance Lead for President Barack Obama. In 2020, Thompson was selected to serve on the Biden-Harris Transition as the Private Sector Liaison where he provided strategic and management oversight of the interaction with the private sector while managing relationships with Fortune 500 CEOs, Wall Street firms, venture-backed enterprises, and industry groups.

A native Texan, Thompson completed his bachelors degree at Texas Christian University, where he was a member of the Horned Frog baseball team. He later earned a Master of Business Administration from Georgetown University. Currently, Thompson serves on the Board of Trustees at Texas Christian University and the Board of Directors at the Sandy Hook Promise Foundation.

Benaree Bennie Pratt Wiley, Member

Benaree Bennie Pratt Wiley is a Corporate Director and Trustee. For fifteen years, Wiley was the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Partnership, Inc., an organization that strengthened Greater Bostons capacity to attract, retain, and develop talented professionals of color. Wiley is currently a director on boards of the BNY Mellon Mutual Funds and CBIZ (NYSE: CBZ). She has served as the Chair of PepsiCos African American Advisory Board and formerly served on the boards of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts and First Albany (NASDAQ: FACT). Her civic activities include serving on the boards of Dress for Success Boston, Spaulding Hospital, and formerly Howard University where she served as Vice Chair. She is a frequent speaker on leadership, diversity, and professional development, and has been the recipient of numerous awards, honors, and four Honorary Doctorates including from Boston College and New England School of Law. Among her many honors are induction into the Academy of Distinguished Bostonians, the Pinnacle Award for Lifetime Achievement from the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce, and Harvard Business School Distinguished Alumni Award from the African American Student Union. Wiley also had the honor of being featured on the cover of Boston magazine as one of Bostons most powerful women and being the subject of a Harvard Business School case, Bennie Wiley and The Partnership.

###

Read this article:

President Biden Announces Key Appointments to Boards and ... - The White House

The World According to Tucker Carlson – The New Yorker

Tucker Carlsons last hour as a Fox News hostlast as in most recent, and also, we now know, as in finalended with him sitting at a shiny white desk, a green-screened image of the Capitol behind him, eating a soggy, sad-looking slice of sausage-and-pineapple pizza. It is a disgusting order, he admitted. But I have no shame. He wore a Rolex, a repp tie, and a slightly manic grin; his hair, as usual, was jauntily mussed, as if hed just stepped off a catamaran. The segment seemed calculated to promote three things: Carlsons salt-of-the-earth charisma; the heroism of a particular Delaware County, Pennsylvania, pizza-delivery man, a ruggedly handsome white guy who had acted as a vigilante assistant to the local police; and a new special on his streaming show Tucker Carlson Originals,a half-hour documentary called Let Them Eat Bugs. (Could there really be a plan to make us all eat bugs? Carlson asked, in an ominous voice-over, followed by a guest providing a putative answer: Its a global agenda that is pushing all of these things.) In the studio, Carlson put down his slice. What a great way to end the week, he said, with a satisfied chuckle. Well be back on Monday.

In fact, late on Monday morning, Fox News announced, in a terse statement, that Carlson and the network had agreed to part ways. We still dont know why, although its hard to imagine that the timingwith one recently settled defamation lawsuit, another defamation suit in the offing, and one of Carlsons former producers sitting on a few undisclosed recordingsis a coincidence. The imagination runs wild: Was it workplace abuse? A private rant about how Kanye was right about the Jews? Was Carlson plotting a corporate coup, or perhaps an actual one? Well learn the details soon enough. For now, all that seems clear is that, after Carlsons years of impunity, despite various scandals and advertiser boycotts and mask-off moments, there must be something, in the end, that his bosses consider a fireable offense.

For the past six years or so, Carlson was the most influential voice in right-wing media, without a close second. Donald Trump had the raw power, but Carlson set the ideological agenda. And, beneath all the self-abasing, clickbait-ready antics, he did seem to have an ideological agenda. Consider the insects. Let Them Eat Bugs is not just a gross-out tour through the weird world of entomophagy; the documentary also makes an argument, in the mode of reactionary, conspiratorial nationalism. All of a sudden, the people in chargepoliticians, billionaire oligarchs, celebritiesare telling you you have to fight climate change by changing what you eat, Carlson said, in an introduction. You may not want to change what you eatno one ever voted on thatbut democracy doesnt matter when it comes to the food supply. (In Carlsons vocabulary, democracy is a floating signifier that may or may not overlap with the actual mechanisms of governance; the people in charge may refer to Kamala Harris, Nicole Kidman, an underpaid female journalist, or an Oberlin sophomore, but rarely to, say, a sitting Republican member of Congress, several of whom Carlson interviewed each week.) Let Them Eat Bugs is a pungent combination of obvious falsehoods (Davos executives are shoving crickets down your throat!) presented as truths, and obvious truths (climate change is upending the food supply) presented as falsehoods, or as a plot contrived by nefarious globalists, or both. In a sense, Carlson is simply dressing up the oldest, most rudimentary conservative laments in sleek, newfangled graphics. The climate is changing, but he doesnt want it to change; so, instead of finding a suitable target for his outrage (fossil-fuel companies, for example, or the political parties that subsidize them), he invents a more creative, convoluted way to stand athwart history, yelling StopNational Review by way of Infowars. He has both a brother and a son named Buckley. For the first half of his career, Tucker Carlson was a William F. Buckley, Jr.-style Beltway neoconservative, writing for the The Weekly Standard and appearing on C-SPAN and CNN. But the conservative coalition has changed, and Buckley has been dead for years. More recently, Carlson has been genuflecting before the MyPillow guy and texting with Alex Jones.

I have watched many hours of Tucker Carlson Tonight, Carlsons prime-time TV show, and of his two streaming shows, Tucker Carlson Today and Tucker Carlson Originals. I have been appalled; I have been amazed; I have shouted rejoinders, vainly, at the screen; but I have rarely been bored. A lot of his story lines, including the one about the bugs, seem to have been repurposed from the deepest recesses of the Internet. In the Tuckerite master narrative, the bad guys are usually the rootless cosmopolitan lites, and the heroes are the local traditionalists, Christian nationalists, not-gonna-take-it-anymore vigilantes, or all of the above. (In Let Them Eat Bugs, one of the main protagonists is Eva Vlaardingerbroek, a right-wing Dutch political commentator who refers to climate change as a so-called crisis and has called feminism one of the biggest shams of our time.) Upcoming Tucker Carlson Originals documentaries, assuming that Fox decides to release them as scheduled, will include one called Meet the Preppers, about the vindication of [disaster] prepping, and another about the total collapse of human rights in the nation of Canada. (Teasing the latter on his prime-time show, Carlson displayed a mockup of Justin Trudeaus face blended with Fidel Castrosan allusion, which any non-Internet-poisoned person would and should have overlooked, to an old urban legend that Castro is Trudeaus real father.) And who could forget the Tucker Carlson Originals special The End of Men, which introduced the world to bromeopathy, the patriotic practice of bathing ones testicles in red light? That special also featured hand-wringing about soy boys, paeans to raw-egg slonkers, and homoerotic montages, apparently filmed on Alex Joness bocce court, that looked like Abercrombie & Fitch ads directed by Leni Riefenstahl. Again, its easy to brush all this off as a campy, desperate ploy for attention, which it was. But The End of Men also made an argument: American men are being systematically emasculated by some sort of ill-defined global cabal, for the purpose of slowing down birth rates in the West; only well-ordered, disciplined groups of men, presumably after being armed and restored to testicular health, can restablish order and restore Western civilization. This is the sort of thing that seems funny until it doesnt.

Carlson may have saved some of the spicier visuals for Foxs streaming service, but the same ideological strands ran through his nightly TV show, which was, at various points, the highest-rated show in the history of cable news. During his six-year run, he chose to interview, as far as I can tell, exactly four sitting world leaders, apart from Donald Trump: Viktor Orbn, Jair Bolsonaro, Andrzej Duda, and Nayib Bukele. Among the nations that still bother to hold credible elections, these were, by most measures, some of the most autocratic leaders on Earth. Carlson often talked about democracy, but he did not define the concept the way that most contemporary political theorists do; his version seemed to mean something more like the will of the people, and not necessarily all the people. He is white, and hes a nationalist, but, of course, he has long denied being a white nationalistwhenever he was asked if he was a white supremacist, he would claim that he didnt even know what the term meant. He doesnt oppose immigrants; he simply opposes immigration, which, according to him, makes our country poor and dirtier and more divided. One of the few bromides that most Democrats and Republicans still agree on is that diversity is our strength, but Carlson dared, repeatedly, to just ask the question: What if its not? Once, on the radio, he referred to Iraqis as semiliterate, primitive monkeys. (To my knowledge, he never said the N-word in publicalthough who knows whats on those undisclosed recordings.) No matter how many racist things he said, his bosses and advertisers and fellow-travellers could keep denying that he was a racist, because he said so.

Retrain your mind to acknowledge the things that are right in front of you, that are obvious, Carlson said, in 2019. This was not a voice-over in an attention-grabbing documentary but a keynote speech at a conservative conference; he was, presumably, saying what he really believed. There are many downsides, I will say, to Trump, but one of the upsides is that the Trump election was so shocking, so unlikely... that it did cause some significant percentage of people to say, Wait a secondif that can happen, like, what else is true? One of the things that turned out to be true was that Tucker Carlson, known to a previous micro-generation as the guy in the bow tie who was once humiliated by Jon Stewart, could become, for a pivotal half decade, the most dominant and dangerous right-wing pundit in the country. Carlson, like Trump, was written off for years as a laughingstock, but he turned out to have a daunting set of skills. He was a cosseted lite, a coastal prep-school heir and a consummate creature of the D.C. swamp; but, like Trump, he was rhetorically slippery enough, despite all that, to take his place at the vanguard of an ostensibly populist movement. Unlike Trump, he is silver-tongued, industrious, and (as much as it pains me to admit it) a gifted writergifted enough that he can tell his audience pretty much anything, including the opposite of what he told them the previous night, and make it feel believable. He has lost the most powerful chair in conservative media, but he hasnt lost those skills. I dont think weve heard the last of him.

More:

The World According to Tucker Carlson - The New Yorker

Government-sponsored review finds religion a force for good in the UK – Church Times

A CLEARER understanding of faith in society would help the Government to tackle issues such as forced marriage, child safeguarding, radicalisation in prison, and faith-based extremism, an independent review has concluded.

Improved faith literacy in the public sector is key to this, it says.

The 165-page report Does government do God? An independent review into how government engages with faith was published on Wednesday, more than three years after it was commissioned by the Governments Levelling-Up department on the cusp of the pandemic.

It was written by Colin Bloom, a former director of the Conservative Christian Fellowship, who was appointed an independent faith engagement adviser by the Government in 2019 to explore the relationship between faith groups and public institutions in the UK. Its remit, Mr Bloom explains in the introduction to his report, does not extend to the ongoing challenges of religiously motivated hatred, including antisemitism or anti-Muslim hatred nor far-right or far-left political extremism.

His research is focused on what he calls true believers people who are true, sincere, and faithful with whom, he says, as with non-believers, the Government should work closely to improve society. This is opposed to the personal greed, ambition, and pride of what he calls make-believers.

More than 21,000 people responded to a public consultation (open for one month from 13 November 2020) for the review, which sets out 22 recommendations for the Government. These include:

The review found that most responders to its call for evidence (84 per cent) saw faith and religion as overall positive things for society. One respondent said: Faith is oxygen to many of us.

Yet 58 per cent of responders also agreed that freedom of religion or belief was under threat in the UK. This view was particularly strong among Christians (68 per cent), who cited high-profile cases of Christians being penalised for being open about their faith in public and at work.

In a press briefing on the report with the Religion Media Centre, Tim Farron MP, a former leader of the Liberal Democrats, said that this statistic was not surprising. To people who are not Christians, Christianity is the establishment; it is privileged. Christians, who, he argued, were a smaller group than the establishment portrayed, needed to understand how they were perceived, and faith literacy was part of that.

The Government will be really bad at diversity if it doesnt understand faith in a non-patronising way, he said. In turn, Christians and people of other faiths needed to understand better the cultural literacy of the world around them.

The report says that the Government should embrace the work that faith groups do within the community, while understanding, as one respondent put it, that this is merely an overflow from the core of their identity, not their actual identity. Greater engagement is needed from the Government to foster positive understanding while not shying away from tackling harmful practices.

A whole chapter in the report is dedicated to forms of faith extremism most extensively 11 pages on Sikh extremism, compared with between one page or a few paragraphs on Hindu nationalism, Islamist extremism, Neo-Nazi occultist groups, white supremacy, and other forms of extremist views.

Commenting on the disparity, Mr Bloom told the Religion Media Centre briefing that the Sikh community were outstanding contributors to UK society, but said that work had not been done before on extremism within this group to the same extent as others. One of his 22 recommendations is that the Government should take steps to develop a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of subversive and sectarian Sikh extremist activity.

Another chapter focuses on faith and education, including a recommendation to ensure that out-of-school faith settings such as Jewish yeshivas and Muslim madrassas are registered and inspected. They should also ensure appropriate resources are allocated to meet childrens welfare and safeguarding requirements, the report says. It goes on to say that RE has become a Cinderella subject and that teaching of the subject should be improved.

While Mr Bloom accepted that there had been many previous reports on this topic with similar recommendations; but he argued that these had not been followed through. I just wish that either this Government, or whatever comes next, will be the Prince Charming that will take this Cinderella to the ball.

His report recommends the introduction of minimum standards regarding timetabling and resourcing to bring RE alongside other humanities subjects which would then be centrally inspected by Ofsted. It also recommends that religious studies is introduced into the GCSE English Baccalaureate, as well as outreach programmes to graduates of theology and RS to improve the quality of teaching.

The final chapter focuses on forced and coercive marriage, cases of which Mr Bloom considers to be underreported, with unacceptably low criminal conviction rates. The Forced Marriage Unit reports an average of just 1359 cases a year, he writes, and only six convictions were made in 2019-20 and 235 protection orders were issued by family courts in 2020.

Mr Bloom told the briefing that the Government had for too long ducked the issue. I know its sensitive, but nobody should be forced to be married against their will. And Im very angry that this Government has not done more despite its fine words . . . Theyve got to stop ducking it and address it.

His report recommends a redoubling of efforts by accepting the wider term forced and coercive marriage to cover the pressure imposed by some faith leaders on individuals to accept religious-only (non-legally binding) and arranged marriages.

Training should be provided to faith leaders to understand how to spot signs of coercive behaviour or control to facilitate a law-change, making it a criminal offence for faith leaders to conduct religious and civil weddings without ensuring both participants have willingly entered into the marriage. He does not say how this would be monitored or enforced.

The Forced Marriage Unit should be led by a Secretary of State and adequately resourced with both a operation and policy team, he adds. The Government should also record more data on forced and coercive marriage, including working more closely with social services and local councils as part of separate review.

Forced marriage is also the focus of reports conclusion. Mr Bloom writes: Some of the recommendations perhaps could have been bolder or more ambitious, but politics is the art of the possible. Every recommendation is within reach of this Government, and any future Government, if it wishes to grasp them.

Tackling faith literacy, UK Armed Forces recruitment, and prison chaplaincy are all important issues, but there is one burning injustice that this Government should not shrink from, which is the issue of forced and coercive marriages. . . If only one thing is achieved from this report, confronting the pernicious and unlawful practice of forced and coercive marriage once and for all should be the goal.

He adds: That said, without faith, places of worship and people of faith, this country would be poorer, blander, and less dynamic. Faith is a force for good, and the Government should do more to both understand and release the potential of this fantastic resource.

Responding to the review, the Church of Englands Director of Faith and Public Life, the Revd Dr Malcolm Brown, said: We welcome the recognition in the report of the need for religious literacy and a greater public understanding of the major world faiths. It is a fact that the majority of people in England Wales identify with a religion, so faith is not a minority pursuit.

Everyone has a belief-system which guides their lives so it is important to enhance understanding of religions without treating religious people as other. There is, of course, a huge diversity of faith in this country and faiths are not all the same.

We look forward to hearing how any training and education in the field of religious literacy can be done in partnership with religious communities and from a perspective that sees faiths in the round.

See the rest here:

Government-sponsored review finds religion a force for good in the UK - Church Times

Tree of Life trial starts as Pittsburgh synagogue congregations find … – Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

On Oct. 27, 2018, New Light was about one week shy of its one-year anniversary in the building. That morning, New Light was just beginning its service in the basement, Tree of Life was in its second-floor sanctuary and Dor Hadash was meeting in a smaller room nearby.

When the gunman burst in, he shot and killed members of all three congregations Jerry Rabinowitz from Dor Hadash; Richard Gottfried, Melvin Wax and Dan Stein from New Light and Joyce Fienberg, Rose Mallinger, David and Cecil Rosenthal, Bernice and Sylvan Simon and Irving Younger from Tree of Life.

Tree of Life victims, from top, left to right: Richard Gottfried, Rose Mallinger, Jerry Rabinowitz, Cecil Rosenthal. Middle row: David Rosenthal, Joyce Fienberg, Daniel Stein. Bottom row: Melvin Wax, Irving Younger, Bernice Simon, Sylvan Simon.

The week after the shooting, all three congregations held a shabbat service together at Beth Shalom synagogue, Mr. Hausman said. From there, theyve taken separate paths. And from the same tragedy, theyve chosen different approaches to memorialization.

The Tree of Life congregation has temporarily moved into Rodef Shalom in Shadyside while members await the demolition and reconstruction of the Tree of Life building. We made a decision right away that we were going to return, said Mr. Hausman. If not, this bad guy wins, and that certainly is not going to happen.

But the building they return to will be far different in design, function and scope than the one they left.

What we are building will be a wholly new American Jewish institution, said Carole Zawatsky, chief executive officer of the new Tree of Life nonprofit.

Tree of Life has enlisted world-famous architect Daniel Libeskind, who has designed Jewish museums and Holocaust memorials all over the world, as well as the master plan for the redevelopment of the World Trade Center.

Not only will the building host Tree of Lifes religious services, it also will house the worlds only museum dedicated to antisemitism. Also in the plans are a memorial to those killed in the shooting, classrooms, offices, a social hall and a film screening room. The building also will serve as a space to host students and partner with universities, as well as become the new home for the Holocaust Center of Pittsburgh.

The planning process was slow-going at first, as the congregation grappled with what seemed like an enormous task. The Tree of Life building, now beginning the demolition phase, is tentatively scheduled to re-open in early 2024.

Early on, we made the decision we were going to use this as a teaching moment we didnt really know how right away, said Mr. Hausman. Nothing like this fortunately had ever happened in the United States and there were no books, no guidelines. Im sure we made a ton of mistakes in the early going, but sometimes thats the best learning experience.

Ms. Zawatsky was in Washington, D.C., the day of the shooting, working as CEO of the Edlavitch Jewish Community Center. Even hundreds of miles away from Pittsburgh, her immediate response was concern for the safety of the congregations in D.C., feeling that all of Judaism was under attack. On the Monday morning following the shootings, she went to work with yahrzeit candles in her bag, lighting them with her staff to honor those killed in Pittsburgh.

As I sit here in this role, its so abundantly obvious that this is what had to happen, she said of the scope of the new Tree of Life building. That we are obligated to use this terrible moment as a beacon for the entire nation and world. Were not defined by our killers, but by what we create out of adversity and tragedy it couldnt have been anything else.

As for New Light, they also initially believed their new location would be temporary, a space in Congregation Beth Shalom in Squirrel Hill.

Even a year after the shooting, Mr. Cohen was confident they would return to the Tree of Life building. But as time passed, they not only became comfortable in their new space in the Helfant Chapel at Beth Shalom, but heard from members of their congregation who still cant drive by the building, much less see themselves inside it.

Initially, we thought we had an obligation to go back because it was such a horrible thing, we needed to make a statement by going back, said Mr. Cohen, sitting in their sanctuary at Beth Shalom. But too many people said I cant. How could they go to a place thats bullet-holed? And it doesnt matter that the bullet holes arent there anymore. And it doesnt matter that theres marble and glass and its beautiful and world famous.

The bullet holes are still there. Theyll always be there. And for some of our members who were most directly involved, thats the message that we as a congregation took. And thats why were here.

After they made the decision in 2020 to stay at Beth Shalom, they didnt want to wait any longer to create a space to mourn those who died, said Mr. Cohen.

Barbara Caplan looks at a list of the shooting victims on the wall of New Light Memorial Chapel in Shaler. (Lucy Schaly/Post-Gazette)

They worked closely with the families of the deceased to turn an open-air, dirt-floor garage on their cemetery property into a chapel, memorial and mini-museum. On a sunny day, colorful light streams through stained glass doors that depicts themes from Genesis 21:1-22:24, the Torah portion intended to be read the morning of Oct. 27, 2018.

Stored in a glass case are the shofar that Gottfried would blow at services, the small travel prayer book that Wax used throughout his life and a section from the Torah that the meticulously-organized Stein would read every year, the date that he did so handwritten on the side from February 1985 to February 2018.

At their hillside cemetery above the chapel, headstones are spaced close together, following the old Romanian custom not to leave space for the devil to get in between the graves, said co-president Barbara Caplan. New Light member Sophie Masloff is buried there, as are Wax and Gottfried their headstones overflowing with stones placed on top, as is Jewish custom.

Along the edge of a bluff in the cemetery, a large stone memorial shaped like a Torah honors Wax, Gottfriend and Stein as holy martyrs, with a Callery pear tree planted next to it that grew from the only tree to survive at the site of 9/11.

All of these things have really been designed to give comfort by something physical that people can relate to, said Mr. Cohen. Weve just felt that, the only way forward as an organization is we have to do something to remember and memorialize.

As for Dor Hadash, the congregation moved into Rodef Shalom after the shooting, and plans to stay there.

Our community has always looked at the community as having value, rather than the physical building, said Dana Kellerman, communications chair for Dor Hadash. Rodef Shalom has been a wonderful, welcoming congregation and while we have never regarded the physical building as an essential component of our congregation, the physical space works very well for us.

At the one-year anniversary of the synagogue shootings, a crowd stands for a moment of silence during an event called ''In Memoriam: Remember the Victims, Demand Stronger Gun Laws'' in 2019 at the North Shore Riverfront Park. (Post-Gazette)

While plans for a physical memorial are still being discussed, the congregation has thrown itself into a different sort of legacy advocacy for gun control and other issues they believe fulfill the Jewish principle of tikkun olam, or repairing the world.

Democracy and social justice are really foundational values for our congregation, said Dr. Kellerman. We have been doing our best, I think, since our founding, but certainly even more emphatically since the shooting.

Following the attack, members of the Dor Hadash Social Action Committee founded a nonprofit, Squirrel Hill Stands Against Gun Violence. The group lobbies legislators, endorses political candidates, raises money and marches at rallies. Following the school shooting in Uvalde, Texas, they partnered with student group March for Our Lives Pittsburgh to hold a large rally in Schenley Park, including a speech by Miri Rabinowitz, whose husband, Jerry, died in the synagogue shooting.

The congregation also has continued its advocacy in support of refugees, including its longstanding work with Jewish refugee resettlement agency HIAS a group that was a repeated target of anti-Semitic online rants by Robert Bowers, the accused synagogue shooter. Dor Hadash, which has seen growth in membership since the shooting, also has a fresh focus on combating antisemitism.

We dont join with the advocacy organizations on either side. ... The purpose of our congregation is to praise God.

Stephen Cohen, co-president, New Light

We do recognize that we are going to be more visible because of the upcoming trial and we would like to use that visibility to also talk a little bit about anti-semitism and its tie-in to white nationalism and white supremacy, said Dr. Kellerman, sitting in the library at Rodef Shalom. We would really look to amplify our voice in a way that calls people to work for a world that is more inclusive, that is democratic, that pushes those anti-democratic, white supremacist, violent insurrectionist forces back under a rock where they belong.

The congregation also has taken a stand against the death penalty for the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter, writing a letter in June 2021 to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland asking that the government abandon its request for the death penalty, as well as a similar letter to then-Attorney General Bill Barr in 2019.

Both Tree of Life and New Light have chosen to remain staunchly apolitical. Its not our job as a congregation to develop a stand, said Mr. Hausman of Tree of Life.

For New Light, that decision came even before the shooting, when the congregation debated whether to take a position on gun control. There were vehement opinions on both sides, said Mr. Cohen, leading the congregation to decide to remain neutral. And its a viewpoint that has stuck.

We dont invite politicians to come talk to us, we dont sign petitions, we dont join with the advocacy organizations on either side. We just, we dont have an opinion. Our members represent a large spectrum of the American population and thats not the purpose of our congregation the purpose of our congregation is to praise God.

Individual members of each congregation of course are free to express their own views. Relatives of nine of the 10 people killed from the Tree of Life and New Light congregations expressed their wishes for the government to proceed with its death penalty case in a July 2021 letter to Mr. Garland.

As the trial nears, once again intertwining the three congregations, there will be more to navigate, any number of fresh decisions they wish they didnt have to confront.

Its something thats never been done before, said Mr. Hausman, so how do you do it?

Anya Sostek: asostek@post-gazette.com.

Read more:

Tree of Life trial starts as Pittsburgh synagogue congregations find ... - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

Thermal Cameras and Machine Learning Combine to Snoop Out Passwords – Tom’s Hardware

Researchers at the University of Glasgow have published a paper that highlights their so-called ThermoSecure implementation for discovering passwords and PINs. The name ThermoSecure provides a clue to the underlying methodology, as the researchers are using a mix of thermal imaging technology and AI to reveal passwords from input devices like keyboards, touchpads, and even touch screens.

Before looking at the underlying techniques and technology, it's worth highlighting how impressive ThermoSecure is for uncovering password inputs. During tests, the research paper states: "ThermoSecure successfully attacks 6-symbol, 8-symbol, 12-symbol, and 16-symbol passwords with an average accuracy of 92%, 80%, 71%, and 55% respectively." Moreover, these results were from relatively cold evidence, and the paper adds that "even higher accuracy [is achieved] when thermal images are taken within 30 seconds."

How does ThermoSecure work? The system needs a thermal camera, which is becoming a much more affordable item in recent years. A usable device may only cost $150, according to the research paper. On the AI software side of things, the system uses an object detection technique based on Mask RCNN that basically maps the (thermal) image to keys. Across three phases, variables like keyboard localization are considered, then key entry and multi-press detection is undertaken, then the order of the key presses is determined by algorithms. Overall it appears to work pretty well, as the results suggest.

With the above thermal attack looking quite viable option for hackers to spy passwords, PINs, and so on, what can be done to mitigate the ThermoSecure threat? We've gathered the main factors that can impact the success of a thermal attack.

Input factors: Users can be more secure by using longer passwords and typing faster. "Users who are hunt-and-peck typists are particularly vulnerable to thermal attacks," note the researchers.

Interface factors: The thermodynamic properties of the input device material is important. If a hacker can image the input device in under 30 seconds, it helps a lot. Keyboard enthusiasts will also probably be interested to know that ABS keycaps retained touch heat signatures much longer than PBT keycaps.

Erase activity: The heat emitted from backlit keyboards helps disguise the heat traces from the human interaction with the keyboard. A cautious person could sometimes touch keys without actuating them and not leave the input area for at least a minute after they input the username / password.

Go passwordless: Even the best passwords are embarrassingly insecure compared to alternative authentication methods such as biometrics.

In summary, the accuracy of these thermal attacks is surprisingly high, even some time after the user has moved away from the keyboard / keypad. It is worrying but no more so than the other surveillance / skimming techniques that are already widespread. The best solution to these kinds of password and PIN guessing methods appears to be the move to biometrics, and / or two or more factor authentication. Preventing unauthorized access to your device in the first place (i.e. not leaving your laptop or phone unattended), especially not right after typing in your PIN/password, will also help thwart attackers.

See the article here:
Thermal Cameras and Machine Learning Combine to Snoop Out Passwords - Tom's Hardware

Software Development Future: AI and Machine Learning – Robotics and Automation News

Discover how AI and ML can potentially change the software development industry, and how AI affects software development and minimizes developers workload

Software development is a long, complex, and expensive process. Business owners and developers themselves constantly seek ways to optimize it. Good news for you, using artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) is becoming increasingly popular in that regard.

According to a recent survey by Gartner, AI and ML are some of the trends that will shape the future of software development. For instance, early 73 percent of adopters of GitHub Copilot, an AI-driven assistant for engineers, reported that it helped them stay in the flow.

The use of this tool resulted in 87 percent of developers conserving mental energy while performing repetitive tasks. That increased their productivity and performance.

Twinslash and other software vendors and developers, on other hand, build AI-driven tools to help engineers with testing, debugging, code maintenance, and so on.

So: lets learn more about AI and ML and their impact on software development.

The ability to automate monotonous manual tasks is one of the significant benefits of AI. There are several ways to effectively implement AI in the development process that completely replace human intervention or, at least, reduce it enough to remove the tediousness of repetitive tasks and allow your engineers to focus on more critical issues.

One of the common applications of AI in development is utilizing it to reduce the number of errors in the code.

AI-powered tools can analyze historical data to identify recurring errors or faults, spot them, and either highlight them for developers to fix or fix them independently in the background. The latter option will reduce the need to roll back for fixes when something goes wrong during your software development process.

AI improves the quality, coverage, and efficiency of software testing. This is because it can analyze large amounts of data without making mistakes. Eggplant and Test Sigma are two well-known AI-assisted software testing tools.

They aid software testers in writing, conducting, and maintaining automated tests to reduce the number of errors and boost the quality of software code. AI in testing is extremely useful in large-scale projects usually combined with automated testing tools, it helps to check through multi-leveled, modular software faster.

ML software can track how a user interacts with a particular platform and process this data to pinpoint patterns that can be used by developers and UX/UI designers to generate a more dynamic, slick software experience.

AI can also help discover UI blocks or elements of UX people are struggling with, so designers and developers can reconfigure and fix them.

Code security is of utmost importance in software development. You can use AI to analyze data and create models to distinguish abnormal activity from ordinary behavior. This will help software development companies catch issues and threats before they can cause any problems.

Apart from that, tools like Snyk, integrated into engineers Integrated Development Environment (IDE) can help pinpoint security vulnerabilities in the apps before releasing them in production.

Lets talk about the main overall trends that are changing the field of software engineering and product development.

Generative AI is a powerful technology that uses AI algorithms to create any kind of data code, design layouts, images, audio or video files, text, and even entire applications. It studies datasets independently and can help produce a wide range of content.

One of the most significant benefits of generative AI is that it can help developers create software quickly and efficiently. For instance, it assists with:

Code completion. AI-enabled code completion tools in IDEs, such as Microsofts Visual Studio Code, can help developers write code faster. For VS, such a tool is called IntelliCode it analyzes a ton of GitHub repos and searches for code snippets that might be relevant for the developers next step and completes the lines for them.

Layout design. AI-powered design tools can analyze user behavior and preferences to generate optimized layouts for websites and mobile applications. For example, for some AI-powered plugins on the design platform, Canva uses machine learning algorithms to suggest layouts, fonts, and colors for marketing materials.

(Entire) app development. With generative AI, developers can automate the process of creating software or pieces of software by telling the AI the prompts for an app one wants to build. OpenAIs Codex can do that, using natural language processing models both for parsing through conversational language and syntax of a programming language.

Continuous delivery is a software development practice where code updates are automatically built, tested, and deployed to production environments. AI-powered continuous delivery can optimize this process by using machine learning algorithms to identify and address issues before they become critical.

Machine learning algorithms can analyze the performance of production environments and predict potential issues before they occur, reducing downtime and improving software reliability.

Apart from that, ML can parse through different deployment strategies and recommend the best approach based on past performance and current conditions of the system.

Now, that trend isnt directly tied to software development, but it impacts it quite significantly. Product and project managers can use AI tools to plan the project faster.

Of course, tools like ChatGPT wont replace the experience of talking to actual potential users, but it can still help them quickly get a grasp of the market situation, trends, or common concerns users have with the competitors product.

Tools like that one can also be utilized to conduct drafts for SWOT analysis, which is also extra vital for planning out the value proposition of the software and prioritizing features-to-be-built for a roadmap. Now, ChatGPT is also a generative AI, but we thought that its application deserves a separate section.

As Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, once said, I think theres going to be a huge revolution in software development with AI. That revolution is now. It is safe to say that the future of software development lies in AI and ML.

With the rise of AI-powered programming assistants and AI-enabled design work and security assessments, software development will become more cost-effective. Utilizing AI and ML in software development will also increase productivity, fasten time-to-market, and improve software quality.

You might also like

Follow this link:
Software Development Future: AI and Machine Learning - Robotics and Automation News

Big data and machine learning can usher in a new era of policymaking – Harvard Kennedy School

Q: What are the challenges to undertaking data analytical research? And where have these modes of analysis been successful?

The challenges are many, especially when you want to make a meaningful impact in one of the most complex sectorsthe health care sector. The health care sector involves a variety of stakeholders, especially in the United States, where health care is extremely decentralized yet highly regulated, for example in the areas of data collections and data use. Analytics-based solutions that can help one part of this sector might harm other parts, making finding globally optimal solutions in this sector extremely difficult. Therefore, finding data-driven approaches that can have public impact is not a walk in the park.

Then there are various challenges in implementation. In my lab, we can design advanced machine learning and AI algorithms that have outstanding performance. But if they are not implemented in practice, or if the recommendations they provide are not followed, they wont have any tangible impact.

In some of our recent experiments, for example, we found that the algorithms we had designed outperformed expert physicians in one of the leading U.S. hospitals. Interestingly, when we provided physicians with our algorithmic-based recommendations, they did not put much weight on the advice they got from the algorithms, and ignored it when treating patients, although they knew the algorithm most likely outperforms them.

We then studied ways of removing this obstacle. We found that combining human expertise with the recommendations provided by algorithms not only made it more likely for the physicians to put more weight on the algorithms advice, but also synthesized recommendations that are superior to both the best algorithms and the human experts.

We have also observed similar challenges at the policy level. For example, we have developed advanced algorithms trained on large-scale data that could help the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention improve its opioid-related policies. The opioid epidemic caused more than 556,000 deaths in the United States between 2000 and 2020, and yet the authorities still do not have a complete understanding of what can be done to effectively control this deadly epidemic. Our algorithms have produced recommendations we believe are superior to the CDCs. But, again, a significant challenge is to make sure CDC and other authorities listen to these superior recommendations.

I do not want to imply that policymakers or other authorities are always against these algorithm-driven solutionssome are more eager than othersbut I believe the helpfulness of algorithms is consistently underrated and often ignored in the practice.

Q: How do you think about the role of oversight and regulation in this field of new technologies and data analytical models?

Imposing appropriate regulations is important. There is, however, a fine line: while new tools and advancements should be guarded against misuses, the regulations should not block these tools from reaching their full potential.

As an example, in a paper that we published in the National Academy of Medicine in 2021, we discussed that the use of mobile health (mHealth) interventions (mainly enabled through advanced algorithms and smart devices) have been rapidly increasing worldwide as health care providers, industry, and governments seek more efficient ways of delivering health care. Despite the technological advances, increasingly widespread adoption, and endorsements from leading voices from the medical, government, financial, and technology sectors, these technologies have not reached their full potential.

Part of the reason is that there are scientific challenges that need to be addressed. For example, as we discuss in our paper, mHealth technologies need to make use of more advanced algorithms and statistical experimental designs in deciding how best to adapt the content and delivery timing of a treatment to the users current context.

However, various regulatory challenges remainsuch as how best to protect user data. The Food and Drug Administration in a 2019 statement encouraged the development of mobile medical apps (MMAs) that improve health care but also emphasized its public health responsibility to oversee the safety and effectiveness of medical devicesincluding mobile medical apps. Balancing between encouraging new developments and ensuring that such developments abide by the well-known principle of do no harm is not an easy regulatory task.

At the end, what is needed are two-fold: (a) advancements in the underlying science, and (b) appropriately balanced regulations. If these are met, the possibilities for using advanced analytics science methods in solving our lingering societal problems are endless.

Banner art by gremlin/Getty Images

See the original post here:
Big data and machine learning can usher in a new era of policymaking - Harvard Kennedy School

Very Slow Movie Player Avoids E-Ink Ghosting With Machine Learning – Hackaday

[mat kelcey] was so impressed and inspired by the concept of a very slow movie player (which is the playing of a movie at a slow rate on a kind of DIY photo frame) that he created his own with a high-resolution e-ink display. It shows high definition frames from Alien (1979) at a rate of about one frame every 200 seconds, but a surprising amount of work went into getting a color film intended to look good on a movie screen also look good when displayed on black & white e-ink.

The usual way to display images on a screen that is limited to black or white pixels is dithering, or manipulating relative densities of white and black to give the impression of a much richer image than one might otherwise expect. By itself, a dithering algorithm isnt a cure-all and [mat] does an excellent job of explaining why, complete with loads of visual examples.

One consideration is the e-ink display itself. With these displays, changing the screen contents is where all the work happens, and it can be a visually imperfect process when it does. A very slow movie player aims to present each frame as cleanly as possible in an artful and stylish way, so rewriting the entire screen for every frame would mean uglier transitions, and that just wouldnt do.

So the overall challenge [mat] faced was twofold: how to dither a frame in a way that looked great, but also tried to minimize the number of pixels changed from the previous frame? All of a sudden, he had an interesting problem to solve and chose to solve it in an interesting way: training a GAN to generate the dithers, aiming to balance best image quality with minimal pixel change from the previous frame. The results do a great job of delivering quality visuals even when there are sharp changes in scene contrast to deal with. Curious about the code? Heres the GitHub repository.

Heres the original Very Slow Movie Player that so inspired [mat], and heres a color version that helps make every frame a work of art. And as for dithering? Its been around for ages, but that doesnt mean there arent new problems to solve in that space. For example, making dithering look good in the game Return of the Obra Dinn required a custom algorithm.

View original post here:
Very Slow Movie Player Avoids E-Ink Ghosting With Machine Learning - Hackaday

Sliding Out of My DMs: Young Social Media Users Help Train … – Drexel University

In a first-of-its-kind effort, social media researchers from Drexel University, Vanderbilt University, Georgia Institute of Technology and Boston University are turning to young social media users to help build a machine learning program that can spot unwanted sexual advances on Instagram. Trained on data from more than 5 million direct messages annotated and contributed by 150 adolescents who had experienced conversations that made them feel sexually uncomfortable or unsafe the technology can quickly and accurately flag risky DMs.

The project, which was recently published by the Association for Computing Machinery in its Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, is intended to address concerns that an increase of teens using social media, particularly during the pandemic, is contributing to rising trends of child sexual exploitation.

In the year 2020 alone, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children received more than 21.7 million reports of child sexual exploitation which was a 97% increase over the year prior. This is a very real and terrifying problem, said Afsaneh Razi, PhD, an assistant professor in Drexels College of Computing & Informatics, who was a leader of the research.

Social media companies are rolling out new technology that can flag and remove sexually exploitative images and helps users to more quickly report these illegal posts. But advocates are calling for greater protection for young users that could identify and curtail these risky interactions sooner.

The groups efforts are part of a growing field of research looking at how machine learning and artificial intelligence be integrated into platforms to help keep young people safe on social media, while also ensuring their privacy. Its most recent project stands apart for its collection of a trove of private direct messages from young users, which the team used to train a machine learning-based program that is 89% accurate at detecting sexually unsafe conversations among teens on Instagram.

Most of the research in this area uses public datasets which are not representative of real-word interactions that happen in private, Razi said. Research has shown that machine learning models based on the perspectives of those who experienced the risks, such as cyberbullying, provide higher performance in terms of recall. So, it is important to include the experiences of victims when trying to detect the risks.

Each of the 150 participants who range in age from 13- to 21-years-old had used Instagram for at least three months between the ages of 13 and 17, exchanged direct messages with at least 15 people during that time, and had at least two direct messages that made them or someone else feel uncomfortable or unsafe. They contributed their Instagram data more than 15,000 private conversations through a secure online portal designed by the team. And were then asked to review their messages and label each conversation, as safe or unsafe, according to how it made them feel.

Collecting this dataset was very challenging due to sensitivity of the topic and because the data is being contributed by minors in some cases, Razi said. Because of this, we drastically increased the precautions we took to preserve confidentiality and privacy of the participants and to ensure that the data collection met high legal and ethical standards, including reporting child abuse and the possibility of uploads of potentially illegal artifacts, such as child abuse material.

The participants flagged 326 conversations as unsafe and, in each case, they were asked to identify what type of risk it presented nudity/porn, sexual messages, harassment, hate speech, violence/threat, sale or promotion of illegal activities, or self-injury and the level of risk they felt either high, medium or low.

This level of user-generated assessment provided valuable guidance when it came to preparing the machine learning programs. Razi noted that most social media interaction datasets are collected from publicly available conversations, which are much different than those held in private. And they are typically labeled by people who were not involved with the conversation, so it can be difficult for them to accurately assess the level of risk the participants felt.

With self-reported labels from participants, we not only detect sexual predators but also assessed the survivors perspectives of the sexual risk experience, the authors wrote. This is a significantly different goal than attempting to identify sexual predators. Built upon this real-user dataset and labels, this paper also incorporates human-centered features in developing an automated sexual risk detection system.

Specific combinations of conversation and message features were used as the input of the machine learning models. These included contextual features, like age, gender and relationship of the participants; linguistic features, such as wordcount, the focus of questions, or topics of the conversation; whether it was positive, negative or neutral; how often certain terms were used; and whether or not a set of 98 pre-identified sexual-related words were used.

This allowed the machine learning programs to designate a set of attributes of risky conversations, and thanks to the participants assessments of their own conversations, the program could also rank the relative level of risk.

The team put its model to the test against a large set of public sample conversations created specifically for sexual predation risk-detection research. The best performance came from its Random Forest classifier program, which can rapidly assign features to sample conversations and compare them to known sets that have reached a risk threshold. The classifier accurately identified 92% of unsafe sexual conversations from the set. It was also 84% accurate at flagging individual risky messages.

By incorporating its user-labeled risk assessment training, the models were also able to tease out the most relevant characteristics for identifying an unsafe conversation. Contextual features, such as age, gender and relationship type, as well as linguistic inquiry and wordcount contributed the most to identifying conversations that made young users feel unsafe, they wrote.

This means that a program like this could be used to automatically warn users, in real-time, when a conversation has become problematic, as well as to collect data after the fact. Both of these applications could be tremendously helpful in risk prevention and the prosecution of crimes, but the authors caution that their integration into social media platforms must preserve the trust and privacy of the users.

Social service providers find value in the potential use of AI as an early detection system for risks, because they currently rely heavily on youth self-reports after a formal investigation had occurred, Razi said. But these methods must be implemented in a privacy-preserving matter to not harm the trust and relationship of the teens with adults. Many parental monitoring apps are privacy invasive since they share most of the teen's information with parents, and these machine learning detection systems can help with minimal sharing of information and guidelines to resources when it is needed.

They suggest that if the program is deployed as a real-time intervention, then young users should be provided with a suggestion rather than an alert or automatic report and they should be able to provide feedback to the model and make the final decision.

While the groundbreaking nature of its training data makes this work a valuable contribution to the field of computational risk detection and adolescent online safety research, the team notes that it could be improved by expanding the size of the sample and looking at users of different social media platforms. The training annotations for the machine learning models could also be revised to allow outside experts to rate the risk of each conversation.

The group plans to continue its work and to further refine its risk detection models. It has also created an open-source community to safely share the data with other researchers in the field recognizing how important it could be for the protection of this vulnerable population of social media users.

The core contribution of this work is that our findings are grounded in the voices of youth who experienced online sexual risks and were brave enough to share these experiences with us, they wrote. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that analyzes machine learning approaches on private social media conversations of youth to detect unsafe sexual conversations.

This research was supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation and the William T. Grant Foundation.

In addition to Razi, Ashwaq Alsoubai and Pamela J. Wisniewski, from Vanderbilt University; Seunghyun Kim and Munmun De Choudhury, from Georgia Institute of Technology; and Shiza Ali and Gianluca Stringhini, from Boston University, contributed to the research.

Read the full paper here: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3579522

See the original post here:
Sliding Out of My DMs: Young Social Media Users Help Train ... - Drexel University

Synthetic data could be better than real data – Nature.com

Credit: Janelle Barone

When more than 155,000 students from all over the world signed up to take free online classes in electronics in 2012, offered through the fledgling US provider edX, they set in motion an explosion in the popularity of online courses.

The edX platform, created by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard University, both in Cambridge, Massachusetts, was not the first attempt at teaching classes online but the number of participants it attracted was unusual. The activity created a massive amount of information on how people interact with online education, and presented researchers with an opportunity to garner answers to questions such as What might encourage people to complete courses?, and What might give them a reason to drop out?.

We had a tonne of data, says Kalyan Veeramachaneni, a data scientist at MITs Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems. Although the university had long dealt with large data sets generated by others, that was the first time that MIT had big data in its own backyard, says Veeramachaneni.

Hoping to take advantage, Veeramachaneni assigned 20 MIT students to run analyses of the information. But he soon ran into a roadblock: legally, the data had to be private. This wealth of information was held on a single computer in his laboratory, with no connection to the Internet to prevent hacking. The researchers had to schedule a time to use it. It was a nightmare, Veeramachaneni says. I just couldnt get the work done because the barrier to the data was very high.

Why artificial intelligence needs to understand consequences

His solution, eventually, was to create synthetic students computer-generated versions of edX participants that shared characteristics with real students using the platform, but that did not give away private details. The team then applied machine-learning algorithms to the synthetic students activity, and in doing so discovered several factors associated with a person failing to complete a course1. For instance, students who tended to submit assignments right on a deadline were more likely to drop out. Other groups took the findings of this analysis and used them to help create interventions to help real people complete future courses2.

This experience of building and using a synthetic data set led Veeramachaneni and his colleagues to create the Synthetic Data Vault, a set of open-source software that allows users to model their own data and then use those models to generate alternative versions of the data3. In 2020, he co-founded a company called DataCebo, based in Boston, Massachusetts, which helps other companies to do this.

The desire to preserve privacy is one of the driving forces behind synthetic-data research. Because artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have expanded rapidly, finding their way into areas as diverse as health care, art and financial analysis, concerns about the data used to train the systems is also growing. To learn, these algorithms must consume vast amounts of information much of which relates to individuals. The system could reveal private details, or be used to discriminate against people when making decisions on hiring, lending or housing, for example. The data fed to these machines might also be owned by an individual or company that does not want the information to be used to create a tool that might then compete with them or at least, might not want to give the data away for free.

Some researchers think that the answer to these concerns could lie in synthetic data. Getting computers to manufacture data that is close enough to the real thing without recycling real information could help to address privacy problems. But it could also do much more. I want to move away from just privacy, says Mihaela van der Schaar, a machine-learning researcher and director of the UK Cambridge Centre for AI in Medicine. I hope that synthetic data could help us create better data.

All data sets come with issues that go beyond privacy considerations. They can be expensive to produce and maintain. In some cases for example, trying to diagnose a rare medical condition using imaging there simply might not be enough real-world data available to train a system to do the task reliably. Bias is also a problem both social biases, which might cause systems to favour one group of people over another, and subtler issues such as a training set of photos that includes only a handful taken at night. Synthetic data, its proponents say, can get around these problems by adding absent information to data sets faster and more cheaply than gathering it from the real world, assuming it were possible to obtain the real thing at all.

To me, its about making data this living, controllable object that you can change towards your application and your goals, says Phillip Isola, a computer scientist at MIT who specializes in machine vision. Its a fundamental new way of working with data.

There are several ways to synthesize data, but they all invoke the same concept. A computer, using a machine-learning algorithm or a neural network, analyses a real data set and learns about the statistical relationships within it. It then creates a new data set containing different data points than the original, but retaining the same relationships. A familiar example is ChatGPT, the text generation engine. ChatGPT is based on a large language model, Generative Pre-trained Transformer, which pored over billions of examples of text written by humans, analysed the relationships between the words and built a model of how they fit together. When given a prompt Write me an ode to ducks ChatGPT takes what it has learnt about odes and ducks and produces a string of words, with each word choice informed by the statistical probability of it following the previous one:

Oh ducks, feathered and free,

Paddling in ponds with such glee,

Your quacks and waddles are a delight,

A joy to behold, day or night.

With the right training, machines can produce not only text but also images, audio or the rows and columns of tabular data. The question is, how accurate is the output? Thats one of the challenges in synthetic data, says Thomas Strohmer, a mathematician who directs the Center for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Research at the University of California, Davis (UC Davis).

Jason Adams, Thomas Strohmer and Rachael Callcut (left to right) are part of the synthetic data research team at UC Davis Health.

You first have to figure out what you mean by accuracy, he says. To be useful, a synthetic data set must retain the aspects of the original that are relevant to the outcome the all-important statistical relationships. But AI has accomplished many of its impressive feats by identifying patterns in data that are too subtle for humans to notice. If we could understand the data well enough to easily identify the relationships in medical data that suggest someone is at risk of a disease, we would have no need for a machine to find those relationships in the first place, Strohmer says.

This catch-22 means that the clearest way to know whether a synthetic data set has captured the important nuances of the original is to see if an AI system trained on the synthetic data makes similarly accurate predictions to a system trained on the original. The more capable the machine, the harder it is for humans to distinguish the real from the fake. AI-generated images and text are already at the point where they seem realistic to most people, and the technology is advancing rapidly. Were getting close to the level where, even to the expert, the imagery looks correct, but it still might not be correct, Isola says. It is therefore important that users treat synthetic data with some caution, and dont lose sight of the fact that it isnt real data, he says. It still might be misleading.

Last April, Strohmer and two of his colleagues at UC Davis Health in Sacramento, California, won a four-year, US$1.2-million grant from the US National Institutes of Health to work out ways to generate high-quality synthetic data that could help physicians to predict, diagnose and treat diseases. As part of the project, Strohmer is developing mathematical methods of proving just how accurate synthetic data sets are.

He also wants to include a mathematical guarantee of privacy, especially given the stringent laws around medical privacy around the world, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act in the United States and the European Unions General Data Protection Regulation. The difficulty is that the utility and privacy of data are in tension; increasing one means decreasing the other.

To increase privacy in data, scientists add statistical noise to a data set. If, for instance, one of the data points collected is a persons age, they throw in some random ages to make individuals less identifiable. Its easier to pinpoint a 45-year-old man with diabetes than a person with diabetes who might be 38, or 51, or 62. But, if the age of diabetes onset is one of the factors being studied, this privacy-protecting measure will lead to less accurate results.

Abandoned: the human cost of neurotechnology failure

Part of the difficulty of guaranteeing privacy is that scientists are not completely sure how synthetic data reveals private information or how to measure how much it reveals, says Florimond Houssiau, a computer scientist at the Alan Turing Institute in London. One way in which secrets could be spilled is if the synthetic data are too similar to the original data. In a data set that contains many pieces of information associated with an individual, it can be hard to grasp the statistical relationships. In this case, the system generating the synthetic version is more likely to replicate what it sees rather than make up something entirely new. Privacy is not actually that well understood, Houssiau says. Scientists can assign a numerical value to the privacy level of a data set, but we dont exactly know which values should be considered safe or not. And so its difficult to do that in a way that everyone would agree on.

The varied nature of medical data sets also makes generating synthetic versions of them challenging. They might include notes written by physicians, X-rays, temperature measurements, blood-test results and more. A medical professional with years of training and experience might be able to put those factors together and come up with a diagnosis. Machines, so far, cannot. We just dont know enough, in terms of machine learning, to extract information from different modalities, Strohmer says. Thats a problem for analysis tools, but its also a problem for machines tasked with creating synthetic data sets that retain the all-important relationships. We dont understand yet how to automatically detect these relationships, he says.

There are also fundamental theoretical limits to how much improvement data can undergo, says Isola. Information theory contains a principle called the data-processing inequality, which states that processing data can only reduce the amount of information available, not add to it4. And all synthetic data must have real data at its root, so all the problems with real data privacy, bias, expense and more still exist at the start of the pipeline. Youre not getting something for free youre still ultimately learning from the world, from data. Youre just reformatting that into an easier-to-work-with format that you can control better, Isola says. With synthetic data, data comes in and a better version of the data comes out.

Although synthetic data in medicine havent yet made their way into clinical use, there are some areas where such data sets have taken off. They are being widely used in finance, Strohmer says, with many companies springing up to help financial institutions create new data that protect privacy. Part of the reason for this difference might be that the stakes are lower in finance than in medicine. If in finance you get it wrong, it still hurts, but it doesnt lead to death, so they can push things a little bit faster than in the medical field, Strohmer says.

In 2021, the US Census Bureau announced that it was looking at creating synthetic data to enhance the privacy of people who respond to its annual American Community Survey, which provides detailed information about households in subsections of the country. Some researchers have objected, however, on the grounds that the move could undermine the datas usefulness. In February, Administrative Data Research UK, a partnership that enables the sharing of public-sector data, announced a grant to study the value of synthetic versions of data sets that have been created by the Office of National Statistics and the UK Data Service.

Bioinspired robots walk, swim, slither and fly

Some people are also using synthetic data to test software that they hope to eventually use on real data that they do not yet have access to, says Andrew Elliott, a statistician at the University of Glasgow, UK. These fake data have to look something like the real data, but they can be meaningless, because they only exists for testing the code. A scientist who wants to analyse a sensitive data set that they are granted only limited access to can perfect the code first with synthetic data, and not have to waste time when they get hold of the real data.

For now, synthetic data are a relatively niche pursuit. van der Schaar thinks that more people should be talking about synthetic data and their potential impact and not just scientists. Its important that not only computer scientists understand, but also the general public, she says. People need to wrap their heads around this technology because it could affect everyone.

The issues around synthetic data not only raise interesting research questions for scientists but also important issues for society at large, Strohmer says. Data privacy is so important in the age of surveillance capitalism, he says. Creating good synthetic data that both preserve privacy and reflect diversity, and that are made widely available, has the potential not just to improve the performance of AI and expand its uses, but also to help democratize AI research. A lot of data is owned by a few big companies, and that creates an imbalance. Synthetic data could help to re-establish this balance a little bit, Strohmer says. I think thats an important, bigger goal behind synthetic data.

See the original post:
Synthetic data could be better than real data - Nature.com

David Higginson of Phoenix Children’s Hospital on using machine … – Chief Healthcare Executive

Chicago - David Higginson has some advice for hospitals and health systems looking to use machine learning.

"Get started," he says.

Higginson, the chief innovation officer of Phoenix Children's Hospital, offered a presentation on machine learning at the HIMSS Global Health Conference & Exhibition. He described how machine learning models helped identify children with malnutrition and people who would be willing to donate to the hospital's foundation.

After the session, he spoke with Chief Healthcare Executive and offered some guidance for health systems looking to do more with machine learning.

"I would say get started by thinking about how you going to use it first," Higginson says. "Don't get tricked into actually building the model."

"Think about the problem, frame it up as a prediction problem," he says, while adding that not all problems can be framed that way.

"But if you find one that is a really nice prediction problem, ask the operators, the people that will use it everyday: 'Tell me how you'd use this,'" Higginson says. "And work with them on their workflow and how it's going to change the way they do their job.

"And when they can see it and say, 'OK, I'm excited about that, I can see how it's going to make a difference,' then go and build it," he says. "You'll have more motivation to do it, you'll understand what the goal is. But when you finally do get it, you'll know it's going to be used."

See the article here:
David Higginson of Phoenix Children's Hospital on using machine ... - Chief Healthcare Executive

How ChatGPT might help your family doctor and other emerging health trends – Toronto Star

Health innovation in Canada has always been strong, but the sector is now experiencing growth at a pace we havent seen before.

While COVID-19 helped accelerate change, new technologies like OpenAIs ChatGPT are also having an impact. Plus, Canadian companies are leveraging machine learning to develop new therapies, diagnostics and patient platforms.

Theres a lot of really interesting drivers out there for innovation, says Jacki Jenuth, partner and chief operating officer at Lumira Ventures. Were starting to better define some of the underlying mechanisms and therapeutics approaches for diseases that up until now had no options, such as neurodegenerative diseases. And researchers are starting to define biomarkers to select patients more likely to respond in clinical settings thats really good news.

Next week, the annual MaRS Impact Health conference will bring together health care professionals, entrepreneurs, investors, policymakers and other stakeholders. Heres a sneak preview of some of the emerging trends in the health care and life sciences space theyll be exploring.

There's huge revenue opportunities in women's health, says Annie Thriault, managing partner at Cross-Border Impact Ventures. (Fryer, Tim)

Womens health funding isnt where it should be, says Annie Thriault, managing partner at Cross-Border Impact Ventures. Bayer recently announced its stopping R&D for womens health to focus on other areas. Other pharmaceutical companies such as Merck have made similar decisions in recent years. Its hard to imagine why groups are moving in that direction, because were seeing huge revenue opportunities in these markets, says Thriault. A lot of exciting things are happening.

One area that Thriault has been watching closely has been personalized medicine that uses artificial intelligence, machine learning or sophisticated algorithms to tailor treatment for women and children. For instance, there are tools that provide targeted cancer treatments that use gender as a key input. In the past, that maybe wouldnt have been thought of as an important variable, she says.

In prenatal care, there are new tools related to diagnosing anomalies in pregnancies through data. What we see in maternal health is a lot of inequalities, Thriault says. But if the exam is performed with the same level of care, accuracy, and specificity, then analyzed through AI to spot problems, you can make positive health outcomes and hopefully a less unequal health system.

Click to expand

With the right protections and security measures, AI could help create efficiencies in health care, says Frank Rudzicz, a ??faculty member at the Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence. (Fryer, Tim)

New technologies like ChatGPT have shown the potential of not just getting AI and machine learning to take large data sets and make sense of them, but also to create efficiencies when it comes to doing paperwork with that information.

I always thought wed get to this point, but I just didnt think wed get to here so soon where we are talking about AI really changing the nature of jobs, says Frank Rudzicz, a faculty member at the Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence. And its just getting started.

There are a lot of inefficiencies in health care that AI can help with. Doctors, for instance, spend up to half their time working on medical records and filling out forms. (A recent study from the Canadian Federation of Independent Business found that collectively they are spending some 18.5 million hours on unnecessary paperwork and administrative work each year the equivalent of more than 55 million patient visits.) Thats not what they signed up for, he says. They signed up to help people.

While people are becoming more comfortable with using technology to track and monitor their health whether that be through smartwatches, smartphone apps or genetic testing there arent as many connection points for them to use that data with their family doctor. There is an opportunity, Rudzicz says, to use data and technologies such as machine learning, with proper guardrails and patient consent, to sync the data with your doctors records to help with diagnosis and prescribing.

Ultimately, doctors are trained professionals and they need to be the ones who make the diagnosis and come up with treatment plans with the patients, he says. But once you get all the pieces together, the results could be more accurate and safer than they have been.

Plus, there are a lot of possible futures for technologies like ChatGPT in health care, such as automating repetitive tasks like filling out forms or writing requisitions and referral letters for doctors to review before submitting. The barrier to entry for anything that will speed up your workflow is going to be very low and easily integrated, Rudzicz says.

While there's been a slowdown in venture capital investments, there's still funding to be found, says Jacki Jenuth, partner and chief operating officer at Lumira Ventures. (Fryer, Tim)

While theres been a slowdown in venture capital funding, with fewer dollars available as markets become more rational after the record highs of the last few years, theres still funding to be found, says Lumiras Jenuth. Management teams in the life sciences space just have to be more resourceful and explore all possible avenues of funding, including corporations, non-dilutive sources, foundations and disease specific funders, she adds.

It helps to build deep relationships with investors who want to make an impact in the health sectors, she says. The pitch needs to be targeted for each one of these groups. Youll hear a lot of nos, so you need to be tenacious. Its not easy.

Discover more of the technologies and ideas that will transform health care at the MaRS Impact Health conference on May 3 and 4.

Disclaimer This content was produced as part of a partnership and therefore it may not meet the standards of impartial or independent journalism.

Read more:
How ChatGPT might help your family doctor and other emerging health trends - Toronto Star

Machine learning: As AI tools gain heft, the jobs that could be at stake – The Indian Express

Watch out for the man with the silicon chipHold on to your job with a good firm gripCause if you dont youll have had your chipsThe same as my old man

Scottish revival singer-songwriter Ewan MacColls 1986 track My Old Man was an ode to his father, an iron-moulder who faced an existential threat to his job because of the advent of technology. The lyrics could finds some resonance nearly four decades on, as industry leaders and tech stalwarts predict the advancement in large language models such as OpenAIs GPT-4 and their ability to write essays, code, and do maths with greater accuracy and consistency, heralding a fundamental tech shift; almost as significant as the creation of the integrated circuit, the personal computer, the web browser or the smartphone. But there still are question marks over how advanced chatbots could impact the job market. And if the blue collar work was the focus of MacColls ballad, artificial intelligence (AI) models of the generative pretrained transformer type signify a greater threat for white collar workers, as more powerful word-predicting neural networks that manage to carry out a series of operations on arrays of inputs end up producing output that is significantly humanlike. So, will this latest wave impact the current level of employment?

According to Goldman Sachs economists Joseph Briggs and Devesh Kodnani, the answer is a resounding yes, and they predict that as many as 300 million full-time jobs around the world are set to get automated, with workers replaced by machines or AI systems. What lends credence to this stark prediction is the new wave of AI, especially large language models that include neural networks such as Microsoft-backed OPenAIs ChatGPT.

The Goldman Sachs economists predict that such technology could bring significant disruption to the labour market, with lawyers, economists, writers, and administrative staff among those projected to be at greatest risk of becoming redundant. In a new report, The Potentially Large Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Economic Growth, they calculate that approximately two-thirds of jobs in the US and Europe are set to be exposed to AI automation, to various degrees.

In general white-collar workers, and workers in advanced economies in general, are projected to be at a greater risk than blue collar workers in developing countries. The combination of significant labour cost savings, new job creation, and a productivity boost for non-displaced workers raises the possibility of a labour productivity boom like those that followed the emergence of earlier general-purpose technologies like the electric motor and personal computer, the report said.

And OpenAI itself predicts that a vast majority of workers will have at least part of their jobs automated by GPT models. In a study published on the arXiv preprint server, researchers from OpenAI and the University of Pennsylvania said that 80 percent of the US workforce could have at least 10 percent of their tasks affected by the introduction of GPTs.

Central to these predictions is the way models such as ChatGPT get better with more usage GPT stands for Generative Pre-trained Transformer and is a marker for how the platform works; being pre-trained by human developers initially and then primed to learn for itself as more and more queries are posed by users to it. The OpenAI study also said that around 19 per cent of US workers will see at least 50 per cent of their tasks impacted, with the qualifier that GPT exposure is likely greater for higher-income jobs, but spans across almost all industries. These models, the OpenAI study said, will end up as general-purpose technologies like the steam engine or the printing press.

A January 2023 paper, by Anuj Kapoor of the Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad and his co-authors, explored the question of whether AI tools or humans were more effective at helping people lose weight. The authors conducted the first causal evaluation of the effectiveness of human vs. AI tools in helping consumers achieve their health outcomes in a real-world setting by comparing the weight loss outcomes achieved by users of a mobile app, some of whom used only an AI coach while others used a human coach as well.

Interestingly, while human coaches scored higher broadly, users with a higher BMI did not fare as well with a human coach as those who weighed less.

The results of our analysis can extend beyond the narrow domain of weight loss apps to that of healthcare domains more generally. We document that human coaches do better than AI coaches in helping consumers achieve their weight loss goals. Importantly, there are significant differences in this effect across different consumer groups. This suggests that a one-size-fits-all approach might not be most effective Kapoor told The Indian Express.

The findings: Human coaches help consumers achieve their goals better than AI coaches for consumers below the median BMI relative to consumers who have above-median BMI. Human coaches help consumers achieve their goals better than AI coaches for consumers below the median age relative to consumers who have above-median age.

Human coaches help consumers achieve their goals better than AI coaches for consumers below the median time in a spell relative to consumers who spent above-median time in a spell. Further, human coaches help consumers achieve their goals better than AI coaches for female consumers relative to male consumers.

While Kapoor said the paper did not go deeper into the why of the effectiveness of AI+Human plans for low BMI individuals over high BMI individuals, he speculated on what could be the reasons for that trend: Humans can feel emotions like shame and guilt while dealing with other humans. This is not always true, but in general and theres ample evidence to suggest this research has shown that individuals feel shameful while purchasing contraceptives and also while consuming high-calorie indulgent food items. Therefore, high BMI individuals might find it difficult to interact with other human coaches. This doesnt mean that health tech platforms shouldnt suggest human plans for high BMI individuals. Instead, they can focus on (1) Training their coaches well to make the high BMI individuals feel comfortable and heard and (2) deciding the optimal mix of the AI and Human components of the guidance for weight loss, he added.

Similarly, the female consumers responding well to the human coaches can be attributed to the recent advancements in the literature on Human AI interaction, which suggests that the adoption of AI is different for females/males and also theres differential adoption across ages, Kapoor said, adding that this can be a potential reason for the differential impact of human coaches for females over males.

An earlier OECD paper on AI and employment titled New Evidence from Occupations most exposed to AI asserted that the impact of these tools would be skewed in favour of high-skilled, white-collar ones, including: business professionals; managers; science and engineering professionals; and legal, social and cultural professionals.

This contrasts with the impact of previous automating technologies, which have tended to take over primarily routine tasks performed by lower-skilled workers. The 2021 study noted that higher exposure to AI may be a good thing for workers, as long as they have the skills to use these technologies effectively. The research found that over the period 2012-19, greater exposure to AI was associated with higher employment in occupations where computer use is high, suggesting that workers who have strong digital skills may have a greater ability to adapt to and use AI at work and, hence, to reap the benefits that these technologies bring. By contrast, there is some indication that higher exposure to AI is associated with lower growth in average hours worked in occupations where computer use is low. On the whole, the study findings suggested that the adoption of AI may increase labour market disparities between workers who have the skills to use AI effectively and those who do not. Making sure that workers have the right skills to work with new technologies is therefore a key policy challenge, which policymakers will increasingly have to grapple with.

View post:
Machine learning: As AI tools gain heft, the jobs that could be at stake - The Indian Express

Can Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Find Life in Space? – BBN Times

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly being used in the field of astrobiology to help in the search for life in space.

The latest advances in artificial intelligence and machine learning could accelerate the search for extraterrestrial lifeby showing the most promising places to look.

With the vastness of the universe, the search for life beyond Earth is a complex and challenging task. AI and ML have the potential to enhance our ability to detect signs of life and to identify the most promising targets for exploration.

The use of AI and ML in space applications have picked up pace as researchers and scientists worldwide deploy machine learning algorithms that analyze vast amounts of data and identify signals and potential targets in space.

The universe is a game of billions - being billions of years old, spanning across billions of light years and harboring billions of stars, galaxies, planets and unidentifiable elements. Amidst this, we are but a tiny speck of life living on the only identified habitable planet in space. Scientists, astronomers, astrologers and common people alike from all over the world have discussed the idea of extraterrestrial life prevailing in any corner of the universe. The likelihood of the existence of life beyond Earth is high, leading to various efforts being put into discovering traces of life through signals, observations, detections and more. And with AI and ML in space applications, detecting life in space has moved beyond just a dream and entered into its practical stages.

The termSETI, or Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, refers to the effort to find intelligent extraterrestrial life by searching the cosmos for signs of advanced civilizations. The theory underlying SETI is that there might be intelligent extraterrestrial civilizations out there and they might be sending out signals that we could pick up on. These signals could manifest as deliberate messages, unintended emissions from advanced technology or even proof of enormous engineering undertakings likeDyson spheres. SETIs role includes, but is not limited to:

To analyze the massive volumes of data gathered from radio telescopes and other sensors used in the hunt for extraterrestrial intelligence, SETI researchers employmachine learningtechniques. ML can be used to help analyze data from other instruments, such as optical telescopes, that may be used in the search for extraterrestrial intelligence. For example, machine learning algorithms can be trained to recognize patterns in the light curves of stars that may indicate the presence of advanced technology.

The identification of signals that might be an indication of extraterrestrial intelligence is one of the ways SETI makes use of machine learning. Both natural signals, such as those produced by pulsars and artificial signals, such as those from satellites and mobile phones, can be collected by radio telescopes. The properties of these various signals can be used to train machine learning algorithms to identify them and separate them from potential signals from extraterrestrial intelligence.

A further application of ML in SETI is to assist in locating and categorizing possible targets for further observations. With so much information to sort through, it can be challenging for human researchers to decide which signals are most intriguing and deserving of additional study. Based on criteria like signal strength, frequency and duration, machine learning algorithms can be used to automatically select possible targets.

While artificial intelligence and machine learning in space applications have shown significant promise in the study of astrobiology, finding extraterrestrial life is a complex and ongoing endeavor that requires many different approaches and technologies. Ultimately, it is only through collaborative efforts of scientific ingenuity and technological innovations that will allow us to find life beyond our planet.

See the original post here:
Can Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Find Life in Space? - BBN Times

How AI, automation, and machine learning are upgrading clinical trials – Clinical Trials Arena

Artificial intelligence (AI) is set to be the most disruptive emerging technology in drug development in 2023, unlocking advanced analytics, enabling automation, and increasing speed across the clinical trial value chain.

Todays clinical trials landscape is being shaped by macro trends that include the Covid-19 pandemic, geopolitical uncertainty, and climate pressures. Meanwhile, advancements in adaptive design, personalisation and novel treatments mean that clinical trials are more complex than ever. Sponsors seek greater agility and faster time to commercialisation while maintaining quality and safety in an evolving global market. Across every stage of clinical research, AI offers optimisation opportunities.

A new whitepaper from digital technology solutions provider Taimei examines the transformative impact of AI on the clinical trials of today and explores how it will shape the future.

The big delay areas are always patient recruitment, site start-up, querying, data review, and data cleaning, explains Scott Clark, chief commercial officer at Taimei.

Patient recruitment is typically the most time-consuming stage of a clinical trial. Sponsors must find and identify a set of subjects, gather information, and use inclusion/exclusion criteria to filter and select participants. And high-quality patient recruitment is vital to a trials success.

Once patients are recruited, they must be managed effectively. Patient retention has a direct impact on the quality of the trials results, so their management is crucial. In todays clinical trials, these patients can be distributed over more than a hundred sites and across multiple geographies, presenting huge data management challenges for sponsors.

AI can be leveraged across patient recruitment and management to boost efficiency, quality, and retention. Algorithms can gather subject information and screen and filter potential participants. They can analyse data sources such as medical records and even social media content to detect subgroups and geographies that may be relevant to the trial. AI can also alert medical staff and patients to clinical trial opportunities.

The result? Faster, more efficient patient recruitment, with the ability to reach more diverse populations and more relevant participants, as well as increase quality and retention. [Using AI], you can develop the correct cohort, explains Clark. Its about accuracy, efficiency, and safety.

Study build can be a laborious and repetitive process. Typically, data managers must read the study protocol and generate as many as 50-60 case report forms (CRFs). Each trial has different CRF requirements. CRF design and database building can take weeks and has a direct impact on the quality and accuracy of the clinical trial.

Enter AI. Automated text reading can parse, categorise, and stratify corpora of words to automatically generate eCRFs and the data capture matrix. In study building, AI is able to read the protocols and pull the best CRF forms for the best outcomes, adds Clark.

It can then use the data points from the CRFs to build the study base, creating the whole database in a matter of minutes rather than weeks. The database is structured for export to the biostatisticians programming. AI can then facilitate the analysis of data and develop all of the required tables, listings and figures (TLFs). It can even come to a conclusion on the outcomes, pending review.

Optical character recognition (OCR) can address structured and unstructured native documents. Using built-in edit checks, AI can reduce the timeframe for study build from ten weeks to just one, freeing up data managers time. We are able to do up to 168% more edit checks than are done currently in the human manual process, says Clark. AI can also automate remote monitoring to identify outliers and suggest the best route of action, to be taken with approval from the project manager.

AI data management is flexible, agile, and robust. Using electronic data capture (EDC) removes the need to manage paper-based documentation. This is essential for modern clinical trials, which can present huge amounts of unstructured data thanks to the rise of advances such as decentralisation, wearables, telemedicine, and self-reporting.

Once the trial is launched, you can use AI to do automatic querying and medical coding, says Clark. When theres a piece of data that doesnt make sense or is not coded, AI can flag it and provide suggestions automatically. The data manager just reviews what its corrected, adds Clark. Thats a big time-saver. By leveraging AI throughout data input, sponsors also cut out the lengthy process of data cleaning at the end of a trial.

Implementing AI means establishing the proof of concept, building a customised knowledge base, and training the model to solve the problem on a large scale. Algorithms must be trained on large amounts of data to remove bias and ensure accuracy. Today, APIs enable best-in-class advances to be integrated into clinical trial applications.

By taking repetitive tasks away from human personnel, AI accelerates the time to market for life-saving drugs and frees up man-hours for more specialist tasks. By analysing past and present trial data, AI can be used to inform future research, with machine learning able to suggest better study design. In the long term, AI has the potential to shift the focus away from trial implementation and towards drug discovery, enabling improved treatments for patients who need them.

To find out more, download the whitepaper below.

See the original post here:
How AI, automation, and machine learning are upgrading clinical trials - Clinical Trials Arena